type: legislation

jurisdiction: US

text:
 115 HR 1738 IH: Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area Establishment Act
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2017-03-27
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I115th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 1738IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMarch 27, 2017Mr. Garamendi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural ResourcesA BILLTo establish the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area Establishment Act. 2.DefinitionsIn this Act:
 (1)Heritage AreaThe term Heritage Area means the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Heritage Area established by section 3(a). (2)Heritage Area management planThe term Heritage Area management plan means the plan developed and adopted by the local coordinating entity under this Act.
 (3)Local coordinating entityThe term local coordinating entity means the local coordinating entity for the Heritage Area designated by section 3(d). (4)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior.
 (5)StateThe term State means the State of California. 3.Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Heritage Area (a)EstablishmentThere is established the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Heritage Area in the State.
 (b)BoundariesThe boundaries of the Heritage Area shall be in the counties of Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, and Yolo in the State of California, as generally depicted on the map entitled Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area Proposed Boundary, numbered T27/105,030, and dated October 2012.
 (c)Availability of mapThe map described in subsection (b) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service and the Delta Protection Commission.
 (d)Local coordinating entityThe local coordinating entity for the Heritage Area shall be the Delta Protection Commission established by section 29735 of the California Public Resources Code.
 (e)Administration
 (1)AuthoritiesFor purposes of carrying out the Heritage Area management plan, the Secretary, acting through the local coordinating entity, may use amounts made available under this Act to—
 (A)make grants to the State or a political subdivision of the State, nonprofit organizations, and other persons;
 (B)enter into cooperative agreements with, or provide technical assistance to, the State or a political subdivision of the State, nonprofit organizations, and other interested parties;
 (C)hire and compensate staff, which shall include individuals with expertise in natural, cultural, and historical resources protection, and heritage programming;
 (D)obtain money or services from any source including any that are provided under any other Federal law or program;
 (E)contract for goods or services; and (F)undertake to be a catalyst for any other activity that furthers the Heritage Area and is consistent with the approved Heritage Area management plan.
 (2)DutiesThe local coordinating entity shall— (A)in accordance with subsection (f), prepare and submit a Heritage Area management plan to the Secretary;
 (B)assist units of local government, regional planning organizations, and nonprofit organizations in carrying out the approved Heritage Area management plan by—
 (i)carrying out programs and projects that recognize, protect, and enhance important resource values in the Heritage Area;
 (ii)establishing and maintaining interpretive exhibits and programs in the Heritage Area; (iii)developing recreational and educational opportunities in the Heritage Area;
 (iv)increasing public awareness of, and appreciation for, natural, historical, scenic, and cultural resources of the Heritage Area;
 (v)protecting and restoring historic sites and buildings in the Heritage Area that are consistent with Heritage Area themes;
 (vi)ensuring that clear, consistent, and appropriate signs identifying points of public access, and sites of interest are posted throughout the Heritage Area; and
 (vii)promoting a wide range of partnerships among governments, organizations, and individuals to further the Heritage Area;
 (C)consider the interests of diverse units of government, businesses, organizations, and individuals in the Heritage Area in the preparation and implementation of the Heritage Area management plan;
 (D)conduct meetings open to the public at least semiannually regarding the development and implementation of the Heritage Area management plan;
 (E)for any year that Federal funds have been received under this Act— (i)submit an annual report to the Secretary that describes the activities, expenses, and income of the local coordinating entity (including grants to any other entities during the year that the report is made);
 (ii)make available to the Secretary for audit all records relating to the expenditure of the funds and any matching funds; and
 (iii)require, with respect to all agreements authorizing expenditure of Federal funds by other organizations, that the organizations receiving the funds make available to the Secretary for audit all records concerning the expenditure of the funds; and
 (F)encourage by appropriate means economic viability that is consistent with the Heritage Area. (3)Prohibition on the Acquisition of Real PropertyThe local coordinating entity shall not use Federal funds made available under this Act to acquire real property or any interest in real property.
 (4)Cost-sharing requirementThe Federal share of the cost of any activity carried out using any assistance made available under this Act shall be 50 percent.
 (f)Heritage area management plan
 (1)In generalNot later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the local coordinating entity shall submit to the Secretary for approval a proposed Heritage Area management plan.
 (2)RequirementsThe Heritage Area management plan shall— (A)incorporate an integrated and cooperative approach to agricultural resources and activities, flood protection facilities, and other public infrastructure;
 (B)emphasize the importance of the resources described in subparagraph (A); (C)take into consideration State and local plans;
 (D)include— (i)an inventory of—
 (I)the resources located in the core area described in subsection (b); and (II)any other property in the core area that—
 (aa)is related to the themes of the Heritage Area; and (bb)should be preserved, restored, managed, or maintained because of the significance of the property;
 (ii)comprehensive policies, strategies and recommendations for conservation, funding, management, and development of the Heritage Area;
 (iii)a description of actions that governments, private organizations, and individuals have agreed to take to protect the natural, historical and cultural resources of the Heritage Area;
 (iv)a program of implementation for the Heritage Area management plan by the local coordinating entity that includes a description of—
 (I)actions to facilitate ongoing collaboration among partners to promote plans for resource protection, restoration, and construction; and
 (II)specific commitments for implementation that have been made by the local coordinating entity or any government, organization, or individual for the first 5 years of operation;
 (v)the identification of sources of funding for carrying out the Heritage Area management plan; (vi)analysis and recommendations for means by which local, State, and Federal programs, including the role of the National Park Service in the Heritage Area, may best be coordinated to carry out this Act; and
 (vii)an interpretive plan for the Heritage Area; and (E)recommend policies and strategies for resource management that consider and detail the application of appropriate land and water management techniques, including the development of intergovernmental and interagency cooperative agreements to protect the natural, historical, cultural, educational, scenic, and recreational resources of the Heritage Area.
 (3)RestrictionsThe Heritage Area management plan submitted under this subsection shall— (A)ensure participation by appropriate Federal, State, tribal, and local agencies, including the Delta Stewardship Council, special districts, natural and historical resource protection and agricultural organizations, educational institutions, businesses, recreational organizations, community residents, and private property owners; and
 (B)not be approved until the Secretary has received certification from the Delta Protection Commission that the Delta Stewardship Council has reviewed the Heritage Area management plan for consistency with the plan adopted by the Delta Stewardship Council pursuant to State law.
 (4)DeadlineIf a proposed Heritage Area management plan is not submitted to the Secretary by the date that is 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the local coordinating entity shall be ineligible to receive additional funding under this Act until the date that the Secretary receives and approves the Heritage Area management plan.
 (5)Approval or disapproval of heritage area management plan
 (A)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of receipt of the Heritage Area management plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary, in consultation with the State, shall approve or disapprove the Heritage Area management plan.
 (B)Criteria for approvalIn determining whether to approve the Heritage Area management plan, the Secretary shall consider whether—
 (i)the local coordinating entity is representative of the diverse interests of the Heritage Area, including governments, natural and historic resource protection organizations, educational institutions, businesses, and recreational organizations;
 (ii)the local coordinating entity has afforded adequate opportunity, including public hearings, for public and governmental involvement in the preparation of the Heritage Area management plan; and
 (iii)the resource protection and interpretation strategies contained in the Heritage Area management plan, if implemented, would adequately protect the natural, historical, and cultural resources of the Heritage Area.
 (C)Action following disapprovalIf the Secretary disapproves the Heritage Area management plan under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall—
 (i)advise the local coordinating entity in writing of the reasons for the disapproval; (ii)make recommendations for revisions to the Heritage Area management plan; and
 (iii)not later than 180 days after the receipt of any proposed revision of the Heritage Area management plan from the local coordinating entity, approve or disapprove the proposed revision.
 (D)Amendments
 (i)In generalThe Secretary shall approve or disapprove each amendment to the Heritage Area management plan that the Secretary determines makes a substantial change to the Heritage Area management plan.
 (ii)Use of fundsThe local coordinating entity shall not use Federal funds authorized by this Act to carry out any amendments to the Heritage Area management plan until the Secretary has approved the amendments.
 (g)Relationship to other Federal agencies
 (1)In GeneralNothing in this Act affects the authority of a Federal agency to provide technical or financial assistance under any other law.
 (2)Consultation and CoordinationThe head of any Federal agency planning to conduct activities that may have an impact on the Heritage Area is encouraged to consult and coordinate the activities with the Secretary and the local coordinating entity to the maximum extent practicable.
 (3)Other Federal AgenciesNothing in this Act— (A)modifies, alters, or amends any law or regulation authorizing a Federal agency to manage Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Federal agency;
 (B)limits the discretion of a Federal land manager to implement an approved land use plan within the boundaries of the Heritage Area; or
 (C)modifies, alters, or amends any authorized use of Federal land under the jurisdiction of a Federal agency.
 (h)Private property and regulatory protections
 (1)In generalSubject to paragraph (2), nothing in this Act— (A)abridges the rights of any property owner (whether public or private), including the right to refrain from participating in any plan, project, program, or activity conducted within the Heritage Area;
 (B)requires any property owner to permit public access (including access by Federal, State, or local agencies) to the property of the property owner, or to modify public access or use of property of the property owner under any other Federal, State, or local law;
 (C)alters any duly adopted land use regulation, approved land use plan, or other regulatory authority of any Federal, State or local agency, or conveys any land use or other regulatory authority to the local coordinating entity;
 (D)authorizes or implies the reservation or appropriation of water or water rights; (E)diminishes the authority of the State to manage fish and wildlife, including the regulation of fishing and hunting within the Heritage Area; or
 (F)creates any liability, or affects any liability under any other law, of any private property owner with respect to any person injured on the private property.
 (2)Opt outAn owner of private property within the Heritage Area may opt out of participating in any plan, project, program, or activity carried out within the Heritage Area under this Act, if the property owner provides written notice to the local coordinating entity.
 (i)Evaluation; report
 (1)In generalNot later than 3 years before the date on which authority for Federal funding terminates for the Heritage Area, the Secretary shall—
 (A)conduct an evaluation of the accomplishments of the Heritage Area; and (B)prepare a report in accordance with paragraph (3).
 (2)EvaluationAn evaluation conducted under paragraph (1)(A) shall— (A)assess the progress of the local coordinating entity with respect to—
 (i)accomplishing the purposes of this Act for the Heritage Area; and (ii)achieving the goals and objectives of the approved Heritage Area management plan;
 (B)analyze the Federal, State, local, and private investments in the Heritage Area to determine the leverage and impact of the investments; and
 (C)review the management structure, partnership relationships, and funding of the Heritage Area for purposes of identifying the critical components for sustainability of the Heritage Area.
 (3)Report
 (A)In generalBased on the evaluation conducted under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall prepare a report that includes recommendations for the future role of the National Park Service, if any, with respect to the Heritage Area.
 (B)Required analysisIf the report prepared under subparagraph (A) recommends that Federal funding for the Heritage Area be reauthorized, the report shall include an analysis of—
 (i)ways in which Federal funding for the Heritage Area may be reduced or eliminated; and (ii)the appropriate time period necessary to achieve the recommended reduction or elimination.
 (C)Submission to congressOn completion of the report, the Secretary shall submit the report to— (i)the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; and
 (ii)the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. (j)Effect of designationNothing in this Act—
 (1)precludes the local coordinating entity from using Federal funds made available under other laws for the purposes for which those funds were authorized; or
 (2)affects any water rights or contracts. 4.Authorization of appropriations (a)In generalThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act $10,000,000, of which not more than $1,000,000 may be made available for any fiscal year.
 (b)Cost-Sharing requirementThe Federal share of the total cost of any activity under this Act shall be determined by the Secretary, but shall be not more than 50 percent.
 (c)Non-Federal shareThe non-Federal share of the total cost of any activity under this Act may be in the form of in-kind contributions of goods or services.
 5.Termination of authority
 (a)In generalIf a proposed Heritage Area management plan has not been submitted to the Secretary by the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Heritage Area designation shall be rescinded.
 (b)Funding authorityThe authority of the Secretary to provide assistance under this Act terminates on the date that is 15 years after the date of enactment of this Act.


type: other

text:
Zásady. I. Základní ustanovení. II. Vymezení pojmů - PDF
 Download "Zásady. I. Základní ustanovení. II. Vymezení pojmů"
 1 Zásady postupu při prodeji bytů a bytových domů v majetku Města Horažďovice Zastupitelstvo města Horažďovice schválilo svým usnesením č. 22 dne tyto Zásady postupu při prodeji bytů a bytových domů v majetku Města Horažďovice (dále jen zásady). I. Základní ustanovení Účelem zásad je stanovit podmínky pro prodej bytů a bytových domů v majetku Města Horažďovice. II. Vymezení pojmů Bytem se rozumí místnost nebo soubor místností, které jsou podle rozhodnutí stavebního úřadu určeny k bydlení. Příslušenstvím bytu se rozumí místnosti a prostory určené k užívání spolu s bytem. Společnými částmi domu se rozumí části domu, určené pro společné užívání, zejména základy, střecha, hlavní svislé a vodorovné konstrukce, vchody, schodiště, chodby, balkony přístupné ze společných prostor domu, prádelny, sušárny, kočárkárny, rozvody teplé a studené vody, kanalizace, rozvody plynu, elektřiny, vzduchotechniky, výtahy, hromosvody, společné antény a společná zařízení domu. Bytovým domem pro účely těchto zásad se rozumí dům s nájemními byty, příslušenstvím bytů a společnými částmi domu. Nájemcem bytu se rozumí fyzická osoba, která byt užívá ke dni rozhodnutí o prodeji na základě platné nájemní smlouvy. III. Předmět prodeje Zastupitelstvo města Horažďovice se usneslo provádět prodej bytů a celých bytových domů ve vlastnictví města po etapách a v rozsahu podle skutečných potřeb a zájmů města. Předmětem prodeje podle těchto zásad jsou byty (jednotky) a odpovídající podíly na společných částech domu a pozemku (stavební parcele) podle z.č. 72/1994 Sb., nebo celé bytové domy s pozemkem (stavební parcelou), s předností pro současné nájemce. Seznam domů určených k prodeji podle těchto zásad předkládá rada města ke schválení zastupitelstvu města. Seznam domů pro I. etapu prodeje je součástí těchto zásad (příl. č. 1). Tento seznam může být na návrh rady města průběžně doplňován. 1
 2 Do prodeje nebudou zahrnuty městské domy, ve kterých jsou zajišťovány sociální, zdravotní a jiné specifické služby a domy, které si Město Horažďovice podle svého uvážení ponechá pro potřebu přidělování bytů občanům a domy, kde se uvažuje se zhotovením půdních nástaveb a vestaveb do doby jejich zhotovení. IV. Postup prodeje O zahájení prodeje v jednotlivých domech, na které byl vyhlášen záměr prodeje, rozhodne rada města. 1. Prodej bytu podle z.č. 72/1994 Sb.: a) Předběžný průzkum: V domech určených k prodeji uskuteční prodávající předběžný průzkum u současných nájemců, vysvětlí jim postup prodeje podle zákona č. 72/1994 Sb. v platném znění, a těchto zásad a předá jim sdělení Města Horažďovice s informacemi o postupu prodeje, stanovení kupní ceny a platebních podmínkách. Nájemci budou zároveň vyzváni, aby ve lhůtě do 15 dnů od převzetí sdělení písemně informovali, zda mají o koupi bytu zájem. Kupující má povinnost uhradit zálohu na budoucí náklady prodávajícího s prodejem souvisejícími ve výši 5.000,- Kč. Tato záloha v případě neuzavření kupní smlouvy ze strany kupujícího připadne celá ve prospěch prodávajícího na úhradu vynaložených nákladů. b) Nabídka nájemcům: V případě, že se předběžným průzkumem zjistí, že současní nájemci mají zájem o odkoupení bytů v domě, posoudí počet zájemců v domě rada města a na základě schválení prodeje bytu, předá prodávající do 90 dnů po jeho ukončení všem nájemcům závaznou písemnou nabídku. Nabídka bude obsahovat vymezení prodávaného bytu podle 6, odst. 1 z.č. 72/1994 Sb., výši kupní ceny a platební podmínky, poučení podle 22, odst. 1 a 2 z.č. 72/1994 Sb. o předkupním právu nájemce, zásady budoucích smluvních vztahů mezi kupujícím a prodávajícím a upozornění na právo prodávajícího zrušit bez náhrady podanou nabídku. Od data převzetí nabídky počne nájemcům běžet podle ustanovení 22, odst. 1 z.č. 72/1994 Sb. zákonná lhůta 6 měsíců pro její přijetí. Tato lhůta může být ukončena dříve v případě přijetí nabídky všemi nájemci. Po uplynutí lhůty 6 měsíců má nájemce podle ustanovení 22, odst. 2 zákona č. 72/1994 Sb. ještě po dobu 1 roku právo na přednostní nabytí bytu ve smyslu 606 Občanského zákoníku, tj. jestliže přijme nabízené podmínky. Přitom je povinen uzavřít kupní smlouvu do 3 měsíců od doručení nabídky. c) Neprodané byty: Pronajaté byty, jejichž nájemci nepřijali nabídku do 6 měsíců ode dne jejího doručení mohou být po projednání v radě města nabídnuty k prodeji ve výběrovém řízení s minimální nabídkovou cenou dle znaleckého posudku se stanovením ceny v místě a čase obvyklé. d) Byty bez nájemního vztahu: Byty bez nájemního vztahu v domě, kde probíhá prodej, budou nabídnuty k prodeji ve výběrovém řízení s minimální nabídkovou cenou dle znaleckého posudku (cena v místě a čase obvyklá). 2
 3 e) Výměny bytů: Výměny bytů v době prodejního řízení v domě lze realizovat. Výměny bytů, kde jedna ze stran dohody o výměně je účastníkem probíhajícího prodejního řízení a druhá nikoliv, budou posuzovány individuálně. f) Prodej pozemku: Spolu s prodejem bytu a odpovídajícího podílu na společných částech domu, bude prodán i podíl na zastavěné části (půdorysu) příslušné stavební parcely. Pokud zastavěná část tvoří pouze část stavební parcely, bude zbytek stavební parcely řešen individuálně, se zřetelem na konkrétní místní situaci a zájmy Města Horažďovice, v návaznosti na územní plán a na základě rozhodnutí městského zastupitelstva. g) Omezení prodeje: Kupní smlouvu s nájemcem bytu vůči kterému má prodávající pohledávky za nezaplacené nájemné a služby spojené s užíváním bytu lze uzavřít až po zaplacení dluhu. Kupní smlouvu nelze uzavřít s nájemcem bytu, který jej bez vážného důvodu neužívá a proto mu byla již dříve dána výpověď z nájmu. 2. Prodej celého domu současným nájemcům: Druhou rovnocennou variantou je prodej celého domu současným nájemcům bytů a) právnické osobě, tvořené současnými nájemci družstvo, b) do podílového vlastnictví nájemců. V. Stanovení kupní ceny 1. Kupní cena bytu včetně spoluvlastnického podílu na společných částech domu, prodávaného současnému nájemci, se stanoví: a) celková podlahová plocha je pro potřeby těchto zásad stanovena jako součet podlahové plochy bytu a podlahové plochy prostorů mimo byt užívaných výhradně nájemcem bytu (balkon, lodžie, komora,.nepatří sem však sklepy a sklepní kóje) b) u místností tvořících společné příslušenství pro více bytů se zjistí jejich podíl náležející konkrétnímu bytu jako poměr podlahové plochy místností tvořících toto společné příslušenství k poměru celkové podlahové plochy bytu zjištěné dle písm. a) shora c) základní cena bytu za 1 m 2 takto zjištěné celkové podlahové plochy bytu a podílu na podlahové ploše místností tvořících společné příslušenství pro více bytů činí: u bytů I.kategorie 5 000,-Kč/m 2 u bytů II.kategorie 4 500,-Kč/m 2 u bytů III.kategorie 4 000,-Kč/m 2 přičemž kategorie bytů byly stanoveny dle původně platné vyhlášky č.176/1993 Sb. d) k takto stanovené základní ceně bytu se připočítává cena za sklepní prostory tak, že základní cena za 1 m 2 podlahové plochy bytu se násobí celkovou výměrou sklepních prostor užívaných výhradně nájemcem a koeficientem
 4 e) k takto stanovené základní ceně bytu a sklepních prostor se dále připočítává cena za opravy v domě. Tato cena se vypočte z celkových nákladů vynaložených na opravy domu a bytů za posledních 15 let před schválením prodeje bytů v orgánech města (tj. zastupitelstvem města) jako hodnota odpovídající poměru podlahové plochy prodávaného bytu k podlahové ploše všech bytů v domě snížená o amortizaci. Amortizace bude stanovena celkovou základní životností konstrukce dle zákona č. 151/1997 Sb., o oceňování majetku ve znění pozdějších změn a příslušné prováděcí vyhlášky (v době schvalování těchto zásad jde o vyhlášku č. 3/2008 Sb). 2. Byty s nájemci, kde stávající nájemce neprojeví o koupi bytu zájem, mohou být po projednání v radě města nabídnuty k prodeji ve výběrovém řízení s minimální nabídkovou cenou dle znaleckého posudku (cena v místě a čase obvyklá). 3. Byty bez nájemního vztahu v domech, kde probíhá prodej, budou prodány ve výběrovém řízení s minimální nabídkovou cenou podle znaleckého posudku (cena v místě a čase obvyklá). 4. K ceně za prodávanou jednotku se připočte cena odpovídajícího podílu na pozemku (stavební parcele) ve smyslu ustanovení 21, odst. 1 zákona č. 72/1994 Sb., která se vypočte minimálně z ceny pozemku stanovené znaleckým posudkem. 5. Kupní cena bytového domu, prodávaného nájemcům podle č. IV, bodu 2 těchto zásad, se stanoví znaleckým posudkem. K ceně domu se připočte cena pozemku (stavební parcely) podle znaleckého posudku. 6. Daň z převodu nemovitosti hradí prodávající. 7. Všechny ostatní náklady spojené s realizací prodeje (pořízení znaleckých posudků, prohlášení vlastníka, zpracování smluv, vklad do katastru a jiné) snížené o složenou zálohu hradí kupující před podpisem smlouvy. VI. Platební podmínky Dohodnutou kupní cenu uhradí kupující v plné výši zásadně před podpisem kupní smlouvy. Kupní smlouvy, týkající se jednotlivého domu, musí být podepsány současně. VII. Závěrečná ustanovení 1. Při prodeji bytů a podílu ke společným částem bytu a pozemku se zřizuje předkupní právo prodávajícího na dobu 5 let ode dne vkladu kupní smlouvy do katastru nemovitostí za stejnou kupní cenu. 2. V odůvodněných případech může rada města doporučit zastupitelstvu města pro prodej bytového domu zvláštní podmínky nad rámec těchto zásad. 3. Výběrové řízení se provede zpravidla formou předání nabídkové ceny v zalepené obálce (tzv. obálková metoda). Výsledky výběrového řízení schvaluje rada města. 4. Zastupitelstvo města si vyhrazuje právo změnit přijaté zásady. 4
 5 5. Každý prodej domu nebo bytu musí schválit zastupitelstvo města. 6. Na prodej bytu nebo domu není právní nárok. VIII. Nabytí účinnosti Tyto zásady nabývají účinnosti dnem jejich schválení zastupitelstvem města. V Horažďovicích dne Ing. Ladislav Lenský místostarosta města. Mgr. Jindřiška Jůdová starostka města 5
 6 PŘÍLOHA č. 1 k Zásadám postupu při prodeji bytů a bytových domů v majetku Města Horažďovice. I.etapa nabídky bytů k prodeji Bytový dům č.p. 781 a 782 ul. Pod Vodojemem 18 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 783 a 784 ul. Mayerova 18 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 785 a 786 ul. Mayerova 18 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 787 a 788 ul. Pod Vodojemem 18 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 789 a 790 ul. Šumavská 18 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 929 a 930 ul. Loretská 24 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 268 ul. Plzeňská 9 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 220 ul. Jiráskova 12 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 91 ul. Trhová 4 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 105 ul. Trhová 6 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 839, 840, 841 a 842 ul. Pod Vodojemem 32 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 877 a 878 ul. Palackého 24 bytových jednotek Bytový dům č.p. 933 a 934 ul. Palackého 36 bytových jednotek CELKEM: 237 bytových jednotek 6
 7 PŘÍLOHA č. 2 k Zásadám postupu při prodeji bytů a bytových domů v majetku Města Horažďovice. Stanovení kupní ceny pro jednotlivé kategorie bytů bylo provedeno postupem dle zákona č. 151/1997 Sb., ve znění zákona č. 121/2000 Sb., podle kterého je obvyklá cena zjištěna jedině analýzou trhu. Po provedení této analýzy v různých místech republiky (např. Strakonice, Klatovy, Blatná, Karlovy Vary, Břeclav, a řada dalších) a porovnání cen prodávaných bytů byla stanovena obvyklá cena pro prodej bytů v majetku Města Horažďovice s připočtením amortizované ceny technického zhodnocení provedené v posledních zhruba patnácti letech. Při odhadování obvyklé ceny bytů bylo zejména přihlíženo k počtu bytů nabízených k prodeji na trhu s byty a k zákonné povinnosti prodeje bytů ne komukoliv, ale přednostně stávajícím nájemcům. Přitom bylo nutné přihlédnout k tomu, že cena nemovitosti ( bytu ) se odvíjí od nabídky a poptávky na trhu a že v nemovitosti bytovém domě je nejvýhodnější prodat pokud možno všechny bytové jednotky, nebo alespoň jejich větší část. 7


type: wikipedia

text:
3. marraskuuta on gregoriaanisen kalenterin mukaan vuoden 307. päivä (308. päivä karkausvuonna). Vuodesta on jäljellä 58 päivää.
 Nimipäivät
 suomalainen kalenteri: Terho
 suomenruotsalainen kalenteri: Erland
 ortodoksinen kalenteri: Ossi
 saamenkielinen kalenteri: Bážá, Dearsu
 vanhemmissa kalentereissa: Eustachius, Hubertus, Malachias, Nehemias
 Tapahtumia
 1793 – Ranskalainen näytelmäkirjailija, journalisti ja feministi Olympe de Gouges mestattiin giljotiinilla.
 1838 – The Times of India, maailman laajalevikkisin englanninkielinen päivittäin ilmestyvä broadsheet-kokoinen sanomalehti, perustettiin nimellä The Bombay Times and Journal of Commerce.
 1848 – Johan Rudolf Thorbecken muotoilema ja voimakkaasti muokkaama Alankomaiden perustuslaki julkaistiin, mikä rajoitti suuresti Alankomaiden kuningashuoneen valtaa ja vahvisti parlamenttia ja ministeriöitä. Perustuslaki on edelleen käytössä.
 1868 – Ulysses S. Grant valittiin ensimmäiselle virkakaudelleen Yhdysvaltain presidentiksi.
 1896 – William McKinley valittiin Yhdysvaltain presidentiksi.
 1903 – Panama julistautui Yhdysvaltain tuella itsenäiseksi Kolumbiasta. Yhdysvaltain presidentti Theodore Roosevelt halusi Yhdysvaltain rakentavan Panaman kanavan, mitä Kolumbia vastusti.
 1908 – William Howard Taft valittiin Yhdysvaltain presidentiksi voitolla William Jennings Bryanista, joka oli demokraattien ehdokkaana kolmannen ja samalla viimeisen kerran.
 1911 – Chevrolet liittyi virallisesti autonvalmistajien joukkoon kilpaillakseen Fordin T-mallia vastaan.
 1918 – Ensimmäinen maailmansota: Itävalta-Unkari ja ympärysvallat solmivat aselevon.
 1918 – Puola julistautui itsenäiseksi Venäjästä.
 1923 – Lady Louise Mountbatten ja Ruotsin kruununprinssi Kustaa Aadolf menivät naimisiin.
 1936 – Franklin D. Roosevelt valittiin äänivyöryvoitolla Alf Landonista toiselle kaudelleen Yhdysvaltain presidentiksi.
 1942 – Toinen maailmansota: El Alameinin toinen taistelu päättyi. Erwin Rommelin johtamat saksalaiset joukot pakotettiin vetäytymään yön aikana.
 1944 – Helsingissä ammuttiin neuvostoliittolainen upseeri Ivan Belov ns. Lauttasaaren välikohtauksessa.
 1954 – Ensimmäisen Godzilla-elokuvan ensi-ilta Japanissa.
 1957 – Avaruustutkimus: Laika-koira lensi ensimmäisenä elollisena olentona kiertoradalla Sputnik 2:ssa. Avaruuskapselia ei ollut suunniteltu palaamaan Maahan, ja Laika kuoli muutaman tunnin päästä lähdöstä stressiin ja kuumuuteen.
 1964 – Virkaatekevä Yhdysvaltain presidentti Lyndon B. Johnson valittiin toiselle presidenttikaudelle voitolla republikaanien Barry Goldwaterista yli 60 prosentin ääniosuudella.
 1969 – Vietnamin sota: Yhdysvaltain presidentti Richard Nixon pyysi televisio- ja radiopuheessaan "hiljaista enemmistöä" tukemaan hänen Vietnamin sotapolitiikkaansa.
 1970 – Salvador Allende astui Chilen presidentin virkaan.
 1971 – UNIX Programmer's Manual julkaistiin.
 1973 – Avaruustutkimus: Mariner-ohjelma. Nasa laukaisi Mariner 10 -luotaimen matkaan kohti Merkurius-planeettaa, jonne se saapui ensimmäisenä luotaimena 29.3.1974.
 1978 – Dominica itsenäistyi Yhdistyneestä kuningaskunnasta.
 1986 – Iran-Contra-skandaali: libanonilainen aikakauslehti Ash-Shiraa raportoi, että Yhdysvallat oli myynyt salaa aseita Iranille turvatakseen libanonilaisen iranilaismielisen ryhmän kaappaaman seitsemän amerikkalaisen panttivangin vapauttamisen.
 1986 – Mikronesian liittovaltio itsenäistyi.
 1988 – Srilankalaiset tamili-palkkasoturit yrittivät kukistaa Malediivien hallituksen. Presidentti Maumoon Abdul Gayoomn pyynnöstä Intian asevoimat kukistivat vallankaappausyrityksen vuorokauden sisällä.
 1992 – Bill Clinton voitti istuvan presidentin, republikaani George H. W. Bushin ja itsenäisen presidenttiehdokkaan Ross Perot'n Yhdysvaltain presidentinvaaleissa.
 1994 – Red Hatin Linux-jakelupaketti 1.0 julkaistiin.
 1997 – Radio Dei perustettiin Suomen ensimmäisenä ja ainoana kristillisenä kaupallisena radiokanavana.
 2003 – Panaman itsenäistymisen satavuotisjuhla.
 2004 – John Kerry soitti Yhdysvaltain presidentti George W. Bushille myöntäen hävinneensä Yhdysvaltojen presidentinvaalit.
 Syntyneitä
 1500 – Benvenuto Cellini, italialainen taiteilija (k. 1571)
 1560 – Annibale Carracci, italialainen taidemaalari (k. 1609)
 1587 – Samuel Scheidt, saksalainen säveltäjä (k. 1654)
 1604 – Osman II, Osmanien valtakunnan sulttaani (k. 1622)
 1794 – William Cullen Bryant, yhdysvaltalainen runoilija ja toimittaja (k. 1878)
 1801 – Vincenzo Bellini, italialainen säveltäjä (k. 1835)
 1852 – Mutsuhito, Japanin keisari (k. 1912)
 1875 − Emīls Dārziņš, latvialainen säveltäjä ja musiikkikriitikko (k. 1910)
 1879 – Vilhjalmur Stefansson, kanadalainen arktisen alueen tutkimusmatkailija ja kansatieteilijä (k. 1962)
 1884 – Wladimir Gröndahl, neuvostoliittolainen kenraalieversti (k. 1940)
 1895 – Olga Nikolajevna, venäläinen suurherttuatar (Venäjän keisari Nikolai II:n vanhin tytär) (k. 1918)
 1900 – Adolf Dassler, saksalainen suutari, Adidaksen perustaja (k. 1978)
 1901 – André Malraux, ranskalainen kirjailija, seikkailija ja valtiomies (k. 1976)
 1901 – Leopold III, Belgian kuningas (k. 1983)
 1903 – Walker Evans, yhdysvaltalainen valokuvaaja (k. 1975)
 1910 – Karel Zeman, tšekkiläinen animaattori ja elokuvaohjaaja (k. 1989)
 1912 – Alfredo Stroessner, Paraguayn presidentti (k. 2006)
 1917 – Mauno Kuusisto, suomalainen laulaja (k. 2010)
 1921 – Charles Buchinsky ("Charles Bronson"), yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä (Väkivallan vihollinen) (k. 2003)
 1926 – Valdas Adamkus, Liettuan presidentti 1998–2003 ja 2004–2009
 1930 – Lois Smith, yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä
 1931 – Monica Vitti, italialainen näyttelijä
 1932 – Antonio Ciciliano, italialainen kilpapurjehtija ja olympiamitalisti (k. 2015)
 1933 – Michael Dukakis, yhdysvaltalainen poliitikko
 1933 – Amartya Sen, vuoden 1998 ns. Nobelin taloustieteen palkinnon saanut intialainen taloustieteilijä
 1933 – Jeremy Brett, englantilainen näyttelijä (k. 1995)
 1934 – John Barry, brittiläinen säveltäjä (viisinkertainen Oscar-voittaja elokuvamusiikista) (k. 2011)
 1937 – Heli Astala, suomalainen kansanedustaja
 1938 – Terrence McNally, yhdysvaltalalainen näytelmäkirjailija (k. 2020)
 1943 – Bert Jansch, skotlantilainen kitaristi ja laulaja-lauluntekijä (k. 2011)
 1945 – Gerd Müller, saksalainen jalkapalloilija (k. 2021)
 1947 – Seppo Nevala, Suojelupoliisin päällikkö 1996–2007 (k. 2008)
 1948 – Helmuth Koinigg, itävaltalainen Formula 1 -kuljettaja (k. 1974)
 1949 – Larry Holmes, yhdysvaltalainen nyrkkeilijä
 1949 – Anna Wintour, brittiläis-yhdysvaltalainen journalisti, Vogue-lehden päätoimittaja
 1950 – James Rothman, vuoden 2013 Nobelin lääketieteen palkinnon saanut yhdysvaltalainen solubiologi
 1952 – Roseanne Barr, yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä ja koomikko
 1952 – Jim Cummings, yhdysvaltalainen ääninäyttelijä
 1953 – Kate Capshaw, yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä (Steven Spielbergin puoliso) (Indiana Jones ja Tuomion temppeli)
 1957 – Dolph Lundgren, ruotsalainen näyttelijä
 1960 – Karch Kiraly, yhdysvaltalainen lentopalloilija (olympiavoittaja)
 1962 – Phil Katz, yhdysvaltalainen hakkeri, joka kehitti alkuperäisen PKZIP-tiedostopakkausohjelman
 1962 – Gabe Newell, yhdysvaltalainen tietokonepelien kehittäjä ja toimitusjohtaja
 1962 – Antti Rinne, suomalainen poliitikko, Suomen pääministeri 2019
 1963 – Ian Wright, englantilainen jalkapalloilija
 1967 – Steven Wilson, englantilainen muusikko
 1969 – Robert Miles, sveitsiläinen elektronisen musiikin säveltäjä ja DJ (k. 2017)
 1969 – Petteri Orpo, suomalainen kokoomuslainen poliitikko
 1971 – Dylan Moran, irlantilainen koomikko, käsikirjoittaja ja näyttelijä
 1972 – Ugo Ehiogu, englantilainen jalkapalloilija (k. 2017)
 1973 – Mick Thomson, yhdysvaltalainen muusikko (Slipknot)
 1974 – Ella Kanninen, suomalainen toimittaja ja juontaja
 1977 – Aria Giovanni, yhdysvaltalainen alastonmalli ja näyttelijä
 1978 – Lenni-Kalle Taipale, suomalainen jazzpianisti ja -säveltäjä
 1982 – Jevgeni Pljuštšenko, venäläinen taitoluistelija
 1982 – Pekka Rinne, suomalainen jääkiekkoilija
 1984 – Christian Bakkerud, tanskalainen moottoriurheilija (k. 2011)
 1985 – Karin Oberhofer, italialainen ampumahiihtäjä
 1987 – Gemma Ward, australialainen malli ja näyttelijä
 1987 – Colin Kaepernick, yhdysvaltalainen amerikkalaisen jalkapallon pelaaja ja aktivisti
 1992 – Joe Clarke, brittiläinen koskimeloja ja olympiavoittaja
 1995 – Kendall Jenner, yhdysvaltalainen malli ja televisioesiintyjä
 Kuolleita
 361 – Constantius II, Rooman keisari (s. 317)
 641 – Omar ibn al-Khattab, islamin toinen kalifi (s. 581)
 1793 – Olympe de Gouges, ranskalainen näytelmäkirjailija (s. 1748)
 1914 – Georg Trakl, itävaltalainen runoilija (s. 1887)
 1926 – Annie Oakley, yhdysvaltalainen tarkka-ampuja ja Villin lännen hahmo (k. 1860)
 1936 – Dezső Kosztolányi, unkarilainen kirjailija, runoilija, toimittaja ja kääntäjä. (s. 1885)
 1944 – Ivan Belov, neuvostoliittolainen kapteeni (s. 1906)
 1949 – Solomon R. Guggenheim, yhdysvaltalainen liikemies ja taiteenkeräilijä (s. 1861)
 1952 – Hanna Granfelt, suomalainen oopperalaulaja (s. 1884)
 1954 – Henri Matisse, ranskalainen taidemaalari (s. 1869)
 1957 – Wilhelm Reich, itävaltalainen psykologi (s 1897)
 1960 – Harold Spencer Jones, englantilainen tähtitieteilijä ja Astronomer Royal (s. 1890)
 1970 – Pietari II, Jugoslavian kuningas (s. 1923)
 1972 – Helle Kannila, suomalainen kirjastoneuvos (kirjastolaitoksen perustaja) (s. 1896)
 1980 – Hans Ruin, suomenruotsalainen kirjailija (s. 1891)
 1988 – Harold Brownlow Martin, australialainen lentäjä ja Kuninkaallisten ilmavoimien kenraali (s. 1918)
 1990 – Mary Martin, yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä (s. 1913)
 1993 – Léon Theremin, venäläinen keksijä (elektronimusiikki-instrumentti theremin) (s. 1896)
 1995 – Ismo Junni, suomalainen sarjamurhaaja (s. 1943)
 1996 – Jean-Bédel Bokassa, Keski-Afrikan tasavallan presidentti, diktaattori ja keisari (s. 1921)
 1998 – Robert Kahn ("Bob Kane"), yhdysvaltalainen sarjakuvapiirtäjä (Batmanin luoja) (s. 1915)
 2009 – Jyrki Kovaleff, suomalainen näyttelijä (s. 1954)
 2010 – Viktor Tšernomyrdin, venäläinen poliitikko, pääministeri 1992-1998 (s. 1938)
 2016 – Clive Derby-Lewis, murhasta tuomittu eteläafrikkalainen poliitikko (s. 1936)
 2016 – Börje Lampenius, suomalainen teatteriohjaaja, näyttelijä ja laulaja (s. 1921)
 2016 – Kay Starr, yhdysvaltalainen jazz- ja poplaulaja (s. 1922)
 2017 – Abdur Rahman Biswas, Bangladeshin presidentti 1991–1996 (s. 1926)
 2017 – Henrik Gestrin, suomalainen yritysjohtaja ja varatuomari (s. 1923)
 2018 – Sondra Locke, yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä (s. 1944)
 2021 – Kirsti Paakkanen, suomalainen toimitusjohtaja ja yrittäjäneuvos (Marimekko) (s. 1929)
 Juhlapäiviä
 Dominica: Itsenäisyyspäivä (1978).
 Japani: Bunka no hi (kulttuurin päivä vuodesta 1946, aiemmin keisarin syntymäpäivä).
 Panama: Itsenäisyyspäivä (1903).
 Mikronesian liittovaltio: Itsenäisyyspäivä (1986).
 Suomi ja Ruotsi: Pyhäinpäivä päivän osuessa lauantaille.
 Katso myös: kalenteri ~ 2. marraskuuta, 4. marraskuuta
 Marraskuu
 -11-03


text:
Agenturní zaměstnávání - BOZP a PO | GUARD7
 Kde jste: Domů » Nabídka » Lexikon BOZP » Agenturní zaměstnávání - BOZP a PO
 Výsledky vyhledávání „Agenturní zaměstnávání - BOZP a PO“
 Agentura práce dočasně přiděluje svého zaměstnance k výkonu práce k jinému zaměstnavateli na základě ujednání v pracovní smlouvě nebo dohodě o pracovní činnosti, kterým se agentura práce zaváže zajistit svému zaměstnanci dočasný výkon práce podle pracovní smlouvy nebo dohody o pracovní činnosti u uživatele a zaměstnanec se zaváže tuto práci konat podle pokynů uživatele a na základě dohody o dočasném přidělení zaměstnance agentury práce, uzavřené mezi agenturou práce a uživatelem – § 308 Zákoníku práce.
 Po dobu dočasného přidělení zaměstnance agentury práce k výkonu práce u uživatele ukládá zaměstnanci agentury práce pracovní úkoly, organizuje, řídí a kontroluje jeho práci, dává mu k tomu účelu pokyny, vytváří příznivé pracovní podmínky a zajišťuje bezpečnost a ochranu zdraví při práci uživatel. Uživatel však nesmí vůči zaměstnanci agentury práce právně jednat jménem agentury práce – § 309 Zákoníku práce.
 Dočasné přidělení končí uplynutím doby, na kterou bylo sjednáno; před uplynutím této doby končí dohodou mezi agenturou práce a dočasně přiděleným zaměstnancem, popřípadě jednostranným prohlášením uživatele nebo dočasně přiděleného zaměstnance podle podmínek sjednaných v dohodě o dočasném přidělení zaměstnance agentury práce.
 Jestliže agentura práce, která zaměstnance dočasně přidělila k výkonu práce u uživatele, uhradila zaměstnanci škodu, která mu vznikla při plnění pracovních úkolů nebo v přímé souvislosti s ním u uživatele, má právo na náhradu této škody vůči tomuto uživateli, pokud se s uživatelem nedohodne jinak.
 Agentura práce a uživatel jsou povinni zabezpečit, aby pracovní a mzdové podmínky dočasně přiděleného zaměstnance nebyly horší, než jsou nebo by byly podmínky srovnatelného zaměstnance. Pokud jsou po dobu výkonu práce pro uživatele pracovní nebo mzdové podmínky dočasně přiděleného zaměstnance horší, je agentura práce povinna na žádost dočasně přiděleného zaměstnance, popřípadě, pokud tuto skutečnost zjistí jinak, i bez žádosti, zajistit rovné zacházení; dočasně přidělený zaměstnanec má právo se domáhat u agentury práce uspokojení práv, která mu takto vznikla.
 Agentura práce nemůže téhož zaměstnance dočasně přidělit k výkonu práce u téhož uživatele na dobu delší než 12 kalendářních měsíců po sobě jdoucích. Toto omezení neplatí v případech, kdy o to agenturu práce požádá zaměstnanec agentury práce, nebo jde-li o výkon práce na dobu náhrady za zaměstnankyni uživatele, která čerpá mateřskou nebo rodičovskou dovolenou, nebo za zaměstnance uživatele, který čerpá rodičovskou dovolenou.
 Mají-li být mezi uživatelem a zaměstnancem agentury práce přijata opatření k vyšší ochraně majetku uživatele, nesmí být tato opatření pro zaměstnance agentury práce méně výhodná, než je tomu podle § 252 až 256, Zákoníku práce.
 Rozsah agenturního zaměstnávání je možné omezit jen v kolektivní smlouvě uzavřené u uživatele – § 309 Zákoníku práce.
 Zdravotní (pracovnělékařské) prohlídky agenturních zaměstnanců
 Nástupní pracovnělékařskou prohlídku u svých zaměstnanců zajišťuje před přidělením k uživateli agentura práce (jako zaměstnavatel). Uživatel by měl agentuře poskytnout všechny potřebné informace, které jsou potřebné k provedení zdravotní prohlídky a posouzení zdravotní způsobilosti k práci, kterou bude vykonávat (zařazení práce do kategorie podle Zákona č. 258/2000 Sb. o veřejném zdraví – kategorizace prací atd.)
 Ideálním by bylo, kdyby zdravotní prohlídku provedl poskytovatel pracovnělékařských služeb uživatele, který zná dobře podmínky na pracovištích uživatele.
 Periodické a mimořádné pracovnělékařské prohlídky zajišťuje agentura.
 Školení agenturních zaměstnanců
 Nástupní i periodické školení BOZP a PO agenturních zaměstnanců zajišťuje zpravidla uživatel ve stejném rozsahu jako pro své zaměstnance.
 Poskytování OOPP agenturním zaměstnancům
 OOPP poskytuje agenturním zaměstnancům uživatel, pokud není v dohodě mezi uživatelem a agenturou stanoveno jinak.
 Pracovní úrazy agenturních zaměstnanců
 V případě pracovního úrazu agenturního zaměstnance uživatel o tom uvědomí agenturu a spolupracuje při vyšetření – § 105, odst. 1 Zákoníku práce. Vyšetření, evidenci a odškodnění pracovního úrazu zajišťuje agentura.
 Písemný pokyn k přidělení agenturního zaměstnance k dočasnému výkonu práce u uživatele
 Podle § 308 Zákona č. 262/2006 Sb., Zákoníku práce musí dohoda agentury práce s uživatelem o dočasném přidělení zaměstnance agentury práce obsahovat:
 jméno, popřípadě jména, příjmení, popřípadě rodné příjmení, státní občanství, datum a místo narození a bydliště dočasně přiděleného zaměstnance,
 druh práce, kterou bude dočasně přidělený zaměstnanec vykonávat, včetně požadavků na odbornou, popřípadě zdravotní způsobilost nezbytnou pro tento druh práce,
 určení doby, po kterou bude dočasně přidělený zaměstnanec vykonávat práci u uživatele,
 den nástupu dočasně přiděleného zaměstnance k výkonu práce u uživatele,
 informace o pracovních a mzdových nebo platových podmínkách zaměstnance uživatele, který vykonává nebo by vykonával stejnou práci jako dočasně přidělený zaměstnanec, s přihlédnutím ke kvalifikaci a délce odborné praxe (dále jen “srovnatelný zaměstnanec”),
 podmínky, za nichž může být dočasné přidělení zaměstnancem nebo uživatelem ukončeno před uplynutím doby, na kterou bylo sjednáno; není však možné sjednat podmínky pro ukončení doby dočasného přidělení před uplynutím doby, na kterou bylo sjednáno pouze ve prospěch uživatele,
 h)číslo a datum vydání rozhodnutí, kterým bylo agentuře práce vydáno povolení ke zprostředkování zaměstnání.
 Dohoda agentury práce s uživatelem o dočasném přidělení zaměstnance agentury práce musí být uzavřena písemně.
 Agentura práce přiděluje zaměstnance k dočasnému výkonu práce u uživatele na základě písemného pokynu, který obsahuje zejména:
 název a sídlo uživatele,
 místo výkonu práce u uživatele,
 dobu trvání dočasného přidělení,
 určení vedoucího zaměstnance uživatele oprávněného přidělovat zaměstnanci práci a kontrolovat ji,
 podmínky jednostranného prohlášení o ukončení výkonu práce před uplynutím doby dočasného přidělení, byly-li sjednány v dohodě o dočasném přidělení zaměstnance agentury práce.


text:
» Tallinna Ringkonnakohus kinnitas üle 6 aasta kestnud AS Pere kriminaalasjas advokaadibüroo RASK seisukohta | Rask Advokaadibüroo
 01.09.2018 Birgit Aasa ja Villy Lopman 28.septembril Eesti Proviisorite Koja konverentsil
 15.08.2018 Vandeadvokaat Gea Vendel esineb 29.augustil toimuval riigihangete konverentsil
 08.08.2018 RASK ja Kaubandustööstuskoda kutsuvad välisvärbamise seminarile!
 7.novembril 2018 kinnitas Tallinna Ringkonnakohtu kriminaalkolleegium oma otsusega üle 6 aasta kestnud ja palju tähelepanu pälvinud AS Pere kriminaalasjas advokaadibüroo RASK seisukohta oma kliendi õigsuses.
 „Oleme seisukohal, et ringkonnakohus tegi õige ja põhjendatud otsuse – otsuse mis arvestab Eestis kehtiva ühinguõiguse aluspõhimõtteid. See on otsus, mis oma sõnastuses rajaneb kehtivale Riigikohtu praktikale ja rõhutab seda veel kord üle. Lihtsustatult on ju nii ringkonnakohtu otsuse kui valitseva Riigikohtu praktika sõnum äärmiselt loogiline: kontsernisisese tehinguga ei saa emaühingule kahju tekitada, kuna emaühingu varade maht tehingu tulemusena ei vähene. See on olnud ka kaitsjate keskne seisukoht alates menetluse esimestest päevadest enam kui 6 aastat tagasi,“ kommenteerib lahendit RASKi partner Ramon Rask.
 Emaühingu poolt tütarühingule vara üleandmisel muutub üle antava vara ulatuses tütarühingu osa väärtus, mistõttu emaühingu vara kogumi tervikväärtus ei muutu. Sellest tulenevalt oli ka Tallinna Ringkonnakohus seisukohal, et 2012. aastal AS Pere poolt 100%-lisele värskelt asutatud tütarühingule OÜ Pere Pagar leivatööstuse kinnistute ja kaubamärkide üleandmine AS Pere vara väärtust ei vähendanud. Võlausaldajate huve sellega ei kahjustatud, mistõttu hindas ringkonnakohus prokuratuuri poolt süüdistuses toodud etteheited alusetuks.
 ERR: Ringkonnakohus mõistis Kilgi AS-i Pere maksejõuetuse põhjustamises õigeks »
 Ärileht: Ringkonnakohus mõistis Rein Kilgi õigeks »
 Postimees: Ringkonnakohus mõistis Kilgi ASi Pere maksejõuetuse põhjustamises õigeks »
 Äripäev: Kilk ilmselt kohtu alt veel ei pääse »


text:
72.900 zł Gotowy na trochę tuningu? Witamy na pokładzie modelu Abarth 500 Custom - wersji, którą można przerobić do potęgi n-tej. Można zmienić w niej dosłownie wszystko: styl, osiągi, własności jezdne. Po prostu bajka! Abarth 500 Custom zaprojektowano do ścigania się. Dzięki zestawom tuningowym możesz zyskać mocniejszy silnik, bardziej agresywny układ kierowniczy i zawieszenia przystosowane do niemal każdych warunków. A ty na ile się odważysz?
 Naciśnij znajdujący się na desce rozdzielczej przycisk sport, a od razu poczujesz wyższy moment, lepiej reagujący pedał przyspieszenia, sztywniejszy układ kierowniczy i aktywny układ TTC (torque transfer control). Ustawienia wyścigowe niczym u profesjonalnych rajdowców.
 szerokość 1893cm, długość 3657cm, wysokość 1485cm
 1.4 TURBO T-JET o mocy 135 KM
 od 5,4 l do 8,4 l
 500 CUSTOM, 595 TURISMO,
 Katalog - ABARTH 500
 Cennik - ABARTH 500
 ABARTH 500 - odkryj więcej możliwości
 595 TURISMOMoc silnika zwiększona do 160 koni mechanicznych, kompletne i ekskluzywne wyposażenie - Abarth 595 „Turismo” łączy w sobie osiągi i elegancję. Wyszukany pod względem zestawienia kolorów (lakiery metalizowane i dwukolorowe), materiałów, tapicerki i detali: 4 różne style 17-calowych obręczy kół ze stopów lekkich, odtworzone na boku i na pokrywie tylnej historyczne aluminiowe logo 595, wykonane z Alutexu nakładki na progi drzwiowe i zespół pedałów.
 595 TURISMOCzy tak piękny samochód może jednocześnie zapewniać doskonałe osiągi? Ależ tak! 210 kilometrów na godzinę, od zera do „setki” w 7,4 sekundy, dzięki silnikowi 1.4 T-Jet o mocy 160 koni mechanicznych, generującemu moment maksymalny na poziomie 230 Nm przy 3000 obrotów. Sportowiec nie mający sobie równych w swojej klasie. Dostępny również w wersji cabrio.
 595 COMPETIZIONENowy Abarth 595 Competizione to kwintesencja osiągów, bez kompromisów: to auto ściganie się ma we krwi. Miłośnicy tuningu, amatorzy najbardziej ekstremalnych sportowych wrażeń i wielbiciele wyścigów - to właśnie oni będą najbardziej identyfikować się z Abarthem 595 Competizione, z jego manualną, 5-biegową skrzynią biegów, a także z jego 4-wylotowym układem wydechowym „Record Monza”, który dzięki technologii Dual Mode powoduje, że krzywa mocy i momentu powyżej 4000 obr/min ostro pnie się w górę.
 595 COMPETIZIONEJego sportowego ducha podkreślają detale: od dwukolorowej karoserii (metalizowanej lub perłowej), po tapicerkę wnętrza (z tkaniny lub ze skóry), na siedzeniach przednich Abarth Corsa by Sabelt. Abarth 595 Competizione to sportowe wrażenia, bez kompromisów. Dostępny również w wersji cabrio.


text:
Apie kaimą Šilutės rajone žr. Kalnujai (Šilutė)
 Kalnujai – kaimas Raseinių rajono savivaldybėje, 6 km į pietus nuo Raseinių, prie autostrados ir kelio . Seniūnijos, parapijos ir seniūnaitijos centras. Stovi Kalnujų Šv. Viktoro bažnyčia. Piliakalnio papėdėje yra hitlerizmo aukų kapinės, čia 1941 m. liepos-lapkričio mėn. vokiečiai sušaudė 1677 žydus. Prie Kalnujų, buvusiame Žieveliškės kaime, M. Davainio-Silvestraičio sodybos vietoje, 1995 m. pastatytas koplytstulpis. Kalnujų miestelyje yra paminklinis akmuo, pastatytas 1989 m. kompozitoriui J. Tallat Kelpšai, kapinėse – antkapinis paminklas jo tėvui Antanui Tallat-Kelpšai, akmuo rašytojui Marcelijui Martinaičiui (pažymėti informacinėje lentoje prie kapinių), Lietuvos partizanų kapai.
 Pro kaimą teka Šaltuonos intakas Kalnupis. Yra paštas (LT-60031).
 Etimologija
 Tikėtina, kad miestelio vardą lėmė tai, jog jis išsidėstęs ant kalno (kalvos). Tai yra nedidelė kalva, pastebima važiuojant ne tik nuo Raseinių, bet ir nuo autostrados.
 Istorija
 Kaime yra Kalnujų piliakalnis, dar vadinamas Palendrių piliakalniu. Kalnujai minimi XIV a. XVIII a. buvo karališkasis kaimas. Per 1711 m. marą kaimo gyventojai išmirė, 1738 m. gyventojų dar nebuvo. 1818 m. pastatyta mūrinė bažnyčia, 1944 m. sugriauta. 1946 m. pastatyta Kalnujų Šv. Viktoro bažnyčia.
 1853 m. minima parapinė mokykla, 1864 m. uždaryta, 1867 m. atidaryta rusiška pradžios mokykla. 1919 m. įsteigta pradžios mokykla, dab. Kalno vidurinės mokyklos skyrius.
 1914 m. ir 1944 m. Kalnujai sudegė. 1928 m. atidarytas paštas, 1955 m. biblioteka, medicinos punktas, 1957 m. kultūros namai, Sovietmečiu buvo kolūkio centrinė gyvenvietė. 2020 m. patvirtintas Kalnujų herbas.
 |}
 Gyventojai
 Žymūs žmonės
 Juozas Tallat-Kelpša (1889–1949), kompozitorius, dirigentas, pedagogas, kultūros veikėjas.
 Galerija
 Pastabos
 Šaltiniai
 Nuorodos
 Kalnujų istorija ir piliakalnis
 Raseinių rajono savivaldybės gyvenvietės


text:
 116 S1930 IS: Fair and Equal Treatment of Women in the Coast Guard Act
 U.S. Senate
 2019-06-20
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 II116th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 1930IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJune 20, 2019Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Markey, and Ms. Duckworth) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationA BILLTo amend title 14, United States Code, to direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to report to
 Congress on
 efforts to increase gender diversity in the Coast Guard, and for other
 purposes.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Fair and Equal Treatment of Women in the Coast Guard Act. 2.Action plan and report on gender diversity in the Coast Guard (a)Action plan with respect to recommendations of RAND diversity report (1)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall—
 (A)determine which recommendations in the RAND gender diversity report may practicably be implemented to promote gender diversity in the Coast Guard; and
 (B)submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives an action plan including the actions the Coast Guard has taken or plans to take to implement such recommendations.
 (2)RAND diversity report definedIn this subsection, the term RAND diversity report means the 2019 report of the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center of the RAND Corporation entitled Improving Gender Diversity in the U.S. Coast Guard: Identifying Barriers to Female Retention.
 (b)Biennial reports
 (1)In generalChapter 51 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 5109.Report on gender diversity in the Coast Guard (a)In generalNot later than January 15, 2022, and biennially thereafter, the Commandant shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on gender diversity in the Coast Guard.
 (b)ElementsEach report required under subsection (a) shall contain the following: (1)Gender diversity overviewAn overview of Coast Guard active duty and Reserve members, including—
 (A)the number of men and women officers and enlisted members; and
 (B)the percentages of men and women serving as Coast Guard active duty and Reserve members. (2)Recruitment and retention(A)An analysis of the changes in the recruitment and retention of women during the preceding two-year period.
 (B)A discussion of any changes to Coast Guard recruitment and retention during the preceding two-year period that were aimed at increasing the recruitment and retention of women members.
 (3)Parental leave(A)The number of men and women who took parental leave during each year covered by the report, including the average length of such leave periods.
 (B)A discussion of the ways in which the Coast Guard worked to mitigate the impacts of parental leave on Coast Guard operations and on the careers of the members taking such leave during the preceding two-year period.
 (4)LimitationsAn analysis of current gender-based limitations on Coast Guard career opportunities, including an analysis of—
 (A)shipboard opportunities; (B)opportunities to serve at remote units; and
 (C)any other limitation on the opportunities of women members. (5)Progress on action planA description of the implementation of the action plan required under section 2 of the Fair and Equal Treatment of Women in the Coast Guard Act..
 (c)Clerical amendmentThe analysis for chapter 51 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
 5109. Report on gender diversity in the Coast Guard..


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 10.5.2022
 GA
 Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
 C 191/18
 Achomharc arna thabhairt an 3 Márta 2022 ag Gminę Miasto Gdynia agus Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. i gcoinne an bhreithiúnais a fógraíodh an 21 Nollaig 2021 i gCás T-263/15 RENV, Gmina Miasto Gdynia agus Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo v an Coimisiún
 (Cás C-163/22 P)
 (2022/C 191/28)
 Teanga an cháis: an Pholainnis
 Páirtithe
 Iarratasóir: Gmina Miasto Gdynia agus Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. (ionadaithe: K. Gruszecka-Spychała, P. K. Rosiak, radcy prawni)
 Páirtithe eile sna himeachtaí: An Coimisiún Eorpach, Poblacht na Polainne
 An t-ordú atá á lorg
 —
 breithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta a fógraíodh an 21 Nollaig 2021 i gCás T 263/15 RENV, Gmina Miasto Gdynia agus Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo v an Coimisiún a chur ar neamhní;
 —
 breithiúnas críochnaitheach a thabhairt sa chás, lena ndearbhaítear go bhfuil bunús maith leis an gcéad, an ceathrú agus an séú saincheist dlí den bhunchaingean, a mhéid a bhaineann leis an achomharc seo, agus ag neamhniú an chinnidh atá faoi chonspóid i gcomhréir leis an bhfoirm ordaithe bunaidh a bhí á lorg;
 —
 rialú a thabhairt sa bhreithiúnas dá dtagraítear sa dara fleasc thuas maidir le costais na n-imeachtaí ag an gcéad chéim agus na n-imeachtaí achomhairc.
 Foras leis an achomharc agus príomhargóintí
 An chéad fhoras achomhairc, lena n-éilítear go ndearna an Chúirt Ghinearálta earráid dlí maidir le léiriú Airteagal 107(1) i gcomhthéacs na hanailíse ar an gcéad chuid den chéad saincheist dlí den bhunchaingean maidir leis an mbuntáiste a shainaithint go mícheart agus an méid cúnaimh atá le haisghabháil a shocrú go mícheart, arna ardú i gcomhthéacs an cheathrú saincheist dlí den bhunchaingean.
 An dara foras achomhairc, lena n-éilítear go ndearna an Chúirt Ghinearálta earráid dlí sa mhéid nár chur an Chúirt san áireamh, agus an dara foras den séú saincheist dlí maidir le neamhdhleathacht Chinneadh 2014/883/AE (1) a tharraingt siar agus a ionadú ag an gcinneadh atá faoi chonspóid á scrúdú aici, prionsabal an ionchais dhlisteanaigh, prionsabal na deimhneachta dlíthiúla, agus prionsabal na cosanta dlí éifeachtaí, trí léiriú neamhdhleathach a ghlacadh a chuireann ar chumas an Choimisiúin a bheart dlí féin a chonspóideadh cheana féin os comhair na Cúirte Ginearálta a tharraingt siar agus a leasú faoi shaoirse, gan leasanna agus ionchais an pháirtí a chonspóid an beart sin a chur san áireamh.
 An tríú foras achomhairc, lena n-éilítear go ndearna an Chúirt Ghinearálta earráid dlí agus an tríú foras den séú saincheist dlí den bhunchaingean maidir le sárú ar chearta nós imeachta na n-iarratasóirí á meas aici, chomh maith le prionsabal an dea-riaracháin, prionsabal an chomhair dhílis agus prionsabal an ionchais dhlisteanaigh, sa mhéid nár thug sí aitheantas don oibleagáid atá ar an gCoimisiún an cinneadh chun an nós imeachta a thionscnamh a leasú nó oibleagáid an Choimisiúin cinneadh nua a ghlacadh chuige sin, i gcás ina bhfuil na coinníollacha a shonraítear sa bhreithiúnas faoi achomharc gur gá leo chun an cinneadh chun an nós imeachta a thionscnamh a cheartú nó a fhadú comhlíonta.
 (1) Cinneadh ón gCoimisiún an 11 Feabhra 2014 maidir le beart SA.35388 (13/C) (ex 13/NN agus ex 12/N) – an Pholainn – Aerfort Gdynia-Kosakowo a chruthú (a bhfuil fógra tugtha ina leith faoi dhoiciméad C(2014) 759); IO 2014 L 357, lch. 51.


text:
 113 HR 4991 IH: Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park Boundary Revision Act of 2014
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2014-06-26
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I
 113th CONGRESS
 2d Session
 H. R. 4991
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 June 26, 2014
 Mr. Bishop of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, and Mr. David Scott of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
 A BILL
 To redesignate Ocmulgee National Monument in the State of Georgia and revise its boundary, and for
 other purposes.
 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park Boundary Revision Act of 2014.
 2.DefinitionsIn this Act:
 (1)MapThe term map means the map entitled ___, numbered ___, and dated __, __.
 (2)Historical parkThe term Historical Park means the Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park in the State of Georgia, as redesignated in
 section 3.
 (3)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior.
 3.Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park
 (a)RedesignationOcmulgee National Monument, established pursuant to the Act of June 14, 1934 (48 Stat. 958), shall
 be known and designated as Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park.
 (b)ReferencesAny reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to Ocmulgee National Monument, other than in this Act, shall be deemed to be a reference to Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park.
 4.Boundary adjustment
 (a)In generalThe boundary of the Historical Park is revised to include approximately 2,100 acres, as generally
 depicted on the map.
 (b)Availability of mapThe map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the
 National Park Service, the Department of the Interior.
 5.Land acquisitionThe Secretary may acquire land or interests in land within the boundary of the Historical Park by
 donation, purchase from a willing seller with donated or appropriated
 funds, or exchange.
 6.AdministrationThe Secretary shall administer any land acquired under section 4 as part of the Historical Park in
 accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
 7.Ocmulgee River corridor special resource study
 (a)In generalThe Secretary shall conduct a special resource study of the Ocmulgee River corridor between the
 cities of Macon, Georgia, and Hawkinsville, Georgia, to determine—
 (1)the national significance of the study area;
 (2)the suitability and feasibility of adding lands in the study area to the National Park System; and
 (3)the methods and means for the protection and interpretation of the study area by the National Park
 Service, other Federal, State, or local government entities, or private or
 nonprofit organizations.
 (b)CriteriaThe Secretary shall conduct the study authorized by this Act in accordance with section 8 of Public
 Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5; commonly known as the National Park System General Authorities Act).
 (c)ReportNot later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this section,
 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the
 House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
 of the Senate a report containing—
 (1)the results of the study; and
 (2)any findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Secretary.


text:
8.1.2000 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 6/11
 — Vulneración del derecho a ser oı́do: La Comisión no Recurso interpuesto el 7 de octubre de 1999 contra la
 permitió a la demandante, a pesar de la autorización República Federal de Alemania por la Comisión de las
 concedida entretanto, presentar observaciones acerca de Comunidades Europeas
 un dictamen sobre el que se apoya, fundamentalmente, la
 Decisión. Tampoco se dio acceso a la demandante a los
 documentos que habı́a transmitido el Bundesverband (Asunto C-378/99)
 deutscher Banken (Asociación Federal alemana de Banca) a
 la Comisión.
 (2000/C 6/21)
 — Motivación errónea: No se aclaran suficientemente las
 fuentes de información de la Comisión, en particular, sólo
 se exponen algunas afirmaciones del dictamen empleado
 por ella, pero no su contexto completo. Finalmente, la En el Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas se ha
 Comisión se remite a sus propias experiencias en la presentado el 7 de octubre de 1999 un recurso contra la
 materia, sin que en realidad las posea. República Federal de Alemania formulado por la Comisión de
 las Comunidades Europeas, representada por la Sra. Marie
 — Vulneración del Tratado o de una norma jurı́dica aplicable Wolfcarius, Consejero Jurı́dico, y el Sr. Gerald Braun, miembro
 en su ejecución: La Comisión aplicó erróneamente el del Servicio Jurı́dico, que designa como domicilio en Luxem-
 concepto de ayuda y, en esta medida, infringió el artı́culo burgo el despacho del Sr. Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, miembro
 87 CE. La absorción del Wohnungsbauförderungsanstalt del Servicio Jurı́dico de la Comisión, Centre Wagner, Kirchberg.
 des Landes Nordrein-Westfalen (Wfa) [Instituto para la
 promoción de la construcción de viviendas del Estado
 Federado Renania del Norte-Westfalia] por el banco West- La demandante solicita al Tribunal de Justicia que:
 deutsche Landesbank Girozentrale (WestLB) no constituye
 una ayuda. La retribución anual que debe pagar el WestLB
 al Estado Federado Renania del Norte-Westfalia por 1. Declare que la República Federal de Alemania ha incum-
 importe del 1,1 % antes del pago de impuestos o del 0,6 % plido las obligaciones que le incumben en virtud del
 después del pago de impuestos es razonable. El principio Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea y de la
 del inversor en una economı́a de mercado, relevante en Directiva 96/53/CE (1) del Consejo, de 25 de julio de 1996,
 este contexto, ha sido aplicado en la jurisprudencia del por la que se establecen, para determinados vehı́culos de
 Tribunal de Justicia hasta la fecha exclusivamente a los carretera que circulan en la Comunidad, las dimensiones
 casos de reestructuración y saneamiento. Puesto que el máximas autorizadas en el tráfico nacional e internacional
 WestLB es una empresa saneada y rentable, cabe plantearse y los pesos máximos autorizados en el tráfico internacional,
 si el principio del inversor en una economı́a de mercado al no haber adoptado dentro del plazo fijado todas
 es aplicable en el presente caso. Incluso partiendo de su las disposiciones legales, reglamentarias y administrativas
 aplicabilidad, la Decisión de la Comisión es errónea desde necesarias para dar cumplimiento a la Directiva;
 una perspectiva fáctica y jurı́dica, puesto que está en
 contradicción con los criterios que, según la jurisprudencia
 del Tribunal de Justicia, definen el principio del inversor 2. Condene en costas a la demandada.
 en una economı́a de mercado. Al establecer como criterio
 la obtención de un rendimiento medio, la Comisión impide
 ver la amplia gama de motivos legı́timos y habituales en la
 práctica de un inversor público y/o privado para efectuar
 una inversión. Con ello, en contradicción con la práctica y Motivos y principales alegaciones
 la jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia hasta la fecha, la
 Comisión se coloca en el lugar de un inversor privado y
 se erige en autoridad de planificación que vincula las El carácter vinculante de las disposiciones del artı́culo 249,
 inversiones del sector público a una expectativa de rendi- párrafo tercero, y del artı́culo 10, párrafo primero, del Tratado
 miento definida y con ello impide a los inversores públicos CE obliga a los Estados miembros a adaptar el Derecho interno
 actuar como un inversor privado en una economı́a de a las disposiciones de una Directiva de la que son destinatarios
 mercado. Además, el principio del inversor en una econo- de forma que con el transcurso del plazo para la adaptación
 mı́a de mercado no puede trasladarse —como ha ocu- puedan desplegar todos sus efectos. El plazo fijado en el
 rrido— sin modificación a la presente inversión en una artı́culo 11 de la Directiva está vencido desde el 17 de
 empresa rentable. La Decisión impugnada también es septiembre de 1997 sin que la República Federal de Alemania
 errónea desde la perspectiva fáctica. La expectativa de haya adoptado hasta la fecha todas las disposiciones necesarias.
 rendimiento del «12 % después del pago de impuestos»
 tomada como base es incorrecta. No tiene ningún funda-
 mento de hecho. Finalmente, tampoco se falsea la compe-
 tencia ni quedan afectados los intercambios comerciales
 entre los Estados miembros. (1) DO L 235, de 17.9.1996, p. 59.
 (1) DO C 366 de 18.12.1999, p. 14.


text:
Yann Choucq es un abogado bretón, especializado en derechos de las minorías étnicas de Europa. Creó en 1968 el grupo político bretón de izquierdas Sav Breizh con Erwan Vallerie e Y. Jezequel. Fue uno de los fundadores del Skoazell Vreizh, (Socorro Bretón) con Javier Grall y Gwenc’hlan Le Scouëzec en los años 70. Estuvo entre los impulsores del comité de Nantes Collectif breton pour la démocratie et les droits de l'homme. También ha sido abogado de terroristas bretonistas (proceso del FLB, asunto de Plévin , ...), de los manifestantes de Plogoff, y terroristas de ETA.
 Abogados de Francia
 Nacidos en Nantes