do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1474/96 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Development programmes in Bolivia
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: European Parliament, HOWITT
Subjects: Bolivia, EU aid, administrative formalities, alternative agricultural production, development plan, drug addiction, narcotic, non-governmental organisation, plantation, use of aid













EUR-Lex - 91996E1474 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1474

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1474/96 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Development programmes in Bolivia  


Official Journal C 322 , 28/10/1996 P. 0073 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1474/96 by Richard Howitt (PSE) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: Development programmes in BoliviaIn the light of reports that development programmes aimed at the eradication of coca plantations in Bolivia have been hampered by lack of participation by peasant farmers, over-bureaucratized with a disproportionate amount of funding being spent on administration and a lack of attention being paid to the principle of developing a sound market policy based on regional self-sufficiency, what measures does the Commission propose to take to ensure that projects financed by the EU but administered by the Bolivian Government will not repeat mistakes made in the past?How does it respond to charges made in the Bolivian press that plans released recently by the Bolivian Government are characterized by the same approach that had been used earlier.Joint answer to Written Questions E-1474/96 and E-1475/96 given by Mr Marín on behalf of the Commission (18. July 1996)Regarding measures taken to date in Bolivia, the Commission has financed a small number of alternative development measures for the rehabilitation of drug addicts. Essentially these are schemes financed by various Bolivian or European NGOs.As to future action, Bolivia has requested the Community's support for the funding of a major alternative development programme to eradicate coca plantations in the Chapere region. This request is currently being considered by the Community authorities. It is clear, however, that should the Commission agree to act upon this request, the basic criteria used for all development aid programmes would be rigorously applied. This means ensuring that measures to be financed have a sound technical basis (especially prior market surveys), use participatory methodology, and avoid excessive bureaucracy.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1446/96 by Christine ODDY to the Commission. UN Fourth World Conference on Women - Beijing, September 1995
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: European Parliament, ODDY
Subjects: China, development policy, gender equality, participation of women, position of women, woman, women's movement, women's rights













EUR-Lex - 91996E1446 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1446

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1446/96 by Christine ODDY to the Commission. UN Fourth World Conference on Women - Beijing, September 1995  


Official Journal C 322 , 28/10/1996 P. 0067 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1446/96 by Christine Oddy (PSE) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: UN Fourth World Conference on Women - Beijing, September 1995What steps has the Commission taken to implement the Beijing Agreement, which aims to create significant progress towards equality development and peace?What measures does the Commission intend to take to monitor and coordinate the EU Governments' plans of action?Joint answer to Written Questions E-1446/96 and E-1453/96 given by Mr Marin on behalf of the Commission (10 July 1996)The resolution of 20 December 1995 on integrating gender issues in development co-operation has been distributed widely, together with a summary of the main Beijing implications for development co-operation. A process of consultation and discussion is under way in the Commission on implementation of the resolution and follow-up to the Beijing platform.The Commission has already introduced mandatory procedures to ensure attention to gender at each stage of the project cycle. These will be continued and reinforced for all mainstream development co-operation. Systematic attention will be given to integrating gender issues in policy and strategy documents. Focal points for gender issues have been established in a number of key services, in order to identify needs, constraints and the best ways for implementing the resolution. A number of training workshops on gender for Commission staff are taking place in June and July 1996. Others are planned to follow.A number of pilot countries have been selected in each developing region for intensive attention to gender and development at policy, programming, and project level, with detailed backup from highly qualified consultants. It is planned to hold in autumn 1996 the first of the expert meetings on gender and development with Member States advocated by the resolution, to discuss development of common criteria and indicators for integration of gender in development. A number of large-scale positive action programmes to reduce gender inequalities are already included in development co-operation programming for 1996. Others are likely to be included as developing countries complete their follow-up plans of action for Beijing.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1574/96 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. CSFs for Portugal - late payments
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: APOLINARIO, European Parliament
Subjects: EU financing, Portugal, administrative procedure, development plan, energy policy, telecommunications, transport policy













EUR-Lex - 91996E1574 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1574

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1574/96 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. CSFs for Portugal - late payments  


Official Journal C 356 , 25/11/1996 P. 0061 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-1574/96 by José Apolinário (PSE) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: CSFs for Portugal - late paymentsCan the Commission explain the delay of four months (January to May 1996) in the payment of funds relating to CSFs in Portugal, involving around 50 billion escudos, despite all the Commission's declared intentions of simplifying the procedures?What practical steps have been taken to avoid any repetition of these occurrences?Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (22 July 1996)The gap between submission of the proposal to reprogramme the operational programme for development of support infrastructure at the monitoring committee meeting of 29 November 1995 and the actual Commission decision (20 May 1996) did exceed the four months allowed for the procedures to amend operations.This is because the programme is a complex one, consisting of three subprogrammes (transport, telecommunications and energy) involving substantial funding (ECU 1 987 million). The importance of the programme and complexity of issues requiring examination meant that completion took longer.Ways of shortening the delay are now being looked into.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1439/96 by Christine ODDY to the Commission. Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: European Parliament, ODDY
Subjects: EU relations, Pakistan, fundamental rights, religious discrimination













EUR-Lex - 91996E1439 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1439

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1439/96 by Christine ODDY to the Commission. Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan  


Official Journal C 297 , 08/10/1996 P. 0129 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1439/96 by Christine Oddy (PSE) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: Ahmadi Muslims in PakistanIs the Commission aware that Ahmadi Muslim families living in Abbottabad (NWFP) in Pakistan are facing a campaign of intimidation by the Youth Force of Anjuman Tahaffuz Khatme Nubbawat (organization for the protection of finality of prophethood) and that a Mr Riaz Ahmad was stoned to death?What steps will the Commission take to denounce this intolerance in Pakistan?Answer given by Mr Marín on behalf of the Commission (28 June 1996)The Commission is not aware of the particular incident to which the Honourable Member refers. It is aware of the general situation of Ahmadis in Pakistan and has raised the subject in the political dialogue between the Union and Pakistan.The Commission attaches the greatest importance to respect for human rights and demonstrates this on all possible occasions in its bilateral relations with partners, including Pakistan.Furthermore, the Commission has clearly indicated that respect for human rights will be the cornerstone of the deepening of relations between the Union and Pakistan when negotiations take place for a new cooperation agreement. It is included as such in the draft directives for negotiations with Pakistan, as recently submitted by the Commission to the Council.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1479/96 by Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Commission. Progress with sub-programme 3, Ionian Islands, Measure 2 of the 2nd CSF: 'Health and Welfare'
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: ALAVANOS, European Parliament
Subjects: Ionian Islands, health policy, health service, medical institution, modernisation aid, regional aid













EUR-Lex - 91996E1479 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1479

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1479/96 by Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Commission. Progress with sub-programme 3, Ionian Islands, Measure 2 of the 2nd CSF: 'Health and Welfare'  


Official Journal C 280 , 25/09/1996 P. 0126 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1479/96 by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: Progress with sub-programme 3, Ionian Islands, Measure 2 of the 2nd CSF: 'Health and Welfare'Measure 3.2 of the regional operational programme for the Ionian Islands provides for funding of health and welfare facilities in the region comprising: improvement and expansion of hospitals and the construction of a new hospital in Corfu with a corresponding increase in the number of hospital beds; improvements to health centres and community clinics, improved facilities and the creation of new community clinics; supplying these hospitals and clinics with the necessary electronic and medical equipment.The breakdown of funding was ECU 2 320 000 for 1994 and ECU 4 350 000 for 1995.1. What was the take-up rate for 1994 and 1995?2. Have there been any delays in taking up the funds and, if so, what were the main reasons for them?3. Can the Commission provide details of the progress made with this measure?Joint answer to Written Questions E-1479/96, E-1480/96, E-1481/96, E-1482/96, E-1483/96, E-1484/96, E-1485/96 and E-1486/96 given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (26 June 1996)The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1495/96 by Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Commission. 'Euroline'
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: European Parliament, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE
Subjects: access to information, distribution cost, operating cost, telephone













EUR-Lex - 91996E1495 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1495

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1495/96 by Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Commission. 'Euroline'  


Official Journal C 356 , 25/11/1996 P. 0046 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1495/96 by Jaak Vandemeulebroucke (ARE) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: 'Euroline'A telephone information line on the European Union is being advertised in the various media in Flanders. It provides a free telephone number on which anyone can ask questions about the European Union.Can the Commission inform me if this facility is also available in other Member States?Can the Commission inform me how much it costs to provide this facility? Can I also be informed as to how many calls have been made to these telephone numbers? What questions were asked time and again?Answer given by Mr Oreja on behalf of the Commission (25 July 1996)The telephone information line to which the Honourable Member refers in his question is not available in all Member States, although there are systems providing easy access to information (Minitel, Kiosks, relays, etc.).The information service, which was open from 2 to 10 May, received 499 calls (compared with 251 in 1995). The total cost, including radio and press advertising, was ECU 78 300.A fairly wide range of questions were asked, though a significant number concerned major European issues such as the Intergovernmental Conference and Economic and Monetary Union.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1560/96 by Wolfgang KREISSL-DÖRFLER to the Commission. French Guyana's National Tropical Forests Park
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: European Parliament, KREISSL-DOERFLER
Subjects: EU law - national law, European Regional Development Fund, French Guiana, co-financing, environmental protection, forest conservation, national park, protection of minorities













EUR-Lex - 91996E1560 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1560

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1560/96 by Wolfgang KREISSL-DÖRFLER to the Commission. French Guyana's National Tropical Forests Park  


Official Journal C 345 , 15/11/1996 P. 0084 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-1560/96 by Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler (V) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: French Guyana's National Tropical Forests ParkIn reply to an earlier question of 20 November 1995 (E-3129/95) ((OJ C 109, 15.4.1996, p. 26. )) concerning the possible Commission involvement in French Guyana's National Tropical Forests Park, the Commission replied that it has provided ECU 1.5 million for this project.Is the Commission aware of the serious objections of the indigenous peoples living in the area, against the proposal?Is the Commission aware that the actual proposal by the 'Comité de Pilotage' is completely opposite to the proposals made by ORSTOM and WWF/IUCN?Has the Commission consulted with the indigenous peoples affected by the National Park proposal before deciding to participate in the funding, and what has been the outcome of these consultations?Is the Commission willing to ask the French Government to review the whole concept of the National Park following the recommendations of environmental organizations and indigenous peoples, and how is the Commission going to improve the participation of indigenous peoples in the project?Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (5 July 1996)In its answer to Written Question No E-3129/95 the Commission stated that co-financing by the European Regional Development Fund of the project to create a tropical forest park in French Guiana was provided for under submeasure 6.3 of the Objective 1 single programming document (SDP) for French Guiana.The Commission would point out that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, the appraisal and final selection of projects proposed for Community co-financing under the programmes adopted are, in the case of France, the responsibility of the prefect of the region in question. The authorities concerned are of course required to take account of national and Community legislation in their appraisal of proposals.Under the Structural Funds Regulation ((OJ L 193, 31.7.1993. )) a committee chaired in this case by the Guianese prefect, of which the Commission is a member, is responsible for ensuring the SDP is properly implemented and, inter alia, monitoring compliance with Community policies. The Commission will inform the committee's chair of the concerns expressed and ask for clarification of the points raised.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1475/96 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Development programmes in Bolivia
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: European Parliament, HOWITT
Subjects: Bolivia, EU aid, administrative formalities, alternative agricultural production, development plan, drug addiction, narcotic, non-governmental organisation, plantation, use of aid













EUR-Lex - 91996E1475 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1475

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1475/96 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Development programmes in Bolivia  


Official Journal C 322 , 28/10/1996 P. 0073 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1475/96 by Richard Howitt (PSE) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: Development programmes in BoliviaHow has the Commission responded to the recommendations made by the European Parliament in the Liese report (A4-0070/96) that aid in the campaign against drugs should be fully monitored, administrative costs kept to a minimum and coordination with other donors such as the IMF and World Bank improved to ensure that the various policies do not contradict each other?In particular, how will the Commission incorporate Parliament's recommendations into EU-funded programmes aimed at the eradication of coca plantations in Bolivia?Joint answer to Written Questions E-1474/96 and E-1475/96 given by Mr Marín on behalf of the Commission (18. July 1996)Regarding measures taken to date in Bolivia, the Commission has financed a small number of alternative development measures for the rehabilitation of drug addicts. Essentially these are schemes financed by various Bolivian or European NGOs.As to future action, Bolivia has requested the Community's support for the funding of a major alternative development programme to eradicate coca plantations in the Chapere region. This request is currently being considered by the Community authorities. It is clear, however, that should the Commission agree to act upon this request, the basic criteria used for all development aid programmes would be rigorously applied. This means ensuring that measures to be financed have a sound technical basis (especially prior market surveys), use participatory methodology, and avoid excessive bureaucracy.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1468/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) after the ingestion of L-tryptophan contaminated during genetic engineering
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: BREYER, European Parliament
Subjects: competence of the Member States, disability insurance, genetic engineering, health risk, illness, pharmaceutical legislation, terms for aid













EUR-Lex - 91996E1468 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1468

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1468/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) after the ingestion of L-tryptophan contaminated during genetic engineering  


Official Journal C 356 , 25/11/1996 P. 0042 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1468/96 by Hiltrud Breyer (V) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: Eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) after the ingestion of L-tryptophan contaminated during genetic engineering1. Is the Commission aware that, after ingesting L-tryptophan contaminated during genetic engineering, some people suffer from muscle and nerve degeneration (EMS), which makes them incapable of work and so turns them into welfare recipients?2. What measures can be taken to avoid such unfortunate conditions as EMS in the EU in the future?3. What practical assistance can EMS sufferers claim as regards(a) confirmation of the diagnosis from a medical and legally relevant viewpoint,(b) offers of information from sufferers and experienced therapists,(c) opportunities for therapy through the training of interested doctors by means of information meetings, databases and presentations?4. What status are EMS sufferers to be assigned in the EU?5. What transitional assistance is planned to compensate EMS sufferers?6. What method of compensation is possible for EMS sufferers?7. Is it possible for mutual relief funds to be established by the pharmaceutical industry, governments and health insurance carriers?Answer given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (30 July 1996)1. The Commission is aware of the reports of adverse reactions to which the Honourable Member refers. This syndrome has been attributed to 'health food products' and medicinal products containing L-Tryptophan. Member States took the necessary measures in the early nineties and no new cases have been reported.2. Although the mechanism of this reaction has never been clarified, it might be related to a change in the purification process of L-Tryptophan. In order to have a better control over this step of manufacture of starting materials, the Commission is currently preparing a draft directive on inspections and control of starting materials manufacturing. In addition, the Commission is currently setting up a telematic network between pharmacovigilance centres in the Member States and the European medicines evaluation agency with a view to identify signals much earlier and improve co-ordination of Member States' strategy.3. to 7. The issues raised to by the Honourable Member are for the authorities of the Member States to consider.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1505/96 by Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Commission. Tuberculosis emergency in Italy
Date: 1996-06-12
Institutions: European Parliament, MUSCARDINI
Subjects: Italy, epidemiology, frontier, health control, infectious disease, public health, research project













EUR-Lex - 91996E1505 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1505

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1505/96 by Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Commission. Tuberculosis emergency in Italy  


Official Journal C 365 , 04/12/1996 P. 0006 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1505/96 by Cristiana Muscardini (NI) to the Commission (12 June 1996)Subject: Tuberculosis emergency in ItalyIn Written Question P-0831/96 I pointed out that the increase in infectious diseases - including tuberculosis, which was thought to have been eradicated - has taken on worrying proportions in certain areas and certain countries.Data contained in the latest report by the ISS (Higher Institute of Health) and the WHO (World Health Organization) are further cause for concern and call for swift action.In Italy, tuberculosis affects about 18 000 people a year. Health workers are talking of an emergency, since these cases are often resistant to some molecules or sometimes all the molecules contained in the antibiotics currently on sale.We are not talking about deaths in Third World countries but in cities such as Turin, Milan, Genoa and New York.The spread of AIDS and, to a certain extent, the 'immigration factor' make the problem more serious.1. Does the Commission consider that it should insist that health checks at European borders be tightened up?2. Can it urge national health authorities to step up the prevention and treatment of easily spread infectious diseases?3. Can it launch a European project for the prevention of such diseases?Answer given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (8 July 1996)Tuberculosis is an important public health problem. The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that more than 30 million people will die of tuberculosis over the next ten years, if current trends persist. A further cause for concern is the appearance of forms which are resistant to the types of treatment used at present.1. Tuberculosis, like all other infectious diseases, does not stop at national borders. It is therefore unrealistic to think that the problem can be controlled by health checks at Community borders. Furthermore, such checks are the responsibility of each Member State.2. In each Member State the problem of tuberculosis prevention and treatment constitutes a major aspect of public health programmes. At Commission level, tuberculosis prevention projects can be financed under the programme on 'AIDS and certain other communicable diseases' ((OJ L 95, 16.4.1996. )). A study relating to the monitoring of this problem at European level will be financed as one of the projects approved for 1996.3. The Commission has tabled a proposal for a Decision creating a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the European Community ((OJ C 123, 26.4.1996. )). Tuberculosis is included in the list of diseases.