text:
 Important legal notice
 |
 22007A1219(10)
 Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation - Declarations
 Official Journal L 334 , 19/12/2007 P. 0149 - 0167
 20071122Agreementbetween the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the readmission of persons residing without authorisationTHE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, hereinafter referred to as "the Community",andTHE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, hereinafter referred to as "Moldova",DETERMINED to strengthen their cooperation in order to combat illegal immigration more effectively,DESIRING to establish, by means of this Agreement and on the basis of reciprocity, rapid and effective procedures for the identification and safe and orderly return of persons who do not, or no longer, fulfil the conditions for entry to, presence in, or residence on the territories of Moldova or one of the Member States of the European Union, and to facilitate the transit of such persons in a spirit of cooperation,EMPHASISING that this Agreement shall be without prejudice to the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the Community, the Member States of the European Union and Moldova arising from International Law, and, in particular, from the European Convention of 4 November 1950 for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Convention of 28 July 1951 on the Status of Refugees and the Convention of 10 December 1984 against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,CONSIDERING that the provisions of this Agreement, which falls within the scope of Title IV of the Treaty establishing the European Community, do not apply to the Kingdom of Denmark, in accordance with the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community,HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1DefinitionsFor the purpose of this Agreement:(a) "Contracting Parties" shall mean Moldova and the Community;(b) "National of Moldova" shall mean any person who holds the citizenship of the Republic of Moldova;(c) "National of a Member State" shall mean any person who holds the nationality, as defined for Community purposes, of a Member State;(d) "Member State" shall mean any Member State of the European Union, with the exception of the Kingdom of Denmark;(e) "Third-country national" shall mean any person who holds a nationality other than that of Moldova or one of the Member States;(f) "Stateless person" shall mean any person who does not hold a nationality;(g) "Residence permit" shall mean a permit of any type issued by Moldova or one of the Member States entitling a person to reside on its territory. This shall not include temporary permissions to remain on its territory in connection with the processing of an asylum application or an application for a residence permit;(h) "Border crossing point" shall mean any crossing point authorised by the competent authorities of the Republic of Moldova or Member States for the purpose of crossing their respective borders, including at International airports;(i) "Visa" shall mean an authorisation issued or a decision taken by Moldova or one of the Member States which is required with a view to entry in, or transit through, its territory. This shall not include airport transit visa;(j) "Requesting State" shall mean the State (Moldova or one of the Member States) submitting a readmission application pursuant to Article 7 or a transit application pursuant to Article 14 of this Agreement;(k) "Requested State" shall mean the State (Moldova or one of the Member States) to which a readmission application pursuant to Article 7 or a transit application pursuant to Article 14 of this Agreement is addressed;(l) "Competent Authority" shall mean any national authority of Moldova or one of the Member States entrusted with the implementation of this Agreement in accordance with Article 19(1) lit. a) thereof;(m) "Border region" shall mean an area which extends up to 30 kilometres from the common land border between a Member State and Moldova, as well as the territories of International airports of the Member States and Moldova;(n) "Transit" shall mean the passage of a third country national or a stateless person through the territory of the Requested State while travelling from the Requesting State to the country of destination.SECTION IREADMISSION OBLIGATIONS BY MOLDOVAArticle 2Readmission of own nationals1. Moldova shall readmit, upon application by a Member State and without further formalities other than those provided for in this Agreement, all persons who do not, or who no longer, fulfil the conditions in force for entry to, presence in, or residence on, the territory of the Requesting Member State provided that, in accordance with Article 8, it is proved, or may be validly assumed on the basis of prima facie evidence furnished, that they are nationals of Moldova.2. Moldova shall also readmit:- minor unmarried children of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1, regardless of their place of birth or their nationality, unless they have an independent right of residence in the Requesting Member State,- spouses, holding another nationality, of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1, provided they have the right to enter and stay or receive the right to enter and stay in the territory of Moldova, unless they have an independent right of residence in the Requesting Member State.3. Moldova shall also readmit persons who have been deprived of, or who have renounced, the nationality of Moldova since entering the territory of a Member State, unless such persons have at least been promised naturalisation by a Member State.4. After Moldova has given a positive reply to the readmission application, the competent Diplomatic Mission or Consular Office of Moldova shall immediately and not later than within three working days, issue the travel document required for the return of the person to be readmitted, with a validity of at least three months. If, for legal or factual reasons, the person concerned cannot be transferred within the period of validity of the travel document that was initially issued, the competent Diplomatic Mission or Consular Office of Moldova shall, within 14 calendar days, issue a new travel document with a period of validity of the same duration. If Moldova has not, within 14 calendar days, issued the new travel document, it shall be deemed to accept the use of the EU standard travel document for expulsion purposes [1].5. In case the person to be readmitted possesses the nationality of a third state in addition to Moldavian nationality, the Requesting Member State shall take into consideration the will of the person to be readmitted to the state of his/her choice.Article 3Readmission of third-country nationals and stateless persons1. Moldova shall readmit, upon application by a Member State and without further formalities other than those provided for in this Agreement, all third-country nationals or stateless persons who do not, or who no longer, fulfil the conditions in force for entry to, presence in, or residence on, the territory of the Requesting Member State provided that, in accordance with Article 9, it is proved, or may be validly assumed on the basis of prima facie evidence furnished, that such persons:(a) hold, or at the time of entry held, a valid visa or residence permit issued by Moldova; or(b) illegally and directly entered the territory of the Member States from Moldova after having stayed on, or transited through, the territory of latter.2. The readmission obligation in paragraph 1 shall not apply if(a) the third country national or stateless person has only been in airside transit via an International Airport of Moldova; or(b) the Requesting Member State has issued to the third country national or stateless person a visa or residence permit before or after entering its territory unless:- that person is in possession of a visa or residence permit, issued by Moldova, which has a longer period of validity, or- the visa or residence permit issued by the Requesting Member State has been obtained by using forged or falsified documents, or by making false statements, or- that person fails to observe any condition attached to the visa.3. After Moldova has given a positive reply to the readmission application, the Requesting Member State issues the person whose readmission has been accepted the EU standard travel document for expulsion purposes [1].SECTION IIREADMISSION OBLIGATIONS BY THE COMMUNITYArticle 4Readmission of own nationals1. A Member State shall readmit, upon application by Moldova and without further formalities other than those provided for in this Agreement, all persons who do not, or who no longer, fulfil the conditions in force for entry to, presence in, or residence on, the territory of Moldova provided that, in accordance with Article 8, it is proved, or may be validly assumed on the basis of prima facie evidence furnished, that they are nationals of that Member State.2. A Member State shall also readmit:- minor unmarried children of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1, regardless of their place of birth or their nationality, unless they have an independent right of residence in Moldova,- spouses, holding another nationality, of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1, provided they have the right to enter and stay or receive the right to enter and stay in the territory of the Requested Member State, unless they have an independent right of residence in Moldova.3. A Member State shall also readmit persons who have been deprived of, or who have renounced, the nationality of a Member State since entering the territory of Moldova, unless such persons have at least been promised naturalisation by Moldova.4. After the Requested Member State has given a positive reply to the readmission application, the competent Diplomatic Mission or Consular Office of that Member State shall immediately and not later than within three working days, issue the travel document required for the return of the person to be readmitted, with a validity of at least three months. If, for legal or factual reasons, the person concerned cannot be transferred within the period of validity of the travel document that was initially issued, the competent Diplomatic Mission or Consular Office of that Member State shall, within 14 calendar days, issue a new travel document with a period of validity of the same duration.5. In case the person to be readmitted possesses the nationality of a third state in addition to that of the Requested Member State, Moldova shall take into consideration the will of the person to be readmitted to the state of his/her choice.Article 5Readmission of third-country nationals and stateless persons1. A Member State shall readmit, upon application by Moldova and without further formalities other than those provided for in this Agreement, all third-country nationals or stateless persons who do not, or who no longer, fulfil the conditions in force for entry to, presence in, or residence on, the territory of Moldova provided that, in accordance with Article 9, it is proved, or may be validly assumed on the basis of prima facie evidence furnished, that such persons:(a) hold, or at the time of entry held, a valid visa or residence permit issued by the Requested Member State; or(b) illegally and directly entered the territory of Moldova after having stayed on, or transited through, the territory of the Requested Member State.2. The readmission obligation in paragraph 1 shall not apply if:(a) the third country national or stateless person has only been in airside transit via an International Airport of the requested Member State; or(b) Moldova has issued to the third country national or stateless person a visa or residence permit before or after entering its territory unless:- that person is in possession of a visa or residence permit, issued by the requested Member State, which has a longer period of validity, or- the visa or residence permit issued by Moldova has been obtained by using forged or falsified documents or by making false statements, or- that person fails to observe any condition attached to the visa.3. The readmission obligation in paragraph 1 is for the Member State that issued a visa or residence permit. If two or more Member States issued a visa or residence permit, the readmission obligation in paragraph 1 is for the Member State that issued the document with a longer period of validity or, if one or several of them have already expired, the document that is still valid. If all of the documents have already expired, the readmission obligation in paragraph 1 is for the Member State that issued the document with the most recent expiry date. If no such documents can be presented, the readmission obligation in paragraph 1 is for the Member State of last exit.4. After the Member State has given a positive reply to the readmission application, Moldova issues the person whose readmission has been accepted the travel document required for his or her return.SECTION IIIREADMISSION PROCEDUREArticle 6Principles1. Subject to paragraph 2, any transfer of a person to be readmitted on the basis of one of the obligations contained in Articles 2 to 5 shall require the submission of a readmission application to the competent authority of the Requested State.2. No readmission application shall be needed where the person to be readmitted is in possession of a valid travel document and, in case such a person is a third-country national or stateless person, also holds, where applicable, a valid visa or residence permit of the Requested State.3. If a person has been apprehended in the border region (including airports) of the Requesting State after illegally crossing the border coming directly from the territory of the Requested State, the Requesting State may submit a readmission application within two days following this persons apprehension (accelerated procedure).Article 7Content of the Readmission application1. To the extent possible, the readmission application is to contain the following information:(a) the particulars of the person to be readmitted (e.g. given names, surnames, date of birth, and — where possible — place of birth, and the last place of residence) and, where appropriate, the particulars of minor unmarried children and/or spouses;(b) indication of the means with which proof or prima facie evidence of nationality, transit, the grounds for the readmission of third-country nationals and stateless persons and unlawful entry and residence will be provided.2. To the extent possible, the readmission application shall also contain the following information:(a) a statement indicating that the person to be transferred may need help or care, provided the person concerned has explicitly consented to the statement;(b) any other protection, security measure or information concerning the health of the person, which may be necessary in the individual transfer case.3. A common form to be used for readmission applications is attached as Annex 5 to this Agreement.Article 8Means of evidence regarding nationality1. Nationality pursuant to Article 2(1) and Article 4(1) can be proved by means of the documents listed in Annex 1 to this Agreement, even if their period of validity has expired. If such documents are presented, the Member States and Moldova shall mutually recognise the nationality without further investigation being required. Proof of nationality cannot be furnished through false documents.2. Prima facie evidence of nationality pursuant to Article 2(1) and Article 4(1) can be particularly furnished through the documents listed in Annex 2 to this Agreement, even if their period of validity has expired. If such documents are presented, the Member States and Moldova shall deem the nationality to be established, unless they can prove otherwise. Prima facie evidence of nationality cannot be furnished through false documents.3. If none of the documents listed in Annexes 1 or 2 can be presented, the competent Diplomatic Mission or Consular Office of the Requested State concerned shall, upon request, make arrangements with the competent authority of the Requesting State to interview the person to be readmitted without undue delay, at the latest within three working days from the requesting day, in order to establish his or her nationality.Article 9Means of evidence regarding third-country nationals and stateless persons1. Proof of the grounds for the readmission of third-country nationals and stateless persons laid down in Article 3(1) and Article 5(1) shall be particularly furnished through the means of evidence listed in Annex 3 to this Agreement; it cannot be furnished through false documents. Any such proof shall be mutually recognised by the Member States and Moldova without any further investigation being required.2. Prima facie evidence of the grounds for the readmission of third-country nationals and stateless persons laid down in Article 3(1) and Article 5(1) shall be particularly furnished through the means of evidence listed in Annex 4 to this Agreement; it cannot be furnished through false documents. Where such prima facie evidence is presented, the Member States and Moldova shall deem the grounds to be established, unless they can prove otherwise.3. The unlawfulness of entry, presence or residence shall be established by means of the travel documents of the person concerned in which the necessary visa or other residence permit for the territory of the Requesting State are missing. A statement by the Requesting State that the person concerned has been found not having the necessary travel documents, visa or residence permit shall likewise provide prima facie evidence of the unlawful entry, presence or residence.Article 10Time limits1. The application for readmission must be submitted to the competent authority of the Requested State within a maximum of 6 months after the Requesting State’s competent authority has gained knowledge that a third-country national or a stateless person does not, or does no longer, fulfil the conditions in force for entry, presence or residence. Where there are legal or factual obstacles to the application being submitted in time, the time limit shall, upon request by the Requesting State, be extended but only until the obstacles have ceased to exist.2. A readmission application must be replied to in writing:- within two working days, if the application has been made under the accelerated procedure (Article 6(3)),- within 11 working days in all other cases.These time limits begin to run with the date of receipt of the readmission request. If there was no reply within this time limit, the transfer shall be deemed to have been agreed to.3. Where there are legal or factual obstacles to the application being replied to within 11 working days, this time limit may, upon duly motivated request, be extended with a maximum of two working days. If there was no reply within the extended time limit, the transfer shall be deemed to have been agreed to.4. Reasons shall be given for the refusal of a readmission request.5. After agreement has been given or, where appropriate, after expiry of the time limit laid down in paragraph 2, the person concerned shall be transferred within three months. On request of the Requesting State, this time limit may be extended by the time taken to deal with legal or practical obstacles.Article 11Transfer modalities and modes of transportation1. Before returning a person, the competent authorities of Moldova and the Member State concerned shall make arrangements in writing in advance regarding the transfer date, the border crossing point, possible escorts and other information relevant to the transfer.2. Transportation may take place by air or land. Return by air shall not be restricted to the use of the national carriers of Moldova or the Member States and may take place by using scheduled or charter flights. In the event of escorted returns, such escorts shall not be restricted to authorised persons of the Requesting State, provided that they are authorised persons from Moldova or any Member State.Article 12Readmission in errorThe Requesting State shall take back any person readmitted by the Requested State if it is established, within a period of three months after the transfer of the person concerned, that the requirements laid down in Articles 2 to 5 of this Agreement are not met.In such cases the procedural provisions of this Agreement shall apply mutatis mutandis and all available information relating to the actual identity and nationality of the person to be taken back shall be provided.SECTION IVTRANSIT OPERATIONSArticle 13Principles1. The Member States and Moldova should restrict the transit of third-country nationals or stateless persons to cases where such persons cannot be returned to the State of destination directly.2. Moldova shall allow the transit of third-country nationals or stateless persons if a Member State so requests, and a Member State shall authorise the transit of third-country nationals or stateless persons if Moldova so requests, if the onward journey in possible other States of transit and the readmission by the State of destination is assured.3. Transit can be refused by Moldova or a Member State:(a) if the third-country national or the stateless person runs the real risk of being subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment or the death penalty or of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political conviction in the State of destination or another State of transit; or(b) if the third-country national or the stateless person shall be subject to criminal sanctions in the Requested State or in another State of transit; or(c) on grounds of public health, domestic security, public order or other national interests of the Requested State.4. Moldova or a Member State may revoke any authorisation issued if circumstances referred to in paragraph 3 subsequently arise or come to light which stand in the way of the transit operation, or if the onward journey in possible States of transit or the readmission by the State of destination is no longer assured. In this case, the Requesting State shall take back the third-country national or the stateless person, as necessary and without delay.Article 14Transit procedure1. An application for transit operations must be submitted to the competent authority of the Requested State in writing and is to contain the following information:(a) type of transit (by air or land), possible other States of transit and intended final destination;(b) the particulars of the person concerned (e.g. given name, surname, maiden name, other names used/by which known or aliases, date of birth, sex and — where possible — place of birth, nationality, language, type and number of travel document);(c) envisaged border crossing point, time of transfer and possible use of escorts;(d) a declaration that in the view of the Requesting State the conditions pursuant to Article 13(2) are met, and that no reasons for a refusal pursuant to Article 13(3) are known of.A common form to be used for transit applications is attached as Annex 6 to this Agreement.2. The Requested State shall, within four working days and in writing, inform the Requesting State of the admission, confirming the border crossing point and the envisaged time of admission, or inform it of the admission refusal and of the reasons for such refusal.3. If the transit operation takes place by air, the person to be readmitted and possible escorts shall be exempted from having to obtain an airport transit visa.4. The competent authorities of the Requested State shall, subject to mutual consultations, assist in the transit operations, in particular through the surveillance of the persons in question and the provision of suitable amenities for that purpose.SECTION VCOSTSArticle 15Transport and transit costsWithout prejudice to the right of the competent authorities to recover the costs associated with the readmission from the person to be readmitted or third parties, all transport costs incurred in connection with readmission and transit operations pursuant to this Agreement as far as the border of the State of final destination shall be borne by the Requesting State.SECTION VIDATA PROTECTION AND NON-AFFECTION CLAUSEArticle 16Data ProtectionThe communication of personal data shall only take place if such communication is necessary for the implementation of this Agreement by the competent authorities of Moldova or a Member State as the case may be. The processing and treatment of personal data in a particular case shall be subject to the domestic laws of Moldova and, where the controller is a competent authority of a Member State, to the provisions of Directive 95/46/EC [2] and of the national legislation of that Member State adopted pursuant to this Directive. Additionally the following principles shall apply:(a) personal data must be processed fairly and lawfully;(b) personal data must be collected for the specified, explicit and legitimate purpose of implementing this Agreement and not further processed by the communicating authority nor by the receiving authority in a way incompatible with that purpose;(c) personal data must be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purpose for which they are collected and/or further processed; in particular, personal data communicated may concern only the following:- the particulars of the person to be transferred (e.g. given names, surnames, any previous names, other names used/by which known or aliases, sex, civil status, date and place of birth, current and any previous nationality),- passport, identity card or driving licence (number, period of validity, date of issue, issuing authority, place of issue),- stop-overs and itineraries,- other information needed to identify the person to be transferred or to examine the readmission requirements pursuant to this Agreement;(d) personal data must be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date;(e) personal data must be kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purpose for which the data were collected or for which they are further processed;(f) both the communicating authority and the receiving authority shall take every reasonable step to ensure as appropriate the rectification, erasure or blocking of personal data where the processing does not comply with the provisions of this article, in particular because those data are not adequate, relevant, accurate, or they are excessive in relation to the purpose of processing. This includes the notification of any rectification, erasure or blocking to the other Party;(g) upon request, the receiving authority shall inform the communicating authority of the use of the communicated data and of the results obtained therefrom;(h) personal data may only be communicated to the competent authorities. Further communication to other bodies requires the prior consent of the communicating authority;(i) the communicating and the receiving authorities are under an obligation to make a written record of the communication and receipt of personal data.Article 17Non-affection clause1. This agreement shall be without prejudice to the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the Community, the Member States and Moldova arising from International Law and, in particular, from:- the Convention of 28 July 1951 on the Status of Refugees as amended by the Protocol of 31 January 1967 on the Status of Refugees,- the international conventions determining the State responsible for examining applications for asylum lodged,- the European Convention of 4 November 1950 for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,- the Convention of 10 December 1984 against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,- international conventions on extradition and transit,- multilateral international conventions and agreements on the readmission of foreign nationals.2. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the return of a person under other formal or informal arrangements.SECTION VIIIMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATIONArticle 18Joint readmission committee1. The Contracting Parties shall provide each other with mutual assistance in the application and interpretation of this Agreement. To this end, they shall set up a joint readmission committee (hereinafter referred to as "the committee") which will, in particular, have the task:(a) to monitor the application of this Agreement;(b) to decide on implementing arrangements necessary for the uniform application of this Agreement;(c) to have regular exchanges of information on the implementing Protocols drawn up by individual Member States and Moldavia pursuant to Article 19;(d) to recommend amendments to this Agreement and its Annexes.2. The decisions of the committee shall be binding on the Contracting Parties.3. The committee shall be composed by representatives of the Community and Moldova; the Community shall be represented by the Commission.4. The committee shall meet where necessary at the request of one of the Contracting Parties.5. The committee shall establish its rules of procedures.Article 19Implementing Protocols1. Upon request of a Member State or Moldova, Moldova and a Member State shall draw up an implementing Protocol which shall cover rules on:(a) designation of the competent authorities, border crossing points and exchange of contact points;(b) the modalities for returns under the accelerated procedure;(c) conditions for escorted returns, including the transit of third-country nationals and stateless persons under escort;(d) means and documents additional to those listed in the Annexes 1 to 4 to this Agreement.2. The implementing Protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall enter into force only after the readmission committee, referred to in Article 18, has been notified.3. Moldova agrees to apply any provision of an implementing Protocol drawn up with one Member State also in its relations with any other Member State upon request of the latter.Article 20Relation to bilateral readmission agreements or arrangements of Member StatesThe provisions of this Agreement shall take precedence over the provisions of any bilateral agreement or arrangement on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation which have been or may, under Article 19, be concluded between individual Member States and Moldova, in so far as the provisions of the latter are incompatible with those of this Agreement.SECTION VIIIFINAL PROVISIONSArticle 21Territorial application1. Subject to paragraph 2, this Agreement shall apply to the territory of Moldova and to the territory in which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applicable.2. This Agreement shall not apply to the territory of the Kingdom of Denmark.Article 22Entry into force, duration and termination1. This Agreement shall be ratified or approved by the Contracting Parties in accordance with their respective procedures.2. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each other that the procedures referred to in the first paragraph have been completed.3. This Agreement is concluded for an unlimited period.4. Each Contracting Party may denounce this Agreement by officially notifying the other Contracting Party. This Agreement shall cease to apply six months after the date of such notification.Article 23AnnexesAnnexes 1 to 6 shall form an integral part of this Agreement.Done at Brussels on the tenth day of October in the year two thousand and seven in duplicate in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish and Moldovan languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.За Европейската общностPor la Comunidad EuropeaZa Evropské společenstvíFor Det Europæiske FællesskabFür die Europäische GemeinschaftEuroopa Ühenduse nimelΓια την Ευρωπαϊκή ΚοινότηταFor the European CommunityPour la Communauté européennePer la Comunità europeaEiropas Kopienas vārdāEuropos bendrijos varduAz Európai Közösség részérőlGħall-Komunitá EwropeaVoor de Europese GemeenschapW imieniu Wspólnoty EuropejskiejPela Comunidade EuropeiaPentru Comunitatea EuropeanăZa Európske spoločenstvoZa Evropsko skupnostEuroopan yhteisön puolestaFör Europeiska gemenskapenPentru Comunitatea EuropeanăPentru Comunitatea Europeană+++++ TIFF ++++++++++ TIFF +++++За Република МолдоваPor la República de MoldovaZa Moldavskou republikuFor Republikken MoldovaFür die Republik MoldauMoldova Vabariigi nimelΓια τη Δημοκρατία της ΜολδαβίαςFor the Republic of MoldovaPour la République de MoldovaPer la Repubblica di MoldovaMoldovas Republikas vārdāMoldovos Respublikos varduA Moldovai Köztársaság részérőlGħar-Repubblika tal-MoldovaVoor de Republiek MoldaviëW imieniu Republiki MołdowyPela República da MoldáviaPentru Republica MoldovaZa Moldavskú republikuZa Republiko MoldavijoMoldovan tasavallan puolestaFör Republiken MoldavienPentru Republica Moldova+++++ TIFF +++++[1] In line with the form set out in EU Council recommendation of 30 November 1994.[2] Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31).--------------------------------------------------20071122ANNEX 1COMMON LIST OF DOCUMENTS THE PRESENTATION OF WHICH IS CONSIDERED AS PROOF OF NATIONALITY (ARTICLES 2(1), 4(1) AND 8(1))- passports of any kind (national passports, diplomatic passports, service passports and, where applicable, collective passports and surrogate passports including children’s passports),- identity cards of any kind,- seaman’s registration books and skippers’ service cards,- citizenship certificates and other official documents that mention or clearly indicate citizenship.--------------------------------------------------20071122ANNEX 2COMMON LIST OF DOCUMENTS THE PRESENTATION OF WHICH IS CONSIDERED AS PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF NATIONALITY (ARTICLES 2(1), 4(1) AND 8(2))- photocopies of any of the documents listed in Annex 1 to this Agreement,- military service books and military identity cards,- official statements made for the purpose of the accelerated procedure by border authority staff or witnesses who can testify that the person concerned has crossed the border,- driving licenses or photocopies thereof,- birth certificates or photocopies thereof,- company identity cards or photocopies thereof,- written statements by witnesses,- written statements made by the person concerned and language spoken by him or her, including by means of an official test result,- any other document which may help to establish the nationality of the person concerned.--------------------------------------------------20071122ANNEX 3COMMON LIST OF DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE CONSIDERED AS PROOF OF THE GROUNDS FOR THE READMISSION OF THIRD COUNTRY NATIONALS AND STATELESS PERSONS (ARTICLES 3(1), 5(1) AND 9(1))- visa or residence permit issued by the Requested State,- entry/departure stamps or similar endorsement in the travel document of the person concerned or other evidence of entry/departure (e.g. photographic),- named documents, certificates and bills of any kind (e.g. hotel bills, appointment cards for doctors/dentists, entry cards for public/private institutions, car rental agreements, credit card receipts etc.) which clearly show that the person concerned stayed on the territory of the requested State,- named tickets and/or passenger lists of air, train, coach or boat passages which show the presence and the itinerary of the person concerned on the territory of the Requested State,- official statements made by border authority staff who can testify to the person concerned crossing the border.--------------------------------------------------20071122ANNEX 4COMMON LIST OF DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE CONSIDERED AS PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE GROUNDS FOR THE READMISSION OF THIRD COUNTRY NATIONALS AND STATELESS PERSONS (ARTICLES 3(1), 5(1) AND 9(2))- information showing that the person concerned has used the services of a courier or travel agency,- official statement in judicial or administrative proceedings by the person concerned, family members or travelling companions,- official statements made by witnesses who can testify to the person concerned crossing the border,- information related to the identity and/or stay of a person which has been provided by an International organisation (e.g. UNHCR).--------------------------------------------------20071122ANNEX 5[Emblem of Republic of Moldova](Place and date)(Designation of requesting authority)Reference:To:ACCELERATED PROCEDURE(Designation of requested authority)+++++ TIFF +++++READMISSION APPLICATIONpursuant to Article 7 of the Agreement of18 September 2007between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the readmission of persons residing without authorisationA. PERSONAL DETAILS1. Full name (underline surname):2. Maiden name:3. Date and place of birth:Photograph4. Sex and physical description (height, colour of eyes, distinguishing marks etc.):5. Also known as (earlier names, other names used/by which known or aliases):6. Nationality and language:7. Civil status:If married: name of spouseNames and age of children (if any):8. Last address in the requesting State:B. PERSONAL DETAILS OF SPOUSE (IF APPROPRIATE)1. Full name (underline surname):2. Maiden name:3. Date and place of birth:4. Sex and physical description (height, colour of eyes, distinguishing marks etc.):5. Also known as (earlier names, other names used/by which known or aliases):6. Nationality and language:marriedwidowedsingledivorced+++++ TIFF +++++C. PERSONAL DETAILS OF CHILDREN (IF APPROPRIATE)1. Full name (underline surname):2. Date and place of birth:3. Sex and physical description (height, colour of eyes, distinguishing marks etc.):4. Nationality and language:D. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE TRANSFEREE1. State of health(e.g. possible reference to special medical care; Latin name of contagious disease):2. Indication of particularly dangerous person(e.g. suspected of serious offence; aggressive behaviour):E. MEANS OF EVIDENCE ATTACHED(Passport No)(date and place of issue)(issuing authority)(expiry date)(Identity card No)(date and place of issue)(issuing authority)(expiry date)(Driving licence No)(date and place of issue)(issuing authority)(expiry date)(Other official document No)(date and place of issue)(issuing authority)(expiry date)F. OBSERVATIONS(Signature) (Seal/stamp)+++++ TIFF +++++--------------------------------------------------20071122ANNEX 6[Emblem of the Republic of Moldova](Place and date)(Designation of requesting authority)Reference:To:(Designation of requested authority)+++++ TIFF +++++TRANSIT APPLICATIONpursuant to Article 14 of the Agreement of18 September 2007the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the readmission of persons residing without authorisationA. PERSONAL DETAILS1. Full name (underline surname):2. Maiden name:3. Date and place of birth:Photograph4. Sex and physical description (height, colour of eyes, distinguishing marks etc.):5. Also known as (earlier names, other names used/by which known or aliases):6. Nationality and language:7. Type and number of travel document:B. IF NECESSARY, SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE TRANSFEREE1. State of health(e.g. possible reference to special medical care; Latin name of contagious disease):2. Indication of particularly dangerous person(e.g. suspected of serious offence; aggressive behaviour):C. TRANSIT OPERATION1. Type of transit2. State of final destination3. Possible other States of transit4. Proposed border crossing point, date, time of transfer and possible escorts5. Admission guaranteed in any other transit State and in the State of final destination(Article 13(2))by airby landyesno+++++ TIFF +++++6. Knowledge of any reason for a refusal of transit(Article 13(3))D. OBSERVATIONSyesno(Signature) (Seal/stamp)+++++ TIFF +++++--------------------------------------------------


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 EUROPSKA KOMISIJA
 Bruxelles, 8.3.2019.
 COM(2019) 111 final
 2019/0061(NLE)
 Prijedlog
 ODLUKE VIJEĆA
 o stajalištu koje u ime Europske unije treba zauzeti u Međunarodnoj komisiji za očuvanje atlantskih tuna i o stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 10974/1/14 REV 1
 OBRAZLOŽENJE
 1.Predmet prijedloga
 Ovaj se Prijedlog odnosi na odluku o utvrđivanju stajališta koje treba zauzeti u ime Unije na sastancima Međunarodne komisije za očuvanje atlantskih tuna (ICCAT) u razdoblju 2019.–2023. u vezi s predviđenim donošenjem mjera očuvanja i upravljanja.
 2.Kontekst prijedloga
 2.1.Međunarodna konvencija za očuvanje atlantskih tuna
 Međunarodnom konvencijom za očuvanje atlantskih tuna (Konvencija ICCAT-a) osnovan je ICCAT, a cilj mu je promicati suradnju na očuvanju populacija tune i skuše u Atlantskom oceanu na razinama koje omogućuju najviši održivi ulov za hranu i u druge svrhe. Konvencija je stupila na snagu 21. ožujka 1969.
 Unija je postala stranka ICCAT-a nakon što je odobrila Konvenciju u skladu s Odlukom Vijeća od 9. lipnja 1986.
 1
 .
 2.2.Međunarodna komisija za očuvanje atlantskih tuna
 ICCAT je tijelo osnovano Konvencijom ICCAT-a za donošenje obvezujućih odluka („preporuke”) o očuvanju i upravljanju ribarstvom u njegovoj nadležnosti. Takve mjere mogu postati obvezujuće za Uniju.
 Kao ugovorna strana ICCAT-a Unija ima pravo sudjelovanja i glasanja. ICCAT odluke donosi konsenzusom.
 2.3.Odluke ICCAT-a
 ICCAT je ovlašten za donošenje preporuka za očuvanje i upravljanje ribarstvom u njegovoj nadležnosti, a one su obvezujuće za ugovorne strane.
 U skladu s člankom VIII.2 Konvencije ICCAT-a preporuke stupaju na snagu šest mjeseci nakon datuma na koji je ICCAT o njima obavijestio ugovorne strane. Preporuke nisu obvezujuće za ugovorne strane ako one podnesu i potvrde prigovor na preporuku. Ako većina ugovornih strana podržava prigovor, preporuka ne proizvodi učinke.
 3.Stajalište koje treba zauzeti u ime Unije
 Stajalište koje treba zauzeti u ime Unije na godišnjim sastancima regionalnih organizacija za upravljanje ribarstvom (RFMO-i) trenutačno se utvrđuje u skladu s dvostupanjskim pristupom. Odlukom Vijeća utvrđuju se vodeća načela i smjernice za stajalište Unije na višegodišnjoj osnovi, a ono te se zatim izmjenjuje za svaki godišnji sastanak na temelju neslužbenih dokumenata Komisije o kojima raspravlja radna skupina Vijeća.
 Za ICCAT taj je pristup uveden Odlukom Vijeća 10974/1/14 REV 1 od 20. lipnja 2014., kojom je utvrđeno stajalište Unije u ICCAT-u za razdoblje 2014.–2018. Odluka sadržava opća načela i smjernice, ali u mjeri u kojoj je to moguće uzimaju se u obzir i posebnosti ICCAT-a. Nadalje, u njoj je utvrđen standardni postupak za godišnje utvrđivanje stajališta Unije, na zahtjev država članica.
 Odlukom 10974/1/14 REV 1 predviđeno je preispitivanje stajališta Unije prije godišnjeg sastanka 2019. Stoga se ovim Prijedlogom utvrđuje stajalište Unije u ICCAT-u za razdoblje 2019.–2023. i zamjenjuje Odluka 10974/1/14 REV 1.
 U Odluci 10974/1/14 REV 1 obuhvaćena su načela i smjernice nove zajedničke ribarstvene politike (ZRP) kako je utvrđeno u Uredbi (EU) br. 1380/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
 2
 te su u obzir uzeti ciljevi utvrđeni u Komunikaciji Komisije o vanjskoj dimenziji ZRP-a
 3
 . Osim toga, stajalište Unije usklađeno je s Ugovorom iz Lisabona.
 U trenutačnom preispitivanju uzimaju se u obzir, kad je riječ o utjecaju ribarstva, Komunikacija Komisije Europskom parlamentu, Vijeću, Europskom gospodarskom i socijalnom odboru i Odboru regija pod naslovom „Europska strategija za plastiku u kružnom gospodarstvu
 4
 ”, Zajednička komunikacija Visokog predstavnika Unije za vanjske poslove i sigurnosnu politiku i Komisije pod naslovom „Međunarodno upravljanje oceanima: plan za budućnost naših oceana
 5
 ” i zaključci Vijeća o toj zajedničkoj komunikaciji
 6
 .
 4.Pravna osnova
 4.1.Postupovna pravna osnova
 4.1.1.Načela
 Člankom 218. stavkom 9. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (UFEU) predviđeno je donošenje odluka kojima se utvrđuju „stajališta koja u ime Unije treba donijeti tijelo osnovano na temelju sporazuma kada je to tijelo pozvano donositi akte koji proizvode pravne učinke, uz iznimku akata kojima se dopunjuje ili mijenja institucionalni okvir sporazuma”.
 „Akti koji proizvode pravne učinke” obuhvaćaju akte koji proizvode pravne učinke na temelju pravila međunarodnog prava koja se primjenjuju na predmetno tijelo te instrumente koji nemaju obvezujući učinak na temelju međunarodnog prava, ali „mogu presudno utjecati na sadržaj propisa koje donese zakonodavac EU-a”
 7
 .
 4.1.2.Primjena u predmetnom slučaju
 ICCAT je tijelo osnovano na temelju sporazuma, odnosno Konvencije ICCAT-a.
 Akti koje je ICCAT pozvan donositi akti su koji proizvode pravne učinke. Akti će biti obvezujući na temelju međunarodnog prava u skladu s člankom VIII. Konvencije ICCAT-a te, s obzirom na to da preporuke ICCAT-a mogu dopuniti, izmijeniti ili zamijeniti obveze utvrđene u postojećem zakonodavstvu EU-a, mogu presudno utjecati na sadržaj sljedećih akata:
 ·Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1005/2008 o uspostavi sustava Zajednice za sprečavanje nezakonitog, neprijavljenog i nereguliranog ribolova, odvraćanje od njega i njegovo zaustavljanje
 8
 ;
 ·Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1224/2009 o uspostavi sustava kontrole Unije za osiguranje sukladnosti s pravilima zajedničke ribarstvene politike
 9
 ;
 ·Uredba (EU) 2017/2403 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o održivom upravljanju vanjskim ribarskim flotama
 10
 ;
 ·Uredba (EU) 2016/1627 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o višegodišnjem planu oporavka plavoperajne tune u istočnom Atlantiku i Sredozemnom moru te o stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 302/2009
 11
 ;
 ·Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1936/2001 o utvrđivanju mjera nadzora ribolova određenih stokova vrlo migratornih riba
 12
 ;
 ·Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 520/2007 o utvrđivanju tehničkih mjera za očuvanje određenih stokova vrlo migratornih vrsta i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EZ) br. 973/2001
 13
 i
 ·Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1984/2003 o uvođenju sustava statističkog praćenja trgovine iglunom i velikookom tunom u Zajednici
 14
 .
 Predviđenim se aktima ne dopunjuje i ne mijenja institucionalni okvir Konvencije ICCAT-a.
 Stoga je postupovna pravna osnova za predloženu odluku članak 218. stavak 9. UFEU-a.
 4.2.Materijalna pravna osnova
 4.2.1.Načela
 Materijalna pravna osnova odluke na temelju članka 218. stavka 9. UFEU-a prije svega ovisi o cilju i sadržaju predviđenog akta o kojemu se zauzima stajalište u ime Unije. Ako taj akt ima dva cilja ili dva elementa te ako se može utvrditi da je jedan od tih dvaju ciljeva ili elemenata glavni, a drugi samo sporedan, odluka na temelju članka 218. stavka 9. UFEU-a mora se temeljiti na samo jednoj materijalnoj pravnoj osnovi, to jest onoj koju zahtijeva glavni ili prevladavajući cilj ili element.
 4.2.2.Primjena u predmetnom slučaju
 Glavni cilj i sadržaj predviđenog akta odnose se na ribarstvo. Uredba (EU) br. 1380/2013 pravna je osnova kojom su uređena načela koja se trebaju odražavati u tom stajalištu.
 Stoga je materijalna pravna osnova predložene odluke članak 43. stavak 2. UFEU-a. Odluka će zamijeniti Odluku 10974/1/14 REV 1, koja obuhvaća razdoblje 2014.–2018.
 4.3.Zaključak
 Pravna osnova predložene odluke trebao bi biti članak 43. stavak 2. UFEU-a u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 9. UFEU-a.
 2019/0061 (NLE)
 Prijedlog
 ODLUKE VIJEĆA
 o stajalištu koje u ime Europske unije treba zauzeti u Međunarodnoj komisiji za očuvanje atlantskih tuna i o stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 10974/1/14 REV 1
 VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,
 uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 43. stavak 2. u vezi s člankom 218. stavkom 9.,
 uzimajući u obzir prijedlog Europske komisije,
 budući da:
 (1)Odlukom Vijeća od 9. lipnja 1986.
 15
 Europska zajednica sklopila je Međunarodnu konvenciju za očuvanje atlantskih tuna (Konvencija ICCAT-a), kojom je osnovana Međunarodna komisija za očuvanje atlantskih tuna (ICCAT).
 (2)ICCAT je nadležan za donošenje mjera kojima se osigurava dugoročno očuvanje i održivo iskorištavanje ribolovnih resursa na području primjene Konvencije ICCAT-a te zaštita morskih ekosustava u kojima se ti resursi nalaze. Takve mjere mogu postati obvezujuće za Uniju.
 (3)Uredbom (EU) br. 1380/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
 16
 predviđeno je da Unija osigura da su aktivnosti u ribarstvu i akvakulturi dugoročno ekološki održive i da se njima upravlja na način koji je u skladu s ciljevima postizanja gospodarskih i društvenih koristi i koristi za zapošljavanje te doprinos dostupnosti opskrbe hranom. Osim toga predviđeno je da Unija primjenjuje predostrožni pristup upravljanju ribarstvom i nastoji osigurati da iskorištavanje živih morskih bioloških resursa obnavlja i održava populacije izlovljavanih vrsta iznad razina koje mogu osigurati najviši održivi prinos. Nadalje, predviđeno je da Unija poduzima mjere upravljanja i očuvanja na temelju najboljih dostupnih znanstvenih savjeta, da podržava razvoj znanstvenog znanja i savjetovanja te da postupno napusti prakse odbacivanja ulova i promiče ribolovne metode koje pridonose selektivnijem ribolovu, najvećem mogućem izbjegavanju i smanjenju neželjenog ulova te ribolovu s manjim utjecajem na morski ekosustav i ribolovne resurse. Uz to, u Uredbi (EU) br. 1380/2013 izričito je predviđeno da Unija te ciljeve i načela treba primjenjivati u svojoj vanjskoj politici u području ribarstva.
 (4)Kako je navedeno u Zajedničkoj komunikaciji Visokog predstavnika Unije za vanjske poslove i sigurnosnu politiku i Europske komisije pod naslovom „Međunarodno upravljanje oceanima: plan za budućnost naših oceana
 17
 ” i u zaključcima Vijeća o toj zajedničkoj komunikaciji
 18
 , promicanje mjera za potporu i povećanje učinkovitosti regionalnih organizacija za upravljanje ribarstvom (RFMO-i) i, ako je relevantno, poboljšanje njihova upravljanja ključno je za djelovanje Unije u tim forumima.
 (5)U Komunikaciji Komisije Europskom parlamentu, Vijeću, Europskom gospodarskom i socijalnom odboru i Odboru regija pod naslovom „Europska strategija za plastiku u kružnom gospodarstvu
 19
 ” navedene su konkretne mjere za smanjenje količine plastike i onečišćenja mora, kao i gubitka ili ostavljanja ribolovnog alata u moru.
 (6)Primjereno je utvrditi stajalište koje u ime Unije treba zauzeti na sastancima ICCAT-a za razdoblje 2019.–2024. jer će mjere očuvanja koje donese ICCAT biti obvezujuće za Uniju te mogu presudno utjecati na sadržaj zakonodavstva Unije, odnosno Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1005/2008
 20
 ; Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1224/2009
 21
 ; i Uredbe (EU) 2017/2403 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
 22
 . Uredba (EU) 2016/1627 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
 23
 ; Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1936/2001
 24
 ; Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 520/2007
 25
 ; i Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1984/2003
 26
 , jer preporuke koje donese ICCAT mogu dopuniti, izmijeniti ili zamijeniti obveze predviđene u postojećem zakonodavstvu EU-a.
 (7)Trenutačno je stajalište koje u ime Unije treba zauzeti na sastancima ICCAT-a utvrđeno Odlukom Vijeća 10974/1/14 REV 1
 27
 . Primjereno je Odluku 10974/1/14 REV 1 staviti izvan snage i zamijeniti je novom odlukom za razdoblje 2019.–2023.
 (8)Budući da se priroda ribolovnih resursa na području primjene Konvencije ICCAT-a mijenja i da je stoga potrebno u stajalištu Unije uzeti u obzir nove događaje, uključujući nove znanstvene i druge relevantne podatke koji su predstavljeni prije ili tijekom sastanaka ICCAT-a, trebalo bi u skladu s načelom lojalne suradnje među institucijama Unije, sadržanom u članku 13. stavku 2. Ugovora o Europskoj uniji (UEU), utvrditi postupke za godišnje usklađivanje stajališta Unije za razdoblje 2019.–2023.,
 DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:
 Članak 1.
 Stajalište koje u ime Unije treba zauzeti na sastancima Međunarodne komisije za očuvanje atlantskih tuna (ICCAT) utvrđeno je u Prilogu I. ovoj Odluci.
 Članak 2.
 Godišnje usklađivanje stajališta koje Unija treba zauzeti na sastancima ICCAT-a provodi se u skladu s Prilogom II.
 Članak 3.
 Stajalište Unije utvrđeno u Prilogu I. preispituje i, ako je potrebno, revidira Vijeće na prijedlog Komisije najkasnije do godišnjeg sastanka ICCAT-a 2024.
 Članak 4.
 Odluka 10974/1/14 REV 1 od 20. lipnja 2014. stavlja se izvan snage.
 Članak 5.
 Ova je Odluka upućena Komisiji.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu,
 Za Vijeće
 Predsjednik
 (1)
 Odluka Vijeća od 9. lipnja 1986. o pristupanju Zajednice Međunarodnoj konvenciji za očuvanje atlantskih tuna kako se izmjenjuje Protokolom u prilogu Završnog akta Konferencije punomoćnika država stranaka Konvencije potpisane u Parizu 10. srpnja 1984. (SL L 162, 18.6.1986., str. 33.).
 (2)
 Uredba (EU) br. 1380/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o zajedničkoj ribarstvenoj politici, izmjeni uredaba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1954/2003 i (EZ) br. 1224/2009 i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba (EZ) br. 2371/2002 i (EZ) br. 639/2004 i Odluke Vijeća 2004/585/EZ (SL L 354, 28.12.2013., str. 22.).
 (3)
 COM(2011) 424, 13.7.2011.
 (4)
 COM(2018) 28 final, 16.1.2018.
 (5)
 JOIN(2016) 49 final, 10.11.2016.
 (6)
 7348/1/17 REV 1, 24.3.2017.
 (7)
 Presuda Suda od 7. listopada 2014., Njemačka / Vijeće, C-399/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2258, točke od 61. do 64.
 (8)
 SL L 286, 29.10.2008., str. 1.
 (9)
 SL L 343, 22.12.2009., str. 1.
 (10)
 SL L 347, 28.12.2017., str. 81.
 (11)
 SL L 252, 16.9.2016., str. 1.
 (12)
 SL L 263, 3.10.2001., str. 1.
 (13)
 SL L 123, 12.5.2007., str. 3.
 (14)
 SL L 295, 13.11.2003., str. 1.
 (15)
 Odluka Vijeća od 9. lipnja 1986. o pristupanju Zajednice Međunarodnoj konvenciji za očuvanje atlantskih tuna kako se izmjenjuje Protokolom u prilogu Završnog akta Konferencije punomoćnika država stranaka Konvencije potpisane u Parizu 10. srpnja 1984. (SL L 162, 18.6.1986., str. 33.).
 (16)
 Uredba (EU) br. 1380/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 11. prosinca 2013. o zajedničkoj ribarstvenoj politici, izmjeni uredaba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1954/2003 i (EZ) br. 1224/2009 i stavljanju izvan snage uredaba (EZ) br. 2371/2002 i (EZ) br. 639/2004 i Odluke Vijeća 2004/585/EZ (SL L 354, 28.12.2013., str. 22.).
 (17)
 JOIN(2016) 49 final od 10.11.2016.
 (18)
 7348/1/17 REV 1 od 24.3.2017.
 (19)
 COM(2018) 28 final, 16.1.2018.
 (20)
 Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1005/2008 o uspostavi sustava Zajednice za sprečavanje nezakonitog, neprijavljenog i nereguliranog ribolova, odvraćanje od njega i njegovo zaustavljanje, o izmjeni uredaba (EEZ) br. 2847/93, (EZ) br. 1936/2001 i (EZ) br. 601/2004 i o stavljanju izvan snage uredaba (EZ) br. 1093/94 i (EZ) br. 1447/1999 (SL L 286, 29.10.2008., str. 1.).
 (21)
 Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1224/2009 od 20. studenoga 2009. o uspostavi sustava kontrole Unije za osiguranje sukladnosti s pravilima zajedničke ribarstvene politike, o izmjeni uredbi (EZ) br. 847/96, (EZ) br. 2371/2002, (EZ) br. 811/2004, (EZ) br. 768/2005, (EZ) br. 2115/2005, (EZ) br. 2166/2005, (EZ) br. 388/2006, (EZ) br. 509/2007, (EZ) br. 676/2007, (EZ) br. 1098/2007, (EZ) br. 1300/2008, (EZ) br. 1342/2008 i o stavljanju izvan snage uredbi (EEZ) br. 2847/93, (EZ) br. 1627/94 i (EZ) br. 1966/2006 (SL L 343, 22.12.2009., str. 1.).
 (22)
 Uredba (EU) 2017/2403 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 12. prosinca 2017. o održivom upravljanju vanjskim ribarskim flotama i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1006/2008 (SL L 347, 28.12.2017., str. 81.).
 (23)
 Uredba (EU) 2016/1627 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 14. rujna 2016. o višegodišnjem planu oporavka plavoperajne tune u istočnom Atlantiku i Sredozemnom moru te o stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 302/2009 (SL L 252, 16.9.2016., str. 1.).
 (24)
 Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1936/2001 od 27. rujna 2001. o utvrđivanju mjera nadzora ribolova određenih stokova vrlo migratornih riba (SL L 263, 3.10.2001., str. 1.).
 (25)
 Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 520/2007 od 7. svibnja 2007. o utvrđivanju tehničkih mjera za očuvanje određenih stokova vrlo migratornih vrsta i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EZ) br. 973/2001 (SL L 123, 12.5.2007., str. 3.).
 (26)
 Uredba Vijeća (EZ) br. 1984/2003 od 8. travnja 2003. o uvođenju sustava statističkog praćenja trgovine iglunom i velikookom tunom u Zajednici (SL L 295, 13.11.2003., str. 1.).
 (27)
 Odluka Vijeća od 20. lipnja 2014. o stajalištu koje treba zauzeti u ime Europske unije u Međunarodnoj komisiji za očuvanje atlantskih tuna (ICCAT).
 ---documentbreak---
 EUROPSKA KOMISIJA
 Bruxelles, 8.3.2019.
 COM(2019) 111 final
 PRILOZI
 Prijedlogu odluke Vijeća
 o stajalištu koje u ime Europske unije treba zauzeti u Međunarodnoj komisiji za očuvanje atlantskih tuna i o stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 10974/1/14 REV 1
 PRILOG I.
 Stajalište koje u ime Unije treba zauzeti u Međunarodnoj komisiji za očuvanje atlantskih tuna (ICCAT)
 1.NAČELA
 Unija u okviru ICCAT-a:
 a) djeluje u skladu s ciljevima i načelima Unije utvrđenima u okviru zajedničke ribarstvene politike (ZRP), posebno primjenom predostrožnog pristupa i s pomoću ciljeva povezanih s najvećim održivim prinosom kako je utvrđeno člankom 2. stavkom 2. Uredbe (EU) br. 1380/2013, kako bi se promicala primjena pristupa upravljanju ribarstvom temeljenog na ekosustavu, kako bi se u najvećoj mogućoj mjeri izbjegao i smanjio neželjeni ulov i postupno napustila praksa odbacivanja ulova te kako bi se utjecaj ribolovnih aktivnosti na morske ekosustave i njihova staništa smanjio na najmanju moguću razinu, te promicanjem gospodarski održivog i konkurentnog ribolova Unije kako bi se osigurao primjeren životni standard za osobe koje ovise o ribolovnim aktivnostima te uzeli u obzir interesi potrošača;
 b) radi na primjerenom uključivanju dionika u pripremnu fazu izrade mjera ICCAT-a i osigurava da su mjere donesene u okviru ICCAT-a u skladu s Konvencijom ICCAT-a;
 c) osigurava da su mjere donesene u okviru ICCAT-a usklađene s međunarodnim pravom, a posebno s odredbama Konvencije UN-a o pravu mora iz 1982., Sporazuma UN-a iz 1995. u pogledu očuvanja i upravljanja pograničnim ribljim stokovima i vrlo migratornim ribljim stokovima te Sporazuma o promicanju usklađivanja ribarskih plovila na otvorenom moru s međunarodnim mjerama očuvanja i upravljanja iz 1993. i Sporazuma Organizacije za hranu i poljoprivredu o mjerama države luke iz 2009.;
 d) promiče stajališta koja su u skladu s najboljim praksama regionalnih organizacija za upravljanje ribarstvom (RFMO-i) na istom području;
 e) nastoji ostvariti usklađenost i sinergiju s politikom koju Unija provodi kao dio svojih bilateralnih odnosa u području ribarstva s trećim zemljama i osigurava usklađenost s njezinim drugim politikama, posebno u području vanjskih odnosa, zapošljavanja, okoliša, trgovine, razvoja, istraživanja i inovacija;
 f)osigurava poštovanje međunarodnih obveza Unije;
 g) postupa u skladu sa zaključcima Vijeća od 19. ožujka 2012. o Komunikaciji Komisije o vanjskoj dimenziji zajedničke ribarstvene politike
 1
 ;
 h) nastoji stvoriti jednake uvjete za flotu Unije na području primjene Konvencije na temelju istih načela i standarda koji se primjenjuju na temelju zakonodavstva Unije te promicati ujednačenu provedbu tih načela i standarda;
 i) postupa u skladu sa Zajedničkom komunikacijom Visokog predstavnika Unije za vanjske poslove i sigurnosnu politiku i Europske komisije pod naslovom „Međunarodno upravljanje oceanima: plan za budućnost naših oceana”
 2
 i zaključcima Vijeća o toj zajedničkoj komunikaciji
 3
 te promiče mjere za potporu i povećanje učinkovitosti ICCAT-a i, ako je relevantno, poboljšava njegovo upravljanje i rad (osobito u znanosti, sukladnosti, transparentnosti i donošenju odluka) kao doprinos održivom upravljanju oceanima u svim njegovim dimenzijama;
 j) promiče bolju koordinaciju između RFMO-a i regionalnih konvencija o moru te, prema potrebi, suradnju sa svjetskim organizacijama u okviru njihovih ovlaštenja, a osobito promiče suradnju s Komisijom OSPAR, Komisijom HELCOM i Konvencijom iz Barcelone, u kojima je Unija isto tako ugovorna strana;
 k)promiče koordinaciju i suradnju s drugim RFMO-ima za tunu u pitanjima od zajedničkog interesa, posebno ponovnom aktivacijom takozvanog postupka iz Kobea za RFMO-e za tunu i njegovim proširivanjem na sve RFMO-e.
 2.SMJERNICE
 Unija nastoji, prema potrebi, podupirati donošenje sljedećih mjera od strane ICCAT-a:
 a) mjere očuvanja i upravljanja ribolovnim resursima na području primjene Konvencije ICCAT-a na temelju najboljih dostupnih znanstvenih savjeta, uključujući ukupni dopušteni ulov (TAC) i kvote ili napor za žive morske biološke resurse koje regulira ICCAT, kojima bi se ako je moguće do 2015. i progresivno i postupno najkasnije do 2020. ostvarila ili zadržala stopa iskorištenosti koja može osigurati najviši održivi prinos. Prema potrebi, te mjere očuvanja i upravljanja obuhvaćaju posebne mjere za stokove izložene prelovu kako bi ribolovni napor ostao u skladu s dostupnim ribolovnim mogućnostima;
 b) mjere za sprečavanje nezakonitih, neprijavljenih i nereguliranih ribolovnih aktivnosti, odvraćanje od njih i njihovo zaustavljanje na području primjene Konvencije, uključujući popis plovila koja obavljaju takav ribolov;
 c) mjere praćenja, kontrole i nadzora na području primjene Konvencije ICCAT-a kako bi se osigurala učinkovitost kontrole i sukladnost s mjerama donesenima u okviru ICCAT-a;
 d) mjere za smanjenje negativnih posljedica ribolovnih aktivnosti i akvakulture na morsku bioraznolikost i morske ekosustave i njihova staništa, uključujući mjere za smanjenje onečišćenja mora i sprečavanje bacanja plastike u more te smanjenje utjecaja plastike koja se nalazi na moru na morsku bioraznolikost i ekosustave i zaštitne mjere za osjetljive morske ekosustave na području primjene Konvencije ICCAT-a u skladu s rezolucijama Opće skupštine UN-a, mjere za najveće moguće izbjegavanje i smanjivanje neželjenog ulova, osobito osjetljivih morskih vrsta, te za postupno napuštanje prakse odbacivanja ulova;
 e)mjere za kontrolu uporabe uređaja za privlačenje ribe (FAD uređaji), osobito radi poboljšanja prikupljanja podataka, kvantificiranja i praćenja uporabe FAD uređaja, smanjenja posljedica na osjetljive stokove tune, ublažavanja njihovih potencijalnih posljedica na ciljne i neciljne vrste te na ekosustav i smanjenja morskog otpada;
 f)mjere za smanjenje posljedica ostavljenog, izgubljenog ili na drugi način odbačenog ribolovnog alata u oceanu i olakšavanje pronalaženja i uklanjanja takvog alata;
 g) mjere kojima je cilj zabrana ribolova koji se obavlja samo radi izlova peraja morskog psa i kojima se zahtijeva da se svi morski psi iskrcaju sa svim perajama prirodno povezanima s trupom;
 h)preporuke, prema potrebi i u mjeri u kojoj je to dopušteno u skladu s relevantnim osnivačkim dokumentima, kojima se potiče provedba Konvencije o radu u ribolovu Međunarodne organizacije rada (ILO);
 i) dodatne tehničke mjere koje se temelje na savjetima pomoćnih tijela i radnih skupina ICCAT-a.
 PRILOG II.
 Godišnje usklađivanje stajališta Unije koje treba zauzeti
 na sastancima Međunarodne komisije za očuvanje atlantskih tuna
 Prije svakog sastanka ICCAT-a, kada se to tijelo pozove na donošenje odluka koje bi za Uniju mogle postati obvezujuće, poduzimaju se potrebni koraci kako bi se u stajalištu koje u ime Unije treba iznijeti uzele u obzir najnovije znanstvene i druge relevantne informacije dostavljene Europskoj komisiji, u skladu s načelima i smjernicama utvrđenima u Prilogu I.
 U tu svrhu i na temelju tih podataka Europska komisija Vijeću ili njegovim pripremnim tijelima pravovremeno prije svakog sastanka ICCAT-a dostavlja pisani dokument u kojem se utvrđuju pojedinosti predloženog usklađivanja stajališta Unije za raspravu i prihvaćanje pojedinosti stajališta koje treba iznijeti u ime Unije.
 Ako na sastanku ICCAT-a ili na licu mjesta nije moguće postići dogovor kako bi se u stajalištu Unije uzeli u obzir novi elementi, pitanje se upućuje Vijeću ili njegovim pripremnim tijelima.
 (1)
 7087/12 REV 1 ADD 1 COR 1.
 (2)
 JOIN(2016) 49 final od 10.11.2016.
 (3)
 7348/1/17 REV 1 od 24.3.2017.


type: wikipedia

text:
Los glaucitinos (Glaucytini) son una tribu de coleópteros polífagos crisomeloideos de la familia Cerambycidae.
 Géneros
 Tiene los siguientes géneros:
 Aureoglaucytes Breuning, 1970
 Ceylanoglaucytes Breuning, 1970
 Coeruleoglaucytes Breuning & Villiers, 1968
 Dilachnus Fairmaire, 1896
 Glaucytes Thomson, 1858
 Graphicoglaucytes Breuning, 1970
 Helenoglaucytes Breuning, 1970
 Iresioides Thomson, 1857
 Metalliglaucytes Breuning & Villiers, 1968
 Novaeglaucytes Hayashi, 1961
 Pachycytes Fairmaire, 1903
 Polyphida Pascoe, 1869
 Pulchroglaucytes Breuning & Villiers, 1968
 Scituloglaucytes Breuning, 1970
 Seuthes Pascoe, 1869
 Thaumasocerus Fairmaire, 1871
 Referencias
 1968: Les Cerambycides de Madagascar. Revision des Cerambycinae Glaucytini. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr., (N.S.), 4(1): 45-67.
 Enlaces externos


type: contracts

text:
 20.7.2017
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 189/34
 ROZHODNUTIE SPOLOČNÉHO VÝBORU EHP
 č. 24/2016
 z 5. februára 2016,
 ktorým sa mení príloha II (Technické predpisy, normy, skúšky a certifikácia) a príloha IV (Energetika) k Dohode o EHP [2017/1307]
 SPOLOČNÝ VÝBOR EHP,
 so zreteľom na Dohodu o Európskom hospodárskom priestore (ďalej len „Dohoda o EHP“), a najmä na jej článok 98,
 keďže:
 (1)
 Delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 518/2014 z 5. marca 2014, ktorým sa menia delegované nariadenia Komisie (EÚ) č. 1059/2010, (EÚ) č. 1060/2010, (EÚ) č. 1061/2010, (EÚ) č. 1062/2010, (EÚ) č. 626/2011, (EÚ) č. 392/2012, (EÚ) č. 874/2012, (EÚ) č. 665/2013, (EÚ) č. 811/2013 a (EÚ) č. 812/2013, pokiaľ ide o označovanie energeticky významných výrobkov na internete štítkami (1), v znení korigenda uverejneného v Ú. v. EÚ L 244, 19.9.2015, s. 60, sa má začleniť do Dohody o EHP.
 (2)
 Prílohy II a IV k Dohode o EHP by sa preto mala zodpovedajúcim spôsobom zmeniť,
 PRIJAL TOTO ROZHODNUTIE:
 Článok 1
 V kapitole IV prílohy II k Dohode o EHP sa v bode 4c [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 392/2012], v bode 4e [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 874/2012], v bode 4i [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1059/2010], v bode 4j [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1060/2010], v bode 4k [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1061/2010], 4l [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1062/2010], v bode 4m [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 626/2011], v bode 4n [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 665/2013], v bode 4s [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 811/2013] a v bode 4t [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 812/2013] dopĺňa tento text:
 „, zmenené týmito právnymi predpismi:
 —
 32014 R 0518: delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 518/2014 z 5. marca 2014 (Ú. v. EÚ L 147, 17.5.2014, s. 1), v znení korigenda uverejneného v Ú. v. EÚ L 244, 19.9.2015, s. 60.“
 Článok 2
 V bode 11c [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 392/2012], v bode 11e [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 874/2012], v bode 11i [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1059/2010], v bode 11j [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1060/2010], v bode 11k [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1061/2010], 11l [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 1062/2010], v bode 11m [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 626/2011], v bode 11n [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 665/2013], v bode 11s [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 811/2013] a v bode 11t [delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 812/2013] prílohy IV k Dohode o EHP sa dopĺňa tento text:
 „, zmenené týmito právnymi predpismi:
 —
 32014 R 0518: delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 518/2014 z 5. marca 2014 (Ú. v. EÚ L 147, 17.5.2014, s. 1), v znení korigenda uverejneného v Ú. v. EÚ L 244, 19.9.2015, s. 60.“
 Článok 3
 Znenie delegovaného nariadenia (EÚ) č. 518/2014 v znení korigenda uverejneného v Ú. v. EÚ L 244, 19.9.2015, s. 60, v islandskom a nórskom jazyku, ktoré sa uverejní v dodatku EHP k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie, je autentické.
 Článok 4
 Toto rozhodnutie nadobúda účinnosť 6. februára 2016 pod podmienkou, že boli doručené všetky oznámenia podľa článku 103 ods. 1 Dohody o EHP (*1).
 Článok 5
 Toto rozhodnutie sa uverejní v oddiele EHP Úradného vestníka Európskej únie a v dodatku EHP k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie.
 V Bruseli 5. februára 2016
 Za Spoločný výbor EHP
 predseda
 Claude MAERTEN
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 147, 17.5.2014, s. 1.
 (*1) Ústavné požiadavky neboli oznámené.


type: caselaw

text:
24.11.2014
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea
 C 421/54
 Ordinanza del Tribunale della funzione pubblica (Prima Sezione) del 9 novembre 2013 — Marcuccio/Commissione
 (Causa F-9/13) (1)
 ((Funzione pubblica - Termine di ricorso - Tardività - Ricorso manifestamente irricevibile))
 2014/C 421/76
 Lingua processuale: l’italiano
 Parti
 Ricorrente: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italia) (rappresentante: G. Cipressa, avvocato)
 Convenuta: Commissione europea (rappresentanti: C. Berardis-Kayser e G. Gattinara, agenti)
 Oggetto
 Domanda di annullamento della decisione della Commissione di procedere alla compensazione tra la somma corrispondente alle spese cui essa è stata condannata dal Tribunale nella causa T-176/04 e la somma dovuta dal ricorrente a seguito dell’ordinanza nella causa T-241/03.
 Dispositivo
 1)
 Il ricorso è respinto in quanto manifestamente irricevibile.
 2)
 Il sig. Marcuccio sopporta le proprie spese ed è condannato a sopportare le spese sostenute dalla Commissione europea.
 (1) GU C 215 del 27.7.2013, pag. 20.


type: other

text:
CBS cijfers 1e halfjaar 2019 (2019H1)
 De gerechtsdeurwaarders verstrekken 2x per jaar een door de KBvG vastgestelde set van gegevens aan het CBS. De ledenraad heeft de cijfers over de eerste helft van 2019 begin oktober gepresenteerd gekregen, het CBS heeft de cijfers gepubliceerd op hun website.
 In de eerste helft van 2019 (2019H1) is het totaal aantal medewerkers bij de gerechtsdeurwaarders gekrompen met 3,5 procent naar 3.752 voltijdsequivalenten (fte). De daling is sterker bij de ambtelijk bevoegde medewerkers (fte) dan bij de niet bevoegde medewerkers (fte).
 In verhouding met geheel 2018 (bijgesteld naar 377,5 miljoen euro) is de omzet in de eerste zes maanden van 2019 toegenomen.
 In totaal werden in 2018 door deurwaarderskantoren ruim 2 miljoen ambtshandelingen uitgevoerd. Naar verhouding is het aantal ambtshandelingen tussen 2018 en 2019H1 niet gewijzigd, ruim 1 miljoen handelingen werden in 2019H1 verricht.
 In het eerste en tweede kwartaal werden door alle deurwaarderskantoren bijna 600 duizend betekeningen in persoon/huisgenoot uitgevoerd.
 Ultimo juni 2019 geven de deurwaarderskantoren in Nederland op dat 3,5 miljoen dossiers in beheer zijn.
 Er werden in 2019H1 bijna 1 miljoen incassodossiers en 259 duizend executiedossiers geopend. Het aantal afgesloten dossiers was 1,3 miljoen in deze periode. 62 procent van de dossiers werd in 2019H1 succesvol afgesloten, dat wil zeggen dat het dossier wordt afgesloten met een positieve afrekening/positieve kasstroom, ongeacht het bedrag of percentage ten overstaande van de vordering en ongeacht waar de betaling wordt ontvangen.
 De totale hoofdsom van alle afgesloten dossiers bedroeg in 2019H1 bijna 2 miljard euro. De recuperatiegraad (de verhouding tussen de totale ontvangsten en de hoofdsommen van de afgesloten dossiers) bedroeg gemiddeld 36 procent 2019H1, een stijging ten opzichte van 2018 (33 procent).
 Het percentage minnelijke ontvangsten (totale betalingen door debiteuren in de zaken zonder titel afgezet tegen het totaal van alle ontvangsten) was in de eerste helft van 2019: 46%.
 Nieuwste Otter-blog: schuldenopkoopfonds is gebakken lucht
 De PvdA en ChristenUnie hebben het idee opgevat om een nationaal schuldenfonds op te richten. Daarmee zou agressieve incassobureaus de pas afgesneden kunnen worden en het zou mensen ‘lucht’ kunnen geven, stellen PvdA en CU. Volgens Paul Otter is het schulden-opkoop-fonds ongenuanceerd en gebakken lucht. Zo’n ballonnetje oplaten en als oplossing presenteren is serieuze politieke partijen onwaardig. Otter roept op: verdiep je in de materie, luister naar professionals en ga dan innoveren. Op dagdromers in Den Haag zitten we niet te wachten. Lees hier de blog van Paul Otter.
 Wijziging van de Wet gemeentelijke schuldhulpverlening naar tweede kamer
 Lees verder en download het voorstel op rijksoverheid.nl
 Brief commissie; Openbaarmaking van het eindverslag "Zicht op schulden" van het programma Schulden van de vaste commissie voor Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid - Preventie en bestrijding van stille armoede en sociale uitsluiting
 Lees verder op parlementairemonitor.nl
 Regeling indexering beloning curatoren, bewindvoerders en mentoren 2020
 Lees verder op officielebekendmakingen.nl
 Aanbieding van de Prinsjesdagstukken door de minister van Financiën.
 Kamervragen over het blog ‘Andere tijden voor de rechtsbescherming’
 Antwoord op vragen van het lid Van Brenk over het SCP-rapport ‘Armoede in kaart 2019’
 Vaststelling van de begrotingsstaten van Koninkrijksrelaties (IV) en het BES-fonds (H) voor het jaar 2020; Motie; Motie van de leden Kuiken en Van der Graaf over schuldhulpverlening voor Caribisch Nederland
 Uitstel beantwoording vragen van het lid Van Nispen over het rapport van de Commissie-Oskam over tarieven en marktwerking voor deurwaarders
 Antwoord op vragen van het lid Jasper van Dijk over de documentaire De schuldmachine
 Gerechtshof Amsterdam 8 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2019:3607
 Klacht tegen gerechtsdeurwaarder. Art. 45 lid 1 Gdw. Beroepschrift niet met redenen omkleed. Gronden niet binnen de beroepstermijn ingediend. Klager niet-ontvankelijk. rechtspraak.nl
 Er bestaan uitzonderingen op de gebondenheid van de rechter aan bindende eindbeslissingen. Lees het artikel van Floor Veldhuis op advocatenblad.nl
 Rechtbank Den Haag 21 augustus 2018 (publ. 10 okt. 2019), ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2018:10387
 Uitvoering incasso-opdracht, geen schending informatie- en verantwoordingsplicht, betalingsverplichting. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch 11 april 2019, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2019:1395
 Vernietiging weigering toelating tot de schuldsaneringsregeling ex artikel 288 lid 1 aanhef en sub b Fw nu schuldenaren thans onder beschermingsbewind staan en er sindsdien, althans zeer kort na het instellen van dit beschermingsbewind, geen nieuwe schulden meer zijn ontstaan. Voorts is het hof uit de houding en uitlatingen van schuldenaren gedurende de mondelinge behandeling in hoger beroep in voldoende mate gebleken van een daadwerkelijke gedragsverandering bij beiden. Daarbij komt dat schuldenaren op dit moment beiden een arbeidsbetrekking hebben. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch 18 april 2019, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2019:1500
 Bekrachtiging weigering toelating tot de schuldsaneringsregeling ex artikel 288 lid 1 aanhef en sub b Fw nu schuldenaar ten aanzien van het ontstaan en onbetaald laten van de schulden in de periode van vijf jaar voorafgaande aan het toelatingsverzoek niet te goeder trouw is geweest. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Rechtbank Rotterdam 4 september 2019, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2019:7970
 Afwikkeling van tussen partijen bestaande overeenkomsten van factoring en debiteurenbeheer, een leningsovereenkomst en een overeenkomst van opdracht tussen eiser en één van de gedaagden. Eindvonnis na tussenvonnis waarin eiser bewijsopdracht heeft gekregen ten aanzien van de omzetgegevens en de daaraan gekoppelde bonus. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Rechtbank Rotterdam 11 september 2019, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2019:7542
 Bevoegdheidsincident. Relatieve bevoegdheid. Forumkeuze (art. 108 Rv). Uitleg begrip “Partijen” in forumkeuzebeding. Haviltex. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Rechtbank Amsterdam 24 september 2019, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2019:6956
 Kort geding. Verbod strafrechtelijke ontruiming krakers 551a Sv afgewezen. We are here-achtige groep uitgeprocedeerde asielszoekers. Criterium. Bewijslast. Positie en belang eigenaar. Compensatie proceskosten. Griffierecht. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden 1 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2019:7979
 Hoger beroep van ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2019:1088; kort geding; executiegeschil over executiegeschil. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof Amsterdam 8 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2019:3631
 Incident ex artikel 351 Rv tot schorsing tenuitvoerlegging. Vordering afgewezen.Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof Amsterdam 8 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2019:3630
 Kort geding, treffen van ordemaatregel niet meer aan de orde, proceskostenveroordeling, verzet tegen executie, art. 438 lid 5 jo. 456 lid 1 Rv. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof Amsterdam 8 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2019:3620
 Huur bedrijfsruimte. Aansprakelijkheid verhuurder voor rook- en roetschade als gevolg van brand in naastgelegen ruimte? Stelling dat de scheidingsmuur gebrekkig was, is tegen de achtergrond van de overgelegde deskundigenrapporten onvoldoende gemotiveerd. Verwijzing naar inhoud van het eerder gewezen arrest in kort geding tot ontruiming volstaat niet. Evenmin is voldoende gemotiveerd dat huurder zelf als gevolg van de onrechtmatige ontruiming (na vernietiging kortgedingvonnis tot ontruiming) schade heeft geleden. Nu het hof tot het oordeel is gekomen dat de verhuurder niet aansprakelijk kan worden gehouden voor de gevolgen van de brand, valt niet in te zien waarom huurder in verband met de vervuiling met rook en roet gedurende twee maanden (de periode waarin het gehuurde had kunnen worden gereinigd als de huurder aan de salvage zou hebben meegewerkt) geen huur zou hebben hoeven betalen, maar tegen dat oordeel van de kantonrechter is verhuurder niet opgekomen in hoger beroep. Voor een langere periode van vrijstelling van huurbetaling bestaat a fortiori geen grond.Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden 8 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2019:8272
 In artikel 6:83 aanhef en onder c BW is geregeld dat verzuim zonder ingebrekestelling intreedt wanneer de schuldeiser uit een mededeling van de schuldenaar moet afleiden dat deze in de nakoming van de verbintenis zal tekortschieten. Die bepaling is van regelend recht, en partijen hebben een specifieke regeling voor het intreden van verzuim afgesproken die ervan afwijkt. Op grond van die afspraak kan de overeenkomst pas worden ontbonden (en kan een boete pas verschuldigd zijn) na een ingebrekestelling. Die bepaling is niet vatbaar voor een uitleg waarin deze uitdrukkelijke voorwaarde niet geldt. Onder bijzondere omstandigheden is wel denkbaar dat een beroep op deze regeling naar maatstaven van redelijkheid en billijkheid onaanvaardbaar zou zijn, maar dergelijke omstandigheden doen zich hier niet voor. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch 8 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2019:3670
 Wijziging en nakoming zorgregeling. Dwangsommen: beperking in duur. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Rechtbank Limburg 9 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2019:9073
 Kort geding - ontruiming woning – niet als goed huurder gedragen - incident met medewerker woningstichting. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Rechtbank Limburg 9 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2019:9074
 Vordering tot ontruiming in kort geding toegewezen. Verdenking van brandstichting door huurder. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Hoge Raad 11 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:1565
 Cassatieprocesrecht. Procesinleiding niet langs elektronische weg ingediend (art. 30c Rv) en geen advocaat bij de Hoge Raad aangewezen (art. 407 lid 3 Rv). Cassatieberoep niet-ontvankelijk. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Hoge Raad 11 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:1580
 Procesrecht. Incident tot zekerheidstelling proceskosten in art. 69 Fw-procedure in cassatie. Analoge toepassing van art. 289 Rv (HR 15 december 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:3143) en van art. 224 Rv. Uitzondering van art. 224 lid 2 Rv van toepassing? Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Hoge Raad 11 oktober 2019, Hoge Raad
 Verbintenissenrecht. Ontbinding, ingebrekestelling en verzuim. Art. 6:265 BW, art. 6:82 BW en art. 6:83 BW. Lengte van termijn voor nakoming die aan schuldenaar moet worden gegeven. Had hoofdaannemer het recht om, na periode van discussie en correspondentie met onderaannemer over de termijn en kwaliteit van nakoming door onderaannemer, de overeenkomst met onderaannemer te ontbinden, of verkeerde de onderaannemer nog niet in verzuim? Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Rechtbank Den Haag 12 oktober 2019, Rechtbank Den Haag
 Beëindiging schuldsaneringsregeling zonder schone lei. Een schuldenaar die met € 12.000,- op zak op Schiphol staande wordt gehouden, moet daarvoor een goede verklaring hebben. Deze heeft schuldenaar niet. Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Financiële cie inzake begroting 2020
 Openingshandeling Schuldenwijzer
 KBvG Regiobijeenkomst Nieuwerkerk a/d IJssel
 Overweldigende aandacht voor Schuldenwijzer na lancering
 Vandaag vindt de officiële lancering van Schuldenwijzer plaats. Na een item in het RTL Nieuws van vanochtend, raakte de website zelfs korte tijd overbelast. In een mum van tijd hadden 2000 mensen ingelogd op het platform.
 Op Schuldenwijzer.nl kan elke Nederlander via DigiD snel en eenvoudig inzicht krijgen in actuele informatie over zijn schuldenpositie (lees meer in het persbericht). Aan RTL Nieuws liet staatssecretaris Van Ark van Sociale Zaken weten blij te zijn met het initiatief. "Mensen met schulden missen vaak het overzicht over hun financiële situatie waardoor problemen verergeren," zei staatssecretaris Van Ark. "Met de schuldenwijzer kunnen professionals sneller en beter schuldhulp verlenen."
 Vijf daklozen met hoge schulden uit verschillende milieus krijgen de kans om weer wat van hun leven te maken. Dat is het format van een nieuw tv-programma van RTL, gepresenteerd door Beau van Erven Dorens. Vijf adviseurs van Rabobank maken hun opwachting en helpen de daklozen met hun schuldenpositie. Lees verder op banken.nl
 Wat zijn de verschillen tussen het UBO-register en het centraal aandeelhoudersregister? Wat is de rol van de notaris bij dat centraal aandeelhoudersregister? En wat zijn de administratieve lasten voor bedrijven? Op donderdag 3 oktober stelden Tweede Kamerleden vragen over het wetsvoorstel centraal aandeelhoudersregister (CAHR) aan initiatiefnemers Henk Nijboer (PvdA) en Mahir Alkaya (SP). Lees verder op knb.nl
 Ondernemers ontvangen uniek btw-id dat privacy beter waarborgt. Lees verder op rijksoverheid.nl
 Publicatie eindrapportage van het onderzoek naar betaalprofielen dat Decisio en DSP in 2019 voor het Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid hebben uitgevoerd. Het onderzoek betrof een inventarisatie van bestaande betaalprofielen, hoe deze worden gebruikt en de effecten van dat gebruik. Download het rapport op rijksoverheid.nl
 De Friese Ammerins Moss-de Boer pleit er bij de rechtbankpresident en de hoofdofficier van justitie in Noord-Nederland voor om tolken Fries zonder examen te beëdigen. Zij zou graag Fries in de rechtbank tolken. Alleen kan dat niet, omdat er momenteel geen examen is dat toegang geeft tot accreditatie voor de rechtspraak. Lees verder op mr-online.nl
 Meer Europese regels tegen witwassen zijn niet nodig, de toepassing van bestaande regels is belangrijker. Dat was het belangrijkste pleidooi van de KNB bij enkele gesprekken met Nederlandse Europarlementariërs. Lees verder op knb.nl
 UBO’s krijgen inzicht in hoe vaak hun informatie wordt geraadpleegd. Ook wordt de identificatie van raadplegers van het UBO-register verbeterd. Met deze twee maatregelen wil minister Wopke Hoekstra van Financiën de privacy van UBO’s verbeteren. Dit schrijft hij in antwoord op vragen van de Tweede Kamer over het wetsvoorstel UBO-register. Op 10 januari 2020 moet het UBO-register in werking treden. Lees verder op knb.nl
 Een ultieme poging van de NOvA om de patstelling rondom de gefinancierde rechtsbijstand te doorbreken, heeft vooralsnog niets uitgehaald. De verhouding met minister Sander Dekker is nu gedaald tot het absolute nulpunt. Lees het artikel van Kees Pijnappels op advocatenblad.nl
 Uit onderzoek van het World Economic Forum blijkt dat Nederland de meest concurrerende economie van Europa is. Wereldwijd staan we op plek 4. Als een van de factoren die daaraan bijdragen wordt de sterke onafhankelijke rechtspraak genoemd.Lees verder op rechtspraak.nl
 Uitsluiting van aanbesteding wegens verwijzing naar algemene voorwaarden disproportioneel
 Aanbestedingsstukken bevatten vaak een regeling die voorziet in de situatie dat een inschrijver bij zijn inschrijving algemene voorwaarden van toepassing verklaart. Dit leidt in veel gevallen tot uitsluiting. De Commissie van Aanbestedingsexperts heeft een advies uitgebracht, waarin zij aangeeft dat een dergelijke regeling disproportioneel kan zijn. Lees verder op recht.nl
 Het gaat goed met de Nederlandse economie en het mkb is het fundament. Dat is af te lezen uit het vijfde Jaarbericht 'De Staat van het mkb' van het Nederlands Comité voor Ondernemerschap. Het bruto binnenlands product (bbp) is in 2018 voor het vijfde jaar op rij gegroeid en het midden- en kleinbedrijf is goed voor maar liefst 71 procent van de werkgelegenheid en 62 procent van de toegevoegde waarde.Lees verder op mkb.nl