type: caselaw

text:
 14.2.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 73/7
 Achomharc arna thabhairt an 16 Nollaig 2021 ag Poblacht Chónaidhme na Gearmáine i gcoinne bhreithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta (an Tríú Dlísheomra) a fógraíodh an 6 Deireadh Fómhair 2021 i gCás T-T45/18 Covestro Deutschland AG v an Coimisiún Eorpach
 (Cás C-791/21 P)
 (2022/C 73/27)
 Teanga an cháis: an Ghearmáinis
 Tionscnaíodh an cás seo roimh an 1 Eanáir 2022, dáta deiridh an mhaolaithe ar an nGaeilge.


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 13.10.2005
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 268/5
 DECISIONE DEL COMITATO MISTO SEE N. 76/2005
 del 10 giugno 2005
 che modifica l’allegato II (Regolamentazioni tecniche, norme, prove e certificazioni) dell’accordo SEE
 IL COMITATO MISTO SEE,
 visto l’accordo sullo Spazio economico europeo, modificato dal protocollo che adegua l’accordo sullo Spazio economico europeo (di seguito ₪l’accordo»), in particolare l’articolo 98,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 L’allegato II dell’accordo è stato modificato dalla decisione del Comitato misto SEE n. 43/2005 dell’11 marzo 2005 (1).
 (2)
 Occorre integrare nell’accordo la direttiva 2004/104/CE della Commissione, del 14 ottobre 2004, che adegua al progresso tecnico la direttiva 72/245/CEE del Consiglio relativa alle perturbazioni radioelettriche (compatibilità elettromagnetica) dei veicoli a motore e che modifica la direttiva 70/156/CEE concernente il ravvicinamento delle legislazioni degli Stati membri relative all’omologazione dei veicoli a motore e dei loro rimorchi (2), rettificata dalla GU L 56 del 2.3.2005, pag. 35,
 DECIDE:
 Articolo 1
 Il capitolo I dell’allegato II dell’accordo è modificato come segue:
 1)
 al punto 1 (direttiva 70/156/CEE del Consiglio) viene aggiunto il seguente trattino:
 «—
 32004 L 0104: direttiva 2004/104/CE della Commissione, del 14 ottobre 2004 (GU L 337 del 13.11.2004, pag. 13), rettificata dalla GU L 56 del 2.3.2005, pag. 35.»;
 2)
 al punto 11 (direttiva 72/245/CEE del Consiglio) viene aggiunto il seguente trattino:
 «—
 32004 L 0104: direttiva 2004/104/CE della Commissione, del 14 ottobre 2004 (GU L 337 del 13.11.2004, pag. 13), rettificata dalla GU L 56 del 2.3.2005, pag. 35.»;
 3)
 al punto 11 (direttiva 72/245/CEE del Consiglio) viene aggiunto l’adattamento seguente:
 Ai fini dell’accordo, le disposizioni della direttiva si intendono adattate come in appresso:
 Al punto 5.2 dell’allegato I viene aggiunto il testo seguente:
 «IS per l’Islanda
 FL per il Liechtenstein
 16 per la Norvegia»;
 4)
 dopo il punto 45ze (decisione 2004/90/CE della Commissione) viene inserito il punto seguente:
 «45zf.
 32004 L 0104: direttiva 2004/104/CE della Commissione, del 14 ottobre 2004, che adegua al progresso tecnico la direttiva 72/245/CEE del Consiglio relativa alle perturbazioni radioelettriche (compatibilità elettromagnetica) dei veicoli a motore e che modifica la direttiva 70/156/CEE concernente il ravvicinamento delle legislazioni degli Stati membri relative all’omologazione dei veicoli a motore e dei loro rimorchi (GU L 337 del 13.11.2004, pag. 13), rettificata dalla GU L 56 del 2.3.2005, pag. 35.»
 Articolo 2
 I testi della direttiva 2004/104/CE nelle lingue islandese e norvegese, da pubblicare nel supplemento SEE della Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea, fanno fede.
 Articolo 3
 La presente decisione entra in vigore l’11 giugno 2005, a condizione che tutte le notificazioni previste dall’articolo 103, paragrafo 1, dell’accordo siano pervenute al Comitato misto SEE (3).
 Articolo 4
 La presente decisione è pubblicata nella sezione SEE e nel supplemento SEE della Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 10 giugno 2005.
 Per il Comitato misto SEE
 Il presidente
 Richard WRIGHT
 (1) GU L 198 del 28.7.2005, pag. 45.
 (2) GU L 337 del 13.11.2004, pag. 13.
 (3) Non è stata comunicata l’esistenza di obblighi costituzionali.


type: legislation

jurisdiction: US

text:
 114 HR 1950 IH: Sunset Inefficient and Unaccountable Government Act
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2015-04-22
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I
 114th CONGRESS
 1st Session
 H. R. 1950
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 April 22, 2015
 Mr. Byrne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
 A BILL
 To abolish certain executive agencies unless Congress disapproves of such abolishment, and for
 other purposes.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Sunset Inefficient and Unaccountable Government Act. 2.Abolishment of agencies (a)In generalEach agency listed in subsection (c) shall be abolished on the date set forth in subsection (c), unless a Federal law disapproving of the abolishment of the agency is enacted before such date.
 (b)Effect of abolishmentWhen an agency is abolished under this Act, the head of such agency may take such actions as are necessary to dispose of the assets, obligations, and liabilities of the agency during the one-year period that begins on the date of such abolishment.
 (c)Schedule for abolishment
 (1)AgricultureThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)The Department of Agriculture. (B)Any other agency—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives.
 (2)CommerceThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)The Department of Commerce. (B)Any other agency—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.
 (C)Any other agency— (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives.
 (D)Any other agency— (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives.
 (3)EducationThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)The Department of Education. (B)Any other agency—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the House of Representatives.
 (4)EnergyThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)The Department of Energy. (B)Any other agency—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.
 (C)Any other agency— (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives.
 (5)Health and Human ServicesThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 6 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the Department of Health and Human Services.
 (6)Housing and Urban Development; JudiciaryThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 7 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)The Department of Housing and Urban Development. (B)Any other agency, other than the Department of Justice—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.
 (7)LaborThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 8 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the Department of Labor.
 (8)InteriorThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 9 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)The Department of the Interior. (B)Any other agency—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives.
 (9)Treasury; Veterans AffairsThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)Any office of the Department of the Treasury. (B)Any other agency, other than the Department of the Treasury—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives.
 (C)The Department of Veterans Affairs. (D)Any other agency—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives.
 (10)Transportation; Armed Services; Foreign Affairs; Homeland SecurityThe date of abolishment referred to in subsection (a) is 11 years after the date of enactment of this Act for the following agencies:
 (A)The Department of Transportation. (B)Any other agency—
 (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
 (C)Any other agency, except the Department of Defense— (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
 (D)Any other agency, except the Department of State— (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
 (E)Any other agency, except the Department of Homeland Security— (i)about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency during the previous 10 years; and
 (ii)whose authorizing legislation was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives.
 (F)Any other agency, except the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Department of the Treasury, about which Congress has not passed a concurrent resolution disapproving of the abolishment of such agency within the last 10 years.
 (d)Future datesOn the date that is 10 years after each date listed in subsection (c) for the abolishment of an agency, and every 10 years thereafter, if such agency exists, such agency shall be abolished.
 3.Self-review of agencies
 Not later 1 year before the date on which an agency is scheduled to be abolished pursuant to section 2(a), the head of such agency shall submit to Congress a report on the roles and responsibilities of the agency detailing the agency’s justification for existence, including areas where the duties of the agency may overlap with the duties of other agencies.
 4.Agency definedThe term agency has the meaning given the term Executive agency in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.


text:
 21.6.2012
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 161/30
 DECYZJA WSPÓLNEGO KOMITETU EOG
 NR 25/2012
 z dnia 10 lutego 2012 r.
 zmieniająca załącznik XIII (Transport) do Porozumienia EOG
 WSPÓLNY KOMITET EOG,
 uwzględniając Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, zmienione Protokołem dostosowującym Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, zwane dalej „Porozumieniem”, w szczególności jego art. 98,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Załącznik XIII do Porozumienia został zmieniony decyzją Wspólnego Komitetu EOG nr 165/2011 z dnia 19 grudnia 2011 r. (1).
 (2)
 W Porozumieniu należy uwzględnić rozporządzenie Komisji (UE) nr 36/2010 z dnia 3 grudnia 2009 r. w sprawie wspólnotowych wzorów licencji maszynisty, świadectw uzupełniających, uwierzytelnionych odpisów świadectw uzupełniających oraz wniosków o wydanie licencji maszynisty zgodnie z dyrektywą 2007/59/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (2), sprostowane w Dz.U. L 286 z 4.11.2010, s. 22,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ:
 Artykuł 1
 Po pkt 42ga (decyzja Komisji 2010/17/WE) w załączniku XIII do Porozumienia dodaje się, co następuje:
 „42 gb.
 32010 R 0036: rozporządzenie Komisji (UE) nr 36/2010 z dnia 3 grudnia 2009 r. w sprawie wspólnotowych wzorów licencji maszynisty, świadectw uzupełniających, uwierzytelnionych odpisów świadectw uzupełniających oraz wniosków o wydanie licencji maszynisty zgodnie z dyrektywą 2007/59/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (Dz.U. L 13 z 19.1.2010, s. 1), sprostowane w Dz.U. L 286 z 4.11.2010, s. 22.
 Do celów Porozumienia przepisy tego rozporządzenia odczytuje się z uwzględnieniem następujących dostosowań:
 a)
 terminy »wspólnotowy wzór« oraz »wzór Wspólnot Europejskich« w rozporządzeniu i załącznikach zastępuje się słowami »model EOG«, jeśli licencja, świadectwo uzupełniające, uwierzytelniony odpis świadectwa uzupełniającego lub wniosek o wydanie licencji maszynisty jest wydane przez państwo EFTA;
 b)
 w załączniku I pkt 3 lit. c) zdanie wprowadzające, w odniesieniu do państw EFTA, otrzymuje brzmienie:
 »oznaczenie państwa EFTA wydającego licencję, wydrukowane czarnym tuszem i otoczone czarną elipsą.«;
 c)
 w załączniku I pkt 3 lit. c) dodaje się, co następuje:
 »N
 :
 Norwegia«;
 d)
 w załączniku I pkt 3 lit. d) dodaje się, co następuje:
 »język norweski
 :
 FØRERBEVIS«;
 e)
 w załączniku I pkt 6 w odniesieniu do państw EFTA dodaje się, co następuje:
 »wydruk oznaczenia państwa EFTA wydającego licencję następuje zgodnie z pkt 3 lit. c) niniejszego załącznika«;
 f)
 prostokąt z 12 gwiazdkami na świadectwie uzupełniającym, uwierzytelnionym odpisie świadectwa uzupełniającego lub wniosku o wydanie licencji maszynisty, o którym mowa w załączniku II pkt 4, załączniku III pkt 4 oraz załączniku IV pkt 2, w odniesieniu do państw EFTA zastępuje się oznaczeniem państwa EFTA wydającego licencję, wydrukowanym czarnym tuszem i otoczonym czarną elipsą.”.
 Artykuł 2
 Teksty rozporządzenia (UE) nr 36/2010, sprostowanego w Dz.U. L 286 z 4.11.2010, s. 22, w języku islandzkim i norweskim, które zostaną opublikowane w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej, są autentyczne.
 Artykuł 3
 Niniejsza decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem 11 lutego 2012 r., pod warunkiem że Wspólny Komitet EOG otrzyma wszystkie notyfikacje przewidziane w art. 103 ust. 1 Porozumienia (3).
 Artykuł 4
 Niniejsza decyzja zostaje opublikowana w sekcji EOG i w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 10 lutego 2012 r.
 W imieniu Wspólnego Komitetu EOG
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 Pełniący obowiązki Przewodniczącego
 (1) Dz.U. L 76 z 15.3.2012, s. 57.
 (2) Dz.U. L 13 z 19.1.2010, s. 1.
 (3) Nie wskazano wymogów konstytucyjnych.


text:
 29.10.2005
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 C 271/27
 Wybór prezesa Sądu do spraw Służby Publicznej
 (2005/C 271/51)
 Na posiedzeniu w dniu 6 października 2005 r. sędziowie Sądu do spraw Służby Publicznej wybrali na okres trzech lat, zgodnie z art. 3 decyzji Rady z dnia 22 lipca 2005 r. (1) i art. 4 ust. 1 załącznika I do Protokołu w sprawie Statutu Trybunału Sprawiedliwości (2), Paula J. Mahoneya na stanowisko prezesa tego Sądu, na okres od 6 października 2005 r. do 5 października 2008 r.
 (1) Decyzja Rady Unii Europejskiej z dnia 22 lipca 2005 r. w sprawie mianowania sędziów Sądu do spraw Służby Publicznej Unii Europejskiej (Dz.U. L 197 z 28.7.2005, str. 28)
 (2) Dz.U. L 333 z 9.11.2004, str. 9


text:
 4.12.2004
 SV
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
 C 300/39
 FÖRSTAINSTANSRÄTTENS DOM
 den 30 september 2004
 i mål T-313/02: David Meca-Medina och Igor Majcen mot Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission (1)
 (Konkurrens - Frihet att tillhandahålla tjänster - Antidopningsregler antagna av Internationella olympiska kommittén (IOK) - Rent idrottsliga regler)
 (2004/C 300/76)
 Rättegångsspråk: franska
 I mål T-313/02, David Meca-Medina, bosatt i Barcelona (Spanien) och Igor Majcen, bosatt i Ljubljana (Slovenien) (ombud för båda: advokaten J.-L. Dupont) mot Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission (ombud: O. Beynet och A. Bouquet, med delgivningsadress i Luxemburg), med stöd av Republiken Finland (ombud: T. Pynnä, med delgivningsadress i Luxemburg), angående en talan om ogiltigförklaring av kommissionens beslut av den 1 augusti 2002 att avslå det klagomål som sökandena ingett mot Internationella olympiska kommittén (IOK), i syfte att få fastställt att vissa bestämmelser som denna antagit och som genomförts av Internationella simförbundet (FINA) samt vissa förfaranden för dopningkontroll strider mot de gemenskapsrättsliga bestämmelserna om konkurrens och frihet att tillhandahålla tjänster (ärende COMP/38158 – Meca-Medina och Majcen mot IOK), har förstainstansrätten (fjärde avdelningen), sammansatt av ordföranden H. Legal samt domarna V. Tiili och M. Vilaras; justitiesekreterare: avdelningsdirektören J. Palacio González, den 30 september 2004 avkunnat en dom där domslutet har följande lydelse:
 1)
 Talan ogillas.
 2)
 Sökandena skall bära sina rättegångskostnader samt ersätta kommissionens rättegångskostnader.
 3)
 Republiken Finland skall bära sin rättegångskostnad.
 (1) EGT C 305, 7.12.2002.


text:
 27.10.2011
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 280/19
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) č. 1082/2011
 z 26. októbra 2011,
 ktorým sa ustanovujú paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1234/2007 z 22. októbra 2007 o vytvorení spoločnej organizácie poľnohospodárskych trhov a o osobitných ustanoveniach pre určité poľnohospodárske výrobky (nariadenie o jednotnej spoločnej organizácii trhov) (1),
 so zreteľom na vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 543/2011 zo 7. júna 2011, ktorým sa ustanovujú podrobné pravidlá vykonávania nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 1234/2007, pokiaľ ide o sektory ovocia a zeleniny a spracovaného ovocia a zeleniny (2), a najmä na jeho článok 136 ods. 1,
 keďže:
 Vykonávacím nariadením (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sa v súlade s výsledkami Uruguajského kola mnohostranných obchodných rokovaní ustanovujú kritériá, na základe ktorých Komisia stanovuje paušálne hodnoty na dovoz z tretích krajín, pokiaľ ide o výrobky a obdobia uvedené v časti A prílohy XVI k uvedenému nariadeniu,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty uvedené v článku 136 vykonávacieho nariadenia (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sú stanovené v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu.
 Článok 2
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť 27. októbra 2011.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 26. októbra 2011
 Za Komisiu v mene predsedu
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 generálny riaditeľ pre poľnohospodárstvo a rozvoj vidieka
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 299, 16.11.2007, s. 1.
 (2) Ú. v. EÚ L 157, 15.6.2011, s. 1.
 PRÍLOHA
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Číselný znak KN
 Kód tretej krajiny (1)
 Paušálna dovozná hodnota
 0702 00 00
 AL
 57,4
 MA
 49,3
 MK
 52,3
 ZZ
 53,0
 0707 00 05
 AL
 45,6
 MK
 62,2
 TR
 151,2
 ZZ
 86,3
 0709 90 70
 AR
 33,4
 TR
 84,3
 ZZ
 58,9
 0805 50 10
 AR
 57,4
 TR
 63,6
 ZA
 73,7
 ZZ
 64,9
 0806 10 10
 BR
 240,6
 CL
 71,4
 TR
 142,3
 ZA
 67,9
 ZZ
 130,6
 0808 10 80
 AR
 61,9
 BR
 86,4
 CA
 106,1
 CL
 90,0
 CN
 82,6
 NZ
 120,1
 US
 99,9
 ZA
 106,6
 ZZ
 94,2
 0808 20 50
 CN
 46,7
 TR
 125,4
 ZZ
 86,1
 (1) Nomenklatúra krajín stanovená nariadením Komisie (ES) č. 1833/2006 (Ú. v. EÚ L 354, 14.12.2006, s. 19). Kód „ZZ“ znamená „iného pôvodu“.


text:
 23.2.2006
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 L 53/38
 ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΕΙΚΤΉΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ ΤΟΥ ΕΟX
 αριθ. 142/2005
 της 2ας Δεκεμβρίου 2005
 για τροποποίηση του παραρτήματος Ι (Κτηνιατρικά και φυτοϋγειονομικά θέματα) της συμφωνίας για τον ΕΟΧ
 Η ΜΕΙΚΤΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ TOY ΕΟΧ,
 Έχοντας υπόψη τη συμφωνία για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο, όπως τροποποιήθηκε από το πρωτόκολλο προσαρμογής της συμφωνίας για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο, εφεξής «η συμφωνία», και ιδίως το άρθρο 98,
 Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:
 (1)
 Το παράρτημα Ι της συμφωνίας τροποποιήθηκε από την απόφαση αριθ. 110/2005 της Μεικτής Επιτροπής του ΕΟΧ (1).
 (2)
 Η απόφαση 2005/435/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής, της 9ης Ιουνίου 2005, με την οποία επιτρέπεται προσωρινά η εμπορία ορισμένων σπόρων του είδους Pisum sativum, Vicia faba και Linum usitatissimum που δεν ικανοποιούν τις απαιτήσεις των οδηγιών του Συμβουλίου 66/401/ΕΟΚ ή 2002/57/ΕΚ αντίστοιχα (2) πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία,
 ΑΠΟΦΑΣΙΖΕΙ:
 Άρθρο 1
 Μετά το σημείο 41 (απόφαση 2005/310/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής) στο μέρος 2 του κεφαλαίου ΙII του παραρτήματος Ι προστίθεται το ακόλουθο σημείο:
 «42.
 32005 D 0435: απόφαση 2005/435/ΕΚ της Επιτροπής, της 9ης Ιουνίου 2005, με την οποία επιτρέπεται προσωρινά η εμπορία ορισμένων σπόρων του είδους Pisum sativum, Vicia faba και Linum usitatissimum που δεν ικανοποιούν τις απαιτήσεις των οδηγιών του Συμβουλίου 66/401/ΕΟΚ ή 2002/57/ΕΚ αντίστοιχα (ΕΕ L 151 της 14.6.2005, σ. 23).»
 Άρθρο 2
 Τα κείμενα της απόφασης 2005/435/ΕΚ στην ισλανδική και τη νορβηγική γλώσσα, τα οποία δημοσιεύονται στο συμπλήρωμα για τον ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, είναι αυθεντικά.
 Άρθρο 3
 Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει την 3η Δεκεμβρίου 2005, υπό την προϋπόθεση ότι έχουν πραγματοποιηθεί προς τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή του ΕΟΧ όλες οι κοινοποιήσεις που προβλέπονται στο άρθρο 103 παράγραφος 1 της συμφωνίας (3).
 Άρθρο 4
 Η παρούσα απόφαση δημοσιεύεται στο τμήμα για τον ΕΟΧ και στο συμπλήρωμα για τον ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
 Βρυξέλλες, 2 Δεκεμβρίου 2005.
 Για τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή του ΕΟΧ
 Ο Πρόεδρος
 Η Α.Υ. ο Πρίγκιπας Νικόλαος του ΛΙΧΤΕΝΣΤΆΪΝ
 (1) EE L 339 της 22.12.2005, σ. 6.
 (2) ΕΕ L 151 της 14.6.2005, σ. 23.
 (3) Δεν έχουν αναφερθεί συνταγματικές απαιτήσεις.


text:
 6.12.2008
 SV
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
 C 313/4
 Domstolens dom (tredje avdelningen) av den 16 oktober 2008 (begäran om förhandsavgörande från Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Nederländerna) – R.H.H. Renneberg mot Staatssecretaris van Financiën
 (Mål C-527/06) (1)
 (Fri rörlighet för arbetstagare - Artikel 39 EG - Skattelagstiftning - Inkomstskatt - Fastställelse av beskattningsunderlaget - Medborgare i en medlemsstat som uppbär hela eller nästan hela sin skattepliktiga inkomst i den staten - Hemvist i en annan medlemsstat)
 (2008/C 313/06)
 Rättegångsspråk: nederländska
 Hänskjutande domstol
 Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
 Parter i målet vid den nationella domstolen
 Klagande: R.H.H. Renneberg
 Motpart: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
 Saken
 Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Tolkning av artiklarna 39 EG och 56 EG – Fastställande av den beskattningsbara inkomsten – Medborgare i en medlemsstat som uppbär hela sin inkomst i denna stat men har sitt hemvist i en annan medlemsstat – Nationell lagstiftning enligt vilken avdrag inte kan göras för ett underskott som är hänförligt till ett bostadshus som är beläget i en annan medlemsstat
 Domslut
 Artikel 39 EG ska tolkas så, att den utgör hinder för en sådan nationell lagstiftning som den som är i fråga i målet vid den nationella domstolen, enligt vilken en gemenskapsmedborgare som saknar hemvist i den medlemsstat där han uppbär en inkomst som utgör hela eller nästan hela hans skattepliktiga inkomst, vid fastställandet av beskattningsunderlaget avseende nämnda inkomst i den medlemsstaten, inte kan yrka avdrag för ett underskott avseende ett hus för bostadsändamål som är beläget i en annan medlemsstat och som nämnde medborgare äger, medan en person med hemvist i den förstnämnda medlemsstaten får göra ett sådant avdrag för underskott vid fastställandet av underlaget för sin inkomstbeskattning.
 (1) EUT C 56, av den 10.3.2007.


text:
 7.9.2013
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 C 260/22
 Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Thüringer Oberlandesgericht (Niemcy) w dniu 11 czerwca 2013 r. — Udo Rätzke przeciwko S+K Handels GmbH
 (Sprawa C-319/13)
 2013/C 260/38
 Język postępowania: niemiecki
 Sąd odsyłający
 Thüringer Oberlandesgericht
 Strony w postępowaniu głównym
 Strona skarżąca: Udo Rätzke
 Strona pozwana: S+K Handels GmbH
 Pytanie prejudycjalne
 Czy art. 4a) rozporządzenia delegowanego Komisji (UE) nr 1062/2010 z dnia 28 września 2010 r. uzupełniającego dyrektywę Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2010/30/UE w odniesieniu do etykiet efektywności energetycznej dla telewizorów (1) należy interpretować w ten sposób, że
 dystrybutorzy mają jedynie wówczas obowiązek opatrzenia telewizorów etykietą (od dnia 30.11.2011 r.), gdy owe telewizory zostały na podstawie art. 3 ust. 1 a) wskazanego rozporządzenia (od dnia 30.11.2011 r.) już dostarczone przez dostawców z odpowiednią etykietą,
 czy też dystrybutorzy mają obowiązek umieszczenia etykiety (od dnia 30.11.2011 r.) również w przypadku telewizorów, które zostały dostarczone przez dostawców przed dniem 30.11.2011 r. bez odpowiednich etykiet, w związku z czym dystrybutor jest zobowiązany (w odpowiednim czasie, następczo) do zamówienia etykiet dla tego rodzajów telewizorów?
 (1) Dz.U. L 314, s. 64.


text:
 19.4.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 165/23
 Iarraidh ar réamhrialú ó Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main (an Ghearmáin) a taisceadh an 1 Feabhra 2022 – IA v DER Touristik Deutschland GmbH
 (Cás C-62/22)
 (2022/C 165/37)
 Teanga an cháis: an Ghearmáinis
 An chúirt a rinne an tarchur
 Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main
 Páirtithe sna príomhimeachtaí
 Iarratasóir: IA
 Cosantóir: DER Touristik Deutschland GmbH
 An cheist a tharchuirtear
 An bhfuil Airteagal 18(1) de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1215/2012 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 12 Nollaig 2012 maidir le dlínse agus le haithint agus forghníomhú breithiúnas in ábhair shibhialta agus tráchtála (athmhúnlú) (1) le léirmhíniú sa chaoi is go gciallaíonn sé go leagtar síos leis an bhforáil sin, chomh maith le socrú maidir le dlínse idirnáisiúnta, socrú nach mór don chúirt ag tabhairt faoin mbreithniú a urramú maidir le dlínse chríche na gcúirteanna náisiúnta i gcásanna a bhaineann le conarthaí taistil má tá sainchónaí ag an tomhaltóir, mar thaistealaí, agus ag a pháirtí conarthach, an tionscnóir turas, sa Bhallstát céanna, cé nach bhfuil ceannphointe an turais sa Bhallstát sin ach i dtír eile, agus, mar thoradh air sin, gur féidir leis an tomhaltóir éilimh chonarthacha a thabhairt i gcoinne an tionscnóra turas, sa bhreis ar fhorálacha náisiúnta, sna cúirteanna den tír ina bhfuil sé ina shainchónaí.
 (1) IO 2012 L 351, lch. 1.