do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 740/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Operating appropriations of the European Institutions (SUPPLEMENTARY ANSWER)
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, LE GALLOU
Subjects: EU institution, EU publication, administrative expenditure (EU), budget appropriation, conference proceedings, dissemination of EU information, nuclear safety, self-employed person













EUR-Lex - 91997E0740(01) - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0740(01)

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 740/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Operating appropriations of the European Institutions (SUPPLEMENTARY ANSWER)  


Official Journal C 076 , 11/03/1998 P. 0321 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0740/97 by Jean-Yves Le Gallou (NI) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Operating appropriations of the European InstitutionsWith regard to heading B4-2000 would the Commission give figures for the total amount of appropriations allocated in 1996 to expenditure on:- studies- meetings of experts- conferences and congresses- information and publications.Can the Commission also give figures for these four types of expenditure expressed as a proportion of the total appropriations allocated to the heading in question and state whether it considers this to be a reasonable proportion.Supplementary joint answer to Written Questions E-0698/97, E-0699/97, E-0700/97, E-0701/97, E-0702/97, E-0703/97, E-0704/97, E-0705/97, E-0706/97, E-0707/97, E-0708/97, E-0709/97, E-0710/97, E-0711/97, E-0712/97, E-0713/97, E-0714/97, E-0715/97, E-0716/97, E-0717/97, E-0718/97, E-0719/97, E-0720/97, E-0721/97, E-0722/97, E-0723/97, E-0724/97, E-0725/97, E-0726/97, E-0727/97, E-0728/97, E-0729/97, E-0730/97, E-0731/97, E-0732/97, E-0733/97, E-0734/97, E-0735/97, E-0736/97, E-0737/97, E-0738/97, E-0739/97, E-0740/97, E-0741/97, E-0742/97, E-0743/97, E-0744/97, E-0745/97, E-0746/97, E-0747/97, E-0748/97, E-0749/97, E-0750/97, E-0751/97, E-0752/97, E-0753/97, E-0754/97, E-0755/97, E-0756/97, E-0757/97, E-0758/97, E-0759/97, E-0760/97, E-0761/97, E-0762/97, E-0763/97, E-0764/97, E-0765/97, E-0766/97, E-0767/97, E-0768/97, E-0769/97, E-0770/97, E-0771/97, E-0772/97, E-0773/97, E-0774/97, E-0775/97, E-0776/97, E-0777/97, E-0778/97, E-0779/97, E-0780/97, E-0781/97, E-0782/97, E-0783/97, E-0784/97, E-0785/97, E-0786/97, E-0787/97, E-0788/97, E-0789/97 and E-0790/97 given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission (19 September 1997)Further to its answer of 5 May 1997 ((OJ C 21, 22.1.1998, p. 28. )), the Commission is now able to provide the following additional information.In view of the length of its answer, the Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 811/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, LE GALLOU
Subjects: EU aid, Viet Nam, association, development aid, financial year, non-governmental organisation, support policy













EUR-Lex - 91997E0811 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0811

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 811/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0167 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0811/97 by Jean-Yves Le Gallou (NI) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodiesWith regard to heading B7-6004 (Community aid to non-governmental organizations operating in Vietnam), can the Commission provide a complete list of associations, NGOs and other bodies benefiting from Community subsidies and the exact amount of these subsidies for the last completed budgetary year, i.e. 1996?Answer given by Mr Marin on behalf of the Commission (2 April 1997)>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 847/97 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. Major projects
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: APOLINARIO, European Parliament
Subjects: Community support framework, EU Member State, Structural Funds, distribution of aid, operational programme, regional aid













EUR-Lex - 91997E0847 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0847

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 847/97 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. Major projects  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0048 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0847/97 by José Apolinário (PSE) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Major projectsUnder the current financial perspective, how many 'major projects' were submitted to the Commission for funding in the Objective 1 regions, and what were they?Is it possible to provide a break-down of these projects by Member State, state of approval and inclusion (or otherwise) in Community Support Frameworks or single planning documents?Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (22 April 1997)Major projects are part-financed by the Structural Funds either individually or, for the most part, under regional Operational Programmes managed by the Member State concerned.Since 1994 the annual reports on the Structural Funds have contained a list of the few major projects approved by the Commission on an individual basis in each Member State. Member States are not required to provide the Commission with information about major projects included in operational programmes at the time the aid is granted but only at a later stage, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 4254/88 as amended ((OJ L 193, 31.7.1993. )).
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 825/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, LE GALLOU
Subjects: EU aid, association, exchange of information, financial year, human rights, non-governmental organisation, report, support policy













EUR-Lex - 91997E0825 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0825

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 825/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0171 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0825/97 by Jean-Yves Le Gallou (NI) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodiesWith regard to heading B7-7040 (Subsidies for certain activities of organizations pursuing human rights objectives), can the Commission provide a complete list of associations, NGOs and other bodies benefiting from Community subsidies and the exact amount of these subsidies for the last completed budgetary year, i.e. 1996?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0825/97 and E-0826/97 given by Mr Van den Broek on behalf of the Commission (11 April 1997)The Commission aims to ensure the greatest possible openness in the use made of the Community budget, and especially of those financial instruments directly linked to human rights.For headings B7-7040 and B7-7070, specific information is always given at the end of the financial year, when the President of Parliament and Chairman of the relevant committee are sent a report with a breakdown of how monies have been spent, a complete list of the associations, NGOs and other bodies which have received grants, and the exact amount of these grants.The details requested by the Honourable Member will be sent as soon as possible.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 780/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Operating appropriations of the European Institutions (SUPPLEMENTARY ANSWER)
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, LE GALLOU
Subjects: Central and Eastern Europe, EU institution, EU programme, EU publication, administrative expenditure (EU), budget appropriation, conference proceedings, dissemination of EU information, self-employed person













EUR-Lex - 91997E0780(01) - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0780(01)

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 780/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Operating appropriations of the European Institutions (SUPPLEMENTARY ANSWER)  


Official Journal C 076 , 11/03/1998 P. 0031 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0780/97 by Jean-Yves Le Gallou (NI) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Operating appropriations of the European InstitutionsWith regard to heading B7-5051 would the Commission give figures for the total amount of appropriations allocated in 1996 to expenditure on:- studies- meetings of experts- conferences and congresses- information and publications.Can the Commission also give figures for these four types of expenditure expressed as a proportion of the total appropriations allocated to the heading in question and state whether it considers this to be a reasonable proportion.Supplementary joint answer to Written Questions E-0698/97, E-0699/97, E-0700/97, E-0701/97, E-0702/97, E-0703/97, E-0704/97, E-0705/97, E-0706/97, E-0707/97, E-0708/97, E-0709/97, E-0710/97, E-0711/97, E-0712/97, E-0713/97, E-0714/97, E-0715/97, E-0716/97, E-0717/97, E-0718/97, E-0719/97, E-0720/97, E-0721/97, E-0722/97, E-0723/97, E-0724/97, E-0725/97, E-0726/97, E-0727/97, E-0728/97, E-0729/97, E-0730/97, E-0731/97, E-0732/97, E-0733/97, E-0734/97, E-0735/97, E-0736/97, E-0737/97, E-0738/97, E-0739/97, E-0740/97, E-0741/97, E-0742/97, E-0743/97, E-0744/97, E-0745/97, E-0746/97, E-0747/97, E-0748/97, E-0749/97, E-0750/97, E-0751/97, E-0752/97, E-0753/97, E-0754/97, E-0755/97, E-0756/97, E-0757/97, E-0758/97, E-0759/97, E-0760/97, E-0761/97, E-0762/97, E-0763/97, E-0764/97, E-0765/97, E-0766/97, E-0767/97, E-0768/97, E-0769/97, E-0770/97, E-0771/97, E-0772/97, E-0773/97, E-0774/97, E-0775/97, E-0776/97, E-0777/97, E-0778/97, E-0779/97, E-0780/97, E-0781/97, E-0782/97, E-0783/97, E-0784/97, E-0785/97, E-0786/97, E-0787/97, E-0788/97, E-0789/97 and E-0790/97 given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission (19 September 1997)Further to its answer of 5 May 1997 ((OJ C 21, 22.1.1998, p. 28. )), the Commission is now able to provide the following additional information.In view of the length of its answer, the Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 630/97 by Lucio MANISCO to the Council. Human rights abuses in the United Kingdom's prisons
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, MANISCO
Subjects: European Convention on Human Rights, Ireland, United Kingdom, competence of the Member States, cruel and degrading treatment, deprivation of rights, health care, human rights, political prisoner, rights of the defence













EUR-Lex - 91997E0630 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0630

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 630/97 by Lucio MANISCO to the Council. Human rights abuses in the United Kingdom's prisons  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0096 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0630/97 by Lucio Manisco (GUE/NGL) to the Council (10 March 1997)Subject: Human rights abuses in the United Kingdom's prisonsThe conditions under which Irish political prisoners are held in the United Kingdom's prisons are extremely serious: family visits have been banned for months and the prisoners' lawyers have to talk to their clients in a locked room behind a glass screen. The authorities are continuing to refuse visits or medical attention even when the prisoners have serious medical conditions.For example, after Patrick Kelly had finally received permission for a difficult operation to remove a tumour, he was transferred to the maximum-security prison at Whitemoor with no consideration given to the after-effects of the operation despite the fact that his doctors had informed the Home Secretary of their serious concern about the possibility of a recurrence of the tumour.1. Does the Council not agree that the human rights abuses in the United Kingdom's prisons should be roundly condemned given that Irish prisoners, in particular, are being discriminated against and the most basic rights to care and to visits from relatives and lawyers are being denied?2. What action does the Council intend to take to put an end to these human rights abuses?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0515/97, E-0630/97, E-1147/97 and E-1148/97 (27 May 1997)The conditions in which prisoners are held in Member States' prisons are within the responsibility of the appropriate authorities of the Member States. The authorities of the Member State referred to in these questions have rejected entirely the allegations made. The Council recalls that all Member States are parties to the European Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950 and all Member States are parties to the European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment of 26 November 1987.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 803/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, LE GALLOU
Subjects: EU aid, EU policy, action programme, aid to refugees, association, financial year, migrant, non-governmental organisation, support policy













EUR-Lex - 91997E0803 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0803

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 803/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0165 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0803/97 by Jean-Yves Le Gallou (NI) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodiesWith regard to heading B3-4113 (Measures to assist refugees), can the Commission provide a complete list of associations and other bodies benefiting from Community subsidies and the exact amount of these subsidies for the last completed budgetary year, i.e. 1996?Answer given by Mrs Gradin on behalf of the Commission (4 April 1997)In 1996, budget line B3-4113 was designated for financing studies that deal with reception facilities as well as the repatriation of individuals who have fled civil wars. Furthermore, the budget line, amounting to a total of ECU 720 000, was intended to finance pilot projects that administer assistance in the hosting of asylum seekers and refugees as well as those that seek to facilitate voluntary repatriation. Finally, the budget line provided for the granting of a Community subsidy of ECU 220 000 to the European council on refugees and exiles (ECRE).Besides the ECU 220 000 granted to ECRE as foreseen in the budget line, ECU 135 556 were granted to the university of Sussex for a study on the conditions for the return of displaced people from the Community. ECU 362 000 were granted to the International centre for migration policy development (ICMPD) to carry out a pilot project for the training, voluntary return and reintegration of small entrepreneurs and their families from Bosnia and Herzgovina who are displaced and residing in the Member States.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 838/97 by Glenys KINNOCK to the Commission. Recommendations made in the evaluation of EU aid to Ethiopia
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, KINNOCK
Subjects: EU aid, Ethiopia, European Development Fund, aid system, development aid, project evaluation, report













EUR-Lex - 91997E0838 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0838

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 838/97 by Glenys KINNOCK to the Commission. Recommendations made in the evaluation of EU aid to Ethiopia  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0176 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0838/97 by Glenys Kinnock (PSE) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Recommendations made in the evaluation of EU aid to EthiopiaWill the Commission please provide a schedule of the main recommendations of the report, contained in paragraphs 373-402 and Appendix XII, and say for each one:1. whether or not it is accepted,2. if accepted, when and how implementation will take place, and3. if not accepted, why not?Answer given by Mr Pinheiro on behalf of the Commission (7 May 1997)In late 1994 the Commission launched an evaluation of Community development aid to Ethiopia. The evaluation was carried out by the Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, UK, and the final report was submitted in July 1996.The Commission explained how it intended to take the report's recommendations on board in its replies to the Honourable Member's Written Question E-2382/96 ((OJ C 11, 13.1.1997. )) and to the oral question put at the last Joint Assembly of the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Community.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 850/97 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. Applications under Article 10 of the ERDF
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: APOLINARIO, European Parliament
Subjects: Community budget, EU aid, European Regional Development Fund, Official Journal, access to EU information, aid recipient, dissemination of EU information, distribution of aid, report













EUR-Lex - 91997E0850 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0850

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 850/97 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. Applications under Article 10 of the ERDF  


Official Journal C 373 , 09/12/1997 P. 0032 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0850/97 by José Apolinário (PSE) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Applications under Article 10 of the ERDF1. Could the Commission provide information regarding the procedure it has adopted with regard to publishing details of applications under Article 10 of the ERDF and, in particular, the reason why it did not advertise the calls for such applications in each of the Member States?2. Does the Commission not consider that the results of the selection processes should be published, including details of the applications received and selected and the amount of funding allocated?3. Why does the Commission not submit an annual report containing precise data in respect of paragraphs 1 and 2?Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (17 April 1997)1. All the calls for proposals under Article 10 of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Regulation ((OJ L 193, 31.7.1993, p. 34. )) are published in the Official Journal and therefore accessible to all the Member States. They can also be found on the Commission's Europa Internet site (DG XVI page). Lastly, an information dossier available in the eleven Community languages is sent to any applicant expressing interest in the call for proposals.2. The results of the selection procedure for the different fields covered by Article 10 will soon be widely distributed via the regular 'Inforegio' newsletter and the Europa site.3. The Commission will, as promised, submit its annual report on the implementation of Article 10 of the ERDF Regulation by the end of the summer.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 840/97 by Pedro MARSET CAMPOS to the Commission. Disturbing prospects threatening the continuation of the Murcia region's status as an Objective 1 region
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, MARSET CAMPOS
Subjects: EU aid, EU financial instrument, European Regional Development Fund, Region of Murcia, Structural Funds, economic support, eligible region, enlargement of the Union, less-favoured region













EUR-Lex - 91997E0840 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0840

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 840/97 by Pedro MARSET CAMPOS to the Commission. Disturbing prospects threatening the continuation of the Murcia region's status as an Objective 1 region  


Official Journal C 373 , 09/12/1997 P. 0031 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0840/97 by Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Disturbing prospects threatening the continuation of the Murcia region's status as an Objective 1 regionThere have been a number of media reports reflecting the concern which has arisen in the Murcia region on account of the potential implications of a lowering of the criteria for eligibility as an Objective 1 region, a status which gives entitlement to maximum aid from the Structural Funds, following the accession of the countries of central and eastern Europe.The situation will get worse if the amounts allocated are not increased proportionately since per capita GDP in the region concerned would automatically remain above the Community average, which would lead to a paradoxical situation in which inequality, precariousness and the lack of a productive sector would continue, with the added difficulty that no further funding would be received.Does the Commission not therefore think that, in the event of enlargement of the EU, the Structural Fund framework regulation, the ERDF regulation and other financial instruments should be conscientiously revised so as to enable the region in question to continue as a prime beneficiary of Community solidarity? If so, how is it intending to carry out such a revision?Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (18 April 1997)The list of less-developed regions eligible under Objective 1 of the Structural Funds was adopted by the Council in July 1993 on the basis of a Commission proposal. It will remain valid until the end of 1999.With regard to the period after 1999, the Commission intends to propose the financial perspective and guidelines for future cohesion policy after the end of the intergovernmental conference.Thereafter, the Commission will propose new regulations for the Structural Funds, accompanied by a proposal for a new list of less-developed regions in the fifteen Member States. This list will be drawn up in the context of a Community with fifteen Member States, to take account of actual progress in terms of real convergence.With regard to the economic situation in Murcia in particular, the statistics currently available do not call into question its eligibility under Objective 1 if the eligibility criteria remain unchanged.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 799/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies (SUPPLEMENTARY ANSWER)
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, LE GALLOU
Subjects: EU aid, EU financing, association, economic support, exchange of information, financial year, non-governmental organisation, report, young person













EUR-Lex - 91997E0799(01) - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0799(01)

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 799/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies (SUPPLEMENTARY ANSWER)  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0041 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0799/97 by Jean-Yves Le Gallou (NI) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodiesWith regard to heading B3-101 (Youth for Europe), can the Commission provide a complete list of associations and other bodies benefiting from Community subsidies and the exact amount of these subsidies for the last completed budgetary year, i.e. 1996?Supplementary answer given by Mrs Cresson on behalf of the Commission (6 June 1997)Further to its answer of 17 April 1997 ((OJ C 217 of 17.7.1997, p. 228. )), the Commission is now able to provide the following additional information.The Commission is sending the information requested direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 818/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies
Date: 1997-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament, LE GALLOU
Subjects: EU aid, Southern Africa, association, development aid, financial year, non-governmental organisation, support policy













EUR-Lex - 91997E0818 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0818

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 818/97 by Jean-Yves LE GALLOU to the Commission. Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodies  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0170 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0818/97 by Jean-Yves Le Gallou (NI) to the Commission (10 March 1997)Subject: Community subsidies to associations, NGOs and various other bodiesWith regard to heading B7-321 (Rehabilitation programmes in southern Africa), can the Commission provide a complete list of associations, NGOs and other bodies benefiting from Community subsidies and the exact amount of these subsidies for the last completed budgetary year, i.e. 1996?Answer given by Mr Pinheiro on behalf of the Commission (25 March 1997)>TABLE>