text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 41998A0123(01)
 Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations
 Official Journal C 024 , 23/01/1998 P. 0002 - 0022
 CONVENTION drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrationsTHE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES to this Convention, Member States of the European Union,REFERRING to the Act of the Council of the European Union of 18 December 1997,RECALLING the need to strengthen the commitments contained in the Convention on mutual assistance between customs administrations, signed in Rome on 7 September 1967,CONSIDERING that customs administrations are responsible on the customs territory of the Community and, in particular at its points of entry and exit, for the prevention, investigation and suppression of offences not only against Community rules, but also against national laws, in particular the cases covered by Articles 36 and 223 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,CONSIDERING that a serious threat to public health, morality and security is constituted by the developing trend towards illicit trafficking of all kinds,CONSIDERING that particular forms of cooperation involving cross-border actions for the prevention, investigation and prosecution of certain infringements of both the national legislation of the Member States and Community customs regulations should be regulated, and that such cross-border actions must always be carried out in compliance with the principles of legality (conforming with the relevant law applicable in the requested Member State and with the Directives of the competent authorities of that Member State), subsidiarity (such actions to be launched only if it is clear that other less significant actions are not appropriate) and proportionality (the scale and duration of the action to be determined in the light of the seriousness of the presumed infringement),CONVINCED that it is necessary to reinforce cooperation between customs administrations, by laying down procedures under which customs administrations may act jointly and exchange data concerned with illicit trafficking activities,BEARING IN MIND that the customs administrations in their day-to-day work have to implement both Community and national provisions, and that there is consequently an obvious need to ensure that the provisions of mutual assistance and cooperation in both sectors evolve as far as possible in parallel,HAVE AGREED ON THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS:TITLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Scope 1. Without prejudice to the competences of the Community, the Member States of the European Union shall provide each other with mutual assistance and shall cooperate with one another through their customs administrations, with a view to:- preventing and detecting infringements of national customs provisions,and- prosecuting and punishing infringements of Community and national customs provisions.2. Without prejudice to Article 3, this Convention shall not affect the provisions applicable regarding mutual assistance in criminal matters between judicial authorities, more favourable provisions in bilateral or multilateral agreements between Member States governing cooperation as provided for in paragraph 1 between the customs authorities or other competent authorities of the Member States, or arrangements in the same field agreed on the basis of uniform legislation or of a special system providing for the reciprocal application of measures of mutual assistance.Article 2 Powers The customs administrations shall apply this Convention with the limits of the powers conferred upon them under national provisions. Nothing in this Convention may be construed as affecting the powers conferred under national provisions upon the customs administrations within the meaning of this Convention.Article 3 Relationship to mutual assistance provided by the judicial authorities 1. This Convention covers mutual assistance and cooperation in the framework of criminal investigations concerning infringements of national and Community customs provisions, concerning which the applicant authority has jurisdiction on the basis of the national provisions of the relevant Member State.2. Where a criminal investigation is carried out by or under the direction of a judicial authority, that authority shall determine whether requests for mutual assistance or cooperation in that connection shall be submitted on the basis of the provisions applicable concerning mutual assistance in criminal matters or on the basis of this Convention.Article 4 Definitions For the purposes of this Convention, the following definitions shall apply:1. 'national customs provisions`: all laws, regulations and administrative provisions of a Member State the application of which comes wholly or partly within the jurisdiction of the customs administration of the Member State concerning:- cross-border traffic in goods subject to bans, restrictions or controls, in particular pursuant to Articles 36 and 223 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,- non-harmonised excise duties;2. 'Community customs provisions`:- the body of Community provisions and associated implementing provisions governing the import, export, transit and presence of goods traded between Member States and third countries, and between Member States in the case of goods that do not have Community status within the meaning of Article 9(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community or goods subject to additional controls or investigations for the purposes of establishing their Community status,- the body of provisions adopted at Community level under the common agricultural policy and the specific provisions adopted with regard to goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products,- the body of provisions adopted at Community level for harmonised excise duties and for value-added tax on importation together with the national provisions implementing them;3. 'infringement`: acts in conflict with national or Community customs provisions, including, inter alia:- participation in, or attempts to commit, such infringements,- participation in a criminal organization committing such infringements,- the laundering of money deriving from the infringements referred to in this paragraph;4. 'mutual assistance`: the granting of assistance between customs administrations as provided for in this Convention;5. 'applicant authority`: the competent authority of the Member State which makes a request for assistance;6. 'requested authority`: the competent authority of the Member State to which a request for assistance is made;7. 'customs administrations`: Member States' customs authorities as well as other authorities with jurisdiction for implementing the provisions of this Convention;8. 'personal data`: all information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person; a person is considered to be identifiable if he or she can be directly or indirectly identified, inter alia by means of an identification number or of one or more specific elements which are characteristic of his or her physical, physiological, psychological, economic, cultural or social identity;9. 'cross-border cooperation`: cooperation between customs administrations across the borders of each Member State.Article 5 Central coordinating units 1. Member States shall appoint in their customs authorities a central unit (coordinating unit). It shall be responsible for receiving all applications for mutual assistance under this Convention and for coordinating mutual assistance, without prejudice to paragraph 2. The unit shall also be responsible for cooperation with other authorities involved in an assistance measure under this Convention. The coordinating units of the Member States shall maintain the necessary direct contact with each other, particularly in the cases covered by Title IV.2. The activity of the central coordinating units shall not exclude, particularly in an emergency, direct cooperation between other services of the customs authorities of the Member States. For reasons of efficiency and consistency, the central coordinating units shall be informed of any action involving such direct cooperation.3. If the customs authority is not, or not completely, competent to process a request, the central coordinating unit shall forward the request to the competent national authority and inform the applicant authority that it has done so.4. If it is not possible to accede to the request for legal or substantive reasons, the coordinating unit shall return the request to the applicant authority with an explanation as to why the request could not be processed.Article 6 Liaison officers 1. Member States may make agreements between themselves on the exchange of liaison officers for limited or unlimited periods, and on mutually-agreed conditions.2. Liaison officers shall have no powers of intervention in the host country.3. In order to promote cooperation between Member States' customs administrations, liaison officers may, with the agreement or at the request of the competent authorities of the Member States, have the following duties:(a) promoting and speeding up the exchange of information between the Member States;(b) providing assistance in investigations which relate to their own Member State or the Member State they represent;(c) providing support in dealing with requests for assistance;(d) advising and assisting the host country in preparing and carrying out cross-border operations;(e) any other duties which Member States may agree between themselves.4. Member States may agree bilaterally of multilaterally on the terms of reference and the location of the liaison officers. Liaison officers may also represent the interests of one or more Member States.Article 7 Obligation to prove identity Unless otherwise specified in this Convention, officers of the applicant authority present in another Member State in order to exercise the rights laid down in this Convention shall at all times be able to produce written authority stating their identity and their official functions.TITLE II ASSISTANCE ON REQUEST Article 8 Principles 1. In order to provide the assistance required under this Title, the requested authority or the competent authority which it has addressed shall proceed as though it were acting on its own account or at the request of another authority in its own Member State. In so doing it shall avail itself of all the legal powers at its disposal within the framework of its national law in order to respond to the request.2. The requested authority shall extend this assistance to all circumstances of the infringement which have any recognisable bearing on the subject of the request for assistance without this requiring any additional request. In case of doubt, the requested authority shall firstly contact the applicant authority.Article 9 Form and content of the request for assistance 1. Requests for assistance shall always be made in writing. Documents necessary for the execution of such requests shall accompany the request.2. Requests pursuant to paragraph 1 shall include the following information:(a) the applicant authority making the request;(b) the measure requested;(c) the object of, and the reason for, the request;(d) the laws, rules and other legal provisions involved;(e) indications as exact and comprehensive as possible on the natural or legal persons being the target of the investigations;(f) a summary of the relevant facts, except in cases provided for in Article 13.3. Requests shall be submitted in an official language of the Member State of the requested authority or in a language acceptable to such authority.4. When required because of the urgency of the situation, oral requests shall be accepted, but must be confirmed in writing as soon as possible.5. If a request does not meet the formal requirements, the requested authority may ask for it to be corrected or completed; measures necessary to comply with the request may be commenced in the meantime.6. The requested authority shall agree to apply a particular procedure in response to a request, provided that that procedure is not in conflict with the legal and administrative provisions of the requested Member State.Article 10 Requests for information 1. At the request of the applicant authority, the requested authority shall communicate to it all information which may enable it to prevent, detect and prosecute infringements.2. The information communicated is to be accompanied by reports and other documents, or certified copies or extracts of the same, on which that information is based and which are in the possession of the request authority or which were produced or obtained in order to execute the request for information.3. By agreement between the applicant authority and the requested authority, officers authorised by the applicant authority may, subject to detailed instructions from the requested authority, obtain information pursuant to paragraph 1 from the offices of the requested Member State. This shall apply to all information derived from the documentation to which the staff of those offices have access. Those officers shall be authorised to take copies of the said documentation.Article 11 Requests for surveillance At the request of the applicant authority, the requested authority shall as far as possible keep a special watch or arrange for a special watch to be kept on persons where there are serious grounds for believing that they have infringed Community or national customs provisions or that they are committing or have carried out preparatory acts with a view to the commission of such infringements. At the request of the applicant authority, the requested authority shall also keep a watch on places, means of transport and goods connected with activities which might be in breach of the abovementioned customs provisions.Article 12 Requests for enquiries 1. The requested authority shall at the request of the applicant authority carry out, or arrange to have carried out, appropriate enquiries concerning operations which constitute, or appear to the applicant authority to constitute, infringements.The requested authority shall communicate the results of such enquiries to the applicant authority. Article 10(2) shall apply mutatis mutandis.2. By agreement between the applicant authority and the requested authority, officers appointed by the applicant authority may be present at the enquiries referred to in paragraph 1. Enquiries shall at all times be carried out by officers of the requested authority. The applicant authority's officers may not, of their own initiative, assume the powers conferred on officers of the requested authority. They shall, however, have access to the same premises and the same documents as the latter, through their intermediary and for the sole purpose of the enquiry being carried out.Article 13 Notification 1. At the request of the applicant authority, the requested authority shall, in accordance with the national rules of the Member State in which it is based, notify the addressee or have it notified of all instruments or decisions which emanate from the competent authorities of the Member State in which the applicant authority is based and concern the application of this Convention.2. Requests for notification, mentioning the subject of the instrument or decision to be notified, shall be accompanied by a translation in the official language or an official language of the Member State in which the requested authority is based, without prejudice to the latter's right to waive such a translation.Article 14 Use as evidence Findings, certificates, information, documents, certified true copies and other papers obtained in accordance with their national law by officers of the requested authority and transmitted to the applicant authority in the cases of assistance provided for in Articles 10 to 12 may be used as evidence in accordance with national law by the competent bodies of the Member State where the applicant authority is based.TITLE III SPONTANEOUS ASSISTANCE Article 15 Principle The competent authorities of each Member State shall, as laid down in Articles 16 and 17, subject to any limitations imposed by national law, provide assistance to the competent authorities of the other Member States without prior request.Article 16 Surveillance Where it serves the prevention, detection and prosecution of infringements in another Member State, each Member State's competent authorities shall:(a) as far as is possible keep, or have kept, the special watch described in Article 11;(b) communicate to the competent authorities of the other Member States concerned all information in their possession and, in particular, reports and other documents or certified true copies or extracts thereof, concerning operations which are connected with a planned or committed infringement.Article 17 Spontaneous information The competent authorities of each Member State shall immediately send to the competent authorities of the other Member States concerned all relevant information concerning planned or committed infringements and, in particular, information concerning the goods involved and new ways and means of committing such infringements.Article 18 Use as evidence Surveillance reports and information obtained by officers of one Member State and communicated to another Member State in the course of the spontaneous assistance provided for in Articles 15 to 17 may be used in accordance with national law as evidence by the competent bodies of the Member State receiving the information.TITLE IV SPECIAL FORMS OF COOPERATION Article 19 Principles 1. Customs administrations shall engage in cross-border cooperation in accordance with this Title. They shall provide each other with the necessary assistance in terms of staff and organisational support. Requests for cooperation shall, as a rule, take the form of requests for assistance in accordance with Article 9. In specific cases referred to in this Title, officers of the applicant authority may engage in activities in the territory of the requested State, with the approval of the requested authority.Coordination and planning of cross-border operations shall be the responsibility of the central coordinating units in accordance with Article 5.2. Cross-border cooperation within the meaning of paragraph 1 shall be permitted for the prevention, investigation and prosecution of infringements in cases of:(a) illicit traffic in drugs and psychotropic substances, weapons, munitions, explosive materials, cultural goods, dangerous and toxic waste, nuclear material or materials or equipment intended for the manufacture of atomic, biological and/or chemical weapons (prohibited goods);(b) trade in substances listed in Tables I and II of the United Nations Convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and intended for the illegal manufacture of drugs (precursor substances);(c) illegal cross-border commercial trade in taxable goods to evade tax or to obtain unauthorised State payments in connection with the import or export of goods, where the extent of the trade and the related risk to taxes and subsidies is such that the potential financial cost to the budget of the European Communities or the Member States is considerable;(d) any other trade in goods prohibited by Community or national rules.3. The requested authority shall not be obliged to engage in the specific forms of cooperation referred to in this Title if the type of investigation sought is not permitted or not provided for under the national law of the requested Member State. In this case, the applicant authority shall be entitled to refuse, for the same reason, the corresponding type of cross-border cooperation in the reverse case, where it is requested by an authority of the requested Member State.4. If necessary under the national law of the Member States, the participating authorities shall apply to their judicial authorities for approval of the planned investigations. Where the competent judicial authorities make their approval subject to certain conditions and requirements, the participating authorities shall ensure that those conditions and requirements are observed in the course of the investigations.5. Where officers of a Member State engage in activities in the territory of another Member State by virtue of this Title and cause damage by their activities, the Member State in whose territory the damage was caused shall make good the damage, in accordance with its national legislation in the same way as it would have done if the damage had been caused by its own officers. That Member State will be reimbursed in full by the Member State whose officers have caused the damage for the amounts it has paid to the victims or to other entitled persons or institutions.6. Without prejudice to the exercise of its rights vis-à-vis third parties and notwithstanding the obligation to make good damages according to the second sentence of paragraph 5, each Member State shall refrain, in the case provided for in the first sentence of paragraph 5, from requesting reimbursement of the amount of damages it has sustained from another Member State.7. Information obtained by officers during cross-border cooperation provided for in Articles 20 to 24 may be used, in accordance with national law and subject to particular conditions laid down by the competent authorities of the State in which the information was obtained, as evidence by the competent bodies of the Member State receiving the information.8. In the course of the operations referred to in Articles 20 to 24, officers on mission in the territory of another Member State shall be treated in the same way as officers of that State as regards infringements committed against them or by them.Article 20 Hot pursuit 1. Officers of the customs administration of one of the Member States pursuing in their country, an individual observed in the act of committing one of the infringements referred to in Article 19(2) which could give rise to extradition, or participating in such an infringement, shall be authorised to continue pursuit in the territory of another Member State without prior authorisation where, given the particular urgency of the situation, it was not possible to notify the competent authorities of the other Member State prior to entry into that territory or where these authorities have been unable to reach the scene in time to take the pursuit.The pursuing officers shall, not later than when they cross the border, contact the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory the pursuit is to take place. The pursuit shall cease as soon as the Member State in whose territory the pursuit is taking place so requests. At the request of the pursuing officers, the competent authorities of the said Member State shall challenge the pursued person so as to establish his identity or to arrest him. Member States shall inform the depositary of the pursuing officers to whom this provision applies; the depositary shall inform the other Member States.2. The pursuit shall be carried out in accordance with the following procedures, defined by the declaration provided for in paragraph 6:(a) the pursuing officers shall not have the right to apprehend;(b) however, if no request to cease the pursuit is made and if the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory the pursuit is taking place are unable to intervene quickly enough, the pursuing officers may apprehend the person pursued until the officers of the said Member State, who must be informed without delay, are able to establish his identity or arrest him.3. Pursuit shall be carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 in one of the following ways as defined by the declaration provided for in paragraph 6:(a) in an area or during a period, as from the crossing of the border, to be established in the declaration;(b) without limit in space or time.4. Pursuit shall be subject to the following general conditions:(a) the pursuing officers shall comply with the provisions of this Article and with the law of the Member State in whose territory they are operating; they shall obey the instructions of the competent authorities of the said Member State;(b) when the pursuit takes place on the sea, it shall, where it extends to the high sea or the exclusive economic zone, be carried out in conformity with the international law of the sea as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and, when it takes place in the territory of another Member State, it shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of this Article;(c) entry into private homes and places not accessible to the public shall be prohibited;(d) the pursuing officers shall be easily identifiable, either by their uniform or an armband or by means of accessories fitted to their means of transport; the use of civilian clothes combined with the use of unmarked means of transport without the aforementioned identification is prohibited; the pursuing officers shall at all times be able to prove that they are acting in an official capacity;(e) the pursuing officers may carry their service weapons, save (i) where the requested Member State has made a general declaration that weapons may never be carried into its territory or (ii) where specifically decided otherwise by the requested Member State. When officers of another Member State are permitted to carry their service weapons, their use shall be prohibited save in cases of legitimate self-defence;(f) once the pursued person has been apprehended as provided for in paragraph 2(b), for the purpose of bringing him before the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory the pursuit took place he may be subjected only to a security search; handcuffs may be used during his transfer; objects carried by the pursued person may be seized;(g) after each operation mentioned in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, the pursuing officers shall present themselves before the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory they were operating and shall give an account of their mission; at the request of those authorities, they must remain at their disposal until the circumstances of their action have been adequately elucidated; this condition shall apply even where the pursuit has not resulted in the arrest of the pursued person;(h) the authorities of the Member State from which the pursuing officers have come shall, when requested by the authorities of the Member State in whose territory the pursuit took place, assist the enquiry subsequent to the operation in which they took part, including legal proceedings.5. A person who, following the action provided for in paragraph 2, has been arrested by the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory the pursuit took place may, whatever his nationality, be held for questioning. The relevant rules of national law shall apply mutatis mutandis.If the person is not a national of the Member State in whose territory he was arrested, he shall be released no later than six hours after his arrest, not including the hours between midnight and 9 a.m., unless the competent authorities of the said Member State have previously received a request for his provisional arrest for the purposes of extradition in any form.6. On signing this convention, each Member State shall make a declaration in which it shall define, on the basis of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, the procedures for implementing pursuit in its territory.A Member State may at any time replace its declaration by another declaration, provided the latter does not restrict the scope of the former.Each declaration shall be made after consultations with each of the Member States concerned and with a view to obtaining equivalent arrangements in those States.7. Member States may, on a bilateral basis, extend the scope of paragraph 1 and adopt additional provisions in implementation of this Article.8. When depositing its instruments of adoption of this Convention, a Member State may declare that it is not bound by this Article or by part thereof. Such declaration may be withdrawn at any time.Article 21 Cross-border surveillance 1. Officers of the customs administration of one of the Member States who are keeping under observation in their country persons in respect of whom there are serious grounds for believing that they are involved in one of the infringements referred to in Article 19(2) shall be authorised to continue their observation in the territory of another Member State where the latter has authorised cross-border observation in response to a request for assistance which has previously been submitted. Conditions may be attached to the authorisation.Member States shall inform the depositary of the officers to whom this provision applies; the depositary shall inform the other Member States.On request, the observation shall be entrusted to officers of the Member State in whose territory it is carried out.The request referred to in the first subparagraph shall be sent to an authority designated by each of the Member States empowered to grant the requested authorisation or pass on the request.Member States shall inform the depositary of the authority designated for this purpose; the depositary shall inform the other Member States.2. Where, for particularly urgent reasons, prior authorisation of the other Member State cannot be requested, the officers conducting the observation shall be authorised to continue beyond the border the observation of persons in respect of whom there are serious grounds for believing that they are involved in one of the infringements referred to in Article 19(2), provided that the following conditions are met:(a) the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory the observation is to be continued shall be notified immediately of the crossing of the border, during the observation;(b) a request submitted in accordance with paragraph 1 and outlining the grounds for crossing the border without prior authorisation shall be submitted without delay.Observation shall cease as soon as the Member State in whose territory it is taking place so requests, following the notification referred to in (a) or the request referred to in (b), or where authorisation has not been obtained five hours after the border was crossed.3. The observation referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 shall be carried out only under the following general conditions:(a) the officers conducting the observation shall comply with the provisions of this Article and with the law of the Member State in whose territory they are operating; they must obey the instructions of the competent authorities of the said Member State;(b) except in the situations provided for in paragraph 2, the officers shall, during the observation, carry a document certifying that authorisation has been granted;(c) the officers conducting the observation shall be able at all times to provide proof that they are acting in an official capacity;(d) the officers conducting the observation may carry their service weapons during the observation save (i) where the requested Member State has made a general declaration that weapons may never be carried into its territory or (ii) where specifically decided otherwise by the requested Member State. When officers of another Member State are permitted to carry their service weapons, their use shall be prohibited save in cases of legitimate self-defence;(e) entry into private homes and places not accessible to the public shall be prohibited;(f) the officers conducting the observation may neither challenge nor arrest the person under observation;(g) all operations shall be the subject of a report to the authorities of the Member State in whose territory they took place; the officers conducting the observation may be required to appear in person;(h) the authorities of the Member State from which the observing officers have come shall, when requested by the authorities of the Member State in whose territory the observation took place, assist the enquiry subsequent to the operation in which they took part, including legal proceedings.4. The Member States may, at bilateral level, extend the scope of this Article and adopt additional measures in implementation thereof.5. When depositing its instruments of adoption of this Convention, a Member State may declare that it is not bound by this Article or by part thereof. Such declaration may be withdrawn at any time.Article 22 Controlled delivery 1. Each Member State shall undertake to ensure that, at the request of another Member State, controlled deliveries may be permitted on its territory in the framework of criminal investigations into extraditable offences.2. The decision to carry out controlled deliveries shall be taken in each individual case by the competent authorities of the requested Member State, with due regard for the national law of that State.3. Controlled deliveries shall take place in accordance with the procedures of the requested Member State. Competence to act and to direct operations shall lie with the competent authorities of that Member State.The requested authority shall take over control of the delivery when the goods cross the border or at an agreed hand-over point in order to avoid any interruption of surveillance. During the rest of the journey it shall ensure that the goods are kept permanently under surveillance in such a way that at any time it has the possibility of arresting the perpetrators and seizing the goods.4. Consignments the controlled delivery of which is agreed to may, with the consent of the Member States concerned, be intercepted and allowed to continue with the initial contents intact or removed or replaced in whole or in part.Article 23 Covert investigations 1. At the request of the applicant authority, the requested authority may authorise officers of the customs administration of the requesting Member State or officers acting on behalf of such administration operating under cover of a false identity (covert investigators) to operate on the territory of the requested Member State. The applicant authority shall make the request only where it would be extremely difficult to elucidate the facts without recourse to the proposed investigative measures. The officers in question shall be authorised in the course of their activities to collect information and make contact with subjects or other persons associated with them.2. Covert investigations in the requested Member State shall have a limited duration. The preparation and supervision of the investigations shall take place in close cooperation between the relevant authorities of the requested and applicant Member States.3. The conditions under which a covert investigation is allowed, as well as the conditions under which it is carried out, shall be determined by the requested authority in accordance with its national law. If, in the course of a covert investigation, information is acquired in relation to an infringement other than that covered by the original request, then the conditions concerning the use to which such information may be put shall also be determined by the requested authority in accordance with its national law.4. The requested authority shall provide the necessary manpower and technical support. It shall take measures to protect the officers referred to in paragraph 1, while they are active in the requested Member State.5. When depositing its instruments of adoption of this Convention, a Member State may declare that it is not bound by this Article or part thereof. Such declaration may be withdrawn at any time.Article 24 Joint special investigation teams 1. By mutual agreement, the authorities of several Member States may set up a joint special investigation team based in a Member State and comprising officers with the relevant specialisations.The joint special investigation team shall have the following tasks:- implementation of difficult and demanding investigations of specific infringements, requiring simultaneous, coordinated action in the Member States concerned,- coordination of joint activities to prevent and detect particular types of infringement and obtain information on the persons involved, their associates and the methods used.2. Joint special investigation teams shall operate under the following general conditions:(a) they shall be set up only for a specific purpose and for a limited period;(b) an officer from the Member State in which the team's activities take place shall head the team;(c) the participating officers shall be bound by the law of the Member State in whose territory the team's activities take place;(d) the Member State in which the team's activities take place shall make the necessary organisational arrangements for the team to operate.3. Membership of the team shall not bestow on officers any powers of intervention in the territory of another Member State.TITLE V DATA PROTECTION Article 25 Data protection for the exchange of data 1. When information is exchanged, the customs administrations shall take into account in each specific case the requirements for the protection of personal data. They shall respect the relevant provisions of the Convention of the Council of Europe of 28 January 1981 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data. In the interest of data protection, a Member State may, in accordance with paragraph 2, impose conditions concerning the processing of personal data by another Member State to which such personal data may be passed.2. Without prejudice to the provisions of the Convention concerning the use of information technology for customs purposes, the following provisions shall apply to personal data which are communicated pursuant to the application of this Convention:(a) processing of the personal data by the recipient authority shall be authorised only for the purpose referred to in Article 1(1). That authority may forward them, without prior consent from the Member State supplying them, to its customs administrations, its investigative authorities and its judicial bodies to enable them to prosecute and punish infringements within the meaning of Article 4(3). In all other cases of data transmission, the consent of the Member State which supplied the information is necessary;(b) the authority of the Member State which communicates data shall ensure that they are accurate and up-to-date. If it emerges that inaccurate data have been communicated or data have been communicated which should not have been communicated or that lawfully communicated data are required at a later stage to be erased in accordance with the law of the communicating Member State, the recipient authority shall be immediately informed thereof. It shall be obliged to correct such data or have them erased. If the recipient authority has reason to believe that communicated data are inaccurate or should be erased, it shall inform the communicating Member State;(c) in cases where communicated data should, according to the law of the communicating Member State, be erased or amended, the persons concerned must be given the effective right to correct the data;(d) the forwarding and receipt of exchanged data shall be recorded by the authorities concerned;(e) if so requested, the communicating and recipient authorities shall inform the person concerned, at that person's request, of the personal data communicated and the use to which they are to be put. There is no obligation to provide the information if it is found, on consideration of the matter, that the importance to the public of the information being withheld outweighs the importance to the person concerned of receiving it. Moreover, the right of the person concerned to receive information about the personal data communicated shall be determined in accordance with the national laws, regulations and procedures of the Member State in whose territory the information is requested. Before any decision is taken on providing information, the communicating authority shall be given the opportunity of stating its position;(f) Member States shall be liable, in accordance with their own laws, regulations and procedures, for injury caused to a person through the processing of data communicated in the Member State concerned. This shall also be the case where the injury was caused by the communication of inaccurate data or the fact that the communicating authority communicated data in violation of the Convention;(g) the data communicated shall be kept for a period not exceeding that necessary for the purposes for which they were communicated. The need to keep them shall be examined at the appropriate moment by the Member State concerned;(h) in any event, the data shall enjoy at least the same protection as is given to similar data in the Member State which received them;(i) every Member State shall take the appropriate measures to ensure compliance with this Article by the application of effective controls. Every Member State may assign the task of control to the national supervisory authority mentioned in Article 17 of the Convention concerning the use of information technology for customs purposes.3. For the purposes of this Article, 'the processing of personal data` shall be understood in accordance with the definition in Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (1).TITLE VI INTERPRETATION OF THE CONVENTION Article 26 Court of Justice 1. The Court of Justice of the European Communities shall have jurisdiction to rule on any dispute between Member States regarding the interpretation or the application of this Convention whenever it has proved impossible for the dispute to be settled by the Council within six months of its being referred to the Council by one of its members.2. The Court of Justice of the European Communities shall have jurisdiction to rule on any dispute between Member States and the Commission concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which it has proved impossible to settle through negotiation. The dispute may be submitted to the Court of Justice after the expiry of a period of six months from the data on which one of the parties notified the other of the existence of a dispute.3. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction, subject to the conditions laid down in paragraphs 4 to 7, to give preliminary rulings on the interpretation of this Convention.4. By a declaration made at the time of the signing of this Convention or at any time thereafter, any Member State shall be able to accept the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give preliminary rulings on the interpretation of this Convention as specified in either paragraph 5(a) or (b).5. A Member State which has made a declaration pursuant to paragraph 4 shall specify that either:(a) any court or tribunal of that State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law may request the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give a preliminary ruling on a question raised in a case pending before it and concerning the interpretation of this Convention if that court or tribunal considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgement, or(b) any court or tribunal of that State may request the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give a preliminary ruling on a question raised in a case pending before it and concerning the interpretation of this Convention if that court or tribunal considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment.6. The Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the Rules of Procedure of that Court of Justice shall apply.7. Any Member State, whether or not it has made a declaration pursuant to paragraph 4, shall be entitled to submit statements of case or written observations to the Court in cases which arise under paragraph 5.8. The Court of Justice shall not have jurisdiction to check the validity or proportionality of operations carried out by competent law enforcement agencies under this Convention nor to rule on the exercise of responsibilities which devolve upon Member States for maintaining law and order and for safeguarding internal security.TITLE VII IMPLEMENTATION AND FINAL PROVISIONS Article 27 Confidentiality The customs administrations shall take account, in each specific case of exchange of information, of the requirements of investigation secrecy. To that end, a Member State may impose conditions covering the use of information by another Member State to which that information may be passed.Article 28 Exemptions from the obligation to provide assistance 1. This Convention shall not oblige the authorities of Member States to provide mutual assistance where such assistance would be likely to harm the public policy or other essential interests of the State concerned, particularly in the field of data protection, or where the scope of the action requested, in particular in the context of the special forms of cooperation provided for in Title IV, is obviously disproportionate to the seriousness of the presumed infringement. In such cases, assistance may be refused in whole or in part or made subject to compliance with certain conditions.2. Reasons must be given for any refusal to provide assistance.Article 29 Expenses 1. Member States shall normally waive all claims for reimbursement of costs incurred in the implementation of this Convention, with the exception of expenses for fees paid to experts.2. If expenses of a substantial and extraordinary nature are, or will be, required to execute the request, the customs administrations involved shall consult to determine the terms and conditions under which a request shall be executed as well as the manner in which the costs shall be borne.Article 30 Reservations 1. Save as provided in Article 20(8), Article 21(5) and Article 23(5), this Convention shall not be the subject of any reservations.2. Member States which have already established agreements between them covering matters regulated in Title IV of this Convention may make reservations pursuant to paragraph 1 only in so far as such reservations do not affect their obligations under such agreements.3. Accordingly, the obligations arising out of the provisions of the Convention of 19 June 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders which provide for closer cooperation shall not be affected by this Convention in the context of relations between the Member States which are bound by those provisions.Article 31 Territorial application 1. This Convention shall apply to the territories of the Member States as referred to in Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (2), as revised by the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (3) and in Regulation (EC) No 82/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 (4), including, for the Federal Republic of Germany, the Island of Heligoland and the territory of Büsingen (within the framework of and pursuant to the Treaty of 23 November 1964 between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation on the inclusion of the commune of Büsingen am Hochrhein in the customs territory of the Swiss Confederation, or the current version thereof) and, for the Italian Republic, the municipalities of Livigno and Campione d'Italia, and to the territorial waters, the inland maritime waters and the airspace of the territories of the Member States.2. The Council, acting unanimously by the procedure provided for in Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, may adapt paragraph 1 to any amendment of the provisions of Community law referred to therein.Article 32 Entry into force 1. This Convention shall be subject to adoption by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.2. Member States shall notify the depositary of the completion of the constitutional procedures for the adoption of this Convention.3. This convention shall enter into force 90 days after the notification referred to in paragraph 2 by the State, Member of the European Union at the time of adoption by the Council of the Act drawing up this Convention, which is last to complete that formality.4. Until this Convention enters into force, any Member State may, when giving the notification referred to in paragraph 2, or at any other later time, declare that as far as it is concerned this Convention, with the exception of Article 23 thereof, shall apply to its relations with Member States that have made the same declaration. Such declarations shall take effect 90 days after the date of deposit thereof.5. This Convention shall apply only to requests submitted after the date on which it enters into force or is applied as between the requested Member State and the applicant Member State.6. On the date of entry into force of this Convention, the Convention on the provision of mutual assistance between customs administrations of 7 September 1967 shall be repealed.Article 33 Accession 1. This Convention shall be open to accession by any State that becomes a Member State of the European Union.2. The text of the Convention in the language of the acceding Member State, as drawn up by the Council of the European Union, shall be authentic.3. The instruments of accession shall be deposited with the depositary.4. This Convention shall come into force with respect to any State that accedes to it 90 days after the deposit of its instrument of accession or on the date of entry into force of the Convention if it has not already entered into force upon expiry of the said period of 90 days.5. Where this Convention has not yet entered into force at the time of the deposit of their instrument of accession, Article 32(4) shall apply to acceding Member States.Article 34 Amendments 1. Amendments to this Convention may be proposed by any Member State that is a High Contracting Party. Any proposed amendment shall be sent to the depositary, who shall communicate it to the Council and the Commission.2. Without prejudice to Article 31(2), the amendments to the Convention shall be adopted by the Council, which shall recommend them to the Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.3. Amendments adopted in accordance with paragraph 2 shall come into force in accordance with Article 32(3).Article 35 Depositary 1. The Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union shall act as depositary of this Convention.2. The depositary shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Communities information on the progress of adoptions and accessions, implementation, declarations and reservations, and also any other notification concerning this Convention.En fe de lo cual los plenipotenciarios abajo firmantes suscriben el presente Convenio.Til bekræftelse heraf har undertegnede befuldmægtigede underskrevet denne konvention.Zu Urkund dessen haben die unterzeichneten Bevollmächtigten ihre Unterschrift unter dieses Übereinkommen gesetzt.Óå ðßóôùóç ôùí áíùôÝñù, ïé õðïãñÜöïíôåò ðëçñåîïýóéïé Ýèåóáí ôçí õðïãñáöÞ ôïõò êÜôù áðü ôçí ðáñïýóá óýìâáóç.In witness whereof, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have hereunto set their hands.En foi de quoi, les plénipotentiaires soussignés ont apposé leurs signatures au bas de la présente convention.Dá Fhianú sin, chuir la Lánchumhachtaigh thíos-sínithe a lámh leis an gCoinbhinsiún seo.In fede di che, i plenipotenziari sottoscritti hanno apposto le loro firme in calce alla presente convenzione.Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekende gevolmachtigden hun handtekening onder deze Overeenkomst hebben gesteld.Em fé do que, os plenipotenciários abaixo-assinados apuseram as suas assinaturas no final da presente Convenção.Tämän vakuudeksi alla mainitut täysivaltaiset edustajat ovat allekirjoittaneet tämän yleissopimuksen.Till bekräftelse härav har undertecknade befullmäktigade ombud undertecknat denna konvention.Hecho en Bruselas, el dieciocho de diciembre de mil novecientos noventa y siete, en un ejemplar único, en lenguas alemana, danesa, española, finesa, francesa, griega, inglesa, irlandesa, italiana, neerlandesa, portuguesa y sueca, cuyos textos son igualmente auténticos y que será depositado en los archivos de la Secretaría General del Consejo de la Unión Europea.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den attende december nitten hundrede og syvoghalvfems, i ét eksemplar på dansk, engelsk, finsk, fransk, græsk, irsk, italiensk, nederlandsk, portugisisk, spansk, svensk og tysk, idet hver af disse tekster har samme gyldighed; de deponeres i arkiverne i Generalsekretariatet for Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.Geschehen zu Brüssel am achtzehnten Dezember neunzehnhundertsiebenundneunzig in einer Urschrift in dänischer, deutscher, englischer, finnischer, französischer, griechischer, irischer, italienischer, niederländischer, portugiesischer, schwedischer und spanischer Sprache, wobei jeder Wortlaut gleichermaßen verbindlich ist; die Urschrift wird im Archiv des Generalsekretariats des Rates der Europäischen Union hinterlegt. ̧ãéíå ïôéò ÂñõîÝëëåò, óôéò äåêáïêôþ Äåêåìâñßïõ ÷ßëéá åííéáêüóéá åíåíÞíôá åðôÜ, óå Ýíá ìüíï áíôßôõðï óôçí áããëéêÞ, ãáëëéêÞ, ãåñìáíéêÞ, äáíéêÞ, åëëçíéêÞ, éñëáíäéêÞ, éóðáíéêÞ, éôáëéêÞ, ïëëáíäéêÞ, ðïñôïãáëéêÞ, óïõçäéêÞ êáé öéíëáíäéêÞ ãëþóóá 7 êÜèå êåßìåíï åßíáé åîßóïõ áõèåíôéêü êáé êáôáôßèåôáé óôá áñ÷åßá ôçò ÃåíéêÞò Ãñáììáôåßáò ôïõ Óõìâïõëßïõ ôçò ÅõñùðáúêÞò ̧íùóçò.Done at Brussels on the eighteenth day of December in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven in a single original, in the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Irish, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish languages, each text being equally authentic, such original remaining deposited in the archives of the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union.Fait à Bruxelles, le dix-huit décembre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-sept, en un exemplaire unique, en langues allemande, anglaise, danoise, espagnole, finnoise, française, grecque, irlandaise, italienne, néerlandaise, portugaise et suédoise, chaque texte faisant également foi, exemplaire qui est déposé dans les archives du Secrétariat général du Conseil de l'Union européenne.Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil ar an ochtú lá déag de Nollaig sa bhliain míle naoi gcéad nócha a seacht, i scríbhinn bhunaidh amháin sa Bhéarla, sa Danmhairgis, san Fhionlainnis, sa Fhraincis, sa Ghaeilge, sa Ghearmáinis, sa Ghréigis, san lodáilis, san Ollainnis, sa Phortaingéilis, sa Spáinnis agus sa tSualainnis agus comhúdarás ag na téacsanna i ngach ceann de na teangacha sin; déanfar an scríbhinn bhunaidh sin a thaisceadh i gcartlann Ardrúnaíocht Chomhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì diciotto dicembre millenovecentonovantasette, in un unico esemplare, in lingua danese, finlandese, francese, greca, inglese, irlandese, italiana, portoghese, spagnola, svedese e tedesca, ciascun testo facente ugualmente fede, e depositato negli archivi del Segretariato generale del Consiglio dell'Unione europea.Gedaan te Brussel, de achttiende december negentienhonderd zevenennegentig, in één exemplaar, in de Deense, de Duitse, de Engelse, de Finse, de Franse, de Griekse, de Ierse, de Italiaanse, de Nederlandse, de Portugese, de Spaanse en de Zweedse taal, zijnde alle teksten gelijkelijk authentiek, dat wordt neergelegd in het archief van het Secretariaat-generaal van de Raad van de Europese Unie.Feito em Bruxelas, em dezoito de Dezembro de mil novecentos e noventa e sete em exemplar único, nas línguas alemã, dinamarquesa, espanhola, finlandesa, francesa, grega, inglesa, irlandesa, italiana, neerlandesa, portuguesa e sueca, fazendo igualmente fé todos os textos, depositado nos arquivos do Secretariado-Geral do Conselho da União Europeia.Tehty Brysselissä kahdeksantenatoista päivänä joulukuuta vuonna tuhatyhdeksänsataayhdeksänkymmentäseitsemän englannin, espanjan, hollannin, iirin, italian, kreikan, portugalin, ranskan, ruotsin, saksan, suomen ja tanskan kielellä yhtenä alkuperäiskappaleena, joka talletetaan Euroopan unionin neuvoston pääsihteeristön arkistoon ja jonka jokainen teksti on yhtä todistusvoimainen.Som skedde i Bryssel den artonde december nittonhundranittiosju i ett enda exemplar på danska, engelska, finska, franska, grekiska, iriska, italienska, nederländska, portugisiska, spanska, svenska och tyska språken, vilka samtliga texter är lika giltiga, vilket skall deponeras i arkivet vid generalsekretariatet vid Europeiska unionens råd.Pour le gouvernement du royaume de BelgiqueVoor de Regering van het Koninkrijk BelgiëFür die Regierung des Königreichs Belgien>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>For regeringen for Kongeriget Danmark>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Für die Regierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Ãéá ôçí êõâÝñíçóç ôçò ÅëëçíéêÞò Äçìïêñáôßáò>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Por el Gobierno del Reino de España>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Pour le gouvernement de la République française>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Thar ceann Rialtas na hÉireannFor the Government of Ireland>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Per il governo della Repubblica italiana>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Pour le gouvernement du grand-duché de Luxembourg>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Voor de regering van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Für die Regierung der Republik Österreich>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Pelo Governo da República Portuguesa>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>Suomen hallituksen puolestaPå finska regeringens vägnar>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>På Konungariket Sveriges vägnar>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>For the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>(1) OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.(2) OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 2.(3) OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 181.(4) OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 2.ANNEX DECLARATIONS TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CONVENTION AND PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL 1. Re Articles 1(1) and 28With reference to the exceptions to the obligation to provide assistance under Article 28 of the Convention, Italy declares that the execution of mutual assistance requests, on the basis of the Convention, concerning infringements which under Italian law are not infringements of national or community customs provisions, may - for reasons relating to the subdivision of competence among domestic authorities in prevention and prosecution of crimes - harm the public policy or other national essential interests.2. Re Articles 1(2) and 3(2)Denmark and Finland declare that they interpret the term 'judicial authorities` or 'judicial authority` in Articles 1(2) and 3(2) of the Convention in the sense of their declarations made pursuant to Article 24 of the European Convention on mutual assistance in criminal matters, signed in Strasbourg on 20 April 1959.3. Re Article 4(3) second indentDenmark declares, as far as it is concerned, that Article 4(3), second indent, covers only actions by which a person participates in the commission by a group of people, acting toward a common goal, of one or more of the infringements concerned, including situations where the person concerned does not take part in the actual commission of the offence or offences in question; such participation must be based on knowledge of the purpose and general criminal activities of the group, or on knowledge of the group's intention to commit the offence(s) in question.4. Re Article 4(3), third indentDenmark declares, as far as it is concerned, that Article 4(3), third indent, applies only to the predicate offences in respect of which at any time receiving stolen goods is punishable under Danish law, including Section 191a of the Danish criminal Code on receiving stolen drugs and Section 284 of the Criminal Code on receiving goods in connection with smuggling of a particularly aggravated nature.5. Re Article 6(4)Denmark, Finland and Sweden declare that the liaison officers referred to in Article 6(4) may also represent the interests of Norway and Iceland or vice versa. The five Nordic countries have since 1982 had an arrangement whereby the stationed liaison officers from one of the countries involved also represent the other Nordic countries. This arrangement was made in order to strengthen the fight against drug trafficking and to limit the economic burden imposed on individual countries by the stationing of the liaison officers. Denmark, Finland and Sweden attach great importance to the continuation of this arrangement, which operates well.6. Re Article 20(8)Denmark declares that it accepts the provisions of Article 20, subject to the following conditions:In case of a hot pursuit exercised by the customs authorities of another Member State at sea or through the air, such pursuit may be extended to Danish territory, including Danish territorial waters and the airspace above Danish territory and territorial waters, only if the competent Danish authorities have received prior notice thereof.7. Re Article 21(5)Denmark declares that it accepts the provisions of Article 21, subject to the following conditions:Cross-border surveillance without prior authorisation may be carried out only in accordance with Article 21(2) and (3) if there are serious grounds for believing that the persons under observation are involved in one of the infringements referred to in Article 19(2) which could give rise to extradition.8. Re Article 25(2)(i)Member States undertake to keep each other informed in the Council on measures taken to ensure that the commitments referred to in point (i) are observed.9. Declaration made pursuant to Article 26(4)At the time of the signing of this Convention, the following declared that they accepted the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 26(5):- Ireland in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 26(5)(a),- the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Italian Republic and the Republic of Austria in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 26(5)(b).DECLARATION The Federal Republic of Germany, the Italian Republic and the Republic of Austria, reserve the right to make provision in their national law to the effect that, where a question relating to the interpretation of the Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations is raised in a case pending before a national court or tribunal against whose decision there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal will be required to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Communities.


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 21.2.2008
 EN
 Official Journal of the European Union
 L 47/1
 DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
 No 96/2007
 of 27 July 2007
 amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms
 THE EEA JOINT COMMMITTEE,
 Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,
 Whereas:
 (1)
 Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 89/2005 of 10 June 2005 (1).
 (2)
 It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Council Decision 2007/162/EC, Euratom of 5 March 2007 establishing a Civil Protection Financial Instrument (2).
 (3)
 Protocol 31 to the Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2007,
 HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
 Article 1
 The following subparagraph shall be added in Article 10(8) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:
 ‘(c)
 Community acts which shall take effect from 1 January 2007:
 —
 32007 D 0162: Council Decision 2007/162/EC, Euratom of 5 March 2007 establishing a Civil Protection Financial Instrument (OJ L 71, 10.3.2007, p. 9).’
 Article 2
 This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (3).
 It shall apply from 1 January 2007.
 Article 3
 This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.
 Done at Brussels, 27 July 2007.
 For the EEA Joint Committee
 The President
 Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON
 (1) OJ L 268, 13.10.2005, p. 25.
 (2) OJ L 71, 10.3.2007, p. 9.
 (3) No constitutional requirements indicated.


type: caselaw

text:
 3.8.2013
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 225/13
 2013 m. gegužės 30 d. Teisingumo Teismo (trečioji kolegija) sprendimas byloje (Nejvyšší správní soud (Čekijos Respublika) prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą) Mehmet Arslan prieš Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie
 (Byla C-534/11) (1)
 (Laisvės, saugumo ir teisingumo erdvė - Direktyva 2008/115/EB - Bendri neteisėtai šalyje esančių trečiųjų šalių piliečių grąžinimo standartai ir tvarka - Taikymas prieglobsčio prašytojams - Galimybė laikyti sulaikytą trečiosios šalies pilietį po prieglobsčio prašymo pateikimo)
 2013/C 225/21
 Proceso kalba: čekų
 Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas
 Nejvyšší správní soud
 Šalys pagrindinėje byloje
 Ieškovas: Mehmet Arslan
 Atsakovė: Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie
 Dalykas
 Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą — Nejvyšší správní soud (Čekijos Respublika) — 2008 m. gruodžio 16 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos 2008/115/EB dėl bendrų nelegaliai esančių trečiųjų šalių piliečių grąžinimo standartų ir tvarkos valstybėse narėse (OL L 348, p. 98) 2 straipsnio 1 dalies, atsižvelgiant į 9 konstatuojamąją dalį, aiškinimas — Taikymo sritis — Valstybės narės teritorijoje neteisėtai esančio trečiosios šalies piliečio sulaikymas siekiant jį grąžinti, kai jis yra padavęs prašymą dėl prieglobsčio, kaip jis suprantamas pagal 2005 m. gruodžio 1 d. Tarybos direktyvą 2005/85/EB, nustatančią būtiniausius reikalavimus dėl pabėgėlio statuso suteikimo ir panaikinimo tvarkos valstybėse narėse (OL L 326, p. 13)
 Rezoliucinė dalis
 1.
 2008 m. gruodžio 16 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos 2008/115/EB dėl bendrų nelegaliai esančių trečiųjų šalių piliečių grąžinimo standartų ir tvarkos valstybėse narėse 2 straipsnio 1 dalį kartu su jos 9 konstatuojamąja dalimi reikia aiškinti taip: ši direktyva netaikoma trečiosios šalies piliečiui, padavusiam tarptautinės apsaugos prašymą, kaip tai suprantama pagal 2005 m. gruodžio 1 d. Tarybos direktyvą 2005/85/EB, nustatančią būtiniausius reikalavimus dėl pabėgėlio statuso suteikimo ir panaikinimo tvarkos valstybėse narėse, laikotarpiu nuo minėto prašymo pateikimo iki tol, kol dėl šio prašymo priimamas sprendimas pirmąja instancija arba prireikus kol išnagrinėjamas dėl minėto sprendimo pareikštas skundas.
 2.
 2003 m. sausio 27 d. Tarybos direktyva 2003/9/EB, nustatančia minimalias normas dėl prieglobsčio prašytojų priėmimo, ir Direktyva 2005/85 nedraudžiama, kad trečiosios šalies pilietis, padavęs tarptautinės apsaugos prašymą, kaip tai suprantama pagal Direktyvą 2005/85, po to, kai buvo sulaikytas remiantis Direktyvos 2008/115 15 straipsniu, būtų toliau sulaikytas pagal nacionalinės teisės nuostatą, kai kiekvienu atveju įvertinus visas reikšmingas aplinkybes paaiškėja, kad šis prašymas pateiktas vien siekiant pavėlinti ar sutrukdyti įvykdyti sprendimą grąžinti ir kad objektyviai būtina sulaikymo priemonę palikti galioti, siekiant neleisti, kad atitinkamas asmuo visiškai išvengtų grąžinimo priemonės taikymo.
 (1) OL C 65, 2012 3 3.


type: wikipedia

text:
A német nagydíj volt az 1954-es Formula–1 világbajnokság hatodik futama, amelyet 1954. augusztus 1-jén rendeztek meg a német Nürburgringen.
 Futam
 Az ötödik versenyt a németországi Nürburgringen rendezték, ahol a német szurkolók nagy örömére a Fangio, a Mercedes volánjánál ülve, pole pozícióból indulva nyert, és a verseny leggyorsabb körét is egy Mercedes futotta, Karl Klingel a volánjánál, aki végül is negyedik lett, s ferraris Sergio Mantovani előtt. A dobogóra Fangio mögött két ferraris állhatott fel, Mike Hawthorn és Maurice Trintignant. De Hawthornnak meg kellett osztania pontjait Gonzálezzel, akivel autót cserélt, hat körrel a 22 körös verseny vége előtt. Fangio a hátralévő három fordulótól függetlenül már világbajnok lett.
 Jegyzetek
 Statisztikák
 A versenyben vezettek: Juan Manuel Fangio 20 kör (1–14., 17–22.) és Karl Kling 2 kör (15–16.).
 Juan Manuel Fangio 11. győzelme, 14. pp., Karl Kling egyetlen lgyk. Mercedes 2. győzelme.
 Megosztott autó:
 #1-es autó: José Froilán González (16 kör), majd Mike Hawthorn (6 kör).
 Onofre Marimón utolsó versenye.
 Források
 A Formula-1 hivatalos oldala
 Nemetnagydij
 Német Formula–1 futamok


type: legislation

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 31990L0604
 Richtlinie 90/604/EWG des Rates vom 8. November 1990 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG über den Jahresabschluß und der Richtlinie 83/349/EWG über den konsolidierten Abschluß hinsichtlich der Ausnahme für kleine und mittlere Gesellschaften sowie der Offenlegung von Abschlüßen in Ecu
 Amtsblatt Nr. L 317 vom 16/11/1990 S. 0057 - 0059 Finnische Sonderausgabe: Kapitel 17 Band 1 S. 0105 Schwedische Sonderausgabe: Kapitel 17 Band 1 S. 0105
 ***** RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 8. November 1990 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG über den Jahresabschluß und der Richtlinie 83/349/EWG über den konsolidierten Abschluß hinsichtlich der Ausnahme für kleine und mittlere Gesellschaften sowie der Offenlegung von Abschlüssen in Ecu (90/604/EWG) DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN - gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, insbesondere auf Artikel 54, auf Vorschlag der Kommission (1), in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Europäischen Parlament (2), nach Stellungnahme des Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses (3), in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe: Die Koordinierung der einzelstaatlichen Vorschriften über die Gliederung und den Inhalt des Jahresabschlusses und des Lageberichtes sowie über die Bewertungsmethoden und die Offenlegung dieser Unterlagen, insbesondere bei der Aktiengesellschaft und der Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, ist das Ziel der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG (4), zuletzt geändert durch die Akte über den Beitritt Spaniens und Portugals. Nach der Entschließung des Rates vom 3. November 1986 zum Aktionsprogramm für die kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen (5) und der Entschließung des Rates vom 30. Juni 1988 über die Verbesserung der Rahmenbedingungen für Unternehmen und die Förderung der Entwicklung von Unternehmen, insbesondere von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen, in der Gemeinschaft (6) sind die administrativen Anforderungen, die an die kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen gestellt werden, soweit wie möglich zu vereinfachen, insbesondere ist die Richtlinie 78/660/EWG im Sinne einer weiteren substantiellen Erleichterung zu prüfen. Aufgrund des Artikels 53 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG sollte eine zweite Überprüfung der bei der Definition der kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen zugrunde gelegten Grössenmerkmale vorgenommen werden. Die Anzahl der Ausnahmeregelungen im Bereich der Aufstellung, Prüfung und Offenlegung von Abschlüssen, die die Mitgliedstaaten nach der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG zugunsten der kleinen Gesellschaften vorsehen können, sollte erweitert werden. Den Mitgliedstaaten sollte die Möglichkeit eingeräumt werden, den Gesellschaften zu gestatten, im Anhang des Jahresabschlusses bestimmte Angaben über Bezuege, die den Mitgliedern des Verwaltungs-, Geschäftsführungs- oder Aufsichtsorgans der Gesellschaft gewährt werden, nicht zu machen, wenn sich anhand dieser Angaben der Status eines bestimmten Mitglieds dieser Organe feststellen lässt. Ferner sollte es den Mitgliedstaaten gestattet sein, die Verpflichtungen der kleinen Gesellschaften hinsichtlich der Aufstellung und Offenlegung des Anhangs zu erleichtern. Es sollte den Mitgliedstaaten möglich sein, diese Gesellschaften von der Verpflichtung zu befreien, im Anhang bestimmte Angaben zu machen, die bei kleineren Gesellschaften als weniger wichtig angesehen werden können. Aus der gleichen Erwägung sollten die Mitgliedstaaten derartige Gesellschaften von der Verpflichtung zur Aufstellung eines Lageberichts befreien können, sofern die Angaben über den Erwerb eigener Aktien nach Artikel 22 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 77/91/EWG (7) in den Anhang aufgenommen werden. Es ist wichtig, die europäische Währungsintegration auch dadurch zu fördern, daß den Gesellschaften zumindest gestattet wird, ihre Abschlüsse in Ecu offenzulegen; hierbei handelt es sich lediglich um eine zusätzliche Kannbestimmung, die nichts an der Situation der Gesellschaften ändert, die ihre Abschlüsse bereits jetzt in Ecu aufstellen und offenlegen können; in dieser Hinsicht gilt es, die Richtlinie 78/660/EWG sowie die Richtlinie 83/349/EWG (1), geändert durch die Akte über den Beitritt Spaniens und Portugals, dadurch zu ergänzen, daß die Gesellschaften, die von dieser Möglichkeit Gebrauch machen, verpflichtet werden, den Umrechnungskurs im Anhang anzugeben - HAT FOLGENDE RICHTLINIE ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Artikel 11 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG wird wie folgt geändert: 1. Unter dem ersten Gedankenstrich wird die Angabe »Bilanzsumme: 1 550 000 ECU" durch »Bilanzsumme: 2 000 000 ECU" ersetzt. 2. Unter dem zweiten Gedankenstrich wird die Angabe »Nettoumsatzerlöse: 3 200 000 ECU" durch »Nettoumsatzerlöse: 4 000 000 ECU" ersetzt. 3. Folgender Unterabsatz wird angefügt: »Die Mitgliedstaaten können zulassen, daß Artikel 15 Absatz 3 Buchstabe a) und Absatz 4 nicht für die verkürzte Bilanz gilt." Diese Änderung der Ecu-Beträge stellt die zweite fünfjährliche Änderung gemäß Artikel 53 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG dar. Artikel 2 Artikel 27 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG wird wie folgt geändert: 1. Unter dem ersten Gedankenstrich wird die Angabe »Bilanzsumme: 6 200 000 ECU" durch »Bilanzsumme: 8 000 000 ECU" ersetzt. 2. Unter dem zweiten Gedankenstrich wird die Angabe »Nettoumsatzerlöse: 12 800 000 ECU" durch »Nettoumsatzerlöse: 16 000 000 ECU" ersetzt. Diese Änderung der Ecu-Beträge stellt die zweite fünfjährliche Änderung gemäß Artikel 53 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG dar. Artikel 3 Artikel 53 Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG erhält folgende Fassung: »(1) Als Ecu im Sinne dieser Richtlinie gilt die Rechnungseinheit, die durch die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3180/78 (*), in der Fassung der Verordnungen (EWG) Nr. 2626/84 (**) und (EWG) Nr. 1971/89 (***), festgelegt worden ist. Der Gegenwert in Landeswährung ist derjenige, welcher am 8. November gilt. (*) ABl. Nr. L 379 vom 30. 12. 1978, S. 1. (**) ABl. Nr. L 247 vom 16. 9. 1984, S. 1. (***) ABl. Nr. L 189 vom 4. 7. 1989, S. 1." Artikel 4 An Artikel 43 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG wird der folgende Absatz angefügt: »(3) Die Mitgliedstaaten können zulassen, daß die in Absatz 1 Nummer 12 vorgesehenen Angaben nicht gemacht werden, wenn sich anhand dieser Angaben der Status eines bestimmten Mitglieds dieser Organe feststellen lässt." Artikel 5 Artikel 44 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG erhält folgende Fassung: »Artikel 44 (1) Die Mitgliedstaaten können gestatten, daß die in Artikel 11 bezeichneten Gesellschaften einen verkürzten Anhang aufstellen, der die in Artikel 43 Absatz 1 Nummern 5 bis 12 verlangten Angaben nicht enthält. Jedoch sind im Anhang zusammengefasst für alle betreffenden Posten die in Artikel 43 Absatz 1 Nummer 6 verlangten Angaben zu machen. (2) Die Mitgliedstaaten können die in Absatz 1 bezeichneten Gesellschaften darüber hinaus von der Verpflichtung befreien, die in Artikel 15 Absatz 3 Buchstabe a) und Absatz 4, den Artikeln 18 und 21 und Artikel 29 Absatz 2, Artikel 30 Absatz 2, Artikel 34 Absatz 2, Artikel 40 Absatz 2 und Artikel 42 Absatz 2 verlangten Angaben zu machen. (3) Artikel 12 ist anzuwenden." Artikel 6 In Artikel 46 der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG wird der folgende Absatz angefügt: »(3) Die Mitgliedstaaten können gestatten, daß die in Artikel 11 bezeichneten Gesellschaften nicht zur Aufstellung eines Lageberichtes verpflichtet sind, sofern sie die in Artikel 22 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 77/91/EWG verlangten Angaben betreffend den Erwerb eigener Aktien im Anhang machen." Artikel 7 Artikel 47 Absatz 2 Buchstabe b) der Richtlinie 78/660/EWG erhält folgende Fassung: »b) einen gemäß Artikel 44 gekürzten Anhang". Artikel 8 In die Richtlinie 78/660/EWG wird der folgende Artikel eingefügt: »Artikel 50a Die Jahresabschlüsse können neben der Währung, in der sie aufgestellt wurden, auch in Ecu offengelegt werden. Dabei ist der am Bilanzstichtag gültige Umrechnungskurs zugrunde zu legen. Dieser Kurs ist im Anhang anzugeben." Artikel 9 In die Richtlinie 83/349/EWG wird der folgende Artikel eingefügt: »Artikel 38a Der konsolidierte Abschluß kann neben der Währung, in der er aufgestellt wurde, auch in Ecu offengelegt werden. Dabei ist der am Stichtag der konsolidierten Bilanz gültige Umrechnungskurs zugrunde zu legen. Dieser Kurs ist im Anhang anzugeben." Artikel 10 (1) Die Mitgliedstaaten erlassen vor dem 1. Januar 1993 die erforderlichen Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften, um dieser Richtlinie nachzukommen. Sie setzen die Kommission unverzueglich davon in Kenntnis. (2) Die Mitgliedstaaten können vorsehen, daß die in dieser Richtlinie bezeichneten Vorschriften erstmals auf die Abschlüsse des am 1. Januar 1995 oder im Laufe des Jahres 1995 beginnenden Geschäftsjahres anzuwenden sind. (3) Die Mitgliedstaaten teilen der Kommission den Wortlaut der wichtigsten innerstaatlichen Rechtsvorschriften mit, die sie auf dem unter diese Richtlinie fallenden Gebiet erlassen. Artikel 11 Diese Richtlinie ist an die Mitgliedstaaten gerichtet. Geschehen zu Brüssel am 8. November 1990. Im Namen des Rates Der Präsident P. ROMITA (1) ABl. Nr. C 287 vom 11. 11. 1986, S. 5, und ABl. Nr. C 318 vom 20. 12. 1989, S. 12. (2) ABl. Nr. C 158 vom 26. 6. 1989, S. 257, und Beschluß vom 24. Oktober 1990 (noch nicht im Amtsblatt veröffentlicht). (3) ABl. Nr. C 139 vom 5. 6. 1989, S. 42. (4) ABl. Nr. L 222 vom 14. 8. 1978, S. 11. (5) ABl. Nr. C 287 vom 14. 11. 1986, S. 1. (6) ABl. Nr. C 197 vom 27. 7. 1988, S. 6. (7) ABl. Nr. L 26 vom 31. 1. 1977, S. 1. (1) ABl. Nr. L 193 vom 18. 7. 1983, S. 1.


type: other

text:
39 ICm 2533/2017
 č.j.: 39 ICm 2533/2017-97
 Krajský soud v Českých Budějovicích rozhodl samosoudcem JUDr. Jiří Nerad v právní věci žalobců a) Zdeněk Plachý a b) Vladislava Plachá, oba bytem U Tří lvů 299/14, 370 01 České Budějovice, proti žalovaným 1) JUDr. Jiří Švihla, Lannova tř. 16/13, 370 01 České Budějovice, insolvenční správce Zdeňka Plachého, a 2) Oschatz Bohemia, spol. s r.o., IČO 14498162, U Tří lvů 298/12, 370 01 České Budějovice, zast. JUDr. Anna Dvořáková, advokátka, Krajinská 31, 370 01 České Budějovice, o určení neplatnost kupní smlouvy, takto:
 I. Návrh, že Kupní smlouva uzavřená dne 20.1. 2017 mezi prvním žalovaným jako prodávajícím a druhým žalovaným jako kupujícím, kterou prodávající prodal kupujícímu za dohodnutou kupní cenu 1.416.289 Kč spoluvlastnický podíl v rozsahu 949/10000 k parc. č. 523 o výměře 485 m2-zastavěná plocha a nádvoří, jehož součástí je stavba č.p. 299, bydlení a spoluvlastnický podíl v rozsahu 1172/10000 k parc. č. 522 o výměře 92 m2-zahrada, to vše v k.ú. České Budějovice 6, s právními účinky zápisu vkladu vlastnického práva v katastru nemovitostí u Katastrálního úřadu pro Jihočeský kraj, Katastrální pracoviště České Budějovice, dnem 2. 2. 2017, je neplatná, se zamítá.
 II. První žalovaný nemá nárok na náhradu nákladů řízení vůči žalobcům.
 III. Druhá žalovaná nemá nárok na náhradu nákladů řízení proti prvému žalobci.
 IV. Druhá žalobkyně je povinna uhradit druhé žalované náklady tohoto řízení do tří dnů od právní moci tohoto rozsudku k rukám JUDr. Anny Dvořákové, advokátky, AK v Českých Budějovicích, Krajinská 31, ve výši 12.342 Kč. isir.justi ce.cz
 V. Zástupkyni JUDr. Ludmile Zdvořákové, advokátce v Českých Budějovicích, Žižkova tř. 309/12, se přiznává odměna a hotové výdaje za zastupování žalobců ve výši 12 804 Kč, když po právní moci tohoto rozsudku jí tato částka bude vyplacena prostřednictvím Krajského soudu v Českých Budějovicích.
 Žalobci podali k níže podepsanému soudu dne 23. 5. 2017 žalobu na určení neplatnosti kupní smlouvy, která byla uzavřena dne 20. 1. 2017 mezi prvním žalovaným (insolvenčním správcem majetku prvého žalobce jakožto dlužníka) a druhým žalovaným jakožto kupujícím. Předmětem převodu byl spoluvlastnický podíl v rozsahu 949/10000 k pozemkové parc. č. 523 o vým 485 m2-zastavěná plocha a nádvoří, včetně stavby čp. 299, a spoluvlastnický podíl ve výši 1172/10000 k pozemkové parc. č. 522 o vým. 92 m2-zahrada, vše v k.ú. České Budějovice 6. Jednalo se o společné jmění prvého žalobce a druhé žalované. Kupní cena činila 1.416.829 Kč. Jako vlastníci v předmětu kupní smlouvy nebyli k ní přizváni. V textu smlouvy je uvedeno, že žalobci mají vypořádáno společné jmění manželů. Toto je nepravdivé. Také kupní cena neodpovídá dané lokalitě a způsobu stanovení její výše první žalovaný bez znaleckého posudku.
 První žalovaný se vyjádřil tak, že prodej mimo dražbu uvedeného majetku byl proveden zákonným způsobem, když tento byl jako společný majetek žalobců zahrnut do majetkové podstaty.
 Stejným způsobem se vyjádřil i druhý žalovaný, když dále uvedl, že i cena, za který byl majetek prodáván, je cenou obecnou. Toto vyplývá i ze soukromého znaleckého posudku, který si nechali zpracovat. Podle tohoto posudku je cena připadající na podíl žalobců pouze o 6.829 Kč vyšší, než-li hodnota spoluvlastnického podílu žalobců dle posudku ing. Huška.
 Ze zprávy prvého žalovaného adresované druhé žalované ze dne 29. 4. 2015 soud zjišťuje, že předmětné nemovitosti byly pojaty do majetkové podstaty v insolvenční věci prvého žalovaného majetku ve společném jmění manželů (SJM).
 Z insolvenčního rejstříku a ze zprávy prvého žalovaného pro insolvenční soud ze dne 21. 2. 2017 soud zjistil, že tato byla zveřejněna dne 23. 2. 2017.
 Z protokolu o přezkumném jednání ze dne 26. 8. 2017 soud zjišťuje, že ke dni 25. 8. 2013 se do konkurzu na prvého žalobce přihlásilo 17 věřitelů s pohledávkami celkem ve výši 4.310.369,87 Kč, z nichž přihlášení uplatnili pohledávky ve výši 2.180.062 Kč a zajištění ve výši 2.130.307 Kč. Z výsledku přezkumného jednání, který byl zaznamenán do seznamu přihlášených pohledávek, vyplývá, že správce popřel pohledávky pouze v nepatrné výši.
 Z pokynu prvého ze tří zajištěných věřitelů, a to CKR security s.r.o. ze dne 1. 1. 2015, adresovaného prvému žalovanému, soud zjišťuje, že tento jako první z věřitelů v pořadí dává pokyn k přímému prodeji nemovitostí mimo dražbu za cenu odpovídající ceně určené znaleckým posudkem. Z e-mailové zprávy druhého zajištěného věřitele České správy sociálního zabezpečení ze dne 27. 1. 2016 vyplývá, že tento s postupem prvého zajištěného věřitele souhlasí. Totéž vyplývá ze zprávy třetího zajištěného věřitele, a to Finančního úřadu pro Jihočeský kraj, úz. pracoviště v Českých Budějovicích, ze dne 27. 1. 2016.
 Ze znaleckého posudku pro potřeby insolvenčního řízení na majetek prvého žalovaného č. 3626-029/14 vypracovaného Ing. Pavlem Huškem soud zjišťuje, že cena předmětných nemovitostí je stanovena na částku 1.400.000 Kč.
 Ze znaleckého posudku Ing. Stanislava Wölfla na předmětné nemovitosti (příloha druhého žalovaného, která byla vrácena zpět), soud zjišťuje, že předmětné nemovitosti byly oceněny na částku 14.800.000 Kč.
 Z provedeného dokazování soud činí skutkový závěr, že prodané nemovitosti se staly součástí majetkové podstaty dlužníka, tedy prvého žalobce, když tam byly zahrnuty jako majetek původně v SJM obou žalobců. Jednalo se o nemovitosti, resp jejich spoluvlastnické podíly ve vlastnictví žalobců, které byly zatíženy k uspokojení tří věřitelů, a to Finančního úřadu pro Jihočeský kraj, Českou správu sociálního zabezpečení a CKR security s.r.o. Po pokynu prvého z nich a souhlasu ostatních dvou zajištěných věřitelů a vypracování znaleckého posudku pro stanovení prodejní ceny, došlo dne 20. 1. 2017 k prodeji předmětných nemovitostí mimo dražbu druhému žalovanému, a to za kupní cenu 1.416.829 Kč.
 Podle § 274 insolvenčního zákona č. 182/2006. Sb. (dále jen INZ), nelze-li provést vypořádání společného jmění manželů proto, že závazky dlužníka, které z něj mohou být uspokojeny, jsou vyšší než majetek, který náleží do společného jmění manželů, zahrne se celý majetek náležející do společného jmění manželů do majetkové podstaty. Podle § 289 odst. 1 věty prvé INZ prodej mimo dražbu může insolvenční správce uskutečnit se souhlasem insolvenčního soudu a věřitelského výboru. Při udělení souhlasu může insolvenční soud stanovit podmínky prodeje. Dokud není souhlas insolvenčním soudem a věřitelským výborem udělen, nenabývá smlouva o prodeji mimo dražbu účinnosti. Podle 2. odst. věty první tohoto ustanovení při prodeji mimo dražbu lze kupní cenu stanovit pod cenu odhadní. Ve třetím odstavci tohoto ustanovení je uvedeno, že platnost smlouvy, kterou došlo ke zpeněžení prodejem mimo dražbu, lze napadnout jen žalobou podanou u insolvenčního soudu nejpozději do 3 měsíců ode dne zveřejnění smlouvy v insolvenčním rejstříku. Podle § 293 odst. 1 ZKV věty prvé, jde-li o zpeněžení věci, práva, pohledávky nebo jiné majetkové hodnoty, která slouží k zajištění pohledávky, je insolvenční správce vázán pokyny zajištěného věřitele směřujícími ke zpeněžení; je-li zajištěných věřitelů více, uděluje tyto pokyny zajištěný věřitel, jehož pohledávka se uspokojuje ze zajištění jako první v pořadí. Podle 2. odst. tohoto ust. § 230 odst. 3 až 5 platí obdobně. Ust. mimo jiné § 289 odst. 1 se použije jen tehdy, není-li zde pokynu zajištěného věřitele. Podle § 230 odst. 2 věta prvá ZKV, jde-li o správu věci, práva, pohledávky nebo jiné majetkové hodnoty, která slouží k zajištění pohledávky, je osoba s dispozičními oprávněními vázána pokyny zajištěného věřitele směřujícími k řádné správě; je-li zajištěných věřitelů více, uděluje tyto pokyny zajištěný věřitel, jehož pohledávka se uspokojuje ze zajištění jako první v pořadí. Podle 4 odst. věty prvé tohoto ustanovení, není-li k pokynu zajištěného věřitele podle odst. 2 připojen písemný souhlas ostatních zajištěných věřitelů, jejichž pohledávka se uspokojuje ze stejného zajištění, osoba s dispozičními oprávněními neprodleně vyrozumí insolvenční soud.
 Soud se nejprve zabýval tím, zda žaloba byla podána včas. Protože byla kupní smlouva zveřejněna v insolvenčním rejstříku dne 23. 2. 2017 a žaloba byla podána 23. 5. 2017, tak se tak stalo ve tříměsíční lhůtě a žaloba je tedy podle ust. § 289 odst. 3 INZ včasná. Protože závazky prvního žalovaného jsou mnohem vyšší nežli hodnota prodávaných nemovitostí a dalšího majetku žalobců, tak insolvenční správce správně ve smyslu § 274 INZ zahrnul majetek v SJM, tedy sporné nemovitosti, do majetkové podstaty. Zajištěný věřitel první v pořadí (CKR security s.r.o.) dal pokyn k přímému prodeji nemovitostí mimo dražbu za cenu dle znaleckého posudku, s čímž další dva zajištění věřitelé (Finanční úřad pro Jihočeský kraj a Česká správa sociálního zabezpečení) vyslovili souhlas. Kupní cena, jak je uvedena v kupní smlouvě, je vyšší nežli cena odhadní připadající na podíl žalobců, takže insolvenční správce, tedy první žalovaný, dostál všem zákonným povinnostem vyplývajícím z ust. § 293 INZ za pomoci ust. § 289 a 230 INZ. Navíc podle § 289 odst. 2 INZ mohla být cena spoluvlastnického podílu žalobců stanovena pod cenu odhadní.
 Zástupkyně žalobců ještě navrhovala přerušení řízení do doby než proběhne kárné řízení na 1. žalovaného u České advokátní komory, zahájené z jejich podnětu. Protože k návrhu 1. žalobce byl níže podepsaným soudem zamítnut návrh na odvolání 1. žalovaného z funkce insolventního správce usnesením ze dne 13.9.2017, č.j. 26 INS 13745/2012 a je zde časová souvislost mezi oběma řízeními, když toto je konáno v rámci insolventního řízení, tak soud tento návrh zamítl.
 Z výše uvedených důvodů soud žalobu prvním výrokem zamítl.
 Druhým výrokem soud nepřiznal prvému žalovanému náhradu nákladů řízení, neboť tento se jich vzdal.
 Třetím výrokem soud rozhodl, že druhá žalovaná nemá nárok na náhradu nákladů proti prvému žalobci z toho důvodu, že tento je v insolvenci.
 Čtvrtým výrokem soud přiznal úspěšné druhé žalované proti druhé žalobkyni náhradu nákladů řízení ve smyslu ust. § 142 odst. 1 o.s.ř. za pomoci ust. § 163 INZ. Tyto náklady tvoří odměna pro advokátku za 3 úkony po 3.100 Kč, 3 režijní paušály po 300 Kč, to vše zvýšeno o DPH 21 %.
 Posledním výrokem soud přiznal opatrovnici odměnu za 3 úkony po 3 968 Kč a 3 režijní paušály po 300 Kč (§ 9 odst. 4 za pomoci §§ 7, 12 odst. 3, 12a a 13 odst. 3 zák. 549/91 Sb. o soudních poplatcích).
 Poučení: Proti tomuto usnesení lze podat odvolání do 15 dnů ode dne doručení k Vrchnímu soudu v Praze prostřednictvím Krajského soudu v Českých Budějovicích.
 České Budějovice 11. 10. 2017
 JUDr. Jiří Nerad samosoudce


text:
 21.1.2019
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 18/51
 РЕШЕНИЕ No 1/2018 НА СЪВЕТА ЗА СТАБИЛИЗИРАНЕ И АСОЦИИРАНЕ
 от 4 декември 2018 година
 за преминаване към втория етап на асоцииране между Европейските общности и техните държави членки, от една страна, и бивша югославска република Македония, от друга страна, съгласно член 5, параграф 3 от Споразумението за стабилизиране и асоцииране [2019/83]
 СЪВЕТЪТ ЗА СТАБИЛИЗИРАНЕ И АСОЦИИРАНЕ,
 като взе предвид Споразумението за стабилизиране и асоцииране между Европейските общности и техните държави членки, от една страна, и бивша югославска република Македония, от друга страна (1) („споразумението“), и по-специално член 5, параграф 3 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В член 5, параграф 1 от споразумението се предвижда преходен период от максимум десет години, разделен на два последователни етапа.
 (2)
 Първият етап започна на 1 април 2004 г., което е датата на влизане в сила на споразумението.
 (3)
 В член 5, параграф 3 от споразумението се предвижда Съветът за стабилизиране и асоцииране да направи оценка на осъществения напредък и да вземе решение за преминаване към втория етап и неговата продължителност, както и за евентуалните изменения, които е необходимо да бъдат направени в съдържанието на разпоредбите, определящи насоките за работа през втория етап.
 (4)
 Страните са решени да спазят задълженията си, свързани с преминаването към втория етап на асоцииране.
 (5)
 Бивша югославска република Македония предприе необходимите мерки за гарантиране на съответствие с всички задължения, произтичащи от преминаването към втория етап,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:
 Член 1
 Преминаването към втория етап на Споразумението за стабилизиране и асоцииране между Европейските общности и техните държави членки, от една страна, и бивша югославска република Македония, от друга страна, съгласно член 5, параграф 3 от споразумението, влиза в действие.
 Член 2
 Настоящото решение влиза в сила в деня на приемането му.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 4 декември 2018 година.
 За Съвета за стабилизиране и асоцииране
 Председател
 (1) ОВ L 84, 20.3.2004 г., стр. 13.


text:
Η Αργυρώ (Ρένια) Λουιζίδου (Θεσσαλονίκη, 18 Ιουλίου 1966) είναι Ελληνίδα ηθοποιός.
 Βιογραφία
 Σπουδές
 Φοίτησε στο Αμερικάνικο Κολλέγιο Ανατόλια, ενώ, στη συνέχεια, σπούδασε φιλολογία στο τμήμα Φιλολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του ΑΠΘ, καθώς και υποκριτική στην Ανώτερη Δραματική Σχολή του Κρατικού θεάτρου Βορείου Ελλάδος (ΚΘΒΕ).
 Καριέρα
 Έχει εμφανιστεί σε αρκετές γνωστές ελληνικές τηλεοπτικές σειρές, όπως Οι Απαράδεκτοι Οι τρεις χάριτες, Της Ελλάδος τα παιδιά, Ο Πέτρος και τα κορίτσια του Το δις εξαμαρτείν, Και οι παντρεμένοι έχουν ψυχή και η σειρά Το καφέ της Χαράς. Εμφανίστηκε στις ταινίες Safe Sex, Πάμπτωχοι Α.Ε., Το κλάμα βγήκε απ' τον Παράδεισο, Πολίτικη κουζίνα και πρωταγωνίστησε στην Πολίτικη κουζίνα. Στην τηλεοπτική σειρά του Alpha,Το σόι σου, είχε πρωταγωνιστικό ρόλο ως Χαρούλα Χαμπέα.
 Προσωπική ζωή
 Από το 1997 είναι παντρεμένη με τον οικονομολόγο Θάνο Κωνσταντάκη και έχουν αποκτήσει έναν γιο, τον Βίκτωρα (γενν. 2000).
 Παραπομπές
 Εξωτερικοί σύνδεσμοι
 Ρένια Λουιζίδου, βιογραφικό και προσωπικές αρθρογραφίες της ηθοποιού στον ιστότοπο Aixmi.gr
 Ελληνίδες ηθοποιοί κινηματογράφου
 Ελληνίδες ηθοποιοί τηλεόρασης
 Ελληνίδες ηθοποιοί θεάτρου


jurisdiction: US

text:
 116 HR 8825 IH: To authorize the Maritime Administrator to use certain appropriated funds to purchase duplicate medals authorized under Merchant Mariners of World War II Congressional Gold Medal Act of 2020, and for other purposes.
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2020-11-30
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I116th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 8825IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESNovember 30, 2020Mr. Garamendi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed ServicesA BILLTo authorize the Maritime Administrator to use certain appropriated funds to purchase duplicate medals authorized under Merchant Mariners of World War II Congressional Gold Medal Act of 2020, and for other purposes.1.Authorization to purchase duplicate medals(a)In generalThe Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Administrator, may use funds appropriated for the Maritime Administration to purchase duplicate medals authorized under the Merchant Mariners of World War II Congressional Gold Medal Act of 2020 (Public Law 116–125) and provide such medals to eligible individuals who engaged in qualified service who submit an application under subsection (b) and were United States merchant mariners of World War II.(b)ApplicationTo be eligible to receive a medal described in subsection (a), an eligible individual who engaged in qualified service shall submit to the Administrator an application containing such information and assurances as the Administrator may require.(c)DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)AdministratorThe term Administrator means the Maritime Administrator. (2)Eligible individual who engaged in qualified serviceThe term eligible individual who engaged in qualified service means an individual who, between December 7, 1941, and December 31, 1946—(A)was a member of the United States merchant marine, including the Army Transport Service and the Navy Transport Service, serving as a crewmember of a vessel that was—(i)operated by the War Shipping Administration, the Office of Defense Transportation, or an agent of such departments;(ii)operated in waters other than inland waters, the Great Lakes, and other lakes, bays, or harbors of the United States;(iii)under contract or charter to, or property of, the Government of the United States; and(iv)serving in the Armed Forces; and(B)while so serving, was licensed or otherwise documented for service as a crewmember of such a vessel by an officer or employee of the United States authorized to license or document the person for such service.