jurisdiction: US

text:
 109 HR 3190 IH: Vietnam Human Rights Act of 2005
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2005-06-30
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I
 109th CONGRESS 1st Session
 H. R. 3190
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 June 30, 2005
 Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Royce, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Payne, Mr. Pence, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Crowley, and Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations
 A BILL
 To promote freedom and democracy in Vietnam.
 1.Short title; table of contents
 (a)Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Vietnam Human Rights Act of 2005.
 (b)Table of contentsThe table of contents for this Act is as follows:
 Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents
 Sec. 2. Findings
 Sec. 3. Purpose
 Title I—Prohibition on nonhumanitarian assistance to the Government of Vietnam
 Sec. 101. Bilateral nonhumanitarian assistance
 Title II—Assistance to support democracy in Vietnam
 Sec. 201. Assistance
 Title III—United States public diplomacy
 Sec. 301. Radio Free Asia transmissions to Vietnam
 Sec. 302. United States educational and cultural exchange programs with Vietnam
 Title IV—United States refugee policy
 Sec. 401. Refugee resettlement for nationals of Vietnam
 Title V—Annual report on progress toward freedom and democracy in Vietnam
 Sec. 501. Annual report
 2.FindingsCongress finds the following:
 (1)The relationship between the United States and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam has grown substantially over the past 10 years, with annual trade between the two countries reaching over $6 billion per year.
 (2)The Government of Vietnam’s transition toward greater economic freedom and trade has not been matched by greater political freedom and substantial improvements in human rights.
 (3)Vietnam remains a one party state, ruled and controlled by the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV), which continues to deny the right of citizens to change their government.
 (4)Although in recent years the National Assembly of Vietnam has played an increasingly active role as a forum for highlighting local concerns, corruption, and inefficiency, the National Assembly remains subject to the direction of the Communist Party of Vietnam and the CPV maintains control over the selection of candidates in national and local elections.
 (5)The Government of Vietnam forbids public challenge to the legitimacy of the one party state, restricts freedoms of opinion, the press, and association and tightly limits access to the Internet and telecommunication.
 (6)The Government of Vietnam continues to detain and imprison persons for the peaceful expression of dissenting religious and political views, including Pham Hong Son, Nguyen Vu Binh, Nguyen Khac Toan, Brother Nguyen Thien Phung, Reverend Than Van Truong and Pastor Nguyen Hong Quang, among others.
 (7)While the Government of Vietnam recently released a handful of political and religious prisoners, including Dr. Nguyen Dan Que, Professor Nguyen Dinh Huy, Father Nguyen Van Ly, and Venerable Thich Thien Minh, these individuals remain under close surveillance by the Government of Vietnam, which has included house detention or police surveillance.
 (8)
 (A)The Government of Vietnam limits freedom of religion and restricts the operation of religious organizations, allowing only religious organizations officially approved by the Government of Vietnam, but often restricting their selection and training of religious leaders as well as their activities.
 (B)On September 15, 2004, Vietnam was declared a Country of Particular Concern by the Department of State for its severe violations of religious freedom, and despite an agreement concluded with the Department of State in May 2005 committing to greater religious freedom, the Government of Vietnam continues to commit serious human rights abuses in this area.
 (C)Unregistered ethnic minority Protestant congregations in the Northwest and Central Highlands of Vietnam suffer severe abuses because of actions by the Government of Vietnam, which have included forced renunciations of faith, the closure and destruction of churches, the arrest and harassment of pastors, and the withholding of social programs provided for the general population, and in a few cases credible reports indicate that minority religious leaders have been beaten and even killed.
 (D)The Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV) suffers severe persecution as the Government of Vietnam confiscated its temples and persecuted its clergy for refusing to join the state-sponsored Buddhist organizations and continually has detained and confined senior UBCV clergy, including the Most Venerable Thich Huyen Quang, the Most Venerable Thich Quang Do, the Venerable Thich Tue Sy, and others.
 (E)The Catholic Church continues to face significant restrictions on the training and ordination of priests and bishops, resulting in numbers insufficient to support the growing Catholic population in Vietnam and officials of the Government of Vietnam continue to limit the Catholic Church’s conduct of religious education classes and charitable activities.
 (F)The Government of Vietnam continues to suppress the activities of other religious adherents, including Cao Dai, Baha’i, and Hoa Hao who lack official recognition or have chosen not to affiliate with the state-sanctioned groups, including through the use of detention and imprisonment.
 (9)The Government of Vietnam controls all print and electronic media, including access to the Internet, jams the signals of some foreign radio stations, including Radio Free Asia, and has detained, convicted, and imprisoned individuals who have posted or sent democracy-related materials via the Internet.
 (10)
 (A)Indigenous Montagnards in the Central Highlands of Vietnam continue to face particularly severe persecution, with numerous cases of arbitrary arrests and detentions and reports that many Montagnards have gone into hiding, fearing arrest, interrogation, or physical abuse by Government authorities.
 (B)During Easter weekend in April 2004, thousands of Montagnards gathered to protest their treatment by the Government of Vietnam, including the confiscation of tribal lands and ongoing restrictions on religious activities, and credible reports indicate that the protests were met with a violent response as many demonstrators were arrested, injured, or are in hiding, and that others were killed.
 (C)Hundreds of Montagnards continue to flee to neighboring countries, over 700 Montagnards reside in different refugee camps operated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Cambodia, and numerous Montagnards have been involuntarily repatriated to Vietnam by the Government of Cambodia, in violation of international law.
 (11)Ethnic minority Hmong in the Northwest Highlands of Vietnam also suffer persecution by the Government of Vietnam, but as with the Central Highlands region, access to the Northwest Highlands by diplomats, nongovernmental organizations, journalists, and other foreigners is severely restricted, making it difficult to verify conditions.
 (12)
 (A)People arrested in Vietnam because of their political or religious affiliations and activities often are not accorded due legal process as they lack full access to lawyers of their choice, experience closed trials, have often been detained for years without trial, and have been subjected to the use of torture to admit to crimes they did not commit or to falsely denounce their own leaders.
 (B)Members of the Mennonite Church such as Pham Ngoc Thach, Nguyen Van Phuong, Nguyen Thanh Nhan, and Nguyen Huu Nghia were repeatedly tortured prior to their sentencing and authorities have also reportedly increasingly resorted to psychiatric torture against religious prisoners such as Ms. Le Thi Hong Lien and Pastor Than Van Truong.
 (13)
 (A)United States refugee resettlement programs, including the Orderly Departure Program (ODP), the Resettlement Opportunities for Returning Vietnamese (ROVR) program, general resettlement of boat people from refugee camps throughout Southeast Asia, the Amerasian Homecoming Act of 1988, and the Priority One Refugee resettlement category have helped rescue Vietnamese nationals who have suffered persecution on account of their associations with the United States as well as Vietnamese nationals who have been persecuted because of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.
 (B)While previous programs have served their purposes well, a significant number of eligible refugees from Vietnam were unfairly denied or excluded, including Amerasians, in some cases by vindictive or corrupt Vietnamese officials who controlled access to the programs, and in others by United States personnel who imposed unduly restrictive interpretations of program criteria. In addition, the Government of Vietnam has denied passports to persons that the United States has found eligible for refugee admission.
 (C)The Department of State has agreed to extend the September 30, 1994, registration deadline for former United States employees, re education survivors, and surviving spouses of those who did not survive re-education camps to sign up for United States refugee programs, as well as to resume the Vietnamese In Country Priority One Program in Vietnam to provide protection to victims of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group who otherwise have no access to the Orderly Departure Program.
 (D)The former United States Immigration and Naturalization Service agreed to resume the processing of former United States employees under the U11 program, which had been unilaterally suspended by the United States Government, as well as to review the applications of Amerasians, children of American servicemen left behind in Vietnam after the war ended in April 1975, for resettlement to the United States under the Amerasian Homecoming Act of 1988.
 (14)Congress has passed numerous resolutions condemning human rights abuses in Vietnam, indicating that although there has been an expansion of relations with the Government of Vietnam, it should not be construed as approval of the ongoing and serious violations of fundamental human rights in Vietnam.
 (15)Enhancement of relations between the United States and Vietnam has provided an opportunity for a human rights dialogue and could lead to future progress on human rights issues in Vietnam.
 3.PurposeThe purpose of this Act is to promote the development of freedom and democracy in Vietnam.
 IProhibition on nonhumanitarian assistance to the Government of Vietnam
 101.Bilateral nonhumanitarian assistance
 (a)Assistance
 (1)In generalExcept as provided in subsection (b), United States nonhumanitarian assistance may not be provided to the Government of Vietnam—
 (A)for fiscal year 2006 unless not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act the President determines and certifies to Congress that the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (2) have been met during the 12-month period ending on the date of the certification; and
 (B)for each subsequent fiscal year unless the President determines and certifies to Congress in the most recent annual report submitted pursuant to section 501 that the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (2) have been met during the 12-month period covered by the report.
 (2)RequirementsThe requirements of this paragraph are that—
 (A)the Government of Vietnam has made substantial progress toward releasing all political and religious prisoners from imprisonment, house arrest, and other forms of detention;
 (B)
 (i)the Government of Vietnam has made substantial progress toward respecting the right to freedom of religion, including the right to participate in religious activities and institutions without interference by or involvement of the Government; and
 (ii)has made substantial progress toward returning estates and properties confiscated from the churches;
 (C)the Government of Vietnam has made substantial progress toward allowing Vietnamese nationals free and open access to United States refugee programs;
 (D)the Government of Vietnam has made substantial progress toward respecting the human rights of members of ethnic minority groups in the Central Highlands or elsewhere in Vietnam; and
 (E)
 (i)neither any official of the Government of Vietnam nor any agency or entity wholly or partly owned by the Government of Vietnam was complicit in a severe form of trafficking in persons; or
 (ii)the Government of Vietnam took all appropriate steps to end any such complicity and hold such official, agency, or entity fully accountable for its conduct.
 (b)Exception
 (1)In generalSubsection (a) shall not apply for any fiscal year with respect to the provision of United States nonhumanitarian assistance for any program or activity for which such assistance was provided to the Government of Vietnam for fiscal year 2005 in an amount not to exceed the amount so provided for fiscal year 2005.
 (2)Continuation of assistance in the national interestNotwithstanding the failure of the Government of Vietnam to meet the requirements of subsection (a)(2), the President may waive the application of subsection (a) for any fiscal year if the President determines that the provision to the Government of Vietnam of increased United States nonhumanitarian assistance would promote the purposes of this Act or is otherwise in the national interest of the United States.
 (3)Exercise of waiver authorityThe President may exercise the authority under paragraph (2) with respect to—
 (A)all United States nonhumanitarian assistance to Vietnam; or
 (B)one or more programs, projects, or activities of such assistance.
 (c)DefinitionsIn this section:
 (1)Severe form of trafficking in personsThe term severe form of trafficking in persons means any activity described in section 103(8) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–386 (114 Stat. 1470); 22 U.S.C. 7102(8)).
 (2)United States nonhumanitarian assistanceThe term United States nonhumanitarian assistance means—
 (A)any assistance under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (including programs under title IV of chapter 2 of part I of that Act, relating to the Overseas Private Investment Corporation), other than—
 (i)disaster relief assistance, including any assistance under chapter 9 of part I of that Act;
 (ii)assistance which involves the provision of food (including monetization of food) or medicine; and
 (iii)assistance for refugees; and
 (B)sales, or financing on any terms, under the Arms Export Control Act.
 IIAssistance to support democracy in Vietnam
 201.Assistance
 (a)In generalThe President is authorized to provide assistance, through appropriate nongovernmental organizations, for the support of individuals and organizations to promote internationally recognized human rights in Vietnam.
 (b)Authorization of appropriationsThere are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out subsection (a) $2,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 and 2007.
 IIIUnited States public diplomacy
 301.Radio Free Asia transmissions to Vietnam
 (a)Policy of the United StatesIt is the policy of the United States to take such measures as are necessary to overcome the jamming of Radio Free Asia by the Government of Vietnam.
 (b)Authorization of appropriationsIn addition to such amounts as are otherwise authorized to be appropriated for the Broadcasting Board of Governors, there are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the policy under subsection (a) $9,100,000 for the fiscal year 2006 and $1,100,000 for the fiscal year 2007.
 302.United States educational and cultural exchange programs with VietnamIt is the policy of the United States that programs of educational and cultural exchange with Vietnam should actively promote progress toward freedom and democracy in Vietnam by providing opportunities to Vietnamese nationals from a wide range of occupations and perspectives to see freedom and democracy in action and, also, by ensuring that Vietnamese nationals who have already demonstrated a commitment to these values are included in such programs.
 IVUnited States refugee policy
 401.Refugee resettlement for nationals of Vietnam
 (a)Policy of the United StatesIt is the policy of the United States to offer refugee resettlement to nationals of Vietnam (including members of the Montagnard ethnic minority groups) who were eligible for the Orderly Departure Program (ODP), Resettlement Opportunities for Vietnamese Returnees (ROVR), the Amerasian Homecoming Act of 1988, or any other United States refugee program and who were deemed ineligible due to administrative error or who for reasons beyond the control of such individuals (including insufficient or contradictory information or the inability to pay bribes demanded by officials of the Government of Vietnam) were unable or failed to apply for such programs in compliance with deadlines imposed by the Department of State.
 (b)Authorized activityOf the amounts authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State for Migration and Refugee Assistance for each of the fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008, such sums as may be necessary are authorized to be made available for the protection (including resettlement in appropriate cases) of Vietnamese refugees and asylum seekers, including Montagnards in Cambodia.
 VAnnual report on progress toward freedom and democracy in Vietnam
 501.Annual report
 (a)In generalNot later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the Congress a report on the following:
 (1)
 (A)The determination and certification of the President that the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through (D) of section 101(a)(2) have been met, if applicable.
 (B)The determination of the President under section 101(b)(2), if applicable.
 (2)Efforts by the United States Government to secure transmission sites for Radio Free Asia in countries in close geographical proximity to Vietnam in accordance with section 301(a).
 (3)Efforts to ensure that programs with Vietnam promote the policy set forth in section 302 and with section 102 of the Human Rights, Refugee, and Other Foreign Policy Provisions Act of 1996 regarding participation in programs of educational and cultural exchange.
 (4)Steps taken to carry out the policy under section 401(a).
 (5)Lists of persons believed to be imprisoned, detained, or placed under house arrest, tortured, or otherwise persecuted by the Government of Vietnam due to their pursuit of the rights described in paragraph (5). In compiling such lists, the Secretary shall exercise appropriate discretion, including concerns regarding the safety and security of, and benefit to, the persons who may be included on the lists and their families. In addition, the Secretary shall include a list of such persons and their families who may qualify for protection under United States refugee programs.
 (6)A description of the development of the rule of law in Vietnam, including, but not limited to—
 (A)progress toward the development of institutions of democratic governance;
 (B)processes by which statutes, regulations, rules, and other legal acts of the Government of Vietnam are developed and become binding within Vietnam;
 (C)the extent to which statutes, regulations, rules, administrative and judicial decisions, and other legal acts of the Government of Vietnam are published and are made accessible to the public;
 (D)the extent to which administrative and judicial decisions are supported by statements of reasons that are based upon written statutes, regulations, rules and other legal acts of the Government of Vietnam;
 (E)the extent to which individuals are treated equally under the laws of Vietnam without regard to citizenship, race, religion, political opinion, or current or former associations;
 (F)the extent to which administrative and judicial decisions are independent of political pressure or governmental interference and are reviewed by entities of appellate jurisdiction; and
 (G)the extent to which laws in Vietnam are written and administered in ways that are consistent with international human rights standards, including the requirements of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
 (b)Contacts with other organizationsIn preparing the report under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, as appropriate, seek out and maintain contacts with nongovernmental organizations and human rights advocates (including Vietnamese-Americans, human rights advocates in Vietnam), including receiving reports and updates from such organizations and evaluating such reports. The Secretary shall also seek to consult with the United States Commission on Religious Freedom for appropriate sections of the report.


type: wikipedia

text:
Deák Bill Gyula (Budapest, 1948. november 8. –) Artisjus-díjas magyar blues-énekes. Gyakran „a magyar blueskirály” jelzővel illetik, de Bill Kapitánynak vagy egyszerűen csak Bill-nek is szokták szólítani. 1984-ben a Budapest Sportcsarnokban Chuck Berryvel közösen lépett fel, aki így vélekedett róla:
 Pályafutása
 Deák Gyula 1948. november 8-án született Budapesten, Kőbányán. Fiatalkorában Beatlest hallgatott, majd áttérve a Rolling Stonesra, megismerte a rockzenét. Később megismerte és megszerette a bluest is, majd egyszer elment Orszáczky Miklós és Szakcsi Lakatos Béla koncertjére, ahol bluest játszottak angol nyelvű dalokkal. A koncert akkora hatással volt rá, hogy úgy érezte, nincs keresnivalója ezen a pályán, abba is akarta hagyni, de végül nem így döntött. Így vélekedik a bluesról:
 Csak fiatalon járt énektanárokhoz, akik mind operaénekest szerettek volna kihozni Bill hangjából, ám ez neki nem tetszett, így leszokott az énektanulásról. Pályafutása során nagy hatással volt rá Jimi Hendrix, valamint Radics Béla és Orszáczky Miklós is. A kőbányai Sztár együttesben külföldi dalok éneklésével kezdte pályafutását, majd később mint dzsesszénekes a Napsugár, a Wanderers és a Loyd zenekarokban énekelt, de első komolyabb együttese a Syrius volt.
 1979 nyaráig vendégként lépett fel a Hobo Blues Banddel, később viszont állandó tagja lett a zenekarnak. Kezdetben a rock és a bluesmuzsika klasszikusait, Rolling Stones-, Doors-, Hendrix-, Cream-nótákat játszottak magyarul, Földes László „Hobo” fordításában, de Kex nóták is szerepeltek műsorukon. Először ezzel a zenekarral lépett fel nagyközönség előtt az 1980-as évek elején, s ekkor vált elismert énekessé. Filmszerepet kapott az '81-es Kopaszkutya című Szomjas György filmben, aminek zenei anyaga csak tizenkét évvel később jelenhetett meg lemezen. 1983-ban még szélesebb ismertségre tett szert Torda táltosának szerepében a Szörényi Levente–Bródy János rockoperában, az István, a királyban, melyben nagyszerű alakítása és hangja lenyűgözte a közönséget. Később az Itt élned, halnod kell, a János vitéz és a Jézus Krisztus szupersztár című musicalekben szerepelt. A Hobo Blues Band számos művelődési házban és fesztiválon fellépett, ahol hatalmas sikereket arattak, melyhez nagyban hozzájárult Bill szereplése, s egy év alatt hihetetlen népszerűségre tett szert az együttes: a Beatrice, a P. Mobil és az Bizottság mellett felléptek a legendás Fekete Bárányok koncerten, amely az akkori rendszert elutasító, szabadságkereső fiatalok számára páratlanul népszerűnek bizonyult. A MOM Művelődési Központban működő klubjuk, az Ifjúsági Park-béli koncertek, valamint a vidéki fellépések során tízezrek kedvencévé vált. 1979 nyarán, amikor a HBB a svájci Krokus és az Omega előzenekaraként a Kisstadionban adott koncertet, a zenekar végleg befutott. Ennek ellenére az akkori hanglemezgyártó vállalat képviselői egyelőre nem akartak tudomást venni a sikereikről. A hatalmas nyomásnak engedve csak 1980-ban jelent meg az első kislemez, később már az első nagylemezt is kiadták, Középeurópai Hobo Blues címmel. Többször is kiérdemelték a különböző közönségszavazásokon az év együttese, az év előadója, az év egyénisége, az év hangszeres előadója címeket. 1985-ben Bill kilépett az együttesből.
 Szólópálya
 1983-ban kezdte el szólópályáját, Rossz vér címmel megjelentette első szólólemezét, majd 1986-ban a Mindhalálig blues című albummal jelentkezett, s megalapította a Bill és a Box Company-t Bencsik Sándorral (a P. Mobil és a P. Box egykori tagjával). Egy évvel később, 1987-ben a Deák Bill Blues Band frontembere lett, amivel Dániában és az egykori Nyugat-Németországban is fellépett, s az 1990-es évektől kezdve vidéken és Budapesten is nagy sikerrel koncertezik ezzel az együttesével. Az 1993-as Bűnön, börtönön, bánaton túl című lemeze megjelenése után hat évig nem készített új lemezt, habár zenekarával rendszeresen koncertezett. Végül 1999-ben megjelentette a Bort, bluest, békességet albumát, majd rá két évvel a Bill kapitány blues cirkuszát, amit 2001-ben újra kiadtak CD-n és kazettán a Mindhalálig blues-zal együtt.
 2007-ben Bill kapta a Blues Patika Életmű-díjat Tátrai Tibor és Sharrie Williams mellett. Betegség miatt viszont az átadón nem tudott megjelenni az énekes.
 2008. március 7-én újabb díjban részesült Bill, mégpedig az első Pont FM Életmű-díjban, majd április 15-én, kilenc év után megjelent hatodik nagylemeze Hatvan csapás címmel. 2008. szeptember 27-én 19:30 perces kezdettel a Hobo Blues Band 30 éves évfordulóját egy jubileumi koncerttel ünnepelte meg a Papp László Budapest Sportarénában azokkal a vendégekkel, akik részt vettek a zenekar pályafutásában, így köztük Deák Bill Gyulával is. December 19-én újabb jubileumi koncerten énekelt, ezúttal a Körcsarnokban ünnepelve saját 60. születésnapját. 2009. február 11-én este a Fonogram díjkiosztó gálán Életmű-díjat kapott, amit a Millenáris Teátrumban vett át, Keresztes Ildikó köszöntésével. Bill így nyilatkozott a Bors napilapnak ezzel kapcsolatban:
 2009. március 24-én Bill kiadta első koncertalbumát 60. születésnapi jubileumi nagykoncert címen DVD-n, amin többnyire a Hatvan csapás lemez számai hallhatóak. Május 30-ára, a Pannónia Fesztivál szombati napjára újra összeállt az egykori Hobo Blues Band, Póka Egon, Tátrai Tibor, Solti János, Deák Bill Gyula és Hobo személyében.
 2009. október 28-án megjelent Bill hetedik nagylemeze A Király meséi címen és egy életmű koncerttel készül november 20-án a Papp László Budapest Sportarénában, amelyről ezt mondta augusztusban:
 2011. február 11–12-én a Hobo Blues Band a Papp László Sportarénában tartotta búcsúkoncertjét, ugyancsak Deák Bill részvételével. 2012. március 15. alkalmával a Magyar Köztársasági Érdemrend Lovagkeresztjével tüntették ki.
 2012. november 11-én infarktust kapott, ezért kórházba kellett szállítani, de szerencsére meggyógyult és azóta újra koncertezik.
 2022 márciusában – „a magyar könnyűzenei életet gazdagító előadóművészi pályája, a magyar blues ikonikus alakjaként elért sikerei, évtizedek óta töretlenül népszerű [...] művészi tevékenysége elismeréseként” – Áder János államfőtől megkapta a Magyar Érdemrend tisztikeresztje kitüntetést.
 Amputáció
 Deák Bill Gyula bal lábát nagyon sok legenda és történet övezi, mivel máig sem lehet tudni pontosan, hogy mi is történt vele. 11 évesen az amputálásra valószínűleg azért került sor, mert focizás közben megrúgták, majd megműtötték, s talán orvosi műhiba következében elzáródott a comb visszere, amitől ödémát kapott, így egy hét múlva amputálni kellett. Bill így emlékszik vissza:
 Galéria
 Diszkográfia
 Hobo Blues Band
 1980 – Középeurópai Hobo Blues
 1982 – Oly sokáig voltunk lenn
 1983 – Még élünk
 1984 – Vadászat
 1993 – Kopaszkutya
 1994 – Csintalan lányok, rossz fiúk
 Szólóalbumok
 1984 – Rossz vér
 1986 – Mindhalálig blues
 1993 – Bűnön, börtönön, bánaton túl
 1999 – Bort, bluest, békességet
 2001 – Bill kapitány blues cirkusza
 2008 – Hatvan csapás
 2009 – A Király meséi
 Koncertalbumok
 2009 – 60. születésnapi jubileumi nagykoncert
 Egyéb, saját szerzemény
 Hosszú fekete haj https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOLMEhOHY08/
 Aranyeső (Bangó Margit részére írta)
 1995 – A zöld, a bíbor és a fekete (két Bill és a Box Company-felvétel + közreműködés a címadó dalban)
 1998 – P. Mobil: Kutyából szalonna (a bónuszanyagban, az eredeti kiadáson két, a 2009-es kiadáson négy dalban énekel)
 2009 – P. Mobil: 4 rocktenor – Petőfi Csarnok DVD (az 1995-ös Bencsikre emlékező P. Mobil koncerten működik közre)
 2009 – P. Mobil: Örökmozgó lettem 1. 30 év Rock N Roll – Népstadion DVD (az 1999-es 30 éves jubileumi P. Mobil koncerten működik közre)
 Filmszerepek
 1981 – Kopaszkutya
 1983 – Könnyű testi sértés
 1983 – István, a király
 1998 – Atilla, Isten kardja
 Színpadi szerepek
 Díjak, kitüntetések
 1986 – Állami Ifjúsági Díj
 2007 – Blues Patika Életmű-díj
 2008 – Artisjus-díj
 2008 – Pont FM Életmű-díj
 2008 – Kőbánya díszpolgára
 2009 – Fonogram Életműdíj
 2012 – A Magyar Érdemrend lovagkeresztje
 2022 – A Magyar Érdemrend tisztikeresztje
 Jegyzetek
 További információk
 Hivatalos facebook oldal
 Dalszövegek
 Magyar énekesek
 Magyar színészek
 A Hobo Blues Band tagjai
 Kőbányaiak
 1948-ban született személyek
 Artisjus-díjasok
 Budapesten született személyek
 Élő személyek
 Bluesénekesek
 Magyar könnyűzenei előadók


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22001D0036
 Decisión del Comité Mixto del EEE n° 36/2001 de 30 de marzo de 2001 por la que se modifica el Anexo I (Cuestiones Veterinarias y Fitosanitarias) del Acuerdo EEE
 Diario Oficial n° L 158 de 14/06/2001 p. 0028 - 0029
 Decisión del Comité Mixto del EEEno 36/2001de 30 de marzo de 2001por la que se modifica el Anexo I (Cuestiones Veterinarias y Fitosanitarias) del Acuerdo EEEEL COMITÉ MIXTO DEL EEE,Visto el Acuerdo sobre el Espacio Económico Europeo, en la redacción dada al mismo por el Protocolo por el que se adapta el Acuerdo sobre el Espacio Económico Europeo, (en lo sucesivo denominado "el Acuerdo"), y, en particular, su artículo 98,Considerando lo siguiente:(1) El anexo I del Acuerdo fue modificado por la Decisión n° 189/1999 del Comité Mixto del EEE, de 17 de diciembre de 1999(1).(2) Deberá incorporarse al Acuerdo la Decisión 1999/312/CE del Consejo, de 29 de abril de 1999, por la que se modifica la Decisión 93/383/CEE relativa a los laboratorios de referencia para el control de biotoxinas marinas(2).(3) La presente Decisión no será aplicable a Liechtenstein.DECIDE:Artículo 1Se añadirá lo siguiente en el punto 17 (Decisión 93/383/CEE del Consejo) del apartado 6.2 del Capítulo I del anexo I del Acuerdo: ", modificada por:- 399 D 0312: Decisión 1999/312/CE del Consejo, de 29 de abril de 1999 (DO L 120 de 8.5.1999, p. 37)."Artículo 2Los textos de la Decisión 1999/312/CE del Consejo en lenguas islandesa y noruega, que se publicarán en el Suplemento EEE del Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas, serán auténticos.Artículo 3La presente Decisión entrará en vigor el 31 de marzo de 2001, siempre que se hayan transmitido al Comité Mixto del EEE(3) todas las notificaciones previstas en el apartado 1 del artículo 103 del Acuerdo.Artículo 4La presente Decisión se publicará en la Sección EEE y en el Suplemento EEE del Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas.Hecho en Bruselas, el 30 de marzo de 2001.Por el Comité Mixto del EEE,El PresidenteP. Westerlund(1) DO L 74 de 15.3.2001, p. 24.(2) DO L 120 de 8.5.1999, p. 37.(3) No se han indicado preceptos constitucionales.


text:
 10.4.2008
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 L 100/99
 AFGØRELSE TRUFFET AF DET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALG
 Nr. 147/2007
 af 26. oktober 2007
 om ændring af protokol 23 til EØS-aftalen om samarbejde mellem tilsynsmyndighederne (artikel 58)
 DET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALG HAR —
 under henvisning til aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde som ændret ved protokollen om tilpasning af aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde (i det følgende benævnt »aftalen«), særlig artikel 98, og
 ud fra følgende betragtninger:
 (1)
 Protokol 23 til aftalen blev ændret ved afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg nr. 178/2004 af 3. december 2004 (1).
 (2)
 For at give EFTA-Tilsynsmyndigheden og EFTA-staterne mulighed for at deltage i de politiske drøftelser i Det Europæiske Konkurrencenet, som indebærer udveksling af fortrolige oplysninger i henhold til artikel 81 og 82 i EF-traktaten, bør der oprettes en retlig ramme for udveksling af fortrolige oplysninger, der ikke allerede er omfattet af aftalen. Der bør derfor indsættes en ny artikel 1A i protokol 23 til aftalen —
 TRUFFET FØLGENDE AFGØRELSE:
 Artikel 1
 Følgende artikel indsættes efter artikel 1 i protokol 23 til aftalen:
 »Artikel 1A
 For at sikre, at EFTA-Tilsynsmyndigheden og Europa-Kommissionen har en ensartet fortolkning af artikel 53 og 54 i aftalen og af artikel 81 og 82 i traktaten, kan EFTA-Tilsynsmyndigheden og EFTA-staternes kompetente myndigheder også få tilladelse til at deltage i møder i det netværk af offentlige myndigheder, der er nævnt i betragtning 15 i Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003, dog kun for så vidt angår drøftelser om generelle politiske spørgsmål. EFTA-Tilsynsmyndigheden, Europa-Kommissionen og de kompetente myndigheder i EFTA-staterne og EF-medlemsstaterne skal have beføjelse til at stille alle de oplysninger til rådighed, der er nødvendige for sådanne generelle politiske drøftelser i dette netværk. Oplysninger, der er stillet til rådighed i denne sammenhæng, må ikke anvendes i håndhævelsesøjemed. Deltagelsen i dette netværk berører ikke EFTA-staternes og EFTA-Tilsynsmyndighedens deltagelsesrettigheder i medfør af EØS-aftalen.«
 Artikel 2
 Denne afgørelse træder i kraft den 27. oktober 2007, forudsat at Det Blandede EØS-udvalg har modtaget alle meddelelser i henhold til aftalens artikel 103, stk. 1 (2).
 Artikel 3
 Denne afgørelse offentliggøres i Den Europæiske Unions Tidendes EØS-afsnit og EØS-tillæg.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 26. oktober 2007.
 På Det Blandede EØS-udvalgs vegne
 Stefán Haukur JÓHANNESSON
 Formand
 (1) EUT L 133 af 26.5.2005, s. 35.
 (2) Ingen forfatningsmæssige krav angivet.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22000D1123(21)
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 96/1999 av den 16 juli 1999 om ändring av bilaga XVI (Offentlig upphandling) till EES-avtalet
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 296 , 23/11/2000 s. 0062 - 0074
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslutnr 96/1999av den 16 juli 1999om ändring av bilaga XVI (Offentlig upphandling) till EES-avtaletGEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉN HAR FATTAT DETTA BESLUTmed beaktande av Avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, justerat genom protokollet med justeringar av Avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, nedan kallat avtalet, särskilt artikel 98 i detta, ochav följande skäl:(1) Bilaga XVI till avtalet ändrades genom Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 7/94 av den 21 mars 1994(1).(2) Anpassningarna av vissa rådsdirektiv om offentlig upphandling måste beaktas i avtalet.(3) Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 97/52/EG av den 13 oktober 1997 om ändring av direktiven 92/50/EEG, 93/36/EEG och 93/37/EEG om samordning av förfarandena vid tilldelning av kontrakt vid offentlig upphandling av tjänster, varor samt bygg- och anläggningsarbeten(2) bör införlivas med avtalet.(4) Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 98/4/EG av den 16 februari 1998 om ändring av direktiv 93/38/EEG om samordning av upphandlingsförfarandet för enheter som har verksamhet inom vatten-, energi-, transport- och telekommunikationssektorerna(3) bör införlivas med avtalet.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1Bilaga XVI till avtalet, inbegripet tilläggen 1-14 till bilagan, skall ändras i enlighet med bilagan till detta beslut.Artikel 2Texterna till- de anpassningar till rådets direktiv 93/36/EEG, 93/37/EEG, 93/38/EEG, 92/13/EEG och 92/50/EEG som fastställs i kapitel XI E (Upphandling), punkterna 1, 2, 3, 4 och 5 i bilaga I till Akten om villkoren för Republiken Österrikes, Republiken Finlands och Konungariket Sveriges anslutning till de fördrag som ligger till grund för Europeiska unionen och om anpassning av fördragen,- direktiv 97/52/EG om ändring av direktiven 92/50/EEG, 93/36/EEG och 93/37/EEG, och- direktiv 98/4/EG om ändring av direktiv 93/38/EEGpå isländska och norska, som bifogas respektive språkversion av detta beslut, är giltiga.Artikel 3Detta beslut träder i kraft den 17 juli 1999 under förutsättning att alla anmälningar enligt artikel 103.1 i avtalet har gjorts till Gemensamma EES-kommittén.Artikel 4Detta beslut skall offentliggöras i EES-delen av och EES-supplementet till Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning.Utfärdat i Bryssel den 16 juli 1999.På Gemensamma EES-kommitténs vägnarN. v. LiechtensteinOrdförande(1) EGT L 160, 28.6.1994, s. 1.(2) EGT L 328, 28.11.1997, s. 1.(3) EGT L 101, 1.4.1998, s. 1.BILAGAtill Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 96/1999Bilaga XVI (Offentlig upphandling) till EES-avtalet, samt tilläggen 1-14 till den bilagan skall ändras på det sätt som anges i följande artiklar.Artikel 1Punkt 2 (rådets direktiv 93/37/EEG) skall ersättas med följande: "2. 393 L 0037: Rådets direktiv 93/37/EEG av den 14 juni 1993 om samordning av förfarandena vid tilldelning av offentliga upphandlingskontrakt för bygg- och anläggningsarbeten (EGT L 199, 9.8.1993, s. 54), ändrat genom:- 194 N: Akt om villkoren för Republiken Österrikes, Republiken Finlands och Konungariket Sveriges anslutning till de fördrag som ligger til grund för Europeiska unionen och om anpassning av fördragen (EGT C 241, 29.8.1994, s. 21, i dess lydelse enligt EGT L 1, 1.1.1995, s. 1).- 397 L 0052: Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 97/52/EG av den 13 oktober 1997 (EGT L 328, 28.11.1997, s. 1).Bestämmelserna i direktivet skall, inom ramen för detta avtal, tillämpas med följande anpassningar:a) I artikel 5 a skall orden "i överensstämmelse med Romfördraget" ersättas med orden "i överensstämmelse med EES-avtalet".b) I artikel 25 skall följande läggas till: "- i Island "Firmaskrá",- i Liechtenstein "Handelsregister, Gewerberegister",- i Norge "Foretaksregisteret"."c) Bilaga I skall kompletteras med tillägg 1 till denna bilaga.d) Beträffande Liechtenstein skall de åtgärder som är nödvändiga för att följa detta direktiv träda i kraft den 1 januari 1996. Under denna övergångsperiod skall tillämpningen av direktivet uppskjutas ömsesidigt mellan Liechtenstein och de övriga avtalsslutande parterna."Artikel 2Tillägg 1 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 1FÖRTECKNING ÖVER ORGAN OCH KATEGORIER AV ORGAN SOM LYDER UNDER OFFENTLIG RÄTTI. ISLAND:offentliga upphandlande enheter som inte är av industriell eller kommersiell natur och som omfattas av följande rättsakter: Lög um skipan opinberra framkvæmda nr. 52/1970, lög um opinber innkaup nr. 52/1997, með siðari breytingum och reglugerð nr. 302/1996.OrganRíkiskaup (Statens handelscentrum)Framkvæmdasÿslan (Statens byggentreprenader)Vegagerð ríkisins (Vägverket)Siglingastofnun (Sjöfartsmyndigheten)Íslandspóstur hf (Isländska posten AB)Innkaupastofnun Reykjavíkurborgar (Reykjaviks upphandlingscenter)KategorierSveitarfélög (kommuner)II. LIECHTENSTEIN:Die öffentlich-rechtlichen Verwaltungseinrichtungen auf Landes- und GemeindeebeneIII. NORGE:Offentlige eller offentlig kontrollerte organer eller virksomheter som ikke har en industriell eller kommersiell karakterOrgan- Norsk Rikskringkasting (Norska riksradion)- Norges Bank (Riksbanken)- Statens lånekasse for utdanning (Statens lånekassa för utbildning)- Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistiska centralbyrån)- Den norske stats Husbank (Norska statens bostadsbank)- Statens Innvandrar- og Flyktningeboliger (Statens invandrar- och flyktingbostäder)- Medisinsk Innovasjon Rikshospitalet- Norges Forskningsråd (Norska tekniska naturvetenskapliga forskningsrådet)- Statens Pensjonskasse (Statens pensionskassa)Kategorier- Statsbedrifter i h.h.t. lov av 25 juni 1965 nr. 3 om statsbedrifter (Statsföretag)- Statsbanker (Statliga banker)- Universitet og høyskoler etter lov av 16 juni 1989 nr. 77 (Universitet och högskolor)"Artikel 3Punkt 3 (rådets direktiv 93/36/EEG) skall ersättas med följande: "3. 393 L 0036: Rådets direktiv 93/36/EEG av den 14 juni 1993 om samordning av förfarandet vid offentlig upphandling av varor (EGT L 199, 9.8.1993, s. 1), ändrat genom- 194 N: Akt om villkoren för Republiken Österrikes, Republiken Finlands och Konungariket Sveriges anslutning till de fördrag som ligger till grund för Europeiska unionen och om anpassning av fördragen (EGT C 241, 29.8.1994, s. 21, ändrad genom EGT L 1, 1.1.1995, s. 1).- 397 L 0052: Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 97/52/EG av den 13 oktober 1997 (EGT L 328, 28.11.1997, s. 1).Bestämmelserna i direktivet, skall, inom ramen för detta avtal, tillämpas med följande anpassningar:a) I artikel 3 skall orden "i Romfördragets artikel 223.1 b" ersättas med orden "i artikel 123 i EES-avtalet".b) Artikel 21.2 skall kompletteras med följande: "- i Island: "hlutafélagaskrá, samvinnufélagaskrá, firmaskrá"- i Liechtenstein: "Handelsregister, Gewerberegister"- i Norge: "Foretaksregisteret"."c) Bilaga I till detta direktiv skall kompletteras med tillägg 2 till denna bilaga. Den bilaga som avses i artikel 1 b i direktivet skall kompletteras med tillägg 1 till denna bilaga.d) Beträffande Liechtenstein skall de åtgärder som är nödvändiga för att följa detta direktiv träda i kraft den 1 januari 1996. Under denna övergångsperiod skall tillämpningen av direktivet uppskjutas ömsesidigt mellan Liechtenstein och de övriga avtalsslutande parterna."Artikel 4Tillägg 2 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 2FÖRTECKNING ÖVER UPPHANDLANDE MYNDIGHETER SOM LYDER UNDER AVTALET I ENLIGHET MED AVTALETS BILAGA I(CENTRALA MYNDIGHETER)ISLANDFÖRTECKNING ÖVER UPPHANDLANDE ENHETER SOM ÄR LIKVÄRDIGA MED DEM SOM OMFATTAS AV AVTALET I ENLIGHET MED BILAGA ICentrala upphandlande enheter som inte är av industriell eller kommersiell natur och som omfattas av följande rättsakter: lög um opinber innkaup nr. 52/1987, með siðari breytingum och reglugerð nr. 302/1996.Ríkiskaup (Statens handelscentrum)Framkvæmdasÿslan (Statens byggentreprenader)Vegagerð ríkisins (Vägverket)Íslandspóstur hf (Isländska posten AB)LIECHTENSTEIN1. Regierung des Fürstentums Liechtenstein2. Liechtensteinische Post-, Telefon- und Telegrafenbetriebe (PTT)NORGE>Plats för tabell>"Artikel 5Tillägg 3 skall utgå.Artikel 6Följande skall ändras i punkt 4 (rådets direktiv 93/38/EEG):- Följande skall läggas till: ", ändrat genom- 194 N: Akt om villkoren för Republiken Österrikes, Republiken Finlands och Konungariket Sveriges anslutning till de fördrag som ligger till grund för Europeiska unionen och om anpassning av fördragen (EGT C 241, 29.8.1994, s. 21, ändrad genom EGT L 1, 1.1.1995, s. 1).- 398 L 0004: Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 98/4/EG av den 16 februari 1998 (EGT L 101, 1.4.1998, s. 1)."- Texten till anpassning e skall utgå.- Anpassning q skall ersättas med följande: "Bilagorna I-X skall kompletteras med tilläggen 3-12 till denna bilaga."- Texten till anpassning p skall utgå.- Följande anpassning skall införas efter anpassning q: "r) i artikel 1 i direktiv 98/4/EG skall ordet "gemenskapen" ersättas med orden "gemenskapen och de Efta-stater som undertecknat avtalet"."Artikel 71. Tillägg 4 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 3PRODUKTION, TRANSPORT ELLER DISTRIBUTION AV DRICKSVATTENISLANDEnheter som producerar eller distribuerar vatten i enlighet med lög nr. 81/1991, um vatnsveitur sveitarfélagaLIECHTENSTEINGruppenwasserversorgung Liechtensteiner OberlandWasserversorgung Liechtensteiner UnterlandNORGEEnheter som producerar eller distribuerar vatten i enlighet med Forskrift om drikkevann og vannforsyning (FOR 1995-01-01 Nr 68)."2. Tillägg 5 till bilaga XVI till avtalet skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 4PRODUKTION, TRANSPORT ELLER DISTRIBUTION AV ELEKTRICITETISLANDLandsvirkjun (Statens kraftbolag) enligt lög nr. 42/1983Rafmagnsveitur ríkisins (Statens elektricitetsverk) enligt orkulög nr. 58/1967Rafmagnsveita ReykjavíkurHitaveita Reykjavíkur enligt lög nr. 38/1940Hitaveita Suðurnesja enligt lög nr. 100/1974Orkubú Vestfjarða enligt lög nr. 66/1976Andra enheter som producerar, transporterar eller distribuerar elektricitet enligt orkulög nr. 58/1967LIECHTENSTEINLiechtensteinische KraftwerkeNORGEEnheter som producerar, transporterar eller distribuerar elektricitet enligt lov om bygging og drift av elektriske anlegg (LOV 1969-06-19 65), Lov om erverv av vannfall, bergverk og annen fast eiendom m.v., kap. I, jf. kap. V (LOV 1917-12-14 16, kap. I), Vassdragsreguleringsloven (LOV 1917-12-14 17) eller Energiloven (LOV 1990-06-29 50)"3. Tillägg 6 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 5TRANSPORT ELLER DISTRIBUTION AV GAS ELLER VÄRMEISLANDHitaveita Reykjavíkur enligt lög nr. 38/1940Hitaveita Suðurnesja enligt lög nr. 100/1974Andra enheter som transporterar eller distribuerar värme enligt orkulög nr. 58/1967LIECHTENSTEINLiechtensteinische GasversorgungNORGEEnheter som transporterar eller distribuerar värme enligt Lov om produksjon, omforming, overføring, omsetning og fordeling av energi m.m (LOV 1990-06-29 50) (Energiloven)"4. Tillägg 7 skall ersättas med följande:"Tillägg 6UNDERSÖKNING AV FÖREKOMSTEN AV OCH UTVINNING AV OLJA OCH GASISLAND-LIECHTENSTEIN-NORGE"Upphandlande enheter som omfattas av Lov om petroleumsvirksomhet (LOV 1996-11-29 72) och förordningar enligt den lagen eller Lov om undersøkelse etter og utvinning av petroleum i grunnen under norsk landområde (LOV 1973-05-04 21)5. Tillägg 8 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 7UNDERSÖKNING AV FÖREKOMSTEN AV OCH UTVINNING AV KOL ELLER ANDRA FASTA BRÄNSLENISLAND-LIECHTENSTEIN-NORGE-"6. Tillägg 9 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 8UPPHANDLANDE ENHETER INOM SEKTORN JÄRNVÄGSTJÄNSTERISLAND-LIECHTENSTEIN-NORGENorges Statsbaner (NSB) och enheter verksamma enligt Lov om anlegg og drift av jernbane, herunder sporvei, tunnelbane og forstadsbane m.m (LOV 1993-06-11 100) (Jernbaneloven)"7. Tillägg 10 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 9UPPHANDLANDE ENHETER INOM SEKTORN TJÄNSTER INOM JÄRNVÄGAR I STADSTRAFIK, SPÅRVAGNAR, TRÅDBUSSAR ELLER BUSSARISLANDStrætisvagnar ReykjavíkurAlmenningsvagnar bsAndra kommunala bussbolagEnheter som tillhandahåller marktransporter enligt artikel 2.1 i lög nr. 58/1987, um skipulag á fólksfutningum með langferðarbifreiðumLIECHTENSTEINLiechtensteinische Post-, Telefon- und Telegrafenbetriebe (PTT)NORGENSB BA och andra enheter som tillhandahåller marktransporter enligt Lov om anlegg og drift av jernbane, herunder sporvei, tunnelbane og forstadsbane m.m (LOV 1993-06-11 100) (Jernbaneloven)"8. Tillägg 11 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 10UPPHANDLANDE ENHETER INOM SEKTORN FLYGPLATSFACILITETERISLANDFlugmálastjórnLIECHTENSTEIN-NORGEEnheter som tillhandahåller flygplatsfaciliteter enligt Luftfartsloven (LOV 1993-06-11 101)"9. Tillägg 12 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 11UPPHANDLANDE ENHETER INOM SEKTORN YTTRE ELLER INRE HAMNAR ELLER ANDRA TERMINALFACILITETERISLANDSiglingastofnun.Andra enheter verksamma enligt Hafnalög nr. 23/1994LIECHTENSTEIN-NORGENorges Statsbaner (NSB) (Järnvägsterminaler)Enheter verksamma enligt Havneloven (LOV 1984-06-08 51)"10. Tillägg 13 skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 12DRIFT AV TELEKOMMUNIKATIONSNÄT ELLER TILLHANDAHÅLLANDE AV TELEKOMMUNIKATIONSTJÄNSTERISLANDLandssími Íslands hfLIECHTENSTEINLiechtensteinische Post-, Telefon- und Telegrafenbetriebe (PTT)NORGEEnheter verksamma enligt Lov om telekommunikasjon (LOV 1995-06-23 39)"Artikel 8Följande skall ändras i punkt 5a (rådets direktiv 92/13/EEG):- Följande skall läggas till: ", ändrat genom- 194 N: Akt om villkoren för Republiken Österrikes, Republiken Finlands och Konungariket Sveriges anslutning till de fördrag som ligger till grund för Europeiska unionen och om anpassning av fördragen (EGT C 241, 29.8.1994, s. 21, ändrad genom EGT L 1, 1.1.1995, s. 1)."- Anpassning d skall ersättas med följande: "Bilagan till direktivet skall kompletteras med tillägg 13 till denna bilaga".Artikel 9Tillägg 14 till bilaga XVI till avtalet skall ersättas med följande: "Tillägg 13NATIONELLA MYNDIGHETER TILL VILKA BEGÄRAN OM MEDLINGSFÖRFARANDE ENLIGT ARTIKEL 9 I RÅDETS DIREKTIV 92/13/EEG KAN STÄLLASISLANDFjármálaráðuneytið (Finansministeriet)LIECHTENSTEINAmt für Volkswirtschaft (Nationalekonomiministeriet)NORGENærings- og handelsdepartementet (Industri- och handelsministeriet)"Artikel 10Följande skall ändras i punkt 5b (rådets direktiv 92/50/EEG):- Följande skall läggas till: ", ändrat genom- 194 N: Akt om villkoren för Republiken Österrikes, Republiken Finlands och Konungariket Sveriges anslutning till de fördrag som ligger till grund för Europeiska unionen och om anpassning av fördragen (EGT C 241, 29.8.1994, s. 21, ändrad genom EGT L 1, 1.1.1995, s. 1).- 397 L 0052: Europaparlamentets och rådets direktiv 97/52/EG av den 13 oktober 1997 (EGT L 328, 28.11.1997, s. 1)."- Texten till anpassning b skall ersättas med följande: "Artikel 30.3 skall kompletteras med följande:- i Island: "Firmaskrá, Hlutafélagaskrá",- i Liechtenstein: "Handelsregister, Gewerberegister",- i Norge: "Foretaksregisteret"."- Följande anpassning skall införas efter anpassning c: "d) I artikel 1 i direktiv 97/52/EG skall ordet "gemenskapen" ersättas med "gemenskapen och de Efta-stater som undertecknat avtalet"."


text:
 23.7.2018
 MT
 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea
 L 185/3
 FTEHIM
 fil-forma ta' Skambju ta' Ittri bejn l-Unjoni Ewropea u New Zealand skont l-Artikolu XXIV:6 u l-Artikolu XXVIII tal-Ftehim Ġenerali dwar it-Tariffi u l-Kummerċ (GATT) 1994 fir-rigward tal-modifika ta' konċessjonijiet fl-iskeda tar-Repubblika tal-Kroazja fil-kuntest tal-adeżjoni tagħha fl-Unjoni Ewropea
 A. Ittra mill-Unjoni
 Sinjur,
 Wara n-negozjati skont l-Artikolu XXIV:6 u l-Artikolu XXVIII tal-Ftehim Ġenerali dwar it-Tariffi u l-Kummerċ (GATT) 1994 fir-rigward tal-modifika fl-Iskeda tar-Repubblika tal-Kroazja fil-kuntest tal-adeżjoni tagħha mal-Unjoni Ewropea, għandi l-unur nipproponi dan li ġej:
 L-Unjoni Ewropea għandha tinkludi fl-iskeda tagħha, għat-territorju doganali tal-UE 28, il-konċessjonijiet li jinsabu fl-iskeda tal-UE 27 bil-modifiki li ġejjin:
 żieda ta' 1 875 tunnellata fil-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi tal-UE “Laħam ta' annimali tal-ifrat, iffriżat — Ġewwieni li jittiekel ta' annimali tal-ifrat, iffriżat”, numri tariffarji 0202 u 0206.29.91, waqt li tinżamm il-kwota kontinġenti preżenti ta' 20 %. Il-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi l-ġdida għandha tkun ta' 54 875 tunnellata;
 żieda ta' 135 tunnellata (piż ta' karkassi) mal-allokazzjoni għal New Zealand skont il-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi tal-UE għal-“Laħam tan-ngħaġ jew tal-mogħoż, frisk, imkessaħ jew iffriżat”, numru tariffarju 0204, waqt li tinżamm il-kwota kontinġenti preżenti ta' 0 %. Il-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi l-ġdida allokata lil New Zealand għandha tkun ta' 228 389 tunnellata.
 L-Unjoni Ewropea u New Zealand għandhom jgħarrfu lil xulxin bit-tlestija tal-proċeduri interni tagħhom għad-dħul fis-seħħ ta' dan il-Ftehim. Dan il-Ftehim għandu jidħol fis-seħħ fi żmien 14-il jum wara d-data tal-wasla tal-aħħar notifika.
 Napprezza jekk tikkonferma li l-Gvern tiegħek jaqbel ma' dan ta' hawn fuq. Għandi l-unur nipproponilek li jekk ta' hawn fuq ikun aċċettabbli għall-Gvern tiegħek, din l-ittra u l-konferma tiegħek ikunu flimkien jikkostitwixxu Ftehim fil-forma ta' Skambju ta' Ittri bejn l-Unjoni Ewropea u New Zealand.
 Nassigurak, Sinjur, mill-ikbar stima li għandi lejk.
 Съставено в Брюксел на
 Hecho en Bruselas, el
 V Bruselu dne
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den
 Geschehen zu Brüssel am
 Brüssel,
 Έγινε στις Βρυξέλλες, στις
 Done at Brussels,
 Fait à Bruxelles, le
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu
 Fatto a Bruxelles, addì
 Briselē,
 Priimta Briuselyje
 Kelt Brüsszelben,
 Magħmul fi Brussell,
 Gedaan te Brussel,
 Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia
 Feito em Bruxelas,
 Întocmit la Bruxelles,
 V Bruseli
 V Bruslju,
 Tehty Brysselissä
 Utfärdat i Bryssel den
 За Европейския съюз
 Рог la Unión Europea
 Za Evropskou unii
 For Den Europæiske Union
 Für die Europäische Union
 Euroopa Liidu nimel
 Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση
 For the European Union
 Pour l'Union européenne
 Za Europsku uniju
 Per l'Unione europea
 Eiropas Savienības vārdā –
 Europos Sąjungos vardu
 Az Európai Unió részéről
 Għall-Unjoni Ewropea
 Voor de Europese Unie
 W imieniu Unii Europejskiej
 Pela União Europeia
 Pentru Uniunea Europeană
 Za Európsku úniu
 Za Evropsko unijo
 Euroopan unionin puolesta
 För Europeiska unionen
 B. Ittra minn New Zealand
 Sinjur,
 Għandi l-unur ngħarrfek li rċevejt l-ittra tiegħek bid-data tal-lum li tgħid hekk:
 “Wara n-negozjati skont l-Artikolu XXIV:6 u l-Artikolu XXVIII tal-Ftehim Ġenerali dwar it-Tariffi u l-Kummerċ (GATT) 1994 fir-rigward tal-modifika fl-Iskeda tar-Repubblika tal-Kroazja fil-kuntest tal-adeżjoni tagħha mal-Unjoni Ewropea, għandi l-unur nipproponi dan li ġej:
 L-Unjoni Ewropea għandha tinkludi fl-iskeda tagħha, għat-territorju doganali tal-UE 28, il-konċessjonijiet li jinsabu fl-iskeda tal-UE 27 bil-modifiki li ġejjin:
 żieda ta' 1 875 tunnellata fil-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi tal-UE “Laħam ta' annimali tal-ifrat, iffriżat - Ġewwieni li jittiekel ta' annimali tal-ifrat, iffriżat”, numri tariffarji 0202 u 0206.29.91, waqt li tinżamm il-kwota kontinġenti preżenti ta' 20 %. Il-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi l-ġdida għandha tkun ta' 54 875 tunnellata;
 żieda ta' 135 tunnellata (piż ta' karkassi) mal-allokazzjoni għal New Zealand skont il-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi tal-UE għal-“Laħam tan-ngħaġ jew tal-mogħoż, frisk, imkessaħ jew iffriżat”, numru tariffarju 0204, waqt li tinżamm il-kwota kontinġenti preżenti ta' 0 %. Il-kwota tar-rata tat-tariffi l-ġdida allokata lil New Zealand għandha tkun ta' 228 389 tunnellata.
 L-Unjoni Ewropea u New Zealand għandhom jgħarrfu lil xulxin bit-tlestija tal-proċeduri interni tagħhom għad-dħul fis-seħħ ta' dan il-Ftehim. Dan il-Ftehim għandu jidħol fis-seħħ fi żmien 14-il jum wara d-data tal-wasla tal-aħħar notifika.
 Napprezza jekk tikkonferma li l-Gvern tiegħek jaqbel ma' dan ta' hawn fuq. Għandi l-unur nipproponilek li jekk ta' hawn fuq ikun aċċettabbli għall-Gvern tiegħek, din l-ittra u l-konferma tiegħek ikunu flimkien jikkostitwixxu Ftehim fil-forma ta' Skambju ta' Ittri bejn l-Unjoni Ewropea u New Zealand.”.
 Jiena ninsab f'pożizzjoni li ninformak illi l-Gvern tiegħi jaqbel mal-kontentut tal-ittra tiegħek.
 Съставено в Брюксел на
 Hecho en Bruselas, el
 V Bruselu dne
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den
 Geschehen zu Brüssel am
 Brüssel,
 Έγινε στις Βρυξέλλες, στις
 Done at Brussels,
 Fait à Bruxelles, le
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu
 Fatto a Bruxelles, addì
 Briselē,
 Priimta Briuselyje
 Kelt Brüsszelben,
 Magħmul fi Brussell,
 Gedaan te Brussel,
 Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia
 Feito em Bruxelas,
 Întocmit la Bruxelles,
 V Bruseli
 V Bruslju,
 Tehty Brysselissä
 Utfärdat i Bryssel den
 For New Zealand
 За Нова Зеландия
 Por Nueva Zelanda
 Za Nový Zéland
 På New Zealands vegne
 Für Neuseeland
 Uus-Meremaa nimel
 Για τη Νέα Ζηλανδία
 Pour la Nouvelle-Zélande
 Za Novi Zeland
 Per la Nuova Zelanda
 Jaunzēlandes vārdā
 Naujosios Zelandijos vardu
 Új-Zéland részéről
 Għal New Zealand
 Voor Nieuw-Zeeland
 W imieniu Nowej Zelandii
 Pela Nova Zelândia
 Pentru Noua Zeelandă
 Za Nový Zéland
 Za Novo Zelandijo
 Uuden-Seelannin puolesta
 För Nya Zeeland


text:
 21.6.2012
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 L 161/33
 ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΕΙΚΤΉΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ ΤΟΥ ΕΟΧ
 αριθ. 27/2012
 της 10ης Φεβρουαρίου 2012
 για την τροποποίηση του παραρτήματος XIII (Μεταφορές) της συμφωνίας για τον ΕΟΧ
 Η ΜΕΙΚΤΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΕΟΧ,
 Έχοντας υπόψη τη συμφωνία για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο, όπως τροποποιήθηκε με το πρωτόκολλο προσαρμογής της συμφωνίας για τον Ευρωπαϊκό Οικονομικό Χώρο, εφεξής «η συμφωνία», και ιδίως το άρθρο 98,
 Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:
 (1)
 Το παράρτημα XIII της συμφωνίας όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία με την απόφαση αριθ. 165/2011 της Μεικτής Επιτροπής ΕΟΧ της 19ης Δεκεμβρίου 2011 (1).
 (2)
 Ο κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 255/2010 της Επιτροπής, της 25ης Μαρτίου 2010, για καθορισμό κοινών κανόνων διαχείρισης της ροής της εναέριας κυκλοφορίας (2) πρέπει να ενσωματωθεί στη συμφωνία,
 ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΑ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ:
 Άρθρο 1
 Μετά το σημείο 66κγη [κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 262/2009 της Επιτροπής] του παραρτήματος XIII της συμφωνίας, παρεμβάλλεται το ακόλουθο σημείο:
 «66κγθ.
 32010 R 0255: κανονισμός (ΕΕ) αριθ. 255/2010 της Επιτροπής, της 25ης Μαρτίου 2010, για καθορισμό κοινών κανόνων διαχείρισης της ροής της εναέριας κυκλοφορίας (ΕΕ L 80 της 26.3.2010, σ. 10).
 Για τους σκοπούς της παρούσας συμφωνίας, οι διατάξεις του κανονισμού προσαρμόζονται ως εξής:
 Ο παρών κανονισμός δεν εφαρμόζεται στο Λιχτενστάιν.».
 Άρθρο 2
 Τα κείμενα του κανονισμού (ΕΕ) αριθ. 255/2010 στην ισλανδική και τη νορβηγική γλώσσα, τα οποία δημοσιεύονται στο συμπλήρωμα ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, είναι αυθεντικά.
 Άρθρο 3
 Η παρούσα απόφαση αρχίζει να ισχύει στις 11 Φεβρουαρίου 2012, υπό την προϋπόθεση ότι έχουν πραγματοποιηθεί προς τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή ΕΟΧ όλες οι κοινοποιήσεις που προβλέπονται στο άρθρο 103 παράγραφος 1 της συμφωνίας (3).
 Άρθρο 4
 Η παρούσα απόφαση δημοσιεύεται στο τμήμα ΕΟΧ και στο συμπλήρωμα ΕΟΧ της Επίσημης Εφημερίδας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
 Βρυξέλλες, 10 Φεβρουαρίου 2012.
 Για τη Μεικτή Επιτροπή του ΕΟΧ
 Ο εκτελών καθήκοντα Προέδρου
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) ΕΕ L 76 της 15.3.2012, σ. 57.
 (2) ΕΕ L 80 της 26.3.2010, σ. 10.
 (3) Δεν έχουν αναφερθεί συνταγματικές απαιτήσεις.


text:
 Události
 Mongolové vpadají do Besarábie
 založení university v Lisabonu, v r. 1308 přenesena do Coimbry
 Falkenštejnovi bratři jsou po srpnových událostech odsouzeni ke ztrátě majetku a odcházejí do vyhnanství (nejdříve do Rakouska, pak do Uher a ti nejmladší nakonec do Polska)
 král Václav II. získal jako léno knížectví vratislavské
 vzpoura v severoitalské Alessandrii
 Vyhnání Židů z Anglie
 Vědy a umění
 V Itálii jsou vynalezeny brýle.
 Narození
 České země
 15. října – Anna Přemyslovna, česká královna († 3. září 1313)
 ? – František Pražský, první kronikář Karla IV. († 1353)
 Svět
 3. ledna – Konstancie Portugalská, královna Kastilie a Leónu jako manželka Ferdinanda IV. († 18. listopadu 1313)
 10. května – Jan Habsburský, syn rakouského vévody Rudolfa II. a Anežky Přemyslovny († 13. prosince 1312 nebo 1313)
 ? – Beatrix Svídnicko-Javorská, bavorská vévodkyně a římskoněmecká královna († 25. srpna 1322)
 ? – Beatrix Uherská, hraběnka z Viennois, dcera neapolského prince Karla Martela († 1354)
 ? – Paolo Veneziano, benátský gotický malíř († 1362)
 ? – Marie, paní z Meneses a Orduñi, portugalská infantka († ?)
 Pravděpodobně narození
 Rudolf Hesso Bádenský, německý šlechtic a bádenský markrabě († 17. srpna 1335)
 Úmrtí
 České země
 27. května – Božena Česká, braniborská markraběnka, dcera českého krále Václava I. (* mezi 1227 a 1230)
 24. srpna – Záviš z Falkenštejna, český šlechtic, popraven pod Hlubokou (* asi 1250)
 ? – Vítek II. z Krumlova, český šlechtic (* ?)
 Svět
 3. února – Jindřich XIII. Bavorský, bavorský vévoda a rýnský falckrabě (* 19. listopadu 1235)
 10. května – Rudolf II. Švábský, syn římského krále Rudolfa I. Habsburského (* 1270)
 8. června – Beatrice Portinariová, žena z Benátek, údajná múza Dante Alighieriho (* 1266)
 23. června – Jindřich IV. Probus, kníže vratislavský a krakovský ze slezské linie Piastovců, otráven (* 1257/1258)
 10. července – Ladislav IV. Kumán, uherský a chorvatský král (* 1262)
 29. listopadu – Eleonora Kastilská, anglická královna jako manželka Eduarda I. (* 1241)
 8. prosince – Magnus III., švédský král (* 1240)
 ? – Markéta I. Skotská, skotská královna (* 1283)
 ? – Salimbene z Parmy, italský kronikář (* 9. října 1221)
 Hlavy států
 České království – Václav II.
 Svatá říše římská – Rudolf I. Habsburský
 Papež – Mikuláš IV.
 Anglické království – Eduard I.
 Francouzské království – Filip IV. Sličný
 Polské knížectví – Jindřich IV. Probus
 Uherské království – Ladislav IV. Kumán – Ondřej III.
 Kastilské království – Sancho IV. Kastilský
 Byzantská říše – Andronikos II. Palaiologos
 Osmanská říše – Osman I.
 Externí odkazy
 13. století


text:
 11.10.2007
 DE
 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union
 L 266/21
 BESCHLUSS DES GEMEINSAMEN EWR-AUSSCHUSSES
 Nr. 58/2007
 vom 8. Juni 2007
 zur Änderung des Anhangs XX (Umweltschutz) des EWR-Abkommens
 DER GEMEINSAME EWR-AUSSCHUSS —
 gestützt auf das Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, geändert durch das Anpassungsprotokoll zum Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, im Folgenden „Abkommen“ genannt, insbesondere auf Artikel 98,
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 (1)
 Anhang XX des Abkommens wurde durch den Beschluss des Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschusses Nr. 36/2007 vom 27. April 2007 (1) geändert.
 (2)
 Die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 166/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. Januar 2006 über die Schaffung eines Europäischen Schadstofffreisetzungs- und -verbringungsregisters und zur Änderung der Richtlinien 91/689/EWG und 96/61/EG des Rates (2) ist in das Abkommen aufzunehmen —
 BESCHLIESST:
 Artikel 1
 Anhang XX des Abkommens wird wie folgt geändert:
 1.
 Nach Nummer 1g (Richtlinie 2001/42/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates) wird folgende Nummer eingefügt:
 „1h.
 32006 R 0166: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 166/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. Januar 2006 über die Schaffung eines Europäischen Schadstofffreisetzungs- und -verbringungsregisters und zur Änderung der Richtlinien 91/689/EWG und 96/61/EG des Rates (ABl. L 33 vom 4.2.2006, S. 1).“
 2.
 Unter Nummer 1f (Richtlinie 96/61/EG des Rates) wird Folgendes angefügt:
 „, geändert durch:
 —
 32006 R 0166: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 166/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. Januar 2006 (ABl. L 33 vom 4.2.2006, S. 1).“
 3.
 Unter Nummer 32a (Richtlinie 91/689/EWG des Rates) wird folgender Gedankenstrich angefügt:
 „—
 32006 R 0166: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 166/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. Januar 2006 (ABl. L 33 vom 4.2.2006, S. 1).“
 Artikel 2
 Die isländische und die norwegische Sprachfassung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 166/2006, die in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht werden, sind verbindlich.
 Artikel 3
 Dieser Beschluss tritt am 9. Juni 2007 in Kraft, sofern dem Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss alle Mitteilungen nach Artikel 103 Absatz 1 des Abkommens vorliegen (3).
 Artikel 4
 Dieser Beschluss wird im EWR-Abschnitt und in der EWR-Beilage des Amtsblatts der Europäischen Union veröffentlicht.
 Geschehen zu Brüssel am 8. Juni 2007.
 Für den Gemeinsamen EWR-Ausschuss
 Der Vorsitzende
 Alan SEATTER
 (1) ABl. L 209 vom 9.8.2007. S. 65.
 (2) ABl. L 33 vom 4.2.2006, S. 1.
 (3) Ein Bestehen verfassungsrechtlicher Anforderungen wurde nicht mitgeteilt.


text:
A szudáni pusztaityúk (Pterocles lichtensteinii) a madarak (Aves) osztályának pusztaityúk-alakúak (Pteroclidiformes) rendjébe, ezen belül a pusztaityúkfélék (Pteroclididae) családjába tartozó faj.
 Előfordulása
 Elszórt populációkban él. Marokkótól Afrikán keresztül, az Arab-félszigettől Pakisztánig honos. Bokros félsivatagos hegyoldalak lakója.
 Alfajai
 Pterocles lichtensteinii arabicus
 Pterocles lichtensteinii ingramsi
 Pterocles lichtensteinii lichtensteinii
 Pterocles lichtensteinii sukensis
 Pterocles lichtensteinii targius
 Megjelenése
 Testhossza 25 centiméter. Feje fekete-fehér csíkokkal díszített, és keskeny fekete begyörvet visel. Hosszú kihegyesedő szárnya és rövid farka van.
 Életmódja
 Magvakkal és más növényi részekkel táplálkozik. Itatóhelye nagy távolságra is lehet a fészkelő helyétől.
 Szaporodása
 A talajon lévő mélyedésbe rakja tojásait.
 Források
 További információk
 Képek az interneten a fajról
 Pusztaityúk-alakúak
 Madárfajok
 Algéria madarai
 Csád madarai
 Dzsibuti madarai
 Az Egyesült Arab Emírségek madarai
 Egyiptom madarai
 Eritrea madarai
 Etiópia madarai
 Irán madarai
 Izrael madarai
 Jemen madarai
 Jordánia madarai
 Kenya madarai
 Líbia madarai
 Mali madarai
 Mauritánia madarai
 Marokkó madarai
 Niger madarai
 Omán madarai
 Pakisztán madarai
 Szaúd-Arábia madarai
 Szomália madarai
 Szudán madarai
 Irak madarai
 Szenegál madarai
 Uganda madarai


text:
A Frutiger sans-serif betűképet Adrian Frutiger tervezte 1976-ban, hogy Frutiger Univers betűtípusát helyettesítse.
 Eredetileg a Párizs-Charles de Gaulle repülőtéren használták. Nem sokkal később nyomtatásban és marketingben is használni kezdték.
 Ez a betűkép a „Humanista” sans-serif családba tartozik. A betűkép forgalmazója, a Linotype, 1999-ben egy újabb, javított változatot adott ki, a Frutiger NEXT-et. A dőlt betűs készletet szinte teljes egészében átdolgozták.
 Frutiger NEXT
 A Frutiger NEXT betűkép a Frutiger-ből lett tervezve, annyi különbséggel, hogy a dőlt betűk szabályszerűbbek mint a Frutigerben. Ettől eltekintve, csak néhány apró részletben tér el.
 Lásd még
 Betűképek listája
 Külső hivatkozások
 Typophile Typowiki: Frutiger
 linotype.com: Frutiger betűkép-család
 linotype.com: Frutiger Next betűkép-család
 Frutiger Symbols betűkép-család
 Frutiger Stones betűkép-család
 Frutiger Capitalis betűkép-család
 Frutiger Serif betűkép-család
 Betűképek


type: caselaw

text:
 677 A.2d 560 (1996)
 342 Md. 461
 Arnold H. MANER et ux.
 v.
 James STEPHENSON et ux.
 No. 113, Sept. Term 1995.
 Court of Appeals of Maryland.
 June 6, 1996.
 Sally D. Adkins (Karen S. Payne, Adkins & Allen, L.L.P., on brief), Salisbury, for petitioner.
 John B. Robins, IV (Robins, Johnson & Wade, on brief), Salisbury, for respondent.
 Jane C. Murphy, Kristin H. Woolam, Family Law Clinic, University of Baltimore School of Law, Baltimore, for University of Baltimore School of Law.
 Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.
 MURPHY, Chief Judge.
 In this case, Arnold and Barbara Maner filed a petition under Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol., 1995 Supp.) § 9-102 of the Family Law Article for visitation with their grandchildren, who live in Salisbury, Maryland with their mother and father, Kita and Jim Stephenson, in an "intact nuclear family."[1] The issue we must resolve is whether the trial court erred in denying that petition.
 *561 I
 The grandchildren, Katie and Trey Stephenson, are ages nine and six respectively. The Maners also live in Salisbury and are Katie and Trey's maternal grandparents.
 The Maners filed their petition in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County on July 14, 1994. The Stephensons agreed, in their original answer to the petition, that "it is important for the children to maintain a relationship with the grandparents, regardless of the relationship between the parties to this proceeding" and were "willing to establish a regular and reasonable visitation schedule." The Stephensons allowed the Maners to see their grandchildren once in August, twice in September, once in October, and on Christmas Eve of 1994. In an amended answer, filed eight months after the original answer, however, the Stephensons requested denial of the petition.
 On April 24, 1995, Judge Alfred T. Truitt, Jr. held an evidentiary hearing at which the Maners and Stephensons testified, in addition to Kita's sister-in-law, grandmother, and several friends and neighbors. After hearing oral arguments, Judge Truitt, in a written opinion, dated June 13, 1995, denied the Maners' petition for visitation. He first noted that Katie and Trey "have a loving and healthy relationship" with their parents; that this was undisputed; and that their parents "are active in the lives of the children and a very stable `nuclear family' exists between the [parents] and their children." Judge Truitt then discussed the history of tension in this family and the events that led to the Maners' petition.
 The evidence presented by both sides at trial establishes that the relationship between Kita Stephenson and Barbara Maner is strained. This strained relationship started when Kita was a child and continues today. The defendant's testimony revealed that she felt as if she was always dominated by her mother, Barbara, and that her brother Mark was favored over her. This favoritism extended to Mark's wife, Anne, and thus led to a strained relationship between Anne and Kita. Other evidence presented by the defendants was that Barbara Maner has been critical of both Kita and Jim Stephenson (sometimes in front of the children). Kita defined her mother as a "relationship destroyer" and was not willing to let the relationship she and her husband had with their children be harmed. The Stephensons also spoke of the stress placed upon the family prior to, during and after visits with the Maners. They testified that this stress made the children uncomfortable. The Maners themselves state that after long periods without visitation, it took a while for the children to feel comfortable around them.
 The Maners testified that Kita was difficult to deal with as a child and as an adult. Barbara Maner says that she loves her daughter except when she exhibits her jealousy.
 The cessation of visitation followed an incident which occurred in October of 1993. The Stephensons had planned a camping trip with the children but agreed to cancel the trip because Kita's grandmother, Beulah, was going to be in town and there would be a family gathering. The cancellation of the trip was at the request of Barbara Maner. Just prior to the family gathering, Barbara Maner called and said that the Stephensons shouldn't come over. The reason for this was that Anne Maner did not want Kita to be present. She was upset that the Stephensons hadn't attended the birthday party of her daughter Nancy earlier in the year. This angered the Stephensons and regular visitation of the Maners with Katie and Trey ceased.
 Judge Truitt noted that the case appeared to be one of first impression, because former grandparent visitation cases did not involve intact nuclear families. The intent of the grandparent visitation statute, the court said, was, nonetheless, to permit grandparents to petition for visitation of grandchildren in both dissolved and intact nuclear families. The issue, Judge Truitt observed, was "[w]hether it is in the best interest of the two grandchildren ... to award visitation rights to their maternal grandparents ... even though such visitation is opposed by the children's parents...."
 *562 In reviewing the law, Judge Truitt said that, to be awarded visitation rights, the grandparents did not have to prove that "exceptional circumstances [existed] ... rather, the outcome of the grandparents' petition lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, guided solely by the best interests of the grandchild." Quoting from Fairbanks v. McCarter, 330 Md. 39, 50, 622 A.2d 121 (1993), the court noted that "the trial court should also be alert to the psychological toll [the] visitation dispute itself might exact on a child in the midst of contesting adults." Addressing the factors enunciated in Fairbanks, id.,[2] the court found:
 a) the nature and stability of the children's relationship with their parents is substantial and stable;
 b) even prior to October 1993, the maternal grandparent's association with the children was at best sporadic and had no regularity;
 c) the potential benefits and detriments of granting visitation is at best speculative and is therefore a neutral factor;
 d) it appears obvious from the testimony that visitation would have a deleterious effect on the nuclear family;
 e) having heard the testimony and judged the credibility of the witnesses, we are constrained to say that the grandmother appears to be domineering and immature and the grandfather is at best docile and subdued, which indicates some emotional instability on their part;
 f) the stability of the children's living and schooling arrangements is a neutral factor since all parties live in the same community.
 In addition to these findings, Judge Truitt observed that "the grandchildren have ongoing visitation with their paternal grandparents, an indication that their denial of visitation with the Maners is not arbitrary." (emphasis added). Judge Truitt accordingly found that visitation was not in the best interest of the children.
 The Maners appealed to the Court of Special Appeals, but before that court heard the matter, we issued a Writ of Certiorari.
 II
 The Maners argue that, although the court's opinion referred to the best interests standard, it improperly deferred to the Stephensons' wishes because they are an intact nuclear family, thereby imposing a higher burden of proof on the Maners. In addition, the Maners contend that the evidence does not support the trial court's factual findings and that it should have applied a rebuttable presumption that visitation with grandparents is in the best interests of grandchildren.
 The Stephensons argue that Judge Truitt applied the best interests standard and did not require the Maners to meet a higher burden of proof. In this regard, to apply a rebuttable presumption in favor of the grandparents, as urged by the Maners, is not in accord with our cases or the plain language of the statute.
 III
 Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol., 1995 Supp.) § 9-102 of the Family Law Article, entitled "Petition by grandparents for visitation," provides:
 An equity court may:
 (1) consider a petition for reasonable visitation of a grandchild by a grandparent; and
 (2) if the court finds it to be in the best interests of the child, grant visitation rights to the grandparent.
 *563 The statute in its original form was preceded by the phrase, "At any time after the termination of a marriage by divorce, annulment, or death." See Ch. 276 of the Acts of 1981. At the time grandparent visitation rights were codified, Maryland courts already had the authority, under the common law, to award grandparents custody or visitation. See, e.g., Maddox v. Maddox, 174 Md. 470, 199 A. 507 (1938) (custody granted to paternal grandmother over mother); Piotrowski v. State, 179 Md. 377, 18 A.2d 199 (1941) (custody granted to maternal grandparents over father). Thus, in Evans v. Evans, 302 Md. 334, 342, 488 A.2d 157 (1985), we agreed with the Court of Special Appeals in Skeens v. Paterno, 60 Md.App. 48, 60, 480 A.2d 820, that the 1981 codification was "a mere restatement of the existing law." Indeed, the law was adopted for the purpose of "clarifying that a court may grant visitation rights to grandparents of a child." Ch. 276 of the Acts of 1981.
 By Ch. 252 of the Acts of 1993, the legislature amended § 9-102 by deleting the phrase "At any time after the termination of a marriage by divorce, annulment, or death." The House Floor Report pertaining to this amendment noted that courts had granted visitation rights to grandparents after termination of the parents' marriage and where no marriage was involved, but had "not recognized visitation rights of grandparents when the marriage of the parents is still intact." The bill, therefore, made "the marital status of parents irrelevant in determining visitation rights of grandparents." Floor Report, H.B. 30 (1993). The plain language of the statute, therefore, clearly reflects the legislature's intent to allow courts to grant grandparents visitation, even where the parents' marriage is intact, if it is in the best interests of the children.
 IV
 Since the 1993 amendment, we have addressed this statute twice. In Fairbanks, supra, 330 Md. at 49, 622 A.2d 121, we held that a petition for grandparent visitation under § 9-102 need not be supported by exceptional circumstances. The parents were divorced and shared joint legal custody of their two children; the father was the custodial parent and the mother enjoyed visitation rights. The maternal grandparents filed a petition for visitation, naming only the father as a defendant. The father agreed to allow the children to see the grandparents while they were with their mother, but the mother did not want to relinquish any of her time with the children to her parents. Id. at 43, 622 A.2d 121. The trial court denied the petition because it found no exceptional circumstances to support the grandparents' petition. Id. at 44, 622 A.2d 121.
 We first held that the mother was a necessary party to the suit. Id. at 45, 622 A.2d 121. We then examined the language of the statute and the legislative history and determined that grandparent visitation is "available, but not mandatory," id. at 46, 622 A.2d 121, that grandparents need not show exceptional circumstances as a precondition to their petition, id. at 47-48, 622 A.2d 121, and that grandparents' rights are "not derivative" of the parent's rights. Id. at 48, 622 A.2d 121. We concluded that "[t]he outcome of the grandparents' petition lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, guided solely by the best interests of the grandchild." Id. at 49, 622 A.2d 121.
 In Beckman v. Boggs, 337 Md. 688, 655 A.2d 901 (1995), we held that adoption of a child by her maternal grandparents does not preclude her paternal grandparents from petitioning for visitation. Following the mother's death, the maternal grandparents, the Beckmans, adopted their granddaughter and the father retained visitation rights. Id. at 694, 655 A.2d 901. The paternal grandparents, the Boggses, then sought visitation. The trial court granted their petition, holding that the Beckman's adoption did not affect the Boggses' rights and that visitation with the Boggses would be in the child's best interests. Id. at 695, 655 A.2d 901.
 We agreed that the severing of the father's rights did "not result in a corresponding loss of the Boggses' independent grandparental rights under § 9-102 to petition for visitation." Id. at 701, 655 A.2d 901. While recognizing the special role grandparents may play in a child's life, id. at 702, 655 A.2d 901, we reiterated that "all relevant factors *564 and circumstances should be considered in assessing what will best serve the child's interest." Id. at 693, 655 A.2d 901. The Fairbanks factors, we emphasized, are guidelines; "they were meant to be illustrative of what should be considered and were not intended as absolutes." Id. at 703, 655 A.2d 901. Although the trial court had not explicitly addressed each of the Fairbanks factors, we upheld its determination because it had considered all the evidence in assessing the best interests of the child.
 V
 "As we have said, determinations concerning visitation are within the sound discretion of the trial court as it is in the best position to assess the import of the particular facts of the case and to observe the demeanor and credibility of the witnesses." Beckman, supra, 337 Md. at 703, 655 A.2d 901. We must, therefore, determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the Maners' petition. Id.; Petrini v. Petrini, 336 Md. 453, 470, 648 A.2d 1016 (1994).
 By its plain language, § 9-102 does not distinguish cases in which the parents' marriage is intact from those in which the marriage is ended or never existed. In every grandparent visitation case, therefore, the trial court must examine the totality of the circumstances and determine whether granting the petition would be in the child's best interests. In this case, the trial court properly considered all the relevant facts and circumstances, applied the best interests standard, and did not abuse its discretion in denying the Maner's petition. That Judge Truitt may have believed that this case was one of first impression due to the presence of an intact nuclear family does not imply that he deferred to the parents' wishes or imposed a higher burden of proof on the Maners.
 Judge Truitt acted well within his discretion in considering the effect of visitation on the childrens' relationship with their parents. It was also permissible for him to consider the relationship between the Maners and the Stephensons, or more specifically between Kita and her mother. Daugherty v. Ritter, 646 N.E.2d 66, 68 (Ind.App. 2 Dist.1995), aff'd, 652 N.E.2d 502 (Ind.1995) ("While the [grandparent-grandchild] relationship may, in any given case, be sufficient to make grandparent visitation in the child's best interest, notwithstanding the dissension between the parent and grandparent, it may not be sufficient to overcome the effects of the discord on the child in another."). In addition, we have recognized that judicial supervision of familial relationships is disruptive to the lives of children, In re Adoption No. 10941, 335 Md. 99, 120, 642 A.2d 201 (1994); see also Brooks v. Parkerson, 265 Ga. 189, 454 S.E.2d 769, 773 (1995) ("[T]he impact of a lawsuit to enforce maintenance of the [grandparent-grandchild] bond over the parents' objection can only have a deleterious effect on the child."). We have also instructed trial courts to consider the "psychological toll" of visitation disputes on children. Fairbanks, supra, 330 Md. at 50, 622 A.2d 121.
 Finally, it bears repeating that courts may not apply a rebuttable presumption in favor of grandparent visitation. Nothing in the language of the statute or the legislative history supports such a presumption. Cf. Campbell v. Campbell, 896 P.2d 635, 643 (Utah App.1995) (holding that visitation statute similar to § 9-102 is constitutional and does not presume grandparent visitation to be in child's best interest). While we have generally recognized the great benefits to children of maintaining relationships with grandparents, Beckman, supra, 337 Md. at 702, 655 A.2d 901, we have held that § 9-102 leaves decisions regarding grandparent visitation to the sound discretion of the trial court. Fairbanks, supra, 330 Md. at 46, 622 A.2d 121. A presumption that grandparent visitation is in the best interests of the child would undermine the trial court's discretion and conflict with the unambiguous language of the statute. See also Brooks, supra, 265 Ga. 189, 454 S.E.2d 769.
 JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; WITH COSTS. *565
 NOTES
 [1] In Moore v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio, 431 U.S. 494, 500, 97 S. Ct. 1932, 1936, 52 L. Ed. 2d 531 (1977), the Court defined "nuclear family" as "essentially a couple and their dependent children."
 [2] In Fairbanks, we said that a trial court, in determining the best interests of the child, "should assess in their totality all relevant factors and circumstances pertaining to the grandchild's best interests," including, but not limited to:
 the nature and stability of the child's relationships with its parents; the nature and substantiality of the relationship between the child and the grandparent, taking into account frequency of contact, regularity of contact, and amount of time spent together; the potential benefits and detriments to the child in granting the visitation order; the effect, if any, grandparental visitation would have on the child's attachment to its nuclear family; the physical and emotional health of the adults involved; and the stability of the child's living and schooling arrangements.
 330 Md. at 50, 622 A.2d 121.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11992M/PRO/PRI/BCE
 Fördraget om Europeiska unionen - Protokoll (nr 7) om ändring av protokollet om Europeiska gemenskapernas immunitet och privilegier
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr C 191 , 29/07/1992 s. 0086
 Fördraget om Europeiska unionen - Protokoll (nr 7) om ändring av protokollet om Europeiska gemenskapernas immunitet och privilegierDE HÖGA FÖRDRAGSSLUTANDE PARTERNA SOM BEAKTAR att Europeiska centralbanken och Europeiska monetära institutet enligt artikel 40 i stadgan för Europeiska centralbankssystemet och Europeiska centralbanken och enligt artikel 21 i Europeiska monetära institutets stadga skall åtnjuta den immunitet och de privilegier på medlemsstaternas territorium som krävs för att de skall kunna fullgöra sina uppgifter HAR ENATS om följande bestämmelser som skall fogas till Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen:Enda artikelFöljande bestämmelser skall läggas till i det protokoll om Europeiska gemenskapernas immunitet och privilegier som är fogat till fördraget om upprättandet av ett gemensamt råd och en gemensam kommission för Europeiska gemenskaperna:«Artikel 23Detta protokoll skall också tillämpas på Europeiska centralbanken medlemmarna av dess beslutande organ och dess personal dock utan att det påverkar tillämpningen av bestämmelserna i protokollet om stadgan för Europeiska centralbankssystemet och Europeiska centralbanken.Europeiska centralbanken skall dessutom vara befriad från alla skatter och liknande avgifter på grund av en ökning av dess kapital och från olika formaliteter som kan vara förenade därmed i den stat där banken har sitt säte. Bankens och dess beslutande organs verksamhet enligt stadgan för Europeiska centralbankssystemet och Europeiska centralbanken skall inte påföras någon omsättningsskatt.Ovannämnda bestämmelser skall också tillämpas på Europeiska monetära institutet. Dess upplösning eller likvidation skall inte medföra någon beskattning.»


type: legislation

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 32002D0650
 Décision de la Commission du 28 juin 2002 concernant la conclusion d'un accord modifiant l'accord entre la Communauté européenne et l'Australie relatif au commerce du vin [notifiée sous le numéro C(2002) 2391] (2002/650/CE)
 Journal officiel n° L 213 du 09/08/2002 p. 0043 - 0043
 Décision de la Commissiondu 28 juin 2002concernant la conclusion d'un accord modifiant l'accord entre la Communauté européenne et l'Australie relatif au commerce du vin[notifiée sous le numéro C(2002) 2391](2002/650/CE)LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES,vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne,vu la décision 94/184/CE du Conseil du 24 janvier 1994 concernant la conclusion et la signature de l'accord entre la Communauté européenne et l'Australie relatif au commerce du vin(1), et notamment son article 3,vu l'accord entre la Communauté européenne et l'Australie relatif au commerce du vin, signé à Bruxelles et Canberra respectivement les 26 et 31 janvier 1994(2), modifié en dernier lieu par l'accord du 25 juillet 2001(3), et notamment son article 17, paragraphe 2,considérant ce qui suit:(1) La Commission a négocié, au nom de la Communauté, une modification dudit accord visant à proroger, jusqu'au 30 juin 2003, l'autorisation provisoire accordée aux vins australiens traités avec des résines d'échangeurs de cations.(2) Le comité de gestion des vins n'a pas émis d'avis dans le délai imparti par son président,DÉCIDE:Article premierL'accord modifiant l'accord entre la Communauté européenne et l'Australie relatif au commerce du vin est approuvé au nom de la Communauté.Le texte de l'accord est joint à la présente décision.Article 2La présente décision et l'accord visé à l'article 1er sont publiés au Journal officiel des Communautés européennes.Fait à Bruxelles, le 28 juin 2002.Par la CommissionFranz FischlerMembre de la Commission(1) JO L 86 du 31.3.1994, p. 1.(2) JO L 86 du 31.3.1994, p. 3.(3) JO L 208 du 1.8.2001, p. 46.