do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ' Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) introducing a Community aid scheme for producers of certain citrus fruits'
Date: 1996-05-30
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: agro-industry, aid system, citrus fruit, common organisation of markets, production aid













EUR-Lex - 51996AC0740 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



51996AC0740

Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ' Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) introducing a Community aid scheme for producers of certain citrus fruits'  


Official Journal C 212 , 22/07/1996 P. 0088 





Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the 'Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC)  introducing a Community aid scheme for producers of certain citrus fruits`(96/C 212/18)On  28  May 1996, the Council decided to consult the Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 43  and 198 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proposal. The Economic and Social Committee decided to appoint Mr Mayayo Bello as Rapporteur-General for its  Opinion. At its 336th Plenary Session (meeting of 30  May 1996), the Economic and Social Committee adopted  the following Opinion by 52 votes to 2 with 5 abstentions. The Committee broadly welcomes the proposed regulation establishing an aid scheme for citrus fruit  producers. It approves the role to be played by producers' organizations in the proposed new regulation; the  industry's negotiating power will be strengthened and it will be able to count on a more regular  supply of raw materials for processing. In the Committee's view, the reductions in the aid should perhaps be changed. The Committee considers it necessary to establish a maximum limit of 20 % as a penalty for  exceeding the threshold. Done at Brussels, 30  May 1996. The Presidentof the Economic and Social CommitteeCarlos FERRER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 957/96 of 30 May 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 773/96 laying down special measures derogating from Regulations (EEC) No 3665/87, (EEC) No 3719/88 and (EEC) No 1964/82 in the beef and veal sector
Date: 1996-05-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, beef, customs formalities, customs regulations, exchange of information, export licence













EUR-Lex - 31996R0957 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R0957

Commission Regulation (EC) No 957/96 of 30 May 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 773/96 laying down special measures derogating from Regulations (EEC) No 3665/87, (EEC) No 3719/88 and (EEC) No 1964/82 in the beef and veal sector  


Official Journal L 130 , 31/05/1996 P. 0005 - 0005 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 957/96 of 30 May 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 773/96 laying down special measures derogating from Regulations (EEC) No 3665/87, (EEC) No 3719/88 and (EEC) No 1964/82 in the beef and veal sectorTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in beef and veal (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 894/96 (2), and in particular Article 13 (12) thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/96 (3) lays down special measures for the regularization of certain export transactions in the wake of the measures taken by several third countries to safeguard against bovine spongiform encephalopathy;Whereas, under Article 5 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/96, the time limit within which products are to leave the customs territory of the Community was extended from 60 to 120 days; whereas, under Article 5 (2) of that Regulation, the time during which products may be placed under suspension arrangements in a free zone or free warehouse is 60 days;Whereas those periods have proved too short for operators to find other outlets for these products; whereas they should thus be extended to 150 and 120 days respectively;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 Regulation (EC) No 773/96 is amended as follows:1. in Article 5 (1), the period '120 days` is replaced by '150 days`;2. in Article 5 (2), the period '60 days` is replaced by '120 days`.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall apply from 30 May 1996.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 30 May 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 24.(2) OJ No L 125, 23. 5. 1996, p. 1.(3) OJ No L 104, 27. 4. 1996, p. 19.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1264/96 by James MOORHOUSE to the Council. Summaries of meetings of the European Council (of Heads of State or of Government)
Date: 1996-05-30
Institutions: European Parliament, MOORHOUSE
Subjects: EU publication, European Council, report













EUR-Lex - 91996E1264 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1264

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1264/96 by James MOORHOUSE to the Council. Summaries of meetings of the European Council (of Heads of State or of Government)  


Official Journal C 356 , 25/11/1996 P. 0023 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1264/96 by James Moorhouse (PPE) to the Council (30 May 1996)Subject: Summaries of meetings of the European Council (of Heads of State or of Government)In its answer of 15 January 1996 to my Written Question E-2482/95 of 13 September 1995 ((OJ C 66, 4.3.1966, p. 14. )) on the existence or otherwise of summary records of European Council meetings, the Council stated that 'no record is drawn up of interventions made during meetings of the European Council', 'only handwritten notes are taken by officials of the General Secretariat of the Council who are present in the room', and 'the notes are used to help the Presidency of the European Council in drawing up its conclusions and are not typed up or kept'.In the light of this response, could the Council now explain how it is possible for me to have in my possession a summary document of a European Council meeting, stretching to some seventy A4 typewritten pages detailing in French and English all the successive interventions of various Heads of State or of Government, as well as the Commission President, at this event?Since it is most unlikely that any individual Head of State or of Government, or indeed Foreign Minister, would keep notes running to seventy pages in more than one language, would the Council please confirm that the text in question must have been drawn up by some central authority, either the Council Secretariat or the Presidency?Would the Council like to clarify why summary documents of this kind are drawn up after each European Council meeting, as the evidence in my possession appears to confirm, only for them to be thrown away at the earliest opportunity, as its previous reply seems to suggest?Could the Council state - as requested but not answered in my previous question - whether it would consider that the unauthorized publication of such a document by a third party, such as myself, would contravene any law, European or national, and, if so, which law?Reply (14 October 1996)The Council can confirm the reply which it gave the Honourable Member on 15 January 1996: no record is drawn up of what is said at meetings of the European Council, either on the Council's behalf or by its General Secretariat.At European Council meetings, internal arrangements are made to keep national delegations and the Commission regularly informed of the progress of proceedings.Should any documents have been drawn up from information obtained in this way, they could not be Council documents and it would not therefore be for the Council to comment on the terms or implications of their publication.