WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2901/98 by Robin TEVERSON to the Commission. Proposal for common rules for direct support schemes under the CAP
Date: 1998-10-02
Institutions: European Parliament, TEVERSON
Subjects: EU aid, EU programme, aid recipient, common agricultural policy, farmer, farmers' income, fraud against the EU, holding of two jobs, proposal (EU)

28.6.1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 182/29

The Council recently received a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
amending Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, a proposal
for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 68/360/EEC on the
abolition of restrictions on movement and residence within the Community for workers of Member States and
their families and a proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an
advisory committee on freedom of movement and social security for Community workers and amending
Council Regulations (EEC) 1612/68 and (EEC) 1408/71.

The Council will make every endeavour to ensure that the discussions on these proposals are brought to a
successful conclusion as soon as possible.

As regards third-country nationals, the future Articles 62, point 1, and 63, point 4, of the EC Treaty . as
introduced by the Amsterdam Treaty . will enable appropriate measures to be taken to facilitate the free
movement of third-country nationals within the Community and the right of residence in the Member States
for third-country nationals who are legally resident in one of the Member States.

(1999/C 182/037)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2901/98

by Robin Teverson (ELDR) to the Commission

(2 October 1998)

Subject: Proposal for common rules for direct support schemes under the CAP

Article 8 of this proposal would require the Member States to restrict payments to certain producers who did
not comply with certain conditions, including their income-related activities. However, this could result in
those people whose off-farm income contributes to the overall household income being penalised and this
would appear to contradict the Commission’s approach to date, which has been supportive of agricultural
diversification and has emphasised the important interrelationship between agriculture and rural areas. Would
the Commission please clarify the thrust of this proposal and how it envisages its implementation, since rules
should not be drawn up which place at a disadvantage those members of the farming community who engage
in multiple activities?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(27 October 1998)

Article 8 of the proposal for a Council regulation establishing common rules for direct support schemes under
the common agricultural policy (1) deals with the restriction of payments.

As explained in the penultimate recital of the proposal, this provision was designed to give Member States the
power to deal with so-called ‘premium hunters’, i.e. those individuals who do not exercise genuine and serious
farming activities but merely carry out activities solely or predominantly to obtain Community agricultural
support. It was not intended to penalise those who also have off-farm incomes provided that they do at the
same time pursue genuine and serious farming activities. As the draft makes clear, implementation would fall
to the Member States.

The proposal is now before the Council, where negotiations on the whole Agenda 2000 (2) package are
continuing. The Parliament’s opinion on the proposal is also awaited.

(1) COM(98) 158 final.
(2) COM(97) 2000 final.