text:
 Fontos jogi nyilatkozat
 |
 12006E/PRO/02
 Az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződés (Konszolidált változat) - B. Az Európai Unióról szóló szerződéshez és az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződéshez csatolt jegyzőkönyvek - (2.) Jegyzőkönyv a schengeni vívmányoknak az Európai Unió keretébe történő beillesztéséről (1997.)
 Hivatalos Lap C 321 E , 29/12/2006 o. 0191 - 0195
 (2.) Jegyzőkönyva schengeni vívmányoknak az Európai Unió keretébe történő beillesztéséről (1997.)A MAGAS SZERZŐDŐ FELEK,TUDOMÁSUL VÉVE, hogy az Európai Unió egyes tagállamai által 1985. június 14-én, illetve 1990. június 19-én Schengenben aláírt, a közös határokon történő ellenőrzések fokozatos megszüntetéséről szóló megállapodások, valamint az ezekhez kapcsolódó megállapodások és az e megállapodások alapján elfogadott szabályok célja az európai integráció elmélyítése, és különösen annak lehetővé tétele, hogy az Európai Unió még gyorsabban a szabadságon, a biztonságon és a jog érvényesülésén alapuló térséggé válhasson,AZZAL AZ ÓHAJJAL, hogy a fent említett megállapodásokat és szabályokat az Európai Unió keretébe illesszék,MEGERŐSÍTVE, hogy a schengeni vívmányok rendelkezései csak akkor és annyiban alkalmazhatók, ha és amennyiben azok az európai uniós és közösségi joggal összeegyeztethetők,FIGYELEMMEL Dánia különleges helyzetére,FIGYELEMMEL arra a tényre, hogy Írország, valamint Nagy-Britannia és Észak-Írország Egyesült Királysága a fenti megállapodásoknak nem részesei, és azokat nem írták alá; hogy mindazonáltal rendelkezni kell annak lehetőségéről, hogy e tagállamok ezeknek a megállapodásoknak egyes vagy valamennyi rendelkezését elfogadják,FELISMERVE, hogy ennek következtében az Európai Unióról szóló szerződésnek és az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződésnek az egyes tagállamok megerősített együttműködésére vonatkozó rendelkezéseit szükséges igénybe venni, továbbá hogy ezeket a rendelkezéseket csak végső eszközként lehet igénybe venni,FIGYELEMMEL az Izlandi Köztársasággal és a Norvég Királysággal való különleges kapcsolat fenntartásának szükségességére, amely államok megerősítették azt a szándékukat, hogy az 1996. december 19-én Luxemburgban aláírt megállapodás alapján vállalják, hogy a fent említett rendelkezések rájuk nézve kötelezőek,MEGÁLLAPODTAK a következő rendelkezésekben, amelyeket az Európai Unióról szóló szerződéshez és az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződéshez csatolnak:1. cikkA Belga Királyság, a Dán Királyság, a Németországi Szövetségi Köztársaság, a Görög Köztársaság, a Spanyol Királyság, a Francia Köztársaság, az Olasz Köztársaság, a Luxemburgi Nagyhercegség, a Holland Királyság, az Osztrák Köztársaság, a Portugál Köztársaság, a Finn Köztársaság és a Svéd Királyság a schengeni megállapodások aláíróiként felhatalmazást kapnak arra, hogy egymás között megerősített együttműködést hozzanak létre az e jegyzőkönyv mellékletében felsorolt megállapodások és az azokhoz kapcsolódó rendelkezések hatálya alá eső területeken (a továbbiakban: a schengeni vívmányok). Ezt az együttműködést az Európai Unió intézményi és jogi keretén belül folytatják az Európai Unióról szóló szerződés és az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződés megfelelő rendelkezéseinek tiszteletben tartása mellett.2. cikk(1) Az Amszterdami Szerződés hatálybalépésének időpontjától kezdődően a schengeni vívmányokat, köztük a schengeni megállapodások által létrehozott Végrehajtó Bizottság ezen időpontot megelőzően elfogadott határozatait e cikk (2) bekezdése rendelkezéseinek sérelme nélkül azonnali hatállyal alkalmazni kell az 1. cikkben említett tizenhárom tagállamra. Ugyanezen időponttól az említett Végrehajtó Bizottság helyébe a Tanács lép.A Tanács az 1. cikkben említett tagjainak egyhangú szavazatával megtesz minden olyan intézkedést, amely e bekezdés végrehajtásához szükséges. A Tanács a szerződések megfelelő rendelkezéseivel összhangban egyhangúlag meghatározza a schengeni vívmányokat alkotó valamennyi rendelkezés vagy határozat jogalapját.Az ilyen rendelkezésekre és határozatokra vonatkozóan és a Tanács által meghatározott jogalappal összhangban az Európai Közösségek Bírósága a szerződések megfelelő hatályos rendelkezései által ráruházott hatásköröket gyakorolja. A Bíróság egy esetben sem rendelkezik hatáskörrel a jog és a közrend fenntartásával és a belső biztonság megőrzésével kapcsolatos intézkedésekre vagy határozatokra vonatkozóan.A fent említett intézkedések meghozataláig és az 5. cikk (2) bekezdésének sérelme nélkül a schengeni vívmányokat alkotó rendelkezéseket és határozatokat az Európai Unióról szóló szerződés VI. címén alapuló jogi aktusoknak kell tekinteni.(2) Az (1) bekezdés rendelkezéseit a schengeni megállapodásokhoz csatolt csatlakozási jegyzőkönyveket aláíró tagállamokra azoktól az időpontoktól kell alkalmazni, amelyeket a Tanács az 1. cikkben említett tagjainak egyhangú szavazatával meghatároz, kivéve ha ezen tagok valamelyike a schengeni vívmányokhoz való csatlakozás feltételeit már az Amszterdami Szerződés hatálybalépésének időpontja előtt teljesítette.3. cikkA 2. cikk (1) bekezdésének második albekezdésében említett meghatározást követően a schengeni vívmányok azon részei tekintetében, amelyek jogalapjaként az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződés IV. címét határozták meg, Dánia a schengeni megállapodások egyéb aláíróival való viszonyában megtartja ugyanazokat a jogait és kötelezettségeit, mint amelyekkel az említett meghatározás előtt rendelkezett.A schengeni vívmányok azon részei tekintetében, amelyek jogalapjaként az Európai Unióról szóló szerződés VI. címét határozták meg, Dánia továbbra is ugyanazokkal a jogokkal és kötelezettségekkel rendelkezik, mint a schengeni megállapodások többi aláírói.4. cikkÍrország, valamint Nagy-Britannia és Észak-Írország Egyesült Királysága, amelyekre nézve a schengeni vívmányok nem kötelezőek, bármikor kérhetik, hogy a schengeni vívmányok rendelkezései egy részének vagy egészének alkalmazásában részt vehessenek.A Tanács a kérelemről az 1. cikkben említett tagjainak és az érintett államok kormánya képviselőinek egyhangú szavazatával határoz.5. cikk(1) A szerződések vonatkozó rendelkezéseinek hatálya kiterjed a schengeni vívmányokon alapuló javaslatokra és kezdeményezésekre.Ebben az összefüggésben, ha Írország vagy az Egyesült Királyság vagy egyik sem jelenti be részvételi szándékát ésszerű időn belül írásban a Tanács elnökének, az Európai Közösségeket létrehozó szerződés 11. cikkében, illetve az Európai Unióról szóló szerződés 40. cikkében említett felhatalmazást az 1. cikkben említett tagállamok részére, illetve — amennyiben az együttműködés kérdéses területein valamelyikük részt kíván venni — Írország vagy az Egyesült Királyság részére megadottnak kell tekinteni.(2) A szerződéseknek az (1) bekezdés első albekezdésében hivatkozott vonatkozó rendelkezéseit akkor is alkalmazni kell, ha a Tanács a 2. cikk (1) bekezdésének második albekezdésében említett intézkedéseket nem fogadta el.6. cikkAz Izlandi Köztársaság és a Norvég Királyság az 1996. december 19-én Luxemburgban aláírt megállapodás alapján társultként részt vesz a schengeni vívmányok végrehajtásában és továbbfejlesztésében. Az erre irányuló megfelelő eljárásokról egy ezekkel az államokkal megkötendő megállapodásban kell megegyezni, amelyet a Tanács köt meg az 1. cikkben említett tagjainak egyhangú szavazata alapján eljárva. Az ilyen megállapodásnak rendelkezéseket kell tartalmaznia Izlandnak és Norvégiának az e jegyzőkönyv végrehajtásából eredő bármely pénzügyi következményhez való hozzájárulásáról.A Tanács egyhangú határozattal Izlanddal és Norvégiával külön megállapodást köt az egyrészről Írország, valamint Nagy-Britannia és Észak-Írország Egyesült Királysága, másrészről Izland és Norvégia közötti azon jogok és kötelezettségek megállapításáról, amelyeket a schengeni vívmányok hatálya alá tartozó területeken ezekre az államokra alkalmazni kell.7. cikkA Tanács minősített többséggel elfogadja a Schengeni Titkárságnak a Tanács Főtitkárságába történő integrálására vonatkozó részletes szabályokat.8. cikkAz új tagállamoknak az Európai Unióba történő felvételére vonatkozó tárgyalások során a schengeni vívmányokat és az intézmények által az ezek hatálya alá tartozó területen hozott további intézkedéseket olyan vívmányoknak kell tekinteni, amelyeket a tagjelölt országoknak teljes egészében el kell fogadniuk.--------------------------------------------------MELLÉKLETSCHENGENI VÍVMÁNYOK1. A Benelux Gazdasági Unió, a Németországi Szövetségi Köztársaság és a Francia Köztársaság kormányai között Schengenben 1985. június 14-én aláírt megállapodás a közös határaikon történő ellenőrzések fokozatos megszüntetéséről.2. A Belga Királyság, a Németországi Szövetségi Köztársaság, a Francia Köztársaság, a Luxemburgi Nagyhercegség és a Holland Királyság között Schengenben 1990. június 19-én aláírt egyezmény a közös határaikon történő ellenőrzések fokozatos megszüntetéséről szóló, Schengenben 1985. június 14-én aláírt megállapodás végrehajtásáról, a kapcsolódó záróokmánnyal és közös nyilatkozatokkal.3. Az Olaszországgal (Párizsban 1990. november 27-én), Spanyolországgal és Portugáliával (Bonnban 1991. június 25-én), Görögországgal (Madridban 1992. november 6-án), Ausztriával (Brüsszelben 1995. április 28-án), valamint Dániával, Finnországgal és Svédországgal (Luxemburgban 1996. december 19-én) aláírt, az 1985. évi megállapodáshoz és az 1990. évi végrehajtási egyezményhez való csatlakozásról szóló jegyzőkönyvek és megállapodások, a kapcsolódó záróokmányokkal és nyilatkozatokkal.4. Az 1990. évi végrehajtási egyezmény által létrehozott Végrehajtási Bizottság által elfogadott határozatok és nyilatkozatok, valamint a Végrehajtó Bizottság által döntéshozatali jogkörrel felruházott szerveknek az egyezmény végrehajtására elfogadott intézkedései.--------------------------------------------------


type: wikipedia

text:
Bifrost (uttal biv-råst, kognat med en icke belagd svensk form *Bävrast; "den bävande rasten" d v s "den darrande vägen", eller bilröst "den flammande rasten/vägen") är i nordisk mytologi en bro som leder från jorden till himlen och slutar i Asgård där guden Heimdall bor.
 Varje dag rider asarna över bron till domsplatsen under Yggdrasil. Bron har tre färger och mycket solitt byggd. Den brukar identifieras med regnbågen eller vintergatan.
 På modern isländska heter den Bilröst i Poetiska Eddan och Bifröst i Snorres Edda.
 Företeelser uppkallade efter Bifrost
 Det finns många platser, organisationer och annat som är uppkallade efter Bifrost eller någon av dess namnvarianter. De som räknas upp här är bara några exempel.
 Bifrost är en stadsdel i Mölndal. Bostadstypen i Bifrost är flerbostadshus.
 Bifrostorden är ett svenskt ordenssällskap grundat 1925.
 Det finns även ett norskt asatrosamfund vid namn Åsatrufellesskapet Bifrost. Det har varit ett officiellt godkänt samfund sedan 1996.
 Bifrost är en Linux-distribution för routrar och brandväggar, från början utvecklat på Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.
 Bifrost är även en trojan.
 Bifrost är en dansk organisation för föreningar som sysslar med lajv och rollspel, motsvarande svenska Sverok.
 Bifröstuniversitetet (isländska: Háskólinn á Bifröst), Bifröst, Borgarbyggðs kommun, Island.
 Bifrostbron, Carl XIII:s bro i Älvkarleby, bron som går från Älvkarleby till Laxön, enligt Ingenjörtrupperna i Södertälje på 1970-talet, förklaring från det militära, bron som går från himmelen till helvetet.
 Bifrostobservatoriet, ett observatorium som drivs av Mariestads Astronomiska Klubb (MAK).
 Se även
 Gjallarbron
 Referenser
 Platser i nordisk mytologi
 Broar


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 25.6.2005
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 C 155/17
 URTEIL DES GERICHTS ERSTER INSTANZ
 vom 20. April 2005
 in der Rechtssache T-318/03, ATOMIC Austria GmbH gegen Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle) (HABM) (1)
 (Gemeinschaftsmarke - Wortmarke ATOMIC BLITZ - Widerspruch des Inhabers der nationalen Wortmarken ATOMIC - Nachweis der Verlängerung der Eintragung der älteren Marke - Umfang der Prüfung des HABM - Zurückweisung des Widerspruchs - Artikel 8 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b der Verordnung [EG] Nr. 40/94)
 (2005/C 155/33)
 Verfahrenssprache: Deutsch
 In der Rechtssache T-318/03, ATOMIC Austria GmbH mit Sitz in Altenmarkt (Österreich), Prozessbevollmächtigte: Rechtsanwälte G. Kucsko und C. Schumacher, gegen Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle) (HABM) (Bevollmächtigte: G. Schneider und B. Müller), anderer Beteiligter des Verfahrens vor der Beschwerdekammer des HABM: Fabricas Agrupadas de Muñecas de Onil, SA mit Sitz in Onil (Spanien), betreffend eine Klage gegen die Entscheidung der Zweiten Beschwerdekammer des HABM vom 9. Juli 2003 (Sache R 95/2003-2) in einem Widerspruchsverfahren zwischen der ATOMIC Austria GmbH und der Fabricas Agrupadas de Muñecas de Onil SA hat das Gericht (Zweite Kammer) unter Mitwirkung des Kammerpräsidenten J. Pirrung sowie des Richters A. W. H. Meij und der Richterin I. Pelikánová — Kanzler: J. Plingers, Verwaltungsrat — am 20. April 2005 ein Urteil mit folgendem Tenor erlassen:
 1.
 Die Entscheidung der Zweiten Beschwerdekammer des Harmonisierungsamts für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle) vom 9. Juli 2003 (Sache R 95/2003-2) wird aufgehoben.
 2.
 Das Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle) trägt die Kosten des Verfahrens.
 (1) ABl. C 304 vom 13.12.2003.


type: contracts

text:
 Svarīgs juridisks paziņojums
 |
 21995A0426(15)
 Oficiālais Vēstnesis L 094 , 26/04/1995 Lpp. 0285 - 0305 Oficiālais Vēstnesis L 094 , 26/04/1995 Lpp. 0285 - 0305
 Agreementin the form of an exchange of letters between the European Community and Mongolia amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European UnionLetter from the Council of the European UnionSir,1. I have the honour to refer to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products initialled on 22 January 1993.2. In order to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union on 1 January 1995, the European Community considers that the following amendments should be made to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products:2.1. The following text is added after Article 8, paragraph 2:"For the purposes of applying the provisions of paragraph 2 in the year 1995, the preceding year's total imports from all third countries shall be calculated on the basis of imports into the Community as constituted on 31 December 1994 and of imports into Austria, Finland and Sweden. Trade between the Community, Austria, Finland and Sweden, or between Austria, Finland and Sweden shall be excluded from this total."2.2. Figures in Annex II which set out the quantitative limits for exports from Mongolia to the European Union are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix I to this letter.2.3. Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, second indent of Protocol A, Title IV should be amended as follows:- AT = AustriaBL = BeneluxDE = Federal Republic of GermanyDK = DenmarkEL = GreeceES = SpainFI = FinlandFR = FranceGB = United KingdomIE = IrelandIT = ItalyPT = PortugalSE = Sweden"2.4. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the certificate of origin is replaced by Appendix II to this letter.2.5. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the export licence is replaced by Appendix III to this letter.2.6. The Annex to Protocol B setting out the model of the certificate applicable to certain cottage industry and folklore products is replaced by Appendix IV to this letter.2.7. Figures in the Annex to Protocol C which set out the quantitative limits for economic outward processing operations are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix V to this letter.2.8. Should one or more acceding countries not join the European Union the adjustments calculated for this or these countries shall be deducted from the "Adjusted limits 1995, 1996 and 1997" set out in Appendices I and V to this letter and the respective amendments mentioned under point 2.3 shall not enter into force.2.9. Notwithstanding the modifications referred to under points 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, during a transitional period that will end on 30 June 1995, the competent authorities of Mongolia shall be authorized to continue issuing the forms that were in use in 1994.2.10. Should inaccuracies appear in the trade figures used to establish the adjustments contained in Appendices I and V, technical revisions of these adjustments will be made following consultations and provided that the request for consultations is made not later than 28 February 1995.3. I should be obliged if you could kindly confirm the acceptance of your Government of the foregoing. Should this be the case, this Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the day on which the Parties have notified each other that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. In the meantime, it shall be applied provisionally from 1 January 1995 on the conditions to be specified in an exchange of notes (see Appendix VI).Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.For the Councilof the European UnionAppendix IANNEX IICOMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITSGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 811 | 4,00 % | 106 | 47 | 87 | 1052 | 1094 | 1137 |IB | 5a | 1000 pieces | 113 | 4,00 % | 1 | 0 | 1 | 115 | 120 | 125 |Appendix IIANNEX TO PROTOCOL A, ARTICLE 2 (1)+++++ TIFF +++++Appendix IIIANNEX TO PROTOCOL A, ARTICLE 7 (1)+++++ TIFF +++++Appendix IVANNEX TO PROTOCOL B+++++ TIFF +++++Appendix VANNEX TO PROTOCOL COUTWARD PROCESSING TRAFFICCommunity quantitative limitsGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 169 | 6,00 % | 5 | 2 | 4 | 180 | 191 | 202 |Appendix VIExchange of notesThe Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Directorate-General wishes to inform the Mission of Mongolia that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the amended Agreement, the European Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the amended Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations would be grateful if the Mission of Mongolia would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the note of the Directorate-General of (date of note verbale) regarding the Agreement on trade in textile products between Mongolia and the European Economic Community initialled on 22 January 1993, as amended by the exchange of letters initialled on (date of initialling).The Mission of Mongolia wishes to confirm to the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and coming into force of the adapted Agreement, the Government of Mongolia is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply de facto from 1 January 1995. This is on the understanding that either Party may at any time terminate this de facto application of the adapted Agreement provided that one hundred and twenty days notice is given.The Mission of Mongolia to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Economic Relations of the Commission of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Letter from the Government of MongoliaSir,I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of ... which reads as follows:"Sir,1. I have the honour to refer to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products initialled on 22 January 1993.2. In order to take into account the expected accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union on 1 January 1995, the European Community considers that the following amendments should be made to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Mongolia on trade in textile products:2.1. The following text is added after Article 8, paragraph 2:"For the purposes of applying the provisions of paragraph 2 in the year 1995, the preceding year's total imports from all third countries shall be calculated on the basis of imports into the Community as constituted on 31 December 1994 and of imports into Austria, Finland and Sweden. Trade between the Community, Austria, Finland and Sweden, or between Austria, Finland and Sweden shall be excluded from this total."2.2. Figures in Annex II which set out the quantitative limits for exports from Mongolia to the European Union are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix I to this letter.2.3. Article 14, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, second indent of Protocol A, Title IV should be amended as follows:- AT = AustriaBL = BeneluxDE = Federal Republic of GermanyDK = DenmarkEL = GreeceES = SpainFI = FinlandFR = FranceGB = United KingdomIE = IrelandIT = ItalyPT = PortugalSE = Sweden"2.4. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the certificate of origin is replaced by Appendix II to this letter.2.5. The Annex to Protocol A setting out the model of the export licence is replaced by Appendix III to this letter.2.6. The Annex to Protocol B setting out the model of the certificate applicable to certain cottage industry and folklore products is replaced by Appendix IV to this letter.2.7. Figures in the Annex to Protocol C which set out the quantitative limits for economic outward processing operations are to be replaced by limits for the enlarged Community as set out in Appendix V to this letter.2.8. Should one or more acceding countries not join the European Union the adjustments calculated for this or these countries shall be deducted from the "Adjusted limits 1995, 1996 and 1997" set out in Appendices I and V to this letter and the respective amendments mentioned under point 2.3 shall not enter into force.2.9. Notwithstanding the modifications referred to under points 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, during a transitional period that will end on 30 June 1995, the competent authorities of Mongolia shall be authorized to continue issuing the forms that were in use in 1994.2.10. Should inaccuracies appear in the trade figures used to establish the adjustments contained in Appendices I and V, technical revisions of these adjustments will be made following consultations and provided that the request for consultations is made not later than 28 February 1995.3. I should be obliged if you could kindly confirm the acceptance of your Government of the foregoing. Should this be the case, this Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the day on which the Parties have notified each other that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. In the meantime, it shall be applied provisionally from 1 January 1995 on the conditions to be specified in an exchange of notes (see Appendix VI).Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration."I have the honour to confirm that my Government is in agreement with the contents of your letter.Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.For the Governmentof MongoliaAppendix IANNEX IICOMMUNITY QUANTITATIVE LIMITSGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 811 | 4,00 % | 106 | 47 | 87 | 1052 | 1094 | 1137 |IB | 5a | 1000 pieces | 113 | 4,00 % | 1 | 0 | 1 | 115 | 120 | 125 |Appendix IIANNEX TO PROTOCOL A, ARTICLE 2 (1)+++++ TIFF +++++Appendix IIIANNEX TO PROTOCOL A, ARTICLE 7 (1)+++++ TIFF +++++Appendix IVANNEX TO PROTOCOL B+++++ TIFF +++++Appendix VANNEX TO PROTOCOL COUTWARD PROCESSING TRAFFICCommunity quantitative limitsGroup | Category | Unit | Existing limit 1995 | Growth rate | Adjustment for | Adjusted limit 1995 | Adjusted limit 1996 | Adjusted limit 1997 |Sweden | Finland | Austria |IB | 5 | 1000 pieces | 169 | 6,00 % | 5 | 2 | 4 | 180 | 191 | 202 |--------------------------------------------------


type: other

text:
Prekážky v práci v pracovnoprávnych vzťahoch - Zakon.sk - právo, dane a účtovníctvo, mzdy, verejná správa, vzdelávanie
 Prednáška bude zameraná na celý rad aspektov, ktoré sa týkajú prekážok v práci na strane zamestnanca a zamestnávateľa (piata časť Zákonníka práce). Základom prednášky budú príklady, na ktorých budú vysvetlené jednotlivé ustanovenia Zákonníka práce a bude poukázané aj na niektoré problémy či nejasnosti, ktoré sa vyskytujú pri právnej úprave a jej aplikácii v praxi.
 Osobitná pozornosť bude venovaná dôležitým osobným ...
 Bratislava 14.10.2019 80,00 € 96,00 €
 Osobitná pozornosť bude venovaná dôležitým osobným prekážkam v práci na vyšetrenie/ošetrenie.
 Všeobecne k prekážkam v práci
 členenie prekážok v práci v Zákonníku práce,
 dve zložky prekážky v práci: ospravedlnenie neprítomnosti v práci a otázka kompenzácie (s náhradou mzdy, bez náhrady mzdy),
 prekážky v práci z hľadiska posúdenia ako výkonu práce (§ 144a ZP),
 poskytnutie alebo odmietnutie pracovného voľna pri prekážke v práci,
 vedomosť zamestnanca o prekážke v práci (prekážka mu je vopred známa), upovedomenie o prekážke v práci bez zbytočného odkladu (§ 144 ods. 1 ZP),
 preukázanie prekážky v práci zamestnancom (§ 144 ods. 2 ZP),
 ospravedlnenie prekážky v práci zamestnávateľom,
 „absencia“ – rozdiel medzi neospravedlneným zameškaním pracovnej zmeny („absencia“) verzus porušenie pracovnej disciplíny (neskoré požiadanie o voľno, neskoré doručenie dokladu) v kontexte prekážok v práci.
 pojmy: verejná funkcia (čo sem spadá), občianska povinnosť, iný úkon vo všeobecnom záujme (§ 137 ZP),
 dlhodobé uvoľnenie na výkon verejnej funkcie a výkon odborovej funkcie (§ 136 ods. 2 a 3 ZP),
 30 pracovných dní alebo zmien v kalendárnom roku (§ 137 ods. 3 ZP),
 darovanie krvi – rozsah uznania, kolektívna zmluva nad rámec zákona (§ 138 ods. 2 ZP),
 všeobecný záujem verzus osobný záujem zamestnanca (vybavovanie si osobných vecí na úradoch verzus predvolanie na úrad),
 prekážka z dôvodu všeobecného záujmu a pružný pracovný čas (vzťah k § 143 ZP),
 prax: prekážka nezasahuje do pracovnej zmeny, ale bráni skutočnému odpočinku zamestnanca (napr. zamestnanec má nočnú zmenu a predvolaný je počas dňa na súd v inom kraji).
 Zvyšovanie kvalifikácie (§ 140 ZP)
 prepojenie § 140 ZP (zvyšovanie kvalifikácie ako prekážka v práci) s § 155 ZP (dohoda o zvyšovaní kvalifikácie),
 rozsah pracovného voľna s náhradou mzdy podľa § 140 ZP – je to minimálny rozsah? Možno tento rozsah znížiť dohodou so zamestnancom?
 pojmy: „deň“, „účasť na vyučovaní“, „skúška“ (§ 140 ods. 3 ZP).
 dôležité osobné prekážky v práci podľa § 141 ods. 1 a podľa § 141 ods. 2 ZP,
 možnosť poskytnutia ďalšieho pracovného voľna podľa § 141 ods. 3 ZP, podmienky jeho poskytnutia,
 a) dôležité osobné prekážky v práci podľa § 141 ods. 1 ZPdočasná pracovná neschopnosť zamestnanca,
 ošetrovanie chorého člena rodiny (okruh oprávnených osôb, rozsah pracovného voľna),
 b) vyšetrenie/ošetrenie v zdravotníckom zariadení
 pojmy: „vyšetrenie/ošetrenie“, „zdravotnícke zariadenie“ (kedy nejde o vyšetrenie v zdravotníckom zariadení?),
 výpočet 7 dní na vyšetrenie/ošetrenie v kalendárnom roku podľa § 141 ods. 5 ZP (prepočet na hodiny),
 krátenie rozsahu „7 dní“ podľa § 141 ods. 6 ZP (vznik a skončenie pracovného pomeru v priebehu kalendárneho roka),
 rozsah „7 dní“ pri kratšom pracovnom čase a pri pružnom pracovnom čase,
 celodenné vyšetrenie zamestnanca, odpočinok na zotavenie na potvrdení od lekára – povinné akceptovanie zamestnávateľom?
 prax: interný predpis zamestnávateľa – uznanie celodennej prekážky na vyšetrenie len do rozsahu 1⁄2 denného pracovného času (napr. 4 hodiny z 8 hodín)?
 prax: uznanie dokladu z vyšetrenia/ošetrenia, ak zamestnanec má nočnú zmenu, odpoludňajšiu zmena, pracuje v sobotu a nedeľu?
 prax: uznanie dokladu vyšetrenie/ošetrenie dva dni po sebe?
 možnosť žiadať predloženie lekárskej správy zamestnávateľom,
 c) narodenie dieťaťa zamestnancovi
 podmienky nároku zamestnanca,
 prevoz matky do zdravotníckeho zariadenia,
 d) sprevádzanie rodinného príslušníka do zdravotníckeho zariadenia
 podmienky nároku, pojmy: „rodinný príslušník“, „dieťa“ (vek dieťaťa), „zdravotnícke zariadenie“,
 prax: uznanie sprevádzania dieťaťa zamestnancom, hoci matka je na materskej/rodičovskej dovolenke,
 výpočet 7/10dní na sprevádzanie v kalendárnom roku podľa § 141 ods. 5 ZP (prepočet na hodiny),
 krátenie rozsahu „7/10 dní“ podľa § 141 ods. 6 ZP (vznik a skončenie pracovného pomeru v priebehu kalendárneho roka),
 rozsah „7/10 dní“ pri kratšom pracovnom čase a pri pružnom pracovnom čase,
 prax: uznanie dokladu o sprevádzaní počas nočnej zmeny, odpoludňajšej zmeny, soboty a nedele; Uznanie sprevádzania aj po vyšetrení/ošetrení, ak sprevádzaná osoba potrebuje čas na zotavenie,
 prax: uznanie sprevádzania dva dni po sebe,
 e) úmrtie rodinného príslušníka
 oprávnená osoba, účasť na pohrebe, obstaranie pohrebu (jedna alebo viac osôb?),
 čerpanie pracovného voľna s cieľom smútku,
 f) svadba
 oprávnená osoba, účasť na svadbe,
 svadba v sobotu (deň pracovného pokoja zamestnanca),
 g) ostatné dôležité osobné prekážky na strane zamestnanca.
 rozdiel v posudzovaní prekážky v práci pri základnom a pri voliteľnom pracovnom čase,
 celodenná priepustka od lekára a započítanie do odpracovaného času pri pružnom pracovnom čase,
 „presná dĺžka nevyhnutne potrebného času“ v zmysle § 143 ods. 2 ZP, rozdiel medzi použitím § 143 ods. 1 a § 143 ods. 2 ZP,
 výpočet jedného dňa pre účely § 143 ods. 2 ZP,
 možnosť započítania celého dňa (priemernej dĺžky pracovnej zmeny) pri vyšetrení/ošetrení, ak to ustanoví kolektívna zmluva,
 nadpracovanie zameškaného pracovného času.
 pojmy: „prestoj“, „nepriaznivé poveternostné vplyvy“, „iné prekážky v práci“, „vážne prevádzkové dôvody“,
 strata predpokladu na strane zamestnanca (napr. pokazenie karty vodiča) – kvalifikácia prekážky v práci – je to prekážka na strane zamestnávateľa alebo zamestnanca,
 neprideľovanie práce z dôvodu neplatného skončenia pracovného pomeru,
 povinnosť zamestnanca žiadať o prideľovanie práce,
 možno žiadať prítomnosť zamestnanca na pracovisku počas prekážky v práci na strane zamestnávateľa.
 14. 10. 2019, Bratislava - Hotel Saffron, Školská 5 (mapa)