Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ' Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision adopting a programme of Community action on health monitoring in the context of the framework for action in the field of public health'
Date: 1996-03-27
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: EU policy, action programme, data collection, data processing, public health













EUR-Lex - 51996AC0407 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



51996AC0407

Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ' Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision adopting a programme of Community action on health monitoring in the context of the framework for action in the field of public health'  


Official Journal C 174 , 17/06/1996 P. 0003 





Opinion of  the Economic and Social Committee on the 'Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision  adopting a programme of Community action on health monitoring in the context of the framework for  action in the field of public health` ()(96/C 174/02)On 12  March 1996 the Council decided  to consult the Economic and Social Committee, under Article  129 of the Treaty establishing the  European Community, on the above-mentioned proposal. The Section for Protection of the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Affairs, which was  responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its Opinion on 5  March  1996. The Rapporteur was Mr  Lemmetty. At its 334th Plenary Session (meeting of 27  March 1996), the Economic and Social Committee adopted  the following Opinion by a large majority with one dissenting vote. 1. ESC Opinions on public health - a review1.1. During the past years the Committee has  produced a number of Opinions in the field of public health. In line with Article  129 of the  Maastricht Treaty, the Committee has called, on several occasions, for closer coordination and  cooperation between individual Member States and between the Community and international  organizations. Better coordination would make it possible to compare achievements in the field of  public health in order to find best possible practices and to gain European 'added value` for the  benefit of citizens of Member States. 1.2. In its Opinion on the framework programme, the ESC stated that public health policy should not  be viewed in a restricted sense, only concerned about disease prevention, but, instead, it should  be viewed as health promotion based on a horizontal, interdisciplinary approach, involving  cooperation between the various disciplines. Furthermore, the Committee called on the Council to  give the Commission a mandate to make a global, horizontal analysis of public health (). 1.3. The importance of valid and available information has been emphasized in various Opinions. The  Committee has stressed, for instance, the importance of exchanging information between Member  States with a view to reducing differences of approach. Furthermore, relevant and accurate data  about the state of public health, and about more detailed indicators would serve as a basis for  future decision-making in the health sector both at the Community level and in Member States, with  whom responsibility and decision-making in most cases rest. 1.4. In its Opinion on health promotion, information, education and training (CES 50/95) the ESC  urged the Commission to set up an 'appropriate structure for processing health data and indicators  in order to provide a clearer picture of the various factors, lifestyles, individual behaviour, and  environmental and socio-economic conditions, and provide a database which can be accessed by Member  States and other health promotion bodies, working in close cooperation with Eurostat` (). 1.5. The Committee has also recommended that a suitable link should be made between health policy  and the socio-economic dimension, in terms of solidarity, competitiveness and employment, in the  framework of a 'social Europe` and the 'Citizens' Europe`, particularly by stepping up the  horizontal approach to the subject (work, employment, urban living environment, housing, farming  policy, consumption, environment, etc.) (). 1.6. The Committee has consistently attached importance to cooperation between Member States and  stressed the principle of subsidiarity. 1.7. Hence, referring to the abovementioned arguments, the Committee warmly welcomes the new  Commission proposal to adopt a Community action programme on health monitoring. After all, the main  aim is to guarantee a high level of health protection to all European citizens. 2. Main contents of the proposal2.1. The Commission proposes a five-year programme for the  development of a high-quality health monitoring system. The system is to provide the Community and  Member States with indicators and data for supporting their efforts in the public health field, and  to facilitate the planning, monitoring and evaluation of Community programmes and actions, in  compliance with the principle of subsidiarity. 2.2. The Community health monitoring programme would also involve the development of a network for  the purpose of collection and dissemination of health data and indicators, using the possibilities  offered by telematics, and the development of a capacity to undertake the analysis of health data  and the production of reports, reviews and other health information material. 2.3. The programme will involve: a) Establishment of Community health indicators; b) Development of a Community-wide network for sharing health data; c) Analyses and reporting. 2.4. The Commission proposal states that the choice of Community health indicators will provide the  necessary means for monitoring health status in the Community and the factors affecting it and for  the planning, monitoring and evaluation of Community programmes and actions. It will also provide  Member States with health-related information to support the development of health policy. 3. General comments3.1. The ESC feels that the Commission's proposed Decision and the  Communication which backs it up is founded on a realistic and sound base. The aims and principles  of the proposal can be endorsed. 3.2. The matter is an important one. The proposed health monitoring programme is necessary if the  EU is to carry out its remit on public health. The preparatory work has been done with care and is  well informed. The action proposed is wholly justified. 3.3. The chief problem, both at national and international level, has proved to be the lack of  sufficiently comprehensive health indicators designed to gauge the impact of health policy  measures, and poor comparability. 3.4. The development and implementation of new indicators is possibly the most important result of  the programme. The ESC feels that the programme should place even more emphasis on this development  stage. 3.5. The ESC also feels that the Commission's views on the principles underlying a health  monitoring system are correct: - use should be made of ready-made systems and existing data; - any duplication or overlap of work should be avoided; - no unnecessary or unjustified burdens should be imposed on Member States; - there should be a cost/benefit assessment; - the system must be as flexible as possible. 3.5.1. In particular, the ESC would like to emphasize the Commission's cooperation with the WHO  (World Health Organization), OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and  EMCDDA (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction). The Commission should also  consider the scope for cooperation with other European agencies, such as the European Environment  Agency, the European Agency for Health and Safety at Work and the European Foundation for the  Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Comparable data is needed from other countries, as  well as from EU Member States. 3.5.2. As regards participation by third countries and associated countries, the Committee would  welcome the inclusion in the Decision of a mention of cooperation, based on agreements, with all  Mediterranean countries. 3.6. In the same way cooperation with the Member States is important if the work is to gain added  value. The analysis and interpretation of the data collected is a demanding task involving a large  amount of research and expertise. Use should also be made of specialist institutions and experts in  the Member States, and part of the meagre budgetary resources proposed could for example be used to  fund their participation and contribution to the work. 3.7. The Committee notes with satisfaction that according to Article  7 of the proposal the  Commission is also to send reports to the Economic and Social Committee. This will serve to  strengthen the established practice applying to all public health programmes. 4. Community health indicators4.1. According to the Commission proposal, establishing health  indicators involves both identifying and analyzing existing indicators and selecting and/or  creating Community health indicators and defining them. In the development stage consideration  should be given to past and current research and development work, both that done by Member States  at their own expense and that funded by the EU in various Community countries. 4.2. According to the proposal, the Commission would be assisted by a committee composed of two  representatives from each Member State. The Committee considers it very important that the  expertise available in Member States and in Community committees handling health and safety  statistics should be utilized in the preparatory work on the selection of 'domains` and 'headings`  for indicators. In particular, the ESC stresses the importance of consulting the Advisory Committee  on Safety, Hygiene and Health Protection at Work. 4.3. The Committee notes that an important part of the programme listing domains and headings for  indicators appears in Annex A to the Communication. Although the list is general and preliminary,  the Committee proposes that it be annexed to the proposal, so that the proposal would contain data  on domains for indicators. 4.4. Some preliminary general comments on Annex A to the Communication are called for here. The  following should be emphasized when the list is being developed: - the concept of health and the factors determining it should be broad enough so that the data  reflects both professional assessments and people's own views; - the concept of health should cover community level and individual level health determinants as  well as actual illnesses and disabilities. The inclusion of these data would help to promote  health. Thus socio-economic factors, as well as those connected with work and the environment,  should also be considered as affecting health. Consequently, health habits, including eating  habits, should be taken into account; - one of the Community's priority areas is consumer protection. As far as the consumer is  concerned, among the essential areas are the quality, provision and financing of health services  and equitable availability of services. The Commission Communication refers indirectly to these, in  dealing with the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of developing statistics on data protection in  the public health sector. Patients' rights and putting these into practice are also an important  consideration. 5. Data collection and dissemination of information5.1. The ESC emphasizes that the rules on  data protection with regard to individuals must be properly observed both when establishing the  indicators and collecting data. 5.2. In addition to existing sources of information, separate studies are needed, some of which  could be carried out annually depending on what they are measuring, while others would be done much  less frequently. These studies should be developed in the various Member States to form part of an  ongoing health information system and there should be collaboration to ensure that the main  procedures used in these studies are as appropriate and comparable as possible. 6. Analyzing and sharing data6.1. The preferred trend would be for data sharing to be developed  using electronic data networks but other methods should be used as well. Use should also be made of  other corresponding projects. 6.2. The formulation, collection, analysis and interpretation of health indicators will require  networking between Member States and specialist institutions. 7. Links with other Community policies and areas of action7.1. The Commission Communication  lists a number of areas of Community policy which are linked to the present proposal. 7.1.1. In particular, the Committee attaches importance to cooperation in the field of health and  safety at work, which would enable an indication to be obtained of the extent of occupational  diseases and accidents at work. 7.1.2. In addition, under the statistical framework programme 1993-1997, Eurostat produces valuable  statistical data in areas such as health and safety, employment, living conditions and social  protection, which are fields of priority action under the sectoral programmes for social policy,  economic and social cohesion and consumer protection. In 1994, a Consumer Household Panel Survey  was launched covering, for instance, demographics, income, labour force participation, education,  housing and certain health aspects. 7.1.3. The Commission proposal on support for the telematic interchange of data between  administrations (IDA) provides for three projects in the field of health. 7.1.4. The Committee also refers to health-care actions under the third and fourth framework  programmes for research and technological development. The establishment of a European Clearing  House on Health Outcomes should also be considered. 8. Conclusions and evaluations8.1. The ESC considers the Commission proposal to be important and  endorses it. 8.2. The ESC emphasizes the importance of establishing and maintaining health indicators and feels  it is important that data users are involved at the development stage. 8.3. It could be difficult to fit all the indicators needed for general monitoring of public health  and health policy into the same framework as those required at present for certain current EU  policies concerning the public health service. It might be better in future to develop these in  tandem only where appropriate and to allow separate development where necessary. 8.4. The ESC draws attention to the size of the appropriation for the programme. The appropriation  for the collection and dissemination of data is too small considering the importance of the matter  for the health policies of Member States and the European Union. In view of the fundamental  importance of the programme, more funds should be provided. Done at Brussels, 27  March 1996. The Presidentof the Economic and Social CommitteeCarlos FERRER() OJ No C  338, 16. 12. 1995, p. 4.  () OJ No C 388, 31. 12. 1994.  () OJ No C 102, 24. 4. 1995.