type: wikipedia

text:
Kirsten Price (Providence, Rhode Island, 1981. november 13. –) amerikai pornószínésznő.
 A Miss Hawaiian Tropic versenyen találkozott vele a közönség. Modellkedés után a Wicked Pictures-nek kezdett dolgozni 2005-ben. 2004-ben Barrett Blade pornószínésszel kötött házasságot.
 Szerepelt a 2007-es, Manhuntesrs c. AVN Legjobb film díjas alkotásban.
 Válogatott filmográfia
 Díjai
 2007 AVN Award, Legjobb színésznő – Manhunters
 2007 AVN Award, Legjobb csoportos szex – FUCK
 Jegyzetek
 További információk
 Amerikai pornószínésznők
 Amerikai nők
 1981-ben született személyek
 Élő személyek
 Providence-iek


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 30.7.2015
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 L 202/22
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG 174/2014 HATÁROZATA
 (2014. szeptember 25.)
 az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodás II. mellékletének (Műszaki előírások, szabványok, vizsgálatok és tanúsítás) módosításáról [2015/1242]
 AZ EGT VEGYES BIZOTTSÁG,
 tekintettel az Európai Gazdasági Térségről szóló megállapodásra (a továbbiakban: az EGT-megállapodás) és különösen annak 98. cikkére,
 mivel:
 (1)
 Az EGT-megállapodásba foglalt 76/117/EGK (1), 79/196/EGK (2) és 82/130/EGK (3) tanácsi irányelvet hatályon kívül helyezte az EGT-megállapodásba foglalt 94/9/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi irányelv (4), ezért a 76/117/EGK, a 79/196/EGK és a 82/130/EGK irányelvre való hivatkozásokat el kell hagyni az EGT-megállapodásból.
 (2)
 Az EGT-megállapodásba foglalt 94/26/EK bizottsági irányelv (5) elavulttá vált, ezért el kell hagyni az EGT-megállapodásból.
 (3)
 Gyakorlati okok miatt a II. melléklet X. fejezetének „JOGI AKTUSOK, AMELYEKET A SZERZŐDŐ FELEK TUDOMÁSUL VESZNEK” részében felsorolt jogi aktusokat újra kell számozni.
 (4)
 Az EGT-megállapodás II. mellékletét ezért ennek megfelelően módosítani kell,
 ELFOGADTA EZT A HATÁROZATOT:
 1. cikk
 Az EGT-megállapodás II. mellékletének X. fejezete a következőképpen módosul:
 1.
 A 2. pont (76/117/EGK tanácsi irányelv), a 3. pont (79/196/EGK tanácsi irányelv), a 4. pont (82/130/EGK tanácsi irányelv) és a 7b. pont (94/26/EK tanácsi irányelv) szövegét el kell hagyni.
 2.
 A „JOGI AKTUSOK, AMELYEKET A SZERZŐDŐ FELEK TUDOMÁSUL VESZNEK” részben a 8 (törölt)–25. pont (törölt) számozása 1–18. pontra változik.
 2. cikk
 Ez a határozat 2014. szeptember 26-án lép hatályba, feltéve, hogy az EGT-megállapodás 103. cikkének (1) bekezdésében előírt összes bejelentést megtették (6).
 3. cikk
 Ezt a határozatot az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának EGT-re vonatkozó részében és EGT-kiegészítésében ki kell hirdetni.
 Kelt Brüsszelben, 2014. szeptember 25-én.
 az EGT Vegyes Bizottság részéről
 az elnök
 Kurt JÄGER
 (1) HL L 24., 1976.1.30., 45. o.
 (2) HL L 43., 1979.2.20., 20. o.
 (3) HL L 59., 1982.3.2., 10. o.
 (4) HL L 100., 1994.4.19., 1. o.
 (5) HL L 157., 1994.6.24., 33. o.
 (6) Alkotmányos követelmények fennállását nem jelezték.


text:
 Svarīgs juridisks paziņojums
 |
 22002D0153
 Oficiālais Vēstnesis L 019 , 23/01/2003 Lpp. 0050 - 0051
 EEZ Apvienotās komitejas LēmumsNr. 153/2002(2002 gada 8. novembris),ar ko groza EEZ līguma XXI pielikumu (Statistika)EEZ APVIENOTĀ KOMITEJA,ņemot vērā Eiropas Ekonomikas zonas līgumu, kas grozīts ar protokolu, ar ko pielāgo Eiropas Ekonomikas zonas līgumu, turpmāk tekstā — "līgums", un jo īpaši tā 98. pantu,tā kā:(1) līguma XXI pielikums ir grozīts ar EEZ Apvienotās komitejas 2002. gada 12. jūlija lēmumu Nr. 110/2002 [1];(2) līgumā jāiekļauj Komisijas 2002. gada 17. maija Regula (EK) Nr. 831/2002, ar ko īsteno Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 322/97 par Kopienas statistiku attiecībā uz pieeju neizpaužamiem datiem zinātniskiem nolūkiem [2],IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.1. pantsAiz līguma XXI pielikuma 17.a punkta (Komisijas Regula (EK) Nr. 322/97) iekļauj šādu punktu:"17.b 32002 R 0831: Komisijas 2002. gada 17. maija Regula (EK) Nr. 831/2002, ar ko īsteno Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 322/97 par Kopienas statistiku attiecībā uz pieeju neizpaužamiem datiem zinātniskiem nolūkiem (OV L 133, 18.5.2002., 7. lpp.)."2. pantsRegulas (EK) Nr. 831/2002 teksti islandiešu un norvēģu valodā, kas jāpublicē Eiropas Kopienu Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ pielikumā, ir autentiski.3. pantsŠis lēmums stājās spēkā 2002. gada 9. novembrī ar noteikumu, ka EEZ Apvienotajai komitejai ir sniegti visi paziņojumi, kas noteikti līguma 103. panta 1. punktā [3].4. pantsŠo lēmumu publicē Eiropas Kopienu Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ iedaļā un EEZ pielikumā.Briselē, 2002. gada 8. novembrīEEZ Apvienotās komitejas vārdā —priekšsēdētājsKjartan Jóhannsson[1] OV L 298, 31.10.2002., 35. lpp.[2] OV L 133, 18.05.2002., 7. lpp.[3] Konstitucionālas prasības nav norādītas.--------------------------------------------------


type: legislation

jurisdiction: US

text:
 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 Fish and Wildlife Service
 50 CFR Part 15
 RIN 1018-AH89
 Importation of Exotic Wild Birds Into the United States; Adding Blue-Fronted Amazon Parrots From Argentina's Approved Sustainable-Use Management Plan to the Approved List of Non-Captive-Bred Species
 AGENCY:
 Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION:
 Proposed rule.
 SUMMARY:
 In this rule, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) proposes to approve a sustainable-use management plan developed by the CITES Management Authority of Argentina for blue-fronted amazon parrots (Amazona aestiva), under the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992 (WBCA). Approval of Argentina's petition would allow the import into the United States of blue-fronted amazon parrots removed from the wild in Argentina under an approved sustainable-use management plan. Criteria for approval of sustainable-use management plans are contained in 50 CFR 15.32. This rule proposes to add blue-fronted amazon parrots to the approved list of non-captive-bred (wild-caught) species contained in 50 CFR 15.33(b).
 DATES:
 Comments must be submitted on or before October 6, 2003.
 ADDRESSES:
 Materials related to this proposed rule are available for public inspection by appointment from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Division of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203.
 Please send comments and materials relating to this proposed rule to Dr. Peter O. Thomas, Chief, Division of Management Authority, at the above address, or via E-mail at: cites@fws.gov.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Dr. Peter O. Thomas, Chief, Division of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; telephone (703) 358-2093; fax (703) 358-2280.
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
 Background
 This proposed rule would amend the regulations implementing aspects of the Wild Bird Conservation Act (WBCA), which was signed into law on October 23, 1992. The WBCA limits or prohibits imports of exotic bird species to ensure that their wild populations are not harmed by trade. It also encourages wild bird conservation programs in countries of origin by ensuring that all imports of such species into the United States are biologically sustainable and not detrimental to the survival of the species. A final rule published in the Federal Register on November 16, 1993 (58 FR 60536), implemented the prohibitions stipulated in the WBCA and provided permit requirements and procedures for some allowed exemptions.
 Import quotas were established for CITES-listed bird species for the year immediately following enactment of the WBCA, from October 23, 1992, to October 22, 1993. Those quotas were announced in the Federal Register on December 4, 1992 (57 FR 57510). In that same notice, we informed the public that, after that year, the importation of all exotic bird species listed in the CITES Appendices would be prohibited unless the species was listed in an approved list, or unless the species was a member of one of the ten families of birds specifically exempted from the WBCA. A notice published on March 30, 1993 (58 FR 16644), solicited public comments and announced a public meeting, held April 15-16, 1993, to receive input for developing regulations to implement some of the provisions of the WBCA. We received input, both at the meeting and in writing, from a broad cross-section of the interested public. During the year in which import quotas for CITES-listed bird species were in place, we published two notices in the Federal Register, one on April 16, 1993 (58 FR 19840), and one on August 10, 1993 (58 FR 42573), announcing species for which the quotas had been met and no further individual birds could be imported.
 Since the publication of the final rule of November 16, 1993, imports of all CITES-listed birds (as defined in the final rule) are prohibited, except for (a) species included in an approved list; (b) specimens for which an import permit has been issued; (c) species from countries that have approved sustainable-use management plans for those species; or (d) specimens from approved foreign captive-breeding facilities. We published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on March 17, 1994 (59 FR 12784), that would implement procedures for the establishment of an approved list of captive-bred species listed in the CITES Appendices that could be imported without a WBCA permit, provide criteria for including non-captive-bred (wild-caught) species in the approved list, and provide criteria for approval of foreign captive-breeding facilities.
 As the result of a lawsuit filed on February 15, 1994, and a resultant District Court Order that found a portion of the regulation in the November 16, 1993, Federal Register invalid, we announced in the Federal Register on May 24, 1994 (59 FR 26810), that all exotic birds listed in Appendix III of CITES would also be covered by the automatic import moratorium of the WBCA, regardless of their country of origin. A proposed rule was published on June 3, 1994 (59 FR 28826), to promulgate that regulatory change, and the final rule was published on December 2, 1994 (59 FR 62254).
 On December 2, 1994 (59 FR 62255), we published a final rule implementing procedures for the establishment of an approved list of captive-bred species listed in the CITES Appendices that could be imported without a WBCA permit; the approved captive-bred species were those for which it had been determined that trade involved only captive-bred specimens.
 A final rule published on January 24, 1996 (61 FR 2084), implemented procedures for the establishment of an approved list of non-captive-bred (wild-caught) species listed in the CITES Appendices that could be imported. The list of approved non-captive-bred species is contained in 50 CFR 15.33(b). For wild-caught CITES-listed birds to be on the approved list, we must determine that CITES is being effectively implemented for the species for each country of origin from which imports will be allowed, CITES-recommended measures are implemented, and there is a scientifically based management plan for the species that is adequately implemented and enforced. The scientifically based management plan must: (a) Provide for the conservation of the species and its habitat; (b) include incentives for conservation; (c) ensure that the use of the species is biologically sustainable and is well above the level at which the species might become threatened; (d) ensure that the species is maintained throughout its range at a level consistent with its role in the ecosystem; (e) address factors that include illegal trade, domestic trade, subsistence use, disease, and habitat loss; and (f) ensure that the methods of capture, transport, and maintenance of the species minimize the risk of injury or damage to health. For a species with a multinational distribution, we must also consider (a) whether populations of the species in other countries will be detrimentally affected by exports from the country requesting approval; (b) whether factors affecting conservation of the species are regulated throughout its range so that recruitment and/or breeding stocks will not be detrimentally affected by the proposed export; (c) whether the projected take and export will detrimentally affect breeding populations; and (d) whether the projected take and export will detrimentally affect existing enhancement activities, conservation programs, or enforcement efforts throughout the species' range. A species and country of export listed in 50 CFR 15.33(b) may be approved for three years, after which time the Service will have an opportunity to consider renewal of the approval.
 On August 10, 2000, we published a notice of receipt of application for approval in the Federal Register (65 FR 49007), which announced the receipt of a petition from the Management Authority of Argentina, Dirección de Fauna and Flora Silvestre, for approval of a sustainable-use management plan for the blue-fronted amazon parrot (Amazona aestiva) in Argentina. We accepted comments on that application until October 11, 2000. Although we have used information received to date in formulating this proposed rule, we will address previously received comments as well as any new comments in our final rule.
 Criteria for Approval of Species for Importation (50 CFR 15.32)
 Section 15.32(b)(1) Whether the Country of Export Is Effectively Implementing the Convention
 Argentina has been a Party to CITES since 1981 and has established two Management Authorities and two Scientific Authorities. Designation of competent CITES authorities is crucial for effective implementation of the Convention and ensures that the country has the necessary regulatory and technical infrastructure for the issuance of CITES documents and for making the required findings for the issuance of those documents. Argentina received a Category 1 rating in the CITES National Legislation Project. As directed in this project, the CITES Secretariat made this determination following a thorough review of Argentina's CITES implementing legislation. Category 1 is the highest rating possible and indicates that a Party has enacted “legislation that is believed generally to meet the requirements for implementation of CITES.” Furthermore, the CITES Standing Committee has never recommended that other CITES Parties enact sanctions against Argentina for failure to submit annual reports or properly implement the Convention. Argentina has also taken additional steps to demonstrate its commitment to the conservation of blue-fronted amazon parrots. In 1992, in response to concerns regarding the large number of blue-fronted amazons in trade, Argentina instituted a zero export quota. Prior to re-opening the export of blue-fronted amazons, Argentina worked to develop and implement a sustainable-use management plan for the species. Based on this information, we conclude that Argentina is effectively implementing CITES.
 Section 15.32(b)(2) Whether the Country of Export Has Developed a Scientifically Based Management Plan for the Species
 Although the population biology information provided in the application is not exhaustive, we conclude that there is sufficient baseline data provided in the petition to determine that Argentina has developed a scientifically based management plan and has established levels of harvest that will not be detrimental to the survival of the species in the wild.
 Conservation of species and habitat and incentives for conservation: The management plan provides for the conservation of the species and its habitat. The purpose of the sustainable-use management program, Project Elé, is to increase wild populations of blue-fronted amazons by working with private landowners to protect critical habitat (Chaco and transitional forests) and allow a strictly controlled limited harvest for export. The project currently covers 150,000 km2 in the Provinces of Chaco, Formosa, Jujuy, and Salta. These Provinces contain the majority of the remaining Chaco and transitional forest habitat and are where the greatest concentration of blue-fronted amazons in Argentina occurs (Moschione and Banchs, 1993). The habitat occurs primarily on privately or communally owned land. The main threat to the species in Argentina is habitat loss. According to Flombaum, et. al. (1997), the most limiting factor for survival of the birds is the lack of nest sites caused by accelerated deforestation. The birds nest only in primary-growth forests, with most nests in white quebracho trees (Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco)—a species that is in demand for tannins used for curing leather. Other species, such as quebracho colorado (Schinopsis quebraco-colorado), ceiba (Ceiba insignis), algarrobo blanco (Prosopsis alba), and palo santo (Bulnesia sarmientoi), which are used by the birds as nesting sites and for food, are commercially valuable for use as fenceposts, telephone poles, and furniture. In addition, large tracts of forest are cleared for cultivation of sugar cane, soybean, cotton, tobacco, and other crops. Because much of the remaining habitat used by the blue-fronted amazon is on private property, participation of property owners in the management program provides a deterrent to destroying parrot habitat for agricultural or development purposes.
 We believe that the proposed level of harvest will maintain the species throughout its range at a level consistent with its role in the ecosystem (See Sustainability, effect on wild population number). The collection quotas are conservative and based on science (Bucher et al., 1995; Flombaum et al., 1997).
 Included with Argentina's application is Decision 425/97, the Letter of Agreement To Conserve the Blue-fronted Parrot (Amazona aestiva) in Argentina, issued by the Department of Natural Resources and Sustainable Development. The Decision requires the establishment, using income generated from the program, of government-owned reserves where harvesting of blue-fronted amazons is prohibited. It also authorizes designating wooded areas within large private properties where parrot harvesting is permitted. The program coordinators work closely with provincial officials to determine where the reserves should be established in order to maximize critical habitat protection. Since the program's inception, three reserves have been established: Salta Province (dry transitional forest, established November, 2001, 15,000 ha), Chaco Province (dry chaco forest, established May, 2002 with 17,500 ha), and Jujuy Province (transitional forest, established December, 2002 with 10,000 ha). The reserve in Salta Province now also serves as the nucleus of a larger biosphere reserve. In Reserva Natural Loro Hablador, Chaco Province, funds from the project paid for the construction of a small building which is used as a guardhouse and a dormitory, and to store supplies for researchers and staff. The reserves are managed with funds and staff from the project.
 The sustainable-use management plan prohibits the felling of nest trees to collect nestlings, thereby protecting nest sites. Exportation is only authorized for birds from nests that are marked and numbered and meet the project criteria. The financial benefits to the landowners from the controlled harvest provide the landowners an incentive to protect the nesting habitat on their property. In citrus groves where juvenile birds are collected, the killing of birds as agricultural pests, normally permitted by provincial law, is prohibited. The applicant notes that participating landowners become sensitized and educated regarding conservation of the species and its habitat through the authorization process, inspections, and advice on how to minimize environmental impact in the harvest process. Based on this information, we conclude that Argentina's scientifically based management plan for blue-fronted amazons provides for the conservation of the species and its habitat.
 Implementation and enforcement: The applicant has provided substantial implementation and enforcement information. Decision 425/97 gives oversight of the project to the Wildlife Office. It provides mechanisms for the administration and enforcement of the program, establishment of reserves, control of illegal trade, and handling and disposition of confiscated birds at the national and provincial levels. Annual decrees also address collection zones, quotas, and export requirements.
 Most of the oversight for the project is done by project staff members. Project staff live in the communities or on the properties of collectors during the harvest seasons. They place leg bands on each captured nestling and record biological data, inspect nests, mark each tree from which nestlings are removed, and inspect animal care conditions. All inspection and biological information is maintained in a large database. Staff members also accompany all collectors of juvenile birds to ensure compliance with project policies. The project coordinators identify collection properties and establish collection quotas for each broker so that brokers do not purchase more birds than allotted. In addition, project staff members accompany brokers when birds are purchased from the collectors. Staff members also inspect the parrot housing facilities of collectors and brokers. Frequent inspections by staff members and the perceived importance of the project in communities where the income generated by the collection is shared among community members reduce the incentive to cheat. During a site visit in January 2003, two U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, International Affairs, biologists observed the project coordinators take every available opportunity to provide outreach materials and information to national law enforcement personnel at highway checkpoints in the region. Officers were reminded to contact the provincial wildlife authority if they observed any individual with numerous parrots who did not have authorized certificates of origin and leg bands on the birds (contact information was provided). Unlike in the 1980s, birds can no longer be exported directly from the provinces; all legal exports of blue-fronted amazons from this project are through Buenos Aires.
 The provinces participating in the program are responsible for meeting the criteria set forth in the national decrees, and only birds from authorized and inspected properties will be permitted to be exported. We received international trade data from the United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) showing that the number of blue-fronted amazons exported from Argentina during 1998 and 1999 closely matched the number of birds that were harvested for the program and certified for export, as reported in the application. Based on the above information, we conclude that the program appears to be adequately implemented and enforced.
 Sustainability, effect on wild population number: The blue-fronted amazon is one of the most common amazon species in South America. Although the species is listed in CITES Appendix II, it is not listed in Birds To Watch 2: The World List of Threatened Birds (Collar et al., 1994), Parrots: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000-2004 (Snyder et al., 2000), or the 2002 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals (http://www.redlist.org). In their comments to the Division of Management Authority (October 2000), TRAFFIC—North America and TRAFFIC—South America argued that the wild blue-fronted amazon parrot population could sustain the proposed harvest.
 The applicant proposes collection of nestlings during the breeding season (December and January) and juvenile birds, which are designated as pests by landowners, on citrus farms in May, June, and July. While the species' range extends over 430,000 km2 in Argentina, not all of the range is available habitat. The greatest population densities are within an area of 200,000 km2, and the area subject to management that contains optimal roosting, foraging, and nesting areas is 170,000 km2 in the Provinces of Chaco, Formosa, Jujuy, and Salta (Moschione and Banchs, 1993). Sampling in three localities between 1996 and 2002 resulted in an estimation of 7.70 nests per km2 (1,309,000 active nests per breeding season within the management area). The mean number of hatchlings per nest at the sites sampled ranged from 3.87 to 4.27 hatchlings (Banchs et al., 2000).
 The nestling collection quotas are based on the total number of participating properties, the amount of forest in each, and the degree of past compliance by each collector. For new properties, satellite photographs are used to determine the area of forest and estimate nest density. If the property is fully forested, there is a high probability that there will be at least one nest per 7 hectares. However, to be conservative, the project assumes one nest per 20 hectares. Therefore, on a 100-hectare property, nestlings may be collected from only 5 nests, regardless of the actual number of nests on the property. In each nest from which birds are collected, a minimum of one nestling must be left in the nest. Because the typical nest contains 4 eggs, of which 3 hatch, and 2 nestlings survive to fledge, on the 100-hectare property, two nestlings could be taken from each of the five nests. Thus, the quota for the property would be 10 nestlings. Using fledgling rate only, the harvest per nest is less than that recommended by Bucher et al. (1995) as sustainable. Using fledging rate only, Bucher et al. (1995) recommended a harvest of 1.5 nestlings per nest based on a study of the population biology of the blue-fronted amazon at the Los Colorados Field Station, Salta Province. According to the model by Bucher et al., on a 100-hectare property, 21.4 nestlings could be harvested sustainably given one nest per seven hectares.
 The greater the number of properties that participate in the program, the higher the quota. Large properties are given much smaller quotas ( based on an estimate of 1 nest/50 ha) because it is unlikely that the collector will explore the entire property. The total national quota is equal to the sum of the quotas from the different properties. The quota per property in succeeding years may be adjusted in response to the results of sampling (actual nest counts and number of hatchlings per nest). If a collector does not abide by the rules of the project, his quota may be lowered or, in rare instances, he may be expelled from the program. Only birds removed from individually numbered nest cavities in standing trees may be collected. Capture involves cutting a hole into the cavity to reach the nestling and resealing the hole following take. The project staff and landowners have observed pairs re-using nests that have been opened in previous years, indicating that opening nests has minimal effect on the quality of a nest cavity.
 The blue-fronted amazon in Argentina is viewed as a pest species by citrus growers (Bucher 1992). The species is legally classified as a pest species in provinces where the project permits the harvest of juveniles, and large numbers of blue-fronted amazon parrots were regularly shot by citrus-grove managers prior to the establishment of the sustainable-use program. During their visit, the Service biologists were informed that there has not been an observed decline in the number of juvenile birds at nearby roosting areas in spite of shooting that may occur on properties not participating in the program. The maximum take of juveniles is set at one-third of the number of nestlings collected in the immediately preceding breeding season. Although the number of participating properties may increase each year, the take of juveniles per unit area does not change. Juveniles can only be taken when the owners declare in writing to the local administrative authority that the birds are damaging their crops, and project staff must verify that the damage is due to blue-fronted amazons. Banchs and Moschione believe that there are over 700,000 juveniles in the transitional forest area (Pers. comm. with DSA and DMA biologists, Jan. 2003). Because few nestlings are found in the Salta and Jujuy Provinces, the creation of reserves there to protect the transitional forests, as required by Decision 425/97, was made possible only through the harvest of juveniles. Thus, the limited harvest of juveniles may actually increase the population by protecting important roosting areas. As with nestlings, a project staff member bands each bird captured and collects biological data. The staff member also explores the property to determine if the participant is also shooting parrots. If so, the quota is reduced in the current or following year, or the collector is suspended from the program.
 It is doubtful that the individuals that are left in the nests following the nestling collection become the source of juveniles collected in the citrus groves are the same. According to Banchs and Moschione, this is because the distance between the nesting areas and the citrus groves is over 150 km. It is unlikely that the flocks observed in the citrus groves are those that nest on the properties participating in the program (E-mail to M. Kreger, February 7, 2003).
 The total quota for nestlings and juveniles has not been met in any given year. This is because the properties are extensive and may not be completely explored. The applicant notes that it is difficult to locate nests, the vegetation is often dense and impenetrable, and most indigenous communities prefer to take only the birds they need to pay for short-term (subsistence) economic needs. No birds may be collected before or after the collection period. From a total authorized quota of 16,348 birds (nestlings + juveniles) for the period 1998-2002, only 8,940 were actually collected and exported.
 Although complete information on the population biology of this species is not available, funds generated by the sustainable-use program are being used to address information gaps. All of the data collected each season by program staff members are entered into a database maintained by I. Berkunsky, a Ph.D. student and author of the management plan for the reserve in Chaco Province. These data are providing information on the number of nestlings per nest, nestling health and mortality, nest locations, whether or not nests are being re-used, harvest trends at each property or habitat, who is harvesting, and levels of compliance.
 Now that reserves are in place, basic biological studies can be accomplished. Because there is no extraction of parrots in the reserves, these areas serve as a control for comparison with properties involved in the harvest. Berkunsky is also studying the reproductive biology of the birds, including clutch size, fledging rate, frequency of repeated nest use, predation of fledglings, natural recruitment, etc. Another study, which will involve radio-tracking of individuals, will examine population dynamics, flock movements, and habitat use. Such a study will determine whether birds in the harvest areas flock to the transitional forests or citrus groves. The project should also allow estimation of the percentage of the total population involved in foraging in citrus groves. Additional studies are proposed to focus on taxonomy, landscape ecology, the impact of foraging on citrus groves, and the impact of the project on local economies.
 The information generated by these studies will also assist us to determine whether to renew the program after the initial approval period. If approved, we will require that the applicant provide an annual report at the end of each collection season during the period covered by the approval. The applicant will be asked to include in the report the number and size of the properties participating in the program, population censuses in the collection areas, and an assessment of the short- and long-term impacts of collection on the population, including recruitment, natural nestling mortality within the nest, and the effects of artificially opening and resealing nest cavities.
 Illegal Trade, Domestic Trade, Subsistence Use, Disease, Habitat Loss
 The management plan for the species addresses illegal trade, domestic trade, subsistence use, disease, and habitat loss. The program is operated at a national level with collaboration at the provincial level. In a supplemental letter dated September 2000, the applicant stated that domestic demand for blue-fronted amazons has declined due to economic factors and stricter controls over the harvest and transport of the species. In addition, more field personnel have been assigned to monitor legal harvest and control illegal trade. Argentina's application states that domestic trade is under the same guidelines as the proposed program and involves fewer than 150 birds per year.
 The project is the only legal means to export blue-fronted amazons or commercialize parrots domestically. Some of the project birds are sold as pets in large cities such as Buenos Aires at prices competitive with export prices. There is a “folkloric” market in small pueblos and aldeas within the range of the species, where birds captured by individuals not participating in the program are sold as pets to local people. Such trade of single birds is permitted within a province. Larger numbers of birds in transport that are not certified as originating from the program are confiscated. Because the birds are imprinted on humans and their exact origin is unknown, they are non-releasable. The project pays for their rehabilitation and distributes them to local people as pets along with information about their care and about conservation of the species. Although about 500 non-program parrots were confiscated in 2002, Banchs and Moschione believe that illegal exports have declined by 600 birds each year since the inception of the program based on the numbers of birds confiscated by provincial authorities (Pers. comm. with DSA and DMA biologists, Jan. 2003).
 The program staff strictly controls the harvest and bands all specimens in the field immediately after capture. Staff members ensure that nesting trees are labeled with plastic tags, check that no tree has been cut down to retrieve nestlings, and inspect some, to all, of the nests from which the nestlings have been removed, to verify that at least one nestling remains in the nest. The nestlings left in the nest are marked by project staff members under each wing with methylene blue to ensure they will not be harvested later and put into trade. Because the bands, capture locations, and other identifying information for each bird must be registered at a national level, and only birds harvested in accordance with the sustainable-use management plan are exported as part of this program, we believe that reasonable measures are being implemented to prevent illegal trafficking in blue-fronted amazon parrots from Argentina. More inspections are made on the properties of first-time participants and on those identified as needing closer oversight to ensure compliance with the program.
 The possibility of disease is a concern within holding areas and in the countries into which the birds are imported. Decision 425/97 requires that a veterinarian be present at the assembly areas, separation within the assembly facility of birds captured from different locations, and appropriate quarantine prior to export. The birds are not assembled in the same housing area as other species, the housing areas must be well-ventilated, the floors of the cages must be cleaned daily, and sick birds must be isolated for diagnosis and treatment. Quarantine in Argentina must comply with rules established by SENASA (National Animal Health Service). Exotic birds imported into the United States are subject to quarantine in U.S. Department of Agriculture approved facilities before they can be released to U.S. importers. If the program were approved, blue-fronted amazons from Argentina would be subject to those quarantine requirements. Spain currently imports a large number of blue-fronted amazons from Argentina's sustainable-use program, and the Management Authority of that country reports that they have not linked any avian disease outbreaks to blue-fronted amazons from Argentina (E-mail to A. St. John, May 12, 2003). We are confident that approving this program would not increase the risk of introduction of avian diseases to the United States.
 Loss of parrot habitat results mainly from logging of nesting habitat or habitat conversion for farming and agriculture. This program is intended to reduce habitat loss by providing incentives for protecting nesting areas on private property and requiring the establishment of national reserves.
 Methods of Capture, Maintenance, and Transport
 Nestlings are harvested in December and January. At least one nestling must be left in every nest harvested. The blue-fronted amazon is a cavity nester. In order to locate nests, collectors look for holes in tree trunks that have insects swarming around the opening, adult birds entering and leaving the cavity, or audible vocalizations from within the cavity. In the 1980s, collectors cut down nesting trees to collect the nestlings. However, Argentina's sustainable-use management program prohibits this practice, and project staff train collectors to use lassos and harness systems to safely climb nest trees to collect the birds. Once at the opening of the cavity, collectors use a weighted string to determine the depth of the nest. When the depth is determined, the collector uses an axe or machete to cut a hole in the side of the tree in order to remove the nestlings. The nestlings are placed in a bag and the collector reseals the new opening with mud and sticks. A plastic identification label, indicating the unique number of the nest, is nailed to each harvested nesting tree. There is no evidence, since full implementation of the project in December 1997, that opening and resealing a hole near the nest has caused mortality of the remaining nestlings or failure of adult pairs to use the site in subsequent years. Project staff are continuing to collect these data.
 After harvest, the nestlings are placed in a holding area until they are purchased by a broker. The holding areas must be dry to avoid fungus-induced respiratory and skin infections. We observed several different holding areas. The most common was a shallow hole dug into the ground with wooden planks over the top to keep predators out and maintain darkness typical of the nest.
 The birds are hand-fed at least three times per day. The feed used is a commercial corn-based mash produced specifically for parrots by a pet food company in Buenos Aires. Project personnel provide the feed and feeding instructions to the collectors. The mash is mixed with water and fed by hand or spoon. On the site visit, we saw no evidence of force-feeding. Collectors and their families often supplement the commercial feed with local fruit and seeds that the birds would have been likely to receive from their parents.
 Brokers prefer to purchase nestlings when the birds can feed independently. In addition, frequent handling of the birds is thought to tame them. We did not see nestlings in the holding area resist handling. We saw no evidence of illness or injuries in the nestlings in the holding areas, and collectors report very few mortalities. The nestlings remain with the collector 2-4 weeks, depending on the age of the birds at the time of collection.
 Project staff members (biologists or field technicians) visit each collector before the arrival of the broker. They affix leg bands (open metal bands that once closed can only be removed by breaking) with the code AR or ARG and a unique identification number. Only staff members may affix leg bands, reducing the likelihood of injury during banding and ensuring that only legally acquired birds are banded. The birds are weighed, wing length is measured, and the general health of each bird is recorded. Injured birds are treated, and most injuries have been superficial around legs or toes. If the project staff were to observe evidence of a high mortality, injuries, or more birds collected than the quota allows, the collector might have his quota reduced the following year or be suspended from the program.
 Juveniles are harvested from May through July in the citrus groves. Project staff members live on the properties and accompany collectors in every stage of the trapping process. Snares made of reeds are set at dawn before the birds arrive to forage in the citrus groves. The snares are set in the branches of the citrus trees to ensure that only birds that are actually foraging are caught. If a parrot is captured, its loud vocalizations alert the collector to the capture. In rare instances, other species are captured (e.g., passerines); however, mortality is reported to be minimal. Every trap is inspected and disarmed within four hours of being set. The parrots usually retreat to the transitional forest by midday to escape the heat. No blue-fronted amazon has required euthanasia as a result of injuries sustained from the trapping process for juvenile birds since the project's inception.
 We visited the holding facilities of three brokers. Each facility was indoors and contained stainless steel cages either suspended from the ceiling, on legs above the floor, or mounted on the wall above the floor. The cages are constructed of wire and contain water and feed pans. Each facility had windows providing sunlight, ventilation, drainage, and a source of clean running water. Depending on the size of the bird, up to 25 birds can be housed in each cage. The same commercial diet provided to collectors is provided to brokers. Brokers typically maintain the birds for less than 2 weeks. According to the application, cages at the assembly area may house up to 30 birds per cubic meter. We believe that, particularly for nestlings, such space is more than adequate. Other housing conditions, such as ventilation, lighting, running water, and sanitation, also appear to be adequate. Each assembly center is required to have a veterinarian available, who is responsible for animal health and official reporting.
 Transport from the point of capture to the quarantine facility in Buenos Aires, road transport in excess of 500 kilometers, and air transport, require the use of crates built to IATA (International Air Transport Association) standards. Air circulation, crate handling, and other conditions for transport within the province of origin are addressed in the application, but do not have to meet IATA standards. It is important to note that Standards for Humane and Healthful Transport of Wild Mammals and Birds to the United States (50 CFR 14.105) prohibits the import of unweaned birds. Subsequently, we would not allow the import of birds into the United States that still require hand-feeding. However, during our visit to collection sites and broker facilities, brokers noted that they only purchase birds from collectors when the birds no longer require hand-feeding.
 In a letter dated September 2000, the applicant reported that mortality during capture and transport is less than one percent. The nestling mortality, primarily during housing, in 1998 was 3.2 percent, 22.5 percent in 1999, and 4.2 percent in 2000. The high mortality in 1999 was due to Pacheco's disease at a quarantine facility that killed 95 percent of the birds at that facility. After that incident, Resolution 1955/99 was passed, that suspends from the program any exporters who experience mortalities greater than 25 percent in one season. Other causes of mortality that have been experienced in the program were not reported to us, although the application indicates that such information is reported to the Wildlife Office. No numbers were provided on animals that were sick or injured during the capture, housing, and transport process. As a condition of program approval, we would require that the annual reports include figures on disease, injury, and mortality during capture, housing, and transport. We would also require that the applicant provide training to program participants to ensure that appropriate parrot husbandry (including diet and basic animal health care) is provided to all individuals who will be responsible for the birds.
 Section 15.32(b)(3) Whether the Country of Export Has Developed a Scientifically Based Management Plan for the Species That Considers Factors Relating to the Multi-National Distribution of the Species
 The Division of Scientific Authority sent letters to the Scientific Authorities of the range countries for this species (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, and Paraguay) and asked them to address this criterion. Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay responded in support of Argentina's sustainable-use management plan. We did not receive a response from Brazil. However, the predominant subspecies in Brazil, Amazona aestiva aestiva, is not found in Argentina (Collar 1997). The Bolivian Scientific Authority said that Bolivia's blue-fronted amazon populations are non-migratory and would not be affected by the sustainable-use program in Argentina (Marianela Subieta Frías, Executive Director of the National Museum of Natural History in La Paz, Bolivia, email to DSA, September 2000). Bolivia expressed its support for Argentina's program, but noted concern over the possibility of illegally harvested Bolivian birds entering Argentina and being exported through this program. Studies of this species in Paraguay indicate that breeding populations are non-migratory and are distinct from populations in Argentina. Thus, the program in Argentina would not affect the populations in Paraguay (Braulio Román Solís, Director, CITES Office, Paraguay, letter to DSA, August 2000). According to Mr. Solís, Paraguay developed a similar program in 1999 based on the Argentine program and has regulations to ensure sustainable management of the species. Although Paraguay reported that its population of blue-fronted amazons is robust and that the species is locally common, the European Commission has asked Member States not to allow imports of blue-fronted amazons from Paraguay until further notice. This decision was made in response to information received that called into question the scientific basis of Paraguay's export quotas for this species. (E-mail to A. St. John, May 8, 2003). Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay have held roundtable discussions to develop a regional study plan in order to determine optimal population management for this species. They have also discussed the need for local educational outreach.
 The application and additional information received from Argentina outline the safeguards in place to prevent illegally harvested birds from entering this program. As discussed above, most of the oversight for the project is done by project staff members. Only program staff affix legbands (open metal bands that once closed can only be removed by breaking) with the code AR or ARG and a unique identification number, and only birds with official bands are permitted for export. See earlier sections for discussion of additional safeguards. This program is the only legal source of birds for export from Argentina, and all exports are through Buenos Aires.
 Complete population biology information is lacking for the specific effects of this program on breeding and recruitment of this species in other range countries, but we are unaware of any possible detrimental effects of this program on conservation programs or enforcement efforts throughout the range of this species. The program coordinators have been in contact with biologists from the other range countries who have expressed interest in developing similar programs (Pers. comm. with DSA and DMA biologists, Jan. 2003). The export of blue-fronted amazon parrots from each range country is regulated by CITES, and imports into the United States would also be subject to the provisions of the WBCA.
 We believe that the proposed level of harvest will maintain the species throughout its range at a level consistent with its role in the ecosystem and that it is unlikely that the proposed harvest will significantly reduce the wild population during the 3 years for which the program would be approved. Critical research on the species' population biology as a result of this program in comparison to non-harvested areas will provide insight into the long- and short-term effects of the program on the species' survival. Any problems that arise during the 3 years could be addressed prior to renewing the program. Furthermore, because the program protects nests, creates nesting habitat, and reduces habitat loss, a population increase is expected.
 Conclusion
 We reviewed the proposal by the Management Authority of Argentina for the approval of a sustainable-use management plan for blue-fronted amazon parrots (Amazona aestiva), based on the criteria in 50 CFR 15.32. We propose to add blue-fronted amazon parrots from Argentina to the list of non-captive-bred species under the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, with the following condition:
 1. The Management Authority of Argentina must provide an annual report at the end of each collection season during the period covered by this approval. The report must include the following information: the number and size of the properties participating in the program, results of population censuses in the collection areas, and short- and long-term impacts of collection on the population, including recruitment, nestling mortality, and the effects of artificially opening and resealing nest cavities. The report must also include the number of birds that became sick or injured during capture, housing, and transport. Causes of mortality, illness, and injury should be reported, if known. Such data will be considered at the time of a request for program renewal.
 References
 Banchs, R., F. Moschione, M. Codesido, P. Gado, and P. Grilli. 2000. Reproductive parameters of Amazona aestiva (Psittacidae) in the Argentine Chaco. Abstracts of the VIII Brazilian Congress of Ornithology.
 Bucher, T. H. 1992. Neotropical parrots as pests. In: New World Parrots in Crisis: Solutions from Conservation Biology. Sr. Beissinger and N.F.R. Snyder, eds. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, pp. 201-219.
 Bucher, E., J. Chani, C. Saravia Toledo, A. Echevarría, and N. Marigliano. 1995. Status and Management of the Blue-fronted Amazon Parrot in Argentina. Unpublished Research Report for TRAFFIC USA. Centro de Zoología Aplicada, University of Córdoba: Argentina, 12 pp.
 Collar, N.J., M.J. Crosby, and A.J. Stattersfield. 1994. Birds To Watch 2: The World List of Threatened Birds. BirdLife International/Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC., p. 198.
 Collar, N.J. 1997. Blue-fronted Amazon (Amazona aestiva). In: Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 4: Sandgrouse to Cuckoos. J. del Hoyo, A. Elliot, J. Sargatal, eds. Lynx Ediciones: Barcelona, p. 473.
 European Commission. April 11, 2003. Note for the Attention of the CITES Scientific Authorities of the Member States. ENV.E.3 Brussels, Belgium.
 Flombaum, P., L.D. Boffi Lissin, and R. Banchs. 1997. Análisis del bosque chaqueño en función del Loro Hablador (Amazona aestiva). Resúmenes XVIII Reunión Arg., Ecol. Fac. Agron. UBA Bs. As.
 IUCN-The World Conservation Union. 2002. 2002 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.
 Juniper, T., and M. Parr. 1998. Parrots: A Guide to Parrots of the World. Yale University Press: New Haven, Connecticut. Pp. 540-541.
 Moschione, F. and R. Banchs. 1993. Distribution of the Loro Hablador (Amazona aestiva) in Northern Argentina. Book of Abstracts I, Ornithology Meeting for the Plata watershed. Ornithology Association of Plata: Iguazú, Paraguay.
 Snyder, N., P. McGowan, J. Gilardi, and A. Grajal. 2000. Parrots: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000-2004. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland. Pp. 90-97.
 Required Determinations
 Regulatory Planning and Review
 In accordance with the criteria in Executive Order 12866, this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, because:
 a. The annual economic effect of the proposed rule would be less than $100 million and it would not adversely affect any economic sector, productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of government. A cost-benefit and economic analysis is not required.
 b. This proposed rule would not create inconsistencies with other agencies' actions.
 c. This proposed rule would not materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof.
 d. This proposed rule would not raise novel legal or policy issues.
 Regulatory Flexibility Act
 The Department of the Interior certifies that the proposed rule would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Most of the potential applicants who might take advantage of the procedures implemented through this rule are individuals or small entities. However, we do not expect that the amount of trade generated as a result of this rule to be large enough to have a significant economic effect on any industries, large or small.
 Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
 This proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, because it:
 a. Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
 b. Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions.
 c. Would not have significant negative effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies.
 Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
 The proposed rule would not significantly or uniquely affect small governments under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501, et seq.). The proposed rule would not produce a Federal requirement of $100 million or greater in any year, so it is not a “significant regulatory action” under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
 Takings
 Under Executive Order 12630, this proposed rule would not have significant takings implications. The proposed rule would set forth regulations under an existing law (the WBCA) and a takings implication evaluation is not required.
 Federalism
 Since the proposed rule applies to the importation of live wild birds into the United States, it does not contain any Federalism impacts as described in Executive Order 13132. This proposed rule would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, and a Federalism evaluation is not required.
 Civil Justice Reform
 Under Executive Order 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has determined that this proposed rule would not overly burden the judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
 Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
 Because this proposed rule would allow the import into the United States of blue-fronted amazon parrots removed from the wild in Argentina under an approved sustainable-use management plan, it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use.
 Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
 This proposed rule does not contain any new information collection requirements that require approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Existing requirements in 50 CFR 15 are currently approved by OMB under OMB control number 1018-0093, which expires on March 31, 2004.
 National Environmental Policy Act
 We have prepared a draft environmental assessment under regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Council on Environmental Quality regulations in 40 CFR 1501.3(b) state that an agency “may prepare an environmental assessment on any action at any time in order to assist agency planning and decision making.” Future regulations implementing the WBCA may be subject to NEPA documentation requirements on a case-by-case basis. The draft environmental assessment for this proposed action is on file at the Division of Management Authority in Arlington, Virginia, and a copy may be obtained for review and comment by contacting Dr. Peter O. Thomas, Chief, Division of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; telephone (703) 358-2093; fax (703) 358-2280.
 Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
 Under the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994, “Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal Governments” (59 FR 22951) and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated possible effects on Federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined that there are no effects.
 Author
 This document was prepared by Ms. Anne St. John, Division of Managment Authority, and Dr. Michael Kreger, Division of Scientific Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC 20240.
 List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 15
 Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
 Regulation Promulgation
 Accordingly, for the reasons given in the preamble, we propose to amend part 15, subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth below:
 PART 15—WILD BIRD CONSERVATION ACT
 1. The authority citation for part 15 continues to read as follows:
 Authority:
 Pub. L. 102-440, 16 U.S.C. 4901-4916.
 2. Amend § 15.33 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
 § 15.33
 Species included in the approved list.
 (b) Non-captive-bred species. The list in this paragraph includes species of non-captive-bred exotic birds and countries for which importation into the United States is not prohibited by § 15.11. The species are grouped taxonomically by order, and may only be imported from the approved country, except as provided under a permit issued pursuant to subpart C of this part. The list of non-captive-bred species follows:
 Species
 Common name
 Country
 Date approved
 Order Psittaciformes:
 Amazona aestiva.
 Blue-fronted Amazon Parrot
 Argentina
 [date of publication of final rule].
 Dated: July 22, 2003.
 Paul Hoffman,
 Assistant Secretary—Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
 [FR Doc. 03-19945 Filed 8-5-03; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


type: caselaw

text:
24.5.2003 PT Jornal Oficial da União Europeia C 124/7
 Recurso interposto, em 14 de Março de 2003, por Augusto b) Se se quisesse considerar, ainda assim, que o reco-
 Fichtner, ex-funcionário da Comissão das Comunidades rrente não cumpriu a referida disposição, essa
 Europeias, do acórdão do Tribunal de Primeira Instância violação não poderia, no entanto, ser considerada
 das Comunidades Europeias (Quarta Secção), de 16 de como cometida «voluntariamente ou por
 Janeiro de 2003, no processo T-75/00, entre Augusto negligência»;
 Fichtner e a Comissão das Comunidades Europeias
 2) Princípio da proporcionalidade (da actuação administra-
 tiva) devido a:
 (Processo C-116/03 P)
 a) Desvio de poder: por a Comissão, ao adoptar a
 (2003/C 124/11) decisão impugnada, ter prosseguido um objectivo
 diverso daquele para que o respectivo poder lhe foi
 atribuído (salvaguarda da ordem interna da função
 pública) e, portanto, pretendido atingir fins diversos
 Deu entrada no Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Euro- dos declarados;
 peias, em 14 de Março de 2003, um recurso do acórdão do
 Tribunal de Primeira Instância das Comunidades Europeias b) Erro manifesto na apreciação dos factos: porque a
 (Quarta Secção), de 16 de Janeiro de 2003, proferido no Comissão não teve em conta:
 processo T-75/00, entre Augusto Fichtner e a Comissão das
 Comunidades Europeias, interposto por Augusto Fichtner, 1) A boa-fé do recorrente;
 representado por Michele Tamburini e Franco Colussi, advoga-
 dos, com domicílio escolhido no Luxemburgo em 36, rue de 2) Que a autorização pedida não podia ter-lhe sido
 Wiltz. recusada, por a actividade externa desenvolvida
 pelo recorrente não implicar qualquer prejuízo
 para a sua independência nem para as activida-
 O recorrente conclui pedindo que o Tribunal se digne: des das Comunidades.
 — anular o acórdão recorrido;
 — dar provimento aos pedidos apresentados na primeira
 instância, ou seja:
 — anular a impugnada decisão da AIPN, de 30.09.99, Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado por despacho
 objecto do processo; do Consiglio di Stato, em sede jurisdicional (Sexta Secção),
 de 17 de Dezembro de 2002, no processo Società Italiana
 — condenar a Comissão a pagar-lhe as retribuições e Dragaggi s.p.a. contra Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei
 indemnizações correspondentes com aumentos e Trasporti e Regione Autonoma del Friuli Venezia Giulia
 juros a contar da data de eficácia do acórdão até à
 data do pagamento efectivo; (Processo C-117/03)
 — condenar a Comissão no ressarcimento dos danos (2003/C 124/12)
 morais e materiais causados, fixando o seu montante
 em 50 000 euros ou em montante diverso fixado
 pelo Tribunal, a pagar, eventualmente, em termos
 de equidade ou por determinação resultante de um Foi submetido ao Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Euro-
 posterior processo judicial. peias um pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado por
 despacho do Consiglio di Stato, em sede jurisdicional (Sexta
 — Com condenação da recorrida nas despesas. Secção), de 17 de Dezembro de 2002, no processo Società
 Italiana Dragaggi s.p.a. contra Ministero delle Infrastrutture e
 dei Trasporti e Regione Autonoma del Friuli Venezia Giulia,
 que deu entrada na Secretaria do Tribunal de Justiça em 18 de
 Fundamentos e principais argumentos Março de 2003. O Consiglio di Stato, em sede jurisdicional
 (Sexta Secção) solicita ao Tribunal de Justiça que se pronuncie
 A decisão do Tribunal (de Primeira Instância) mostra ter sido a título prejudicial sobre a seguinte questão:
 feita em violação do direito comunitário e, nomeadamente,
 do: «O artigo 4.o, n.o 5, da Directiva 92/43/CEE do Conselho (1),
 de 21 de Maio de 1992, deve ser interpretado no sentido de
 1) Artigo 86.o, n.o 1, do Estatuto dos Funcionários; isto que as medidas previstas no artigo 6.o, especialmente a prevista
 porque: no artigo 6.o, n.o 3, da mesma directiva, são obrigatórias para
 os Estados-Membros só depois da aprovação definitiva, em
 a) O recorrente não deixou de cumprir a obrigação a sede comunitária, da lista dos sítios nos termos do artigo 21.o,
 que se refere o artigo 12.o, terceiro parágrafo, do ou se, diversamente, para além da determinação do momento
 Estatuto, tendo demonstrado que pediu autorização a partir do qual devem ser aplicadas as medidas de conservação,
 para desempenhar uma actividade externa; se tiver de distinguir entre inscrições declarativas e constitutivas
 ---pagebreak--- C 124/8 PT Jornal Oficial da União Europeia 24.5.2003
 (incluindo-se entre as primeiras as relativas aos sítios prioritá- 2b) No caso de o artigo 2.o, parte inicial e n.o 4, da Directiva
 rios), e com o objectivo de salvaguardar o efeito útil da 92/46/CEE também visar os produtos semi-acabados,
 directiva destinada à conservação dos habitats, apenas no caso com base em que critérios se deve determinar se o leite
 de identificação por um Estado-Membro de um sítio de ou um produto lácteo é uma parte essencial de um
 importância comunitária com tipos de habitats naturais ou produto, quer pela sua quantidade quer pelo seu efeito
 espécies prioritárias, não deve considerar-se que existe uma caracterizador do produto, conforme referido no
 obrigação de sujeitar a avaliação os planos e projectos artigo 2.o, parte inicial e n.o 4, da Directiva 92/46/CEE?
 com incidências significativas sobre o sítio, mesmo antes da
 elaboração pela Comissão do projecto de lista dos sítios ou da
 (1 ) JO L 268, de 14.9.1992, p. 1.
 adopção definitiva da referida lista nos termos do artigo 21.o
 da directiva e, em substância, a partir da apresentação da lista
 nacional?»
 ( 1) JO L 206, de 22.7.1992, p. 7.
 Acção intentada em 20 de Março de 2003 pela Comissão
 das Comunidades Europeias contra a República Federal
 da Alemanha
 (Processo C-126/03)
 Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado por despacho
 do College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven, de 11 de (2003/C 124/14)
 Março de 2003, no processo 1) Artrada (Freezone) N.V.,
 2) Videmecum B.V., 3) Jac. Meisner Internationaal Expedi-
 tiebedrijf B.V. contra Rijksdienst voor de keuring van Vee
 en Vlees Deu entrada em 20 de Março de 2003, no Tribunal de Justiça
 das Comunidades Europeias, uma acção contra a República
 Federal da Alemanha, intentada pela Comissão das Comunida-
 (Processo C-124/03) des Europeias, representada por Klaus Wiedner, membro
 do Serviço Jurídico da Comissão Europeia, com domicílio
 (2003/C 124/13) escolhido no Luxemburgo.
 A demandante conclui pedindo que o Tribunal de Justiça se
 Foi submetido ao Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Euro- digne:
 peias um pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado por
 despacho do College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven, de — Declarar que a adjudicação, pela cidade de Munique, de
 11 de Março de 2003, no processo 1) Artrada (Freezone) um contrato de transporte de resíduos sem observância
 N.V., 2) Videmecum B.V., 3) Jac. Meisner Internationaal das disposições regras de publicidade constantes do
 Expeditiebedrijf B.V. contra Rijksdienst voor de keuring van artigo 8.o, conjugado com os artigos 15.o, n.o 2, e 16.o,
 Vee en Vlees, que deu entrada na Secretaria do Tribunal de n.o 1, da Directiva 92/50 (1), consubstancia um não
 Justiça em 20 de Março de 2003. O College van Beroep cumprimento, pela República Federal da Alemanha, das
 voor het bedrijfsleven solicita ao Tribunal de Justiça que se obrigações que lhe incumbem por força daquela directiva;
 pronuncie a título prejudicial sobre as seguintes questões: e
 1a) O conceito «leite destinado ao fabrico de produtos à base — Condenar a República Federal da Alemanha nas despesas.
 de leite» do artigo 2.o, parte inicial e n.o 2, da Directiva
 92/46/CEE (1) deve ser interpretado no sentido de que
 (também) abrange os constituintes lácteos de um produto Fundamentos e principais argumentos
 que contém igualmente outros constituintes, não lácteos,
 e em que o constituinte lácteo não pode ser separado dos
 constituintes não lácteos? Quando — como acontece com a autarquia da Stadt München
 (cidade de Munique) — estejam preenchidos os requisitos de
 1b) Em caso de resposta afirmativa à questão 1a), o artigo 22.o existência de um organismo de direito público, a directiva
 da Directiva 92/46/CEE deve ser interpretado no sentido prevê que não é necessário distinguir, em relação a cada um
 de que, no caso de importação de países terceiros, esta dos serviços solicitados, se é prestado no interesse geral e se
 directiva apenas é aplicável ao constituinte lácteo de um tem ou não carácter industrial ou comercial. Como tal, não é
 produto e, portanto, não é aplicável ao produto do qual relevante que, no presente caso, a cidade de Munique proceda,
 aquele é um constituinte? no âmbito de uma prestação de serviços, à incineração de lixo
 por conta de um terceiro nas suas instalações, não efectuando
 2a) O conceito «produtos à base de leite» do artigo 2.o, parte ela própria o transporte, recorrendo antes a uma empresa
 inicial e n.o 4, da Directiva 92/46/CEE refere- privada. Quando um organismo de direito público seja esco-
 -se exclusivamente ao produtos finais ou também aos lhido para prestar a totalidade do serviço, mas tenha que
 produtos semi-acabados que ainda terão de sofrer uma recorrer à subcontratação, está então obrigado a aplicar os
 transformação antes de serem vendidos ao consumidor? procedimentos previstos na Directiva 92/50.


text:
 27.2.2014
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 L 58/12
 EEZ APVIENOTĀS KOMITEJAS LĒMUMS
 Nr. 159/2013
 (2013. gada 8. oktobris),
 ar ko groza EEZ līguma II pielikumu (Tehniskie noteikumi, standarti, testēšana un sertifikācija)
 EEZ APVIENOTĀ KOMITEJA,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Ekonomikas zonu (“EEZ līgums”) un jo īpaši tā 98. pantu,
 tā kā:
 (1)
 EEZ līgumā jāiekļauj Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2011. gada 8. jūnija Direktīva 2011/62/ES, ar ko Direktīvu 2001/83/EK par Kopienas kodeksu, kas attiecas uz cilvēkiem paredzētām zālēm, groza attiecībā uz to, kā novērst viltotu zāļu nokļūšanu legālas piegādes ķēdē (1).
 (2)
 Tādēļ būtu attiecīgi jāgroza EEZ līguma II pielikums,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 Līguma II pielikuma XIII nodaļas 15.q punktam (Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīva 2001/83/EK) pievieno šādu ievilkumu:
 “—
 32011 L 0062: Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2011. gada 8. jūnija Direktīvu 2011/62/ES (OV L 174, 1.7.2011., 74. lpp.).”
 2. pants
 Direktīvas 2011/62/ES teksts islandiešu un norvēģu valodā, kas jāpublicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ papildinājumā, ir autentisks.
 3. pants
 Šis lēmums stājas spēkā 2013. gada 9. oktobrī, ja EEZ Apvienotajai komitejai ir iesniegti visi paziņojumi saskaņā ar EEZ līguma 103. panta 1. punktu (2).
 4. pants
 Šo lēmumu publicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ iedaļā un tā EEZ papildinājumā.
 Briselē, 2013. gada 8. oktobrī
 EEZ Apvienotās komitejas vārdā –
 priekšsēdētājs
 Thórir IBSEN
 (1) OV L 174, 1.7.2011., 74. lpp.
 (2) Konstitucionālās prasības ir norādītas.


type: other

text:
Pascal / 2010, 2011 ir 2012 informatikos VBE praktinių užduočių sprendimai (Pascal)
 « Įrašytas: 2012-06-03 22:43:00 pm »
 Ruošdamasis egzaminui išsisprendžiau 2010 ir 2011 metų informatikos egzamino praktines užduotis, tik truputi kiek paveluotai idėjau egzas jau kitą dieną, tad sėkmės laikantiems
 Jie yra prisegti prie mano post'o gero žiūrėjimo
 EDIT: Na, šviežiai iš po egzo dar išsprendžiau šių metų užduotis, kuriu nespėjau per egzą išspresti :/ Sprendimai prisegti prie žinutes
 Jūsų kurti internetiniai puslapiai / Kiek liko laiko iki "egzų" ? arba "EgzTaimeris" :D
 « Įrašytas: 2012-05-18 19:55:40 pm »
 Nežinai kiek liko laiko pasiruošti egzams? spausk čia ir sužinosi
 Čia šioks toks pažaidimas su js countdownais. for fun
 HTML, CSS ir JavaScript - Klausimai / Keletas countdown'ų vienu metu
 « Įrašytas: 2012-05-17 20:09:45 pm »
 Pametėkit kokią idėją kaip gražiai susukti kelis countdown'us su javascriptu vienu metu.
 Turiu pasidaręs šitiek:
 function component(x, v) {
 return Math.floor(x / v);
 createtimer('.id-1 .liko');
 createtimer('.id-2 .liko');
 createtimer('.id-3 .liko');
 createtimer('.id-4 .liko');
 createtimer('.id-5 .liko');
 function createtimer (selector) {
 time = el.attr('lang');
 chtime(time,el);
 function chtime(timestamp,selector) {
 var tmpst = timestamp;
 var timestamp = parseInt(timestamp)*1000 - Date.now();
 timestamp /= 1000;
 timestamp--;
 var days = component(timestamp, 24 * 60 * 60),
 hours = component(timestamp, 60 * 60) % 24,
 minutes = component(timestamp, 60) % 60,
 seconds = component(timestamp, 1) % 60;
 $(selector).html(days + " days, " + hours + ":" + minutes + ":" + seconds);
 // Nuemus () po start , viskas pradejo veikti :D
 setInterval(start, 1000);
 Mano variantu visi laikai nueina i neigiamas reiksmes :/
 Patarkite ką daryti šiuo atveju.
 EDIT: Šiek tiek pataisiau. Dabar likusi laika rodo tiksliai, bet jis nemazeja... :/
 Heh... Susitvarkiau , dviem skliausteliais per daug buvo
 Parašytas kodas 100% veikia.
 Jei turit minčių, kaip patobulinti šitą reikalą, tai pasidalinkite, nes manau čia ne pats geriausiais variantas
 Virtuvė / Euclideon - Scam ar tiesa? Jūsų nuomonė
 « Įrašytas: 2012-05-10 21:15:00 pm »
 Čia užsiminė kažkas apie žaidimų kūrimą ir pradėjau šiaip žiūrinėti pavyzdžius susyjusius su žaidimų kūrimu ir užtikau youtube naujos, nerealio IT kompanijos prezentacinį video. Jie tvirtina turintys technologiją pakeisiančia polygonalus kažkokiais atomais(Ištikrųjų Voxeliais - jie juos pervadino i atomus) ir jie praktiškai gali veikti be jokios vaizdo kortos. Neįtikėtina? Pasižiūrėkite:
 Neįtikino? Pažiūrėite šitą:
 Pasaka?
 Ką manote apie šitą?
 Aš manau kad čia scam. Jaukas prisivilioti investuotojus. Ir be to kiek suprantu jie čia rodo jau surenderintą vaizdelį, tai realiai kažin ar taip įmanoma būtu padaryti žaidimą.
 Visokios bėdos bėdelės ir šiaip klausimai / wamp publikavimas, DNS, problema
 « Įrašytas: 2012-05-07 22:13:17 pm »
 Reikalas toks:
 turiu routeri namie ir interneta su dinaminiu ip ir ISP blokuoja 80 porta(taigi, reikia kaip suprantu per DDNS). taigi bandau paleisti wamp viešai.
 Ką aš jau dariau:
 Sukūriau router'io valdymo skydelyje virtual server su wamp portu ir mano kompo vidiniu ip (Niekas negalejo prisijungti naudojant išorini mano IP, nei aš pats)
 poto Susikūriau Dynamic DNS pas no-ip.com , prisijungiau router'yje prie DDNS su no-ip.com duomenimis - atrodo viskas veikia, ivedu no-ip.com sugeneruota ip(pvz. 1.1.1.1:8080) i narsykle ir veikia, BET tik man paciam ir visam namu tinklui ,ir kas svarbiausia netgi tada, kai WAMP yra išjungtas, bet padarius WAMP offline nebeveikė(tai kaip supratau WAMP'as veikia kažkiek background'e) .
 Gal turite kokių minčių? Gal ką blogai darau?
 Routeris: TP LINK TL-MR3220, firewallai visi isjungti , exceptionai 80 ir 8080 portam sudeti.
 Beto esu pakeites WAMP porta is 80 i 8080
 Visokios bėdos bėdelės ir šiaip klausimai / Oro uostų tvarkaraščiai
 « Įrašytas: 2012-04-14 22:37:39 pm »
 Gal kam yra tekę ką nors kurti kas susyje su oro uostų tvarkaraščiais, traukinių ar panašiai.
 Iš kur juos gauti? Gal kokius API turi orouostų tinklalapiai? Pavyzdžiui iš kur čia ištraukia visus reisus, net su kainomis? Web scrappingą gal čia daro? Any ideas?
 Visokios bėdos bėdelės ir šiaip klausimai / Subdomenai
 « Įrašytas: 2012-02-22 17:17:49 pm »
 Turiu tokia situaciją: Turiu užsisakęs hostingo planą serveriai.lt, ten talpinu svetainę, ir turiu III lygio adresą (pvz: dom.demo.lt ) jau nebe serveriai.lt , o hostex.lt .
 Kaip reiketu priparkuoti tą subdomeną prie serveriai.lt ?
 Reikia į hostex.lt prie demo.lt domeno suvesti serveriai.lt DNS aresus?
 Jūsų kurti internetiniai puslapiai / RoadRules testavimo sistemėlė.
 « Įrašytas: 2012-01-11 17:23:15 pm »
 Senokai, gal užpraeitais metais kažkada, kurtas app'sas.
 http://rubikokubas.lt/ketas.lt
 Tūrinys skirtas tik mokymosi tikslais ir kaip programavimo pavyzdys.
 Prisijungimo duomenys norintiems išbandyti:
 el.paštas: haris@bmx.lt
 slaptažodis: kakaka
 Būtu įdomu pamatyti kritikos iš veikimo pusės
 Kitos programavimo kalbos / RoR - Ruby on Rails pamokos
 « Įrašytas: 2011-12-30 14:11:26 pm »
 Neseniai susidomėjau Rubiu ir beieškodamas informacijos aptikau keletą labai įdomių ir informatyvių pamokų, tai:
 Interaktyvus tutorialas, kuris susideda iš 6 Chapterių, rodos. Kairėje pusėje paaiškina teoriją ir viską, ką reikia žinoti , o dešinėje pusėje galite išbandyti įgytas žinias, tiesiog naršyklėje.
 Tai šitas yra grynam rubiui, o kitas RoR
 Tai lyg žaidimas susidedantis iš penkių lygių, kur mokysitės grynai RoR(Ruby on Rails). Kiekvieno lygio pradžioje yra parodomas labai įdomus ir tūriningas video su pamokomis tam lygiui. Ir peržiūrėjus tą video pritaikote įgytas žinias lygiui įveikti. Šitame puslapyje kodas yra vedamas taip pat kaip ir TryRuby puslapyje, tiesiog naršyklėje.
 Smagaus žaidimo
 Visokios bėdos bėdelės ir šiaip klausimai / Didelis HTTP srautas
 « Įrašytas: 2011-12-27 20:36:50 pm »
 Ar normalu, kad per mėnesį pareina ~3Gg HTTP srautas?
 Jūsų kurti internetiniai puslapiai / Periodinė elementų lentelė
 « Įrašytas: 2011-11-05 12:51:55 pm »
 Chemijos kontrolinio metu labai nesekėsi, bet užtat sugalvojau sukurti tokį , turbūt galima pavadinti, periodinės elementų lentelės web app'są.
 Paspaudus ant elemento iššoka pop-up'as su detalesniu aprašymu apie jį.
 Dar yra kelių kalbų galimybė: Lietuvių pilnai,o anglų tik iš dalies.
 Taip pat yra naudojama http://blg.lt statistikos sistema!
 Pakritikuokit
 EDIT: Anglų kalba jau pilnai veikia ir yra prie kiekvieno elemento nuoroda į vikipediją. Jeigu pasirinkote anglu kalbą, tai perkels į vikipediją aglų kalba, jei Lietuviu į Lietuvišką ir ttt...
 Jūsų kurti internetiniai puslapiai / Magnetinis klevo lapas - MagnetinisKlevas.LT
 « Įrašytas: 2011-08-17 15:17:28 pm »
 Dar vienas naujas puslapiukas/mini parduotuvė sukurtas draugo mažam versliukui, kuriame galima įsigyti magnetinį klevo lapą.
 Klevo lapas reikalingas asmenims, kurie išlaikė praktinį vairavimo egzaminą regitroje ir neturi 2 metų vairavimo stažo.
 MagnetinisKlevas.lt
 PHP ir SQL - Testai / Paprasta prisijungimo prie MySQL DB klasė
 « Įrašytas: 2011-07-29 15:36:11 pm »
 $this->setVals($this->getVals("sql.ini"));
 $this->connectDB() or die(print ('Neįmanoma prisijungti prie duomenų bazės.'));
 $this->disconnectDB();
 private function disconnectDB() {
 mysql_close($this->connectDB());
 private function getVals($link) {
 return parse_ini_file($link);
 private function setVals($vals) {
 $con = mysql_connect($this->host, $this->user, $this->pass);
 $sel = mysql_select_db($this->database, $con);
 Neseniai pradėjau OOP ir šiandien sukonstravau šiokią tokią klasę.
 Įvertinkit ar patarkit ką nors? ar viskas čia OK ?
 Jūsų kurti internetiniai puslapiai / RubikoKubas.LT
 « Įrašytas: 2011-07-21 13:04:41 pm »
 Pagaliau galiu pristatyti savo ilgai kurtą projektėlį www.rubikokubas.lt.
 Jame yra Parduotuvė , kur galima įsigyti įvairių galvosūkių(kolkas jų dar nėra taip daug ), laikmatis , kuris padės gerinti kubo susukimo rekordus , forumas ir kitų dalykėlių...
 Rašykit ką manot?
 Virtuvė / .eu domenai po 2LT/Metams
 « Įrašytas: 2011-07-19 22:46:28 pm »
 Gal kas matėt, o gal nematėt IV.lt siūlo .eu domenus po 2 Litus, metams
 http://iv.lt
 PHP ir SQL - Klausimai ir pagalba / [Klausimas] OOP klasės prasmė
 « Įrašytas: 2011-07-18 00:08:31 am »
 Nagrinėdamas NET beans IDE sample project'a "AirAliance" pamačiau tokį dalyką
 Sukuriama tokia klasė:
 private $dest;
 function set_FID($FID) {
 function set_FName($fName) {
 function set_dest($dest) {
 $this->dest = $dest;
 function get_FID() {
 return $this->FID;
 function get_FName() {
 function get_source() {
 function get_dest() {
 return $this->dest;
 Ji panaudojama:
 function getFlightInfo($FID){
 if($FID == 0){
 $query = "SELECT * FROM Flights";
 $query = "SELECT * FROM Flights WHERE FID='".$FID."'";
 // or die ("Query Failed ".mysql_error());
 $flightData;
 $flightID = 0;
 $FID = $row['FID'];
 $FName = $row['FName'];
 $SourceSID = $row['SourceSID'];
 $DestSID = $row['DestSID'];
 $query2 = "SELECT * FROM Sectors WHERE SID='".$SourceSID."'";
 //or die ("Query Failed ".mysql_error());
 $source = $row2['Sector'];
 $query3 = "SELECT * FROM Sectors WHERE SID='".$DestSID."'";
 $dest= $row3['Sector'];
 //Build the Flight object
 $flight->set_FID($FID);
 $flight->set_FName($FName);
 $flight->set_source($source);
 $flight->set_dest($dest);
 //Build the Flight object array
 $flightData[$flightID] = $flight;
 $flightID = $flightID +1;
 closeDB($connection);
 return $flightData;
 Išvedama info:
 $flightData = getFlightInfo($FID);
 for($index=0;$index < count($flightData);$index++){
 $flight = $flightData[$index];
 echo "".$flight->get_FID()."	";
 echo "".$flight->get_FName()."	";
 echo "".$flight->get_source()."	";
 echo "".$flight->get_dest()."	";
 Kodėl klasėje talpinama info ir einama per ją? nepaprasčiau būtu tiesiogiai atvaizduoti su while ir mysql_fetch array?
 Electro / Kele - The Boxer [2010]
 « Įrašytas: 2011-07-12 21:51:55 pm »
 Grupės Bloc party , vokalisto solinis albumas The Boxer .
 Tikrai gan geras
 1. "Walk Tall" 3:45
 2. "On the Lam" 3:33
 3. "Tenderoni" 4:30
 4. "The Other Side" 3:52
 5. "Everything You Wanted" 3:49
 6. "The New Rules" 3:55
 7. "Unholy Thoughts" 2:55
 8. "Rise" 5:11
 9. "All the Things I Could Never Say" 5:32
 10. "Yesterday's Gone" 4:07
 11. "Meet in the Middle" (digital-only bonus track)
 1. "Walk Tall"
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y12vWVR4qSk
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA-V37Z8vdw
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YN2NSBaMdE
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0c_0SZTznY&feature=artist
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRwAOwowdQk&feature=artist
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bkDLfQDyvs&feature=artist
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9N9E_0jpSg&feature=artist
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IfhU-h890Q&feature=artist
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaZ61A6Dy3A&feature=artist
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alawNq3qQ7s&feature=artist
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rBClCHY8uA&feature=artist
 Gero klausimo
 PHP ir SQL - Klausimai ir pagalba / [klausimas] Daug masyvų sutraukimas į vieną
 « Įrašytas: 2011-06-24 23:30:55 pm »
 Padėkite kas nors sugalvoti kaip sutraukti daug masyvų (su f-ja array_merge_recursive) tokiu pavidalu:
 $arr[1] = array('asd');
 $arr[2] = array('asd');
 $arr[3] = array('asd');
 $arr[n] = array('asd');
 Skelbimų lenta / NULL
 « Įrašytas: 2011-06-12 23:12:44 pm »


text:
Yacine Mousli, né le , est un athlète algérien, spécialiste du saut en hauteur.
 Biographie
 Troisième des Jeux africains de 1991, au Caire, il remporte le titre des championnats d'Afrique de 1992, à Maurice, en établissant la meilleure marque de sa carrière avec . En 1995, il remporte les championnats arabes, au Caire.
 Il participe aux Jeux olympiques de 1992 mais ne franchit pas le cap des qualifications.
 Palmarès
 Records
 Notes et références
 Liens externes
 Sauteur en hauteur algérien
 Champion d'Afrique d'athlétisme
 Athlète (homme) aux Jeux olympiques d'été de 1992
 Naissance en mai 1967


text:
 13.12.2012
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 L 341/19
 EEZ APVIENOTĀS KOMITEJAS LĒMUMS
 Nr. 168/2012
 (2012. gada 28. septembris),
 ar ko groza EEZ līguma IX pielikumu (Finanšu pakalpojumi)
 EEZ APVIENOTĀ KOMITEJA,
 ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Ekonomikas zonu (“EEZ līgums”) un jo īpaši tā 98. pantu,
 tā kā:
 (1)
 EEZ līgumā jāiekļauj Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Regula (ES) Nr. 583/2010, ar ko īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz ieguldītājiem paredzēto pamatinformāciju un nosacījumiem, kuri jāievēro, nodrošinot ieguldītājiem pamatinformāciju vai prospektu pastāvīgā informācijas nesējā, kas nav papīrs, vai tīmekļa vietnē (1).
 (2)
 EEZ līgumā jāiekļauj Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Regula (ES) Nr. 584/2010, ar ko īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz tipveida paziņojuma vēstules un apliecinājuma par PVKIU formu un saturu, elektroniskās saziņas izmantošanu starp kompetentajām iestādēm paziņošanas nolūkos un kārtību, kādā veicamas pārbaudes uz vietas un izmeklēšana, kā arī informācijas apmaiņa starp kompetentajām iestādēm (2).
 (3)
 EEZ līgumā jāiekļauj Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Direktīva Nr. 2010/43/ES, ar ko īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz organizatoriskajām prasībām, interešu konfliktiem, profesionālo ētiku, riska pārvaldību un starp depozitāriju un pārvaldības sabiedrību noslēdzamās vienošanās saturu (3).
 (4)
 EEZ līgumā jāiekļauj Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Direktīva 2010/44/ES, ar kuru īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz dažiem noteikumiem par fondu apvienošanu, galvenajām–pakārtotajām struktūrām un paziņošanas procedūru (4), kas labota ar OV L 179, 14.7.2010., 16. lpp.
 (5)
 Tādēļ attiecīgi būtu jāgroza EEZ līguma IX pielikums,
 IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.
 1. pants
 EEZ līguma IX pielikumā pēc 30.b punkta (Komisijas Direktīva 2007/16/EK) iekļauj šādus punktus:
 “30.c
 32010 R 0583: Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Regula (ES) Nr. 583/2010, ar ko īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz ieguldītājiem paredzēto pamatinformāciju un nosacījumiem, kuri jāievēro, nodrošinot ieguldītājiem pamatinformāciju vai prospektu pastāvīgā informācijas nesējā, kas nav papīrs, vai tīmekļa vietnē (OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 1. lpp.).
 30.d
 32010 R 0584: Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Regula (ES) Nr. 584/2010, ar ko īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz tipveida paziņojuma vēstules un apliecinājuma par PVKIU formu un saturu, elektroniskās saziņas izmantošanu starp kompetentajām iestādēm paziņošanas nolūkos un kārtību, kādā veicamas pārbaudes uz vietas un izmeklēšana, kā arī informācijas apmaiņa starp kompetentajām iestādēm (OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 16. lpp.).
 30.e
 32010 L 0043: Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Direktīva Nr. 2010/43/ES, ar ko īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz organizatoriskajām prasībām, interešu konfliktiem, profesionālo ētiku, riska pārvaldību un starp depozitāriju un pārvaldības sabiedrību noslēdzamās vienošanās saturu (OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 42. lpp.).
 30.f
 32010 L 0044: Komisijas 2010. gada 1. jūlija Direktīva 2010/44/ES, ar kuru īsteno Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīvu 2009/65/EK attiecībā uz dažiem noteikumiem par fondu apvienošanu, galvenajām–pakārtotajām struktūrām un paziņošanas procedūru (OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 28. lpp.), kas labota ar OV L 179, 14.7.2010., 16. lpp.”
 2. pants
 Regulu (ES) Nr. 583/2010 un (ES) Nr. 584/2010 un Direktīvu 2010/43/ES un 2010/44/ES, kas labota ar OV L 179, 14.7.2010., 16. lpp., teksts islandiešu un norvēģu valodā, kas jāpublicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ papildinājumā, ir autentisks.
 3. pants
 Šis lēmums stājas spēkā 2012. gada 29. septembrī, ja EEZ Apvienotajai komitejai ir sniegti visi paziņojumi saskaņā ar EEZ līguma 103. panta 1. punktu (5).
 4. pants
 Šo lēmumu publicē Eiropas Savienības Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ iedaļā un tā EEZ papildinājumā.
 Briselē, 2012. gada 28. septembrī
 EEZ Apvienotās komitejas vārdā –
 priekšsēdētājs
 Atle LEIKVOLL
 (1) OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 1. lpp.
 (2) OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 16. lpp.
 (3) OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 42. lpp.
 (4) OV L 176, 10.7.2010., 28. lpp.
 (5) Konstitucionālās prasības ir norādītas.


text:
 31.8.2013
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 L 233/43
 VYKONÁVACIE NARIADENIE KOMISIE (EÚ) č. 835/2013
 z 30. augusta 2013,
 ktorým sa ustanovujú paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 EURÓPSKA KOMISIA,
 so zreteľom na Zmluvu o fungovaní Európskej únie,
 so zreteľom na nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1234/2007 z 22. októbra 2007 o vytvorení spoločnej organizácie poľnohospodárskych trhov a o osobitných ustanoveniach pre určité poľnohospodárske výrobky (nariadenie o jednotnej spoločnej organizácii trhov) (1),
 so zreteľom na vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 543/2011 zo 7. júna 2011, ktorým sa ustanovujú podrobné pravidlá uplatňovania nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 1234/2007, pokiaľ ide o sektory ovocia a zeleniny a spracovaného ovocia a zeleniny (2), a najmä na jeho článok 136 ods. 1,
 keďže:
 (1)
 Vykonávacím nariadením (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sa v súlade s výsledkami Uruguajského kola mnohostranných obchodných rokovaní ustanovujú kritériá, na základe ktorých Komisia stanovuje paušálne hodnoty na dovoz z tretích krajín, pokiaľ ide o výrobky a obdobia uvedené v časti A prílohy XVI k uvedenému nariadeniu.
 (2)
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty sa vypočítajú každý pracovný deň v súlade s článkom 136 ods. 1 vykonávacieho nariadenia (EÚ) č. 543/2011, pričom sa zohľadnia premenlivé každodenné údaje. Toto nariadenie by preto malo nadobudnúť účinnosť dňom jeho uverejnenia v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie,
 PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:
 Článok 1
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty uvedené v článku 136 vykonávacieho nariadenia (EÚ) č. 543/2011 sú stanovené v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu.
 Článok 2
 Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dňom jeho uverejnenia v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
 Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
 V Bruseli 30. augusta 2013
 Za Komisiu v mene predsedu
 Jerzy PLEWA
 generálny riaditeľ pre poľnohospodárstvo a rozvoj vidieka
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ L 299, 16.11.2007, s. 1.
 (2) Ú. v. EÚ L 157, 15.6.2011, s. 1.
 PRÍLOHA
 Paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien niektorých druhov ovocia a zeleniny
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Číselný znak KN
 Kód tretej krajiny (1)
 Paušálna dovozná hodnota
 0707 00 05
 TR
 95,4
 ZZ
 95,4
 0709 93 10
 TR
 119,1
 ZZ
 119,1
 0805 50 10
 AR
 94,9
 CL
 121,1
 TR
 70,0
 UY
 121,3
 ZA
 104,7
 ZZ
 102,4
 0806 10 10
 EG
 166,4
 TR
 142,8
 ZZ
 154,6
 0808 10 80
 AR
 140,5
 BR
 98,2
 CL
 135,3
 CN
 67,2
 NZ
 127,9
 US
 118,8
 ZA
 114,2
 ZZ
 114,6
 0808 30 90
 AR
 195,1
 CN
 88,3
 TR
 145,3
 ZA
 76,0
 ZZ
 126,2
 0809 30
 BA
 45,1
 TR
 140,6
 ZZ
 92,9
 0809 40 05
 BA
 51,8
 MK
 49,7
 XS
 56,3
 ZZ
 52,6
 (1) Nomenklatúra krajín stanovená nariadením Komisie (ES) č. 1833/2006 (Ú. v. EÚ L 354, 14.12.2006, s. 19). Kód „ZZ“ znamená „iného pôvodu“.


text:
 26.1.2017
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 21/101
 REGOLAMENTO DI ESECUZIONE (UE) 2017/130 DELLA COMMISSIONE
 del 25 gennaio 2017
 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di taluni ortofrutticoli
 LA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA,
 visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea,
 visto il regolamento (UE) n. 1308/2013 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 17 dicembre 2013, recante organizzazione comune dei mercati dei prodotti agricoli e che abroga i regolamenti (CEE) n. 922/72, (CEE) n. 234/79, (CE) n. 1037/2001 e (CE) n. 1234/2007 del Consiglio (1),
 visto il regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011 della Commissione, del 7 giugno 2011, recante modalità di applicazione del regolamento (CE) n. 1234/2007 del Consiglio nei settori degli ortofrutticoli freschi e degli ortofrutticoli trasformati (2), in particolare l'articolo 136, paragrafo 1,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 Il regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011 prevede, in applicazione dei risultati dei negoziati commerciali multilaterali dell'Uruguay round, i criteri per la fissazione da parte della Commissione dei valori forfettari all'importazione dai paesi terzi, per i prodotti e i periodi indicati nell'allegato XVI, parte A, del medesimo regolamento.
 (2)
 Il valore forfettario all'importazione è calcolato ciascun giorno feriale, in conformità dell'articolo 136, paragrafo 1, del regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011, tenendo conto di dati giornalieri variabili. Pertanto il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea,
 HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:
 Articolo 1
 I valori forfettari all'importazione di cui all'articolo 136 del regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011 sono quelli fissati nell'allegato del presente regolamento.
 Articolo 2
 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea.
 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, il 25 gennaio 2017
 Per la Commissione,
 a nome del presidente
 Jerzy PLEWA
 Direttore generale
 Direzione generale dell'Agricoltura e dello sviluppo rurale
 (1) GU L 347 del 20.12.2013, pag. 671.
 (2) GU L 157 del 15.6.2011, pag. 1.
 ALLEGATO
 Valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di taluni ortofrutticoli
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Codice NC
 Codice dei paesi terzi (1)
 Valore forfettario all'importazione
 0702 00 00
 MA
 135,1
 SN
 268,2
 TR
 175,2
 ZZ
 192,8
 0707 00 05
 EG
 250,3
 MA
 79,2
 TR
 209,9
 ZZ
 179,8
 0709 91 00
 EG
 168,8
 ZZ
 168,8
 0709 93 10
 MA
 277,7
 TR
 239,8
 ZZ
 258,8
 0805 10 22 , 0805 10 24 , 0805 10 28
 EG
 54,2
 MA
 48,6
 TN
 59,5
 TR
 73,1
 ZZ
 58,9
 0805 21 10 , 0805 21 90 , 0805 29 00
 EG
 83,8
 IL
 134,6
 JM
 109,0
 MA
 80,7
 TR
 86,3
 ZZ
 98,9
 0805 22 00
 IL
 139,7
 MA
 79,0
 ZZ
 109,4
 0805 50 10
 AR
 92,5
 EG
 85,5
 TR
 93,7
 ZZ
 90,6
 0808 10 80
 CN
 145,5
 US
 124,9
 ZZ
 135,2
 0808 30 90
 CN
 93,3
 TR
 154,0
 ZA
 84,4
 ZZ
 110,6
 (1) Nomenclatura dei paesi stabilita dal Regolamento (UE) n. 1106/2012 della Commissione, del 27 novembre 2012, che attua il regolamento (CE) n. 471/2009 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, relativo alle statistiche comunitarie del commercio estero con i paesi terzi, per quanto riguarda l'aggiornamento della nomenclatura dei paesi e territori (GU L 328 del 28.11.2012, pag. 7). Il codice «ZZ» corrisponde a «altre origini».