Statement of Assurance concerning activities financed from the general budget for the financial year 1994
Date: 1995-10-26
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU activity, auditing, balance sheet, budgetary control, financial year, general budget (EU)













EUR-Lex - 31995Y1230(07) - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31995Y1230(07)

Statement of Assurance concerning activities financed from the general budget for the financial year 1994  


Official Journal C 352 , 30/12/1995 P. 0005 - 0010 





Statement of Assurance concerning activities  financed from the general budget for the financial year 1994 NOTE TO THE READER The Statement of  Assurance (DAS) concerning the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the  underlying transactions which is set out in the following pages is based on a Special Report which  is annexed to the DAS and develops each of the points made in the statement in greater detail. Chapter 3 of the Special Report gives details of the audit results produced by the Court. Chapter 4 indicates which lessons may be learnt from the audit and lists the Court's main  recommendations.Statement of assurance concerning activities financed from the  general budget for the financial year 1994INTRODUCTORY REMARKSThe Court's mandate(Paragraph 1.3  of the attached report) 1. Pursuant to the Treaties (1), the Court of Auditors of the European  Communities (hereinafter referred to as 'the Court`) has examined the accounts and underlying  transactions for the financial year 1994 concerning activities financed from the European Union's  general budget so as to be able to submit to the European Parliament and the Council a Statement  of Assurance concerning the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of these  operations (2). The accounts and operations covered by the DAS(Paragraph 1.5 of the attached report) 2. The  accounts audited are those summarized in Volume IV (containing the consolidated revenue and  expenditure account and financial balance sheet, as well as the explanatory notes) of the documents  submitted by the Commission to the discharge authorities and, on 28 April 1995, to the Court of  Auditors (3). (Paragraph 1.7 of the attached report) 3. The DAS covers all of the accounts and all of the  underlying transactions, down to the level of final taxpayers and beneficiaries. The scope and limits of the DAS(Paragraph 1.9 of the attached report) 4. As required by the  Treaty, the DAS is global in nature: it is not intended to produce a specific assessment or arrive  at a quantified conclusion on any particular operational or geographical area of Community  activity. (Paragraph 1.10 of the attached report) 5. The DAS applies to the 1994 accounts as they stand at  present. The operations that come under the fields audited by the Court during the production of  the DAS are likely to be subjected to further verification by other authorities, on the basis of  current regulations, particularly during the clearance of the EAGGF-Guarantee accounts. (Paragraph 1.12 of the attached report) 6. Some checks made previously by other auditors have  brought to light cases of irregularity and anomalies which the Court cannot take over as they are,  in the context of the statistical method used for the DAS, but which it does take into account in  its final assessment, especially as regards the traditional own resources. (Paragraph 1.17 of the attached report) 7. The DAS itself contains no assessment of the degree of  compliance with the principles of sound financial management. This is something which the Court is  continuing to assess separately, as part of its other work, in particular in the context of its  annual and other special reports. (Paragraph 1.20 of the attached report) 8. Certain cases of deliberate irregularity to the  detriment of the Community finances cannot, by reason of their very nature, be detected by the  usual auditing procedures implemented in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The  Court is not therefore in a position to give any assurance concerning the non-existence of cases of  this type. (Paragraph 1.24 of the attached report) 9. Because of the macro-economic nature of the statistical  data on which the GNP and VAT own resources - which account for about 80 % of Community revenue -  are based, the Court has limited its examination to assessing the suitability of the procedures for  drawing up these data and guaranteeing their reliability. THE COURT'S DECLARATION(Paragraph 3.1 of the attached report 10. The Court is of the opinion  that: (i)the accounts as drawn up at 31 December 1994 accurately reflect the revenue and expenditure, as  well as the financial situation, of the Union; the informative value of these accounts should  however be improved in several important respects on which the Court has reservations; (ii)the Court's examination of the revenue entered in the accounts in respect of traditional own  resources did not reveal any significant errors; however, it is obviously not possible to give an  assurance that all chargeable imports have actually been declared and have yielded the  corresponding revenue; (iii)regarding the expenditure, there are too many errors in the transactions underlying the  payments entered in the accounts for the Court to be able to give a positive global assurance as to  their legality/regularity. Regarding the reliability of the accountThe consolidated revenue and expenditure  account(Paragraph 3.2 of the attached report) 11. The consolidated revenue and expenditure account  gives a true picture of the Union's revenue and expenditure, but nevertheless calls for the  following reservations. (Paragraph 3.3 of the attached report) 12. Due to actual out-turn for total revenue and  expenditure, the total volume of payments amounts to ECU 63 580,8 million instead of the ECU 60  304,8 million which appears in the revenue and expenditure account. (Paragraph 3.5 of the attached report) 13. The accounting information concerning the ECU 13 000  million of payments in 1994, which consist of advances/payments on account, is not separately  presented in Volume IV. (Paragraph 3.15 of the attached report) 14. EAGGF-Guarantee expenditure amounting to ECU 45,8  million is not included in the accounts for the financial year 1994 and the budgetary principle of  annuality was thus not observed. (Paragraph 3.18 of the attached report) 15. The revenue and expenditure account does not give a  fair view of the European Union's legal commitments at the close of the financial year 1994, since  certain accounting commitments no longer relate to legal obligations. The European Union's consolidated balance sheet(Paragraph 3.44 of the attached report) 16. The  European Union's consolidated balance sheet, the consolidation of which is the sole responsibility  of the Commission, gives a true picture of the Union's financial situation, but nevertheless calls  for the following reservations. The Commission's balance sheet(Paragraph 3.53 of the attached report) 17. The Court must express a  reservation regarding the value (ECU 254,2 million) entered in the Commission's balance sheet for  movable property located in Brussels and Luxembourg. (Paragraph 3.71 of the attached report) 18. The magnitude of the errors and problems detected in  the separate accounts concerning customs duties and agricultural levies does not allow the Court to  conclude that the figure of ECU some 577 million entered in the balance sheet is reliable. (Paragraph 3.74 of the attached report) 19. The claims on Member States connected with the  clearance of the EAGGF-Guarantee accounts for the financial years 1989 to 1991, amounting to ECU 2  000 million, are not shown in the accounts. (Paragraph 3.81 of the attached report) 20. Various potential European Union obligations, amounting  to at least ECU 88 000 million, are not shown in the financial balance sheet, or even in the  Annexes showing off-balance sheet commitments. The balance sheets of other Community institutions and bodies(Paragraph 3.92 of the attached  report) 21. The Court expresses reservations as to the value (ECU 121,1 million) of movable assets  entered in the respective balance sheets of several Community institutions and bodies. (Paragraph 3.96 of the attached report) 22. Neither the balance sheets, nor the notes to the  balance sheets, of the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Justice provide  information as to the existence of significant property or similar rights (ECU 292 million), or as  to property obligations (ECU 1 823 million). With regard to the legality/regularity of the underlying transactionsRevenue-related  transactions(Paragraph 3.101 of the attached report) 23. Regarding the traditional own resources,  the audits carried out on a sample of underlying transactions in the Member States did not uncover  any elements that might cast doubt on the legality and regularity of the corresponding revenue, or  which helped to uncover any substantial errors that were sufficiently significant to affect the  Community budget at the level of entitlements established and collected. Nevertheless, it must be  clear that the sample selected by the Court cannot be extracted from the whole of the population  concerned, since, obviously, no authority has a list of imports containing those not declared to  the customs authorities. The same problem arises above all in connection with taxes based on  declarations. This being the case, it is not possible to make any judgement as to the completeness  of the traditional own resources. (Paragraph 3.114 of the attached report) 24. The own resources based on VAT and GNP do not call for  any comments by the Court as far as the reliability of the calculations and the legality/regularity  of the procedures used to determine the basic data are concerned. Expenditure-related transactionsCases of expenditure in respect of which the Court cannot give an  assurance(Paragraph 3.122 of the attached report) 25. In several areas, representing about 14 % of  Community spending, the Court is unable to express an opinion. This unsatisfactory situation is  largely due either to the inadequacy of the information supplied to the Court or to the  unreliability of the systems in place for the management of the transactions the Court was required  to audit. As a result, in those cases where the Court observed errors, the extrapolated numerical  results given in this document may well underestimate the impact of these errors, since the  extrapolations were made on the supposition, in the auditee's own interest, that there were no  errors in the part of the budget on which the Court does not express an opinion. (Paragraphs 3.139 to 3.143 of the attached report) Errors affecting the legality/regularity of the  commitments entered into during the financial year(Paragraph 3.139 of the attached report) 26. The  Court's audit of the commitments did not uncover any serious substantial errors (4). (Paragraph 3.140 of the attached report) 27. The most likely cumulative volume of the transactions  affected by serious formal errors concerning commitments, of which there are few, and the direct  impact of which on the amounts chargeable to the budget cannot be quantified, is of the order of  ECU  720 million (5). (Paragraph 3.142 of the attached report) 28. These serious errors mainly affect the decision and  commitment rules (absence of compulsory prior decision or opinion). They originate within the  Community institutions. (Paragraphs 3.144 to 3.151 of the attached report) Errors affecting the legality/regularity of the  transactions underlying the payments(Paragraph 3.144 of the attached report) 29. The most probable  cumulative amount of the very numerous serious substantial errors concerning payments, which  resulted in the sums concerned being wrongly charged to the budget, is of the order of ECU 2 386  million. (Paragraph 3.146 of the attached report) 30. These serious substantial errors vary greatly and  particularly affect the eligibility of transactions for Community financing, the reality or  correctness of the expenditure financed, the accuracy of the way in which the Community  contribution was calculated and the quality of the supporting documents on which the payments were  based. They occurred in most cases at national administration level. Some concerned the Structural  Funds. In that case - where payments by the Commission consist of advances/payments on account -  the existence of errors at the level of the underlying transactions, in particular down to final  beneficiary level, does not necessarily mean that the payments by the Commission were themselves  incorrect at the time they were made. However, as such underlying transactions were financed with  European Union funds the general budget is affected by these errors. (Paragraph 3.148 of the attached report) 31. The most likely volume of transactions affected by the  numerous serious formal errors concerning payments is ECU 2 880 million. These errors are also  likely, in some cases, to have resulted in a loss to the Community budget, but their direct impact  on the sums chargeable to the budget is not itself quantifiable. (Paragraph 3.150 of the attached report) 32. These serious formal errors affect in particular the  authorizing procedures implemented by the authorizing officer and the Financial Controller, the  tendering procedures, and the beneficiaries' compliance with certain obligations. They originated  just as much at national administration level as at the Commission. This statement was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 25 and  26 October 1995.  For the Court of Auditors André J MIDDELHOEK President  (1) Article 188 C of the Treaty establishing the European  Community, Article 160C of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and Article  45C of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, as regards the transactions  under the ECSC's former administrative budget which were incorporated into the general budget by  the Merger Treaty of 8 April  1965.  (2) The EDF and the ECSC are the subject of separate statements of assurance.  (3) Documents SEC(95) 253 final, SEC(95) 254 final and SEC(95)255 final.  (4) An 'error` is considered to be any error in the crediting or charging of sums to the accounts  and any transaction which was not carried out in accordance with the applicable legal and  regulatory provisions. Substantial errors are those which have direct implications for the value of  the underlying transactions. Classification in the categories of 'serious` and 'less serious` is  made in the light of an analysis of the principles concerned and the facts observed (see paragraph  1.40 of the attached report).  (5) A 'formal error` is one which has no direct or measurable impact that is detrimental to the  Community budget (see paragraph 1.40 of the attached report).