Council Resolution of 6 December 1994 on the legal protection of the financial interests of the Communities
Date: 1994-12-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: cooperation in home affairs, customs fraud, financial interests of members, international criminal law, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, tax offence













EUR-Lex - 31994Y1214(01) - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31994Y1214(01)

Council Resolution of 6 December 1994 on the legal protection of the financial interests of the Communities  


Official Journal C 355 , 14/12/1994 P. 0002 - 0003 





COUNCIL RESOLUTION of 6 December 1994 on the legal protection of the financial interests of the Communities (94/C 355/02) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,  Having regard to the Treaty on European Union,  Having regard to the Council resolution of 13 November 1991 concerning the protection of the financial interests of the Communities (1), in which the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council,  stated that cooperation between the Member States in the prevention and combating of fraudulent practices by which harm is done to the financial interests of the Communities is enhanced by a compatibility of the norms in the legal and administrative  provisions of the Member States by which such conduct is sanctioned,  Taking into consideration the study of the relationship between Community law and national criminal law conducted in 1991 by the ad hoc Working Party on Community Law and National Criminal Law,  Taking into consideration the comparative study of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States applicable to fraud against the Community budget and the report of June 1994 from the Greek Presidency,  Having regard to the study on the systems of administrative and criminal penalties of the Member States and on the general principles applicable to Community penalties conducted by the Commission, and the proposal from the Commission for a Council  Regulation (EC, Euratom) on protection of the Communities' financial interests,  Having regard to the Council resolution of 29 November 1993 on the protection of the Community's financial interests, in which the Council stated that considering that, without prejudice to Community competence, the question of protection of the  financial interests of the Community must be examined also in the light of the cooperation introduced pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty, and that it considered it appropriate to examine the measures which should be taken to achieve a greater degree of  compatibility in the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States in the effort to combat fraud by which harm is done to the financial interests of the Community,  Having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the European Council at Corfu on 24 and 25 June 1994, in which it is stated that the European Council asked the Justice and Home Affairs Council to reach agreement on tackling the criminal aspects of fraud  and report back to its meeting at Essen in December 1994,  Having regard to the draft Council Decision on joint action on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty regarding the protection of the financial interests of the European Communities, presented by the United Kingdom,  Having regard to the draft from the Commission for a Council act establishing a convention for the protection of the Communities' financial interests,  Having regard to the reports of the Court of Auditors, and in particular its annual report concerning the financial year 1993 presented in November 1994,  Recalling that the Council has invited the European Parliament to give its views on the two abovementioned drafts:  1. RECOGNIZES afresh the need to protect the financial interests of the Communities, inter alia by criminal sanctions;  2. NOTES, in this connection, that criminal provisions protecting the Communities' financial interests already exist in many areas in the Member States; there are wide variations, however, as to what constitutes an offence and/or in legal consequences;  there are also gaps which may affect cooperation between Member States;  3. IS OF THE OPINION THAT, taking into account the existing distribution of responsibility between the Member States and the Communities, the criminal laws of the Member State should be made more compatible in the interest of effectively deterring and  combating criminal offences against the financial interest of the Communities, and of improving cooperation on criminal matters between the Member States;  4. CALLS UPON the Member States to ensure that the obligation arising out of Article 209a, first subparagraph, of the Treaty establishing the European Community is fully implemented;  5. WELCOMES efforts to strengthen the legal protection of the financial interests of the Communities by developing minimum standards of protection in Member States' criminal laws, and in this connection also to improve cooperation in combating fraud;  6. IS OF THE OPINION THAT a legal instrument should be established for the protection under national criminal law of the financial interests of the Communities;  7. REQUESTS the elaboration as soon as possible of such a legal instrument on the basis of the drafts from the United Kingdom for a joint action and from the Commission for a convention between Member States, taking into account, inter alia, the  following guiding principles:  (a) for the purposes of such an instrument, a definition of fraud should be drawn up. It should refer, subject to conditions and terms to be defined more closely, to intentional (2) acts or omissions, including at least incorrect statements and  concealment of facts in violation of duties of disclosure, resulting in damage to the budget of the Communities or to budgets managed by or on behalf of them, and involving, on the one hand, misappropriation, wrongful retention and misapplication of  funds, and, on the other hand, the wrongful diminution of revenues;  (b) each Member State should apply to such fraud appropriate sanctions which take into account the seriousness of the conduct concerned. At least serious fraud, for example where more than a certain amount of funds (to be defined) is involved, should be  regarded as criminal and imprisonable. So should attempting, assisting in or inducing the commission of such fraud;  (c) every Member State should be competent to prosecute relevant criminal offences committed in whole or in part within its territory. It should also be possible, in principle, for a Member State to prosecute one of its nationals who has committed a  relevant criminal offence wholly outside its territory but who is not extradited solely because of his nationality;  (d) where a relevant offence of fraud against the financial interests of the Communities involves two or more Member States, those States should cooperative effectively in relation to such an offence, for example through mutual assistance, extradition,  the transfer of criminal proceedings or the enforcement of foreign criminal sentences. The principle of 'ne bis in idem' shall apply;  (e) serious cases of fraud should be extradition offences. Mutual assistance and extradition should also be provided for regarding relevant offences as referred to in (a) involving violations of customs provisions and provisions concerning value added  tax;  (f) in addition to criminal sanctions against a natural person for a relevant criminal offence, it should also be possible, under conditions to be defined, to impose appropriate criminal or other sanctions on legal persons;  (g) Member States should take the same measures to punish fraud referred to in (a) involving officials of the European Communities as they take in respect of their own officials;  (h) Member States should take effective measures to punish bribery involving officials of the European Communities in relation to the financial interests of the Communities;  (i) Member States' laws concerning money laundering should also be extended to the protection of the Communities' financial interests.  (1) OJ No C 328, 17. 12. 1991, p. 1.  (2) The Commission is of the opinion that the scope of the instrument should in addition include gross negligence as provided by its draft.