text:
VPVP • Pranešėjai
 VPVP 2010
 VPVP 2011
 VPVP 2012
 ProgramaPranešėjaiMokymaiStraipsniaiKontaktai
 Gediminas Vedrickas
 Irma Kaukienė
 Marius Šveistrys
 Tadas Pukšta
 Adriana Dębska-Gil
 Dr. Darius Šilingas dirba No Magic Europe nuo 1998 m. Šiuo metu jis vadovauja modeliavimo sprendimų skyriui bei eina verslo analitikams bei architektams skirto modeliavimo produkto Cameo Business Modeler vadovo pareigas. Dirbdamas No Magic Europe, Darius Šilingas sukaupė didžiulę praktinių mokymų patirtį – jis yra vedęs kelis šimtus mokymų bei konsultacijų sesijų daugiau nei 20 valstybių.
 Darius yra vienas iš Lietuvos verslo procesų valdymo praktikų bendruomenės lyderių. Jis aktyviai dalyvauja akademinėje veikloje, publikuoja straipsnius bei skaito pranešimus apie verslo procesų modeliavimą. Darius taip eina ISM Executive School vadovų magistratūros modulio “Verslo procesų valdymas” vadovo pareigas. Darius yra informatikos mokslų daktaras ir OMG sertifikuotas verslo procesų valdymo ekspertas.
 Konferencijos atidarymas bei uždarymas.
 BPTrends, BPTrends Associates
 Roger T. Burlton yra vienas iš BPTrends Associates įkūrėjų, verslo procesų valdymo knygos Business Process Management: Profiting from Process autorius. Jis yra neseniai paskelbto Business Process Manifesto redaktorius.
 Roger gerai žinomas kaip novatoriškų organizacijų pokyčių valdymo metodų lyderis. Jo publikacijos bei metodikos, susijusios su verslo procesų valdymu, suinteresuotų šalių analize, strateginės architektūros valdymu, prototipų kūrimu bei žmonėmis pagrįstu projektų valdymu yra pripažintos ir naudojamos visame pasaulyje. Roger savo klientams siūlo pragmatiškus sprendimus, paremtus realia ilgamete praktika.
 There is a clear convergence coming among a variety of well-established business and IT disciplines. Some Enterprise Architects have realized that IT centric EA is doomed without appropriate business direction driving the vision. Business Process Management professionals have been consistently moving the BPM practice to enterprise wide business process architectures for the sustainable management and governance of end to end process assets and total alignment of process results and measures to external stakeholder outcomes. Many Business Analysts are taking a much wider and strategic view of the businesses they must analyze if they are to be successful in defining business, business system and information systems requirements. All of these are all marching towards the same space but are coming from a different starting point, however. How can we get these apparently disparate professions to share the same perspective and knowledge base? This session will introduce a proven approach to have everyone working towards a common foundation. Building a true multidimensional Business Architecture from the point of view of the business and not solely from the perspective of an individual professional group is what is needed for all groups to start together. No one group of professionals can do it alone and none of them should own it outright. Business Architecture is for the whole business and its stewardship must reside there. This session will outline how we can build a shareable, robust and sustainable Business Architecture that everyone can use.
 A little history of EA, BPM and BA practices (where we are coming from)
 An integrated view of the component parts as seen by the business (where we are going to)
 A method that glues it all together to achieve strategic outcomes (A Business Architecture method)
 Some illustrations of its use in private sector and government (case studies)
 What does this mean for BPM and BA professionals (your future)
 Rūta Kinderytė pastaruoju metu dirba Swedbank Grupės Mokėjimų padalinyje, atsakinga už Mokėjimų srities verslo architektūrą ir susijusių IT sistemų valdymą Švedijoje ir Baltijos regione. Prieš tai dalyvavo veiklos efektyvumo projektuose diegiant Lean principus organizacijoje, vadovavo įvairiems Swedbank Grupės IT padaliniams. Swedbank dirba nuo 1998 metų.
 Verslo architektūros panaudojimas transformuojant organizaciją ir keičiant IT sistemą
 Lietuvoje dažnai verslo architektūros taikymas apsiriboja tik verslo procesų analize ir modeliavimu. Šiame pranešime remiantis dviem realiais Swedbank projektų įgyvendinimo pavyzdžiais parodoma ir kitų verslo architektūros komponentų: verslo strategijos ir tikslų, verslo modelių, veiklos principų, bendrųjų terminų ir kt. taikymo nauda.
 2012 m. Swedbank Mokėjimų Operacijų padalinys iš Stokholmo buvo keliamas į Rygą. Sprendimo priėmimui ir įgyvendinimui buvo panaudoti šie įrankiai: verslo tikslų suformulavimas, bendrųjų terminų suvienodinimas, esamų ir būsimų verslo procesų analizė ir modeliavimas, modelių panaudojimas darbo instrukcijų ruošimui bei žmogiškųjų išteklių valdymo modelio diegimas. Kitame banko projekte buvo keičiama viena iš bazinių IT sistemų. Įprastai Swedbank IT projektuose apibrėžiami tik funkciniai reikalavimai sistemai. Šio projekto metu papildomai buvo suformuluoti bendrieji veiklos principai, verslo modelis, atlikta verslo paslaugų ir procesų analizė bei peržiūrėtos darbuotojų atliekamos funkcijos. Šiuose projektuose pritaikius verslo architektūros įrankius buvo sukurta efektyvesnė organizacijos struktūra, apibrėžti aiškūs darbuotojų vaidmenys ir atsakomybės, standartizuoti veiklos procesai, sumažintos personalo išlaidos. Pranešimo informacija gali būti naudinga įmonėms, siekiančioms išnaudoti visų verslo architektūros komponentų taikymo privalumus.
 Kim-Nena ne vienerius metu dirbo didelėse, skirtingų šakų įmonėse, kuriose buvo atsakinga už verslo procesų valdymo sritį – nuo planų rengimo, tobulinimo ir pristatymo įmonių vadovams, iki darbuotojų mokymų, kuriuose supažindindavo skirtingose pasaulio vietose išsibarsčiusius darbuotojus su verslo procesų valdymo įrankiais bei metodais.
 Šiuo metu Kim-Nena dirba išorine konsultante, kuri moko verslo analitikus ir reikalavimų inžinierius suprasti, modeliuoti bei dokumentuoti procesus, su kuriais jie dirba. Tokių mokymų rezultatas - optimizuota organizacijos veikla ir užtikrintas tinkamas IT bei procesų suderinamumas.
 Do's and Don'ts in BPM and EAM activities
 Imagine three big enterprises from different sectors (government agency, utility company, insurance) with the same goals: to identify internal business processes and to describe the used enterprise architecture artifacts to be able to derive business capabilities, optimize organizational activities and IT support, reduce costs, motivate employees, enhance flexibility and transparency, and many more.
 In the last years companies have tried different approaches:
 enterprise wide BPM initiatives, where the entire enterprise is described to identify company strategy, objectives, all business processes and enterprise and information technology architecture to then start continuous improvements
 small separated projects with different teams in different organizational focuses with process orientation and the commitment of everyone involved to fill the enterprise architecture e.g. via optimization projects, implementing organizational changes, gathering requirements for a new tool, etc.
 no BPM or enterprise-architecture-documentation at all based on the fear of producing a paper tiger
 So what is best practice for benefitting from EAM and BPM in your enterprise with appropriate time and effort?
 See real life examples and learn the do ́s and don ́ts for your own enterprise while listening to this talk.
 Gediminas Vedrickas yra Fair Isaac korporacijos (FICO) projektuotojų komandos EMEA regionui narys, atsakingas už informacinių technologijų produktų bei sistemų veiklos sprendimų valdymui projektavimą bei jų įgyvendinimą.
 Gediminas turi sukaupęs daugiau nei 12 metų informacinių sistemų kūrimo ir diegimo patirtį, kuri surformavo solidų informacinių technologijų taikymo veiklos procesų automatizavimui įvairiuose ūkio sektoriuose bagažą. Projektuose vykdytos užduotys sudaro pilną informacinių sistemų kūrimo ciklą, paremtą Object Management Group bei kitų, standartus leidžiančių organizacijų, specifikacijomis reikalavimų analizės, veiklos modeliavimo, sistemų projektavimo ir realizavimo, sistemų integracijos srityse. Pagrindinės Gedimino įgytos kompetencijos apima rizikos valdymo sistemų muitinėms bei viešųjų pirkimo tarnyboms įgyvendinimą, priimamų veiklos sprendimų, veiklos procesų valdymo ir kontrolės procesų automatizavimą finansų, draudimo, viešojo valdymo sektoriuose. Ryškiausi informacinių technologijų produktų bei sistemų kūrimo diegimo pavyzdžiai paremti FICO, SAP, Oracle, EMC, o taip pat, atvirojo kodo SpringSource, JBoss, Apache, Eclipse, kt. programinės įrangos gamintojų produktais.
 Nuo 2013 m. vasario mėn. Gediminas Vedrickas eina Fair Isaac Lithuania, UAB generalinio direktoriaus pareigas. 2012 m. įkurta Lietuvos įmonė yra FICO profesionalių konsultavimo bei informacinių technologijų paslaugų teikimo centras, veikiantis pasauliniame FICO verslo tinkle.
 Sprendimų valdymo praktika efektyviems veiklos procesams
 Veiklos procesai yra pagrindinis organizacijos instrumentas misijos vykdymui ir užsibrėžtų tikslų siekimui. Iš pirmo karto suprojektuoti efektyvų veiklos procesą yra labai sudėtinga, dažnai net neįmanoma. Geras procesas subrandinamas per laiką, įtraukiant organizacijos kaupiamą patirtį bei žinias. Šioje veiklos proceso raidoje tyko didėjančio sudėtingumo pavojus, kurio priežastis slypi organizacijos poreikiuose atspindėti veiklos procese augančią situacijų ir išimčių įvairovę. Didėjantis sudėtingumas lemia didesnius kaštus, mažesnį lankstumą, prastą patirtį, o tai savo ruožtu mažina bendrąjį veiklos našumą.
 Pranešime bus įvardintos dažniausiai pasitaikančios didėjančio veiklos procesų sudėtingumo priežastys, bus diskutuojama, kaip būtų galima ženkliai pagerinti procesų architektūrą pasitelkiant sprendimų valdymo praktiką. Diskusiją numatoma paremti gyvenimišku veiklos proceso bei sprendimų modelio pavyzdžiu.
 Chris Henn IT produktų/verslo vystymo bei rinkodaros srityse dirba jau 20 metų ir turi didelę patirtį dirbant su novatoriškomis technologijomis bei sprendimais. Ši patirtis leido Chris iš esmės keisti kertinius verslo procesus bei darbo eigos principus chemijos ir vaistų, biomedicinos, naftos ir dujų, automobilių ir lėktuvų gamybos pramonėje. Darbą su procesų pokyčiais Chris tęsė finansiniame bei telekomunikacijų sektoriuose.
 Prieš prisijungdamas prie E2E komandos, Chris užėmė vadovaujančias pozicijas SGI, Obtree, IXOS bei Esmertec kompanijose. Jis turi Bazelio (Šveicarija) universiteto molekulinės biologijos magistro laipsnį ir yra kelių vizualizavimo, bendro naudojimo bei komponentinės programinės įrangos patentų bendraautorius.
 Business Middleware: Bridging the Gap between BPM and Systems Integration
 Business and middleware are words that go easily together in the same sentence. One has nothing to do with technology, the other is all about it. But if BPM is to be more than producing pretty pictures, it needs to be inseparably liked with an organizations operational IT. The only way to do that is by bridging BPM and middleware, which provides access to all data sources to bring a process to live.
 Current approaches struggle to fill this gap because BPM and systems integration use different languages to describe their artifacts. Just as if one person speaks Lithuanian and the other speaks English, misunderstandings – and the resulting loss of time and money – are the logical consequence.
 But what if systems integration could be done by using the language of business – in form of models that can provide a shared context between technical and non-technical co-workers across the entire process lifecycle. And what if that model representation of interfaces could be directly executed to provide live connectivity to existing backend applications?
 This presentation analyzes the impact of using 100% Model Driven Integration via Direct Model Execution of BPMN and UML, an approach where the model IS the middleware and the documentation IS the code – a unique form of de-risking ongoing change management.
 As a case study, the restructuring of all sales processes at Nikon Europe, covering 35 countries and several thousand dealers, will be discussed in detail.
 Vevaldis, UAB
 Irma Kaukienė yra Vevaldis, UAB partnerė, verslo konsultantė.
 Irma yra įgijusi technologijos mokslų daktaro (informatikos inžinerija) laipsnį bei baigusi vadybos studijas BMI, neseniai įgijo OMG – Certified Expert in Business Process Modeling sertifikatą.
 Irma specializuojasi rodiklių sistemų, veiklos procesų analizės ir optimizavimo, verslo valdymo sistemų diegimo valdymo projektuose.
 Subalansuotų rodiklių sistemos ir verslo architektūros suderinimas
 Veiklos procesų aprašymas yra daugelio vadybos metodikų diegimo pagrindas (pvz., ISO standartų, LEAN, TOC ir kt.). Taip pat visos vadybos metodikos negali būti pilnai įdiegtos neapibrėžus matavimo rodiklių, skirtų matuoti metodikos įgyvendinimo rezultatus ir sėkmę. Subalansuotų rodiklių sistema (BSC) gali tarnauti kaip apjungianti įvairius matavimo tikslus ir rodiklius vadybos metodika, tačiau mechaniškai įtraukti veiklos procesų matavimo tikslus ir rodiklius į BSC sistemą yra klaida, nes būtina atskirti BSC (strateginio) lygmens matavimus ir veiklos procesų (operatyvinio) lygmens matavimus, o formuojant strateginio lygmens rodiklių sąrašus reikia teisingai parinkti, kurie veiklos procesus matuojantys rodikliai yra išties strateginio lygmens, o kurie turi likti operatyviniame lygmenyje.
 Pranešime pristatysime du rodiklių sistemų kūrimo atvejus, per kuriuos parodysime:
 kuo skiriasi ir kur persidengia strateginio ir operatyvinio lygmens matavimai bei kokie turėtų būti atskyrimo kriterijai su praktiniais rodiklių pavyzdžiais
 kodėl veiklos procesų modeliavimas yra svarbus žingsnis diegiant BSC, kaip braižyti ir naudoti veiklos procesų žemėlapius ir juos panaudoti apibrėžiant BSC matavimus
 kuo skiriasi veiklos procesų matavimas ir strategijos įgyvendinimo matavimas
 Anne Rozinat turi dešimties metų procesų analizės (angl. process mining) patirtį. Anne, kartu su profesorium Wil van der Aalst, dirbo Eindhoveno technologijos universiteto (Olandija) procesų analizės grupėje. Šiame universitete ji apgynė procesų analizės daktaro laipsnį.
 Anne yra viena iš Fluxicon kompanijos įkūrėjų ir rašo tinklaraštį http://www.fluxicon.com/blog/.
 BPM - Upside Down (Process Mining)
 Most organizations have complex processes that are invisible, thus hard to manage or improve. Each stakeholder sees only part of the process. Manual discovery through workshops, interviews, and review of existing documentation is costly and time-consuming, and rarely reflects actual process complexity. Process mining closes this gap by making the real process visible based on existing IT data. Complete and accurate pictures of the process can be generated to analyze actual process flows, highlight bottlenecks, and show variants.
 Marius Šveistrys tiekimo grandinės srityje dirba nuo 2001 metų, nuo 2005 metų UAB „ Švyturys –Utenos alus“ kompanijoje įgyta patirtis įvairiose grandyse: gamybos planavime, sandėliavime, produkcijos distribucijoje, transportavime, veiklos optimizavimo projektuose, IT sistemų ( SAP, TPS, Hamilton) diegime. Nuo 2010 metų Utenos alaus daryklos vadovas.
 Darbuotojų įtraukimas – raktas į sklandų veiklos valdymą Utenos alaus darykloje
 Taip kaip tūkstančiai kitų gamybos įmonių pasaulyje, Utenos Alaus darykla nuo pat įkūrimo 1977 metais valdoma pagal nusistovėjusius tiekimo grandinės principus. Sklandžiam ir kokybiškam tokios veiklos valdymui naudojami kokybės vadybos, aplinkosaugos, darbų saugos standartai. Tačiau, drastiškai auganti konkurencija vietinėje ir tarptautinėse rinkose reikalauja naujovių pačiame įmonių valdyme . Utenos alaus daryklos veiklos valdyme prieš keletą metų reikšmingą postūmį inicijavo Lean filosofijos diegimas kasdienėje veikloje. Bene svarbiausias pokytis, įgalinantis sklandų veiklos valdymą, yra kitoks santykis tarp vadovų ir operatorių. Alaus darykla veikia visą parą septynias dienas per savaitę, todėl operatoriai turi savarankiškai inicijuoti ir vykdyti veiklos korekcijas bei siūlyti stambesnius pokyčius vadovybei. Tiesioginis darbuotojų įtraukimas į valdymą įgalina pastovaus tobulėjimo kultūrą bei leidžia pasiekti reikšmingų pokyčių veiklos rezultatuose.
 BCS - Dr. Jurgen Pitschke
 Jürgen yra konsultacinės kompanijos BCS - Dr Jürgen Pitschke steigėjas ir savininkas.
 Pagrindinė Jürgen darbo sritis – įmonių bei sprendimų architektūros modeliavimas ir dizainas. Jis yra pripažintas metodologinio standartų taikymo kelio ekspertas, kurio patarimai padėjo ne vienam klientui pradėti taikyti standartus ir metodus savo kasdienėje veikloje. Jürgen išvertė į vokiečių kalbą knygą „RuleSpeak approach“.
 Jürgen klientų tarpe galima rasti ir verslo (pvz. Kuehne + Nagel (AG & Co KG)), ir viešojo sektoriaus (pvz. Šveicarijos federalinės policijos biuras) atstovų.
 Mastering Business Modeling - Soft Skills for Business Analysts
 How to introduce Business Process Modeling, Business Rules Analysis and Business Architecture
 "If you can't describe it, you can't build it." John Zachman
 We develop models to describe business processes, IT systems or entire enterprise. These models are part of Business Analysis and Business Process Management.
 The OMG standards as BPMN are meanwhile widely adopted for Business Process Modeling and Management. Other standard notations address the presentation of Business Rules, Business Motivation and other aspects of an Enterprise Model. But there are also resentments and failed projects.
 The presentation reflects how model based approaches can be successfully implemented for enterprise initiatives. Process modeling is seen as engineering discipline which is systematic and predictable. To produce high quality models it is necessary to apply different analysis and modeling techniques.
 The presentation discusses especially soft skills needed to apply standard notations successfully. Some of the questions covered are:
 What are most common problems when introducing a model based approach?
 How to learn and apply notations? What working techniques should we apply?
 What roles do we need in a project?
 How can we produce good quality models? How can we measure the quality of a model?
 IĮ LEAN MOKYKLA
 Tadas Pukšta yra Lean – Toyota Kata (Toyota rutinų) mokytojas ir konsultantas. Jis yra Lean mokyklos steigėjas ir jau 9 metus padeda įmonėms Lietuvoje ir užsienyje mokytis ir praktikuoti Lean (Toyota) mąstymo ir veikimo būdą. Du metus Tadas Pukšta Toyota mąstymo ir veikimo būdo mokėsi iš Hitoshi Takeda ir Masuyuki Wada.
 Pastaraisiais metais Tadas aktyviai mokosi geriausiose pasaulio Lean organizacijose JAV (Lean Enterprise Institute, Michigan University) bei Lenkijoje. Pastaruosius penkerius metus beveik kiekvieną darbo dieną Tadas ugdo įmonių vadovus ir jų komandas Lean mąstymo ir veikimo būdo, Tobulinimo ir Ugdymo rutinų. Tadas turi patirties metalo, baldų, tekstilės, laivų statybos, statybų, elektronikos, biotechnologijų, maisto, bankininkystės ir kitose pramonės šakose.
 Tadas yra aktyvus Toyota Kata pasaulinės bendruomenės narys. Jis prisideda prie mokslinio darbo, ieškodamas būdų, kaip Toyota metodologiją efektyviau pritaikyti Lietuvos įmonių ir organizacijų kontekste. Tadas turi iškirtinės patirties Lietuvoje Lean metodų taikymo projektinėse organizacijose, naujų gaminių ir procesų kūrimo srityje. Kelios įmonės yra geri tokios veiklos sėkmės pavyzdžiai.
 Lean taikymo patirtis kompleksinius projektus vykdančiose organizacijose
 Lean pasaulyje domimasi nuo 1990 metų, jau daugiau nei 20 metų. Lean atėjo iš Toyota gamybos sistemos. Toyota organizacijoje sakoma: "Geras mąstymas, geras procesas, geras rezultatas". Tai iš tiesų kitoks mąstymo ir veikimo būdas, ženkliai besiskiriantis nuo to, kaip vakarų vadyba supranta ir moko procesų valdymo. Projektų valdymo aplinkoje pasaulyje domimasi įvairiais metodais, padedančiais komandoms tarpusavyje susišnekėti, sinchronizuoti tarpusavio veiklas. Šiame pranešime plačiau pažvelgsime į Lean metodų taikymą projektų valdyme. Paanalizuosime, kaip Toyota geba į rinką pristatyti naujus produktus ar naujus procesus greičiau nei kiti. Taip pat aptarsime:
 Lean ypatumai projektinėse organizacijose
 Oobeya – komplikuotų projektų valdymo aplinka
 Project roadmap – projektų valdymo platforma su Lean elementais
 Išankstinis problemų iškėlimas ir sprendimas, ypatumai projektinėse veiklose
 Konkretūs Lean pritaikymo pavyzdžiai dviejose statybų sektoriaus projektinėse organizacijose Lietuvoje.
 Alexander Samarin dirba IT srityje nuo 1977 metų, o 1986 metais jis apgynė kompiuterinės grafikos daktaro laipsnį. Alexander dirbo IT koordinatoriumi CERN bei ISO standartų organizacijoje Šveicarijoje. Darbo CERN metu jis parašė knygą "Latex companion".
 Nuo 2004 Alexander dirbo konsultantu Tarptautiniame olimpiniame komitete (Šveicarija), Jungtinės Karalystės globos asociacijoje (JK), Mutuel grupėje (Šveicarija), Europos medicinos ir slaugos departamente (Prancūzija), IT strategijos departamente prie Šveicarijos finansų ministerijos (Šveicarija) ir Ženevos informacinių technologinių centre (Šveicarija).
 Alexander yra įmonių architektūros kūrimo, įgyvendinimo ir evoliucijos specialistas. Savo sprendimuose jis intensyviai naudoja įmonių architektūros, verslo architektūros, BPM, SOA, ECM, IT valdymo ir IT strategijų sprendimus.
 2009 metais Alexander išleido knygą "Improving enterprise business process management systems". Nuo 2012 metų jis dirba Afrikos plėtros banko įmonės architektu Tunise.
 Business Architecture Patterns
 Although business architecture is different from one enterprise to another, there are several common techniques or practices in doing the business architecture. In architecture, those techniques or practices are known as patterns. The latter are proven solutions to typical problems. Any well-established architecture (for example, civil architecture or software architecture) already has a lot patterns. Use of patterns allows enterprises to concentrate on their specific challenges thus become more effective and efficient.
 In this session, we will present several business architecture patterns. Those patterns link different business architecture artefacts (organisational unit, business objectives, capabilities, rules, roles, etc.) and provide practical advices for addressing typical BA concerns. Examples of those patterns are: Strategy To Portfolio (STOP), Structure IT Organisation (SITO), Platform-Enabled Agile Solutions (PEAS). Knowledge of the patterns helps the participants to apply the power of business architecture in a better way.
 Nerius Jasinavičius baigė Buhalterinės apskaitos ir audito bakalauro ir magistro studijas Vilniaus Universitete. Taip pat įgijo Verslo Administravimo magistro laipsnį Edinburgo Universitete, dirbo vadovaujančiose pareigose finansų, gamybos, distribucijos bei IT įmonėse.
 Pastaruosius 9 metus dirba konsultacinėje įmonėje TOC sprendimai, kuri padeda įmonėms ir organizacijoms diegti Apribojimų Teorijos bei LEAN metodus prekių bei paslaugų gamyboje, atsargų valdyme bei pardavimuose. Nerius Jasinavičius yra Sertifikuotas vadybos konsultantas (CMC), sertifikuotas Apribojimų Teorijos praktikas bei tinklaraščio www.commonsense.lt autorius.
 Priežasties-pasekmės loginės analizės naudojimas procesų tobulinime
 Yra įprasta procesų analizei naudoti statistinius analizės metodus bei stebėjimą. Tačiau neretai proceso trukdžiai yra akiai nematomos taisyklės ar nustatyti matavimai. Tokius trukdžius galima efektyviai identifikuoti su priežasties-pasekmės logikos pagalba. Apribojimų teorija (TOC) turi metodologiją, vadinamą Mąstymo Procesu. O jos įrankis - Esamos Realybės Medis leidžia efektyviai identifikuoti procesų (bei sistemų/organizacijų) esminius trukdžius.
 Process Renewal Group Polska
 Adriana yra procesų architektūros vystymo ekspertė bei turi verslo administravimo magistro laipsnį. Jos patirtis - daugiau nei 15 metų BPM, procesų architektūros, BPM valdymo ir kokybės valdymo srityse. Šią patirtį Adriana įgijo dirbdama strateginėse, taktinėse ir valdymo pozicijose organizacijose, turinčiose nuo 40 iki 40000 darbuotojų.
 Adriana dirba išorės eksperte su įmonėmis ir kapitalo grupėmis iš telekomunikacijų, energijos, naftos bei valdžios sektorių. Šioms įmonėms ji padeda sukurti BPM ekspertų grupes, moko valdyti procesus, kurti bei diegti procesų architektūrą. Ji taip pat pritaiko bendrinę srities architektūrą, modelius bei metodus specifiniams įmonių poreikiams.
 Adriana dirbo BPM projektų vadove ir buvo atsakinga už ne vieną visą kompaniją įtraukiantį BPM projektą.
 From Process Architecture to Functional Requirements
 In recent years, many organizations implement the integrated information systems, which supposed to support as much as possible the fulfillment of the current activities performed by different groups of users.
 Experience has shown that only an active participation of the company-wide business process’ users in the analysis and design phases guarantees the identification the complete set of functional requirements. Typically, in any organization, there are groups of employees with different levels of business processes understanding and varying degrees of sophistication in the use of various applications.
 This case study will show how to plan, run and carry out a BPM project in order to successfully define the functional requirements in a large scale enterprise having employees with a low process knowledge and IT awareness.
 The presentation will discuss a practical approach to the BPM project including:
 Project planning with a Process Architecture definition, process analysis and design, and collection of functional requirements
 Creation of project team and definition of its roles and responsibilities.
 Adaptation of work methodology and preparation of analytical tools relevant to the participants’ potential
 Risk management including cultural and political threats.
 IIBA įkūrėja ir buvusi prezidentė
 Tarptautinio Verslo Analizės Instituto (IIBA) įkūrėja ir buvusi prezidentė bei vykdančioji direktorė. Kathleen Barret tarptautiniame verslo analizės institute (IIBA) dirbo nuo pat šios organizacijos įsteigimo 2003 metais. 2009 metų birželį ji tapo organizacijos vykdančiąja direktore bei prezidente. IIBA institutas – tai profesionalių verslo analitikų asociacija, kuri kuria ir tobulina verslo analitikams skirtą gidą Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (BABOK®) bei įgyvendina verslo analitikų sertifikavimo programą.
 Kathleen turi sukaupusi 25 metų darbo informacinių technologijų versle patirtį. Vienas iš paskutinių jos projektų – nutolusio didelės finansinių paslaugų organizacijos programinės įrangos kūrimo departamento valdymas. Į verslo analizės sritį Kathleen įsiliejo kurdama verslo analitikų kompetencijos centrą organizacijoje, kurioje tuo metu dirbo. Eiti IIBA vadovės pareigas Kathleen padėjo ilgametė darbo patirtis skirtingose pramonės šakose. Ji taip pat ne vienerius metus dirbo konsultante bei yra CMMI ir lyginamosios analizės ekspertė.
 A Business Analysis perspective on business process management: the foundation of effective organizational change
 Business process is the foundation of business analysis, a radical thought since business analysis is typically associated with technology change. Although business analysts do capture technology requirements, they must also include the changes to processes and the needs of people impacted by the change for a complete picture of the requirements to emerge. In the IIBA BABOK v3 draft, business process is a set of defined ad-hoc or sequenced collaborative activities performed in a repeatable fashion by an organization. “Process is inherent in every organization regardless of the type. How an organization conducts its affairs to achieve the goals and objectives of its stakeholders is accomplished through the processes of that organization - manual, automated, or more likely, a combination. Business Process Management (BPM) determines how these processes are governed, created, modified, or cancelled. Technology supports organizational processes and enables efficiency; it cannot exist without process as the foundation.”
 The BA must understand how the business domain operates, how the people do their jobs and how the data and business rules achieve the value goals set by the organization.
 Today’s session will describe how the business analyst (BA) takes on the role of process analyst (PA) to focus on process improvement. You will be introduced to the foundation skills a BA brings in the execution of process analysis tasks. You will discover how process improvement is the first step towards the requirements necessary to make effective change within the organization.
 Describe the role of the business process analyst
 List the skills & competencies required by the BPA to be successful
 Explain how BPA activities and process improvement initiate the requirements process and the cycle of change to technology and the people impacted
 Sekite naujausią informaciją:
 Lapkričio 13.Patalpinome konferencijos nuotraukas bei Roger T. Burlton pranešimo vaizdo įrašą.
 Spalio 25.Patalpinome konferencijoje pristatytų pranešimų skaidres.
 Spalio 21.Roger T. Burlton mokymai ir VPVP / BPM in Practice 2013 konferencija sėkmingai įvyko, o joje dalyvavo 267 dalyviai!
 Rugpjūčio 30.Patalpinome visą informaciją apie pranešėjus ir pranešimus.
 Konferenciją organizuoja:
 © 2013 No Magic Europe, UAB. Visos teisės saugomos


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
18.12.2010
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 C 346/44
 Sag anlagt den 21. september 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki mod Domstolen
 (Sag T-447/10)
 ()
 2010/C 346/89
 Processprog: engelsk
 Parter
 Sagsøger: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athen, Grækenland) (ved advokaterne N. Korogiannakis og M. Dermitzakis)
 Sagsøgt: Domstolen
 Sagsøgerens påstande
 —
 Annullation af Domstolens beslutning om ikke at antage sagsøgerens bud, der blev afgivet i forbindelse med offentligt udbud CJ 7/09 »Offentlige udbud vedrørende levering af tjenester på informationsteknologiområdet« (1), og af alle Domstolens øvrige relaterede beslutninger, herunder beslutningen om at tildele de respektive kontrakter til de valgte tilbudsgivere
 —
 Domstolen tilpligtes at betale 5 000 000 EUR til sagsøgeren i erstatning for det tab, som sagsøgeren har lidt som følge af den omhandlede udbudsprocedure.
 —
 Domstolen tilpligtes at betale sagsøgeren erstatning på 500 000 EUR for den skade, som sagsøgeren har lidt som følge af mistet mulighed og krænkelse af sagsøgerens omdømme og troværdighed
 —
 Domstolen tilpligtes at betale sagsøgerens sagsomkostninger og udgifter i forbindelse med dette søgsmål, også hvis sagsøgeren ikke får medhold.
 Søgsmålsgrunde og væsentligste argumenter
 Sagsøgeren har i den foreliggende sag nedlagt påstand om annullation af Domstolens beslutning af 12. juli 2010 om ikke at antage sagsøgerens bud, som blev afgivet under den åbne udbudsprocedure CJ 7/09 for tjenester på informationsteknologiområdet, og om at tildele kontrakterne til de valgte virksomheder. Sagsøgeren har endvidere nedlagt påstand om erstatning for den skade, som selskabet angiveligt har lidt på grund af udbudsproceduren.
 Sagsøgeren fremsætter til støtte for sine påstande følgende anbringender:
 For det første gør sagsøgeren gældende, at den ordregivende myndighed har undladt at overholde princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling af tilbudsgiverne, eftersom flere af de valgte tilbudsgivere ikke opfyldte udelukkelseskriterierne, og dermed har tilsidesat finansforordningens (2) artikel 93 og 94, gennemførelsesbestemmelsernes artikel 133 såvel som princippet om god forvaltningsskik.
 Sagsøgeren gør endvidere gældende, at Domstolen har tilsidesat bestemmelserne i finansforordningens artikel 100, stk. 2, i begge henseender, nemlig begrundelsespligten ved at nægte at give sagsøgeren en tilstrækkelig begrundelse eller forklaring. Navnlig blev de kvaliteter og relative fordele, som kendetegner det valgte bud, ikke tilstrækkeligt oplyst. Sagsøgerens bud blev alene givet en simpel teknisk karakter i henhold til hvert enkelt kriterium, ligesom der blev brugt vage vendinger, mens det for så vidt angår de antagne tilbudsgivere blot blev nævnt, at deres bud var af højere kvalitet.
 Sagsøgeren gør for det tredje gældende, at Domstolen ikke har sikret en retfærdig behandling af alle udbudsgivere, da den indbød dem til at besøge Domstolens lokaler, eftersom dette ikke gjorde det muligt for dem at konkurrere på lige vilkår mod den virksomhed, som i sidste ende vandt udbudsrunden.
 Endelig gør sagsøgeren gældende, at Domstolen ved at anvende andre kriterier end dem, der er tilladt i henhold til finansforordningens artikel 138, og ved at behandle data, som ikke var blevet fremlagt af sagsøgeren selv med henblik på udbudsproceduren og ved at sammenblande udvælgelses- og kontrakttildelingskriterier og ikke anvende kriterier forbundet med tilbudets økonomiske fordel, har tilsidesat finansforordningens artikel 97 og gennemførelsesbestemmelsernes artikel 138.
 (1) EUT 2009/S 217-312293
 (2) Rådets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002 af 25.6.2002 om finansforordningen vedrørende De Europæiske Fællesskabers almindelige budget (EFT 2002 L 248, s. 1).


type: wikipedia

text:
Ovčie kiahne alebo varicela (, ) je detské vírusové, silne nákazlivé ochorenie. Na rozdiel od pravých kiahní sa dajú dobre liečiť. Infekciu spôsobuje varicella-zoster vírus (VZV), nazývaný tiež ľudský herpes vírus 3 (HHV-3, )
 Ochorenie je spôsobené DNA-vírusom VZV (Varicella-Zoster Virus), ktorý sa prenáša z chorých osôb priamym kontaktom a vzdušnou cestou. Čas inkubácie – teda čas od nakazenia po úplné rozvinutie sa choroby je približne 14 dní. Vyrážky sa objavujú najskôr na trupe, tvári a vo vlasoch a postupujú na končatiny. Spočiatku majú podobu červených fliačikov a postupne sa menia na pupence, potom pľuzgieriky, obsah ktorých sa zamúti, pľuzgierik puká a vytvorí sa chrastička. Táto premena trvá cca 24 hodín. Počas ďalších 5 – 6 dní sa objavia nové vlny vyrážok, takže na tele chorého sú viditeľné všetky uvedené štádiá vyrážky. Priemerný počet vyrážok u inak zdravých jedincov je 250 – 500.
 Prenos ochorenia
 Zdrojom nákazy je chorý človek, ktorý vylučuje vírusy zo svojich čerstvých vyrážok a prenos sa deje vzdušnou cestou. Nákazlivosť začína posledným dňom inkubačnej doby (t. j. ešte počas obdobia bez príznakov) a končí premenou poslednej vyrážky na chrastu. Ochorenie začína spravidla horúčkou a výsevom červených fľakov tvaru šošovice, ktoré sa v priebehu niekoľkých hodín menia na pupence a pľuzgieriky. Výsev začína na trupe, tvári a vlasatej časti hlavy, ďalej sa šíri na končatiny s výnimkou dlaní a plosiek nôh. U detí v predškolskom veku sa môžu vyskytnúť aj na plosiek nôh. Pľuzgieriky sa v ďalšom priebehu (zvyčajne v priebehu 1 dňa) skalia a neskôr zasychajú do chrasty (chrasty odpadajú cca za 2 týždne). Výsev vyrážok prebieha vo vlnách, takže sú prítomné rôzne štádiá vyrážky. U zdravých malých detí ochorenie prebieha zvyčajne bez vážnejších komplikácií, problematické býva u dospelých.
 Obsah pľuzgierikov je infekčný až do zaschnutia posledných vyrážok, čo si vyžaduje izoláciu 1 – 2 týždne. V našich podmienkach, v miernom klimatickom pásme, v populácii bez zavedeného plošného očkovania varicelu do dosiahnutia dospelosti prekoná viac ako 90% ľudí. Najvyšší výskyt má ochorenie v predškolskom a skorom školskom veku. Po prekonaní ovčích kiahní vírus VZV pretrváva neaktívny v organizme a v neskoršom veku sa môže znova aktivovať v podobe pásového oparu (Herpes-Zoster). Opakovaný výskyt ovčích kiahní u jedinca, ktorý ich už raz prekonal, bol opísaný, ale je veľmi zriedkavý.
 Liečba ochorenia
 Ovčie kiahne majú vo väčšine prípadov mierny priebeh a odznejú spontánne. Odporúča sa pokoj na lôžku, dostatok tekutín, ľahká strava s dostatkom prírodných vitamínov, prípadne, po porade s lekárom, zmierňovanie horúčky a svrbenia.
 Komplikácie ochorenia
 V niektorých prípadoch, aj u inak zdravých jedincov, môžu nastať komplikácie. Medzi najčastejšie patrí druhotná bakteriálna infekcia vyrážok, ktorá ak je ohraničená, môže mať za následok vznik jazvičiek, ak sa však rozšíri do organizmu, môže spôsobiť závažný celkový stav až s možnosťou úmrtia. Medzi ďalšie komplikácie patria zápal pľúc, zápal mozgu, neurologické poruchy, postihnutie obličiek a ďalších orgánov.
 Skupiny s vyšším rizikom
 Všeobecne závažnejší priebeh má ochorenie u detí mladších, ako 1 rok, u dospelých a u jedincov s oslabenou imunitou (onkologické ochorenia, stavy po transplantáciách orgánov, infekcia HIV, užívanie imunosupresív atď.) Varicela u tehotnej ženy v prvej polovici tehotenstva môže v cca 2% prípadov viesť k poškodeniu plodu, pri infekcii v neskorších štádiách tehotenstva, hlavne pár dní pred a po pôrode môže dôjsť k prenosu ochorenia na dieťa, zvyčajne s ťažkým priebehom. Vyššiemu riziku vzniku ochorenia sú vystavení zdravotnícki pracovníci a pracovníci v detských kolektívoch.
 Očkovanie
 Vzhľadom na rozšírenosť a nákazlivosť ochorenia je najúčinnejším spôsobom ako mu predísť očkovanie. Očkovanie proti varicele existuje vo forme kombinovanej detskej vakcíny proti viacerým ochoreniam a aj ako samostatná vakcína, ktorou môžu byť očkovaní aj dospelí. Na Slovensku sú dostupné obe vakcíny na lekársky predpis a očkovanie je dobrovoľné. Plošné očkovanie (t. j.všetci jedinci v určenom veku života) proti ovčím kiahňam bolo zavedené napr. v USA (1995) alebo Nemecku (2006). U žien v plodnom veku sa odporúča predchádzať otehotneniu po dobu troch mesiacov po očkovaní. Očkovanie tehotných a dojčiacich žien sa neodporúča. U osôb, ktoré ešte neprekonali ovčie kiahne a prišli do kontaktu s chorým jedincom má význam podať očkovaciu látku až do piateho dňa po kontakte s chorým. Tak ako pri všetkých vakcínach, ochranná imunitná odpoveď sa nemusí vyvolať u všetkých očkovaných. U niektorých zaočkovaných môže aj napriek očkovaniu dôjsť k tomu, že varicelu dostanú, keď s ňou prídu do kontaktu. Ochorenie však u nich má vo väčšine prípadov miernejšiu podobu, ako by malo bez očkovania. Vyrážok je zvyčajne menej ako 50, horúčka je nižšia alebo úplne neprítomná a chorý jedinec je menej nákazlivý pre svoje okolie ako chorý neočkovaný jedinec. Pre optimálnu ochranu sa v súčasnosti odporúča očkovanie v dvoch dávkach s odstupom minimálne mesiac medzi 1. a 2. dávkou.
 Iné projekty
 Referencie
 Infekčné choroby
 Vírusové choroby


type: contracts

text:
 19.11.2009
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 304/6
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG 95/2009 HATÁROZATA
 (2009. szeptember 25.)
 az EGT-megállapodás VII. mellékletének (A szakképesítések kölcsönös elismerése) módosításáról
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás kiigazításáról szóló jegyzőkönyvvel módosított, az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: a megállapodás) és különösen annak 98. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 A megállapodás VII. mellékletét a 2008. december 5-i 127/2008 EGT vegyes bizottsági határozat módosította (1).
 (2)
 A szakmai képesítések elismeréséről szóló 2005/36/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv II. mellékletének módosításáról szóló, 2009. április 6-i 279/2009/EK bizottsági rendeletet (2) bele kell foglalni a megállapodásba,
 A KÖVETKEZŐKÉPPEN HATÁROZOTT:
 1. cikk
 A megállapodás VII. mellékletének 1. pontja (2005/36/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv) a következő francia bekezdéssel egészül ki:
 „—
 32009 R 0279: a Bizottság 2009. április 6-i 279/2009/EK rendelete (HL L 93., 2009.4.7., 11. o.).”
 2. cikk
 A 279/2009/EK rendeletnek az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-kiegészítésében közzéteendő izlandi és norvég nyelvű szövege hiteles.
 3. cikk
 Ez a határozat 2009. szeptember 26-án lép hatályba, feltéve, hogy az EGT Vegyes Bizottság a megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdésében előírt összes bejelentést megkapta (3).
 4. cikk
 Ezt a határozatot az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében és EGT-kiegészítésében kell közzétenni.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2009. szeptember 25-én.
 az EGT Vegyes Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Oda Helen SLETNES
 (1) HL L 25., 2009.1.29., 33. o.
 (2) HL L 93., 2009.4.7., 11. o.
 (3) Alkotmányos követelmények fennállását nem jelezték.


text:
 7.11.2016
 EL
 Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης
 C 410/9
 Προσφυγή της 9ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2016 — Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή κατά Μεγάλου Δουκάτου του Λουξεμβούργου
 (Υπόθεση C-489/16)
 (2016/C 410/10)
 Γλώσσα διαδικασίας: η γαλλική
 Διάδικοι
 Προσφεύγουσα: Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή (εκπρόσωποι: J. Hottiaux, G. von Rintelen)
 Καθού: Μεγάλο Δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου
 Αιτήματα
 Η προσφεύγουσα ζητεί από το Δικαστήριο:
 —
 να αναγνωρίσει ότι το Μεγάλο Δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου, καθόσον παρέλειψε να θεσπίσει, το αργότερο έως τις 16 Ιουνίου 2015, τις αναγκαίες νομοθετικές, κανονιστικές και διοικητικές διατάξεις προκειμένου να συμμορφωθεί προς την οδηγία 2012/34/ΕΕ του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 21ης Νοεμβρίου 2012, για τη δημιουργία ενιαίου ευρωπαϊκού σιδηροδρομικού χώρου [ΕΕ L 343 της 14.12.2012, σ. 32], ή, εν πάση περιπτώσει, καθόσον δεν ανακοίνωσε τις διατάξεις αυτές στην Επιτροπή, παρέβη τις υποχρεώσεις που υπέχει βάσει του άρθρου 64, παράγραφος 1, πρώτο εδάφιο, της εν λόγω οδηγίας·
 —
 να επιβάλει στο Μεγάλο Δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου, σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 260, παράγραφος 3, ΣΛΕΕ, την καταβολή ημερήσιας χρηματικής ποινής ποσού ύψους 8710 ευρώ λόγω παραβάσεως της υποχρεώσεως ανακοινώσεως των μέτρων μεταφοράς της οδηγίας 2012/34/ΕΕ, από την ημέρα της δημοσιεύσεως της απόφασης του Δικαστηρίου επί της υπό κρίση υποθέσεως·
 —
 να καταδικάσει το Μεγάλο Δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου στα δικαστικά έξοδα.
 Ισχυρισμοί και κύρια επιχειρήματα
 Η προθεσμία για τη μεταφορά της οδηγίας στην εσωτερική έννομη τάξη έληξε στις 16 Ιουνίου 2015.
 Από τις διάφορες απαντήσεις του Μεγάλου Δουκάτου του Λουξεμβούργου, ιδίως από την απάντηση στην αιτιολογημένη γνώμη της Επιτροπής, προκύπτει ότι, περισσότερο από ένα έτος μετά τη λήξη της προθεσμίας μεταφοράς που προέβλεπε η οδηγία, το Μεγάλο Δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου δεν είχε θεσπίσει τα απαιτούμενα μέτρα.
 Ο προσδιορισμός της κυρώσεως του άρθρου 260, παράγραφος 3, ΣΛΕΕ βασίζεται στα τρία κριτήρια τα οποία εφαρμόζονται στο πλαίσιο του άρθρου 260, παράγραφος 2, ΣΛΕΕ, ήτοι τη σοβαρότητα της παραβάσεως, τη διάρκειά της, και την ανάγκη να εξασφαλιστεί ότι η ποινή λειτουργεί αποτρεπτικώς για άλλες παραβάσεις.


type: legislation

text:
 Tähtis õiguslik teade
 |
 52008PC0027
 Ettepanek: Nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1234/2007, millega kehtestatakse põllumajandusturgude ühine korraldus ning mis käsitleb teatavate põllumajandustoodete erisätteid (ühise turukorralduse ühtne määrus) /* KOM/2008/0027 lõplik - CNS 2008/0011 */
 [pic] | EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE KOMISJON |Brüssel 29.1.2008KOM(2008) 27 lõplik2008/0011 (CNS)Ettepanek:NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS,millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1234/2007, millega kehtestatakse põllumajandusturgude ühine korraldus ning mis käsitleb teatavate põllumajandustoodete erisätteid (ühise turukorralduse ühtne määrus)(komisjoni esitatud)SELETUSKIRIETTEPANEKU TAUST- Ettepaneku põhjused ja eesmärgidLina ja kanepi turu ühist korraldust käsitleva nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 ei ole alates turustusaastast 2008/2009 ette nähtud lühikese linakiu ja kanepikiu toetuse andmine. Kõnealuse määruse artikli 15 lõikega 3 on siiski ette nähtud, et esitatakse aruanne, milles komisjonil palutakse hinnata, kas toetuse kohaldamise korda tuleks pikendada. Aruanne on ettevalmistamisel ja see esitatakse, enne 2008/2009. turustusaasta algust nii nagu on ette nähtud. Komisjon leiab, et praeguse poliitika mis tahes sisuliste muudatuste üle tuleks otsustada vaid tervisekontrolli raames. Seepärast peab komisjon asjakohaseks, et praegust toetuskava tuleks pikendada veel ühe turustusaasta võrra ning et lõplikke otsuseid võetaks vastu alles järgmisest turustusaastast alates tervisekontrolli raames teostatavate poliitikaanalüüside raames.Määrus (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 tunnistatakse kehtetuks määrusega (EÜ) nr 1234/2007 (ühise turukorralduse ühtne määrus) alates 1. juulist 2008, mis on 2008/2009. turustusaasta alguskuupäev. Seepärast käsitletakse lisatud ettepanekus sisalduvates muudatustes ühise turukorralduse ühtset määrust.- Üldine taustÜldine hinnang lina- ja kanepisektori praegusele korraldusele on positiivne ning hindamisaruandes märgitakse, et praegune ühine turukorraldus toimib hästi. Kiududele töötlemistoetuse kehtestamise kõige olulisem tulemus on spekulatiivse tootmise kaotamine. 2000. aasta reformiga vähendati oluliselt ühenduse kulutusi ja tasakaalustati 20 miljoni euro suurune eelarve. Samuti paranesid reformi tulemusena kõnealusel ajavahemikul majanduslikult elujõulised turustusvõimalused ning tootjate tulud jäid üldjuhul samaks või mõnel juhul isegi suurenesid.Töötlemistoetusega on toetatud ELi lina- ja kanepikiu tootmist, sest neil materjalidel on keskkonnale positiivne mõju (bioloogilise mitmekesisuse säilitamine). Lisaks sellele on ühise turukorraldusega seotud töötlemistoetusega aidatud säilitada ja luua töökohti traditsioonilistes tootmispiirkondades ja muudes paikades ning toetatud investeeringuid teadus- ja arendustegevusse, et täiustada töötlemismeetodeid ja töötada välja taimekiude sisaldavaid uusi tooteid.Euroopa Liiduga 2004. aastal ühinenud liikmesriikidest toodetakse linakiudu seitsmes ja kanepikiudu neljas liikmesriigis. Uutes liikmesriikides näitab linatootmine vähenemise ja kanepitootmine suurenemise tendentsi.- Ettepaneku valdkonnas kehtivad õigusnormidNõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 tunnistatakse kehtetuks määrusega (EÜ) nr 1234/2007, millega kehtestatakse põllumajandusturgude ühine korraldus (ühise turukorralduse ühtne määrus).- Kooskõla Euroopa Liidu muude tegevuspõhimõtete ja eesmärkidegaEi kohaldata.KONSULTEERIMINE HUVITATUD ISIKUTEGA JA MÕJU HINDAMINE- Konsulteerimine huvitatud isikutegaEttepaneku suhtes on konsulteeritud kõnealuse sektori sidusrühmadega, lina- ja kanepituru nõuandekomitee, looduslike kiudude turu korralduskomitee ning lina- ja kanepisektori esindajate ja PD AGRI kabineti esindajate kahepoolse kohtumise raames.- Eksperdiarvamuste kogumine ja kasutamineAsjaomased teadus- / erialavaldkonnadpõllumajandus ja statistika.Kasutatud metoodikaSõltumatute ekspertide (Ernst&Young and AND-International) poolt 2007. aasta novembris lõpetatud uurimise ajakohastamine.Peamised organisatsioonid/eksperdid, kellega konsulteeritiVt eespool.Eksperdiarvamuste avalikustamiseks kasutatud vahendidAruanne on kättesaadav: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/index_en.htm.- Mõju hindamineEi kohaldata.ETTEPANEKU ÕIGUSLIK KÜLG- Kavandatud meetmete kokkuvõteEttepanek ühise turukorralduse ühtse määruse muutmiseks tähendab, et kuni 2008/2009. turustusaastani säilib pika linakiu toetus praegusel tasemel (160 eurot tonni kohta) ning lühikese linakiu ja kanepikiu toetuse suuruseks jääb 90 eurot tonni kohta. Garanteeritud riiklikud kogused jäävad samale tasemele.Arvestades, et enamik liikmesriike kasutab erandit lisandite 7,5 % piirmäära kohta ning et teatavad lõpptarbijad nõuavad kõrget lisandite taset, tuleks lisandite ja linaluude piirmäära praegune süsteem säilitada, et lubada liikmesriikidel anda toetust lühikese linakiu puhul, mis sisaldab maksimaalselt 15 % lisandeid ja linaluid ning kanepikiu puhul, mis sisaldab maksimaalselt 25 % lisandeid ja kanepiluid.Pikakiulise lina esmatöötlejatele antava lisatoetuse suurus teatavates traditsioonilistes tootmispiirkondades Madalmaades, Belgias ja Prantsusmaal ei muutu ning vastavalt määrusele (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 on see I tsoonis 120 eurot hektari kohta ja II tsoonis 50 eurot hektari kohta.- Õiguslik alusNõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 ja nõukogu määrus (EÜ) nr 1234/2007 (ühise turukorralduse ühtne määrus)- Subsidiaarsuse põhimõteEttepanekuga jäävad liikmesriikide vastutusalasse järgmised olulised elemendid:- tetrahüdrokannabinooli (THC) sisalduse ja kanepi lubatud sortide kontroll;- heakskiidetud esmatöötlejate raamatupidamise kontroll;- laovarude kontroll.- Proportsionaalsuse põhimõteEttepanek on proportsionaalsuse põhimõttega kooskõlas, kuna järgib ühise põllumajanduspoliitika üldeesmärke.- Õigusakti valikKavandatud õigusaktid: Nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse nõukogu määrust (EÜ) nr 1234/2007, millega kehtestatakse põllumajandusturgude ühine korraldus ning mis käsitleb teatavate põllumajandustoodete erisätteid.MÕJU EELARVELEKõnealuse pikendamisega kaasnevad lisakulud ulatuvad hinnanguliselt 4,64 miljoni euroni. Praegu kohaldatava toetuse pikendamise kogukulud oleksid 20,82 miljonit eurot.2008/0011 (CNS)Ettepanek:NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS,millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1234/2007, millega kehtestatakse põllumajandusturgude ühine korraldus ning mis käsitleb teatavate põllumajandustoodete erisätteid (ühise turukorralduse ühtne määrus)EUROOPA LIIDU NÕUKOGU,võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, eriti selle artikleid 36 ja 37,võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut,võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi arvamust[1]ning arvestades järgmist:1. Lühikese linakiu ja kanepikiu puhul, mis ei sisalda rohkem kui 7,5 % lisandeid ning lina- ja kanepiluid, kohaldatakse töötlemistoetust kuni 2007/2008. turustusaasta lõpuni. Arvestades praegusele toetuskavale vastava kiu soodsat turusuundumust ja selleks, et soodustada uuenduslike toodete ja nende turuväljundite konsolideerumist, tuleks kõnealuse töötlemistoetuse kohaldamist pikendada 2008/2009. turustusaasta lõpuni.2. Nõukogu 27. juuli 2000. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 (kiu tootmiseks kasvatatava lina ja kanepi turu ühise korralduse kohta)[2] on ette nähtud suurendada pika linakiu töötlemistoetust alates 2008/2009. turustusaastast. Määrus (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 on asendatud nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 1234/2007[3] alates 2008/2009. turustusaastast. Määruse (EÜ) nr 1234/ 2007 sätted on koostatud määruse (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 sätteid silmas pidades sel viisil, kuidas neid oleks kohaldatud alates kõnealusest turustusaastast, määrates kindlaks toetuse asjaomasel ettenähtud tasemel. Kuna lühikese linakiu töötlemistoetust kohaldatakse kuni 2008/2009. turustusaasta lõpuni, peaks pika linakiu suhtes kohaldatav töötlemistoetus kõnealuse lisaturustusaasta jaoks jääma samale tasemele, nagu see on seni olnud määrusega (EÜ) nr 1673/2000 ette nähtud kuni 2008/2009. turustusaasta lõpuni.3. Kvaliteetse lühikese linakiu ja kanepikiu tootmise soodustamiseks antakse toetust kiu puhul, mis ei sisalda rohkem kui 7,5 % lisandeid ega lina- või kanepiluid. Liikmesriigid võivad siiski teha nimetatud piirangust erandeid ja anda töötlemistoetust ka lühikese linakiu puhul, mis sisaldab 7,5–15 % lisandeid ja linaluid, ning kanepikiu puhul, mis sisaldab 7,5–25 % lisandeid ja kanepiluid. Kuna kõnealune võimalus on ette nähtud ainult kuni 2007/2008. turustusaastani, tuleb liikmesriikidele anda võimalus teha piirangust erandeid veel kahe turustusaasta jooksul.4. Kuna turul on kujunenud uued väljundid, on vaja tagada toorainega varustamise miinimumtase. Liikmesriikides tuleb mõistliku tootmistaseme tagamiseks pikendada perioodi, mille puhul kehtivad garanteeritud riiklikud kogused.5. Lisatoetustega on toetatud traditsioonilise linatootmise jätkumist Madalmaade, Belgia ja Prantsusmaa teatavates piirkondades. Üleminekutoetust tuleb pikendada kuni 2008/2009. turustusaasta lõpuni, et põllumajandustootjad saaksid järk-järgult kohaneda uue turusituatsiooniga.6. Seepärast tuleks määrust (EÜ) nr 1234/2007 vastavalt muuta,ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA MÄÄRUSE.Artikkel 1Määrust (EÜ) nr 1234/2007 muudetakse järgmiselt.1) II osa I jaotise IV peatüki I jao II alajao pealkiri asendatakse järgmisega:„II alajaguKiu tootmiseks kasvatatav lina ja kanep”2) Artiklit 91 muudetakse järgmiselt:a) lõike 1 esimene lõik asendatakse järgmiste lõigetega:„Toetust kiu tootmiseks kasvatatava pika lina- ja kanepivarte töötlemiseks antakse heakskiidetud esmatöötlejatele selle kiukoguse põhjal, mis tegelikult saadakse vartest, mille suhtes on põllumajandustootjaga sõlmitud ostu-müügileping.2008/2009. turustusaasta jooksul antakse samadel tingimustel toetust ka kiu tootmiseks kasvatatava lühikese lina ja kanepivarte töötlemise puhul.”b) lõige 2 asendatakse järgmisega:„2. Käesolevas alajaos on „heakskiidetud esmatöötleja” füüsiline või juriidiline isik või füüsiliste või juriidiliste isikute rühm (sõltumata ühenduse või selle liikmete õiguslikust seisundist vastavalt liikmesriigi õigusele), kelle on heaks kiitnud selle liikmesriigi pädev asutus, mille territooriumil isiku või rühma lina- või kanepikiu tootmise seadmed paiknevad.”3) Artikli 92 lõige 1 asendatakse järgmisega:„1. Artikliga 91 ettenähtud töötlemisabi suurus määratakse kindlaks:a) pika linakiu puhul:- 2008/2009. turustusaastaks 160 eurot tonni kohta;- alates 2009/2010. turustusaastast 200 eurot tonni kohta;b) lühikese linakiu ja kanepikiu puhul, mis ei sisalda rohkem kui 7,5 % lisandeid ega lina- või kanepiluid, 2008/2009. turustusaasta jooksul 90 eurot tonni kohta.Traditsioonilistele turustusvõimalustele osutades võivad liikmesriigid otsustada anda toetust:a) lühikese linakiu puhul, mille lisandite ja linaluude sisaldus on 7,5 %–15 %;b) kanepikiu puhul, mille lisandite ja kanepiluude sisaldus on 7,5–25 %.Teises lõigus esitatud juhtudel annab liikmesriik toetust seoses kogusega, mis 7,5 % lisandite ja linaluude sisalduse puhul ei ületa toodetud kogust.”4) Artiklit 94 muudetakse järgmiselt:a) lõige 1 asendatakse järgmisega:„1. Pika linakiu garanteeritud maksimumkoguseks, mille puhul võib anda toetust, kehtestatakse 80 878 tonni turustusaasta kohta. See kogus jagatakse asjaomaste liikmesriikide vahel garanteeritud riiklike kogustena vastavalt XI lisa punktile A.I.”b) pärast lõiget 1 lisatakse järgmine lõige:„1a. Toetuskõlbliku lühikese linakiu ja kanepikiu puhul kehtestatakse garanteeritud maksimumkoguseks 147 265 tonni 2008/2009. turustusaasta kohta. See kogus jagatakse asjaomaste liikmesriikide vahel garanteeritud riiklike kogustena vastavalt XI lisa punktile A.II.”c) lisatakse järgmine lõik:„3. Iga liikmesriik võib osa lõikes 1 osutatud garanteeritud riiklikust kogusest üle kanda lõikes 1a nimetatud garanteeritud riiklikule kogusele ja vastupidi.Esimeses lõigus nimetatud ülekannete aluseks võetakse ühe tonni pika linakiu vastavus 2,2 tonnile lühikesele linakiule ja kanepikiule.Töötlemistoetust antakse üksnes lõigetes 1 ja 1a osutatud koguste puhul, mida on kohandatud käesoleva lõike kahe esimese lõigu kohaselt.”5) Artikli 94 järele lisatakse järgmine artikkel:„Artikkel 94a Lisatoetus2008/2009. turustusaasta jooksul antakse täiendavat toetust heakskiidetud esmatöötlejale IX lisa punktis A.III. kirjeldatud I ja II tsooni kuuluvate piirkondade puhul, kus kasvatatakse lina ja mille varte toodangu suhtes:a) kehtib artikli 91 lõikes 1 nimetatud ostu-müügileping või kohustus ningb) antakse pikaks kiuks töötlemise toetust.Täiendava toetuse suurus I tsoonis on 120 eurot hektari kohta ja II tsoonis 50 eurot hektari kohta.”6) XI lisa muudetakse vastavalt käesoleva määruse lisale.Artikkel 2Käeolev määrus jõustub seitsmendal päeval pärast selle avaldamist Euroopa Liidu Teatajas .Käesolevat määrust kohaldatakse alates 1. juulist 2008.Käesolev määrus on tervikuna siduv ja vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides.Brüssel,Nõukogu nimeleesistujaLISAXI lisa punkt A asendatakse järgmisega:„A.I. Artikli 94 lõikes 1 osutatud pika linakiu garanteeritud maksimumkoguste jaotumine liikmesriikide vahelBelgia | 13 800 |Bulgaaria | 13 |Tšehhi Vabariik | 1 923 |Saksamaa | 300 |Eesti | 30 |Hispaania | 50 |Prantsusmaa | 55 800 |Läti | 360 |Leedu | 2 263 |Madalmaad | 4 800 |Austria | 150 |Poola | 924 |Portugal | 50 |Rumeenia | 42 |Slovakkia | 73 |Soome | 200 |Rootsi | 50 |Ühendkuningriik | 50 |A.II. Artikli 94 lõikes 1a osutatud lühikese linakiu ja kanepikiu garanteeritud maksimumkoguste jaotumine liikmesriikide vahelArtikli 94 lõikes 1a osutatud kogused jaotatakse:a) garanteeritud riiklike kogustena järgmistele liikmesriikidele:Belgia | 10 350 |Bulgaaria | 48 |Tšehhi Vabariik | 2 866 |Saksamaa | 12 800 |Eesti | 42 |Hispaania | 20 000 |Prantsusmaa | 61 350 |Läti | 1 313 |Leedu | 3 463 |Ungari* | 2 061 |Madalmaad | 5 550 |Austria | 2 500 |Poola | 462 |Portugal | 1 750 |Rumeenia | 921 |Slovakkia | 189 |Soome | 2 250 |Rootsi | 2 250 |Ühendkuningriik | 12 100 |* Ungarile määratud garanteeritud riiklik kogus käsitleb ainult kanepikiudu.b) 5 000 tonni jaotatakse garanteeritud riiklike kogustena 2008/2009. turustusaastal Taani, Iirimaa, Kreeka, Itaalia ja Luksemburgi vahel. Selline jaotus määratakse nende alade alusel, mille kohta kehtib üks artikli 91 lõikes 1 osutatud lepingutest või kohustustest.”A.III. Artiklis 94a osutatud abikõlblikud tsoonidI tsoon1. Madalmaade territoorium.2. Järgmised Belgia kommuunid: Assenede, Beveren-Waas, Blankenberge, Bredene, Brugge, Damme, De Haan, De Panne, Diksmuide (välja arvatud Vladslo ja Woumen), Gistel, Jabbeke, Knokke-Heist, Koksijde, Lo-Reninge, Middelkerke, Nieuwport, Oostende, Oudenburg, Sint-Gillis-Waas (ainult Meerdonk), Sint-Laureins, Veurne ja Zuienkerke.II tsoon1. Muud kui I tsooni kuuluvad Belgia piirkonnad.2. Järgmised Prantsusmaa piirkonnad:- Nord'i departemang,- järgmised ringkonnad: Béthune, Lens, Calais ja Saint-Omer ning Marquise’i kanton Pas-de-Calais’ departemangus,- Saint-Quentini ja Vervins'i ringkonnad Aisne’i departmangus,- Charleville-Mézières'i ringkond Ardennes'i departemangus.FINANTSSELGITUS |1. | EELARVERUBRIIK: 05 02 07 01 | ASSIGNEERINGUD: 21 miljonit eurot |2. | PEALKIRI: Nõukogu määrus, millega muudetakse määrust (EÜ) nr 1234/2007, millega kehtestatakse põllumajandusturgude ühine korraldus ning mis käsitleb teatavate põllumajandustoodete erisätteid |3. | ÕIGUSLIK ALUS: Asutamislepingu artikkel 37 |4. | EESMÄRGID: Lina ja kanepi puhul pikendada olemasolevat süsteemi ühe aasta võrra. |5. | FINANTSMÕJU | 12-KUULINE PERIOOD (miljonites eurodes) | JOOKSEV EELARVEAASTA 2008 (miljonites eurodes) | JÄRGMINE EELARVEAASTA 2009 (miljonites eurodes) |5.0 | KULUD – EÜ EELARVEST MAKSTAVAD (TOETUSED/SEKKUMISED) – RIIGIASUTUSED – MUUD | 4,64 | 0 | 2,44 |5.1 | TULUD – EÜ OMAVAHENDID (MAKSUD/TOLLIMAKSUD) – RIIKLIKUD | – | – | – |2010 |5.0.1 | KAVANDATUD KULUD | 2,20 miljonit eurot |5.1.1 | KAVANDATUD TULUD |5.2 | ARVUTAMISMEETOD: Hinnangud: [pic] |6.0 | KAS PROJEKTI SAAB RAHASTADA JOOKSVA EELARVE ASJAKOHASES PEATÜKIS KIRJENDATUD ASSIGNEERINGUTEST? | JAH EI |6.1 | KAS PROJEKTI SAAB RAHASTADA ASSIGNEERINGUTE ÜMBERPAIGUTAMISEGA JOOKSVA EELARVE PEATÜKKIDE VAHEL? | JAH EI |6.2 | KAS ON VAJA LISAEELARVET? | JAH EI |6.3 | KAS TULEVASTESSE EELARVETESSE ON VAJA KIRJENDADA ASSIGNEERINGUID? | JAH EI |MÄRKUSED: Hinnangulised kogused on turustusaastate 2004/05 (tegelikud kogused) ning 2005/06 ja 2006/07 keskmine toodang (teatavaks tehtud hinnangud). (Kooskõlas 2008. aasta muutmisettepanekuga) Juhul kui kasutatakse ära kõik garanteeritud riiklikud kogused, on maksimaalne finantsmõju 12,02 miljonit eurot. |[1] ELT C ..., ..., lk ...[2] EÜT L 193, 29.7.2000, lk 16. Määrust on viimati muudetud määrusega (EÜ) nr 953/2006 (ELT L 175, 29.6.2006, lk 1).[3] ELT L 299, 16.11.2007, lk 1.


text:
 Události
 25. březen – Robert Bruce korunován skotským králem
 založen cisterciácký klášter Thronus Regis (nikdy nebyl postaven)
 4. srpen – zavražděním Václava III. v Olomouci vymřela po meči královská větev rodu Přemyslovců
 16. říjen – svatba Rudolfa Habsburského s Eliškou Rejčkou
 říjen – manžel sestry Václava III. Jindřich Korutanský, který byl právoplatně zvoleným nástupcem Václava, byl vyhnán Rudolfem Habsburským, kterého poté část podplacené české šlechty zvolila za krále
 Zlaté Hory povýšeny na město
 Filip IV. Sličný vyhnal z Francie Židy a zkonfiskoval jejich majetek
 Narození
 Alžběta Dolnobavorská, rakouská vévodkyně ( † 25. března 1330)
 Úmrtí
 Česko
 7. května – Přemek Ratibořský, kníže ratibořský (* 1258/1268)
 4. srpna – Václav III., král český, král polský a uherský (* 1289)
 ? – Ojíř z Lomnice, český šlechtic z rodu Vítkovců (* ?)
 ? – Jan I. z Michalovic, český šlechtic a zakladatel rodu pánů z Michalovic (* po 1260)
 Svět
 7. srpna – Albert z Trapani, sicilský katolický kněz a světec (* 1250)
 ? – Jacopone da Todi, italský mnich františkán, právník, básník a blahoslavený (* 1236)
 Hlavy států
 Jižní Evropa
 Iberský poloostrov
 Portugalské království – Dinis I. Hospodář
 Kastilské království – Ferdinand IV. Pozvaný
 Aragonské království – Jakub II. Spravedlivý
 Itálie
 Papež – Klement V.
 La serenissima – Pietro Gradenigo
 Západní Evropa
 Francouzské království – Filip IV. Sličný
 Anglické království – Eduard I.
 Skotské království – Robert Bruce
 Severní Evropa
 Norské království – Haakon V. Magnusson
 Švédské království – Birger Magnusson
 Dánské království – Erik VI. Menved
 Střední Evropa
 Svatá říše římská – Albrecht I. Habsburský
 České království – Václav III. – Jindřich Korutanský – Rudolf Habsburský
 Hrabství henegavské – Vilém I. Henegavský
 Polské knížectví – Václav II. Český – Vladislav I. Lokýtek
 Uherské království – Ota III. Dolnobavorský
 Východní Evropa
 Litevské velkoknížectví – Vytenis
 Moskevská Rus – Jurij III. Daniilovič
 Bulharské carství – Teodor Svetoslav
 Byzantská říše – Andronikos II. Palaiologos
 Blízký východ a severní Afrika
 Kyperské království – Jindřich II. Kyperský – Amalrich z Tyru (guvernér a regent)
 Osmanská říše – Osman I.
 Afrika
 Habešské císařství – Ouédem Arad
 Externí odkazy
 14. století


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 11957E/PRO/BEI/06
 TRAKTAT OM OPRETTELSE AF DET EUROPAEISKE OEKONOMISKE FAELLESSKAB, PROTOKOL VEDROERENDE VEDTAEGTERNE FOR DEN EUROPAEISKE INVESTERINGSBANK, ARTIKEL 6
 Artikel 6.1. Paa forslag af Bestyrelsen kan Styrelsesraadet med kvalificeret flertal beslutte, at Medlemsstaterne skal yde Banken saerlige rentebaerende laan i de tilfaelde og i det omfang, Banken har brug for saadanne laan til finansiering af bestemte projekter, og Bestyrelsen kan paavise, at Banken ikke er i stand til at skaffe sig de noedvendige midler paa kapitalmarkederne paa rimelige betingelser i betragtning af de paagaeldende projekters art og formaal.2. De saerlige laan kan foerst kraeves fra begyndelsen af det fjerde aar efter Traktatens ikrafttraeden. De maa hverken overskride 400 millioner regningsenheder i alt, eller 100 millioner regningsenheder pr. aar.3. De saerlige laans loebetid fastsaettes afhaengigt af varigheden af de kreditter eller garantier, som Banken agter at yde ved hjaelp af disse laan; den maa ikke overskride tyve aar. Paa forslag af Bestyrelsen kan Styrelsesraadet med kvalificeret flertal traeffe beslutning om tidligere tilbagebetaling af de saerlige laan.4. De saerlige laan forrentes med 4% p.a., medmindre Styrelsesraadet under hensyntagen til rentens udvikling og niveau paa kapitalmarkederne fastsaetter en anden rentefod.5. De saerlige laan skal ydes af Medlemsstaterne i forhold til deres andel i den tegnede kapital; de skal indbetales i de paagaeldende Medlemsstaters egen valuta senest seks maaneder efter deres udskrivning.6. I tilfaelde af Bankens likvidation tilbagebetales Medlemsstaternes saerlige laan foerst efter, at Bankens oevrige gaeld er daekket.


text:
 23.11.2017
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 308/8
 DECYZJA WSPÓLNEGO KOMITETU EOG
 NR 109/2016
 z dnia 3 czerwca 2016 r.
 zmieniająca załącznik I (Sprawy weterynaryjne i fitosanitarne) oraz załącznik II (Przepisy techniczne, normy, badania i certyfikacja) do Porozumienia EOG [2017/2127]
 WSPÓLNY KOMITET EOG,
 uwzględniając Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym (zwane dalej „Porozumieniem EOG”), w szczególności jego art. 98,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 W Porozumieniu EOG należy uwzględnić rozporządzenie Komisji (UE) 2016/143 z dnia 18 stycznia 2016 r. zmieniające załącznik IV do rozporządzenia (WE) nr 396/2005 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w odniesieniu do COS-OGA, cerewisanu, wodorotlenku wapnia, lecytyn, Salix spp cortex, octu, fruktozy, wirusa mozaiki pepino, szczep CH2, izolat 1906, Verticillium albo-atrum, izolat WCS850 oraz Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum, szczep D747 (1).
 (2)
 Niniejsza decyzja dotyczy prawodawstwa w zakresie środków spożywczych. Prawodawstwa dotyczącego środków spożywczych nie stosuje się do Liechtensteinu, o ile stosowanie porozumienia pomiędzy Wspólnotą Europejską a Konfederacją Szwajcarską w sprawie handlu produktami rolnymi jest rozszerzone o Liechtenstein, jak ustanowiono w zmianach sektorowych zawartych w załączniku I oraz wprowadzeniu do rozdziału XII załącznika II do Porozumienia EOG. Niniejszej decyzji nie stosuje się zatem do Liechtensteinu.
 (3)
 Należy zatem odpowiednio zmienić załączniki I i II do Porozumienia EOG,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ:
 Artykuł 1
 W rozdziale II pkt 40 (rozporządzenie (WE) nr 396/2005 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady) w załączniku I do Porozumienia EOG dodaje się tiret w brzmieniu:
 „—
 32016 R 0143: rozporządzeniem Komisji (UE) 2016/143 z dnia 18 stycznia 2016 r. (Dz.U. L 28 z 4.2.2016, s. 12).”.
 Artykuł 2
 W rozdziale XII pkt 54zzy (rozporządzenie (WE) nr 396/2005 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady) w załączniku II do Porozumienia EOG dodaje się tiret w brzmieniu:
 „—
 32016 R 0143: rozporządzeniem Komisji (UE) 2016/143 z dnia 18 stycznia 2016 r. (Dz.U. L 28 z 4.2.2016, s. 12).”.
 Artykuł 3
 Teksty rozporządzenia (UE) 2016/143 w języku islandzkim i norweskim, które zostaną opublikowane w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej, są autentyczne.
 Artykuł 4
 Niniejsza decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem 4 czerwca 2016 r., pod warunkiem dokonania wszystkich notyfikacji przewidzianych w art. 103 ust. 1 Porozumienia EOG (*1).
 Artykuł 5
 Niniejsza decyzja zostaje opublikowana w sekcji EOG i w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 3 czerwca 2016 r.
 W imieniu Wspólnego Komitetu EOG
 Claude MAERTEN
 Przewodniczący
 (1) Dz.U. L 28 z 4.2.2016, s. 12.
 (*1) Nie wskazano wymogów konstytucyjnych.


text:
El Rayo-X is David Lindley's debut studio album, released in 1981.
 The album spent 18 weeks on the Billboard 200, peaking at No. 83 on July 16, 1981.
 Reception
 The album generally received favorable reviews.
 AllMusic's Matthew Greenwald stated:
 Boo Browning, of The Washington Post, wrote:
 Track listing
 Side 1
 "She Took Off My Romeos" (Bob "Frizz" Fuller) – 3:00
 "Bye Bye Love" (Boudleaux Bryant, Felice Bryant) – 2:50
 "Mercury Blues" (K. C. Douglas, Bob Geddins) – 3:33
 "Quarter of a Man" (Bob "Frizz" Fuller) – 3:45
 "Ain't No Way" (Bob "Frizz" Fuller) – 3:42
 "Twist and Shout" (Phil Medley, Bert Russell) – 2:44
 Side 2
 "El Rayo-X" (Jorge Calderón, David Lindley) – 2:53
 "Your Old Lady" (Elmo Glick, O'Kelly Isley, King Curtis) – 4:14
 "Don't Look Back" (Smokey Robinson, Ronald White) – 3:55
 "Petit Fleur" (Solomon Feldthouse, Nancy Lindley) – 3:11
 "Tu-Ber-Cu-Lucas and the Sinus Blues" (Huey "Piano" Smith) – 2:14
 "Pay the Man" (David Lindley, George "Baboo" Pierre) – 3:30
 Personnel
 Musicians
 David Lindley – bass (track 8), fiddle, guitar, violin, guitar (electric), vocals, whistle (human), slide guitar, bandurria, divan saz
 Bob Glaub – bass (all tracks except 6, 8, 10-11)
 George "Ras Baboo" Pierre – percussion, timbales, vocals, (all tracks), accordion on "Pay the Man"
 William D. "Smitty" Smith – organ, keyboards (tracks 1, 5-7, 11-12)
 Ian Wallace – drums
 Reggie McBride – bass (tracks 6, 10-11)
 Curt Bouterse – hammer dulcimer on "Petit Fleur"
 Jackson Browne – vocals on "Bye Bye Love", "Twist and Shout" and "Don't Look Back"
 Jorge Calderón – vocals on "Twist and Shout"
 Garth Hudson – horn, keyboards on "El Rayo-X"
 Bill Payne – organ, keyboards on "Bye Bye Love"
 Technical
 Greg Ladanyi – engineer, producer
 Jackson Browne – producer
 George Ybara, Jamie Ledner – assistant engineers
 Doug Sax, Mike Reese – mastering
 Jimmy Wachtel – art direction, design
 Gloria Von Jansky – lettering
 Kaz Sakamoto – photography
 Awards and Charts
 Billboard charts
 References
 1981 debut albums
 David Lindley (musician) albums
 Asylum Records albums
 Albums produced by Greg Ladanyi
 Albums with cover art by Jimmy Wachtel


text:
 Události
 Úmrtím Euagria z Antiochie končí melétiánké schizma.
 Vizigóti opustili provincii Gallia Narbonensis a usadili se v Hispánii.
 Wallia se stal králem Vizigótů.
 Židé byli vyhnáni z Alexandrie.
 Narození
 Eurich, vizigótský král
 Úmrtí
 Athaulf, vizigótský král
 Euagrios z Antiochie
 Hypatia z Alexandrie, helénská matematička a filosofka
 Sigerich, vizigótský král
 Hlavy států
 Papež – Inocenc I. (401–417)
 Východořímská říše – Theodosius II. (408–450)
 Západořímská říše – Honorius (395–423)
 Perská říše – Jazdkart I. (399–421)
 Vizigóti – Athaulf (410–415) » Sigerich (415) » Wallia (415–419)
 Vandalové – Gunderich (407–428)
 Externí odkazy
 5. století


jurisdiction: US

text:
The declaration in this case alleges that the plaintiff was the owner of the leasehold interest in the house and property in Baltimore City known as No. 2797 Remington avenue; that in the years 1914 and 1915, the defendant, The City Dairy Company, a corporation, unlawfully diverted a certain stream of water "that ran eastward on Twenty-eighth street, adjoining the plaintiff's property, * * * carrying the surface and house drainage from the area and buildings in the block bounded by Remington avenue, Twenty-eighth street, Huntington avenue, Twenty-ninth street and the adjoining neighborhood," and that by reason thereof the said stream, instead of running past the plaintiff's property, "as before the unlawful acts of the defendant," was caused "to run upon and empty into the premises of the plaintiff," whereby the plaintiff's property was greatly damaged, and that in consequence thereof her tenants gave up their lease and she was unable to rent the property.
 The defendant interposed the plea that it did not commit the wrong alleged, and during the trial, which resulted in the judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $300.00 from which this appeal was taken, the defendant reserved five exceptions to the rejection of certain evidence offered by it, and one exception to the rulings of the Court below on the prayers and on motions to strike out evidence produced by the plaintiff and admitted subject to exception.
 The property of the plaintiff is at the corner of Remington avenue and Twenty-eighth street, spoken of in the evidence as the northeast corner. Remington avenue runs northwest and southeast, and is crossed by Twenty-eighth street at right-angles. These streets were not paved, and for a number of years prior to the acts of the defendant complained of, the drainage from Remington and Huntington avenues, northwest of Twenty-eighth street, and from Twenty-eighth street, west of Remington avenue, flowed, as shown by the photographs offered in evidence and produced at the argument of *Page 550
 the case in this Court, in a well-defined stream, in a northeasterly direction on Twenty-eighth street, past the plaintiff's property, to the rear of her lot, and ultimately found its way into a pool or pond located between Twenty-eighth and Twenty-ninth streets, several hundred feet east of Remington avenue and plaintiff's lot.
 The grade of Remington avenue and Twenty-ninth street, and the land north of Twenty-ninth street was much higher than the lot on which the pool was located, and there is evidence tending to show that water from a spring thereon, and the surface water or drainage on that lot, and over that lot from the adjoining land to the northwest, formerly flowed either into pools or ponds on or adjoining the lot and from those ponds or pools into Sumwalt Run, which flowed in a southeasterly direction through a ravine just east of the lot, or directly into Sumwalt Run.
 In 1908 the City constructed a storm water drain or sewer eight foot in diameter, following the course of Sumwalt Run, "as a tunnel for that stream and tributary drainage," in which there were two "openings" or "inlets," of twenty-four inch terra cotta pipe, on the north side of the sewer, which "took care of the drainage" that formerly flowed into Sumwalt Run. One of these openings was east of the lot on which the pool was located, and the other was southeast of the intersection of Twenty-eighth street and Remington avenue. After the construction of this drain or sewer by the City, various persons commenced to fill up the ravine from Twenty-sixth street towards Twenty-eighth street, and the evidence shows that prior to the filing of the ravine east of Twenty-eighth street, the drainage on Twenty-eighth street flowed in a southeasterly direction towards Sumwalt Run and the opening in the sewer southeast of the corner of Twenty-eighth street and Remington avenue.
 In January, 1914, the defendant purchased the lot on which the pool was located and also a larger parcel of land just north of 29th street and east of Remington avenue. *Page 551
 After it acquired the property, the defendant was notified by the Health Department that the pool referred to constituted a nuisance and that the defendant would have to abate the nuisance. In August, 1914, the defendant, when grading its lot north of 29th street, moved a large quantity of earth across 29th street and dumped it on its lot south of 29th street, filling up the lot and the pool.
 The plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that the filling up of defendant's lot obstructed the flow of the stream in question over the defendant's lot to the pool, and that at times of heavy rains the drainage that flowed on 28th street and from 28th street over the land to the rear of her lot, was forced back upon her lot and into her house to the depth of several feet, thereby injuring her property and causing her to lose her tenants.
 The defense in this case, as presented by the defendant's prayers, is based upon two theories: (1) That the narr. alleges in effect that the stream diverted by the defendant was anatural stream, which carried with it surface and house drainage, and that there is no evidence in the case to establish the existence of such a stream. (2) That unless the drainage on 28th street, in flowing upon the lot of the defendant, followed its natural course according to the natural slope of the ground, or had been allowed to flow over the defendant's lot for twenty years or more before the obstruction of the same by the defendant, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.
 The first of these contentions, and the further contention that there is no evidence in the case to show that the drainage in question followed its natural course, or that it had flowed over the defendant's lot for twenty years or more before the alleged obstruction thereof, is presented by the defendant's first prayer, which asserts that under the pleadings there is no evidence in the case legally sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover. *Page 552
 The narr. alleges that the defendant diverted a "certain stream of water that ran eastward on Twenty-eighth street, * * * said stream carrying the surface and house drainage from the area and buildings in the block bounded by Remington avenue," etc. It does not state the source or origin of the stream, or that it included any water other than the "surface and house drainage" referred to. According to Webster's New InternationalDictionary, a stream is "a current or course of water or other fluid, flowing on the earth, as a river, brook, etc., or from a vessel, reservoir or fountain; * * * any course of running water." In Mitchell v. Bain, 42 N.E. 230, the Supreme Court of Indiana said: "A water course is a stream of water having a bed, sides and banks, and the water need not flow continually. * * * Even surface water becomes a natural water course at the point where it begins to form a reasonably well-defined channel, with bed and banks or sides and current, although the stream itself may be very small, and the water may not flow continuously." In P., W. B.R.R. v. Davis, 68 Md. 281, the Court held that the defendant was liable for changing the course of a stream of surface water to the injury of plaintiff's property, and in B. S.R.R. v. Hackett, 87 Md. 224, the defendant was required to respond in damages for obstructing the natural flow of surface drainage. As we have said, there was a well-defined stream of water flowing in a northeasterly direction on Twenty-eighth street which carried the "surface and house drainage" referred to, and the evidence fully meets the averments of the narr., so far as the character of the stream is concerned.
 In considering the further contention of the appellant in support of its first prayer, it is important to keep in view the averment of the declaration that the injuries complained of were caused by the diversion of the stream referred to in the narr.
 The evidence shows that the land of the defendant does not adjoin the land of the plaintiff, but at its nearest point is *Page 553
 about one hundred feet northeast of the plaintiff's lot. The drainage in question flowed in a northeasterly direction on Twenty-eighth street until it reached a point beyond a point opposite the rear end of plaintiff's lot, where it left Twenty-eighth street and flowed over the land between plaintiff's and defendant's lots to the defendant's lot and then over the defendant's lot to the pool thereon. The filling up of the defendant's lot obstructed the flow of the drainage referred tofrom the adjoining land over the lot of the defendant to the pool, and whenever there was a heavy rain the drainage flooded the plaintiff's lot and property and caused the injuries for which she seeks to recover. The only charge in the declaration is that the defendant unlawfully diverted the stream mentioned, and thereby caused the injuries complained of. In order to show that what the defendant did was unlawful it was incumbent upon the plaintiff, under the circumstances of this case, to show that the drainage flowed naturally upon the defendant's lot because of the natural slope of the land from the corner of Twenty-eighth street and Remington avenue, or that the right to have it flow over the defendant's land had been acquired by prescription or grant. Lewin v. Simpson, 38 Md. 468; 2 Farnham on Waters,etc., secs. 558, 559b; P.W. B.R.R. v. Davis, supra; B. S.R.R. v. Hackett, supra; Fahnestock v. Feldner. 98 Md. 335. We have carefully examined the Record and fail to find any evidence to establish either of these requirements. On the contrary, the evidence shows that the natural slope of the land from the corner of Remington avenue and Twenty-eighth street was towards the southeast, and that the drainage on Twenty-eighth street, following its natural course, flowed in that direction into Sumwalt Run, and, later, into the City sewer, until the ravine east of Twenty-eighth street was filled up after the construction of the sewer in 1908. The diversion of the drainage from its natural course to the land of the defendant was, therefore, an unlawful invasion of its property, which it had the right to resist. *Page 554
 The appellee very earnestly insists that the defendant had no right to abate the nuisance on its lot by casting the water on the plaintiff's property. But that view deals with a situation with which we are not here concerned. This is not a case where A, upon whose land drainage has been unlawfully imposed by B, in order to get rid of it discharges it from his land upon the land of his innocent neighbor, C. It may well be that after water gets on A's lot, he is bound not to dispose of it in such a way as to injure C, who was in no way responsible for the nuisance on A's land. But that is hardly the case made by the pleadings, nor does the evidence in the case, when fairly interpreted, show that the defendant forced or turned the drainage mentioned, after it was on its land, or the water in the pool upon the property of the plaintiff. The witness Frances Thornton, did say, "that the dumping filled in the hole (the pool) which seems to have pushed the water back on Mrs. Scott's house," but, continuing her testimony, she said, "that they dumped the dirt into the hole where the water was; that after the water dissolved into the ground, and she has seen nothing of it since, and as they filled it in that carried the water away; * * * that the water that went on the Scott property came down from Twenty-ninth street and Remington avenue when we had those awful hard storms, and it would run right around back of her house down Twenty-eighth street, and before they dumped, the water didn't bother them at all." And the witness Lewis said, "that the City Dairy Company dumped south from Twenty-ninth street and blocked the water from the little drain and backed the water that came down Twenty-eighth street on to the Scott property; that he saw the Scott house on the thirty-first of May, 1914, and it was then in good condition; that after they commenced dumping, water backed right up in the house." This witness further stated that he swept the water out of the house on several occasions when it was flooded. The testimony referred to is the only evidence in the case affording the slightest foundation for the *Page 555
 suggestion that the defendant forced the water out of the pool, or the drainage on its lot upon the property of the plaintiff, and when these statements are read in connection with the rest of the testimony of these witnesses, as well as other evidence in the case, it clearly appears that what these witnesses meant was that the "dumping" on the lot prevented the flow of the drainage over defendant's lot into the pool, and thereby caused it, when there was a heavy rain, to flood the plaintiff's property. Therefore all that the defendant did, so far as the drainage in question is concerned, was to fill up its lot so that the drainage could no longer flow upon its property. It is said in 3Farnham on Water, etc., p. 2576, that the proprietor upon whose land water is unlawfully thrown may erect barriers against it, and in the case of Wills v. Babb, 78 N.E. 42, 6 L.R.A. (N.S.), 136, the Supreme Court of Illinois said: "We think it clear the water of Hadley creek have been diverted from their natural channel by the Caffrey cut, the filling up of the old creek and the construction of the Miller, Likes and Atkinson levees, in such manner that appellees are justified in erecting a levee upon their east lines to protect themselves from the overflow of Hadley creek thus cast upon them. That is, by reason of the crowding of the waters of Hadley creek westward, a burden has been cast upon the lands of appellees that legally they are not bound to bear; and that the owners of such lands may lawfully erect such barriers along the eastern border of said lands as may be necessary to protect said lands from such overflow, or, in other words, that they may lawfully repel from their lands, by proper levees, the waters of Hadley creek which have been wrongfully cast upon their lands." After citing a number of cases, the Court quotes the statement in Kauffman v.Griesemer, 26 Pa. 407: "The plaintiffs had no right to insist upon his (the defendant's) receiving waters which nature never appointed to flow there, and against any contrivance to reverse the order of nature he might peaceably and on his own land take measures *Page 556
 of protection. * * * The only servitude the plaintiffs could claim in the defendant's land was that it should receive the overflow which was natural and customary. * * * The elevation which protected him in ordinary times could not be reduced without his consent, and when the undue liberty was taken, he was not a wrongdoer in protecting himself from the consequences." The Supreme Court of Illinois said further: "It is, however, said on behalf of the appellant that he or his predecessors in title were in no way responsible for the change made in the course of Hadley creek. The same may be said of the appellees and their predecessors in title. * * * By claiming a prescriptive right to flood appellees' land by virtue of the acts of the persons who in part diverted the waters of old Hadley creek from its channel, the appellant makes the acts of those parties his own, and is bound thereby."
 It follows from what has been said that the defendant's first prayer should have been granted.
 We have considered the exception to the ruling of the Court on the prayers notwithstanding the exception includes rulings on motions to strike out evidence, contrary to the approved practice in this State. Harris v. Hipsley, 122 Md. 418.
 There is evidence tending to show that there was a spring and small drain on the defendant's lot, and that the surface drainage on and over that lot naturally flowed in a southeasterly or easterly direction. If the filling up of the lot caused that drainage or the water from the spring to flow upon the plaintiff's lot and thereby contributed to the injury to her property, the defendant would, under appropriate pleadings, be liable, and we will therefore reverse the judgment of the Court below, without now awarding a new trial, with leave to the appellee to apply to this Court for a new trial, if she desires to do so, and then determine whether it shall be awarded.
 Judgment reversed, with costs. *Page 557