text:
 13.2.2019
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 42/25
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) 2019/251
 z dnia 12 lutego 2019 r.
 dotyczące ostatecznych ceł antydumpingowych nałożonych na przywóz pochodzący z przedsiębiorstwa Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co., Ltd oraz zmieniające rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) 2015/2272 nakładające ostateczne cło antydumpingowe na przywóz niektórych rur i przewodów bez szwu, z żelaza lub stali, pochodzących z Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, w szczególności jego art. 266,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/1036 z dnia 8 czerwca 2016 r. w sprawie ochrony przed przywozem produktów po cenach dumpingowych z krajów niebędących członkami Unii Europejskiej („rozporządzenie podstawowe”) (1), w szczególności jego art. 11 ust. 2,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 KONTEKST I WYROKI SĄDOWE
 (1)
 Rozporządzeniem Rady (WE) nr 926/2009 (2) nałożono ostateczne cła antydumpingowe na przywóz niektórych rur i przewodów bez szwu, z żelaza lub stali („SPT”), pochodzących z Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej („ChRL”).
 (2)
 W grudniu 2009 r. Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd („Hubei”), jeden z producentów eksportujących SPT w ChRL, wniósł do Sądu Unii Europejskiej skargę o stwierdzenie nieważności rozporządzenia (WE) nr 926/2009. W wyroku z dnia 29 stycznia 2014 r. w sprawie T-528/09 (3) Sąd stwierdził nieważność rozporządzenia (WE) nr 926/2009 w zakresie, w jakim nakłada ono cła antydumpingowe na wywóz SPT wytwarzanych przez Hubei oraz pobiera tymczasowe cła nałożone na ten wywóz.
 (3)
 W kwietniu 2014 r. pewna liczba unijnych producentów SPT odwołała się od tego wyroku do Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej (sprawy C-186/14 P i C-193/14 P) (4).
 (4)
 W dniu 7 grudnia 2015 r. w następstwie wniosku o dokonanie przeglądu wygaśnięcia na podstawie art. 11 ust. 2 rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 1225/2009 (5) Komisja rozszerzyła, rozporządzeniem wykonawczym (UE) 2015/2272 (6), cła na przywóz SPT z ChRL, w tym również cła na przywóz SPT wytwarzanych przez Hubei.
 (5)
 W dniu 7 kwietnia 2016 r. w wyroku w sprawach połączonych C-186/14 P i C-193/14 P Trybunał Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej oddalił apelację od wyroku Sądu w sprawie T-528/09, potwierdzając tym samym wyrok Sądu.
 (6)
 W dniu 3 czerwca 2016 r. w celu wykonania wyżej wymienionych wyroków służby Komisji usunęły Hubei z grupy przedsiębiorstw wymienionych w dodatkowym kodzie TARIC A950 i umieściły oddzielnie to przedsiębiorstwo pod dodatkowym kodem TARIC C129 (tzw. „decyzja Komisji z dnia 3 czerwca 2016 r.”). Ta zmiana kodu TARIC odzwierciedlała unieważnienie przez Trybunał ceł antydumpingowych na przywóz SPT wytwarzanych przez Hubei.
 POSTĘPOWANIE PRZED SĄDEM W SPRAWIE T-364/16
 (7)
 W dniu 7 czerwca 2016 r. pewna liczba unijnych producentów SPT złożyła do Sądu wniosek o stwierdzenie nieważności zmian wprowadzonych do bazy danych TARIC. Wyrokiem z dnia 18 października 2018 r. w sprawie T-364/16 (7) Sąd stwierdził nieważność tzw. decyzji Komisji z dnia 3 czerwca 2016 r. dotyczącej usunięcia Hubei z wykazu przedsiębiorstw objętych dodatkowym kodem TARIC A 950 i umieszczenia go w wykazie pod dodatkowym kodem TARIC C 129.
 (8)
 W wyroku w sprawie T-364/16 Sąd potwierdził, iż Komisja Europejska słusznie uznała, że zgodność z poprzednimi wyrokami z dnia 7 kwietnia 2016 r. oraz z dnia 29 stycznia 2014 r. wymagała, zgodnie z art. 266 Traktatu o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, by cła antydumpingowe ustanowione rozporządzeniem wykonawczym (UE) 2015/2272 nie były już pobierane od towarów produkowanych przez Hubei (8).
 (9)
 Sąd uznał jednak, że unieważnienie rozporządzenia (WE) nr 926/2009 w zakresie, w jakim odnosi się ono do Hubei, nie może oznaczać automatycznego usunięcia z porządku prawnego UE przepisów rozporządzenia wykonawczego (UE) 2015/2272, które nie zostały unieważnione przez sądy Unii Europejskiej (9). W związku z tym, ponieważ rozporządzenie wykonawcze (UE) 2015/2272 korzysta z domniemania ważności, Komisja powinna była je zmienić lub uchylić w drodze rozporządzenia (10).
 ZMIANA ŚRODKÓW ANTYDUMPINGOWYCH
 (10)
 W świetle ustaleń Sądu w sprawie T-364/16 i zgodnie z zasadą równoważności formy rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) 2015/2272 należy zmienić, aby wyłączyć Hubei z zakresu środków antydumpingowych mających zastosowanie do przywozu SPT z ChRL z mocą wsteczną do daty wejścia w życie wspomnianego rozporządzenia.
 (11)
 Wnioski o zwrot lub umorzenie powinny być składane do krajowych organów celnych zgodnie z obowiązującymi przepisami prawa celnego.
 (12)
 W świetle niedawnego orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości (11) właściwe jest ustalenie wysokości odsetek należnych w przypadku zwrotu ceł ostatecznych. Wynika to z faktu, że obowiązujące przepisy dotyczące należności celnych nie określają wysokości takich odsetek, a stosowanie przepisów krajowych prowadziłoby do nieuzasadnionych zakłóceń konkurencji między przedsiębiorstwami w zależności od państwa członkowskiego, w którym dokonywana byłaby odprawa celna.
 (13)
 W dniu 13 grudnia 2018 r. Komisja poinformowała zainteresowane strony o swoim zamiarze wprowadzenia zmian w rozporządzeniu wykonawczym Komisji (UE) 2015/2272 w celu usunięcia Hubei z wykazu przedsiębiorstw, na których produkty nałożono cła antydumpingowe, oraz przekazała zainteresowanym stronom odnośne uzasadnienie. Nie otrzymano żadnych uwag.
 (14)
 Środki przewidziane w niniejszym rozporządzeniu są zgodne z opinią komitetu ustanowionego na mocy art. 15 ust. 1 rozporządzenia (UE) 2016/1036,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 1. Zwraca się lub umarza ostateczne cła antydumpingowe, które zostały naliczone na mocy rozporządzenia wykonawczego (UE) 2015/2272 w związku z przywozem do Unii produktu objętego postępowaniem pochodzącego od Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co., Ltd. Wnioski o zwrot lub umorzenie składa się do krajowych organów celnych zgodnie z obowiązującymi przepisami prawa celnego.
 2. W przypadku zwrotu, który daje prawo do wypłaty należnych odsetek, stosuje się stopę procentową, którą wykorzystuje Europejski Bank Centralny do jego głównych operacji refinansujących, publikowaną w serii C Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej, obowiązującą pierwszego dnia kalendarzowego miesiąca, w którym przypada termin płatności, powiększoną o jeden punkt procentowy.
 Artykuł 2
 W rozporządzeniu wykonawczym (UE) 2015/2272 wprowadza się następujące zmiany:
 1)
 art. 1 ust. 2 otrzymuje brzmienie:
 „2. Stawka ostatecznego cła antydumpingowego mająca zastosowanie do ceny netto na granicy Unii przed ocleniem jest następująca dla produktów opisanych w ust. 1 i wytworzonych przez poniższe przedsiębiorstwa:
 Przedsiębiorstwo
 Stawka cła antydumpingowego (%)
 Dodatkowy kod TARIC
 Shandong Luxing Steel Pipe Co., Ltd, Qingzhou City, ChRL
 17,7
 A949
 Inne przedsiębiorstwa współpracujące wymienione w załączniku
 27,2
 A950
 Wszystkie pozostałe przedsiębiorstwa
 39,2
 A999
 Cło antydumpingowe nie ma zastosowania w przypadku produktów opisanych w ust. 1 i wytwarzanych przez Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co., Ltd. Dodatkowy kod TARIC ustanowiony dla Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co., Ltd. to C129.”;
 2)
 tabela w załączniku otrzymuje brzmienie:
 „Nazwa przedsiębiorstwa
 Miasto
 Hebei Hongling Seamless Steel Pipes Manufacturing Co., Ltd
 Handan
 Hengyang Valin MPM Co., Ltd
 Hengyang
 Hengyang Valin Steel Tube Co., Ltd
 Hengyang
 Jiangsu Huacheng Industry Group Co., Ltd
 Zhangjiagang
 Jiangyin City Seamless Steel Tube Factory
 Jiangyin
 Jiangyin Metal Tube Making Factory
 Jiangyin
 Pangang Group Chengdu Iron & Steel Co., Ltd
 Chengdu
 Shenyang Xinda Co., Ltd
 Shenyang
 Suzhou Seamless Steel Tube Works
 Suzhou
 Tianjin Pipe (Group) Corporation (TPCO)
 Tianjin
 Wuxi Dexin Steel Tube Co., Ltd
 Wuxi
 Wuxi Dongwu Pipe Industry Co., Ltd
 Wuxi
 Wuxi Seamless Oil Pipe Co., Ltd
 Wuxi
 Zhangjiagang City Yiyang Pipe Producing Co., Ltd
 Zhangjiagang
 Zhangjiagang Yichen Steel Tube Co., Ltd
 Zhangjiagang”
 Artykuł 3
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie następnego dnia po jego opublikowaniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Art. 2 stosuje się od dnia 9 grudnia 2015 r.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 12 lutego 2019 r.
 W imieniu Komisji
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 Przewodniczący
 (1) Dz.U. L 176 z 30.6.2016, s. 21.
 (2) Rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 926/2009 z dnia 24 września 2009 r. nakładające ostateczne cło antydumpingowe i stanowiące o ostatecznym pobraniu tymczasowego cła nałożonego na przywóz niektórych rur i przewodów bez szwu, z żelaza lub stali, pochodzących z Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej, Dz.U. L 262 z 6.10.2009, s. 19.
 (3) Wyrok Sądu (druga izba) z dnia 29 stycznia 2014 r. w sprawie T-528/09 Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd przeciwko Radzie Unii Europejskiej, ECLI:EU:T:2014:35.
 (4) Wyrok Trybunału (druga izba) z dnia 7 kwietnia 2016 r. w sprawach połączonych C-186/14 P i C-193/14 P ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Ostrava a.s. i inni przeciwko Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd i Rada Unii Europejskiej przeciwko Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd, ECLI:EU:C:2016:209.
 (5) Rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1225/2009 z dnia 30 listopada 2009 r. w sprawie ochrony przed przywozem produktów po cenach dumpingowych z krajów niebędących członkami Wspólnoty Europejskiej (Dz.U. L 343 z 22.12.2009, s. 51).
 (6) Rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) 2015/2272 z dnia 7 grudnia 2015 r. nakładające ostateczne cło antydumpingowe na przywóz niektórych rur i przewodów bez szwu, z żelaza i stali, pochodzących z Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej, w następstwie przeglądu wygaśnięcia na podstawie art. 11 ust. 2 rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 1225/2009, Dz.U. L 322 z 8.12.2015, s. 21.
 (7) Wyrok Sądu (siódma izba) z dnia 18 października 2018 r. w sprawie T-364/16 ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Ostrava a.s. i inni przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej, ECLI:EU:T:2018:696.
 (8) Sprawa T-364/16, pkt 67.
 (9) Sprawa T-364/16, pkt 65.
 (10) Sprawa T-364/16, pkt 68.
 (11) Wyrok Trybunału (trzecia izba) z dnia 18 stycznia 2017 r., C-365/15, Wortmann przeciwko Hauptzollamt Bielefeld, EU:C:2017:19, pkt 35–39.


type: wikipedia

text:
Iar-imreoir sacair ón Spáinn ab ea Santiago Ezquerro Marín (a rugadh ar an 14 Nollaig 1976 i gCalahorra, La Rioja). Chríochnaigh se ag imirt peile sa bhliain 2009. D'imir sé a séasúr deireanach le F.C. Osasuna. D'imir sé freisin le Atlético Madrid, chomh maith le Athletic Bilbao agus F.C. Barcelona. Ionsaitheoir nó cliathánaí a bhí ann de ghnáth, a toghadh uair amháin ar fhoireann náisiúnta na Spáinne.
 Ezquerro, Santiago
 Ezquerro, Santiago
 Ezquerro, Santiago
 Ezquerro, Santiago
 Ezquerro, Santiago
 Daoine beo


type: other

jurisdiction: US

text: b' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL\n\n Washington, D.C. 20201\n\n\n\n\nSeptember 7, 2010\n\nTO: Mary Wakefield, Ph.D., R.N.\n Administrator\n Health Resources and Services Administration\n\n\nFROM: /Lori S. Pilcher/\n Assistant Inspector General for Grants, Internal Activities,\n and Information Technology Audits\n\n\nSUBJECT: Results of Limited Scope Review of Hudson River HealthCare, Inc.\xe2\x80\x99s Process for\n Compiling and Reporting Selected Recovery Act Data (A-02-10-02011)\n\n\nAttached, for your information, is an advance copy of our final report on Hudson River\nHealthCare, Inc. (Hudson River). We will issue this report to Hudson River within 5 business\ndays. The review was requested by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at\n(202) 619-1175, or through email at Lori.Pilcher@oig.hhs.gov. Please refer to report number\nA-02-10-02011 in all correspondence.\n\n\nAttachment\n\x0cDepartment of Health & Human Services\n OFFICE OF\n INSPECTOR GENERAL\n\n\n\n\n RESULTS OF LIMITED SCOPE\n REVIEW OF HUDSON RIVER\n HEALTHCARE, INC.\xe2\x80\x99S PROCESS\nFOR COMPILING AND REPORTING\nSELECTED RECOVERY ACT DATA\n\n\n\n\n Daniel R. Levinson\n Inspector General\n\n September 2010\n A-02-10-02011\n\x0c Office of Inspector General\n http://oig.hhs.gov\n\n\n\nThe mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG), as mandated by Public Law 95-452, as\namended, is to protect the integrity of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)\nprograms, as well as the health and welfare of beneficiaries served by those programs. This\nstatutory mission is carried out through a nationwide network of audits, investigations, and\ninspections conducted by the following operating components:\n\nOffice of Audit Services\n\nThe Office of Audit Services (OAS) provides auditing services for HHS, either by conducting\naudits with its own audit resources or by overseeing audit work done by others. Audits examine\nthe performance of HHS programs and/or its grantees and contractors in carrying out their\nrespective responsibilities and are intended to provide independent assessments of HHS\nprograms and operations. These assessments help reduce waste, abuse, and mismanagement and\npromote economy and efficiency throughout HHS.\n\nOffice of Evaluation and Inspections\nThe Office of Evaluation and Inspections (OEI) conducts national evaluations to provide HHS,\nCongress, and the public with timely, useful, and reliable information on significant issues.\nThese evaluations focus on preventing fraud, waste, or abuse and promoting economy,\nefficiency, and effectiveness of departmental programs. To promote impact, OEI reports also\npresent practical recommendations for improving program operations.\n\nOffice of Investigations\nThe Office of Investigations (OI) conducts criminal, civil, and administrative investigations of\nfraud and misconduct related to HHS programs, operations, and beneficiaries. With\ninvestigators working in all 50 States and the District of Columbia, OI utilizes its resources by\nactively coordinating with the Department of Justice and other Federal, State, and local law\nenforcement authorities. The investigative efforts of OI often lead to criminal convictions,\nadministrative sanctions, and/or civil monetary penalties.\n\nOffice of Counsel to the Inspector General\nThe Office of Counsel to the Inspector General (OCIG) provides general legal services to OIG,\nrendering advice and opinions on HHS programs and operations and providing all legal support\nfor OIG\xe2\x80\x99s internal operations. OCIG represents OIG in all civil and administrative fraud and\nabuse cases involving HHS programs, including False Claims Act, program exclusion, and civil\nmonetary penalty cases. In connection with these cases, OCIG also negotiates and monitors\ncorporate integrity agreements. OCIG renders advisory opinions, issues compliance program\nguidance, publishes fraud alerts, and provides other guidance to the health care industry\nconcerning the anti-kickback statute and other OIG enforcement authorities.\n\x0c DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General\n\n\n Office of Audit Services\n Jacob Javits Federal Building\n 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3900\n New York, NY 10278\nSeptember 9, 2010\n\nReport Number: A-02-10-02011\n\nMs. Anne Kauffman Nolon, M.P.H.\nPresident and Chief Executive Officer\nHudson River HealthCare, Inc.\n1200 Brown Street\nPeekskill, NY 10566\n\nDear Ms. Nolon:\n\nEnclosed is the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector\nGeneral (OIG), final report entitled Results of Limited Scope Review of Hudson River\nHealthCare, Inc.\xe2\x80\x99s Process for Compiling and Reporting Selected Recovery Act Data. We will\nforward a copy of this report to the HHS action official noted on the following page for review\nand any action deemed necessary.\n\nThe HHS action official will make final determination as to actions taken on all matters reported.\nWe request that you respond to this official within 30 days from the date of this letter. Your\nresponse should present any comments or additional information that you believe may have a\nbearing on the final determination.\n\nSection 8L of the Inspector General Act, 5 U.S.C. App., requires that OIG post its publicly\navailable reports on the OIG Web site. Accordingly, this report will be posted at\nhttp://oig.hhs.gov.\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this report, please do not hesitate to call me, or\ncontact Glenn H. Richter, Audit Manager, at (518) 437-9390, extension 227, or through email at\nGlenn.Richter@oig.hhs.gov. Please refer to report number A-02-10-02011 in all\ncorrespondence.\n\n Sincerely,\n\n\n\n /James P. Edert/\n Regional Inspector General\n for Audit Services\n\n\nEnclosure\n\x0cPage 2 \xe2\x80\x93 Ms. Anne Kauffman Nolon, M.P.H.\n\n\nDirect Reply to HHS Action Official:\n\nMs. Sandy Seaton\nExternal Audits, A-133\nHealth Resources and Services Administration\nOffice of Federal Assistance Management/Division of Financial Integrity\nRoom 11A-55, Parklawn Building\nRockville, MD 20857\n\x0cDepartment of Health & Human Services\n OFFICE OF\n INSPECTOR GENERAL\n\n\n\n\n RESULTS OF LIMITED SCOPE\n REVIEW OF HUDSON RIVER\n HEALTHCARE, INC.\xe2\x80\x99S PROCESS\nFOR COMPILING AND REPORTING\nSELECTED RECOVERY ACT DATA\n\n\n\n\n Daniel R. Levinson\n Inspector General\n\n September 2010\n A-02-10-02011\n\x0c Office of Inspector General\n http://oig.hhs.gov\n\n\n\nThe mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG), as mandated by Public Law 95-452, as\namended, is to protect the integrity of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)\nprograms, as well as the health and welfare of beneficiaries served by those programs. This\nstatutory mission is carried out through a nationwide network of audits, investigations, and\ninspections conducted by the following operating components:\n\nOffice of Audit Services\n\nThe Office of Audit Services (OAS) provides auditing services for HHS, either by conducting\naudits with its own audit resources or by overseeing audit work done by others. Audits examine\nthe performance of HHS programs and/or its grantees and contractors in carrying out their\nrespective responsibilities and are intended to provide independent assessments of HHS\nprograms and operations. These assessments help reduce waste, abuse, and mismanagement and\npromote economy and efficiency throughout HHS.\n\nOffice of Evaluation and Inspections\nThe Office of Evaluation and Inspections (OEI) conducts national evaluations to provide HHS,\nCongress, and the public with timely, useful, and reliable information on significant issues.\nThese evaluations focus on preventing fraud, waste, or abuse and promoting economy,\nefficiency, and effectiveness of departmental programs. To promote impact, OEI reports also\npresent practical recommendations for improving program operations.\n\nOffice of Investigations\nThe Office of Investigations (OI) conducts criminal, civil, and administrative investigations of\nfraud and misconduct related to HHS programs, operations, and beneficiaries. With\ninvestigators working in all 50 States and the District of Columbia, OI utilizes its resources by\nactively coordinating with the Department of Justice and other Federal, State, and local law\nenforcement authorities. The investigative efforts of OI often lead to criminal convictions,\nadministrative sanctions, and/or civil monetary penalties.\n\nOffice of Counsel to the Inspector General\nThe Office of Counsel to the Inspector General (OCIG) provides general legal services to OIG,\nrendering advice and opinions on HHS programs and operations and providing all legal support\nfor OIG\xe2\x80\x99s internal operations. OCIG represents OIG in all civil and administrative fraud and\nabuse cases involving HHS programs, including False Claims Act, program exclusion, and civil\nmonetary penalty cases. In connection with these cases, OCIG also negotiates and monitors\ncorporate integrity agreements. OCIG renders advisory opinions, issues compliance program\nguidance, publishes fraud alerts, and provides other guidance to the health care industry\nconcerning the anti-kickback statute and other OIG enforcement authorities.\n\x0c Notices\n\n\n THIS REPORT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC\n at http://oig.hhs.gov\n\n Section 8L of the Inspector General Act, 5 U.S.C. App., requires\n that OIG post its publicly available reports on the OIG Web site.\n\nOFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES FINDINGS AND OPINIONS\n\n The designation of financial or management practices as\n questionable, a recommendation for the disallowance of costs\n incurred or claimed, and any other conclusions and\n recommendations in this report represent the findings and\n opinions of OAS. Authorized officials of the HHS operating\n divisions will make final determination on these matters.\n\x0c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\n\nBACKGROUND\n\nThe American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), P.L. No. 111-5, was\nenacted February 17, 2009, to preserve and create jobs; to assist those most affected by the\nrecession; to increase economic efficiency by investing in technological advances in science and\nhealth care; to invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that\nwill provide long-term economic benefits; and to stabilize State and local budgets. The\nRecovery Act provides approximately $145.7 billion to the Department of Health & Human\nServices (HHS).\n\nTo promote transparency and accountability, section 1512 of the Recovery Act requires each\nrecipient of Recovery Act funds to report on its use of funds to the applicable Federal agency not\nlater than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter. The reports should include, among\nother things, the total amount of Recovery Act funds received, funds expended, project status,\nfinal project report indicator, and the number of jobs created or retained with Recovery Act\nfunds. To implement section 1512, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued\nguidance to Federal awarding agencies for reporting Recovery Act data.\n\nThe Health Centers Consolidation Act of 1996 (P.L. No. 104-299) consolidated the Health Center\nProgram under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. \xc2\xa7 254(b). Within\nHHS, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) administers the Health Center\nProgram. Under the Recovery Act, HRSA received $2.5 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2009,\nincluding $2 billion to expand the Health Center Program to serve more patients, stimulate new\njobs, and meet the significant increase in demand for primary health care services among the\nNation\xe2\x80\x99s uninsured and underserved populations. HRSA has provided guidance on compiling\nand reporting Recovery Act data to health centers awarded Recovery Act funds which\nincorporates OMB\xe2\x80\x99s guidance to Federal awarding agencies.\n\nHudson River HealthCare, Inc. (Hudson River), is a nonprofit health center organized in 1975 to\nprovide medical, dental, and addiction services to residents throughout New York State\xe2\x80\x99s\nHudson Valley. Hudson River is primarily funded by patient service revenues and Federal,\nState, and local government grants. During FY 2009, HRSA awarded Hudson River a 2-year\nRecovery Act grant totaling $917,282 for increases in health care services.\n\nOur review covered recipient data submitted during the second and third reporting periods. The\nsecond reporting period covered October 1 through December 31, 2009, and the third reporting\nperiod covered January 1 through March 31, 2010.\n\nOBJECTIVE\n\nOur objective was to determine whether Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s processes for compiling and reporting\nselected data provided reasonable assurance of compliance with section 1512 requirements of the\nRecovery Act.\n\n\n\n i\n\x0cSUMMARY OF FINDINGS\n\nHudson River\xe2\x80\x99s processes for reporting the selected data elements in the second and third\nreporting periods generally provided reasonable assurance that it complied with section 1512\nrequirements of the Recovery Act. Specifically, Hudson River accurately reported funds\nreceived, funds expended, project status, and the final project report indicator. However, Hudson\nRiver:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 overstated the number of jobs retained by 38.02 full-time equivalents (FTE) in the second\n reporting period by inappropriately counting jobs funded with non-Recovery Act funds,\n and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 overstated the number of jobs retained by 37.47 FTEs in the third reporting period by\n inappropriately counting jobs funded with non-Recovery Act funds.\n\nAccording to Hudson River officials, these deficiencies occurred because Hudson River\nmisinterpreted HRSA guidance on compiling Recovery Act data. The reporting errors could\nhave resulted in the public being misled or confused by Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s use of Recovery Act\nfunds.\n\nRECOMMENDATIONS\n\nWe recommend that Hudson River:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 follow current HRSA reporting guidance and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 ensure that similar errors are not made in subsequent reporting periods.\n\nHUDSON RIVER COMMENTS\n\nIn written comments on our draft report, Hudson River concurred with our recommendations and\ndescribed completed and ongoing actions to address our findings. Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s comments are\nincluded in their entirety as the appendix.\n\n\n\n\n ii\n\x0c TABLE OF CONTENTS\n\n Page\n\nINTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1\n\n BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................1\n American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ...................................................1\n Section 1512 Reporting Requirements ..........................................................1\n Office of Management and Budget Implementing Guidance ........................1\n Health Resources and Services Administration .............................................2\n Hudson River HealthCare, Inc. .....................................................................2\n\n OBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY .....................................................3\n Objective ........................................................................................................3\n Scope ..............................................................................................................3\n Methodology ..................................................................................................3\n\nFINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................4\n\n DATA ELEMENTS REPORTED .............................................................................4\n Recovery Act Reporting Requirements .........................................................4\n Data Elements Accurately Reported ..............................................................5\n Data Elements Inaccurately Reported ............................................................5\n Conclusion .....................................................................................................5\n\n RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................................................................6\n\n HUDSON RIVER COMMENTS ..............................................................................6\n\n\nAPPENDIX\n\n HUDSON RIVER COMMENTS\n\n\n\n\n iii\n\x0c INTRODUCTION\n\nBACKGROUND\n\nAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act\n\nThe American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), P.L. No. 111-5, was\nenacted February 17, 2009, to preserve and create jobs; to assist those most affected by the\nrecession; to increase economic efficiency by investing in technological advances in science and\nhealth care; to invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that\nwill provide long-term economic benefits; and to stabilize State and local budgets. The\nRecovery Act provides approximately $145.7 billion to the Department of Health & Human\nServices (HHS).\n\nSection 1512 Reporting Requirements\n\nTo promote transparency and accountability, section 1512 of the Recovery Act requires quarterly\nreporting by recipients of certain funds made available under the Recovery Act. A recipient\nincludes any non-Federal entity, other than an individual, that receives Recovery Act funds\ndirectly from the Federal Government. Section 1512 reporting requirements apply mainly to\nrecipients of grants, contracts, and loans for discretionary programs. Section 1512(c) requires\neach recipient to report to the applicable Federal agency, not later than 10 days after the end of\neach calendar quarter:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 the total amount of Recovery Act funds received and the amount that was expended or\n obligated;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 a detailed list of all projects for which Recovery Act funds were expended or obligated,\n including the project name, description, and completion status and an estimate of the\n number of jobs created or retained; and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 detailed information on payments to subrecipients and vendors.\n\nOffice of Management and Budget Implementing Guidance\n\nTo implement section 1512 of the Recovery Act, on June 22, 2009, OMB issued memorandum\nM-09-21, which requires recipients to report detailed information on their projects. 1 This\nguidance applies to recipients of grants, loans, tribal agreements, cooperative agreements, and\nother forms of assistance. During the second reporting period, October 1 through December 31,\n2009, OMB updated its guidance (memorandum M-10-08) to incorporate lessons learned from\nthe first reporting period (ended September 30, 2009) and address recommendations of the\nGovernment Accountability Office. The update simplified the manner in which job estimates are\n\n1\n Section 3.1 of M-09-21 requires that the information reported by recipients and subrecipients of Recovery Act\nfunds be submitted through FederalReporting.gov, reviewed by the funding agency, and published on Recovery.gov.\nPrograms subject to the reporting requirements in section 1512 of the Recovery Act are listed in Supplement 1 of\nM-09-21.\n\n 1\n\x0ccalculated and reported. Specifically, recipients now report job estimates on a quarterly, rather\nthan a cumulative basis; all other data elements are still reported cumulatively. Recipients are no\nlonger required to sum various data on hours worked across multiple quarters of data when\ncalculating job estimates. In addition, recipients are no longer required to make a subjective\njudgment on whether jobs were created or retained as a result of the Recovery Act.\n\nHealth Resources and Services Administration\n\nThe Health Centers Consolidation Act of 1996 (P.L. No. 104-299) consolidated the Health\nCenter Program under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act, codified at 42 U.S.C.\n\xc2\xa7 254(b). Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. \xc2\xa7 254(b), the Health Center Program is a national program\ndesigned to provide comprehensive primary health care services to medically underserved\npopulations through planning and operating grants to health centers. Within HHS, the Health\nResources and Services Administration (HRSA) administers the Health Center Program.\n\nThe Health Center Program provides grants to nonprofit, private, or public entities that serve\ndesignated medically underserved populations, including migrant and seasonal farm workers, the\nhomeless, and residents of public housing. Health centers funded by HRSA are community\nbased, patient-directed organizations that meet the definition of \xe2\x80\x9chealth center\xe2\x80\x9d under 42 U.S.C.\n\xc2\xa7 254(b).\n\nUnder the Recovery Act, HRSA received $2.5 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2009, including\n$2 billion to expand the Health Center Program to serve more patients, stimulate new jobs, and\nmeet the significant increase in demand for primary health care services among the Nation\xe2\x80\x99s\nuninsured and underserved populations.\n\nOn December 29, 2009, HRSA issued the third edition of the Health Center Quarterly Reporting\nManual (the reporting manual), which incorporates OMB\xe2\x80\x99s revised guidance. 2 The reporting\nmanual provides guidance to assist health centers awarded Recovery Act funds report section\n1512 Recovery Act data elements. In addition, the reporting manual requires recipients to report\non a limited number of health center program performance elements to allow HRSA to report on\nand demonstrate the impact of health center activities funded under the Recovery Act. To further\nassist recipients in reporting Recovery Act data elements, HRSA holds a quarterly technical\nconference call that addresses reporting requirements.\n\nHudson River HealthCare, Inc.\n\nHudson River HealthCare, Inc. (Hudson River), is a nonprofit health center organized in 1975 to\nprovide medical, dental, and addiction services to residents throughout New York State\xe2\x80\x99s\nHudson Valley. Hudson River is funded primarily by patient service revenues, and Federal,\nState, and local government grants. During FY 2009, HRSA awarded Hudson River a 2-year\nRecovery Act grant totaling $917,282 for increases in health care services.\n\n\n\n2\n Subsequent to our review period, on June 23, 2010, HRSA issued the fifth edition of the Health Center Quarterly\nReporting Manual for the quarter ending June 30, 2010.\n\n 2\n\x0cOBJECTIVE, SCOPE, METHODOLOGY\n\nObjective\n\nOur objective was to determine whether Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s processes for compiling and reporting\nselected data provided reasonable assurance of compliance with section 1512 requirements of the\nRecovery Act.\n\nScope\n\nOur review covered recipient data submitted during the second and third reporting periods. The\nsecond reporting period covered October 1 through December 31, 2009, and the third reporting\nperiod covered January 1 through March 31, 2010. We reviewed Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s processes in\ncompiling and reporting Recovery Act data elements for the second reporting period and the\nactions taken to enhance data quality for the third reporting period. Specifically, we selected the\ndata elements for funds received, funds expended, project status, final project report indicator,\nand jobs created or retained to ensure compliance with section 1512 requirements of the\nRecovery Act. To gain an understanding of Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s compiling and reporting of\nRecovery Act data elements, we conducted a limited review of the internal controls related to our\naudit objective.\n\nWe performed our fieldwork at Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s administrative office in Peekskill, New York,\nduring May 2010.\n\nMethodology\n\nTo accomplish our objective, we:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 reviewed relevant Federal laws, regulations, and guidance;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 reviewed Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s HRSA Increased Demand for Services (IDS) 3 grant application\n and award;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 reviewed Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s Recovery Act reported data elements and comments reported\n on FederalReporting.gov;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 interviewed personnel to gain an understanding of Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s Recovery Act\n reporting processes;\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 performed analytical procedures to determine the reasonableness of the reported data\n elements when compared with supporting documentation for expenditures and funds\n received;\n\n\n\n3\n The IDS award made available by the Recovery Act supports health centers in addressing the increased demand for\nservices nationwide, as well as creating employment opportunities in underserved communities over a 2-year period.\n\n 3\n\x0c \xe2\x80\xa2 reconciled the number of jobs created or retained to payroll records to determine the\n reasonableness of the number of jobs reported; and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 discussed our findings with Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s officials.\n\nWe conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government\nauditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain\nsufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions\nbased on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis\nfor our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.\n\n FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS\n\nHudson River\xe2\x80\x99s processes for reporting the selected data elements in the second and third\nreporting periods generally provided reasonable assurance that it complied with section 1512\nrequirements of the Recovery Act. Specifically, Hudson River accurately reported funds\nreceived, funds expended, project status, and the final project report indicator. However, Hudson\nRiver:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 overstated the number of jobs retained by 38.02 full-time equivalents (FTE) in the second\n reporting period by inappropriately counting jobs funded with non-Recovery Act funds,\n and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 overstated the number of jobs retained by 37.47 FTEs in the third reporting period by\n inappropriately counting jobs funded with non-Recovery Act funds.\n\nAccording to Hudson River officials, these deficiencies occurred because Hudson River\nmisinterpreted HRSA guidance on compiling Recovery Act data. The reporting errors could\nhave resulted in the public being misled or confused by Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s use of Recovery Act\nfunds.\n\nDATA ELEMENTS REPORTED\n\nRecovery Act Reporting Requirements\n\nOMB memorandum M-09-21, section 2.5, states that all data contained in each quarterly\nrecipient report will be cumulative to encompass the total amount of funds expended to date.\nHowever, OMB later issued memorandum M-10-08 allowing for recipients to report job estimate\ninformation on a quarterly basis, rather than a cumulative one.\n\nOMB memorandum M-10-08 states that the estimated number of jobs created or retained should\nbe expressed as FTEs. Specifically, OMB memorandum M-10-08 states that in calculating an\nFTE, the number of actual hours worked in funded jobs are divided by the number of hours\nrepresenting a full work schedule for the kind of job being estimated. These FTEs are then\nadjusted to count only the portion corresponding to the share of the job funded by Recovery Act\nfunds. All other reporting elements continue to be reported cumulatively.\n\n 4\n\x0cHRSA\xe2\x80\x99s reporting manual restates OMB\xe2\x80\x99s guidance that FTEs will be reported only to the extent\nthat Recovery Act funds are used.\n\nData Elements Accurately Reported\n\nHudson River was in compliance with HRSA guidance in the reporting of second period data\nelements for funds received, funds expended, project status, and final project report indicator.\nSpecifically, Hudson River accurately reported $240,432 of funds received and expended and it\nreported the IDS grant project status as less than 50 percent completed. Therefore, Hudson River\ncorrectly reported the final project indicator as \xe2\x80\x9cnot completed.\xe2\x80\x9d\n\nData Elements Inaccurately Reported\n\nOverstated the Number of Jobs Retained for the Second Reporting Period\n\nHudson River overstated the number of jobs retained by inappropriately counting jobs funded\nwith non-Recovery Act funds. Specifically, in April 2009, Hudson River used non-Recovery\nAct funds to purchase a mental health facility located in Yonkers, New York, which had planned\nto close. Hudson River officials stated that they would not have had the organizational capacity\nto administer the facility without Recovery Act funds. The officials stated that they believed\nRecovery Act funds were indirectly related to Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s being able to retain jobs at the\nfacility and included these jobs in Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s Recovery Act reporting data. However, the\nmethodology used by Hudson River to calculate its second period jobs was inconsistent with\nHRSA guidance to report only the jobs funded by Recovery Act funds. As a result, Hudson\nRiver overstated the number of jobs reported by 38.02 FTEs (51.06 FTEs reported less 13.04\nFTEs that should have been reported).\n\nOverstated the Number of Jobs Retained for the Third Reporting Period\n\nHudson River overstated the number of jobs retained by inappropriately counting jobs funded\nwith non-Recovery Act funds. Specifically, Hudson River continued to inappropriately report\nthe number of FTEs for jobs retained at the Yonkers, New York, mental health facility. As a\nresult, Hudson River overstated the number of jobs reported by 37.47 FTEs (51.06 reported less\n13.59 FTEs that should have been reported).\n\nConclusion\n\nHudson River had implemented a review process for gathering and reviewing data elements\nbefore submitting data to FederalReporting.gov. However, the process was not designed to\ndetect errors caused by the misinterpretation of HRSA guidance on calculating Recovery Act\nFTE jobs retained.\n\nHRSA questioned the number of jobs reported in the second and third reporting periods in emails\nand in comments to Hudson River on FederalReporting.gov. After the second reporting period,\nHRSA emailed Hudson River that there was an error in the number of jobs Hudson River\n\n 5\n\x0creported. After the second and third reporting periods, HRSA commented on\nFederalReporting.gov that Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s reported FTE jobs appeared to be high in relation to\nRecovery Act funds received. HRSA referred Hudson River to updated guidance and requested\nthat it either revise or explain its jobs numbers. According to Hudson River officials, HRSA\xe2\x80\x99s\nemail and posted comments did not specifically indicate why Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s reported numbers\nwere overstated. However, the officials acknowledged they did not immediately respond to the\nemail, reply to the comments, or contact HRSA to obtain additional clarification. Subsequent to\nthe third reporting period, Hudson River officials responded to HRSA\xe2\x80\x99s comments and, based on\nensuing discussions, the officials stated that they realized why they had overstated Hudson\nRiver\xe2\x80\x99s FTE jobs numbers.\n\nThe reporting errors could have resulted in the public being misled or confused by Hudson\nRiver\xe2\x80\x99s use of Recovery Act funds.\n\nRECOMMENDATIONS\n\nWe recommend that Hudson River:\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 follow current HRSA reporting guidance and\n\n \xe2\x80\xa2 ensure that similar errors are not made in subsequent reporting periods.\n\nHUDSON RIVER COMMENTS\n\nIn written comments on our draft report, Hudson River concurred with our recommendations and\ndescribed completed and ongoing actions to address our findings. Hudson River\xe2\x80\x99s comments are\nincluded in their entirety as the appendix.\n\n\n\n\n 6\n\x0cAPPENDIX \n\n\x0c APPENDIX: HUDSON RIVER COMMENTS \n\n\n\n\n\n corn rn u n ityhealth\n c\n Hudson River HealthCare, Inc.\n\nJuly 29, 20 10\n\nMr. James P. Edell\nRegional Inspect or Gcncrul for Aud it Services\nOflice of Inspect o r General , Region II\nJacob Javitz Federal Building\n26 Federal Plaza, Room 3900\nNew York. NY 10278\n\nDear Mr. Eden:\n\nHudson River HeahhCare Inc. (HR HCarc) is in receipt of your repon "UCSIIIIS ofUmi/Cd\nStvpc! Ucl"icw (if Hudson Ui\\"er Healrhrarc, Inc. \'" Prrx:e.I\'S/or Compiling and lkporlin);\nSelected I?ccol\'ery Act /Jaw" dated July 27. 20 10. As directed in your cover letter.\nHRHCare is submitting comments o n the repo rt and its reco mmendations.\n\nRecommendation 1: O IG recommends that HRHCare follow current HRSA reporti ng\nguidance.\n\n HRJ-I Care is in concurrence with this recommendation and intends 10 comply with\n all HRSA guidance on reponing of Recovery Act dma. Previously. HRHCare\n panici paled in all HRSA\xc2\xb7spon sored quanerl y calls and reviewed all HRSA\xc2\xb7\n developed manual s. HRHCare will continue to engage in these activities to\n ensure compliance with all HRSA reponin g guidance. In addition. HR HCare will\n respond to any HRSA communicatio ns regarding qual1crly rcpol1S to cnsurc that\n any questions regard ing submitted data are responded to promptl y and\n appropriately.\n\n\nRecommendation 2: O IG recommend s thaI HRHCare ensure Ihal similar elTOrs are not\nmade in subsequent reponing periods.\n\n HR HCare is in concurrence with this reCOllimendation. As directed by HRSA.\n HRH Care submitted a revised quarterly repon on Jul y 10111. 2010 that is consistent\n with Ihe HRSA reponing guidance,\n\nIf you have an y additional questions regardin g thi s response, please contact me at\n9 14.134.8147 or at anolon@ hrhcare.o rg.\n\n\nSincerely.\n\nAnne K. Nolon\nPresidenl & CEO\n\x0c'


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 21.4.2005
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 102/21
 BESCHLUSS DES GEMEINSAMEN EWR-AUSSCHUSSES
 Nr. 148/2004
 vom 29. Oktober 2004
 zur Änderung des Anhangs II (Technische Vorschriften, Normen, Prüfung und Zertifizierung) des EWR-Abkommens
 DER GEMEINSAME EWR-AUSSCHUSS —
 gestützt auf das Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, geändert durch das Anpassungsprotokoll zum Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, nachstehend „Abkommen“ genannt, insbesondere auf Artikel 98,
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 (1)
 Anhang II des Abkommens wurde durch das am 14. Oktober 2003 in Luxemburg unterzeichnete Übereinkommen über die Beteiligung der Tschechischen Republik, der Republik Estland, der Republik Zypern, der Republik Lettland, der Republik Litauen, der Republik Ungarn, der Republik Malta, der Republik Polen, der Republik Slowenien und der Slowakischen Republik am Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum (1) geändert.
 (2)
 Die Richtlinie 2004/20/EG der Kommission vom 2. März 2004 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme des Wirkstoffs Chlorpropham (2) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen.
 (3)
 Die Richtlinie 2004/30/EG der Kommission vom 10. März 2004 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme der Wirkstoffe Benzösäure, Flazasulfuron und Pyraclostrobin (3) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen.
 (4)
 Die Richtlinie 2004/58/EG der Kommission vom 23. April 2004 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme der Wirkstoffe Alpha-Cypermethrin, Benalaxyl, Bromoxynil, Desmedipham, Ioxynil und Phenmedipham (4) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen.
 (5)
 Die Richtlinie 2004/60/EG der Kommission vom 23. April 2004 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme des Wirkstoffs Quinoxyfen (5) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen.
 (6)
 Die Richtlinie 2004/62/EG der Kommission vom 26. April 2004 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme des Wirkstoffes Mepanipyrim (6) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen.
 (7)
 Die Richtlinie 2004/71/EG der Kommission vom 28. April 2004 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme des Wirkstoffs Pseudomonas chlororaphis (7) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen —
 BESCHLIESST:
 Artikel 1
 In Anhang II Kapitel XV des Abkommens werden unter Nummer 12a (Richtlinie 91/414/EG des Rates) folgende Gedankenstriche angefügt:
 „—
 32004 L 0020: Richtlinie 2004/20/EG der Kommission vom 2. März 2004 (ABl. L 70 vom 9.3.2004, S. 32);
 —
 32004 L 0030: Richtlinie 2004/30/EG der Kommission vom 10. März 2004 (ABl. L 77 vom 13.3.2004, S. 50);
 —
 32004 L 0058: Richtlinie 2004/58/EG der Kommission vom 23. April 2004 (ABl. L 120 vom 24.4.2004, S. 26);
 —
 32004 L 0060: Richtlinie 2004/60/EG der Kommission vom 23. April 2004 (ABl. L 120 vom 24.4.2004, S. 39);
 —
 32004 L 0062: Richtlinie 2004/62/EG der Kommission vom 26. April 2004 (ABl. L 125 vom 28.4.2004, S. 38);
 —
 32004 L 0071: Richtlinie 2004/71/EG der Kommission vom 28. April 2004 (ABl. L 127 vom 29.4.2004, S. 104).“
 Artikel 2
 Der Wortlaut der Richtlinien 2004/20/EG, 2004/30/EG, 2004/58/EG, 2004/60/EG, 2004/62/EG und 2004/71/EG in isländischer und norwegischer Sprache, der in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht wird, ist verbindlich.
 Artikel 3
 Dieser Beschluss tritt am 30. Oktober 2004 in Kraft, sofern dem Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss alle Mitteilungen nach Artikel 103 Absatz 1 des Abkommens vorliegen (8).
 Artikel 4
 Dieser Beschluss wird im EWR-Abschnitt und in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht.
 Brüssel, den 29. Oktober 2004
 Für den Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss
 Der Vorsitzende
 Kjartan JÓHANNSSON
 (1) ABl. L 130 vom 29.4.2004, S. 3.
 (2) ABl. L 70 vom 9.3.2004, S. 32.
 (3) ABl. L 77 vom 13.3.2004, S. 50.
 (4) ABl. L 120 vom 24.4.2004, S. 26.
 (5) ABl. L 120 vom 24.4.2004, S. 39.
 (6) ABl. L 125 vom 28.4.2004, S. 38.
 (7) ABl. L 127 vom 29.4.2004, S. 104.
 (8) Ein Bestehen verfassungsrechtlicher Anforderungen wurde nicht mitgeteilt.


text:
Klumpiasnapis (Balaeniceps rex) šeimos iš gandrinių (Ciconiiformes) paukščių būrio, paukštis, paplitęs Afrikos centrinėje dalyje.
 Paukštis 1,1–1,4 m aukščio, turi labai didelį, platų, klumpės pavidalo snapą. Kojos ilgos su dideliu užpakalinio piršto nagu. Kūno spalva rusvai pilka, snapas gelsvas, kojos juodos.
 Gyvena Afrikoje, Baltojo Nilo aukštupyje (Sudano pietuose), taip pat Kenijoje, Ugandoje, Tanzanijoje ir Zambijoje. Gyvenamosios vietos yra sunkiai prieinamos pelkės, nendrynai.
 Gaudo žuvis, varles ir smulkius žinduolius. Peri sunkiai įžengiamose pelkėse, lizdą suka ant plūduriuojančių augalų. Deda 2 kiaušinius. Karštą dieną jis vėsinasi pildamas snapu vandenį.
 Gandriniai paukščiai


type: caselaw

text:
15.6.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 144/53
 tjänster. Att stödbeloppet a priori inte fastställdes som en — i andra hand ogiltigförklara artikel 3 första meningen i
 procentsats av investeringen eller lönekostnaden hindrar beslutet, och
 inte på något sätt att så kan ske a posteriori, i syfte att
 säkerställa att nivån på godkända regionalstöd, enligt — förplikta kommissionen att ersätta rättegångskostna-
 kartan över regionalstöd, inte överskrids. derna.
 e) Alternativt – i förhållande till alla övriga grunder – hävdas
 att beslutet att stöden skall återtas (artikel 3 första Grunder och huvudargument
 meningen i det ifrågasatta beslutet) utgör ett åsidosättande
 av artikel 14.1 sista meningen i förordning (EG) nr 659/
 1999, med hänsyn till de särskilda omständigheter som Sökanden ifrågasätter kommissionens beslut K (2001) 4475
 föreligger i detta fall (den tid under vilken den första slutlig av den 20 december 2001, i vilket den befrielse från
 granskningen pågick, som uppgick till 79 månader). Att bolagsskatt som följer av artikel 14 i Norma Foral nr 5/1993
 kommissionen granskade de omtvistade skattebestäm- av den 24 juni om brådskande skatteåtgärder till stöd för
 melserna år 1994 och inte gav uttryck för en negativ investeringar i och stimulans av ekonomisk verksamhet (Boletı́n
 inställning till demsamma gav upphov till berättigade Oficial de Bizkaia nr 154, av den 7 juli 1993) förklaras vara ett
 förväntningar på att de ansågs vara förenliga med gemen- statligt stöd som strider mot den gemensamma marknaden. I
 skapsrätten. Artikel 3 i beslutet utgör därför ett åsidosät- nämnda Norma Foral föreskrevs befrielse från bolagsskatt för
 tande av principerna om rättssäkerhet och om skydd för bolag som bildades mellan tidpunkten då dessa föreskrifter
 berättigade förväntningar. trädde i kraft och den 31 december 1994, förutsatt att bolagen
 investerade mer än 80 miljoner pesetas (480 810 euro) i
 materiella anläggningstillgångar, skapade mer än tio arbetstill-
 fällen och hade inlett sina verksamheter med ett inbetalat
 aktiekapital som uppgick till minst 20 miljoner pesetas
 (120 202 euro).
 De grunder som sökanden har åberopat till stöd för sin talan
 är identiska med dem som har åberopats i mål T-86/02.
 Talan mot Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission väckt
 den 26 mars 2002 av El Territorio Historico de Bizkaia,
 La Diputación Foral de Bizkaia
 (Mål T-87/02) Talan mot Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission väckt
 den 26 mars 2002 av El Territorio Historico de Guipoz-
 coa, La Diputación Foral de Guipozcoa
 (2002/C 144/105)
 (Mål T-88/02)
 (Rättegångsspråk: spanska)
 (2002/C 144/106)
 (Rättegångsspråk: spanska)
 El Territorio Historico de Bizkaia, La Diputación Foral de
 Bizkaia, har den 26 mars 2002 väckt talan vid Europeiska
 gemenskapernas förstainstansrätt mot Europeiska gemenska- El Territorio Historico de Guipozcoa, La Diputación Foral de
 pernas kommission. Sökanden, med säte i Bizkaia (Spanien), Guipozcoa, har den 26 mars 2002 väckt talan vid Europeiska
 företräds av Ignacio Saenz-Cortabarria och Marta Morales Isasi, gemenskapernas förstainstansrätt mot Europeiska gemenska-
 letrados en ejercicio. pernas kommission. Sökanden, med säte i Guipozcoa (Spa-
 nien), företräds av Ignacio Saenz-Cortabarria och Marta Mora-
 les Isasi, letrados en ejercicio.
 Sökanden yrkar att förstainstansrätten skall
 Sökanden yrkar att förstainstansrätten skall
 — ogiltigförklara kommissionens beslut av den 20 december — ogiltigförklara kommissionens beslut av den 20 december
 2001 om en stödordning som Spanien tillämpade under 2001 om en stödordning som Spanien tillämpade under
 år 1993 till förmån för vissa företag som nyligen hade år 1993 till förmån för vissa företag som nyligen hade
 bildats i Alava, bildats i Guipozcoa,


text:
935 résultats pour police fédérale de liège
 Inspection générale de la police fédérale et de la police locale Nomination Par arrêté royal du 10 mai 2006, M. Dumoulin, Michel, est nommé à l'emploi d'enquêteur auprès du poste déconcentré de Liège
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 19 janvier 2017
 Dès lors que l'agent requérant n'est, de l'aveu même de la partie adverse, qu'un élément en réalité non décisif de la chaîne de causalité, il convenait que l'acte attaqué expose concrètement en quoi les faits commis par lui, isolés des conséquences qui étaient le fait de tiers, pouvaient lui être reprochés. Or, l'acte attaqué reste en défaut de le faire et maintient un lien indissociable entre...
 ..., avocat, rue des Augustins 32 4000 Liège, . contre : . l'État belge, représenté par le ... prise par le directeur général de la police judiciaire d'infliger au requérant «la ... Verviers de la police judiciaire fédérale de Liège depuis 1997. . 2. Le 15 janvier 2015, ...
 Police fédérale. - Mandat Par arrêté royal du 15 juin 2018
 ... un terme renouvelable de cinq ans à l'emploi de directeur coordonnateur au sein de la police fédérale pour l'arrondissement judiciaire de Liège...
 Police fédérale. - Mandat Par arrêté royal du 26 novembre 2013
 ...ésigné pour un terme renouvelable de cinq ans à l'emploi de directeur judiciaire de la police fédérale pour l'arrondissement judiciaire de Liège...
 Police fédérale. - Mandat Par arrêté royal du 2 avril 2014
 ... renouvelable de cinq ans à l'emploi de directeur coordonnateur administratif de la police fédérale pour l'arrondissement judiciaire de Liège...
 Police fédérale. - Mandat Par arrêté royal du 10 avril 2014
 Police fédérale. - Mandat Par arrêté royal du 17 août 2019
 ...Eric SNOECK à l'emploi de directeur judiciaire de la police fédérale pour l'arrondissement judiciaire de Liège est renouvelée à la date du ...
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 13 novembre 2015
 S'il est exact que l'article 17, § 1er, des lois coordonnées sur le Conseil d'État, applicable depuis le 1er mars 2014, mentionne que, pour obtenir la suspension, le requérant doit soulever au moins un moyen sérieux et faire état d'une urgence incompatible avec le traitement de l'affaire en annulation, il convient cependant de ne pas considérer, d'emblée, la demande de suspension comme étant...
 ... par Monsieur le Directeur général de la police judiciaire fédérale ff (autorité disciplinaire ...édérale, police judiciaire fédérale de Liège - division de Huy. . 2. Le 15 juin 2006, les ...
 Police fédérale. - Mandat Par arrêté royal du 4 juin 2013
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 9 décembre 2014
 Il y a lieu de prendre en compte, comme date de notification de la proposition de sanction faisant courir le délai pour introduire la requête en reconsidération prévu par les articles 38sexies et 51bis de la loi du 13 mai 1999 portant le statut disciplinaire des membres du personnel des services de police, le lendemain de l'envoi du premier recommandé. Le délai pour introduire la requête en...
 ...Le requérant est inspecteur principal de police au sein de la division "homicides" de la police udiciaire fédérale de Liège. . 2. Le 14 mai 2012, le procureur du ...
 Inspection générale de la police fédérale et de la police locale Désignation Par arrêté ministériel du 3 octobre 2013
 ...Par arrêté ministériel du 3 octobre 2013, Monsieur Benoît Leclercq est désigné auprès du poste déconcentré de LIEGE de l'Inspection générale de la police fédérale et de la police locale à ...
 Inspection générale de la police fédérale et de la police locale. - Désignation Par arrêté ministériel du 28 octobre 2016
 ...- Désignation. Par arrêté ministériel du 28 octobre 2016, Monsieur Michel GOFFARD est désigné auprès du poste déconcentré de LIEGE de l'Inspection générale de la police fédérale et de la police locale, à compter ...
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 19 mai 2015
 Si un cas de force majeure peut conduire à une application plus souple de certaines exigences, il ne peut s'agir, en l'absence d'habilitation expresse, d'exonérer un agent de l'obligation de satisfaire à une condition objective relative au suivi et à la réussite d'une formation.
 ..., boulevard de la Sauvenière 91 4000 Liège, . contre : . l'État belge, représenté par le ... Mobilité et de la Gestion du Personnel -Police Fédérale (...), reçue le 13 janvier 2014 par ...
 27 MAI 2009. - Arrêté du Gouvernement wallon instituant le Conseil de Coordination de la Sécurité dans les Transports en commun et fixant les modalités de remboursement des indemnités kilométriques de ses membres
 ...ésentant du Commissariat général de la police : Thierry Maurer;. d/ un représentant de la ce fédérale : Olivier Libois;. e/ un représentant du Parquet ...i/ deux représentants du TEC Liège-Verviers : Isabelle Mewissen et Daniel Dewaay;. ...
 Arrêté du Gouvernement wallon instituant le Conseil de Coordination de la Sécurité dans les Transports en commun et fixant les modalités de remboursement des indemnités kilométriques de ses membres, de 27 mai 2009
 ...ésentant du Commissariat général de la police : Thierry Maurer;. d/ un représentant de la lice fédérale : Olivier Libois;. e/ un représentant du ... i/ deux représentants du TEC Liège-Verviers : Isabelle Mewissen et Daniel Dewaay;. ...
 L'article 55 de la loi du 13 mai 1999 portant le statut disciplinaire des membres du personnel des services de police prévoit que l'autorité disciplinaire supérieure communique par envoi recommandé à la poste ou par notification avec accusé de réception, au membre du personnel concerné, sa décision dans un délai de trente jours après qu'elle ait reçu le dernier mémoire écrit. L'agent requérant a...
 ... octobre 2011 du directeur général de la Police judiciaire fédérale lui infligeant la ...és de la Police judiciaire fédérale de Liège" (PJF Liège) où il occupe la fonction de chef d'\xC3"...
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 9 novembre 2011
 Un préjudice professionnel et moral est inhérent à toute sanction disciplinaire. Le préjudice résultant d'un blâme est normalement réparé par l'arrêt d'annulation qui interviendra le cas échéant. Les inconvénients qui peuvent en résulter dans le milieu professionnel ou la vie privée n'ont pas, en règle générale, une gravité telle qu'un arrêt d'annulation ne serait pas en mesure de les réparer....
 ... de Monsieur le Directeur Général de la Police Judiciaire Fédérale arrêtée le 4 mai 2011 de ... à la police judiciaire fédérale de Liège. . 2. Le 28 septembre 2010, il se rend à ...
 ... 14° l'ensemble des bâtiments ou des parties de bâtiments et des dépendances attribués à la police fédérale et situés à 4000 Liège : rue Saint-Léonard, rue du Palais et place des Guillemins, à 4020 Liège : quai Gloesener et à 4041 Vottem, rue Verte Voie et l'ensemble des ...
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 25 octobre 2012
 Les dispositions relatives au mode de convocation des membres du conseil communal ont pour but de garantir à ceux-ci le plein exercice de leurs prérogatives, en sorte qu'ils sont les seuls à pouvoir former, contre une délibération, un recours fondé sur l'atteinte portée à ces prérogatives.
 ... 1170 Bruxelles, . 2. la zone de police 5303 Namur , . ayant élu domicile chez. M es ... administratif de la police fédérale ou son délégué. 3⁄4 Le chef de corps est ... général près la Cour d'appel de Liège sur la candidature des cinq postulants ...
 Arrêt no 117790 de Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers - Ie Chambre, 29 janvier 2014
 ... 16h35, vous avez été interceptée par la police fédérale à bord du trai Verviers-Liège. Ne ...
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 26 septembre 2012
 Il est de jurisprudence constante, depuis l'arrêt de l'Assemblée générale du contentieux administratif du Conseil d'État, nÂ° 93.290 du 13 février 2001, que le délai imparti pour former un recours en annulation est interrompu en faveur de celui qui introduit une réclamation auprès de l'autorité de tutelle habilitée à exercer la tutelle générale, à condition que cette réclamation soit introduite...
 ...contre : . la zone de police 5281 de Basse-Meuse , représentée par le ..., Ilot Saint-Michel place Verte 13 4000 Liège. . ... zone adjoint, interpeller l'autorité fédérale...
 Décision judiciaire de Conseil d'État, 26 septembre 2011
 Les temps de travail et de repos du personnel des services de police sont réglés par le chapitre III du titre Ier de la partie VI de l'arrêté royal du 30 mars 2001 portant la position juridique du personnel des services de police (PJPol). Ces dispositions permettent de dépasser les durées de travail en principe prévues, notamment pour "l'exécution de certains devoirs judiciaires qui sont...
 ... "la décision du directeur général de la Police Judiciaire Fédérale d'infliger au requérant la ...és de la Police judiciaire fédérale de Liège" (PJF Liège) où il occupe la fonction de Chef d'\xC3"...
 Arrêté ministériel portant règlement sur la police de la circulation routière, de 17 décembre 2010
 ... - N81/A28/E411;. - N4;. - N63;. 3° Province de Liège :. - A3/E40;. - A13/E313;. - A25/E25;. - A26;. - A601;. - ... Vu la convention de partenariat Région wallonne - Police fédérale du 5 mai 2009;. Considérant les conditions et les prévisions ...
 17 DECEMBRE 2010. - Arrêté ministériel portant règlement sur la police de la circulation routière
 ...Vu la convention de partenariat Région wallonne - Police fédérale du 5 mai 2009;. Considérant les conditions et les prévisions giques se sont nettement améliorées pour les provinces de Liège, Luxembourg et Namur;. Considérant que la Police fédérale de la route ...
 regolamento ce euratom 1995 2006
 art 56 l 392 78


text:
Oscar Guanabarino de Sousa Silva (Niterói, 1851 — Rio de Janeiro, 1937) foi um crítico de arte, músico e dramaturgo brasileiro.
 Pianista e dramaturgo, a atividade em que mais se destacou foi, todavia, a crítica de arte periódica, exercida de 1879 até 1937, sendo atualmente mais conhecido justamente como o temido crítico musical que foi.
 Sobretudo, Guanabarino se nos apresenta como uma figura central da vida cultural do Rio de Janeiro de sua época, os anos finais do Segundo Império e a Primeira República Brasileira.
 Sua introdução no meio jornalístico foi favorecida pela influência do pai, Joaquim Norberto de Sousa Silva. Ao longo de todo o seu trabalho nos jornais O Paiz e no Jornal do Commercio, deixou também textos sobre as artes plásticas, que podem ser vistos como testemunhos vivos de uma cultura artística ainda pouco estudada no Brasil.
 Crítica musical
 Como crítico musical tornou-se célebre por seus comentários totalmente desfavoráveis à música de Villa-Lobos, motivo pelo qual entrou em polêmica com Alberto Nepomuceno. Por causa de rivalidades com os professores do Instituto Nacional de Música, tinha também o hábito de criticar violentamente tudo o que dizia respeito a esta instituição.
 Além de crítico foi professor de piano e de música, tendo como seu aluno talvez mais célebre a futura compositora Eunice Catunda.
 Quando de seu falecimento em 1937, sua coluna semanal Pelo mundo das artes no Jornal do Comércio, foi substituída por outra intitulada Pelo mundo da música, escrita por Andrade Muricy.
 Ligações externas
 GRANGEIA, Fabiana Guerra, Destaques de "A Crítica de Arte em Oscar Guanabarino: Artes Plásticas no Século XIX", página visitada de 12 de setembro de 2013.
 Retrato do crítico, página visitada de 12 de setembro de 2013.
 Nascidos em 1851
 Mortos em 1937
 Dramaturgos do Brasil
 Pianistas do Rio de Janeiro
 Críticos musicais do Brasil
 Críticos de arte do Brasil
 Críticos musicais
 Naturais de Niterói


text:
Mode d'emploi Chaudière Ferroli domina c24E - forum - batipole.com
 Message original de yaya (Part 38) Déjà lu 35295 fois avant vous
 Titre : Mode d'emploi Chaudière Ferroli domina c24E
 pardon, j'ai oublié, voici mon mail
 v.martin3@tiscali.fr
 Réponse de yaya (Part 38)
 Titre : Re : Mode d'emploi Chaudière Ferroli domina c24E
 quelqu'un a t-il ce mode d'emploi? au secours!
 Réponse de jague (Part 68)
 cristofolijean@yahoo.fr
 Réponse de vince (Part 57)
 Pouvez vous m'envoyer également ce mode d emploi.
 franck.willaime@free.fr
 Réponse de sébastien (Part 19)
 Suite à l'achat d une maison, je suis confronté à des problémes d'entretien de ma chaudière puisque je n'ai pas le mode d'emploi. Quelqu'un pourrait-il me le faire passer?
 mail: sebtulle@aol.com
 Réponse de doncaribou (Part 91)
 bonjour je suis à la recherche d'une notice pour une chaudiére Ferroli domina f24E
 Quelle est la pression du circuit et comment faire pour rajouter de l'eau dans le circuit merci pour votre aide doncaribou@hotmail.com
 Réponse de marie (Part 59)
 j'ai une chaudière de ce type qui a un an et j'ai un pb de pression et de mise en sécurité.
 Quelqu'un a la notice ?
 Mon mail : mariefauquenoy@yahoo.fr
 Réponse de ducauquy (Pro 80)
 je voudrai la notice pour cette chaudiere et surtou la vu eclater pour changer les sonde pour les referance merci ducauquy@hotmail.com
 Réponse de David87 (Part 87)
 Bonjour' pourriez-vous m'envoyer le mode d'emploi a mon adresse s'il vous plait.
 david.peelman@neuf.fr
 je voudrais y brancher un thermostat d'ambiance. merci beaucoup
 Réponse de guitou57070 (Part 57)
 Posté le : 21/09/08
 Si quelqu'un avait cette notice à me fournir. Merci d'avance.
 Mail : guy.matt842@orange.fr
 Réponse de stef (Part 59)
 Posté le : 23/09/08
 Je recherche le mode d'emploi de la ferroli c24 domina ( rachat maison et pas de notice fournie).
 galadhrim2@neuf.fr
 Réponse de SAD (Part 78)
 Je souhaiterai avoir le mode d'emploi d'une chaudière ma chaudière ferroli , vous pouvez me la transmettre par mail a l'adresse suivante sadika66@hotmail.fr
 Réponse de LAURENT (Part 08)
 J ai un soucis après avoir remis la pression a 2 ( elle etait a 0.5 ) voila que le bruleur de ma chaudiere ne se mets plus en marche malgré un reset....
 mode d emploi svp ?
 laurent.newtel@hotmail.fr
 Réponse de lolo08 (Part 08)
 Mais j ai un petit de 14 mois qui dors dans une chambre très froide j aimerais vraiment que cette chaudière remarche !
 je me demande si elle c pas mise en sécurité ( mais bon j ai tente de faire un off puis reset 10 sec ca a rien changé )....
 franchement deja l annee derniere j ai tjrs etais enmmerdé avec cette chaudière et ca me tape sur les nerfs
 comment on fais si elle c mise en sécurité ?
 Je n ai qu un voyant d allumé en continu, celui tout a fait a droite...les autres sont eteints
 Réponse de vany (Part 38)
 pouvez vous m'envoyer le mode d'emploi de la chaudiere ferrolli domina C24 svp je suis desesperée!
 Réponse de lila (Part 93)
 Posté le : 12/10/08
 bonjour, j'ai aussi un souci avec cette chaudière
 Le premier est qu'elle me donne de l'eau chaude que deux minutes d'affilée et quand on prend une douche c'est vraiment la galière. Après obligée d'éteindre l'eau froide histoire de laisser l'eau chaude arriver de nouveau dans le conduit.
 Après rallumer et enfin avoir de l'eau utilisable sans se bruler ou sans se les geler.
 autre problème, depuis ce matin, la pression est à 0 je n'ai ni eau chaude ni chauffage alors que quand je déclenhe eau chaude, le voyant vert s'allume mais rien ne se déclenche.
 j'ai fait un reset et rien nada ...
 si quelqu'un pouvait me répondre et / ou m'envoyer la notice de cette antiquité merci
 taninna19@libertysurf.fr
 Réponse de Céline (Part 59)
 Titre : Panne Chaudière Ferroli domina F24E
 Ma chaudière Ferroli s'arrête souvent lorsque l'on prend de l'eau chaude. Le chauffage marche lui très bien. Que pius-je faire?
 maerten.celine@voila.fr
 Titre : Re : Pour Celine
 Il y a de fortes chances que se soit la sonde de température sanitaire qui fonctionne mal.
 Réponse de Jean-Luc (Part 92)
 Posté le : 09/12/08
 Titre : Mode d'emploi Chaudière Ferroli domina F24E
 Je suis à la recherche du mode d'emploi de la chaudière FERROLI DOMINA OASI F24E.
 Réponse de dsdesigns (Part 59)
 j'ai un bruit dans l'échangeur quand le gaz augmente dans le bruleur. cela resonne dans les radiateur.
 et si qq'un possède la notice d'util vous pouvez me l'envoyer sur dominique.peugeot@gmail.com, merci
 Réponse de brian59400 (Part 59)
 bonjour j'ai une chaudiere ferroli domina c24 e et n'ai plus la doc quelqu'un peut t'il m'aider??
 la pression ne monte plus au mano meme en purgent j'ai max 1.3 bar.
 mon adresse mail sebastien.leveque6@orange.fr
 Réponse de reno2001 (Part 44)
 j'ai un gros problème de pression sur ma chaudière Feroli oasi C 24 E (3 bars et plus) et je ne parviens pas à trouver la notice (sauf en payant 49€!). Pouvez vous me dire comment me procurer cette notice? merci d'avance!
 Réponse de romain (Part 54)
 EST CE QUE QUELQU UN POURAIT ME TRANSFERRER PAR MAIL LA NOTICE DE LA
 DOMINA OASI C24E
 romainpetit2004@aol.com
 Réponse de zady (Part 01)
 j'aimerai avoir le mode d'emploi chaudiere ferroli domina c24
 mon email: zady1.many1@hotmail.com
 Réponse de José (Part 10)
 pouvez vous m 'envoyer le mode d emploi de la chaudiere ferroli domina C 24
 mon e mail : retourdefneuh@hotmail.com
 Si d ailleurs qqn sait comment ajuster la pression de l installation qui est insuffisante ? Je n ai pas trouvé en dessous de la chaudière sur quel bouton ou vis il faut agir pour ce
 Réponse de llacer (Part 65)
 Posté le : 14/06/09
 Titre : Mode d'emploi Chaudière Ferroli domina c24
 probleme avec pression pas de notice
 ni plan merçi si vous pouvez meles faire parvenir
 mon email alfredllacer@wanadoo.fr
 Réponse de rachid (Part 59)
 Posté le : 02/07/09
 Réponse de roseabsolue (Part 10)
 nous avons acheté une maison avec une chaudiére FERROLI domina c 24 E mais les anciens propriétaires n'ont pas pu nous donner la notice.si quelqu'un pouvait nous l'envoyer ce serait gentil.merci
 Virginievillaume@aol.com
 Réponse de Gilles (Pro 31)
 Posté le : 21/11/09
 apparemment, comme beaucoup de gens ici, j'ai une chaudière Ferroli C24 sans notice, suite à emménagement récent dans la maison (à croire que c'est la maladie des propriétaires de Ferroli de perdre la notice ;-) )
 Mon mail est le suivant : gilles.bouttard@free.fr
 Réponse de feix (Part 60)
 quel est le debit de gaz ou G20
 Réponse de trop froid (Part 90)
 Bonjour tous le monde je suis dans le cas de beaucoup de personne, ma chaudiere se met sans cesse en sécurité et ca caille trop.
 Apres se couper normalement elle se met en securité en redemarrant le bruit qu'elle fait me fait penser a une électrovanne qui ne colle pas ce qui bloque la chaudiere.
 Alors si quelqu'un a le mode d'emploi et une idée de la panne...
 Réponse de Vapona59 (Part 59)
 Titre : Re : Mode d'emploi Chaudière Ferroli domina c24d
 Bonjour, erreur F37 sur chaudière ferroli c24d. Il faut charger l'installation mais comment? Pas de vanne bleue ou noire, après avoir essayé tous les robinets, aucun résultat!!! AU SECOURS !!! Merci de m'aider en adressant un mail à cielazur2722@hotmail.com
 Réponse de bibi (Part 54)
 merci de me communiquer la notice de cette chaudière l'ancien poprio ne la plus
 francoise.fetet@neuf.fr
 Réponse de escale (Part 34)
 Titre : Re : Mode d'emploi Chaudière Ferroli domitop F24E
 la pression à chaud monte à 3.5 bars
 et à froid 1bars
 le réglage de l'eau circuit de chauffage est réglé à 55°c.
 comment obtenir une pression inférieur à 3.5bars, ou est ce bien de conservercette pression de fonctionnement
 comment obtenir une pression inférieur à 3.5bars, ou est ce bien de conserver cette pression de fonctionnement
 escale.michel@neuf.fr
 Réponse de Goody (Part 69)
 Posté le : 20/04/10
 Titre : Notice Chaudière Ferroli Domina C 24 E
 http://showmee.fr/showcase.php?id=a817c9ac6f6314fe606953ccfe5f5612&ps=3&sc=1&fs=1&type=2&color=000000
 Réponse de BB (Part 30)
 Salut a tous les malheureux
 Ma chaudière DOMITOP F 24 E FERROLI me fourni bien de l'eau chaude mais fait tomber le différentiel 30 mA du tableau électrique dès que je lui demande du chaufage. La pression est correcte, par contre le disconnecteur (N°74 / figure 2.02)goutte et le joint de connection sup au circulateur perd aussi.
 IL n'y à pas d'eau sur la plaquette electronique.
 Ou trouver des pieces près d'Avignon?
 Mon e mail: brunobruninx@hotmail.com
 Titre : Sond en panne
 g un voyant rouge qui s'allume je pense que c'est une sonde e message ique faireci ...
 comment purger la chaudière après travaux dans la rue? on a de l'air dans les tuyaux, merci
 Réponse de yvesromain (Part 87)
 Bonjour a toutes et a tous, je possede la notice d'installation et d'utilisation de la chaudiere FERROLI modele DOMINA VMC 24E, en format pdf. yvesromain@msn.com
 Réponse de marie (Part 2a)
 Salut je vie en corse ou trouver des piecemon courrielmariepanzini@porti.fr
 Réponse de wiwi (Part 80)
 Titre : Re : chaudiere DOMINA F 24 E
 Bonjour, ma maison a été équipée par les anciens propriètaires d'une chaudière DOMINA F24 E. Le chauffage fonctione corectement, mais lors que je me prends de l'eau chaude le brûleur se coupe régulièrement.J'ai pensé que cela venait de la sonde. Qui peut me dire s'il s'agit bien de cela ? et où trouver cette pièce ?
 bonsoir. J'ai une fuite à la vanne 9 bars. Je ne sais pas si la pression vas baisser? Si oui,comment faire pour la faire remonter? Merci
 Réponse de Ti@ (Part 91)
 Posté le : 14/10/12
 Titre : Problème mise en sécurité Chaudière domina c24E
 Bonjour, Lorsque je tente de mettre la chauffage la chaudière démarre et se met en sécurité au bout de 2 min, redémarre et se remet en sécurité, et ainsi de suite... la pression est normale (1.5 bars). Que faire? Merci de votre aide
 Réponse de lacap (Part 17)
 Posté le : 27/10/12
 bonjour si qq peut m'envoyer la notice de cette chaudière rapidement, ce serait sympa merci à l'avance lacsap58@live.fr
 Réponse de Alain Théven (Part 17)
 Posté le : 20/11/13
 je souhaite trouver le mode d'emploi de cette chaudiére.
 Bonsoir je recherche une chaudière neuve de marque Ferroli Domina
 C 24 E 002 31601 81
 connaitre le TTC avec livraison
 et les délais .
 Réponse de christian (Part 987)
 Posté le : 21/11/13
 Je suis Christian MARQUES,ayant tout perdu à cause d’un accident circulation je croule sous des dettes et cette situation s’est aggravé avec les faux prêteurs,je me suis fait avoir six(06) fois,alors j’ai contacté Mr MISSLIN celui dont tout le mon parle sur les forums .Mr MISSLIN m’a fait suivre des procédures sécurisées pour nous deux et j’ai fini par avoir les 90000€ 72 heures après.Si vous avez besoin d’un prêt auprès d’une personne honnête, sérieux et fiable voici son mail : c.misslin@live.fr


text:
Valotikku (tai hohtotikku, hehkutikku) on läpinäkyvä muoviputki, joka sisältää kemiallisia nesteitä toisistaan erotettuina. Ulkoinen putki sisältää osan kemiallisesta sekoituksesta. Loput sekoituksesta sisällään pitävä sisempi putki on tehty lasista tai muusta hauraasta materiaalista. Jos valotikkua taitetaan, sisempi putki hajoaa ja kemikaalit sekoittuvat. Tästä seuraa reaktio, joka tuottaa valoa, muttei välttämättä lämpöä. Tätä ilmiötä kutsutaan kemiluminesenssiksi.
 Kemiallinen reaktio
 Hohtotikun muovisen ulkokuoren sisällä on difenyylioksalaattia sekä jotakin sopivaa, hohtavaa (fluoresoivaa) väriainetta, joka määrää hohtavan tikun valon värin. Varsinaisesta seoksesta erillään, lasiputken sisällä, on taas vetyperoksidia. Ulomman putken taivuttaminen rikkoo ohuen lasiputken, ja nesteet pääsevät sekoittumaan. Aineiden sekoittuminen aiheuttaa kemiallisen reaktion eli kemiluminenssin, joka tuottaa hohtavaa valoa. Reaktio virittää väriaineen atomien elektronit viritystiloille, joiden purkautuminen synnyttää värivalon. Putkea on hyvä ravistaa taittamisen jälkeen, jotta kemikaalit sekoittuvat kunnolla.
 Käyttö
 Valotikut ovat vedenpitävä, edullisia, eivätkä ne tarvitse paristoja. Ne myös kestävät hyvin painetta, joten niitä voidaan käyttää myös veden alla. Valotikuilla on useita käyttötarkoituksia. Niitä käytetään valonlähteenä tai merkkivaloina asevoimissa, telttailussa ja retkeilyssä, sukelluksessa tai vaikka autossa hätävalona. Hohtotikkuja voidaan käyttää myös viihdykkeinä juhlissa ja konserteissa. Viihdekäytössä hohtotikut ovat usein ohuempia ja niitä voi liittää päistään yhteen. Näin juhlija saa hohtavan ”korun” esimerkiksi ranteen tai kaulan ympärille. Pimeässä hohtotikkuja voi käyttää poi-tanssissa välineinä samaan tapaan kuin tulta: nuoran päihin voi kiinnittää valotikut ja pyörittää niitä tanssiessa (glowsticking, glowringing), jolloin muodostuu näyttäviä kuvioita, tai yhtä lailla pyörittää valotikkuja ilman nuoraa.
 Valmistajat voivat tuottaa valotikkuja, jotka säteilevät vain lyhyen ajan tai säteilevät himmeämmin paljon pidemmän ajan säätämällä kemikaalien väkevyyttä. Kemikaalien sekoittaminen väkevimmällä sekoitussuhteella (yleensä vain laboratorio-olosuhteissa) aiheuttaa kiivaan reaktion, joka tuottaa muutaman sekunnin ajan voimakasta valoa.
 Turvallisuus
 Kemiallisen reaktion seurauksena tikun sisälle syntyy sivutuotteena fenolia. Jos tikku rikkoutuu, ei sen sisällä olevaa seosta tulisi päästä iholle ja sitä tulee välttää vahingossa nielemästä. Tikusta vuotanut seos saattaa aiheuttaa ihoärsytystä tai turvotusta, pahimmillaan seos voi saada aikaan pahoinvointia.
 Kuvia
 Lähteet
 Aiheesta muualla
 The Most Epicly Filmed Glowsticking Video You Will Ever See (www.youtube.com)
 Valaisimet


text:
1099 (MXCIX) je bilo navadno leto, ki se je po julijanskem koledarju začelo na soboto.
 Dogodki
 Prva križarska vojna (1095-99): zavzetje Jeruzalema
 januar - Križarji se v nekoliko okrnjeni zasedbi odpravijo naprej proti Jeruzalemu. Hugo Vermandoiški in Štefan Bloiški sta dezertirala, Bohemond Tarantski in Baldvin Bouillonski že imata vsak svoja fevda. Če prištejemo še žrtve bolezni, bojev in lakote, se številčnost giblje med tretjino in polovico vojske pred odhodom izpred Konstantinopla pred štirimi leti.
 april - Nenehna prerekanja okoli pristnosti Svete sulice prekine njen "odkritelj" Peter Bartolomej, ki pristane na preizkus z ognjem. V preizkusu je hudo opečen in štirinajst dni kasneje umre.
 april, maj - Rajmondov poskus obleganja obalne Arqe, brez uspeha.
 7. junij - Križarji pridejo pred obzidje Jeruzalema, mesto je na križarje dobro pripravljeno. Večina vodnjakov okoli mesta je zastrupljenih in križarji začno trpeti pomanjkanje hrane in vode.
 13. junij - Po več spodletelih napadih na Jeruzalem v pristanišče Jafa priplujeta genovski ladji z živežem in orodjem za gradnjo oblegovalnih naprav.
 8. julij - "Procesija sestradanih" okoli jeruzalemskega obzidja. Z juga se odpravi iz Egipta fatimidska vojska, ki gre na pomoč oblegancem v Jeruzalemu.
 15. julij - Zavzetje Jeruzalema po izjemno težavnem obleganju. Križarji v bojnem srdu pomorijo večino prebivalcev, muslimanske in krščanske kronike so si enotne v izjemnih razsežnostih pokola.
 Po osvojitvi mesta se je nekaj sto muslimanov zateklo v varstvo Tankreda in vikonta Gastona IV., ki sta jim zagotovila zaščito. Ostali križarji so naslednji dan poklali tudi te.
 julij - Med zavzemanjem Jeruzalema flota beneške mornarice, ki jo je v Sveto deželo poslal na pomoč beneški dož Vitale I Michiel, pri Rodosu porazi fatimidsko floto in vzpostavi neovirano plovno pot do Palestine.
 22. julij - Ustanovljena je Kraljevina Jeruzalem. Njen prvi vladar Godfrej Bouillonski prevzame naziv "Varuh Božjega groba".
 1. avgust - Za jeruzalemskega patriarha je izbran Arnulf Chocqueški.
 5. avgust - Križarji dobijo po poizvedovanju preko preživelih v posest relikvijo Pravega križa.
 12. avgust - Bitka pri Askalonu: križarji s hitrim protinapadom presenetijo in porazijo mnogo številčnejšo fatimidsko vojsko. Kljub zmagi zaradi notranjih nesoglasij ne zavzamejo bližnjega utrjenega mesta Askalon, ki je kasneje v nadaljevanju križarskih vojn izhodišče za vpade v Kraljevino Jeruzalem.
 Po zmagi pri Askalonu se večina križarjev vrne nazaj domov v Evropo z nalogo, da pridobijo nove romarje, ki bi ostali v Sveti deželi. Novi papež Pashal II. sprejme novico o zavzetju Jeruzalema sprva nezaupljivo.
 Ustanovitev viteškega reda Svetega Janeza, ki je na splošno skrbel za bolnike med križarji in romarji, ter manjšega redu Svetega Lazarja, ki je skrbel za gobave križarje in romarje. Oba reda se sčasoma institucionalizirata v mednarodni organizaciji.
 Ostalo
 6. januar - Henrik V. Nemški, sin Henrika IV. postane nemški sokralj.
 29. julij - Po smrti papeža Urbana II. je za papeža izvoljen Pashal II.↓
 14. avgust → Za papeža je posvečen Pashal II., 160. po seznamu. Protipapež v cesarskem taboru je še vedno Klemen III.
 Rojstva
 Jurij Dolgoroki, veliki kijevski knez († 1157)
 Olaf Magnusson, norveški kralj († 1115)
 Oton II., moravski vojvoda († 1126)
 Rajmond Poitierski, antiohijski knez († 1149)
 Ranulf de Gernon, angleški plemič, 4. grof Chester († 1153)
 Thierry Alzacijski, flandrijski grof, križar († 1168)
 Viljem X., akvitanski vojvoda († 1137)
 Smrti
 20. april - Peter Bartolomej, francoski križar in mistik
 10. julij - El Cid, kastilski vojskovodja, protagonist istoimenskega epa (* 1043)
 29. julij - papež Urban II. (* 1042)
 Donald III., škotski kralj (* 1033)
 Opombe
 Glej tudi


text:
Lawrence Hertzog (* 25. Juni 1951 in Flushing, Queens, USA; † 19. April 2008 in Los Angeles, Kalifornien; auch Larry Hertzog) war ein US-amerikanischer Drehbuchautor und Produzent von Fernsehserien und Fernsehfilmen.
 Leben und Leistungen
 Hertzog wurde in Flushing, einem Stadtteil von Queens, einem Borough von New York City, geboren. Seine Eltern waren Arlene und Harold Hertzog. Er hatte einen älteren Bruder namens David. Die Kinder wuchsen in Teaneck im Bundesstaat New Jersey auf. 1977 übersiedelte Lawrence Hertzog nach Los Angeles.
 Er schrieb und produzierte über 25 Jahre lang vor allem Fernsehserien, zum Beispiel Nowhere Man – Ohne Identität! mit Bruce Greenwood in der Hauptrolle. Hertzog arbeitete in dieser Serie mit Joel Surnow zusammen, und sie befreundeten sich. Später holte ihn Surnow während der dritten Staffel zur Serie Nikita, in der Peta Wilson und Roy Dupuis die Hauptrollen darstellten. In der vierten Staffel dieser Agentenserie verfasste Hertzog zusammen mit Peter M. Lenkov einen Großteil der Skripte. Insgesamt tragen vierzehn Drehbücher von Nikita seinen Namen. Er übernahm auch einen Teil der Arbeit von Surnow in der vierten Staffel und war als Executive Consultant tätig. Er war während Nowhere Man – Ohne Identität! und Nikita mit Fans der Serien übers Internet in Kontakt.
 Hertzog war Autor von zwei Reunion-Fernsehfilmen der Serie Hart aber herzlich mit Robert Wagner und Stefanie Powers in den Hauptrollen.
 Im Jahr 2007 arbeitete er als Drehbuchautor und Associate Producer an der Fernsehserie Painkiller Jane mit Kristanna Loken in der Hauptrolle.
 Er starb im Alter von 56 Jahren an Krebs. Er hinterließ seine Frau Karen.
 Filmografie (Auswahl)
 Drehbuchautor
 1979: Mrs. Columbo (Fernsehserie)
 1979: Hart aber herzlich (Hart to Hart) (Fernsehserie)
 1983: Hardcastle & McCormick (Hardcastle and McCormick) (Fernsehserie)
 1986–1987: Stingray (Fernsehserie)
 1990: Die totale Gefahr (Project: Tin Men)
 1994: Darkman II – Durants Rückkehr (Darkman II: The Return of Durant)
 1994: Hart aber herzlich – Tod einer Freundin (Hart to Hart: Home Is Where the Hart Is)
 1994: Hart aber herzlich – Dem Täter auf der Spur (Hart to Hart: Crimes of the Hart)
 1995–1996: Nowhere Man – Ohne Identität! (Nowhere Man) (Fernsehserie)
 1999–2001: Nikita (La Femme Nikita) (Fernsehserie)
 2002: 24 (Fernsehserie)
 2005: Nowhere Man: Fact or Fiction? – True Stories of CIA Mind Control Techniques
 2007: Painkiller Jane (Fernsehserie)
 Produzent
 1983: Hardcastle & McCormick (Hardcastle and McCormick) (Fernsehserie)
 1986–1987: Stingray (Fernsehserie)
 1989: Down Delaware Road
 1990: Die totale Gefahr (Project: Tin Men)
 1994–1995: SeaQuest DSV (Fernsehserie)
 1995–1996: Nowhere Man – Ohne Identität! (Nowhere Man) (Fernsehserie)
 2007: Painkiller Jane (Fernsehserie)
 Executive Consultant
 2000–2001: Nikita (La Femme Nikita) (Fernsehserie)
 Literatur
 Christopher Heyn: Inside Section One: Creating and Producing TV’s La Femme Nikita, Los Angeles: Persistence of Vision Press, September 2006, englisch, ISBN 0-9787625-0-9. Lawrence Hertzog wurde unter anderem auf den Seiten 37 bis 40 über sein Wirken in dieser Serie interviewt.
 Weblinks
 Drehbuchautor
 Filmproduzent
 Person (Teaneck)
 US-Amerikaner
 Geboren im 20. Jahrhundert
 Gestorben 2008
 Mann