type: other

text: b' OFFICE OF\n INSPECTOR\n GENERAL\n UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE\n\n\n\n\n 21st Century Post Office:\nAligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n Management Advisory\n\n\n\n\n January 23, 2012\n\n\nReport Number DA-MA-12-002\n\x0c January 23, 2012\n\n 21st Century Post Office: Aligning with the\n National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative\n\n Report Number DA-MA-12-002\n\n\n\n\nIMPACT ON:\nU.S. Post Office Operations and WHAT THE OIG RECOMMENDED:\nFacilities. We recommend the vice president,\n Facilities, explore partnerships with\nWHY THE OIG DID THE AUDIT: commercial ISPs to increase broadband\nThis is part of a series of reports coverage in unserved areas by offering\naddressing the 21st Century Post Office. a master lease agreement to Postal\nOur objective was to assess the benefits Service real estate and installing\nof the U.S. Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s role in the \xe2\x80\x95Wireless Fidelity Hotspots\xe2\x80\x96 in unserved\nNational Broadband Infrastructure areas.\nInitiative.\n WHAT MANAGEMENT SAID:\nWHAT THE OIG FOUND: While management generally agreed\nBased on our analysis of the technical, that a public/private partnership could at\nengineering, and business planning some point further the interests of the\nissues involved, we concluded that National Broadband Infrastructure\nfor-profit Internet Service Providers Initiative, management disagreed with\n(ISPs) have provided thorough both recommendations, citing a need for\nbroadband coverage in the areas of the significant funding to further\nU.S. that would garner economic profit. infrastructure development and\nHowever, there are unserved areas incentivize ISPs in rural markets.\nwithin the U.S. \xe2\x80\x94 mostly in rural areas\n\xe2\x80\x94 due, in large part, to the negative AUDITORS\xe2\x80\x99 COMMENTS\nfinancial return involved when entering We do not plan to pursue these\nthose markets. recommendations through the formal\n audit resolution process and we believe\nThe private sector cannot change this that offering a master lease agreement\nbroadband coverage gap alone. The to such providers is preferable to the\nPostal Service can assist the National Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s current national\nBroadband Infrastructure Initiative agreement and will be instrumental in\nthrough a public/private partnership with developing an economic incentive to\ncommercial ISPs to provide facilities and attract infrastructure providers to\nland for the expansion of the broadband unserved areas.\ninfrastructure. A public/private venture\ncould make ISP operations more Link to review the entire report\naffordable for the underserved.\n\x0cJanuary 23, 2012\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: TOM A. SAMRA\n VICE PRESIDENT, FACILITIES\n\n\n\n\nFROM: Michael A. Magalski\n Deputy Assistant Inspector General\n for Support Operations\n\nSUBJECT: Management Advisory \xe2\x80\x93 21st Century Post Office: Aligning\n with the National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative\n (Report Number DA-MA-12-002)\n\nThis management advisory presents our analysis of advantages for the U.S. Postal\nService to align with the U.S. National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative (Project\nNumber 11YG027DA000). This self-initiated review addresses strategic risk.\n\nWe appreciate the cooperation and courtesies provided by your staff. If you have any\nquestions or need additional information, please contact Monique P. Colter, director,\nFacilities, Environmental and Sustainability, or me at 703-248-2100.\n\nAttachments\n\ncc: David E. Williams\n Corporate Audit and Response Management\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n TABLE OF CONTENTS\n\n\nIntroduction ..................................................................................................................... 1\n\nConclusion ...................................................................................................................... 2\n\nRecommendations .......................................................................................................... 3\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s Comments .............................................................................................. 3\n\nEvaluation of Management Comments ........................................................................... 3\n\nAppendix A: Additional Information ................................................................................. 5\n\n Background ................................................................................................................. 5\n\n Objective, Scope, and Methodology ............................................................................ 7\n\n Prior Audit Coverage ................................................................................................... 8\n\nAppendix B: Detailed Information .................................................................................... 9\n\n Unserved Communities Mostly Rural .......................................................................... 9\n\n Master Contracts for Broadband Expansion .............................................................. 10\n\n Wi-Fi at Post Offices.................................................................................................. 11\n\nAppendix C: Management\xe2\x80\x99s Comments ....................................................................... 15\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nIntroduction\n\nTo determine whether it is beneficial for the U.S. Postal Service to align with the\nU.S. National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative, the U.S. Postal Service Office of\nInspector General (OIG) reviewed the technical and economic aspects of broadband\npropagation. This is part of a series of reports addressing the 21 st Century Post Office.\nSee Appendix A for additional information about this self-initiated review that addresses\nstrategic risk.\n\nIn early 2009, Congress directed the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to\ndevelop a National Broadband Plan to ensure that every American has broadband\naccess. Congress also required this plan to include a detailed strategy for achieving\naffordability and maximum use of broadband.1\n\nTo fulfill Congress\xe2\x80\x99s mandate, the national plan, in part, seeks to ensure that the entire\nbroadband ecosystem (networks, devices, content, and applications) is healthy. The\nplan suggests that government can influence the broadband ecosystem in four ways:\n\n1. Design policies to ensure robust competition and, as a result, maximize consumer\n welfare, innovation, and investment.\n\n2. Ensure efficient allocation and management of the assets that government controls\n or influences, such as spectrum, poles, and rights-of-way, to encourage network\n upgrades and competitive entry.\n\n3. Reform current universal service mechanisms to support deployment of broadband\n and voice in high-cost areas, ensure that low-income Americans can afford\n broadband, and support efforts to boost adoption and utilization.\n\n4. Reform laws, policies, standards, and incentives to maximize the benefits of\n broadband in sectors that government influences significantly, such as public\n education, health care, and government operations.\n\nThe FCC set a 10-year timetable for implementing the plan. Currently, parts of the plan\nhave been implemented, such as those for researching broadband implementation and\ndispersing grants to state and private entities to further the development of middle-mile\nbroadband infrastructure and broadband education in unserved areas. However,\nrecommendations to expedite placement of wireless towers on federal government\nproperty and buildings and to explore public/private partnerships to improve broadband\nadoption have not yet begun to be implemented.2\n1\n Such a strategy would enable the advance of consumer welfare, civic participation, public safety and homeland\nsecurity, community development, health care delivery, energy independence and efficiency, education, employee\ntraining, private sector investment, entrepreneurial activity, job creation and economic growth, and other national\npurposes.\n2\n Recommendations 55 and 89 of the FCC National Broadband Plan.\n 1\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n\n\nConclusion\n\nWith a network of over 33,000 facilities nationwide, including rural areas that are\ncurrently underserved by broadband providers, the Postal Service could influence the\nbroadband ecosystem by using its expansive footprint of properties to encourage\nnetwork upgrades and competitive entry, especially in unserved or underserved areas.\n\nInternet Service Providers (ISPs) have provided thorough broadband coverage in the\nareas of the U.S. that would garner economic profit. However, there are still unserved\nareas within the U.S., mostly rural. Approximately 3 percent of all post offices nationally\nlie in wholly unserved areas.3 Lack of broadband access for these post offices can\nmean a diminished connection with the Postal Service operations network. Lack of\naccess for residents in these areas can create barriers to educational, cultural, medical,\nand economic resources.\n\nThe private sector cannot change this broadband gap alone. The Postal Service could\nassist the initiative through a public/private partnership with commercial ISPs. The\nPostal Service is in a position to develop a comprehensive lease agreement to provide\nPostal Service facilities and land for the expansion of the broadband infrastructure.\nOffering a comprehensive lease would streamline the leasing process, enabling\ninterested telecommunications carriers to more easily use Postal Service facilities to\nsupport their network sites through installation of network equipment.4 Such an\nagreement would lower the cost of entry for ISPs into sparsely populated areas. A\npublic/private venture would bring the Post Office value cost curve down and make ISP\noperations more affordable. These efforts would also provide the Postal Service a\nmoderate income stream upwards of $4.2 million annually.5 In addition, the Postal\nService could provide a community service by designating post offices in unserved\nareas as Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi) hotspots,6 providing wireless broadband access to the\npublic to generate additional foot traffic and goodwill.\n\n\n\n\n3\n Post offices tend to be in towns and rural towns are far more likely to have some form of broadband than the less\npopulated areas near and around them. As a result, a high percentage of post offices are in areas that are considered\nserved.\n4\n Network equipment includes towers, base stations, and antennas.\n5\n Concentrating solely on rural unserved areas, we calculated a very conservative lease revenue estimate based on\nrepresentative rural lease rates for the 1,000 post offices in unserved areas.\n6\n Wi-Fi is a technology for wirelessly connecting electronic devices over a relatively short range using the Institute of\nElectrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11 standard. IEEE 802.11 is a set of standards for implementing\nwireless LAN computer communication in the 2.4, 3.6, and 5 GHz frequency bands.\n\n\n 2\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nRecommendations\n\nWe recommend the vice president, Facilities, explore partnerships with commercial\nInternet service providers to increase broadband coverage in unserved areas by:\n\n1. Offering a master lease agreement to Postal Service real estate.\n\n2. Installing Wireless Fidelity hotspots in unserved areas.\n\nManagement\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\nManagement was in general agreement that a public/private partnership could at some\npoint further the interests of the National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative. However,\nmanagement further clarified in correspondence received January 6, 2012 that they\ndisagreed with the first recommendation to increase broadband coverage in unserved\nareas by offering a master lease agreement to Postal Service real estate. In addition,\nthey disagreed with the recommendation to install Wi-Fi hotspots in unserved areas.\n\nManagement further stated that the Postal Service already has a national agreement in\nplace with a wireless infrastructure company that has standard lease agreements in\nplace for wireless and ISPs. Management expressed the opinion that it is unrealistic to\nexpect rural communication tower development and subsequent coverage to be\nenhanced by Postal Service-owned properties any further than its current and regular\ncourse of dealings allows. Specifically, a recent review by the Postal Service\ndetermined that, at this time, less than 100 facilities would be viable for communication\ntower development. The locations identified would not enhance coverage in currently\nunserved or rural markets. Because the return on investment for private companies is\ntypically unachievable in a rural market, the challenge is not making Postal Service\nproperties available; it is developing an economic model that is attractive to both the\ninfrastructure provider and the carrier end-user.\n\nConsequently, it is management\xe2\x80\x99s opinion that rural "Wi-Fi Hotspots," tower\ndevelopment, and carrier co-location thereon can be furthered only with significant\nalternative funding sources, including significant government subsidies. See Appendix C\nfor management\xe2\x80\x99s comments in their entirety.\n\nEvaluation of Management Comments\n\nManagement disagreed with our recommendations. We do not plan to pursue these\nrecommendations through the formal audit resolution process.\n\nWe understand that the Postal Service is currently offering Postal Service-owned\nproperty for telecommunication leasing and we agree that further development of\nbroadband coverage in rural regions would require incentives to attract infrastructure\nproviders. However, we believe that offering a master lease agreement to providers\ncould be beneficial in developing such an economic incentive. Furthermore, we\n\n\n 3\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\ndisagree that the Postal Service national agreement is equal to the master lease\nagreement we recommended.\n\nWe examined the Postal Service review mentioned in management\xe2\x80\x99s comments. This\nreview determined that less than 100 facilities would be viable for communication tower\ndevelopment based on anticipated return on investment. This document further\nsupports the need for incentives to increase broadband propagation in unserved areas.\n\nUsing the master lease we recommended, an ISP can avoid the cost and effort of\nnegotiating individual leases for numerous sites, and could possibly receive preferred\nlease rates. While reducing the prices for leases on government property may reduce\nfees paid to the Postal Service, the decline in prices may also increase the number of\ncompanies that acquire leases on government property. Also, our recommendation to\noffer a master lease directly to ISPs would eliminate the need to work through a third\nparty to access the Postal Service properties or construct towers and thus, could\nexpand the potential pool of investors.\n\nWe agree that government funding would benefit the National Broadband Infrastructure\nInitiative through tower development and Wi-Fi hotspot installation. Postal Service\ncomprehensive leasing can operate in conjunction with federal broadband infrastructure\nintegration programs such as the U.S. Department of Agriculture\xe2\x80\x99s Rural Broadband\nLoan Program. This program is designed to provide loans for funding the cost of\nconstruction, improvement, and acquisition of facilities and equipment to provide\nbroadband service to eligible rural communities. We believe the Postal Service should\npursue discussions with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the National\nTelecommunications and Information Administration, and related government agencies\nto determine whether such funding could be made available.\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n Appendix A: Additional Information\n\nBackground\n\nThe American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 20097 directed the FCC to\ndevelop a national broadband plan \xe2\x80\x95to ensure that all people of the United States have\naccess to broadband capability and establish benchmarks for meeting that goal.\xe2\x80\x96 The\nNational Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), in conjunction with\nthe FCC, defines \xe2\x80\x95unserved\xe2\x80\x96 by broadband as any community in which speeds of\n3 megabits per second (mbps)/768 kilobits per second (kbps) are unavailable.8\n\nPresident Obama set the goal of enabling businesses to provide high-speed wireless\nservices to at least 98 percent of all Americans within 5 years. The rollout of the next\ngeneration of high-speed wireless, the fourth-generation or \xe2\x80\x954G\xe2\x80\x96 technology leading\ncarriers are now deploying in the U.S., promises considerable benefits to our economy\nand society. More than 10 times faster than current high-speed wireless services, this\ntechnology promises to benefit all Americans; bolster public safety; and spur innovation\nin wireless services, equipment, and applications. Private investments are extending 4G\nto most of the nation, but are leaving some rural areas behind.\n\nThe Postal Service has a network of over 33,000 facilities nationwide. Due to declining\nmail volume and the resulting financial condition of the Postal Service, facility\noptimization has become a widely discussed topic. Through various optimization and\nconsolidation programs, the Postal Service is working to generate revenue and reduce\nrent obligations and operational costs. To further the facility optimization goal, the Postal\nService is in a position to use its large facility footprint to support the expansion of\nbroadband networks.9 Broadband networks require land sufficient for housing the tower,\nantenna, and installation of necessary backhaul10 for carrier-grade wireless\ntechnologies.11 Illustration 1 demonstrates a broadband architecture with antennas and\na base station on a self-supporting mast located either on the building rooftop or\nalongside the building.\n\n\n\n\n7\n ARRA, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 516 (February 19, 2009).\n8\n Refers to data transmission stream of 3 mbps per second downstream (from the Internet to the user\xe2\x80\x99s computer)\nand 768 kbps per second upstream (from the user\xe2\x80\x99s computer to the Internet).\n9\n Real estate that the Postal Service rents rather than owns may not be eligible if construction of towers and\nsubleasing is limited by lease agreement.\n10\n The portion of a communications network that transmits data between end points (such as tower locations) and a\npublic Internet connection point or another dedicated network location.\n11\n A network capable of providing service at a level that consumers expect from commercial carriers. A typical carrier\ngrade technology is Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX), a 4G wireless broadband technology.\nIt supports higher data rates than 3G technologies. In technical terms, WiMAX refers to IEEE standard 802.16, which\ndictates the wireless delivery rate of 40 Mbit/s and 1GB using the newest IEEE 802.16M standard.\n\n\n 5\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n Illustration 1 \xe2\x80\x93 Tower/Antenna Architecture\n\n\n\n\nThe concept of providing Postal Service facility space for installation of\ntelecommunications equipment is not new. The Postal Service currently has a master\ncontract with American Tower to sublease antenna space to wireless service providers.\nThrough this contract, the Postal Service is leasing to wireless providers such as AT&T,\nSprint, Verizon, Cingular, and T-Mobile. The Postal Service is using 58 of its facilities\nnationwide to house 98 antennas, providing annual rent revenue of $726,376. In\naddition, the Postal Service is currently in discussions with a communication technology\ncompany to explore the possibility of leasing Postal Service property to\ntelecommunications providers for antenna usage.\n\nThe idea of Wi-Fi signal propagation is well-established. In 2007, Meraki, a cloud\nnetworking company, set up indoor and outdoor wireless routers to offer public Wi-Fi for\nhomes, parks, and local businesses in San Francisco. To further propagate the wireless\nsignal, Meraki offered an inexpensive repeater12 to allow consumers and communities\nto start creating their own networks.\n\nCurrently, 86 percent of public libraries nationwide provide Internet access to their\npatrons. In addition, many coffee shops and fast food restaurant chains provide Wi-Fi\naccess to customers. Hotspots are considered a valuable productivity tool for students,\nbusiness people, and other frequent users of network services. A Wi-Fi hotspot can\nsupplement and/or substitute for a broadband internet connection at home or work.\nHotspots are especially valuable in providing broadband access to users who otherwise\nwould not have access to Internet connections due to location or cost. Unfortunately,\nWi-Fi network coverage is rarely found in rural areas. Consequently, wireless hotspots\nare in demand.\n\nWi-Fi networks require a broadband high-speed Internet connection (cable or DSL13), a\nrouter/access point/gateway device,14 and access to a computer (for configuring the\nbroadcast device). Some broadcast devices allow for the cable broadband to be\nplugged directly into the back of the device. Others will require a modem. In this case,\n12\n A network repeater is a device used to expand the boundaries of a Wi-Fi local area network (LAN). Meraki\xe2\x80\x99s\nrepeater was offered at $49. An outdoor version with a range of up to 700 feet was also available for $99.\n13\n Digital subscriber line.\n14\n The hardware device that broadcasts the connection via radio waves to wireless enabled devices.\n\n\n 6\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nthe broadcast signal cable plugs into the modem and an ethernet cable connects the\nmodem to the broadcast device (see Illustration 2).\n\n Illustration 2 \xe2\x80\x93 Wireless LAN\n\n\n\n\nObjective, Scope, and Methodology\n\nOur objective was to determine whether it is beneficial for the Postal Service to align\nwith the U.S. National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative. The scope of the review is\nPostal Service involvement in broadband propagation within the U.S. This is part of a\nseries of reports addressing the 21st Century Post Office.\n\nWe initially considered two approaches to the Postal Service assisting in the National\nBroadband Infrastructure Initiative: 1) serving as an ISP, providing broadband service to\ncustomers in unserved areas and 2) partnering with an ISP to provide space for\nbroadband tower placement in exchange for bandwidth usage for Postal Service\nfunctions.\n\nThe Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act15 specifically states that the\nPostal Service may only provide \xe2\x80\x95non-postal\xe2\x80\x96 services offered as of January 1, 2006.\nProviding Internet service would qualify as a prohibited non-postal service, as the Postal\nService did not provide Internet service as of 2006. However, there is no law or postal\npolicy that would preclude partnering with an ISP to provide non-postal services to the\npublic. The Postal Service would facilitate the ISP\'s provision of services. The Postal\nService regularly enters into "strategic alliances" with private entities. A partnership with\nan ISP could fall under this umbrella as long as the contract allows competition between\nISPs and does not provide the Postal Service with an unfair competitive advantage.\nConsequently, we focused our review on the latter approach of a public/private\npartnership.\n\n15\n Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, Public Law No. 109\xe2\x80\x93435 (December 20, 2006).\n\n\n 7\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nTo answer our objective, we researched the National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative,\nbroadband technology, and broadband implementation nationwide. The OIG employed\na third-party contractor, a management and technology consulting firm with specialized\ntechnical expertise, to assess the feasibility and benefits of the Postal Service aligning\nwith the initiative. Specifically, we requested the subject matter expert to:\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Identify geographic demand for broadband Internet.\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Determine technical needs for the Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s involvement in the National\n Broadband Infrastructure Initiative.\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 Analyze the economic and operational feasibility of the Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s involvement\n in the National Broadband Infrastructure Initiative.\n\nWe conducted this review from April 2011 through January 2012 in accordance with the\nCouncil of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, Quality Standards for\nInspection and Evaluation. As part of this review, we relied upon the work of a\nmanagement and technology consulting firm to provide technical data and analysis. We\ndiscussed our observations and conclusions with management on November 8, 2011,\nand included their comments where appropriate.\n\nWe assessed the reliability of Postal Service facility data by comparing a sample of data\nfrom the electronic Facilities Management System database and the Facility Database\nto verify accuracy. We obtained evidence of the qualifications and independence of the\nconsulting firm\xe2\x80\x99s members. In addition, we assessed the reliability of the consulting\nfirm\xe2\x80\x99s data by reviewing their research report and examining support documentation.\nWe determined that the data from the aforementioned sources were sufficiently reliable\nfor the purposes of this report.\n\nPrior Audit Coverage\n\nWe did not identify any prior work that directly relates to the review objective.\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n Appendix B: Detailed Information\n\nUnserved Communities Mostly Rural\n\nAccording to the FCC, 98.3 percent of urban populations nationwide currently have\naccess to broadband technology16; however, only 84.8 percent of rural populations\nnationwide have access. This disparity is further illustrated by the broadband map\ndemonstrating the difference in broadband speed availability between rural and urban\nareas within each state. For example, in California, over 31 percent more of the\npopulation in urban areas have access to broadband than those in rural areas while, in\nFlorida, the availability gap between urban and rural areas is negligible (see Illustration\n3).\n\n Illustration 3 \xe2\x80\x93 National Broadband Map: Difference in Speed Availability\n\n\n\n\n16\n At download speeds of greater than 3 mbps and upload speeds of greater than 768 kbps.\n\n\n 9\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nStates with the greatest discrepancy in urban and rural area broadband availability are\nshown in Table 1 below.\n\n Table 1 \xe2\x80\x93 States with Largest Discrepancy in Broadband Availability\n Between Urban and Rural Areas\n Percentage of Discrepancy in\n Urban and Rural Broadband States\n Availability\n California, Alaska, Idaho, Indiana, and West\n Greater than 31%\n Virginia\n New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Alabama,\n Between 17 and 30%\n Kentucky, Virginia, and Wisconsin\n\n\nTo determine how many Postal Service facilities are in areas defined as unserved by\nbroadband under NTIA\'s and the FCC\'s definition, we tasked the contracted subject\nmatter experts with sampling and analyzing the following representative states:\n\n \xef\x82\xa7 Idaho and Wyoming: representative of largely rural northwestern states.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Utah: representative of largely rural southwestern states.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Maine: representative of largely rural eastern states.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Maryland: representative of more densely populated eastern states.\n \xef\x82\xa7 Alaska: representative of rural areas overall.\n\nUsing NTIA and Census Bureau data, along with a data set of all Postal Service\nlocations in the U.S., the contracted team was able to estimate the number of Postal\nService facilities in the unserved areas of those states. Extrapolation of the data\nprovided us with a nationwide estimate that approximately 3 percent of all Postal\nService facilities are located in unserved areas.\n\nMaster Contracts for Broadband Expansion\n\nThe Postal Service has the opportunity to offer a comprehensive lease agreement to\nISPs in the form of a master lease.17 Such an agreement would allow the lessee, under\nthe same terms and conditions as the original acquisition, to acquire any additional\nPostal Service real estate for the installation of network equipment.\n\nAn ISP can avoid the cost and effort of negotiating individual leases for potentially\nhundreds of sites, and would possibly receive preferred lease rates. A master leasing\nprocess would have significant benefits beyond reducing ISP transaction costs. While\nreducing the prices for leases on government property may reduce fees paid to the\nPostal Service, the decline in prices may also greatly increase the number of companies\nthat acquire leases on government property. Postal Service comprehensive leasing can\noperate in conjunction with federal broadband infrastructure integration programs such\n17\n Agreement that allows a company to acquire equipment or real estate in multiple locations without having to\nexecute a new lease each time.\n\n\n 10\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nas the U.S. Department of Agriculture\xe2\x80\x99s Rural Broadband Loan Program. This program\nis designed to provide loans for funding the costs of construction, improvement, and\nacquisition of facilities and equipment to provide broadband service to eligible rural\ncommunities.18 Such a loan program can increase the incentive for ISPs to enter rural\nmarkets. In any case, the increased deployment of broadband should stimulate\ninvestment and benefit society.\n\nEstablishing master leases directly addresses a recommendation made by both the\ntelecommunications industry and the FCC to reduce the complexity and shorten the\ntimeframe for federal facility licensing. In addition, it aligns with the National Broadband\nPlan\xe2\x80\x99s goal that the federal government ensures efficient management of assets by\ndeveloping contracts to expedite the placement of wireless towers on federal property\nand buildings.\n\nThis comprehensive leasing scenario would demonstrate that the Postal Service is\nresponsive to the FCC\xe2\x80\x99s goals to facilitate private sector investment and streamline the\nprocess for expansion into previously cost-prohibitive rural areas. These efforts could\nalso provide the Postal Service a moderate income stream upwards of $4.2 million\nannually.19\n\nWi-Fi at Post Offices\n\nBecause each Post Office facility is different, a Wi-Fi network would need to be\nindividually engineered for each site. A public Wi-Fi signal would cover the interior of the\nfacility and varying distances surrounding the building. Wi-Fi is a line-of-sight\ntechnology, so obstructions such as buildings, hills, and trees would limit the signal\npropagation. Signal reception is also influenced by the end user\xe2\x80\x99s device. In areas with\nno visual obstructions, a Wi-Fi signal could reach a mobile device .5 miles away, and\nreach a fixed wireless device as far as 1.5 miles away.\n\n\n\n\n18\n In addition, the Rural Broadband Loan can be used for the cost of leasing facilities required to provide service at\nthe broadband lending speed if such lease qualifies as a capital lease under Generally Accepted Accounting\nPrinciples.\n19\n If we concentrate solely on rural unserved areas, we can calculate a very conservative lease revenue estimate\nbased on representative rural lease rates for the 1,000 post offices in unserved areas.\n\n\n 11\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nExamples of the effects of terrain on signal propagation are illustrated by the following\npost offices located in unserved areas:\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 The Unalaska Post Office located at 82 Airport Beach Road, Unalaska, AK 99685;\n and the Dutch Harbor Post Office located at 1745 Airport Beach Road, Dutch\n Harbor, AK 99692 are just over 1 mile apart and are close to many of the town\xe2\x80\x99s\n community anchor institutions. The hilly terrain diminishes the Wi-Fi signals to less\n than .5 miles. Illustration 4 provides a visual demonstration.\n\n Illustration 4 \xe2\x80\x93 Unalaska-Dutch Harbor Wi-Fi Maximum Signal Reach with\n Topography\n\n\n\n\n 12\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n\n\n\xef\x82\xa7 The Fort Duchesne Post Office located at 7299 U.S. 40, Fort Duchesne, UT 84026,\n is in one of the residential developments, 1 mile north of the area\xe2\x80\x99s larger residential\n development. The Post Office is on a flat terrain. A Wi-Fi device would provide signal\n coverage for the smaller residential area and the supermarket, approximately a .5\n mile-range. However, moderate tree cover would block the signal to the larger\n residential development and tribal offices. Illustration 5 provides a visual\n demonstration.\n\n Illustration 5 \xe2\x80\x93 Fort Duchesne Wi-Fi Maximum Signal Reach with Topography\n\n\n\n\nThe Postal Service may be able to provide a vital public service to residents who lack\nbroadband access and generate substantial goodwill. Particularly in unserved areas, the\nPostal Service could provide Wi-Fi connections, allowing residents to access a basic\nlevel of Internet connectivity similar to what is offered at coffee shops and public\nlibraries. The Postal Service could further expand this Wi-Fi hotspot model by partnering\nwith local community groups to expand the wireless coverage provided. The community\ncould purchase inexpensive, off-the-shelf equipment to extend the Postal Service\xe2\x80\x99s\nwireless signal into a community-wide network.\n\nThe goodwill created by this endeavor has the potential to attract partnerships with local\nor national commercial ISPs. Such partnerships could be in the form of the\naforementioned master lease, with a donation of bandwidth for the community Wi-Fi or,\nmore simply, a donation of Internet service. Additional revenue for the Postal Service\ncould be generated through advertising as a part of the service provided. In terms of\neconomic feasibility, this model would require limited Postal Service investment to\n\n\n 13\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\nprovide each participating Postal Service site with the necessary connectivity to\naccommodate bandwidth demands.\n\n\n\n\n 14\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n Appendix C: Management\xe2\x80\x99s Comments\n\n\n\n\n 15\n\x0c21st Century Post Office: DA-MA-12-002\n Aligning with the National Broadband\n Infrastructure Initiative\n\n\n\n\n 16\n\x0c'


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21987A0130(01)
 Συμφωνία για την τροποποίηση της συμφωνίας μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Οικονομικής Κοινότητας και της κυβέρνησης της Δημοκρατίας της Ισημερινής Γουινέας σχετικά με την αλιεία στα ανοικτά των ακτών της Ισημερινής Γουινέας, που υπογράφηκε στο Μαλαμπό στις 15 Ιουνίου 1984
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα αριθ. L 029 της 30/01/1987 σ. 0003
 ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΑ για την τροποποίηση της συμφωνίας μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Οικονομικής Κοινότητας και της κυβέρνησης της Δημοκρατίας της Ισημερινής Γουινέας σχετικά με την αλιεία στα ανοικτά ακτών της Ισημερινής Γουινέας, που υπογράφηκε στο Μαλαμπό στις 15 Ιουνίου 1984 Αρθρο 1 Το παράρτημα που αναφέρεται στο άρθρο 4 και το πρωτόκολλο που αναφέρεται στο άρθρο 6 της συμφωνίας μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Οικονομικής Κοινότητας και της κυβέρνησης της Δημοκρατίας της Ισημερινής Γουινέας σχετικά με την αλιεία στα ανοικτά των ακτών της Ισημερινής Γουινέας, που υπογράφηκε στις 15 Ιουνίου 1984, αντικαθίσταται από τα κείενα που περιλαμβάνονται στο παράρτημα της παρούσας συμφωνίας . Αρθρο 2 Η παρούσα συμφωνία, συντάσσεται σε δύο αντίτυπα στην αγγλική, γαλλική, γερμανική, δανική, ελληνική, ισπανική, ιταλική, ολλανδική και πορτογαλική γλώσσα και όλα τα κείμενα είναι εξίσου αυθεντικά; αρχίζει να ισχύει την ημέρα της υπογραφής της . Εφαρμόζεται από τις 27 Ιουνίου 1986 μέχρι τις 26 Ιουνίου 1989 . ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ ΟΠΟΙ ΑΣΚΗΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΛΙΕΙΑΣ ΣΤΗ ΖΩΝΗ ΑΛΙΕΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΙΣΗΜΕΡΙΝΗΣ ΓΟΥΙΝΕΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΣΚΑΦΗ ΠΟΥ ΦΕΡΟΥΝ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΚΡΑΤΩΝ ΜΕΛΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΑΣ Α.Διατυπώσεις που εφαρμόζονται στην αίτηση και την έκδοση των αδειών Οι διαδικασίες που εφαρμόζονται στις αιτήσεις και την έκδοση των αδειών που επιτρέπουν στα σκάφη, τα οποία φέρουν σημαία ενός των κρατών μελών της ΚΟινότητας, να αλιεύουν στη ζώνη αλιείας της Ισημερινής Γουινέας είναι οι ακόλουθες : Οι αρμόδιες αρχές της Κοινότητας υποβάλλουν, μέσω των αρχών της Επιτροπής των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων στην Ισημερινή Γουινέα, στο Υπουργείο Υδάτων, Δασών και Αναδάσωσης της Δημοκρατίας της Ισημερινής Γουινέας, μια αίτηση για κάθε σκάφος που επιθυμεί να αλιεύσει δυνάμει της συμφωνίας, τουλάχιστον τριάντα ημέρες πριν από την αιτούμενη ημερομηνία έναξης ισχύους της αδείας . Οι αιτήσεις υποβάλλονται σύμφωνα με τα έντυπα που παρέχουν για το σκοπό αυτό οι αρμόδιες αρχές της Δημοκρατίας της Ισημερινής Γουνιέας, των οποίων υπόδειγμα επισυνάπτεται . Κάθε αίτηση αδείας συνοδεύεται από την απόδειξη πληρωμής για τη διάρκεια ισχύους της στο λογαριασμό που αναφέρεται στο άρθρο 3 του πρωτοκόλλου . Οι άδειες, αφού υπογραφούν, χορηγούνται από τις αρχές της Ισημερινής Γουινέας στους εφοπλιστές ή τους αντιπροσώπους τους . Η άδεια πρέπει να φυλάσσεται συνεχώς επί του σκάφους . 1.Διατάξεις που ισχύουν για τις μηχανότρατες α)Οι άδειες για τις μηχανότρατες εκδίδονται για περιόδους ενός έτους, έξι μηνών ή τριών μηνών . Μπορούν να ανανεωθούν . β)Τα τέλη για τις ετήσιες άδειεσ καθορίζονται ως εξής : -55 ECU ανά κόρο ολικής χωρητικότητας ( κοχ ) ετησίως για τα ιχθυαλιευτικά, -75 ECU ανά κοχ ετησίως για τα αλιευτικά γαρίδας . Τα τέλη για τις άδειες μικρότερης περιόδου ισχύος καθορίζονται prorata temporis . 2.Διατάξεις που ισχύουν για τα τονοαλιευτικά α)Τα τέλη καθορίζονται σε 20 ECU ανά τόνο ψαριών που αλιεύθηκαν στην αλιευτική ζώνη της Ισημερινής Γουινέας . β)Οι άδειεσ για τα θυνναλιευτικά εκδίδονται αφού καταβληθεί στο Υπουργείο Υδάτων, Δασών και Αναδάσωσης κατ'^αποκοπή ποσό 1^000 ECU ανά θυνναλιευτικό ( με γρι-γρι ) ετησίως και 200 ECU ανά τονοαλιευτικό ( με καλάμια ) ετησίως, που ισοδυναμεί με τα τέλη για : -50 τόνους τόνου που αλιεύονται ανά θυνναλιευτικό ( με γρι-γρι ) ετησίως, -10 τόνους τόνου που αλιεύονται ανά θυνναλιευτικό ( με καλάμια ) ετησίως . Μια προσωρινή κατάσταση των τελών που οφείλονται για την αλιευτική περίοδο, συντάσσεται από την Επιτροπή των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων στο τέλος τάθε ημερολογιακού έτους, βάσει των δηλώσεων των αλιευμάτων κάθε εφοπλιστή οι οποίες ανακοινώνονται ταυτόχρονα στις αρχές της Ισημερινής Γουινέας και στις αρμόδιες υπηρεσίες της Επιτροπής . Το αντίστοιχο ποσό καταβάλλεται από κάθε εφοπλιστή στο Υπουργείο Υδάτων, Δασών και Αναδάσωσης, το αργότερο στις 31 Μαρτίου του επόμενου έτους, σύμφωνα με τη διαδικασία πληρωμής που αναφέρεται στο άρθρο 3 του πρωτοκόλλου . Η οριστική κατάσταση των οφειλόμενων τελών συντάσσεται από την Επιτροπή, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη την εξακρίβωση του όγκου των αλιευμάτων που πραγματοποιείται από ειδικευμένο επιστημονικό οργανισμό στην περιοχή . Η οριστική αυτή κατάσταση ανακοινώνεται στις αρχές της Ισημερινής Γουινέας και κοινοποιείται στους εφοπλιστές, στους οποίους δίνεται προθεσμία τριάντα ημερών για να εκπληρώσουν τις χρηματικές τους υποχρέωσεις . Ωστόσο, αν στην κατάσταση εμφαίνεται ποσό κατώτερο από το ποσό της προκαταβολής που αναφέρεται ανωτέρω, το υπόλοιπο δεν επιστρέφεται στον εφοπλιστή . Β.Δήλωση των αλιευμάτων 1 . ^Τα σκάφη τα οποία επιτρέπεται να αλιεύουν στα ύδατα της Ισημερινής Γουινέας, στα πλαίσια της συμφωνίας, υποχρεούνται να ανακοινώνουν τα αλιεύματα στο Υπουργείο Υδάτων, Δασών και Αναδάσωσης, στέλνοντας αντίγραφο στις αρχές της Επιτροπής στην Ισημερινή Γουινέα, με τον ακόλουθο τρόπο : -οι μηχανότρατες και τα θυνναλιευτικά ( με καλάμια ) δηλώνουν τα αλιεύματά τους βάσει του συνημμένου υποδείγματος . Οι δηλώσεις αυτές είναι μηνιαίες και πρέπει να γνωστοποιούνται τουλάχιστον μια φορά ανά τρίμηνο, -τα θυνναλιευτικά ( με γρι-γρι ) ανακοινώνουν στο ραδιογωνικό σταθμό του Annobon ( κωδικός : 3 CA-24 ) το αποτέλεσμα κάθε αλίευσης με τράτα . 2 . ^Κάθε σκάφος της Κοινότητας που αλιεύει στην αλιευτική ζώνη της Ισημερινής Γουινέας επιτρέπει και διευκολύνει την επιβίβαση στο σκάφος και την εκπλήρωση των καθηκόντων κάθε υπαλλήλου της Ισημερινής Πουινέας ο οποίος είναι υπεύθυνος για την επιθεώρηση και τον έλεγχο . Η παραμονή του υπαλλήλου αυτού επί του σκάφους δεν πρέπει να υπερβαίνει το χρόνο που ειαναι αναγκαίος για την εξακρίβωση των αλιευμάτων με δειγματοληψία καθώς και για κάθε άλλη επιθεώρηση σχετικά με τις αλιευτικές δραστηριότητες . 3 . ^Σε περίπτωση μη τήρησης των διατάξεων αυτών, η κυβέρνηση της Ισημερινής Γουινέας διατηρεί το δικαίωμα αναστολής της αδείας του σχετικού σκάφους έως ότου τηρηθούν οι διατυπώσεις . Γ.εκφόρτωση των αλιευμάτων Οι μηχανότρατες οι οποίες επιτρέπεται να αλιεύνου στη ζώνη της Ισημερινής Γουινέας συμβάλλουν στον εφοδιασμό σε ψάρια του τοπικού πληθυσμού, εκφορτώνοντας : -τα ιχθυαλιευτικά : 6^000 χιλιόγραμμα ψαριών ανά σκάφος ετησίως, -τα αλιευτικά γαρίδας : 4^000 χιλιόγραμμα ψαριών ανά σκάφος ετησίως, στην τιμή που καθορίζει το Υπουργειο Υδάτων, Δασών και Αναδάσωσης σε συμφωνία με τον εφοπλιστή, βάσει των τιμών της τοπικής αγοράς και σε συνεργασία με τις αρχές της Επιτροπής στην Ισημερινή Γουινέα . Σε περίπτωση ανανέωσης της αδείας, το τέλος μπορεί να μειωθεί ανάλογα, μέχρι της αξίας των ψαρίων που έχουν εκφορτωθεί . Οι εκφορτώσεις μπορούν να πραγματοποιούνται μεμονωμένα ή συλλογικά, στο λιμάνι της Ισημερινής Γουινέας που εξυπηρετεί περισσότερο τους αλιείς . Η μη τήρηση της υποχρέωσης εκφόρτωσης συνεπάγεται επιβολή των ακόλουθων κυρώσεων από τις αρχές της Ισημερινής Γουινέας : -πρόττιμο 1^000 ECU ανά μη εκφορτωθέντα τόνο και -αφαίρεση και μη αναωέωση της αδείας του σχετικού σκάφους ή άλλου σκάφους του ίδιου εφοπλιστή . Δ.Ναυτολόγηση 1 . ^Οι εφοπλιστές μηχανοτρατών στις οποίες χορηγούνται οι άδειες αλιείας που προβλέονται στη συμφωνία συμβάλουν στην πρακτική επαγγελματική κατάρτιση των υπηκόων της Ισημερινής Γουινέας, κάτω από τις ακόλουθες συνθήκες και μέσα στα εξής όρια : -ένας ναύτης-αλιέας για τις μηχανότρατες χωρητικότητας κατώτερης από ή ίσης με 300 κοχ, -δύο ναύτες-αλιείς για τις μηχανότρατες χωρητικότητας ανώτερης των 300 κοχ . 2 . ^Ο μισθός των ναυτών-αλιέων καθορίζεται κατόπιν συμφωνίας μεταξύ των εφοπλιστών και των αρχών της Ισημερινής Γουινέας και επιβαρύνει τους εφοπλιστές . Σε περίπτωση που η Ισημερινή ουινέα δεν έχει να προτείνει υποψηφίους, οι υποχρεώσεις αυτές αντικαθίστανται από κατ'^αποκοπή ποσό ίσο με το 30^% των μισθών των εν λόγω ναυτών . Το ποσό αυτό χρησιμοποιείται για την κατάρτιση των ναυτών-αλιέων της Ισημερινής Γουινέας και καταβάλλεται στο λογαριασμό που υποδεικνύυν οι αρμόδιες αρχές της . Ε.Αλιευτικές ζώνες Οι μηχανότρατες με ψυκτικά μηχανήματα που αναφέρονται στο άρθρο 1 του πρωτοκόλλου, έχουν την άδεια να ασκούν τις αλιευτικές τους δραστηριότητες στα ύδατα που βρίσκονται πέραν των 6 ναυτικών μιλίων . Παράρτημα Ι του νόμου περί αλιείας ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΑΛΙΕΥΜΑΤΑ ΑΠΟ ΒΙΟΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΗ ΑΛΙΕΙΑ ( Νόμος περί αλιείας, άρθρο 42 ) 1.ίΟνομα και αριθμός νηολόγησης του σκάφους : 2.Ιθαγένεια : 3.Τύπος του σκάφους : ( δηλαδή : φρέσκο ψάρι, τόνος, κλπ .) 4.ίΟνομα του πλοιάρχου ή του κυβερνήτη του σκάφους : 5.ίΑδεια αλιείας εκδοθείσα από : Διάρκεια ισχύος : 6.Τύπος αλιείας : 7.Ηημερομηνία εξόδου από τον λιμένα : Ημερομηνία εισόδου στον λιμένα : 8.Αποτέλεσμα κάθε αλίευσης με τράτα : ΗμερομηνίαΖώνη αλιείαςΑλιευθέντα είδηΤόνοιΛιμένας εκφόρτωσης Ο υπογράφων ........, πλοίαρχος ή κυβερνήτης του ανωτέρω σκάφους ή ο αντιπρόσωπός του, δηλώνω ότι τα ανωτέρω στοιχεία είναι αληθή; τούτο επικυρώνεται από τον παρατηρητή της κυβέρνησης . Επικυρώνεται από τονΟ πλοίρχος παρατηρητή της κυβέρνησηςή ο κυβερνήτης ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΙΣΗΜΕΡΙΝΗΣ ΓΟΥΙΝΕΑΣ ΕΝΤΥΠΟ ΑΙΤΗΣΗΣ ΣΛΕΙΑΣ ΑΛΙΕΙΑΣ 1 . Διάρκεια ισχύος : απόμέχρι 2 . ίΟνομα του σκάφους : 3 . ίΟνομα του εφοπλιστή: 4 . Λιμένας και αριθμός νηολόγησης : 5 . Τύπος αλιείας : 6 . Επιτρεπόμενο μέζεθος ματιών : 7 . Μήκος του σκάφους : 8 . Πλάτος : 9 . Ολική χωρητικότητα : 10 . Χωρητικότητα των αμπαριών : 11 . Δύναμη κινητήρα : 12 . Είδος κατασκευής : 13 . Σύνηθες δυναμικό του πληρώματος του σκάφους : 14 . Ραδιοηλεκτρικός εξοπλισμός : 15 . ίΟνομα του πλοιάρχου : Οι ανωτέρω πληροφορίες παρέχονται με την πληροφορίες παρέχονται με την πλήρη ευθύνη του εφοπλιστή ή του αντιποσώπου του . Ημερομηνία της αίτησης :


type: legislation

text:
 13.8.2013
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 217/30
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) NR 774/2013
 z dnia 12 sierpnia 2013 r.
 dotyczące zezwolenia na stosowanie preparatu Lactobacillus kefiri DSM 19455 jako dodatku paszowego dla wszystkich gatunków zwierząt
 (Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1831/2003 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 22 września 2003 r. w sprawie dodatków stosowanych w żywieniu zwierząt (1), w szczególności jego art. 9 ust. 2,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 W rozporządzeniu (WE) nr 1831/2003 przewidziano udzielanie zezwoleń na stosowanie dodatków w żywieniu zwierząt oraz określono sposób uzasadniania i procedury przyznawania takich zezwoleń.
 (2)
 Zgodnie z art. 7 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 1831/2003 złożony został wniosek o zezwolenie na stosowanie preparatu Lactobacillus kefiri DSM 19455. Do wniosku dołączone zostały dane szczegółowe oraz dokumenty wymagane na mocy art. 7 ust. 3 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 1831/2003.
 (3)
 Wniosek dotyczy zezwolenia na stosowanie preparatu Lactobacillus kefiri DSM 19455 jako dodatku paszowego dla wszystkich gatunków zwierząt, celem sklasyfikowania go w kategorii „dodatki technologiczne”.
 (4)
 Europejski Urząd ds. Bezpieczeństwa Żywności („Urząd”) w opinii z dnia 13 marca 2013 r. (2) stwierdził, że zgodnie z proponowanymi warunkami stosowania preparat nie ma negatywnego wpływu na zdrowie zwierząt, ludzi ani na środowisko naturalne. Urząd stwierdził również, że preparat zwiększa stabilność tlenową kiszonek poprzez zwiększenie wytwarzania kwasu octowego i obniżenie pH kiszonek z materiałów łatwych i średnio trudnych do kiszenia. Zdaniem Urzędu nie ma potrzeby wprowadzania szczegółowych wymogów dotyczących monitorowania po wprowadzeniu do obrotu. Urząd poddał również weryfikacji sprawozdanie dotyczące metod analizy dodatków paszowych w paszy, przedłożone przez laboratorium referencyjne ustanowione rozporządzeniem (WE) nr 1831/2003.
 (5)
 Ocena przedmiotowego preparatu dowodzi, że warunki udzielenia zezwolenia przewidziane w art. 5 rozporządzenia (WE) nr 1831/2003 są spełnione. W związku z tym należy zezwolić na stosowanie preparatów, jak określono w załączniku do niniejszego rozporządzenia.
 (6)
 Środki przewidziane w niniejszym rozporządzeniu są zgodne z opinią Stałego Komitetu ds. Łańcucha Żywnościowego i Zdrowia Zwierząt,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 Preparat wyszczególniony w załączniku, należący do kategorii „dodatki technologiczne” i do grupy funkcjonalnej „dodatki do kiszonki”, zostaje dopuszczony jako dodatek stosowany w żywieniu zwierząt zgodnie z warunkami określonymi w załączniku.
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie dwudziestego dnia po jego opublikowaniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 12 sierpnia 2013 r.
 W imieniu Komisji
 José Manuel BARROSO
 Przewodniczący
 (1) Dz.U. L 268 z 18.10.2003, s. 29.
 (2) Dziennik EFSA 2013; 11(4):3177.
 ZAŁĄCZNIK
 Numer identyfikacyjny dodatku
 Nazwa posiadacza zezwolenia
 Dodatek
 Skład, wzór chemiczny, opis, metoda analityczna
 Gatunek lub kategoria zwierzęcia
 Maksymalny wiek
 Minimalna zawartość
 Maksymalna zawartość
 Inne przepisy
 Data ważności zezwolenia
 CFU/kg materiału świeżego
 Kategoria: dodatki technologiczne Grupa funkcjonalna: dodatki do kiszonki.
 1k20742
 —
 Lactobacillus kefiri DSM 19455
 Skład dodatku
 Preparat Lactobacillus kefiri DSM 19455 zawierający co najmniej 1 × 1010 CFU/g dodatku
 Charakterystyka substancji czynnej
 Żywotne komórki Lactobacillus kefiri DSM 19455
 Metoda analityczna
 (1)
 Oznaczanie liczby w dodatku paszowym: metoda posiewu powierzchniowego (EN 15787)
 Identyfikacja: elektroforeza w zmiennym pulsowym polu elektrycznym (PFGE)
 Wszystkie gatunki zwierząt
 —
 —
 —
 1.
 W informacjach dotyczących stosowania dodatku i premiksów należy podać warunki przechowywania.
 2.
 Minimalna dawka dodatku w przypadku stosowania bez łączenia z innymi mikroorganizmami jako dodatku do kiszonki: 5 × 107 CFU/kg materiału świeżego.
 3.
 Dodatek stosuje się w materiałach łatwych i średnio trudnych do kiszenia (2).
 4.
 Środki bezpieczeństwa: zaleca się stosowanie ochrony dróg oddechowych oraz rękawic podczas kontaktu z produktem.
 2 września 2023 r.
 (1) Szczegóły dotyczące metod analitycznych można znaleźć na stronie laboratorium referencyjnego: http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EURLs/EURL_feed_additives/Pages/index.aspx
 (2) Pasze łatwe do kiszenia: > 3 % rozpuszczalnych węglowodanów w materiale świeżym. Pasze średnio trudne do kiszenia: 1,5–3,0 % rozpuszczalnych węglowodanów w materiale świeżym. Zgodnie z definicją zawartą w rozporządzeniu Komisji (WE) nr 429/2008 (Dz.U. L 133 z 22.5.2008, s. 1).


type: caselaw

text:
C 192/18 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 8.7.2000
 Recurso interposto em 26 de Abril de 2000 pelo Consor- Fundamentos e principais argumentos
 zio Industrie Fiammiferi (CIF) contra a Comissão das
 Comunidades Europeias O recorrente é notário-adjunto no Baden-Würtemberg (Ale-
 manha), aı́ exercendo uma actividade de consultadoria jurı́dica.
 (Processo T-107/00) Em 1994, solicitou a admissão ao exame de aptidão, nos
 termos da lei alemã relativa à admissão à advocacia (lei relativa
 (2000/C 192/32) ao exame de aptidão). Este pedido foi indeferido, em várias
 instâncias, pelas autoridades e tribunais alemães. O recorrente
 alega agora que a lei alemã relativa ao exame de aptidão foi
 (Lı́ngua do processo: italiano) adoptada para transposição da Directiva 89/48/CEE (1). Na
 sequência das decisões negativas das autoridades e tribunais
 Deu entrada em 26 de Abril de 2000, no Tribunal de Primeira alemães, esta directiva diz directa e individualmente respeito
 Instância das Comunidades Europeias, um recurso contra ao recorrente. O artigo 1.o da directiva viola o artigo 12.o CE e
 a Comissão das Comunidades Europeias, interposto pelo vários direitos fundamentais. Aquela disposição abre o acesso
 Consorzio Industrie Fiammiferi (CIF), representado e assistido à advocacia alemã aos nacionais de outros Estados-Membros
 por Antonio Tizzano e Gian Michele Roberti, advogados no que estejam na posse de um dos diplomas que são suficientes
 foro de Nápoles, com domicı́lio escolhido na Place du Sablon, para cumprir as exigências formais da directiva, sem terem de
 36, Bruxelas. se sujeitar ao exame de aptidão, enquanto esta possibilidade
 é recusada aos cidadãos alemães detentores de diplomas
 equivalentes. Existe aqui uma diferença de tratamento que deve
 O recorrente conclui pedindo que o Tribunal se digne: levar à anulação da directiva.
 — anular o indeferimento tácito do pedido de reexame
 apresentado pelo Consorzio ao secretário-geral da Comis- (1) JO L 19, de 24.1.1989, p. 16.
 são em 20 de Janeiro de 2000 e, se necessário, a resposta
 provisória de Mary E. Prestorn, de 17 de Fevereiro de 2000;
 — condenar a Comissão das Comunidades Europeias nas
 despesas.
 Recurso interposto em 2 de Maio de 2000 pela British
 American Tobacco International (Investments) limited
 Fundamentos e principais argumentos contra a Comissão das Comunidades Europeias
 Os fundamentos e principais argumentos são similares aos (Processo T-111/00)
 invocados no processo T-40/00, Consorzio Industrie Fiammi-
 (2000/C 192/34)
 feri/Comissão.
 (Lı́ngua do processo: inglês)
 Deu entrada, em 2 de Maio de 2000, no Tribunal de Primeira
 Instância das Comunidades Europeias, um recurso contra a
 Comissão das Comunidades Europeias, interposto pela British
 Recurso interposto em 26 de Abril de 2000 por Bernd American Tobacco International (Investments) limited (com
 Schmidt contra o Conselho da União Europeia sede em Londres, Inglaterra), representada por Scott Crosby,
 do escritório Kemmler, Rapp, Böhlke & Crosby, Bruxelas.
 (Processo T-109/00)
 A recorrente conclui pedindo que o Tribunal se digne:
 (2000/C 192/33) — anular a decisão da Comissão, de 8 de Março de 2000, que
 recusou o acesso às actas das reuniões do Comité dos
 Impostos Especiais de Consumo de 29-30 de Abril de
 (Lı́ngua do processo: alemão) 1998 e 28-29 de Outubro de 1999 relativas à decisão do
 Comité de classificar o tabaco expandido como um
 Deu entrada em 26 de Abril de 2000, no Tribunal de Primeira produto sujeito a imposto e confirmar essa decisão;
 Instância das Comunidades Europeias, um recurso contra o
 Conselho da União Europeia, interposto por Bernd Schmidt, de — condenar a Comissão no pagamento das despesas nos
 Schwäbisch Hall (RFA), representado pelo advogado Joachim termos do artigo 87.o do Regulamento de Processo do
 Schorpp, Schmidt Lamatsch-Grund Rapp, Delitzsch (RFA). Tribunal de Primeira Instância.
 O recorrente conclui pedindo que o Tribunal se digne: Fundamentos e principais argumentos
 — anular a Directiva 89/48 do Conselho, de 21 de Dezembro A recorrente afirma que, como uma empresa de tabaco, tem
 de 1988, relativa a um sistema geral de reconhecimento interesse vital em saber por que razão um dado produto —
 dos diplomas de ensino superior que sancionam formações tabaco expandido — é tratado como um tabaco susceptı́vel de
 profissionais com duração mı́nima de três anos, no que ser fumado na acepção do artigo 5.o, n.o 1, da Directiva
 respeita às profissões de advogado e de agente de patentes. 95/59/CE (1) e, deste modo, um produto sujeito a imposto. A
 ---pagebreak--- 8.7.2000 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias C 192/19
 recorrente considera o produto um produto intermédio, não — Violação do artigo 37.o do Tratado CE: o regime de
 susceptı́vel de ser fumado sem operações ulteriores, e portanto notificações previsto pelo regulamento em causa ignora os
 não sujeito a imposto. Não há uma decisão publicada que objectivos prosseguidos por esta disposição, na medida em
 determine esta solução e fundamente a classificação escolhida. que a sua execução comporta o desaparecimento de um
 Por conseguinte, solicitou o acesso às actas completas das grande número de operadores económicos e, ao mesmo
 reuniões do Comité dos Impostos Especiais de Consumo de tempo, a concentração das fontes de aprovisionamento
 29 e 30 de Abril de 1998 e de 28 e 29 de Outubro de 1999 dos produtos fitofarmacêuticos nas mãos de algumas
 nas quais foi aparentemente determinado o tratamento fiscal empresas multinacionais, o que lhes permitirá limitar o
 do tabaco expandido. Este pedido foi definitivamente recusado aprovisionamento e por consequência aumentar os preços.
 pela carta do Secretário Geral de 8 de Março de 2000.
 — Violação da Directiva 91/414/CEE: o regulamento impug-
 A recorrente contesta a validade desta decisão. Os fundamentos nado altera as condições necessárias para pedir a autori-
 legais e principais argumentos são semelhantes aos apresenta- zação de comercialização de um produto fitofarmacêutico
 dos no processo T-41/00. relativamente às previstas na directiva acima referida, que
 constitui a sua base jurı́dica.
 (1) JO 1995, L 291, p. 40. — Violação dos princı́pios da segurança jurı́dica, da confiança
 legı́tima e da boa gestão: o novo sistema de notificação
 impede as partes requerentes de prosseguir a comerciali-
 zação de determinadas substâncias, para as quais benefi-
 ciam de autorizações de comercialização no quadro do
 sistema previsto na Directiva 91/414/CEE, sem que encon-
 tre justificação numa razão de interesse público.
 Recurso interposto em 2 de Maio de 2000 por Iberotam
 S.A. e 7 o. contra a Comissão das Comunidades Europeias — Violação do acordo sobre os aspectos dos direitos de
 propriedade intelectual relacionados com o comércio
 (OCM) (3): o regulamento contestado confere aos titulares
 (Processo T-112/00) informações confidenciais que devem ser fornecidas para
 obter a autorização de comercializar os produtos fitofar-
 (2000/C 192/35) macêuticos, uma protecção exclusiva que ultrapassa a que
 decorre dos princı́pios em que se baseiam as disposições
 do acordo supramencionado, designadamente os n.os 2 do
 (Lı́ngua do processo: francês) artigo 8.o e 3 do artigo 39.o
 Deu entrada em 2 de Maio de 2000, no Tribunal de Primeira (1) JO L 55, p. 25.
 Instância das Comunidades Europeias, um recurso contra a (2) JO L 230, p. 1.
 Comissão das Comunidades Europeias, interposto por Ibero- (3) JO L 336, de 23.12.1994, p. 214.
 tam S.A., com sede social em Barcelona (Espanha), e 7 o.,
 representadas por Miquel Roca Junyent e Joan Roca Sagarra,
 advogados no foro de Barcelona.
 As recorrentes concluem pedindo que o Tribunal se digne:
 — anular o Regulamento (CE) n.o 451/2000 da Comissão, de
 28 de Fevereiro de 2000, que estabelece as normas de
 Recurso interposto em 2 de Maio pela Aktionsgemein-
 execução da segunda e terceira fases do programa de
 trabalho referido no n.o 2 do artigo 8.o da Directiva schaft Recht und Eigentum e.V. (ARE) contra a Comissão
 91/414/CEE do Conselho; das Comunidades Europeias
 — condenar a Comissão Europeia nas despesas. (Processo T-114/00)
 (2000/C 192/36)
 Fundamentos e principais argumentos
 As recorrentes contestam o Regulamento (CE) 451/2000 da
 (Lı́ngua do processo: alemão)
 Comissão, de 28 de Fevereiro de 2000, que estabelece as
 normas de execução da segunda e terceira fases do programa
 de trabalho referido no n.o 2 do artigo 8.o da Directiva Deu entrada em 2 de Maio de 2000, no Tribunal de Primeira
 91/414/CEE do Conselho (1), relativa à colocação dos produtos Instância das Comunidades Europeias, um recurso contra a
 fitofarmacêuticos no mercado (2), cujo objectivo é o exame Comissão das Comunidades Europeias, interposto por Aktions-
 gradual das substâncias activas presentes no mercado com gemeinschaft Recht und Eigentum e.V. (ARE), com domicı́lio
 vista à sua inscrição eventual no anexo I da directiva acima em Borken (República Federal da Alemanha), representada
 mencionada. Os fundamentos invocados são os seguintes: pelo Professor Matthias Pechstein, Advogado em Berlim.


text:
278/1996 Z. z. Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa zákon Slovenskej národnej rady č. ... | Aktuálne znenie
 Hľadaj v 278/1996 ×
 Zákon č. 278/1996 Z. z.Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa zákon Slovenskej národnej rady č. 322/1992 Zb. o štátnej štatistike v znení neskorších predpisov
 Platnosť od 30.09.1996 do31.12.2001
 Účinnosť od 01.10.1996 do31.12.2001
 Zrušený 540/2001 Z. z. (nepriamo)
 Čl. I (§ 11)
 Aktuálne znenie 01.10.1996 - 31.12.2001
 1. V § 2 sa dopĺňa písmeno d), ktoré znie:
 „d) štatistickou jednotkou rozumie objekt, o ktorom sa zisťujú štatistické údaje.“.
 2. V § 4 ods. 1 sa za spojku „a“ vkladajú slová „pre oblasť“.
 „(2) Na čele Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky je predseda, ktorého vymenúva a odvoláva vláda Slovenskej republiky.“.
 4. V § 5 a v celom ďalšom texte zákona sa vypúšťajú slová „pre potrebu Slovenskej republiky“.
 5. V § 5 písm. o) sa za slovami „Slovenskej republike“ vypúšťa čiarka a slová „zverejňuje výsledky štatistických zisťovaní, ktoré organizuje a vykonáva,“.
 6. V § 5 písm. r) sa na konci vypúšťa čiarka a pripájajú sa tieto slová:
 7. V § 5 písm. u) sa za spojku „a“ vkladajú slová „pre oblasť“.
 8. V § 5 sa za písmeno u) vkladá nové písmeno v), ktoré znie:
 „v) zverejňuje výsledky štatistických zisťovaní a vydáva štatistické publikácie,“.
 a) vypracúva koncepciu krízového štatistického informačného systému (ďalej len „krízový systém“),
 b) určuje po dohode s príslušnými ústrednými orgánmi štátnej správy štatistické ukazovatele štátnych štatistických zisťovaní pre potreby krízového systému,
 c) organizuje a vykonáva štátne štatistické zisťovania pre potreby krízového systému.“.
 10. V § 8 odsek 1 sa slovo „jej“ nahrádza slovom „jeho“.
 11. § 9 až 11 znejú:
 (1) Územnými štatistickými orgánmi Slovenskej republiky sú
 a) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Bratislave,
 b) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Trnave,
 c) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Trenčíne,
 d) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Nitre,
 e) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Žiline,
 f) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Banskej Bystrici,
 g) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Prešove,
 h) Krajská správa Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Košiciach,
 (2) Sídla krajských správ a ich územné obvody sú totožné so sídlami a územnými obvodmi krajov ustanovených podľa osobitného predpisu2).
 (3) Krajské správy sú orgánmi štátnej správy pre oblasť štátnej štatistiky.
 (4) Krajské správy sú rozpočtovými organizáciami.“.
 „2) § 8 a 9 zákona Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 221/1996 Z. z. o územnom a správnom usporiadaní Slovenskej republiky.“.
 (1) Krajské správy môžu so súhlasom Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky zriaďovať aj pracoviská mimo sídla krajskej správy.
 (2) Úlohy pracovísk zriadených podľa odseku 1 určuje príslušná krajská správa.“.
 (1) Na čele krajskej správy je riaditeľ, ktorého vymenúva a odvoláva predseda Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky. Riaditeľ krajskej správy zodpovedá za výkon svojej funkcie predsedovi Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky.
 (2) Na čele pracoviska podľa § 10 ods. 1 je vedúci, ktorého vymenúva a odvoláva riaditeľ príslušnej krajskej správy. Vedúci tohto pracoviska zodpovedá za výkon svojej funkcie riaditeľovi príslušnej krajskej správy.“.
 12. § 12 sa vypúšťa.
 13. V § 13 sa v úvodnej vete slovo „Oblastné“ nahrádza slovom „Krajské“.
 14. V § 13 písm. d) sa za slovo „spravodajských“ vkladajú slová „a štatistických“ a vypúšťajú sa slová „a ich organizačných zložiek“.
 15. V § 13 písm. h) sa slová „okresné oddelenia“ nahrádzajú slovami „nimi zriadené pracoviská“.
 16. V § 14 sa slovo „Oblastné“ nahrádza slovom „Krajské“.
 17. § 15 a 16 sa vypúšťajú.
 18. V § 18 ods. 3 sa za slová „aby im“ vkladajú slová „ústredné orgány Slovenskej republiky uvedené v § 2 písm. b), ako aj ďalšie“ a slová „umožniť im bezplatný prístup aj ku svojim údajovým základniam.“ nahrádzajú slovami „bezplatne im poskytnúť spracované údaje zo svojich údajových základní podľa ich požiadaviek, a to vo forme, ako ich vedú.“.
 19. V § 19 ods. 6 sa číslice „4 a 5“ nahrádzajú číslicami „3 a 4“.
 20. V § 21 sa vypúšťa písmeno e).
 21. V § 23 sa vypúšťa odsek 2. Označenie odseku 1 sa zrušuje.
 22. V § 24 ods. 2 sa vypúšťajú slová „podľa § 25 ods. 1“.
 23. V § 25 ods. 1 v druhej vete sa vypúšťa slovo „Slovenskej“.
 24. V § 25 ods. 2 sa za slová „programu zisťovaní“ vkladá slovo „republiky“.
 25. V § 26 ods. 1 a 2 sa vypúšťa slovo „vykonávané“.
 26. V § 27 ods. 1 v poslednej vete sa vypúšťa spojka „a“, nahrádza sa čiarkou a na koniec vety sa pripájajú slová „a bezplatne“.
 27. V § 32 ods. 1 a 2 sa slová „jednotiek a ich organizačných zložiek“ nahrádzajú slovami „a štatistických jednotiek“.
 28. V § 34 ods. 1 sa slová „Oblastné správy a Mestská správa v Bratislave“ nahrádzajú slovami „Krajské správy“.
 29. V § 34 ods. 2 sa slová „Okresné oddelenia a mestské oddelenie“ nahrádzajú slovami „Krajské správy“, pred slovo „fyzickým“ sa vkladá slovo „aj“ a slová „v okrese“ sa nahrádzajú slovami „v kraji“.
 30. V § 45 ods. 1 písm. a), b) sa slovo „Kčs“ nahrádza slovom „Sk“.
 31. V § 46 ods. 1 sa slovo „Kčs“ nahrádza slovom „Sk“.
 32. V § 46 ods. 2 sa vypúšťajú slová „obvodné a“.
 „10) Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 222/1996 Z. z. o organizácii miestnej štátnej správy a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov.“.
 33. § 50 znie:
 (1) Pôsobnosť, práva a povinnosti z pracovnoprávnych vzťahov, majetkovoprávnych vzťahov a iných vzťahov prechádzajú dňom účinnosti tohto zákona z Oblastnej správy Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Bratislave, Oblastnej správy Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Banskej Bystrici, Oblastnej správy Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Košiciach a Mestskej správy Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v hlavnom meste Slovenskej republiky Bratislave na tie krajské správy, ktoré sú v ich bývalom územnom obvode zriadené.
 (2) Pôsobnosť, práva a povinnosti z pracovnoprávnych vzťahov, majetkovoprávnych vzťahov a iných vzťahov prechádzajú dňom účinnosti tohto zákona z doterajších okresných oddelení Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky a Mestského oddelenia Štatistického úradu Slovenskej republiky v Košiciach na tie krajské správy, do ktorých územného obvodu je začlenený ich bývalý územný obvod.“.
 34. Príloha zákona Slovenskej národnej rady č. 322/1992 Zb. sa vypúšťa.
 1. Vyhláška Ústrednej komisie ľudovej kontroly a štatistiky č. 71/1965 Zb. o zavedení a využívaní jednotnej klasifikácie priemyslových odborov a výrobkov a jednotnej klasifikácie výrobkov v poľnohospodárstve a lesníctve.
 2. Vyhláška Ústrednej komisie ľudovej kontroly a štatistiky č. 9/1966 Zb. o vykonávaní kontroly a štatistiky cien.
 3. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 113/1972 Zb. o zavedení a využívaní jednotnej klasifikácie odvetví národného hospodárstva.
 4. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 114/1972 Zb. o zavedení a využívaní jednotnej klasifikácie výkonov.
 5. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 115/1972 Zb. o zavedení a využívaní jednotnej klasifikácie krajín.
 6. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 116/1972 Zb. o utváraní a udržiavaní odborových číselníkov priemyselných výrobkov.
 7. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 117/1972 Zb. o jednotnom číselníku organizácií v ČSSR.
 8. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 117/1981 Zb. o zavedení a využívaní jednotnej klasifikácie priemyselných prác výrobnej povahy.
 9. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 81/1982 Zb. o jednotnej klasifikácii odborov vzdelania.
 10. Vyhláška Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 97/1985 Zb. o jednotnej klasifikácii zamestnaní.
 11. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 29. 10. 1975 č. 18 685/1975 o odvetvovom zatrieďovaní organizácií (registrované v čiastke 38/1975 Zb.).
 12. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 26. 5. 1976 č. 8743/76, ktorou sa vydáva doplnená a upravená klasifikácia výrobkov v poľnohospodárstve a lesníctve (registrované v čiastke 33/1976 Zb.).
 13. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 15. 8. 1978 č. 2997/78-032/1615, ktorou sa mení a dopĺňa jednotná klasifikácia výrobkov v poľnohospodárstve a v lesníctve (registrované v čiastke 31/1978 Zb.).
 14. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 8. 3. 1979 č. 876/79-032-331 o doplnení jednotnej klasifikácie odvetvia národného hospodárstva (registrované v čiastke 22/1979 Zb.).
 15. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu zo 4. 12. 1979 č. 3668/79-03 o ďalšej aktualizácii jednotnej klasifikácie krajín (registrované v čiastke 28/1979 Zb.).
 16. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 24. 10. 1980 č. 2754/80-032-1504 o doplnení a zmenách jednotnej klasifikácie priemyselných odborov a výrobkov (registrované v čiastke 2/1981 Zb.).
 17. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 22. 12. 1980 č. 3151/80 o jednotnej údajovej základni organizácií v oblasti práce, miezd a sociálnych vecí (registrované v čiastke 12/1981 Zb.).
 18. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 27. 1. 1981 č. 250/81-03-160 o ďalšom doplnení a zmenách jednotnej klasifikácie výrobkov v poľnohospodárstve a v lesníctve (registrované v čiastke 12/1981 Zb.).
 19. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 30. 1. 1980 č. 210/81-03 o jednotnej údajovej základni organizácií v oblasti základných osobných charakteristík (registrované v čiastke 12/1981 Zb.).
 20. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 209/81-03 a Federálneho ministerstva financií č. XV/1-1769/81 o obsahu a forme katalógov jednotnej údajovej základne organizácií z 30. 1. 1981 (registrované v čiastke 13/1981 Zb.).
 21. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu č. 208/81-03 a Federálneho ministerstva financií č. XV/1-1768/81 o jednotnej údajovej základni organizácií v oblasti charakteristík všeobecnej povahy z 30. 1. 1981 (registrované v čiastke 13/1981 Zb.).
 22. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 29. 6. 1981 č. Vk 1102/82, ktorou sa menia a dopĺňajú smernice „23/2 Ceny VC“ (registrované v čiastke 21/1981 Zb.).
 23. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 1. 12. 1981 č. Vk 1504/82, ktorou sa menia a dopĺňajú smernice „2/2 Roč Priem“ (registrované v čiastke 34/1981 Zb.).
 24. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 24. 9. 1981 č. 1984/81-03 o novom vydaní jednotnej klasifikácie výkonov (registrované v čiastke 10/1982 Zb.).
 25. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 2. 12. 1982 č. Vk 2067/83, ktorou sa menia a dopĺňajú smernice „18 Nem Úr“ (registrované v čiastke 5/1983 Zb.).
 26. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 8. 4. 1983 č. Vk 2096/83 o sledovaní experimentálneho overovania opatrení na zvýšenie účinnosti zahraničnoekonomických vzťahov (registrované v čiastke 19/1983 Zb.).
 27. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 8. 12. 1983 č. 2682/83-413 o ďalšom doplnení a zmenách Jednotnej klasifikácie výrobkov v poľnohospodárstve a lesníctve (registrované v čiastke 14/1984 Zb.).
 28. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu zo 6. 7. 1984 č. Vk 2766/84, ktorou sa menia a dopĺňajú smernice „23/2 Ceny VC“ (registrované v čiastke 21/1984 Zb.).
 29. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 21. 11. 1984 č. 2538/84-41 o ďalšom doplnení a zmenách jednotnej klasifikácie výrobkov v poľnohospodárstve a lesníctve (registrované v čiastke 1/1985 Zb.).
 30. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 12. 7. 1984 č. 1687/84-41 o novom vydaní jednotnej klasifikácie priemyslových odborov a výrobkov (registrované v čiastke 1/1985 Zb.).
 31. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 8. 8. 1985 č. 1754/85 o zmenách a doplnkoch jednotnej klasifikácie výkonov (registrované v čiastke 33/1985 Zb.).
 32. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 8. 8. 1985 č. 1751/85 o úpravách jednotnej klasifikácie odvetví národného hospodárstva (registrované v čiastke 33/1985 Zb.).
 33. Úprava Federálneho štatistického úradu z 8. 8. 1985 č. 1752/85 o zmenách a doplnkoch jednotnej klasifikácie výrobkov v poľnohospodárstve a v lesníctve (registrované v čiastke 33/1985 Zb.).
 34. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu z 30. 10. 1975 č. Vk 1842/1975 k štátnym štatistickým výkazom za úsek mesačné vybrané ukazovatele – 27 MVU (registrované v čiastke 11/1976 Zb.).
 35. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu z 23. 7. 1980 č. Vk 407/81 k štátnym štatistickým výkazom za úsek veľkoobchodné ceny v priemysle „23/2 Ceny VC“ (registrované v čiastke 12/1981 Zb.).
 36. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu z 28. 11. 1983 č. Vk 2497/84 na preverenie a doplnenie výberového súboru výrobkov – reprezentantov sledovaných FŠÚ pre výpočet indexu cien dodávok do poľnohospodárstva a na zistenie údajov na určenie váhového systému „Ceny D Poľn“ (registrované v čiastke 5/1984 Zb.).
 37. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu zo 4. 8. 1983 č. Vk 2371/84 k výkazu „ORG 2-99“ – „Výkaz o aktualizácii registra organizačných jednotiek“ (registrované v čiastke 5/1984 Zb.).
 38. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu z 20. 9. 1984 č. Vk 2872/85 k osobitne organizovanému zisťovaniu o využití vybraných strojov a zariadení za september 1985 „Zp 1985 – B“ (registrované v čiastke 22/1984 Zb.).
 39. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu z 11. 6. 1985 č. Vk 6/86 k štátnym štatistickým výkazom za úsek základné prostriedky „24 ZP“ (registrované v čiastke 1/1986 Zb.).
 40. Príloha smerníc Federálneho štatistického úradu z 11. 7. 1985 č. Vk 257/86 „13/2 Energ“ – Prehľad náplne ukazovateľov merných spotrieb palív a energie“ (registrované v čiastke 1/1986 Zb.).
 41. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu z 11. 6. 1985 č. Vk 2/86 k štátnym štatistickým výkazom za úsek poľnohospodárske meliorácie a zúrodnenie pôdy „8/4 Poľ Mel“ (registrované v čiastke 1/1986 Zb.).
 42. Smernice Federálneho štatistického úradu zo 17. 6. 1985 č. Vk 208/86 k štátnym štatistickým výkazom za úsek demografia „22 Dem“ (registrované v čiastke 1/1986 Zb.).
 43. Pokyny Federálneho štatistického úradu z 27. 5. 1981 č. 1454/81-03 na postup pri podávaní návrhov na rezortné štatistické zisťovania a na vytváranie čiastkových systémov štatistických zisťovaní (registrované v čiastke 17/1981 Zb.).


text:
 EIROPAS KOMISIJA
 Briselē, 21.3.2022
 COM(2022) 117 final
 2022/0082(NLE)
 Priekšlikums
 PADOMES LĒMUMS
 par 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura nolīguma grozījumu noslēgšanu
 PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTS
 1.PRIEKŠLIKUMA KONTEKSTS
 •Priekšlikuma pamatojums un mērķi
 Savienība ir Starptautiskā cukura nolīguma
 11 (“nolīgums”) puse un Starptautiskās Cukura organizācijas (“SCO”) biedre. Ar Padomes Lēmumu (ES) 2017/2242 (2017. gada 30. novembris)
 22 un Padomes Lēmumu (ES) 2019/2136
 33 Padome pilnvaroja Komisiju sākt sarunas ar pārējām nolīguma pusēm nolūkā modernizēt nolīgumu, it īpaši attiecībā uz neatbilstību starp locekļu balsu sadalījumu un finanšu iemaksām un to nosacīto stāvokli pasaules cukura tirgū.
 Sarunas par nolīguma grozījumu norisinājās, apspriežoties ar Preču jautājumu darba grupu (PROBA), un grozījums atbilst Padomes pieņemtajām sarunu norādēm. Izmaiņas attiecas uz šādiem trim elementiem: administratīvais budžets un biedru iemaksas saskaņā ar 25. pantu, mērķu, pētījumu, izvērtējumu un pētniecības darbību paplašināšana, kas ļautu 1., 32., 33. un 34. panta tvērumā iekļaut citus ar cukuru saistītus produktus (konkrēti, bioetanolu), un noteikumi par izpilddirektora iecelšanu saskaņā ar 23. pantu.
 Starptautiskās Cukura padomes 59. sanāksmē 2021. gada 26. novembrī Starptautiskā Cukura padome (“SCP”) vienbalsīgi vienojās ieteikt SCO biedriem nolīgumu grozīt atbilstoši sarunu iznākumam.
 Šā Padomes lēmuma mērķis ir apstiprināt grozījumus un izraudzīties personu (personas), kas pilnvarotas Savienības vārdā norādītajā vietā iesniegt paziņojumu par grozījuma pieņemšanu.
 2.JURIDISKAIS PAMATS
 Saskaņā ar LESD 207. panta 4. punktu un 218. panta 6. punkta a) apakšpunkta v) punktu Komisijai kā nolīguma grozījumu sarunvedējai ir jānāk klajā ar priekšlikumu Padomei pēc Eiropas Parlamenta piekrišanas noslēgt nolīguma grozījumus.
 3.IETEKME UZ BUDŽETU
 Saskaņā ar pašreizējiem SCO noteikumiem par finanšu iemaksām Savienības finanšu iemaksu daļa kopš 1992. gada ir palikusi praktiski nemainīga, lai gan pasaules cukura tirgus un jo īpaši Savienības relatīvā pozīcija tajā ir būtiski mainījusies. Tā rezultātā Savienība ir uzņēmusies nesamērīgi lielu budžeta izmaksu daļu
 44.
 Ja tiks apstiprināts grozījums nolīguma 25. pantā, kas reglamentē administratīvā budžeta pieņemšanu un biedru iemaksas, balsu sadalījuma aprēķins būs labāk salāgots ar pašreizējo situāciju pasaules cukura tirgū. Ir paredzēts 10 gadu pārejas periods, kurā balsu skaita ikgadējās izmaiņas pirmajos piecos gados ir ierobežotas līdz 15 %, savukārt atlikušajos 5 gados – ierobežotas līdz 20 %. Aprēķina metodes izmaiņas pazeminās ES piešķirto balsu skaitu budžeta vajadzībām, un tas samazinās ES iemaksu Starptautiskajā Cukura organizācijā.
 4.CITI ELEMENTI
 •Detalizēts konkrētu priekšlikuma noteikumu skaidrojums
 Saskaņā ar nolīguma 44. panta 1. punktu katrs biedrs SCP noteiktajā termiņā paziņo depozitāram par grozījuma pieņemšanu. Atbilstoši Starptautiskās Cukura padomes apstiprinātajam laika grafikam biedriem jāpanāk grozījumu apstiprināšana saskaņā ar konstitucionālajām procedūrām līdz 2022. gada 25. novembrim. Pēc apstiprinājuma saņemšanas biedriem Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas ģenerālsekretāram Ņujorkā pirms 2023. gada 30. jūnija ir jāiesniedz paziņojums par grozījumu apstiprināšanu.
 2022/0082 (NLE)
 Priekšlikums
 PADOMES LĒMUMS
 par 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura nolīguma grozījumu noslēgšanu
 EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Savienības darbību un jo īpaši tā 207. panta 4. punktu, lasītu saistībā ar 218. panta 6. punkta otrās daļas a) apakšpunkta v) punktu,
 ņemot vērā Eiropas Komisijas priekšlikumu,
 ņemot vērā Eiropas Parlamenta piekrišanu,
 tā kā:
 (1)Savienība ir puse 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura nolīgumā (“nolīgums”), ko Savienība noslēgusi ar Padomes Lēmumu 92/580/EEK
 5
 , un ir Starptautiskās Cukura organizācijas (“SCO”) locekle.
 (2)Pamatojoties uz pilnvarojumu, kas dots ar Padomes Lēmumiem (ES) 2017/2242
 6
 un (ES) 2019/2136
 7
 , Komisija Savienības vārdā sarunās ar pārējiem SCO locekļiem un saskaņā ar Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas Tirdzniecības un attīstības konferences vadlīnijām vienojās par nolīguma grozīšanu.
 (3)Sarunas par nolīguma grozījumiem ir noslēgušās, un Starptautiskā Cukura padome 57. sesijā 2020. gada novembrī un 58. sesijā 2021. gada jūnijā grozījumu redakciju apstiprināja.
 (4)Visus grozījumus, par kuriem panākta vienošanās sarunās, Starptautiskā Cukura padome saskaņā ar nolīguma 44. pantā noteikto procedūru ieteiks SCO locekļiem.
 (5)Ar Padomes Lēmumu (ES) 2021/1851
 8
 Komisija tika pilnvarota īpašajā balsojumā, kas notika Starptautiskās Cukura padomes 59. sesijā 2021. gada novembrī, balsot par labu tam, lai SCO locekļiem ieteiktu nolīgumu grozīt. Starptautiskā Cukura padome balsošanā priekšlikumu atbalstīja vienbalsīgi.
 (6)Saskaņā ar nolīguma 44. panta 1. punktu katram SCO biedram ir jāpazino depozitāram par grozījumu pieņemšanu.
 (7)Savienībai grozījumi būtu jāapstiprina,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 Ar šo Savienības vārdā apstiprina grozījumus 1992. gada Starptautiskajā Cukura nolīgumā.
 Grozījumu teksts ir pievienots šim lēmumam.
 2. pants
 Komisija Savienības vārdā paziņo depozitāram par grozījumu pieņemšanu, kā tas paredzēts nolīguma 44. panta 1. punktā, lai izteiktu Savienības piekrišanu uzņemties nolīguma grozījumu uzliktās saistības.
 3. pants
 Šis lēmums stājas spēkā [...]
 9
 .
 Briselē,
 Padomes vārdā —
 priekšsēdētājs
 FINANŠU PĀRSKATS
 FinancSt/10/
 PSH/cl/830164
 6.22.2022.1
 DATUMS: 01.02.2022.
 1.
 BUDŽETA POZĪCIJA
 14 20 03 06 – Starptautiskās organizācijas un nolīgumi
 APROPRIĀCIJAS
 B2022 5 300 000 EUR
 2.
 NOSAUKUMS
 Priekšlikums Padomes lēmumam par 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura nolīguma grozījumu noslēgšanu
 3.
 JURIDISKAIS PAMATS: Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 207. panta 4. punkts un 218. panta 6. punkta a) apakšpunkta v) punkts
 4.
 MĒRĶI
 Šā Padomes lēmuma mērķis ir apstiprināt grozījumus un izraudzīties personu (personas), kas pilnvarotas Savienības vārdā norādītajā vietā iesniegt paziņojumu par grozījuma pieņemšanu, kā to paredz nolīguma 44. panta 1. punkts.
 Grozījums attiecas uz administratīvo budžetu un biedru iemaksām (25. pants); mērķu, pētījumu, izvērtējumu un pētniecības darbību paplašināšanu nolūkā iekļaut citus ar cukuru saistītus produktus (1., 32., 33. un 34. pants) un noteikumiem par izpilddirektora iecelšanu (23. pants).
 Konkrētāk, 25. pantā piedāvāta pārskatīta aprēķina metode un iedarbīgāks korekcijas mehānisms, kura nolūks ir normalizēt ES budžeta izmaksu daļu un atbildību Starptautiskajā Cukura organizācijā.
 5.
 FINANSIĀLĀ IETEKME
 12 MĒNEŠU PERIODS
 (miljonos EUR)
 KĀRTĒJAIS FINANŠU GADS
 2022.
 (miljonos EUR)
 NĀKAMAIS FINANŠU GADS
 2023.
 (miljonos EUR)
 5,0
 IZDEVUMI
 -
 KO SEDZ NO ES BUDŽETA
 (KOMPENSĀCIJAS/INTERVENCES)
 -
 VALSTU IESTĀDES
 -
 CITI
 -
 -
 -
 5.1.
 IEŅĒMUMI
 -
 ES PAŠU RESURSI
 (NODEVAS/MUITAS NODOKĻI)
 -
 VALSTU
 2024....... (miljonos EUR)
 5.0.1
 PAREDZAMIE IZDEVUMI
 -
 5.1.1
 PAREDZAMIE IEŅĒMUMI
 5.2
 APRĒĶINA METODE:
 6,0
 VAI PROJEKTU VAR FINANSĒT NO APROPRIĀCIJĀM, KAS IERAKSTĪTAS KĀRTĒJĀ BUDŽETA ATTIECĪGAJĀ NODAĻĀ?
 JĀ
 6.1.
 VAI PROJEKTU VAR FINANSĒT, VEICOT KĀRTĒJĀ BUDŽETA STARPNODAĻU PĀRVIETOJUMUS?
 -
 6.2.
 VAI BŪS VAJADZĪGS PAPILDU BUDŽETS?
 -
 6.3.
 VAI APROPRIĀCIJAS BŪS JĀIERAKSTA NĀKAMO GADU BUDŽETOS?
 JĀ
 PIEZĪMES
 Priekšlikumam var būt finansiālas sekas no 2024. gada, bet patlaban tās nevar izteikt skaitļos. Savienības finanšu iemaksu daļa atšķirsies atkarībā no galīgā balsu skaita, kas Eiropas Savienībai tiks piešķirts pēc vienošanās par grozījumiem. Visticamāk, ES daļa samazināsies.
 (1)
 1
 Padomes Lēmums 92/580/EEK (1992. gada 13. novembris) par 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura līguma parakstīšanu un noslēgšanu (OV L 379, 23.12.1992., 15. lpp.).
 (2)
 2
 Padomes Lēmums (ES) 2017/2242 (2017. gada 30. novembris), ar ko pilnvaro sākt sarunas ar mērķi grozīt 1992. gada Starptautisko cukura nolīgumu (OV L 322, 7.12.2017., 29. lpp.).
 (3)
 3
 Padomes Lēmums (ES) 2019/2136 (2019. gada 5. decembris), ar ko pilnvaro sākt sarunas ar mērķi grozīt 1992. gada Starptautisko cukura nolīgumu (OV L 324, 13.12.2019., 3.–4. lpp.).
 (4)
 4
 Katra biedra finanšu iemaksu SCO gada budžetā aprēķina, izmantojot balsu skaitu, ko nosaka saskaņā ar 25. pantu, un summu par vienu balsi.
 (5)
 Padomes Lēmums 92/580/EEK (1992. gada 13. novembris) par 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura līguma parakstīšanu un noslēgšanu (OV L 379, 23.12.1992., 15. lpp.).
 (6)
 Padomes Lēmums (ES) 2017/2242 (2017. gada 30. novembris), ar ko pilnvaro sākt sarunas ar mērķi grozīt 1992. gada Starptautisko cukura nolīgumu (OV L 322, 7.12.2017., 29. lpp.).
 (7)
 Padomes Lēmums (ES) 2019/2136 (2019. gada 5. decembris), ar ko pilnvaro sākt sarunas ar mērķi grozīt 1992. gada Starptautisko cukura nolīgumu (OV L 324, 13.12.2019., 3.–4. lpp.).
 (8)
 Padomes Lēmums (ES) 2021/1851 (2021. gada 15. oktobris) par nostāju, kas Eiropas Savienības vārdā jāieņem Starptautiskajā Cukura padomē attiecībā uz 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura nolīguma grozījumiem un to īstenošanas grafiku (OV L 374, 22.10.2021., 49.–51. lpp.).
 (9)
 Nolīguma spēkā stāšanās datumu Padomes Ģenerālsekretariāts publicēs Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī.
 ---documentbreak---
 EIROPAS KOMISIJA
 Briselē, 21.3.2022
 COM(2022) 117 final
 PIELIKUMS
 dokumentam
 PriekšlikumsPADOMES LĒMUMAM
 par 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura nolīguma grozījumu noslēgšanu
 PIELIKUMS
 1992. gada Starptautisko cukura nolīgumu (“nolīgums”) groza šādi:
 (1)nolīguma 1. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “1. pants
 Mērķi
 1992. gada Starptautiskā cukura nolīguma (turpmāk “šis nolīgums”) mērķi, ņemot vērā Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas Tirdzniecības un attīstības konferences pieņemto Rezolūciju Nr. 93 (IV), ir šādi:
 (a)nodrošināt pastiprinātu starptautisko sadarbību saistībā ar cukura un saldinātāju jautājumiem pasaulē, kā arī saistītiem jautājumiem, ieskaitot bioenerģiju un degvielas etanola ražošanu no cukura kultūraugiem;
 (b)nodrošināt forumu starpvaldību apspriedēm par cukura un saldinātāju tirgiem, kā arī par cukura rūpniecības blakusproduktu tirgiem un no cukura kultūraugiem iegūta degvielas etanola tirgiem;
 (c)veicināt tirdzniecību, vācot un sniedzot informāciju par pasaules cukura tirgu un par citiem saldinātājiem, kā arī par bioenerģiju un no cukura kultūraugiem iegūtu degvielas etanolu;
 (d)veicināt lielāku pieprasījumu pēc cukura un cukura kultūraugiem, īpaši nepārtikas vajadzībām.”;
 (2)nolīguma 23. panta 1. punktu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “1. Padome ar īpašu balsojumu uz četriem gadiem ieceļ izpilddirektoru. Padome ieceļ amatā izpilddirektoru vismaz sešus mēnešus pirms izpilddirektora pilnvaru termiņa sākuma. Padome var atkārtoti iecelt izpilddirektoru ar īpašu balsojumu uz otro četru gadu laikposmu. Izpilddirektoru ieceļ ne vairāk kā uz diviem termiņiem. Par konkrētiem izpilddirektora iecelšanas noteikumiem lemj Padome.”;
 (3)nolīguma 25. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “25. pants
 Administratīvā budžeta pieņemšana un locekļu iemaksas
 1. Šā panta piemērošanas vajadzībām locekļiem ir 2000 balsu.
 2.(a)Katram loceklim ir balsu skaits, ko nosaka saskaņā ar šā panta 3. punktu.
 (b)Nevienam loceklim nevar būt mazāk par 6 balsīm.
 (c)Balsis nesadala. Noapaļošana ir atļauta aprēķināšanas procesā un lai nodrošinātu, ka tiek piešķirts pilns balsu skaits.
 3.Balsis nosaka katru gadu saskaņā ar šādu procedūru: katru gadu no 2023. gada, kad Starptautiskā Cukura organizācija publicē Cukura gadagrāmatu, balsu skaitu katram loceklim aprēķina, pamatojoties uz šādiem rādītājiem un to relatīvo svērumu:
 ·20 % balsu, pamatojoties uz minētā locekļa proporcionālo daļu kopējā locekļu eksportā, plus
 ·20 % balsu, pamatojoties uz minētā locekļa proporcionālo daļu kopējā locekļu importā, plus
 ·20 % balsu, pamatojoties uz minētā locekļa proporcionālo daļu kopējā locekļu ražošanas apjomā, plus
 ·20 % balsu, pamatojoties uz minētā locekļa proporcionālo daļu kopējā locekļu patēriņā, plus
 ·20 % balsu, pamatojoties uz minētā locekļa proporcionālo daļu no kopējā locekļu maksātspējas koeficienta (APF). APF ir vienāds ar jaunākajiem publicētajiem novērtējumiem par Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas izdevumu sadalījumu.
 Attiecībā uz katru no iepriekš minētajiem rādītājiem katra locekļa balsu skaitu aprēķina, izmantojot attiecīgā rādītāja vidējo rādītāju pēdējos piecos gados, kas publicēts organizācijas Cukura gadagrāmatas jaunākajā izdevumā. Katra locekļa daļu no visu locekļu kopējām vērtībām attiecībā uz iepriekš minētajiem rādītājiem aprēķina izpilddirektors. Visi iepriekš minētie dati locekļiem tiks izplatīti aprēķinu veikšanas laikā.
 4.Ja kāds loceklis vai locekļi pievienojas pēc šā nolīguma stāšanās spēkā, to balsis nosaka atbilstoši 2. un 3. punktā dotajai aprēķina skalai. Esošo locekļu balsis attiecīgi pārrēķina tā, lai kopējais balsu skaits paliktu 2000.
 5.Locekļa vai locekļu izstāšanās gadījumā, locekļa vai locekļu, kas izstājas, balsis pārdala pārējiem locekļiem, pamatojoties uz locekļu pārrēķināto daļu attiecībā uz 5 rādītājiem, lai visu locekļu balsu kopskaits paliktu 2000.
 6.Pārejas režīms:
 (a)lai noteiktu korekciju aprēķināšanas sākumpunktu, par pamatu tiks ņemta dalības un balsošanas situācija 2022. gadā;
 (b)pārejas perioda pirmajos piecos gados katra locekļa balsu skaits nedrīkst būt par vairāk nekā 15 % lielāks vai mazāks nekā iepriekšējā gadā apstiprināto balsu skaits, bet pārejas perioda otrajos piecos gados katra locekļa balsu skaits nedrīkst būt par vairāk nekā 20 % lielāks vai mazāks par iepriekšējā gadā apstiprināto balsu skaitu. Noapaļošana ir atļauta, izņemot gadījumus, kad saskaņā ar 2. punkta c) apakšpunkta noteikumiem noapaļošanas rezultātā kādam loceklim piešķirto balsu skaits pārsniegtu saskaņoto procentuālo daļu;
 (c)lai noteiktu iemaksas apmēru par vienu balsi, balsis, kas nav izmantotas, piemērojot 6. punkta b) apakšpunktu, nepārdala citiem locekļiem. Tādējādi iemaksu par vienu balsi noteiks, pamatojoties uz pārrēķināto kopējo balsu skaitu, ar nosacījumu, ka tas nepārsniegs 2000 balsis;
 (d)pārejas režīms tiks pabeigts 10 gadu laikā.
 7. Uz šo pantu neattiecas 26. panta 2. punkta noteikumi par balsstiesību apturēšanu pienākumu neizpildes gadījumā.
 8. Katra gada otrajā pusē Padome pieņem organizācijas administratīvo budžetu nākamajam gadam un, ņemot vērā šā panta 6. punkta noteikumus, nosaka locekļu iemaksas par vienu balsi, kas vajadzīgas, lai izpildītu šo budžetu.
 9.Katra locekļa iemaksas administratīvajā budžetā aprēķina, reizinot katras balss iemaksu ar balsu skaitu, kas loceklim ir saskaņā ar šo pantu, šādi:
 (a)attiecībā uz locekļiem, kuri administratīvā budžeta galīgās pieņemšanas laikā ir locekļa statusā, – balsu skaits, kas loceklim ir uz to brīdi; un
 (b)attiecībā uz locekļiem, kas kļūst par locekļiem pēc administratīvā budžeta pieņemšanas, – balsu skaits, ko tie saņem brīdī, kad kļūst par locekļiem, to koriģējot proporcionāli atlikušajam periodam, ko sedz no budžeta vai budžetiem; novērtējumus, kas veikti attiecībā uz citiem locekļiem, nemaina.
 10.Padome ar īpašu balsojumu var veikt tādus pasākumus, kādus tā varētu uzskatīt par piemērotiem, lai mazinātu ietekmi uz locekļu iemaksām, ko izraisa, iespējams, ierobežota dalība 2024. gada administratīvā budžeta pieņemšanas laikā vai jebkāds būtisks dalības samazinājums pēc tam.”;
 (4)nolīguma 32. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “32. pants
 Informācija un pētījumi
 1.Organizācija darbojas kā centrs, kas apkopo un publicē statistikas informāciju un pētījumus par cukura produktu ražošanu, cenām, eksportu un importu, patēriņu un krājumiem pasaulē, kā arī par cukura produktiem piemērojamiem nodokļiem.
 2.Locekļi apņemas termiņā, ko var noteikt reglamentā, sniegt visu pieejamo statistiku un informāciju, ko šajos noteikumos var noteikt kā vajadzīgu, lai organizācija varētu pildīt savas funkcijas saskaņā ar šo nolīgumu. Vajadzības gadījumā organizācija izmanto attiecīgo informāciju, kas tai var būt pieejama no citiem avotiem. Organizācija nepublicē informāciju, kas varētu kalpot tam, lai identificētu to personu vai uzņēmumu darbības, kas ražo, pārstrādā vai tirgo cukura produktus.”;
 (5)nolīguma 33. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “33. pants
 Tirgus izvērtējums, patēriņš un statistika
 1. Padome izveido Cukura produktu tirgus izvērtēšanas, patēriņa un statistikas komiteju, kuras sastāvā ir visi locekļi un kuru vada izpilddirektors.
 2. Komiteja pastāvīgi izskata jautājumus, kas saistīti ar cukura produktu ekonomiku pasaulē, un informē locekļus par tās apspriežu rezultātiem, un šajā nolūkā tā rīko sanāksmes, kuras parasti notiek divreiz gadā. Izskatīšanā komiteja ņem vērā visu attiecīgo informāciju, ko organizācija savākusi saskaņā ar 32. pantu.
 3. Komiteja veic darbu šādās jomās:
 (a)cukura produktu statistikas sagatavošana un cukura produktu ražošanas, patēriņa, krājumu, starptautiskās tirdzniecības un cenu statistiskā analīze;
 (b)tirgus uzvedības un to ietekmējošo faktoru analīze, īpašu uzmanību veltot jaunattīstības valstu dalībai pasaules tirdzniecībā;
 (c)cukura produktu pieprasījuma analīze, arī cukura produktu jebkāda veida dabisku un mākslīgu aizstājēju izmantošanas ietekme uz cukura produktu pasaules tirdzniecību un patēriņu;
 (d)citi Padomes apstiprināti jautājumi.
 4. Padome katru gadu izskata izpilddirektora sagatavotu turpmākā darba programmas projektu ar aplēstajām resursu vajadzībām.”;
 (6)nolīguma 34. pantu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “34. pants
 Pētniecība un izstrāde
 Lai sasniegtu 1. pantā izklāstītos mērķus, Padome var palīdzēt gan zinātniskā pētniecībā un izstrādē saistībā ar cukura produktu ekonomiku, gan šajā jomā iegūto rezultātu izplatīšanā. Šajā nolūkā Padome var sadarboties ar starptautiskām organizācijām un pētniecības iestādēm, ar nosacījumu, ka Padome neuzņemas papildu finanšu saistības.”;
 (7)pielikuma nosaukumu aizstāj ar šādu:
 “1992. gadā sākotnēji apstiprinātais balsu sadalījums”.