WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2537/98 by Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN to the Commission. The Crédit Mutuel and state aid
Date: 1998-09-01
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European Commission, consumer behaviour, financial institution, financing, infringement procedure (EU), regional development, restriction on competition, sales promotion, savings, savings bank

5.2.1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 31/149

Nevertheless, for the time being the Union has unanimously chosen to give its support to the on-going United
States mediating efforts to bring the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations back on track, in the belief that the United
States proposal is the best way out of the present impasse.

It is a fact that despite its initial reservations the Palestinian Authority accepted the American proposal some time
ago. The Commission is of the opinion that no efforts should be spared to convince Israel to do likewise and
accept what constitutes a compromise proposal in its own interest and in that of peace in the region.

It goes without saying that the American mediation has a limited time span and that the Union would be forced to
re-evaluate the situation in the event that it fails to achieve a long-awaited breakthrough.

(1999/C 31/214)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2537/98

by Marie-Noºlle Lienemann (PSE) to the Commission

(1 September 1998)

Subject: The CrØdit Mutuel and state aid

How does the Commission envisage the future of public savings promotion products which are used to finance
social, industrial and local development projects?

In the absence of any such plans, notably as regards the necessary harmonization measures, will these products,
for instance the (cid:145)A Booklet(cid:146), the (cid:145)Codevi(cid:146) or the (cid:145)Blue Booklet(cid:146) in France, simply be allowed to disappear in the
face of the imperatives of economic competition?

Answer given by Mr Van Miert on behalf of the Commission

(11 September 1998)

Public savings promotion products which are used to finance social, industrial and local development projects do
not pose any problems in terms of the Community(cid:146)s interest and may of course continue to exist.

In some instances, however, problems may be posed by the way in which the collection of savings is organised if
an incidental effect of such organisation might be ultimately to confer an indirect advantage on the body
responsible for carrying out the task.

In one instance, CrØdit Mutuel(cid:146)s (cid:145)Blue Booklet(cid:146) in France, the Commission has initiated proceedings under
Article 93(2) of the EC Treaty in order to examine this aspect.

(1999/C 31/215)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2554/98

by Marjo Matikainen-Kallstr(cid:246)m (PPE), Raimo Ilaskivi (PPE)
and Jyrki Otila (PPE) to the Commission

(1 September 1998)

Subject: Equal treatment in respect of certain services

The Commission quite rightly pays close attention to the issue of the equal treatment of persons. In that
connection, the advantages granted to shareholders in telephone companies have been declared invalid on the
grounds that they represent a breach of the directive.

However, in Finland different policies are applied to summer and permanent residents as regards postal services,
real estate taxes and refuse collection charges. An additional charge is levied for the delivery of mail to summer
residents, whose monthly refuse collection charges may be as much as the annual costs paid by permanent
residents.

Does the Commission not regard this as a breach of the legislation on equal treatment? If so, what measures does
it plan to take to remedy the situation?