do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3533/96 by Honório NOVO to the Commission. Relocation of Grundig Indústria de Portugal's Audio Products Factory in Braga (Portugal)
Date: 1996-12-04
Institutions: European Parliament, NOVO
Subjects: Community support framework, EU aid, EU financing, Hungary, Portugal, audiovisual industry, collective dismissal, transfer of businesses













EUR-Lex - 91996E3533 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E3533

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3533/96 by Honório NOVO to the Commission. Relocation of Grundig Indústria de Portugal's Audio Products Factory in Braga (Portugal)  


Official Journal C 083 , 14/03/1997 P. 0131 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-3533/96 by Honório Novo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (4 December 1996)Subject: Relocation of Grundig Indústria de Portugal's Audio Products Factory in Braga (Portugal)Recent information confirms that Grundig Indústria de Portugal - Audio Products Factory intends to sell its factory in Braga and relocate its audio/hi-fi production to Hungary. This will endanger some 700 employees, who may possibly be collectively dismissed.In the 1989 to 1992 period alone, the multinational received aid amounting to almost 1 billion escudos (ECU 5 million), 75% of which was Community co-funding, and that the construction of the building Grundig is now seeking to sell was financed with such funds. It should also be stressed that even so, Grundig created only 34 jobs instead of the 59 which it had promised, despite the fact that at the same time, it cut the workforce considerably.It is assumed that Grundig Indústria de Portugal will subsequently have proceeded to submit new applications for Community funding via the PEDIP II of the industrial subprogramme of the Second Community Support Framework.Can the Commission tell me whether it is attempting to take any steps with regard to this attempt to relocate or not, particularly with regard to the sale of buildings funded under PEDIP I, so as to force Grundig to repay the Community and Portuguese national funding it received?Have there been fresh Grundig applications for Community funding since 1994? If so, what was the Commission intend to do?If the audio/hi-fi production is relocated to Hungary, does the Commission believe that Grundig will be able to obtain Community funding again there?Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (9 January 1997)The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3515/96 by Graham WATSON to the Commission. Industrial action taken by French road hauliers
Date: 1996-12-04
Institutions: European Parliament, WATSON
Subjects: France, carriage of goods, drivers, financial loss, free movement of goods, indemnification, road transport, strike













EUR-Lex - 91996E3515 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E3515

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3515/96 by Graham WATSON to the Commission. Industrial action taken by French road hauliers  


Official Journal C 096 , 24/03/1997 P. 0089 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-3515/96 by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission (4 December 1996)Subject: Industrial action taken by French road hauliersAs the Commission will be aware, the industrial action taken by the French road haulage industry has had severe effects on the transportation of goods throughout this part of Europe.In view of the commitment to abolish restrictions on the free movement of goods, persons and services in Article 3(c) of the Treaty, does the Commission intend to pursue the French Government for its inability to secure safe and quick passage for non-French lorries caught up in this domestic dispute, and what action will it take to ensure that adequate compensation is made available to non-French road haulage companies which have suffered financially because of this dispute?Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission (14 January 1997)The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its statement during the debate on the French road haulage dispute at Parliament's November part-session ((Debates of Parliament (November 1996). )).During and since the dispute the Commission has maintained close contact with the French Government, particularly on the issue of compensation. The Commission is informed that a full system of administration of compensation claims is now in operation with the primary role being fulfilled by the prefectures.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3516/96 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. Projects financed from Community funds - Spain
Date: 1996-12-04
Institutions: APOLINARIO, European Parliament
Subjects: Cohesion Fund, EU financing, EU programme, European Commission, European Regional Development Fund, Spain, exchange of information, project evaluation













EUR-Lex - 91996E3516 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E3516

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3516/96 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. Projects financed from Community funds - Spain  


Official Journal C 083 , 14/03/1997 P. 0131 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-3516/96 by José Apolinário (PSE) to the Commission (4 December 1996)Subject: Projects financed from Community funds - SpainCan the Commission provide details of projects financed from Community funds (especially ERDF and the Cohesion Fund) within the Kingdom of Spain on the international Douro, Tagus and Guadiana rivers or their tributaries since January 1995, specifying the total amount, the percentage or amount of Community co-funding, the date and the Commission services' approval?Would the Commission also provide the same information with regard to projects pending or under assessment (total amounts, total Community financial involvement and location)?Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (13 January 1997)In view of the length of its answer, the Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.
97/1/EC: Commission Decision of 4 December 1996 amending Decision 93/693/EC establishing a list of semen collection centres approved for the export to the Community of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species from third countries (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 1996-12-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Hungary, animal breeding, artificial insemination, cattle, import, research body













EUR-Lex - 31997D0001 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31997D0001

97/1/EC: Commission Decision of 4 December 1996 amending Decision 93/693/EC establishing a list of semen collection centres approved for the export to the Community of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species from third countries (Text with EEA relevance)  


Official Journal L 001 , 03/01/1997 P. 0003 - 0003 





COMMISSION DECISION of 4 December 1996 amending Decision 93/693/EC establishing a list of semen collection centres approved for the export to the Community of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species from third countries (Text with EEA relevance) (97/1/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 88/407/EEC of 14 June 1988 laying down the animal health requirements applicable to intra-Community trade in and imports of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 9 (1), thereof,Whereas Commission Decision 93/693/EC (2), as last amended by Decision 96/570/EC (3), establishes a list of semen collection centres approved for the export to the Community of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species from third countries;Whereas the competent veterinary service of Hungary has forwarded a request for amendment to the list of semen collection centres officially approved for the export of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species to the Community; whereas it is therefore necessary to amend the list of approved centres; whereas guarantees regarding compliance with the requirement specified in Article 9 of Directive 88/407/EEC have been received by the Commission;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1 In Part 6 of the Annex to Decision 93/693/EC in respect of Hungary the following semen collection centre is added:'Génbank KFT5820 MezóhegyesKozma F. u. 30.Pf.24.Approval code: H 04`.Article 2 This Decision is addressed to the Member States.Done at Brussels, 4 December 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 194, 22. 7. 1988, p. 10.(2) OJ No L 320, 22. 12. 1993, p. 35.(3) OJ No L 250, 2. 10. 1996, p. 17.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2327/96 of 4 December 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2031/96 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugar
Date: 1996-12-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: export licence, export refund, fruit juice, fruit product, vegetable product













EUR-Lex - 31996R2327 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R2327

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2327/96 of 4 December 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2031/96 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugar  


Official Journal L 316 , 05/12/1996 P. 0015 - 0016 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2327/96 of 4 December 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2031/96 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugarTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 of 24 February 1986 on the common organization of the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2314/95 (2), and in particular Articles 13 (8), 14 (5) and 14a (7) thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/96 (3) fixes the quantities eligible for export licences, other than those applied for in the context of food aid;Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1429/95 of 23 June 1995 on implementing rules for export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugars (4), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 341/96 (5), sets up the components for establishing the quantities on which export refunds may be paid; whereas, for reasons of transparency, the updated situation concerning those quantities should be brought to the attention of the operators;Whereas, taking account of the amendment introduced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1222/96 (6), the figure 9 is deemed to be integrated into the export refunds nomenclature code after the eight figures relating to the nomenclature subheadings with effect from 1 January 1997;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Products Processed from Fruit and Vegetables,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2031/96 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 4 December 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 49, 27. 2. 1986, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 233, 30. 9. 1995, p. 69.(3) OJ No L 271, 24. 10. 1996, p. 25.(4) OJ No L 141, 24. 6. 1995, p. 28.(5) OJ No L 48, 27. 2. 1996, p. 8.(6) OJ No L 161, 29. 6. 1996, p. 62.ANNEX 'ANNEX>TABLE>