WRITTEN QUESTION No. 449/98 by Carlo RIPA DI MEANA to the Commission. Urban waste in the Lombardy region
Date: 1998-02-27
Institutions: European Parliament, RIPA DI MEANA
Subjects: Lombardy, biodegradability, infringement procedure (EU), storage of waste, transport document, transport of dangerous goods, waste, waste disposal, waste management, waste recycling













EUR-Lex - 91998E0449 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91998E0449

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 449/98 by Carlo RIPA DI MEANA to the Commission. Urban waste in the Lombardy region  


Official Journal C 310 , 09/10/1998 P. 0065 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0449/98 by Carlo Ripa di Meana (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (27 February 1998)Subject: Urban waste in the Lombardy regionIn winter 1996 the city of Milan stopped dumping solid urban waste at the Cerro dump. Since then a percentage of the urban waste has been dumped outside the province and the region.Milan city council has frequently said it did not dump waste outside the region and that more than 30% of the waste collected was sorted.The special commissioner for the waste emergency has authorized the former Maserati site as a final solution to the Milan waste emergency. According to press reports the disposal of waste outside the region, which began two years ago, is still going on.Is it true that the collection of sorted waste, and not just the sorting of portions of waste has reached the percentage indicated?Do means exist for identifying the compostable proportion that demonstrate actual disposal at composting sites?Is the Commissioner responsible for the environment interested in finding out the real situation so as not to compromise the credibility of the guidelines behind the European rules on recycling?Why is the former Maserati plant not used to stabilize and recycle the humid proportion of the sorted waste?Which urban waste - and how much - is disposed of outside the province and the region?Will the European Parliament set up a committee of inquiry into the 'Milan' case in order to restore credibility to sorted waste collection?Answer given by Mrs Bjerregaard on behalf of the Commission (26 March 1998)The Commission does not have any specific information concerning the aspects of the separate collection schemes in Milan to which the Honourable Member refers, except for the news which appeared in the press.The Commission is presently assessing the new Italian legislation implementing Directive 91/156/EEC on waste ((OJ L 78, 26.3.1991. )), Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste ((OJ L 377, 31.12.1991. )) and Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste ((OJ L 365, 31.12.1994. )). Infringement proceedings for non-compliance of the Italian legislation (decree 22/1997) with certain aspects of these directives were started in 1997.The Honourable Member refers to separate collection and recycling of municipal solid waste. Directive 94/62/EC provides for recycling and recovery targets of packaging waste to be achieved by 30 June 2001 and as a consequence requires Member States to set up separate collection schemes for such wastes. Directive 91/157/EEC (1) requires Member States to set up separate collection schemes for batteries and accumulators containing certain dangerous substances. As for municipal waste, there is no other mandatory provision concerning separate collection and recycling of waste, although the Community strategy for waste management ((COM(96) 399 final. )) invokes material recycling, including composting, as the preferred waste recovery method over other recovery methods (such as energy recovery). Separate collection schemes are therefore warmly welcomed by the Commission. The Commission does not however see a violation of Community law in the fact that certain rates of recycling have not yet been achieved, particularly since the targets of Directive 94/62/EC are to be achieved by the year 2001. The Commission is convinced that the material recycling of waste, including composting, represents a valid solution for waste recovery and believes that organisational or technical difficulties which arise in specific situations, such as that mentioned by the Honourable Member, are not a valid reason to re-consider the hierarchy of waste management methods established by the Community.The Commission does not have information on why biodegradable waste is not treated in the ex-Maserati area and on how much waste is disposed of outside the province and the region. In this regard, the Commission informs the Honourable Member that Italy has not complied with the requirement concerning waste management planning laid down in Article 7 of Directive 91/156/EEC and therefore the Commission does not know how waste is disposed of or recovered in the Lombardy region (infringement proceedings for failure to comply with Community provisions on waste management planning have been initiated by the Commission).Concerning the identification forms for biodegradable waste, Article 15 of decree 22/1997 requires that waste be accompanied by an identification form which gives indications on the destination of the waste transported. According to the information available at the Commission, this provision is not yet applied since the Italian authorities have not yet produced the identification form. In addition, this provision does not apply to municipal solid waste transported by public collectors. The Commission is presently assessing whether this complies with the corresponding Community legislation Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the Community ((OJ L 30, 6.2.1993. )).