Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/94 of 19 September 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of ball bearings with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 30 mm, originating in Thailand but exported to the Community from another country
Date: 1994-09-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Thailand, bearing, countervailing charge, import tax, re-export, third country













EUR-Lex - 31994R2271 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31994R2271

Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/94 of 19 September 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of ball bearings with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 30 mm, originating in Thailand but exported to the Community from another country  


Official Journal L 247 , 22/09/1994 P. 0001 - 0002 Finnish special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 33 P. 0004  Swedish special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 33 P. 0004  





COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2271/94 of 19 September 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of ball bearings with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 30 mm, originating in Thailand but  exported to the Community from another countryTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,  Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community (1), and in particular Articles 12 and 14 thereof,  Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consultation within the Advisory Committee,  Whereas:   A. Background  (1) In July 1993, the Council, by Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93 (2), imposed a definitive countervailing duty of 6,7 % on imports of ball bearings with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 30 mm, originating in Thailand but exported  to the Community from another country.  (2) This duty was imposed following a review of Commission Decision 90/266/EEC (3) accepting an undertaking offered by the Royal Thai Government, in connection with the countervailing duty proceeding concerning imports of the abovementioned ball  bearings. This involved the Royal Thai Government levying an export tax to offset the subsidies granted. No countervailing duty was imposed at the time of adoption of this Decision. The review investigation revealed, however, that a duty was necessary  in order to prevent indirect imports into the Community avoiding the export tax levied by the Royal Thai Government on direct imports and to safeguard the effectiveness of the undertaking.  (3) The definitive duty rate of 6,7 % was based on the revised rate of export tax of 0,91 baht per piece, as determined by Decision 93/381/EEC (4) following the above review.   B. Reopening of investigation  (4) In October 1993, the Commission initiated a review of Decision 93/381/EEC and Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (5).  (5) The purpose of this review was to examine the amount of subsidy granted by the Royal Thai Government, with a view to allowing a modification of the rate of export tax established by Decision 93/381/EEC, and to determine whether the subsidies granted  were still countervailable. Since the rate of countervailing duty on indirect imports directly reflects the export tax rate, the review also covers Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93 imposing the definitive duty.  (6) The Commission officially advised the Royal Thai Government, the exporters and importers known to be concerned, as well as the complainant in the original investigation (Febma) and gave the parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their  views known in writing and request a hearing. The Royal Thai Government, the exporters located in Thailand and the Community producers, represented by Febma, made their views known in writing.  (7) The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed to be necessary for the purposes of a determination and carried out an investigation at the premises of the following:  (a) Royal Thai Government:  Departement of Foreign Trade, Bangkok,  Board of Investment, Bangkok,  Department of Revenue, Bangkok.  (b) Thai exporters:  NBM Thai Ltd, Ayutthaya, Thailand,  Pelmec Thai Ltd, Bang Pa-In, Thailand,  NMB Hi-Tech Ltd, Bang Pa-In, Thailand.  All these exporting companies are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Minebea Co. Ltd, Japan.  (8) Upon request, parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the amendment to the rate of definitive countervailing duty. They were also granted a period within which to make  representations subsequent to the disclosure.  The written comments submitted by the parties were, where appropriate, taken into consideration.   C. Countervailability of subsidies and recalculation of subsidy amount  (9) The Commission has determined that the subsidies granted to the exporters in Thailand are still countervailable, and that the subsidy granted in the period 1 October 1992 to 30  September 1993 amounts to 0,72 baht per piece. The Council confirms these findings. The Royal Thai Government has accordingly amended the export tax rate on ball bearings exported directly to the Community to 0,72 baht per piece, and has offered a  modified version of the undertaking to this effect. This has been accepted by Commission Decision 94/639/EC (6), which also explains in detail the reasoning with regard to the countervailability and the calculation of the amount of subsidy.   D. Injury and Community interest  (10) No new evidence was supplied with regard to injury or Community interest. The Council therefore maintains its conclusions set out in Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93 concerning these matters.   E. Amendements to definitive duty  (11) In view of the change in the export tax rate from 0,91 to 0,72 baht per piece, the rate of definitive countervailing duty on indirect imports should be amended according to an amount equivalent to the new export  tax rate. When expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Community-frontier, price of product, the new rate of countervailing duty amounts to 5,3 %.   F. Collection of anti-dumping and countervailing duties  (12) As explained in recital (10) of Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93, the countervailing duty should continue to be collected in addition to the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No  2934/90 (7).  The combined amount of anti-dumping and countervailing duty to be collected in this case is, therefore, 12 % (6,7 % anti-dumping duty plus 5,3 % countervailing duty).  The basis for calculating the amount of both anti-dumping and countervailing duty should be the same net, free-at-Community-frontier, price of the product,  HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:  Article 1  Article 1 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1781/93 shall be replaced by the following:  '2. The countervailing duty expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Community-frontier, price of product, shall be 5,3 %'.  Article 2  This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.  This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.  Done at Brussels, 19 September 1994.  For the Council The President Th. WAIGEL (1) OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 522/94 (OJ No L 66, 10. 3. 1994, p. 10).  (2) OJ No L 163, 6. 7. 1993, p. 1.  (3) OJ No L 152, 16. 6. 1990, p. 59.  (4) OJ No L 163, 6. 7. 1993, p. 35.  (5) OJ No C 286, 22. 10. 1993, p. 6.  (6) See page 29 of this Official Journal.  (7) OJ No L 281, 12. 10. 1990, p. 1.