text:
Susedské vzťahy
 Obecný úrad > Info pre občanov > Susedské vzťahy
 Právna úprava susedských vzťahov
 Subjekty práv a povinností
 Subjektmi práv a povinností v susedských vzťahoch môžu byť fyzické aj právnické osoby, prípadne štát (ak je účastníkom občianskoprávneho vzťahu), a to vlastníci nehnuteľných alebo hnuteľných vecí. Ochrany práv sa však môžu domáhať aj iné osoby ako vlastníci veci, napr. oprávnení užívatelia.
 Základná zásada
 Právna úprava susedských vzťahov vychádza zo zásady, že susedské práva sa môžu účinne uplatňovať iba na základe princípu vzájomnosti – ochrana poskytovaná právam vlastníka jednej veci nesmie byť v nepomere k spravodlivej ochrane, ktorá prislúcha právam vlastníka druhej veci. Samozrejme, nie podľa zásady – keď mne zdochla koza, nech zdochne aj susedovi, ale skôr podľa starého dobrého – nikdy nerob druhému to, čo nechceš, aby druhí robili tebe. Aj v tom prípade teda platí, že práva jedného sa končia tam, kde sa začínajú práva druhého.
 Všeobecné vymedzenie základných práv a povinností obsahuje ustanovenie § 127, ods. 1 Občianskeho zákonníka, podľa ktorého sa vlastník veci musí zdržať všetkého, čím by nad mieru primeranú pomerom obťažoval iného alebo čím by vážne ohrozoval výkon jeho práv.
 Príklady zakázaných zásahov
 Zákon uvádza aj príklady zakázaných zásahov do susedských práv. Vlastníkovi veci zakazuje najmä:
 a) ohroziť susedovu stavbu alebo pozemok úpravami pozemku alebo úpravami stavby zriadenej na ňom bez toho, aby urobil dostatočné opatrenia na upevnenie stavby alebo pozemku,
 b) obťažovať susedov hlukom, prachom, popolčekom, dymom, plynmi, parami, pachmi, pevnými a tekutými odpadmi, svetlom, tienením, vibráciami, a to nad mieru primeranú pomerom,
 c) nechať chované zvieratá unikať na susediaci pozemok,
 d) nešetrne, prípadne v nevhodnom ročnom období odstrániť zo svojej pôdy korene stromov alebo vetvy stromu presahujúce na svoj pozemok.
 Posúdenie, či je zásah zakázaným zásahom
 Ochrana sa neposkytuje proti akýmkoľvek zásahom, ale iba proti zásahom, ktoré nad mieru primeranú pomerom obťažujú iného alebo ktoré predstavujú vážne ohrozenie výkonu jeho práv. Či ide o takýto zásah, alebo nie, nemožno posudzovať podľa subjektívneho stanoviska dotknutej osoby, práve naopak – zásah sa hodnotí zásadne z objektívnych hľadísk. Konkrétnu situáciu treba vždy vidieť a hodnotiť komplexne a na jej objektívne posúdenie môžu mať vplyv viaceré okolnosti, napríklad:
 miestne pomery a ich špecifiká – napr. na dedine zvyčajne býva väčšia miera znášania psieho štekotu ako na sídliskách,
 ročné obdobie – napr. pachy môžu byť oveľa intenzívnejšie, a tým presahovať rámec miery primeranej pomerom v letných mesiacoch, zatiaľ čo v zimných mesiacoch budú v rámci normy,
 či ide o zásah jednorazový, opakovaný, úmyselný, nakoľko v zásade platí, že „maličkosti“ nepredstavujú zakázaný zásah. Opakovaním či úmyselným konaním sa však z maličkostí v ich súhrne a súvislostiach môže stať šikana, ktorá ako taká v zmysle ustanovenia § 3, ods. 1 Občianskeho zákonníka odporuje dobrým mravom a dotknutá osoba sa môže domáhať z toho vyplývajúcej ochrany svojich práv.
 Na posúdenie konkrétnej situácie sa využívajú aj znalecké posudky, správy hygienických staníc, stanoviská štátnych zdravotných ústavov, svedecké výpovede, obhliadky a pod.
 Ak máte pocit, že vo vašom prípade konanie suseda možno považovať za zásah do vašich vlastníckych práv, môžete sa domáhať, aby vám právnu ochranu poskytla obec, v ktorej došlo k zásahu. Využitím tohto spôsobu ochrany však nie je dotknuté vaše právo domáhať sa ochrany na súde. Je teda iba na vás, či sa budete domáhať ochrany svojich práv v obci, alebo na súde. Vašou záležitosťou sa dokonca môžu súčasne zaoberať oba orgány, to však platí iba dovtedy, kým sa rozhodnutie súdu nestane vykonateľným. Potom už konanie pred obcou o tomto prípade nemôže pokračovať. Konanie pred obcou býva zvyčajne rýchlejšie a pri priamej konfrontácii sa susedia za pomoci obce možno skôr „udobria“ a vyriešia konfliktnú situáciu.
 Ak by ste sa predsa len rozhodli riešiť vec súdnou cestou, mali by ste myslieť na správnu formuláciu žalobného petitu. Ak by ste v žalobe žiadali, aby súd susedovi uložil konkrétnu povinnosť, konkrétny spôsob odstránenia zásahu, musíte rátať s tým, že vaša žaloba bude zrejme neúspešná. Pri splnení zákonných podmienok bude úspešná iba žaloba, ktorou sa budete domáhať určenia povinnosti, aby sa sused zdržal presne vymedzeného zásahu do vašich práv.
 Aké konkrétne opatrenia sa na tento účel zvolia, to už treba ponechať na samotnom susedovi. Napríklad ak susedovi chlapci často hrávajú futbal a lopta stále lieta za plot na váš pozemok, nemôžete sa úspešne domáhať, aby súd susedovi uložil povinnosť vybudovať vysoký plot. Súd mu môže uložiť iba povinnosť, aby sa zdržal takého konania, pri ktorom by lopty lietali na váš pozemok nad mieru primeranú pomerom. Je potom na susedovi, či si túto svoju povinnosť splní vybudovaním zodpovedajúceho oplotenia alebo siete, či sa deti budú hrávať na inej, dostatočne vzdialenej časti pozemku, alebo im futbal na pozemku úplne zakáže.
 Či sú vykonané opatrenia suseda vyhovujúce, alebo nie, to už bude skúmať súd v prípadnom súdnom výkone rozhodnutia vedenom na váš návrh. Návrh na výkon rozhodnutia môžete na základe vykonateľného rozhodnutia podať aj opakovane proti každému rušivému zásahu toho istého druhu.
 Do problematiky susedských vzťahov patrí aj problematika oplotenia. Vlastníkovi pozemku zo zákona nevyplýva všeobecná povinnosť oplotiť svoj pozemok. Súd mu však môže na návrh vlastníka susediacich pozemkov uložiť, aby oplotil svoj pozemok, ak sú splnené tieto požiadavky:
 1. oplotenie je potrebné – toto hľadisko sa považuje za splnené najmä vtedy, ak oplotenie poskytne ochranu proti nedovoleným zásahom,
 2. oplotenie nebude brániť účelne užívať susediace pozemky a stavby – účelným užívaním pozemkov možno rozumieť ich využívanie podľa oficiálneho zaradenia v katastri nehnuteľností (napr. vinice, záhrady a pod.),
 3. súd musí zistiť stanovisko príslušného stavebného úradu, ktorým síce súd nie je viazaný, ale musí si ho zadovážiť a prihliadnuť naň. V prípade záporného stanoviska stavebného úradu súd zváži, či aj napriek tomu uloží povinnosť pozemok oplotiť.
 Oplotenie, ktoré si vlastník pozemku postaví na vlastnom pozemku, stáva sa jeho vlastníctvom a je povinný udržiavať ho v dobrom stave.
 Vstup na susedov pozemok
 Sused je povinný umožniť vám vstup na svoj pozemok, prípadne na stavby stojace na ňom v takom prípade, ak si to nevyhnutne vyžaduje údržba a obhospodarovanie vašich pozemkov a stavieb. A naopak takú istú povinnosť máte i vy voči svojim susedom. Ide najmä o situácie, keď by sa údržba a obhospodarovanie pozemkov bez vstupu na susediaci pozemok alebo stavbu nemohli vôbec alebo sčasti vykonať – pomerne častým príkladom je výmena odkvapových ríms. Vstup sa však musí uskutočniť iba na nevyhnutný čas a v nevyhnutnej miere. Vlastník pozemku je povinný umožniť vstup na pozemok aj iným osobám, ktoré majú na starosti údržbu stavby alebo obhospodarovanie pozemku pre susedného vlastníka.
 Ak v súvislosti so vstupom vznikne škoda na pozemku alebo na stavbe, potom ten, kto škodu spôsobil, je povinný ju nahradiť. Pritom nerozhoduje, či škodu spôsobil sused osobne, alebo prostredníctvom iných osôb, jeho zodpovednosť je daná objektívne.
 Ako vidno, v susedských vzťahoch je mnoho rôznych možností, ako sa dajú susedské práva porušovať. Ak teda kupujete dom či byt, okrem technického a právneho stavu nehnuteľnosti sa nezabudnite oboznámiť aj s aktuálnymi susedskými vzťahmi, možno tak predídete budúcim konfliktom. Ak už bývate vo svojom, prípadné nedorozumenia skúste riešiť vzájomnou toleranciou, pochopením a dohodou.
 Ako treba pri susedských sporoch postupovať.
 1. Kam mám zájsť so sťažnosťou na suseda?
 • Na obec. Obec môže predbežne zásah zakázať, prerokovať susedské nezhody, a tak zabezpečiť ochranu práv.
 • Na políciu. Ak by konanie susedov malo znaky priestupku alebo trestného činu, môžete sa obrátiť na orgány činné v trestnom konaní.
 • Na súd.
 2. Ako treba postupovať?
 So sťažnosťou sa možno obrátiť na obec, ktorá môže tento zásah zakázať alebo uložiť povinnosť uviesť situáciu do pôvodného stavu.
 3. Čo musí sťažnosť obsahovať?
 Z návrhu musí byť zrejmé, kto ho podáva, čiže treba uviesť meno, adresu, prípadne dátum narodenia. Ďalej, akej veci sa týka – napríklad obťažovanie susedov prachom a čo človek navrhuje - napríklad zákaz prášenia koberčekov z okien. Písomný návrh treba zaslať na obec, alebo priamo starostovi, alebo ústne do zápisnice v podateľni.
 4. Nezabudnite na dôkazy!
 Dôkazy o porušení susedských práv sú kľúčové. Ak porušenie nie je ako dokázať, nemožno očakávať nápravu či sankciu. zídu sa hlavne usvedčujúce fotografie, svedecké výpovede, znalecké posudky, úradné listiny a podobne. Odbornú pomoc v tomto smere môže poskytnúť advokát.
 5. Myslíte si, že sa susedským sporom u nás venuje dostatočná pozornosť?
 Susedské spolunažívanie je veľmi citlivou záležitosťou. Úrady sú často zavalené sťažnosťami a nie sú schopné ich efektívne riešiť. Keďže treba zistiť skutkový stav veci, vypočuť obe strany a dodržať zákonné lehoty, riešenie týchto sporov je často veľmi zdĺhavé a s tým súvisí aj podceňovanie niektorých sporov. Je tiež otázne, či právomoci, ktoré úrady majú, sú dostatočné na to, aby mohli efektívne riešiť vzniknuté situácie.
 AKÉ SANKCIE HROZIA SUSEDOVI?
 Sankcie za priestupky sú pokarhanie, pokuta, zákaz činnosti alebo prepadnutie veci.
 • Pokutu možno uložiť do 33 €.
 • Ak niet pochýb, že sa obvinený priestupku dopustil a vec nebola vybavená, môže čakať pokutu do 250 €.
 • Za krádež, spreneveru, podvod alebo poškodenie veci hrozí pokuta až do 331 eur.
 • Ak sused spôsobí škodu inému susedovi, musí mu ju nahradiť.
 Aktualizované 15.3.2017
 NPR Hrdovická
 PZ Hrdovická
 Urbárska spoločnosť Nitrianska Streda
 Obec Nitrianska Streda, Nitrianska Streda 1, 956 16
 CMS systém (redakčný) systém WEBY PORTÁL, mapa stránky web portál, webhosting, WEBY HOSTING, domény, registrácia domény spoločnosti WEBY GROUP, s.r.o., technický prevádzkovateľ - kontakt, 22.09.2019 14:27:59
 5388120
 Videá zo života v obci


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 16.10.2017
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 C 347/32
 Žaloba podaná 25. júla 2017 – TO/EEA
 (Vec T-462/17)
 (2017/C 347/41)
 Jazyk konania: francúzština
 Účastníci konania
 Žalobca: TO (v zastúpení: N. Lhoëst, advokát)
 Žalovaná: Európska environmentálna agentúra
 Návrhy
 Žalobca navrhuje, aby Všeobecný súd:
 —
 zrušil rozhodnutie Európskej environmentálnej agentúry (EEA) z 22. septembra 2016 o skončení zamestnania žalobcu ako zmluvného zamestnanca,
 —
 zrušil rozhodnutie EEA z 20. apríla 2017 o zamietnutí sťažnosti podanej žalobcom 21. decembra 2016,
 —
 uložil EEA povinnosť zaplatiť žalobcovi náhradu mzdy vypočítanú na základe ušlej mzdy za 4 roky po odpočítaní podpory v nezamestnanosti, ktorú dostával počas tohto obdobia,
 —
 uložil EEA povinnosť zaplatiť žalobcovi sumu 3 500,00 eur ako náhradu škody za výdavky spojené s predčasným skončením jeho nájomnej zmluvy v Kodani, s výhradou prípadného zvýšenia,
 —
 zrušil výplatnú pásku žalobcu za september 2016, najmä v rozsahu, v akom neobsahuje plat za 22. septembra 2016,
 —
 uložil EEA povinnosť zaplatiť žalobcovi sumu 50 000,00 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy spôsobenej rozhodnutím o prepustení z 22. septembra 2016,
 —
 uložil EEA povinnosť zaplatiť žalobcovi sumu 5 000,00 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy spôsobenej tým, že EEA porušila článok 26 služobného poriadku úradníkov Európskej únie,
 —
 uložil EEA povinnosť zaplatiť žalobcovi sumu 10 000,00 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy spôsobenej psychickým nátlakom vykonávaným zo strany EEA počas jeho práceneschopnosti,
 —
 a napokon uložil EEA povinnosť zaplatiť žalobcovi náhradu mzdy za jeden mesiac výpovednej doby a náhradu vo výške jednej tretiny základnej odmeny za každý mesiac stáže v súlade s ustanoveniami článku 84 Podmienok zamestnávania ostatných zamestnancov (ďalej len „PZOZ“),
 —
 uložil EEA povinnosť nahradiť všetky trovy konania.
 Dôvody a hlavné tvrdenia
 Na podporu svojej žaloby žalobca uvádza osem žalobných dôvodov.
 1.
 Prvý dôvod je založený na neuplatniteľnosti článku 48 písm. b) PZOZ.
 2.
 Druhý dôvod je založený na porušení článku 48 písm. b) a článku 16 ods. 2 PZOZ.
 3.
 Tretí dôvod je založený na námietke nezákonnosti z dôvodu diskriminácie v súvislosti s článkom 48 písm. b) PZOZ.
 4.
 Štvrtý dôvod je založený na porušení článku 26 služobného poriadku a porušení práva na obhajobu.
 5.
 Piaty dôvod je založený na porušení nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 45/2001 z 18. decembra 2000 o ochrane jednotlivcov so zreteľom na spracovanie osobných údajov inštitúciami a orgánmi spoločenstva a o voľnom pohybe takýchto údajov (Ú. v. ES L 8, 2001, s. 1; Mim. vyd. 13/026, s. 102) a článku 8 Charty základných práv Európskej únie.
 6.
 Šiesty dôvod je založený na porušení článku 84 PZOZ a článku 41 Charty základných práv Európskej únie, ako aj povinnosti starostlivosti.
 7.
 Siedmy dôvod je založený na zjavne nesprávnom posúdení.
 8.
 Ôsmy dôvod je založený na zneužití právomoci.


type: contracts

text:
 26.10.2012
 NL
 Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie
 C 326/1
 PROTOCOL (Nr. 32)
 BETREFFENDE DE VERWERVING VAN ONROERENDE GOEDEREN IN DENEMARKEN
 DE HOGE VERDRAGSLUITENDE PARTIJEN,
 GELEID DOOR DE WENS bepaalde bijzondere problemen te regelen die betrekking hebben op Denemarken,
 HEBBEN OVEREENSTEMMING BEREIKT OMTRENT de volgende bepalingen, welke aan het Verdrag betreffende de Europese Unie en aan het Verdrag betreffende de werking van de Europese Unie worden gehecht:
 Niettegenstaande de bepalingen van de Verdragen mag Denemarken zijn huidige wetgeving inzake de verwerving van tweede woningen handhaven.


text:
 Ważna informacja prawna
 |
 22003D0145
 Dziennik Urzędowy L 041 , 12/02/2004 P. 0029 - 0030
 Decyzja Wspólnego Komitetu EOGnr 145/2003z dnia 7 listopada 2003 r.zmieniająca załącznik II (Przepisy techniczne, normy, badania i certyfikacja) do Porozumienia EOGWSPÓLNY KOMITET EOG,uwzględniając Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, dostosowane Protokołem dostosowującym Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym, zwane dalej Porozumieniem, w szczególności jego art. 98,a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:(1) Załącznik II do Porozumienia został zmieniony decyzją Wspólnego Komitetu EOG nr 108/2003 z dnia 26 września 2003 r. [1](2) Rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 544/2003 z dnia 27 marca 2003 r. zmieniające załączniki I i II do rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2377/90 ustanawiającego wspólnotową procedurę określania maksymalnego limitu pozostałości weterynaryjnych produktów leczniczych w środkach spożywczych pochodzenia zwierzęcego [2] należy włączyć do Porozumienia.(3) Rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 665/2003 z dnia 11 kwietnia 2003 r. zmieniające załącznik III do rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2377/90 ustanawiającego wspólnotową procedurę dla określania maksymalnego limitu pozostałości weterynaryjnych produktów leczniczych w środkach spożywczych pochodzenia zwierzęcego [3] należy włączyć do Porozumienia.(4) Rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 739/2003 z dnia 28 kwietnia 2003 r. zmieniające załącznik I do rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2377/90 ustanawiającego wspólnotową procedurę określania maksymalnego limitu pozostałości weterynaryjnych produktów leczniczych w środkach spożywczych pochodzenia zwierzęcego [4] należy włączyć do Porozumienia,PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ:Artykuł 1W załączniku II do Porozumienia rozdział XIII pkt 14 (rozporządzenie Rady (EWG) nr 2377/90) dodaje się tiret w brzmieniu:"— 32003 R 0544: rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 544/2003 z dnia 27 marca 2003 r.(Dz.U. L 81 z 28.3.2003, str. 7),— 32003 R 0665: rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 665/2003 z dnia 11 kwietnia 2003 r. (Dz.U. L 96 z 12.4.2003, str. 7),— 32003 R 0739: rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 739/2003 z dnia 28 kwietnia 2003 r. (Dz.U. L 106 z 29.4.2003, str. 9).".Artykuł 2Teksty rozporządzeń (WE) nr 544/2003, (WE) nr 665/2003 oraz (WE) nr 739/2003 w językach islandzkim i norweskim, które zostaną opublikowane w Dodatku EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej, są autentyczne.Artykuł 3Niniejsza decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem 8 listopada 2003 r., pod warunkiem że wszystkie notyfikacje na mocy art. 103 ust. 1 Porozumienia zostały dokonane wobec Wspólnego Komitetu EOG [5].Artykuł 4Niniejsza decyzja jest opublikowana w Sekcji EOG oraz w Dodatku EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej.Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia 7 listopada 2003 r.W imieniu Wspólnego Komitetu EOGHSH Prinz Nikolaus von LiechtensteinPrzewodniczący[1] Dz.U. L 331 z 18.12.2003, str. 20.[2] Dz.U. L 81 z 28.3.2003, str. 7.[3] Dz.U. L 96 z 12.4.2003, str. 7.[4] Dz.U. L 106 z 29.4.2003, str. 9.[5] Nie wskazano wymogów konstytucyjnych.--------------------------------------------------


type: other

text:
LIGHTer News Maj 2020
 News Maj 2020
 Full aktivitet i vår nya vardag
 Vi kämpar alla med de nya förutsättningarna i vår nya coronavardag. Inom LIGHTer jobbar vi i vanlig takt, men hemifrån på distans. Vi försöker fullfölja så många av våra planer som möjligt.
 Vi har två intressanta utlysningar öppna för att erbjuda de organisationer som står på benen att ta viktiga kliv in i framtiden via forskning och utveckling. Den ena utlysningen handlar om cirkulära materialflöden för lättviktslösningar. Det är en fråga som alla som arbetar med lättviktsmaterial och -konstruktioner behöver hantera. Den andra är vår årliga utlysning för FoI-projekt och Genomförbarhetsstudier. Här har vi förlängt öppettiden fram till 15 oktober. Välkomna med era ansökningar!
 LIGHTer PhD Network tar nya grepp och bjuder in till digitala seminarier. Koppla upp dig imorgon kl. 14-15, länk finns nedan. Ett smidigt sätt att få spetskompetens om 3D-vävda kompositer i makroskala.
 Pernilla Walkenström är medlem i LIGHTers styrelse och presenterar sig i en film nedan.
 Fordonskomponenten skrev om LIGHTer i sitt senaste nummer. Roligt! Se mer nedan.
 Kalendariet är fullt av spännande saker. Ta en titt och boka in datum!
 Håll gärna kontakten med oss!
 Cecilia, Christian och Lotta
 Vi kommer att anordna två webinarier där du ges möjlighet att ställa frågor om utlysningen och hur man söker stödet. Nedan kan du se på det första webinariet i efterhand.
 Webinarium 1: 5 maj kl. 14.00-15.00 Här kan du se webinariet i efterhand
 Webinarium 2: 2 juni kl. 10.00-11.00 Anslut via denna länk
 Snart är det dags för Digi Demo Day!
 Välkommen till årets Digi Demo Day ”Den uppkopplade testbädden” torsdagen den 17 september hos RISE IVF i Mölndal. Fokus ligger på digitalisering av produktionssystem som kan testas och demonstreras i våra testbäddar.
 Pernilla Walkenström är divisionschef för Material och Produktion på RISE med ca 500 medarbetare och sitter också i RISE koncernledning. Sedan årsstämman i november har hon en ordinarie plats i LIGHTers styrelse.
 Pernilla har en lång erfarenhet av tillämpad forskning. I styrelsen representerar hon perspektivet från industriforskningsinstituten i Sverige.Vi är mycket glada att ha hennes kompetens i LIGHTers styrelse.
 I filmen nedan berättar hon mer om sig själv, sin syn på LIGHTer och sin roll i styrelsen.
 We are happy to invite you to a new series of events – LIGHTer PhD Network Seminars. Members within the LIGHTer PhD Network, who recently finished their PhD or Licentiate degree, will give presentations about their work.
 The first seminar will be given by:
 Carolyn Oddy, Modelling 3D-woven composites on the macroscale: Predicting damage initiation and inelastic phenomena
 Lluís Pérez Caro, Modelling Aspects in Forming and Welding of Nickel-Base Superalloys
 LIGHTer PhD Network Seminars - Expand network across the boundaries
 Date: 13th May, 2020, 14:00 – 15:00
 By Carolyn Oddy, and Lluís Pérez Caro (link for abstract)
 Zoom meeting: join the meeting by clicking the link below
 Date: 11th June, 2020, 14:00 – 15:00
 Zoom meeting: https://chalmers.zoom.us/j/68456101850?pwd=cCtST3l4NUlEK3F6YkVCTkd0bmRPQT09
 Date: 26th August, 2020, 14:00 – 15:00
 Zoom meeting: https://chalmers.zoom.us/j/63848494935?pwd=NE1iditFVjFMcndmR1lGbGlRTGxhUT09
 Lic seminar and diputations
 • Da Wu, 12 maj
 • Wilhelm Johannisson, 3 juni
 Join the seminar on the 13th May
 Intensiv jakt efter nya material
 DYNAmore Nordic och LIGHTer intervjuas tillsammans i branschtidningen Fordonskomponenten* för fordonsindustrin.
 Nextcomp är ett projekt inom LIGHTer som ska korta utvecklingstiden för materialmodelleringsprocessen. Ett företag som ingår i projektet är DYNAmore Nordic som tar fram beräkningsmetoder för hållfasthet kring lättviktsmaterial.
 - Att få fram moderna högpresterande lättviktsmaterial som fungerar där de behövs, kan vara en komplicerad process, säger forskningschef Mats Landervik som sedan tre år tillbaka är medlem i LIGHTers styrelse.
 LIGHTer får Sverige att lätta
 Inom fordonsindustrin är lättare komponenter och nya materiallösningar sedan länge ett prioriterat område för att nå Europas högt ställda utsläppskrav.
 - Fordonsindustrin är en av de mest drivande branscherna, eftersom man på alla sätt vill minska fordonens koldioxidutsläpp, säger Cecilia Ramberg, verksamhetsledare för LIGHTer.
 * Fordonskomponenten nr 1, 2020.
 13 maj LIGHTer PhD Network Seminars – Expand network across the boundaries
 11 juni LIGHTer PhD Network Seminar – zoom meeting
 26 aug LIGHTer PhD Network Seminar – zoom meeting


text:
z Irinyi család ősi fészke Iriny község, Romániában, Szatmár megye (judeţul Satu-Mare) délnyugati részén, az Érmelléken, Szatmárnémetitől 58 kilométerre, a román-magyar határtól légvonalban 40 kilométerre található. Mai neve Irina (kiejtése Iriná). Szomszéd települései Portelek, Érszodoró, Érdengeleg. A legközelebbi város, a 20 kilométerre északnyugatra fekvő Nagykároly (román nevén Carei).
 A község címeréről sajnosnincs képünk
 község egykori címere kék mázú csücsköstalpú tarpajzs, melyet négy hullámos fonal oszt ketté. Felső részén három, legyezőszerűen széttárt arany búzakalász, a pajzstalpon három egyforma, egymástól egyenlő távolságra álló, tömött lombú fa látható. Egy-egy fa magassága a címer hosszának egyharmada.Mindhárom motívum a település egykori pecsétjén is megtalálható. A címerképek közül az arany kalászok a község mezőgazdasági jellegére, a hullámos pólyák illetve a tömött lombú fák az Érmellék ligetes, fás részeire utal. Ma már címerét természetesen semmilyen formában nem használják. Ismereteink szerint a címerábrázolás egyik legutolsó hivatalosan is használt változata egy 1907-es pecséten maradt fenn.
 égészeti ásatások a település határában VI-VII. századi avar, IX. századi szláv és X. századi magyar sírokat tártak fel. Irinyről az egyik legkorábbi ismert írott forrás, éppen az Irinyi család privilégiumait megerősítő, 1279-ből származó királyi oklevél. Ettől kezdve a település története az Irinyi családdal szorosan összefonódik. A család itt építi ki birtokközpontját, s válik egészen a XX. század elejéig Iriny és házasságok révén (lásd nemesi családfák), a környező települések legnagyobb földbirtokosává.
 Iriny 1919-ig Szatmár vármegyéhez tartozik, majd Románia Szilágy megyéjének része lesz. 1940 és 1944 között a második Bécsi döntést követően, rövid időre újból Magyarországhoz tartozik, majd a második világháború után visszakerül Romániához, Szatmár megyéhez. A község népessége az 1990-es években jelentős mértékben kicserélődik, egykori magyar ajkú lakói nagy része a környező városokba vagy Magyarországra települt át.
 A községjelző román-magyar kétnyelvű táblaIriny 2007.
 Az egykori Irinyi-kúria falán láthatóromán-magyar kétnyelvű tábla
 községben ma egy református és egy görögkeleti templom illetve egy római katolikus kápolna áll. A román és magyar tagozattal is rendelkező általános iskola az egykori Irinyi-kúria épületében működik. A földszintes épületről Borovszky Samu, Magyarország vármegyéi és városai című művének, Szathmár vármegyéről szóló kötetében szép litográfiát találunk, amely a kúriát az 1800-as évek végi állapotában ábrázolja.
 Iriny - Az Irinyi család úrilakaBorovszky Samu művében látható litográfia
 A kúria épülete egy U-alaprajzú, földszintes épület. A litográfián egy L-alaprajzú épület látható. A főhomlokzat közepén látható díszes fafaragású tornác az idők folyamán, elpusztult illetve átépítésre került. Az épület park felöli homlokzata az épület háború utáni funkcióváltása miatt, sajnos ma már csak egy dísztelen hátsó homlokzat képét mutatja. A franciakert helyén ma kukoricás van.
 A kúria Borovszky-ban látható homlokzatánakmai látképe (a park helyén ma kukoricás van)
 A nemes irinyi Irinyi család egykori kúriája maI-VIII. osztályos általános iskola
 A földszintes Irinyi-kúria hátsó homlokzataFotó: Irinyi Gábor (Nagyvárad)
 Az Irinyi-kúria hátsó homlokzata (folytatás)a saroktorony bővítéssel
 Az elmúlt száz évben az épületet átépítették, kibővítették. Amennyiben hihetünk a litográfiának, akkor a jobb oldali szárnyat később egy egyszintes sátortetős, toronyépülettel toldották meg. Az épületen se címer, se másmilyen díszítő motívum nem utal a kúria egykori lakóira, az Irinyiekre.
 Az Irinyi-kúria egykori parkjánakvégében levő köztemető
 Az irinyi Irinyi család kápolnájaIriny 2007.
 zzel szemben, a kúria egykori kertjének végében, a község köztemetőjében áll az Irinyi család kápolnája. A kápolna timpanonján pedig a nemesi család, általunk ismert legszebb, barokk címerábrázolását láthatjuk. Az épület homlokzatán található márványtábla felirata szerint a kápolnát Irinyi Zsigmond özvegye, Csepei Zoltán Juliánna építette 1836-ban. A kápolna és körülötte a temető is szép rendezett állapotban van.
 A nemes irinyi Irinyiek címereFotó: Irinyi István (Nyíregyháza)
 A kápolna homlokzatán a címer alatti felirat:Az örök Isten dicsőségéres híven szeretett férjem irinyi Irinyi Sigmondés egyetlen fia Lajos hamvaik nyughelyéülállítata Csepei Zoltán JuliannaMDCCCXXXVI
 Borovszky Samu: Szathmár Vármegye. 1901. Budapest, Apolló Kiadó


text:
 7.11.2016
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 410/24
 Προσφυγή της 17ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2016 — Márquez Alentà κατά EUIPO — Fiesta Hotels & Resorts (αναπαράσταση ενός μυρμηγκιού)
 (Υπόθεση T-657/16)
 (2016/C 410/34)
 Γλώσσα του δικογράφου της προσφυγής: η ισπανική
 Διάδικοι
 Προσφεύγων: Marc Márquez Alentà (Cervera, Ισπανία) (εκπρόσωπος: J. Carbonell Callicó, δικηγόρος)
 Καθού: Γραφείο Διανοητικής Ιδιοκτησίας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (EUIPO)
 Αντίδικος ενώπιον του τμήματος προσφυγών: Fiesta Hotels & Resorts, SL (Ίμπιζα, Ισπανία)
 Στοιχεία σχετικά με τη διαδικασία ενώπιον του EUIPO
 Αιτών: Ο προσφεύγων
 Επίδικο σήμα: Εικονιστικό σήμα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (αναπαράσταση ενός μυρμηγκιού) — Υπ’ αριθ. 12 715 661 αίτηση καταχωρίσεως
 Διαδικασία ενώπιον του EUIPO: Διαδικασία ανακοπής
 Προσβαλλόμενη απόφαση: Απόφαση του πρώτου τμήματος προσφυγών του EUIPO της 30ής Ιουνίου 2016 στην υπόθεση R 1242/2015-1
 Αιτήματα
 Η προσφεύγουσα ζητεί από το Γενικό Δικαστήριο:
 —
 να ακυρώσει την προσβαλλόμενη απόφαση όσον αφορά τη μερική αποδοχή της προσφυγής R 1242/2015-1 και της ανακοπής για ορισμένα προϊόντα της κλάσεως 16 και τις υπηρεσίες της κλάσεως 35·
 —
 κατά συνέπεια, να επιβεβαιώσει την απόφαση του τμήματος ανακοπών και, ως εκ τούτου, την καταχώριση του ζητούμενου σήματος για όλα τα προϊόντα και τις υπηρεσίες που υπάγονται στις κλάσεις 16, 35, 41 και 43·
 —
 να καταδικάσει το ΕUIPO στα δικαστικά έξοδα, σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 87, παράγραφος 2, του κανονισμού για το κοινοτικό σήμα.
 Προβαλλόμενος λόγος
 —
 Παράβαση του άρθρου 8, παράγραφος 1, στοιχεία α' και β', του κανονισμού 207/2009.


text:
 31.10.2013
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 291/60
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG 94/2013 HATÁROZATA
 (2013. május 3.)
 az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás XVII. mellékletének (Szellemi tulajdon) módosításáról
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: az EGT-megállapodás) és különösen annak 98. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A szerzői jog és egyes szomszédos jogok védelmi idejéről szóló 2006/116/EK irányelv módosításáról szóló, 2011. szeptember 27-i 2011/77/EU európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelvet (1) bele kell foglalni az EGT-megállapodásba.
 (2)
 Az EGT-megállapodás XVII. mellékletét ezért ennek megfelelően módosítani kell,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A HATÁROZATOT:
 1. cikk
 Az EGT-megállapodás XVII. mellékletének 9f. pontja (2006/116/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv) a következő szöveggel egészül ki:
 „, az alábbi módosítással:
 —
 32011 L 0077: az Európai Parlament és a Tanács 2011. szeptember 27-i 2011/77/EU irányelve (HL L 265., 2011.10.11., 1. o.)”.
 2. cikk
 A 2011/77/EU irányelvnek az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja EGT-kiegészítésében közzéteendő izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövege hiteles.
 3. cikk
 Ez a határozat 2013. május 4-én lép hatályba, feltéve, hogy az EGT-megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdésében előírt összes bejelentést megtették (2).
 4. cikk
 Ezt a határozatot az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében és EGT-kiegészítésében ki kell hirdetni.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2013. május 3-án.
 az EGT Vegyes Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) HL L 265., 2011.10.11., 1. o.
 (2) Alkotmányos követelmények fennállását jelezték.


type: legislation

text:
 30.1.2018
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 25/1
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2018/137 НА СЪВЕТА
 от 29 януари 2018 година
 за прилагане на Регламент (ЕС) No 101/2011 относно ограничителни мерки, насочени срещу определени лица, образувания и органи с оглед на положението в Тунис
 СЪВЕТЪТ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Регламент (ЕС) No 101/2011 на Съвета от 4 февруари 2011 г. относно ограничителни мерки, насочени срещу определени лица, образувания и органи с оглед на положението в Тунис (1), и по-специално член 12 от него,
 като взе предвид предложението на върховния представител на Съюза по въпросите на външните работи и политиката на сигурност,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 На 4 февруари 2011 г. Съветът прие Регламент (ЕС) No 101/2011.
 (2)
 Въз основа на преглед на списъка в приложение I към Регламент (ЕС) No 101/2011 вписването за едно лице следва да бъде изменено.
 (3)
 Поради това приложение I към Регламент (ЕС) No 101/2011 следва да бъде съответно изменено,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Приложение I към Регламент (ЕС) No 101/2011 се изменя, както е посочено в приложението към настоящия регламент.
 Член 2
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила в деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 29 януари 2018 година.
 За Съвета
 Председател
 Р. ПОРОЖАНОВ
 (1) ОВ L 31, 5.2.2011 г., стр. 1.
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 Вписването за посоченото по-долу лице, съдържащо се в приложение I към Регламент (ЕС) No 101/2011, се заменя със следното:
 Име
 Идентификационни данни
 Основания
 „5.
 Fahd Mohamed Sakher Ben Moncef Ben Mohamed Hfaiez MATERI
 Тунизиец, роден в гр. Тунис на 2 декември 1981 г., син на Naïma BOUTIBA, женен за Nesrine BEN ALI, л.к. No 04682068.
 Лице, срещу което тунизийските власти водят съдебни разследвания във връзка със съучастие в присвояване на тунизийски публични средства от лице на публична длъжност, съучастие в злоупотреба със служебно положение от лице на публична длъжност (в случая бившия президент Ben Ali) с цел извличане на облаги за трето лице и причиняване на вреди на администрацията, оказване на неправомерно влияние върху лице на публична длъжност (в случая бившия президент Ben Ali) с цел пряко или косвено получаване на облаги за друго лице и във връзка със съучастие в престъплението съзнателно неправомерно получаване от публичен служител на публични средства и използването им за лични облаги или облаги на членове на семейството му.“


text:
 EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE KOMISJON
 Brüssel 16.11.2005
 KOM(2005) 575 lõplik
 Ettepanek:
 NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS
 millega kehtestatakse kalandusaastaks 2006 soovitushinnad ja ühenduse tootjahinnad
 teatavatele kalandustoodetele kooskõlas määrusega (EÜ) nr 104/2000
 (komisjoni esitatud)
 ET ET
 ---pagebreak--- SELETUSKIRI
 1) ETTEPANEKU TAUST
 •
 110
 Ettepaneku põhjused ja eesmärgid
 Käesoleva ettepaneku eesmärk on eelkõige võimaldada nõukogul täita oma õigusloome
 kohust ning kindlaks määrata 2006. kalandusaasta soovitushinnad ja ühenduse
 tootjahinnad. Selle ettepaneku laiem eesmärk on seega kõnealusel kalandusaastal
 tagada nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 104/2000 kehtestatud hinnatoetuse ja
 sekkumismehhanismide toimimine.
 •
 120
 Üldine taust
 Nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 104/2000 on loodud kalandus- ja akvakultuuritooteturu
 ühine korraldus, millega reguleeritakse ühise kalanduspoliitika turu- ja
 kaubandusaspekte ning mis aitab seega kaasa asutamislepingu artiklis 33 sätestatud
 eesmärkide saavutamisele. Ühise turukorralduse oluline osa on konkreetsed
 hinnatoetus- ja sekkumismehhanismid. Seoses sellega on nõukogu kõnealuse määruse
 artiklite 18 ja 26 kohaselt kohustatud kehtestama enne iga kalandusaasta algust
 komisjoni ettepanekul kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega teatavatele ühenduse
 tähtsusega kalandustoodetele nii soovitushinna, ühenduse tootjahinna kui ka ühenduse
 tootjahinna teatavate tuunitoodetele. Soovitushinnad on võrdlusaluseks
 sekkumismehhanismide kasutamiseks vajalikele tehnilistele parameetritele, mis hiljem
 määratakse kindlaks komisjoni määrustega. Ühenduse tootjahind on oluline töötlevale
 tööstusele hüvitise maksmisel tarnitud tuunikoguste puhul, kui maailmaturu hinnad
 langevad teatavast käivituslävest allapoole.
 Nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 kohaselt järgivad vastavad hinnad nii eelneva
 kolme aasta turuhindade arengut kui ka tootmise ja nõudluse suundumusi. Seoses
 sellega käsitletakse ettepanekus järgmisi hinnamuutusi: enamiku valge lihaga
 kalaliikide nagu tursk ja kilttursk puhul hinnatõus 0,5–1,5%, muude valge lihaga
 kalaliikide nagu meriahven ja süsikas puhul hinnalangus samas suurusjärgus; heeringa,
 makrelli ja anšoovise puhul hinnatõus 2–3%, sardiini, kuningmakrelli ja pikkuim-tuuni
 puhul hinnalangus 1–3% ning väiksem hinnalangus vähkide puhul. Külmutatud toodete
 osas kajastab ettepanek maailmaturu hinnalangust, v.a mõõkkala, kalmaari ja
 garneelide puhul, kus võib teha ettepaneku hinda tõsta 0,5–2%. Ettepanekus nähakse
 tuunitoodete puhul ette ühenduse tootjahinna taseme säilitamine.
 •
 130
 Ettepanekus käsitletavas valdkonnas kehtivad õigusnormid
 Nõukogu 6. detsembri 2004. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 2132/2004, millega kehtestatakse
 kalandusaastaks 2005 soovitushinnad ja ühenduse tootjahinnad teatavatele
 kalandustoodetele kooskõlas määrusega (EÜ) nr 104/2000.
 •
 140
 Kooskõla Euroopa Liidu muude põhimõtete ja eesmärkidega
 Nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 104/2000 loodud ühise turukorralduse toimimine ning
 samuti sellest määrusest tulenevate õigusloome kohustuste täitmine aitavad kaasa
 asutamislepingu artiklis 33 sätestatud eesmärkide saavutamisele.
 ET 2 ET
 ---pagebreak--- 2) KONSULTEERIMINE HUVITATUD ISIKUTEGA JA MÕJU HINDAMINE
 • Konsulteerimine huvitatud isikutega
 211
 Konsultatsioonimeetodid, peamised sihtvaldkonnad ja vastajate üldiseloomustus
 Kalandustooteturu korralduskomitee ning kalanduse ja vesiviljeluse nõuandekomitee.
 212
 Vastuste kokkuvõte ja nende arvessevõtmine
 Mõlemad komiteed üldiselt ühinesid komisjoni turuanalüüsi seisukohtadega.
 • Ekspertarvamuste kogumine ja kasutamine
 221
 Asjaomased teadus- ja ekspertiisivaldkonnad
 Kalandustoodete turg
 222
 Kasutatud metoodika
 Avalik arutelu
 223
 Peamised organisatsioonid ja eksperdid, kellega konsulteeriti
 Kalandustooteturu korralduskomitee juures liikmesriike esindavad eksperdid.
 Kalanduse ja vesiviljeluse nõuandekomitee juures kõiki tähtsamaid ELi huvigruppe
 esindavad eksperdid.
 2249
 Saadud ja kasutatud nõuannete kokkuvõte
 Tõsiseid pöördumatute tagajärgedega ohte ei mainitud.
 225
 Valdavalt kajastuvad nõuanded ettepanekus, milles määratakse kindlaks
 soovitushinnad ja ühenduse tootjahinnad.
 226
 Ekspertide nõuannete avalikustamiseks kasutatud vahendid
 Kalandustooteturu korralduskomitee ja kalanduse ja vesiviljeluse nõuandekomitee
 koosolekute protokollid.
 •
 230
 Mõju hindamine
 Silmas pidades ettepaneku konkreetset iseloomu, nimelt iga-aastast asjaomaste hindade
 määramist ühise turukorralduse praeguse versiooni sätetele vastavalt, ei ole mõju
 hindamine vajalik.
 Ettepanek toetub siiski eelnevate kalandusaastate sekkumiste korrapärasele jälgimisele
 ning iga asjaomase kalandustoote põhjalikule turuanalüüsile.
 ET 3 ET
 ---pagebreak--- 3) ETTEPANEKU ÕIGUSLIK KÜLG
 •
 305
 Kavandatud meetmete kokkuvõte
 Ettepanek nõukogu määruse kohta, millega kehtestatakse kalandusaastaks 2006
 teatavatele kalandustoodetele soovitushinnad ja ühenduse tootjahinnad.
 •
 310
 Õiguslik alus
 Nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 18 lõige 3 ja artikli 26 lõige 1.
 •
 329
 Subsidiaarsuse põhimõte
 Ettepanek kuulub ühenduse ainupädevusse. Subsidiaarsuse põhimõtet seetõttu ei
 kohaldata.
 • Proportsionaalsuse põhimõte
 Ettepanek on proportsionaalsuse põhimõttega kooskõlas järgmistel põhjustel:
 331
 Siseturu toimimine kalandustoodete valdkonnas tingib soovitushindade
 kindlaksmääramise. Ühine turukorraldus näeb ette konkreetsed sekkumismehhanismid,
 aga ei sunni ühtegi osalist (tootjaorganisatsioonid) sekkuma.
 332
 Ühine turukorraldus on märkimisväärselt vähendanud nii ebaotstarbeka turult
 eemaldamise kujul toimunud sekkumise atraktiivsust kui ka sekkumiseks kulunud
 rahalisi vahendeid.
 • Õigusakti valik
 341
 Kavandatud õigusakt: määrus.
 342
 Muud õigusaktid ei ole piisavad järgmis(t)el põhjus(t)el:
 Nõukogu määrab komisjoni ettepanekul kvalifitseeritud häälteenamusega kindlaks
 soovitushinnad ja ühenduse tootjahinnad. Määrus on vajalik vahetu kohaldamise ja
 ühetaolisuse tagamiseks kogu ühenduses.
 4) MÕJU EELARVELE
 401
 Kuna kõnealune ettepanek käsitleb hindade kindlaksmääramist, on tema mõju
 kulutustele kaudne ning sõltub suures osas turumuutustest ning lossitud
 kalandustoodete kogustest.
 ET 4 ET
 ---pagebreak--- Ettepanek:
 NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS
 millega kehtestatakse kalandusaastaks 2006 soovitushinnad ja ühenduse tootjahinnad
 teatavatele kalandustoodetele kooskõlas määrusega (EÜ) nr 104/2000
 EUROOPA LIIDU NÕUKOGU,
 võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut,
 võttes arvesse nõukogu 17. detsembri 1999. aasta määrust (EÜ) nr 104/2000 kalastus- ja
 akvakultuuritooteturu ühise korralduse kohta,1 eriti selle artikli 18 lõiget 3 ja artikli 26 lõiget 1,
 võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut,
 ning arvestades järgmist:
 (1) Määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 18 lõikes 1 ja artikli 26 lõikes 1 on sätestatatud, et
 soovitushind ja ühenduse tootjahind peaksid olema kehtestatud igaks kalandusaastaks,
 et kindlaks määrata teatavate kalandustoodete sekkumishind.
 (2) Määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 18 lõikega 1 nõutakse soovitushindade kehtestamist
 nimetatud määruse I ja II lisas loetletud igale tootele ja tooterühmale.
 (3) Praegu kättesaadavate andmete põhjal, mis kajastavad asjaomaste toodete hindu, ja
 kriteeriumide põhjal, millele on osutatud määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 18 lõikes 2,
 tuleks soovitushindu 2006. kalandusaastaks liigist sõltuvalt suurendada, samal tasemel
 säilitada või vähendada.
 (4) Määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 26 lõikega 1 nõutakse ühenduse tootjahinna
 kehtestamist kõnealuse määruse III lisas loetletud toodetele. Asjakohane on kehtestada
 ühenduse tootjahind ühele nendest toodetest ning muudele toodetele arvutada
 ühenduse tootjahind komisjoni määruses (EMÜ) nr 3510/822 osutatud
 ümberarvestuskoefitsientide abil.
 (5) Määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 18 lõike 2 esimeses ja teises taandes ning artikli 26
 lõikes 1 kehtestatud kriteeriumide põhjal tuleks ühenduse tootjahinda kalandusaastaks
 2006 korrigeerida.
 1
 EÜT L 17, 21.1.2000, lk 22. Määrust on viimati muudetud 2003. aasta ühinemisaktiga.
 2
 EÜT L 368, 28.12.1982, lk 27. Määrust on viimati muudetud määrusega (EMÜ) nr 3899/92 (EÜT L
 392, 31.12.1992, lk 24).
 ET 5 ET
 ---pagebreak--- ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA MÄÄRUSE:
 Artikkel 1
 Käesoleva määruse I lisas kehtestatakse soovitushinnad kalandusaastaks 1. jaanuar–31.
 detsember 2005 kooskõlas määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 18 lõikega 1.
 Artikkel 2
 Käesoleva määruse II lisas kehtestatakse ühenduse tootjahinnad kalandusaastaks 1. jaanuar–
 31. detsember 2005 kooskõlas määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 artikli 26 lõikega 1.
 Artikkel 3
 Käesolev määrus jõustub 1. jaanuaril 2006.
 Käesolev määrus on tervikuna siduv ja vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides.
 Brüssel,
 Nõukogu nimel
 eesistuja
 ET 6 ET
 ---pagebreak--- I LISA
 Lisad Liik Kaubanduslik esitusviis Soovitushind
 Määruse (EÜ) nr 104/2000 I ja II lisas loetletud tooted (eurot tonni kohta)
 I 1. Heeringas liigist Clupea harengus Terve kala 265
 2. Sardiinid liigist Sardina pilchardus Terve kala 569
 3. Harilik ogahai (Squalus acauthias), Terve kala või 1079
 roogitud kala koos peaga
 4. Koerhaid (Scyliorhinus spp.), Terve kala või 763
 roogitud kala koos peaga
 5. Meriahvenad (Sebastes spp.) Terve kala 1136
 6. Tursk liigist Gadus morhua Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 1631
 7. Süsikas (Pollachius virens) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 747
 8. Kilttursk (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 998
 9. Merlang (Merlangius merlangus) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 937
 10. Molvad (Molva spp.) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 1196
 11. Makrell liigist Scomber scombrus Terve kala 323
 12. Makrell liigist Scomber japonicus Terve kala 294
 13. Anšoovised (Engraulis spp.) Terve kala 1308
 14. Atlandi merilest (Pleuronectes platessa) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 1074
 ajavahemikul 1.1.2005–30.4.2005
 Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 1484
 ajavahemikul 1.5.2005–31.12.2005
 15. Euroopa merluus liigist Merluccius merluccius Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 3656
 16. Kammellased (Lepidorhombus spp.) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 2491
 17. Harilik soomuslest (Limanda limanda) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 881
 18. Harilik lest (Platichthys flesus) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 519
 19. Pikkuim-tuun (Thunnus alalunga) Terve kala 2220
 Roogitud kala koos peaga 2477
 20. Seepia (Sepia officinalis ja Rossia macrosoma) Terve kala 1613
 21. Merikuradid (Lophius spp.) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 2867
 Ilma peata 5928
 22. Garneel liigist Crangon crangon Vees keedetud 2415
 23. Harilik süvameregarneel (Pandalus borealis) Vees keedetud 6347
 Värske või jahutatud 1598
 24. Taskukrabi (Cancer pagurus) Terve kala 1731
 25. Norra salehomaar (Nephrops norvegicus) Terve kala 5337
 Sabad 4237
 26. Merikeeled (Solea spp.) Terve kala või roogitud kala koos peaga 6679
 II 1. Süvalest (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas 1917
 originaalpakendis
 2. Merluusid perekonnast Merluccius spp. Külmutatud, terved, üht tüüpi tooteid 1227
 sisaldavas originaalpakendis
 Külmutatud, fileeritud, üht tüüpi tooteid 1484
 sisaldavas originaalpakendis
 3. Harilik hammasahven ja besuugod (Dentex dentex ja Külmutatud, partiidena või üht tüüpi tooteid 1602
 Pagellus spp.) sisaldavas originaalpakendis
 4. Mõõkkala (Xiphias Gladius) Külmutatud, terved, üht tüüpi tooteid 4079
 sisaldavas originaalpakendis
 5. Seepiad (Sepia officinalis) (Rossia macrosoma) Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas 1946
 (Sepiola rondeletti) originaalpakendis
 6. Kaheksajalad (Octopus spp.) Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas 2129
 originaalpakendis
 7. Ebakalmaarid (Loligo spp.) Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas 1168
 originaalpakendis
 8. Nooljas kalmaar (Ommastrephes sagittatus) Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas 961
 originaalpakendis
 9. Argentiina lühiuimkalmaar (Illex argentinus) Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas 870
 originaalpakendis
 10. Krevett sugukonnast Penaeidae 4075
 Krevett liigist Parapenaeus longirostris Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas
 originaalpakendis
 - Teised sugukonna Penaeidae liigid Külmutatud, üht tüüpi tooteid sisaldavas 8101
 originaalpakendis
 ET 7 ET
 ---pagebreak--- II LISA
 Liik Kaal Kaubanduslikud Ühenduse
 Määruse (EÜ) nr andmed tootjahind
 104/2000 III lisas (EUR/tonni)
 loetletud tooted
 Kulduim-tuun mis kaalub üle 10 kg Terve kala 1207
 (Thunnus albacares):
 Roogitult
 Muud
 mis kaalub kuni 10 Terve kala
 kg
 Roogitult
 Muud
 Pikkuim-tuun mis kaalub üle 10 kg Terve kala
 (Thunnus alalunga)
 Roogitult
 Muud
 mis kaalub kuni 10 Terve kala
 kg
 Roogitult
 Muud
 Vööttuun Terve kala
 (Katsuwonus
 Roogitult
 pelamis)
 Muud
 Harilik tuun Terve kala
 (Thunnus thynnus)
 Roogitult
 Muud
 Teised Thunnus ja Terve kala
 Enthynnus perekonna
 Roogitult
 liigid
 Muud
 ET 8 ET
 ---pagebreak--- LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
 1. NAME OF THE PROPOSAL :
 Proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the guide prices for the 2006 fishing year for
 fishery products listed in Annexes I and II and the Community producer price for the
 fishery products listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 on the common
 organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products
 2. ABM / ABB FRAMEWORK
 Policy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities:
 Policy Area 11: Fisheries
 Activity ABB 11 02: Fisheries markets
 3. BUDGET LINES
 3.1. Budget lines (operational lines and related technical and administrative assistance
 lines (ex- B.A lines)) including headings :
 11 02 01: Interventions in fishery products (18.200.000 € in the PDB 2006):
 Indicative breakdown:
 - Operational programmes: 6.750.000 € 3
 - Community withdrawals: 3.000.000 €
 - Autonomous withdrawals and carry-overs: 2.200.000 €
 - Private storage aid: 350.000 €
 - Compensatory allowance for tuna: 1.700.000 €
 - Community carry-overs: 4.000.000 €
 - Technical assistance: 200.000 €
 3.2. Duration of the action and of the financial impact:
 Measures restricted to the 2006 fishing year (16.10.2005 – 16.10.2006)
 Since this is a price-fixing exercise, the impact on expenditure is indirect. The expenditure
 in question will largely depend on developments in the market situation and on quantities
 landed.
 3
 Aid not affected by the fixation of the guide prices
 ET 9 ET
 ---pagebreak--- 3.3. Budgetary characteristics (add rows if necessary) :
 Contributions
 EFTA Heading in financial
 Budget line Type of expenditure New from applicant
 contribution perspective
 countries
 11 02 01 Comp/ Diff4/ No 11 Agriculture
 YES/
 Non- Non- YES/NO YES/NO expenses (except rural
 NO
 comp diff5 development)
 4. SUMMARY OF RESOURCES
 4.1. Financial Resources
 4.1.1. Summary of commitment appropriations (CA) and payment appropriations
 (PA)
 EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Section n+5
 no. and
 Expenditure type Year n n+1 n+2 n+3 n+4 later Total
 Operational expenditure6
 Appropriations 8.1 a 11.450.000 11.450.000
 Administrative expenditure within reference amount7
 Technical & - - - - - - -
 administrative assistance 8.2.4 c
 (NDA)
 TOTAL REFERENCE AMOUNT
 Appropriations a 11.450.000 11.450.000
 +
 c
 Administrative expenditure not included in reference amount8
 Human resources and 9
 associated expenditure 8.2.5 d
 (NDA)
 Administrative costs, other
 than human resources and
 associated costs, not 8.2.6 e
 included in reference amount
 (NDA)
 4
 Differentiated appropriations
 5
 Non-differentiated appropriations hereafter referred to as NDA
 6
 Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned.
 7
 Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx.
 8
 Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05.
 9
 Does not affect tasks distribution and does not require additional posts
 ET 10 ET
 ---pagebreak--- Total indicative financial cost of intervention
 TOTAL CA including a+c - - - - - - -
 cost of Human +d+
 Resources e
 TOTAL PA including b+c - - - - - - -
 cost of Human +d+
 Resources e
 Co-financing details
 If the proposal involves co-financing by Member States, or other bodies (please specify
 which), an estimate of the level of this co-financing should be indicated in the table below
 (additional lines may be added if different bodies are foreseen for the provision of the co-
 financing):
 EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Co-financing body
 n + 5
 and
 Year n+1 n+2 n+3 n+4 Total
 later
 n
 No co-financing through - - - - - - -
 Member States or other f
 bodies
 TOTAL CA including co- a+c - - - - - - -
 financing +d+
 e+f
 4.1.2. Compatibility with Financial Programming
 ⌦ Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming.
 Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial
 perspective.
 Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Interinstitutional
 Agreement10 (i.e. flexibility instrument or revision of the financial
 perspective).
 4.1.3. Financial impact on Revenue
 ⌦ Proposal has no financial implications on revenue
 Proposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as follows:
 10
 See points 19 and 24 of the Inter-institutional agreement.
 ET 11 ET
 ---pagebreak--- NB: All details and observations relating to the method of calculating the effect on revenue
 should be shown in a separate annex.
 EUR million (to one decimal place)
 Prior to Situation following action
 action
 Budget line Revenue [Year [Yea [n+1] [n+2] [n+3 [n+4] [n+5]
 n-1] r n] ] 11
 a) Revenue in absolute terms
 b) Change in revenue ∆
 (Please specify each revenue budget line involved, adding the appropriate number
 of rows to the table if there is an effect on more than one budget line.)
 4.2. Human Resources FTE (including officials, temporary and external staff) – see detail
 under point 8.2.1.
 Annual requirements Year n n+1 n+2 n+3 n+4 n+5
 and
 later
 Total number of - - - - - -
 human resources
 5. CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVES
 5.1. Need to be met in the short or long term
 The interventions concerning fishery products are carried out under the Common
 Fisheries Policy (CFP) in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty. They aim at providing
 stability to the Community markets by preventing possible risks of crisis. In this context,
 appropriate price and supply policies are of utmost importance. The interest of the
 production and marketing chain and the need to strengthen the competitiveness of the
 sector in a context of globalisation must be taken into account. The objective of market
 stability together with the support to producers’ income can essentially be achieved
 through the different mechanisms of intervention on the markets, e.g. withdrawals, carry-
 over, compensatory allowance. The interest of the consumers must also be considered.
 5.2. Value-added of Community involvement and coherence of the proposal with other
 financial instruments and possible synergy
 The question of subsidiarity is not relevant to this proposal since Community intervention
 falls within the exclusive competence of the Community. The added value of Community
 intervention is directly related to the underlying arguments of the existence of a common
 organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products.
 11
 Additional columns should be added if necessary i.e. if the duration of the action exceeds 6 years
 ET 12 ET
 ---pagebreak--- 5.3. Objectives, expected results and related indicators of the proposal in the context of
 the ABM framework
 This proposal aims at the fixation of guide prices and Community producer price by the
 Council in accordance with Articles 18 and 26 of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000.
 The guide prices provide the basis for the subsequent fixing, by way of Commission
 Regulations, of the different parameters needed for the operation of the intervention
 mechanisms for the fishing year concerned. Similarly, the Community producer price
 forms the basis of the granting of the compensatory allowance for tuna which might be
 triggered depending on the development of prices on the world markets.
 In order to ensure the proper functioning of the common organisation of the markets in
 2006, all regulations should be adopted before the end of 2005.
 5.4. Method of Implementation (indicative)
 Show below the method(s)12 chosen for the implementation of the action.
  ٱCentralised Management
 ⌦ Directly by the Commission
 ٱ Indirectly by delegation to:
 ٱ Executive Agencies
 ٱ Bodies set up by the Communities as referred to in art.
 185 of the Financial Regulation
 ٱ National public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service
 mission
  ٱShared or decentralised management
 ⌦ With Member states
  ٱWith Third countries
  ٱJoint management with international organisations (please specify)
 Relevant comments:
 Most measures financed under the budget heading 11.02.01 are implemented in
 shared management with the EU Member States. However, the management of data
 notified by the Member States in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No
 80/2001 is the sole responsibility of the Commission.
 12
 If more than one method is indicated please provide additional details in the "Relevant comments"
 section of this point
 ET 13 ET
 ---pagebreak--- MONITORING AND EVALUATION
 5.5. Monitoring system
 The monitoring of the envisaged measures is ensured through the collection and the
 analysis of data notified by the Member States by way of the FIDES system in accordance
 with Commission Regulation (EC) No 80/2001.
 5.6. Evaluation
 5.6.1. Ex-ante evaluation
 Considering the specific nature of the proposal, namely the annual fixation of certain
 Community prices within the framework of the current common organisation of the
 markets for fishery and aquaculture products, an ex-ante evaluation as defined in
 Article 21 (1) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down
 detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation is not required.
 Nevertheless, the Commission proposal is based on regular monitoring of
 interventions in previous fishing years and thorough analysis of the market situation
 for the relevant products.
 5.6.2. Measures taken following an intermediate/ex-post evaluation (lessons learned
 from similar experiences in the past)
 Not relevant since the intervention measures for fishery products have not yet been
 subject to intermediary or ex-post evaluation.
 5.6.3. Terms and frequency of future evaluation
 While a factual implementation report is due to be submitted pursuant to Article 41 of
 Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 by 31 December 2005, an overall evaluation of
 the different mechanisms foreseen in the Common Market Organisation in its current
 version will be conducted in accordance with the Financial Regulation in 2006.
 6. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES
 The anti-fraud measures are in conformity with the provisions laid down in Regulation (CE)
 No 104/2000 and, in particular, with the provisions laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 595/91
 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid.
 ET 14 ET
 ---pagebreak--- 7. DETAILS OF RESOURCES
 7.1. Objectives of the proposal in terms of their financial cost
 Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 (Headings of Objectives, actions and Type of Av. Year Year n+1 Year n+2 Year n+3 Year n+4 Year n+5 and TOTAL
 outputs should be provided) output cost n later
 No. Total No. Total No. Total No. Total No. Total No. Total No. Total
 outputs cost outputs cost outputs cost outputs cost outputs cost outputs cost outputs cost
 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE No.1
 13
 .........
 Action 1...................
 - Output 1
 - Output 2
 Action 2...................
 - Output 1
 Sub-total Objective 1
 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE No.2
 1
 .........
 Action 1...................
 - Output 1
 Sub-total Objective 2
 1
 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE No.n
 Sub-total Objective n
 TOTAL COST
 13
 As described under Section 5.3
 ET 15 ET
 ---pagebreak--- 7.2. Administrative Expenditure
 7.2.1. Number and type of human resources
 Types of Staff to be assigned to management of the action using existing and/or additional
 post resources (number of posts/FTEs)
 Year n Year n+1 Year n+2 Year n+3 Year n+4 Year n+5
 15
 Officials A*/AD
 or
 temporary B*,
 staff14 C*/AST
 (XX 01
 01)
 Staff financed16 by
 art. XX 01 02
 Other staff17
 financed by art. XX
 01 04/05
 TOTAL
 7.2.2. Description of tasks deriving from the action
 7.2.3. Sources of human resources (statutory)
 (When more than one source is stated, please indicate the number of posts originating from
 each of the sources)
 Posts currently allocated to the management of the programme to be replaced
 or extended
 Posts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year n
 Posts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedure
 Posts to be redeployed using existing resources within the managing service
 (internal redeployment)
 Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB exercise of the
 year in question
 14
 Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount
 15
 Does not affect administrative cost or staffing
 16
 Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount
 17
 Cost of which is included within the reference amount
 ET 16 ET
 ---pagebreak--- 7.2.4. Other Administrative expenditure included in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 –
 Expenditure on administrative management)
 EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Budget line Year
 n+5
 Year Year Year Year Year
 (number and heading) TOTAL
 n n+1 n+2 n+3 n+4
 and
 later
 1 Technical and administrative
 assistance (including related staff costs)
 Executive agencies18
 Other technical and administrative
 assistance
 - intra muros
 - extra muros
 Total Technical and administrative
 assistance
 7.2.5. Financial cost of human resources and associated costs not included in the
 reference amount
 EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Year n+5
 Type of human resources Year n Year n+1 Year n+2 Year n+3 Year n+4
 and later
 Officials and temporary staff (XX 01
 01)
 Staff financed by Art XX 01 02
 (auxiliary, END, contract staff, etc.)
 (specify budget line)
 Total cost of Human Resources
 and associated costs (NOT in
 reference amount)
 18
 Reference should be made to the specific legislative financial statement for the Executive Agency(ies)
 concerned.
 ET 17 ET
 ---pagebreak--- Calculation– Officials and Temporary agents
 Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable
 Calculation– Staff financed under art. XX 01 02
 Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable
 8.2.6 Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount
 EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Year
 n+5
 Year Year Year Year
 TOTAL
 Year n+1 n+2 n+3 n+4
 and
 n
 later
 XX 01 02 11 01 – Missions
 XX 01 02 11 02 – Meetings & Conferences
 XX 01 02 11 03 – Committees19
 XX 01 02 11 04 – Studies & consultations
 XX 01 02 11 05 - Information systems
 2 Total Other Management
 Expenditure (XX 01 02 11)
 3 Other expenditure of an
 administrative nature (specify
 including reference to budget line)
 Total Administrative expenditure, other
 than human resources and associated
 costs (NOT included in reference
 amount)
 Calculation - Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount
 19
 Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.
 ET 18 ET