do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2844/96 by Amedeo AMADEO to the Commission. 1996-1997 agricultural prices
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: AMADEO, European Parliament
Subjects: GATT, agricultural guidance, agricultural product, aid per hectare, approximation of laws, common organisation of markets, farm price support, farm prices, reform of the CAP, set-aside













EUR-Lex - 91996E2844 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2844

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2844/96 by Amedeo AMADEO to the Commission. 1996-1997 agricultural prices  


Official Journal C 096 , 24/03/1997 P. 0017 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2844/96 by Amedeo Amadeo (NI) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: 1996-1997 agricultural pricesWith reference to the Commission proposal on agricultural prices and related measures for 1996-1997, will the Commission introduce a more effective policy for the non-food use of agricultural primary products, a reduction in the administrative burdens facing farmers, respect for payment deadlines and swifter harmonization of legislation? This would help farmers to get through the current difficult adjustment phase?Joint answer to Written Questions E-2729/96 and E-2844/96 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (12 December 1996)The points raised by the Honourable Member relate to the Commission's agricultural price proposals for 1996/97. Each year, these proposals review the decisions to be taken on agricultural products subject to a market organization in the light of the economic and commercial circumstances and the budgetary rules. These proposals have a smaller impact on agricultural prices as such than in the past since, in general, sectoral reforms have resulted in direct payments to producers.The Commission accepts that in future multi-annual programming may be more appropriate than annual revisions, as it stated in its study on alternative strategies on the future accession of the countries of central and eastern Europe. ((CSE(95) 607. )) A number of measures have been taken to encourage the non-food use of agricultural products, including the possibility of cultivating land set aside under Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops. ((OJ L 181, 1.7.1992. )) As a result of the experience gained, the Commission does not at present intend to consider substantially amending its scope.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2853/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Nuclear industry in thre Slovak Republic
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: BREYER, European Parliament
Subjects: EU aid, Slovakia, consumer price, decommissioning of power stations, electrical energy, nuclear reactor, radioactive waste, storage, storage cost, waste management













EUR-Lex - 91996E2853 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2853

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2853/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Nuclear industry in thre Slovak Republic  


Official Journal C 096 , 24/03/1997 P. 0024 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2853/96 by Hiltrud Breyer (V) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Nuclear industry in thre Slovak RepublicHow does the Commission regard the fact that no solution - in terms of funding, choice of location, technology and state of the art - has been found for the short or the long term to the problem of nuclear waste, given that this problem is beyond the technical and financial resources of the Slovak Republic?Answer given by Mr Van den Broek on behalf of the Commission (6 January 1997)Radioactive waste from reactor operation is the largest quantity produced in terms of volume. Definitive disposal takes place at the repository for short-lived waste located near Mochovce. Long-lived waste is stored at the power plants until a repository in deep geological formations is available. Research for siting and developing such a deep repository is in progress. Spent nuclear fuel is likewise stored at or near the power plants, and a special dry storage facility for long term storage is being prepared.This situation is quite similar to the situation in a number of Member States. Financing of the management of radioactive waste is provided by charging costs through the price of electricity to the consumer. There is also a provision for later decommissioning. An exception is the dismantling of the old Bohunice A1 reactor, where decommissioning has to be supported by the general budget.The Slovak Republic receives assistance for developing a full regulatory framework and for decommissioning of the A1 reactor, mainly through the Commission Phare programme.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2864/96 by Anita POLLACK to the Commission. Sale of leghold traps in EU and Regulation 3254/ 91
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: European Parliament, POLLACK
Subjects: France, application of EU law, hunting regulations, protection of animals, sale













EUR-Lex - 91996E2864 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2864

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2864/96 by Anita POLLACK to the Commission. Sale of leghold traps in EU and Regulation 3254/ 91  


Official Journal C 083 , 14/03/1997 P. 0082 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2864/96 by Anita Pollack (PSE) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Sale of leghold traps in EU and Regulation 3254/91When the above regulation was debated in Parliament the text referred to banning the manufacture, sale and use of leghold traps in the EU, however the word 'sale' was deleted from the final Council text. Since these traps are on sale in France, does the Commission plan any review of this regulation to ascertain its effectiveness?Answer given by Mrs Bjerregaard on behalf of the Commission (27 November 1996)Article 2 of the Regulation concerned indeed only prohibits the use of leghold traps in the Community. This prohibition is effective since 1 January 1995.Although there are no plans for a specific review of its effectiveness, it is of course one of the Commission's duties to ensure the correct implementation of Community legislation. Any infringements of the measure which are brought to its attention will therefore be given full attention.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2826/96 by Gianni TAMINO to the Commission. Fatal accident at SIA srl, Viadana (Mantua)
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: European Parliament, TAMINO
Subjects: Italy, Lombardy, chemical industry, industrial pollution, labour inspectorate, national implementing measure, occupational accident, occupational mortality, occupational safety













EUR-Lex - 91996E2826 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2826

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2826/96 by Gianni TAMINO to the Commission. Fatal accident at SIA srl, Viadana (Mantua)  


Official Journal C 072 , 07/03/1997 P. 0082 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2826/96 by Gianni Tamino (V) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Fatal accident at SIA srl, Viadana (Mantua)Guido Golino, an engineer and senior manager at SIA srl in Viadana (Mantua), was killed in an industrial accident on 14 September 1996. The company concerned, like Sadepan Chimica and Sadepan Legno, which are part of the Mauro Saviola group, has for years been the subject of very fierce controversy regarding the noxious nature of its products, the insanitary conditions at the plant, its harmful impact on the environment, and the inadequate safety standards for workers. There have been four other fatal accidents at the above companies in the last eight years, as well as numerous incidents of various kinds. Furthermore, the factories now lie within urban areas, Viadana and Cogozzo, even though Sadepan Chimica srl was classed as a high-risk plant by the Ministry for Industry in 1988 and in a report issued by the Lombardy regional authorities in 1991.Can the Commission ascertain whether the companies in question have complied with the provisions of Community Directives on health and safety at work, in particular the framework Directive (Directive 89/391/EEC) ((OJ L 183, 29.6.1989. p. 1. )) and the successive amendments thereto? What is the situation as regards implementation of these Directives in Italy?Answer given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (2 December 1996)Under Article 4(2) of Directive 89/391/EEC ((OJ L 183, 29.6.1989. )), it is up to the Member States to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring of the implementation of these provisions. It is therefore the responsibility of the national authorities * in this case the Italian labour inspectorate * to check that national measures implementing the above-mentioned Directive are being complied with by employers.The Commission would remind the Honourable Member that, for its part, it is responsible for ensuring that secondary legislation is transposed correctly and with full legal effect by the Member States. In cases where problems arise concerning the application of national implementing measures, the Commission can if necessary decide to institute an infringement procedure pursuant to Article 169 of the EC Treaty.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2946/96 by Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Revision of the rules governing the common organization of the market in olive oil
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: European Parliament, PAPAYANNAKIS
Subjects: World Trade Organisation, agrarian reform, agricultural quota, aid to agriculture, common organisation of markets, environmental protection, olive oil, product quality, regional aid, welfare













EUR-Lex - 91996E2946 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2946

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2946/96 by Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Revision of the rules governing the common organization of the market in olive oil  


Official Journal C 091 , 20/03/1997 P. 0022 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-2946/96 by Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Revision of the rules governing the common organization of the market in olive oilIn view of the fact that:a) the Commission is due to adopt - probably on 13 November 1996 - a plan for revising the rules governing the common organization of the market in olive oil in the European Union, introducing far-reaching changes to the form of support and replacing aid for producers by a flat-rate aid by tree;b) this radical restructuring is being undertaken in a sector which has no need for such measures and is motivated apparently by reasons unconnected with the operation of the market; andc) these radical measures will seriously jeopardize the future of the sector and the quality of the product which is an important factor in the olive oil market;Will the Commission say:1. Whether it intends to submit to the European Parliament a text containing the relevant proposals and, if so, when?2. What form will such a document take?3. Whether it intends to accompany its proposals - whatever form they take -by a study of the consequences of its proposals both for producers and the natural environment and for the future development of the olive oil market?Joint answer to Written Questions E-2684/96, E-2685/96 and P-2946/96 given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (20 November 1996)The Commission will be discussing the different possible options for a reform of the olive oil common market organisation in the very near future. A document will be transmitted to the Parliament and the Council for discussion before any concrete proposals are finalised.The Commission cannot pre-empt the outcome of its deliberations by answering specific questions on the options but will certainly take the Honourable Member's questions and remarks into account.It must be clear that the new olive oil common market organisation should be simple, more transparent and easier to control than the existing regime. Quality should be at a premium and producers should be targeted as directly as possible. Differences of a regional, social and environmental kind should be taken into account.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2849/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Nuclear energy in the Slovak Republic
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: BREYER, European Parliament
Subjects: Slovakia, capital goods, economic reconstruction, financial solvency, loan, monetary policy, nuclear energy













EUR-Lex - 91996E2849 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2849

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2849/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Nuclear energy in the Slovak Republic  


Official Journal C 083 , 14/03/1997 P. 0081 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2849/96 by Hiltrud Breyer (V) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Nuclear energy in the Slovak Republic1. What is the Commission's view of the risk that in a neighbouring Associated country such as the Slovak Republic the difficult economic and political situation is such that an enormous increase in the financial burden involved in the reconstruction of Bohunice and the retrofitting of Mochovce could have a lasting effect on the citizens of that country?2. To what extent are the Member States of the EU prepared to accept the losses of tax revenue if the Slovak Republic were to become insolvent if the financial burden of its nuclear policy were to become too great?Answer given by Mr Van den Broek on behalf of the Commission (12 December 1996)The Slovak Republic has pursued prudent fiscal, monetary and exchange policies. The general government deficit has shrunk from 7.5% of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 1993 to register a small surplus of 0.5% of GDP in 1995. The current account balance turned from a deficit of 5% of GDP in 1993 to a surplus in subsequent years. 1996 has witnessed a deterioration in the current account as imports of consumer and investment goods have increased considerably. However, the current account deficit is being amply financed by strong capital inflows and as a result official reserves remain at a comfortable level (representing more than 4 months imports in mid-September 1996). While there will continue to be pressure on the current account due to increasing imports of investment goods such as those for the Mochovce project, it would seem reasonable to expect that prudence in fiscal and monetary policies will continue with respect to Slovak government financing of investment in the energy field.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2798/96 by Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Commission. Needless deaths caused by occult practices
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: European Parliament, MUSCARDINI
Subjects: EU police cooperation, crime, human rights, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, public safety, religious sect, repression













EUR-Lex - 91996E2798 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2798

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2798/96 by Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Commission. Needless deaths caused by occult practices  


Official Journal C 072 , 07/03/1997 P. 0080 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2798/96 by Cristiana Muscardini (NI) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Needless deaths caused by occult practicesIn Italy, as in other countries of the European Union, there has been a dangerous rise in occultism, Satanism and sects of various kinds.Such sects have already caused too many deaths, either as a result of satanist rituals or under the influence of self-appointed spiritual leaders.It is the youngest and weakest members of society, and sometimes innocent children, who fall prey to these influences.Would the Commission ascertain whether the Member States' legislation to protect the public from associations of this kind is sufficiently stringent and inflexible?Could the Commission take appropriate measures to oblige European Union countries to set up a special investigatory body exclusively concerned with this dangerous area, to attempt to prevent this pointless waste of human life?Answer given by Mrs Gradin on behalf of the Commission (13 November 1996)Where certain sects adopt methods and engage in activities of a criminal nature, they can be prosecuted in the Member States and the provisions in Title IV of the Treaty on European Union governing judicial and police cooperation will be applicable. Under Article K.2 these matters are dealt with in compliance with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights. Although the Commission is fully associated with the work of the Council in these areas, it does not have the right of initiative here.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2847/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Nuclear industry in the Slovak Republic
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: BREYER, European Parliament
Subjects: Slovakia, economic reconstruction, financial solvency, loan, monetary policy, nuclear energy













EUR-Lex - 91996E2847 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2847

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2847/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Nuclear industry in the Slovak Republic  


Official Journal C 083 , 14/03/1997 P. 0081 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2847/96 by Hiltrud Breyer (V) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Nuclear industry in the Slovak RepublicIn the second half of the year the Slovak Republic (SR) has taken out loans (e.g. $ 150 million from a consortium of 27 foreign banks arranged by J.P. Morgan) in addition to the loans granted by the Bank for Reconstruction and the Société Général in Paris.How great is the risk that the loans will not be repaid by the due date, for example because - in contrast to the previous year - the Slovak electricity industry (or, as the case may be, the SR) already has a balance of payment deficit of SK 27 billion in the first half of 1996?Answer given by Mr Van den Broek on behalf of the Commission (12 December 1996)Slovakia's international ratings (indicators of the market's perceived creditworthiness) have remained stable since Moody's assigned Slovakia an investment grade mark in May 1995 (Moody's long-term foreign currency rating is Baa3; Standard & Poor's long term foreign currency rating is BB+). These rankings have been granted against a background of prudent fiscal, monetary and exchange policies on the Slovak side. Most macroeconomic indicators in Slovakia continue to show a positive evolution. The current account has moved from a surplus in 1995 to a deficit in 1996. However, the current account deficit is being financed by strong capital inflows and official reserves remain at a comfortable level (representing more than 4 months imports in mid-September 1996).
Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending for the fourth time Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 laying down criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and for processing and marketing of its products (COM(96)0189 - C4-0312/96 - 96/0124(CNS)) (Consultation procedure)
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: Committee on Fisheries, European Parliament
Subjects: aquaculture, fishing industry, food processing, marketing, structural policy













EUR-Lex - 51996AP0306 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



51996AP0306

Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending for the fourth time Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 laying down criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and for processing and marketing of its products (COM(96)0189 - C4-0312/96 - 96/0124(CNS)) (Consultation procedure)  


Official Journal C 347 , 18/11/1996 P. 0451 





A4-0306/96Proposal for a Council Regulation amending for the fourth time Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 laying down criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and for processing and marketing of its products (COM(96)0189 - C4-0312/96 - 96/0124(CNS))The proposal was approved.Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending for the fourth time Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 laying down criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and for processing and marketing of its products (COM(96)0189 - C4-0312/96 - 96/0124(CNS))(Consultation procedure)The European Parliament,- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council, COM(96)0189 - 96/0124(CNS) ((OJ C 178, 21.6.1996, p. 20.)),- having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 43 of the EC Treaty (C4-0312/96),- having regard to Rule 58 of its Rules of Procedure,- having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A4-0306/96),1. Approves the Commission proposal;2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission proposal;4. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2824/96 by Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Commission. Terrorism and arms trafficking
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: European Parliament, MUSCARDINI
Subjects: Islam, arms trade, extremism, organised crime, terrorism













EUR-Lex - 91996E2824 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2824

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2824/96 by Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Commission. Terrorism and arms trafficking  


Official Journal C 083 , 14/03/1997 P. 0076 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2824/96 by Cristiana Muscardini (NI) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Terrorism and arms traffickingIn Europe there is a vast network of helpers and persons who obtain funds, propaganda material, and weapons to enable Islamic fundamentalists to carry out their terrorist strategies. Europe's capital cities offer a guaranteed safe haven to terrorist leaders and are used as the base for their movements' operations.Will the Commission issue a Directive with a view to unmasking the secret network that operates through suspect bank accounts, private donations, pamphlets, and news publications?Answer given by Mrs Gradin on behalf of the Commission (27 November 1996)The fight against terrorism, including the threat from religious extremism, falls within Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, and is therefore a matter of common interest for the Member States, on which they may adopt joint positions, joint actions or conventions. The Commission is fully associated with the work in this area, but has no right of initiative to make proposals on aspects related to terrorism.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2808/96 by Livio FILIPPI to the Commission. Abduction of Milena Bianchi in Tunisia
Date: 1996-10-25
Institutions: European Parliament, FILIPPI
Subjects: EU national, Italy, Tunisia, competence of the Member States, cooperation in home affairs, illegal restraint, international responsibility, judicial cooperation, judicial inquiry













EUR-Lex - 91996E2808 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E2808

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2808/96 by Livio FILIPPI to the Commission. Abduction of Milena Bianchi in Tunisia  


Official Journal C 072 , 07/03/1997 P. 0081 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-2808/96 by Livio Filippi (PPE) to the Commission (25 October 1996)Subject: Abduction of Milena Bianchi in TunisiaMilena Bianchi, aged 21, from Bassano del Grappa, disappeared without trace on 23 November 1995 in Dar Chaabane el Fehiri, Tunisia.The 11-month investigation has drawn a blank.The Tunisian authorities seem unwilling to consider the possibility of abduction.The Italian and Tunisian authorities concerned did not make initial contact until four months after the abduction.The Tunisian authorities have resorted to every means to prevent the Bianchi family from going to Tunisia.What steps will the Commission take to alert the authorities of the two countries to ensure that they put an end to Milena Bianchi's abduction and enable her to return home?Answer given by Mr Marín on behalf of the Commission (18 November 1996)The Commission believes that this question is a matter for ministers of the Member States meeting within the framework of cooperation in the fields of justice and home affairs.