WRITTEN QUESTION No. 589/98 by Mirja RYYNÄNEN to the Commission. European framework for foresty certification
Date: 1998-03-04
Institutions: European Parliament, RYYNAENEN
Subjects: Community certification, EU environmental policy, forest conservation, forestry policy, wood industry, wood product

C 386/28

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

11.12.98

(98/C 386/035)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0589/98

by Mirja Ryyn(cid:228)nen (ELDR) to the Commission

(4 March 1998)

Subject: European framework for foresty certification

There is growing pressure within the market for the introduction of various forestry certification systems. There
is a danger that, because of their competitive position, the EU Member States may be compelled to adopt in haste
a certification system which aspires to a monopolistic position and is not appropriate to all the various
circumstances. The EU(cid:146)s forestry industry would be placed in a weaker position than others as a result.

In its resolution on the forestry strategy, the European Parliament called on the Commission to develop a
certification system which is internationally recognized, transparent, voluntary and non-discriminatory and
which moreover takes account of the specific ecological, biological and socio-economic characteristics of each
country, including forest ownership patterns. (Thomas report)

1. What will the Commission do to accelerate the establishment of a certification framework of the kind
proposed by Parliament, the formulation of which should take adequate account of the general views of the
forestry industry?

2. Will the Commission ensure that, according to the certification framework adopted under the auspices of
the EU, national certification systems are treated as equal?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 1998)

The Commission is monitoring current developments with regard to forestry certification, including the aspects
concerned with markets for forestry products. While continuing dialogue with all the parties concerned, the
Commission is also considering whether it would be appropriate in practical and legal terms to take a Community
initiative in this area. Depending on the outcome of its assessment, it will make appropriate proposals as part of its
response to Parliament(cid:146)s resolution on the European Union(cid:146)s forestry strategy.

The Commission would also request the Honourable Member to refer to its answer to Written Question
No E-164/98 by Mrs Pollack on systems of forest certification. (1)

(1) OJ C 310, 9.10.1998, p. 31.

(98/C 386/036)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0604/98

by Carlos Carnero GonzÆlez (GUE/NGL), Laura GonzÆlez `lvarez (GUE/NGL),
Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) and Alonso Puerta (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(4 March 1998)

Subject: Madrid-Valladolid high-speed train project drawn up by the Spanish Ministry for Development and

recently submitted for public consultation

The Madrid-Valladolid high-speed train project drawn up by the Spanish Ministry for Development and recently
submitted for public consultation has generated much disquiet amongst
the population of the Madrid
Autonomous Community (MAC) and, in particular, in Valle del Lozoya and other localities through which
the route will pass, such as Tres Cantos. Rejection of the project (and also of the one which was drawn up at the
same time by the MAC Government) on account of the serious environmental impact which it would have on the
Valle del Lozoya (which is of great ecological value) and the poorer quality of life of those living in the localities
which would be affected has been expressed in speeches opposing the project made by the leaders of ten local
councils in the area, by the coordinator of Asociaciones de Montaæa de la Sierra Norte, by various regiona