do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 123/96 of 25 January 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2307/95 fixing, for unginned cotton, the estimated production and amount of the advance on the aid for the 1995/96 marketing year
Date: 1996-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aid system, cotton, farm price support













EUR-Lex - 31996R0123 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996R0123

Commission Regulation (EC) No 123/96 of 25 January 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2307/95 fixing, for unginned cotton, the estimated production and amount of the advance on the aid for the 1995/96 marketing year  


Official Journal L 020 , 26/01/1996 P. 0007 - 0007 





COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 123/96 of 25 January 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2307/95 fixing, for unginned cotton, the estimated production and amount of the advance on the aid for the 1995/96 marketing yearTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Act of Accession of Greece, and in particular Protocol 4 on cotton, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1553/95 (1),Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1554/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down the general rules for the system of aid for cotton and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2169/81 (2), and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof,Whereas Article 5 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1554/95 provides that the amount of the advance on the aid must be determined by taking account of the estimated production of unginned cotton and of the anticipated amount of the aid, without, however, exceeding 40 % of the guide price; whereas in application of those criteria the amount of the advance for the 1995/96 marketing year was fixed in Article 1 (2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2307/95 (3) at 40 % of the guide price for Spain and at a lower amount for the other Member States;Whereas in the light of a revised estimate of the forecast production for cotton and of the anticipated level of aid in the Member States concerned the amount of the advance fixed for the Member States other than Spain for the marketing year in question should be increased;Whereas in order to ensure that all operators are treated equally, the increase in the advance should apply retroactively;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Flax and Hemp,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1 In the second indent of Article 1 (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2307/95 the amount of 'ECU 29,210` is hereby replaced by 'ECU 42,52`.Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall apply from 30 September 1995.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 25 January 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 148, 30. 6. 1995, p. 45.(2) OJ No L 148, 30. 6. 1995, p. 48.(3) OJ No L 233, 30. 9. 1995, p. 51.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 51/96 by Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. Display screen equipment
Date: 1996-01-25
Institutions: European Parliament, HUGHES STEPHEN
Subjects: statistics, video display unit work, working conditions, working population













EUR-Lex - 91996E0051 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E0051

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 51/96 by Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. Display screen equipment  


Official Journal C 280 , 25/09/1996 P. 0006 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0051/96 by Stephen Hughes (PSE) to the Commission (25 January 1996)Subject: Display screen equipmentHow many workers are estimated to use display screen equipment in each Member State respectively?Answer given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (1 March 1996)The Commission estimates that, overall, about half of the working population in the Community uses VDU equipment for work purposes.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 12/96 by Undine-Uta BLOCH von BLOTTNITZ to the Commission. Garching research reactor
Date: 1996-01-25
Institutions: BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, European Parliament
Subjects: Bavaria, impact study, nuclear power station, nuclear reactor, nuclear safety, research project, uranium













EUR-Lex - 91996E0012 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E0012

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 12/96 by Undine-Uta BLOCH von BLOTTNITZ to the Commission. Garching research reactor  


Official Journal C 185 , 25/06/1996 P. 0035 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0012/96 by Undine-Uta Bloch von Blottnitz (V) to the Commission (25 January 1996)Subject: Garching research reactorReports by the Bavarian technical monitoring body TÜV state that the research project in Garching near Munich poses a number of potentially harzardous technical risks to safety. Specific mention is made of the as yet untested compact fuel rods. When in permanent use, these fuel rods might react in such a way as to lead to interruptions in the circulation of coolant due to expansion, with the possibility of a meltdown. The discharge of only 5% of the radioactive inventory would be sufficient to render large sections of the city of Munich uninhabitable for decades.1. Is the Commission aware of the risks associated with the use of compact fuel rods?2. What action will the Commission take in view of the high risk to safety posed by the Garching project?3. Does the Commission continue to consider that the use of highly enriched uranium - possibly originating from the former Soviet Union - in the Garching installation is appropriate?Answer given by Mrs Bjerregaard on behalf of the Commission (3 April 1996)The Commission has no specific information on the FRM-II neutron source (research reactor).All nuclear facilities of this type must be covered by authorizations issued by the national authority in respect of both the facility itself and the fuel used.Several research reactors within the Community use highly enriched uranium in order to achieve the high fluxes needed in order successfully to conduct experiments.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 50/96 by Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. Display screen equipment
Date: 1996-01-25
Institutions: European Parliament, HUGHES STEPHEN
Subjects: EC Directive, occupational safety, video display unit work













EUR-Lex - 91996E0050 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E0050

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 50/96 by Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. Display screen equipment  


Official Journal C 280 , 25/09/1996 P. 0006 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0050/96 by Stephen Hughes (PSE) to the Commission (25 January 1996)Subject: Display screen equipmentHow many Member States have attempted to implement Directive 90/270/EEC ((OJ L 156, 21.6.1990, p. 14. )) but the Commission believes their attempt to be inadequate?Answer given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (1 March 1996)All the Member States apart from Spain have informed the Commission of the national implementing measures for the transposal of Directive 90/270/EEC.The conformity of these measures with the Directive is being discussed with the various Member States.Depending on the results of this work, the Commission could, if necessary, take appropriate measures to rectify any shortcomings.
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 21/96 by Frederik WILLOCKX to the Commission. The 'Euro' single currency and blind people and the partially sighted
Date: 1996-01-25
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: euro, paper money, physically disabled person













EUR-Lex - 91996E0021 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



91996E0021

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 21/96 by Frederik WILLOCKX to the Commission. The 'Euro' single currency and blind people and the partially sighted  


Official Journal C 280 , 25/09/1996 P. 0005 





WRITTEN QUESTION E-0021/96 by Frederik Willockx (PSE) to the Commission (25 January 1996)Subject: The 'Euro' single currency and blind people and the partially sightedA properly thought out information campaign will be needed to secure popular acceptance of the single currency, the 'Euro'. What is important, however, is to satisfy all the users of the new currency who include the blind and the partially sighted.Numerous banknotes and coins currently contain marks enabling the blind and the partially sighted to distinguish between them. Does the Commission intend to take such people into account when it decides on what the banknotes and coins are to look like? These distinguishing marks are easy to incorporate in the design, and they cannot possibly hold up production.This is an opportunity to take account of one part of the population from the very start of the new currency. The 'Euro' must not lag behind national currencies.Answer given by Mr de Silguy on behalf of the Commission (12 March 1996)The Commission was in contact with blind and partially sighted people prior to drafting its Green Paper on the introduction of the single currency and is continuing to take account of their particular problems in planning the practical arrangements for the changeover to the euro.The European association representing the blind and partially sighted was thus invited to take part in the recent Round Table on the euro, which had the task of devising the communication strategy for the introduction of the single currency.The design of coins and banknotes is the responsibility of the Working Group of Mint Directors on the basis of a mandate from the Ecofin Council and the European Monetary Institute.The Commission has drawn the Working Group's attention and that of the EMI to this problem. To the best of its knowledge, the recommendations of the European association representing the blind and partially sighted have been taken into consideration and bilateral meetings have been organized.
96/128/EC: Commission Decision of 25 January 1996 approving the annual programme of measures submitted by the Greek Government in 1995 concerning the restructuring of the system for agricultural surveys in Greece (Only the Greek text is authentic)
Date: 1996-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Greece, agricultural performance, economic survey, statistics













EUR-Lex - 31996D0128 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31996D0128

96/128/EC: Commission Decision of 25 January 1996 approving the annual programme of measures submitted by the Greek Government in 1995 concerning the restructuring of the system for agricultural surveys in Greece (Only the Greek text is authentic)  


Official Journal L 029 , 07/02/1996 P. 0010 - 0010 





COMMISSION DECISION of 25 January 1996 approving the annual programme of measures submitted by the Greek Government in 1995 concerning the restructuring of the system for agricultural surveys in Greece (Only the Greek text is authentic) (96/128/EC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 85/360/EEC of 16 July 1985 concerning the restructuring of the system of agricultural surveys in Greece (1), as last amended by Decision 92/582/EEC (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,Whereas, according to Article 4 (1) of the aforementioned decision, the Greek Government presented the annual programme of measures which comprise:- the report on the experience gained during the implementation of the programme of the previous year (1994),- the programme of measures planned for the following year (1996);Whereas the programme submitted is such as to attain the objectives of organizing in Greece a system of surveys on agricultural matters which will satisfy Community requirements in respect of statistical information in this field;Whereas the measures provided for by this Decision comply with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics;Whereas the Community contribution to the expenditure scheduled for 1996 must take account of the limits stipulated in Decision 85/360/EEC (maximum contribution of ECU 20 million, or 50 % of the total cost of the programme),HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1 The annual programme of measures submitted in 1995 by the Greek Government is approved. The Community contribution for 1996 will be granted within the limits stipulated in Decision 85/360/EEC, taking account of payments already made and provided that the aims of the plan have been achieved.Article 2 This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.Done at Brussels, 25 January 1996.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 191, 23. 7. 1985, p. 53.(2) OJ No L 394, 31. 12. 1992, p. 28.