Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ' Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products'
Date: 1996-03-27
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: Structural Funds, aquaculture, fishery product, fishing fleet, fishing industry













EUR-Lex - 51996AC0414 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



51996AC0414

Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ' Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products'  


Official Journal C 174 , 17/06/1996 P. 0031 





Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the  'Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No  3699/93 laying down the  criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and  aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products` ()(96/C 174/09)On 30   January 1996 the Council decided to consult the Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 43  and 198 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proposal. The Section for Agriculture and Fisheries, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work  on the subject, adopted its Opinion on 7  March 1996. The Rapporteur was Mr Little. At its 334th Plenary Session of 27 and 28  March 1996 (meeting of 27  March 1996), the Economic and  Social Committee adopted the following Opinion by 93 votes to two, with five abstentions. 1. Introduction1.1. Council Regulation (EC) No  3699/93 provides the general framework  for structural assistance to the fisheries sector under the Financial Instrument of Fisheries  Guidance (FIFG). The Commission's present proposal seeks to amend two separate facets of the  Regulation. 1.2. To adjust fishing effort in order to meet the fleet capacity reduction targets of the  multi-annual guidance programmes, Member States may take, inter alia, permanent cessation measures.  Annex IV of the Regulation sets ceilings, varying with gross registered tonnage and the age of the  vessel, for the state aids which can be paid for the permanent cessation of fishing activities. The  stated scale of ceilings applies to 15 year-old vessels and the scale amounts are increased by 1,5  % per annum for vessels less than 15 years old and decreased by 1,5 % per annum for vessels older  than 15 years. Under the Commission's proposal, the ceiling for permanent withdrawal premiums would  be fixed, at that for 30  year-old vessels, for all vessels above that age. 1.3. Member States may take measures to alleviate the temporary cessation of fishing activities  within a maximum daily scale for each eligible vessel. The Commission now proposes to set an  overall limit on Community aid available to each Member State for this purpose and which would be  the greater of ECU 200 000 or 0,5 % of the total spending indicated in the Sectoral Plan for the  year concerned. 2. Comments2.1. The present year-by-year reduction in the maximum financial assistance for the  withdrawal of vessels acts as a disincentive to the scrapping, transfer or re-assignment of the  oldest vessels. The Committee concurs with the aim of securing the withdrawal of the oldest vessels  in the EU fleet, and thus supports the proposal to have the maximum assistance for vessels aged 30  years or over fixed at the scale ceilings for 30  year-old vessels. 2.2. In its Opinion on the introduction of Regulation 3699/93 (), the Committee pointed out that  temporary cessation, if properly regulated, could be a useful instrument for conserving resources  and it supported the provision of assistance related to temporary cessation measures. 2.2.1. In order to achieve the longer-term objectives for the management of fishing effort,  structural assistance may be provided by means of the various measures specified in the Regulation.  It is logical that emphasis should be given to measures which have a long term effect and therefore  the Committee supports the principle of introducing limits to the FIFG assistance which can be  given for temporary cessation of activities. 2.2.2. However, the proposed limit of 0,5 % appears to be based on experience over a very short  period of time and would provide no flexibility for year-by-year fluctuations. Accordingly, the  Committee recommends that the overall limit of FIFG assistance for each Member State be raised to  the greater of ECU  400 000 or 1 % of the funds foreseen in the Sectoral financial plan for each  Member State for the year concerned. 2.3. The Commission's proposals, if implemented, would have no effect on the total funding  indicated under approved Sectoral Plans for each Member State or on funding available under FIFG  but minor changes in the allocation between measures could arise from both facets. 2.4. Subject to the point made in 2.2.2, the Committee supports the Commission's proposals. Done at Brussels, 27  March 1996. The Presidentof the Economic and Social CommitteeCarlos FERRER() OJ No C 49,  20. 2. 1996, p. 9.  () OJ No C 52, 19. 2. 1994.