do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1760/96 by Daniel FÉRET to the Commission. EU recognition of qualifications in cosmetic medicine
Date: 1996-06-20
Institutions: European Parliament, FERET
Subjects: consumer protection, freedom to provide services, physician, professional qualifications, recognition of diplomas, right of establishment













EUR-Lex - 91996E1760 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1760

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1760/96 by Daniel FÉRET to the Commission. EU recognition of qualifications in cosmetic medicine  


Official Journal C 345 , 15/11/1996 P. 0104 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-1760/96 by Daniel Féret (NI) to the Commission (20 June 1996)Subject: EU recognition of qualifications in cosmetic medicineDoes Council Directive No 93/16/EEC ((OJ L 165, 7.7.1993, p. 1. ))to facilitate the free movement of doctors and the mutual recognition of their diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications provide for recognition of specialist medical training in cosmetic medicine, as distinct from plastic surgery?Whereas plastic surgery is in practice recognized as a speciality, training in cosmetic medicine still remains to be defined.While there is a growing demand for this type of treatment (mesotherapy, electrotherapy, cellulite treatment, etc.), there is considerable disparity within the European Union between laws governing this profession and this often leads to abuse or such services being offered by unqualified practitioners, to the detriment of patients.The European Union should therefore recognize qualifications in cosmetic medicine wherever the speciality exists in order to allow doctors with this qualification freedom of establishment throughout the European Union and legal protection for this medical qualification.Does the Commission not consider that existing legislation needs to be supplemented and will it put forward a proposal to recognize qualifications in cosmetic medicine in the European Union?Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission (11 July 1996)The Commission has not received any request that the medical speciality of cosmetic medicine be covered by Council Directive 93/16/EEC. In any event, such a step must be in response to a sustained request from several Member States where that speciality is carried on. It must also satisfy an effective need as regards the right of establishment and the freedom to provide services. Such a need has not yet been shown to exist.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1112/96 of 20 June 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/95 laying down special detailed rules of application for export refunds on milk and milk products
Date: 1996-06-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Switzerland, cheese, export licence, export refund, suspension of customs duties, tariff reduction













EUR-Lex - 31996R1112 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R1112

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1112/96 of 20 June 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/95 laying down special detailed rules of application for export refunds on milk and milk products  


Official Journal L 148 , 21/06/1996 P. 0024 - 0025 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1112/96 of 20 June 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/95 laying down special detailed rules of application for export refunds on milk and milk productsTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2931/95 (2), and in particular Articles 13 (3) and 17 (4) thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1466/95 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 995/96 (4), lays down special detailed rules of application for export refunds on milk and milk products;Whereas Article 1b of Regulation (EC) No 1466/95 introduces special arrangements for exports of certain cheeses to Switzerland; whereas it should be stipulated that those arrangements apply only to exports benefiting from an exemption from or a reduction in customs duties on import into Switzerland; whereas the cheeses referred to in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1953/82 (5), repealed by Regulation (EC) No 823/96 (6), should be added to the list of cheeses covered by those arrangements so as to include all the cheeses benefiting from preferential duties on import into Switzerland;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 Regulation (EC) No 1466/95 is hereby amended as follows:1. Article 1b (1) is replaced by the following:'1. This Article lays down special detailed rules governing exports to Switzerland of the cheeses listed in the Annex, which benefit from an exemption from or a reduction in customs duties on import.`;2. The Annex is replaced by the Annex hereto.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall apply from 5 May 1996.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 20 June 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13.(2) OJ No L 307, 20. 12. 1995, p. 10.(3) OJ No L 144, 28. 6. 1995, p. 22.(4) OJ No L 133, 4. 6. 1996, p. 13.(5) OJ No L 212, 21. 7. 1982, p. 5.(6) OJ No L 111, 4. 5. 1996, p. 9.ANNEX 'ANNEX>TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1746/96 by Charlotte CEDERSCHIÖLD to the Commission. Definition of unemployment
Date: 1996-06-20
Institutions: CEDERSCHIOELD, European Parliament
Subjects: International Labour Office, Structural Funds, Sweden, dissemination of information, employment aid, employment statistics, labour market, unemployed person, unemployment













EUR-Lex - 91996E1746 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1746

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1746/96 by Charlotte CEDERSCHIÖLD to the Commission. Definition of unemployment  


Official Journal C 305 , 15/10/1996 P. 0120 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-1746/96 by Charlotte Cederschiöld (PPE) to the Commission (20 June 1996)Subject: Definition of unemploymentIn Sweden, unemployed persons who are offered publicly-funded training or work on labour market schemes are no longer described as unemployed. This means that they cannot travel abroad to look for ordinary work on the open labour market whilst still drawing unemployment benefit. People who turn down publicly-funded courses as part of labour market schemes are in the same situation. Rather than preventing the unemployed from taking the initiative or making them dependent on public assistance, such schemes should, as a general rule, encourage people to work. Is there a common European definition of the term 'unemployed'?How does the Commission define the term 'unemployed'? Does it agree that basically the definition should make it easier for people to seek work outside publicly-funded labour market schemes, i.e. on the open market? Is it contemplating the introduction of such a definition?Answer given by Mr de Silguy on behalf of the Commission (15 July 1996)For the analysis and follow-up of the labour market, for the dissemination of statistical information and for the implementation of its structural policies (distribution of structural funds), the Commission uses a definition of unemployment which is in accordance with the recommendations of the International Labour Office (ILO) and is generally suitable for international comparisons. According to this definition, all persons above 15 years of age who are out of work (who have not done a single hour of paid work during the reference week), who are actively looking for a job and who are available for work (ready to start work within two weeks) are considered unemployed.The definition of unemployment used by the Commission is therefore a statistical definition which aims to measure unemployment in a way that is as comparable as possible with other countries, and which is independent of each Member State's own statutory regulations.
Resolution on the conciliation procedure provided for in the Joint Declaration of 4 March 1975 by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the draft Council Regulation (EURATOM, EC) concerning the provision of assistance to economic reform and recovery in the New Independent States and Mongolia (COM(95)0012 - C4-0242/95 - 4546/96 - C4-0090/96 - COM(96)0213 - 95/0056(CNS))
Date: 1996-06-20
Institutions: Committee on External Economic Relations, European Parliament
Subjects: EU relations, Mongolia, economic reconstruction, technical cooperation













EUR-Lex - 51996IP0202 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



51996IP0202

Resolution on the conciliation procedure provided for in the Joint Declaration of 4 March 1975 by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the draft Council Regulation (EURATOM, EC) concerning the provision of assistance to economic reform and recovery in the New Independent States and Mongolia (COM(95)0012 - C4-0242/95 - 4546/96 - C4-0090/96 - COM(96)0213 - 95/0056(CNS))  


Official Journal C 198 , 08/07/1996 P. 0202 





A4-0202/96Resolution on the conciliation procedure provided for in the Joint Declaration of 4 March 1975 by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the draft Council Regulation (EURATOM, EC) concerning the provision of assistance to economic reform and recovery in the New Independent States and Mongolia (COM(95)0012 - C4-0242/95 - 4546/96 - C4-0090/96 - COM(96)0213 - 95/0056(CNS))The European Parliament,- having regard to the Commission proposals to the Council, COM(95)0012 ((OJ C 134, 1.6.1995, p. 16.)) and COM(96)0213 - 95/0056(CNS),- having regard to the draft Council Regulation, 4546/96 - C4-0090/96,- having regard to the Joint Declaration by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 4 March 1975, particularly Articles 5 and 6 thereof,- having regard to Rule 61(4) of its Rules of Procedure,- having regard to the report of the Committee on External Economic Relations (A4-0202/96),1. Condemns the fact that the Council has not used all possibilities available in order to seek an agreement with Parliament, thereby failing to respect the terms of the 1975 declaration; insists that the time available should be used for reaching such an outcome;2. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1109/96 of 20 June 1996 amending Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 establishing an additional levy in the milk and milk products sector in respect of the total quantity for Denmark and the footnote concerning Germany
Date: 1996-06-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, Germany, agricultural levy, milk, milk product, regulation of agricultural production













EUR-Lex - 31996R1109 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R1109

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1109/96 of 20 June 1996 amending Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 establishing an additional levy in the milk and milk products sector in respect of the total quantity for Denmark and the footnote concerning Germany  


Official Journal L 148 , 21/06/1996 P. 0013 - 0014 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1109/96 of 20 June 1996 amending Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 establishing an additional levy in the milk and milk products sector in respect of the total quantity for Denmark and the footnote concerning GermanyTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 of 28 December 1992 establishing an additional levy in the milk and milk products sector (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 635/96 (2), and in particular Article 4 (2) thereof,Whereas Regulation (EC) No 635/96, in accordance with Article 4 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92, adjusts the total quantities fixed in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 on the basis of notification from the Member States of quantities definitively converted from direct sales into deliveries and vice versa; whereas the quantities for Denmark and the text of the footnote concerning Germany contain errors; whereas these should be corrected by increasing the quantity of deliveries by 10 tonnes and reducing the quantity of direct sales by 10 tonnes for Denmark and replacing the text of the footnote concerning Germany with the text as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1552/95 (3);Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 The table given in the first subparagraph of Article 3 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 is hereby replaced by the following:>TABLE>Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall apply from 1 April 1995.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 20 June 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 405, 31. 12. 1992, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 90, 11. 4. 1996, p. 17.(3) OJ No L 148, 30. 6. 1995, p. 43.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1789/96 by Nikitas KAKLAMANIS to the Commission. Funding of NGOs in Turkey
Date: 1996-06-20
Institutions: European Parliament, KAKLAMANIS
Subjects: EU financing, European Commission, Türkiye, human rights, non-governmental organisation, project evaluation













EUR-Lex - 91996E1789 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1789

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1789/96 by Nikitas KAKLAMANIS to the Commission. Funding of NGOs in Turkey  


Official Journal C 322 , 28/10/1996 P. 0104 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-1789/96 by Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) to the Commission (20 June 1996)Subject: Funding of NGOs in TurkeyIt has been reported that the Turkish authorities are exerting pressure on the Commission to cease funding certain NGO activities in the field of human rights.Will the Commission say:Are the reports correct? If so what is its response? Has the Commission ever been subject to this kind of pressure in any other country?Answer given by Mr Van den Broek on behalf of the Commission (17 July 1996)The Turkish authorities contacted the Commission's representation in Ankara to point out the activities of some non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Turkey which went beyond the bounds of human rights.The Commission will continue to appraise projects from all Turkish NGOs on the basis of their merits and their contribution to improving the human rights situation.