do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 426/96 of 8 March 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2123/89 establishing the list of representative markets for pigmeat in the Community
Date: 1996-03-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU market, common organisation of markets, pigmeat













EUR-Lex - 31996R0426 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R0426

Commission Regulation (EC) No 426/96 of 8 March 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2123/89 establishing the list of representative markets for pigmeat in the Community  


Official Journal L 060 , 09/03/1996 P. 0003 - 0003 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 426/96 of 8 March 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2123/89 establishing the list of representative markets for pigmeat in the Community THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organization of the market in pigmeat (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (2), and in particular Article 4 (6) thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2123/89 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1448/95 (4), established the list of representative markets for pigmeat in the Community;Whereas in France a change to the representative markets has taken place; whereas the list of representative markets for pigmeat in the Community listed is the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2123/89 should consequently be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 Point 5 of the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2123/89 is replaced by the following:'5. The following group of quotation centres: Rennes, Nantes, Metz, Lyon and Toulouse`.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 1996.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 8 March 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105.(3) OJ No L 203, 15. 7. 1989, p. 23.(4) OJ No L 143, 27. 6. 1995, p. 47.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 655/96 by Eva KJER HANSEN to the Commission. Commission delays in dealing with complaints about technical barriers to trade
Date: 1996-03-08
Institutions: European Parliament, KJER HANSEN
Subjects: Denmark, consultation procedure, intra-EU trade













EUR-Lex - 91996E0655 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E0655

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 655/96 by Eva KJER HANSEN to the Commission. Commission delays in dealing with complaints about technical barriers to trade  


Official Journal C 217 , 26/07/1996 P. 0090 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-0655/96 by Eva Kjer Hansen (ELDR) to the Commission (8 March 1996)Subject: Commission delays in dealing with complaints about technical barriers to tradeA recent survey of Danish industry reveals that one undertaking in seven has encountered technical barriers to trade when seeking to market their products in the EU in recent years. They have however given up making complaints to the Commission as it takes an average of a year to deal with them.What does the Commission intend to do to speed up its complaint procedure?Will the Commission conduct an investigation into the extent to which EU companies in general are not bothering to complain about barriers to trade as they believe that the procedure is too cumbersome and protracted?Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission (19 April 1996)The Commission is fully aware of the problem raised by the Honourable Member. The examination of generally complex cases and the numerous contacts with the administrations concerned take time and, if too protracted, can be detrimental to the credibility of action taken by it.For this reason, the Commission is currently looking into ways of improving and speeding up infringement procedures in the light of experience to date. In the run-up to the Intergovernmental Conference, it has emphasized that 'the means available to it to enforce Community law should be made more effective, notably as regards the internal market.' ((Commission Opinion of 28 February 1996, 'Reinforcing political union and preparing for enlargement' (COM(96) 90). ))The Commission would point out that redress for infringements of Community law can always be sought before national courts. Furthermore, as was made clear in a recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, ((Judgment of 5 March 1996 in Joined Cases C-46/93 and C-48/93, not yet published. )) reparation for loss or damage caused by breaches of Community law that are attributable to Member States can be obtained through this type of action.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 428/96 of 8 March 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2294/92 on detailed rules for the application of the support system for producers of the oilseeds referred to in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92
Date: 1996-03-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: oil seed rape, oleaginous plant, production aid, regional aid, seed













EUR-Lex - 31996R0428 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R0428

Commission Regulation (EC) No 428/96 of 8 March 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2294/92 on detailed rules for the application of the support system for producers of the oilseeds referred to in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92  


Official Journal L 060 , 09/03/1996 P. 0006 - 0006 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 428/96 of 8 March 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2294/92 on detailed rules for the application of the support system for producers of the oilseeds referred to in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 of 30 June 1992 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2989/95 (2), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2294/92 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 762/95 (4), restricts the producers of rapeseed eligible for the compensatory payments to those producers sowing seed of specified qualities and varieties; whereas additional varieties of rapeseed which meet the eligibility criteria are now also available to producers; whereas these varieties should also be added to the list;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Joint Management Committee for Cereals, Oils and Fats and Dried Fodder,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 The following varieties shall be added to the list in Annex II of Regulation (EEC) No 2294/92:'Alpine`, 'Arietta`, 'Boni`, 'Bullet`, 'Capitol`, 'Challenger`, 'Chiquero`, 'Cocktail`, 'Corniche`, 'CSH 01`, 'Darin`, 'Diamant`, 'Ebony`, 'Ecudor`, 'Garrison`, 'ISH 93-2`, 'Jazz`, 'Jockey`, 'Limbo`, 'Limpet`, 'Lizard`, 'Longbow`, 'Manta`, 'Mohican`, 'OAC Summit`, 'Rebel`, 'Unica`, 'Valo` and 'Verdi`.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 8 March 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 12.(2) OJ No L 312, 23. 12. 1995, p. 5.(3) OJ No L 221, 6. 8. 1992, p. 22.(4) OJ No L 76, 5. 4. 1995, p. 1.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 657/96 by Peter TRUSCOTT to the Commission. Mr Emerson' s case and TACIS funding
Date: 1996-03-08
Institutions: European Parliament, TRUSCOTT
Subjects: EU aid, European official, application of EU law, fund (EU)













EUR-Lex - 91996E0657 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E0657

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 657/96 by Peter TRUSCOTT to the Commission. Mr Emerson' s case and TACIS funding  


Official Journal C 185 , 25/06/1996 P. 0077 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-0657/96 by Peter Truscott (PSE) to the Commission (8 March 1996)Subject: Mr Emerson's case and TACIS fundingGiven the concerns surrounding the Michael Emerson case, could the Commission:1. Give a full breakdown of TACIS projects funded over the last five years, and an assessment of whether the money was well spent;2. Investigate whether Mr Emerson or any of his business contacts benefited directly or indirectly from EU-funded projects;3. Review whether EU money is being diverted for improper use;4. Confirm whether criminal or other investigations are continuing into the activities of Mr Emerson during his period as EU Ambassador in Moscow;5. Introduce immediate monitoring of EU TACIS funding to Russia, both before and after project completion?Answer given by Mr Van den Broek on behalf of the Commission (19 April 1996)The Commission will regularly continue to provide the Parliament with the information agreed earlier (Tacis financial performance). An updated list of all projects (about 300) can be made available to the Honourable Member by the Commission.The Commission did not consider it appropriate that Mr Emerson, while being an official in the Commission, undertook certain outside contacts in the perspective of his future career after resignation from the Commission service. The Commission has no evidence of corruption. It has no evidence that Mr Emerson abused his position to obtain advantages for himself or for his business contacts.A Tacis monitoring system has been in place since 1993, and was reinforced in 1995. A description of the system is forwarded direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.The administrative and financial management of the Tacis programme (tenders, contracts, payments) is centralized in Brussels. There has so far been no decentralization of management responsibility by the Moscow delegation except for the small-scale 'Bistro' programme for which, however, strict administrative and financial procedures apply.
96/218/EC: Commission Decision of 8 March 1996 amending for the second time Decision 93/74/EEC concerning the status of Denmark with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 1996-03-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, fish farming, health control, sea fish













EUR-Lex - 31996D0218 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996D0218

96/218/EC: Commission Decision of 8 March 1996 amending for the second time Decision 93/74/EEC concerning the status of Denmark with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (Text with EEA relevance)  


Official Journal L 072 , 21/03/1996 P. 0039 - 0039 





COMMISSION DECISION of 8 March 1996 amending for the second time Decision 93/74/EEC concerning the status of Denmark with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (Text with EEA relevance) (96/218/EC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (1), as last amended by Directive 95/22/EC (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,Whereas Denmark, by Commission Decision 93/74/EEC (3), is recognized as an approved continental and coastal zone for fish with regard to infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN) and, partly, as an approved continental and coastal zone with regard to viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS);Whereas Denmark, by letter dated 22 May 1995, has submitted to the Commission the appropriate justifications for extending the approved zone with regard to VHS;Whereas, after scrutiny, these justifications allow extension of the approved zone as far as VHS is concerned to include the Ørum Å catchment area;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1 In the Annex to Decision 93/74/EEC, 'Ørum Å` is added to the first column.Article 2 This Decision is addressed to the Member States.Done at Brussels, 8 March 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 1.(3) OJ No L 27, 4. 2. 1993, p. 35.
96/221/EC: Commission Decision of 8 March 1996 approving the programme concerning viral haemorrhagic septicaemia for certain geographical zones presented by Denmark (Only the Danish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 1996-03-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, animal disease, aquaculture, catch area, fish farming, health control













EUR-Lex - 31996D0221 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996D0221

96/221/EC: Commission Decision of 8 March 1996 approving the programme concerning viral haemorrhagic septicaemia for certain geographical zones presented by Denmark (Only the Danish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)  


Official Journal L 074 , 22/03/1996 P. 0042 - 0043 





COMMISSION DECISION of 8 March 1996 approving the programme concerning viral haemorrhagic septicaemia for certain geographical zones presented by Denmark (Only the Danish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (96/221/EC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (1), as last amended by Directive 95/22/EC (2), and in particular Article 10 (2) thereof,Whereas the Member States may submit to the Commission a programme designed in particular to enable them to obtain, for one or more of their territories, approved status with regard to certain diseases affecting fish;Whereas, by letter dated 22 May 1995, Denmark presented a programme concerning viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) in certain catchment areas;Whereas the programme specifies the geographical zones, the measures to be taken by the official services, the procedures to be followed by the laboratories, the prevalence of the disease concerned and the measures to combat the disease where detected;Whereas upon scrutiny the programme has been found to comply with Article 10 of Council Directive 91/67/EEC;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1 The VHS control programme for the geographical zones set out in the Annex, presented by Denmark, is hereby approved.Article 2 Denmark shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the programme referred to in Article 1.Article 3 This Decision is addressed to Denmark.Done at Brussels, 8 March 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 1.ANNEX CATCHMENT AREAS Fiskebæk ÅGudenåenHalkær ÅStoråenÅrhus Å