jurisdiction: US

text:
 113 S1054 IS: Gold Butte National Conservation Area Act
 U.S. Senate
 2013-05-23
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 II
 113th CONGRESS
 1st Session
 S. 1054
 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
 May 23, 2013
 Mr. Reid introduced the
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
 Committee on Energy and Natural
 Resources
 A BILL
 To establish the Gold Butte National Conservation Area in
 Clark County, Nevada in order to conserve, protect, and enhance the cultural,
 archaeological, natural, wilderness, scientific, geological, historical,
 biological, wildlife, educational, and scenic resources of the area, to
 designate wilderness areas, and for other purposes.
 1.Short
 title; table of contents
 (a)Short
 titleThis Act may be cited
 as the Gold Butte National
 Conservation Area Act.
 (b)Table of
 contentsThe table of contents for this Act is as follows:
 Sec. 1. Short title; table of
 contents.
 Sec. 2. Findings.
 Sec. 3. Definitions.
 TITLE I—Gold Butte National Conservation Area
 Sec. 101. Establishment of Gold Butte National Conservation
 Area.
 Sec. 102. Management of Conservation Area.
 Sec. 103. General provisions.
 Sec. 104. Gold Butte National Conservation Area Advisory
 Council.
 TITLE II—Designation of wilderness areas in Clark County,
 Nevada
 Sec. 201. Findings.
 Sec. 202. Additions to National Wilderness Preservation
 System.
 Sec. 203. Administration.
 Sec. 204. Adjacent management.
 Sec. 205. Military, law enforcement, and emergency
 overflights.
 Sec. 206. Release of wilderness study areas.
 Sec. 207. Native American cultural and religious
 uses.
 Sec. 208. Wildlife management.
 Sec. 209. Wildfire, insect, and disease management.
 Sec. 210. Climatological data collection.
 Sec. 211. National Park System land.
 TITLE III—General provisions
 Sec. 301. Relationship to Clark County Multi-Species Habitat
 Conservation Plan.
 Sec. 302. Visitor center, research, and
 interpretation.
 Sec. 303. Termination of withdrawal of Bureau of Land
 Management land.
 2.FindingsCongress finds that—
 (1)the public land
 in southeastern Nevada generally known as Gold Butte is
 recognized for outstanding—
 (A)scenic
 values;
 (B)natural
 resources, including critical habitat, sensitive species, wildlife, desert
 tortoise habitat, and geology;
 (C)historic
 resources, including historic mining, ranching and other western cultures, and
 pioneer activities; and
 (D)cultural
 resources, including evidence of prehistoric habitation and rock art;
 (2)Gold Butte has
 become a destination for diverse recreation opportunities, including camping,
 hiking, hunting, motorized recreation, and sightseeing;
 (3)Gold Butte draws
 visitors from throughout the United States;
 (4)Gold Butte
 provides important economic benefits to Mesquite and other nearby
 communities;
 (5)inclusion of the
 Gold Butte National Conservation Area in the National Landscape Conservation
 System would provide increased opportunities for—
 (A)interpretation of
 the diverse values of the area for the visiting public; and
 (B)education and
 community outreach in the region; and
 (6)designation of
 Gold Butte as a National Conservation Area will permanently protect the scenic,
 biological, natural, historical, scientific, paleontological, recreational,
 ecological, wilderness, and cultural resources within the area.
 3.DefinitionsIn this Act:
 (1)Advisory
 councilThe term Advisory Council means the Gold
 Butte National Conservation Area Advisory Council established under section
 104(a).
 (2)Conservation
 areaThe term Conservation Area means the Gold Butte
 National Conservation Area established by section 101(a).
 (3)CountyThe
 term County means Clark County, Nevada.
 (4)Designated
 routeThe term designated route means a road that is
 designated as open by the Route Designations for Selected Areas of Critical
 Environmental Concern Located in the Northeast Portion of the Las Vegas BLM
 District Environmental Assessment, NV–052–2006–0433.
 (5)Management
 planThe term management plan means the management
 plan for the Conservation Area developed under section 102(b).
 (6)MapThe
 term Map means the map entitled Gold Butte National
 Conservation Area and dated May 23, 2013.
 (7)Public
 landThe term public land has the meaning given the
 term public lands in section 103 of the Federal Land Policy and
 Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702).
 (8)SecretaryThe
 term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior.
 (9)StateThe
 term State means the State of Nevada.
 (10)Wilderness
 areaThe term wilderness area means a wilderness
 areas designated by section 202(a).
 IGold
 Butte National Conservation Area
 101.Establishment
 of Gold Butte National Conservation Area
 (a)EstablishmentThere
 is established the Gold Butte National Conservation Area in the State.
 (b)Area
 includedThe Conservation Area shall consist of approximately
 348,515 acres of public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management in
 the County, as generally depicted on the Map.
 (c)Map and legal
 description
 (1)In
 generalAs soon as practicable after the date of enactment of
 this Act, the Secretary shall file a map and legal description of the
 Conservation Area with the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of
 Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the
 Senate.
 (2)EffectThe
 map and legal description prepared under paragraph (1) shall have the same
 force and effect as if included in this title, except that the Secretary may
 correct minor errors in the map or legal description.
 (3)Public
 availabilityA copy of the map and legal description shall be on
 file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the
 Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service.
 102.Management of
 Conservation Area
 (a)PurposesIn
 accordance with this title, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976
 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), and other applicable laws, the Secretary shall manage
 the Conservation Area in a manner that conserves, protects, and enhances the
 scenic, biological, natural, historical, scientific, paleontological,
 recreational, ecological, wilderness, and cultural resources of the
 Conservation Area.
 (b)Management
 plan
 (1)Plan
 requiredNot later than 3 years after the date of enactment of
 this Act, the Secretary shall develop a management plan for the long-term
 protection and management of the Conservation Area.
 (2)ConsultationThe
 Secretary shall prepare the management plan in consultation with the State,
 local and tribal government entities, the Advisory Council, and the
 public.
 (3)RequirementsThe
 management plan shall—
 (A)describe the
 appropriate uses and management of the Conservation Area; and
 (B)include a
 recommendation on interpretive and educational materials regarding the cultural
 and biological resources of the region within which the Conservation Area is
 located.
 (4)Incorporation
 of route designationsThe management plan shall incorporate the
 decisions in the Route Designations for Selected Areas of Critical
 Environmental Concern Located in the Northeast Portion of the Las Vegas BLM
 District Environmental Assessment, NV–052–2006–0433.
 (c)UsesThe
 Secretary shall allow only such uses of the Conservation Area that the
 Secretary determines would further the purpose of the Conservation Area
 described in subsection (a).
 (d)Incorporation
 of acquired land and interestsAny land or interests in land
 located within the boundary of the Conservation Area that is acquired by the
 United States after the date of enactment of this Act shall become part of the
 Conservation Area and be managed as provided in subsection (a).
 (e)Motorized
 vehicles
 (1)In
 generalExcept in cases in which motorized vehicles are needed
 for administrative purposes or to respond to an emergency, the use of motorized
 vehicles shall be permitted only on designated routes.
 (2)Monitoring and
 evaluationThe Secretary shall annually—
 (A)assess the
 effects of the use of motorized vehicles on designated routes; and
 (B)in consultation
 with the Nevada Department of Wildlife, assess the effects of designated routes
 on wildlife and wildlife habitat to minimize environmental impacts and prevent
 damage to cultural and historical resources from the use of designated
 routes.
 (3)Management
 (A)In
 generalThe Secretary shall manage designated routes in a manner
 that—
 (i)is
 consistent with motorized and mechanized use of the designated routes that is
 authorized on the date of the enactment of this Act;
 (ii)ensures the
 safety of the people that use the designated routes;
 (iii)does not damage
 sensitive habitat or cultural or historical resources; and
 (iv)provides for
 adaptive management of resources and restoration of damaged habitat or
 resources.
 (B)Rerouting
 (i)In
 generalA designated route may be temporarily closed or rerouted
 if the Secretary, in consultation with the State, the County, and the Advisory
 Council, subject to subparagraph (C), determines that—
 (I)the designated
 route is having an adverse impact on—
 (aa)sensitive
 habitat;
 (bb)natural
 resources;
 (cc)cultural
 resources; or
 (dd)historical
 resources;
 (II)the designated
 route threatens public safety;
 (III)temporary
 closure of the designated route is necessary to repair—
 (aa)the
 designated route; or
 (bb)resource damage;
 or
 (IV)modification of
 the designated route would not significantly affect access within the
 Conservation Area.
 (ii)PriorityIf
 the Secretary determines that the rerouting of a designated route is necessary
 under clause (i), the Secretary may give priority to existing roads designated
 as closed.
 (iii)DurationA
 designated route that is temporarily closed under clause (i) shall remain
 closed only until the date on which the resource or public safety issue that
 led to the temporary closure has been resolved.
 (C)NoticeThe
 Secretary shall provide information to the public regarding any designated
 routes that are open, have been rerouted, or are temporarily closed
 through—
 (i)use
 of appropriate signage within the Conservation Area; and
 (ii)the distribution
 of maps, safety education materials, law enforcement, and other information
 considered to be appropriate by the Secretary.
 (4)No effect on
 non-Federal land or interests in non-Federal landNothing in this
 section affects ownership, management, or other rights relating to non-Federal
 land or interests in non-Federal land.
 (5)Map on
 fileThe Secretary shall keep a current map on file at the
 appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
 (6)Road
 constructionExcept as necessary for administrative purposes or
 to respond to an emergency, the Secretary shall not construct any permanent or
 temporary road within the Conservation Area after the date of enactment of this
 Act.
 (f)National
 landscape conservation systemThe Conservation Area shall be
 administered as a component of the National Landscape Conservation
 System.
 (g)Hunting,
 fishing, and trappingNothing in this title affects the
 jurisdiction of the State with respect to fish and wildlife, including hunting,
 fishing, and trapping in the Conservation Area.
 103.General
 provisions
 (a)No buffer
 zones
 (1)In
 generalThe establishment of the Conservation Area shall not
 create an express or implied protective perimeter or buffer zone around the
 Conservation Area.
 (2)Private
 landIf the use of, or conduct of an activity on, private land
 that shares a boundary with the Conservation Area is consistent with applicable
 law, nothing in this title concerning the establishment of the Conservation
 Area prohibits or limits the use or conduct of the activity.
 (b)WithdrawalsSubject
 to valid existing rights, all public land within the Conservation Area,
 including any land or interest in land that is acquired by the United States
 within the Conservation Area after the date of enactment of this Act, is
 withdrawn from—
 (1)entry,
 appropriation or disposal under the public land laws;
 (2)location, entry,
 and patent under the mining laws; and
 (3)operation of the
 mineral leasing, mineral materials, and geothermal leasing laws.
 (c)Special
 management areas
 (1)In
 generalThe establishment of the Conservation Area shall not
 affect the management status of any area within the boundary of the
 Conservation Area that is protected under the Clark County Multi-Species
 Habitat Conservation Plan.
 (2)Conflict of
 lawsIf there is a conflict between the laws applicable to an
 area described in paragraph (1) and this title, the more restrictive provision
 shall control.
 104.Gold Butte
 National Conservation Area Advisory Council
 (a)EstablishmentNot
 later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
 shall establish an advisory council, to be known as the Gold Butte
 National Conservation Area Advisory Council.
 (b)DutiesThe
 Advisory Council shall advise the Secretary with respect to the preparation and
 implementation of the management plan.
 (c)Applicable
 lawThe Advisory Council shall be subject to—
 (1)the Federal
 Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.); and
 (2)the Federal Land
 Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.).
 (d)Members
 (1)In
 generalThe Advisory Council shall include 13 members to be
 appointed by the Secretary, of whom, to the extent practicable—
 (A)4 members shall
 be appointed after considering the recommendations of the Mesquite, Nevada,
 City Council;
 (B)1 member shall be
 appointed after considering the recommendations of the Bunkerville, Nevada,
 Town Advisory Board;
 (C)1 member shall be
 appointed after considering the recommendations of the Moapa Valley, Nevada,
 Town Advisory Board;
 (D)1 member shall be
 appointed after considering the recommendations of the Moapa, Nevada, Town
 Advisory Board;
 (E)1 member shall be
 appointed after considering the recommendations of the Moapa Band of Paiutes
 Tribal Council; and
 (F)5 at-large
 members from the County shall be appointed after considering the
 recommendations of the County Commission.
 (2)Special
 appointment considerationsThe at-large members appointed under
 paragraph (1)(F) shall have backgrounds that reflect—
 (A)the purposes for
 which the Conservation Area was established; and
 (B)the interests of
 persons affected by the planning and management of the Conservation
 Area.
 (3)RepresentationThe
 Secretary shall ensure that the membership of the Advisory Council is fairly
 balanced in terms of the points of view represented and the functions to be
 performed by the Advisory Council.
 (4)Initial
 appointmentNot later than 180 days after the date of enactment
 of this Act, the Secretary shall appoint the initial members of the Advisory
 Council in accordance with paragraph (1).
 (e)Duties of the
 advisory councilThe Advisory Council shall advise the Secretary
 with respect to the preparation and implementation of the management plan,
 including budgetary matters relating to the Conservation Area.
 (f)CompensationMembers
 of the Advisory Council shall receive no compensation for serving on the
 Advisory Council.
 (g)Chairperson
 (1)In
 generalThe Advisory Council shall elect a Chairperson from among
 the members of the Advisory Council.
 (2)TermThe
 term of the Chairperson shall be 3 years.
 (h)Term of
 members
 (1)In
 generalThe term of a member of the Advisory Council shall be 3
 years.
 (2)SuccessorsNotwithstanding
 the expiration of a 3-year term of a member of the Advisory Council, a member
 may continue to serve on the Advisory Council until a successor is
 appointed.
 (i)Vacancies
 (1)In
 generalA vacancy on the Advisory Council shall be filled in the
 same manner in which the original appointment was made.
 (2)Appointment for
 remainder of termA member appointed to fill a vacancy on the
 Advisory Council shall serve for the remainder of the term for which the
 predecessor was appointed.
 (j)TerminationThe
 Advisory Council shall terminate not later than 3 years after the date on which
 the final version of the management plan is published.
 IIDesignation of
 wilderness areas in Clark County, Nevada
 201.FindingsCongress finds that—
 (1)public land
 administered by the Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, and
 National Park Service in the County contains unique and spectacular natural,
 cultural, and historical resources, including—
 (A)priceless habitat
 for numerous species of plants and wildlife;
 (B)thousands of
 acres of land that remain in a natural state; and
 (C)numerous sites
 containing significant cultural and historical artifacts; and
 (2)continued
 preservation of the public land would benefit the County and all of the United
 States by—
 (A)ensuring the
 conservation of ecologically diverse habitat;
 (B)protecting
 prehistoric cultural resources;
 (C)conserving
 primitive recreational resources; and
 (D)protecting air
 and water quality.
 202.Additions to
 National Wilderness Preservation System
 (a)AdditionsIn
 furtherance of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the following
 public land administered by the National Park Service or the Bureau of Land
 Management in the County is designated as wilderness and as components of the
 National Wilderness Preservation System:
 (1)Virgin peak
 wildernessCertain public land managed by the Bureau of Land
 Management, comprising approximately 18,296 acres, as generally depicted on the
 Map, which shall be known as the Virgin Peak Wilderness.
 (2)Black ridge
 wildernessCertain public land managed by the Bureau of Land
 Management, comprising approximately 18,192 acres, as generally depicted on the
 Map, which shall be known as the Black Ridge Wilderness.
 (3)Bitter ridge
 north wildernessCertain public land managed by the Bureau of
 Land Management comprising approximately 15,114 acres, as generally depicted on
 the Map, which shall be known as the Bitter Ridge North
 Wilderness.
 (4)Bitter ridge
 south wildernessCertain public land managed by the Bureau of
 Land Management, comprising approximately 12,646 acres, as generally depicted
 on the Map, which shall be known as the Bitter Ridge
 Wilderness.
 (5)Billy goat peak
 wildernessCertain public land managed by the Bureau of Land
 Management, comprising approximately 30,460 acres, as generally depicted on the
 Map, which shall be known as the Billy Goat Peak
 Wilderness.
 (6)Million hills
 wildernessCertain public land managed by the Bureau of Land
 Management, comprising approximately 24,818 acres, as generally depicted on the
 Map, which shall be known as the Million Hills
 Wilderness.
 (7)Overton
 wildernessCertain Federal land within the Lake Mead National
 Recreation Area, comprising approximately 23,227 acres, as generally depicted
 on the Map, which shall be known as the Overton
 Wilderness.
 (8)Twin springs
 wildernessCertain Federal land within the Lake Mead National
 Recreation Area, comprising approximately 9,684 acres, as generally depicted on
 the Map, which shall be known as the Twin Springs
 Wilderness.
 (9)Scanlon wash
 wildernessCertain Federal land within the Lake Mead National
 Recreation Area, comprising approximately 22,826 acres, as generally depicted
 on the Map, which shall be known as the Scanlon Wash
 Wilderness.
 (10)Hiller
 mountains wildernessCertain Federal land within the Lake Mead
 National Recreation Area, comprising approximately 14,832 acres, as generally
 depicted on the Map, which shall be known as the Hiller Mountains
 Wilderness.
 (11)Hell's kitchen
 wildernessCertain Federal land within the Lake Mead National
 Recreation Area, comprising approximately 12,439 acres, as generally depicted
 on the Map, which shall be known as the Hell's Kitchen
 Wilderness.
 (12)Indian hills
 wildernessCertain Federal land within the Lake Mead National
 Recreation Area, comprising approximately 8,955 acres, as generally depicted on
 the Map, which shall be known as the Indian Hills
 Wilderness.
 (13)Lime canyon
 wilderness additionsCertain public land managed by the Bureau of
 Land Management, comprising approximately 10,069 acres, as generally depicted
 on the Map, which is incorporated in, and shall be managed as part of, the
 Lime Canyon Wilderness designated by section 202(a)(9) of the
 Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002 (16
 U.S.C. 1132 note; Public Law 107–282).
 (b)National
 landscape conservation systemThe wilderness areas administered
 by the Bureau of Land Management shall be administered as components of the
 National Landscape Conservation System.
 (c)Road
 offsetThe boundary of any portion of a wilderness area that is
 bordered by a road shall be at least 100 feet away from the centerline of the
 road so as not to interfere with public access.
 (d)Lake
 offsetThe boundary of any portion of a wilderness area that is
 bordered by Lake Mead or the Colorado River shall be 300 feet inland from the
 high water line.
 (e)Map and legal
 description
 (1)In
 generalAs soon as practicable after the date of enactment of
 this Act, the Secretary shall file a map and legal description of each
 wilderness area with the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of
 Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the
 Senate.
 (2)EffectEach
 map and legal description under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and
 effect as if included in this title, except that the Secretary may correct
 clerical and typographical errors in the map or legal description.
 (3)AvailabilityEach
 map and legal description under paragraph (1) shall be on file and available
 for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land
 Management and the National Park Service.
 203.Administration
 (a)ManagementSubject
 to valid existing rights, the wilderness areas shall be administered by the
 Secretary in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.),
 except that—
 (1)any reference in
 that Act to the effective date of that Act shall be considered to be a
 reference to the date of enactment of this Act; and
 (2)any reference in
 that Act to the Secretary of Agriculture shall be considered to be a reference
 to the Secretary.
 (b)Incorporation
 of acquired land and interestsAny land or interest in land
 within the boundaries of a wilderness area that is acquired by the United
 States after the date of enactment of this Act shall be added to, and
 administered as part of, the wilderness area within which the acquired land or
 interest is located.
 (c)Water
 rights
 (1)FindingsCongress
 finds that—
 (A)the land
 designated as a wilderness area—
 (i)is
 within the Mojave Desert;
 (ii)is
 arid in nature; and
 (iii)includes
 ephemeral streams;
 (B)the hydrology of
 the land designated as a wilderness area is locally characterized by complex
 flow patterns and alluvial fans with impermanent channels;
 (C)the subsurface
 hydrogeology of the region within which the land designated as a wilderness
 area is located is characterized by ground water subject to local and regional
 flow gradients and artesian aquifers;
 (D)the land
 designated as a wilderness area is generally not suitable for use or
 development of new water resource facilities;
 (E)there are no
 actual or proposed water resource facilities and no opportunities for
 diversion, storage, or other uses of water occurring outside the land
 designated as a wilderness area that would adversely affect the wilderness or
 other values of the land; and
 (F)because of the
 unique nature and hydrology of the desert land designated as a wilderness area
 and the existence of the Clark County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan,
 it is possible to provide for proper management and protection of the
 wilderness, perennial springs, and other values of the land in ways different
 than the methods used in other laws.
 (2)Statutory
 construction
 (A)No
 reservationNothing in this title constitutes an express or
 implied reservation by the United States of any water or water rights with
 respect to the land designated as a wilderness area.
 (B)State
 rightsNothing in this title affects any water rights in the
 State existing on the date of enactment of this Act, including any water rights
 held by the United States.
 (C)No
 precedentNothing in this subsection establishes a precedent with
 regard to any future wilderness designations.
 (D)No effect on
 compactsNothing in this title limits, alters, modifies, or
 amends any of the interstate compacts or equitable apportionment decrees that
 apportion water among and between the State and other States.
 (E)Clark county
 multi-species habitat conservation planNothing in this title
 limits, alters, modifies, or amends the Clark County Multi-Species Habitat
 Conservation Plan with respect to the land designated as a wilderness area,
 including specific management actions for the conservation of perennial
 springs.
 (3)Nevada water
 lawThe Secretary shall follow the procedural and substantive
 requirements of State law in order to obtain and hold any water rights not in
 existence on the date of enactment of this Act with respect to the land
 designated as a wilderness area.
 (4)New
 projects
 (A)Definition
 (i)In
 generalIn this paragraph, the term water resource
 facility means irrigation and pumping facilities, reservoirs, water
 conservation works, aqueducts, canals, ditches, pipelines, wells, hydropower
 projects, and transmission and other ancillary facilities, and other water
 diversion, storage, and carriage structures.
 (ii)ExclusionIn
 this paragraph, the term water resource facility does not
 include wildlife guzzlers.
 (B)No licenses or
 permitsExcept as otherwise provided in this title, on and after
 the date of enactment of this Act, neither the President nor any other officer,
 employee, or agent of the United States shall fund, assist, authorize, or issue
 a license or permit for the development of any new water resource facility
 within the land designated as a wilderness area.
 (d)WithdrawalSubject
 to valid existing rights, any Federal land within the wilderness areas,
 including any land or interest in land that is acquired by the United States
 within the Conservation Area after the date of enactment of this Act, is
 withdrawn from—
 (1)entry,
 appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws;
 (2)location, entry,
 and patent under the mining laws; and
 (3)operation of the
 mineral leasing, mineral materials, and geothermal leasing laws.
 204.Adjacent
 management
 (a)No buffer
 zonesCongress does not intend for the designation of land as
 wilderness areas to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or buffer
 zones around the wilderness areas.
 (b)Nonwilderness
 activitiesThe fact that nonwilderness activities or uses can be
 seen or heard from areas within a wilderness area shall not preclude the
 conduct of those activities or uses outside the boundary of the wilderness
 area.
 205.Military, law
 enforcement, and emergency overflightsNothing in this Act restricts or
 precludes—
 (1)low-level
 overflights of military, law enforcement, or emergency medical services
 aircraft over the area designated as wilderness by this Act, including
 military, law enforcement, or emergency medical services overflights that can
 be seen or heard within the wilderness area;
 (2)flight testing
 and evaluation; or
 (3)the designation
 or creation of new units of special use airspace, or the establishment of
 military, law enforcement, or emergency medical services flight training
 routes, over the wilderness area.
 206.Release of
 wilderness study areas
 (a)FindingCongress
 finds that, for the purposes of section 603 of the Federal Land Policy and
 Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782), the Bureau of Land Management land in
 any portion of the wilderness study areas located within the Conservation Area
 not designated as a wilderness area has been adequately studied for wilderness
 designation.
 (b)ReleaseAny
 Bureau of Land Management land described in subsection (a) that is not
 designated as a wilderness area—
 (1)is no longer
 subject to section 603(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976
 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c));
 (2)shall be managed
 in accordance with—
 (A)the land
 management plans adopted under section 202 of that Act (43 U.S.C. 1712);
 and
 (B)cooperative
 conservation agreements in existence on the date of enactment of this Act;
 and
 (3)shall be subject
 to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
 207.Native
 American cultural and religious usesNothing in this title diminishes—
 (1)the rights of any Indian tribe; or
 (2)tribal rights regarding access to Federal
 land for tribal activities, including spiritual, cultural, and traditional
 food-gathering activities.
 208.Wildlife
 management
 (a)In
 generalIn accordance with section 4(d)(7) of the Wilderness Act
 (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(7)), nothing in this title affects or diminishes the
 jurisdiction of the State with respect to fish and wildlife management,
 including the regulation of hunting, fishing, and trapping, in the wilderness
 areas.
 (b)Management
 activities
 (1)In
 generalIn furtherance of the purposes and principles of the
 Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), management activities to maintain or
 restore fish and wildlife populations and the habitats to support the
 populations may be carried out within the wilderness areas, if the
 activities—
 (A)are consistent
 with relevant wilderness management plans; and
 (B)are carried out
 in accordance with appropriate policies, such as those set forth in Appendix B
 of House Report 101–405.
 (2)Use of
 motorized vehiclesThe management activities under paragraph (1)
 may include the occasional and temporary use of motorized vehicles, if the use,
 as determined by the Secretary, would—
 (A)promote healthy,
 viable, and more naturally distributed wildlife populations that would enhance
 wilderness values; and
 (B)accomplish the
 purposes described in subparagraph (A) with the minimum impact necessary to
 reasonably accomplish the task.
 (c)Existing
 activitiesConsistent with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act
 (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)) and in accordance with appropriate policies such as
 those set forth in Appendix B of House Report 101–405, the State may continue
 to use aircraft (including helicopters) to survey, capture, transplant,
 monitor, and provide water for wildlife populations, including bighorn sheep,
 and feral stock, horses, and burros.
 (d)Wildlife water
 development projectsSubject to subsection (f), the Secretary
 shall authorize structures and facilities, including existing structures and
 facilities, for wildlife water development projects, including guzzlers, in the
 wilderness areas if—
 (1)the structures
 and facilities will, as determined by the Secretary, enhance wilderness values
 by promoting healthy, viable and more naturally distributed wildlife
 populations; and
 (2)the visual
 impacts of the structures and facilities on the wilderness areas can reasonably
 be minimized.
 (e)Hunting,
 fishing, and trapping
 (1)In
 generalThe Secretary may designate, by regulation, areas in
 which, and establish periods during which, for reasons of public safety,
 administration, or compliance with applicable laws, no hunting, fishing, or
 trapping will be permitted in the wilderness areas.
 (2)ConsultationExcept
 in emergencies, the Secretary shall consult with the appropriate State agency
 before promulgating regulations under paragraph (1).
 (f)Cooperative
 agreementThe State,
 including a designee of the State, may conduct wildlife management activities
 in the wilderness areas—
 (1)in accordance
 with the terms and conditions specified in the cooperative agreement between
 the Secretary and the State entitled Memorandum of Understanding between
 the Bureau of Land Management and the Nevada Department of Wildlife Supplement
 No. 9 and signed November and December 2003, including any amendments
 to the cooperative agreement agreed to by the Secretary and the State;
 and
 (2)subject to all
 applicable laws (including regulations).
 209.Wildfire,
 insect, and disease management
 (a)In
 generalIn accordance with
 section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)), the Secretary may
 take such measures in each wilderness area as the Secretary determines to be
 necessary for the control of fire, insects, and diseases (including, as the
 Secretary determines to be appropriate, the coordination of the activities with
 a State or local agency).
 (b)EffectNothing
 in this Act precludes a Federal, State, or local agency from conducting
 wildfire management operations (including operations using aircraft or
 mechanized equipment) in accordance with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act
 (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)).
 210.Climatological
 data collectionSubject to
 such terms and conditions as the Secretary may require, nothing in this title
 precludes the installation and maintenance of hydrologic, meteorologic, or
 climatological collection devices in the wilderness areas if the facilities and
 access to the facilities are essential to flood warning, flood control, and
 water reservoir operation activities.
 211.National Park
 System landTo the extent any
 of the provisions of this title are in conflict with laws (including
 regulations) or management policies applicable to Federal land within the Lake
 Mead National Recreation Area designated as a wilderness area, the laws
 (including regulations) or policies shall control.
 IIIGeneral
 provisions
 301.Relationship
 to Clark County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan
 (a)In
 generalNothing in this Act limits, alters, modifies, or amends
 the Clark County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan with respect to the
 Conservation Area and the wilderness areas, including the specific management
 actions contained in the Clark County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan
 for the conservation of perennial springs.
 (b)Conservation
 management areasThe Secretary shall credit the Conservation Area
 and the wilderness areas as Conservation Management Areas, as may be required
 by the Clark County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (including
 amendments to the plan).
 (c)Management
 planIn developing the management plan, to the extent consistent
 with this section, the Secretary may incorporate any provision of the Clark
 County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
 302.Visitor
 center, research, and interpretation
 (a)In
 generalThe Secretary, acting through the Director of the Bureau
 of Land Management, may establish, in cooperation with any other public or
 private entities that the Secretary may determine to be appropriate, a visitor
 center and field office in Mesquite, Nevada—
 (1)to serve
 visitors; and
 (2)to assist in
 fulfilling the purposes of—
 (A)the Lake Mead
 National Recreation Area;
 (B)the Grand
 Canyon-Parashant National Monument; and
 (C)the Conservation
 Area.
 (b)RequirementsThe
 Secretary shall ensure that the visitor center authorized under subsection (a)
 is designed—
 (1)to interpret the
 scenic, biological, natural, historical, scientific, paleontological,
 recreational, ecological, wilderness, and cultural resources of each of the
 areas described in that subsection; and
 (2)to serve as an
 interagency field office for each of the areas described in that
 subsection.
 (c)Cooperative
 agreementsThe Secretary may, in a manner consistent with this
 Act, enter into cooperative agreements with the State, the State of Arizona,
 and any other appropriate institutions and organizations to carry out the
 purposes of this section.
 303.Termination of
 withdrawal of Bureau of Land Management land
 (a)Termination of
 withdrawalThe withdrawal of the parcels of Bureau of Land
 Management land described in subsection (b) for use by the Bureau of
 Reclamation is terminated.
 (b)Description of
 landThe parcels of land referred to in subsection (a) consist of
 the Bureau of Land Management land identified on the Map as Transfer
 from BOR to BLM.
 (c)Map and legal
 description
 (1)In
 generalAs soon as practicable after the date of enactment of
 this Act, the Secretary shall finalize the legal description of the land
 reverting to the Bureau of Land Management under subsection (a).
 (2)Minor
 errorsThe Secretary may correct any minor error in—
 (A)the Map;
 or
 (B)the legal
 description.
 (3)AvailabilityThe
 Map and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection
 in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of
 Reclamation.


type: other

text:
 ΟΑΕΔ | Τάσος Κουράκης
 Η σχεδιαζόμενη πρόσληψη και τοποθέτηση ΕΕΠ και ΕΒΠ στα ειδικά σχολεία και στα ΚΕΔΔΥ μέσω των προγραμμάτων κοινοφελούς χαρακτήρα του ΟΑΕΔ ή .....
 Αριθμός πρωτοκόλλου κατάθεσης:3930/19.11.2013
 Η σχεδιαζόμενη πρόσληψη και τοποθέτηση ΕΕΠ και ΕΒΠ στα ειδικά σχολεία και στα ΚΕΔΔΥ μέσω των προγραμμάτων κοινοφελούς χαρακτήρα του ΟΑΕΔ ή μέσω οποιουδήποτε άλλου φορέα πλην του μόνου αρμόδιου κατά το Νόμο Υπουργείου Παιδείας αποτελεί θεσμική εκτροπή η οποία παραβιάζει τους νόμους της Ειδικής Αγωγής και Εκπαίδευσης
 Δείτε την απάντηση εδώ: http://bit.ly/LxCmY1
 Δεν αναγνωρίζεται πλήρως η προϋπηρεσία από το Υπουργείο Παιδείας Δια Βίου Μάθησης και Θρησκευμάτων στους εκπαιδευτικούς που έχουν διδάξει στις Σχολές Μαθητείας του ΟΑΕΔ.
 Δεν αναγνωρίζεται πλήρως η προϋπηρεσία από το Υπουργείο Παιδείας Δια Βίου Μάθησης και Θρησκευμάτων στους εκπαιδευτικούς που έχουν διδάξει στις Σχολές Μαθητείας του ΟΑΕΔ. Κατηγοριοποιούνται εκπαιδευτικοί λειτουργοί ίδιων προσόντων σε διαφορετικές ταχύτητες και δικαιώματα.
 «Δικαιολογημένη ανασφάλεια βιώνουν οι αναπληρωτές και ωρομίσθιοι εκπαιδευτικοί τεχνικών ειδικοτήτων του ΟΑΕΔ αφού δεν τους αναγνωρίζεται η προϋπηρεσία τους στο Υπουργείο Παιδείας»
 αριθμός πρωτοκόλου κατάθεσης:11767/21.2.2011
 Αποτροπή από την συμμετοχή στο Πρόγραμμα Επιχορήγησης Νέων Ελεύθερων Επαγγελματιών αποτελεί η προϋπόθεση της εκπλήρωσης στρατιωτικών υποχρεώσεων σε ηλικία 18 ετών
 τους κκ. Υπουργούς • Εργασίας και Κοινωνικής Ασφάλισης •Οικονομικών
 Ο βουλευτής του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ Τάσος Κουράκης κατέθεσε ερώτηση (13-2-09)σχετικά με τον αποκλεισμό από τις επιδοτούμενες θέσεις εργασίας του ΟΑΕΔ όσων έχουν καταδικαστεί με τον νόμο περί ναρκωτικών.
 Υπουργούς Εθνικής Παιδείας και Θρησκευμάτων, Απασχόλησης και Κοινωνικής Προστασίας
 Κατά την εφαρμογή του νόμου 3475/06, «Οργάνωση και λειτουργία της δευτεροβάθμιας επαγγελματικής εκπαίδευσης...», αδικούνται οι μαθητές που αποφοίτησαν το σχολικό έτος 2007-2008 από την τρίτη τάξη του Α ́ κύκλου των ΤΕΕ μαθητείας του ΟΑΕΔ. Αναλυτικότερα, μέχρι σήμερα οι μαθητές των σχολών μαθητείας του ΟΑΕΔ είχαν την δυνατότητα να παρακολουθήσουν έναν, τριετούς διάρκειας, Α ́ κύκλο σπουδών για την απόκτηση πτυχίου επιπέδου ΙΙ. Στη συνέχεια μετά την παρακολούθηση του μονοετούς Β ́ κύκλου σπουδών, τους χορηγείτο ανώτερο πτυχίο επιπέδου ΙΙΙ.
 Ο ΟΑΕΔ ΑΡΝΕΙΤΑΙ ΣΤΟΥΣ ΜΙΣΟΥΣ ΑΠΟΦΥΛΑΚΙΣΜΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΩΜΑ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΟΧΗΣ ΣΕ ΕΠΙΔΟΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΑ ΝΕΩΝ ΘΕΣΕΩΝ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑΣ
 Με ερώτησή του ο βουλευτής του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ Τάσος Κουράκης καταγγέλλει τον αποκλεισμό από τον ΟΑΕΔ όσων αποφυλακισμένων είχαν καταδικαστεί για παράβαση του νόμου περί ναρκωτικών από τη συμμετοχή σε προγράμματα νέων θέσεων εργασίας και ζητεί την έκδοση υπουργικής απόφασης η οποία θα άρει τον απαγορευτικό όρο για τη συμμετοχή στα προγράμματα.
 Αναγνώριση προϋπηρεσίας των εκπαιδευτικών των σχολείων του ΟΑΕΔ
 Με τον νόμο 3475/2006 και τις αλλαγές στην Τεχνική Επαγγελματική Εκπαίδευση (δημιουργία των ΕΠΑΛ-ΕΠΑΣ), οι ωρομίσθιοι εκπαιδευτικοί που δίδασκαν επί χρόνια στα δημόσια σχολεία δευτεροβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης του Υπουργείου Απασχόλησης ( ΤΕΣ, ΤΕΕ ΟΑΕΔ) αποκλείστηκαν σταδιακά και εν τέλει ολοκληρωτικά από την εργασία τους στην εκπαίδευση. Τούτο συνέβη καθώς πολλές ειδικότητες καταργήθηκαν στις ΕΠΑΣ ΟΑΕΔ με αποτέλεσμα εκατοντάδες εκπαιδευτικοί να μην μπορούν να εργαστούν πλέον στα σχολεία του ΟΑΕΔ.


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 7.11.2009
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 C 267/45
 2009 m. rugsėjo 2 d.Perfetti Van Melle SpA pateiktas apeliacinis skundas dėl 2009 m. liepos 1 d. Pirmosios instancijos teismo (aštuntoji kolegija) priimto sprendimo byloje T-16/08, Perfetti Van Melle SpA prieš Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnybą (prekių ženklams ir pramoniniam dizainui) (VRDT), Cloetta Fazer AB
 (Byla C-353/09 P)
 2009/C 267/78
 Proceso kalba: anglų
 Šalys
 Apeliantė: Perfetti Van Melle SpA, atstovaujama advokatų P. Perani ir P. Pozzi
 Kitos proceso šalys: Vidaus rinkos derinimo tarnyba (prekių ženklams ir pramoniniam dizainui) (VRDT), Cloetta Fazer AB
 Apeliantės reikalavimai
 —
 Patenkinti apeliacinį skundą ir panaikinti visą Pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimą byloje T-16/08, remiantis Teisingumo Teismo statuto 61 straipsniu ir Procedūros reglamento 113 straipsniu;
 —
 jei toje bylos stadijoje tai bus įmanoma, priimti galutinį sprendimą panaikinant 2005 m. lapkričio 24 d. VRDT Anuliavimo skyriaus sprendimą, byloje Nr. 941 C 973065 ir priteisti iš atsakovių bylinėjimosi Pirmosios instancijos teisme ir Teisingumo Teisme bei VRDT panaikinimo procedūroje patirtas išlaidas.
 Apeliacinio skundo pagrindai ir pagrindiniai argumentai
 1. Teisiniai motyvai
 Šiuo apeliaciniu skundu Perfetti Van Melle SpA ginčija 2009 m. liepos 1 d. Pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimą byloje T-16/08, apie kurį buvo pranešta 2009 m. liepos 2 dieną.
 Grįsdama savo skundą apeliantė teigia, kad skundžiamu Pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimu buvo neteisingai išaiškintas ir pritaikytas 1993 m. gruodžio 20 d. Tarybos reglamento (EB) Nr. 40/94 dėl Bendrijos prekių ženklo (1) 8 straipsnio 1 dalies b punktas ir 53 straipsnio 1 dalies a punktas.
 1.1 Pirmas priekaištas: apeliantė skundžia tai, kad Pirmosios instancijos teismas neįvertino nagrinėjamų prekių ženklų pagal „visapusiško vertinimo“ ar „bendrojo įspūdžio“ kriterijų.
 Nusistovėjo principas, kad visapusiškas supainiojimo galimybės vertinimas, kiek tai susiję su prekių ženklų vizualiu, skambėjimo ir koncepciniu panašumu, turi būti pagrįstas prekių ženklų sukuriamu bendru įspūdžiu, ypač atsižvelgiant į jų išskirtinius ir dominuojančius elementus. Apeliantė teigia, kad Pirmosios instancijos teismas nepritaikė šio principo ir, kalbant konkrečiai, pripažino galimybę supainioti prekių ženklus, remdamasis tik jų bendru elementu „CENTER“.
 Skundžiamame sprendime prekių ženklai nebuvo išnagrinėti „visapusiškai“ ir nebuvo įvertintas jų sukurtas „bendras įspūdis“. Skundžiamame sprendime buvo panaudotas analitinis metodas ir prekių ženklas „CENTER“ palygintas su ginčijamo prekių ženklo pirmuoju žodiniu elementu „CENTER“, visiškai atmetant bet kokią antrojo žodinio elemento „SHOCK“ svarbą. Tiesa, skundžiamame sprendime buvo paminėtas visapusiško vertinimo ir bendrojo įspūdžio kriterijus, tačiau neužtenka tik paminėti ir pakartoti teismų praktikoje nusistovėjusį kriterijų. Siekiant veikti teisingai, svarbu juo vadovautis ir tinkamai taikyti jį byloje. To nebuvo padaryta skundžiamame sprendime. Jame tik buvo pripažinta, kad du lyginami prekių ženklai yra panašūs dėl jiems bendro žodinio elemento „CENTER“, tačiau nebuvo paaiškinta, kodėl žodinio elemento „SHOCK“ nepakanka pašalinti supainiojimo galimybę.
 Dėl šių priežasčių apeliantė teigia, kad skundžiamame sprendime buvo iškreipti faktai ir pažeista motyvavimo pareiga.
 1.2 Antras priekaištas: apeliantė skundžia tai, kad savo sprendime Pirmosios instancijos teismas neįvertino kai kurių labai svarbių ir reikšmingų veiksnių.
 Skundžiamu sprendimu taip pat buvo pažeistas 8 straipsnio 1 dalies b punktas, nes jame neįvertinti veiksniai, ypač reikšmingi nustatant galimybę supainioti prekių ženklus. Konkrečiai kalbant, Pirmosios instancijos teismas neatsižvelgė į ilgą lyginamų prekių ženklų koegzistenciją ir faktinio jų painiojimo nebuvimą, kaip buvo išsamiai paaiškinta Pirmosios instancijos teismui pateiktame pareiškime.
 Be to, Pirmosios instancijos teismas neteisingai įvertino kitą svarbų veiksnį, o būtent atitinkamos visuomenės pastabumo laipsnį. Iš tikrųjų Pirmosios instancijos teismas padarė nelogišką išvadą, kad pakankamai informuotas, protingai pastabus ir nuovokus vartotojas nepastebės žodžio „SHOCK“ ir nepripažins, kad nagrinėjami prekių ženklai ne tik skiriasi vizualiai ir fonetiškai, bet turi skirtingą reikšmę, o būtent prekių ženklas „CENTER“ reiškia kažko vidurio tašką, o prekių ženklas „CENTER SHOCK“ dėl papildomo žodžio „SHOCK“ buvimo perteikia mintį, kad vartotojas patirs stiprų pojūtį (šoką), kramtydamas kramtomos gumos vidurį.
 2. Apeliantės reikalavimai
 —
 Patenkinti apeliacinį skundą ir visiškai panaikinti Pirmosios instancijos teismo sprendimą, remiantis Teisingumo Teismo statuto 61 straipsniu ir Procedūros reglamento 113 straipsniu;
 —
 jei toje bylos stadijoje tai bus įmanoma, priimti galutinį sprendimą panaikinant 2005 m. lapkričio 24 d. VRDT Anuliavimo skyriaus sprendimą, byloje Nr. 941 C 973065 ir priteisti iš atsakovių bylinėjimosi Pirmosios instancijos teisme ir Teisingumo Teisme bei VRDT panaikinimo procedūroje patirtas išlaidas, remiantis Procedūros reglamento 122 straipsniu;
 —
 jei toje bylos stadijoje nebus įmanoma priimti galutinio sprendimo, perduoti bylą Pirmosios instancijos teismui iš naujo nagrinėti taikant Teisingumo Teismo nustatytus privalomus kriterijus.
 (1) OL L 11, 1994, p. 1; 2004 m. specialusis leidimas lietuvių k., 17 sk.,1 t., p. 146.


type: contracts

text:
 11/Sv. 093
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 185
 22000D1109(29)
 L 284/65
 SLUŽBENI LIST EUROPSKE UNIJE
 28.05.1999.
 ODLUKA ZAJEDNIČKOG ODBORA EGP-a
 br. 74/1999
 od 28. svibnja 1999.
 o izmjeni Protokola 37 i Priloga II. (Tehnički propisi, norme, ispitivanje i izdavanje potvrda) Sporazumu o EGP-u
 ZAJEDNIČKI ODBOR EGP-a,
 uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, kako je izmijenjen Protokolom o prilagodbi Sporazuma o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, dalje u tekstu „Sporazum”, a posebno njegove članke 98. do 101.,
 budući da:
 (1)
 Protokol 37 Sporazuma izmijenjen je Odlukom br. 38/1999 Zajedničkoga odbora EGP-a od 30. ožujka 1999. (1)
 (2)
 Prilog II. Sporazumu izmijenjen je Odlukom br. 49/1999 Zajedničkoga odbora EGP-a od 30. travnja 1999. (2)
 (3)
 U slučaju lijekova za ljudsku uporabu, kriteriji kvalitete, sigurnosti i učinkovitosti u velikoj su mjeri usklađeni Direktivom Vijeća 65/65/EEZ (3), Direktivom Vijeća 75/318/EEZ (4) i drugom Direktivom Vijeća 75/319/EEZ (5), prema uzastopnim izmjenama.
 (4)
 U slučaju veterinarskih lijekova, slični rezultati postignuti su Direktivom Vijeća 81/851/EEZ (6) i Direktivom Vijeća 81/852/EEZ (7), kako je izmijenjena.
 (5)
 Direktivom Vijeća 87/22/EEZ (8) uspostavljen je mehanizam u vezi s koncentracijom, prije bilo koje nacionalne odluke u vezi s lijekom visoke tehnologije, s ciljem postizanja jedinstvenih odluka.
 (6)
 Iskustvo unutar Zajednice, nakon stupanja na snagu Direktive 87/22/EEZ, pokazalo je nužnost uspostave centraliziranog postupka Zajednice za lijekove napredne tehnologije. Ovaj je postupak na raspolaganju osobama koje na tržište stavljaju lijekove koji sadrže nove aktivne tvari namijenjene uporabi kod ljudi ili kod životinja koje proizvode hranu.
 (7)
 Stoga, Uredbom Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2309/93 (9) osnovana je Europska agencija za ocjenu medicinskih proizvoda, dalje u tekstu „Agencija”. Bilo je nužno osigurati usku suradnju između Agencije i znanstvenika koji djeluju u državama članicama. Stoga je isključiva nadležnost za izradu mišljenja Agencije o svim pitanjima u vezi s lijekovima za ljudsku uporabu povjerena Odboru za patentirane medicinske proizvode, osnovanom drugom Direktivom Vijeća 75/319/EEZ. S obzirom na veterinarske lijekove, ova je nadležnost povjerena Odboru za veterinarske lijekove, osnovanom Direktivom 81/851/EEZ.
 (8)
 Agencija je također odgovorna za usklađivanje djelatnosti država članica u području praćenja štetnih reakcija lijekova (farmakovigilancija). Također je bilo nužno osigurati nadzor nad lijekovima koje je odobrila Zajednica. U tom cilju, Agencija usklađuje provjeru pridržavanja načela dobre proizvođačke prakse, dobre laboratorijske prakse i dobre kliničke prakse.
 (9)
 U interesu javnog zdravlja nužno je da se odluke o odobrenju takvih lijekova trebaju temeljiti na objektivnim znanstvenim kriterijima o kvaliteti, sigurnosti i učinkovitosti dotičnih lijekova, isključujući ekonomska i druga razmatranja. Međutim, države članice Zajednice mogu iznimno na svojem teritoriju zabraniti primjenu lijekova za ljudsku uporabu koji narušavaju objektivno zacrtane koncepte javnog reda i javnog morala. Nadalje, Zajednica ne smije odobriti veterinarske lijekove ako je njihova primjena u suprotnosti s pravnim mjerama koje je utvrdila Zajednica u okviru zajedničke poljoprivrede politike.
 (10)
 Direktivom Vijeća 93/39/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. o izmjeni direktiva 65/65/EEZ, 75/318/EEZ i 75/319/EEZ u vezi s lijekovima (10) predviđa se da u slučaju neslaganja između država članica Zajednice oko kvalitete, sigurnosti ili učinkovitosti lijeka koji podliježe decentraliziranom postupku odobrenja Zajednice, spor treba riješiti obvezujućom Odlukom Zajednice nakon znanstvene procjene obuhvaćenih pitanja. S obzirom na veterinarske lijekove, slične su odredbe predviđene Direktivom Vijeća 93/40/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. o izmjeni Direktiva 81/851/EEZ i 81/852/EEZ (11).
 (11)
 Od temeljnog je značaja osigurati jedinstvenu zaštitu ljudskog i životinjskog zdravlja i zaštititi potrošače lijekova unutar Europskoga gospodarskog prostora.
 (12)
 Nužno je osigurati ispravnu primjenu Sporazuma usvajanjem jedinstvenih zakonodavnih odredbi prvenstveno temeljenih na objektivnim znanstvenim kriterijima u vezi stavljanja na tržište i primjenu lijekova.
 (13)
 Stoga, kroz izmjene Priloga II. Sporazumu, u Sporazum se uvrštava određeno zakonodavstvo Zajednice i načela o centraliziranom postupku za lijekove napredne tehnologije i lijekove koji sadrže nove aktivne tvari, a namijenjeni su primjeni kod ljudi ili kod životinja koje proizvode hranu, kao i zakonodavstvo o decentraliziranom postupku pod uvjetom da se u slučaju neslaganja između ugovornih stranaka o kvaliteti, sigurnosti i učinkovitosti lijeka, spor rješava obvezujućom odlukom nakon znanstvene ocjene predmetnih pitanja.
 (14)
 Dobra primjena Sporazuma zahtijeva da predstavnici nadležnih tijela dotičnih država EFTA-e budu uključeni u rad Odbora za patentirane medicinske proizvode, osnovanog drugom Direktivom Vijeća 75/319/EEZ i Odbora za veterinarske lijekove osnovanog Direktivom 81/851/EEZ.
 (15)
 Stoga je nužno napraviti izmjene Protokola 37 kojim se navode odbori u čiji se rad uključuju stručnjaci iz država EFTA-e kada se to zahtijeva dobrim provođenjem Sporazuma.
 (16)
 Nužno je izmijeniti Prilog II. Sporazumu u vezi s Protokolom 37 kako bi se odredili detaljni načini uključivanja,
 ODLUČIO JE:
 Članak 1.
 Protokol 37 uz Sporazum mijenja se kako je utvrđeno u Prilogu I. ovoj Odluci.
 Članak 2.
 Prilog II. Sporazumu mijenja se kako je utvrđeno u Prilogu II. ovoj Odluci.
 Članak 3.
 Tekstovi direktiva 93/39/EEZ, 93/40/EEZ i 93/41/EEZ, Uredaba (EEZ) br. 2309/93 i (EZ) br. 297/95 i uredaba (EZ) br. 540/95, (EZ) br. 541/95, (EZ) br. 542/95 i (EZ) br. 2141/96 na islandskom i norveškom jeziku, koji su priloženi njihovim odnosnim jezičnim inačicama ove Odluke, vjerodostojni su.
 Članak 4.
 Za potrebe Sporazuma datumi u vezi stupanja na snagu ili provedbe akata navedenih u Prilogu II. ovoj Odluci tumače se na sljedeći način:
 —
 ako dan stupanja na snagu ili provedbe akta prethodi datumu stupanja na snagu ove Odluke, primjenjuje se dan stupanja na snagu ove Odluke,
 —
 ako dan stupanja na snagu ili provedbe akta nastupa nakon datuma stupanja na snagu ove Odluke, primjenjuje se dan stupanja na snagu ili provedbe akta.
 Članak 5.
 Ova Odluka stupa na snagu 29. svibnja 1999. pod uvjetom da su sve obavijesti na temelju članka 103. stavka 1. Sporazuma dostavljene Zajedničkom odboru EGP.
 Članak 6.
 Ova se Odluka objavljuje u odjeljku o EGP-u i Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europskih zajednica.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 28. svibnja 1999.
 Za Zajednički odbor EGP-a
 Predsjednik
 F. BARBASO
 (1) SL L 266, 19.10.2000.
 (2) SL L 284, 9.11.2000., str. 6.
 (3) SL 22, 9.2.1965., str. 369/65.
 (4) SL L 147, 9.6.1975., str. 1.
 (5) SL L 147, 9.6.1975., str. 13.
 (6) SL L 317, 6.11.1981., str. 1.
 (7) SL L 317, 6.11.1981., str. 16.
 (8) SL L 15, 17.1.1987., str. 38.
 (9) SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 1.
 (10) SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 22.
 (11) SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 31.
 PRILOG I.
 Odluci br. 74/1999 Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a
 Protokol 37 (koji sadrži popis predviđen člankom 101.) uz Sporazum mijenja se kako je niže utvrđeno.
 U Protokolu 37 uz Sporazum dodaje se sljedeće:
 „10.
 Odbor za patentirane medicinske proizvode (druga Direktiva Vijeća 75/319/EEZ).
 11.
 Odbor za veterinarske lijekove (Direktiva Vijeća 81/851/EEZ).”
 PRILOG II.
 Odluci br. 74/1999 Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a
 Prilog II. (Tehnički propisi, norme, ispitivanje i izdavanje potvrda), poglavlje XIII. (Lijekovi) Sporazuma izmjenjuje se kako je niže utvrđeno.
 1.
 U tekstu poglavlja XIII. Priloga II. Sporazumu, iza trećeg stavka umeće se sljedeće:
 „Kada se odluke o odobrenju lijekova donose u skladu s postupcima Zajednice utvrđenima Uredbom Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2309/93, drugom Direktivom Vijeća 75/319/EEZ, kako je izmijenjena Direktivom 93/39/EEZ, i Direktivom Vijeća 81/852/EEZ, kako je izmijenjena Direktivom 93/40/EEZ, države EFTA-e će istodobno donositi odgovarajuće odluke na temelju odgovarajućih zakona. O tome se izvješćuje Zajednički odbor EGP-a i on periodički objavljuje popise takvih odluka u Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu.
 Nadzorno tijelo EFTA-e će pratiti primjenu odluka koje su donijele države EFTA-e kako je predviđeno člankom 109. Sporazuma.
 Kada se nekim od određenih zakona omogućavaju postupci Zajednice o dodjeli, ukidanju i povlačenju dozvole za stavljanje u promet, kao i nadzor, uključujući farmakovigilanciju, te kontrole i kazne, ove i slične zadaće obavljaju nadležna tijela država EFTA-e na temelju jednakih obveza poput onih koje imaju nadležna tijela država članica Zajednice.
 Ako dođe do nekog neslaganja između ugovornih stranaka oko primjene ovih odredaba, dio VII. Sporazuma primjenjuje se mutatis mutandis.
 Države EFTA-e, ugovorne stranke ovog Sporazuma, sudjeluju u radu Europske agencije za ocjenu medicinskih proizvoda (EMEA), dalje u tekstu „Agencija” osnovanoj Uredbom (EEZ) br. 2309/93. Lihtenštajn može sudjelovati i financijski potpomagati rad Agencije kada njegovo tijelo za nadzor nad lijekovima bude raspolagalo nužnim tehničkim sredstvima.
 Financijske odredbe iz Glave IV., Poglavlja 2. Uredbe (EEZ) br. 2309/93 odnose se na sudjelovanje dotičnih država EFTA-e u radu Agencije.
 Dotične države EFTA-e stoga, od stupanja na snagu ove Odluke, sudjeluju u doprinosu Zajednice na što se odnosi članak 57. stavak 1. Uredbe (EEZ) br. 2309/93.
 U tu se svrhu postupci predviđeni u članku 82. stavku 1. točki (a) i Protokolu 32 uz Sporazum primjenjuju mutatis mutandis s obzirom na financijski doprinos dotičnih država EFTA-e gore navedenom doprinosu Zajednice.
 Dotične države EFTA-e mogu poslati promatrače na sastanke upravnog odbora Agencije.
 Dotične države EFTA-e u potpunosti su uključene u rad Odbora za patentirane medicinske proizvode (CPMP) i Odbora za patentirane veterinarske lijekove (CVMP). Detaljni načini sudjelovanja predstavnika država EFTA-e sukladni su odredbama iz glave IV., poglavlja 1. Uredbe (EEZ) br. 2309/93. Takvi predstavnici, međutim, neće sudjelovati u glasanju a njihovi će se stavovi zasebno zabilježiti. Mjesto predsjedavajućeg rezervirano je za člana kojeg imenuje država članica Zajednice. Interni poslovnik tih odbora izmjenjuje se kako bi se u potpunosti omogućilo sudjelovanje država EFTA-e.
 Dotične države EFTA-e u potpunosti sudjeluju u telematskoj razmjeni informacija o programu lijekova (IMP).
 Dotične države EFTA-e osiguravaju svojim nacionalnim nadležnim tijelima i nositeljima odobrenja za stavljanje u promet jezičnu inačicu odobrenja za stavljanje u promet potrebnih za pristup njihovom vlastitom tržištu.
 Odobrenje za stavljanje u promet dodijeljeno za lijek nakon mišljenja koje je usvojio nadležni znanstveni odbor EMEA, u skladu s člankom 9. ili članku 31. Uredbe (EEZ) br. 2309/93, ne podliježe nikakvim naknadama, osim onim navedenim u članku 57. stavku 1. i članku 58. Uredbe (EEZ) br. 2309/93.
 Dotične države EFTA-e, unutar vremenskog roka koji je odredio Zajednički odbor EGP-a, obavješćuju Agenciju o nacionalnim nadležnim tijelima odgovornima za rad one vrste koji obavlja Agencija i imenuje odgovarajuće osobe da zastupaju ta tijela u gore navedenim znanstvenim odborima.
 Agencija s pravnom osobnosti uživa u svim državama ugovornih stranaka najširu poslovnu sposobnost koja se priznaje pravnim osobama na temelju njihovih zakona.
 Dotične države EFTA-e primjenjuju na Agenciju Protokol o privilegijama i imunitetima Europskih zajednica.
 Iznimno od članka 12. stavka 2. točke (a) Uvjeta o zapošljavanju ostalih službenika Europskih zajednica, državljane država EFTA-e koji uživaju puna prava državljanstva može ugovorno zaposliti izvršni direktor Agencije.”
 2.
 U točku 1. (Direktiva Vijeća 65/65/EEZ) dodaje se sljedeća alineja:
 „—
 393 L 0039: Direktiva Vijeća 93/39/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. (SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 22.).”
 3.
 U točku 2. (Direktiva Vijeća 75/318/EEZ) dodaje se sljedeća alineja:
 „—
 393 L 0039: Direktiva Vijeća 93/39/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. (SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 22.).”
 4.
 U točku 3. (druga Direktiva Vijeća 73/319/EEZ) dodaje se sljedeća alineja:
 „—
 393 L 0039: Direktiva Vijeća 93/39/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. (SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 22.).”
 5.
 U točku 5. (Direktiva Vijeća 81/851/EEZ) dodaje se sljedeća alineja:
 „—
 393 L 0040: Direktiva Vijeća 93/40/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. (SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 31.).”
 6.
 U točku 6. (Direktiva Vijeća 81/852/EEZ) dodaje se sljedeća alineja:
 „—
 393 L 0040: Direktiva Vijeća 93/40/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. (SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 31.).”
 7.
 Tekst točke 8. (Direktiva Vijeća 87/22/EEZ) zamjenjuje se sa:
 „—
 393 L 0041: Direktiva Vijeća 93/41/EEZ od 14. lipnja 1993. o ukidanju Direktive 87/22/EEZ o usklađivanju nacionalnih mjera koje se odnose na stavljanje visokotehnoloških lijekova na tržište, posebno onih koji su dobiveni biotehnologijom (SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 40.).”
 8.
 Iza točke 15f (Direktiva Vijeća 92/109/EEZ) umeću se sljedeće točke:
 „15g.
 393 R 2309: Uredba Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2309/93 od 22. srpnja 1993. o utvrđivanju postupaka Zajednice za odobravanje i nadzor lijekova za ljudsku i veterinarsku uporabu i kojom se osniva Europska agencija za ocjenu medicinskih proizvoda (SL L 214, 24.8.1993., str. 1.).
 15h.
 395 R 0297: Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 297/95 od 10. veljače 1995. o naknadama koje se plaćaju Europskoj agenciji za ocjenu medicinskih proizvoda (SL L 35, 15.2.1995., str. 1.).
 15i.
 395 R 0540: Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 540/95 od 10. veljače 1995. o utvrđivanju postupaka izvještavanja o sumnjivim neočekivanim štetnim reakcijama koje nisu ozbiljne, bilo da nastaju u Zajednici ili u trećoj zemlji, na medicinske proizvode za ljudsku ili veterinarsku uporabu odobrene u skladu s odredbama Uredbe Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2309/93 (SL L 55, 11.3.1995., str. 5.).
 15j.
 395 R 0541: Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 541/95 od 10. ožujka 1995. o razmatranju izmjena uvjeta odobrenja za stavljanje u promet koje dodjeljuje nadležno tijelo države članice (SL L 55, 11.3.1995., str. 7.).
 15k.
 395 R 0542: Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 542/95 od 10. ožujka 1995. o razmatranju izmjena uvjeta odobrenja za stavljanje u promet koje je obuhvaćeno Uredbom Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2309/93 (SL L 55, 11.3.1995., str. 15.).
 15l.
 396 R 2141: Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 2141/96 od 7. studenoga 1996. o razmatranju zahtjeva za prijenos odobrenja za stavljanje u promet lijeka koji je obuhvaćen Uredbom Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2309/93 (SL L 286, 8.11.1996., str. 6.).”


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22000D0920(02)
 Decisione n. 1/2000 del Consiglio di associazione UE-Estonia, del 24 luglio 2000, recante adozione delle condizioni e delle modalità di partecipazione della Repubblica di Estonia a programmi comunitari nei settori della formazione e dell'istruzione
 Gazzetta ufficiale n. L 236 del 20/09/2000 pag. 0018 - 0021
 Decisione n. 1/2000 del Consiglio di associazione UE-Estoniadel 24 luglio 2000recante adozione delle condizioni e delle modalità di partecipazione della Repubblica di Estonia a programmi comunitari nei settori della formazione e dell'istruzione(2000/560/CE)IL CONSIGLIO DI ASSOCIAZIONE,visto l'accordo europeo che istituisce un'associazione tra le Comunità europee e i loro Stati membri, da una parte, e la Repubblica di Estonia, dall'altra, in particolare l'articolo 108(1),considerando quanto segue:(1) A norma dell'articolo 108 dell'accordo europeo e del relativo allegato X, l'Estonia può partecipare ai programmi quadro, ai programmi specifici, ai progetti o alle altre azioni della Comunità, in particolare nei settori della formazione e dell'istruzione.(2) A norma dello stesso articolo, il Consiglio di associazione stabilisce le condizioni e le modalità della partecipazione dell'Estonia a tali attività.(3) A seguito della decisione n. 3/98 del Consiglio di associazione tra le Comunità europee e i loro Stati membri, da una parte, e la Repubblica di Estonia, dall'altra, del 29 ottobre 1998, recante adozione delle condizioni e delle modalità di partecipazione dell'Estonia a programmi comunitari nei settori della formazione, della gioventù e dell'istruzione(2), l'Estonia partecipa dal 1o novembre 1998 alla prima fase dei programmi Leonardo da Vinci(3) e Socrate(4) e ha espresso il desiderio di partecipare anche alla seconda fase,DECIDE:Articolo 1L'Estonia partecipa alla seconda fase dei programmi della Comunità europea Leonardo da Vinci e Socrate di cui, rispettivamente, alla decisione 1999/382/CE del Consiglio, del 26 aprile 1999, che istituisce la seconda fase del programma d'azione comunitaria in materia di formazione professionale "Leonardo da Vinci"(5), e alla decisione n. 253/2000/CE del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 24 gennaio 2000, che istituisce la seconda fase del programma d'azione comunitaria in materia di istruzione "Socrate"(6), (in seguito denominati "Leonardo da Vinci II" e "Socrate II"), secondo le condizioni e le modalità descritte negli allegati I e II che formano parte integrante della presente decisione.Articolo 2La presente decisione si applica per la durata dei programmi Leonardo da Vinci II et Socrate II, con decorrenza dal 1o gennaio 2000.Articolo 3La presente decisione entra in vigore il giorno della sua adozione da parte del Consiglio di associazione.Fatto a Bruxelles, addì 24 luglio 2000.Per il Consiglio di associazioneIl PresidenteH. Védrine(1) GU L 68 del 9.3.1998, pag. 3.(2) GU L 307 del 17.11.1998, pag. 19.(3) GU L 340 del 29.12.1994, pag. 8.(4) GU L 87 del 20.4.1995, pag. 10. Decisione modificata dalla decisione n. 576/98/CE (GU L 77 del 14.3.1998, pag. 1).(5) GU L 146 dell'11.6.1999, pag. 33.(6) GU L 28 del 3.2.2000, pag. 1.ALLEGATO ICONDIZIONI E MODALITÀ DELLA PARTECIPAZIONE DELLA REPUBBLICA DI ESTONIA AI PROGRAMMI "LEONARDO DA VINCI II" E "SOCRATE II"1. L'Estonia partecipa alle attività dei programmi "Leonardo da Vinci II" e "Socrate II" (in seguito denominati "i programmi") nel rispetto - salvo altre disposizioni della presente decisione - degli obiettivi, dei criteri, delle procedure e dei termini definiti dalla decisione 1999/382/CE del Consiglio e dalla decisione n. 253/2000/CE del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio che istituiscono questi programmi d'azione comunitari.2. A norma dell'articolo 5 delle decisioni relative a Leonardo da Vinci II e a Socrate II nonché delle disposizioni relative alle responsabilità degli Stati membri e della Commissione riguardo alle agenzie nazionali Leonardo da Vinci e Socrate, adottate dalla Commissione, l'Estonia creerà le strutture adeguate per la gestione coordinata delle azioni del programma a livello nazionale e adotterà le misure necessarie a garantire l'adeguato finanziamento di tali agenzie, che nell'ambito del programma riceveranno contributi per le loro attività. L'Estonia adotterà tutte le altre misure necessarie per una gestione efficace dei programmi a livello nazionale.3. Per partecipare ai programmi, l'Estonia verserà ogni anno un contributo al bilancio generale dell'Unione europea, secondo le disposizioni di cui all'allegato II.Al fine di tener conto degli sviluppi del programma o dell'evoluzione della capacità di assorbimento dell'Estonia, il comitato di associazione è autorizzato, se necessario, ad adeguare il contributo, in modo da evitare squilibri di bilancio nell'attuazione dei programmi.4. Le condizioni e le modalità di presentazione, valutazione e selezione delle domande delle istituzioni, delle organizzazioni e dei cittadini estoni aventi diritto, sono le stesse che valgono per le istituzioni, le organizzazioni e i cittadini aventi diritto nella Comunità.La Commissione può prendere in considerazione anche esperti estoni, quando, ai sensi delle pertinenti disposizioni delle decisioni che istituiscono i programmi, nomina esperti indipendenti che forniscano assistenza per la valutazione dei progetti.5. Al fine di garantire la dimensione comunitaria del programma, per essere ammissibili al sostegno finanziario della Comunità i progetti e le attività devono includere almeno un partner appartenente ad uno degli Stati membri della Comunità.6. I fondi a favore delle attività di mobilità di cui all'allegato I, sezione III, punto 1, della decisione relativa a Leonardo da Vinci II, e delle azioni decentrate di Socrate, nonché per il sostegno finanziario alle attività delle agenzie nazionali create a norma del precedente punto 2 saranno assegnati all'Estonia in base alla suddivisione annuale della dotazione finanziaria del programma decisa a livello comunitario e al contributo dell'Estonia al programma. Il sostegno finanziario alle attività delle agenzie nazionali non sarà mai superiore al 50 % del bilancio a favore dei programmi di lavoro delle agenzie nazionali.7. Gli Stati membri della Comunità e l'Estonia si impegneranno al massimo, nell'ambito delle attuali disposizioni, per facilitare la libera circolazione e il soggiorno di studenti, insegnanti, tirocinanti, formatori, personale amministrativo delle università, giovani e di altre persone aventi diritto, che viaggiano tra l'Estonia e gli Stati membri della Comunità nel quadro della loro partecipazione ad attività contemplate dalla presente decisione.8. L'Estonia esenterà le attività contemplate dalla presente decisione da imposte indirette e dazi doganali e non applicherà divieti e restrizioni sulle importazioni ed esportazioni relative a beni e servizi destinati ad essere utilizzati nell'ambito di tali attività.9. Fatte salve le responsabilità della Commissione delle Comunità europee e della Corte dei conti delle Comunità europee nel monitoraggio e nella valutazione dei programmi, conformemente alle decisioni relative ai programmi Leonardo da Vinci e Socrate (rispettivamente articoli 13 e 14), la partecipazione dell'Estonia ai programmi sarà oggetto di controllo costante e congiunto da parte della Commissione delle Comunità europee e dell'Estonia. L'Estonia presenta alla Commissione apposite relazioni e partecipa ad altre attività specifiche organizzate dalla Comunità in questo contesto.10. Ai sensi dei regolamenti finanziari della Comunità, le intese contrattuali concluse con o da organismi estoni disciplinano i controlli e le verifiche contabili da esperirsi da parte o sotto il controllo della Commissione e della Corte dei conti. Le verifiche contabili possono essere eseguite con lo scopo di controllare le entrate e le spese di tali organismi relativamente ai loro obblighi contrattuali nei confronti della Comunità. Le competenti autorità estoni provvedono a prestare, in uno spirito di collaborazione e nel reciproco interesse, tutta l'assistenza necessaria o utile, secondo le circostanze, per l'esecuzione di tali controlli e verifiche contabili.Le disposizioni relative alle responsabilità degli Stati membri e della Commissione riguardo alle agenzie nazionali Leonardo da Vinci e Socrate, adottate dalla Commissione, si applicheranno alle relazioni tra Estonia, Commissione e agenzie nazionali estoni. Nel caso di irregolarità, negligenze o frodi imputabili alle agenzie nazionali estoni, le autorità estoni saranno responsabili per i fondi non recuperati.11. Fatte salve le procedure di cui all'articolo 7 della decisione relativa a Leonardo da Vinci II e all'articolo 8 della decisione relativa a Socrate II, i rappresentanti dell'Estonia parteciperanno ai comitati di programma in qualità di osservatori, per i punti che li riguardano. Per la discussione degli altri punti e al momento del voto, tali comitati si riuniranno senza la presenza di rappresentanti estoni.12. La lingua utilizzata per i contatti con la Commissione, nelle procedure relative alle domande, nei contratti, nelle relazioni presentate e in tutti gli altri aspetti amministrativi dei programmi sarà una delle lingue ufficiali della Comunità.13. La Comunità e l'Estonia possono interrompere le attività contemplate dalla presente decisione in qualsiasi momento previo preavviso scritto di dodici mesi. I progetti e le attività in corso al momento dell'interruzione continueranno e verranno portate a termine ai sensi delle condizioni stabilite nella presente decisione.ALLEGATO IICONTRIBUTO FINANZIARIO DELLA REPUBBLICA DI ESTONIA AI PROGRAMMI LEONARDO DA VINCI II E SOCRATE II1. Leonardo da VinciPer partecipare al programma Leonardo da Vinci II, l'Estonia dovrà versare al bilancio dell'Unione europea il seguente contributo finanziario (in euro):>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>2. SocrateIl contributo finanziario che l'Estonia dovrà versare al bilancio dell'Unione europea per partecipare al programma Socrate II nel 2000 sarà di 659000 EUR.Nel corso del 2000, il Consiglio di associazione stabilirà l'importo del contributo che l'Estonia dovrà versare per i prossimi anni del programma.3. L'Estonia verserà il contributo di cui sopra, attingendo in parte al bilancio nazionale estone e in parte dal programma nazionale PHARE per l'Estonia. Tramite una procedura di programmazione separata PHARE, i fondi PHARE richiesti saranno trasferiti all'Estonia mediante una convenzione finanziaria separata. Tali fondi, insieme agli importi provenienti dal bilancio nazionale estone, rappresenteranno il contributo nazionale dell'Estonia, che sarà usato dal paese per effettuare i versamenti a fronte delle annuali richieste di fondi della Commissione.4. I fondi PHARE saranno chiesti secondo il seguente prospetto:- 305000 EUR per il contributo al programma Socrate II nel 2000,- per il contributo al programma Leonardo da Vinci II, i seguenti importi annui (in euro):>SPAZIO PER TABELLA>La parte rimanente del contributo dell'Estonia proverrà dal bilancio statale ungherese.5. Il regolamento finanziario del 21 dicembre 1977 applicabile al bilancio generale delle Comunità europee(1) si applicherà, in particolare, alla gestione del contributo dell'Estonia.Le spese di viaggio e di soggiorno, sostenute dai rappresentanti e dagli esperti estoni nel quadro della loro partecipazione in qualità di osservatori ai lavori dei comitati di cui all'allegato I, punto 11, o ad altre riunioni nel quadro dell'attuazione dei programmi, sono rimborsate dalla Commissione in base e conformemente alle procedure attualmente applicabili agli esperti non governativi degli Stati membri dell'Unione europea.6. Dopo l'entrata in vigore della presente decisione e all'inizio di ogni anno successivo, la Commissione invierà all'Estonia una richiesta di fondi, che corrisponderà al suo contributo a ciascuno dei programmi contemplati dalla presente decisione.Il contributo è espresso in euro e versato su conto bancario in euro della Commissione.In risposta alla richiesta di fondi, l'Estonia verserà il proprio contributo:- entro il 1o maggio per la parte finanziata dal bilancio nazionale, purché la Commissione invii la richiesta di fondi prima del 1o aprile, altrimenti il versamento verrà effettuato al più tardi un mese dopo l'invio della richiesta di fondi,- entro il 1o maggio per la parte finanziata dai fondi PHARE, purché gli importi corrispondenti siano stati inviati all'Estonia entro tale data, altrimenti il versamento avverrà entro e non oltre 30 giorni dalla data in cui tali fondi sono stati inviati all'Estonia.Qualsiasi ritardo nel pagamento del contributo darà luogo ad un pagamento, da parte dell'Estonia, di interessi sull'importo restante alla data di scadenza. Il tasso di interesse è pari al tasso applicato alla data della scadenza dalla Banca centrale europea per le sue operazioni in euro, maggiorato di 1,5 punti percentuali.(1) GU L 356 del 31.12.1977, pag. 1. Regolamento finanziario modificato dal ultimo dal regolamento (CE, CECA, Euratom) n. 2673/1999 (GU L 326 del 18.12.1999, pag. 1).


text:
 10.8.2015
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 262/39
 A Közszolgálati Törvényszék (második tanács) 2015. június 30-i ítélet – Z kontra Bíróság
 (F-64/13. sz. ügy) (1)
 ((Közszolgálat - Tisztviselők - Értékelő jelentés - Az értékelő jelentés késedelmes elkészítése - Megsemmisítés iránti kereset - Kártérítési kereset))
 (2015/C 262/52)
 Az eljárás nyelve: francia
 Felek
 Felperes: Z (képviselő: F. Rollinger ügyvéd)
 Alperes: az Európai Unió Bírósága (képviselő: A. V. Placco meghatalmazott)
 Az ügy tárgya
 A felperes 2008. január 1-je és december 31. közötti időszakra vonatkozó értékelő jelentésének megsemmisítése, valamint az alperes nem vagyoni kártérítés fizetésére való kötelezése iránti kérelem.
 Az ítélet rendelkező része
 1)
 A Közszolgálati Törvényszék a keresetet elutasítja.
 2)
 Z maga viseli sajt költségeit, valamint köteles viselni az Európai Unió Bírósága részéről felmerült költségeket.
 (1) HL C 274., 2013.9.21., 30. o.