WRITTEN QUESTION No. 645/98 by Jorge HERNANDEZ MOLLAR to the Commission. Conditions for upgrading the Spanish 'Ingeniero Técnico' engineering qualification in comparison with others
Date: 1998-03-09
Institutions: European Parliament, HERNANDEZ-MOLLAR
Subjects: European official, Spain, administrator, competition (EU), diploma, engineer, equal treatment, equivalence of diplomas, recognition of studies, recruitment

19. 11. 98

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 354/13

(98/C 354/24)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0643/98
by Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) to the Commission
(9 March 1998)

Subject: Conditions for upgrading the Spanish (cid:145)Ingeniero Te·cnico(cid:146) engineering qualification in comparison with

others

Why,  in  the  Spanish  version  of  the  notice  of  open  competitions  COM/A/720  and  COM/A/721  (OJ  C  52  A,
28.2.1991),  did  the  Commission  include  the  requirement  that  applicants  be  holders  of  a  higher  education
qualification obtained after a five-year course, when that same requirement did not appear in any other language
version of the said notice?

(98/C 354/25)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0644/98
by Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) to the Commission
(9 March 1998)

Subject: Conditions for upgrading the Spanish (cid:145)Ingeniero Te·cnico(cid:146) engineering qualification in comparison with

others

What  has  led  the  Commission  to  require  that  Mr  Vicente  Alonso  Morales,  holder  of  the  Spanish  (cid:145)Ingeniero
Te·cnico(cid:146) qualification and candidate for open competition COM/A/1047 (OJ C 145 A, 13.5.1997), should have
successfully completed the equivalent of a full-length Spanish degree course, given that such a requirement does
not appear in the text of the notice of competition?

(98/C 354/26)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0645/98
by Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) to the Commission
(9 March 1998)

Subject: Conditions for upgrading the Spanish (cid:145)Ingeniero Te·cnico(cid:146) engineering qualification in comparison with

others

Why, in the Spanish version of the notice of open competition COM/A/1047 (OJ C 145 A, 13.5.1991), has the
Commission included the requirement that applicants be holders of a (cid:145)university(cid:146) qualification, when that same
requirement does not appear in the German version of the said notice?

(98/C 354/27)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0669/98
by Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) to the Commission
(10 March 1998)

Subject: Conditions for upgrading the Spanish (cid:145)Ingeniero Te·cnico(cid:146) engineering qualification in comparison with

others

Is  it  the  case  that  applications  from  holders  of  a  (cid:145)Fachhochschuldiplom(cid:146)  are  or  have  been  accepted  by  the
Commission for open competitions to fill category A/LA posts in the European civil service?

(98/C 354/28)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0670/98
by Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) to the Commission
(10 March 1998)

Subject: Conditions for upgrading the Spanish (cid:145)Ingeniero Te·cnico(cid:146) engineering qualification in comparison with

others

Which does the Commission consider the highest education qualification in Germany: the (cid:145)Fachhochschuldi-
plom(cid:146), or the (cid:145)Hochschuldiplom(cid:146) (university-level degree)?

(98/C 354/29)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0671/98
by Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) to the Commission
(10 March 1998)

Subject: Conditions for upgrading the Spanish (cid:145)Ingeniero Te·cnico(cid:146) engineering qualification in comparison with

others

Does  the  Commission  consider  the  (cid:145)Fachhochschuldiplom(cid:146)  a  higher  qualification  than  that  of  (cid:145)Ingeniero
Te·cnico(cid:146)? Why?