type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 6.12.2019
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 L 316/3
 TÕLGE
 Ameerika Ühendriikide ja Euroopa Liidu vaheline Kokkulepe, mis käsitleb kõrgekvaliteedilise veiseliha tariifikvoodi osa eraldamist Ameerika Ühendriikidele, millele on osutatud muudetud vastastikuse mõistmise memorandumis, mis käsitleb teatavaid kasvuhormoone mittesaavatelt loomadelt pärit veiseliha importi ning Ameerika Ühendriikide poolt teatavate Euroopa Liidu toodete suhtes kehtestatud kõrgendatud tollimakse (2014)
 Ameerika Ühendriigid ja Euroopa Liit, 21. oktoobri 2013. aasta muudetud vastastikuse mõistmise memorandumi (mis käsitleb teatavaid kasvuhormoone mittesaavatelt loomadelt pärit veiseliha importi ning Ameerika Ühendriikide poolt teatavate Euroopa Liidu toodete suhtes kehtestatud kõrgendatud tollimakse) (edaspidi „2014. aasta memorandum“) osalised, on kokku leppinud järgmises:
 Artikkel 1
 Eesmärgid
 Käesoleva kokkuleppe eesmärgid on järgmised:
 1)
 eraldada Ameerika Ühendriikidele osa kõrgekvaliteedilise veiseliha autonoomsest tariifikvoodist (edaspidi „tariifikvoot“) 45 000 tootemassitonni, millele on osutatud 2014. aasta memorandumi II artikli lõikes 4, II artikli lõikes 5 ja VI artiklis, ning
 2)
 täiendada või muuta 2014. aasta memorandumi III, IV, V, VII ja VIII artiklis osutatud teatavaid osaliste õigusi ja kohustusi.
 Artikkel 2
 Jaotamine kvoodi raames
 1. Euroopa Liit eraldab Ameerika Ühendriikidele 35 000 tonni artiklis 1 osutatud 45 000 tonni suurusest tariifikvoodist. Ülejäänud 10 000 tonni tehakse kättesaadavaks kõigile teistele riikidele. Eraldised jaotatakse etapiviisiliselt seitsmeks aastaks (edaspidi „rakendusperiood“) järgmiselt:
 Ameerika Ühendriigid
 Kõik teised riigid
 Aasta 1
 18 500 tonni
 26 500 tonni
 Aasta 2
 23 000 tonni
 22 000 tonni
 Aasta 3
 25 400 tonni
 19 600 tonni
 Aasta 4
 27 800 tonni
 17 200 tonni
 Aasta 5
 30 200 tonni
 14 800 tonni
 Aasta 6
 32 600 tonni
 12 400 tonni
 Alates aastast 7
 35 000 tonni
 10 000 tonni
 2. Kindluse tagamiseks kohaldatakse Ameerika Ühendriikidele eraldatud tariifikvoodi osa suhtes 2014. aasta memorandumi II artikli lõikes 1 sätestatud põhikohustusi, sealhulgas kvoodisisest tariifimäära null (0) protsenti.
 3. Tariifikvoodi aastane maht jaotatakse võrdselt nelja kolmekuulise alamperioodi peale. Kvoodiaasta algab 1. juulil ja lõpeb 30. juunil.
 Kui käesolev kokkulepe jõustub muul kuupäeval kui 1. juulil, algab aasta 1 rakendusperiood sama kvoodiaasta järgmise alamperioodi esimesel päeval ja kestab neli järjestikust alamperioodi (1). Kõik kogused, mis jäid kasutamata kõnealuse kvoodiaasta alamperioodidel, mis eelnesid aasta 1 esimesele päevale, lisatakse rakendusperioodi aasta 1 esimesel alamperioodil saadaolevatele kogustele. Need kogused lisatakse Ameerika Ühendriikidele eraldatud kogustele ja teistele riikidele eraldatud kogustele proportsionaalselt nende osaga tariifikvoodi kogumahust.
 Artikkel 3
 Kvootide haldamine
 Ameerika Ühendriikidele eraldatud kõrgekvaliteedilise veiseliha tariifikvoodi osa haldab Euroopa Liit saabumise järjekorras teenindamise põhimõttel. Euroopa Liit teeb kõik endast oleneva, et hallata Ameerika Ühendriikidele eraldatud tariifikvoodi osa viisil, mis võimaldab importijatel seda täielikult ära kasutada. Käesolev artikkel asendab 2014. aasta memorandumi III artikli.
 Artikkel 4
 Vaidlusasi „EÜ–hormoonid“
 1. Ameerika Ühendriikide kaubandusesindaja viib 1974. aasta kaubandusseaduse (muudetud redaktsioon) 306. jao punkti c alusel lõpule menetluse, mis algatati detsembris 2016 eesmärgiga mitte ennistada loa andmist vaidlusasjas WT/DS26/21. Ameerika Ühendriigid avaldavad oma otsuse hiljemalt kuupäevaks, mil jõustub artiklis 2 määratletud kvoodi eraldamine riikidele aastaks 1.
 2. Artikli 2 lõikes 1 osutatud rakendusperioodi ja artikli 4 lõikes 3 osutatud läbivaatamisperioodi jooksul ning kuni läbivaatamisaja saabumiseni esitatakse artikli 4 lõikes 3 osutatud mõlemat kokkuleppeosalist rahuldav lahendus:
 a)
 kokkuleppeosalised ei nõua WTO vaidluste lahendamist reguleerivate eeskirjade ja protseduuride käsitusleppe artikli 21 lõike 5 kohase vahekohtu moodustamist vaidlusasjas „Euroopa Ühendus – liha ja lihatoodetega (hormoonidega) seotud meetmed“ (WT/DS26), (edaspidi „EÜ–hormoonid“);
 b)
 Ameerika Ühendriigid ei peata tariifsete soodustuste ega sellega seotud kohustuste kohaldamist Euroopa Liidu suhtes, nagu seda on volitanud Maailma Kaubandusorganisatsiooni vaidluste lahendamise organ vaidlusasjas „EÜ–hormoonid“, mille puhul Ameerika Ühendriigid tuginevad vaidlusasjas WT/DS26/21 vaidluse lahendamist reguleerivate eeskirjade ja protseduuride käsitusleppe artikli 22 lõikele 7.
 3. Hiljemalt kümme (10) aastat pärast käesoleva kokkuleppe jõustumist kohtuvad Ameerika Ühendriigid ja EL, et vaadata läbi tariifikvootide toimimine, et jõuda mõlemat kokkuleppeosalist rahuldava lahenduseni, millest teatatakse läbivaatamise lõpus WTO vaidluste lahendamise organile vastavalt vaidluste lahendamist reguleerivate eeskirjade ja protseduuride käsitusleppe artikli 3 lõikele 6. Läbivaatamine viiakse lõpule hiljemalt 11 aastat pärast käesoleva kokkuleppe jõustumist. Käesolev artikkel asendab 2014. aasta memorandumi IV artikli.
 4. Kui kokkuleppeosalised ei esita 11 aasta jooksul pärast käesoleva kokkuleppe jõustumist WTO vaidluste lahendamise organile ühiselt mõlemat kokkuleppeosalist rahuldavat lahendust, võib kumbki kokkuleppeosaline kokkuleppe lõpetada kooskõlas artikli 6 lõikega 1.
 Artikkel 5
 Kohapealsed kontrollid
 Komisjon võib paluda Ameerika Ühendriikide valitsusel lubada komisjoni esindajatel teha kohapealseid kontrolle Ameerika Ühendriikides, tingimusel et kohapealseid kontrolle tehakse teiste riikide tarnijate suhtes mittediskrimineerival viisil. Kõnealuseid kontrolle tehakse koos Ameerika Ühendriikide pädevate asutustega.
 Artikkel 6
 Taganemine ja mõju
 1. Kumbki kokkuleppeosaline võib käesolevast kokkuleppest taganeda, teatades sellest kirjalikult teisele kokkuleppeosalisele. Kokkulepe lõpetatakse kuus kuud pärast seda, kui teine kokkuleppeosaline on kõnealuse teate kätte saanud. Kokkuleppest taganemine ei tähenda taganemist 2014. aasta memorandumist, välja arvatud juhul, kui kokkuleppeosalised on sõnaselgelt väljendanud sellist kavatsust.
 2. Taganemine 2014. aasta memorandumist toob selle V artikli lõike 4 kohaselt kaasa taganemise käesolevast kokkuleppest. Kokkuleppeosalised täidavad 2014. aasta memorandumi II artiklis loetletud põhikohustusi kuue kuu jooksul alates selle V artikli lõikes 4 osutatud taganemisteatise esitamise kuupäevast.
 3. Kui WTO vaidluste lahendamise organile ei teatata artikli 4 lõike 3 kohaselt mõlemat kokkuleppeosalist rahuldavast lahendusest, ei tõlgendata ühtki käesoleva kokkuleppe sätet nii, et see muudaks kummagi kokkuleppeosalise õigusi või kohustusi, mis tulenevad vaidluste lahendamist reguleerivate eeskirjade ja protseduuride käsitusleppest seoses vaidlusasjaga „EÜ–hormoonid“.
 4. Ühtegi käesoleva kokkuleppe sätet ei tõlgendata viisil, mis annaks kokkuleppeosalistele muid õigusi või kohustusi peale nende, mis on kokkuleppeosaliste vahel kindlaks määratud, ega viisil, mis võimaldaks otseselt tugineda käesolevale kokkuleppele kohtutes ja kokkuleppeosaliste õigussüsteemides.
 5. Käesolev kokkulepe jõustub esimesel päeval pärast seda, kui mõlemad kokkuleppeosalised on teatanud teineteisele artikli 2 ja artikli 4 lõike 1 kohaste kokkuleppeosaliste kohustuste täitmise tagamiseks vajalike sisemenetluste lõpuleviimisest.
 SELLE KINNITUSEKS on valitsuste täievolilised esindajad käesolevale kokkuleppele alla kirjutanud.
 KOOSTATUD Washingtonis kahe tuhande üheksateistkümnenda aasta augustikuu teisel päeval kahes eksemplaris inglise keeles, mis on kokkuleppe autentne tekst.
 Euroopa Liidu nimel
 Ameerika Ühendriikide nimel
 (1) Suurema selguse huvides, kui käesolev kokkulepe jõustub kvoodiaasta alamperioodi n alguses, tehakse aasta 1 maht kättesaadavaks nelja järjestikuse alamperioodi jooksul, jagades selle võrdselt kõnealuste alamperioodide vahel, alustades kõnealuse kvoodiaasta alaperioodist n ning lõpetades järgneva kvoodiaasta alamperioodiga n-1. Alates aastast 2 tehakse mahud kättesaadavaks neljal järjestikusel alamperioodil, jagades need võrdselt kõnealuste alamperioodide vahel, alustades järgneva kvoodiaasta alamperioodist n.


type: other

text:
RIS - 95/13/0279 - Entscheidungstext - Verwaltungsgerichtshof (VwGH)
 Entscheidungstext 95/13/0279
 95/13/0279
 AVG §73 Abs1;
 BAO §303 Abs4;
 Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hat durch den Vorsitzenden Senatspräsident Dr. Weiss und die Hofräte Dr. Fellner, Dr. Hargassner, Mag. Heinzl und Dr. Fuchs als Richter, im Beisein des Schriftführers Dr. Fegerl, über die Beschwerde der F GmbH in W, vertreten durch Dr. R, Rechtsanwalt in W, gegen den Bescheid der Finanzlandesdirektion für Wien, Niederösterreich und Burgenland vom 19. Oktober 1995, Zl 11-95/89/1, betreffend Zurückweisung eines Devolutionsantrages, zu Recht erkannt:
 Nach der Beschwerde und dem ihr angeschlossenen angefochtenen Bescheid wies die belangte Behörde einen Devolutionsantrag der Beschwerdeführerin bezüglich "Anregung auf amtswegige Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens" betreffend Umsatzsteuer, Körperschaftsteuer, Gewerbesteuer 1991 sowie Verspätungszuschlag betreffend Umsatzsteuer 1991 mangels entscheidungspflichtigen Anbringens als unzulässig zurück.
 Die Beschwerdeführerin beantragt die Aufhebung des angefochtenen Bescheides wegen Rechtswidrigkeit seines Inhaltes und in eventu wegen Rechtswidrigkeit infolge Verletzung von Verfahrensvorschriften.
 In dem von der Beschwerdeführerin zunächst als verletzt erachteten Recht auf "ordnungsgemäße Abgabenfestsetzung" wurde die Beschwerdeführerin durch den angefochtenen Bescheid schon deshalb nicht verletzt, weil der angefochtene Bescheid keine Abgabenfestsetzung zum Gegenstand hat und - selbst wenn man der Ansicht der Beschwerdeführerin folgte, daß in letzter Konsequenz die Abgabenverfahren wiederaufzunehmen gewesen wären - die Abgabenfestsetzungen (jeweils) einem gesonderten Bescheid vorbehalten wären, wenngleich ein solcher gemäß § 307 Abs 1 BAO mit einem die Wiederaufnahme bewilligenden oder verfügenden Bescheid zu verbinden wäre.
 Soweit aber das Beschwerdevorbringen auch dahin verstanden werden kann, daß sich die Beschwerdeführerin in ihrem Recht auf Entscheidung ihrer so auch in der Beschwerde bezeichneten "Anregung" auf amtswegige Wiederaufnahme verschiedener Abgabenverfahren verletzt erachtet, ist Folgendes zu sagen:
 Gemäß § 311 Abs 1 BAO sind die Abgabenbehörden verpflichtet, über die in Abgabenvorschriften vorgesehenen Anbringen (§ 85) der Parteien ohne unnötigen Aufschub zu entscheiden. Werden Bescheide der Abgabenbehörde erster Instanz der Partei nicht innerhalb einer Frist von sechs Monaten nach Einlangen der Anbringen bekanntgegeben (§ 97), so geht auf schriftliches Verlangen der Partei gemäß § 311 Abs 2 BAO die Zuständigkeit zur Entscheidung auf die Abgabenbehörde zweiter Instanz über.
 Voraussetzung für einen zulässigen Antrag auf Übergang der Zuständigkeit (Devolution) ist somit ein in den Abgabenvorschriften vorgesehenes Anbringen im Sinne des § 85 BAO. Unter einem Anbringen im Sinne des § 85 BAO ist - soweit dies im Beschwerdefall in Betracht kommt - ein solches zur Geltendmachung von Rechten zu verstehen. Nun räumt jedoch § 303 Abs 4 BAO der Partei ein subjektives Recht auf amtswegige Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens nicht ein (vgl etwa die hg Erkenntnisse vom 22. Oktober 1980, 695/80, und vom 19. Mai 1988, 87/16/0003, mwN).
 Da somit die von der Beschwerdeführerin selbst zu Recht nur als solche bezeichnete Anregung, bestimmte Abgabenverfahren wiederaufzunehmen, kein Anbringen zur Geltendmachung von Rechten darstellt, war die Behörde auch nicht verpflichtet, hierüber bescheidmäßig abzusprechen. Mangels Entscheidungspflicht der Behörde hat zu Recht auch die belangte Behörde nicht über die Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens entschieden, sondern den Antrag der Beschwerdeführerin auf Übergang der Zuständigkeit zur Entscheidung an die Abgabenbehörde zweiter Instanz als unzulässig zurückgewiesen.
 Zu dem von der Beschwerdeführerin zur Stützung ihrer Ansicht, Entscheidungspflicht läge vor, zitierten Erkenntnis des Verwaltungsgerichtshofes vom 15. Juni 1982, 82/07/0024, ist lediglich darauf hinzuweisen, daß dieses Erkenntnis nicht zu
 § 311 BAO, sondern zu § 73 Abs. 1 AVG ergangen ist. Anders als
 § 73 AVG erfaßt aber § 311 BAO nicht Partei"anträge"
 schlechthin, sondern nur die in den Abgabenvorschriften ausdrücklich vorgesehenen Anbringen solcher Art, über die eine bescheidmäßige Erledigung zu ergehen hat (vgl auch das hg Erkenntnis vom 15. November 1990, 89/16/0211). Ein solches Anbringen stellt aber - wie ausgeführt - eine Anregung auf amtswegige Wiederaufnahme von Verfahren nicht dar.
 Mangels entsprechender Entscheidungspflicht und mangels tatsächlicher Wiederaufnahme von Verfahren erübrigt sich ein Eingehen auf das Beschwerdevorbringen, unter welchen Umständen eine Wiederaufnahme von Verfahren von Amts wegen im Rahmen des Ermessens erfolgen kann.
 Da somit bereits der Inhalt der Beschwerde erkennen ließ, daß die von der Beschwerdeführerin behaupteten Rechtsverletzungen nicht vorliegen, war die Beschwerde ohne weiteres Verfahren in nichtöffentlicher Sitzung gemäß § 35 Abs 1 VwGG als unbegründet abzuweisen.
 JWT_1995130279_19960124X00


type: caselaw

text:
 8.12.2012
 SV
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
 C 379/13
 Begäran om förhandsavgörande framställd av Raad van State (Nederländerna) den 27 augusti 2012 — A.M. van der Ham, A.H. van der Ham-Reijersen van Buuren mot College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Zuid-Holland
 (Mål C-396/12)
 2012/C 379/21
 Rättegångsspråk: nederländska
 Hänskjutande domstol
 Raad van State
 Parter i målet vid den nationella domstolen
 Klagande: A.M. van der Ham, A.H. van der Ham-Reijersen van Buuren
 Motpart: College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Zuid-Holland
 Tolkningsfrågor
 1.
 Hur ska begreppet uppsåtlig överträdelse i artikel 51.1 i rådets förordning (EG) nr 1698/2005 av den 20 september 2005 om stöd för landsbygdsutveckling från Europeiska jordbruksfonden för landsbygdsutveckling (EJFLU) (EUT L 277, s. 1), i dess lydelse enligt rådets förordning (EG) nr 74/2009 av den 19 januari 2009 (EUT L 30, s. 100), artikel 23 i kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1975/2006 av den 7 december 2006 om tillämpningsföreskrifter för förordning 1698/2005 (EUT L 368, s. 74) och artikel 67.1 i kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 796/2004 av den 21 april 2004 om närmare föreskrifter för tillämpningen av de tvärvillkor, den modulering och det integrerade administrations- och kontrollsystem som föreskrivs i rådets förordning (EG) nr 1782/2003 om upprättande av gemensamma bestämmelser för system för direktstöd inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken och om upprättande av vissa stödsystem för jordbrukare (EUT L 141, s. 18) tolkas? Räcker det att en politik som gällt länge åsidosätts, såsom anges i artikel 8.2 c i de nationella policyreglerna om ramvillkor för minimikraven i den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken (Beleidsregels normenkader randvoorwaarden Gemeenschappelijk Landbouwbeleid)?
 2.
 Hindrar unionsrätten att en medlemsstat beslutar att en bestämmelse har åsidosatts uppsåtligen, i den mening som avses i förordningarna, redan av det skälet att en eller flera av följande omständigheter är för handen:
 a)
 Det åsidosatta kravet har i sig uppsåt som rekvisit.
 b)
 Det aktuella kravet är komplext.
 c)
 Det är fråga om en politik som gällt länge.
 d)
 Det är fråga om en aktiv handling eller avsiktlig underlåtenhet.
 e)
 Lantbrukaren har tidigare underrättats om bristande efterlevnad av det aktuella kravet.
 f)
 Det sätt på vilket kravet åsidosatts ger anledning att finna att uppsåt föreligger?
 3.
 Kan stödmottagaren hållas ansvarig för en uppsåtlig överträdelse om verksamheten utförts av en tredje man på dennes uppdrag?


type: wikipedia

text:
Peter 'Pete' Levin (Boston, 20 december 1942) is een Amerikaanse jazzmuzikant (piano, orgel, keyboard).
 Biografie
 Levin werd bekend als een oud lid van het Gil Evans Orchestra, met wie hij tot halverwege de jaren 1980 regelmatig optrad en verschillende albums opnam, zoals Svengali (1973), The Gil Evans Orchestra Plays the Music of Jimi Hendrix (1974), There Comes a Time (1975), Live at the Public Theatre (New York, 1980) en Live at Sweet Basil (1985). Tijdens de jaren 1980 werkte hij samen met de Jimmy Giuffre 4, te horen op het album Quasar. In 1984 speelde hij in de fusionband van John Scofield, vanaf 1988 met Lew Soloff (Little Wing, 1991). Levin werkte ook in het trio met zijn broer, bassist Tony Levin en drummer Danny Gottlieb. Vanaf 1990 nam hij een aantal albums op onder zijn eigen naam, voornamelijk bij het Gramavision-label. In 2007 trad Levin op met Joe Beck, Harvey Sorgen en Ernie Colon in de New Yorkse Knitting Factory.
 Amerikaans jazzpianist
 Amerikaans jazzorganist
 Amerikaans toetsenist


type: legislation

text:
 3.12.2015
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 317/29
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2015/2234
 z dne 2. decembra 2015
 o določitvi standardnih uvoznih vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 922/72, (EGS) št. 234/79, (ES) št. 1037/2001 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 (1),
 ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 543/2011 z dne 7. junija 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 za sektorja sadja in zelenjave ter predelanega sadja in zelenjave (2) ter zlasti člena 136(1) Izvedbene uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 543/2011 na podlagi izida večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj urugvajskega kroga določa merila, po katerih Komisija določi standardne vrednosti za uvoz iz tretjih držav za proizvode in obdobja iz dela A Priloge XVI k tej uredbi.
 (2)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost se izračuna vsak delovni dan v skladu s členom 136(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 ob upoštevanju spremenljivih dnevnih podatkov. Zato bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti iz člena 136 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
 Člen 2
 Ta uredba začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 2. decembra 2015
 Za Komisijo
 V imenu predsednika
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Generalni direktor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
 (1) UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 671.
 (2) UL L 157, 15.6.2011, str. 1.
 PRILOGA
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Oznaka KN
 Oznaka tretje države (1)
 Standardna uvozna vrednost
 0702 00 00
 AL
 53,3
 MA
 73,3
 ZZ
 63,3
 0707 00 05
 AL
 57,9
 MA
 93,3
 TR
 152,1
 ZZ
 101,1
 0709 93 10
 AL
 80,9
 MA
 72,5
 TR
 153,6
 ZZ
 102,3
 0805 10 20
 MA
 77,5
 TR
 50,5
 UY
 52,1
 ZA
 53,6
 ZZ
 58,4
 0805 20 10
 MA
 76,9
 PE
 78,3
 ZZ
 77,6
 0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70, 0805 20 90
 TR
 87,0
 ZZ
 87,0
 0805 50 10
 TR
 103,6
 ZZ
 103,6
 0808 10 80
 CA
 159,0
 CL
 85,4
 MK
 28,7
 US
 119,9
 ZA
 155,9
 ZZ
 109,8
 0808 30 90
 BA
 91,6
 CN
 97,5
 TR
 144,0
 ZZ
 111,0
 (1) Nomenklatura držav, določena v Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 1106/2012 z dne 27. novembra 2012 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 471/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statistiki Skupnosti o zunanji trgovini z državami nečlanicami v zvezi s posodabljanjem nomenklature držav in ozemelj (UL L 328, 28.11.2012, str. 7). Oznaka „ZZ“ predstavlja „druga porekla“.


text:
No L 275 / 16 Official Journal of the European Communities 10 . 10 . 74
 AGREEMENT
 between the European Economic Community and the Republic of the Gambia
 on the supply of husked rice as food aid
 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
 of the one part,
 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA,
 of the other part,
 HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their plenipotenti
 aries :
 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES :
 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA :
 WHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS :
 Article I Article V
 As a part of its food aid programme (cereals) for The country of destination undertakes to use the
 1970/71 , the European Economic Community (here product received as aid for purposes of consumption
 inafter referred to as the 'Community') shall supply, and to distribute it free of charge to people in need .
 by way of gift, the Republic of the Gambia
 (hereinafter referred to as the 'country of destination ') Article VI
 with 1 500 metric tons of husked rice .
 The Contracting Parties undertake to implement this
 Article II Agreement in such a way as to avoid any prejudice to
 the normal structure of domestic production and inter
 Deliveries will be made cif to ports of discharge of the national trade . To this end they shall take any
 country of destination in new jute bags of a net weight measures required to ensure that aid supplies are in
 of 50 kg each . addition to, and do not replace business transactions
 which might reasonably be expected in the absence of
 Article III such supplies.
 The obligations and responsibilities of the Commu Article VII
 nity and of the country of destination relating to
 delivery and the taking of delivery are defined in the The country of destination shall take all measures
 Annex which forms an integral part of this Agree required to prevent :
 ment .
 — the re-export of the product received as aid and
 any products or by-products derived therefrom ;
 Article IV
 — the export, commercially or otherwise, within six
 The country of destination undertakes to make all months of the last delivery, both of locally
 necessary arrangements for the transport and insur produced rice of the same kind as that received as
 ance of the product from ports of discharge to places aid and of any products or by-products derived
 of destination . therefrom .
 ---pagebreak--- 10 . 10 . 74 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 275/ 17
 Article VIII Article IX
 The country of destination undertakes to inform the At the request of either of them , the Contracting
 Community of the implementation of this Agree Parties shall consult each other on any questions
 ment. To this end it shall provide the Commission of concerning the implementation of this Agreement.
 the European Communities with the following infor Article X
 mation at the end of distribution, and in any event
 every six months from delivery of the product : This Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the
 number and nature of the recipients ; quantities distri Danish, Dutch, English, French, German and Italian
 buted ; places, manner and time table of distribution . languages, each of these texts being authentic.
 ANNEX
 Provisions laid down in Article III of the Agreement
 Article 1 It shall have inserted in the charter party an undertaking by
 the captain to give the country of destination at least 72
 Delivery shall be effected and all risk shall pass from the hours' notice of the probable date of the ship's arrival in the
 Community to the country of destination at the moment at port of discharge.
 which the goods are actually taken in charge in the ship's
 hold at the port of discharge.
 Article 4
 The country of destination shall pay all costs subsequent to
 delivery of the goods, including the costs of unloading On delivery of the cargo, a tolerance of 5 % less than the
 (breaking bulk, hoisting, taking delivery, for example) as well quantity laid down under Article I of the Agreement shall be
 as any lighterage costs. permitted.
 Any demurrage or dispatch money at the port of discharge Article 5
 shall be borne by or paid to the country of destination. The
 rates and conditions of payment laid down in the contract To implement the provisions of this Annex, the Community
 between the authorized agent of the Community referred to shall appoint an authorized agent whose name and address it
 in Article 5 and the carrier must have been agreed in shall make known in good time to the country of destina
 advance between that agent and the receiving agent of the tion .
 country of destination referred to in Article 5.
 The country of destination shall appoint a receiving agent in
 Article 2 each port of discharge, whose name and address it shall
 make known to the Community before the Agreement is
 The Community shall forward to the country of destination, implemented.
 as soon as possible after the goods have been shipped, a
 notice giving the name of the ship, the date of loading, the Article 6
 quantity and quality of the goods on loading and the port of
 discharge. On delivery of the goods, the country of destination shall
 hand over to the authorized agent of the Community a certifi
 Article 3 cate of acceptance which shall set out the place and date of
 acceptance, and the nature and quality of the cargo accepted,
 The Community shall inform the country of destination of and which shall contain any remarks on the quality of the
 the ship's estimated date of arrival at the port of discharge at cargo. A copy of the certificate shall be sent to the Commis
 least 10 clear days before that date. sion of the European Communities.


text:
Hypnos (ytterst av antik grekiska ὕπνος (hýpnos), "sömn") är ett transartat tillstånd mellan vakenhet och sömn, karaktäriserat av avslappning, fantasi, öppenhet för förslag och ett starkt fokus, samt metoden att uppnå detta tillstånd.
 Definition
 Hypnotisören är den som försätter en person i ett hypnotiskt tillstånd. Detta kan ske på flera olika sätt, exempelvis genom att låta personen fokusera på ett glänsande objekt, exempelvis en klocka, som hypnotisören låter dingla framför personens ögon. Hypnos kan även framkallas genom upprepade monotona rörelser eller genom en starkt rogivande, lugnande röst eller ett normalt tonfall med suggestioner om att slappna av. Väl hypnotiserad befinner sig personen i ett diffust tillstånd i vilket denna förefaller ovanligt öppen för förslag och frågor och uppmaningar. Den hypnotiserade är inte drömmande eller sovande, utan mycket medveten, men medveten på ett annat sätt än vanligt. Ibland liknas detta tillstånd vid ett sorts trans. Exakt vad som sker i en hypnos är än idag omtvistat. Under slutet av 1900-talet har hypnotisörens roll ifrågasatts; och många har menat att de i alltför hög grad styr/leder de hypnotiserade då de ställer sina frågor. Detta gäller till exempel de via hypnos framkallade skildringarna av bortförande av utomjordingar och den typ av hypnos som ofta kallas regressionshypnos. Det finns andra former av hypnosmetoder som inte ställer frågor eller på annat sätt leder den hypnotiserade.
 Historik
 Ordet hypnos härstammar från det grekiska ordet för sömn, och även om det användes i dagens betydelse först 1822 av d’Henin de Cuvilliers så finns äldre exempel på hypnos. Både i sumeriska kilskrifter och egyptiska källor omnämns metoder genom vilka människor kan försättas i hypnotiska tillstånd, och genom dessa antingen nå djupa insikter, eller överkomma psykiska barriärer. Den som i modernare tider bidragit mest till hypnosens genombrott och utveckling torde ha varit Franz Mesmer. Från dennes tid fram till psykoanalysens födelse var hypnos ett vanligt verktyg inom psykiatrin.
 Hypnotisk suggestion
 En hypnotisk suggestion är en suggestion som ges till en person under hypnos av en annan person eller av personen själv. I det senare fallet brukar det kallas självhypnos.
 Posthypnotisk suggestion kallas det när en person utför något som suggererats under det hypnotiska tillståndet efter att det hypnotiska tillståndet upphört.
 Det hypnotiska tillståndet
 Mycket av det som berör området hypnos är direkt kopplat till det hypnotiska tillståndet. Detta tillstånd brukade ofta uppfattas som ett enda tillstånd, men anses numera vara ett förenklat uttryck för en hel mängd tillstånd, vilka har gemensamt att de skiljer sig från det vanliga, vakna tillståndet.
 Estradhypnos
 Hypnos förekommer ibland i underhållningssyfte. Denna användning av hypnos kallas estradhypnos.
 I Sverige är speciellt estradhypnos lagreglerad och utövandet begränsas av ordningslagen (1993:1617).
 Klinisk applikation
 Hypnos kan utnyttjas inom terapi. Det kan då handla om saker som att:
 minska smärta - hypnotisk smärtlindring (hypnotisk analgesi) är en metod som visat sig vara effektiv för smärtlindring hos människor. I en studie användes en PET-kamera för att se om den hypnotiska smärtlindringen gick att se på hjärnavbildningar. Vid en PET-undersökning förs radioaktiva spårämnen in i kroppen. För att försöka klarlägga cerebrala mekanismer bakom hypnotisk analgesi, så mättes regionalt cerebralt blodflöde med positronemissionstomografi hos patienter med fibromyalgi, under hypnotiskt inducerad smärtlindring och vilande vakenhet.
 eliminera fobier
 öka avslappning och förbättra förmågan att hantera stress - hypnos kan bidra till att man hantera olika rädslor, t.ex. att tala inför publik. Empiriska undersökningar har visat att hypnos kan bidra till effektiviteten av kognitiv beteendeterapi hos patienter med ångeststörningar.
 trauma – ett flertal fallstudier som hävdar att hypnos är en effektiv metod för att behandla olika trauman, som exempelvis posttraumatiskt stressyndrom.
 dissociation - Det finns en stark koppling mellan framgångsrik behandling av komplex kronisk dissociation och hypnos.
 Hypnos i sig är inte en terapiform, den är endast ett verktyg för att åstadkomma de förändringar som är sökta.
 Konversationell hypnos
 Det finns även en form av hypnos kallad konversationell hypnos. Det utmärkande för den här formen av hypnos är att den hypnotiska påverkan som hypnotisören har inte sker under en "formell" trans, där subjektet typiskt sitter/ligger blundande och tar emot en rad suggestioner. Istället sker den hypnotiska påverkan inom ramen för en vanlig konversation, och hypnotisören använder en mängd metoder och språkmönster för att ta subjektet igenom den hypnotiska processen under något som på ytan ser ut som mer eller mindre vanlig dialog. Detta sätt att använda hypnos utvecklades och populariserades till stor del av Dr. Milton H. Erickson, och sedermera av Richard Bandler och John Grinder i och med deras studie och protokollförande av Ericksons metodik.
 Se även
 Satanic Ritual Abuse
 Animal magnetism
 Katarsis
 Pythia
 Sublimering (psykologi)
 Källor
 Externa länkar
 :en:James Esdaile (om mesmerismens och hypnosens tidiga historia som anestesimetod)
 Verksamheter inom Hypnos (Företag i Sverige som erbjuder Hypnos)
 Förändrade medvetandetillstånd


text:
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 C 202/265
 PROTOKOL (č. 6)
 O UMIESTNENÍ SÍDEL INŠTITÚCIÍ A NIEKTORÝCH ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR A ÚTVAROV EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE
 ZÁSTUPCOVIA VLÁD ČLENSKÝCH ŠTÁTOV,
 SO ZRETEĽOM na článok 341 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie a článok 189 Zmluvy o založení Európskeho spoločenstva pre atómovú energiu,
 PRIPOMÍNAJÚC A POTVRDZUJÚC rozhodnutie z 8. apríla 1965 a bez toho, aby boli dotknuté rozhodnutia týkajúce sa sídla budúcich orgánov, úradov a agentúr a odborov,
 SA DOHODLI NA týchto ustanoveniach, ktoré sú pripojené k Zmluve o Európskej únii, k Zmluve o fungovaní Európskej únie a k Zmluve o založení Európskeho spoločenstva pre atómovú energiu,
 Jediný článok
 a)
 Európsky parlament má svoje sídlo v Štrasburgu, kde sa koná 12 mesačných plenárnych zasadnutí, vrátane zasadnutia o rozpočte. Dodatočné plenárne zasadnutia sa konajú v Bruseli. Výbory Európskeho parlamentu zasadajú v Bruseli. Generálny sekretariát Európskeho parlamentu a jeho oddelenia zostávajú v Luxemburgu.
 b)
 Rada má svoje sídlo v Bruseli. Počas apríla, júna a októbra sa zasadnutia Rady konajú v Luxemburgu.
 c)
 Komisia má svoje sídlo v Bruseli. Odbory uvedené v článkoch 7, 8 a 9 rozhodnutia z 8. apríla 1965 sa vytvoria v Luxemburgu.
 d)
 Súdny dvor Európskej únie má svoje sídlo v Luxemburgu.
 e)
 Dvor audítorov má svoje sídlo v Luxemburgu.
 f)
 Hospodársky a sociálny výbor má svoje sídlo v Bruseli.
 g)
 Výbor regiónov má svoje sídlo v Bruseli.
 h)
 Európska investičná banka má svoje sídlo v Luxemburgu.
 i)
 Európska centrálna banka má svoje sídlo vo Frankfurte.
 j)
 Úrad Európskej polície (Europol) má svoje sídlo v Haagu.


jurisdiction: US

text:
 105 HR 8800 IH: American Financial Markets Integrity and Security Act
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2020-11-20
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I116th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 8800IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESNovember 20, 2020Mr. Gallagher (for himself, Ms. Cheney, and Mr. Stewart) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, Armed Services, Education and Labor, Intelligence (Permanent Select), and Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedA BILLTo prohibit the trading of the securities of certain Communist Chinese military companies on a national securities exchange, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the American Financial Markets Integrity and Security Act.2.Prohibitions relating to certain Communist Chinese military companies(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)CommissionThe term Commission means the Securities and Exchange Commission.(2)ControlThe term control has the meaning given the term in section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)).(3)Covered entity(A)In generalThe term covered entity—(i)means an entity on—(I)the list of Communist Chinese military companies required by section 1237(b) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note); or(II)the entity list maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce and set forth in Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of the title 15, Code of Federal Regulations; and(ii)includes a parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of, or an entity controlled by, an entity described in clause (i).(B)Grace periodFor the purposes of this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, an entity shall be considered to be a covered entity beginning on the date that is 1 year after the date on which the entity first qualifies under the applicable provision of subparagraph (A).(4)Exchange; securityThe terms exchange and security have the meanings given those terms in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)). (5)Insurance companyThe term insurance company has the meaning given the term in section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)).(b)Prohibitions(1)Listing on exchangeBeginning on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall prohibit a covered entity from offering to sell or selling securities issued by the covered entity, including pursuant to an exemption to section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77e).(2)Investments; limitation on actions(A)In generalThe Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) is amended—(i)in section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 80a–12(d)), by adding at the end the following:(6)(A)It shall be unlawful for any investment company, or any person that would be an investment company but for the application of paragraph (1) or (7) of section 3(c), to invest in a covered entity.(B)In this paragraph, the term covered entity has the meaning given the term in section 2(a) of the American Financial Markets Integrity and Security Act.; and(ii)in section 13(c)(1)—(I)in subparagraph (A), by striking or at the end;(II)in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting or; and(III)by adding at the end the following:(C)are covered entities, as that term is defined in section 12(d)(6)(B)..(B)Effective dateThe amendments made by subparagraph (A) shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.(3)Federal funds(A)In generalExcept as provided in subparagraph (B), on and after the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, no Federal funds may be used to enter into, extend, or renew a contract or purchasing agreement with a covered entity.(B)WaiverThe head of a Federal agency may issue a national security waiver to the prohibition in subparagraph (A) for a period of not more than 2 years with respect to a covered entity if the agency head submits to Congress a notification that includes—(i)a written justification for the waiver; and(ii)a plan for a phase-out of the goods or services provided by the covered entity.(4)Investments by insurance companies(A)In generalOn and after the date of enactment of this Act, an insurance company shall not invest in a covered entity.(B)Certification of compliance(i)In generalEach insurance company shall, on an annual basis, submit to the Secretary of the Treasury a certification of compliance with subparagraph (A).(ii)Responsibilities of the SecretaryThe Secretary of the Treasury shall create a form for the submission required under clause (i) in such a manner that minimizes the reporting burden on an insurance company making the submission.(C)Sharing informationThe Secretary of the Treasury, acting through the Federal Insurance Office, shall share the information received under subparagraph (B) and coordinate verification of compliance with State insurance offices.(c)Qualified trusts, Etc(1)In generalSubsection (a) of section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after paragraph (38) the following new paragraph:(39)Prohibited investmentsA trust which is part of a plan shall not be treated as a qualified trust under this subsection unless the plan provides that no part of the plan's assets will be invested in any covered entity (as defined in section 12(d)(6)(B) of the Investment Company Act of 1940)..(2)IRAsParagraph (3) of section 408(a) of such Code is amended by striking contracts and inserting contracts or in any covered entity (as defined in section 12(d)(6)(B) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.(3)Fiduciary dutySection 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1104) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:(f)Prohibited investmentsNo fiduciary shall cause any assets of a plan to be invested in any covered entity (as defined in section 12(d)(6)(B) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–12(d)(6)(B)))..(4)Effective date(A)In generalExcept as provided in subparagraph (B), the amendments made by this subsection shall apply to plan years beginning after the date which is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.(B)Plan amendmentsIf subparagraph (C) applies to any retirement plan or contract amendment—(i)such plan or contract shall not fail to be treated as being operated in accordance with the terms of the plan during the period described in subparagraph (C)(ii) solely because the plan operates in accordance with the amendments made by this subsection; and(ii)except as provided by the Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary’s delegate), such plan or contract shall not fail to meet the any requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 by reason of such amendment.(C)Amendments to which paragraph applies(i)In generalThis subparagraph shall apply to any amendment to any plan or annuity contract which—(I)is made pursuant to the provisions of this section; and(II)is made on or before the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after the date which is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act (4 years after such date of enactment, in the case of a governmental plan).(ii)ConditionsThis subparagraph shall not apply to any amendment unless—(I)during the period beginning on the date which is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and ending on the date described in subclause (I)(bb) (or, if earlier, the date the plan or contract amendment is adopted), the plan or contract is operated as if such plan or contract amendment were in effect; and(II)such plan or contract amendment applies retroactively for such period.(D)Subsequent amendmentsRules similar to the rules of subparagraphs (B) and (C) shall apply in the case of any amendment to any plan or annuity contract made pursuant to any update of the list of Communist Chinese military companies required by section 1237(b) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) which is made after the effective date of the amendments made by this subsection.3.Modification of requirements for list of Communist Chinese military companiesSection 1237(b) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended—(1)by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:(2)Revisions to the list(A)AdditionsThe Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, or the Director of National Intelligence may add a person to the list required by paragraph (1) at any time.(B)RemovalsA person may be removed from the list required by paragraph (1) if the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of National Intelligence agree to remove the person from the list.(C)Submission of updates to CongressNot later than February 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a version of the list required paragraph (1), updated to include any additions or removals under this paragraph, to the committees and officers specified in paragraph (1).;(2)by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:(3)ConsultationIn carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of National Intelligence shall consult with each other, the Attorney General, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.; and(3)in paragraph (4), by striking making the determination required by paragraph (1) and of carrying out paragraph (2) and inserting this section.4.Analysis of financial ambitions of the government of the people's republic of china(a)Analysis requiredThe Director of the Office of Commercial and Economic Analysis of the Air Force shall conduct an analysis of—(1)the strategic importance to the Government of the People’s Republic of China of inflows of United States dollars through capital markets to the People’s Republic of China;(2)the methods by which that Government seeks to manage such inflows;(3)how the inclusion of the securities of Chinese entities in stock or bond indexes affects such inflows and serves the financial ambitions of that Government; and(4)how the listing of the securities of Chinese entities on exchanges in the United States assists in—(A)meeting the strategic goals of that Government, including defense, surveillance, and intelligence goals; and(B)the fusion of the civilian and military components of that Government.(b)Submission to congressThe Director of the Office of Commercial and Economic Analysis of the Air Force shall submit to Congress a report—(1)setting forth the results of the analysis conducted under subsection (a); and(2)based on that analysis, making recommendations for best practices to mitigate any national security and economic risks to the United States relating to the financial ambitions of the Government of the People’s Republic of China.