do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 321/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in France
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Community budget, EAGGF Guarantee Section, European Court of Auditors, France, agricultural expenditure, common organisation of markets, olive oil













EUR-Lex - 91997E0321 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0321

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 321/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in France  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0013 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0321/97 by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in FranceThe Court of Auditors' annual report for the financial year 1995 shows that the 1996 budget provided for EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure on olive oil totalling ECU 1781 million. Even though this figure is in line with expenditure between 1991 and 1993, expenditure was far lower in 1995, when it stood at only ECU 812.5 million.What is the total figure for expenditure in France?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0320/97, E-0321/97, E-0322/97, E-0323/97, E-0324/97, E-0325/97, E-0326/97, E-0327/97, E-0328/97, E-0329/97, E-0330/97, E-0331/97, E-0332/97, E-0333/97, E-0334/97, E-0335/97, E-0336/97, E-0337/97, E-0338/97, E-0339/97, E-0340/97, E-0341/97, E-0342/97, E-0343/97 and E-0344/97 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (6 March 1997)The Honourable Member will find the figure he requests in the table below. Total Community expenditure under the 1995 and 1996 budgets was 812.5 and 2007.7 million ecus respectively. The discrepancy with the totals in the table largely relates to payments for olive oil promotion action. The 1995 budget is much lower than for 1996 (and 1994) because the 1994/95 prices package included a decision to move the payment date. This meant that the 1995 budget made no provision for 1994/95 marketing year payments but only for outstanding ones from 1993/94.(in MECU)>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 323/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in Italy
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Community budget, EAGGF Guarantee Section, European Court of Auditors, Italy, agricultural expenditure, common organisation of markets, olive oil













EUR-Lex - 91997E0323 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0323

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 323/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in Italy  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0013 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0323/97 by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in ItalyThe Court of Auditors' annual report for the financial year 1995 shows that the 1996 budget provided for EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure on olive oil totalling ECU 1781 million. Even though this figure is in line with expenditure between 1991 and 1993, expenditure was far lower in 1995, when it stood at only ECU 812.5 million.What is the total figure for expenditure in Italy?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0320/97, E-0321/97, E-0322/97, E-0323/97, E-0324/97, E-0325/97, E-0326/97, E-0327/97, E-0328/97, E-0329/97, E-0330/97, E-0331/97, E-0332/97, E-0333/97, E-0334/97, E-0335/97, E-0336/97, E-0337/97, E-0338/97, E-0339/97, E-0340/97, E-0341/97, E-0342/97, E-0343/97 and E-0344/97 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (6 March 1997)The Honourable Member will find the figure he requests in the table below. Total Community expenditure under the 1995 and 1996 budgets was 812.5 and 2007.7 million ecus respectively. The discrepancy with the totals in the table largely relates to payments for olive oil promotion action. The 1995 budget is much lower than for 1996 (and 1994) because the 1994/95 prices package included a decision to move the payment date. This meant that the 1995 budget made no provision for 1994/95 marketing year payments but only for outstanding ones from 1993/94.(in MECU)>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 392/97 by Bernd LANGE to the Commission. Establishment of hairdressers in Germany
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, LANGE
Subjects: Germany, access to a profession, competence of the Member States, free movement of workers, freedom to provide services, hairdressing and beauty care, occupational status, right of establishment, single market, vocational training













EUR-Lex - 91997E0392 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0392

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 392/97 by Bernd LANGE to the Commission. Establishment of hairdressers in Germany  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0066 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0392/97 by Bernd Lange (PSE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: Establishment of hairdressers in GermanyUnder the German Crafts Code, persons wishing to set up their own hairdressing business in Germany have to hold a master's qualification. Successful completion of a training course is not sufficient.1. Does the Commission consider this rule to constitute a restriction on freedom of establishment?2. If it believes that the above rule restricts freedom of establishment within the internal market, what steps will it take to remove the restriction?Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission (4 April 1997)Member States are free to lay down rules governing both the taking-up and pursuit of professions. Accordingly, it is for each of them to prescribe, along with the relevant professional regulations, the training to be completed and the conditions to be met for taking up a particular profession.However, in order to facilitate the free movement of professionals not satisfying the qualification requirements of the host Member State, Community law imposes on the latter a number of obligations vis-à-vis migrants.As regards hairdressers, Council Directive 82/489/EEC of 19 July 1982 laying down measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services in hairdressing ((OJ L 218, 27.7.1982. )) stipulates that, where in a Member State the taking-up of pursuit of the profession of hairdresser is subject to possession of general, commercial and professional knowledge and ability, that Member State must accept as sufficient evidence of such knowledge and ability the fact that the activities in question have been pursued lawfully in another Member State for at least three years in a self-employed capacity or as a person responsible for managing an undertaking.As far as the Commission is aware, Germany has correctly transposed the above Directive into national law. However, the Commission is prepared to examine any additional information in the Honourable Member's possession which might indicate that a problem of Community law is involved.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 344/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: expenditure on storage measures in Portugal
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EAGGF Guarantee Section, European Court of Auditors, Portugal, agricultural expenditure, common organisation of markets, market intervention, olive oil, storage













EUR-Lex - 91997E0344 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0344

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 344/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: expenditure on storage measures in Portugal  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0018 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0344/97 by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: CMO for olive oil: expenditure on storage measures in PortugalThe Court of Auditors' annual report for the financial year 1995 shows that the 1996 budget provided for EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure on olive oil totalling ECU 1781 million. Even though this figure is in line with expenditure between 1991 and 1993, expenditure was far lower in 1995, when it stood at only ECU 812.5 million.Of this expenditure, storage measures had a negative value in 1995, standing at ECU * 94.9 million.What is the total figure for expenditure on storage measures in respect of olive oil in Portugal?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0320/97, E-0321/97, E-0322/97, E-0323/97, E-0324/97, E-0325/97, E-0326/97, E-0327/97, E-0328/97, E-0329/97, E-0330/97, E-0331/97, E-0332/97, E-0333/97, E-0334/97, E-0335/97, E-0336/97, E-0337/97, E-0338/97, E-0339/97, E-0340/97, E-0341/97, E-0342/97, E-0343/97 and E-0344/97 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (6 March 1997)The Honourable Member will find the figure he requests in the table below. Total Community expenditure under the 1995 and 1996 budgets was 812.5 and 2007.7 million ecus respectively. The discrepancy with the totals in the table largely relates to payments for olive oil promotion action. The 1995 budget is much lower than for 1996 (and 1994) because the 1994/95 prices package included a decision to move the payment date. This meant that the 1995 budget made no provision for 1994/95 marketing year payments but only for outstanding ones from 1993/94.(in MECU)>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 336/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: expenditure on consumption aid in France
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EAGGF Guarantee Section, European Court of Auditors, France, agricultural expenditure, common organisation of markets, market support, marketing, olive oil, sales promotion













EUR-Lex - 91997E0336 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0336

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 336/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: expenditure on consumption aid in France  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0016 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0336/97 by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: CMO for olive oil: expenditure on consumption aid in FranceThe Court of Auditors' annual report for the financial year 1995 shows that the 1996 budget provided for EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure on olive oil totalling ECU 1781 million. Even though this figure is in line with expenditure between 1991 and 1993, expenditure was far lower in 1995, when it stood at only ECU 812.5 million.Of this expenditure, consumption aid accounted for ECU 268.6 million and ECU 166 million in 1995 and 1996 respectively.What is the figure for total expenditure on consumption aid for olive oil in France?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0320/97, E-0321/97, E-0322/97, E-0323/97, E-0324/97, E-0325/97, E-0326/97, E-0327/97, E-0328/97, E-0329/97, E-0330/97, E-0331/97, E-0332/97, E-0333/97, E-0334/97, E-0335/97, E-0336/97, E-0337/97, E-0338/97, E-0339/97, E-0340/97, E-0341/97, E-0342/97, E-0343/97 and E-0344/97 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (6 March 1997)The Honourable Member will find the figure he requests in the table below. Total Community expenditure under the 1995 and 1996 budgets was 812.5 and 2007.7 million ecus respectively. The discrepancy with the totals in the table largely relates to payments for olive oil promotion action. The 1995 budget is much lower than for 1996 (and 1994) because the 1994/95 prices package included a decision to move the payment date. This meant that the 1995 budget made no provision for 1994/95 marketing year payments but only for outstanding ones from 1993/94.(in MECU)>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 381/97 by Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. Training and employment of seafarers in the European Union
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, HUGHES STEPHEN
Subjects: change of job, crew, fisherman, shipping policy, vocational training, work study













EUR-Lex - 91997E0381 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0381

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 381/97 by Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. Training and employment of seafarers in the European Union  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0063 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0381/97 by Stephen Hughes (PSE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: Training and employment of seafarers in the European UnionFollowing my participation in a Commission-sponsored conference in Dublin during December 1996, on the Training and Employment of Seafarers in the EU, I wonder whether the Commission has undertaken any research comparable to that undertaken in the UK by the University of Wales in Cardiff for the UK Department of Transport, the Chamber of Shipping and the Marine Society, investigating requirements for people with seafaring experience in shore-based jobs?If such research has not been conducted for the EU as a whole, would the Commission agree that there is a need for further research, since without knowledge of the requirements on a European-wide basis, the true dimensions of the problem posed by the decline in EU seafarer employment cannot be assessed, nor the nature or scale of any corrective action that may need to be taken?Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission (4 April 1997)The Commission has already undertaken a number of studies of various aspects of maritime training and the prospects for the maritime professions in the Community. At the conference in Dublin on 17-18 December 1996, a series of other research topics carried out in Member States and by the industry and international organisations were presented to the participants.The Commission agrees that the study carried out by the University of Wales in Cardiff is a very useful piece of research and, as far as it is aware, no similar exercise has been conducted for the Community as a whole. The Commission however cannot at this stage indicate to the Honourable Member whether a further study covering the other Member States will be undertaken although the matter is under continual review, especially as a result of the approach to maritime employment set out in the 1996 maritime strategy White Paper.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 322/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in Greece
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Community budget, EAGGF Guarantee Section, European Court of Auditors, Greece, agricultural expenditure, common organisation of markets, olive oil













EUR-Lex - 91997E0322 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0322

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 322/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in Greece  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0013 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0322/97 by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in GreeceThe Court of Auditors' annual report for the financial year 1995 shows that the 1996 budget provided for EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure on olive oil totalling ECU 1781 million. Even though this figure is in line with expenditure between 1991 and 1993, expenditure was far lower in 1995, when it stood at only ECU 812.5 million.What is the total figure for expenditure in Greece?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0320/97, E-0321/97, E-0322/97, E-0323/97, E-0324/97, E-0325/97, E-0326/97, E-0327/97, E-0328/97, E-0329/97, E-0330/97, E-0331/97, E-0332/97, E-0333/97, E-0334/97, E-0335/97, E-0336/97, E-0337/97, E-0338/97, E-0339/97, E-0340/97, E-0341/97, E-0342/97, E-0343/97 and E-0344/97 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (6 March 1997)The Honourable Member will find the figure he requests in the table below. Total Community expenditure under the 1995 and 1996 budgets was 812.5 and 2007.7 million ecus respectively. The discrepancy with the totals in the table largely relates to payments for olive oil promotion action. The 1995 budget is much lower than for 1996 (and 1994) because the 1994/95 prices package included a decision to move the payment date. This meant that the 1995 budget made no provision for 1994/95 marketing year payments but only for outstanding ones from 1993/94.(in MECU)>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 286/97 by Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Commission. Restriction on meat production - Regulation (EC) No 2222/96 of 18 November 1996
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE
Subjects: animal disease, beef, fraud, production quota, slaughter premium













EUR-Lex - 91997E0286 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0286

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 286/97 by Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Commission. Restriction on meat production - Regulation (EC) No 2222/96 of 18 November 1996  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0052 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0286/97 by Jaak Vandemeulebroucke (ARE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: Restriction on meat production - Regulation (EC) No 2222/96 of 18 November 1996As a result of the BSE crisis a number of measures have been adopted to restrict meat production. One such measure is in Council Regulation (EC) No 2222/96 ((OJ L 296, 21.11.1996, p. 50. )) amending Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 ((OJ L 148, 28.6.1968, p. 24. )) on the common organization of the market in beef and veal.I am informed by experts that the application of the amended Article 4i of Regulation EEC No 805/68, and in particular paragraphs 2 and 5, may lead to improper use or fraud if no adequate measures are taken.Firstly, lighter animals, which weigh less than 85% of the average slaughter weight of the previous year, are also covered by the provisions on premiums. These animals should nevertheless also be able to be offered for slaughter without the premium.Also, if no adequate measures are taken for the application of Article 4i (2) second indent, calves from a Member State with lighter calves will be slaughtered in Member States with a heavier average slaughter weight.The same applies to the variation in the premium between the various regions in a Member State.What measures has the Commission taken or does it intend to take to counteract this situation? Are there specific fraud prevention measures in relation to the points noted above?Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (2 April 1997)Provisions on the early marketing premium for calves were set by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2311/96 of 2 December 1996 ((OJ L 313, 3.12.1996. )) amending Regulation (EEC) No 3886/92 laying down detailed rules for the application of premium schemes in the beef and veal sector. Further amendments were made by Regulations (EC) No 18/97 ((OJ L 5, 9.1.1997. )), (EC) No 200/97 ((OJ L 31, 1.2.1997. )) and (EC) No 280/97 ((OJ L 47, 18.2.1997. )).These provisions should be perfectly adequate to guarantee proper administration of the premium and obviate fraud risks. As regards any fear of speculative movement of animals, a compulsory retention period of 90 days has been set to thwart this danger (see point 2 in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 18/97).
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 337/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: expenditure on consumption aid in Greece
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EAGGF Guarantee Section, European Court of Auditors, Greece, agricultural expenditure, common organisation of markets, market support, marketing, olive oil, sales promotion













EUR-Lex - 91997E0337 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0337

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 337/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: expenditure on consumption aid in Greece  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0017 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0337/97 by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: CMO for olive oil: expenditure on consumption aid in GreeceThe Court of Auditors' annual report for the financial year 1995 shows that the 1996 budget provided for EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure on olive oil totalling ECU 1781 million. Even though this figure is in line with expenditure between 1991 and 1993, expenditure was far lower in 1995, when it stood at only ECU 812.5 million.Of this expenditure, consumption aid accounted for ECU 268.6 million and ECU 166 million in 1995 and 1996 respectively.What is the figure for total expenditure on consumption aid for olive oil in Greece?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0320/97, E-0321/97, E-0322/97, E-0323/97, E-0324/97, E-0325/97, E-0326/97, E-0327/97, E-0328/97, E-0329/97, E-0330/97, E-0331/97, E-0332/97, E-0333/97, E-0334/97, E-0335/97, E-0336/97, E-0337/97, E-0338/97, E-0339/97, E-0340/97, E-0341/97, E-0342/97, E-0343/97 and E-0344/97 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (6 March 1997)The Honourable Member will find the figure he requests in the table below. Total Community expenditure under the 1995 and 1996 budgets was 812.5 and 2007.7 million ecus respectively. The discrepancy with the totals in the table largely relates to payments for olive oil promotion action. The 1995 budget is much lower than for 1996 (and 1994) because the 1994/95 prices package included a decision to move the payment date. This meant that the 1995 budget made no provision for 1994/95 marketing year payments but only for outstanding ones from 1993/94.(in MECU)>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 324/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in Portugal
Date: 1997-02-13
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Community budget, EAGGF Guarantee Section, European Court of Auditors, Portugal, agricultural expenditure, common organisation of markets, olive oil













EUR-Lex - 91997E0324 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0324

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 324/97 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in Portugal  


Official Journal C 367 , 04/12/1997 P. 0013 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0324/97 by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (13 February 1997)Subject: CMO for olive oil: EAGGF expenditure in PortugalThe Court of Auditors' annual report for the financial year 1995 shows that the 1996 budget provided for EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure on olive oil totalling ECU 1781 million. Even though this figure is in line with expenditure between 1991 and 1993, expenditure was far lower in 1995, when it stood at only ECU 812.5 million.What is the total figure for expenditure in Portugal?Joint answer to Written Questions E-0320/97, E-0321/97, E-0322/97, E-0323/97, E-0324/97, E-0325/97, E-0326/97, E-0327/97, E-0328/97, E-0329/97, E-0330/97, E-0331/97, E-0332/97, E-0333/97, E-0334/97, E-0335/97, E-0336/97, E-0337/97, E-0338/97, E-0339/97, E-0340/97, E-0341/97, E-0342/97, E-0343/97 and E-0344/97 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (6 March 1997)The Honourable Member will find the figure he requests in the table below. Total Community expenditure under the 1995 and 1996 budgets was 812.5 and 2007.7 million ecus respectively. The discrepancy with the totals in the table largely relates to payments for olive oil promotion action. The 1995 budget is much lower than for 1996 (and 1994) because the 1994/95 prices package included a decision to move the payment date. This meant that the 1995 budget made no provision for 1994/95 marketing year payments but only for outstanding ones from 1993/94.(in MECU)>TABLE>