text:
16 ta’ Marzu 2011
 Kawża F-21/10
 “Servizz pubbliku — Uffiċjali — Rikors għad-danni — Illegalità — Trażmissjoni ta’ ittra dwar l-ispejjeż ta’ kawża lill-avukat li jkun irrappreżenta lir-rikorrent f’tali kawża — Rikors manifestament infondat fid-dritt — Artikolu 94 tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura”
 Suġġett: Rikors ippreżentat skont l-Artikolu 270 TFUE, applikabbli għat-Trattat KEEA skont l-Artikolu 106a tiegħu, li permezz tiegħu L. Marcuccio jitlob, minn naħa, l-annullament tad-deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni li tiċħad it-talba tiegħu għall-kumpens tad-dannu li, fil-fehma tiegħu, jirriżulta mit-trażmissjoni lir-rappreżentant tiegħu fil-kawża li tat lok għad-digriet tal-Qorti tal-Prim’Istanza tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej, tas-17 ta’ Mejju 2006, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni (T‐241/03), ta’ ittra dwar il-ħlas tal-ispejjeż fl-imsemmija kawża u, min-naħa l-oħra, li l-Kummissjoni tiġi ordnata tħallsu danni.
 Deċiżjoni: Ir-rikors huwa miċħud bħala manifestament infondat fid-dritt. Ir-rikorrent għandu jbati l-ispejjeż kollha. Ir-rikorrent huwa kkundannat iħallas lit-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku s-somma ta’ EUR 2 000.
 1. Uffiċjali — Rikors — Rikors għad-danni — Talba għall-annullament tad-deċiżjoni prekontenzjuża li tiċħad it-talba għad-danni
 2. Proċedura — Spejjeż — Spejjeż fiergħa u vessatorji imposti fuq it-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku minħabba r-rikors abbużiv ta’ uffiċjal
 1. It-talbiet għal annullament intiżi kontra deċiżjoni ta’ istituzzjoni li tiċħad talba għad-danni matul il-fażi prekontenzjuża ma jistgħux jiġu evalwati indipendentement mit-talbiet għad-danni.
 (ara l-punti 19 u 20)
 Referenza: Il-Qorti tal-Prim’Istanza 14 ta’ Ottubru 2004, I vs Il‐Qorti tal-Ġustizzja, T‐256/02, punt 47, u l-ġurisprudenza ċċitata
 2. Skont l-Artikolu 94 tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tat-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku, jekk dan tal-aħħar ikun sostna spejjeż li setgħu jiġu evitati, b’mod partikolari meta r-rikors ikun manifestament abbużiv, huwa jista’ jikkundanna lill-parti li tkun ikkawżathom tirrimborsa l-ispejjeż kollha jew parti minnhom, liema ammont ma għandux jeċċedi EUR 2 000.
 Din id-dispożizzjoni għandha tapplika fil-każ ta’ rikors ta’ uffiċjal li d-diversi rikorsi tiegħu quddiem il-qrati tal-Unjoni diġà ġew miċħuda, minn tal-inqas parzjalment, bħala manifestament inammissibbli jew manifestament infondati fid-dritt u li r-rikors tiegħu huwa ċertament ta’ natura fiergħa u vessatorja, peress li r-rikorrent ikun għażel li jressaq proċeduri kontenzjużi mingħajr ebda ġustifikazzjoni.
 (ara l-punti 33, 35 u 36)
 Referenza: Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja 9 ta’ Diċembru 2009, Marcuccio vs IlKummissjoni, C‐513/08 P; 9 ta’ Diċembru 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, C‐528/08 P; Il-Qorti tal-Prim’Istanza 9 ta’ Settembru 2008, Marcuccio vs IlKummissjoni, T‐143/08; 9 ta’ Settembru 2008, Marcuccio vs Il-Kummissjoni, T‐144/08; 26 ta’ Ġunju 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, T‐114/08 P; 28 ta’ Settembru 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, T‐46/08 P; Il-Qorti Ġenerali tal-Unjoni Ewropea 23 ta’ Marzu 2010, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, T‐16/09 P; 28 ta’ Ottubru 2010, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, T‐32/09 P; It-Tribunal għas-Servizz Pubbliku 11 ta’ Mejju 2007, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐2/06; 6 ta’ Diċembru 2007, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐40/06; 14 ta’ Diċembru 2007, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐21/07; 4 ta’ Novembru 2008, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐18/07; 4 ta’ Novembru 2008, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐87/07; 18 ta’ Frar 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐70/07; 31 ta’ Marzu 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐146/07, li hija s-suġġett ta’ appell pendenti quddiem il-Qorti Ġenerali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, Kawża T‐239/09 P; 20 ta’ Lulju 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐86/07, li hija s-suġġett ta’ appell pendenti quddiem il-Qorti Ġenerali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, Kawża T‐402/09 P; 7 ta’ Ottubru 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐122/07; 7 ta’ Ottubru 2009, Marcuccio vs Il‐Kummissjoni, F‐3/08


type: wikipedia

text:
Partizanske "republike" bile su područja koja su kontrolirali gerilski pokreti otpora u drugom svjetskom ratu.
 Ovisno o veličini i stalnosti, te republike su uspijevale dosegnuti određenu razinu organiziranog mirnodopskog života.
 Naziv "republike" bi dobila područja pod partizanskom kontrolom, pod uvjetom da su to bila velika područja, ili, mogla su biti i relativno manja područja, ali uz višu razinu uspostavljenosti civilnog života (uprave, pošte, škole, kazališta, bolnice), koja je bila dugotrajnija.
 Popis partizanskih republika
 Hrvatska
 Mućka republika (Gizdavačka republika)
 Bihaćka republika (također i u BiH)
 Podravska republika
 Srbija
 Užička republika
 Bosna i Hercegovina
 Bihaćka republika (također i u Hrvatskoj)
 Fočanska republika
 Drvarska republika
 "Republika" na području Kozare i okolice
 Italija
 Sve se odnosi na 1944. godinu.
 Alto Monferrato (rujan - 02.prosinac)
 Alto Tortonese (rujan - prosinac)
 Bobbio (07.srpanj - 27.kolovoz)
 Cansiglio (srpanj - rujan)
 Carnia (srpanj - listopad)
 Imperia (kolovoz - listopad)
 Istočna Furlanija (30.lipanj - rujan)
 Langhe (rujan - studeni)
 Montefiorino (17.lipanj - 01.kolovoz)
 Ossola (10.rujan - 23.listopad)
 Val Ceno (10.lipanj - 11.srpanj)
 Val d'Enza e Val Parma (lipanj - srpanj)
 Val Maira e Val Varaita (lipanj - 21.kolovoz)
 Val Taro (15.lipanj - 24.srpanj)
 Valli di Lanzo (25.lipanj - rujan)
 Valsesia (11.lipanj - 10.srpanj)
 Varzi (rujan - 29.studeni)
 Grčka
 Poljska
 Ukrajina
 Bjelorusija
 Vidi još
 :en:Italian resistance movement#List of partisan governments


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 11/Sv. 100
 HR
 Službeni list Europske unije
 58
 22006D0013(01)
 L 092/42
 SLUŽBENI LIST EUROPSKE UNIJE
 ODLUKA ZAJEDNIČKOG ODBORA EGP-a
 br. 13/2006
 od 27. siječnja 2006.
 o izmjeni Priloga XX. (Okoliš) Sporazumu o EGP-u
 ZAJEDNIČKI ODBOR EGP-a,
 uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, kako je izmijenjen Protokolom o prilagodbi Sporazuma o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, dalje u tekstu „Sporazum”, a posebno njegov članak 98.,
 budući da:
 (1)
 Prilog XX. Sporazumu je izmijenjen Odlukom Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a br. 107/2005 od 8. srpnja 2005. (1).
 (2)
 Odluka Komisije 2005/174/EZ od 28. veljače 2005. o utvrđivanju smjernica koje nadopunjuju dio B Priloga II. Direktivi Vijeća 90/219/EEZ o ograničenoj uporabi genetski modificiranih mikroorganizama (2), kako je ispravljena u SL L 65, 11.3.2005., str. 39., treba se unijeti u Sporazum,
 ODLUČIO JE:
 Članak 1.
 Iza točke 24.b (Odluka Komisije 2000/608/EZ) Priloga XX. Sporazumu umeće se sljedeća točka:
 „24.c
 32005 D 0174 Odluka Komisije 2005/174/EZ od 28. veljače 2005. o utvrđivanju smjernice koje nadopunjuju dio B Priloga II. Direktivi Vijeća 90/219/EEZ o ograničenoj uporabi genetski modificiranih mikroorganizama (SL L 59, 5.3.2005., str. 20), kako je ispravljena u SL L 65, 11.3.2005., str. 39.”
 Članak 2.
 Tekst Odluke 2005/174/EZ na islandskom i norveškom jeziku, koji se objavljuje u Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europske unije, vjerodostojan je.
 Članak 3.
 Ova Odluka stupa na snagu 28. siječnja 2006., pod uvjetom da su sve obavijesti na temelju članka 103. stavka 1. Sporazuma podnesene Zajedničkom odboru EGP-a (3).
 Članak 4.
 Ova se odluka objavljuje u Odjeljku o EGP-u i Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europske unije.
 Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 27. siječnja 2006.
 Za Zajednički odbor EGP-a
 Predsjednik
 R. WRIGHT
 (1) SL L 306, 24.11.2005., str. 45.
 (2) SL L 59, 5.3.2005., str. 20.
 (3) Ustavni zahtjevi nisu navedeni.


text:
 Ważna informacja prawna
 |
 21980A1017(04)
 Dziennik Urzędowy L 275 , 18/10/1980 P. 0037 - 0042 Specjalne wydanie fińskie: Rozdział 3 Tom 12 P. 0171 Specjalne wydanie szwedzkie: Rozdział 3 Tom 12 P. 0171 Specjalne wydanie greckie: Rozdział 11 Tom 22 P. 0028
 Porozumieniew formie wymiany listów między Europejską Wspólnotą Gospodarczą a Wschodnią Republiką Urugwaju w sprawie handlu mięsa baraniego i mięsa jagnięcegoList nr 1Szanowny Panie,Mam zaszczyt nawiązać do negocjacji przeprowadzonych ostatnio pomiędzy naszymi delegacjami w celu stworzenia uregulowań związanych z przywozem z Urugwaju do Europejskiej Wspólnoty Gospodarczej mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego, w związku z wprowadzaniem przez Wspólnotę wspólnej organizacji rynku mięsa owczego i mięsa koziego.W toku negocjacji Strony uzgodniły, co następuje:1. Niniejsze Porozumienie obejmuje:- świeże lub chłodzone mięso baranie, mięso jagnięce i mięso kozie (podpozycja 02.01 A IV a),- mrożone mięso baranie, mięso jagnięce i mięso kozie (podpozycja 02.01 A IV b).2. W ramach niniejszego Porozumienia możliwości wywozu mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego z Urugwaju do Wspólnoty są ustalone na poziomie:5100 ton rocznie, w przeliczeniu na wagę tuszy [1],W celu zapewnienia sprawnego funkcjonowania Porozumienia Urugwaj zobowiązuje się do wprowadzenia odpowiednich procedur, w celu zapewnienia, że roczne ilości faktycznie wywożone nie przekraczają ilości uzgodnionych i że są wywożone zgodnie z tradycyjną formą ich prezentacji (mrożone lub chłodzone).Jeżeli jakiekolwiek zmiany w technologii i handlu umożliwią zmiany struktury handlu pod względem form prezentacji towaru, przed wprowadzeniem jakiejkolwiek zmiany Strony niniejszego Porozumienia przeprowadzą konsultacje w ramach komitetu wymienionego w klauzuli 10, w celu znalezienia odpowiedniego rozwiązania.3. W razie zastosowania przez Wspólnotę klauzuli ochronnej, Wspólnota zobowiązuje się, że nie będzie to miało wpływu na dostęp Urugwaju do rynków Wspólnoty, przewidziany w niniejszym Porozumieniu.4. Jeżeli przywóz w danym roku przekroczy uzgodnione wielkości, Wspólnota zachowuje prawo do zawieszenia przywozu z Urugwaju na pozostałą część roku. Ilość nadwyżkowa ponad te wielkości podlega odliczeniu od uprawnień wywozowych Urugwaju w roku następnym.5. Wspólnota zobowiązuje się ograniczyć opłatę stosowaną w odniesieniu do przywozu produktów objętych obecnym Porozumieniem do maksymalnej wysokości 10 % ad valorem.6. W momencie przystąpienia nowych Państw Członkowskich, Wspólnota, w uzgodnieniu z Urugwajem, zmieni wielkości określone w klauzuli 2, zgodnie z wymianą handlową Urugwaju z każdym nowym Państwem Członkowskim. Opłaty odnoszące się do przywozu do wspomnianych nowych Państw Członkowskich zostają ustalone zgodnie z zasadami Traktatu o Przystąpieniu; z uwzględnieniem maksymalnego poziomu opłat, określonego w klauzuli 5 niniejszego Porozumienia.Całkowitą ilość podana w powyższej klauzuli 2 ustala się na 5800 ton w wadze tuszy, licząc od dnia przystąpienia Grecji do Wspólnoty.7. Wspólnota dołoży starań w celu uniknięcia wszelkich zmian na rynku, które mogłyby naruszyć wprowadzanie do obrotu mięsa baraniego i mięsa jagnięcego z Urugwaju na rynek Wspólnoty, w granicach uzgodnionych ilości. W szczególności, Wspólnota podejmie kroki, aby zapewnić, że sprzedaż zapasów interwencyjnych w postaci mrożonej, jako wynik działań podejmowanych w ramach regulacji rynku nie osłabi sprzedaży urugwajskiego mięsa baraniego i mięsa jagnięcego.8. Biorąc pod uwagę cele i postanowienia niniejszego Porozumienia, Wspólnota potwierdza, że jakiekolwiek zwroty lub inne formy wspierania wywozu mięsa baraniego i mięsa jagnięcego oraz żywych owiec i jagniąt rzeźnych, będzie stosowana jedynie według cen i warunków, odpowiadających istniejącym zobowiązaniom międzynarodowym oraz zgodnie ze zwyczajowymi udziałami Wspólnoty w światowym eksporcie tych produktów. Powyższe stwierdzenie interpretuje się w sposób zgodny z art. XVI Układu Ogólnego w sprawie Taryf Celnych i Handlu i w szczególności zgodnie z artykułem 10 ustęp 2 litera c) Porozumienia w sprawie interpretacji i stosowania artykułów VI, XVI i XXIII Układu Ogólnego w sprawie Taryf Celnych i Handlu.9. Urugwaj zapewnia, że niniejsze Porozumienie jest przestrzegane, w szczególności, poprzez wydawanie świadectw wywozowych na produkty wymienione w klauzuli 1 w granicach ilości objętych niniejszym Porozumieniem.Ze swojej strony, Wspólnota zobowiązuje się do przyjęcia wszelkich koniecznych przepisów w celu wydawania świadectw przywozowych na wyżej wymienione produkty pochodzące z Urugwaju, które uzależnione jest od przedstawienia świadectwa wywozowego wydanego przez właściwe władze wyznaczone przez rząd Urugwaju.Szczegółowe zasady stosowania tego systemu ustanawia się w taki sposób, aby nie było potrzeby składania zabezpieczenia za wystawianie świadectwa wywozowego na omawiane produkty.Ponadto te szczegółowe zasady stosowania stanowią również, że właściwe władze Urugwaju będą informować okresowo właściwe władze we Wspólnocie, o ilościach na które wydano świadectwa wywozowe, podzielone, gdzie stosowne, według miejsca przeznaczenia.10. Tworzy się komitet doradczy złożony z przedstawicieli Wspólnoty i Urugwaju. Komitet zapewnia, że Porozumienie jest odpowiednio stosowane i że funkcjonuje bez przeszkód. Komitet regularnie bada tendencje na rynkach mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego w państwach obydwu Stron oraz tendencje na rynku międzynarodowym, a także warunki sprzedaży na tych rynkach włącznie z warunkami istotnymi z punktu widzenia celów określonych w klauzuli 7 niniejszego Porozumienia.Komitet zapewnia, że właściwe stosowanie niniejszego Porozumienia nie jest zakłócane przez wywóz do Wspólnoty produktów z mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego, występujących pod pozycjami taryfowymi niewymienionymi w obecnym Porozumieniu.Komitet omówi wszystkie kwestie, które mogłyby wyniknąć z zastosowania Porozumienia i zarekomenduje właściwym władzom odpowiednie rozwiązania.11. Postanowienia niniejszego Porozumienia przyjmuje się bez uszczerbku dla praw i obowiązków Stron w ramach GATT.12. Roczna ilość ustalona w klauzuli 2 odnosi się do okresu od dnia 1 stycznia do dnia 31 grudnia. Ilość obowiązująca od wejścia w życie obecnego Porozumienia do dnia 1 stycznia następnego roku zostanie ustalona proporcjonalnie w stosunku do całkowitej rocznej ilości przy uwzględnieniu wahań sezonowych handlu.13. Niniejsze Porozumienie stosuje się, z jednej strony, do terytoriów, na których stosuje się Traktat ustanawiający Europejską Wspólnotę Gospodarczą i na warunkach określonych w Traktacie, oraz na terytorium Republiki Urugwaju z drugiej strony.14. Porozumienie wchodzi w życie z dniem 20 października 1980 roku. Porozumienie pozostaje w mocy do dnia 31 marca 1984 roku i pozostanie w mocy w okresie późniejszym, z zastrzeżeniem prawa każdej Strony jego pisemnego wypowiedzenia z rocznym wyprzedzeniem. W każdym przypadku postanowienia niniejszego Porozumienia będą ponownie zbadane przez Strony przed dniem 1 kwietnia 1984 roku, w celu wprowadzenia wszelkich dostosowań uznanych wspólnie za niezbędne.Będę zobowiązany, jeżeli potwierdzi Pan zgodę Pańskiego rządu na powyższe.Proszę przyjąć, Szanowny Panie, wyrazy mojego najwyższego szacunku.W imieniu RadyWspólnot EuropejskichList nr 2Szanowny Panie,Mam zaszczyt potwierdzić otrzymanie Pańskiego listu z dnia dzisiejszego o następującej treści:"Mam zaszczyt nawiązać do negocjacji przeprowadzonych ostatnio pomiędzy naszymi delegacjami w celu stworzenia uregulowań związanych z przywozem z Urugwaju do Europejskiej Wspólnoty Gospodarczej mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego w związku z wprowadzaniem przez Wspólnotę wspólnej organizacji rynku mięsa owczego i mięsa koziego.W toku negocjacji Strony uzgodniły, co następuje:2. Niniejsze Porozumienie obejmuje:- świeże lub chłodzone mięso baranie, mięso jagnięce i mięso kozie (podpozycja 02.01 A IV a)),- mrożone mięso baranie, mięso jagnięce i mięso kozie (podpozycja 02.01 A IV b)).2. W ramach niniejszego Porozumienia, możliwości wywozu mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego z Urugwaju do Wspólnoty są ustalone na poziomie:5100 ton rocznie, w przeliczeniu na wagę tuszy [2],W celu zapewnienia sprawnego funkcjonowania Porozumienia, Urugwaj zobowiązuje się do wprowadzenia odpowiednich procedur, w celu zapewnienia, że roczne ilości faktycznie wywożone nie przekraczają ilości uzgodnionych i że są wywożone zgodnie z tradycyjną formą ich prezentacji (mrożone lub chłodzone).Jeżeli jakiekolwiek zmiany w technologii i handlu umożliwiają zmiany struktury handlu pod względem form prezentacji towaru, przed wprowadzeneim jakiejkolwiek zmiany Strony niniejszego Porozumienia przeprowadzą konsultacje w ramach komitetu wymienionego w klauzuli 10, w celu znalezienia odpowiedniego rozwiązania.3. W razie zastosowania przez Wspólnotę klauzuli ochronnej, Wspólnota zobowiązuje się, że nie będzie to miało wpływu na dostęp Urugwaju do rynków Wspólnoty, przewidziany w niniejszym Porozumieniu.4. Jeżeli przywóz w danym roku przekroczy uzgodnione wielkości, Wspólnota zachowuje prawo do zawieszenia przywozu z Urugwaju na pozostałą część roku. Nadwyżka w ilości wywiezionej podlega odliczeniu od ilości jaką Urugwaj jest może wywieżć w następnym roku.5. Wspólnota zobowiązuje się ograniczyć opłatę stosowaną w odniesieniu do przywozu produktów objętych niniejszym Porozumieniem do maksymalnej wysokości 10 % ad valorem.6. W momencie przystąpienia nowych Państw Członkowskich, Wspólnota, w uzgodnieniu z Urugwajem, zmieni wielkości określone w klauzuli 2, zgodnie z wymianą handlową Urugwaju z każdym nowym Państwem Członkowskim. Opłaty stosowane przy przywozie do tych nowych Państw Członkowskich zostają ustalone zgodnie z zasadami Traktatu o Przystąpieniu; z uwzględnieniem maksymalnego poziomu opłat, określonego w klauzuli 5 niniejszego Porozumienia.Całkowitą ilość podana w powyższej klauzuli 2 ustala się na 5800 ton w wadze tuszy, licząc od dnia przystąpienia Grecji do Wspólnoty.7. Wspólnota dołoży starań w celu uniknięcia wszelkich zmian na rynku, które mogłyby naruszyć wprowadzanie do obrotu mięsa baraniego i mięsa jagnięcego z Urugwaju na rynek Wspólnoty, w granicach uzgodnionych ilości. W szczególności, Wspólnota podejmie kroki, aby zapewnić, że sprzedaż zapasów interwencyjnych w postaci mrożonej, jako wynik działań podejmowanych w ramach regulacji rynku, nie osłabia sprzedaży urugwajskiego mięsa baraniego i mięsa jagnięcego8. Biorąc pod uwagę cele i postanowienia niniejszego Porozumienia, Wspólnota potwierdza, że jakiekolwiek zwroty lub inne formy wspierania wywozu mięsa baraniego i mięsa jagnięcego oraz żywych owiec i jagniąt rzeźnych, będzie stosowana jedynie według cen i warunków, odpowiadających istniejącym zobowiązaniom międzynarodowym oraz zgodnie ze zwyczajowymi udziałami Wspólnoty w światowym eksporcie tych produktów. Powyższe stwierdzenie interpretuje się w sposób zgodny z artykułem XVI Układu Ogólnego w sprawie Taryf Celnych i Handlu i w szczególności zgodnie z artykułem 10 ustęp 2 litera c) porozumienia w sprawie interpretacji i stosowania artykułów VI, XVI i XXIII Układu Ogólnego w sprawie Taryf Celnych i Handlu.9. Urugwaj zapewnia, że niniejsze Porozumienie jest przestrzegane, w szczególności, poprzez wydawanie świadectw wywozowych na produkty wymienione w klauzuli 1 w granicach ilości objętych niniejszym Porozumieniem.Ze swojej strony, Wspólnota zobowiązuje się do przyjęcia wszelkich koniecznych przepisów w celu wydawania świadectw przywozowych na wymienione wyżej produkty pochodzące z Urugwaju, które uzależnione jest od przedstawienia świadectwa wywozowego wydanego przez właściwe władze wyznaczone przez rząd Urugwaju.Szczegółowe zasady stosowania tego systemu ustanawia się w taki sposób, aby nie było potrzeby składania zabezpieczenia za wystawianie swiadectwa wywozowego na omawiane produkty.Ponadto te szczegółowe zasady stosowania stanowią również, że właściwe władze Urugwaju będą informować okresowo właściwe władze we Wspólnocie, o ilościach na które wydano świadectwa wywozowe, podzielone, gdzie stosowne, według miejsca przeznaczenia..10. Tworzy się komitet doradczy złożony z przedstawicieli Wspólnoty i Urugwaju. Komitet zapewnia, że Porozumienie jest odpowiednio stosowane i że funkcjonuje bez przeszkód. Komitet regularnie bada tendencje na rynkach mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego w państwach obu Stron oraz tendencje na rynku międzynarodowym, a także warunki sprzedaży na tych rynkach włącznie z warunkami istotnymi z punktu widzenia celów określonych w klauzuli 7 niniejszego Porozumienia.Komitet zapewnia, że właściwe stosowanie niniejszego Porozumienia nie jest zakłócane przez wywóz do Wspólnoty produktów z mięsa baraniego, mięsa jagnięcego i mięsa koziego, występujących pod pozycjami taryfowymi niewymienionymi w niniejszym Porozumieniu.Komitet omówi wszystkie kwestie, które mogłyby wyniknąć z zastosowania Porozumienia i zarekomenduje właściwym władzom odpowiednie rozwiązania.11. Postanowienia niniejszego Porozumienia przyjmuje się bez uszczerbku dla praw i obowiązków Stron w ramach GATT.12. Roczna ilość ustalona w klauzuli 2 odnosi się do okresu od dnia 1 stycznia do dnia 31 grudnia. Ilość obowiązująca od wejścia w życie niniejszego Porozumienia do dnia 1 stycznia następnego roku zostanie ustalona proporcjonalnie do całkowitej rocznej ilości, przy uwzględnieniu wahań sezonowych handlu.13. Niniejsze Porozumienie stosuje się, z jednej strony, do terytoriów, na których stosuje się Traktat ustanawiający Europejską Wspólnotę Gospodarczą i na warunkach określonych w Traktacie, oraz na terytorium Republiki Urugwaju z drugiej strony.14. Porozumienie wchodzi w życie z dniem 20 października 1980 roku Porozumienie pozostaje w mocy do dnia 31 marca 1984 roku i pozostanie w mocy w okresie późniejszym, z zastrzeżeniem prawa każdej Strony jego pisemnego wypowiedzenia z rocznym wyprzedzeniem. W każdym przypadku postanowienia niniejszego Porozumienia będą ponownie zbadane przez Strony przed dniem 1 kwietnia 1984 roku, w celu wprowadzenia wszelkich dostosowań uznanych wspólnie za niezbędne."Mam zaszczyt potwierdzić, że mój rząd zgadza z treścią Pańskiego listu.Proszę przyjąć, Szanowny Panie, wyrazy mojego najwyższego szacunku.W imieniu RząduWschodniej Republiki Urugwaju[1] Waga tuszy (odpowiednik wagi z kością). Przez pojęcie to rozumie się wagę mięsa wraz z kością jako takiego jak również mięso bez kości przeliczone przy pomocy odpowiedniego współczynnika na wagę z kością. Do tego celu 55 kg mięsa baraniego bez kości odpowiada 100 kg mięsa baraniego z kością, a 60 kg mięa jagnięcego bez kości odpowiada 100 kg mięsa jagnięcego z kością.[2] Waga tuszy (odpowiednik wagi z kością). Przez pojęcie to rozumie się wagę mięsa wraz z kością jako takiego jak również mięso bez kości przeliczone przy pomocy odpowiedniego współczynnika na wagę z kością. Do tego celu 55 kilogramom mięsa baraniego bez kości odpowiada 100 kilogramów mięsa baraniego z kością, a 60 kilogramom mięsa jagnięcego bez kości odpowiada 100 kilogramów mięsa jagnięcego z kością.--------------------------------------------------


text:
Der Sommertagszug ist ein Brauchtumsfest in der Kurpfalz und in den angrenzenden Gebieten. Traditionell wird es an „Mittfasten“ begangen, am Sonntag Laetare, also drei Wochen vor Ostern, teilweise jedoch auch an anderen Terminen, abhängig von der örtlichen Tradition. Der Sommertagszug gehört zu den Bräuchen der Winterverbrennung und des Todaustragens.
 Ursprung
 Wahrscheinlich ist der Sommertagszug heidnischen Ursprungs und stellt den Kampf des Winters mit dem Sommer dar. Darüber hinaus fließen Elemente eines Heischebrauches mit ein. Am Ende des Winters waren viele Vorratskammern leer und die Kinder gingen betteln. Erwähnung findet das Fest bereits in den Briefen von Lieselotte von der Pfalz, der Schwägerin Ludwigs XIV. von Frankreich. Sie erwähnt in ihren Briefen schon das Lied „Stroh, Stroh, Stroh“. An manchen Orten haben sich andere Bräuche mit dem Sommertagsbrauch vermischt, wie in Iggelheim, die Weckspende, die aus der Weckackerstiftung hervorging, in Horchheim der Wackauswurf oder in Forst die Stiftung der Spitzwecken mit Hansel-Fingerhut-Spiel am Sonntag Laetare.
 Geschichtliche Entwicklung
 Der Brauch des Sommertags wurde teilweise im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert von den christlichen Bekenntnissen als „heidnisches Greuel“ gesehen, jedoch offenbar um 1800 wiederbelebt, aber nach dem Hambacher Fest in der bayerischen Pfalz als meldepflichtiges Volksfest beobachtet. Die Bayerischen Landes- und Volkskunde charakterisierte später die Lieder der Sommertagsbräuche als „heidnisch gedacht und gefasst und zumeist durch ungehöriges, großenteils unverstehliches Beiwerk erneuert“. Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts begannen die Heimatpflege und Volkskunde sowie die Ortsgemeinden, die Wirtschaft und der Fremdenverkehr die Sommertagsbräuche mit Inhalt zu füllen bzw. zu organisieren. Im Ersten Weltkrieg und Zweiten Weltkrieg fielen die Sommertagszüge aus. In den 1920er und 1930er Jahren wurde die Tradition mit größeren Umzügen fortgesetzt. In der NS-Zeit gab es Versuche, den Sommertag politisch zu vereinnahmen. Nach 1945 kam es an vielen Orten nach und nach zum Verschwinden des Sommertags. Jedoch lässt sich in den letzten vier Jahrzehnten mancherorts die Wiederaufnahme der Sommertagszüge durch vielfältige Veranstalter verzeichnen.
 Verlauf
 Der Sommertagszug zieht durch den Ort (in Mannheim durch den Luisenpark) und verkündet den Bewohnern, dass der Winter nun ein Ende hat. Kinder bekleben bunte Stecken mit farbigem Papier und stecken auf die Spitze eine süße Hefebrezel, die sogenannte Sommertagsbrezel, oft auch noch ein ausgeblasenes Ei. Begleitet werden die Kinder von den Butzen, das sind große Gestelle, in denen Personen stecken, die sie herumtragen. Diese Gestelle sind mit Stroh (für den tristen Winter) oder Tannenzweigen (für den grünen Sommer) geschmückt. Oft läuft noch ein Schneemann aus Pappmaché mit. Zum Abschluss des Umzuges tanzen die Butzen miteinander und der Schneemann wird verbrannt. Vereine schmücken Wagen mit österlichen oder Frühjahrs-Motiven, ein Musikverein spielt Frühlingslieder.
 Sommertagslied
 Ein Lied darf auf keinen Fall fehlen, dessen Text von Ort zu Ort variieren kann:
 Strih, Strah, Stroh,
 Der Sommerdag is do.
 Der Sommer und der Winter
 Des sin Geschwisterkinder.
 Sommerdag, stab aus
 bloß dem Winter die Aage aus
 Strih, Strah Stroh,
 Der Sommerdag is do
 Isch her die Schlissel klingle,
 Was werre se uns dann bringe
 Neuer Wein und Brezel drein,
 Was noch dazu? Paar neie Schuh,
 Strih Strah Stroh
 Der Sommerdag is do
 O du alter Stockfisch,
 wann mer kummt, do hosch nix
 Als e Schipp voll Kohle,
 Der Kukuck soll disch hole.
 Strih Strah Stroh,
 Der Sommerdag is do.
 Heit iwwers Johr,
 Do simmer widder do.
 Sommertagsveranstaltungen in den Regionen, Stichjahr 2014
 1789 zum Kurfürstentum Pfalz gehörende Ort sind grün unterlegt
 Quellen
 Literatur
 Albert Becker, Sommertag Neues zur Geschichte und Volkskunde der Pfälzer Lätarebräuche Neustadt/Haardt 1931
 Bavaria Landes- und Volkskunde des Königreiches Bayer, Vierter Band zweite Abteilung bayerische Rheinpfalz, München 1867
 Helmut Seebach, Alte Fest in der Pfalz, Annweiler-Queichhambach 1998
 Vaterländisches Taschenbuch für Freunde des Guten und Schönen zur Unterhaltung und Belehrung, Frankfurt a. M, 1804
 Veranstaltungsorte (Auswahl)
 Allgemeine Zeitung Rhein-Main-Presse, Online
 Amtsblatt der Verbandsgemeinde Westhofen
 Amtsblatt der Verbandsgemeinde Grünstadt-Land
 Amtsblatt der Verbandsgemeinde Guntersblum
 Amtsblatt der Verbandsgemeinde Hettenleidelheim
 Amtsblatt der Verbandsgemeinde Lingenfeld
 Amtsblatt der Verbandsgemeinde Nieder-Olm
 Die Pfalz feiert, online
 Metropolnews – Nachrichtenmagazin, online
 Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar News, online
 Morgenweb, Mannheimer Morgen, online
 Feste und Veranstaltungen Südpfalz-Tourismus 2014, online
 Webseiten der Veranstalter
 Weblinks
 Foto-Galerie „Sommertagszug“
 Foto-Galerie "Sommertagszug Heidelberg 2017"
 Kurpfalz
 Kultur (Mannheim)
 Frühlingsfest
 Festumzug


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999A0715(01)
 Additional Protocol To the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Cyprus
 Official Journal L 180 , 15/07/1999 P. 0037 - 0045
 ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLTo the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and the Republic of CyprusTHE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, hereinafter referred to as "the Community",of the one part, andTHE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, hereinafter referred to as "Cyprus",of the other part,WHEREAS the Agreement establishing an association between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Cyprus, hereinafter referred to as the "Association Agreement", has entered into force on 1 June 1973;WHEREAS a Protocol on financial and technical co-operation between the Community, of the one part, and Cyprus, of the other part was signed on 30 October 1995;WHEREAS the objectives of the Protocol referred to in Article 1 thereof includes the provision that Cyprus is to be facilitated in its transition efforts with a view to accession to the European Union;WHEREAS Article 3(2) of the Protocol provides that priority shall be given to projects and operations having inter alia the aim of promoting participation by Cyprus in Community framework programmes and in the field of science and technology, the creation or strengthening of links between training and research establishments in Cyprus and the European Union;WHEREAS in the Resolution of the Association Council set up by the Association Agreement dated 12th June 1995, it was reiterated that in the context of the preparation of Cyprus for entry into the European Union a specific strategy will comprise provisions and arrangements concerning inter alia participation by Cyprus in Community programmes open to the Member States and/or partner countries which have applied for accession;WHEREAS the European Council at its meeting in Luxembourg on 12 and 13 December 1997 calls for the opening of certain Community programmes (such as in the field of research) to the candidate countries, as a way of familiarising themselves with the policies and working methods of the Union, each candidate country being expected to make a steadily increasing financial contribution of its own;WHEREAS the conclusions of the aforementioned Council also call for the participation of the candidate countries, as observers and for the points which concern them, in the committees assisting the Commission in the implementation of the programmes to which they contribute financially;WHEREAS, by Decision No 182/1999/EC, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union adopted the fifth framework programme of the European Community for research and technological development and demonstration activities (1998 to 2002), hereinafter called "the fifth framework programme";WHEREAS; without prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaty instituting the European Community, this Protocol and any activities entered into under it will in no way affect the powers vested in the Member States to undertake bilateral activities with Cyprus in the field of science, technology, research and development, and to conclude, where appropriate, agreements to that end,HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 11. Research entities established in Cyprus, in accordance with the laws of Cyprus, may participate in all the specific programmes of the fifth framework programme. Cypriot scientists or research entities may participate in the activities of the Joint Research Centre, to the extent that such activities are not covered by the first sentence.2. Research entities established in the Community may participate in research programmes and projects in Cyprus in themes equivalent to those of the programmes of the fifth framework programme.3. "Research entities" as referred to in this Protocol, shall include inter alia universities, organisations engaged in research activities, industrial companies, including small and medium-sized enterprises, or natural persons.Article 2Cooperation may take the following forms:1. Participation of research entities established in Cyprus in the implementation of all specific programmes adopted under the fifth framework programme, in accordance with the terms and conditions laid down in the "rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results for the implementation of the fifth framework programme of the European Community (1998-2002)".2. Financial contribution by Cyprus to the budgets of the programmes adopted for the implementation of the fifth framework programme on the basis of the ratio of the gross domestic product (GDP) of Cyprus to the sum of the GDPs of the Member States of the European Union and that of Cyprus.3. Participation of research entities established in the Community in Cypriot research projects and rights to their results, in accordance with the laws of Cyprus in every case, and shall require the joint participation of at least one Cypriot research entity. Research entities established in the Community participating in Cypriot research projects within research and development programmes shall cover their own costs, including their relative share of the project's general management and administrative costs.4. Timely provision of information concerning the implementation of RTD programmes in Cyprus and the Community, and concerning the results of work undertaken within the framework of cooperation.5. Cooperation may be adapted and developed at any time by mutual agreement between the Parties.Article 31. Research entities established in Cyprus participating in Community research programmes, shall, as regards ownership, exploitation and dissemination of information and intellectual property arising from such participation, have the same rights and obligations as those of research entities established in the Community, subject to the provisions of Annex A.2. Research entities established in the Community, taking part in Cypriot research projects within research and development programmes, shall, as regards ownership, exploitation and dissemination of information and intellectual property arising from such participation, have the same rights and obligations as those of Cypriot research entities in the project in question.Article 4A joint committee shall be established under this Protocol, to be called "EC-Cyprus Research Committee", whose functions shall include:- reviewing, evaluating and discussing measures to ensure the implementation of this Protocol,- examining any measure of a nature to improve and develop cooperation.The committee, which shall be composed of representatives of the Commission and of Cyprus, shall adopt its rules of procedure.It shall meet at the request of any of the Parties and at least once a year.Article 51. The financial contribution of Cyprus deriving from participation in the implementation of the specific programmes shall be established in proportion to, and in addition to, the amount available each year in the general budget of the European Communities for commitment appropriations to meet the Commission's financial obligations stemming from work to be carried out in the forms necessary for the implementation, management and operation of these programmes.2. The proportionality factor governing the contribution of Cyprus shall be obtained by establishing the ratio between the GDP of Cyprus, at market prices, and the sum of the GDPs, at market prices, of the Member States of the European Union and Cyprus. This ratio shall be calculated on the basis of the latest statistical data from the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat) pertaining on the same year, available at the time of publication of the preliminary draft budget of the European Communities.3. In order to facilitate its participation in the specific programmes, the contribution of Cyprus will be implemented as follows:>TABLE>4. The rules for financial participation by the Community are set out in Annex IV of Decision No 182/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.5. The rules governing the financial contribution of Cyprus are set out in Annex B.Article 61. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 3, research entities established in Cyprus participating in the fifth framework programme shall have the same contractual rights and obligations as entities established in the Community, taking into account the mutual interests of the Community and Cyprus.2. For Cypriot research entities, the terms and conditions applicable for the submission and evaluation of proposals and those for the granting and conclusion of contracts under Community programmes shall be the same as those applicable for contracts concluded under the same programmes with research entities in the Community, taking into account the mutual interests of the Community and Cyprus.3. Cypriot experts shall be taken into consideration, alongside Community experts, in the selection of evaluators or experts under the Community's RTD programmes and as members of the advisory groups and other consultative bodies which assist the Commission in the implementation of the fifth framework programme.4. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 3, research entities established in the Community participating in research projects within research and development programmes shall have the same contractual rights and obligations as Cypriot entities, taking into account the mutual interests of the Community and Cyprus.5. A Cypriot research entity may be coordinator of a project under the same terms and conditions applicable to entities established in the Community. In conformity with the Community's Financial Regulations, contractual arrangements concluded with, or by, Cypriot research entities shall provide for controls and audits to be carried out by, or under the authority of, the Commission and the Court of Auditors. Financial audits may be carried out with the purpose of controlling such entities' income and expenditures, related to the contractual obligations towards the Community. In a spirit of cooperation and mutual interest, the relevant Cypriot authorities shall provide any reasonable and feasible assistance as may be necessary or helpful under the circumstances to perform such controls and audits.6. For research entities from the Community, the terms and conditions applicable for the submission and evaluation of proposals and those for the granting and conclusion of contracts for projects within Cypriot programmes shall be equivalent to those applicable for contracts concluded under the same research and development programmes with research entities in Cyprus, taking into account the mutual interests of the Community and Cyprus.Article 71. Each Party undertakes, in accordance with its own rules and regulations, to facilitate the movement and residence of research workers participating, in Cyprus and in the Community, in the activities covered by this Protocol and to facilitate cross border movement of goods intended for use in such activities.2. Cooperation under this Protocol shall be exempt from Cypriot indirect taxes, customs duties, prohibitions and restrictions on imports and exports in respect of goods and services intended for use under such cooperation.Article 81. Cypriot representatives will, for the points which concerns them, participate as observers in the programme committees of the fifth framework programme. These committees shall moreover meet without the presence of Cypriot representatives at the time of voting. Cyprus will be informed.2. Participation as referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the same form, including procedures for receipt of information and documentation, as that applicable to participants from Member States.Article 91. This Protocol is hereby concluded for the duration of the fifth framework programme.2. Subject to paragraph 1, either of the Parties may terminate this Protocol at any time upon twelve months' notice in writing. Projects and activities in progress at the time of termination and/or expiry of this Protocol shall continue until their completion under the conditions laid down in this Protocol.3. Should the Community decide to revise one or more Community programmes, this Protocol may be terminated under mutually agreed conditions. Cyprus shall be notified of the exact content of the revised programs within one week of their adoption by the Community. The Parties shall notify each other, within one month after the adoption of the Community decision, of any intention to terminate this Protocol.4. Where the Community adopts a new multi-annual framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities, this Protocol may be renegotiated or renewed under mutually agreed conditions.Article 10This Protocol shall enter into force on the date on which the Parties have notified each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for that purpose.Article 11This Protocol including Annexes A and B thereto form an integral part of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Cyprus.Article 12This Protocol shall be drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish and Greek languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.Done at Brussels, 20 May 1999.For the European Community>PIC FILE= "L_1999180EN.004001.EPS">For the Republic of Cyprus>PIC FILE= "L_1999180EN.004002.EPS">ANNEX APRINCIPLES ON THE ALLOCATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTSRights to intellectual property (IP) created or furnished under the Protocol shall be allocated as provided in this Annex.I. ApplicationThis Annex is applicable to joint research undertaken pursuant to this Protocol, except as otherwise specifically agreed by the Parties.II. Ownership, allocation and exercise of rights1. For purposes of this Protocol "intellectual property" shall have the meaning given in Article 2 of the Convention establishing the World Intellectual Property Organisation, done at Stockholm on 14 July 1967.2. This Annex deals with the allocation of rights, interests and royalties of the Parties and their Participants. Each Party and its participants shall ensure that the other Party and its participants may obtain the rights to IP allocated to it in accordance with this Annex. This Annex does not otherwise alter or prejudice the allocation of rights, interests and royalties between a Party and its nationals or participants, which shall be determined by the laws and practices applicable to each party.3. The following principles shall apply and be provided for in the contractual arrangements:(a) Adequate protection of IP. The Parties, their agencies and/or their participants, as appropriate, shall ensure that they notify one another within a reasonable time of the creation of any IP arising under this Protocol or implementing arrangements and that they seek protection for such intellectual property in a timely fashion.(b) Taking account of the contributions of the Parties or their participants in determining the rights and interests of the Parties and participants.(c) Effective exploitation of results.(d) Non-discriminatory treatment of participants from the other party as compared with the treatment given to its own participants.(e) Protection of business-confidential information.4. The participants shall jointly develop a Technology Management Plan (TMP) in respect of the ownership and use, including publication, of information and IP to be created in the course of joint research. The indicative features of a TMP are contained in the Appendix to this Protocol. The TMP shall be approved by the responsible funding agency or department of the Party involved in financing the research, before the conclusion of the specific research and development cooperation contract to which it is attached. The TMPs shall be developed taking into account the aims of the joint research, the relative financial or other contributions of the Parties or participants, the advantages and disadvantages of licensing by territory or for fields of use, the transfer of export-controlled data, goods or services, requirements imposed by the applicable laws including those of the Parties concerning IP rights and other factors deemed appropriate by the participants. The rights and obligations concerning the research generated by visiting researchers in respect of IP shall also be dealt with in the TMPs.5. Subject to the specific provisions of the Parties concerning IP rights, information or IP created in the course of joint research and not addressed in the TMP shall be allocated, with the approval of the Parties, according to the principles set out in the TMP. In case of disagreement, such information or IP shall be owned jointly by all the participants involved in the joint research from which the information or IP results. Each participant to whom this provision applies shall have the right to use such information or IP for his own commercial exploitation with no geographical limitation.6. Each Party shall ensure that the other Party and its participants may have the rights to IP allocated to them in accordance with these principles.7. While maintaining the conditions of competition in areas affected by the Protocol, each Party shall endeavour to ensure that rights acquired pursuant to this Protocol and arrangements made under it are exercised in such a way as to encourage, in particular, (i) the dissemination and use of information created, disclosed or otherwise made available, under the Protocol, and (ii) the adoption and implementation of international standards.8. Termination or expiry of this Protocol shall not affect rights or obligations under this Annex.III. International conventionsIP belonging to the Parties or to their participants shall be accorded treatment consistent with the relevant international Conventions that are applicable to the Parties including the TRIPS Agreement (Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights administered by the World Trade Organisation) as well as the Berne Convention (Paris Act 1971 ) and the Paris Convention (Stockholm Act 1967).IV. Scientific literary worksWithout prejudice to Section V, and unless otherwise agreed in the TMP, publication of results of research shall be made jointly by the parties or participants to that joint research. Subject to the foregoing general rule, the following procedures shall apply:1. In the case of publication by a Party or public bodies of that Party of scientific and technical journals, articles, reports, books, including video and software arising from joint research pursuant to this Protocol, the other Party shall be entitled to a world-wide, non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free licence to translate, reproduce, adapt, transmit and publicly distribute such works.2. The Parties shall ensure that literary works of a scientific character arising from joint research pursuant to this Protocol and published by independent publishers are disseminated as widely as possible.3. All copies of a copyright work to be publicly distributed and prepared under this provision shall indicate the names of the author(s) of the work unless an author explicitly declines to be named. They shall also bear a clearly visible acknowledgement of the cooperative support of the Parties.V. Undisclosed InformationA. Documentary undisclosed information1. Each Party, its agencies or its participants, as appropriate, shall identify at the earliest possible moment and preferably in the TMP the information that they wish to remain undisclosed, taking into account, inter alia, the following criteria:(a) confidentiality of the information in the sense that it is not, as a body or in the precise configuration or assembly of its components, generally known among or readily accessible by lawful means to experts in the field;(b) the actual or potential commercial value of the information by virtue of its confidentiality;(c) previous protection of the information in the sense that it has been subject to steps that were reasonable under the circumstances by the person lawfully in control, to maintain its confidentiality.The Parties, their agencies and their participants, as appropriate, may in certain cases agree that, unless otherwise indicated, parts or all of the information provided, exchanged or created in the course of joint research may not be disclosed.2. Each Party shall ensure that it and its participants clearly identify undisclosed information, for example by means of an appropriate marking or restrictive legend. This also applies to any reproduction of the said information, in whole or in part.A Party and a participant receiving undisclosed information shall respect the privileged nature thereof. Such respect shall automatically terminate when this information is disclosed by the owner and enters the public domain.3. Undisclosed information communicated under this Protocol may be disseminated by the receiving Party or its organisation to persons within or employed by the receiving Party or organisation authorised for the specific purposes of the joint research under way, provided that any undisclosed information so disseminated is pursuant to an agreement of confidentiality and readily recognisable as such, as set out above.4. With the prior written consent of the Party providing undisclosed information, the receiving Party may disseminate such undisclosed information more widely than otherwise permitted in paragraph 3 above. The Parties shall cooperate in developing procedures for requesting and obtaining prior written consent for such wider dissemination, and each Party will grant such approval to the extent permitted by its domestic policies, regulations and laws.B. Non-documentary undisclosed informationNon-documentary undisclosed or other confidential information provided in seminars and other meetings arranged under this Protocol, or information arising from the attachment of staff, use of facilities, or joint projects, shall be treated by the Parties or their participants according to the principles specified for documentary information in the Protocol; this is on the understanding, however, that the recipient of such undisclosed or other confidential or privileged information was made aware of the confidential character of the information communicated at the time such communication was made.C. ControlEach Party shall endeavour to ensure that undisclosed information received by it under this Protocol is controlled as provided herein. If one of the Parties becomes aware that it will be, or may be reasonably expected to become, unable to meet the non-dissemination provisions of sections A and B, it shall immediately inform the other Party. The Parties shall thereafter consult to define an appropriate course of action.Appendix to ANNEX AIndicative features of a TMPThe TMP is a specific agreement to be concluded between the participants on the implementation of joint research and the respective rights and obligations of the participants.With respect to IP, the TMP will normally deal with, among other things, ownership, protection, user rights for research and development purposes, exploitation and dissemination, including arrangements for joint publication, the rights and obligations of visiting researchers and dispute settlement procedures. The TMP may also deal with foreground and background information, licensing and deliverables.ANNEX BRULES GOVERNING THE FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF CYPRUS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 5 OF THIS PROTOCOL1. Determination of the financial participation1.1. The Commission of the European Communities shall communicate to Cyprus, and shall inform the sub-committee referred to in Article 4 of this Protocol of such communication, as soon as possible, and at the latest on 1 September, of each financial year the following information, together with relevant background material:(a) the amounts in commitment appropriations, in the statement of expenditure of the preliminary draft budget of the European Communities corresponding to the fifth framework programme;(b) the estimated amount of the contributions derived from the preliminary draft budget, corresponding to the participation of Cyprus in the fifth framework programme.Nonetheless, in order to facilitate internal budgetary procedures, the Commission services shall provide corresponding indicative figures at the latest on 30 May of each year.1.2. Once the general budget has been finally adopted the Commission shall communicate to Cyprus in the statement of expenditure corresponding to Cyprus's participation, the amounts referred to in paragraph 1.1.2. Payment procedures2.1. The Commission shall issue, at the latest on 1 January and 15 June of each financial year, a call for funds to Cyprus corresponding to its contribution under this Protocol. These calls for funds shall provide, respectively, for the payment.- of six-twelfths of the contribution of Cyprus not later than 20 February,- and six-twelfths of its contribution not later than 15 July.However, the six-twelfths, to be paid not later than 20 February shall be calculated on the basis of the amount set out in the statement of revenue of the preliminary draft budget: the regularisation of the amount thus paid shall occur with the payment of the six-twelfths not later than 15 July.2.2. For the first year of implementation of this Protocol, the Commission shall issue a first call for funds within 30 days of its coming into effect. Should this call be issued after 15 June, it shall provide for the payment of twelve/twelfths of the contribution of Cyprus within 30 days, calculated on the basis of the amount set out in the statement of revenue of the budget.2.3. The contribution of Cyprus shall be expressed and paid in euro.2.4. Cyprus shall pay its contribution under this Protocol according to the schedule in paragraphs 2.1. and 2.2. above. Any delay in payment shall give rise to the payment of interest at a rate equal to the one-month interbank offered rate (Euribor) in euro as quoted on Telerate. This rate shall be increased by 1,5 % for each month of delay. The increased rate shall be applied to the entire period of delay. However, the interest shall be due only if the contribution is paid more than thirty days after the scheduled payment dates mentioned in paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2 above.2.5. Travel costs incurred by Cypriot representatives and experts for the purposes of taking part in the work of the committee referred to in Articles 4, and 8(1) and of the groups and bodies referred to in Article 6(3) of this Protocol and those involved in the implementation of the fifth framework programe shall be reimbursed by the Commission on the same basis as and in accordance with the procedures currently in force for the representatives and experts of the Member States of the European Union.3. Conditions for the implementation.3.1. The financial contribution of Cyprus to the fifth framework programme in accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol shall normally remain unchanged for the financial year in question.3.2. The Commission, at the time of the closure of the accounts relating to each financial year (n), within the framework of the establishment of the revenue and expenditure account, shall proceed to the regularisation of the accounts with respect to the participation of Cyprus, taking into consideration modifications which have taken place, either by transfer, cancellations, carry-overs, decommitments, or by supplementary and amending budgets during the financial year. This regularisation shall occur at the time of the second payment for the year n+1. Further regularisations shall occur every year until July 2006.Payment by Cyprus shall be credited to the Community programmes as budget receipts allocated to the appropriate budget heading in the statement of revenue of the general budget of the European Communities.The financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities shall apply to the management of the appropriations.4. InformationAt the latest on 31 May of each financial year (n+1), the statement of appropriations for the fifth framework programme related to the previous financial year (n), shall be prepared and transmitted to Cyprus for information, according to the format of the Commission's revenue and expenditure account.


type: legislation

jurisdiction: US

text:
 III
 Calendar No. 101
 110th CONGRESS
 1st Session
 S. RES. 30
 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
 January 16, 2007
 Mr. Biden (for himself,
 Mr. Lugar, Mr.
 Lieberman, Ms. Snowe,
 Mr. Feingold, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs.
 Boxer, Ms. Cantwell,
 Mr. Casey, Mr.
 Cochran, Ms. Klobuchar,
 Mr. Levin, Mr.
 Menendez, Mr. Obama,
 Mr. Sanders, Mr. Webb, Mr.
 Kerry, Mr. Dodd, and
 Mr. Cardin) submitted the following
 resolution; which was referred to the
 Committee on Foreign
 Relations
 March 29, 2007
 Reported by Mr. Biden,
 without amendment
 RESOLUTION
 Expressing the sense of the Senate
 regarding the need for the United States to address global climate change
 through the negotiation of fair and effective international
 commitments.
 Whereas there is a scientific consensus, as established by
 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and confirmed by the National
 Academy of Sciences, that the continued buildup of anthropogenic greenhouse
 gases in the atmosphere threatens the stability of the global climate;
 Whereas there are significant long-term risks to the
 economy and the environment of the United States from the temperature increases
 and climatic disruptions that are projected to result from increased greenhouse
 gas concentrations;
 Whereas the potential impacts of global climate change,
 including long-term drought, famine, mass migration, and abrupt climatic
 shifts, may lead to international tensions and instability in regions affected
 and, therefore, have implications for the national security interests of the
 United States;
 Whereas the United States has the largest economy in the
 world and is also the largest emitter of greenhouse gases;
 Whereas the greenhouse gas emissions of the United States
 are projected to continue to rise;
 Whereas the greenhouse gas emissions of developing
 countries are rising more rapidly than the emissions of the United States and
 will soon surpass the greenhouse gas emissions of the United States and other
 developed countries;
 Whereas reducing greenhouse gas emissions to the levels
 necessary to avoid serious climatic disruption requires the introduction of new
 energy technologies and other climate-friendly technologies, the use of which
 results in low or no emissions of greenhouse gases or in the capture and
 storage of greenhouse gases;
 Whereas the development and sale of climate-friendly
 technologies in the United States and internationally present economic
 opportunities for workers and businesses in the United States;
 Whereas climate-friendly technologies can improve air
 quality by reducing harmful pollutants from stationary and mobile sources and
 can enhance energy security by reducing reliance on imported oil, diversifying
 energy sources, and reducing the vulnerability of energy delivery
 infrastructure;
 Whereas other industrialized countries are undertaking
 measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which provides the industries in
 those countries with a competitive advantage in the growing global market for
 climate-friendly technologies;
 Whereas efforts to limit emissions growth in developing
 countries in a manner that is consistent with the development needs of those
 countries could establish significant markets for climate-friendly technologies
 and contribute to international efforts to address climate change;
 Whereas the United States Climate Change
 Science Program launched by President George W. Bush concluded in April 2006
 that there is no longer a discrepancy between the rates of global average
 temperature increase observed at the Earth’s surface and in the atmosphere,
 strengthening the scientific evidence that human activity contributes
 significantly to global temperature increases;
 Whereas President Bush, in the State of the Union Address
 given in January 2006, called on the United States to reduce its
 addiction to oil and focus its attention on developing cleaner,
 renewable, and sustainable energy sources;
 Whereas President Bush has launched the Asia-Pacific
 Partnership on Clean Development and Climate to cooperatively develop new and
 cleaner energy technologies and promote their use in fast-developing nations
 like India and China;
 Whereas the national security of the United States will
 increasingly depend on the deployment of diplomatic, military, scientific, and
 economic resources toward solving the problem of the overreliance of the United
 States and the world on high-carbon energy;
 Whereas the United States is a party to the United Nations
 Framework Convention on Climate Change, done at New York May 9, 1992, and
 entered into force in 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the
 Convention);
 Whereas, at the December 2005 United Nations Climate
 Change Conference in Montreal, Canada, parties to the Convention, with the
 concurrence of the United States, initiated a new dialogue on long-term
 cooperative action to address climate change;
 Whereas the Convention sets a long-term objective of
 stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that
 would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate
 system;
 Whereas the Convention establishes that parties bear
 common but differentiated responsibilities for efforts to achieve the objective
 of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations;
 Whereas an effective global effort to address climate
 change must provide for commitments and action by all countries that are major
 emitters of greenhouse gases, developed and developing alike, and the widely
 varying circumstances among the developed and developing countries may require
 that such commitments and action vary; and
 Whereas the United States has the capability to lead the
 effort to counter global climate change: Now, therefore, be it
 That it is the sense of the Senate
 that the United States should act to reduce the health, environmental,
 economic, and national security risks posed by global climate change and foster
 sustained economic growth through a new generation of technologies, by—
 (1)participating in
 negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,
 done at New York May 9, 1992, and entered into force in 1994, and leading
 efforts in other international fora, with the objective of securing United
 States participation in binding agreements that—
 (A)advance and
 protect the economic and national security interests of the United
 States;
 (B)establish
 mitigation commitments by all countries that are major emitters of greenhouse
 gases, consistent with the principle of common but differentiated
 responsibilities;
 (C)establish
 flexible international mechanisms to minimize the cost of efforts by
 participating countries; and
 (D)achieve a
 significant long-term reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions; and
 (2)establishing a
 bipartisan Senate observer group, the members of which shall be designated by
 the chairman and ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
 Senate, to—
 (A)monitor any
 international negotiations on climate change; and
 (B)ensure that the
 advice and consent function of the Senate is exercised in a manner to
 facilitate timely consideration of any applicable treaty submitted to the
 Senate.
 March 29, 2007
 Reported without amendment


type: other

text:
ThailandsHistoria.se - Historien om thailand - Thailands patriotiska nätverk och dess aktiviteter (januari 2011)
 Gränsmarknaden Ban Khlong Luek (även känd som Talat Rong Kluea)
 Thailands patriotiska nätverk (TPN) kommer att hålla en stor demonstration framför regeringsbyggnaden under morgondagen. I uttalandet, som lästes upp av Chaiwat Sinsuwong onsdagen den 12 januari 2011, krävde man återigen regeringens avgång.
 Uttalandet krävde att premiärminister Abhisit, biträdande premiärminister Suthep Thaugsuban, försvarsminister Prawit Wongsuwan, utrikesminister Kasit Piromya och hans sekreterare Chavanont Intarakomalyasut skulle avgå. De hade visat försumlighet då de misslyckats med att hjälpa de sju arresterade thailändarna.
 Om regeringen inte hörsammade deras krav skulle nätverket demonstrera i Aranyaprathet i provinsen Sa Kaeo för att stänga den viktiga gränskontrollen Khlong Luek (Khlong Lük) คลองลึก - Poipet ปอยเปต. Här finns också den stora gränsmarknaden Rong Kluea (Talat Rong Klüa) ตลาดโรงเกลือ.
 I uttalandet sades det att de nu medgav att thailändarna gjort intrång på kambodjansk mark med förhoppningen om att de skulle beviljas kunglig nåd från den kambodjanske kungen.
 Nätverket krävde också att regeringen skulle överlämna ett brev till FN för att be organisationen att motsätta sig den kambodjanska domstolens jurisdiktion i fallet. Nätverket hävdar att den kambodjanska domstolen inte har auktoritet att handha ärendet mot de arresterade thailändarna.
 I uttalandet uppmanades den thailändska och den kambodjanska regeringen att följa den fjärde Genèvekonventionen, som de båda länderna skrivit under, som förbjuder arresteringar och rättegångar mot civila i ett omtvistat område.
 Nätverket skulle lämna över ett brev till FN och till internationella Röda Korset i Thailand för att be dem se över de sju thailändarnas situation för att garantera deras säkerhet medan de sitter internerade i fängelset Prey Sar i Phnom Penh.
 Regeringen kommer inte tillåta supportrar till TPN att stänga den viktigaste gränsövergången i Sa Kaeo. Detta sade biträdande premiärminister Suthep Thaugsuban under torsdagen den 13 januari. Gods värt nästan 30 miljarder baht passerar denna gränsövergång varje år och många thailändare korsar gränsen här för att spela bort sina pengar i Kambodjas kasinon.
 Gulskjortorna vid regeringsbyggnaden övervägde också att lämna en begäran till kungen där man anklagade regeringen för försumlighet med att hjälpa de arresterade landsmännen i Kambodja. Men Suthep menade att regeringen och myndigheterna gjort sitt bästa för att få dem släppta.
 Omkring 300 personer från fyra gränsdistrikt i Sa Kaeo samlades framför Aranyaprathets kommunkontor på torsdagen för att visa sitt missnöje med TPN:s hot om att bege sig hit och stänga gränsövergången Klong Luek-Poipet, berättade polisen.
 Folk från distrikten Ta Phraya ตาพระยา, Khok Sung, Aranyaprathet och Khlong Hat คลองหาด sade att ansvaret för att hjälpa de sju arresterade thailändarna låg hos regeringen och utrikesministeriet och inte hos TPN. De sade att säkerheten för befolkningen som lever vid gränsen hotades om ett krig skulle bryta ut.
 Sa Kaeos polischef generalmajor Theerayuth Thammasaroj (Thirayut Thammasarot) ธีรยุทธ ธรรมสาโรช (11 mars 1951-) beordrade polisen i de fyra gränsdistrikten att sätta upp vägspärrar för att undersöka fordon, på väg till gränsen, för vapen. En lista med namn på framträdande medlemmar i nätverket och bilnummer delades ut till polisen vid alla vägspärrar.
 Gränsövergången Khlong Luek-Poi Pet var öppen som vanligt på torsdagsmorgonen, men antalet thailändska turister på väg mot Angor Wat i Siem Reap och till landets kasinon var uppenbart färre än vanligt.
 På tisdagsmorgonen den 18 januari marscherade omkring 1 000 TPN-supportrar från regeringsbyggnaden till Grand Palace där de lämnade över ett klagomål mot regeringen för vidarebefordran till kungen.
 Enligt nätverket hade regeringen misslyckats med att sköta de thai-kambodjanska gränsproblemen och inte gjort tillräckligt för att få de arresterade thailändarna frigivna i Kambodja.
 Demonstranterna, som leddes av Chaiwat Sinsuwong, började sin marsch klockan 09.59 från regeringsbyggnaden. Detta trots att det blivit känt att fyra av de arresterade thailändarna i Kambodja, förutom Veera Somkwamkid, hade beviljats borgen.
 Chaiwat hade med sig en lista med 82 000 namnunderskrifter från nätverkets supportrar och demonstranterna kom fram till Grand Palace klockan 11.15. Här lämnade de över sin namninsamling vid porten Wiset Chaisri (Pratu Wiset Chaisi) ประตูวิเศษไชยศรี.
 Chaiwat påstod att den thailändska och kambodjanska regeringen hade konspirerat för att släppa fyra av de arresterade thailändarna och behålla Veera i häktet för att förhindra honom att delta i deras protester. Trots att sex av de sju arresterade nu släppts mot borgen var nätverkets mål att få hem alla sju till Thailand, sade han.
 Nätverket skulle snart presentera detaljer om en ny protest. Denna gång mot hur landets rättsprocesser sköttes, tillade han.
 Thawil Pliensri, som var generalsekreterare för det nationella säkerhetsrådet (NSC), sade att nätverkets demonstration kunde fortsätta då det inte fanns någon lag som förhindrade offentliga folksamlingar.
 Nätverket, som blockerade Phitsanulok Road, gick på tisdagen med på att släppa fram trafik två gånger om dagen. Dels på morgonen och dels under rusningstrafiken. Detta skulle man börja göra under onsdagen, sade ett högre polisbefäl.
 Detta hade man kommit fram till efter samtal mellan nätverket och polischefen Wichai Sungprapai, som tidigare hade hyllats för sina insatser som förhandlare under demonstrationerna april-maj 2010.
 Men på onsdagsmorgonen vägrade nätverkets demonstranter plötsligt att följa polisens uppmaning om att öppna gatan framför regeringsbyggnaden för trafik.
 Polisen och generalmajoren Kreerin Inkaew (Kririn Inkaeo) กรีรินทร์ อินทร์แก้ว och generalmajoren Wichai Sangprapai försökte förgäves förhandla med ledaren för Santi Asoke, Samana Phothirak สมณะโพธิรักษ์ (5 juni 1934-), om att öppna upp gatan.
 En av nätverkets medlemmar Sunthorn Rakrong (Sunthon Rakrong) สุนทร รักษ์รงค์ sade efteråt att man inte ville öppna upp vägen då man väntade fler demonstranter från andra provinser och ville ha utrymme för dessa.
 Delar av Phitsanulok Road från Panichayakarn (Phanit Chayakan) พาณิชยการ och Suan Misakawan-korsningen (Si Yaek Suan Misakawan) สี่แยกสวนมิสกวัน förblev därmed stängda.
 Sunthorn läste också upp ett uttalande från nätverket som förklarade att man skulle fortsätta demonstrera mot regeringen då den hade misskött att lösa problemen med Kambodja. Uttalandet fördömde också polisen för att ha arresterat deras ledare Chaiwat Sinsuwong och Somboon Thongburan. (Se artikeln ”Chaiwat Sinsuwong och Somboon Thongburan arresteras (19 januari 2011)”.)
 (Chaiwat under arrest)
 TPN:s ledare Chaiwat Sinsuwong och den tidigare senatorn Somboon Thongburan hade struntat i kallelser från domstolen och undlåtit att infinna sig hos polisen för att stå till svars för anklagelserna om terrorism. Därför hade polisen ingen annan möjlighet än att arrestera dem sade biträdande premiärminister Suthep Thaugsuban under onsdagen.
 Suthep berättade att 107 personer har anklagats för terrorism efter gulskjortornas ockupation av flygplatserna 2008. Omkring 100 av dem hade hörsammat polisens kallelser. Sju av dem, inklusive Chaiwat och Somboon, hade inte gjort det.
 Suthep sade också att det var nödvändigt att förtydliga att de två hade arresterats på grund av de gamla terroristanklagelserna och inte på grund av de pågående demonstrationerna mot regeringen.
 Avdelningen för brottsbekämpning (CSD) hade fört Chaiwat och Somboon till brottmålsdomstolen på onsdagsmorgonen och begärt dem häktade i tolv dagar från den 19-30 januari.
 CSD förklarade för domstolen att de inte motsatte sig om de två skulle släppas mot borgen. Men då med krav om att de skulle avhålla sig från deltagande i politiska samlingar eller annan politisk verksamhet som stred mot författningen eller sprida information eller ge intervjuer som kunde störa polisens utredning eller insamlande av bevis.
 Chaiwat och Somboon sade dock från början att de inte tänkte begära att bli släppta mot borgen. Istället lämnade in en begäran som motsatte sig polisens önskemål om att frihetsberöva dem i 12 dagar. Som argument för detta sade de att de blivit falskeligen anklagade i förbindelse med flygplatsockupationerna 2008.
 Men brottmålsdomstolen godkände polisens begäran om att få behålla Chaiwat och Somboon från den 19 januari till den 30 januari.
 Amiral Bannawit Kengrian, som var en viktig medlem i TPN, lämnade torsdagen den 20 januari in ett klagomål mot den nationelle polischefen Vichien Potposri. Han anklagade polisen för att ha använt övervåld då man arresterade Chaiwat Sinsuwong och Somboon Thongburan och uppmanade Vichien att förklara vad som hänt för allmänheten.
 Enligt Bannawit hade polisen agerat alltför våldsamt då de arresterade och förde bort Chaiwat då han satt och åt på sukiyakirestaurang. Polisen hade heller inte följt gängse regler då man vägrat att läsa upp arretsteringsordern för honom.
 Bannawit sade också att polisen hade gjort ett misstag då de först förväxlade en annan man, vid namn Chokepisit Worapattanachai (Chokphisit Woraphatthanachai) โชคพิสิฐ วรพัฒนาชัย, för Somboon. Chokepisit hade därefter anklagats för att ha hindrat polisen i deras arbete. En kvinna skulle också ha skadats i samband med arresteringarna.
 Chaiwat var anklagad på nio punkter, inklusive terrorism, och Somboon på sju punkter, inklusive terrorism. Chefen för Bangkokhäktet, Sophon Thitithampruek (Sophon Thitithamphrük) โสภณ ธิติธรรมพฤกษ์ (1 november 1953-), sade att Chaiwat och Somboon skulle hållas åtskilda från UDD-medlemmarna som också finns på fängelset för att undgå problem.
 (Sophon Thitithampruek)
 Då rödskjortorna vanligtvis fick ta emot besök klockan 10.00-11.00 skulle besökstiden för Chaiwat och Somboon läggas efter klockan 11.00, sade Sophon.
 Chaiwat och Somboon släpptes torsdagen den 27 januari mot borgen. Brottsmålsdomstolen beordrade frisläppandet av de två efter att deras advokater betalat en borgen på 800 000 baht i kontanter. 600 000 baht för Chaiwat och 200 000 för Somboon.
 Khlong Luek; Klong Luek.
 Poipet; Poi Pet, Poiphet.
 Ta Phraya; Amphoe Ta Phraya อําเภอตาพระยา.
 Theerayuth Thammasaroj; Teerayut Thammasaroj.
 Samana Phothirak; Bhodirak.
 Sunthorn Rakrong; สุนทร รักรงค์.
 Denna artikel senast uppdaterad: 2017-08-12, 14.34


text:
Utugt - som "i tugt og Herrens formaning", "optugtelse" og "tugthus" - af nedertysk tucht - er et gammeldags, kristent udtryk for seksuelt samkvem udenfor ægteskabet.
 Prostitution blev juridisk rutinemæssigt omtalt som "erhvervsmæssig utugt". Sådan omtales prostitution også i straffelovens § 229 om udleje af værelser til dette brug.
 Utugt var regnet som en af de syv dødssynder, det modsatte af kyskhed. På latin sagde man luxuria, som i moderne oversættelse er blevet omdøbt til nydelsessyge i stedet for "utugt".
 Noter
 Kristendom


text:
No L 175/ 8 Official Journal of the European Communities 29 . 6. 78
 AGREEMENT
 extending the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the
 Kingdom of Morocco
 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
 of the one part,
 HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF MOROCCO,
 of the other part,
 WHEREAS the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom
 of Morocco signed in Rabat on 27 April 1976, extended successively on 30 June and 31 December
 1977, expires not later than 30 June 1978 .
 WHEREAS, pending the entry into force of the Cooperation Agreement between the European
 Economic Community and the Kingdom of Morocco signed in Rabat on 27 April 1976, it is
 necessary to extend the Interim Agreement again,
 HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their
 Plenipotentiaries :
 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES :
 Gunnar RIBERHOLDT,
 Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary,
 Permanent Representative of Denmark,
 Chairman of the Permanent Representatives Committee ;
 Klaus MEYER ,
 Director-General for Development, Commission of the European Communities ;
 HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF MOROCCO ;
 Zine EL Abidine SEBTI,
 Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary,
 Head of the Representation of the Kingdom of Morocco to the European Economic
 Community ;
 WHO, having exchanged their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed as follows :
 Article 1
 The date '30 June 1978' specified in the second subparagraph of Article 43 (2) of the
 Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of
 Morocco is replaced by '31 December 1978'.
 Article 2
 The text of Annex C to the Interim Agreement concerning the minimum prices for
 prepared and preserved sardines falling within subheading 16.04 D of the Common
 ---pagebreak--- 29 . 6. 78 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 175/9
 Customs Tariff is replaced by the text given in the Annex. The prices for the period
 beginning 1 July 1978 shall be not lower than those specified in the said Annex thus
 amended, as updated by exchange of letters between the Contracting Parties to take
 account of cost trends for the products in question.
 Article 3
 This Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, French,
 German, Italian and Arabic languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.
 Article 4
 This Agreement shall enter into force on 1 July 1978 .
 ---pagebreak--- No L 175/ 10 Official Journal of the European Communities 29 . 6. 78
 ANNEX
 ANNEX C
 Minimum prices applicable from 1 July 1978
 Minimum prices
 Size
 Net Semi-gross Capacity Coefficients (customs duties included)
 weight weight in u.a . per carton of
 100 tins
 Community
 Trade Total
 height Ounces Grams Grams cm'
 specifications
 (mm) In olive oil Other
 Rectangular base :
 V10 club 20 2 56 95 53 0.60 12.30 11-40
 1/8 club 25 2 3/4 80 120 75 0.70 14.35 13.30
 1/4 reduced 18 2 5/8 74 130 73 0.77 15.79 14-63
 1/8 club 30 3 1/4 90 140 93 0.80 16-40 15-20
 1/4 special 25 3 1/6 90 140 90 0.85 17-43 16-15
 1/8 low plat 24 3 3/8 95 145 96 0.90 18-45 17.10
 1/4 club 30 4 3/8 125 190 125
 V, P 25 176 125
 1.00
 1/4 usual 22 3 3/4 105 180 106 20-50 19.00
 1/6 (club 30) 188 130
 1/4 usual 24 4 3/8 125 195 125 1.10 22-55 20.90
 1/4 usual 30 5 1/4 150 240 169
 V4 club 40 6 1/4 175 250 178 1.30 26-65 24-70
 V4 P 30 250 187
 1/4 American 30 7 200 300 207 1.60 32-80 30-40
 V4 usual 40 9 1/4 260 326 250
 1/3 P 337 250 1.80 36.90 34-20
 1/4 club long 40 8 3/4 248 320 241
 1/2 low 30 9 1/4 260 370 245 2-20 45-10 41.80
 V4 usual long 40 11 1⁄2 325 423 313 2.50 51-25 47-50
 V4 usual 48 11 310 390 297 2.60 53-30 49-40
 1/2 large 40 11 v2 325 460 330
 2.70
 V2 P 476 375 55-35 51.30
 902 750
 4.65
 80 271⁄2 780 950 771 95-33 88.35
 Oval base :
 V2 oval 40 15 425 555 452 3.40 69.70, 64.60


text:
 Pomembno pravno obvestilo
 |
 22001D0016
 Uradni list L 117 , 26/04/2001 str. 0016 - 0020
 Sklep Skupnega odbora EGPšt. 16/2001z dne 28. februarja 2001o spremembi Priloge II (Tehnični predpisi, standardi, preskušanje in certificiranje) in Priloge XI (Telekomunikacijske storitve) k Sporazumu EGPSKUPNI ODBOR EGP JE -ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor ga spreminja Protokol o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, v nadaljnjem besedilu "Sporazum", in zlasti člena 98 Sporazuma,ob upoštevanju naslednjega:(1) Priloga II k Sporazumu je bila spremenjena s Sklepom št. 146/1999 Skupnega odbora EGP z dne 5. novembra 1999 [1].(2) Priloga XI k Sporazumu je bila spremenjena s Sklepom št. 108/2000 Skupnega odbora EGP z dne 30. novembra 2000 [2].(3) Direktivo 98/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. junija 1998 o spremembi Direktive 98/34/ES o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov [3] je treba vključiti v Sporazum -SKLENIL:Člen 1V Poglavju XIX Priloge II k Sporazumu se točka 1 (Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta) spremeni na naslednji način:1. pred prilagoditvami se vstavi naslednje:"kakor je bila spremenjena z:— 398 L 0048: Direktivo 98/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. julija 1998 (UL L 217, 5.8.1998, str. 18).";2. besedilo "člen 1(2)" v prilagoditvi (a) se nadomesti s "člen 1(3)";3. prilagoditev (d) se nadomesti z naslednjo:"Členu 8(2) se doda naslednje:Nadzorni organ EFTA posreduje Komisiji ES pripombe držav Efte v obliki enkratnega koordiniranega obvestila, pripombe Skupnosti pa Komisija posreduje Nadzornemu organu EFTA. Kadar se pogodbenici sklicujeta na šestmesečni rok mirovanja v skladu s svojimi internimi pravili in če se sklicujeta na štirimesečni rok mirovanja v skladu z internim sistemom Evropske skupnosti ali za države Efte v skladu z naslednjima dvema odstavkoma, se po enakem postopku o tem medsebojno obvestita.Pristojni organi držav Efte za štiri mesece preložijo sprejetje vsakega osnutka predpisa o storitvah od datuma, ko je nadzorni organ EFTA prejel besedilo osnutka predpisa, če druga država Efte v treh mesecih poda natančno mnenje, na podlagi katerega lahko predvideni ukrep ovira prosti pretok storitev ali svobodo ustanavljanja obratovalcev storitev na trgih držav Efte.V zvezi z osnutki predpisov o storitvah podrobna menja držav Efte ne smejo vplivati na nobene kulturno-politične ukrepe, zlasti ne na avdiovizualnem področju, ki jih utegnejo države Efte sprejeti v skladu s pravom EGP, pri čemer upoštevajo svojo jezikovno raznolikost, svoje specifične nacionalne in regionalne značilnosti ter svojo kulturno dediščino.";4. prilagoditev (e) se nadomesti z naslednjo:"Člen 9 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:1. Pristojni organi držav članic ES in držav Efte odložijo sprejetje osnutka notificiranih tehničnih predpisov za tri mesece od datuma, ko so besedilo tega osnutka predpisov prejeli od- Komisije ES, če so države članice Skupnosti notificirale osnutke,- Nadzornega organa EFTA, če so države Efte notificirale osnutke.2. Obdobja mirovanja iz odstavka 1 in člena 8(2) pa ne veljajo, če- morajo pristojni organi v zelo kratkem času pripraviti tehnične predpise zaradi nujnega varstva javnega zdravja ali javne varnosti, zaradi varstva zdravja in življenja živali ali rastlin, v primeru predpisov o storitvah tudi zaradi javnega reda, zlasti varstva mladoletnikov, da jih lahko takoj sprejmejo in uvedejo, brez možnosti posvetovanja, ali če- morajo pristojni organi takoj sprejeti in uvesti predpise o finančnih storitvah iz nujnih razlogov, ki nastanejo zaradi resnih razmer, povezanih z zaščito varnosti in integritete finančnega sistema, zlasti z zaščito vlagateljev, investitorjev in zavarovanih oseb.Pristojni organi podajo razloge, ki utemeljujejo nujnost sprejetih ukrepov. Utemeljitev nujnih ukrepov naj bo natančno in jasno obrazložena, pri čemer naj bo poudarjena nepredvidljivost in resnost nevarnosti za zadevne organe, kakor tudi absolutna nujnost takojšnjega ukrepanja za odpravo te nevarnosti.";5. prilagoditev (g)(9) se nadomesti z naslednjo:"informacija o začetku šestmesečnega mirovanja;".Člen 2V Prilogi XI k Sporazumu se za točko 5h (Direktiva 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta) vstavi naslednje:"Storitve informacijske družbe5i. 398 L 0034: Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov (UL L 204, 21.7.1998, str. 37), kakor je bila spremenjena z:Za namene tega sporazuma veljajo določbe Direktive z naslednjimi prilagoditvami:- 398 L 0048: Direktivo 98/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. julija 1998 (UL L 217, 5.8.1998, str. 18).Za namene tega sporazuma veljajo določbe Direktive z naslednjimi prilagoditvami:(a) drugi pododstavek člena 1(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:"Pojem "tehnična specifikacija" zajema tudi pridelovalne metode in procese, ki se uporabljajo za proizvode, namenjene za prehrano ljudi in živali ter za zdravila, kakor so opredeljena v členu 1 Direktive 65/65/EGS (točka 1 Poglavja XIII Priloge II k Sporazumu), in tudi pridelovalne metode in procese za druge proizvode, če vplivajo na njihove značilnosti."(b) v členu 8(1) se na koncu prvega pododstavka doda naslednje besedilo:"Celotno besedilo notificiranega osnutka tehničnega predpisa je na razpolago v izvirnem jeziku, kakor tudi v popolnem prevodu v enem od uradnih jezikov Evropske skupnosti.";(c) v členu 8(1) se četrtemu pododstavku doda naslednji stavek:"Skupnost na eni strani in Nadzorni organ EFTA ali države Efte prek Nadzornega organa EFTA na drugi strani lahko zaprosijo za dodatne informacije o osnutku notificiranega tehničnega predpisa."(d) členu 8(2) se doda naslednje:"Nadzorni organ EFTA posreduje Komisiji ES pripombe držav Efte v obliki enkratnega koordiniranega obvestila, pripombe Skupnosti pa Komisija posreduje Nadzornemu organu EFTA. Kadar se pogodbenici sklicujeta na šestmesečni rok mirovanja v skladu s svojimi internimi pravili in če se sklicujeta na štirimesečni rok mirovanja v skladu z internim sistemom Evropske skupnosti ali za države Efte v skladu z naslednjima dvema odstavkoma, se po enakem postopku o tem medsebojno obvestita.Pristojni organi držav Efte za štiri mesece preložijo sprejetje vsakega osnutka predpisa o storitvah od datuma, ko je nadzorni organ EFTA prejel besedilo osnutka predpisa, če druga država Efte v treh mesecih poda natančno mnenje, na podlagi katerega lahko predvideni ukrep ovira prosti pretok storitev ali svobodo ustanavljanja obratovalcev storitev na trgih držav Efte.V zvezi z osnutki predpisov o storitvah podrobna menja držav Efte ne smejo vplivati na nobene kulturno-politične ukrepe, zlasti ne na avdiovizualnem področju, ki jih utegnejo države Efte sprejeti v skladu s pravom EGP, pri čemer upoštevajo svojo jezikovno raznolikost, svoje specifične nacionalne in regionalne značilnosti ter svojo kulturno dediščino.";(e) člen 9 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:"1. Pristojni organi držav članic ES in držav Efte odložijo sprejetje osnutka notificiranih tehničnih predpisov za tri mesece od datuma, ko so besedilo tega osnutka predpisov prejeli od- Komisije ES, če so države članice Skupnosti notificirale osnutke,- Nadzornega organa EFTA, če so države Efte notificirale osnutke.2. Obdobja mirovanja iz odstavka 1 in odstavka 1 prilagoditve (d) pa ne veljajo, če- morajo pristojni organi v zelo kratkem času pripraviti tehnične predpise zaradi nujnega varstva javnega zdravja ali javne varnosti, zaradi varstva zdravja in življenja živali ali rastlin, v primeru predpisov o storitvah pa tudi zaradi javnega reda, zlasti varstva mladoletnikov, da jih lahko takoj sprejmejo in uvedejo, brez možnosti posvetovanja, ali če- morajo pristojni organi takoj sprejeti in uvesti predpise o finančnih storitvah iz nujnih razlogov, ki nastanejo zaradi resnih razmer, povezanih z zaščito varnosti in integritete finančnega sistema, zlasti z zaščito vlagateljev, investitorjev in zavarovanih oseb.Pristojni organi podajo razloge, ki utemeljujejo nujnost sprejetih ukrepov. Utemeljitev nujnih ukrepov naj bo natančno in jasno obrazložena, pri čemer naj bo poudarjena nepredvidljivost in resnost nevarnosti za zadevne organe, kakor tudi absolutna nujnost takojšnjega ukrepanja za odpravo te nevarnosti.";(f) Prilogi II se doda:"ISLANDIJASTRIStaðlaráð ÍslandsLIHTENŠTAJNTPMNLiechtensteinische Technische Prüf-, Mess- und NormenstelleNORVEŠKANSFNorges StandardiseringsforbundNEKNorsk Elektroteknisk KomitePTPost- og teletilsynet";(g) za uporabo Direktive so obvezna naslednja obvestila po elektronski poti:naslednja obvestila se trenutno lahko pošiljajo po normalni pošti, čeprav se priporoča pošiljanje po elektronski poti:1. notifikacijski dokumenti. Posredovani so lahko pred posredovanjem celotnega besedila ali skupaj z njim;2. potrdilo o prejemu osnutka besedila, ki vsebuje med drugim ustrezen rok mirovanja, določen v skladu z pravili vsakega sistema;3. sporočila z zaprosili za dodatne informacije;4. odgovori na zaprosila za dodatne informacije;5. pripombe;6. zahteve za sestanke ad hoc;7. odgovori na zahteve za sestanke ad hoc;8. zaprosila za končno besedilo;9. informacija o začetku šestmesečnega mirovanja;naslednja obvestila se trenutno lahko pošiljajo po normalni pošti, čeprav se priporoča pošiljanje po elektronski poti:10. celotno besedilo notificiranega osnutka;11. temeljne zakonske ali uredbene določbe;12. končno besedilo;(h) pogodbenice se skupaj dogovorijo o upravnih ukrepih v zvezi z obvestili."Člen 3Besedili Direktive 98/48/ES v islandskem in norveškem jeziku, objavljeni v Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropskih skupnosti, sta verodostojni.Člen 4Ta sklep začne veljati 1. marca 2001 pod pogojem, da so bila Skupnemu odboru EGP predložena vsa uradna obvestila v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma [4].Člen 5Ta sklep se objavi v sklopu EGP in v Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropskih skupnosti.V Bruslju, 28. februarja 2001Za Skupni odbor EGPPredsednikP. Westerlund[1] UL L 15, 18.1.2001, str. 40.[2] UL L 45, 15.2.2001, str. 47.[3] UL L 217, 5.8.1998, str. 18.[4] Ustavne zahteve niso sporočene.--------------------------------------------------


text:
Η τρέχουσα σελίδα αφορά το έτος 590 κατά το Γρηγοριανό ημερολόγιο
 Γεγονότα
 7 Φεβρουαρίου - Ο Πάπας Πελάγιος Β ́ πέφτει θύμα του λοιμού που έπληξε τη Ρώμη.
 26 Μαρτίου - Ο αυτοκράτορας Μαυρίκιος ανακηρύσσει το γιο του, Θεοδόσιο, συναυτοκράτορα της Βυζαντινής Αυτοκρατορίας.
 3 Σεπτεμβρίου - Ο ηλικίας 50 ετών Πάπας Γρηγόριος Α ́ διαδέχεται τον Πάπα Πελάγιο Β' ως ο 64ος Πάπας και ο πρώτος που προέρχεται από τη μοναστική κοινότητα.
 Ο Κομεντίολος, διοικητής του βυζαντινού στρατού, δέχεται τον νόμιμο βασιλιά της Περσίας, Χοσρόη Β', ως πρόσφυγα στην έδρα του στην Ιεράπολη.
 Γεννήσεις
 Έανφριθ, βασιλιάς της Βερνικίας
 Καβάδης Β', βασιλιάς της Περσίας
 Κέντα, πρίγκιπας του Ουέσσεξ
 Φουραντόχη, βασίλισσα της Περσίας
 Χάρσα, Ινδός αυτοκράτορας
 Θάνατοι
 7 Φεβρουαρίου - Πάπας Πελάγιος Β ́
 5 Σεπτεμβρίου - Αυθάριος, βασιλιάς των Λομβαρδών
 Ορμίσδας Δ', βασιλιάς της Περσίας
 Έτη


text:
Een meideun is of zijn liedje(s) over de maand mei, onder meer gespeeld op een carillon.
 Geschiedenis
 In veel steden in de Lage landen waar een carillon was, moest de beiaardier in de maand mei vaak al heel vroeg in de morgen meiliederen spelen tot vermaak van de man in de straat. Zo werd in het Zeeuwse Veere 's morgens vroeg van 5 tot 6 uur gespeeld. De traditie bestaat nog in Nijkerk, waar de Meideun echter al sinds lang voor 1900 's avonds plaatsvindt, vanaf 1983 op de dinsdagavonden van mei. Ook Schoonhoven, Alkmaar, Hoorn en Utrecht hadden zo'n traditie. In Gouda is het een nog steeds bestaande traditie om in de maand mei op het carillon van de sint-Janskerk de meideun met een voorspel te laten spelen. De melodie, een Franse (courante) die hier gebruikt wordt is zeer oud. De melodie van dit lied dat ook in Alkmaar werd gebruikt voor de speeltrommel, komt ook voor in het Liedboek voor de kerken als gezang 413 en is afkomstig uit de Neder-landsche Gedenck Clanck van Adriaan Valerius (overleden in 1625). Deze geeft als tekst: De Heer in zijnen troon, zeer schoon.
 Liedtekst
 Deze tekst stond ooit in een programmaboekje van een concert met meiliederen.
 Bibliografie
 Luc Rombouts: Zingend Brons, uitgeverij Davidsfonds Leuven, 2010, ISBN 978-90-5826-720-7
 André Lehr: Van Paardebel tot Speelklok, uitgave Europese Bibliotheek Zaltbommel 1971 (geen ISBN)
 Heleen van der Weel: Klokkenspel Het carillon en zijn bespelers tot 1800, Uitgeverij Verloren Hilversum 2008, ISBN 978-90-8704-061-1
 Mei


type: caselaw

text:
 23.7.2005
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 C 182/15
 ROZSUDOK SÚDNEHO DVORA
 (šiesta komora)
 z 2. júna 2005
 vo veci C-68/04: Komisia Európskych spoločenstiev proti Helénskej republike (1)
 (Nesplnenie povinnosti štátom - Smernica 2001/81/ES - Látky znečisťujúce ovzdušie - Národný emisný strop)
 (2005/C 182/28)
 Jazyk konania: gréčtina
 Vo veci C-68/04, Komisia Európskych spoločenstiev (splnomocnení zástupcovia: G. Valero Jordana a M. Konstantinidis) proti Helénskej republike (splnomocnená zástupkyňa: N. Dafniou), ktorej predmetom je žaloba o nesplnenie povinnosti podľa článku 226 ES podaná 13. februára 2004, Súdny dvor (šiesta komora), v zložení: predseda šiestej komory A. Borg Barthet (spravodajca), sudcovia A. La Pergola a A. Ó Caoimh, generálny advokát: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, tajomník: R. Grass, vyhlásil 2. júna 2005 rozsudok, ktorého výrok znie:
 1.
 Neprijatím zákonov, iných právnych predpisov a správnych opatrení potrebných na dosiahnutie súladu so smernicou Európskeho parlamentu a Rady 2001/81/ES z 23. októbra 2001 o národných emisných stropoch pre určité látky znečisťujúce ovzdušie, si Helénska republika nesplnila povinnosti, ktoré jej vyplývajú z článku 15 ods. 1 tejto smernice.
 2.
 Helénska republika je povinná nahradiť trovy konania.
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ C 94, 17.4.2004.


text:
 30.1.2010
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 24/71
 A Közszolgálati Törvényszék (első tanács) 2009. november 30-i ítélete — Zangerl-Posselt kontra Bizottság
 (F-83/07. sz. ügy) (1)
 (Közszolgálat - Nyílt versenyvizsga - Gyakorlati tesztre és szóbeli vizsgára bocsátás megtagadása - Szükséges oklevelek - A felsőfokú végzettség fogalma - Életkorral kapcsolatos megkülönböztetés)
 2010/C 24/128
 Az eljárás nyelve: német
 Felek
 Felperes: Brigitte Zangerl-Posselt (Merzig, Németország) (képviselő: S. Paulmann, ügyvéd)
 Alperes: az Európai Közösségek Bizottsága (képviselők: J. Currall és B. Eggers, meghatalmazottak)
 Az ügy tárgya
 A német nyelvű titkársági asszisztensekből álló tartaléklista (AST 1) létrehozásáról szóló, a felperest a gyakorlati és a szóbeli vizsgákra nem engedő 2007. június 18-i versenyvizsgabizottsági határozat megsemmisítése
 Az ítélet rendelkező része
 1.
 A Közszolgálati Törvényszék a keresetet elutasítja.
 2.
 A Közszolgálati Törvényszék az Európai Közösségek Bizottságát kötelezi saját költségein felül B. Zangerl-Posselt költségei kétharmadának viselésére.
 3.
 A Közszolgálati Törvényszék B. Zangerl-Posseltet kötelezi saját költségei egyharmadának viselésére.
 (1) HL C 235., 2007.10.6., 32. o.