do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 135/97 of 24 January 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector
Date: 1997-01-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: beef, common organisation of markets, export licence, import licence, quantitative restriction













EUR-Lex - 31997R0135 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31997R0135

Commission Regulation (EC) No 135/97 of 24 January 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector  


Official Journal L 024 , 25/01/1997 P. 0014 - 0014 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 135/97 of 24 January 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in beef and veal (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2222/96 (2), and in particular Articles 9 and 13 thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2333/96 (4), lays down rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector;Whereas the quantity covered by application for licences with advances fixing of the refund continues to be significantly higher than that normally disposed of;Whereas, in order to avoid jeopardizing the sound management of the market, a reduction should be made in term of validity of such licences;Whereas the Management Committee for Beef and Veal has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 Article 8 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 shall be replaced by the following:'1. Licences shall be valid 30 days from their date of issue as defined in Article 21 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88.`Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall apply to export licences with advance fixing of the refund applied for from the day following the day of entry into force of this Regulation.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 24 January 1997.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 24.(2) OJ No L 296, 21. 11. 1996, p. 50.(3) OJ No L 143, 27. 6. 1995, p. 35.(4) OJ No L 317, 6. 12. 1996, p. 13.
Commission Decision of 24 January 1997 extending the period referred to in Article 15 (2a) of Directive 66/403/EEC on the marketing of seed potatoes
Date: 1997-01-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: marketing, potato, seedling













EUR-Lex - 31997D0090 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31997D0090

Commission Decision of 24 January 1997 extending the period referred to in Article 15 (2a) of Directive 66/403/EEC on the marketing of seed potatoes  


Official Journal L 027 , 30/01/1997 P. 0049 - 0049 





COMMISSION DECISION of 24 January 1997 extending the period referred to in Article 15 (2a) of Directive 66/403/EEC on the marketing of seed potatoes (97/90/EC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 66/403/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of seed potatoes (1), as last amended by Directive 96/72/EC (2), and in particular Article 15 (2a) thereof,Whereas in principle, with effect from certain dates, Member States may no longer determine for themselves the equivalence of seed potatoes harvested in third countries with seed potatoes harvested within the Community and complying with that Directive;Whereas, however, since work to establish Community equivalence for all the third countries concerned had not been completed, Article 15 (2a) of that Directive permitted Member States to extend to 31 March 1996 the period of validity of equivalence which they had already for certain countries not covered by the Community equivalence;Whereas the said work is still incomplete;Whereas the authorization may only be extended in accordance with Member States' obligations under the common rules on plant health, laid down by Council Directive 77/93/EEC (3), as last amended by Commission Directive 96/78/EC (4);Whereas by Commission Decision 97/89/EC (5) derogations provided for by certain Member States from certain provisions of Directive 77/93/EEC in respect of seed potatoes originating in Canada have been approved until 31 March 1997;Whereas the authorization granted to Member States by Article 15 (2a) of Directive 66/403/EEC should accordingly be extended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1 In Article 15 (2a) of Directive 66/403/EEC, '31 March 1996` is replaced by '31 March 1997`.Article 2 This Decision is addressed to the Member States.Done at Brussels, 24 January 1997.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2320/66.(2) OJ No L 304, 27. 11. 1996, p. 10.(3) OJ No L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 20.(4) OJ No L 321, 12. 12. 1996, p. 20.(5) See page 45 of this Official Journal.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 72/97 by José BARROS MOURA to the Council. Aims of the structural funds
Date: 1997-01-24
Institutions: BARROS MOURA, European Parliament
Subjects: Structural Funds, competitiveness, economic and social cohesion, economic disparity, environmental protection, fight against unemployment, gender equality, investment aid, job creation, professional qualifications













EUR-Lex - 91997E0072 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91997E0072

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 72/97 by José BARROS MOURA to the Council. Aims of the structural funds  


Official Journal C 319 , 18/10/1997 P. 0022 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0072/97 by José Barros Moura (PSE) to the Council (24 January 1997)Subject: Aims of the structural fundsIn the speech she gave in Montpellier on 19 September 1996, Commissioner Wulf-Mathies stated that she had concentrated resources on political priorities such as combating unemployment, strengthening competitiveness, especially in the case small and medium-sized undertakings through support for research, development and professional training, improved environmental protection and equal opportunities for men and women.However, there was no mention of economic and social cohesion, including the aim of reducing socio-economic disparities between Member States, between regions and between social categories.It must be pointed out that the structural funds are defined in the Treaty and in secondary legislation, and do not correspond to the Commissioner's 'political priorities'.How does the Council view this definition of 'priorities' in the light of Community law in this field?Answer (30 May 1997)As the Honourable Member points out, the aims of the Structural Funds are defined in the Treaty and in secondary legislation, with the Commission being responsbile for implementing them.It may be noted here that, in its 1996 Joint Report on Employment , the Council stated, in keeping with the conclusions of the Florence European Council meeting, that it was possible to focus structural policies more on job creation, without jeopardizing the basic principles, the existing legal framework and the amounts of the Structural Funds. In line with this European Council conclusion, the new programmes for the regions in industrial decline (Objective 2, 1997-1999) should take into account the multi-annual programmes so as to ensure that the Funds support the implementation of the employment strategy, in conformity with economic and social cohesion principles.The Council would point out lastly that the procedures for any steps to revise or adapt the Community support frameworks are laid down in the existing legislation. In any event, they have to be conducted in full compliance with the principle of partnership.