do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 272/96 of 13 February 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 1430/95 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugar
Date: 1996-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: export refund, fruit juice, fruit product, vegetable product













EUR-Lex - 31996R0272 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R0272

Commission Regulation (EC) No 272/96 of 13 February 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 1430/95 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugar  


Official Journal L 036 , 14/02/1996 P. 0015 - 0017 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 272/96 of 13 February 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 1430/95 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugarTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 of 24 February 1986 on the common organization of the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2314/95 (2), and in particular Articles 13 (8) and 14 (5) thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1430/95 (3) fixes the quantities eligible for export licences, other than those applied for in the context of food aid;Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1429/95 of 23 June 1995 on implementing rules for export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugars (4) sets up the components for establishing the quantities on which export refunds may be paid; whereas, for reasons of transparency, the updated situation concerning those quantities should be brought to the attention of the operators;Whereas in the light of the international trade situation the quantities and rates of refund should be provisionally adjusted for the coming period;Whereas the dates for the submission of applications for each allocation period should be specified;Whereas the Management Committee for Products Processed Fruit and Vegetables has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1430/95 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 13 February 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 49, 27. 2. 1986, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 233, 30. 9. 1995, p. 69.(3) OJ No L 141, 23. 6. 1995, p. 32.(4) OJ No L 141, 23. 6. 1995, p. 28.ANNEX >TABLE>
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 373/96 by Luigi CALIGARIS to the Commission. Trieste and the ' Adriatic Corridor' project
Date: 1996-02-13
Institutions: CALIGARIS, European Parliament
Subjects: France, Italy, combined transport, feasibility study, transport policy













EUR-Lex - 91996E0373 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E0373

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 373/96 by Luigi CALIGARIS to the Commission. Trieste and the ' Adriatic Corridor' project  


Official Journal C 217 , 26/07/1996 P. 0031 





WRITTEN QUESTION P-0373/96 by Luigi Caligaris (UPE) to the Commission (13 February 1996)Subject: Trieste and the 'Adriatic Corridor' projectBecause of its geographical position, the city of Trieste can be said to constitute a natural meeting point with Central, Eastern, and southern Europe, and the Mediterranean.Advantageously placed as it is within the multimodal transport network that the 'Adriatic Corridor' project is intended to set up, the Trieste area is particularly well suited to act as a gateway to the natural Central European hinterland, for traffic bound for Eastern Europe, and as a port of call for shipping heading for the Mediterranean.In anticipation of the forthcoming decision by Parliament and the Council on the Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, what prospects exist, in the Commission's opinion, for expansion of land and sea transport infrastructure in Trieste?Can the Commission also say, given the current state of play, what kind of connections are likely to be provided to link Trieste to the 'Adriatic Corridor' project as a whole?Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission (14 March 1996)The city of Trieste and the Friuli-Venezia-Giulia region are concerned about the priority project high speed train combined transport France-Italy (Lyon-Turin-Verona-Venice-Trieste). The Community programme of pilot actions for combined transport (PACT) has already contributed to the improvement of links with Greece and this action will continue. In addition, as far as maritime transport is concerned, the Community is committed to the promotion of short-sea shipping as an effective and environmentally-friendly means of transport.The so-called Adriatic corridor project represents an alternative route to link the central regions of the Community and Italy to Greece and the eastern part of the Mediterranean basin, avoiding the inland route through the former Yugoslavia. It integrates rail and road infrastructure, ports, links to ports and combined transport along the Adriatic coast, from Trieste to Brindisi.In 1995, the Community provided 1 MECU to finance a feasibility study for the Adriatic corridor. The aim of the study is to provide decision makers with a range of technically feasible and economically viable options for the improvement of transport services in the corridor, with particular emphasis on existing infrastructures. The study will also assist in the development of studies on the necessary investment so that a scenario for further action can be defined.