Council Regulation (EEC) No 2966/92 of 12 October 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 in respect of the definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of monosodium glutamate originating, inter alia, in Indonesia and the Republic of Korea
Date: 1992-10-12
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Indonesia, South Korea, chemical product, tariff exemption













EUR-Lex - 31992R2966 - EN






Avis juridique important




|



31992R2966

Council Regulation (EEC) No 2966/92 of 12 October 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 in respect of the definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of monosodium glutamate originating, inter alia, in Indonesia and the Republic of Korea  


Official Journal L 299 , 15/10/1992 P. 0001 - 0003 





COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2966/92  of 12 October 1992  amending Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 in respect of the definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of monosodium glutamate originating, inter alia, in Indonesia and the Republic of KoreaTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,  Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,  Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community (1), and in particular Article 14 thereof,  Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consultation within the Advisory Committee as provided for under the above Regulation,  Whereas:  A. Previous procedure  (1) In Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 (2), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of ECU 0,510 per kilogram and ECU 0,189 per kilogram on imports of monosodium glutamate originating, inter alia, in Indonesia and in the Republic of Korea  respectively, with the exception of imports from one Indonesian company and two companies in the Republic of Korea from which price undertakings were accepted by the Commission.  B. Review  (2) By a notice published on 5 November 1991 (3), the Commission, after consultation within the Advisory Committee and in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88, initiated a review of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 as it concerned three  Indonesian companies, PT Indomiwon Citra Inti, PT Cheil Samsung Astra and PT Miwon Indonesia and reopened the investigation.  (3) Having completed its investigation, the Commission disclosed its findings to the companies concerned, the details of which are set out in Decision 92/493/EEC (4). Price undertakings were subsequently offered by PT Indomiwon Citra Inti and PT Cheil  Samsung Astra in respect of their exports of monosodium glutamate to the Community. Having consulted the Advisory Committee, the Commission accepted these undertakings by Decision 92/493/EEC.  (4) As regards the situation of PT Miwon Indonesia, since this company had neither exported to the Community during the investigation period nor shown any firm intention to do so in the future, it should continue to be subject to the anti-dumping duty  at present in force concerning imports of monosodium glutamate originating in Indonesia.  C. Amendment of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 as a consequence of the review in respect of certain imports of the product concerned originating in Indonesia  (5) Accordingly, the Council considers it appropriate that Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 should be amended in order that PT Indomiwon Citra Inti and PT Cheil Samsung Astra be exempted from the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of monosodium  glutamate originating in Indonesia.  (6) The Community Industry concerned was informed of the main facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intended to recommend the amendment of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 and did not object to them.  (7) Since Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 has been only partially reviewed as regards certain imports of the product concerned originating in Indonesia, its validity is not prolonged in so far as Article 15 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 is concerned.  D. Amendment of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 in respect of certain imports of the product concerned originating in the Republic of Korea  (8) In May 1992 a company in the Republic of Korea, Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul, requested the Commission to correct a misspelling of the company's name in Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 in order to avoid problems faced by this company at the time of clearing its  exports of the product concerned through Community customs.  (9) By the same request, Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul, informed the Commission that it exports the product concerned to the Community through its fully controlled trading company, Miwon Trading and Shipping Co. Ltd. It also informed the Commission that since  Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 only excludes from the anti-dumping duty direct imports from Miwon Co. Ltd, imports of the product concerned produced by this company and exported by Miwon Trading and Shipping Co. Ltd were not considered by the custom  authorities in some Member States as direct imports subject to the said exclusion. Consequently, Miwon Co. Ltd has requested an amendment of the Regulation to take account of this situation.  (10) In support of its request, Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul, has submitted evidence that Miwon Trading and Shipping Co. Ltd is the trading company of Miwon Group to which they both belong, that there is a common management control of both companies and that  Miwon Trading and Shipping Co. Ltd exports to the Community exclusively monosodium glutamate produced by Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul. Furthermore, under the terms of the undertaking offered by Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul, and accepted by Commission Regulation (EEC)  No 547/90 (5), this company undertakes not to export either directly or indirectly through a subsidiary, a branch or an agent of the company below the minimum price agreed upon. Consequently, the price undertaking given by Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul, which  justifies the exemption from the anti-dumping duty, also covers exports to the Community of monosodium glutamate produced by this company and made by Miwon Trading and Shipping Co. Ltd.  (11) In these circumstances, the Council considers it appropriate that Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 be amended in order to bring it into line with the price undertaking given by Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul and to specify the correct name of this company.  (12) To ensure uniform application of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90, the amendment in respect of certain imports of the product concerned originating in the Republic of Korea should take effect as from 4 March 1990, the date on which Regulation (EEC) No  547/90, accepting undertakings in this proceeding, entered into force. The validity of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 is not, however, prolonged in so far as Article 15 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 is concerned,  HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:  Article 1  The first and second indents of Article 1 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/90 are hereby replaced by the following:  '- ECU 0,510 per kilogram for imports originating in Indonesia (Taric additional code 8400).  Direct imports from PT Sasa, Jakarta, PT Indomiwon Citra Inti and PT Cheil Samsung Astra shall be excluded from the duty (Taric additional code 8401),  - ECU 0,189 per kilogram for imports originating in the Republic of Korea (Taric additional code 8402).  Direct imports from Cheil Foods and Chemicals Inc., Seoul, Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul and imports produced by Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul and exported by Miwon Trading and Shipping Co. Ltd, Seoul, shall be excluded from the duty (Taric additional code 8403).'  Article 2  This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.  It shall apply with effect from 4 March 1990 as regards the exclusion from the definitive anti-dumping duty of imports produced by Miwon Co. Ltd, Seoul and exported by Miwon Trading and Shipping Co. Ltd, Seoul. This Regulation shall be binding in its  entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.  Done at Luxembourg, 12 October 1992. For the Council  The President  W. WALDEGRAVE   (1) OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 167, 30. 6. 1990, p. 1. (3) OJ No C 287, 5. 11. 1991, p. 5. (4) See page 40 of this Official Journal. (5) OJ No L 56, 3. 3. 1990, p. 23.