text:
 Důležité právní upozornění
 |
 52005PC0088
 Návrh nařízení Evropského Parlamentu a Rady o statistice Společenství o struktuře a činnosti zahraničních přidružených společností /* KOM/2005/0088 konecném znení - COD 2005/0016 */
 V Bruselu dne 15.3.2005KOM(2005) 88 v konečném znění2005/0016 (COD)NávrhNAŘÍZENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU A RADYo statistice Společenství o struktuře a činnosti zahraničních přidružených společností(předložená Komisí)ODŮVODNĚNÍ1. SouvislostHospodářská globalizace má vliv na podniky, a proto jsou zapotřebí statistiky, aby pomáhaly tvůrcům vnitrostátní politiky a politiky EU stanovit náležité strategie a podnikům vyhodnocovat probíhající vývoj. Kromě toho jsou statistiky důležité i v mnohých dalších strategických oblastech, např. pro fungování vnitřního trhu nebo zavádění GATS[1].Dobrovolné shromažďování údajů o struktuře a činnosti zahraničních přidružených společností v členských státech ukázalo, že je sběr dat proveditelný. Vnitřní obchodní statistiky o zahraničních přidružených společnostech (dále jen „vnitřní FATS“) byly shromažďovány v rámci strukturální statistiky podnikání rozčleněním obchodní statistiky podle státní příslušnosti podniků vykonávajících zahraniční kontrolu. Vnitřní FATS byly shromažďovány také v rámci statistiky platební bilance generováním dat pro podsoubor, v kterém přímé zahraniční investice dosahovaly úrovně odpovídající zahraniční kontrole. Údaje pro vnější FATS (obchodní statistiky o činnosti přidružených společností v zahraničí) jsou shromažďovány v rámci platební bilance čistě na bázi dobrovolnosti. Jsou také založeny na rozšíření proměnných shromažďovaných pro přímé zahraniční investice, pro zahraniční přidružené společnosti kontrolované přímým investorem.Ačkoliv všechny členské státy EU 15 předaly data pro vnitřní FATS v některém ze statistických rámců, nebylo možné vypočítat souhrnné ukazatele pro EU 15, protože se tyto soubory údajů lišily po stránce rozsahu, proměnných i metodologie. Protože jsou všichni uživatelé závislí na dostupnosti souhrnných ukazatelů EU, bylo nutné harmonizovat sběr dat vnitřních FATS za účelem stanovení společného rámce pro pořizování ucelených FATS. Pokud jde o vnější FATS, shromažďuje údaje na bázi dobrovolnosti jen devět členských států.Navrhované nařízení přesně specifikuje předmět dodání a ponechává rozhodnutí o nejlepším způsobu jeho dosažení na zvážení členských států.Návrh k obchodním statistikám FATS je výsledkem četných konzultací a porad s členskými státy, z nichž jej velká většina podporuje.2. Obsah nařízeníToto nařízení obsahuje dva společné moduly, a to pro vnitřní FATS (příloha 1) a pro vnější FATS (příloha 2).Společný modul pro vnitřní FATS (příloha 1) je do značné míry založen na údajích shromažďovaných v rámci nařízení Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 58/97 o strukturální statistice podnikání (nařízení o SBS). Shromažďování ukazatelů umožňuje odhadovat rozsah a intenzitu globalizace na vnitřním trhu a poskytuje informace o pohybech kapitálu, přímých investicích a o technologii. Přímá vazba na strukturální statistiku podnikání umožňuje porovnávat podniky kontrolované ze zahraničí s podniky kontrolovanými v tuzemsku, což umožňuje snadno analyzovat rozdíly v produktivitě, výkonnosti a ziskovosti, jakož i posuzovat vliv na výkonnost ekonomiky z hlediska růstu, zaměstnanosti, výzkumu a vývoje.Členění činnosti podle NACE[2] poskytuje informace o rozložení zahraniční kontroly v ekonomice vykazující země a o příslušné mezinárodní konkurenceschopnosti určitých sektorů. Členění podle kontrolující země ukazuje postavení konkrétních zahraničních zemí jako domicilu podniků kontrolujících přidružené společnosti v členských státech EU a atraktivitu jednotlivých členských států.Společný modul pro vnější FATS (příloha 2) zahrnuje také členění podle země sídla a podle činnosti zahraničních přidružených společností kontrolovaných v zahraničí. Struktura členění je pro navrhované ukazatele stejná jako struktura použitá pro přímé zahraniční investice v návrhu nařízení o statistice platební bilance. Nesouhlas členských států s předchozí verzí předloženou Výboru pro statistické programy v září 2003 vedl k tomu, že budou pro všechny ukazatele pro vnější FATS provedeny pilotní studie, jak je stanoveno v příloze II.Protože informace požadované uživateli přesahují rámec tohoto návrhu nařízení, jsou v případě vnitřních FATS plánovány pilotní studie pro posouzení, zda je sběr údajů proveditelný pro další členění. Pokud se týče vnějších FATS, je nyní v důsledku nesouhlasu členských států s předchozí verzí předloženou Výboru pro statistické programy v září 2003 celá příloha 2 zahrnuta do pilotních studií.Toto nařízení bylo zevrubně projednáno se zástupci členských států i kandidátských zemí ve společné pracovní skupině FATS. Společná pracovní skupina FATS zahrnuje obě skupiny poskytovatelů dat, tedy státní statistické úřady shromažďující údaje FATS v rámci strukturální statistiky podnikání a národní centrální banky poskytující údaje v rámci vypracování platební bilance. Návrh byl také projednán v CMFB[3] a BSDG[4] s členskými státy i kandidátskými zeměmi a získal všeobecnou podporu. Oba moduly byly vypracovány po rozsáhlých konzultacích s členskými státy, které podporují jak obsah, tak i vlastní seznamy.2005/0016 (COD)NávrhNAŘÍZENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU A RADYo statistice Společenství o struktuře a činnosti zahraničních přidružených společností (Text s významem pro EHP)EVROPSKÝ PARLAMENT A RADA EVROPSKÉ UNIE,s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství a zejména na čl. 285 odst. 1 této smlouvy,s ohledem na návrh Komise[5],po konzultaci s Evropskou centrální bankou podle čl. 105 odst. 4 Smlouvy[6],v souladu s postupem stanoveným v článku 251 Smlouvy[7],vzhledem k těmto důvodům:(1) Pravidelné a kvalitní statistiky Společenství o struktuře a činnosti zahraničních přidružených společností v celé ekonomice jsou velmi důležité pro náležité hodnocení vlivu podniků ve vlastnictví zahraničních firem na ekonomiku Evropské unie. To by také umožnilo sledovat efektivitu vnitřního trhu a postupnou integraci ekonomik v souvislosti s globalizací. V tomto kontextu hrají vedoucí úlohu nadnárodní společnosti, avšak zahraniční kontrolou mohou být dotčeny i malé a středně velké podniky.(2) Provádění a přezkum Všeobecné dohody o obchodu službami (dále jen „GATS“) a Dohody o obchodních aspektech práv k duševnímu vlastnictví (TRIPS), jakož i současná a budoucí ujednání dalších smluv vyžadují zpřístupnění důležitých statistických informací pro podporu jednání.(3) Pro určování strategií v oblasti hospodářství, hospodářské soutěže, podnikání, výzkumu, technologického rozvoje a zaměstnanosti v kontextu procesu liberalizace jsou potřebné statistiky o zahraničních přidružených společnostech za účelem posouzení přímých a nepřímých vlivů zahraniční kontroly na zaměstnanost, mzdy a produktivitu v jednotlivých zemích a odvětvích.(4) Informace poskytované podle stávajících právních předpisů Společenství nebo přístupné v členských státech nejsou dostatečné, adekvátní nebo dostatečně srovnatelné k tomu, aby sloužily jako spolehlivý základ pro práci Komise.(5) Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. .../...[8] stanoví společný rámec pro systematické pořizování statistik Společenství o platební bilanci, mezinárodním obchodu službami a přímých zahraničních investicích. Protože statistiky platební bilance pokrývají údaje obsažené v dohodě GATS jen částečně, je důležité, aby byly pravidelně vypracovávány podrobné statistiky o zahraničních přidružených společnostech.(6) Nařízení Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 58/97 ze dne 20. prosince 1996 o strukturální statistice podnikání[9] a nařízení (EHS) č. 696/93 ze dne 15. března 1993 o statistických jednotkách pro účely statistického zjišťování a analýzy hospodářství ve Společenství[10] stanoví společný rámec pro pořizování, sestavování, předávání a vyhodnocování statistik Společenství o struktuře a činnosti podniků ve Společenství.(7) Sestavování národních účtů podle nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2223/96[11] ze dne 25. června 1996 o Evropském systému národních a regionálních účtů ve Společenství vyžaduje srovnatelnou, úplnou a spolehlivou statistiku podnikání o zahraničních přidružených společnostech.(8) Pokyny Spojených národů (OSN) ke statistice mezinárodního obchodu službami, pokyny Mezinárodního měnového fondu (MMF) k platební bilanci (5. vydání), srovnávací definice přímých zahraničních investic a pokyny k indikátorům hospodářské globalizace Organizace pro hospodářskou spolupráci a rozvoj (OECD) společně definují obecná pravidla pro vypracování mezinárodně srovnatelných statistik o zahraničních přidružených společnostech.(9) Vypracování statistik Společenství je určeno pravidly stanovenými v nařízení (ES) č. 322/97[12].(10) Protože nelze cíle zamýšlené činnosti, totiž tvorby společných statistických norem pro vypracovávání srovnatelných statistik o zahraničních přidružených společnostech, z důvodu rozsahu nebo dopadů této činnosti úspěšně dosáhnout na úrovni členských států, nýbrž jen na úrovni Společenství, může Společenství přijmout opatření podle zásady subsidiarity, jak je stanoveno v článku 5 Smlouvy. Na základě principu proporcionality, jak je stanoveno ve zmíněném článku, nepřesahuje toto nařízení rámec nezbytný k dosažení tohoto cíle.(11) Opatření nutná pro provádění tohoto nařízení by měla být přijata v souladu s rozhodnutím Rady 1999/468/ES ze dne 28. června 1999 o postupech pro výkon prováděcích pravomocí svěřených Komisi[13].(12) Byl konzultován Výbor pro statistické programy a Výbor pro měnovou a finanční statistiku a statistiku platební bilance,PŘIJALY TOTO NAŘÍZENÍ:Článek 1PředmětToto nařízení stanoví společný rámec pro systematické vypracovávání statistik Společenství o struktuře a činnosti zahraničních přidružených společností.Článek 2DefinicePro účel tohoto nařízení platí tyto definice:„Zahraniční přidruženou společností“ se rozumí podnik se sídlem ve vykazující zemi, nad kterým má kontrolu institucionální jednotka nesídlící ve vykazující zemi, případně podnik nesídlící ve vykazující zemi, nad kterým má kontrolu institucionální jednotka se sídlem ve vykazující zemi.„Kontrolou“ se rozumí schopnost určovat všeobecnou politiku podniku jmenováním příslušného vedení podniku, je-li to nutné. Podnik A je považován za kontrolovaný institucionální jednotkou B, jestliže B kontroluje – přímo nebo nepřímo – více než polovinu volebních hlasů akcionářů nebo více než polovinu akcií.„Zahraniční kontrolou“ se rozumí, že kontrolující institucionální jednotka má sídlo v jiné zemi než v zemi, v které sídlí institucionální jednotka, nad kterou má kontrolu.„Pobočkami“ se rozumí místní jednotky bez samostatné právní identity, které jsou závislé na podnicích ve vlastnictví zahraničních firem. Jsou pokládány za kvazispolečnosti.„Statistikou o zahraničních přidružených společnostech“ se rozumí statistika popisující celkovou činnost zahraničních přidružených společností.„Vnitřní statistikou o zahraničních přidružených společnostech“ se rozumí statistika popisující činnost zahraničních přidružených společností se sídlem ve vykazující ekonomice.„Vnější statistikou o zahraničních přidružených společnostech“ se rozumí statistika popisující činnost zahraničních přidružených společností v cizině kontrolovaných vykazující ekonomikou.„Nejvyšší kontrolující institucionální jednotkou zahraniční přidružené společnosti“ se rozumí řídící institucionální jednotka provozující řetězec zahraničních přidružených společností, která není kontrolovaná jinou institucionální jednotkou.„Podnik“, „místní jednotka“ a „institucionální jednotka“ mají význam jim přiřazený v nařízení (EHS) č. 696/93 ze dne 15. března 1993[14] o statistických jednotkách pro účely statistického zjišťování a analýzy hospodářství ve Společenství.Článek 3Předkládání údajůČlenské státy budou prostřednictvím Eurostatu předkládat Komisi údaje o zahraničních přidružených společnostech jako ukazatele podle členění ekonomických činností a geografického členění, jak je uvedeno v přílohách I, II a III.Článek 4Zdroje dat1. Členské státy mohou při dodržení podmínek kvality, jak je uvedeno v článku 6, shromažďovat informace potřebné podle tohoto nařízení s použitím zdrojů, které považují za relevantní.2. Fyzické a právnické osoby, které mají podávat informace, dodržují při odpovídání lhůty a definice stanovené vnitrostátními institucemi odpovědnými za sběr údajů v rámci členských států v souladu s tímto nařízením.3. Nelze-li shromáždit požadované údaje za přiměřené náklady, je možné sdělit co nejlepší odhady.Článek 5Pilotní studie1. Komise vypracuje program pilotních studií, které budou provádět vnitrostátní orgány ve smyslu článku 2 nařízení Rady (ES) č. 322/97 na bázi dobrovolnosti za účelem ověření proveditelnosti a nákladů na sběr údajů o dalších proměnných a členěních pro vnitřní statistiku o zahraničních přidružených společnostech a na sběr údajů pro vnější statistiku o zahraničních přidružených společnostech.2. Program Komise pro pilotní studie bude v souladu s přílohami I a II.3. Na základě závěrů z pilotních studií přijme Komise nezbytná prováděcí opatření v souladu s postupem stanoveným v čl. 10 odst. 2.4. Pilotní studie budou vypracovány nejpozději do tří let po vstupu tohoto nařízení v platnost.Článek 6Normy kvality a zprávy o kvalitě1. Členské státy přijmou veškerá nezbytná opatření k zabezpečení kvality údajů předávaných podle společných norem kvality.2. Členské státy předloží Komisi prostřednictvím Eurostatu zprávu o kvalitě předávaných údajů (dále jen „zprávy o kvalitě“).3. Společné normy kvality, jakož i obsah zpráv o kvalitě stanoví Komise v souladu s postupem uvedeným v čl. 10 odst. 2.4. Komise bude posuzovat kvalitu předaných údajů na základě zpráv o kvalitě předkládaných členskými státy a přesně stanoví frekvenci předkládání zpráv.Článek 7Referenční příručkaV úzké spolupráci s členskými státy vydá Komise referenční příručku, která bude obsahovat doplňující pokyny ke statistikám Společenství vypracovávaným podle tohoto nařízení.Článek 8Harmonogram a odchylky1. Členské státy shromažďují údaje podle realizačního harmonogramu, jak je specifikováno v příloze I.2. Během přechodného období, které nepřesáhne období čtyř let po skončení prvního referenčního roku, může Komise členským státům povolit odchylky, budou-li jejich vnitrostátní statistické systémy vyžadovat závažnější úpravy.Článek 9Prováděcí opatřeníOpatření k provádění tohoto nařízení se přijmou v souladu s postupem uvedeným v čl. 10 odst. 2. Budou zahrnovat zejména opatření:pro přizpůsobení se ekonomickému a technickému rozvoji ve sběru a statistickém zpracovávání údajů, jakož i zpracovávání a sdělování výsledků;eventuálně pro přizpůsobení definicí podle ekonomického a metodologického rozvoje;pro přizpůsobení úrovně členění uvedené v přílohách I, II a III;pro definování odpovídajících společných norem kvality a obsahu zpráv o kvalitě;pro stanovení příslušného formátu a postupu pro sdělování výsledků členskými státy;pro aplikaci výsledků pilotních studií.Článek 10Výbor1. Komisi je nápomocen Výbor pro statistické programy zřízený rozhodnutím 89/382/EHS, Euratom[15].2. Odkazuje-li se na tento odstavec, použijí se články 5 a 7 rozhodnutí 1999/468/ES s ohledem na článek 8 uvedeného rozhodnutí.Doba uvedená v čl. 5 odst. 6 rozhodnutí 1999/468/ES je tři měsíce.3. Výbor přijme svůj jednací řád.4. Evropská centrální banka a národní centrální banky se mohou zúčastňovat zasedání výboru jako pozorovatelé.Článek 11Spolupráce s Výborem pro měnovou a finanční statistiku a statistiku platební bilancePři provádění tohoto nařízení si Komise vyžádá stanovisko Výboru pro měnovou a finanční statistiku a statistiku platební bilance (CMFB) zřízeného rozhodnutím Rady 91/115/EHS[16] ke všem věcem spadajícím do působnosti tohoto výboru, zejména ke všem opatřením pro přizpůsobení se ekonomickému a technickému rozvoji v souvislosti se shromažďováním a statistickým zpracováváním údajů, zpracováváním a předáváním výsledků.Článek 12Zpráva o pokroku při prováděníDo pěti let od vstupu tohoto nařízení v platnost předloží Komise Evropskému parlamentu a Radě zprávu o pokroku při jeho provádění. Zpráva bude zejména:posuzovat kvalitu vypracovaných statistik;posuzovat přínos plynoucí Společenství, členským státům, poskytovatelům a uživatelům statistických informací z vypracovaných statistik v poměru k nákladům;posuzovat pokrok pilotních studií a jejich provádění;určovat oblasti možných úprav a změn považovaných za nezbytné s přihlédnutím k dosaženým výsledkům a zahrnutým nákladům.Článek 13Vstup v platnostToto nařízení vstupuje v platnost dvacátým dnem po vyhlášení v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie.Toto nařízení je závazné v celém rozsahu a přímo použitelné ve všech členských státech.V Bruselu dne .Za Evropský parlament Za Radupředseda / předsedkyně předseda / předsedkyněPŘÍLOHA ISPOLEČNÝ MODUL PRO VNITŘNÍ OBCHODNÍ STATISTIKU O ZAHRANIČNÍCH PŘIDRUŽENÝCH SPOLEČNOSTECHOddíl 1Statistická jednotkaStatistické jednotky jsou podniky a všechny pobočky pod zahraniční kontrolou podle definicí uvedených v článku 2.Oddíl 2UkazateleJe třeba sestavit níže uvedené ukazatele, jak je definováno v příloze nařízení Komise (ES) č. 2700/98 ze dne 17. prosince 1998 o definicích ukazatelů pro strukturální statistiku podnikání[17]:Kód | Název |11 11 0 | Počet podniků |12 11 0 | Obrat |12 12 0 | Hodnota produkce |12 15 0 | Přidaná hodnota v nákladech na výrobní činitele |13 11 0 | Nákup výrobků a služeb celkem |13 12 0 | Nákup výrobků a služeb určených k prodeji v nezměněném stavu |13 31 0 | Osobní náklady |15 11 0 | Hrubé investice do hmotných aktiv |16 11 0 | Počet pracujících osob |22 11 0 | Celkové vnitropodnikové výdaje na výzkum a vývoj (*) |22 12 0 | Počet pracovníků ve výzkumu a vývoji celkem (*) |Pokud není počet pracujících osob dostupný, doplní se počet zaměstnanců (kód 16 13 0).Proměnné celkových vnitropodnikových výdajů na výzkum a vývoj (kód 22 110) a celkový počet pracovníků ve výzkumu a vývoji (kód 22 120) je nezbytné vyplnit pouze pro činnosti sekcí C, D, E a F NACE.Pro sekci J NACE by se měl vyplnit pouze počet podniků, obrat (**) a počet pracujících osob (nebo místo toho počet zaměstnanců).Oddíl 3Úroveň členěníÚdaje se poskytují podle „koncepce nejvyšší kontrolující institucionální jednotky“ s úrovní 2 vnitřní statistiky podle geografického členění ve spojení s úrovní 3 členění podle činností, jak je specifikováno v příloze III, a s úrovní 3 geografického členění ve spojení s celkovou činností.Oddíl 4První referenční rok a periodicita1. Prvním referenčním rokem, za který se vypracují výroční statistiky, je kalendářní rok vstupu tohoto nařízení v platnost.2. Potom budou členské státy podávat údaje za každý kalendářní rok.Oddíl 5Předávání výsledkůVýsledky se předají do 20 měsíců od skončení sledovaného roku.Oddíl 6Zprávy a pilotní studie1. Členské státy dodají Komisi zprávu o definici, struktuře a dostupnosti statistických údajů, které mají být shromážděny pro účel tohoto společného modulu.2. Pro úroveň členění, na kterou se vztahuje tato příloha, stanoví Komise pilotní studie, které budou provádět vnitrostátní orgány ve smyslu článku 2 nařízení Rady (ES) č. 322/97 podle článku 5 tohoto nařízení.3. Pilotní studie se provádějí za účelem vyhodnocení proveditelnosti sběru údajů, přičemž se bere v úvahu přínos dostupnosti údajů v poměru k nákladům na sběr údajů a k zatížení podniků.4. Pilotní studie budou provedeny pro tyto ukazateleKód | Název |Vývoz výrobků a služeb |Dovoz výrobků a služeb |Vývoz výrobků a služeb v rámci skupiny |Dovoz výrobků a služeb v rámci skupiny |5. Pilotní studie se budou provádět také pro zkoumání proveditelnosti sběru údajů pro činnosti v sekcích M, N a O NACE a sběru proměnných celkových vnitropodnikových výdajů na výzkum a vývoj (kód 22 11 0) a celkového počtu pracovníků ve výzkumu a vývoji (kód 22 12 0) pro činnosti v sekcích G, H, I, J, K, M, N a O NACE. Pilotní studie se budou provádět také za účelem stanovení relevantnosti a proveditelnosti členění do velikostních tříd podle počtu pracujících osob a jejich nákladů, jak je stanoveno v oddílu 2.PŘÍLOHA IISPOLEČNÝ MODUL PRO VNĚJŠÍ OBCHODNÍ STATISTIKU O ZAHRANIČNÍCH PŘIDRUŽENÝCH SPOLEČNOSTECHOddíl 1Statistická jednotkaStatistické jednotky jsou podniky a všechny pobočky v zahraničí kontrolované institucionální jednotkou se sídlem ve vykazující ekonomice podle definicí uvedených v článku 2.Oddíl 2Pilotní studiePro úroveň členění, na kterou se vztahuje tato příloha, zavede Komise pilotní studie, které budou provádět vnitrostátní orgány ve smyslu článku 2 nařízení Rady (ES) č. 322/97 podle článku 5 tohoto nařízení.Pilotní studie se provádějí za účelem stanovení relevantnosti a proveditelnosti sběrů údajů, přičemž se bere v úvahu přínos dostupnosti údajů v poměru k nákladům na sběr údajů a zatížení podniků.Oddíl 3UkazatelePředmětem těchto pilotních studií bude shromažďování následujících ukazatelů, jak je definováno v příloze k nařízení Komise (ES) č. 2700/98 ze dne 17. prosince 1998 o definicích ukazatelů pro strukturální statistiku podnikání[18]:Kód | Název |12 11 0 | Obrat |16 130 | Počet zaměstnanců |11 11 0 | Počet podniků |13 31 0 | Osobní náklady |Vývoz výrobků a služeb |Dovoz výrobků a služeb |Vývoz výrobků a služeb v rámci skupiny |Dovoz výrobků a služeb v rámci skupiny |12 15 0 | Přidaná hodnota v nákladech na výrobní činitele |15 11 0 | Hrubé investice do hmotných aktiv |Oddíl 4Úroveň členěníÚdaje se poskytují s členěním podle země sídla a druhu činnosti zahraniční přidružené společnosti, jak je stanoveno v příloze 3. Členění podle země sídla a druhu činnosti se spojuje takto:- Úroveň 1 geografického členění se spojuje s úrovní 2 členění podle činnosti.- Úroveň 2 geografického členění pro vnější statistiku se spojuje s úrovní 1 členění podle činnosti.- Úroveň 3 geografického členění se spojuje pouze s údaji o celkové činnosti.PŘÍLOHA IIIÚROVNĚ PRO PODROBNÉ INFORMACE PODLE GEOGRAFIE A ČINNOSTIÚROVNě PODLE geografické-ho členění | Úroveň 1 | Úroveň 2 vnější statistika (Úroveň 1 + 34 zemí) |D5 | Extra EU 25 | D5 | Extra EU 25 |IS | Island |LI | Lichtenštejnsko |NO | Norsko |CH | Švýcarsko | CH | Švýcarsko |BG | Bulharsko |HR | Chorvatsko |RO | Rumunsko |RU | Ruská federace | RU | Ruská federace |TR | Turecko |EG | Egypt |MA | Maroko |NG | Nigérie |ZA | Jihoafrická republika |CA | Kanada | CA | Kanada |US | Spojené státy americké | US | Spojené státy |MX | Mexiko |AR | Argentina |BR | Brazílie | BR | Brazílie |CL | Chile |UY | Uruguay |VE | Venezuela |IL | Izrael |CN | Čína | CN | Čína |HK | Hongkong | HK | Hongkong |IN | Indie | IN | Indie |ID | Indonézie |JP | Japonsko | JP | Japonsko |KR | Jižní Korea |MY | Malajsie |PH | Filipíny |SG | Singapur |TW | Tchaj-wan |TH | Thajsko |AU | Austrálie |NZ | Nový Zéland |D6 | Kandidátské země |W5 | Extra EU 25 nestanoveno | W5 | Extra EU 25 nestanoveno |C4 | Zahraniční (offshore) finanční střediska | C4 | Zahraniční (offshore) finanční střediska |Úroveň 2 – vnitřní statistikaA1 | Celosvětově celkem (všechny jednotky včetně vykazující země) |Z9 | Zbývající země světa (nepočítaje v to vykazující zemi) |A2 | Kontrolováno vykazující zemí |D3 | EU 25 (intra EU 25) nepočítaje v to vykazující zemi |BE | Belgie |CZ | Česká republika |DK | Dánsko |DE | Německo |EE | Estonsko |GR | Řecko |ES | Španělsko |FR | Francie |IE | Irsko |IT | Itálie |CY | Kypr |LV | Lotyšsko |LT | Litva |LU | Lucembursko |HU | Maďarsko |MT | Malta |NL | Nizozemsko |AT | Rakousko |PL | Polsko |PT | Portugalsko |SI | Slovinsko |SK | Slovenská republika |FI | Finsko |SE | Švédsko |UK | Spojené království |D5 | Extra-EU 25 |AU | Austrálie |BG | Bulharsko |CA | Kanada |CH | Švýcarsko |CN | Čína |HK | Hongkong |IL | Izrael |IS | Island |JP | Japonsko |LI | Lichtenštejnsko |NO | Norsko |NZ | Nový Zéland |RO | Rumunsko |RU | Ruská federace |TR | Turecko |US | Spojené státy |C4 | Zahraniční (offshore) finanční střediska |W5 | Extra 25 nestanoveno |Úroveň 3AD | Andorra | EE | Estonsko* | KZ | Kazachstán | QA | Katar |AE | Spojené arabské emiráty | EG | Egypt | LA | Laoská lidově demokrat. republika | RO | Rumunsko |AF | Afghánistán | ER | Eritrea | LB | Libanon | RU | Ruská federace |AG | Antigua a Barbuda | ES | Španělsko* | LC | Svatá Lucie | RW | Rwanda |AI | Anguilla | ET | Etiopie | LI | Lichtenštejnsko | SA | Saúdská Arábie |AL | Albánie | FI | Finsko* | LK | Sri Lanka | SB | Šalomounovy ostrovy |AM | Arménie | FJ | Fidži | LR | Libérie | SC | Seychely |AN | Nizozemské Antily | FK | Falklandské ostrovy (Malvíny) | LS | Lesotho | SD | Súdán |AO | Angola | FM | Federativní státy Mikronésie | LT | Litva* | SE | Švédsko |AQ | Antarktida | FO | Faerské ostrovy | LU | Lucembursko* | SG | Singapur |AR | Argentina | FR | Francie* | LV | Lotyšsko* | SH | Svatá Helena |AS | Americká Samoa | GA | Gabon | LY | Lybijská arabská džamáhirije | SI | Slovinsko* |AT | Rakousko* | GB | Spojené království* | MA | Maroko | SK | Slovensko* |AU | Austrálie | GD | Grenada | MD | Moldavská republika | SL | Sierra Leone |AW | Aruba | GE | Gruzie | MG | Madagaskar | SM | San Marino |AZ | Ázerbájdžán | GG | Guernsey – Guam (bez oficiálního kódu země ISO 3166-1, zvlášť vyhrazené kódové prvky) | MH | Marshallovy ostrovy | SN | Senegal |BA | Bosna a Hercegovina | GH | Ghana | MK[19] | Makedonie, Bývalá jugoslávská republika | SO | Somálsko |BB | Barbados | GI | Gibraltar | ML | Mali | SR | Surinam |BD | Bangladéš | GL | Grónsko | MM | Myanmar (Barma) | ST | Svatý Tomáš a Princův ostrov |BE | Belgie* | GM | Gambie | MN | Mongolsko | SV | Salvador |BF | Burkina Faso | GN | Guinea | MO | Macao | SY | Syrská arabská republika |BG | Bulharsko | GQ | Rovníková Guinea | MP | Severní Mariany | SZ | Svazijsko |BH | Bahrajn | GR | Řecko* | MQ | Martinik | TC | Turks a Caicos |BI | Burundi | GS | Jižní Georgia a Jižní Sandwichovy ostrovy | MR | Mauretánie | TD | Čad |BJ | Benin | GT | Guatemala | MS | Montserrat | TG | Togo |BM | Bermudy | GU | Guam | MT | Malta* | TH | Thajsko |BN | Brunej Darussalam | GW | Guinea-Bissau | MU | Mauricius | TJ | Tádžikistán |BO | Bolívie | GY | Guyana | MV | Maldivy | TK | Tokelau |BR | Brazílie | HK | Hongkong | MW | Malawi | TM | Turkmenistán |BS | Bahamy | HM | Heardův ostrov a McDonaldovy ostrovy | MX | Mexiko | TN | Tunisko |BT | Bhútán | HN | Honduras | MY | Malajsie | TO | Tonga |BV | Bouvetův ostrov | HR | Chorvatsko | MZ | Mosambik | TP | Východní Timor |BW | Botswana | HT | Haiti | NA | Namibie | TR | Turecko |BY | Bělorusko | HU | Maďarsko* | NC | Nová Kaledonie | TT | Trinidad and Tobago |BZ | Belize | ID | Indonézie | NE | Niger | TV | Tuvalu |CA | Kanada | IE | Irsko* | NF | Ostrov Norfolk | TW | Taiwan, provincie Číny |CC | Kokosové (Keelingovy) ostrovy | IL | Izrael | NG | Nigérie | TZ | Tanzanská sjednocená republika |CD | Demokratická republika Kongo | IM | Ostrov Man (bez oficiálního kódu země ISO 3166-1, zvlášť vyhrazené kódové prvky) | NI | Nikaragua | UA | Ukrajina |CF | Středoafrická republika | IN | Indie | NL | Nizozemsko* | UG | Uganda |CG | Kongo | IO | Britské indickooceánské území | NO | Norsko* | UM | Menší odlehlé ostrovy USA |CH | Švýcarsko | IQ | Irák | NP | Nepál | US | Spojené státy americké |CI | Pobřeží Slonoviny | IR | Íránská islámská republika | NR | Nauru | UY | Uruguay |CK | Cookovy ostrovy | IS | Island | NU | Niue | UZ | Uzbekistán |CL | Chile | IT | Itálie* | NZ | Nový Zéland | VA | Svatý stolec (Vatikánský městský stát) |CM | Kamerun | JE | Jersey (bez oficiálního kódu země ISO 3166-1, zvlášť vyhrazené kódové prvky) | OM | Omán | VC | Svatý Vincenc a Grenadiny |CN | Čína | JM | Jamaika | PA | Panama | VE | Venezuela |CO | Kolumbie | JO | Jordánsko | PE | Peru | VG | Britské Panenské ostrovy |CR | Kostarika | JP | Japonsko | PF | Francouzská Polynésie | VI | Americké Panenské ostrovy |CU | Kuba | KE | Keňa | PG | Papua – Nová Guinea | VN | Vietnam |CV | Kapverdy | KG | Kyrgyzstán | PH | Filipíny | VU | Vanuatu |CX | Vánoční ostrov | KH | Kambodža (Kampučia) | PK | Pákistán | WF | Wallis a Futuna |CY | Kypr* | KI | Kiribati | PL | Polsko* | WS | Samoa |CZ | Česká republika* | KM | Komory | PN | Pitcairnovy ostrovy | YE | Jemen |DE | Německo* | KN | Svatý Kryštof a Nevis | PR | Portoriko | YT | Mayotte |DJ | Džibutsko | KP | Korejská lidově demokratická republika (Severní Korea) | PS | Palestinská okupovaná území | CS | Srbsko a Černá Hora |DK | Dánsko* | KR | Korejská republika (Jižní Korea) | PT | Portugalsko* | ZA | Jihoafrická republika |DM | Dominika | KW | Kuvajt | PW | Palau | ZM | Zambie |DO | Dominikánská republika | KY | Kajmanské ostrovy | PY | Paraguay | ZW | Zimbabwe |DZ | Alžírsko |EC | Ekvádor |A2 | Kontrolováno vykazující zemí | W5 | Extra EU 25 nestanoveno | * = Pouze pro vnitř. statist. |ÚROVNě čLENěNÍ PODLE čINNOSTIÚroveň 1 | Úroveň 2 |ICFA | NACE rev. 1.1[20] |ČINNOST CELKEM | CELKOVÁ ČINNOST | Sekce C až O (vyjma L) |HORNICTVÍ A POV. DOBÝVÁNÍ | HORNICTVÍ A POVRCHOVÉ DOBÝVÁNÍ | Sekce C |Z toho: |Těžba ropy a plynu | Oddíl 11 |VÝROBA | VÝROBA | Sekce D |Potravinářské výrobky | Subsekce DA |Textil a oděvy | Subsekce DB |Dřevo, vydavatelství a tisk | Subsekce DD a DE |CELKEM textilní a dřevařské činnosti |Výroba čištěné ropy a jiné úpravy | Oddíl 23 |Výroba chemikálií a chemických výrobků | Oddíl 24 |Pryžové a plastové výrobky | Oddíl 25 |Ropné, chem., pryž., plast. výrobky | CELKEM ropné, chemické, pryžové, plastové výrobky |Kovové výrobky | Subsekce DJ |Strojní výrobky | Oddíl 29 |CELKEM kovové a strojní výrobky |Kancelářská a výpočetní technika | Oddíl 30 |Rozhlasové, televizní, sdělovací zařízení | Oddíl 32 |Kanc., výpoč., rozhl. a tel., sděl. zař. | CELKEM kancelářská a výpočetní technika, rozhlasové, televizní, sdělovací zařízení |Motorová vozidla | Oddíl 34 |Jiná dopravní zařízení | Oddíl 35 |Vozidla, jiná dopravní zařízení | CELKEM: vozidla + jiná dopravní zařízení |Výroba jinde neuvedená |ELEKTŘINA, PLYN A VODA | ELEKTŘINA, PLYN A VODA | Sekce E |STAVEBNÍ ČINNOST | STAVEBNÍ ČINNOST | Sekce F |SLUŽBY CELKEM | SLUŽBY CELKEM |ŘEMESLA A OPRAVY | ŘEMESLA A OPRAVY | Sekce G |Prodej, údržba a opravy automobilů a motocyklů; maloobchodní prodej pohonných hmot pro automobily | Oddíl 50 |Velkoobchod a komisionářský obchod kromě automobilů a motocyklů | Oddíl 51 |Maloobchod, kromě automobilů a motocyklů; oprava osobního zboží a zboží pro domácnost | Oddíl 52 |HOTELY A RESTAURACE | HOTELY A RESTAURACE | Sekce H |DOPRAVA, SKLADOV. A SPOJE | DOPRAVA, SKLADOVÁNÍ A SPOJE | Sekce I |Doprava a skladování | Oddíl 60, 61, 62, 63 |Pozemní doprava; doprava potrubím | Oddíl 60 |Lodní doprava | Oddíl 61 |Letecká doprava | Oddíl 62 |Podpůrné a pomocné dopravní činnosti; činnosti cestovních kanceláří | Oddíl 63 |Pošta a telekomunikace | Oddíl 64 |Poštovní a kurýrní činnosti | Skupina 641 |Telekomunikace | Skupina 642 |FINANČ. ZPROSTŘEDKOVÁNÍ | FINANČNÍ ZPROSTŘEDKOVÁNÍ | Sekce J |Finanční zprostředkování kromě pojistných a penzijních fondů | Oddíl 65 |Pojistné a penzijní fondy kromě povinného sociálního zabezpečení | Oddíl 66 |Pomocné činnosti k finančnímu zprostředkování | Oddíl 67 |ČINNOSTI V OBLASTI NEMOVITOSTÍ | Sekce K, oddíl 70 |PRONÁJEM STROJNÍHO ZAŘÍZENÍ A VYBAVENÍ BEZ OBSLUHY A PERSONÁLU | Sekce K, oddíl 71 |POČÍTAČE A SOUV. ČINNOSTI | POČÍTAČE A SOUVISEJÍCÍ ČINNOSTI | Sekce K, oddíl 72 |VÝZKUM A VÝVOJ | VÝZKUM A VÝVOJ | Sekce K, oddíl 73 |JINÉ OBCHODNÍ ČINNOSTI | JINÉ OBCHODNÍ ČINNOSTI | Sekce K, oddíl 74 |Právní činnosti, účetní evidence, průzkum trhu, poradenství | Skupina 741 |Právní činnosti | Třída 7411 |Účetní evidence, účetnictví a audit; daňové poradenství | Třída 7412 |Průzkum trhu a průzkum veřejného mínění | Třída 7413 |Obchodní poradenství a poradenství v oblasti řízení | Třída 7414 |Řídící činnosti holdingových společností | Třída 7415 |Architektonické, inženýrské a jiné technické činnosti | Skupina 742 |Reklama | Skupina 744 |Obchodní činnosti jinde neklasifikované | Skupina 743, 745, 746, 747, 748 |VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ | Sekce M |ZDRAVOTNICKÁ A SOCIÁLNÍ PRÁCE | Sekce N |ČIŠTĚNÍ ODPADNÍCH VOD A LIKVIDACE ODPADŮ | Sekce O, oddíl 90 |ČINNOSTI ČLENSKÝCH ORGANIZACÍ (JINDE NEKLASIFIKOVANÉ) | Sekce O, oddíl 91 |REKREACE, KULT., SPORT. | REKREAČNÍ, KULTURNÍ, SPORTOVNÍ ČINNOSTI | Sekce O, oddíl 92 |Filmové, rozhlasové, televizní a jiné zábavné činnosti | Skupina 921, 922, 923 |Zpravodajské činnosti | Skupina 924 |Knihovnické, archivní, muzeální, jiné kulturní činnosti | Skupina 925 |Sportovní a jiné rekreační činnosti | Skupina 926, 927 |ČINNOSTI V JINÝCH OBLASTECH SLUŽEB | Sekce O, oddíl 93 |Nestanoveno |Úroveň 3 (NACE rev. 1.1) |Název | Požadovaná úroveň členění |Činnost celkem | Sekce C až K |Hornictví a povrchové dobývání | Sekce C |Výroba | Sekce D Všechny subsekce DA až DN Všechny oddíly 15 až 37 |Souhrnné ukazatele: |Vyspělá technologie (HIT) Středně vyspělá technologie (MHT) Středně jednod. Technologie (MLT) Jednoduchá technologie (LOT) | 24.4, 30, 32, 33, 35.3 24 vyjma 24.4, 29, 31, 34, 35.2, 35.4, 35.5 23, 25-28, 35.1 15-22, 36, 37 |Dodávka elektřiny, plynu a vody | Sekce E Všechny oddíly (40 a 41) |Stavební činnost | Sekce F (oddíl 45) Všechny skupiny (45.1 až 45.5) |Velkoobchod a maloobchod; oprava automobilů, motocyklů a osobního zboží a zboží pro domácnost | Sekce G Všechny oddíly (50 až 52) Skupiny 50.1+50.2+50.3, 50.4, 50.5, 51.1 až 51.7 Skupiny 52.1 až 52.7 |Hotely a restaurace | Sekce H (oddíl 55) Skupiny 55.1 až 55.5 |Doprava, skladování a spoje | Sekce I Všechny oddíly Skupiny 60.1, 60.2, 60.3, 63.1+63.2, 63.3, 64.1, 64.2 |Finanční zprostředkování | Sekce J Všechny oddíly |Činnosti v oblasti nemovitostí, pronájmu a obchodní činnosti | Sekce K Oddíl 70 Oddíl 71, skupiny 71.1+71.2, 71.3 a 71.4 Oddíl 72, skupiny 72.1 až 72.6 Oddíl 73 Oddíl 74, souhrnné ukazatele 74.1 až 74.4 a 74.5 až 74.8 |LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTPolicy area(s): Statistics, Internal Market, Trade, Competition Activit(y/ies): Structural Business Statistics, Balance of Payments Statistics |TITLE OF ACTION: PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (EC) NO ../.. ON COMMUNITY STATISTICS AND ACTIVITY OF FOREIGN AFFILIATES |1. BUDGET LINE(S) + HEADING(S)29 02 01 Statistical Information Policy2. OVERALL FIGURES2.1. Total allocation for action (Part B): € 2.150 million for the period 2005-20072.2. Period of application:Yearly data collection and compilation starting from the year after entry into force of the regulation.2.3. Overall multiannual estimate of expenditure:(a) Schedule of commitment appropriations/payment appropriations (financial intervention) (see point 6.1.1)€ million ( to three decimal places)2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Total |Commitments | 0.450 | 0.850 | 0.850 | 2.150 |Payments |(b) Technical and administrative assistance and support expenditure is 0.Subtotal a+b | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Total |Commitments | 0.450 | 0.850 | 0.850 | 2.150 |Payments |(c) Overall financial impact of human resources and other administrative expenditure (see points 7.2 and 7.3)TOTAL a+b+c | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Total |Commitments | 0.450 | 0.850 | 0.850 | 2.150 |Payments |2.4. Compatibility with financial programming and financial perspectiveProposal is compatible with existing financial programming.2.5. Financial impact on revenue: [21]Proposal has no financial implications (involves technical aspects regarding implementation of a measure)3. BUDGET CHARACTERISTICSType of expenditure | New | EFTA contribution | Contributions form applicant countries | Heading in financial perspective |Non-comp | Diff/ Non-diff | NO | YES | YES | No 3 Internal Policies |4. LEGAL BASIS- Council Regulation (EC) No. 322/97 on Community Statistics.- Decision No. 2367/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 16 December 2002 on the Community Statistical Programme 2003 to 2007.5. DESCRIPTION AND GROUNDS5.1. Need for Community intervention [22]5.1.1. Objectives pursuedThis Council Regulation aims to make available harmonised statistical information on foreign-controlled affiliates in the reporting country (inward FATS). The feasibility of collecting harmonised statistical information on foreign affiliates controlled by the reporting country (outward FATS) will be tested in pilot studies. The information is needed for drawing up, monitoring and evaluating Community policies, in particular concerning the internal market as well as economic, trade, employment, research and development, competition and enterprise policies. Furthermore, international treaties such as that instituting the General Agreements on Trade in Services (GATS) require harmonised statistics in this area.5.1.2. Measures taken in connection with ex ante evaluationThe feasibility of collecting the data, taking into account the benefits of the availability of the data in relation to the costs of collection and the burden of businesses was tested for the inward FATS part since reference year 1996 in yearly pilot studies on a voluntary basis.The legal basis for the pilot studies was Annex 1 Section 10 of Council Regulation No 58/97 of 20 December 1996 concerning structural business statistics, also known as the SBS Regulation.[23] Up to now, 12 Member States participated and are participating in the project, providing data for several reference years (up to 2001). The scope of the pilot studies was extended over the years while introducing additional variables and increasing the level of country detail.The pilot studies for inward FATS have proven that a breakdown of structural business statistics by ultimate controlling institutional unit of a foreign affiliate is possible. It has been shown convincingly that the data can be collected, that the statistics can be produced in a cost-effective way, and that the results are of great interest to users inside and outside the European Commission. It has been shown that it is possible accurately to compare the impact on foreign controlled affiliates not only with their nationally controlled counterparts, but also with the FATS of other countries.Several publications presenting the results of the data collection so far have been produced. A publication and several Statistics in Focus on foreign-controlled enterprises have been published so far. Data are also available in Eurostat’s reference database, New Cronos, Theme 4, SBS Domain, FATS Collection.The main limitation is the lack of coverage of all Member States. To evaluate the implementation of the GATS and the functioning of the Internal Market it is essential to have data for all EU Member States.The benefits of the availability of the data have been measured against the costs of collection and the burden on businesses for the pilot studies. The burden on businesses was difficult to quantify, because there are not data existing in the Member States quantifying it. But it can be appreciated that it is not very heavy, because existing data are generally used for processing the FATS data sets and the data collection is based on already existing data collections. Therefore, the additional costs of FATS to business outside normal national statistics activity is restricted to occasional contact for clarification of ownership and control, or to a few additional questions on that theme in ongoing surveys.The costs to the Member States of data collection and processing are also not very high, because existing registers are used and most of the data used to calculate FATS are available as part of the regular surveys. The only additional data collection necessary is for the allocation of control. Therefore, the costs to the Member States are restricted mainly to administrative and computer services expenses.The implementation of new statistics always involves set-up costs as well as costs for the research and development of the data process in the implementation phase. If FATS can be produced automatically as part of an inquiry results process, for example, the costs will be restricted to register and inquiry analysis time. For the pilot studies the Commission contributed financial support to help cover the costs of the Member States.The benefits of FATS are also difficult to quantify in figures. However, in the past few years the Member States and Eurostat have registered a growth in the number of requests for FATS-type statistics on both the services and manufacturing sectors from international organisations such as the OECD and UNCTAD as well as from economists, banks, foreign embassies, academics and other statistical offices.5.1.3. Measures taken following ex post evaluationAccording to article 12 of the proposed regulation it is envisaged that a report on the implementation of this regulation will be submitted within five years of the entry into force of the regulation, to the European Parliament and the Council. In particular, the report shall also assess the benefits accruing to the Community, the Member States, the providers and users of statistical information of the statistics produced in relation to the costs.5.2. Action envisaged and budget intervention arrangementsThe proposed Regulation describes the legal framework within which Member States’ National Statistical Offices or Central Banks will provide the FATS data. Both this regulation and future implementing regulations will be output measures, defining the statistical variables to be provided, but leaving Member States full flexibility in how to obtain the variables. In practice, many Member States will use existing data sources to obtain the results required.The contribution from the Commission budget with respect to the work by the national statistical institutes or other national authorities responsible for Commission statistics represents only part of the total of the statistical work undertaken by the national authorities. In principle production and transmission of regular statistics, which form an integral part of the statistical programme, will be based on the subsidiarity principle, and the operational and administrative costs are borne by the national authorities. The regular data collection is based on existing administrative sources, but for pilot studies co-financing would be necessary to test the feasibility of the collection of the data requested by our main users but difficult to collect.The Commission contribution will take the form of grants awarded on the basis of grant applications submitted by Member States in advance, which will include estimated cost statements. The pilot studies will be funded via the existing Community Statistical Programme 2003 to 2007. There will be no Community funding on the basis of the proposed Regulation after the year 2007. This funding only concerns co-financing of pilot studies. The population who should get budgetary help are the national authorities. According to Article 2 of Council Regulation (CE) No 322/97 on Community Statistics[24] national authorities shall mean national statistical institutes and other bodies responsible in each Member State for producing Community statistics. They should directly be given to the data processing institutes, namely statistical institutes and central banks.Work by Eurostat to develop and document the Community methodology and to process, analyse and disseminate data will be covered in full. Additional costs are expected to be marginal.Data will be provided annually. Eurostat will maintain a database for the data, and will publish FATS annually.5.3. Methods of implementationManagement of the grants procedure and all data handling will be carried out by permanent Commission staff, with no externalisation.6. FINANCIAL IMPACT6.1. Total financial impact on Part B - (over the entire programming period)(The method of calculating the total amounts set out in the table below must be explained by the breakdown in Table 6.2. )6.1.1. Financial interventionCommitments (in € million to three decimal places)Breakdown | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Total |Grants to national authorities for pilot studies | 0.450 | 0.850 | 0.850 | 2.150 |TOTAL | 0.450 | 0.850 | 0.850 | 2.150 |7. IMPACT ON STAFF AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE7.1. Impact on human resourcesTypes of post | Staff to be assigned to management of the action using existing resources | Total | Description of tasks deriving from the action |Number of permanent posts | Number of temporary posts |Officials or temporary staff | A B C | 2 3 | 1 | 2 4 | A-grades for implementation of the Regulation and methodological work, B-grades for data treatment and the maintenance of the informatics system. |Other human resources |Total | 5 | 6 |7.2. Overall financial impact of human resourcesType of human resources | Amount (€) | Method of calculation * |Officials Temporary staff | 648.000 | 6x108.000 |Other human resources (specify budget line) |Total | 648.000 |Existing human resources will be reallocated for the management and the needs of the programme, no other resources are necessary.7.3. Other administrative expenditure deriving from the actionNo or only marginal increase in other administrative expenditure is foreseen. Expenditure on working groups and missions etc. are expected to continue at the current level.8. FOLLOW-UP AND EVALUATION8.1. Follow-up arrangementsThe implementation of this Regulation will be treated in a comitology procedure. As specified in article 9 of this Regulation, Commission Regulations will be developed in relation to- the adjustment to economic and technical developments in the collection and statistical processing of data, as well as the processing and transmission of results,- the adjustment of the definitions, if necessary, according to economic and methodological developments,- for adaptation of the level of detail listed in Annexes I, II and III of the proposed Regulation,- for the definition of the proper common quality standards and the contents of the quality reports,- to setting out the appropriate format and procedure for the transmission of results by Member States- and to the implementation of the results of the pilot studies.8.2. Arrangements and schedule for the planned evaluationEach Member State will take all measures necessary to ensure the quality of the data transmitted according to common quality standards. Member States will supply the Commission with a report on the quality of the data transmitted. The common quality standards as well as the content of the quality reports will be specified by the Commission by comitology. The Commission shall assess the quality of the data transmitted on the basis of the quality reports transmitted by Member States, and shall define the periodicity of such exercise.The Commission will, within five years of the entry into force of this Regulation, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Regulation. In particular, this report will assess the quality of the statistics produced, assess the benefits accruing to the Community, the Member States, the providers and users of statistical information of the statistics produced in relation to the costs, assess the progress of the pilot studies and their implementation and identify areas for potential improvement and amendments considered necessary in light of the results obtained and the costs involved.9. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURESA revised system of internal management and control was put in place following the Commission’s Reform initiative on financial management. This system included a reinforced internal audit capacity.Annual monitoring of progress with implementation of the Commission’s Internal Control Standards is designed to give assurance on the existence and functioning of procedures for prevention and detection of fraud and irregularities.New rules and procedures have been adopted for the principal budgetary process: calls for tenders, grants, commitments, contracts and payments. The manual of procedures are made available to all those intervening in financial acts with a view to clarify responsibilities, simplify workflows and indicate key control points. Training on their use is provided. The manuals are subject to regular review and updating.IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORMTHE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL ON BUSINESS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES( SMEs)Title of proposalProposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on Community Statistics on the Structure and Activity of Foreign Affiliates.DOCUMENT REFERENCE NUMBERThe proposal1. Taking account of the principle of subsidiarity, why is Community legislation necessary in this area and what are its main aims?Community legislation on statistics on the structure and activity of foreign affiliates is needed to set common statistical standards for data, with a high degree of comparability between data colleted in different Member States. Such comparability is requested by all users, not only at Community level, but also within Member States.The aim of the proposed regulation is to establish common rules for the production of Community statistics on the structure and activity of foreign affiliates. The regulation defines a set of relevant statistical data, together with the most important definitions needed to ensure the comparability of the statistics. This is essential, for the calculation of EU aggregates, which are in great demand by users.The impact on business2. Who will be affected by the proposal?- which sectors of businessNACE section C to K- which sizes of business (what is the concentration of small and medium-sized firms)As foreign control is exerted in general in big enterprises, the impact on small and medium-sized firms will be relatively small.- are there particular geographical areas of the Community where these businesses are foundNo.3. What will business have to do to comply with the proposal?In general, data for inward FATS can be collected from existing administrative sources, e.g. Structural Business Statistics, or statistical business registers in the Member States. Therefore the additional burden for businesses should be small.For outward FATS, resident owners should supply information on the activity of their affiliates located in extra-EU countries. Additional variables should be supplied with respect to FDI surveys, although FATS only consider controlled affiliates while FDI considers affiliates with more than 10% of equity capital.4. What economic effects is the proposal likely to have?- on employmentNone.- on investment and the creation of new businessesThe statistics which will become available via this Regulation will assist enterprises in finding attractive destinations for setting-up foreign affiliates. This Regulation may therefore help businesses in investment decisions.- on the competitiveness of businessesThe statistics which will become available via this Regulation will assist enterprises who wish to benchmark their operations against the industry average. This Regulation may therefore help to promote the competitiveness of businesses.5. Does the proposal contain measures to take account of the specific situation of small and medium-sized firms (reduced or different requirements etc)?Pilot studies have shown that foreign-controlled affiliates are rather big enterprises. Thus, small and medium-sized firms are less concerned by the data collection.Consultation6. List the organisations which have been consulted about the proposal and outline their main views.The National Statistical Offices, the National Central Banks and other competent national authorities responsible for data collections have been consulted on many occasions during the preparation of this text. A draft of a legal act was first presented to a FATS Task Force in September 2002 and was then presented and discussed at the meetings of the FATS Joint Working Group in January 2003, where both groups of data providers, National Statistical Institutes and Central Banks, were present. Based on the discussions in this working group meeting, a revised version was drafted and sent for written consultation to the FATS contacts in March 2003. The draft proposal was amended on the basis of written consultation and a revised version was presented to the BSDG and the CMFB in June 2003. There was general support in both groups for the regulation. The draft Regulation was discussed at the meeting of the SPC on 17 September 2003. Several delegations supported the proposal. The main areas of concern for some delegations were especially outward FATS, exchange of individual data and the level of detail requested. A series of consultations with Member States were conducted; specifically, discussions in the SBS Steering Group in November 2003 and in the CMFB in January 2004 and three written consultations of the members of the FATS Joint Working Group in November 2003, January and March 2004 and one written consultation. These resulted in revisions of the act, and finally the agreed text of the present proposal. In particular, the article on exchange of individual data has been deleted, outward FATS are now planned as pilot studies and the level of detail of inward FATS has been reduced. The draft Regulation was presented to the SPC for opinion in May 2004. The members of the SPC generally supported the proposal.[1] Všeobecná dohoda o obchodu službami.[2] Statistická klasifikace ekonomických činností v Evropském společenství.[3] Výbor pro měnovou a finanční statistiku a pro statistiku platební bilance.[4] Skupina ředitelů pro statistiku podnikání.[5] Úř. věst. C , , s. .[6] Úř. věst. C [...], [...], s. [...].[7] Úř. věst. C , , s. .[8] Úř. věst. L , , s. .[9] Úř. věst. L 14, 17.1.1997, s.1. Nařízení ve znění nařízení (ES) č. 1670/2003 (Úř. věst. L 244 , 29.9.2003, s. 74).[10] Úř. věst. L 76, 30.3.1993, s.1.[11] Úř. věst. L 310, 30.11.1996, s.1.[12] Úř. věst. L 52, 22.2.1997, s. 1.[13] Úř. věst. L 184, 17.7.1999, s. 23. Nařízení ve znění nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1882/2003 (Úř. věst. L 284, 31.10.2003, s. 1).[14] Úř. věst. L 76, 30.3.1993, s. 1.[15] Úř. věst. L 181, 28.6.1989, s. 47.[16] Úř. věst. L 59, 6.3.1991, s. 19. Rozhodnutí ve znění rozhodnutí 96/174/ES (Úř. věst. L 51, 1.3.1996, s. 48).[17] Úř. věst. L 344, 18.12.1998. Nařízení ve znění nařízení (ES) č. 1670/2003 (Úř. věst. L 244 , 29.9.2003, s. 74).(*) Proměnné 22 11 0 a 22 12 0 se vykazují každý druhý rok. Pokud celkový obrat nebo počet pracujících osob v oddíle NACE rev. 1.1 sekce C až E představují v členském státě méně než 1 % celkového výsledku Společenství, nemusejí se pro účely tohoto nařízení shromažďovat informace nutné pro sestavení statistik týkajících se ukazatelů 22 11 0 a 22 12 0. Pokud to potřeby politiky Společenství vyžadují, může Komise postupem podle čl. 10 odst. 2 tohoto nařízení požadovat sběr těchto údajů ad-hoc .(**) Pro oddíl 65 NACE rev. 1.1 bude obrat nahrazen hodnotou produkce.[18] Úř. věst. L 344, 18.12.1998.[19] „Prozatímní kód, který nebude ovlivňovat konečné označení země, bude stanoven po ukončení jednání právě probíhajících ve Spojených národech“.[20] Nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 3037 ze dne 9. října 1990 o statistické klasifikaci ekonomických činností v Evropském společenství a nařízení Komise (ES) č. 29/2002 ze dne 19. prosince 2001, kterým se mění nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 3037 o statistické klasifikaci ekonomických činností v Evropském společenství.[21] For further information, see separate explanatory note.[22] For further information, see separate explanatory note.[23] Council Regulation (EC, EURATOM) No. 58/97 of 20 December 1996 concerning structural business statistics (OJ No. L 14, 17.1.97)[24] OJ L 52, 22.02.1997.


type: wikipedia

text:
Kommunikatsioon ehk suhtlemine ehk suhtlus on organismidevaheline teabevahetus. Teabe vahetamine võib olla kas ühe- või mitmesuunaline. Ühesuunalist kommunikatsiooni nimetatakse informeerimiseks, sel juhul ei oota teabe edastaja, et talle vastatakse või antakse tagasisidet. Mitmesuunalise kommunikatsiooni puhul ootab informatsiooni andja tagasisidet. Mistõttu peavad informatsiooni saajad mõistma, mida neile edastati, suutma informatsioonile vastata ja infot edastada.
 Kommunikatsiooni käigus toimub tähenduse loomine ja vahetus, milles osaleb kolm põhilüli: kommunikaator ehk teate saatja, teade ehk tähendust omav märk, retsipient ehk teate saaja. Kommunikatsioon on võimalik erinevate märgisüsteemide abil, üheks neist on kõnekeel.
 Kommunikatsiooni tasandid
 intrapersonaalne kommunikatsioon ehk suhtlemine iseendaga
 interpersonaalne kommunikatsioon ehk inimestevaheline suhtlemine
 grupikommunikatsioon ehk rühmasuhtlemine
 massikommunikatsioon ehk massiteabelevi hõlmab korraga väga paljusid erinevatesse gruppidesse kuuluvaid inimesi ehk massiauditooriumi, mille poole pöördub kommunikaator, kes tavaliselt ei esinda iseennast
 Kommunikatsiooni analüüsimine
 Kommunikatsiooni analüüsimiseks ja sõnumiteedastuse efektiivsuse mõõtmiseks leidub erinevaid viise, mille hulgas on nii kvalitatiivseid kui ka kvantitatiivseid meetodeid. Kommunikatsiooni analüüsiks valitud meetodid ja vahendid sõltuvad paljuski sellest, millistes kanalites toimus sõnumi edastus:
 ülesande elluviimise eel püstitatud kommunikatsioonieesmärkide täitmine/mittetäitmine,
 meediamonitooring,
 sõnumi tagasisideküsimustikud,
 rahulolu-uuring,
 kommunikatsiooniaudit,
 maineuuring,
 sisekommunikatsiooni uuringud,
 uute partnerlussuhete tekke arv,
 kommunitseeritud aktsioonis osalejate arv/aktiivsus või nende tegevuse tulemus,
 veebilehe/kampaanialehe külastuste arv (unikaalsed külastused vs tervikkülastuste arv),
 aktsiooni/organisatsiooni sotsiaalmeediakanalite kasutajate (fännide) arv.
 Taimed ja seened
 Kommunikatsiooni jälgitakse taime organismi siseselt, näiteks taime rakkude, samade taimede ja sugulastaimede, taimede ning mitte-taimede vahel, eriti juure tasandil. Taimed kommunitseerivad risoomi bakteri kaudu, seened ja putukad mulla kaudu. Neid infovahetusi juhivad süntaktilised, pragmaatilised ja semantilised reeglid, mis on võimalikud taimede detsentraliseeritud "närvisüsteemile". Sõna "neuron" pärineb kreekakeelsest sõnast, mis tähendab taimekiudu, ning hilisem uuring näitab, et enamik mikroorganismi taime kommunikatsiooni on neuroni-sugused. Taimed kommunitseerivad ka õhu kaudu, kui neid herbivoorselt rünnatakse, millega omakorda hoiatatakse lähedalasuvaid taimi. Paralleelselt toodavad nad ise õhu kaudu levivaid osakesi, et meelitada ligi parasiite, kes neid herbivoore ründaksid. Stressiolukorras suudavad taimed genoomide üleselt, mille nad on pärinud oma vanematelt ja viidata vanavanemate või vana-vanavanemate genoomidele.
 Seened kommunitseerivad, et koordineerida ja organiseerida oma kasvu ning arendada viljakehade kasvu. Seenelised kommunitseerivad teiste seentega, aga ka muude organismidega, näiteks bakteritega, ainuraksete eukarüootidega, taimede ja putukatega biokeemiliste ainete abil, mis tulenevad biootikast. Biokeemilised ained vallandavad seenelised organismid käituma väga konkreetsel viisil. Kui need samad keemilised molekulid ei ole osa biootilisest sõnumist, siis seeneorganism ei reageeri. See viitab, et seeneorganismid suudavad vahet teha nende molekulide vahel, mis on osa bioonilisest sõnumist ja mis ei ole. Seni teatakse viit peamist signaali saatvat molekuli, mis koordineerivad erinevaid käitumismustreid, näiteks filamentatsioon, paaritus, kasv ja patogeensus. Käitumise koordinatsioon ja signaali sisu tootmine saavutatakse tõlgendamise protsessis, mis lubab organismil vahet teha sama ja erineva, biootilise indikaatori, sarnase või erineva biootilisel sõnumil ning isegi eristada "müra", näiteks sarnased molekulid ilma biootilise sisuta.
 Vaata ka
 alternatiivkommunikatsioon
 autokommunikatsioon
 biokommunikatsioon
 massikommunikatsioon
 semiootika
 suhtlusoskused
 suhtlusmeetod
 sisekommunikatsioon
 zoosemiootika
 taktiilne kommunikatsioon
 tervitus
 Viited
 Välislingid


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 9.2.2008
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 37/17
 Prasība, kas celta 2007. gada 30. novembrī — Eiropas Kopienu Komisija/Itālijas Republika
 (Lieta C-540/07)
 (2008/C 37/24)
 Tiesvedības valoda — itāļu
 Lietas dalībnieki
 Prasītāja: Eiropas Kopienu Komisija (pārstāvji — R. Lyal un A. Aresu)
 Atbildētāja: Itālijas Republika
 Prasītājas prasījumi:
 —
 atzīt, ka, atstājot spēkā nodokļu režīmu, kas ir apgrūtinošāks attiecībā uz dividendēm, kuras izmaksā citās dalībvalstīs un Eiropas Ekonomikas zonas līguma (turpmāk tekstā — “EEZ līgums”) līgumslēdzējās valstīs dibinātām sabiedrībām, salīdzinājumā ar režīmu, kuru piemēro attiecībā uz vietējām sabiedrībām izmaksātajām dividendēm, Itālijas Republika nav izpildījusi pienākumus, ko tai uzliek EKL 56. pants un EEZ līguma 40. pants attiecībā uz kapitāla brīvu apriti dalībvalstīs un EEZ līguma līgumslēdzējas valstīs, kā arī tās pienākumus saskaņā ar EEZ līguma 31. pantu attiecībā uz uzņēmējdarbības veikšanas brīvību EEZ līguma līgumslēdzējas valstīs;
 —
 piespriest Itālijas Republikai atlīdzināt tiesāšanās izdevumus.
 Pamati un galvenie argumenti
 Komisija atsaucas uz attiecīgo spēkā esošo Itālijas tiesisko regulējumu, kura pamatā ir arī līgums un kas attiecībā uz dividenžu izmaksāšanu Itālijā nedibinātām sabiedrībām (proti, izejošās dividendes) piemēro nodokļu režīmu, kas ir nelabvēlīgāks nekā režīms, kuru piemēro attiecībā uz dividenžu izmaksu Itālijā dibinātām sabiedrībām (proti, vietējām sabiedrībām izsniegtās dividendes).
 Komisija norāda, ka šāds tiesiskais regulējums, kuru tomēr Itālijas valdība plāno grozīt, ir pretrunā ar kapitāla brīvas aprites principu, jo tas negatīvi ietekmē nerezidējošo akcionāru Itālijas sabiedrībās lēmumus par peļņu un investīcijām, kas tajā pašā laikā Itālijas sabiedrībām rada sarežģījumus kapitāla palielināšanai ārzemēs. Līdz ar to šāds tiesiskais regulējums ir jāatzīst par tādu, kas acīmredzami pārkāpj EKL 56. pantu, ar ko ir aizliegti visi kapitāla brīvas aprites ierobežojumi dalībvalstu starpā, un Eiropas ekonomikas zonas līguma 40. pantu, kurā līdzīgā veidā ir regulēta kapitāla brīva aprite EEZ līguma līgumslēdzēju valstu starpā.
 Turklāt Komisija uzskata, ka šāds tiesiskais regulējums var būt pretrunā arī tiesībām veikt uzņēmējdarbību, kas ir noteiktas EEZ līguma 31. pantā, jo šis tiesiskais regulējums ir piemērojams arī kontrolētajām kapitāldaļām Itālijas sabiedrībās, kuras pieder sabiedrībām, kas ir dibinātas kādā no EEZ līguma līgumslēdzējām valstīm, — kapitāldaļām, attiecībā uz kurām nav piemērojams nodokļu režīms, kas ir saskaņots ar Direktīvu 90/435/EEK (1).
 Valsts pienākuma neizpildes procedūrā Komisijai bija iespēja izvērtēt Itālijas Republikas aizstāvības argumentus, kas pamato attiecīgo tiesisko regulējumu, bet Komisija uzskatīja, ka tie nav piemēroti šī mērķa sasniegšanai. Tomēr Itālijas valdība nesen paziņoja savu nodomu reformēt minēto tiesisko regulējumu, lai tas būtu saderīgs ar Kopienu tiesībām: celtā prasība varētu paātrināt šo reformu.
 (1) OV L 225, 20.8.1990., 6. lpp.


type: other

text:
DJAL 30/05/2014 - Pg. 37 - Jurisdicional - primeiro grau | Diário de Justiça do Estado de Alagoas | Diários Jusbrasil
 Página 37 da Jurisdicional - Primeiro Grau do Diário de Justiça do Estado de Alagoas (DJAL) de 30 de Maio de 2014
 próprio ajuizamento da demanda. Se o referido contrato não tiver na posse do autor e não for possível consegui-lo administrativamente, inclusive no site da instituição financeira - bastando para tanto o número do contrato , só lhe restará ajuizar ação preparatória de exibição de documento para acessar o documento imprescindível, sem o qual a ação revisional não pode ser proposta. Para o (a) demandante que já tem contra si ajuizada ação de busca e apreensão ou reintegração de posse, sendo autor a instituição financeira, basta consulta os autos da busca para ter acesso ao contrato, pois o referido documento também é imprescindível nestas demandas. Adeque-se, ainda, o valor atribuído à causa ao proveito econômico visado com a demanda, com base nas especificações do pedido feitas a partir do contrato, recolhendo-se as custas e taxas com base neste novo valor. Dito isso, com fundamento no artigo 284 do CPC, determino a intimação da parte autora para, no prazo de 10 dias, aditar a petição inicial no sentido de apontar às cláusulas contratuais supracitadas, juntamente com o contrato que rege a relação entre os litigantes, bem assim a adequação do valor da causa e do pagamento das custas processuais, sob pena de indeferimento da petição da petição inicial.Havendo pedido de assistência judiciária, junte-se a documentação necessário à comprovação do estado de pobreza, uma vez que não é crível acreditar que alguém seja pobre fazendo um financiamento de veículo para pagar a longo prazo com valor considerável da prestação, além de demandar revisão de contrato com assistência de advogado particular. Por isso, não basta a declaração de pobreza, devendo a parte apresentar documentos outros CTPS, contracheque, declaração de rendas ou de isente etc. que comprove tal condição social. Ademais, por cautela e até que sejam apreciados os pedidos liminares após emenda da inicial, com o fito de evitar a configuração da mora, determino que a parte autora deposite em juízo, no prazo de 5 dias, os valores integrais correspondentes às parcelas contratadas, inclusive, a partir do 1.o depósito, das demais parcelas que se vencerem no curso da demanda, mantendo-se, assim agindo, na posse do bem especificado na inicial. Finalmente, comuniquese imediatamente ao réu a respeito do conteúdo da decisão, com o fim de evitar cobranças indevidas ou mesmo eventual inclusão do nome da demandante em cadastros de restrição ao crédito. Cumpra-se com urgência.Maceió , 05 de maio de 2014. Gustavo Souza Lima Juiz de Direito
 ADV: ADRIANA MARIA MARQUES REIS COSTA (OAB 4449/AL) - Processo
 0720278-93.2013.8.02.0001 - Procedimento Ordinário - Interpretação / Revisão de Contrato - AUTOR: FERNANDO LUIZ NETO RÉ: BV Financeira S/A Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento - DECISÃO Analisando a petição inicial, especificamente no que diz respeito ao cumprimento do artigo 285 B do CPC, percebi que a autora não apontou na inicial o vínculo das causas de pedir que embasaram às pretensões deduzidas em juízo com as cláusulas contratuais relacionadas com as obrigações que a (o) demandante pretende controverter nesta demanda. Claro que o cumprimento da determinação supra só é possível se a parte autora estiver de posse do contrato que rege a relação jurídica entre ela e a parte ré, porquanto é impossível deduzir a respeito de quais obrigações contratuais pretende controverter sem manipular o contrato.Portanto, é ônus da parte autora, por força da redação emanada do artigo 285 B do CPC, apresentar o contrato junto com a petição inicial, por ser esse documento imprescindível à propositura da ação, não cabendo no contexto pleitear inversão do ônus da prova, visto que isso não resolve o problema, porquanto anterior a angularização da relação jurídica processual, além de se fazer necessário para o próprio ajuizamento da demanda. Se o referido contrato não tiver na posse do autor e não for possível consegui-lo administrativamente, inclusive no site da instituição financeira - bastando para tanto o número do contrato , só lhe restará ajuizar ação preparatória de exibição de documento para acessar o documento imprescindível, sem o qual a ação revisional não pode ser proposta. Para o (a) demandante que já tem contra si ajuizada ação de busca e apreensão ou reintegração de posse, sendo autor a instituição financeira, basta consulta os autos da busca para ter acesso ao contrato, pois o referido documento também é imprescindível nestas demandas.Adeque-se, ainda, o valor atribuído à causa ao proveito econômico visado com a demanda, com base nas especificações do pedido feitas a partir do contrato, recolhendo-se as custas e taxas com base neste novo valor. Dito isso, com fundamento no artigo 284 do CPC, determino a intimação da parte autora para, no prazo de 10 dias, aditar a petição inicial no sentido de apontar às cláusulas contratuais supracitadas, juntamente com o contrato que rege a relação entre os litigantes, bem assim a adequação do valor da causa e do pagamento das custas processuais, sob pena de indeferimento da petição da petição inicial. Havendo pedido de assistência judiciária, junte-se a documentação necessário à comprovação do estado de pobreza, uma vez que não é crível acreditar que alguém seja pobre fazendo um financiamento de veículo para pagar a longo prazo com valor considerável da prestação, além de demandar revisão de contrato com assistência de advogado particular. Por isso, não basta a declaração de pobreza, devendo a parte apresentar documentos outros CTPS, contra-cheque, declaração de rendas ou de isente etc. que comprove tal condição social. Ademais, por cautela e até que sejam apreciados os pedidos liminares após emenda da inicial, com o fito de evitar a configuração da mora, determino que a parte autora deposite em juízo, no prazo de 5 dias, os valores integrais correspondentes às parcelas contratadas, inclusive, a partir do 1.o depósito, das demais parcelas que se vencerem no curso da demanda, mantendo-se, assim agindo, na posse do bem especificado na inicial. Finalmente, comunique-se imediatamente ao réu a respeito do conteúdo da decisão, com o fim de evitar cobranças indevidas ou mesmo eventual inclusão do nome da demandante em cadastros de restrição ao crédito. Cumpra-se com urgência. Maceió , 05 de maio de 2014. Gustavo Souza Lima Juiz de Direito
 ADV: ANTONIO HAROLDO GUERRA LOBO (OAB 15166/CE) - Processo 0720364-64.2013.8.02.0001 - Procedimento Ordinário - Interpretação / Revisão de Contrato - AUTOR: EDVAR RODRIGUES DE SOUSA - RÉU: Banco Panamericano S/A - DECISÃO Analisando a petição inicial, especificamente no que diz respeito ao cumprimento do artigo 285 B do CPC, percebi que a autora não apontou na inicial o vínculo das causas de pedir que embasaram às pretensões deduzidas em juízo com as cláusulas contratuais relacionadas com as obrigações que a (o)
 demandante pretende controverter nesta demanda. Claro que o cumprimento da determinação supra só é possível se a parte autora estiver de posse do contrato que rege a relação jurídica entre ela e a parte ré, porquanto é impossível deduzir a respeito de quais obrigações contratuais pretende controverter sem manipular o contrato. Portanto, é ônus da parte autora, por força da redação emanada do artigo 285 B do CPC, apresentar o contrato junto com a petição inicial, por ser esse documento imprescindível à propositura da ação, não cabendo no contexto pleitear inversão do ônus da prova, visto que isso não resolve o problema, porquanto anterior a angularização da relação jurídica processual, além de se fazer necessário para o próprio ajuizamento da demanda. Se o referido contrato não tiver na posse do autor e não for possível consegui-lo administrativamente, inclusive no site da instituição financeira - bastando para tanto o número do contrato , só lhe restará ajuizar ação preparatória de exibição de documento para acessar o documento imprescindível, sem o qual a ação revisional não pode ser proposta. Para o (a) demandante que já tem contra si ajuizada ação de busca e apreensão ou reintegração de posse, sendo autor a instituição financeira, basta consulta os autos da busca para ter acesso ao contrato, pois o referido documento também é imprescindível nestas demandas. Adeque-se, ainda, o valor atribuído à causa ao proveito econômico visado com a demanda, com base nas especificações do pedido feitas a partir do contrato, recolhendo-se as custas e taxas com base neste novo valor. Dito isso, com fundamento no artigo 284 do CPC, determino a intimação da parte autora para, no prazo de 10 dias, aditar a petição inicial no sentido de apontar às cláusulas contratuais supracitadas, juntamente com o contrato que rege a relação entre os litigantes, bem assim a adequação do valor da causa e do pagamento das custas processuais, sob pena de indeferimento da petição da petição inicial.Havendo pedido de assistência judiciária, junte-se a documentação necessário à comprovação do estado de pobreza, uma vez que não é crível acreditar que alguém seja pobre fazendo um financiamento de veículo para pagar a longo prazo com valor considerável


text:
 24.4.2017
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 129/5
 Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu, ko 2017. gada 9. februārī iesniedza Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugāle) – David Vicente Fernandes/Gabinete Português de Carta Verde
 (Lieta C-71/17)
 (2017/C 129/07)
 Tiesvedības valoda – portugāļu
 Iesniedzējtiesa
 Supremo Tribunal de Justiça
 Pamatlietas puses
 Prasītājs: David Vicente Fernandes
 Atbildētājs: Gabinete Português de Carta Verde
 Prejudiciālie jautājumi
 1)
 Vai Luksemburgā izsniegtajai apdrošināšanas polisei Portugālē ir tāds pats juridiskais spēks kā atbilstošai apdrošināšanas polisei, kas būtu izsniegta Portugālē?
 2)
 Vai Gabinete Português de Carta Verde ir kompensācijas iestāde, kas ir minēta Direktīvas 2009/103/EK (1) 24. panta 1. punktā, un vai tā – kā iestāde, kas atbild par kompensācijas nodrošināšanu cietušajām personām šīs pašas direktīvas 20. panta 1. punktā minētajos gadījumos – ir atbildīga tādā pašā veidā kā Luksemburgas apdrošināšanas sabiedrība?
 3)
 Vai šajā lietā ir pietiekami ar prasības celšanu pret kompensācijas iestādi, vai tomēr ir nepieciešams celt prasību arī pret apdrošināšanas sabiedrību? Vai šajā pēdējā gadījumā prasība ir jāceļ pret minēto apdrošināšanas sabiedrību pēc tās juridiskās adreses Luksemburgā, vai tomēr prasība ir ceļama pret tās pārstāvi Portugālē?
 4)
 Pret kuru personu ir ceļama prasība pilnai kompensācijas samaksai gadījumā, ja apdrošināšanas sabiedrībai nav pārstāvja Portugālē un ja pastāv apdrošināšanas polise ar civiltiesiskās atbildības segumu neierobežotā apmērā?
 (1) Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīva 2009/103/EK par civiltiesiskās atbildības apdrošināšanu saistībā ar mehānisko transportlīdzekļu izmantošanu un kontroli saistībā ar pienākumu apdrošināt šādu atbildību (OV 2009, L 263, 11. lpp.)


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22002D0082
 Afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg nr. 82/2002 vom 25. Juni 2002 om ændring af bilag II (tekniske forskrifter, standarder, prøvning og certificering) til EØS-aftalen
 EF-Tidende nr. L 266 af 03/10/2002 s. 0032 - 0033
 Afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalgnr. 82/2002vom 25. Juni 2002om ændring af bilag II (tekniske forskrifter, standarder, prøvning og certificering) til EØS-aftalenDET BLANDEDE EØS-UDVALG HAR -under henvisning til aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde, ændret ved protokollen om tilpasning af aftalen om Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde, i det følgende benævnt "aftalen", særlig artikel 98, ogud fra følgende betragtninger:(1) Bilag II til aftalen blev ændret ved afgørelse nr. 52/2002 truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg den 31. maj 2002(1).(2) Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2001/82/EF af 6. november 2001 om oprettelse af en fællesskabskodeks for veterinærlægemidler(2) skal indarbejdes i aftalen.(3) Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2001/83/EF af 6. november 2001 om oprettelse af en fællesskabskodeks for humanmedicinske lægemidler(3) skal indarbejdes i aftalen.(4) Direktiv 2001/82/EF og 2001/83/EF ophæver flere retsakter, der allerede er indarbejdet i aftalen, og som derfor skal udgå af aftalen -TRUFFET FØLGENDE AFGØRELSE:Artikel 1Kapitel XIII i bilag II til aftalen ændres således:1) Følgende indsættes efter punkt 15o (Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2001/20/EF):"15p. 32001 L 0082: Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2001/82/EF af 6. november 2001 om oprettelse af en fællesskabskodeks for veterinærlægemidler (EFT L 311 af 28.11.2001, s. 1).15q. 32001 L 0083: Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2001/83/EF af 6. november 2001 om oprettelse af en fællesskabskodeks for humanmedicinske lægemidler (EFT L 311 af 28.11.2001, s. 67)."2) Teksten til punkt 1 (Rådets direktiv 65/65/EØF), 2 (Rådets direktiv 75/318/EØF), 3 (Rådets andet direktiv 75/319/EØF), 5 (Rådets direktiv 81/851/EØF), 6 (Rådets direktiv 81/852/EØF), 10 (Rådets direktiv 89/342/EØF), 11 (Rådets direktiv 89/343/EØF), 12 (Rådets direktiv 89/381/EØF), 13 (Rådets direktiv 90/677/EØF), 15b (Rådets direktiv 92/25/EØF), 15c (Rådets direktiv 92/26/EØF), 15d (Rådets direktiv 92/27/EØF) og 15e (Rådets direktiv 92/28/EØF) udgår.Artikel 2Teksterne til direktiv 2001/82/EF og 2001/83/EF på islandsk og norsk, som offentliggøres i EØS-tillægget til De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende, er autentiske.Artikel 3Denne afgørelse træder i kraft den 26. juni 2002, forudsat at Det Blandede EØS-udvalg har modtaget alle fornødne meddelelser i henhold til aftalens artikel 103, stk. 1(4).Artikel 4Denne afgørelse offentliggøres i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidendes EØS-afsnit og EØS-tillæg.Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 25. juni 2002.På Det Blandede EØS-udvalgs vegneP. WesterlundFormand(1) EFT L 238 af 5.9.2002, s. 10.(2) EFT L 311 af 28.11.2001, s. 1.(3) EFT L 311 af 28.11.2001, s. 67.(4) Ingen forfatningsmæssige krav angivet.