text:
 Viktigt rättsligt meddelande
 |
 22004A1223(01)
 Avtal mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Folkrepubliken Kinas regering om samarbete och ömsesidigt administrativt bistånd i tullfrågor
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning nr L 375 , 23/12/2004 s. 0020 - 0026
 Avtalmellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Folkrepubliken Kinas regering om samarbete och ömsesidigt administrativt bistånd i tullfrågorEUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPENochFOLKREPUBLIKEN KINAS REGERING(nedan kallade "de avtalsslutande parterna"),SOM BEAKTAR vikten av handelsförbindelserna mellan Folkrepubliken Kina och Europeiska gemenskapen och som önskar bidra till att dessa förbindelser utvecklas på ett harmoniskt sätt till fördel för båda de avtalsslutande parterna,SOM ANSER att det bör finnas ett åtagande att utveckla tullsamarbetet i syfte att uppnå detta mål,SOM TAR HÄNSYN TILL utvecklingen av tullsamarbetet mellan de avtalsslutande parterna med avseende på tullförfaranden,SOM BEAKTAR att verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen, exempelvis överträdelser av immateriella rättigheter, är till skada för de båda avtalsslutande parternas ekonomiska, skattemässiga och kommersiella intressen, och som inser vikten av att säkerställa att tullar och andra avgifter fastställs på ett korrekt sätt, i synnerhet genom en korrekt tillämpning av reglerna för tullvärdeberäkning, ursprung och klassificering,SOM ÄR ÖVERTYGADE OM att åtgärder mot sådan verksamhet kan bli effektivare om parternas respektive behöriga förvaltningsmyndigheter samarbetar,HAR ENATS OM FÖLJANDE.AVDELNING IALLMÄNNA BESTÄMMELSERArtikel 1DefinitionerI detta avtal avses meda)tullagstiftningalla Europeiska gemenskapens eller Kinas lagar, författningar och andra rättsligt bindande instrument som reglerar import, export och transitering av varor och hänförande av varor till alla andra slags tullförfaranden, inbegripet åtgärder avseende förbud, begränsning och kontroll,b)tullmyndigheti Kina, den allmänna tullförvaltningen (General Administration of Customs), och i Europeiska gemenskapen, behöriga avdelningar med ansvar för tullfrågor vid Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission och Europeiska gemenskapens medlemsstaters tullmyndigheter,c)begärande myndigheten behörig tullmyndighet som av en avtalsslutande part har utsetts för detta ändamål och som gör en framställan om administrativt bistånd enligt detta avtal,d)anmodad myndigheten behörig tullmyndighet som av en avtalsslutande part har utsetts för detta ändamål och som mottar en framställan om administrativt bistånd enligt detta avtal,e)personuppgifteralla uppgifter om en identifierad eller identifierbar person,f)verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningenalla överträdelser eller försök till överträdelse av tullagstiftningen,g)personantingen en fysisk eller en juridisk person,h)informationuppgifter, oavsett om de behandlats och analyserats eller inte, samt dokument, rapporter och andra meddelanden, oavsett format, inbegripet i elektronisk form, eller bestyrkta kopior av dessa.Artikel 2Territoriell tillämpningDetta avtal skall tillämpas, å ena sidan, på Kinas tullområde och, å andra sidan, på de territorier där Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen är tillämpligt och i enlighet med de villkor som fastställs i fördraget.Artikel 3Framtida utvecklingI syfte att utöka och komplettera tullsamarbetet kan de avtalsslutande parterna i samförstånd och i enlighet med sin respektive tullagstiftning utvidga detta avtal genom avtal om särskilda sektorer eller frågor.AVDELNING IIAVTALETS RÄCKVIDDArtikel 4Samarbetets och biståndets utövandeAllt samarbete och bistånd enligt detta avtal skall utövas av de avtalsslutande parterna i enlighet med deras tillämpliga lagar, författningar och andra rättsligt bindande instrument. Dessutom skall samarbete och bistånd enligt detta avtal som utövas av någon av de avtalsslutande parterna utövas inom ramen för dess behörighet och tillgängliga resurser.Artikel 5Skyldigheter enligt andra avtal1. Med beaktande av Europeiska gemenskapens och medlemsstaternas respektive behörighet skall bestämmelserna i detta avtala) inte inverka på de avtalsslutande parternas skyldigheter enligt andra internationella avtal eller konventioner,b) anses utgöra ett tillägg till sådana avtal om tullsamarbete och ömsesidigt administrativt bistånd som har ingåtts eller kan komma att ingås mellan enskilda medlemsstater och Kina,c) inte inverka på gemenskapsbestämmelser avseende utbytet mellan kommissionens behöriga avdelningar och medlemsstaternas tullmyndigheter av information som erhållits inom ramen för detta avtal och som kan vara av intresse för gemenskapen.2. Utan hinder av punkt 1 skall bestämmelserna i detta avtal ha företräde framför bestämmelserna i bilaterala avtal om tullsamarbete och ömsesidigt administrativt bistånd som har ingåtts eller kan komma att ingås mellan enskilda medlemsstater och Kina, om bestämmelserna i de senare är oförenliga med bestämmelserna i detta avtal.3. När det gäller frågor rörande detta avtals tillämplighet skall de avtalsslutande parterna samråda för att finna en lösning inom ramen för den gemensamma tullsamarbetskommitté som inrättats genom artikel 21 i detta avtal.AVDELNING IIITULLSAMARBETEArtikel 6Samarbetets räckvidd1. De avtalsslutande parterna skall åta sig att utveckla tullsamarbetet. De avtalsslutande parterna skall särskilt sträva efter att samarbeta när det gällera) att upprätta och vidmakthålla kommunikationskanaler mellan sina tullmyndigheter för att underlätta och säkerställa ett snabbt informationsutbyte,b) att underlätta en effektiv samordning mellan sina tullmyndigheter,c) alla andra administrativa frågor i samband med detta avtal beträffande vilka det ibland kan krävas gemensamma åtgärder.2. De avtalsslutande parterna åtar sig att utveckla handelsfrämjande åtgärder på tullområdet med beaktande av det arbete som internationella organisationer utför på detta område.3. Tullsamarbetet inom ramen för detta avtal skall omfatta alla frågor avseende tillämpningen av tullagstiftningen.Artikel 7Samarbete om tullförfarandenDe avtalsslutande parterna bekräftar sitt åtagande att underlätta lagliga varurörelser och skall utbyta information och sakkunskap om åtgärder för att förbättra tullteknik, tullförfaranden och datoriserade system, i syfte att genomföra detta åtagande i överensstämmelse med bestämmelserna i detta avtal.Artikel 8Tekniskt samarbeteDe avtalsslutande parternas tullmyndigheter kan, när detta är fördelaktigt för dem båda, ge varandra tekniskt bistånd i tullfrågor, exempelvisa) utbyte av personal och experter i syfte att förbättra den ömsesidiga förståelsen av varandras tulllagstiftning, tullförfaranden och tullteknik,b) utbildning, i synnerhet vidareutbildning av deras tulltjänstemän,c) utbyte av yrkesmässig, vetenskaplig och teknisk information som hänför sig till tullagstiftning och tullförfaranden,d) teknik och förbättrade metoder för behandling av passagerare och last,e) alla andra allmänna förvaltningsfrågor beträffande vilka det ibland kan krävas gemensamma åtgärder av deras tullförvaltningar.Artikel 9Samordning i internationella organisationerTullmyndigheterna skall sträva efter att utveckla och förstärka sitt samarbete i frågor av gemensamt intresse i syfte att nå en samordnad ståndpunkt när dessa frågor diskuteras inom ramen för internationella organisationer.AVDELNING IVÖMSESIDIGT ADMINISTRATIVT BISTÅNDArtikel 10Räckvidd1. Tullmyndigheterna skall bistå varandra genom att tillhandahålla information som underlättar en korrekt tillämpning av tullagstiftningen och som är avsedd att förebygga, utreda och beivra överträdelser av denna lagstiftning.2. Bistånd i tullfrågor i enlighet med detta avtal skall vara tillämpligt på varje förvaltningsmyndighet hos de avtalsslutande parterna som är behörig att tillämpa avtalet. Detta avtal skall inte påverka tillämpningen av reglerna om ömsesidigt bistånd i straffrättsliga frågor. Det skall heller inte omfatta information som erhållits med stöd av befogenheter som utövas på anmodan av en rättslig myndighet.3. Detta avtal skall inte omfatta bistånd avseende uppbörd av tullar, skatter eller böter, anhållande eller kvarhållande av personer eller beslag eller kvarhållande av egendom.Artikel 11Bistånd efter framställan1. På framställan av den begärande myndigheten skall den anmodade myndigheten tillhandahålla all relevant information som den begärande myndigheten kan behöva för att säkerställa att tullagstiftningen tillämpas på ett korrekt sätt, inbegripet information om konstaterade eller planerade aktiviteter som är eller skulle kunna utgöra verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen. På framställan skall tullmyndigheterna särskilt ge varandra information om verksamhet som kan leda till brott på den andra partens territorium, t.ex. oriktiga tulldeklarationer och ursprungscertifikat, fakturor eller andra dokument som man vet eller misstänker är oriktiga eller förfalskade.2. På framställan av den begärande myndigheten skall den anmodade myndigheten informera den begärande myndigheten om huruvidaa) officiella handlingar som framlagts till stöd för en varudeklaration som ingivits till den anmodade partens tullmyndighet är äkta,b) de varor som exporterats från den ena avtalsslutande partens territorium har importerats på lagligt sätt till den andra avtalsslutande partens territorium och, vid behov, ange vilket tullförfarande som har tillämpats på varorna,c) de varor som importerats till den ena avtalsslutande partens territorium har exporterats på lagligt sätt från den andra avtalsslutande partens territorium och, vid behov, ange vilket tullförfarande som har tillämpats på varorna.3. På framställan av den begärande myndigheten skall den anmodade myndigheten inom ramen för sina lagar, författningar eller andra rättsligt bindande instrument vidta de åtgärder som är nödvändiga för att säkerställa att en särskild övervakning sker ava) personer som det finns rimliga skäl att anta är eller har varit delaktiga i verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen,b) platser där varor lagras eller kan lagras på ett sådant sätt att det finns rimliga skäl att anta att dessa varor är avsedda att användas för verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen,c) varor som transporteras eller kan transporteras på ett sådant sätt att det finns rimliga skäl att anta att de är avsedda att användas för verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen,d) transportmedel som används eller kan användas på ett sådant sätt att det finns rimliga skäl att anta att de är avsedda att användas för verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen.Artikel 12Bistånd på eget initiativDe avtalsslutande parterna skall bistå varandra, på eget initiativ och i enlighet med sina lagar, författningar eller andra rättsligt bindande instrument, om de anser att detta är nödvändigt för en korrekt tillämpning av tullagstiftningen, framför allt i situationer som kan medföra väsentlig skada för ekonomin, folkhälsan, den allmänna säkerheten eller liknande centrala intressen hos den andra avtalsslutande parten, särskilt beträffandea) aktiviteter som strider mot eller förefaller att strida mot tullagstiftningen och som kan vara av intresse för den andra avtalsslutande parten,b) nya medel eller metoder som används för att utföra en verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen,c) varor som man vet är föremål för en verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen,d) personer som det finns rimliga skäl att anta är eller har varit delaktiga i verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen,e) transportmedel som det finns rimliga skäl att anta har använts, används eller kan användas i verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen.Artikel 13Biståndsframställningarnas form och innehåll1. Framställningar i enlighet med detta avtal skall göras skriftligen. De skall åtföljas av de handlingar som är nödvändiga för att tillmötesgå framställan. I brådskande fall kan en muntlig framställan godtas, men en sådan framställan skall omedelbart bekräftas skriftligen.2. Framställningar enligt punkt 1 skall innehålla uppgifter om följande:a) Den begärande myndighetens formella påskrift.b) Den åtgärd som begärs.c) Föremålet för och skälet till framställan.d) De lagar, författningar eller andra rättsligt bindande instrument som berörs.e) Så exakta och fullständiga uppgifter som möjligt om de personer som är föremål för undersökningarna.f) En sammanfattning av relevanta fakta och av de undersökningar som redan har utförts.3. Framställningar skall inges på ett av den anmodade myndighetens officiella språk eller på ett språk som denna kan godta. Detta krav skall inte gälla sådana handlingar som åtföljer framställan enligt punkt 1.4. Om en framställan inte uppfyller ovanstående formella krav får rättelse eller komplettering av den begäras. Under tiden får säkerhetsåtgärder förordnas.Artikel 14Handläggning av framställningar1. I syfte att efterkomma en framställan om bistånd skall den anmodade myndigheten, inom ramen för sina befogenheter och tillgängliga resurser, förfara som om den handlade för egen räkning eller på framställan av andra myndigheter hos samma avtalsslutande part genom att tillhandahålla den information som den redan innehar, eller utföra eller låta utföra lämpliga undersökningar.2. Framställningar om bistånd skall handläggas i enlighet med den anmodade myndighetens lagar, författningar eller andra rättsligt bindande instrument.3. En avtalsslutande parts vederbörligen bemyndigade tjänstemän får, med den andra berörda avtalsslutande partens samtycke och på de villkor som denna ställer, vara närvarande vid undersökningar som i enskilda fall genomförs inom den andra partens jurisdiktionsområde.4. Om framställan inte kan efterkommas skall den begärande myndigheten omgående underrättas om detta med angivande av orsakerna och med bifogande av all annan information som den anmodade myndigheten anser kan vara till hjälp för den begärande myndigheten.Artikel 15Former för informationsutbyte1. Den anmodade myndigheten skall skriftligen till den begärande myndigheten meddela resultatet av gjorda undersökningar tillsammans med relevanta handlingar, bestyrkta kopior eller andra föremål.2. Denna information kan lämnas i datoriserad form, men skall omedelbart bekräftas skriftligen när det är nödvändigt.Artikel 16Undantag från skyldigheten att lämna bistånd1. Bistånd får nekas eller göras avhängigt av att vissa villkor eller krav uppfylls i de fall då en avtalspart anser att bistånd enligt detta avtal skullea) kunna kränka suveräniteten hos Kina eller hos en medlemsstat i Europeiska gemenskapen som har anmodats att lämna bistånd enligt detta avtal,b) kunna inverka menligt på allmän ordning, säkerhet eller andra väsentliga intressen, särskilt i de fall som avses i artikel 17.2, ellerc) medföra röjande av en industri-, affärs- eller yrkeshemlighet.2. Biståndet får uppskjutas av den anmodade myndigheten med den motiveringen att det skulle påverka en pågående undersökning eller ett pågående domstolsförfarande eller annat förfarande. I sådana fall skall den anmodade myndigheten samråda med den begärande myndigheten för att fastställa om bistånd kan ges på de villkor som den anmodade myndigheten eventuellt ställer.3. Om den begärande myndigheten begär bistånd som den själv inte skulle kunna lämna om den hade fått en sådan framställan, skall den ange detta i sin framställan. Det ankommer då på den anmodade myndigheten att avgöra hur den skall förhålla sig till en sådan framställan.4. I de fall som avses i punkterna 1 och 2 skall den begärande myndigheten utan dröjsmål underrättas om den anmodade myndighetens beslut och om skälen för detta.Artikel 17Utbyte av information och konfidentialitet1. All information som, oavsett i vilken form det sker, överlämnas i enlighet med detta avtal skall behandlas som konfidentiell eller begränsad enligt tillämpliga regler hos respektive avtalsslutande part. Den skall omfattas av officiell sekretess och åtnjuta det skydd som gäller för likartad information enligt den relevanta lagstiftningen hos den avtalsslutande part som mottar informationen och enligt motsvarande bestämmelser som gäller för gemenskapsmyndigheterna.2. Personuppgifter får utbytas endast om den mottagande avtalsslutande parten åtar sig att skydda uppgifterna på ett sätt som åtminstone är likvärdigt med det sätt som i det aktuella fallet gäller hos den avtalsslutande part som lämnar uppgifterna. Den avtalsslutande part som tillhandahåller uppgifterna skall inte ställa strängare krav än de som gäller inom den egna jurisdiktionen. De avtalsslutande parterna skall överlämna information till varandra om de bestämmelser som är tillämpliga hos dem, inbegripet i förekommande fall gällande rättsliga bestämmelser i gemenskapens medlemsstater.3. Detta avtal skall inte utesluta att information eller handlingar som erhållits i enlighet med avtalet används som bevis i förvaltningsförfaranden som sedan inleds i fråga om verksamhet som strider mot tullagstiftningen. De avtalsslutande parterna får således i uppteckningar av bevismaterial, rapporter och vittnesmål samt i förvaltningsförfaranden som bevis använda den information de har erhållit och de handlingar de har tagit del av i enlighet med bestämmelserna i detta avtal. Den behöriga myndighet som lämnat informationen eller givit tillgång till handlingarna skall underrättas om sådan användning.4. Erhållen information skall endast användas för de ändamål som anges i detta avtal. Om en av de avtalsslutande parterna önskar använda sådan information för andra ändamål skall den inhämta ett skriftligt förhandsmedgivande från den myndighet som tillhandahållit informationen. Sådan användning skall därefter omfattas av de begränsningar som denna myndighet har fastställt.5. De praktiska arrangemangen för genomförandet av denna artikel skall fastställas av den gemensamma tullsamarbetskommitté som inrättats genom artikel 21.Artikel 18Experter och vittnenTjänstemän vid en anmodad myndighet får, inom ramen för beviljat tillstånd, inställa sig som experter eller vittnen i förvaltningsförfaranden såvitt avser frågor som omfattas av detta avtal inom den andra avtalsslutande partens territorium och förevisa sådana föremål, handlingar eller bevittnade kopior av dessa som kan behövas i förfarandena. I en framställan om inställelse skall anges inför vilken förvaltningsmyndighet denne tjänsteman skall inställa sig samt om vilka frågor och i vilken egenskap tjänstemannen skall höras.Artikel 19Kostnader för bistånd1. De avtalsslutande parterna skall avstå från alla krav gentemot varandra på ersättning för kostnader som är en följd av tillämpningen av detta avtal, förutom när det gäller kostnader för experter och vittnen samt för tolkar och översättare som inte är offentligt anställda.2. Om det medför eller kommer att medföra stora eller ovanligt stora utgifter att handlägga framställan, skall de avtalsslutande parterna samråda i syfte att fastställa villkoren för den fortsatta handläggningen samt hur kostnaderna skall bäras.AVDELNING VSLUTBESTÄMMELSERArtikel 20Genomförande1. Tullmyndigheterna vid Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission och i tillämpliga fall tullmyndigheterna i Europeiska gemenskapens medlemsstater, å ena sidan, samt Kinas tullmyndighet, å andra sidan, skall ansvara för genomförandet av detta avtal. De skall besluta om alla praktiska åtgärder och arrangemang som är nödvändiga för tillämpningen av detta avtal och därvid beakta gällande bestämmelser, särskilt på området dataskydd. De kan för de behöriga organen föreslå sådana ändringar av detta avtal som de anser vara nödvändiga.2. De avtalsslutande parterna skall samråda om och informera varandra om de närmare genomförandebestämmelser som antas i enlighet med bestämmelserna i detta avtal.Artikel 21Gemensam tullsamarbetskommitté1. En gemensam tullsamarbetskommitté bestående av företrädare för Kinas och Europeiska gemenskapens tullmyndigheter skall inrättas. Plats, datum och dagordning för dess möten skall fastställas genom ömsesidig överenskommelse.2. Den gemensamma tullsamarbetskommittén skall bland annata) se till att avtalet fungerar väl,b) pröva alla frågor som uppstår i samband med dess tillämpning,c) vidta nödvändiga åtgärder när det gäller tullsamarbete i enlighet med målen i detta avtal,d) utbyta synpunkter om alla frågor av gemensamt intresse när det gäller tullsamarbete, inbegripet framtida åtgärder och resurser för dessa,e) rekommendera lösningar i syfte att uppnå målen i detta avtal.3. Den gemensamma tullsamarbetskommittén skall anta sin egen arbetsordning.4. Den gemensamma tullsamarbetskommittén skall i tillämpliga fall underrätta den gemensamma kommitté som inrättats enligt artikel 15 i avtalet om handelsmässigt och ekonomiskt samarbete mellan Europeiska ekonomiska gemenskapen och Kina om åtgärder enligt detta avtal.Artikel 22Ikraftträdande och giltighetstid1. Detta avtal träder i kraft den första dagen i den månad som följer efter den dag då de avtalsslutande parterna till varandra anmält att de förfaranden som är nödvändiga för detta har avslutats.2. Var och en av de avtalsslutande parterna kan säga upp detta avtal genom skriftlig anmälan till den andra avtalsslutande parten. Uppsägningen skall träda i kraft tre månader efter den dag då uppsägningen anmälts till den andra avtalsslutande parten. Framställningar om bistånd som har mottagits innan avtalet sagts upp skall fullföljas i enlighet med bestämmelserna i detta avtal.Artikel 23Giltiga texterDetta avtal är upprättat i två exemplar på danska, engelska, estniska, finska, franska, grekiska, italienska, lettiska, litauiska, maltesiska, nederländska, polska, portugisiska, slovakiska, slovenska, spanska, svenska, tjeckiska, tyska, ungerska och kinesiska, vilka alla texter är lika giltiga.Till bevis härpå har undertecknade befullmäktigade undertecknat detta avtal.Utfärdad i Haag den 8 december 2004.Por la Comunidad EuropeaZa Evropské společenstvíFor Det Europæiske FællesskabFür die Europäische GemeinschaftEuroopa Ühenduse nimelΓια την Ευρωπαϊκή ΚοινότηταFor the European CommunityPour la Communauté européennePer la Comunità europeaEiropas Kopienas vārdāEuropos bendrijos varduaz Európai Közösség részérőlVoor de Europese GemeenschapW imieniu Wspólnoty EuropejskiejPela Comunidade EuropeiaZa Európske spoločenstvoza Evropsko skupnostEuroopan yhteisön puolestaPå Europeiska gemenskapens vägnarPor el Gobierno de la República Popular ChinaZa vládu Činské lidové republikyFor Folkerepublikken Kinas regeringIm Namen der Regierung der Volksrepublik ChinaHiina Rahvavabariigi valitsuse nimelΓια την κυβέρνηση της Λαϊκής Δημοκρατίας της ΚίναςFor the Government of the People's Republic of ChinaPour le gouvernement de la République populaire de ChinePer il Governo della Repubblica popolare cineseKīnas Tautas Republikas vārdāKinijos Liaudies Respublikos Vyriausybės varduA Kínai Népköztársaság kormánya részérőlVoor de Regering van de Volksrepubliek ChinaW imieniu rządu Chińskiej Republiki LudowejPelo Governo da República Popular da ChinaZa vládu Činskey ľudovej republikyZa Vlado Ljudske republike KitajskeKiinan kansantasavallan hallituksen puolestaPå Folkrepubliken Kinas regerings vägnar--------------------------------------------------


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 21.2.2009
 RO
 Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
 C 44/73
 Hotărârea Tribunalului Funcției Publice (Camera întâi) din 9 decembrie 2008 — Efstathopoulos/Parlamentul European
 (Cauza F-144/07) (1)
 (Funcție publică - Foști agenți temporari - Regulamentul (CE, Euratom) nr. 2689/95 - Indemnizație la încetarea funcției - Luarea în calcul a unei indemnizații de productivitate la stabilirea cuantumului veniturilor brute încasate în cadrul noii funcții)
 (2009/C 44/128)
 Limba de procedură: greaca
 Părțile
 Reclamant: S. Efstathopoulos (Chalandri, Grecia) (reprezentanți: N. Korogiannakis și M. Michi, avocați)
 Pârât: Parlamentul European (reprezentanți: A. Lukošiūtė și A. Troupiotis, agenți)
 Obiectul
 Anularea Deciziei Parlamentului European din 18 aprilie 2007 care determină diminuarea pensiei pentru limită de vârstă a reclamantului și recuperarea sumelor plătite în exces
 Dispozitivul
 1)
 Respinge acțiunea.
 2)
 Fiecare parte suportă cheltuielile de judecată.
 (1) JO C 92, 12.4.2008, p. 50.


type: legislation

text:
 29.8.2013
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 230/14
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) št. 819/2013
 z dne 28. avgusta 2013
 o določitvi standardnih uvoznih vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (Uredba o enotni SUT) (1),
 ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 543/2011 z dne 7. junija 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 za sektorja sadja in zelenjave ter predelanega sadja in zelenjave (2) ter zlasti člena 136(1) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 543/2011 na podlagi izida večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj urugvajskega kroga določa merila, po katerih Komisija določi standardne vrednosti za uvoz iz tretjih držav za proizvode in obdobja iz dela A Priloge XVI k tej uredbi.
 (2)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost se izračuna vsak delovni dan v skladu s členom 136(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 ob upoštevanju spremenljivih dnevnih podatkov. Zato bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti iz člena 136 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
 Člen 2
 Ta uredba začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 28. avgusta 2013
 Za Komisijo V imenu predsednika
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Generalni direktor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
 (1) UL L 299, 16.11.2007, str. 1.
 (2) UL L 157, 15.6.2011, str. 1.
 PRILOGA
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Tarifna oznaka KN
 Oznaka tretje države (1)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost
 0707 00 05
 TR
 95,4
 ZZ
 95,4
 0709 93 10
 TR
 127,5
 ZZ
 127,5
 0805 50 10
 AR
 122,1
 CL
 123,1
 TR
 70,0
 UY
 79,4
 ZA
 107,9
 ZZ
 100,5
 0806 10 10
 EG
 179,1
 TR
 140,5
 ZZ
 159,8
 0808 10 80
 AR
 100,3
 BR
 108,7
 CL
 130,5
 CN
 67,2
 NZ
 129,2
 US
 130,9
 ZA
 108,3
 ZZ
 110,7
 0808 30 90
 AR
 194,7
 CN
 88,3
 TR
 147,4
 ZA
 84,5
 ZZ
 128,7
 0809 30
 TR
 141,5
 ZZ
 141,5
 0809 40 05
 BA
 47,5
 MK
 52,2
 XS
 55,6
 ZZ
 51,8
 (1) Nomenklatura držav, določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1833/2006 (UL L 354, 14.12.2006, str. 19). Oznaka „ZZ“ predstavlja „druga porekla“.


type: wikipedia

text:
Musiikissa dynamiikalla tarkoitetaan äänenvoimakkuutta ja erityisesti sen eri vaihteluita.
 Nuottikirjoituksessa käytetään yleisesti seuraavia merkkejä:
 Merkit fff ja ppp ovat yleisiä nuottikirjoituksessa, mutta merkit, joissa on näitä enemmän f tai p -merkkejä ovat melko harvinaisia.
 Lisäksi on olemassa merkkejä, jotka ilmoittavat voimakkuuden tasaista nousua tai laskua. Yleisimmät sellaiset ovat crescendo (lyhennys cresc.) ja decrescendo (lyhennys decresc.), jonka synonyymi on diminuendo (lyhennys dim.). Crescendo tarkoittaa äänenvoimakkuuden tasaista nousua ja decrescendo äänenvoimakkuuden tasaista laskua.
 Lähteet
 Aiheesta muualla
 Musiikin teoria
 Musiikkitermit
 Seulonnan keskeiset artikkelit


type: contracts

text:
L 375/568 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.12.2006
 Regulation No 124 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations CON/ECE)
 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of wheels
 for passenger cars and their trailers
 1. SCOPE
 This Regulation covers new replacement wheels designed for vehicles in categories M1,
 M1G, O1 and O2 1/.
 It does not apply to original equipment wheels or vehicle manufacturer’s replacement
 wheels as defined in paragraphs 2.3. and 2.4.1. It does not apply to "Special wheels", as
 defined in paragraph 2.5., which shall remain subjected to national approval.
 This Regulation comprises requirements for wheel manufacture and installation.
 2. DEFINITIONS
 For the purpose of this Regulation:
 2.1. "Wheel" means a rotating load-carrying member between the tyre and the axle. It usually
 consists of two major parts:
 (a) the rim;
 (b) the wheel disc.
 The rim and wheel disc may be integral, permanently attached, or detachable.
 2.1.1. "Disc wheel" means a permanent combination of a rim and wheel disc.
 2.1.2. "Wheel with demountable rim " means a wheel so constructed that the demountable rim is
 clamped to the wheel disc.
 2.1.3. "Rim" means that part of the wheel on which the tyre is mounted and supported.
 2.1.4. "Wheel disc" means that part of the wheel which is the supporting member between the
 axle and the rim.
 2.2. "Wheel type" means a wheel which does not differ in the following essential characteristics:
 the wheel manufacturer;
 wheel or rim size designation (according to ISO 3911:1998);
 _____________
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 2
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/569
 1/ Categories M and O as defined in Annex 7 to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of
 Vehicles (R.E.3) (document TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.1/Amend.2).
 2.2.3. construction materials;
 2.2.4. wheel attachment holes;
 2.2.5. maximum load capacity;
 2.2.6. recommended maximum inflation pressure;
 2.2.7. method of production (welded, forged, cast,...).
 2.3. "OE-wheels" means wheels which are authorized to be fitted, to the vehicle model, by the
 vehicle manufacturer during the production of the vehicle.
 2.4. "Replacement Wheels" means wheels which are intended to replace the OE wheels during
 the service life of the vehicle. Replacement wheels may belong to one of the following
 category:
 2.4.1. "Vehicle manufacturer's replacement wheels" being wheels supplied by the vehicle
 manufacturer;
 2.4.2. "Identical replacement wheels" being wheels which are manufactured using the same
 manufacturing equipment and material as that used for replacement wheels supplied by the
 vehicle manufacturer. They differ from vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheels only by
 the absence of vehicle manufacturer’s trademarks and part number;
 2.4.3. "Replica replacement wheels" being wheels which are replicas of vehicle manufacturer’s
 replacement wheels but produced by a manufacturer who is not a supplier of the vehicle
 manufacturer with the specified wheel. With regard to the design (basic contour,
 dimensions, inset, material type and quality and so on) and service life they fully
 correspond to vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheels;
 2.4.4. "Pattern part replacement wheels" being wheels produced by a manufacturer who is not a
 supplier of the vehicle manufacturer with the specified wheel. With regard to the design,
 inset, rim designation wheel fixing PCD and spigot mounting diameter, correspond to that
 of an OE-wheel, but wheel contour, material and so on, may be different;
 2.5. "Special wheels" means wheels which are not OE-wheels and which do not fulfil the
 criteria for wheels described in paragraph 2.4. (for example wheels with different rim width
 or diameter).
 2.6. "Inset" means the distance from the attachment face of the disc to the centre line of the rim
 (that can be positive, as shown in Figure 1 below, zero, or negative).
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/570 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 3 27.12.2006
 Figure 1
 2.7. "Dynamic radius" means the dynamic loaded radius defined as the theoretical rolling
 circumference divided by 2R of the largest tyre to be used on the wheel as specified by the
 wheel manufacturer.
 2.8. "International Tyre and Rim Standards" mean documents concerning wheel standardization
 issued by the following Organizations:
 (a) The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2/;
 (b) The European Tyre and Rim Technical Organization (ETRTO) 3/:
 "Standards Manual";
 (c) The European Tyre and Rim Technical Organization (ETRTO) 3/:
 "Engineering Design Information - obsolete data";
 (d) The Tyre and Rim Association Inc. (TRA) 4/: "Year Book";
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 4
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/571
 (e) The Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association (JATMA) 5/:
 "Year Book”;
 (f) The Tyre and Rim Association of Australia (TRAA) 6/:"Standard
 Manual";
 (g) The Associação Latino Americana de Pneus e Aros (ALAPA) 7/:
 "Manual de Normal Technicas”;
 (h) The Scandinavian Tyre and Rim Organisation (STRO) 8/:"Data
 Book”
 2.9. "Technical crack" is a material separation with a propagation of more than 1 mm occurring
 during a dynamic test (defects caused by the production process are not to be taken into
 account).
 2.10. "Wheel calliper" is the rotating profile shape, formed by the internal wheel contour (see
 Annex 10, figure 1).
 2.11. "Tyre size designation" means a designation showing the nominal section width, the
 nominal aspect ratio and the conventional number that denotes the nominal rim diameter
 (these terms are further defined in Regulation No. 30).
 3. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL
 3.1. The application for approval of a wheel type shall be submitted by the manufacturer, or by
 his duly accredited representative, and shall be accompanied by:
 ________________
 The tyre standards can be obtained from the following addresses:
 2/ ISO, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Genève 20 – Switzerland
 3/ ETRTO, 32 Av. Brugmann - Bte 2, B-1060 Brussels, Belgium
 4/ TRA, 175 Montrose West Avenue, Suite 150, Copley, Ohio, 44321 USA
 5/ JATMA, NO.33 MORI BLDG. 8th Floor 3-8-21, Toranomon Minato-Ku, Tokio
 105-0001, Japan
 6/ TRAA, Suite 1, Hawthorn House, 795 Glenferrie Road, Hawthorn, Victoria,
 3122 Australia
 7/ ALAPA, Avenida Paulista 244-12° Andar, CEP, 01310 Sao Paulo, SP Brazil
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/572 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 5 27.12.2006
 8/ STRO, Älggatan 48 A, Nb, S-216 15 Malmö, Sweden
 3.1.1. Drawings, in triplicate, sufficiently detailed to permit identification of the type. They shall
 also show the position intended for the approval mark and for the wheel markings;
 3.1.2. Technical description including at least the following characteristics:
 3.1.2.1. Category of replacement wheels – see paragraphs 2.4.2., 2.4.3. and 2.4.4.;
 3.1.2.2. rim contour designation - wheel inset - wheel attachment details;
 3.1.2.3. tightening torque for studs and nuts;
 3.1.2.4. fixing method of balancing weights;
 3.1.2.5. necessary accessories (i.e. additional mounting components);
 3.1.2.6. International Standard reference;
 3.1.2.7. suitable for tubeless tyre mounting;
 3.1.2.8. suitable valves types;
 3.1.2.9. maximum load capacity;
 maximum inflation pressure;
 3.1.2.11. detail of material including chemical composition (see Annex 4).
 3.1.2.12. tyre size designations specified for original equipment by the vehicle manufacturer.
 3.1.3. Documentation in accordance with paragraph 1. of annex 10 to this Regulation:
 - vehicle characteristics (Annex 10, paragraph 1.2.);
 - additional characteristics (Annex 10, paragraph 1.3.);
 - fitting instructions details (Annex 10, paragraph 1.4.); and
 - additional requirements (Annex 10, paragraph 2.).
 3.1.4. Sample wheels representative of the wheel type necessary for the execution of laboratory
 tests or test reports issued by the Type Approval Authority.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 6
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/573
 3.2. In case of application for approval of an identical wheel, the applicant shall satisfy the type
 approval authority that the wheel is indeed an "identical replacement wheel" as defined in
 paragraph 2.4.2.
 4. APPROVAL
 4.1. If the wheel submitted for approval in accordance with paragraph 3. above meets the
 requirements, then approval for this type of wheel shall be granted.
 4.2. An approval number shall be assigned to each type approved. The first two digits (at
 present 00 for the regulation in its original form) shall indicate the series of amendments
 incorporating the most recent major technical amendments made to the Regulation at the
 time of issue of the approval. The same Contracting Party may not assign the same number
 to another type of wheel.
 4.3. Notice of approval or refusal or extension of approval of a type of wheel under this
 regulation shall be communicated to the parties to the 1958 Agreement which apply this
 regulation by means of a communication form conforming to the model in annex 1 to this
 Regulation.
 4.4. Every wheel conforming to a type approved under this regulation shall bear, in addition to
 the markings prescribed in paragraph 5., a clearly legible and indelible international
 approval mark consisting of:
 4.4.1. circle surrounding the letter E followed by the distinguishing number of the country which
 has granted approval (see Annex 2). 9/
 4.4.2. The number of this Regulation, followed by the letter R, a dash and the approval number
 according to paragraph 4.2.
 ________________
 9/ 1 for Germany, 2 for France, 3 for Italy, 4 for Netherlands, 5 for Sweden, 6 for Belgium, 7 for
 Hungary, 8 for the Czech Republic, 9 for Spain, 10 for Yugoslavia, 11 for the United Kingdom, 12
 Austria, 13 for Luxembourg, 14 for Switzerland, 15 (vacant), 16 for Norway, 17 for Finland, 18 for
 Denmark, 19 for Romania, 20 for Poland, 21 for Portugal, 22 for the Russian Federation, 23 for
 Greece, 24 for Ireland, 25 for Croatia, 26 for Slovenia, 27 for Slovakia, 28 for Belarus, 29 for
 Estonia, 30 (vacant), 31 for Bosnia and Herzegovina, 32 for Latvia, 33 (vacant), 34 for Bulgaria,
 35 (vacant), 36 for Lithuania, 37 for Turkey, 38 (vacant), 39 for Azerbaijan, 40 for The former
 Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 41 (vacant), 42 for the European Community (Approvals are
 granted by its member States using their respective ECE symbol), 43 for Japan,44 (vacant), 45 for
 Australia, 46 for Ukraine, 47 for South Africa, 48 for New Zeeland, 49 for Cyprus, 50 for Malta
 and 51 for the Republic of Korea. Subsequent numbers shall be assigned to other countries in the
 chronological order in which they ratify or accede to the Agreement Concerning the Adoption of
 Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted
 and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approval
 Granted on the Basis of these Prescriptions, and the numbers thus assigned shall be communicated
 by the Secretary-General of the United Nations to the Contracting Parties to the Agreement.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/574 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 7 27.12.2006
 4.5. The approval mark shall be permanent, visible and clearly legible, when the tyre is fitted
 on the wheel.
 4.6. Annex 2 to this regulation gives an example of the arrangement of the approval mark.
 4.7. The wheel manufacturer's facilities may be used for test purposes provided that the Type
 Approval Authority or a designated representative witnesses the tests.
 5. WHEEL MARKINGS
 5.1. The wheel shall be permanently and legibly marked as follows, in a position chosen by
 the manufacturer, but visible when the tyre is fitted on the wheel:
 5.1.1. manufacturer name or trade mark;
 5.1.2. the wheel or rim contour designation;
 5.1.2.1. It shall be expressed according to the prescription of one International Tyre and Rim
 Standards and includes at least:
 rim size designation comprising:
 rim contour designation nominal rim diameter,
 the symbol "x" if one piece rim,
 the symbol "-" if multipiece rim
 letter "A" if the well is located asymmetrically (optional),
 the letter "S" if the well is located symmetrically (optional).
 5.1.3. the wheel inset;
 date of manufacture(at least the month and year);
 5.1.5. the wheel/rim part number.
 5.2. Annex 3 to this regulation gives an example of the arrangement of the wheel markings.
 6. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
 6.1. Rim contour shall conform to the International Standard specified by the wheel
 manufacturer.
 6.2. Rim contour shall ensure the correct fitting of tyres and valves.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 8
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/575
 6.2.1. Wheels designed for use with tubeless tyres shall ensure air retention.
 6.3. Materials used for the construction of the wheel shall be analysed according to Annex 4.
 6.4. In the case of identical replacement wheel as defined in paragraph 2.4.2., there shall not be
 any requirement for physical testing as given in paragraph 6.5. or vehicle fitment checking
 as given in paragraph 2. of Annex 10 to this Regulation.
 6.5. The replica replacement wheels and pattern part replacement wheels shall satisfy the
 following tests:
 6.5.1. Steel wheels
 6.5.1.1. Disc wheels
 (a) rotating bending test as per Annex 6;
 (b) rolling test as per Annex 7.
 6.5.2. Aluminium alloy wheels
 6.5.2.1. One piece wheels
 (a) Corrosion test as per Annex 5. If the process within a production line is
 always the same, only one representative test is to be carried out.
 (b) Rotating bending test as per Annex 6;
 (c) Rolling test as per Annex 7.
 (d) Impact test as per Annex 8.
 6.5.2.2. Demountable rim wheels
 (a) Corrosion test as per Annex 5;
 (b) Rotating bending test as per Annex 6;
 (c) Rolling test as per Annex 7;
 (d) Impact test as per Annex 8;
 (e) Alternating torque test as per Annex 9.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/576 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 9 27.12.2006
 6.5.3. Magnesium alloy wheels
 6.5.3.1. One piece wheels
 (a) Corrosion test as per Annex 5;
 (b) Rotating bending test as per Annex 6;
 (c) Rolling test as per Annex 7;
 (d) Impact test as per Annex 8.
 6.5.3.2. Demountable rim wheels
 (a) Corrosion test as per Annex 5;
 (b) Rotating bending test as per Annex 6;
 (c) Rolling test as per Annex 7;
 (d) Impact test as per Annex 8;
 (e) Alternating torque test as per Annex 9.
 6.6. Where a wheel manufacturer submits application for type approval for a range of wheels, it
 is not considered necessary to carry out all tests on every type of wheels in the range.
 Worst case selection may be made at the discretion of the type approval Authority or the
 designated Technical Service (see Annex 6 paragraph 4. of this Regulation).
 6.7. Pattern part replacement wheels shall satisfy the following requirements to guarantee
 proper fitment on the vehicle:
 6.7.1. The nominal rim diameter, nominal rim width and nominal inset of ECE-approved
 wheels shall be the same as the manufacturer’s replacement wheel.
 6.7.2. Wheels shall be suitable for tyres of the tyre size designations specified initially by the
 vehicle manufacturer for the particular model concerned.
 6.7.3. The checks and documentation relevant to the wheel/vehicle fitment are described in
 Annex 10.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 10
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/577
 7. MODIFICATIONS AND EXTENSION OF APPROVAL FOR WHEEL
 7.1. Every modification of the wheel type shall be notified to the approval authority which
 granted the type approval. The approval authority may then:
 7.1.1. either consider that the modifications made are unlikely to have appreciable adverse
 effects and that in any case the type of wheel still complies with the requirements;
 7.1.2. or require a further test.
 7.2. Confirmation or refusal of approval, specifying the alterations, shall be notified by the
 procedure specified in paragraph 4.3. above to the parties to the agreement applying this
 regulation.
 7.3. The competent authority issuing the extension of approval shall assign a series number
 to each communication form drawn up for such an extension.
 8. CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION
 8.1. The conformity of production procedures shall comply with those set out in the
 Agreement - E/ECE/324-E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2, Appendix 2.
 8.2. The authority which has granted type approval may at any time verify the conformity
 control methods applied in each production facility. The normal frequency of these
 verifications shall be once every two years.
 9. PENALTIES FOR NON-CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION
 9.1. The approval granted in respect of a type of wheel pursuant to this regulation may be
 withdrawn if the requirements set forth above are not met or if a wheel bearing the
 approval mark does not conform to the type approved.
 9.2. If a Contracting Party to the Agreement applying this regulation withdraws an approval
 it has previously granted, it shall forthwith so notify the other Contracting Parties
 applying this regulation, by means of a communication form conforming to the model in
 Annex 1 to this Regulation.
 10. PRODUCTION DEFINITELY DISCONTINUED
 If the holder of an approval completely ceases to manufacture a wheel approved in
 accordance with this regulation, he shall so inform the authority which granted the
 approval. Upon receiving the relevant communication, that authority shall inform the
 other parties applying this regulation by means of a communication form conforming to
 the model in Annex 1 to this Regulation.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/578 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 11 27.12.2006
 11. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF TECHNICAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE FOR
 CONDUCTING APPROVAL TESTS AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS
 The Contracting Parties to the Agreement applying the regulation shall communicate to the
 United Nations secretariat the names and addresses of the Technical Services responsible
 for conducting approval tests and of the administrative departments which grant approval
 and to which forms certifying approval or extension or refusal or withdrawal of approval, or
 production definitely discontinued issued in other countries, are to be sent.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 12
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/579
 Annex 1
 COMMUNICATION
 (Maximum format: A4(210 x 297 mm))
 issued by: Name of administration:
 ......... ......................... .........
 concerning: 2/ APPROVAL GRANTED
 APPROVAL EXTENDED
 APPROVAL REFUSED
 APPROVAL WITHDRAWN
 PRODUCTION DEFINITELY DISCONTINUED
 of a wheel type, pursuant to Regulation No. XY
 Approval No. ...... Extension No. ......
 Wheel manufacturer: ..............................................................................................................
 Wheel type designation:
 Category of replacement wheels: ............................................................................................
 Construction material:.............................................................................................................
 Method of production:
 Rim contour designation:
 Wheel inset: ...........................................................................................................................
 Wheel attachment: ......................................................................................................
 Maximum load capacity
 3. Address of the manufacturer: ...........................................................................................
 4. If applicable, name and address of manufacturers representative:....................................
 5. Date on which the wheel was submitted for approval tests: ............................................
 6. Technical Service responsible for carrying out the approval test: ...................................
 7. Date of test report issued by the Technical Service: ........................................................
 8. Number of test report issued by the Technical Service: ...................................................
 9. Remarks: ..........................................................................................................................
 10. Approval granted/refused/extended/withdrawn 2/:...........................................................
 11. Reason(s) for the extension (if applicable): .....................................................................
 12. Place: ................................................................................................................................
 13. Date: .................................................................................................................................
 14. Signature/Name: ...............................................................................................................
 Annexed is a list of documents making up the approval file, deposited with the competent
 authority which granted approval, a copy can be obtained on request.
 ___________________
 1/ Distinguishing number of the country granting the approval.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/580 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 13 27.12.2006
 2/ Strike out what does not apply.
 Annex 2
 ARRANGEMENT OF THE APPROVAL MARK
 .
 The wheel bearing the above approval mark is a wheel that has been approved in Italy (E3) under
 approval number 001148.
 The first two digits of the approval number indicate that the approval was granted in accordance
 with the requirements of Regulation No. XY in its original form.
 The marking of approval mark, the Regulation number and approval number may be at a distance
 from each other respecting the sequence.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 14
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/581
 Annex 3
 ARRANGEMENT OF THE WHEEL MARKINGS
 Example of markings which shall be applied to a wheel conforming to this Regulation:
 ABCDE 5 1⁄2 J x 14 FH 36 01 99 ab123
 This example of marking defines a wheel:
 manufactured by ABCDE
 having a rim contour designation (51⁄2 J)
 having a one piece construction(x)
 having a nominal rim diameter code (14)
 having a non symmetrical location of the well (no mark)
 having a flat hump configuration of the bead-seat area on one side only (FH) – optional
 marking
 having a wheel inset of 36 mm
 manufactured in January 1999 (0199)
 the manufacturer’s part number (ab123)
 The rim designation shall include in the following order the rim contour designation, the construction,
 the nominal rim diameter code, the location of the well and the bead-seat configuration, as in the
 example 51⁄2 J x 14 FH. It is also permitted to reverse the order for the first three elements as in the
 example 14 x 51⁄2 J FH.
 The marking of the wheel inset, the date of production and manufacturer’s name may be at a distance
 from the rim designation.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/582 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 15 27.12.2006
 Annex 4
 MATERIAL TEST
 The following metallurgical analysis shall carried out and reported:
 Material Tests
 Aluminium alloy a, c, e
 Magnesium alloy a, c, e
 Steel a, b, d
 Chemical analysis of the raw-material.
 Check of the following mechanical characteristics (Rp0,2, Rm, and A) relevant to the materials:
 - percentage elongation after fracture (A) : Permanent elongation of the gauge length after
 fracture (Lu – Lo), expressed as a percentage of the original length (Lo).
 Where
 original gauge length (Lo) : Gauge length before application of force.
 final gauge length (Lu) : Gauge length after rupture of the test piece.
 - proof strength, non-proportional extension (Rp) : Stress at which a non-proportional extension
 is equal to a specified percentage of the extensometer gauge length (Le). The symbol used is
 followed by a suffix giving the prescribed percentage of the extensometer gauge length, for
 example: Rp0,2.
 - tensile strength (Rm) : Stress corresponding to the maximum force (Fm).
 Check of the mechanical characteristics (Rp0,2, Rm, and A) of test-pieces taken from the hub
 mounting area and in the disc to rim transition area or in the failure zone if any.
 Analysis of the metallurgic defects and of the raw material structure.
 Analysis of the metallurgic defects and of the test-pieces structure taken from the hub mounting area
 and in the disc to rim transition area or in the failure zone if any.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 16
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/583
 Annex 5
 CORROSION TEST
 1. Carry out a salt-spray test as per ISO 9227 for 384 hours.
 1.1. Sample preparation
 A surface treated sample, taken from production, shall be damaged by cross engraving and
 stone impact (ISO 565) to represent damaging situations during the normal usage of vehicle
 (damage shall be in the area of the rim flange and inside the wheel).
 1.2. Test development
 The surface treated sample shall pass a salt-spray test, in which the sample and any
 components with which is normally in contact are put in upright position into the salt-spray
 test equipment. The wheel is turned through 90° every 48 hours.
 1.3. Evaluation
 Individual measures which may affect the corrosion are to be evaluated (covers, crews, zinc
 or cadmium buses, alloy insulating covers, etc.)
 The test documentation shall include photos showing the main corrosion points which have
 been mechanically washed in order to show the material defects.
 There shall not be any significant corrosion after a test duration of 192 hours. After 384
 hours the wheel functionality, the mounting components and the tyre bead seat shall not be
 adversely affected by corrosion. This shall be confirmed by a rotating bending test as per
 Annex 6 or by a rolling test as per Annex 7, depending on the location of the corrosion.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/584 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 17 27.12.2006
 Annex 6
 ROTATING BENDING TEST
 1. Test Description
 During the rotating bending test, the lateral forces acting on wheel in driving around a curve
 are simulated. Four wheel samples shall be tested, two at 50% and two at 75% of the
 maximum side force. The wheel rim is fixed rigidly to the test bench, and a bending
 moment Mb is applied to the hub mounting area (i.e. through a loading arm with a flange
 having the same pitch circle diameter as the vehicle for which the wheel is intended). Light
 alloy wheels are fixed using the internal rim flange by two semicircular flanges.
 Should other fixing devices be used, it is necessary prove their equivalence.
 Screws or fixing nuts are tightened to the torque stated by the vehicle manufacturer and
 retightened after 10,000 cycles approximately.
 2. Formula for the bending moment calculation
 Cars and off-road vehicles : MbmaX = S * FV ( o* rdyn + d)
 MbmaX = maximum reference bending moment ]Nm_
 FV = maximum load capacity of wheel ]N_
 rdyn = dynamic radius of largest tyre recommended for wheel ]m_
 d = inset ]m_
 o = coefficient of friction
 S = factor of safety
 3. The test is carried out with two percentage values (50 per cent and 75 per cent) of the max
 moment and on the basis of the following standards
 Coefficient of friction 0.9
 Factor of safety 2.0
 Nominal cycles per minute The number of cycles per minute can be the maximum
 possible but outside the testing rig resonance frequency.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 18
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/585
 Aluminium / Magnesium Steel
 Vehicle category M1 and M1G O1 and O2 M1 and M1G O1 and O2
 5 5 4 4
 Min cycles with 75 2.0*10 0.66*10 6.0 * 10 2.0*10
 per cent MbmaX
 6 6 5 5
 Min cycles with 50 1.8*10 0.69*10 6.0*10 2.3*10
 per cent MbmaX
 Acceptance limits Shaft displacement less than 10 per cent greater than the displacement measured
 after approximately 10,000 cycles.
 Technical cracks are not accepted. -
 Allowable loss of Maximum 30 per cent
 tightening torque
 initially applied to
 the wheel fixing
 studs and nuts 1/
 4. Test schedule for range of wheel types
 Wheels of the same type (paragraph 2.2.) but with different inset values can be grouped
 using the highest value of test bending moment according to the following test schedule.
 Wheel versions having a larger centre hole shall be included in the test. In the case of a
 failure further samples shall be tested.
 Necessary tests:
 Number of wheels to be tested Rotating bending test
 Short test Long test
 Minimum PCD 1 1
 Maximum PCD 1 1
 if only one PCD 2 2
 Inset variations up to 2 mm -- --
 From 2 mm to 5 mm 1 --
 @ 5 mm 1 1
 Tests to be carried out should the maximum permitted wheel load subsequently increase.
 ____________
 1/ Check loss of tightening torque of wheel fixings by retightening, not by measuring torque to
 loosen fixings.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/586 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 19 27.12.2006
 If the resulting test bending 1 1
 moment increases up to 10 per cent
 max.
 Short test = rotating bending test with 75 per cent of l Mbmax
 (calculated for the max wheel load)
 Long test = rotating bending test with 50 per cent of Mbmax
 Should the testing moment be increased of more of 10 per cent, when compared to the first
 approval, the whole programme shall be repeated.
 Example of a rotating bending test rig.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 20
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/587
 Annex 7
 ROLLING TEST
 1. Test Description
 In the rolling test the stress on the wheel when driving straight ahead is simulated by testing a
 wheel rolling against a drum which has a minimum outside diameter of 1.7 m, in the case of an
 external rolling test, or a minimum internal diameter equal to the dynamic radius of the tyre
 divided by 0.4 in the case of an internal rolling test. Two wheels shall be tested.
 2. Formula for calculation of the test load
 All types of vehicles FP = S * FV
 FP =testing load [N]
 FV =wheel maximum load capacity of the wheel [N]
 S =factor of safety
 3. Tests Procedure and Requirements
 Tests are carried out on the basis of the following specifications:
 M1 and M1G O1 and O2
 Rolling direction Straight
 Factor of safety - S 2.5 2.0
 2.25 1/
 Tyres Taken from normal (series) production and, if possible, of the
 maximum nominal section width recommended for the wheel
 Testing speed in km/h The max. allowed by the tyre given by the speed index, usually
 60-100 km/hour
 Equivalent rolling distance 2,000 km 2,000 km
 1,000 km 1/ 1,000 km 1/
 Tyre pressure at start of test (nor Normal usage: rolling test pressure
 checked or controlled during the Up to 160 kPa 280 kPa
 test) More than 160 kPa min. 400 kPa
 Limits of acceptance Technical cracks and/or air leakage are not accepted.
 Allowable loss of tightening  30 per cent
 torque initially applied to the
 wheel fixing studs and nuts 2/
 ______________
 1/ For passenger cars steel disc wheels.
 2/ Check loss of tightening torque of wheel fixings by retightening - not by measuring torque to
 loosen fixing.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/588 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 21 27.12.2006
 Examples of rolling test rigs.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 22
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/589
 Annex 8
 IMPACT TEST
 Test Description
 Wheel strength with regard to the fractures on edges and other critical points when the wheel
 strikes an obstacle shall be checked. In order to show the sufficient resistance to fractures it is
 necessary carry out an impact test as per Annex 8 - Appendix 1.
 2. Formula for the calculation of test load
 D = 0.6 * FV / g + 180 [kg]
 D = value of falling mass [kg]
 FV = maximum wheel load capacity [N]
 2
 g = acceleration due to gravity 9.81 m/s
 3. Test Procedure and Requirements
 M1 and M1G
 Procedure and As per Annex 8 – Appendix 1
 requirements
 Tyre pressure The tyre pressure recommended by the tyre manufacturer based on the load
 index and the max. vehicle speed, but at least 200 kPa.
 Tyres Tyres taken from normal (series) production with the minimum nominal
 section width and minimum rolling circumference on the range of tyres
 recommended for the particular wheel.
 Acceptance criteria The test shall be considered satisfactory if there is not any visible fracture
 penetrating through the wheel surface and if there is not any loss of inflation
 pressure within one minute of completing the test. Fractures and indentations
 caused by the direct contact with the falling weight are acceptable.
 In the case of wheels with demountable rims or other components that can be
 dismantled, if threaded fastenings that are close to the spoke or ventilation
 holes fail the wheel is to be considered as having failed the test.
 Number of samples to One for each impact position.
 be tested
 Impact positions One in the area connecting spokes to rim and further one in the area between
 two spokes, very close to the valve hole.
 If possible, the impact direction shall not coincide with the radial line between
 a fixing hole and the wheel centre.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/590 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 23 27.12.2006
 4. Tests schedule for range of wheel types
 Tests necessary:
 Wheels to be tested Impact test
 Minimum PCD of fixing holes One for each impact position
 Maximum PCD of fixing holes One for each impact position
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 24
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/591
 Annex 8 - Appendix 1
 PASSENGER CARS - LIGHT ALLOY WHEELS - IMPACT TEST
 1. SCOPE
 This annex specifies a laboratory test procedure to evaluate the axial (lateral) kerb impact
 collision properties of a wheel manufactured either wholly or partly of light alloys. It is
 intended for passenger car applications, with the purpose of screening and/or quality control
 of the wheel.
 2. TEST EQUIPMENT
 2.1. New wheels, fully processed, representative of wheels intended for passenger car
 application, fitted with a tyre.
 2.2. Impact loading test machine with a vertically acting striker having an impacting face at least
 125 mm wide and at least 375 mm long and sharp edges broken by radius or chamfer, in
 accordance with figure 1. The falling mass, D, within a tolerance of  2 per cent, expressed
 in kilograms, shall be as follows:
 D = 0.6 * FV / g + 180 [kg]
 where FV / g is the maximum static wheel loading, as specified by the wheel and/or vehicle
 manufacturer, expressed in kilograms.
 2.3. Mass of 1,000 kg.
 3. CALIBRATION
 Ensure, by means of a test calibration adapter, that the 1,000 kg mass (paragraph 2.3.)
 applied vertically to the centre of the wheel fixing as shown in figure 2 causes a deflection
 of 7.5 mm ± 0.75 mm when measured at the centre of the beam.
 4. TEST PROCEDURE
 4.1. Mount the test wheel (paragraph 2.1.) and tyre in the test machine (paragraph 2.2.) such that
 the impact loading is applied to the rim flange of the wheel. The wheel shall be mounted
 with its axis at an angle of 13°  1° to the vertical with its highest point presented to the
 striker.
 The tyre mounted on the test wheel shall be the smallest nominal section width tubeless
 radial-ply tyre intended for use on that wheel. The inflation pressure shall be that specified
 by the vehicle manufacturer or, in the absence of such specification, it shall be 200 kPa.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/592 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 25 27.12.2006
 The temperature of the test environment shall remain within a range of 10 °C to 30 °C
 throughout the test period.
 4.2. Ensure that the wheel is mounted on the hub fixture with dimensionally representative
 fixings such as would be used on a vehicle. Manually tighten the fixings to a value or by a
 method as recommended by the vehicle or wheel manufacturer.
 Because the design of wheel centre members may vary, test a sufficient number of locations
 on the wheel rim circumference to ensure that the integrity of the centre members is
 assessed. Use new wheels each time.
 In case of test on the spoke, that spoke is to be chosen where the bolt hole is closest.
 4.3. Ensure that the striker is over the tyre, and overlaps the rim flange by 25 mm  1 mm.
 Raise the striker to a height of 230 mm  2 mm above the highest part of the rim flange and
 allow it to fall.
 5. FAILURE CRITERIA
 The wheel is considered to have failed the test if any of the following apply:
 (a) visible fracture(s) penetrate through a section of the centre member of the wheel
 assembly;
 (b) the centre member separates from the rim;
 (c) the tyre loses all air pressure within 1 min.
 The wheel is not considered to have failed the test by deformation of the wheel assembly or
 by fractures in the area of the rim section struck by the face plate of the striker.
 _______
 Note: Tyres and wheels used in the tests should not be used subsequently on a vehicle.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 26
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/593
 Figure 1 – Impact loading test machine
 Figure 1 - Detail A
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/594 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 27 27.12.2006
 Dimensions in millimetres
 Figure 2 – Application of loading to centre of wheel mount
 Dimensions in millimetres
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 28
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/595
 Annex 9
 ALTERNATING TORQUE TEST
 2. Test Description
 In an alternating torque test the torque acting on wheel during braking and acceleration is
 simulated. The sample wheels shall be tested at each percentage value (50 per cent and 75 per
 cent ) of the maximum calculated torque. Each wheel flange is rigidly fixed on the test table
 and stressed by an alternating torque of ± MT, introduced through the attachment face i.e.
 through a brake disc or through other components.
 2. Formula for the calculation of the test torque
 MT = S * FV * rdyn
 Where:
 MT = test torque [Nm]
 S = factor of safety
 FV = maximum wheel load capacity [N]
 rdyn = dynamic radius [m]
 Tests are carried out on the basis of the following parameters:
 Factor of safety S 1,0
 5
 Min number of cycles with ± 90 per cent MT 2* 10
 6
 Min number of cycles with ± 45 per cent MT 2* 10
 Acceptance criteria Technical cracks not acceptable
 Allowable loss of the initial torque applied to wheel 30 per cent
 fixing studs and nuts 1/
 __________
 1/ Check loss of tightening torque of wheel fixings by retightening, not by measuring torque to loosen
 fixing.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/596 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 29 27.12.2006
 Annex 10
 VEHICLE FITMENT CHECKS AND DOCUMENTATION
 1. Application and fitting Information
 The type approval authority shall be supplied with a copy of following information which
 shall also be supplied to the consumer with the wheel.
 1.1. Wheel characteristics:
 ECE approval number, wheel type and variant, international rim designation (for example,
 15 H2 x 5 1⁄2 J) and inset.
 1.2. Vehicle characteristics:
 Vehicle manufacturer, vehicle model name and description, vehicle power and VIN range
 including at least WMI, VDS and first digit of VIS describing the model year (see ISO
 3779-1983).
 1.3. Additional characteristics: Any particular requirements, special fittings and so on that are
 specified when using the manufacturer’s replacement wheels or specific requirements for
 the ECE approved wheel.
 1.4. Fitting instruction detail: Recommendations and safety precautions when fitting the wheel;
 Use of any additional or substitute wheel fixing components, for example, longer wheel
 bolts or studs with alloy wheels;
 Wheel fixing tightening torque; drawing attention to the importance of this aspect and the
 need to preferably use a calibrated torque wrench; Instruction regarding the necessity to re-
 tighten the wheel fixing after 50 km of driving; References to the use and mounting of
 hubcaps, if applicable;
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 30
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/597
 1.5. Example of a possible structure of the Application and fitting Information table.
 Wheel characteristics (mandatory fields in bold characters)
 ECE approval Wheel type Size Inset Pcd fixing holes 1/
 number
 XY R-I 0001148 6014 6Jx14H2 38 mm 98 mm 4
 Wheel variant Control Wheel centre ring Centre hole max. wheel
 spigot marking marking Dia. load in N
 location
 A Yes 98-38 120-98 58.1 mm 5500
 Vehicles' characteristics
 Vehicle vehicle Vehicle Power
 Identification (VIN)
 manufacturers model name type In kW
 ALFA ALFA 66 - 95 WMI VDS Year(s)
 FIAT ROMEO ROMEO
 145/146 930 1C9 Y817H3 4
 Additional characteristics
 Ref. Characteristic
 1/ Spherical fastening screws
 Additional requirements
 Wheel calliper check
 The design of the inner contour of the wheel (wheel calliper see Figure 1) must provide
 sufficient space for the brake, suspension and steering components.
 In the case where the wheel calliper is outside of the vehicle manufacturer’s replacement
 wheel calliper, no verification is necessary.
 In the case where the calliper is inside the vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel
 calliper, a check shall be carried out of wheel operating clearance with respect to brake,
 suspension and steering components and general under body components, taking into
 account the effect of wheel balance weights.
 As a rule, the following criteria have to be fulfilled:
 minimum clearance for brake components (worst case, for example with new brake
 linings): 3 mm 1/),
 minimum clearance for suspension components (e. g. upper and lower suspension arms): 4
 mm,
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 L 375/598 EN Official Journal of the European Union page 31 27.12.2006
 minimum clearance for steering components (e. g. track rod and steering joints ): 4 mm, and
 minimum clearance between balance weights and vehicle components:2 mm.
 The check may be carried out statically or dynamically. If the various clearances on the
 vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel are less than those given above, then these can
 be accepted.
 2.2. Ventilation holes check
 An approved wheel shall not reduce the brake efficiency in comparison with a
 manufacturer’s replacement wheel. The heat transfer from the brakes into steel wheels is
 regarded as being more severe than that with of light alloy wheels. In the case where the
 vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel is designed for a defined air circulation from the
 brake through the wheel ventilation holes (for example by "windmilling" effect) and where
 the area of the ventilation holes, in a pattern part replacement wheel, is smaller than the
 corresponding vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel, a comparison test shall be carried
 out to evaluate the brake efficiency.
 The test shall follow the requirements of Regulation No. 13, appendix 4, paragraph 1.5.
 Type I - Fade test procedure. The criterion is the brake temperature. The maximum
 temperature measured (discs, drum) using the vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel
 must not be exceeded with the wheel to be approved.
 Any hubcaps normally fitted are to be taken into account.
 2.3. Wheel fixing
 The use of vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel fixing components is
 recommended. Any special wheel fixing components shall allow fitting of the pattern
 part replacement wheel without requiring any additional change. The basic number of
 wheel fixings, for example 4 holes, 5 holes and so on, shall not be changed. Wheel
 fixings shall not foul other components, for example, brake components. Regarding
 wheel bolts, nuts and studs, the length of thread engagement shall be the same as
 achieved by the vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel and wheel fixings. The
 profile of the bolts / nuts shall be compatible with the profile of the location hole in the
 approved wheel. The material used for the wheel fixing components shall be at least
 equivalent to the vehicle manufacturer’s replacement wheel fixing components.
 ________________
 1/ Use of vehicle manufacturer brake component profiles and wheel caliper is recommended.
 However in-service monitoring is necessary because of possible change of brake parts and/or OE-
 wheel calliper during the vehicle production run.
 ---pagebreak--- TRANS/WP.29/2005/46
 page 32
 27.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 375/599
 In the case where wheel accessories are provided, any necessary special tools for
 mounting and demounting shall also be provided.
 Where different wheel fixing components are supplied, they shall be detailed in the
 information required by paragraph 1.2., and any necessary special fitting tools shall be
 provided.
 2.4. External projections
 The approved wheel when fitted to the vehicle, together with any necessary wheel
 accessories, shall not create any danger. The requirements of Regulation ECE-R26 shall
 be respected.
 2.5. Miscellaneous
 The test report shall contain the details and results of the tests carried out. It shall
 confirm that the tested wheel meets the requirements.
 Wheel Caliper contour
 Line outside the Wheel Caliper
 contour
 line inside the Wheel Caliper contour
 Figure 1 : Wheel inner contour including examples of inside
 and outside situations.
 _____


text:
C 258/28 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle ComunitaÁ europee 15.8.98
 Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Kanton- Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Tribu-
 gerecht di Groninga, con ordinanza 20 maggio 1998, nella nal du travail di Liegi (Settima Sezione), con ordinanza
 causa Heindrik Van der Woude contro Stichting 17 giugno 1998, nella causa Marie-Nathalie D'Hoop con-
 Beatrixoord tro Office national de l'emploi
 (Causa C-222/98) (Causa C-224/98)
 (98/C 258/45) (98/C 258/47)
 Con ordinanza 20 maggio 1998, pervenuta in cancelleria Con ordinanza 17 giugno 1998, pervenuta nella cancelle-
 il 17 giugno 1998, nella causa Heindrik Van de Woude ria della Corte il 22 giugno 1998, nella causa Marie-
 contro Stichting Beatrixoord, il Kantongerecht di Gro- Nathalie D'Hoop contro Office national de l'emploi, il
 ninga ha sottoposto alla Corte di giustizia delle ComunitaÁ Tribunal du travail di Liegi (Settima Sezione) ha sottopo-
 europee la seguente questione pregiudiziale: sto alla Corte di giustizia delle ComunitaÁ europee la
 seguente questione pregiudiziale:
 Se il combinato disposto di cui all'art. II, lett. G (che
 «Se, in quanto dall'interpretazione giaÁ formulata dalla
 dispone l'inderogabilitaÁ delle disposizioni (1) del contratto
 Corte di giustizia dell'art. 48 del Trattato CE e dell'art. 7
 collettivo di lavoro (CAO) di cui trattasi (2)) e l'art. 32 (il
 del regolamento n. 1612/68 (1) emerge che l'art. 36 del
 regime di cassa malattia (3)) del CAO sia in contrasto con
 regio decreto 25 novembre 1991 non può essere di osta-
 il disposto degli artt. 85 e 86 del Trattato CE.
 colo alla concessione di indennitaÁ di disoccupazione giova-
 nile a uno studente, a carico di un lavoratore migrante
 (1) «Non eÁ consentito al datore di lavoro . . . di concordare con il della ComunitaÁ, che ha terminato i suoi studi secondari in
 lavoratore condizioni di lavoro che non trovano alcuna disci- un istituto di uno Stato membro diverso dal Belgio, le
 plina nel contratto collettivo di lavoro». stesse disposizioni debbano essere interpretate nel senso
 (2) Contratto collettivo di lavoro per gli ospedalieri. che vietano altresì che il detto art. 36 del regio decreto
 (3) Il (menzionato) lavoratore può affiliarsi al (ai) regime(i) collet-
 tivo(i) di cassa malattia (IZZ). Conformemente a tale articolo,
 25 novembre 1991 osti alla concessione delle indennitaÁ di
 il Beatrixoord paga per il signor Van der Woude il 50 % del disoccupazione giovanile a uno studente belga in cerca di
 premio del regime collettivo (privato) della cassa malattia IZZ. prima occupazione che, parimenti, ha terminato i suoi
 studi secondari in un istituto di uno Stato membro diverso
 dal Belgio».
 (1) Regolamento del Consiglio 15 ottobre 1968, relativo alla
 libera circolazione dei lavoratori all'interno della ComunitaÁ
 (GU L 257 del 19.10.1968, pag. 2).
 Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Kam-
 marrätten i Stockholm con ordinanza 16 giugno 1998,
 nella causa Adidas AG
 (Causa C-223/98)
 (98/C 258/46)
 Ricorso presentato il 22 giugno 1998 contro la Repubblica
 francese dalla Commissione delle ComunitaÁ europee
 Con ordinanza 16 giugno 1998, pervenuta nella cancelle- (Causa C-225/98)
 ria della Corte il 18 giugno 1998, nella causa Adidas AG, (98/C 258/48)
 il Kammarrätten i Stockholm ha sottoposto alla Corte di
 giustizia delle ComunitaÁ europee la seguente questione
 pregiudiziale: Il 22 giugno 1998 la Commissione delle ComunitaÁ euro-
 pee, rappresentata dai signori Michel Nolin, membro del
 servizio giuridico in qualitaÁ di agente, con domicilio eletto
 «Se una normativa nazionale che, in materia doganale, in Lussemburgo presso il signor Carlos Gómez de la Cruz,
 non consenta che al titolare di un marchio vengano comu- Centre Wagner, Kirchberg, ha proposto dinanzi alla Corte
 nicati i nominativi dei destinatari o dei soggetti che di giustizia delle ComunitaÁ europee un ricorso contro la
 abbiano presentato la dichiarazione in dogana relativa- Repubblica francese.
 mente a presunte merci contraffatte, sia in contrasto con il
 regolamento (CE) n. 3295/94 (1)».
 La Commissione delle ComunitaÁ europee conclude che la
 ( ) Del 22 dicembre 1994, che fissa misure intese a vietare
 1 Corte voglia:
 l'immissione in libera pratica, l'esportazione, la riesportazione
 e il vincolo ad un regime sospensivo di merci contraffatte e di
 merci usurpative (GU L 341 del 30.12.1994, pag. 8). dichiarare che la Repubblica francese, in occasione delle
 procedure di appalto indette per un periodo di tre anni
 dalla reÂgion Nord-Pas de Calais e dal deÂpartement du
 Nord per l'aggiudicazione di lavori di costruzione e manu-


text:
3 . 6 . 95 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas N° C 137/9
 Recurso interpuesto el 28 de junio de 1993 contra la Motivos y principales alegaciones
 Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas por Hanseatische
 Industrie Beteiligungen GmbH Los motivos y las principales alegaciones se contienen en
 (Asunto C-62/95 ) una comunicación publicada en el DO n° C 222 de 18 de
 agosto de 1993 , p . 10 .
 ( 95/C 137/15 )
 (M DO n° L 144 de 16 . 6 . 1993 , p . 21 .
 El recurso interpuesto contra la Comisión de las Comuni ( 2 ) DO n° C 222 de 18 . 8 . 1993 , p . 8 .
 dades Europeas por Hanseatische Industrie Beteiligungen
 GmbH ( asunto C-335/93 ), remitido al Tribunal de Primera
 Instancia mediante auto del Tribunal de Justicia de 27 de
 septiembre de 1993 con arreglo al artículo 4 de la Decisión
 93/350/Euratom, CECA, CEE del Consejo de 8 de junio de
 Recurso interpuesto el 10 de marzo de 1995 contra la
 1993 por la que se modifica la Decisión 88/591 /CECA,
 CEE, Euratom, por la que se crea el Tribunal de Primera Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas por la República
 Italiana
 Instancia de las Comunidades Europeas ( ] ), está pendiente
 desde el 8 de marzo de 1995 ante el Tribunal de Justicia de (Asunto C-69/95 )
 las Comunidades Europeas, una vez que el Tribunal de ( 95/C 137/17 )
 Primera Instancia, mediante auto, se declarara incompe
 tente para conocer de ese asunto, que se había inscrito en el En el Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas se
 Registro del Tribunal de Primera Instancia con el n° T ha presentado el 10 de marzo de 1995 un recurso contra la
 488/93 , y remitiera el asunto al Tribunal de Justicia con Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas , formulado por la
 objeto de que éste pueda decidir sobre el mismo junto con el República Italiana , representada por el Prof. Umberto
 asunto C-329/93 ( 2 ). Leanza, en calidad de Agente, asistido por el Sr . Oscar
 Fiumara , avvocato dello Stato, que designa como domicilio
 Motivos y principales alegaciones en Luxemburgo la sede de la Embajada de Italia, 5 , rué
 Marie-Adélaide .
 Los motivos y las principales alegaciones se contienen en
 una comunicación publicada en el DO n° C 222 de 18 de La parte demandante solicita al Tribunal de Justicia que :
 agosto de 1993 , p . 9 .
 — Anule la Decisión de la Comisión de fecha 21 de
 diciembre de 1994 n° C ( 94 ) 3308 def., relativa a la
 (M DO n" L 144 de 16 . 6 . 1993 , p . 21 . liquidación de cuentas presentadas por los Estados
 ( 2 ) DO n° C 222 de 18 . 8 . 1993 , p . 8 .
 miembros correspondientes a los gastos del ejercicio de
 1991 financiados por el Fondo Europeo de Orientación
 y de Garantía Agrícola —Sección Garantía— en la
 medida en que excluye de la imputabilidad al FEOGA la
 cantidad de 103 161 493 560 liras italianas, en la
 liquidación de cuentas presentadas por la República
 Italiana .
 Recurso interpuesto el 1 de julio de 1993 contra la Comisión
 de las Comunidades Europeas por Bremer Vulkan Verbund — Condene a la parte demandada al pago de las costas del
 AG procedimiento .
 (Asunto C-63/95 )
 ( 95/C 137/16 ) Motivos y principales alegaciones
 Infracción y aplicación errónea de los artículos 1 , 3 y 5 del
 El recurso interpuesto contra la Comisión de las Comuni Reglamento ( CEE ) n° 729/70 del Consejo ('), del artículo 8
 dades Europeas por Bremer Vulkan Verbund AG ( asunto del Reglamento ( CEE) n° 1723/72 de la Comisión ( 2 ) y de las
 C-339/93 ), remitido al Tribunal de Primera Instancia normas reguladoras del sector lácteo [art. 4 del Reglamento
 mediante auto del Tribunal de Justicia de 27 de septiembre ( CEE ) n° 857/84 del Consejo ( 3 ) y sus sucesivas modifica
 de 1993 con arreglo al artículo 4 de la Decisión 93/ ciones; Reglamento ( CEE ) n° 1546/88 de la Comisión (4 )].
 350/Euratom, CECA, CEE del Consejo de 8 de junio de Causa de nulidad . Defecto de motivación: Italia ha respe
 1993 por la que se modifica la Decisión 88/591 /CECA, tado plenamente la normativa comunitaria en lo que se
 CEE, Euratom, por la que se crea el Tribunal de Primera refiere a la nueva adquisición de las cantidades de referencia ,
 Instancia de las Comunidades Europeas ('), está pendiente en tanto que ha suspendido la nueva asignación de las
 desde el 8 de marzo de 1995 ante el Tribunal de Justicia de citadas cantidades, cumpliendo plenamente los objetivos
 las Comunidades Europeas, una vez que el Tribunal de comunitarios , debido a la especial situación con que aún se
 Primera Instancia, mediante auto, se declarara incompe enfrenta . A lo largo de 1991 , coincidiendo, por consi
 tente para conocer de ese asunto, que se había inscrito en el guiente, con la expiración del plazo señalado para la nueva
 Registro del Tribunal de Primera Instancia con el n° asignación de las cantidades nuevamente adquiridas, que la
 T-490/93 , y remitiera el asunto al Tribunal de Justicia con normativa comunitaria había fijado en el 1 dejuniode 1991 ,
 objeto de que éste pueda decidir sobre el mismo junto con el comenzó a manifestarse una clara divergencia entre la
 asunto C-329/93 ( 2 ). producción real de leche y la cantidad nacional garantizada .


text:
 8.6.2015
 CS
 Úřední věstník Evropské unie
 C 190/10
 Rozsudek Tribunálu ze dne 22. dubna 2015 – Tomana a další v. Rada a Komise
 (Věc T-190/12) (1)
 („Společná zahraniční a bezpečnostní politika - Omezující opatření přijatá vůči určitým osobám a subjektům s ohledem na situaci v Zimbabwe - Omezení vstupu na území Unie a průjezdu přes toto území - Zmrazení finančních prostředků - Právní základ - Zjevně nesprávné posouzení - Povinnost uvést odůvodnění - Právo na obhajobu - Základní práva - Proporcionalita“)
 (2015/C 190/11)
 Jednací jazyk: angličtina
 Účastníci řízení
 Žalobci: Johannes Tomana (Harare, Zimbabwe) a 120 dalších žalobců, jejichž jména a názvy jsou uvedeny v příloze rozsudku (zástupci: původně D. Vaughan, QC, M. Lester, R. Lööf, barristers, a M. O’Kane, solicitor, poté D. Vaughan, M. Lester a R. Lööf)
 Žalované: Rada Evropské unie (zástupci: B. Driessen, M. Veiga a A. Vitro, zmocněnci) a Evropská komise (zástupci: M. Konstantinidis, T. Scharf a E. Georgieva, zmocněnci)
 Vedlejší účastník podporující žalované: Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska (zástupci: E. Jenkinson, C. Murrell a M. Holt, zmocněnci, ve spolupráci se S. Lee, barrister)
 Předmět věci
 Návrh na zrušení rozhodnutí Rady 2012/97/SZBP ze dne 17. února 2012, kterým se mění rozhodnutí 2011/101/SZBP o omezujících opatřeních vůči Zimbabwe (Úř. věst. L 47, s. 50), prováděcího nařízení Komise (EU) č. 151/2012 ze dne 21. února 2012, kterým se mění nařízení Rady (ES) č. 314/2004 o některých omezujících opatřeních vůči Zimbabwe (Úř. věst. L 49, s. 2), a prováděcího rozhodnutí Rady 2012/124/SZBP ze dne 27. února 2012, kterým se provádí rozhodnutí 2011/101/SZBP o omezujících opatřeních vůči Zimbabwe (Úř. věst. L 54, s. 20), v rozsahu, v němž se týkají žalobců.
 Výrok rozsudku
 1)
 Žaloba se zamítá.
 2)
 Johannes Tomana a 120 dalších žalobců, jejichž jména a názvy jsou uvedeny v příloze, ponesou vlastní náklady řízení a nahradí náklady řízení vynaložené Radou Evropské unie a Evropskou komisí.
 3)
 Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska ponese vlastní náklady řízení.
 (1) Úř. věst. C 194, 30.6.2012.


text:
Die Wirtschaftsrechtlichen Blätter sind eine Fachzeitschrift zum österreichischen und europäischen Wirtschaftsrecht. Sie erscheinen monatlich im Verlag Österreich als Beilage der Zeitschrift Juristische Blätter (JBl).
 In der juristischen Fachliteratur wird die Zeitschrift mit dem Kürzel „WBl“ zitiert.
 Inhalt
 Der Inhalt teilt sich in aktuelle Aufsätze und umfangreiche Entscheidungen, welche auf Wissenschaft und Praxis abgestimmt sind. Des Weiteren werden neue Entwicklungen des Europarechts dargestellt.
 Herausgeber
 Herausgeber der Zeitschrift sind Josef Aicher (Professor an der Universität Wien), Konrad Grillberger (Professor an der Universität Salzburg), Wolfgang Schuhmacher (Professor an der Universität Salzburg), Franz W. Urlesberger und Ewald Wiederin (Professor an der Universität Wien). Schriftleiter ist Wolfgang Schuhmacher.
 Weblinks
 Wirtschaftsrechtliche Blätter bei Verlag Österreich
 Juristische Fachzeitschrift (Österreich)
 Deutschsprachige Monatszeitschrift
 Wirtschaftsrecht (Österreich)


text:
Horemheb oli Egyptin 18. dynastian viimeinen faarao. Hän hallitsi vuosina 1323–1295 eaa.
 Horemheb ei ollut kuninkaallista syntyperää, vaan hän oli toiminut edeltävien faaraoiden (mm. Tutankhamonin ja Ayn) upseerina. Faarao Ayn kuoleman jälkeen silloinen upseeri Horemheb julisti itsensä faaraoksi.
 Hänen vanhemmistaan tai muusta perheestään ei ole asuinpaikan lisäksi juurikaan tietoa. He asuivat todennäköisesti Herakleopoliissa (muinaisegyptiläiseltä nimeltään Nen(i)-nesut/Hut-nen-nesu). Vaimoja hänellä oli kolme, kaksi joiden nimiä ei tiedetä ja Mutnodjmet. Mutnodjmet oli mahdollisesti faarao Akhenatenin vaimon Nefertitin sisar.
 Valtaan päästyään Horemheb julkisti Horemhebin ediktin nimellä tunnetun julistuksen, joka on löydetty steelaan kaiverrettuna Karnakista. Siinä kuvattiin maan tuolloista surkeaa tilaa, kansan kurjuutta ja virkamiesten väärinkäytöksiä. Ediktissä uhattiin ankarilla rangaistuksilla: vilppiin syyllistyneiltä virkamiehiltä oli leikattava nenä ja myös maanpakorangaistus palautettiin käyttöön.
 Horemheb teki myös voitavansa hävittääkseen kaikki muistot Akhenatonista ja tämän kolmesta seuraajasta, Smenkhkaresta, Tutankhamonista ja Aysta, joita hän piti syyllisinä Egyptissä tuolloin vallinneeseen kurjuuteen. Niinpä heitä esittävät veistokset joko rikottiin tai niistä hakattiin nimet pois ja tilalle hakattiin uuden hallitsijan nimi. Myös Akhenatonin rakennuttamat Atonin temppelit purettiin. Horemheb selitti myös olleensa Amenhotep III:n laillinen seuraaja, minkä vuoksi egyptiläisissä asiakirjoissa alettiin laskea hänen hallitusvuotensakin Amenhotep III:n kuolemasta, vaikka hän todellisuudessa nousi valtaan lähes 30 vuotta myöhemmin. Sen vuoksi eräissä egyptiläisissä teksteissä hänen mainitaankin hallinneen 50 vuotta. Vielä seuraavan 19. dynastian aikaisissa luetteloissa, esimerkiksi Abydoksen kuningasluettelossa, Horemheb mainitaan Amenhoptep III:n välittömänä seuraajana.
 Horemhebin hauta sijaitsee Kuninkaiden laaksossa (hauta KV57). Lisäksi hänellä oli Sakkarassa keskeneräinen ei-kuninkaallinen hauta, joka kuitenkin jäi käyttämättä. Horemhebin kivinen sarkofagi on yhä haudassa, mutta muumiota ei ole löydetty. Sen sijaan haudasta on löydetty naisen ja vastasyntyneen lapsen muumiot, jotka ovat todennäköisesti kuuluneet Mutnodjmetille ja hänen lapselleen.
 Horemhebilla ei ollut perillisiä, joten 18. dynastia päättyi hänen kuolemaansa.
 Horemheb on myös keskeisessä sivuosassa Mika Waltarin romaanissa Sinuhe egyptiläinen.
 Lähteet
 Aiheesta muualla
 Egyptin faaraot
 Ennen ajanlaskumme alkua syntyneet
 Ennen ajanlaskumme alkua kuolleet


text:
 13.8.2021
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea
 L 291/120
 REGOLAMENTO DI ESECUZIONE (UE) 2021/1355 DELLA COMMISSIONE
 del 12 agosto 2021
 relativo ai programmi nazionali pluriennali di controllo dei residui di antiparassitari che devono essere stabiliti dagli Stati membri
 (Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)
 LA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA,
 visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea,
 visto il regolamento (UE) 2017/625 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 15 marzo 2017, relativo ai controlli ufficiali e alle altre attività ufficiali effettuati per garantire l'applicazione della legislazione sugli alimenti e sui mangimi, delle norme sulla salute e sul benessere degli animali, sulla sanità delle piante nonché sui prodotti fitosanitari, recante modifica dei regolamenti (CE) n. 999/2001, (CE) n. 396/2005, (CE) n. 1069/2009, (CE) n. 1107/2009, (UE) n. 1151/2012, (UE) n. 652/2014, (UE) 2016/429 e (UE) 2016/2031 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, dei regolamenti (CE) n. 1/2005 e (CE) n. 1099/2009 del Consiglio e delle direttive 98/58/CE, 1999/74/CE, 2007/43/CE, 2008/119/CE e 2008/120/CE del Consiglio, e che abroga i regolamenti (CE) n. 854/2004 e (CE) n. 882/2004 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, le direttive 89/608/CEE, 89/662/CEE, 90/425/CEE, 91/496/CEE, 96/23/CE, 96/93/CE e 97/78/CE del Consiglio e la decisione 92/438/CEE del Consiglio (regolamento sui controlli ufficiali) (1), in particolare l'articolo 19, paragrafo 3, lettera b),
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 Il regolamento (UE) 2017/625 disciplina i controlli ufficiali e le altre attività ufficiali effettuati dalle autorità competenti degli Stati membri al fine di verificare la conformità alla normativa dell'Unione nel settore, tra gli altri, della sicurezza alimentare in tutte le fasi della produzione, della trasformazione e della distribuzione. Esso prevede norme specifiche sui controlli ufficiali in relazione a sostanze il cui impiego può dar luogo a residui di tali sostanze negli alimenti e nei mangimi.
 (2)
 Il regolamento (UE) 2017/625 abroga l'articolo 30 del regolamento (CE) n. 396/2005 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio (2), che resta tuttavia applicabile fino al 14 dicembre 2022 a meno che un atto delegato non stabilisca una data anteriore. Tale articolo 30 stabilisce requisiti specifici relativi all'istituzione di programmi nazionali pluriennali di controllo dei residui di antiparassitari, basati sul rischio, con il duplice obiettivo di valutare l'esposizione dei consumatori e l'osservanza della legislazione.
 (3)
 L'articolo 110 del regolamento (UE) 2017/625 prevede requisiti minimi relativi al contenuto dei piani di controllo nazionali pluriennali. Tali requisiti non tengono tuttavia conto delle modalità pratiche specifiche necessarie per la preparazione dei programmi nazionali pluriennali di controllo dei residui di antiparassitari.
 (4)
 È pertanto opportuno stabilire requisiti specifici per la preparazione dei programmi nazionali pluriennali di controllo dei residui di antiparassitari, che dovrebbero far parte dei piani di controllo nazionali pluriennali. È particolarmente importante garantire che il regime di controllo tenga conto dell'obiettivo di valutare l'esposizione dei consumatori e l'osservanza del regolamento (CE) n. 396/2005.
 (5)
 Poiché l'articolo 30 del regolamento (CE) n. 396/2005 non sarà più applicato a decorrere dal 15 dicembre 2022, è opportuno che il presente regolamento si applichi a decorrere da tale data.
 (6)
 Le misure di cui al presente regolamento sono conformi al parere del comitato permanente per le piante, gli animali, gli alimenti e i mangimi,
 HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:
 Articolo 1
 Programmi nazionali pluriennali di controllo dei residui di antiparassitari
 1. Gli Stati membri stabiliscono programmi nazionali pluriennali di controllo dei residui di antiparassitari nell'ambito dei rispettivi piani di controllo nazionali pluriennali. Essi aggiornano ogni anno il loro programma pluriennale.
 2. I programmi sono basati sul rischio e volti a valutare l'esposizione dei consumatori e l'osservanza del regolamento (CE) n. 396/2005. In essi devono essere specificati almeno i seguenti elementi:
 a)
 i prodotti da sottoporre a campionamento;
 b)
 il numero di campioni da prelevare e di analisi da effettuare;
 c)
 gli antiparassitari da analizzare;
 d)
 i criteri applicati ai fini dell'elaborazione dei programmi, tra cui, in particolare:
 i)
 le combinazioni antiparassitario/prodotto da selezionare;
 ii)
 il numero di campioni prelevati, rispettivamente, per i prodotti della produzione nazionali e per quelli esteri;
 iii)
 il consumo dei prodotti, rispetto alla dieta alimentare nazionale;
 iv)
 il programma di controllo dell'Unione; e
 v)
 i risultati dei precedenti programmi nazionali pluriennali di controllo.
 3. Gli Stati membri partecipano al programma pluriennale di controllo dell'Unione conformemente all'articolo 29 del regolamento (CE) n. 396/2005.
 Articolo 2
 Entrata in vigore e applicazione
 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il ventesimo giorno successivo alla pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea.
 Esso si applica a decorrere dal 15 dicembre 2022.
 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 12 agosto 2021
 Per la Commissione
 La presidente
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 (1) GU L 095 del 7.4.2017, pag. 1.
 (2) Regolamento (CE) n. 396/2005 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 23 febbraio 2005, concernente i livelli massimi di residui di antiparassitari nei o sui prodotti alimentari e mangimi di origine vegetale e animale e che modifica la direttiva 91/414/CEE del Consiglio (GU L 70 del 16.3.2005, pag. 1).


text:
Farmec este cel mai mare producător de cosmetice din România și unul dintre cei mai importanți din Europa de Sud-Est. Compania a fost înființată în anul 1945 la Cluj-Napoca. Farmec S.A. a fost privatizată integral în anul 1995 prin metoda MEBO. Firma are capital românesc, singurul acționar fiind PAS Farmec.
 În prezent, Farmec deține peste 400 de produse cosmetice și de curățenie reprezentate de peste 15 branduri, printre cele mai cunoscute mărci ale firmei se află Gerovital H3, Ecovital, Farmec 16, Dermofarm, Triumf și Nufăr. În categoria cremelor și emulsiilor, Farmec deține mărci precum Gerovital Plant, Ana Aslan, Aslavital, Farmec și Doina, iar din categoria deodorantelor fac parte Obsesie, Athos, You & Me.
 10% din cifra de afaceri a companiei constă în exporturi, aceasta fiind prezentă pe toate continentele lumii.
 După anii 1990, Farmec a început să investească în a crea proprii rețele de distribuții prin cele 14 reprezentanțe deschise în: Cluj, București, Constanța, Brașov, Craiova, Focșani, Sibiu, Pitești, Piatra Neamț, Timișoara, Galați și Tg. Mureș.
 Număr de angajați:
 2017: 760
 2013: 600
 2005: 700
 Cifra de afaceri:
 Istoric
 În anul 1889 s-au înființat la Budapesta, laboratoarele Molnar Moser. După 54 de ani, s-a desprins un mic laborator – Mol-Mos – și a început activitatea la Cluj-Napoca. În anii 60', partidul comunist din România a decis că țara are nevoie pe partea de cosmetică de o fabrica care să intre în competiție cu marile concerne din vestul Europei. Fabrica din Cluj-Napoca a fost cea mai potrivită. În anul 1965, Farmec a produs pentru prima dată laptele Doina, produs folosit pentru hidratare și pentru îndepărtarea machiajului.
 În anii 1967, Farmec a cumpărat sau a încredințat prima formulă (cremă) de anti-aging numită Gerovital. Crema Gerovital este prima formulă de anti-aging din lume creată de Ana Aslan, cea care a descoperit beneficiile curative ale procainei prin tratamentul de lungă durată în doze mici. Gerovital H3 a fost primul medicament de anti-aging descoperit între anii 1946 și 1956. Dr. Ana Aslan a preparat vitamina H3 a cărei bază este procaina (substanța care a fost cunoscută în acea vreme ca un anestezic local). Primele produse Gerovital H3 au fost produse de către Farmec în 1967.
 Note
 Legături externe
 Site web oficial
 Distributor Gerovital in Italia
 Povestea Farmec Cluj-Napoca: produse cosmetice din comunism la mare căutare și astăzi pe trei continente, 8 noiembrie 2013, Adina Vlad, Adevărul
 Companii de cosmetice din România
 Companii din Cluj-Napoca
 Mărci românești
 Fondări în 1889