text:
Iniciativa em: 23/11/2015
 AUTOGRAFO DE LEI No 0119/2015
 Sancionou: Lei Complementar No. 0371/2015
 Art. 1°. O artigo 108 da Lei Complementar no 031/2005, passa a ter a seguinte redação:
 Art. 1o - Fica criado o artigo 17 na Lei Municipal Complementar No.214 de 28 de agosto de 2012, assim disposto:
 Art. 17o - Os funcionários municipais descritos nos artigos 12, 13, 14 e 15, poderão ser de caráter efetivo ou temporário, sendo facultado ao município nomear até 2 (dois) profissionais com carga horária de 20 horas semanais, ou 1 (um) profissional com carga horária de 40 horas semanais, conforme a necessidade.
 Art. 2o - fica corrigida a numeração do artigo 27 que passa a ser o artigo 18, e o artigo 21 que passa a ser o artigo 19.
 O Projeto de Lei que ora submetemos a apreciação desta Casa, tem por objetivo solicitar autorização para este Poder Executivo Municipal alterar a Lei Complementar N. 214 de 28 de agosto de 2012, que “DISPÕE SOBRE A OFERTA DE CURSOS NA MODALIDADE A DISTÂNCIA, BEM COMO DISPÕE SOBRE A REGULAMENTAÇÃO DO ATO DE CRIAÇÃO E SUSTENTABILIDADE FINANCEIRA DO PÓLO DE ATENDIMENTO PRESENCIAL DA UNIVERSIDA ABERTA DO BRASIL EM BRAÇO DO NORTE E DA OUTRAS PROVIDÊNCIAS”.
 A criação do artigo 17 se faz necessário para que não pairem dúvidas acerca da possibilidade da nomeação dos funcionários municipais descritos nos artigos 12, 13, 14 e 15, seja ele servidor efetivo ou servidor temporário do quadro municipal, haja vista que a própria lei apenas descreve a obrigatoriedade de ser efetivo do quadro, o servidor nomeado para exercer a função de Coordenador do Polo de Apoio Presencial da UAB, conforme consta no §1o do artigo 10 da lei supracitada.
 Faz-se necessário também, possibilitar que o município nomeie até 02 profissionais com carga horária de 20 horas semanais, ou 01 profissional com carga horária de 40 horas semanais, conforme a necessidade, uma vez que a lei atual apenas possibilita a nomeação de 01 profissional com carga horária de 40 horas semanais, o que muitas vezes pode ser desnecessário.
 Por fim, faz-se necessário que seja corrigida a numeração do artigo 27 e 21, uma vez que após o artigo 16 criou-se diretamente o artigo 27 (era para ser 17), e após o artigo 27 criou-se o 21 (era para ser 18).
 Braço do Norte, 19 de novembro de 2015.


type: wikipedia

text:
Viljams Henrijs Herisons (, dzimis , miris ) bija Amerikas Savienoto Valstu devītais prezidents, pārstāvēja Vigu partiju. Prezidenta amatā bija vienu mēnesi, no līdz . Miris no saaukstēšanās inaugurācijas laikā, kas izsauca plaušu karsoni. Viņš bija pirmais ASV prezidents, kas mira prezidentūras laikā, tas izraisīja konstitucionālo krīzi par pēctecību.
 Kā ģenerālis veiksmīgi karoja pret britiem 1812. gada Britu—amerikāņu karā.
 Viljams Herisons ir vectēvs divdesmit trešajam ASV prezidentam Bendžaminam Herisonam, kura prezidentūra bija no 1889. līdz 1893. gadam. Viljams Herisons ir pēdējais prezidents, kurš dzimis pirms ASV revolūcijas, kas beidzās 1783. gadā.
 Atsauces
 Ārējās saites
 1773. gadā dzimušie
 1841. gadā mirušie
 Amerikas Savienoto Valstu prezidenti
 ASV senatori
 Virdžīnijā dzimušie


type: other

text:
LPM447/2006
 ID intern unic: 322824
 LEGE Nr. 447
 Publicat : 13.04.2007 în Monitorul Oficial Nr. 51-53 art Nr : 239
 Art.I. - Legea nr.416-XII din 18 decembrie 1990 cu privire la poliţie (republicată în Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2002, nr.17-19, art.56), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică şi se completează după cum urmează:
 1. Articolul 23 alineatul 2:
 după punctul 5) se introduce un nou punct 6), cu următorul cuprins:
 "6) la raţie alimentară şi echipament. În schimbul raţiei alimentare şi al echipamentului, colaboratorul poliţiei poate primi o compensaţie bănească, conform normelor stabilite de Guvern, din bugetul de stat, din bugetele unităţilor administrativ-teritoriale şi din mijloacele speciale;"
 punctul 6) devine punctul 7).
 "Articolul 24. Retribuirea muncii colaboratorilor poliţiei
 Retribuirea muncii colaboratorilor poliţiei se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar.
 Pentru munca prestată în zile de odihnă şi în zile de sărbătoare, colaboratorilor poliţiei li se plăteşte o recompensă bănească în conformitate cu legislaţia în vigoare."
 Art.II. - Articolul 26 din Legea nr.39-XIII din 7 aprilie 1994 despre statutul deputatului în Parlament (republicată în Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2005, nr.59-61, art.201), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 "(1) Pentru exercitarea eficientă a mandatului, deputatul în Parlament are dreptul:
 a) la salariu lunar în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar;
 b) la diurne şi alte plăţi compensatorii, în mărimile stabilite de Parlament, care nu se includ în salariul lunar şi nu se iau în calcul la stabilirea cuantumului prestaţiilor de asigurări sociale."
 alineatele (2)-(5) şi (8) se exclud;
 alineatele (6) şi (7) devin alineatele (2) şi (3).
 Art.III. - Articolul 21 din Legea nr.317-XIII din 13 decembrie 1994 cu privire la Curtea Constituţională (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 1995, nr.8, art.86), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 la alineatele (2) şi (3), cuvîntul "salariu," se exclude;
 "(4) Salarizarea Preşedintelui şi judecătorilor Curţii Constituţionale se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar, din mijloacele bugetului Curţii Constituţionale."
 [Art.IV abrogat prin LP158-XVI din 04.07.08, MO230-232/23.12.08 art.840; în vigoare 01.01.09]
 Art.V. - Articolul 53 alineatul (7) din Legea оnvгюгmоntului nr.547-XIII din 21 iulie 1995 (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 1995, nr.62-63, art.692), cu modificгrile ulterioare, va avea urmгtorul cuprins:
 “(7) Salarizarea cadrelor didactice se efectueazг оn modul, condiюiile єi mгrimile prevгzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare оn sectorul bugetar.”
 Art.VI. - Legea nr.789-XIII din 26 martie 1996 cu privire la Curtea Supremă de Justiţie (republicată în Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2003, nr.196-199, art.764), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 "(3) Salarizarea judecătorilor-asistenţi se efectuează în conformitate cu Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar."
 la alineatul (4), cuvintele "concomitent" şi "la salariul funcţiei, la sporurile şi suplimentele care li se cuvin, precum şi" se exclud.
 2. La articolul 27 alineatul (4), cuvintele "cu Legea serviciului public şi cu alte acte normative" se înlocuiesc cu cuvintele "cu prevederile legislaţiei în vigoare."
 Art.VII. - La articolul 22 alineatul (2) din Legea nr.836-XIII din 17 mai 1996 cu privire la sistemul instanţelor judecătoreşti militare (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 1996, nr.51, art.482), cu modificările ulterioare, cuvintele "privind salarizarea în organele judecătoreşti" se înlocuiesc cu cuvintele "în vigoare".
 Art.VIII. - Legea nr.1036-XIII din 17 decembrie 1996 cu privire la sistemul penitenciar (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 1997, nr.15, art.154), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 2. Articolul 23 :
 la alineatul (1), cuvintele "drepturi băneşti" se înlocuiesc cu cuvîntul "salariu";
 "(2) Salarizarea colaboratorilor sistemului penitenciar se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar."
 alineatele (4) şi (5) devin alineatele (3) şi (4).
 3. La articolul 29:
 alineatele (6), (7) şi (8) devin alineatele (5), (6) şi (7).
 Art.IX. - Legea nr.1111-XIII din 20 februarie 1997 privind asigurarea activităţii Preşedintelui Republicii Moldova (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 1997, nr.16-17, art.180), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 "Articolul 2. Retribuirea muncii
 Munca Preşedintelui Republicii Moldova este retribuită în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar."
 2. Articolele 3, 4 şi 5 se exclud.
 Art.X. - Codul electoral nr.1381-XIII din 21 noiembrie 1997 (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 1997, nr.81, art.667), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 1. La articolul 21 alineatul (3), propoziţia întîi va avea următorul cuprins: "Salarizarea membrilor permanenţi ai Comisiei Electorale Centrale se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar."
 2. La articolul 23, alineatul (2) va avea următorul cuprins:
 "(2) Remunerarea salariaţilor aparatului Comisiei Electorale Centrale se efectuează conform prevederilor legislaţiei în vigoare. Persoanelor care nu activează permanent în componenţa comisiei li se stabileşte, pentru perioada în care sînt degrevate de atribuţiile de la locul de muncă permanent, un spor la salariu de 25 la sută."
 Art.XI. - Articolul 36 alineatul (1) din Legea serviciului în organele vamale nr.1150-XIV din 20 iulie 2000 (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2000, nr.106-108, art.765), cu modificările ulterioare, va avea următorul cuprins:
 "(1) Salarizarea colaboratorului vamal se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar."
 Art.XII. - Articolul 26 din Legea nr.761-XV din 27 decembrie 2001 cu privire la serviciul diplomatic (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2002, nr.20, art.80), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 "(1) Salarizarea personalului instituţiilor serviciului diplomatic se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar."
 alineatele (3)-(7) devin alineatele (2)-(6).
 Art.XIII. - Articolul 33 din Legea nr.118-XV din 14 martie 2003 cu privire la Procuratură (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2003, nr.73-75, art.328), cu modificările ulterioare, va avea următorul cuprins:
 "Articolul 33. Salarizarea procurorului
 Salarizarea procurorului se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar."
 Art.XIV. - Articolul 157 din Codul nr.259-XV din 15 iulie 2004 cu privire la ştiinţă şi inovare al Republicii Moldova (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2004, nr.125-129, art.663), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică şi se completează după cum urmează:
 alineatul (2) se completează în final cu cuvintele "în modul prevăzut de legislaţia în vigoare";
 la alineatul (5), cuvintele "o indemnizaţie lunară", "Indemnizaţia" se înlocuiesc cu cuvintele "un spor lunar", "Sporul".
 Art.XV. - Legea nr.162-XVI din 22 iulie 2005 cu privire la statutul militarilor (Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 2005, nr.129-131, art.618), cu modificările ulterioare, se modifică după cum urmează:
 1. În textul legii, cuvintele "solda de funcţie" se înlocuiesc cu cuvintele "salariul funcţiei".
 2. La articolul 2, noţiunea "soldă lunară" va avea următorul cuprins:
 "soldă lunară - salariul funcţiei, sporul pentru gradul militar şi sporul pentru vechime în serviciul militar, suplimente şi sporuri la salariul funcţiei şi alte plăţi de stimulare cu caracter permanent;"
 3. La articolul 18, alineatele (1) şi (2) vor avea următorul cuprins:
 "(1) Salarizarea militarilor se efectuează în modul, condiţiile şi mărimile prevăzute de Legea nr.355-XVI din 23 decembrie 2005 cu privire la sistemul de salarizare în sectorul bugetar.
 (2) Alte plăţi se stabilesc în conformitate cu prevederile legislaţiei în vigoare."
 Nr.447-XVI. Chişinău, 28 decembrie 2006.


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 9.11.2013
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 325/20
 Üldkohtu 16. septembri 2013. aasta otsus — British Telecommunications ja BT Pension Scheme Trustees versus komisjon
 (Liidetud kohtuasjad T-226/09 ja T-230/09) (1)
 (Riigiabi - Osaline vabastamine kohustusest teha pensionikindlustusfondi sissemakseid - Otsus, millega abi tunnistatakse siseturuga kokkusobimatuks - Mõiste „riigiabi” - Riigi ressursid - Eelis - Valikulisus - Konkurentsi kahjustamine - Mõju liikmesriikide vahelisele kaubandusele - Võrdne kohtlemine - Proportsionaalsus - Õiguspärane ootus - Põhjendamiskohustus - Abi rakendamine)
 2013/C 325/33
 Kohtumenetluse keel: inglise
 Pooled
 Hagejad: British Telecommunications (London, Ühendkuningriik) (esindajad: solicitor G. Robert, solicitor M. Newhouse, solicitor T. Castorina, barrister J. Holmes ja QC H. Legge) (kohtuasi T-226/09); ja BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd (London) (esindajad: advokaadid J. Derenne ja A. Müller-Rappard) (kohtuasi T-230/09)
 Kostja: Euroopa Ühenduste Komisjon (esindajad: L. Flynn ja N. Khan)
 Ese
 Nõue tühistada komisjoni 11. veebruari 2009. aasta otsus 2009/703/EÜ, mis puudutab Suurbritannia ja Põhja-Iiri Ühendkuningriigi antud riigiabi (C 55/2007 (ex NN 63/2007, CP 106/06) — Riigitagatis ettevõtjale B(ritish) T(elecommunications) (ELT L 242, lk 21).
 Resolutsioon
 1)
 Jätta hagid rahuldamata.
 2)
 Kohtuasjas T-226/09 mõista kohtukulud välja British Telecommunications plc’lt.
 3)
 Kohtuasjas T-230/09 mõista kohtukulud välja BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd’lt.
 (1) ELT C 193, 15.8.2009.


text:
 25.9.2010
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 260/20
 Προσφυγή της 23ης Ιουλίου 2010 — Yusef κατά Επιτροπής
 (Υπόθεση T-306/10)
 ()
 2010/C 260/28
 Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: η αγγλική
 Διάδικοι
 Προσφεύγων: Hani El Sayyed Elsebai Yusef (Λονδίνο, Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο) (εκπρόσωποι: E. Grieves, Barrister και H. Miller, Solicitor)
 Καθής: Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή
 Αιτήματα του προσφεύγοντος
 Ο προσφεύγων ζητεί από το Γενικό Δικαστήριο:
 —
 να διαπιστωθεί ότι η παράλειψη της Επιτροπής να διαγράψει τον προσφεύγοντα από το παράρτημα 1 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) 881/2002 του Συμβουλίου είναι παράνομη·
 —
 να διατάξει την Επιτροπή να διαγράψει άμεσα τον προσφεύγοντα από το εν λόγω παράρτημα·
 —
 να υποχρεώσει την Επιτροπή να καταβάλει, πλέον των εξόδων της, τα έξοδα του προσφεύγοντος καθώς και οποιοδήποτε ποσό καταβλήθηκε ως ευεργέτημα πενίας από το ταμείο του Δικαστηρίου.
 Ισχυρισμοί και κύρια επιχειρήματα
 Ο προσφεύγων ασκεί προσφυγή κατά το άρθρο 265 ΣΛΕΕ για την ανάκληση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) 1629/2005 της Επιτροπής, της 5ης Οκτωβρίου 2005, που τροποποιεί για πεντηκοστή τέταρτη φορά τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 881/2002 του Συμβουλίου για την επιβολή συγκεκριμένων περιοριστικών μέτρων κατά ορισμένων προσώπων και οντοτήτων που συνδέονται με τον Οσάμα Μπιν Λάντεν, το δίκτυο της Αλ Κάιντα και τους Ταλιμπάν (1), ως προς το πρόσωπό του.
 Προς στήριξη της προσφυγής του, ο προσφεύγων επικαλείται τρεις λόγους ακυρώσεως.
 Πρώτον, ισχυρίζεται ότι η Επιτροπή ουδέποτε εξέτασε ανεξάρτητα το έρεισμα της συμπεριλήψεως του προσφεύγοντος στο παράρτημα 1 ούτε αναζήτησε τους λόγους για τη συμπερίληψη αυτή.
 Δεύτερον, υποστηρίζει ότι η Επιτροπή παρέλειψε να ενημερώσει τον προσφεύγοντα σχετικά με τους λόγους που δικαιολογούν τη συμπερίληψή του στο παράρτημα 1 κατά παράβαση του δικαιώματός του πραγματικής προσφυγής ενώπιον δικαστηρίου, του δικαιώματός του «να υπερασπίσει ο ίδιος εαυτόν» και κατά παράβαση των δικαιωμάτων του ιδιοκτησίας σύμφωνα με την Ευρωπαϊκή Σύμβαση για τα Δικαιώματα του Ανθρώπου.
 Τρίτον, ισχυρίζεται ότι η παράλειψη της Επιτροπής να διαγράψει τον προσφεύγοντα από το παράρτημα 1 είναι εκτός λογικής καθώς ουδόλως δικαιολογείται η πλήρωση των κριτηρίων σχετικά με τη συμπερίληψη στο παράρτημα 1, ενώ και το United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office εκτιμά ότι ο προσφεύγων δεν πληροί πλέον τα σχετικά κριτήρια.
 (1) EE 2005 L 260, σ. 10.


text:
 22.1.2005
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 19/28
 Προσφυγή-αγωγή της Rhodia Consumer Specialities Limited κατά της Επιτροπής των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων, που ασκήθηκε την 1η Οκτωβρίου 2004
 (Υπόθεση Τ-402/04)
 (2005/C 19/60)
 Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: η αγγλική
 Η Rhodia Consumer Specialities Limited, με έδρα το Watford, Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο, εκπροσωπούμενη από τους K. Van Maldegem και C. Mereu, δικηγόρους, άσκησε την 1η Οκτωβρίου 2004 ενώπιον του Πρωτοδικείου των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων προσφυγή-αγωγή κατά της Επιτροπής των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων.
 Η προσφεύγουσα-ενάγουσα ζητεί από το Πρωτοδικείο:
 —
 να υποχρεώσει την καθής να ανταποκριθεί στο αίτημα της προσφεύγουσας-ενάγουσας·
 —
 ή, επικουρικώς, να ακυρώσει την απόφαση D 341571(04) της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής·
 —
 να υποχρεώσει την καθής να καταβάλει στην προσφεύγουσα-ενάγουσα αποζημίωση, η οποία ορίζεται προσωρινά σε ένα ευρώ, για τις ζημίες που υπέστη λόγω της μη εκπληρώσεως, εκ μέρους της καθής, των εκ του κοινοτικού δικαίου υποχρεώσεών της καθόσον δεν απάντησε στην προσφεύγουσα-ενάγουσα ή, άλλως, για τις ζημίες που προκλήθηκαν από την απόφαση D 341571(04) της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής, καθώς και κάθε νόμιμο τόκο, με την επιφύλαξη του υπολογισμού και του καθορισμού του ακριβούς ποσού·
 —
 να καταδικάσει την καθής στο σύνολο των δικαστικών εξόδων.
 Λόγοι ακυρώσεως και κύρια επιχειρήματα
 Οι λόγοι ακυρώσεως συμπίπτουν με τους προβαλλόμενους στην υπόθεση Τ-400/04, Arch Chemicals και Arch Timber Protection κατά Επιτροπής.


text:
 16.5.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 198/11
 Ordú na Cúirte Breithiúnais (an tOchtú Dlísheomra) an 24 Márta 2022 (iarraidh ar réamhrialú ó Chúirt Réigiúnach Rodez – an Fhrainc) – BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v AN, CN
 (Cás C-82/20) (1)
 (Tarchur chun réamhrialú - Airteagal 99 de Rialacha Nós Imeachta na Cúirte Breithiúnais - Cosaint tomhaltóirí - Treoir 93/13/CEE - Téarmaí éagóracha i gconarthaí tomhaltóra - Comhaontú iasachta morgáiste atá ainmnithe in airgeadra eachtrach (Franc na hEilvéise) - Airteagal 4(2) - Príomhchuspóir an chonartha - Téarmaí lena gcuirtear an t-iasachtaí faoi riosca malairte eachtraí - Ceanglais intuigtheachta agus trédhearcachta - Airteagal 3(1) - Éagothroime shuntasach - Airteagal 5 - Téarma conarthach a dhréachtú go soiléir agus go hintuigthe)
 (2022/C 198/18)
 Teanga an cháis: an Fhraincis
 An chúirt a rinne an tarchur
 Cúirt Réigiúnach Rodez
 Páirtithe sna príomhimeachtaí
 Iarratasóir: BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA
 Cosantóirí: AN, CN
 Páirtí eile sna himeachtaí: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel du Languedoc
 An chuid oibríochtúil
 1)
 Ní mór Airteagal 4(2) de Threoir 93/13/CEE ón gComhairle 5 Aibreán 1993 maidir le téarmaí éagóracha i gconarthaí tomhaltóra a léirmhíniú sa chiall go gcomhlíontar, i gcomhthéacs conartha iasachta atá ainmnithe in airgeadra eachtrach, an ceanglas maidir le trédhearcacht théarmaí an chonartha sin, lena bhforáiltear go bhfuil an t-airgeadra eachtrach mar airgeadra cuntasaíochta agus gurb é an euro an t-airgeadra íocaíochta agus a fhágfaidh go mbeidh an riosca malairte eachtraí ar an iasachtaí, ar choinníoll gur sholáthair an díoltóir nó an soláthróir don tomhaltóir faisnéis leordhóthanach agus chruinn chun go mbeadh gnáth-thomhaltóir, atá réasúnta eolach agus réasúnta géarintinneach airdeallach, in ann oibriú praiticiúil an tsásra airgeadais lena mbaineann a thuiscint agus measúnú a dhéanamh ar an riosca go bhféadfadh iarmhairtí suntasacha diúltacha eacnamaíocha a bheith ag téarma den sórt sin ar a oibleagáidí airgeadais le linn an chonartha sin.
 2)
 Ní mór Airteagal 3(1) de Threoir 93/13 a léirmhíniú sa chiall go bhféadfaí, mar thoradh ar théarmaí comhaontú iasachta, lena bhforáiltear go bhfuil an t-airgeadra eachtrach mar airgeadra cuntasaíochta agus gurb é an euro an t-airgeadra íocaíochta agus a fhágfaidh go mbeidh an riosca malairte eachtraí, gan foráil a dhéanamh maidir le huasteorainn, ar an iasachtaí, éagothroime shuntasach a chruthú idir cearta agus oibleagáidí na bpáirtithe a eascraíonn as an gconradh sin chun dochair an tomhaltóra, toisc nach bhféadfadh an díoltóir nó an soláthróir a bheith ag súil, i gcomhréir leis an gceanglas maidir le trédhearcacht maidir leis an tomhaltóir, go nglacfadh an tomhaltóir le riosca ráta malairte eachtraí díréireach a eascraíonn as na téarmaí sin, agus nach leor go n-aimseofaí easpa meon macánta an díoltóra nó an soláthróra, ann féin, i gcás inarb iomchuí, chun críocha aicmiú na héagothroime sin.
 (1) Dáta an taiscthe: 14/02/2020.


text:
 12.1.2015
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 7/4
 2014 m. lapkričio 5 d. Teisingumo Teismo (pirmoji kolegija) sprendimas byloje (Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgarija) prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą) Snezhana Somova/Glaven director na Stolichno upravlenie „Sotsialno osiguryavane“
 (Byla C-103/13) (1)
 ((Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą - Socialinė apsauga - Reglamentas (EEB) Nr. 1408/71 - 12, 45, 46 ir 94 straipsniai - Nacionalinės teisės aktai, pagal kuriuos reikalaujama nutraukti senatvės draudimo įmokų mokėjimą, kad būtų skirta senatvės pensija - Trūkstamų draudimo laikotarpių įgijimas sumokant įmokas - Draudimo laikotarpių sutapimas keliose valstybėse narėse - Apdraustojo galimybė nukrypti nuo draudimo įmokų mokėjimo ir draudimo laikotarpių sumavimo taisyklės - Skirtos pensijos mokėjimo nutraukimas ir permokos susigrąžinimas - Pareiga mokėti palūkanas))
 (2015/C 007/05)
 Proceso kalba: bulgarų
 Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas
 Administrativen sad Sofia-grad
 Šalys pagrindinėje byloje
 Ieškovė: Snezhana Somova
 Atsakovas: Glaven director na Stolichno upravlenie „Sotsialno osiguryavane“
 Rezoliucinė dalis
 1.
 Pagal SESV 49 straipsnį draudžiama valstybės narės teisės nuostata, kaip antai Socialinio draudimo kodekso (Kodeks za sotsialnoto osiguryavane) 94 straipsnio 1 dalis, pagal kurią teisei į senatvės pensiją įgyvendinti nustatyta išankstinė sąlyga nutraukti socialinio draudimo įmokų, susijusių su kitoje valstybėje narėje vykdoma veikla, mokėjimą.
 2.
 1996 m. gruodžio 2 d. Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 118/97 iš dalies pakeistos ir atnaujintos redakcijos 1971 m. birželio 14 d. Tarybos reglamento (EEB) Nr. 1408/71 dėl socialinės apsaugos sistemų taikymo pagal darbo sutartį dirbantiems asmenims, savarankiškai dirbantiems asmenims ir jų šeimos nariams, judantiems Bendrijoje, iš dalies pakeisto 2006 m. gruodžio 18 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 1992/2006, 45 straipsnis, 46 straipsnio 2 dalis ir 94 straipsnio 2 dalis aiškintini kaip neleidžiantys apdraustiesiems socialiniu draudimu, nustatant jų teises vienoje valstybėje narėje, pasirinkti, kad nebūtų atsižvelgta į draudimo laikotarpius, įgytus kitoje valstybėje narėje iki šio reglamento įsigaliojimo pirmojoje valstybėje narėje datos.
 (1) OL C 129, 2013 5 4.


type: contracts

text:
 30.7.2015
 EN
 Official Journal of the European Union
 L 202/96
 DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
 No 208/2014
 of 30 September 2014
 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1276]
 THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,
 Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,
 Whereas:
 (1)
 Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (1), as corrected by OJ L 161, 29.6.2010, p. 11, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.
 (2)
 Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,
 HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
 Article 1
 The following is inserted after point 1k (Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:
 ‘1l.
 32009 L 0128: Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71), as corrected by OJ L 161, 29.6.2010, p. 11.
 The provisions of the Directive shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
 With regard to Norway, the words “26 November 2012” in Article 4(2) shall be replaced by the words “1 January 2016”.’
 Article 2
 The texts of Directive 2009/128/EC, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.
 Article 3
 This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (2), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 203/2014 of 30 September 2014 (3), whichever is the later.
 Article 4
 This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.
 Done at Brussels, 30 September 2014.
 For the EEA Joint Committee
 The President
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71.
 (2) Constitutional requirements indicated.
 (3) See page 57 of this Official Journal.


type: legislation

jurisdiction: US

text:
 117 HR 3839 IH: Notch Fairness Act of 2021
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2021-06-11
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I117th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 3839IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJune 11, 2021Ms. Meng (for herself and Mr. San Nicolas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and MeansA BILLTo amend title II of the Social Security Act to allow workers who attain age 65 after 1981 and before 1992 to choose either lump sum payments over four years totaling $5,000 or an improved benefit computation formula under a new 10-year rule governing the transition to the changes in benefit computation rules enacted in the Social Security Amendments of 1977, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Notch Fairness Act of 2021.2.New guaranteed minimum primary insurance amount where eligibility arises during transitional period(a)In GeneralSection 215(a) of the Social Security Act is amended—(1)in paragraph (4)(B), by inserting (with or without the application of paragraph (8)) after would be made, and by striking 1984 in clause (i) and inserting 1989; and(2)by adding at the end the following:(8)(A)In the case of an individual described in paragraph (4)(B) (subject to subparagraphs (F) and (G) of this paragraph), the amount of the individual’s primary insurance amount as computed or recomputed under paragraph (1) shall be deemed equal to the sum of—(i)such amount, and(ii)the applicable transitional increase amount (if any).(B)For purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii), the term applicable transitional increase amount means, in the case of any individual, the product derived by multiplying—(i)the excess under former law, by(ii)the applicable percentage in relation to the year in which the individual becomes eligible for old-age insurance benefits, as determined by the following table:If the individual becomesThe applicableeligible for such benefits in:percentage is:1979551980451981351982321983251984201985161986101987319885.(C)For purposes of subparagraph (B), the term excess under former law means, in the case of any individual, the excess of—(i)the applicable former law primary insurance amount, over(ii)the amount which would be such individual’s primary insurance amount if computed or recomputed under this section without regard to this paragraph and paragraphs (4), (5), and (6).(D)For purposes of subparagraph (C)(i), the term applicable former law primary insurance amount means, in the case of any individual, the amount which would be such individual’s primary insurance amount if it were—(i)computed or recomputed (pursuant to paragraph (4)(B)(i)) under section 215(a) as in effect in December 1978, or(ii)computed or recomputed (pursuant to paragraph (4)(B)(ii)) as provided by subsection (d),(as applicable) and modified as provided by subparagraph (E). (E)In determining the amount which would be an individual’s primary insurance amount as provided in subparagraph (D)—(i)subsection (b)(4) shall not apply,(ii)section 215(b) as in effect in December 1978 shall apply, except that section 215(b)(2)(C) (as then in effect) shall be deemed to provide that an individual’s computation base years may include only calendar years in the period after 1950 (or 1936 if applicable) and ending with the calendar year in which such individual attains age 61, plus the 3 calendar years after such period for which the total of such individual’s wages and self-employment income is the largest, and(iii)subdivision (I) in the last sentence of paragraph (4) shall be applied as though the words without regard to any increases in that table in such subdivision read including any increases in that table.(F)This paragraph shall apply in the case of any individual only if such application results in a primary insurance amount for such individual that is greater than it would be if computed or recomputed under paragraph (4)(B) without regard to this paragraph.(G)(i)This paragraph shall apply in the case of any individual subject to any timely election to receive lump sum payments under this subparagraph.(ii)A written election to receive lump sum payments under this subparagraph, in lieu of the application of this paragraph to the computation of the primary insurance amount of an individual described in paragraph (4)(B), may be filed with the Commissioner of Social Security in such form and manner as shall be prescribed in regulations of the Commissioner. Any such election may be filed by such individual or, in the event of such individual’s death before any such election is filed by such individual, by any other beneficiary entitled to benefits under section 202 on the basis of such individual’s wages and self-employment income. Any such election filed after December 31, 2022, shall be null and void and of no effect.(iii)Upon receipt by the Commissioner of a timely election filed by the individual described in paragraph (4)(B) in accordance with clause (ii)—(I)the Commissioner shall certify receipt of such election to the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of the Treasury, after receipt of such certification, shall pay such individual, from amounts in the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, a total amount equal to $5,000, in 4 annual lump sum installments of $1,250, the first of which shall be made during fiscal year 2023 not later than July 1, 2023, and(II)subparagraph (A) shall not apply in determining such individual’s primary insurance amount.(iv)Upon receipt by the Commissioner as of December 31, 2022, of a timely election filed in accordance with clause (ii) by at least one beneficiary entitled to benefits on the basis of the wages and self-employment income of a deceased individual described in paragraph (4)(B), if such deceased individual has filed no timely election in accordance with clause (ii)—(I)the Commissioner shall certify receipt of all such elections received as of such date to the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of the Treasury, after receipt of such certification, shall pay each beneficiary filing such a timely election, from amounts in the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, a total amount equal to $5,000 (or, in the case of two or more such beneficiaries, such amount distributed evenly among such beneficiaries), in 4 equal annual lump sum installments, the first of which shall be made during fiscal year 2023 not later than July 1, 2023, and(II)solely for purposes of determining the amount of such beneficiary’s benefits, subparagraph (A) shall be deemed not to apply in determining the deceased individual’s primary insurance amount..(b)Effective Date and Related Rules(1)Applicability of amendments(A)In generalExcept as provided in paragraph (2), the amendments made by this Act shall be effective as though they had been included or reflected in section 201 of the Social Security Amendments of 1977.(B)ApplicabilityNo monthly benefit or primary insurance amount under title II of the Social Security Act shall be increased by reason of such amendments for any month before July 2023.(2)Recomputation to reflect benefit increasesIn any case in which an individual is entitled to monthly insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act for June 2023, if such benefits are based on a primary insurance amount computed—(A)under section 215 of such Act as in effect (by reason of the Social Security Amendments of 1977) after December 1978, or(B)under section 215 of such Act as in effect prior to January 1979 by reason of subsection (a)(4)(B) of such section (as amended by the Social Security Amendments of 1977),the Commissioner of Social Security (notwithstanding section 215(f)(1) of the Social Security Act) shall recompute such primary insurance amount so as to take into account the amendments made by this Act.


text:
 12.12.2018
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 315/23
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2018/1957 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 11 декември 2018 година
 за изменение на Регламент (ЕС) No 885/2010 по отношение на условията за разрешаване на препарата от наразин и никарбазин като фуражна добавка за пилета за угояване (притежател на разрешителното — Eli Lilly and Company Ltd)
 (текст от значение за ЕИП)
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 22 септември 2003 г. относно добавки за използване при храненето на животните (1), и по-специално член 13, параграф 3 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 се предвижда разрешителен режим за добавките, предвидени за употреба при храненето на животните, и се посочват основанията и процедурите за предоставянето на такова разрешение.
 (2)
 С Регламент (ЕС) No 885/2010 на Комисията употребата на препарата от наразин и никарбазин като фуражна добавка при пилета за угояване беше разрешена за срок от десет години (2).
 (3)
 В съответствие с член 13, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003 притежателят на разрешителното предложи да се променят условията на разрешителното за препарата с подаването на заявление за промяна на съдържанието на micro tracer red от 11 g/kg до диапазон 4—11 g/kg. Заявлението бе придружено от съответните данни, подкрепящи искането за промяна.
 (4)
 В становището си от 18 октомври 2016 г. (3) Европейският орган за безопасност на храните („Органът“) заключи, че намаляването на съдържанието на micro tracer red от 11 g/kg до диапазон 4—11 g/kg добавка не оказва въздействие върху физикохимичните и биологичните свойства на добавката. Поради това той стигна до заключението, че оценката на безопасността и ефикасността, извършена за предишната формулировка с 11 g/kg micro tracer red, е валидна и за новата формулировка. Органът не счита, че са необходими специални изисквания за мониторинг след пускането на пазара. Той също така провери доклада относно метода за анализ на фуражната добавка във фуражите, предоставен от референтната лаборатория, определена с Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003.
 (5)
 Освен това на 10 юли 2018 г. Eli Lilly and Company Ltd. подаде заявление съгласно член 13, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003, с което предлага да бъде променено наименованието на притежателя на разрешителното. Заявителят твърди, че, считано от 3 април 2018 г., Elanco GmbH, звено на предприятието Eli Lilly and Company Ltd., трябва да се счита за притежател на правата за търговия с посочената по-горе добавка. Заявлението бе придружено от съответните данни, подкрепящи искането за промяна.
 (6)
 Предложената промяна в условията на разрешителното, които се отнасят до наименованието на притежателя на разрешителното, е от чисто административно естество и не налага нова оценка на съответната добавка. Органът беше информиран за заявлението.
 (7)
 При оценката на препарата от наразин и никарбазин с новото съдържание на micro tracer red бе установено, че условията за разрешаване, предвидени в член 5 от Регламент (ЕО) No 1831/2003, са изпълнени.
 (8)
 Поради това Регламент (ЕС) No 885/2010 следва да бъде съответно изменен.
 (9)
 Тъй като няма съображения във връзка с безопасността, които да налагат незабавното прилагане на въведените с настоящия регламент изменения, е целесъобразно да се предвиди преходен период, по време на който съществуващите запаси от фуражната добавка наразин и никарбазин, които отговарят на разпоредбите, приложими преди датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент, могат да продължат да се пускат на пазара и да се употребяват до тяхното изчерпване.
 (10)
 Мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент, са в съответствие със становището на Постоянния комитет по растенията, животните, храните и фуражите,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Приложението към Регламент (ЕО) No 885/2010 се изменя, както следва:
 а)
 в колона 2 думите „Eli Lilly and Company Ltd“ се заменят с „Elanco GmbH“;
 б)
 в колона 4 „Състав, химична формула, описание, метод за анализ“ в „Състав на добавката“ при съдържанието на Micro tracer red думите „11 g/kg“ се заменят с „4—11 g/kg“.
 Член 2
 Съществуващите наличности от добавката, които отговарят на разпоредбите, приложими преди датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент, могат да продължат да бъдат пускани на пазара и използвани до тяхното изчерпване.
 Член 3
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на двадесетия ден след деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 11 декември 2018 година.
 За Комисията
 Председател
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) ОВ L 268, 18.10.2003 г., стр. 29.
 (2) Регламент (ЕС) No 885/2010 на Комисията от 7 октомври 2010 г. относно разрешително за употребата на препарата от наразин и никарбазин като фуражна добавка за пилета за угояване (притежател на разрешителното — Eli Lilly and Company Ltd) и за изменение на Регламент (ЕО) No 2430/1999 (ОВ L 265, 8.10.2010 г., стр. 5).
 (3) EFSA Journal (Бюлетин на ЕОБХ), 2016; 14(11):4614.


text:
2009.07. 9. Jogi Fórum / Európai Közösségek Bírósága
 A Bíróság C‐204/08. sz. ügyben hozott ítélete - Rehder kontra Air Baltic:
 A közösségen belüli repülőjárat utasai járattörlés esetén átalány-kártérítés iránti kérelmüket a repülőgép indulási vagy érkezési helye szerinti bíróság elé terjeszthetik.
 A joghatósággal rendelkező bíróság kiválasztása tekintetében sem a járatot biztosító társaság székhelye, sem a légi szállítási szerződés megkötésének helye nem meghatározó.
 Egy járattörlés miatt benyújtott kártérítési kérelem alkalmat ad a Bíróságnak arra, hogy pontosítsa a joghatósági szabályokat a légi közlekedés területén.
 A légi utasoknak nyújtandó kártalanításról és segítségről szóló rendelet [1] előírja, hogy járattörlés esetén az utasok 250 és 600 EUR közötti átalányösszegű kártérítésben részesülhetnek. Ha egy légitársaság, közösségen belüli repülőjárat esetén, megtagadja az átalány-kártérítés kifizetését, felvetődik a kérdés, hogy az érintett utasnak a joghatóságra vonatkozó közösségi rendelet [2] alapján van‐e lehetősége az e társaság székhelye szerint illetékes bíróságon kívül egy másik tagállam bíróságához fordulni.
 A Münchenben lakóhellyel rendelkező P. Rehder a rigai (Lettország) székhelyű Air Baltic‐nál Münchenből Vilniusba irányuló repülőutat foglalt. Az utasokat körülbelül 30 perccel a tervezett müncheni indulás előtt értesítették a járatuk törléséről. P. Rehder – a foglalásának az Air Baltic általi módosítását követően – Koppenhágán át repült Vilniusba.
 P. Rehder az Amtsgericht Erding – amelynek illetékességi területén a müncheni repülőtér található – elé terjesztett kérelmében azt kérte, hogy e bíróság a légi utasoknak nyújtandó kártalanításról és segítségről szóló rendeletnek megfelelően 250 EUR összegű kártérítés megfizetésére kötelezze az Air Baltic‐ot.
 Az Amtsgericht Erding – mivel úgy ítélte meg, hogy a légi szállítási szolgáltatásokat a repülőgép indulási helyén nyújtják, amiből következően a joghatóságról szóló rendelet értelmében a szerződéses kötelezettség teljesítési helye az indulási repülőtér – megállapította joghatóságát P. Rehder kártérítési kérelmének elbírálására.
 Miután e határozatot az Air Baltic fellebbezése nyomán hatályon kívül helyezték azzal az indokkal, hogy a légitársaság székhelye szerinti bíróság rendelkezik joghatósággal, P. Rehder a Bundesgerichtshof-hoz fordult. A Bundesgerichtshof azt kérdezi, hogy nem kell‐e a nemzetközi légi szállítási szerződésekből eredő jogviták esetén a szerződések terén fennálló különös joghatóságot főszabály szerint egyetlen teljesítési helyre összpontosítani.
 A mai napon kihirdetett ítéletében a Bíróság megállapítja, hogy a szolgáltatásnyújtás több, különböző tagállambeli helye esetén meg kell keresni azt a helyet, amely a legszorosabb kapcsolatot biztosítja a szóban forgó szerződés és a joghatósággal rendelkező bíróság között, nevezetesen azt, ahol e szerződés alapján az elsődleges szolgáltatásnyújtás történik.
 Az érintett légitársaság székhelye, illetve üzleti tevékenységének fő helye nem mutatja a szerződéssel való szükséges szoros kapcsolatot. Az e helyről végzett operatív tevékenységek és lépések, mint például többek között a megfelelő gép és személyzet rendelkezésre bocsátása, ugyanis a légi szállítási szerződés teljesítését szolgáló logisztikai és előkészítő intézkedéseknek minősülnek, nem pedig olyan szolgáltatásoknak, amelyeknek a nyújtása a szerződés tulajdonképpeni tartalmához kapcsolódik. Ugyanez igaz a légi szállítási szerződés megkötésének és a jegy kiállításának helyére is.
 Valójában az utasfelvétel, és -beszállítás, valamint az utasok fogadása a repülőgép fedélzetén a vonatkozó szállítási szerződésben megjelölt felszállási helyen, a gép elindulása az előírt időben, az utasoknak és poggyászaiknak az indulási helyről az érkezési helyre történő fuvarozása, az út tartama alatt az utasokról való gondoskodás és végül az utasok biztonságos kiszállítása az e szerződésben megjelölt leszállási helyen és időben tekinthetők a légi személyszállítási szerződésből eredő kötelezettségek teljesítésének megfelelő szolgáltatásnyújtásnak.
 Márpedig a szerződés tárgyával összefüggő kötelezettségek teljesítéseként nyújtott fenti szolgáltatásokkal közvetlen kapcsolatot egyedül a repülőgép indulási és érkezési helye mutat. Az „indulási és érkezési hely” kifejezések alatt pedig az egy adott légitársasággal, mint üzemeltető fuvarozóval kötött szállítási szerződésben megállapított helyeket kell érteni.
 Mindkét említett hely kellően közeli kapcsolatot mutat a jogvita tárgyával, miáltal a szerződés és a joghatósággal rendelkező bíróság közötti szoros kapcsolat megléte is biztosítva van. Következésképpen a járattörlés miatti kártérítési kérelem az érintett utas választása szerint azon bíróság elé terjeszthető, amelynek az illetékességi területén az indulási vagy érkezési hely található.
 [1] A visszautasított beszállás és légi járatok törlése vagy hosszú késése esetén az utasoknak nyújtandó kártalanítás és segítség közös szabályainak megállapításáról szóló 261/2004/EK rendelet (HL 2004. L 46., 1. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 7. fejezet, 8. kötet, 10. o.).
 [2] A polgári és kereskedelmi ügyekben a joghatóságról, valamint a határozatok elismeréséről és végrehajtásáról szóló 44/2001/EK rendelet (HL 2001. L 12., 1. o.; helyesbítve: HL 2006. L 242., 6. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 19. fejezet, 4. kötet, 42. o.).


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21976A0216(02)
 Protocol betreffende de samenwerking in noodsituaties bij de bestrijding van de verontreiniging van de Middellandse Zee door koolwaterstoffen en andere schadelijke stoffen
 Publicatieblad Nr. L 162 van 19/06/1981 blz. 0006 - 0013 Bijzondere uitgave in het Fins: Hoofdstuk 11 Deel 10 blz. 0007 Bijzondere uitgave in het Zweeds: Hoofdstuk 11 Deel 10 blz. 0007 Bijzondere uitgave in het Spaans: Hoofdstuk 15 Deel 3 blz. 0027 Bijzondere uitgave in het Portugees: Hoofdstuk 15 Deel 3 blz. 0027
 PROTOCOL concerning cooperation in combating pollution of the Mediterranean Sea by oil and other harmful substances in cases of emergency THE CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE PRESENT PROTOCOL, BEING PARTIES to the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution, RECOGNIZING that grave pollution of the sea by oil and other harmful substances in the Mediterranean Sea area involves a danger for the coastal States and the marine ecosystem, CONSIDERING that the cooperation of all the coastal States of the Mediterranean is called for to combat this pollution, BEARING IN MIND the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, the International Convention relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties, 1969, as well as the Protocol relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Marine Pollution by Substances Other than Oil, 1973, FURTHER TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969, HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: Article 1 The Contracting Parties to this Protocol (hereinafter referred to as "the Parties") shall cooperate in taking the necessary measures in cases of grave and imminent danger to the marine environment, the coast or related interests of one or more of the Parties due to the presence of massive quantities of oil or other harmful substances resulting from accidental causes or an accumulation of small discharges which are polluting or threatening to pollute the sea within the area defined in Article 1 of the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"). Article 2 For the purpose of this Protocol, the term "related interests" means the interests of a coastal State directly affected or threatened and concerning, among others: (a) activities in coastal waters, in ports or estuaries, including fishing activities; (b) the historical and tourist appeal of the area in question, including water sports and recreation; (c) the health of the coastal population; (d) the preservation of living resources. Article 3 The Parties shall endeavour to maintain and promote, either individually or through bilateral or multilateral cooperation, their contingency plans and means for combating pollution of the sea by oil and other harmful substances. These means shall include, in particular, equipment, ships, aircraft and manpower prepared for operations in cases of emergency. Article 4 The Parties shall develop and apply, either individually or through bilateral or multilateral cooperation, monitoring activities covering the Mediterranean Sea area in order to have as precise information as possible on the situations referred to in Article 1 of this Protocol. Article 5 In the case of release or loss overboard of harmful substances in packages, freight containers, portable tanks or road and rail tank wagons, the Parties shall cooperate as far as practicable in the salvage and recovery of such substances so as to reduce the danger of pollution of the marine environment. Article 6 1. Each Party undertakes to disseminate to the other Parties information concerning: (a) the competent national organization or authorities responsible for combating pollution of the sea by oil and other harmful substances; (b) the competent national authorities responsible for receiving reports of pollution of the sea by oil and other harmful substances and for dealing with matters concerning measures of assistance between Parties; (c) new ways in which pollution of the sea by oil and other harmful substances may be avoided, new measures of combating pollution and the development of related research programmes. 2. Parties which have agreed to exchange information directly between themselves shall nevertheless communicate such information to the regional centre. The latter shall communicate this information to the other Parties and, on a basis of reciprocity, to coastal States of the Mediterranean Sea area which are not Parties to this Protocol. Article 7 The Parties undertake to coordinate the utilization of the means of communication at their disposal in order to ensure, with the necessary speed and reliability, the reception, transmission and dissemination of all reports and urgent information which relate to the occurrences and situations referred to in Article 1. The regional centre shall have the necessary means of communication to enable it to participate in this coordinated effort and, in particular, to fulfil the functions assigned to it by paragraph 2 of Article 10. Article 8 1. Each Party shall issue instructions to the masters of ships flying its flag and to the pilots of aircraft registered in its territory requiring them to report by the most rapid and adequate channels in the circumstances, and in accordance with Annex I to this Protocol, either to a Party or to the regional centre: (a) all accidents causing or likely to cause pollution of the sea by oil or other harmful substances; (b) the presence, characteristics and extent of spillages of oil or other harmful substances observed at sea which are likely to present a serious and imminent threat to the marine environment or to the coast or related interests of one or more of the Parties. 2. The information collected in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be communicated to the other Parties likely to be affected by the pollution: (a) by the Party which has received the information, either directly or preferably, through the regional centre ; or (b) by the regional centre. In case of direct communication between Parties, the regional centre shall be informed of the measures taken by these Parties. 3. In consequence of the application of the provisions of paragraph 2, the Parties are not bound by the obligation laid down in Article 9, paragraph 2, of the Convention. Article 9 1. Any Party faced with a situation of the kind defined in Article 1 of this Protocol shall: (a) make the necessary assessments of the nature and extent of the casualty or emergency or, as the case may be, of the type and approximate quantity of oil or other harmful substances and the direction and speed of drift of the spillage: (b) take every practicable, measure to avoid or reduce the effects of pollution; (c) immediately inform all other Parties, either directly or through the regional centre, of these assessments and of any action which it has taken or which it intends to take to combat the pollution; (d) continue to observe the situation for as long as possible and report thereon in accordance with Article 8. 2. Where action is taken to combat pollution originating from a ship, all possible measures shall be taken to safeguard the persons present on board and, to the extent possible, the ship itself. Any Party which takes such action shall inform the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization. Article 10 1. Any Party requiring assistance for combating pollution by oil or other harmful substances polluting or threatening to pollute its coasts may call for assistance from other Parties either directly or through the regional centre referred to in Article 6, starting with the Parties which appear likely to be affected by the pollution. This assistance may comprise, in particular, expert advice and the supply to, or placing at the disposal of, the Party concerned of products, equipment and nautical facilities. Parties so requested shall use their best endeavours to render this assistance. 2. Where the Parties engaged in an operation to combat pollution cannot agree on the organization of the operation, the regional centre may, with their approval, coordinate the activity of the facilities put into operation by these Parties. Article 11 The application of the relevant provisions of Articles 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of this Protocol relating to the regional centre shall be extended, as appropriate, to sub-regional centres in the event of their establishment, taking into account their objectives and functions and their relationship with the said regional centre. Article 12 1. Ordinary meetings of the Parties to this Protocol shall be held in conjunction with ordinary meetings of the Contracting Parties to the Convention, held pursuant to Article 14 of the Convention. The Parties to this Protocol may also hold extraordinary meetings as provided in Article 14 of the Convention. 2. It shall be the function of the meetings of the Parties to this Protocol, in particular: (a) to keep under review the implementation of this Protocol, and to consider the efficacy of the measures adopted and the need for any other measures, in particular in the form of Annexes; (b) to review and amend as required any Annex to this Protocol; (c) To discharge such other functions as may be appropriate for implementation of this Protocol. Article 13 1. The provisions of the Convention relating to any Protocol shall apply with respect to the present Protocol. 2. The rules of procedure and the financial rules adopted pursuant to Article 18 of the Convention shall apply with respect to this Protocol, unless the Parties to this Protocol agree otherwise. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized by their respective Governments, have signed this Protocol. Done at Barcelona on 16 February 1976 in a single copy in the Arabic, English, French and Spanish languages, the four texts being equally authoritative. ANNEX Contents of the report to be made pursuant to Article 8 to this Protocol 1. Each report shall, as far as possible, contain, in general: (a) the identification of the source of pollution (identity of the ship, where appropriate); (b) the geographic position, time and date of the occurrence of the incident or of the observation; (c) the wind and sea conditions prevailing in the area; (d) where the pollution originates from a ship, relevant details respecting the conditions of the ship. 2. Each report shall contain, whenever possible, in particular: (a) a clear indication or description of the harmful substances involved, including the correct technical names of such substances (trade names should not be used in place of the correct technical names); (b) a statement or estimate of the quantities, concentrations and likely conditions of harmful substances discharged or likely to be discharged into the sea; (c) where relevant, a description of the packaging and identifying marks ; and (d) the name of the consignor, consignee or manufacturer. 3. Each report shall clearly indicate, whenever possible, whether the harmful substances discharged or likely to be discharged is oil or a noxious liquid, solid or gaseous substance and whether such substance was or is carried in bulk or contained in packaged form, freight containers, portable tanks, or road and rail tank wagons. 4. Each report shall be supplemented, as necessary, by any relevant information requested by a recipient of the report or deemed appropriate by the person sending the report. 5. Any of the persons referred to in Article 8, paragraph 1, of this Protocol shall: (a) supplement, as far as possible, the initial report, as necessary, with information concerning further developments ; and (b) comply as fully as possible with requests from affected States for additional information.


text:
Mikko Jakowleff (12. toukokuuta 1899 – 26. huhtikuuta 1918) oli lappeenrantalainen ylioppilas ja Lappeenrannan kaupungin miliisipäällikkö Suomen sisällissodan aikana 1918.
 Poliisilaitoksen kansliassa työskennellyt Jakowleff oli harvoja punaisten puolelle liittyneitä ylioppilaita. Vallanvaihdon jälkeen hänet vangittiin ja vietiin muiden mukana poliisikamarille. Vangittuja kuulusteltiin kaupunginkamreeri August Gestrinin johdolla. Läsnä oli myös Toivo Tapanainen. Kuulustelu keskeytyi jääkärikapteeni Väinö Strömbergin ja hotellinjohtaja Uno Sereniuksen tullessa paikalle. Nämä riistivät Jakowleffin pidätyssellistä. Humalassa ollut Strömberg ampui Jakowleffiä kuolettavasti selkään poliisikamarin pihalla.
 Kun Jakowleffin ruumis luovutettiin omaisille, annettiin samalla määräys, että ruumista ei saa siunata kirkossa. Ortodoksiperheelle tämä oli erityisen raskasta. Samoihin aikoihin ammuttiin myös Mikko Jakowleffin kanssa seurustellut näyttelijä Maiju Saikko. Hänen murhalleen ei löytynyt muuta syytä kuin suhde Jakowleffiin.
 Lähteet
 Viitteet
 Suomen sisällissodan punaiset
 Suomalaiset henkirikosten uhrit
 Vuonna 1899 syntyneet
 Vuonna 1918 kuolleet


text:
 Važna pravna obavijest
 |
 22013A1018(01)
 Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju između Europskih zajednica i njihovih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Srbije, s druge strane
 Službeni list L 278 оd 18/10/2013 Str. 0016 - 0473
 Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanjuizmeđu Europskih zajednica i njihovih država članica, s jedne strane, i Republike Srbije, s druge straneOvaj će dokument biti objavljen u posebnom izdanju Službenog lista Europske unije na hrvatskom jeziku ako zadovolji potrebne uvjete.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 31987R2816
 Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2816/87 af 21. september 1987 om genindførelse af opkrævning af told for urinstof med et nitrogenindhold på over 45 vægtprocent (beregnet på grundlag af tørsubstansen) henhørende under pos. 31.02 B i den fælles toldtarif og med oprindelse i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, som er præferenceberettiget i henhold til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3924/86
 EF-Tidende nr. L 269 af 22/09/1987 s. 0018 - 0018
 ***** KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EOEF) Nr. 2816/87 af 21. september 1987 om genindfoerelse af opkraevning af told for urinstof med et nitrogenindhold paa over 45 vaegtprocent (beregnet paa grundlag af toersubstansen) henhoerende under pos. 31.02 B i den faelles toldtarif og med oprindelse i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, som er praeferenceberettiget i henhold til Raadets forordning (EOEF) nr. 3924/86 KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPAEISKE FAELLESSKABER HAR - under henvisning til Traktaten om Oprettelse af Det Europaeiske OEkonomiske Faellesskab, under henvisning til Raadets forordning (EOEF) nr. 3924/86 af 16. december 1986 om anvendelse af generelle toldpraeferencer i 1987 for visse industrivarer med oprindelse i udviklingslande (1), saerlig artikel 15, og ud fra foelgende betragtninger: I henhold til artikel 1 og 12 i den naevnte forordning suspenderes toldsatserne for hvert af de lande og territorier, der er anfoert i bilag III, bortset fra dem, der er anfoert i kolonne 4 i bilag I, inden for rammerne af de praeferencetoldlofter, som er fastsat i kolonne 9 i det naevnte bilag I; i henhold til artikel 13 i den naevnte forordning kan opkraevningen af told ved indfoersel af de omhandlede varer med oprindelse i et af de omhandlede lande og territorier genindfoeres paa et hvilket som helst tidspunkt, saa snart de paagaeldende individuelle lofter er naaet paa faellesskabsplan; for urinstof med et nitrogenindhold paa over 45 vaegtprocent (beregnet paa grundlag af toersubstansen), henhoerende under pos. 31.02 B i den faelles toldtarif, er det individuelle loft fastsat til 380 000 ECU; den 17. september 1987 har indfoerslerne af de omhandlede varer i Faellesskabet med oprindelse i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater ved afskrivning naaet det paagaeldende loft; opkraevningen af told skal for de paagaeldende varer genindfoeres over for De Forenede Arabiske Emirater - UDSTEDT FOELGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 Fra den 25. september 1987 genindfoeres opkraevning af told, som har vaeret suspenderet ifoelge Raadets forordning (EOEF) nr. 3924/86, ved indfoersel i Faellesskabet af foelgende varer med oprindelse i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater: 1.2.3 // // // // Loebe- nummer // Position i den faelles toldtarif (NIMEXE-nummer) // Varebeskrivelse // // // // 10.0400 // 31.02 B (31.02-15) // Urinstof med et nitrogenindhold paa over 45 vaegtprocent (beregnet paa grundlag af toersubstansen) // // // Artikel 2 Denne forordning traeder i kraft paa tredjedagen efter offentliggoerelsen i De Europaeiske Faellesskabers Tidende. Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gaelder umiddelbart i hver medlemsstat. Udfaerdiget i Bruxelles, den 21. september 1987. Paa Kommissionens vegne COCKFIELD Naestformand (1) EFT nr. L 373 af 31. 12. 1986, s. 1.


text:
Ολόκληρη η προκήρυξη για 19.101 προσλήψεις ανέργων του ΟΑΕΔ - Peripteras
 Eκδόθηκε η τρίτη προκήρυξη για τη νέα φάση της Κοινωφελούς Εργασίας του ΟΑΕΔ που αναμένεται αν εξασφαλίσει 19.101 θέσεις εργασίας σε ανέργους. Διαβάστε ποια είναι τα κριτήρια συμμετοχής στο πρόγραμμα
 Αύγουστος 25 2015 19:00
 Εκδόθηκε πριν απο λίγα λεπτά και παρουσιάζουν πρώτα τα dikaiologitika.gr την τρίτη προκήρυξη για την νέα φάση της Κοινωφελούς Εργασίας του ΟΑΕΔ και αφορούν 19.101 προσλήψεις ανέργων. Οι αιτήσεις ξεκινούν αύριο το πρωί και λήγουν 14 Σεπτεμβρίου.
 Οι αιτήσεις για την τρίτη προκήρυξη του ΟΑΕΔ για προσλήψεις κοινωφελούς εργασίας θα γίνουν και πάλι ηλεκτρονικά στο oaed.gr ενώ θα ανοίξουν αύριο στις 26/8 στις 10 το πρωί και οι επιτυχόντες των προηγούμενων προκηρύξεων για την Κοινωφελή Εργασία δεν θα μπορούν να κάνουν αίτηση
 Συγκεκριμένα ο ΟΑΕΔ καλεί τους ενδιαφερόμενους εγγεγραμμένους ανέργους στα μητρώα ανέργων του Οργανισμού, ηλικίας 18 ετών και άνω, που επιθυμούν να συμμετάσχουν στη διαδικασία προσλήψεων προσωπικού για την προώθηση της απασχόλησης μέσω προγραμμάτων κοινωφελούς χαρακτήρα, στους δημόσιους φορείς (Επιβλέποντες Φορείς) οι οποίοι ορίζονται στο Κεφάλαιο 4 (Παράρτημα I) της παρούσας Δημόσιας Πρόσκλησης, να υποβάλουν με ηλεκτρονικό τρόπο αίτηση συμμετοχής από 26/08/2015 και ώρα 10η πρωινή έως και 14/09/2015 και ώρα 12η μεσημβρινή στον διαδικτυακό τόπο του ΟΑΕΔ www.oaed.gr, χρησιμοποιώντας το σχετικό πεδίο καταχώρισης ηλεκτρονικών αιτήσεων
 1. εγγεγραμμένοι άνεργοι στα μητρώα ανέργων του ΟΑΕΔ, μέλη οικογενειών στις οποίες δεν εργάζεται κανείς και οι σύζυγοι αυτών είναι εγγεγραμμένοι άνεργοι στα μητρώα ανέργων του ΟΑΕΔ1
 3. εγγεγραμμένοι μακροχρόνια άνεργοι στα μητρώα ανέργων του ΟΑΕΔ3
 Κρίσιμος χρόνος συνδρομής των προϋποθέσεων και των κριτηρίων που λαμβάνονται υπόψη για την επιλογή των υποψηφίων ανέργων είναι ο χρόνος λήξης της προθεσμίας υποβολής των αιτήσεων συμμετοχής είναι η 14/9/2015
 Δείτε εδώ όλη την προκήρυξη του ΟΑΕΔ.
 στις 8/26/2015 01:25:00 π.μ.


text:
Danske adelsslægter. Den danske adel, der groft inddeles i uradel og brevadel, og i højadel og lavadel, består i dag af 189 slægter (hvoraf 6 er uddøde i mandslinjen), der enten er ubetitlede, friherrelige (= baron), lensfriherrelige (= lensbaron), grevelige eller lensgrevelige. Endvidere blev en gren af den franske hertugslægt Decazes i 1818 udnævnt til hertuger af Glücksbierg. Som uradel regnes den adel, der kendes før reformationen, mens brevadelen er den adel, der derefter har fået sit adelskab gennem et patent (primært embedsmænd eller militærfolk, heraf sværdadel). Som højadel regnes den gamle rigsrådsadel og den betitlede adel efter enevældens indførelse 1660.
 I 1600- og 1700-tallet uddøde mange slægter fra den gamle danske uradel (fx Brahe, Gyldenstierne, Marsvin etc.), og de blev "erstattet" af især tyske adelsslægter, hvis medlemmer blev naturaliseret (dvs. anerkendt) som dansk adel.
 Det er dog værd at bemærke, at der gennem tiden har levet mange udenlandske adelsslægter i Danmark, der af forskellige – ofte tilfældige – grunde ikke er blevet naturaliseret (se en ufuldstændig liste her). De henregnes således ikke til den danske adel, men er adelige i deres oprindelseslande.
 Oversigter
 Der er flere oversigter over dansk adel:
 Nyt Dansk Adelslexikon
 Thiset og Wittrup udgav i 1904: Nyt Dansk Adelslexikon (NDA). Det indeholder en lille artikel om hver slægt, med dens navn, våben, første og sidste kendte mand. Herunder mange enkeltpersoner, hvis familieforhold ikke kendes. NDA er det nærmeste vi kommer til en 'officiel' liste, men der ses mange enkeltpersoner og enkelte slægter i (senere trykte) kildeudgivelser, som ikke er medtaget.
 Danmarks Adels Aarbog
 Danmarks Adels Aarbog (DAA) er udkommet siden 1884 og udgives af Dansk Adels Forening. Hvert bind indeholder en 'præsensliste' dvs slægtstavler over nulevende medlemmer af alle danske adelsslægter.
 Dertil er der stamtavler for mere end 750 danske adelsslægter, incl nogle norske - plus rettelser og tilføjelser. Navneregister over stamtavlerne i hvert bind.
 Danske Adelsvåbener. En heraldisk nøgle
 Sven Tito Achen:
 Danske Adelsvåbener. En heraldisk nøgle.
 Politikens Forlag
 København 1973
 Bogen rummer 1716 tegninger af våben plus omtale af slægterne. Våbnene er fra
 H Storck:
 Dansk Våbenbog. Afbildninger til ... Nyt Dansk Adelsleksikon (NDA).
 København 1910.
 Heri har professor Hermann Storck (1839-1922) tegnet et 'standard-våben' for hver slægt.
 Teksten om slægterne er fra Nyt dansk Adelsleksikon, og der er suppleret med henvisninger hertil og til DAA (Adelsaarbogen). Slægter hvis våben ikke kendes skal søges i Adelsleksikonnet.
 Dansk Adelskalender
 Ferdinand von Krogh, Dansk Adelskalender, København 1878, er en anden større oversigt, som kun opregner de på det daværende tidspunkt blomstrende adelsslægter.
 Derudover har A.F. Bergsøe i Den danske Stats Statistik, bind 1, 1844, bragt en liste over "Den danske Arveadel".
 Liste over danske adelsslægter
 NB: Skemaet er ikke komplet. Følgende skema er begyndelsen på en komplet liste over danske adelsslægter, både nulevende og uddøde. Pt. skulle samtlige nulevende slægter være opført på listen.
 Årstal for adling er anført i skemaet. Kendes kun årstal for, hvornår slægten første gang træder frem i historien, anføres dette med firkantede parenteser (fx [1283]). For slægter, der er blevet dansk adel ved naturalisation, fremgår både året, hvor slægten træder frem i historien, og året for den kgl. naturalisation ("nat."). Også her mangler der endnu oplysninger et par steder.
 Personer er anført med det slægtsnavn, som de bar før adlingen.
 A
 B
 C
 D
 E
 F
 G
 H
 I
 J
 K
 L
 M
 N
 O
 P
 Q
 R
 S
 T
 U
 V
 W
 Z
 Hertugslægter
 Der findes to slægter med dansk hertugtitel:
 Hertug af Slesvig: Udsprunget af børn til Gerhard 3. af Holsten, siden 1459 gennem kvinder det Oldenborgske hus inkl. Gottorpske gren og Sønderborgske grene.
 Hertug af Glücksbierg: Den franske slægt Decazes.
 Se også
 Ikke-naturaliserede adelsslægter i Danmark
 Uradel
 Adel
 Norske adelsslægter
 Svenske adelsslægter
 Kilder
 Eksterne henvisninger
 Afskrift af Dansk Adelskalender
 Database over slægten Reventlow
 Adel i Danmark – Den Store Danske
 1600 Adelsvåben fra middelalderen - over 800 danske
 Stamtavler for ca 230 adelsslægter
 Kofoed Adels Adelsbrevet 1514 Controversies


text:
Voievod (termen de origine slavă) este unul din titlurile sub care sunt cunoscute căpeteniile militare slave, ulterior fiind preluat și de vlahii nord-dunăreni. Semnificația acestui termen a variat în funcție de perioada de raportare, cât și de spațiul geografic.
 Originea numelui
 Alte denumiri sunt: Wojwode/Vojvode, Wojwoda/Vojvoda, Woiwod, Воевода/Wojewoda și Войвода/Wojwoda, derivate din cuvintele slave „Войвода”/„Wojwoda”.
 Istoric
 Termenul „voievod” se referea, în general, la un guvernator și era folosit în special pentru un rang nobiliar slav, sub un prinț (cneaz) sau pentru un comandant militar. La Granița Militară cu Imperiul Otoman, voievodul era comandantul unei divizii de 50 de bărbați de militari recrutați din populația de frontieră. O astfel de unitate era numită „voievodat”.
 Titlul „voievod” era folosit în: Pomerania, Rügen, Polonia, Bosnia, Serbia, Croația, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Rusia, Belarus, Ucraina, de asemenea principatele Moldova și Țara Românească și în Ungaria (Vajda) și Austria. În Principatele Dunărene Moldova și Țara Românească, a fost titlul oficial al hospodarului și, mai târziu, al domnitorului. În Bulgaria și Macedonia au fost numiți, de asemenea, conducătorii cetnici ca voievod. În Austro-Ungaria, împăratul Austriei purta titlul de Mare Voievod al Voievodatului Serbiei.
 În Țaratul Rusiei, Voevoda (воевода) a fost un titlu militar până la reformele lui Petru cel Mare. Fiecare stat avea unul sau mai mulți voievozi care conduceau garnizoana lor militară. În plus, au existat "voievozi de uscat" (полевые воеводы), care au condus diferite părți ale armatei.
 În Moldova, Țara Românească și Transilvania
 Astfel, titlul de voievod (sau de vodă) avea, în accepțiunea cancelariilor din Țara Moldovei și Țara Românească, sensul de conducător al armatei, spre deosebire de titlul de domn, care se referea la conducătorul administrativ (preluat după terminologia bizantină).
 Odată cu cedarea puterii politice și militare Imperiului Otoman, titulatura de voievod se contopește cu cea de domn, pentru ca, din secolul următor să devină un rang nobiliar înalt, echivalent cu cel de pașă, în cadrul structurii organizatorice a Imperiului Otoman.
 În Transilvania, titlul de voievod este perceput ca un titlu nobiliar echivalent cu cel de principe sau de mare duce, formă care a fost preluată de către cultura occidentală. Termenul se păstrează până la absorbția Transilvaniei în Arhiducatul Austriei în 1691. Ultimul voievod al Transilvaniei a fost Francisc Rákóczi al II-lea, purtând însă numai titlul nominal până în 1711.
 Titulatura de voievod este cel mai bine păstrată însă în forma ei incipientă la nobilimea românească din Ardeal, cu precădere din Țara Hațegului și Maramureș, unde titulatura de voievod, alături de cea de cneaz/ chinez, rămâne aceea de nobil, dar și de conducător al unor armate sau miliții locale.
 Între 1930 și 1940, titlul de „Mare Voevod de Alba Iulia” desemna moștenitorul la tronul regal românesc.
 În Imperiul Otoman
 Titlul de voievod a fost utilizat de asemenea și în cadrul Imperiului Otoman. Un astfel de exemplu a fost titlul de voievod al Atenei, fiind guvernatorul otoman al Atenei otomane.
 Utilizarea de astăzi în Republica Polonă
 În Polonia titlul de voievod (poloneză: wojewoda) a fost folosit din Evul Mediu târziu pentru a se referi la șeful administrației unui voievodat, adică cel mai înalt district administrativ. Voievodul este reprezentantul guvernului central în voievodat și este numit de premierul polonez.
 Note
 Bibliografie suplimentară
 Voievodul dincolo de sala tronului: scene din viața privată, Dan Horia Mazilu, Editura Polirom, 2003
 Vezi și
 Lista domnilor Țării Românești
 Lista domnilor Moldovei
 Listă de voievozi ai Transilvaniei
 Istoria României
 Voievodul țiganilor
 Boier
 Titluri nobiliare
 Titluri otomane


text:
 15.1.2011
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 13/37
 Avaliku Teenistuse Kohtu 12. oktoobri 2010. aasta otsus — Wendler versus komisjon
 (Kohtuasi F-49/09) (1)
 (Avalik teenistus - Ametnikud - Vanaduspension - Pensioni maksmine - Kohustus avada arvelduskonto elukohaliikmesriigis - Teenuste osutamise vabadus - Avalikul huvil põhinev väide - Võrdne kohtlemine)
 2011/C 13/72
 Kohtumenetluse keel: saksa
 Pooled
 Hageja: Eberhard Wendler (Laveno Mombello, Itaalia) (esindaja: advokaat M. Müller-Trawinski)
 Kostja: Euroopa Komisjon (esindajad: D. Martin ja B. Eggers)
 Kostja toetuseks menetlusse astuja: Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu (esindajad: M. Bauer ja K. Zieleśkiewicz)
 Ese
 Nõue tühistada komisjoni poolt hagejale esitatud nõue, et hageja esitaks pensionimaksete vastuvõtmiseks arvelduskonto oma elukohas.
 Resolutsioon
 1.
 Jätta E. Wendleri kaebus rahuldamata
 2.
 Mõista E. Wendlerilt lisaks tema enda kohtukuludele välja ka Euroopa Komisjoni kohtukulud.
 3.
 Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu kannab oma kohtukulud ise.
 (1) ELT C 167, 18/7/2009, lk 27.


text:
 Dôležité právne oznámenie
 |
 21988A1130(02)
 Úradný vestník L 327 , 30/11/1988 S. 0036 - 0048 Fínske špeciálne vydanie: Kapitola 11 Zväzok 14 S. 0169 Švédske špeciálne vydanie: Kapitola 11 Zväzok 14 S. 0169
 Štvrtý dodatkový protokolk dohode medzi Európskym hospodárskym spoločenstvom a Izraelským štátomEURÓPSKE HOSPODÁRSKE SPOLOČENSTVO,na jednej strane, aIZRAELSKÝ ŠTÁT,na strane druhej,SO ZRETEĽOM na dohodu medzi Európskym hospodárskym spoločenstvom a Izraelským štátom, podpísanú v Bruseli 11. mája 1975, ďalej len "dohoda", a dodatkový protokol podpísaný v Bruseli 8. februára 1977,BERÚC DO ÚVAHY, že spoločenstvo a Izrael si želajú naďalej posilňovať svoje vzťahy, s cieľom vzatia do úvahy nových možností vytvorených pristúpením Španielska a Portugalska k Európskemu spoločenstvu, 1. januára 1986, a aby článok 22 dohody stanovil možnosť zlepšenia jej podmienok,BERÚC DO ÚVAHY, že by sa mali stanoviť určité pravidlá, aby sa umožnilo udržanie tradičných vývozných tokov z Izraela do spoločenstva,ROZHODLI SA uzavrieť protokol, ktorým sa prispôsobujú určité ustanovenia dohody, a za týmto účelom určili ako svojich splnomocnených zástupcov:RADA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV:Jakob Esper Larsen,mimoriadny a splnomocnený veľvyslanec,stály zástupca Dánska,predseda Výboru stálych zástupcov,Jean Durieux,osobitný poradca v Generálnom riaditeľstve pre vonkajšie vzťahy Komisie Európskych spoločenstiev;VLÁDA IZRAELSKÉHO ŠTÁTU:Avraham Primor,mimoriadny a splnomocnený veľvyslanec;KTORÍ, po výmene svojich plných mocí uznaných za správne a náležité,DOHODLI SA TAKTO:Článok 11. Clá uplatniteľné podľa tejto dohody na dovoz produktov do spoločenstva, ktoré sú uvedené v prílohe A k tomuto protokolu a majú pôvod v Izraeli, sa postupne zrušia v rovnakých obdobiach a v rovnakej miere, ako je to stanovené v akte o pristúpení Španielska a Portugalska vzhľadom na dovoz tých istých produktov zo Španielska a Portugalska do spoločenstva ustanovenom 31 decembra 1985. Toto ustanovenie sa uplatňuje v súlade s pravidlami stanovenými v tomto článku.Počas tohto postupného rušenia ciel a ak sa úroveň platných ciel pre dovoz zo Španielska do spoločenstva, ako bolo ustanovené 31. decembra 1985, odlišuje od úrovne uplatňovanej na dovoz s pôvodom v Portugalsku, produkty s pôvodom v Izraeli podliehajú vyššej z týchto dvoch sadzieb.2. Keď je clo na produkt uvedený v prílohe A nižšie pre Izrael ako pre Španielsko, Portugalsko alebo obe krajiny, postupné zrušenie cla začína, keď clo na tento produkt zo Španielska aj Portugalska klesne pod úroveň cla uplatňovaného na dovoz s pôvodom v Izraeli.3. Ustanovenia odsekov 1 a 2 sa uplatňujú v rámci limitov a v súlade s osobitnými podmienkami, ktorým podliehajú colné zníženia uvedené v článkoch 9 a 10 protokolu 1 k tejto dohode.4. Clá na dovoz produktov s pôvodom v Izraeli a uvedených v prílohe A, vzhľadom na ktoré sú colné kvóty spoločenstva uvedené v danej prílohe, sa postupne zrušia v rámci limitov týchto kvót.Keď objem dovozu týchto produktov prekročí kvóty, spoločenstvo uplatní clá vyplývajúce z tejto dohody.5. Na účely postupného rušenia ciel pre určité produkty uvedené v prílohe A s pôvodom v Izraeli sa týmto stanovujú referenčné množstvá uvedené v danej prílohe.Ak objem dovozu jedného z týchto produktov prekročí referenčné množstvo, môže spoločenstvo, so zreteľom na ročný prehľad obchodných tokov, ktorý vykonáva, pre príslušný produkt zaviesť colnú kvótu spoločenstva podľa odseku 4, ktorej objem je rovnaký ako referenčné množstvo.6. Ak spoločenstvo zistí, na základe ročného prehľadu obchodných tokov, ktorý vykonáva, že objem dovozu produktu alebo produktov uvedených v prílohe A, okrem produktov uvedených v odsekoch 4 a 5, by mohol spôsobiť ťažkosti na trhu spoločenstva, môže stanoviť referenčné množstvo podľa odseku 5.Článok 21. Clá na dovoz produktov do spoločenstva, ktoré sú uvedené v prílohe B k tomuto protokolu s pôvodom v Izraeli sa postupne rušia tým istým spôsobom, ako je uvedené v článku 1 ods. 1, 4, 5 a 6.Keď však objem dovozu týchto produktov prekročí colné kvóty spoločenstva, v zmysle článku 1 ods. 4, spoločenstvo uplatní clá Spoločného colného sadzobníka.2. Postupné rušenie ciel na čerstvé rezané kvety a puky položky 06.03 spoločného colného sadzobníka podlieha niektorým podmienkam zjednaným na základe výmeny dopisov.Článok 31. Spoločenstvo na základe štatistického prieskumu a analýzy uvedenej v odstavci 2 a s prihliadnutím na faktory, ktoré sa týkajú cieľa zachovať tradičné obchodné toky v rámci rozšírenia Společenstva, rozhodne pre rok 1990 a pre každý následujúci hospodárský rok, či upraví vstupné ceny stanovené v nariadení (EHS) č. 1035/72 pre uvedené produkty, ktoré pochádzajú z Izraela, v rámci nižšie uvedených množstevných obmedzení:Číslo položky Spoločného colného sadzobníka | Opis | Množstvo |08.02 ex A | Pomaranče, čerstvé | 293000 ton |08.02 ex B | Mandarínky (vrátane druhov tangerines a satsumas); klementínky, wilkingy a podobné citrusové hybridy; čerstvé | 14200 ton |08.02 ex C | Citróny, čerstvé | 6400 ton |2. Od roku 1987 a na konci každého hospodárskeho roku spoločenstvo vykonáva na základe štatistického prehľadu analýzu situácie pre uvedené produkty s pôvodom v Izraeli a vyvážané do spoločenstva.Pre tieto isté produkty, od roku 1989 a pre každý nasledujúci rok, spoločenstvo vyhotoví spoločne s Izraelom prognózu produkcie a dodávok.3. Možná úprava stanovená v odseku 1 sa odvoláva na sumu, ktorá sa má vzhľadom na clo odpočítať od reprezentatívnych cien zaznamenaných v spoločenstve na účely kalkulácie vstupnej ceny pre každý z týchto produktov, v rámci limitov stanovených v článku 152 ods. 2 písm. c) aktu o pristúpení Španielska a Portugalska.Článok 4Clá na dovoz produktov uvedených nižšie do Izraela s pôvodom v spoločenstve sa postupne zrušia v období od 1. januára 1990 do 31. decembra 1995. Potrebné opatrenia sa dohodnú výmenou listov do 1. januára 1990.Číslo položky Spoločného colného sadzobníka | Opis |ex 02.01 | Mäso z hovädzích zvierat, iné ako mrazené |ex 04.02 | Mlieko v prášku |Článok 51. Výbor pre obchod a hospodársku spoluprácu sa zriaďuje na účely zlepšenia činnosti inštitucionálnych mechanizmov dohody. Výbor uľahčí:- pravidelnú výmenu informácií o údajoch a prognózach týkajúcich sa obchodu a výroby,- pravidelnú výmenu informácií o príležitostiach na spoluprácu v oblastiach, na ktoré sa vzťahuje táto dohoda.Výboru striedavo predsedá zástupca Komisie Európskych spoločenstiev a zástupca Izraela.2. Rada pre spoluprácu rozhodne, v čo možno najkratšom termíne o zložení tohto výboru a o spôsobe jeho fungovania, v súlade s článkom 12 ods. 2 dodatkového protokolu k dohode podpísaného 8. februára 1977. Môže prípadne tiež rozhodnúť o tom, že jej výbor bude zasielať správy.Článok 6Od roku 1995 spoločenstvo a Izrael preskúmajú výsledky spolupráce medzi zmluvnými stranami s cieľom odhadnúť situáciu a budúci vývoj ich vzťahov na základe cieľov definovaných v tejto dohode.Článok 7Tento protokol tvorí neoddeliteľnú súčasť dohody medzi Európskym hospodárskym spoločenstvom a Izraelským štátom.Článok 81. Tento protokol ratifikujú, prijmú alebo schvália zmluvné strany v súlade s ich vlastnými postupmi; zmluvné strany si vzájomne oznámia ukončenie postupu potrebného na tento účel.2. Tento protokol vstupuje do platnosti prvý deň mesiaca nasledujúceho po mesiaci, v ktorom bola notifikácia stanovená v odseku 1 predložená.Článok 9Tento protokol je vypracovaný v dvoch vyhotoveniach v anglickom, dánskom, francúzskom, gréckom, holandskom, nemeckom, portugalskom, španielskom, talianskom a hebrejskom jazyku, pričom každé z týchto znení je rovnako autentické.+++++ TIFF +++++En fe de lo cual, los plenipotenciarios abajo firmantes suscriben el presente Protocolo.Til bekræftelse heraf har undertegnede befuldmægtigede underskrevet denne protokol.Zu Urkund dessen haben die unterzeichneten Bevollmächtigten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses Protokoll gesetzt.Åéò πßóôùóç ôùí áíùôÝñù, ïé õπïãåãñáììÝíïé πëçñåîïýóéïé Ýèåóáí ôéò õπïãñáöÝò ôïõò óôï πáñüí πñùôüêïëëï.In witness whereof, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Protocol.En foi de quoi, les plénipotentiaires soussignés ont apposé leurs signatures au bas du présent protocole.In fede di che, i plenipotenziari sottoscritti hanno apposto le loro firme in calce al presente protocollo.Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekende gevolmachtigden hun handtekening onder dit Protocol hebben gesteld.Em fé do que, os plenipotenciários abaixo assinados apuseram as suas assinaturas no final do presente protocolo.+++++ TIFF +++++Hecho en Bruselas, el quince de diciembre de mil novecientos ochenta y siete.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den femtende december nitten hundrede og syvogfirs.Geschehen zu Brüssel am fünfzehnten Dezember neunzehnhundertsiebenundachtzig.Έãéíå óôéò ÂñõîÝëëåò, óôéò äÝêá πÝíôå Äåêåìâñßïõ χßëéá åííéáêüóéá ïãäüíôá åπôÜ.Done at Brussels on the fifteenth day of December in the year one thousand nine hundred and eighty-seven.Fait à Bruxelles, le quinze décembre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-sept.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì quindici dicembre millenovecentottantasette.Gedaan te Brussel, de vijftiende december negentienhonderdzevenentachtig.Feito em Bruxelas, em quinze de Dezembro de mil novecentos e oitenta e sete.+++++ TIFF +++++Por el Consejo de las Comunidades EuropeasFor Rådet for De Europæiske FællesskaberFür den Rat der Europäischen GemeinschaftenÃéá ôï Óõìâïýëéï ôùí Åõñùπáúêώí ÊïéíïôήôùíFor the Council of the European CommunitiesPour le Conseil des Communautés européennesPer il Consiglio delle Comunità europeeVoor de Raad van de Europese GemeenschappenPelo Conselho das Comunidades Europeias+++++ TIFF +++++Por el Estado de IsraelFor IsraelFür den Staat IsraelÃéá ôï êñÜôïò ôïõ ÉóñáήëFor the State of IsraelPour l'État d'IsraëlPer lo Stato d'IsraeleVoor de Staat IsraëlPelo Estado de Israel--------------------------------------------------PRÍLOHA AČíslo položky Spoločného colného sadzobníka | Opis || |07.01 | Zelenina, čerstvá alebo chladená: G.Mrkva, okrúhlica; šalátová repa, kozia brada, hľuzový zeler, reďkev a podobné jedlé korene:ex II.Mrkva a okrúhlica:Mrkva, od 1. januára do 31. marcaex H.Cibuľa, šalotka a cesnak:Cibuľa, od 15. februára do 15. májaS.Sladká paprikaT.Ostatné:ex I.Cukety:Od 1. decembra do konca februáraex II.Baklažány:Od 15. januára do 30. aprílex III.Ostatné:Stonky zeleru, od 1. januára do 30. apríla | |08.01 | Datle, banány, kokosové orechy, para orechy, kešu orechy, ananásy, avokáda, mangá, guajavy a mangostany, čerstvé alebo sušené, tiež vylúpané zo škrupiny: D.AvokádaH.Ostatné | |08.02 | Citrusové plody, čerstvé alebo sušené: ex A.Pomaranče:Čerstvéex B.Mandarínky (vrátane druhov tangerines a satsumas); klementínky, wilkingy a podobné citrusové hybridy:Čerstvéex C.Citróny:ČerstvéD.Grapefruity | |08.08 | Bobuľové ovocie, čerstvé: A.Jahody:ex II.Od 1. augusta do 30. apríla:Od 1. novembra do 31. marca | |ex 08.09 | Ostatné ovocie, čerstvé: Melóny, od 1. novembra do 31. májaVodové melóny, od 1. apríla do 15. júna | |08.10 | Ovocie, tiež varené vo vode alebo v pare, mrazené, neobsahujúce pridaný cukor alebo ostatné sladidlá: ex D.Ostatné:Grapefruitové segmenty | |08.11 | Ovocie dočasne konzervované (napr. plynným oxidom siričitým, v slanom náleve, v sírenej vode alebo v iných konzervačných roztokoch), ale v tomto stave nevhodné na okamžitú spotrebu: ex B.Pomaranče:Jemne mletéex E.Ostatné:Citrusové plody, jemne mleté | |09.04 | Korenie rodu Piper sušené alebo drvené alebo mleté plody rodu Capsicum alebo rodu Pimenta: A.Nedrvené ani nemletéII.rod Pimento:ex c)Ostatné:Od 15. novembra do 30. aprílaB.Drvené alebo mleté | |13.03 | Rastlinné šťavy a výťažky; pektínové látky, pektináty a pektáty; agar-agar a ostatné slizy a zahusťovadlá, tiež modifikované, získané z rastlinných produktov: ex B.Pektínové látky, pektináty a pektáty:Pektínové látky, pektináty | |20.02 | Zelenina pripravená alebo konzervovaná inak ako v octe alebo kyseline octovej: ex C.Paradajky:LúpanéPretlakex H.Ostatné, vrátane zmesí:Zelerové, iné ako zmesiKapustové, iné ako zmesiHusté polievky, iné ako zmesi | |20.06 | Ovocie, pripravené alebo konzervované, obsahujúce alebo neobsahujúce pridaný cukor alebo alkohol: B.Ostatné:II.Neobsahujúce pridaný alkohol:a)Obsahujúce pridaný cukor, v balení na okamžitú spotrebu s netto hmotnosťou vyššou ako 1 kg:2.Grapefruitové segmentyex 3.Mandarínky (vrátane druhov tangerines a satsumas); klementínky, wilkingy a podobné citrusové hybridy:Jemne mleté7.Broskyne a marhule:ex aa)S obsahom cukru vyšším ako 13 % hmotnosti:Marhuleex bb)OstatnéMarhuleex 8.Ostatné ovocie:GrapefruityPomaranče a citróny, jemne mletéex 9.Ovocné zmesiOvocný šalátb)Obsahujúce pridaný cukor, v balení na okamžitú spotrebu s netto hmotnosťou nižšou ako 1 kg2.Grapefruitové segmentyex 3.Mandarínky (vrátane druhov tangerines a satsumas); klementínky, wilkingy a podobné citrusové hybridy:Jemne mleté | || ex 8.Ostatné ovocie:GrapefruityPomaranče a citróny, jemne mleté | || ex 9.Ovocné zmesiOvocný šalát | || c)Neobsahujúce pridaný cukor, v balení na okamžitú spotrebu s netto hmotnosťou:1.4,5 kg a viacex aa.)MarhulePolovice marhúľMarhuľová dreň | || ex dd)Ostatné ovocie | || Grapefruitové segmentyGrapefruityDreň citrusových plodovCitrusové plody, jemne mleté | |ex 20.07 | Ovocné šťavy (vrátane hroznového muštu) a zeleninové šťavy, neskvasené a neobsahujúce pridaný alkohol, tiež obsahujúce pridaný cukor alebo ostatné sladidlá: A.S hustotou vyššou ako 1,33 g/cm3 pri 20 °C:III.Ostatné:ex a)S hodnotou presahujúcou 30 ECU na 100 kg hmotnosti:Pomarančová šťavaGrapefruitová šťavaex b)Ostatné:Pomarančová šťavaGrapefruitová šťavaŠťava z akéhokoľvek iného jednotlivého citrusového ovociaB.S hustotou menšou ako 1,33 g/cm3 pri 20 °C:II.Ostatné:a)S hodnotou presahujúcou 30 ECU na 100 kg hmotnosti:1.Pomarančová šťava2.Grapefruitová šťavaex 3.Citrónová šťava a šťava z akéhokoľvek iného jednotlivého citrusového ovocia:Šťava z akéhokoľvek iného jednotlivého citrusového ovocia (okrem citrónovej šťavy)5.Paradajková šťavab)S hodnotou nepresahujúcou 30 ECU na 100 kg hmotnosti:1.Pomarančová šťava6.Paradajková šťava | |--------------------------------------------------PRÍLOHA BČíslo položky Spoločného colného sadzobníka | Opis |06.03 | Rezané kvety a puky druhov vhodných na kytice alebo na okrasné účely, čerstvé, sušené, bielené, farbené, napustené alebo inak upravené: A.Čerstvé |06.04 | Lístie, konáre a ostatné časti (bez kvetov alebo bez pukov) stromov, krov a ostatných rastlín a machy, lišajníky a trávy, tovar druhov vhodných na kytice alebo okrasné účely, čerstvé, sušené, bielené, farbené, napustené alebo inak upravené: B.Ostatné:I.Čerstvé |07.01 | Zelenina, čerstvá alebo chladená: A.Zemiaky:II.Nové zemiaky:ex a)Od 1. januára do 15. mája:Od 1. januára do 31. marcaB.Kapusta, karfiol a ružičkový kel:ex III.Ostatné:"Čínska kapusta", od 1. novembra do 31. decembraD.Šalátová zelenina, vrátane čakanky:I.Hlávkový šalát:ex a)od 1. apríla do 30. novembraHlávkový šalát (Lactuca sativa a L. var. capitata) (Iceberg), od 1. do30. novembraex b)od 1. decembra do 31. marcaHlávkový šalát (Lactuca sativa a L. var. capitata) (Iceberg), od 1. do30. decembra |07.04 | Sušená zelenina, celá, rozrezaná na kúsky alebo na plátky, drvená alebo v prášku, ale ďalej neupravená: ex B.Ostatná:Sladká paprika |08.01 | Datle, banány, kokosové orechy, para orechy, kešu orechy, ananásy, avokáda, mangá, guajavy a mangostany, čerstvé alebo sušené, tiež vylúpané zo škrupiny: A.Ďatle |08.02 | Citrusové plody, čerstvé alebo sušené: ex E.Ostatné:Cumquats |08.04 | Hrozno, čerstvé alebo sušené: A.Čerstvé:I.Stolové hrozno:ex a)Od 1. novembra do 14. júla:Od 1. februára do 30. júna |08.09 | Ostatné ovocie, čerstvé: Kiwi, od 1. januára do 30. aprílaPomegranátyEbenovník virgínsky, od 1. decembra do 31. júla |08.10 | Ovocie, tiež varené vo vode alebo v pare, mrazené, neobsahujúce pridaný cukor alebo ostatné sladidlá: ex D.Ostatné:Ďatle |20.01 | Zelenina a ovocie, pripravené alebo konzervované v octe alebo kyseline octovej obsahujúce alebo neobsahujúce cukor, soľ, korenie alebo horčicu: ex C.Ostatné:Ibištek jedlý a malá cibuľka (perličková cibuľka) |20.06 | Ovocie, pripravené alebo konzervované, obsahujúce alebo neobsahujúce pridaný cukor alebo alkohol: A.Orechy (vrátane podzemnice olejnej), pražené, v obaloch s netto hmotnosťou:ex I.Vyššou ako 1 kg:Podzemnica olejná |--------------------------------------------------Spoločné vyhlásenie zmluvných strán týkajúce sa článkov 1, 2, a 3 dodatkového protokoluZmluvné strany sa dohodnú, že ak vstup do platnosti dodatkového protokolu nebude v zhode so začiatkom kalendárneho alebo prípadne sezónneho roku, množstevné limity uvedené v článkoch 1, 2 a 3 sa budú uplatňovať proporcionálne.Zmluvné strany sa ďalej dohodnú, že účtovanie množstevných limitov dovozu produktov s pôvodom v Izraeli do spoločenstva, ktoré podliehajú týmto limitom podľa dodatkového protokolu, sa začne od 1. januára každého roku, s výnimkou týchto produktov, pre ktoré sa uplatňuje dátum uvedený nižšie:— 08.02 | ex A. | Pomaranče, čerstvé: 1. júl |— 08.02 | ex B. | Mandarínky (vrátane druhov tangerines a satsumas); klementínky, wilkingy a podobné citrusové hybridy; čerstvé: 1. júl |— 06.03 | ex A. | Rezané kvety a puky kvetov, čerstvé: 1. november |--------------------------------------------------Spoločné vyhlásenie zmluvných strán týkajúce sa nových zemiakov patriacich do podpoložky 07.01 A II ex a) Spoločného colného sadzobníkaS cieľom predísť narušeniu trhu spoločenstva zmluvné strany súhlasili, že sa stretnú v rámci poradnej pracovnej skupiny, aby preskúmali situáciu na trhu so zemiakmi (stav úrody a situácia zásobovania) v dovážajúcich krajinách spoločenstva aj vo vyvážajúcich krajinách Stredomoria. Členov tejto pracovnej skupiny určia vlády hlavných vyvážajúcich krajín Stredomoria a dovážajúcich krajín spoločenstva.Pracovná skupina, ktorej predsedá Komisia Európskych spoločenstiev, by sa mala stretávať najmenej trikrát ročne a najmä predtým, ako sa uskutoční sejba vo vyvážajúcich krajinách a v čase dodávok.Tieto stretnutia by umožňovali najmä krajinám, ktoré vyvážajú zemiaky, aby boli informované o cieľových trhoch aj o konkurenčných trhoch, a ich účelom by bolo zostaviť indikatívne časové plány vývozu určené na zabránenie tomu, aby sa dodávky koncentrovali okolo citlivých období pre trh spoločenstva.--------------------------------------------------Vyhlásenie zástupcu Spolkovej republiky Nemecko týkajúce sa definície nemeckej štátnej príslušnostiKaždá nemecká osoba, v zmysle základov ústavného práva uplatňovaného v Spolkovej republike Nemecko, sa považuje za štátneho príslušníka Spolkovej republiky Nemecko--------------------------------------------------Vyhlásenie zástupcu Spolkovej republiky Nemecko týkajúce sa uplatňovania štvrtého dodatkového protokolu na BerlínŠtvrtý dodatkový protokol sa tiež uplatňuje na krajinu Berlín, za predpokladu, že vláda Spolkovej republiky Nemecko neadresuje počas troch mesiacov od vstupu tohto protokolu do platnosti ostatným zmluvným stranám žiadne protichodné vyhlásenie.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 9.1.2017
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 6/51
 Acțiune introdusă la 8 noiembrie 2016 – Mediaexpert/EUIPO – Mediaexpert (mediaexpert)
 (Cauza T-780/16)
 (2017/C 006/64)
 Limba în care a fost formulată acțiunea: engleza
 Părțile
 Reclamantă: Mediaexpert sp. z o.o. (Varșovia, Polonia) (reprezentant: J. Aftyka, avocat)
 Pârât: Oficiul Uniunii Europene pentru Proprietate Intelectuală (EUIPO)
 Cealaltă parte din procedura care s-a aflat pe rolul camerei de recurs: Mediaexpert S.A. (Varșovia, Polonia)
 Datele privind procedura în fața EUIPO
 Titularul mărcii în litigiu: cealaltă parte din procedura care s-a aflat pe rolul camerei de recurs
 Marca în litigiu: marca figurativă a Uniunii Europene cu culorile negru, galben și alb, care cuprinde elementul verbal „mediaexpert” – marca nr. 11 674 132 a Uniunii Europene
 Procedura care s-a aflat pe rolul EUIPO: procedură de declarare a nulității
 Decizia atacată: Decizia Camerei întâi de recurs a EUIPO din 11 august 2016 în cauza R 2583/2015-1
 Concluziile
 Reclamanta solicită Tribunalului:
 —
 anularea deciziei atacate;
 —
 anularea deciziei Diviziei de anulare din data de 29 octombrie 2015 adoptate în procedura de declarare a nulității nr. 000009371 C;
 —
 trimiterea cauzei la EUIPO în vederea modificării deciziei pe fond și a anulării mărcii nr. 011674132 a Uniunii Europene pentru toate serviciile vizate;
 —
 obligarea EUIPO la plata cheltuielilor de judecată efectuate în fața Diviziei de anulare, a Camerei de recurs și a Tribunalului.
 Motivul invocat
 —
 încălcarea articolului 53 alineatul (1) litera (a) coroborat cu articolul 8 alineatul (1) literele (a) și (b) din Regulamentul nr. 207/2009.


text:
 24.8.2007
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 219/1
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ (ЕО) No 986/2007 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 23 август 2007 година
 за определяне на фиксирани вносни стойности за определяне на входната цена на някои плодове и зеленчуци
 КОМИСИЯТА НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИТЕ ОБЩНОСТИ,
 като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) No 3223/94 на Комисията от 21 декември 1994 г. относно правилата за прилагане на режима за внос на плодове и зеленчуци (1), и по-специално член 4, параграф 1 от него,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 В изпълнение на резултатите от Уругвайския кръг от многостранните търговски преговори Регламент (ЕО) No 3223/94 посочва критерии за определяне от Комисията на фиксирани стойности при внос от трети страни на продуктите и периодите, посочени в приложението към него.
 (2)
 В изпълнение на горепосочените критерии фиксираните вносни стойности следва да се определят на нивата, посочени в приложението към настоящия регламент,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Фиксираните вносни стойности, посочени в член 4 от Регламент (ЕО) No 3223/94, се определят, както е посочено в таблицата в приложението.
 Член 2
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на 24 август 2007 година.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави-членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 23 август 2007 година.
 За Комисията
 Jean-Luc DEMARTY
 Генерален директор на Генерална дирекция „Земеделие и развитие на селските райони“
 (1) ОВ L 337, 24.12.1994 г., стр. 66. Регламент, последно изменен с Регламент (ЕО) No 756/2007 (ОВ L 172, 30.6.2007 г., стр. 41).
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 към регламент на Комисията от 23 август 2007 година за определяне на фиксирани вносни стойности за определяне на входната цена на някои плодове и зеленчуци
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Код по КН
 Кодове на трети страни (1)
 Фиксирана вносна стойност
 0702 00 00
 MK
 55,1
 TR
 56,2
 XK
 48,8
 XS
 36,3
 ZZ
 49,1
 0707 00 05
 TR
 106,4
 ZZ
 106,4
 0709 90 70
 TR
 106,5
 ZZ
 106,5
 0805 50 10
 AR
 64,3
 UY
 49,5
 ZA
 62,2
 ZZ
 58,7
 0806 10 10
 EG
 236,6
 TR
 99,3
 US
 164,8
 ZZ
 166,9
 0808 10 80
 AR
 46,1
 BR
 77,5
 CL
 73,5
 CN
 72,8
 NZ
 88,2
 US
 100,4
 ZA
 84,0
 ZZ
 77,5
 0808 20 50
 AR
 43,8
 CN
 21,3
 TR
 121,2
 ZA
 89,6
 ZZ
 69,0
 0809 30 10, 0809 30 90
 TR
 142,6
 ZZ
 142,6
 0809 40 05
 BA
 41,3
 IL
 153,7
 TR
 78,6
 ZZ
 91,2
 (1) Номенклатура на страните, определена с Регламент (ЕО) No 1833/2006 на Комисията (ОВ L 354, 14.12.2006 г., стр. 19). Код „ZZ“ означава „друг произход“.