do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
96/334/EC: Commission Decision of 3 May 1996 authorizing Sweden to adopt more stringent provisions concerning the presence of Avena fatua in cereal seed (Only the Swedish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 1996-05-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Sweden, cereals, health certificate, marketing, plant health legislation, seed













EUR-Lex - 31996D0334 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996D0334

96/334/EC: Commission Decision of 3 May 1996 authorizing Sweden to adopt more stringent provisions concerning the presence of Avena fatua in cereal seed (Only the Swedish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)  


Official Journal L 127 , 25/05/1996 P. 0039 - 0039 





COMMISSION DECISION of 3 May 1996 authorizing Sweden to adopt more stringent provisions concerning the presence of Avena fatua in cereal seed (Only the Swedish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (96/334/EC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (1), as last amended by Commission Directive 95/6/EC (2), and in particular Article 14 (1 a) thereof,Having regard to Commission Directive 74/268/EEC of 2 May 1974 establishing certain conditions concerning the presence of Avena fatua in fodder plant and cereal seed (3), as last amended by Directive 78/511/EEC (4),Having regard to the request submitted by Sweden,Whereas the abovementioned Directive lays down tolerances as regards the presence of Avena fatua in cereal seed;Whereas it nevertheless permits Member States to subject seeds of their home production to requirements which are more rigorous;Whereas Sweden avails itself of this provision;Whereas, moreover, there is a campaign to eradicate Avena fatua from crops grown in this Member State;Whereas the applicant Member State should therefore be authorized to adopt more stringent provisions as regards the marketing of seed originating in other Member States;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1 Sweden is authorized to prescribe that cereal seed may not be marketed in its territory unless it is accompanied by an official certificate issued in accordance with the provisions of Article 11 of Directive 66/402/EEC and complies with the conditions set out in Article 2 of Directive 74/268/EEC.Article 2 Sweden shall notify the Commission as to the date from which and the manner in which it intends to avail itself of the authorization granted in Article 1. The Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof.Article 3 This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.Done at Brussels, 3 May 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2309/66.(2) OJ No L 67, 25. 3. 1995, p. 30.(3) OJ No L 141, 24. 5. 1974, p. 19.(4) OJ No L 157, 15. 6. 1978, p. 34.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1041/96 by José VALVERDE LÓPEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with the Directive on safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment
Date: 1996-05-03
Institutions: European Parliament, VALVERDE LOPEZ
Subjects: Council of the European Union, EC Directive, Spain, application of EU law, labour law, occupational safety, video display unit work













EUR-Lex - 91996E1041 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1041

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1041/96 by José VALVERDE LÓPEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with the Directive on safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment  


Official Journal C 297 , 08/10/1996 P. 0074 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1041/96 by José Valverde López (PPE) to the Commission (3 May 1996)Subject: Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with the Directive on safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipmentHow does the Commission view the Spanish Government's failure in the context of employment, labour relations and social affairs, to comply with Directive 90/270/EEC ((OJ L 270, 21.6.1990, p.14 )) on minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment?Joint answer to Written Questions E-1041/96, E-1042/96, E-1043/96 and E-1044/96 given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (12 June 1996)The Honourable Member should consult the Commission's Thirteenth Annual Report to the Parliament on monitoring the application of Community law - 1995 ((COM(96) 600 )), and notably the annex 'State of application of the directives', which will shortly be transmitted to Parliament.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1040/96 by José VALVERDE LÓPEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with the Directive on dangerous substances in the aquatic environment
Date: 1996-05-03
Institutions: European Parliament, VALVERDE LOPEZ
Subjects: Spain, civil defence, dangerous substance, directive, environmental protection, free service, nuclear safety













EUR-Lex - 91996E1040 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1040

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1040/96 by José VALVERDE LÓPEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with the Directive on dangerous substances in the aquatic environment  


Official Journal C 305 , 15/10/1996 P. 0041 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1040/96 by José Valverde López (PPE) to the Commission (3 May 1996)Subject: Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with the Directive on dangerous substances in the aquatic environmentHow does the Commission view the failure of the Spanish government, in the field of the environment, nuclear safety and civil protection, to comply with Directives 76/464/EEC ((OJ L 129, 18.5.1976, p.23. )), 82/176/EEC ((OJ L 81, 27.3.1982, p.29. )), 86/280/EEC ((OJ L 181, 4.7.1986, p.16. )), 84/156/EEC ((OJ L 74, 17.3.1984 p.49. )), 83/516/EEC ((OJ L 291, 24.10.1983, p.1. )), and 84/491/EEC ((OJ L 274, 17.10.1984, p.11. )), on dangerous substances in the aquatic environment?Answer given by Mrs Bjerregaard on behalf of the Commission (11 June 1996)The Honourable Member is referred to the Commission's 12th (1994) annual report to Parliament on monitoring the application of Community law ((OJ C 254, 29.9.1995. )) and to the 13th (1995) report ((COM(96)600. )) and in particular to the annexes on 'Application of Directives'. The 13th report will be submitted to Parliament in the near future.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1022/96 by David THOMAS to the Commission. Tied houses
Date: 1996-05-03
Institutions: European Parliament, THOMAS
Subjects: EU publication, beer, exclusive distribution agreement, marketing restriction, trade licence, vertical agreement













EUR-Lex - 91996E1022 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E1022

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1022/96 by David THOMAS to the Commission. Tied houses  


Official Journal C 280 , 25/09/1996 P. 0113 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-1022/96 by David Thomas (PSE) to the Commission (3 May 1996)Subject: Tied housesRecognizing the importance of the tied house to the brewing industry, not just within the UK but in other parts of the EU, would the Commissioner indicate how many observations he has received to the Green Paper on the Block Exemption and their nature?Answer given by Mr Van Miert on behalf of the Commission (23 May 1996)Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 ((OJ L 173, 30.6.1983. )) of 22 June 1983 on the application of Article 85(3) of the EC Treaty to categories of exclusive purchasing agreements contains general rules on exclusive purchasing agreements and special provisions for beer-supply agreements (the so-called beer block exemption) and service station agreements. This Regulation and Regulation n° 1983/83(¹) on exclusive distribution agreements both expire in December 1997. In addition the franchise block exemption is expiring at the end of 1999.The Commission has therefore considered it useful to envisage consultations on the application of the Community competition rules on vertical restraints (the common element of the above block exemptions), and to this effect to prepare a green book on vertical restraints which will contain several possible options. This green book is currently under preparation by the Commission and thus no observations on it have yet been received.However, in preparing the draft green book, the Commission had informal contacts with all sectors of industry. With regard to brewing, these contacts included representatives of the European federations of brewers (who have requested a renewal of the current block exemption), beer consumers and tenants. Also some individual brewers have been seen and the United Kingdom Brewers and licensed retailers federation has already forwarded a submission supporting their case for the renewal of the beer block exemption.The consultation process on the green book has therefore not yet started. It is however the intention of the Commission to allow several months for all interested parties to make their submissions on the green book, once it has been published, and the options it contains for the future orientation of Community competition rules with regard to vertical restraints, of which exclusive beer-supply agreements form a part.