WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3032/98 by Odile LEPERRE-VERRIER to the Commission. Protection of Kosovo's heritage
Date: 1998-10-08
Institutions: European Parliament, LEPERRE-VERRIER
Subjects: Kosovo, UNO, Unesco, cooperation policy, cultural cooperation, cultural heritage, heritage protection, the EU's international role

C 142/74

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

21.5.1999

(1999/C 142/089)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3032/98

by Odile Leperre-Verrier (ARE) to the Commission

Subject: Protection of Kosovo’s heritage

(8 October 1998)

The current fighting in Kosovo is not without its consequences for the country’s cultural heritage, whether
civil, religious, Muslim or orthodox.

Can the Commission say whether it envisages taking measures to protect Kosovo’s heritage and working
with UNESCO to raise the awareness of the international community and promote the development of a
consensus between two communities which each have a rich cultural heritage?

Answer given by Mr Oreja on behalf of the Commission

(7 December 1998)

The Commission shares the concern of the Honourable Member about the destructive consequences that
the conflict in Kosovo had on its civil and religious cultural heritage.

As the Honourable Member is aware, the Community is very much involved in the international efforts to
reconcile the two communities. However, the Commission does not have the competence to take any
measures for the protection of Kosovo’s cultural heritage.

The Commission would be willing to consider co-operation with the United Nations educational, scientific
and cultural organisation (Unesco), should this organisation undertake an initiative concerning the matter
raised by the Honourable Member.

(1999/C 142/090)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3033/98

by Gianfranco Dell’Alba (ARE) to the Commission

(8 October 1998)

Subject: Accusations by Alitalia of an abuse of office to further private interests in the Malpensa affair

On 20 September 1998 Alitalia ran an advertisement in a number of Italian daily newspapers which bore
the headline ‘To stop Malpensa from opening some people are playing dirty tricks’, and which went on to
allege that ‘they want to cancel everything because of pressure from a number of international airlines
seeking to protect their own economic interests’.

Alitalia’s criticisms are clearly directed at the Commission’s decision which ruled that the Burlando
decree contravened Community law. Alitalia claims the Commission has acted unlawfully (hence the
‘dirty tricks’) in order to protect ‘the economic interests of a number of international airlines’.

What action, including legal action, does the Commission intend to take in response to these allegations,
which imply that the Commission’s decision in the Malpensa affair arose from an abuse of office to further
private interests, and that this involved other crimes such as acts of corruption etc.?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(26 November 1998)

In its decision of 16 September 1998, the Commission addressed the substantive issues of discrimination
and lack of proportionality posed by the air traffic distribution rules then intended for use by the Italian
government. This decision was based on Article 8 of Council Regulation (EEC) 2408/92 of 23 July 1992
on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (1). The intervention of the