type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 EVROPSKÁ KOMISE
 V Bruselu dne 11.9.2019
 COM(2019) 410 final
 2019/0191(NLE)
 Návrh
 ROZHODNUTÍ RADY
 o postoji, který má být jménem Evropské unie zaujat v Generální radě Světové obchodní organizace k přijetí rozhodnutí o prodloužení výjimky WTO umožňující rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat preferenční sazební zacházení pro produkty z nejméně rozvinutých zemí
 DŮVODOVÁ ZPRÁVA
 1.Předmět návrhu
 Tento návrh se týká rozhodnutí o postoji, který má být jménem Unie zaujat v Generální radě Světové obchodní organizace (dále jen „WTO“) v souvislosti se zamýšleným přijetím rozhodnutí o prodloužení výjimky WTO umožňující rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat preferenční sazební zacházení pro nejméně rozvinuté země.
 2.Souvislosti návrhu
 2.1.Dohoda o zřízení Světové obchodní organizace z Marrákeše
 Dohoda o zřízení Světové obchodní organizace z Marrákeše (dále jen „Dohoda o WTO“) vstoupila v platnost dne 1. ledna 1995.
 Evropská unie je smluvní stranou této dohody.
 2.2.Konference ministrů a Generální rada Světové obchodní organizace
 Podle čl. IV odst. 1 Dohody o WTO je Konference ministrů oprávněna přijímat rozhodnutí ve všech otázkách vztahujících se ke všem mnohostranným obchodním dohodám.
 Podle čl. IV odst. 2 Dohody o WTO vykonává v období mezi zasedáními Konference ministrů její funkce Generální rada.
 Podle čl. IX odst. 1 přijímá WTO obvykle rozhodnutí cestou konsensu.
 2.3.Zamýšlený akt Generální rady WTO
 Podle čl. IX odst. 3 Dohody o WTO může být člen za výjimečných okolností zproštěn některého ze závazků.
 V návaznosti na žádost Chile, Číny, Indie, Thajska a Turecka (dále jen „spolupředkladatelé“) má Generální rada WTO v souladu s čl. IX odst. 3 a 4 Dohody o WTO přijmout rozhodnutí o prodloužení platnosti stávající výjimky umožňující rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat preferenční sazební zacházení pro nejméně rozvinuté země (dále jen „zamýšlený akt“).
 Platnost stávající výjimky pro nejméně rozvinuté země skončila dne 30. června 2019. Účelem zamýšleného aktu je proto prodloužit platnost výjimky na období od 1. července 2019 do 30. června 2029.
 Zamýšlený akt se stane závazným pro členy WTO v souladu s čl. IX odst. 3, jakož i s čl. II odst. 2 Dohody o WTO, který stanoví: „Dohody a související právní nástroje, zahrnuté do příloh 1, 2 a 3 [...], tvoří nedílnou součást této Dohody a jsou závazné pro všechny Členy“.
 3.Postoj, který má být zaujat jménem Unie
 Spolupředkladatelé požádali o prodloužení stávající výjimky WTO z jejich závazků podle čl. I odst. 1 GATT 1994 umožňující rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat od 1. července 2019 do 30. června 2029 preferenční sazební zacházení produktům z nejméně rozvinutých zemí, které jako takové označila Organizace spojených národů, aniž by se tyto celní sazby musely rozšířit na obdobné produkty z jiných členských zemí.
 Spolupředkladatelé předložili žádost podle čl. IX odst. 3 a 4 Dohody o WTO. Žádost odůvodnili obzvláštní zranitelností nejméně rozvinutých zemí a specifickými strukturálními obtížemi, s nimiž se tyto země potýkají v globální ekonomice, jakož i tím, že je důležité zlepšit jejich účinné zapojení do mnohostranného obchodního systému díky poskytnutí smysluplného přístupu na trh, který podpoří diverzifikaci jejich výrobní a vývozní základny.
 Půjde o druhé prodloužení výjimky pro preferenční sazební zacházení pro nejméně rozvinuté země, která byla poprvé poskytnuta dne 15. června 1999 do 30. června 2009
 1
 a poté byla dne 27. května 2009 prodloužena do 30. června 2019
 2
 .
 Prodloužení výjimky by nemělo nepříznivý vliv ani na ekonomiku Unie, ani na obchodní vztahy se zeměmi využívajícími tuto výjimku. Unie poskytuje nejméně rozvinutým zemím plný bezcelní a bezkvótový přístup prostřednictvím své iniciativy „Vše kromě zbraní“ a podporuje úsilí ostatních členů WTO, včetně rozvojových zemí, o poskytování preferenčního sazebního zacházení pro nejméně rozvinuté země. Unie se dále domnívá, že k tomu, aby rozvojové země mohly toto preferenční zacházení poskytovat, je nezbytný právní nástroj, jelikož zmocňovací ustanovení WTO umožňuje poskytování pouze rozvinutým členským zemím.
 4.Právní základ
 4.1.Procesněprávní základ
 4.1.1.Zásady
 Ustanovení čl. 218 odst. 9 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie (SFEU) zavádí rozhodnutí, kterými se stanoví „postoje, které mají být jménem Unie zaujaty v orgánu zřízeném dohodou, má-li tento orgán přijímat akty s právními účinky, s výjimkou aktů, které doplňují nebo pozměňují institucionální rámec dohody“.
 Pojem „akty s právními účinky“ zahrnuje akty, které mají právní účinky na základě pravidel mezinárodního práva, kterým se dotyčný orgán řídí. Zahrnuje rovněž nástroje, které podle mezinárodního práva nemají závazný účinek, ale „mohou rozhodujícím způsobem ovlivnit obsah právní úpravy přijaté zákonodárcem Unie“
 3
 .
 4.1.2.Uplatnění v tomto konkrétním případě
 Generální rada WTO je orgán zřízený dohodou, konkrétně Dohodou o WTO.
 Akt, který má Generální rada přijmout, představuje akt s právními účinky. Zamýšlený akt bude závazným podle mezinárodního práva v souladu s čl. II odst. 2 a čl. IX odst. 3 Dohody o WTO.
 Zamýšlený akt nedoplňuje ani nepozměňuje institucionální rámec dohody.
 Procesněprávním základem navrhovaného rozhodnutí je tudíž čl. 218 odst. 9 SFEU.
 4.2.Hmotněprávní základ
 4.2.1.Zásady
 Hmotněprávní základ rozhodnutí podle čl. 218 odst. 9 SFEU závisí v první řadě na cíli a obsahu zamýšleného aktu, k němuž se zaujímá postoj jménem Unie. Sleduje‐li zamýšlený akt dvojí účel nebo má-li dvě složky a lze‐li jeden z těchto účelů nebo jednu z těchto složek identifikovat jako hlavní, zatímco druhý účel či druhá složka je pouze vedlejší, musí být rozhodnutí přijaté podle čl. 218 odst. 9 SFEU založeno na jediném hmotněprávním základu, a sice na tom, který si žádá hlavní nebo převažující účel či složka.
 4.2.2.Uplatnění v tomto konkrétním případě
 Hlavní cíl a obsah zamýšleného aktu se týkají společné obchodní politiky.
 Hmotněprávním základem navrhovaného rozhodnutí je tudíž čl. 207 odst. 4 první pododstavec SFEU.
 4.3.Závěr
 Právním základem navrhovaného rozhodnutí by měl být čl. 207 odst. 4 první pododstavec ve spojení s čl. 218 odst. 9 SFEU.
 5.Zveřejnění zamýšleného aktu
 Jelikož tento akt Generální rady WTO bude provádět ustanovení dohody o WTO s ohledem na výjimky, je vhodné jej po přijetí zveřejnit v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie.
 2019/0191 (NLE)
 Návrh
 ROZHODNUTÍ RADY
 o postoji, který má být jménem Evropské unie zaujat v Generální radě Světové obchodní organizace k přijetí rozhodnutí o prodloužení výjimky WTO umožňující rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat preferenční sazební zacházení pro produkty z nejméně rozvinutých zemí
 RADA EVROPSKÉ UNIE,
 s ohledem na Smlouvu o fungování Evropské unie, a zejména na čl. 207 odst. 4 první pododstavec ve spojení s čl. 218 odst. 9 této smlouvy,
 s ohledem na návrh Evropské komise,
 vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
 (1)Dohoda o zřízení Světové obchodní organizace z Marrákeše (dále jen „Dohoda o WTO“) vstoupila v platnost dne 1. ledna 1995.
 (2)Podle čl. II odst. 2 Dohody o WTO „[d]ohody a související právní nástroje, zahrnuté do příloh 1, 2 a 3 (dále uváděné jako „Mnohostranné obchodní dohody“), tvoří nedílnou součást této Dohody a jsou závazné pro všechny Členy“.
 (3)Podle čl. IX odst. 3 může za výjimečných okolností Konference ministrů rozhodnout o zproštění člena některého ze závazků, které mu jsou uloženy Dohodou o WTO nebo některou z mnohostranných obchodních dohod.
 (4)V čl. IX odst. 3 a 4 Dohody o WTO jsou stanoveny postupy pro poskytování výjimek týkajících se mnohostranných obchodních dohod uvedených v přílohách 1A, 1B nebo 1C Dohody o WTO a přílohách těchto dohod.
 (5)Podle čl. IV odst. 1 Dohody o WTO je Konference ministrů oprávněna přijímat rozhodnutí ve všech otázkách vztahujících se ke všem mnohostranným obchodním dohodám.
 (6)Podle čl. IV odst. 2 Dohody o WTO vykonává v období mezi zasedáními Konference ministrů WTO její funkce Generální rada. Podle čl. IX odst. 1 přijímá WTO obvykle rozhodnutí cestou konsensu.
 (7)Dne 15. června 1999 členové WTO udělili zproštění závazků podle čl. I odst. 1 GATT 1994 v nezbytném rozsahu, aby bylo možné rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat do 30. června 2009 preferenční sazební zacházení pro produkty z nejméně rozvinutých zemí, které jako takové označila Organizace spojených národů, aniž by se tyto celní sazby musely rozšířit na obdobné produkty. Dne 27. května 2009 rozšířili členové WTO tuto výjimku na období od 1. července 2009 do 30. června 2019.
 (8)V souladu s čl. IX odst. 3 a 4 Dohody o WTO předložily Chile, Čína, Indie, Thajsko a Turecko (dále jen „spolupředkladatelé“) žádost, aby Generální rada přijala rozhodnutí o prodloužení stávající výjimky WTO umožňující rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat od 1. července 2019 do 30. června 2029 preferenční sazební zacházení pro produkty z nejméně rozvinutých zemí.
 (9)Spolupředkladatelé žádost odůvodnili obzvláštní zranitelností nejméně rozvinutých zemí a specifickými strukturálními obtížemi, s nimiž se tyto země potýkají v globální ekonomice, jakož i tím, že je důležité zlepšit jejich účinné zapojení do mnohostranného obchodního systému díky poskytnutí smysluplného přístupu na trh, který podpoří diverzifikaci jejich výrobní a vývozní základny.
 (10)Prodloužení výjimky by nemělo nepříznivý vliv ani na ekonomiku Unie, ani na její obchodní vztahy se zeměmi využívajícími tuto výjimku. Unie navíc poskytuje nejméně rozvinutým zemím bezcelní a bezkvótový přístup na trh v rámci režimu „Vše kromě zbraní“ a podporuje ostatní členy WTO, kteří nejméně rozvinutým zemím rovněž poskytují obchodní preference.
 (11)Je vhodné stanovit postoj, který má Evropská komise jménem Unie zaujmout v Generální radě WTO na podporu žádosti spolupředkladatelů o prodloužení výjimky v souladu s čl. 218 odst. 9 SFEU, jelikož prodloužení výjimky bude pro členy WTO závazné,
 PŘIJALA TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:
 Článek 1
 Postojem, který má Evropská komise zaujmout jménem Unie v Generální radě Světové obchodní organizace, je podpořit prodloužení výjimky WTO umožňující rozvojovým členským zemím poskytovat od 1. července 2019 do 30. června 2029 preferenční sazební zacházení produktům pocházejícím z nejméně rozvinutých zemí.
 Článek 2
 Toto rozhodnutí je určeno Komisi.
 V Bruselu dne
 Za Radu
 předseda/předsedkyně
 (1)
 WT/L/304.
 (2)
 WT/L/759.
 (3)
 Rozsudek Soudního dvora ze dne 7. října 2014, Německo v. Rada, C-399/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2258, body 61 až 64.


type: other

text:
RICHIEDI CONSULENZA SU QUESTO ARGOMENTO 1. I termini processuali sono stabiliti a ore, a giorni, a mesi o ad anni.
 3. Il termine stabilito a giorni, il quale scade in giorno festivo, è prorogato di diritto al giorno successivo non festivo.
 4. Salvo che la legge disponga altrimenti, nel termine non si computa l’ora o il giorno in cui ne è iniziata la decorrenza; si computa l’ultima ora o l’ultimo giorno.
 5. Quando è stabilito soltanto il momento finale, le unità di tempo stabilite per il termine si computano intere e libere.
 6. Il termine per fare dichiarazioni, depositare documenti o compiere altri atti in un ufficio giudiziario si considera scaduto nel momento in cui, secondo i regolamenti, l’ufficio viene chiuso al pubblico.
 Giurisprudenza annotataRegole generali
 In materia di termini processuali stabiliti a giorni, la proroga prevista dall'art. 172, comma 3, c.p.p. con riferimento ai giorni festivi riguarda esclusivamente la scadenza dei termini stessi e non anche l'inizio della loro decorrenza, che dunque non è prorogata di diritto nell'ipotesi in cui il primo giorno sia festivo. (Fattispecie, in tema di appello, in cui il primo giorno di decorrenza del termine per proporre impugnazione era festivo). (Rigetta, App. L'Aquila, 01/03/2013 )
 Cassazione penale sez. II 14 maggio 2014 n. 24277 In tema di turbative nello svolgimento di manifestazioni sportive, il termine massimo di 96 ore per la convalida del provvedimento del questore, impositivo dell'obbligo di presentazione all'autorità di p.s. decorre dall'ora della notificazione e non è soggetto alla proroga di diritto prevista dall'art. 172, comma 3, c.p.p. per i termini stabiliti a giorni che scadono in giorno festivo. (Annulla senza rinvio, G.i.p. Trib. Napoli, 22/03/2013)
 Cassazione penale sez. III 20 febbraio 2014 n. 17288 Il termine stabilito per il deposito delle liste testimoniali è computato in giorni interi e liberi e dunque allo stesso non si applica la proroga automatica del termine che scade in un giorno festivo stabilito dal comma terzo dell'art. 172 c.p.p. Rigetta, App. Bari, 03/05/2011
 Cassazione penale sez. V 30 novembre 2012 n. 1139 In tema di decorrenza dei termini di custodia cautelare, la previsione di cui all'art. 297, comma primo, cod. proc. pen. - per la quale gli effetti della custodia cautelare decorrono dal momento della cattura, dell'arresto o del fermo - deroga alla disciplina generale che prevede la non computabilità del "dies a quo" (art. 14, comma secondo, cod. pen. e 172, comma quarto, cod. proc. pen.). Annulla senza rinvio, Trib. lib. Napoli, 13/01/2012
 Cassazione penale sez. VI 23 maggio 2012 n. 22035 In tema di computo dei termini processuali, la regola posta dall'art. 172, comma 3, c.p.p., secondo cui il termine stabilito a giorni, che cade in giorno festivo, è prorogato di diritto al giorno successivo non festivo, si applica anche agli atti e ai provvedimenti del giudice, e si riferisce, pertanto, anche al termine per la redazione della sentenza.
 Cassazione penale sez. un. 29 settembre 2011 n. 155 La regola per cui il termine stabilito a giorni, il quale scade in giorno festivo, è prorogato di diritto al giorno successivo non festivo, posta nello specifico dall'art. 172, comma 3, c.p.p., si applica anche agli atti e ai provvedimenti del giudice, e si riferisce perciò anche al termine per la redazione della sentenza.
 Cassazione penale sez. un. 29 settembre 2011 n. 155 In materia di termini processuali stabiliti a giorni, la proroga prevista dall'art. 172, comma terzo, cod. proc. pen. con riferimento ai giorni festivi riguarda esclusivamente la scadenza dei termini stessi, e non anche l'inizio della loro decorrenza, la quale dunque non è prorogata di diritto anche quando debba essere riferita, in concreto, ad un giorno festivo. Rigetta, App. Campobasso, 8 Maggio 2008
 Cassazione penale sez. III 19 novembre 2008 n. 133 Art. precedente
 Equitalia a rate: ora si paga al tabacchino con Lottomatica e SisalParenti e affini: qual è la differenza e quali sono i gradi?Lesione del diritto all’immagine: quando, come, perchéStudi di settore: per l’accertamento, lo sforamento dalle medie non basta Cosa è l’adempimento di un’obbligazione?
 La previdenza facileTra moglie e maritoIl caffè sospesoLa famiglia oltre il conflittoSOS Consumatori UTILIZZO DEI COOKIES


type: contracts

text:
 25.6.2009
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 162/20
 DECISIONE DEL COMITATO MISTO SEE
 N. 43/2009
 del 24 aprile 2009
 che modifica l’allegato II (Regolamentazioni tecniche, norme, prove e certificazioni) dell’accordo SEE
 IL COMITATO MISTO SEE,
 visto l’accordo sullo Spazio economico europeo, modificato dal protocollo che adegua l’accordo sullo Spazio economico europeo, di seguito denominato «l’accordo», in particolare l’articolo 98,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 L’allegato II dell’accordo è stato modificato dalla decisione del Comitato misto SEE n. 96/2008 del 26 settembre 2008 (1).
 (2)
 Occorre integrare nell’accordo il regolamento (CE) n. 692/2008 della Commissione, del 18 luglio 2008, recante attuazione e modifica del regolamento (CE) n. 715/2007 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio relativo all’omologazione dei veicoli a motore riguardo alle emissioni dai veicoli passeggeri e commerciali leggeri (5 EUR e 6 EUR) e all’ottenimento di informazioni per la riparazione e la manutenzione del veicolo (2).
 (3)
 Occorre integrare nell’accordo la direttiva 2008/89/CE della Commissione, del 24 settembre 2008, che modifica, per adeguarla al progresso tecnico, la direttiva 76/756/CEE del Consiglio concernente l’installazione dei dispositivi di illuminazione e di segnalazione luminosa dei veicoli a motore e dei loro rimorchi (3),
 DECIDE:
 Articolo 1
 Il capitolo I dell’allegato II dell’accordo è modificato come segue:
 1)
 al punto 21 (Direttiva 76/756/CEE del Consiglio) viene aggiunto il seguente trattino:
 «—
 32008 L 0089: Direttiva 2008/89/CE della Commissione, del 24 settembre 2008 (GU L 257 del 25.9.2008, pag. 14).»;
 2)
 al punto 45zt [Regolamento (CE) n. 715/2007 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio] viene aggiunto il testo seguente:
 «, modificato da:
 —
 32008 R 0692: Regolamento (CE) n. 692/2008 della Commissione, del 18 luglio 2008 (GU L 199 del 28.7.2008, pag. 1).»;
 3)
 dopo il punto 45zt [Regolamento (CE) n. 715/2007 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio] viene aggiunto il punto seguente:
 «45zu.
 32008 R 0692: Regolamento (CE) n. 692/2008 della Commissione, del 18 luglio 2008, recante attuazione e modifica del regolamento (CE) n. 715/2007 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio relativo all’omologazione dei veicoli a motore riguardo alle emissioni dai veicoli passeggeri e commerciali leggeri (5 EUR e 6 EUR) e all’ottenimento di informazioni per la riparazione e la manutenzione del veicolo (GU L 199 del 28.7.2008, pag. 1).
 Ai fini del presente accordo le disposizioni del regolamento si intendono adattate come di seguito:
 Al punto 3.2 dell’allegato XIII viene aggiunto il testo seguente:
 «IS per l’Islanda
 FL per il Liechtenstein
 16 per la Norvegia».»
 Articolo 2
 I testi del regolamento (CE) n. 692/2008 e della direttiva 2008/89/CE nelle lingue islandese e norvegese, da pubblicare nel supplemento SEE della Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea, fanno fede.
 Articolo 3
 La presente decisione entra in vigore il 25 aprile 2009, a condizione che al Comitato misto SEE siano pervenute tutte le notifiche previste dall’articolo 103, paragrafo 1, dell’accordo (4).
 Articolo 4
 La presente decisione è pubblicata nella sezione SEE e nel supplemento SEE della Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 24 aprile 2009.
 Per il Comitato misto SEE
 Il presidente
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) GU L 309 del 20.11.2008, pag. 15.
 (2) GU L 199 del 28.7.2008, pag. 1.
 (3) GU L 257 del 25.9.2008, pag. 14.
 (4) Non è stata comunicata l’esistenza di obblighi costituzionali.


type: wikipedia

text:
Adralés (en asturiano y oficialmente Adralés) es una parroquia del concejo de Cangas del Narcea, en el Principado de Asturias (España). Alberga una población de 124 habitantes (INE 2013) en 40 viviendas. Ocupa una extensión de 3,46 km2.
 Está situada en la zona centro-norte del concejo, a 3 km de la capital, Cangas del Narcea. Limita al norte con la parroquia de Santa Marina / Obanca; al este, con las de Corias y Cangas del Narcea; al sureste, con la de Cueras / Santolaya; al suroeste, con la de La Regla de Perandones / La Riela; y al oeste, con la de Trones.
 El primer recurso de la parroquia fue siempre la ganadería. Debido a la cercanía de la villa de Cangas del Narcea, los agricultores de Adralés siempre estuvieron presentes en los mercados de la villa y podían suministrar incluso leche, mientras los demás pueblos de concejo solo producían ganado para la carne ya que no se podía transportar ni conservar la leche. Hoy en día la mayor parte de la población de Adralés son agricultores jubilados o jóvenes que trabajan en Cangas.
 En siglos pasados había habido una gran emigración a Cuba y también a las Filipinas, de hecho el apellido "Adrales" es bastante frecuente en las Filipinas y tiene su origen en esta parroquia asturiana.
 Durante todo el y hasta los años setenta del Adralés perdía la mayor parte de su población por el fenómeno de la emigración. La mayor parte de los emigrantes de Adralés se dirigían a Madrid como serenos. Un considerable número emigró a la Argentina y a Venezuela, mientras en la década de los sesenta y setenta casi todas las casas del pueblo tenían a alguno de sus miembros en Suiza.
 Localidades
 Según el nomenclátor de 2013 la parroquia está formada por las poblaciones de:
 Alto de Santarbás (oficialmente, en asturiano, L'Altu Santarvás) (casería): 8 habitantes.
 Adralés (aldea): 56 habitantes.
 Villar de Adralés (Villar d'Adralés) (lugar): 60 habitantes.
 Referencias
 Parroquias de Cangas del Narcea


text:
 18.7.2013
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 195/20
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) NR 683/2013
 z dnia 17 lipca 2013 r.
 ustanawiające standardowe wartości w przywozie dla ustalania ceny wejścia niektórych owoców i warzyw
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1234/2007 z dnia 22 października 2007 r. ustanawiające wspólną organizację rynków rolnych oraz przepisy szczegółowe dotyczące niektórych produktów rolnych („rozporządzenie o jednolitej wspólnej organizacji rynku”) (1),
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) nr 543/2011 z dnia 7 czerwca 2011 r. ustanawiające szczegółowe zasady stosowania rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 1234/2007 w odniesieniu do sektorów owoców i warzyw oraz przetworzonych owoców i warzyw (2), w szczególności jego art. 136 ust. 1,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Rozporządzenie wykonawcze (UE) nr 543/2011 przewiduje – zgodnie z wynikami wielostronnych negocjacji handlowych Rundy Urugwajskiej – kryteria, na których podstawie ustalania Komisja ustala standardowe wartości dla przywozu z państw trzecich, w odniesieniu do produktów i okresów określonych w części A załącznika XVI do wspomnianego rozporządzenia.
 (2)
 Standardowa wartość w przywozie jest obliczana każdego dnia roboczego, zgodne z art. 136 ust. 1 rozporządzenia wykonawczego (UE) nr 543/2011, przy uwzględnieniu podlegających zmianom danych dziennych. Niniejsze rozporządzenie powinno zatem wejść w życie z dniem jego opublikowania w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 Standardowe wartości celne w przywozie, o których mowa w art. 136 rozporządzenia wykonawczego (UE) nr 543/2011, są ustalone w załączniku do niniejszego rozporządzenia.
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie z dniem jego opublikowania w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 17 lipca 2013 r.
 W imieniu Komisji, za Przewodniczącego,
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Dyrektor Generalny ds. Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich
 (1) Dz.U. L 299 z 16.11.2007, s. 1.
 (2) Dz.U. L 157 z 15.6.2011, s. 1.
 ZAŁĄCZNIK
 Standardowe wartości w przywozie dla ustalania ceny wejścia niektórych owoców i warzyw
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Kod CN
 Kod państw trzecich (1)
 Standardowa wartość w przywozie
 0702 00 00
 MK
 18,5
 ZZ
 18,5
 0707 00 05
 TR
 105,8
 ZZ
 105,8
 0709 93 10
 MA
 60,4
 TR
 133,2
 ZZ
 96,8
 0805 50 10
 AR
 80,6
 CL
 81,7
 TR
 70,0
 UY
 78,3
 ZA
 93,6
 ZZ
 80,8
 0808 10 80
 AR
 148,8
 BR
 112,7
 CL
 128,9
 CN
 95,9
 NZ
 143,3
 US
 157,7
 ZA
 123,1
 ZZ
 130,1
 0808 30 90
 AR
 127,0
 CL
 140,0
 CN
 70,6
 NZ
 159,4
 TR
 174,5
 ZA
 133,8
 ZZ
 134,2
 0809 10 00
 TR
 191,0
 ZZ
 191,0
 0809 29 00
 TR
 328,0
 ZZ
 328,0
 0809 30
 TR
 184,5
 ZZ
 184,5
 0809 40 05
 BA
 137,2
 MK
 99,6
 XS
 103,8
 ZZ
 113,5
 (1) Nomenklatura krajów ustalona w rozporządzeniu Komisji (WE) nr 1833/2006 (Dz.U. L 354 z 14.12.2006, s. 19). Kod „ZZ” odpowiada „innym pochodzeniom”.


type: caselaw

text:
 21.8.2017
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 C 277/31
 Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali 29 ta’ Ġunju 2017 – EUIPO vs Hotel Cipriani (CIPRIANI)
 (Kawża T-343/14) (1)
 ([“Trade mark tal-Unjoni Ewropea - Proċedimenti għal dikjarazzjoni ta’ invalidità - Trade mark verbali tal-Unjoni Ewropea CIPRIANI - Assenza ta’ mala fide - Artikolu 52(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009 - Assenza ta’ ksur ta’ dritt għal isem ta’ persuna magħrufa - Artikolu 53(2)(a) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009”])
 (2017/C 277/45)
 Lingwa tal-kawża: l-Ingliż
 Partijiet
 Rikorrent: Arrigo Cipriani (Venezia, l-Italja)(rappreżentanti: A. Vanzetti, G. Sironi u S. Bergia,)
 Konvenut: L-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea (rappreżentant: J. Crespo Carrillo, aġent)
 Parti oħra fil-proċedimenti quddiem il-Bord tal-Appell tal-EUIPO, intervenjenti quddiem il-Qorti Ġenerali: Hotel Cipriani Srl (Venezia) (rappreżentanti: inizjalment C. Hoole, solicitor, sussegwentement T. Alkin, B. Brandreth, barristers, W. Sander, P. Cantrill, M. Pearce, A. Hall u A. Ward, solicitors, u finalment B. Brandreth, barrister, A. Poulter u P. Brownlow, solicitors)
 Suġġett
 Rikors ippreżentat kontra d-deċiżjoni tar-Raba’ Bord tal-Appell tal-EUIPO, tal-14 ta’ Marzu 2014 (Każ R 224/2012-4), dwar proċedimenti għal dikjarazzjoni ta’ invalidità bejn A. Cipriani u Hotel Cipriani.
 Dispożittiv
 1)
 Ir-rikors huwa miċħud
 2)
 Arrigo Cipriani għandu jbati l-ispejjeż tiegħu kif ukoll dawk sostnuti mill-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea (EUIPO) u dawk ta’ Hotel Cipriani Srl.
 (1) ĠU C 261, 11.8.2014.


text:
Ochranné pásmo hradu Lipnice | Tajemnící obecních úřadů | Kraj Vysočina
 Ochranné pásmo hradu Lipnice
 Okresní národní výbor – odbor kultury – Havlíčkův Brod
 Č. j.: kult/1264/88 V Havlíčkově Brodě dne 26. 10. 1988
 Okresní národní výbor v Havlíčkově Brodě, odbor kultury vydává toto
 V dohodě s dotčenými úřady a orgány a po dohodě s odborem výstavby okresního národního výboru se podle § 33, odst. 2 zákona č. 50/1976 Sb., o územním plánování a stavebním řádu a podle § 17 odst. 1 zákona 20/1987 Sb., o státní památkové péči určuje ochranné pásmo pro státní hrad Lipnici – nemovitou kulturní památku zapsanou ve Státním seznamu nemovitých kulturních památek pod rejstříkovým číslem 279.
 Rozsah ochranného pásma se v souladu s vyhláškou č. 66/1988 o státní památkové péči vymezuje takto:
 na severu hranice ochranného pásma
 jde po vnějším okraji parcel k. ú. Volichov č. 472/1 (silnice), 77, 78, kolmo překračuje parcelu č. 43, jde po vnějším okraji parcel č. 43, 81/1, 80/5, 82, 83, 85/1, k. ú. Lipnice č. 486 (potok), 2122/2 (silnice), 2123 (cesta), 391/11, 2115 (cesta), 2113/1 (silnice), k. ú. Dolní Město č. 3127/4 (silnice)
 jde po vnějším okraji parcel k. ú. Dolní Město č. 3200, kolmo překračuje p. č. 3178, jde po vnějším okraji parcel č. 3199, kolmo překračuje p. č. 3181, jde po vnějším okraji parcel č. 3198 (silnice), 786/1, 785/1, 787, k. ú. Lipnice 2026, 2224 (potok), 1995/1, 2230, 1995/2, 2113/2, 1994/4, 2230, 1994/3, 1994/1, 1994/2, 2226 (Kejžlický potok)
 jde po vnějším okraji parcel k. ú. Lipnice č. 1547, 1521/1, 1518, 1517/2, 1516, 2181, 2180, 1497, 1488/1, 1488/3, 1488/2, 2179 (cesta), 1410/3, 1410/2, 2178, 1231/1, 2177, 2176, 1218/1, 1218/6, 1218/7, 1218/11, 12,13,14,15,16, 1217/9,10,11,12,1,8, ST 502, 1217/15,7,6, 1209, 2173, 2172, 1164/3, 1164/1, 1161, 2170/2
 jde po vnějším okraji parcel k. ú. Lipnice č. 1158/1, 1137, 1156, 1142, 2168, 1150, 2168, 1151/2, 1142, 1140, 1142, 1114, 2167, 1105, 1082, 1081/1 (hranice katastru), 2144, 2143, 2142, (cesty), k. ú. Volichov č. 435 (cesta), kolmo překračuje p. č. 438, jde po vnějším okraji parcel č. 439 (cesta), 440/1 (cesta), k výchozí parcele č. 427/1.
 Hranice ochranného pásma je vyznačená v kopii pozemkové mapy, která je neoddělitelnou součástí tohoto rozhodnutí.
 Rozhodnutí o zřízení ochranného pásma včetně grafické přílohy s vyznačenou hranicí jsou uloženy u:
 - odboru kultury ONV v Havlíčkově Brodě
 - odboru výstavby a územního plánování ONV v Havlíčkově Brodě
 - MNV v Lipnici nad Sázavou, Krásné Hoře, Dolním Městě
 - KSSPPOP v Pardubicích
 - Geodézie, n. p. Praha, středisko geodézie pro okres Havlíčkův Brod,
 Kde je také možné do nich nahlédnout
 1) v POP není dovoleno provádět takové zásahy, opatření a změny, které by buď přímo nebo ve svých důsledcích narušily hodnoty SH a s ní souvisejícího prostředí, nebo které by uplatnění těchto hodnot omezovaly nebo znemožňovaly.
 2) Zvýšená ochrana hodnot SH a jeho prostředí přitom spočívá zejména v ochraně následujících komponent:
 - urbanistické struktury POP určené dochovanou historickou půdorysnou a hmotovou skladbou, výškovou konfigurací a měřítkem zástavby
 - charakterem uličních interiérů
 - veřejné zeleně, popř. přírodních nebo krajinných prvků, parků, vodotečí, vodních ploch a podobně
 - vazby SH s jeho přírodně – krajinným prostředím
 - významných pohledů na SH a výhledů z něho
 3) Při všech přestavbách, nové výstavbě a dalších úpravách a změnách v POP budou respektovány architektonicko – urbanistické vztahy tohoto území k SH. Architektonické řešení novostaveb bude navazovat na charakter dochovaného prostředí a dotvářet jej přiměřenými prostředky soudobé architektonické tvorby.
 4) Hodnoty SH a s ním souvisejícího prostředí je nutno respektovat a pro její ochranu dodržovat zejména při:
 a) pořizování a schvalování všech stupňů a kategorií územně plánovací dokumentace a při zpracování urbanistických studií
 b) zpracování a schvalování předprojektové a projektové dokumentace staveb a jejích úprav
 c) vydávání územních rozhodnutí, stavebních povolení a při všech dalších řízeních vyplývajících ze zákona č. 50/1976 Sb., o územním plánování a stavebním řádu a příslušných převáděcích předpisů, zejména při povolování a provádění:
 - staveb a jejích úprav a při odstraňování staveb
 - úprav komunikačních, vodohospodářských, těžebních, terénních...
 - rozvodu nadzemních sítí
 - zásahů do přírodního prostředí a veřejné zeleně
 - dislokačních změn a změn ve způsobu užívání a obhospodařování nemovitostí
 - a dalších zásahů, které se mohou projevit ve vnějším vzhledu a charakteru POP
 5) Všechny zásahy, opatření a změny, které se buď přímo nebo ve svých důsledcích dotýkají hodnot SH a s ním souvisejícího prostředí (v rozsahu vymezeného body 1 a 2), nebo jejichž provádění je upraveno zásadami obsaženými v bodech 3 – 5, je nutno předem projednat s výkonným orgánem státní památkové péče, kterým je odbor kultury ONV v Havlíčkově Brodě, lze je provádět pouze jeho souhlasem a za podmínek jím stanovených.
 6) Příslušní orgán územního plánování vyznačí hranici POP ve všech kategoriích a stupních územně plánovací dokumentace a ve všech dalších plánech, jimiž se řídí organizace územní a stavební činnosti v něm.
 Vlastnická práva ani dosavadní způsob obhospodařovaní nemovitostí v ochranném pásmu nejsou dotčeny. Při změně vlastníků nebo uživatelů nemovitostí ležících v ochranném pásmu přecházejí podmínky ochrany i na nové uživatele nebo nabyvatele.
 Dohled nad dodržováním podmínek ochrany v ochranném pásmu zajišťuje ONV v Havlíčkově Brodě, odbor kultury, jako výkonný orgán státní památkové péče ve spolupráci s Krajským střediskem státní památkové péče a ochrany přírody v Pardubicích, okresním konzervátorem a OVVS v Havlíčkově Brodě.
 Ochranné pásmo se vymezuje po vyjádření KSSPPOP podle § 17 zákona č. 20/1987 Sb., o státní památkové péči. Zřízením ochranného pásma kolem nemovité kulturní památky státního hradu Lipnice se sleduje zvýšená ochrana prostředí před případnými nepříznivými vlivy z nejbližšího okolí a rušivými zásahy, zvláště při stavebních změnách v území vymezeném ochranným pásmem. Území ochranného pásma státního hradu Lipnice zahrnuje obec Lipnici nad Sázavou a zasahuje dále do okolí, neboť silueta hradu pohledově ovládá nejen městečko, ale celou krajinu zejména ve východním a západním sektoru.
 U památky se výrazně uplatňuje začlenění nejen do struktury sídla, sevřeného středověkého urbanistického útvaru, ale i do širokého okolí, které si – bohatým členěním mezemi, solitérními stromy, remízky a roztroušenými drobnými osadami a dvorci – dosud zachovalo ráz středověké krajiny.
 Z hlediska historicko – urbanistického je tak prostředí památky svědectvím nejen prostorového a hmotového uspořádání, ale zároveň hmotným dokladem funkčních a významových vazeb celku, jehož je hrad součástí. Protože SH Lipnice patří bezesporu mezi nejvýznamnější památky, patří k jeho prezentaci nejen úprava památky samé, ale i esteticky vhodná a památkově nerušící úprava prostředí. Zachování okolí SH, co nejméně pozměněné oproti době jeho vzniku, je zejména z památkového, kulturně – výchovného i společenského hlediska velmi žádoucí.
 Proti tomuto rozhodnutí je možno podat do 15 dnů ode dne doručení odvolání k odboru kultury KNV v Hradci Králové prostřednictvím odboru kultury ONV v Havlíčkově Brodě. Odkladný účinek se s ohledem na ustanovení § 55, odst. 2 zákona č. 71/1967 Sb., o správním řízení, vylučuje, protože jakákoliv činnost odporující tomuto rozhodnutí by mohla způsobit nenahraditelné škody na kulturní památce a byla by v rozpor s veřejným zájmem.
 Vedoucí odboru kultury ONV
 Paeddr.. Hůlka Vladimír
 Reagovat na dokument "Ochranné pásmo hradu Lipnice"
 Počet návštěv: 17880


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21994A0517(17)
 Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und der Republik Slowenien über den Handel mit Textilwaren - Protokoll A - Protokoll B - Protokoll C - Protokoll D - Vereinbarte Niederschriften - Notenwechsel Nichtamtliche Übersetzung
 Amtsblatt Nr. L 123 vom 17/05/1994 S. 0608 - 0662 Finnische Sonderausgabe: Kapitel 11 Band 31 S. 0610 Schwedische Sonderausgabe: Kapitel 11 Band 31 S. 0610
 AGREEMENT between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia on trade in textile products THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA,of the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing every security for trade, the orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Economic Community (hereinafter referred to as 'the Community') and the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter referred to as 'Slovenia'),RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, and in particular, to eliminate real risks of market disruption on the market of the Community and real risks of disruption to the textile trade of Slovenia,HAVING regard to the Cooperation Agreement between the Community and Slovenia, signed on 5 April 1993, and in particular Article 16 thereof,HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA,WHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The present Agreement established the regime applicable to trade of textile products originating in Slovenia listed in Annex I.TITLE I QUANTITATIVE REGIME Article 21. The classification of the products covered by this Agreement is based on the tariff and statistical nomenclature of the Community (hereinafter called the 'combined nomenclature', or in abbreviated form 'CN') and any amendments thereof.Where any decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to this Agreement the affected products shall follow the trade regime applicable to the practice or category they fall into after such changes.Any amendment to the combined nomenclature (CN) made in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community concerning categories of products covered by this Agreement or any decision relating to the classification of goods shall not have the effect of reducing quantitative limits introduced pursuant to this Agreement.2. The origin of the products covered by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the rules in force in the Community.Any amendment to these rules of origin shall be communicated to Slovenia and shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established pursuant to this Agreement.The procedures for control of the origin of the products referred to above are laid down in Protocol A.Article 31. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, exports from Slovenia to the Community of products listed in Annex I and originating in Slovenia shall, at the time of entry into force of this Agreement, be free from quantitative limits and measures of equivalent effect. Quantitative limits may subsequently be introduced under conditions specified in Article 8.2. Should quantitative limits be introduced, exports of the textile products made subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to a double-checking system as specified in Protocol A.3. At the time of entry into force of this Agreement, exports of products listed in Annex II, not subject to quantitative limits, shall be subject to the double-checking system referred to in paragraph 2.4. Following consultations in accordance with the procedures set out in Article 14, exports of products in Annex I not subject to quantitative limits, other than those listed in Annex II, may be subject, subsequently to the entry into force of the Agreement, to the double-checking system referred to in paragraph 2 or to a prior surveillance system introduced by the Community.Article 4The Community and Slovenia recognize the special and differential character of re-imports of textile products into the Community after processing in Slovenia as a specific form of industrial and trade cooperation.Should quantitative limits be established under Article 8, provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing in force in the Community, these re-imports shall not be subject to these quantitative limits if they are subject to the specific arrangements laid down in Annex III.Article 5Slovenian exports of cottage-industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other made-up articles obtained manually from such fabrics and of traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established under this Agreement, provided that these products originating in Slovenia meet the conditions laid down in Protocol B.Article 61. Imports into the Community of textile products covered by this Agreement shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established under this Agreement, provided that they are declared to be for re-export outside the Community in the same state or after processing, within the framework of the administrative system of control which exists within the Community.However, the release for home use of products imported into the Community under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export licence ißüd by the authorities of Slovenia, and to proof of origin in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A.2. Where the Community authorities ascertain that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Agreement, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported outside the Community, the authorities shall inform the Slovenian authorities within four weeks of the quantities involved and authorize imports of identical quantities of the same products, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Agreement for the current or the following year, as appropriate.Article 7Should quantitative limits be introduced under Article 8, the following provisions shall apply:1. In any Agreement year advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established for the following Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 5 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limits established for the following Agreement year.2. Carry-over to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following Agreement year of the amounts not used during any Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 9 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.3. Transfers in respect of categories in Group I shall not be made from any category except as follows:- transfers between categories 1, 2 and 3 may be made up to 7 % of the quantitative limits for the category to which the transfer is made,- transfers between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be made up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Transfers into any category in Groups II and III may be made from any category or categories in Groups I, II and III up to 10 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to above is given in Annex I to this Agreement.5. The increase in any category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above during an Agreement year shall not exceed 17 %.6. Prior notification shall be given by the Slovenian authorities in the event of recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, at last 15 days in advance.Article 81. Exports of textile products listed in Annex I to this Agreement may be made subject to quantitative limits on the conditions laid down in the following paragraphs.2. Where the Community finds, under the system of administrative control set up, that the level of imports of products in a given category listed in Annex I originating in Slovenia exceeds, in relation to the preceding year's total imports into the Community from all sources of products in that category, the following rates:- 1 % for categories of products in Group I,- 5 % for categories of products in Group II,- 10 % for categories of products in Groups III,it may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedure described in Article 14 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate restraint level for the products in such category.3. Pending a mutually satisfactory solution, Slovenia undertakes to limit exports of the products concerned to the Community or to the region or regions of the Community market specified by the Community for a provisional period of three months from the date on which the request for consultations is made.Such provisional limit shall be established at 25 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, and gave rise to the request for consultation, or 25 % of the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, whichever is the higher.4. Should the Contracting Parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 14, the Community shall have the right to introduce a definitive quantitative limit at an annual level not lower than the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, or 106 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2 and gave rise to the request for consultations, whichever is the higher.The annual level so fixed shall be revised upwards after consultations in accordance with the procedure refferred to in Article 14, with a view to fulfilling the conditions set out in paragraph 2, should the trend of total imports into the Community of the product in question make this necessary.5. The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under this Article shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Protocol C.6. The provisions of this Article shall not apply where the percentages specified in paragraph 2 have been reached as a result of a fall in total imports into the Community, and not as a result of an increase in exports of products originating in Slovenia.7. In the event the provisions of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, the Community shall authorize the imports of products of the category concerned shipped from Slovenia before the request for consultation was submitted.Should the provisions of paragraph 2 or 4 be applied, Slovenia undertakes to ißü export licences for products covered by contracts concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.8. Up to the date of communication of the statistics referred to in Article 9 (6), the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply on the basis of the annual statistics previously communicated by the Community.Article 91. Slovenia shall supply the Commission with precise statistical information on all export licences ißüd for categories of textile products subject to quantitative limits established under this Agreement or to a double-checking system, expressed in quantities and in terms of valü and broken down by Member States of the Community, as well as on all certificates ißüd by the competent Slovenian authorities for products referred to in Article 5 and subject to the provisions of Protocol B.2. The Community shall likewise transmit to the Slovenian authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations ißüd by the Community authorities and import statistics for products covered by the system referred to in Article 8 (2).3. The information referred to above shall, for all categories of products, be forwarded before the end of the month following the month to which the statistics relate.4. Upon request by the Community, Slovenia shall supply import statistics for all products covered by Annex I.5. Should it be found on analysis of the information exchanged that there are significant discrepancies between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be initiated in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 14 of this Agreement.6. For the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8, the Community undertakes to provide the Slovenian authorities before 15 April of each year with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Agreement, broken down by supplying country and Community Member State.Article 101. In view of ensuring the effective functioning of this Agreement, the Community and Slovenia agree to cooperate fully in order to prevent, to investigate and to take any necessary legal and/or administrative action against circumvention by transhipment, re-routing, false declaration concerning the country or place of origin, falsification of documents, false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities, description or classification of merchandise and by whatever other means. Accordingly, Slovenia and the Community agree to establish the necessary legal provisions and administrative procedures permitting effective action to be taken against such circumvention, which shall include the adoption of legally binding corrective measures against exporters and/or importers involved.2. Should the Community believe on the basis of information available that the present Agreement is being circumvented, the Community will consult with Slovenia with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution. These consultations will be held as early as possible and at the latest within 30 days from the date of request.3. Pending the results of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, Slovenia shall, as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the Community, take all necessary measures to ensure that, where sufficient evidence of circumvention is provided, adjustments of quantitative limits established under Article 8 liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 2 may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted.4. Should the Parties be unable, in the course of the consultation referred to in paragraph 2, to reach a mutually satisfactory solution, the Community shall have the right:(a) where there is sufficient evidence that products originating in Slovenia have been imported in circumvention of the present Agreement, to set off the relevant quantities against the quantitative limits established under Article 8;(b) where sufficient evidence shows that false declaration concerning fibre content, quantities, description or classification of products originating in Slovenia has occured, to refuse to import the products in question;(c) Should it appear that the territory of Slovenia is involved in transhipment or re-routing of products not originating in Slovenia, to introduce quantitative limits against the same products originating in Slovenia if they are not already subject to quantitative limits, or to take any other appropriate measures.5. The Parties agree to establish a system of administrative cooperation to prevent and to addreß effectively all problems arising from circumvention in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A to this Agreement.Article 111. The quantitative limits established under this Agreement on imports into the Community of textile products of Slovenian origin will not be broken down by the Community into regional shares.2. The Parties shall cooperate in order to prevent sudden and prejudicial changes in traditional trade flows resulting in regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.3. Slovenia shall monitor its exports of products under restraint or surveillance into the Community. Should a sudden and prejudicial change in traditional trade flows arise, the Community will be entitled to request consultations in order to find a satisfactory solution to those problems. Such consultations must be held within 15 working days of their being requested by the Community.4. Slovenia shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits into the Community are spaced out as evenly as possible over the year dü account being taken in particular of seasonal factors.Article 12In the event of denunciation of this Agreement as provided for in Article 17 (4), the quantitative limits established pursuant to this Agreement shall be reduced on a pro rata temporis basis unleß the Contracting Parties decide otherwise by common agreement.Article 13Slovenia and the Community undertake to refrain from discrimination in the allocation of export licences and import authorizations or documents referred to in Protocols A and B.Article 141. Save where it is otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the consultation procedures referred to in this Agreement shall be governed by the following provisions:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Contracting Party,- the request for consultations shall be followed, within a reasonable period and in any case not later than 15 days following the notification, by a report setting out the circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the Contracting Parties shall enter into consultations within one month of notification of the request at the latest, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest,- the period of one month referred to above for the purpose of reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion may be extended by common accord.2. The Community may request consultations in accordance with paragraph 1 when it ascertains that during a particular year of application of the Agreement difficulties arise in the Community or one of its regions dü to a sharp and substantial increase, by comparison to the preceding year, in imports of a given category of Group I.3. At the request of either of the Contracting Parties, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Agreement. Any consultations held under this Article shall take place in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the differences between the Contracting Parties.TITLE II TARIFF REGIME Article 151. The import into the Community of products listed in Annex V and originating in Slovenia according to the provisions set out in Protocol 1 to the Cooperation Agreement shall be subject to the annual ceilings indicated in that Annex.2. As soon as a ceiling for the import of a category of products has been reached, the Community may reintroduce until the end of the concerned calendar year the levying of the customs duties actually applied in respect of imports of products originating in third countries.TITLE III FINAL PROVISIONS Article 16This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of the Republic of Slovenia.Article 171. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for that purpose. It shall be applicable until 31 December 1994. Thereafter, the application of all the provisions of this Agreement shall be extended automatically for a period of one more year up to 31 December 1995, unleß either Party notifies the other at least six months before 31 December 1994 that is dös not agree with this extension.2. This Agreement shall apply with effect from the date of entry into force of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia, signed on 5 April 1993.3. Either Contracting Party may at any time propose modifications to this Agreement.4. Either Contracting Party may at any time denounce the Agreement provided that at least 60 days' notice is given. In that event, the Agreement shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice.5. The Contracting Parties agree to enter into consultations not later than six months before the expiration of the present agreement with a view to possibly concluding a new Agreement.6. The Annexes, Protocols, Agreed Minutes and letters exchanged or attached to this Agreement, shall form an integral part thereof.Article 18This Agreement shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portugüse, Spanish and Slovenian languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.For the Government of the Republic of SloveniaFor the Council of the European CommunitiesANNEX I PRODUCTS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1 1. When the constitutive material of the products of categories 1 to 114 is not specifically mentioned, these products are to be taken to be made exclusively of wool or of fine hair, of cotton or of man-made fibres.2. Garments which are not recognizable as being garments for men or boys or as being garments for women or girls are classified with the latter.3. Where the expression 'babies' garments' is used, this is meant to cover garments up to and including commercial size 86.>PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>>PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>>PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>>PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>>PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>>PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>ANNEX II Products without quantitative limits subject to the double-checking system referred to in Article 3 (3) of the Agreement.(The full products descriptions of the categories listed in this Annex are to be found in Annex I to the Agreement.)Category:56789ANNEX III Reimports into the Community, within the meaning of Article 4 of this Agreement, of products listed in the Annex IV shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement, unleß the special provisions below provide otherwise:1. Subject to paragraph 2, only reimports into the Community of products affected by the specific quantitative limits laid down in Annex IV shall be considered reimports within the meaning of Article 4 of the Agreement.2. Reimports of products not covered by Annex IV may be made subject to specific quantitative limits following consultations in accordance with the procedures set out in Article 14 of the Agreement, provided the products concerned are subject to quantitative limits pursuant to the Agreement, to a double-checking system or to surveillance measures.3. Having regard to the interests of both Parties, the Community may at its discretion, or in response to a request under Article 14 of the Agreement:(a) examine the possibility of transferring from one category to another, using in advance or carrying over from one year to the next, portions of specific quantitative limits;(b) consider the possibility of increasing specific quantitative limits.4. However, the Community may apply automatically the flexibility rules set out in paragraph 3 above within the following limits:(a) transfers between categories may not exceed 25 % of the quantity for the category to which the transfer is made;(b) carry-over of a specific quantitative limit from one year to the next may not exceed 13,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization;(c) advance use of specific quantitative limits from one year to another may not exceed 7,5 % of the quantity set for the year of actual utilization.5. The Community shall inform Slovenia of any measure taken pursuant to the preceding paragraphs.6. The competent authorities in the Community shall debit the specific quantitative limits referred to in paragraph 1 at the time of ißü of the prior authorization required by Council Regulation (EEC) No 636/82 which governs economic outward processing arrangements. A specific quantitative limit shall be debited for the year in which a prior authorization is ißüd.7. A certificate of origin made out by the organizations authorized to do so under Slovenian law shall be ißüd, in accordance with Protocol A to the Agreement, for all products covered by this Annex. This certificate shall bear a reference to the prior authorization mentioned in paragraph 6 above as evidence that the processing operation it describes has been carried out in Slovenia.8. For the purpose of applying the provisions of Annex V the certificate of circulation EUR1 ißüd according to the provisions of Protocol 1 of the Cooperation Agreement replaces the certificate of origin mentioned in paragraph 7, bearing the same reference to the prior authorization.9. The Community shall provide Slovenia with the names and addresses of, and specimens of the stamps used by, the competent authorities of the Community which ißü the prior authorizations referred to in paragraph 6 above.ANNEX IV (The product descriptions of the categories listed in this Annex are to be found in Annex I to the Agreement) OPT QUOTAS >PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>ANNEX V (The product descriptions of the categories listed in this Annex are to be found in Annex I to the Agreement) DIRECT IMPORTS >PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>OPT QUOTAS >PLATZ FÜR EINE TABELLE>PROTOCOL A TITLE I CLASSIFICATION Article 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Slovenia of any changes in the combined nomenclature (CN) before the date of their entry into force in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform the competent authorities of Slovenia of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the present Agreement, within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category and the related CN codes;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to the Agreement, the competent authorities of the Community shall provide 30 days' notice, from the date of the Community's communication, before the decision is put into effect. Products shipped before the date of entry into effect of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in the question are presented for importation into the Community within 60 days of that date.4. Where a Community decision on classification resulting in a change of classification practice or a change of categorization of any product subject to the Agreement affects a category subject to quantitative limits, the Contracting Parties agree to enter into consultation in accordance with the procedures described in Article 14 of the Agreement with a view to honouring the obligation under the second subparagraph of Article 2 (1) of the Agreement.5. In case of divergent opinions between Slovenia and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by the present Agreement, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the Community, pending consultations in accordance with Article 14 with a view to reaching agreement on definitive classification of the product concerned.TITLE II ORIGIN Article 21. Products originating in Slovenia for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements set out in Title I of this Agreement shall be accompanied by a certificate of Slovenian origin conforming to the model annexed to this Protocol.2. The certificate of origin shall be certified by the competent Slovenian authorities if the products in question can be considered products originating in that country within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.3. However, the products in Group III may be imported into the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement on production of a declaration by the exporter on the invoice or other commercial document relating to the products to the effect that the products in question originate in Slovenia within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.4. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required for import of goods covered by a certificate of circulation EUR 1 or a form EUR 2 ißüd in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 1 of the Cooperation Agreement.Article 3The certificate of origin shall be ißüd only on application having been made in writing by the exporter or, under the exporter's responsibility, by his authorized representative. The competent Slovenian authorities shall ensure that the certificate of origin is properly completed and for this purpose they shall call for any necessary documentary evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, the certificates or declarations of origin must contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods on the basis of which the certificate was ißüd or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between the statements made in the certificate of origin and those made in the documents produced to the customs office for the purpose of carrying out the formalities for importing the products shall not ipso facto cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE III DOUBLE-CHECKING SYSTEM Section I Exportation Article 61. The competent authorities of Slovenia shall ißü an export licence in respect of all consignments from Slovenia of textile products subject to any definitive or provisional quantitative limits established under Article 8 of the Agreement, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified by Articles 7, 10 and 12 of the Agreement, as well as of all consignments of textile products subject to a double-checking system without quantitative limits as provided for in Article 3 (3) and (4) of the Agreement.Article 71. For products subject to quantitative limits under this Agreement the export licence shall conform to Model 1 annexed to this Protocol and it shall be valid for exports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community applies. However, where the Community has made recourse to the provisions of Articles 8 and 11 of the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreed Minute No 1, or to the Agreed Minute No 2, the textile products covered by the export licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.2. Where quantitative limits have been introduced pursuant to this Agreement, each export licence must certify inter alia that the quantity of the product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit established for the category of the products concerned and shall only cover one category of products subject to quantitative limits. It may be used for one or more consignments of the products in question.3. For products subject to a double-checking system without quantitative limits the export licence shall conform to Model 2 annexed to this Protocol. It shall only cover one category of products and may be used for one or more consignments of the products in question.Article 8The competent authorities of the Community must be informed immediately of the withdrawal or modification of any export licence already ißüd.Article 91. Exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits pursuant to this Agreement shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which the shipment of the goods has been effected even if the export licence is ißüd after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading onto the exporting aircraft, vehicule or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 12 hereafter, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence have been shipped.Section II Importation Article 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits or to a double-checking system pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization.Article 121. The competent authorities of the Community shall ißü the import authorization referred to in Article 11 above, within five working days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.2. The import authorizations concerning products subject to quantitative limits under this Agreement shall be valid for six months from the date of their ißü for imports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied. However, where the Community has recourse to the provisions of Articles 8 and 11 of the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreed Minute No 1, or to the Agreed Minute No 2, the products covered by the import licences can only be put into free circulation in the region(s) of the Community indicated in those licences.3. The import authorizations for products subject to a double-checking system without quantitative limits shall be valid for six months from the date of their ißü for imports throughout the customs territory to which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applicable.4. The competent authorities of the Community shall cancel the import authorization already ißüd whenever the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent authorities of the Community are notified of the withdrawal or the cancellation of the export licence only after the importation of the products into the Community, the relevant quantities shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the category and the quota year concerned.Article 131. If the competent authorities of the Community find that the total quantities covered by export licences ißüd by the competent authorities of Slovenia for a particular category in any year exceed the quantitative limit established in accordance with Article 8 of the Agreement for that category, as may be modified by Articles 7, 10 and 12 of the Agreement, the said authorities may suspend the further ißü of import authorizations. In this event, the competent authorities of the Community shall immediately inform the authorities of Slovenia and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 14 of the Agreement shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of products of Slovenian origin subject to quantitative limits or a double-checking system and not covered by Slovenian export licences ißüd in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol may be refused an import authorization by the competent Community authorities.However, without prejudice to Article 10 of the Agreement if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent authorities of the Community, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits established pursuant to this Agreement, without the expreß agreement of the competent authorities of Slovenia.TITLE IV FORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT CERTIFICATES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONS CONCERNING EXPORTS TO THE COMMUNITY Article 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in printed script.These documents shall measure 210 × 297 mm. The paper used shall be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp, and weighing not leß than 25 g/m2. If the documents have several copies only the top copy, which is the original, shall be printed with the guilloche pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original' and the other copies as 'copies'. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities of the Community as being valid for the purpose of export to the Community in accordance with the provision of the Agreement.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying the exporting country as follows: SI,- two letters identifying the intended Member State of customs clearance as follows:BL = Benelux,DE = Federal Republic of Germany,DK = Denmark,EL = Greece,ES = Spain,FR = France,GB = United Kingdom,IE = Ireland,IT = Italy,PT = Portugal,- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in the respective year, e.g. 3 for 1993,- a two-digit number from 01 to 99, identifying the particular issuing office concerned in the exporting country,- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the intended Member State of customs clearance.Article 15The export licence and the certificate of origin may be ißüd after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they must bear the endorsement 'délivré a posteriori' or the endorsement 'ißüd retrospectively'.Article 161. In the event of a theft, loß or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent Slovenian authorities which ißüd the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so ißüd shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata' or 'duplicate'.2. The duplicate shall bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE V ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION Article 17The Community and Slovenia shall cooperate closely in the implementation of the provisions of this Protocol. To this end, contacts and exchanges or views, including on technical matters, shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 18In order to ensure the correct application of this Protocol, the Community and Slovenia offer mutual assistance for the checking of the authenticity and the accuracy of export licences and certificates of origin ißüd or of any declarations made within the terms of this Protocol.Article 19Slovenia shall transmit to the Commission of the European Communities the names and addresses of the authorities competent to ißü and verify the export licences and the certificates of origin, together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities and specimen signatures of officials responsible for signing the export licences and the certificates of origin. Slovenia shall also notify the Community of any change in this information.Article 201. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to the accuracy of the information regarding the trü origin of the products in question.2. In such cases, the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate of origin or the export licence or a copy thereof to the competent Slovenian authorities, giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance which justify an enquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or to the licence or their copies. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The provisions of paragraph 1 above shall also apply to subsequent verifications of the declarations of origin provided for in Article 2 of this Protocol.4. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 above shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest. The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate, licence or declaration, applies to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export under the arrangements established by the Agreement. The information shall also include, at the request of the Community, copies of all the documentation necessary to fully determine the facts, and in particular the trü origin of the goods.Should such verifications reveal systematic irregularities in the use of declarations of origin, the Community may subject imports of the products in question to the provisions of Article 2 (1) of this Protocol.5. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for at least two years by the competent Slovenian authorities.6. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 211. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 20 or where information available to the competent authorities of the Community or of Slovenia indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Agreement are being circumvented or infringed, the two Contracting Parties shall cooperate closely and with the appropriate urgency in order to prevent any such circumvention or infringement.2. To this end, the competent authorities of Slovenia shall, on their own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriate inquiries, or arrange for such inquiries to be carried out, concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be, in circumvention or infringement of this Protocol. Slovenia shall communicate the results, of these inquiries to the Community, including any other pertinent information enabling the cause of the circumvention or infringement, including the trü origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the Community and Slovenia, officials designated by the Community may be present at the inquiries referred to in paragraph 2 above.4. Pursuant to the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1 above, the competent authorities of the Community and Slovenia shall exchange any information considered by either Contracting Party to be of use in preventing circumvention or infringement of the provisions of this Agreement. These exchanges may include information on the production of textile, products in Slovenia and on the trade in the type of products covered by this Agreement between Slovenia and third countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit acroß the territory of Slovenia prior to their importation into the Community. This information may include at the request of the Community copies of all available relevant documentation.5. Where sufficient evidence shows that the provisions of this Protocol have been circumvented or infringed, the competent authorities of Slovenia and the Community may agree to take the measures set out in Article 10 (4) of the Agreement, and any other measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such circumvention or infringement.Annex to Protocol A, Article 2 (1) CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN >VERWEIS AUF EINEN FILM>Annex to Protocol A, Article 7 (1): Model 1 EXPORT LICENCE FOR PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO QUANTITATIVE LIMITS >VERWEIS AUF EINEN FILM>Annex to Protocol A, Article 7 (3): Model 2 EXPORT LICENCE FOR PRODUCTS SUBJECT NOT TO QUANTITATIVE LIMITS BUT DOUBLE-CHECKING >VERWEIS AUF EINEN FILM>PROTOCOL B referred to in Article 5 Cottage industry and folklore products originating in Slovenia1. The exemption provided for in Article 5 in respect of cottage industry products shall apply to the following types of product only:(a) fabrics woven on looms operated solely by hand or foot, being fabrics of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Slovenia;(b) garments or other textile articles of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Slovenia obtained manually from the fabrics referred to above and sewn exclusively by hand without the aid of any machine;(c) traditional folklore products of Slovenia made by hand, in a list to be agreed between the Community and Slovenia.Exemption shall be granted in respect only of products covered by a certificate conforming to the specimen attached to this Protocol and ißüd by the competent authorities in Slovenia. These certificates must indicate the reasons justifying their issuance. The competent authorities of the Community will accept them after having checked that the products concerned have fulfilled the conditions established in this Protocol. The certificates concerning the products envisaged in (c) above must bear a stamp 'FOLKLORE' marked clearly. In the case of a difference of opinion between the Parties concerning the nature of these products, consultations shall be held within one month in order to resolve these differences.Should imports of any product covered by this Protocol reach proportions liable to cause problems within the Community, consultations with Slovenia shall be initiated as soon as possible, with a view to resolving the situation by the adoption if necessary of a quantitative limit, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14 of this Agreement.2. The provisions of Titles IV and V of Protocol A shall apply mutatis mutandis to the products covered by paragraph 1 of this Protocol.Annex to Protocol B CERTIFICATE OF COTTAGE INDUSTRY AND FOLKLORE PRODUCTS >VERWEIS AUF EINEN FILM>PROTOCOL C The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits which may be introduced under Article 8 of the Agreement for the products covered by the Agreement shall be fixed by Agreement between the Parties in accordance with the consultation procedures established in Article 14 of the Agreement.Agreed Minute No 1 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled at Brussels on 23 July 1993, the Parties agreed that Article 8 of the Agreement dös not preclude the Community, if the conditions are fulfilled, from applying the safeguard measures for one or more of its regions in conformity with the principles of the internal market.In such an event, Slovenia shall be informed in advance of the relevant provisions of Protocol A to the Agreement to be applied, as appropriate.For the Government of the Republic of SloveniaFor the Council of the European CommunitiesAgreed Minute No 2 Notwithstanding Article 11 (1) of this Agreement, for imperative technical or administrative reasons or to find a solution to economic problems resulting from regional concentration of imports, or in order to combat circumvention and fraud of the provisions of this Agreement, the Community will establish for a limited period of time a specific management system in conformity with the principles of the internal market.However, if the Parties are unable to reach a satisfactory solution during the consultations provided for in Article 11 (3), Slovenia undertakes, if so requested by the Community, to respect temporary export limits for one or more regions of the Community. In such a case, these limits shall not preclude the importation into the region(s) concerned of products which were shipped from Slovenia on the basis of export licences obtained before the date of formal notification to Slovenia by the Community about the introduction of the above limits.The Community shall inform Slovenia of the technical and administrative measures, such as defined in the attached note verbale, that need to be introduced by both Parties in order to implement the above paragraphs in conformity with the principles of the internal market.For the Government of the Republic of SloveniaFor the Council of the European CommunitiesAgreed Minute No 3 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled at Brussels on 23 July 1993, the Parties agreed that Slovenia shall endeavour not to deprive certain regions of the Community which have traditionally had relatively small shares of Community quotas of imports of products serving as inputs for their processing industry.The Community and Slovenia further agreed to hold consultations, should the need arise, in order to avert any problems which might occur in this respect.For the Government of the Republic of SloveniaFor the Council of the European CommunitiesAgreed Minute No 4 In the context of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia on trade in textile and clothing products, initialled at Brussels on 23 July 1993, Slovenia agreed that, from the date of request for and pending the consultations referred to in Article 11 (3), it shall cooperate by not issuing export licences that would further aggravate the problems resulting from the regional concentration of direct imports into the Community.For the Government of the Republic of SloveniaFor the Council of the European CommunitiesExchange of notes The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Ministry of Economic Relations and Development of the Republic of Slovenia and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on textile products between Slovenia and the Community initialled at Brussels on 23 July 1993.The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Ministry that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from the date of entry into force of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia, signed on 5 April 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Agreement provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations would be grateful if the Ministry would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Ministry of Economic Relations and Development of the Republic of Slovenia the assurance of its highest consideration.Exchange of notes The Ministry of Economic Relations and Development of the Republic of Slovenia presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on textile products between Slovenia and the Community initialled at Brussels on 23 July 1993.The Ministry of Economic Relations and Development of the Republic of Slovenia wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Government of the Republic of Slovenia is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from the date of entry into force of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia signed on 5 April 1993. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the Agreement provided that 120 days' notice is given.The Ministry of Economic Relations and Development of the Republic of Slovenia avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Agreed Minute No 5 In the course of the negotiations for the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia on trade in textile and clothing products held in Brussels on 14 and 15 July 1993, the two Parties agreed to hold consultations during the last quarter of 1993 in order to asseß, on the ground of available import statistics, the opportunity to extend the double-checking provisions and the tariff regime provided for by Annexes II and V of the Agreement to categories 1, 2, 3, 15, 16 and 67.For the Government of the Republic of SloveniaFor the Council of the European CommunitiesAgreed Minute No 6 In the context of the negotiations of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Slovenia on trade in textile and clothing products held in Brussels on 14 and 15 July 1993, it was agreed that, should a cumulation of origin be introduced by the Community for the territories and Republics of the former Yugoslavia, the Parties will hold consultations to review the relevant provisions of the Agreement.For the Government of the Republic of SloveniaFor the Council of the European Communities


text:
 2.12.2006
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 294/42
 Rozsudek Soudu prvního stupně ze dne 27. září 2006 – Archer Daniels Midland v. Komise
 (Věc T-59/02) (1)
 („Hospodářská soutěž - Kartelové dohody - Kyselina citronová - Článek 81 ES - Pokuta - Článek 15 odst. 2 nařízení č. 17 - Pokyny o metodě stanovování pokut - Sdělení o spolupráci - Zásada právní jistoty a zákazu zpětné účinnosti - Zásada proporcionality - Rovné zacházení - Povinnost odůvodnění - Práva obhajoby“)
 (2006/C 294/89)
 Jednací jazyk: angličtina
 Účastníci řízení
 Žalobkyně: Archer Daniels Midland Co. (Decatur, Illinois, Spojené státy) (zástupci: C.O. Lenz, advokát, L. Martin Alegi, M. Garcia a E. Batchelor, solicitors)
 Žalovaná: Komise Evropských společenství (zástupce: P. Oliver, zmocněnec)
 Předmět věci
 Návrh na zrušení článku 1 rozhodnutí Komise 2002/742/ES ze dne 5. prosince 2001 v řízení podle článku 81 Smlouvy o ES a článku 53 Dohody o EHP (COMP/E-1/36.604 – Kyselina citronová) (Úř. věst. 2002, L 239, s. 18), v části, ve které určuje, že žalobkyně porušila článek 81 ES a článek 53 Dohody o EHP tím, že se podílela na omezení dotčených tržních kapacit a na určení výrobce, který měl řídit zvyšování cen v každé vnitrostátní oblasti uvedeného relevantního trhu, návrh na zrušení článku 3 téhož rozhodnutí v části, ve které se týká žalobkyně a, podpůrně, návrh na snížení jí uložené pokuty.
 Výrok rozsudku
 1)
 Článek 1 rozhodnutí Komise 2002/742/ES ze dne 5. prosince 2001 v řízení podle článku 81 Smlouvy o ES a článku 53 Dohody o EHP (věc COMP/E-1/36.604 – Kyselina citronová) se zrušuje v části, ve které ve spojení s bodem 158 odůvodnění konstatuje, že Archer Daniels Midland Co. zmrazila, omezila a uzavřela výrobní kapacity kyseliny citronové.
 2)
 Článek 1 rozhodnutí 2002/742 se zrušuje v části, ve které ve spojení s bodem 158 odůvodnění konstatuje, že Archer Daniels Midland Co. určila výrobce, který měl řídit zvyšování cen v každém vnitrostátním segmentu relevantního trhu.
 3)
 Žaloba se ve zbývající části zamítá.
 4)
 Komisi se ukládá náhrada desetiny nákladů řízení vynaložených ADM Archer Daniels Midland Co.
 5)
 Archer Daniels Midland Co. se ukládá náhrada zbývající části vlastních nákladů řízení, jakož i nákladů řízení vynaložených Komisí.
 (1) Úř. věst. C 144, 15.6.2002.