do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1793/97 of 16 September 1997 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods
Date: 1997-09-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: customs regulations, customs valuation, fresh fruit, fresh vegetable, perishable goods













EUR-Lex - 31997R1793 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31997R1793

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1793/97 of 16 September 1997 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods  


Official Journal L 255 , 18/09/1997 P. 0006 - 0011 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1793/97 of 16 September 1997 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 82/97 (2),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1427/97 (4), and in particular Article 173 (1) thereof,Whereas Articles 173 to 177 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 provide that the Commission shall periodically establish unit values for the products referred to in the classification in Annex 26 to that Regulation;Whereas the result of applying the rules and criteria laid down in the abovementioned Articles to the elements communicated to the Commission in accordance with Article 173 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 is that unit values set out in the Annex to this Regulation should be established in regard to the products in question,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 The unit values provided for in Article 173 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 are hereby established as set out in the table in the Annex hereto.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 September 1997.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 16 September 1997.For the CommissionMartin BANGEMANNMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 302, 19. 10. 1992, p. 1.(2) OJ L 17, 21. 1. 1997, p. 1.(3) OJ L 253, 11. 10. 1993, p. 1.(4) OJ L 196, 24. 7. 1997, p. 31.ANNEX >TABLE>
Decision on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Decision establishing a Community action programme in the field of cultural heritage - the Raphael Programme (C4-0391/97 95/ 0078(COD))
Date: 1997-09-16
Institutions: Delegation to the Conciliation Committee, European Parliament
Subjects: EU programme, action programme, cooperation policy, cultural heritage, heritage protection, principle of subsidiarity













EUR-Lex - 51997AP0267 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



51997AP0267

Decision on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Decision establishing a Community action programme in the field of cultural heritage - the Raphael Programme (C4-0391/97 95/ 0078(COD))  


Official Journal C 304 , 06/10/1997 P. 0031 





A4-0267/97Decision on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Decision establishing a Community action programme in the field of cultural heritage - the Raphael Programme (C4-0391/97 - 95/0078(COD))(Codecision procedure: third reading)The European Parliament,- having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee and the relevant Commission and Parliament declarations, C4-0391/97 - 95/0078(COD),- having regard to its opinion at first reading ((OJ C 287, 30.10.1995, p. 149.)) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(95)0110 - C4-0141/95),- having regard to its decision on the common position ((OJ C 347, 18.11.1996, p. 19.)),- having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position (COM(96)0627 - C4-0659/96),- having regard to Article 189b(5) of the EC Treaty,- having regard to Rule 77(2) of its Rules of Procedure,- having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee (A4-0267/97),1. Approves the joint text and the relevant declaration by Parliament;2. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, pursuant to Article 191(1) of the EC Treaty;3. Instructs its Secretary-General duly to sign the act and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal;4. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and Commission.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2889/97 by Glyn FORD to the Council. Human rights abuses in the former Yugoslavia
Date: 1997-09-16
Institutions: European Parliament, FORD
Subjects: Croatia, Yugoslavia, aid policy, democracy, human rights, the EU's international role













EUR-Lex - 91997E2889 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E2889

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2889/97 by Glyn FORD to the Council. Human rights abuses in the former Yugoslavia  


Official Journal C 134 , 30/04/1998 P. 0028 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2889/97 by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Council (16 September 1997)Subject: Human rights abuses in the former YugoslaviaIs the Council aware that Croatian authorities within areas of the former Yugoslavia such as Lika are turning a blind eye to human rights abuses?What plans does the Council have to put pressure on Croatia if these abuses continue?Answer (22 December 1997)The Council is aware of the failure to respect human rights and the rights of minorities in Croatia and other countries of the former Yugoslavia.For this reason, the Council at its meeting on 29 April 1997 adopted conclusions on the application of conditionality to relations with the countries in the area. The Euroepan Union intends to develop these relations in a framework designed to promote democracy, the rule of law, higher standards of respect for human rights and the rights of minorities, market economy reform and greater cooperation between these countries.The Council has therefore defined the political and economic conditions which constitute the basis for a coherent and transparent policy on relations with the European Union in the fields of trade, financial assistance and economic cooperation as well as contractual relations. This strategy of conditionality should encourage the countries concerned, including Croatia, to comply with these conditions and constitutes an important means of exercising pressure.The European Union is continuing to urge the Croatian authorities to fulfil their obligations under the peace arrangements and to respect human rights and the rights of minorities. Accordingly, the European Council meeting in Amsterdam on 16 and 17 June 1997 emphasized that strict respect for human and minority rights throughout the country, including the return of displaced persons and refugees, remains an essential requirement for the reintegration process and for an improvement of relations between the European Union and Croatia. The European Union is insisting on these points in its contacts with the Croatian authorities and has taken a number of steps to that end.In this context, the European Union is also supporting projects in Eastern Slavonia to encourage the return of refugees and displaced persons as well as reconciliation and peaceful reintegration in this region of Croatia.
Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Decision on concluding the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Republic of South Africa (COM(97)0119 C4- 0264/97 97/0112 (CNS))
Date: 1997-09-16
Institutions: Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, European Parliament
Subjects: South Africa, cooperation agreement (EU), scientific cooperation, technical cooperation













EUR-Lex - 51997AP0268 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



51997AP0268

Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Decision on concluding the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Republic of South Africa (COM(97)0119 C4- 0264/97 97/0112 (CNS))  


Official Journal C 304 , 06/10/1997 P. 0037 





A4-0268/97Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Decision on concluding the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Republic of South Africa (COM(97)0119 - C4- 0264/97 - 97/0112 (CNS))(Consultation procedure)The European Parliament,- having regard to the proposal for a Council Decision, COM(97)0119 - 97/0112(CNS) ((OJ C 134, 29.4.1997, p. 7.)),- having regard to the draft agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Republic of South Africa initialled by the Commission (COM(97)0119),- having regard to Article 130m of the EC Treaty,- having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 228(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty (C4-0264/97),- having regard to Rule 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,- having regard to the report of the Committee on Research, Technological Development and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on External Economic Relations (A4-0268/97),1. Approves conclusion of the agreement;2. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of South Africa.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2956/97 by Patricia McKENNA to the Council. Harassment of the 'European Peace Train' in Turkey
Date: 1997-09-16
Institutions: European Parliament, MCKENNA
Subjects: Kurdistan question, Türkiye, democracy, human rights, peacekeeping, police, political violence, public order













EUR-Lex - 91997E2956 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E2956

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2956/97 by Patricia McKENNA to the Council. Harassment of the 'European Peace Train' in Turkey  


Official Journal C 134 , 30/04/1998 P. 0043 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2956/97 by Patricia McKenna (V) to the Council (16 September 1997)Subject: Harassment of the 'European Peace Train' in TurkeyThere have been numerous reports that those participating in the Musa Anser 'European Peace Train', which is campaigning for an end to the oppression of the Kurdish people by the Turkish authorities, have faced police harassment and intimidation.Hundreds were detained after a recent peace rally in Istanbul, a peace convoy of seven coaches has been stopped in Urfa while en route to Diyarbakir, and delegates who alighted from the convoy to go to a service station near Birecik were reportedly attacked by the police, with three of them requiring treatment for injuries.A report dated 2 September 1997 indicated that the peace convoy had been forced to return to Istanbul, that the participants are not being allowed to stop at service points and that they have to follow the police escort at all times.Additionally, there have been reports of harassment of human rights activists in Diyarbakir. Two British activists, including Michael Feeney, the adviser to Cardinal Basil Hume on refugees, have effectively been held under house arrest in their hotel.Has the Council been in contact with the Turkish authorities about the incidents referred to above? What action does it propose to take?Answer (22 December 1997)The Council regrets the incidents referred to by the Honourable Member and would stress that it attaches the greatest importance to respect for human rights and democracy in Turkey and has no hesitation about condemning any abuses in this area in its contacts with the Turkish authorities.In the case of the peace envoy, the President of the Council brought up the matter of the treatment of this convoy, on 1 September 1997 in Ankara. The Turkish Government justified such treatment, including the refusal to allow the convoy access to Ankara, on grounds of public order. There is no doubt that the Turkish authorities have handled this whole affair badly. They are aware of the legitimate consternation which their action has prompted in the European Union.