jurisdiction: US

text:
 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
 48 CFR Parts 1834, 1841, 1846, 1851 and 1852
 RIN 2700-AE01
 NASA FAR Supplement Regulatory Review No. 1
 AGENCY:
 National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
 ACTION:
 Proposed rule.
 SUMMARY:
 NASA is updating the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) with the goal of eliminating unnecessary regulation, streamlining overly burdensome regulation, clarifying language, and simplifying processes where possible. This proposed rule is the first in a series and includes updates and revisions to five NFS parts. On January 18, 2011, President Obama signed Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review, directing agencies to develop a plan for a retrospective analysis of existing regulations. The revisions to this rule are part of NASA's retrospective plan under EO 13563 completed in August 2011.
 DATES:
 Interested parties should submit comments to NASA at the address below on or before June 17, 2013 to be considered in formulation of the final rule.
 ADDRESSES:
 Interested parties may submit comments, identified by RIN number 2700-AE01 via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments may also be submitted to Leigh Pomponio via email at leigh.pomponio@NASA.gov. NASA's full plan can be accessed at: http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/581545main_Final%20Plan%20for%20Retrospective%20Analysis%20of%20Existing%20Regulations.pdf.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Leigh Pomponio, NASA, Office of Procurement, email: leigh.pomponio@NASA.gov.
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
 A. Background
 The NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) is codified at 48 CFR 1800. Periodically, NASA performs a comprehensive review and analysis of the regulation, makes updates and corrections, and reissues the NASA FAR Supplement. The last reissue was in 2004. The goal of the review and analysis is to reduce regulatory burden where justified and appropriate and make the NFS content and processes more efficient and effective, faster and simpler, in support of NASA's mission. Consistent with Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review, NASA is currently reviewing and revising the NFS with an emphasis on streamlining and reducing burden. Due to the volume of the regulation, the revisions to the regulation will be made in increments. This proposed rule is the first of three expected rules which together will constitute the NFS update and reissue. This rule includes revisions to parts 1834, 1841, 1846, 1851, and 1852 of the NFS. Further, this rule provides notice that no regulatory changes will be made to parts 1814, 1815 (exclusive of subpart 1815.4), 1818, 1822, 1824, and 1843.
 NASA analyzed the existing regulation to determine whether any portions should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. Special emphasis was placed on identifying and eliminating or simplifying overly burdensome processes that could be streamlined without jeopardizing Agency mission effectiveness. Additionally, NASA sought to identify current regulatory coverage that is not regulatory in nature, and to remove or relocate such coverage to internal guidance. In addition to substantive changes, this rule includes administrative changes necessary to make minor corrections and updates. Specifically, the changes in this rule are summarized as follows:
 Part 1815: No regulatory changes to Part 15 but note that two corresponding clauses are revised. The pre-proposal clause at 1852.215-77 is revised to add additional information on security information required for attendance at conferences at NASA field locations. The clause entitled Proposal Page Limitations at 1852.215-81 is revised to clarify the maximum acceptable proposal page counts.
 Part 1834:
 1. Administrative changes are made to policy on Earned Value Management System which correct nomenclature and Web site references.
 2. In Notice of Earned Value Management System provision at 1852.234-1, a requirement is added for offerors to provide a matrix that correlates each guideline in ANSI/EIA 748 (current version at time of solicitation) to the corresponding process in the offeror's written management procedures; the rule also updates Web site and references in the provision.
 3. In Earned Value Management System clause at 1852.234-2, administrative changes are made to correct nomenclature and add a Web site reference.
 Part 1841: Subpart 1841.5—Solicitation Provision and Contract Clauses, is deleted in its entirety. Clause text at 1852.241-70, Renewal of Contract, is removed. The prescription and clause are removed because the clause at FAR 52.217-9 is sufficient to provide for a contract extension or renewal. A NASA-unique clause to address extension and renewal in a utility contract is not necessary.
 Part 1846:
 1. Subpart 1846.6—Material Inspection and Receiving Reports, is revised to align with DFAR Appendix F, facilitating comparison of NASA and DoD practices and procedures with regard to DD Form 250, especially for contractors doing business with both agencies. Administrative changes are also made to this subpart to clarify DD Form 250 preparation instructions.
 2. The clause 1852.246-72, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, is revised slightly to clarify distribution requirements.
 Part 1851: Section 1851.102-70, Contractor acquisition of filing cabinets, is deleted because it is no longer relevant or necessary.
 Part 1852: Changes to clauses are discussed above according to corresponding NFS part.
 B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
 Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule is not a “significant regulatory action” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
 C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
 NASA certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. because it mainly clarifies or updates existing regulations. In one instance, it adds new requirements to the Earned Value Management System Clause, but that clause is rarely applicable in contracts with small businesses. In several instances, this rule deletes requirements, but not to the extent that small entities would be significantly impacted.
 D. Paperwork Reduction Act
 The proposed rule contains a new information collection requirement that requires the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). The collection is at 1852.215-77(c), Pre-proposal/pre-bid conference, wherein attendees at pre-proposal or pre-bid conferences will be required to submit personal identity information. NASA invites public comments on the following aspects of the proposed rule: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of NASA, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. The following is a summary of the information collection requirement.
 Title: Security Checks for Attendance at Pre-proposal Conferences. NASA FAR Supplement 1852.215-77, Pre-proposal/Pre-bid Conference
 Type of Request: New collection.
 Number of Respondents: 30.
 Responses per Respondent: 12.
 Annual Responses: 360.
 Average Burden per Response: 0.25 hours.
 Annual Burden Hours: 90.
 Needs and Uses: This information collection requires contractors to supply personal identity information for attendees at pre-proposal conferences that are held at NASA facilities. The information includes, but is not limited to name, social security number, place of birth, and citizenship. NASA will utilize the information to perform security checks for entrance to NASA facilities. Without the collection of this information, NASA will be unable to permit entrance to NASA facilities for attendance at pre-proposal conferences.
 Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit and not-for-profit institutions.
 Frequency: On occasion.
 Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to NASA, Attn: Leigh Pomponio leigh.pomponio@NASA.gov. Comments can be received up to 60 days after the date of this notice.
 To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to NASA, Attn: Leigh Pomponio, 300 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20546-0001.
 List of Subjects in 48 CFR 1834, 1841, 1846, 1851, and 1852.
 Government procurement.
 William P. McNally,
 Assistant Administrator for Procurement.
 Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1834, 1841, 1846, 1851, and 1852 are proposed to be amended as follows:
 PART 1834—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
 1. The authority citation continues to read as follows:
 Authority:
 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
 1834.201
 [Amended]
 2. Amend section 1834.201 to read as follows:
 a. Amend paragraph (a) introductory text by removing the word “acquisitions” in the first sentence and adding in its place the word “contracts”.
 b. Amend paragraph (a)(3) by adding the phrase “Earned Value Management” before the acronym EVM and adding parentheses around EVM.
 c. Amend the first sentence of paragraph (b), by removing the phrase “earned value management” with “EVM” and adding the phrase “a schedule management system” with “an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)”.
 d. Amend paragraph (d) by adding the phrase “and the applicable NASA Center EVM Focal Point (http://evm.nasa.gov/council.html)” between “office” and “in determining”.
 e. Amend paragraph (e) by removing “American National Standards Institute/Electronics Industries Alliance Standard” and the parentheses around the existing acronym ANSI/EIA.
 f. Add paragraph (f).
 The addition reads as follows:
 1834.201
 Policy.
 (f) As a minimum, and in accordance with NPD 7120.5, requirements initiators shall ensure that EVMS monthly reports are included as a deliverable in the acquisition package provided to the procurement office for implementation into contracts where EVMS applies. Additionally, the acquisition package shall include a Contract Performance Report (CPR), IMS and a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and the appropriate data requirements descriptions (DRDs) for implementation into the contract.
 1834.203-70
 [Amended]
 3. Amend section 1834.203-70 by removing “1834.201(a)(3)” and adding in its place “1834.201(c)” in the first sentence.
 PART 1841—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES
 4. The authority citation for this section continues to read as follows:
 Authority:
 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
 Subpart 1841.5 [Removed and Reserved].
 5. Remove and reserve Subpart 1841.5.
 PART 1846—QUALITY ASSURANCE
 6. The authority citation continues to read as follows:
 Authority:
 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
 7. Add Subpart 1846.1 to read as follows:
 Subpart—1846.1 General
 1846.101
 Definitions.
 “Counterfeit goods” means an item that is an unauthorized copy or substitute that has been identified, marked, and/or altered by a source other than the item's legally authorized source and has been misrepresented to be an authorized item of the legally authorized source.
 “Legally authorized source” means the current design activity or the original manufacturer or a supplier authorized by the current design activity or the original manufacturer to produce an item.
 1846.102
 Policy.
 (f) See NPR 8735.2, Section 2.1, concerning quality assurance for critical acquisition items. Generally, the quality assurance requirements set forth in the NPR for critical acquisition items are not allowed under Part 12 procedures. See FAR 12.208.
 8. Section 1846.670-1 is revised to read as follows:
 1846.670-1
 General.
 This subpart contains procedures and instructions for use of the DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report (MIRR), (DD Form 250 series equivalents, and commercial shipping/packing lists used to document Government contract quality assurance (CQA).
 9. Section 1846.670-2 is revised to read as follows:
 1846.670-2
 Applicability.
 (a) This subpart applies to supplies or services acquired by or for NASA when the clause at 1852.246-72, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, is included in the contract.
 10. Section 1846.670-3 is revised to read as follows:
 1846.670-3
 Use.
 (a) The DD Form 250 is a multipurpose report used for—
 (1) Providing evidence of CQA at origin or destination;
 (2) Providing evidence of acceptance at origin or destination;
 (3) Packing lists;
 (4) Receiving;
 (5) Shipping; and
 (6) Contractor invoice support.
 (b) Do not use MIRRs for shipments—
 (1) By subcontractors, unless the subcontractor is shipping directly to the Government; or,
 (2) Of contract inventory.
 (c) The contractor prepares the DD Form 250, except for entries that an authorized Government representative is required to complete. The contractor shall furnish sufficient copies of the completed form, as directed by the Government Representative.
 11. Section 1846.670-5 is revised to read as follows:
 1846.670-5
 Forms.
 An electronic copy of the DD Form 250 may be downloaded from the General Services Administration's Forms Library at http://www.gsa.gov/portal/category/100000.
 12. In 1846.672-1, paragraphs (a)(1), (b), and (c) are revised to read as follows:
 1846.672-1
 Preparation Instructions.
 (1) Dates shall include nine spaces consisting of the four digits of the year, the first three letters of the month, and two digits for the date (e.g., 2012SEP24).
 (b) Classified information. Do not include classified information on the MIRR. MIRRs must not be classified.
 (c) Block 1—PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION (CONTRACT NUMBER) Enter the ten-character, alpha-numeric procurement identifier of the contract.
 (h) Block 6—INVOICE.
 The contractor may enter the invoice number and actual or estimated date on all copies of the MIRR. When the date is estimated, enter an “E” after the date. Do not correct MIRRs to reflect the actual date of invoice submission.
 * * *
 (j) Block 8—ACCEPTANCE POINT. Enter an “S” for origin or “D” for destination as specified in the contract as the point of acceptance.
 (k) Block 9—PRIME CONTRACTOR. Enter the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and address.
 * * *
 In section 1846.672, the first sentence of paragraph (r)(1)(i) is amended by removing the phrase “Federal” and adding its place the phrase “national” and removing the phrase “(FSN)” and adding in its place the phrase “(NSN)”.
 j. In section 1846.672, paragraph (r)(3) is revised by replacing “Command” with “Agency”.
 k. In section 1846.672, paragraph (r)(4)(ii) is revised by replacing “FSN” with “NSN”.
 l. In section 1846.672, paragraph (r)(4)(v) is revised by replacing “FSN” with “NSN”.
 m. In section 1846.672, paragraph (r)(4)(xi) is revised by replacing “shall” with “will”.
 1846.672-5
 [Removed]
 13. Section 1846.672-5 is removed.
 1846.672-6 and 1846.672-7
 [Redesignated as 1846.672-5 and 1846.672-6]
 Sections 1846.672-6 and 1846.672-7 are redesignated as 1846.672-5 and 1846.672-6.
 14. Section 1846.674 is revised to read as follows:
 1846.674
 Contract clause.
 The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.246-72, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, in solicitations and contracts when there will be separate and distinct deliverables, even if the deliverables are not separately priced. The clause is not required for—
 (1) Contracts awarded using simplified acquisition procedures;
 (2) Negotiated subsistence contracts; or
 (3) Contracts for which the deliverable is a scientific or technical report. Insert number of copies and distribution instructions in paragraph (a).
 PART 1851—USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS
 15. The authority citation continues to read as follows:
 Authority:
 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
 1851.102-70
 [Removed and Reserved]
 16. Remove and reserve section 1851.102-70.
 PART 1852—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
 17. The authority citation continues to read as follows:
 Authority:
 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
 18. Section 1852.215.77 is amended by adding paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
 1852.215-77
 Preproposal/Pre-Bid Conference.
 PRE-PROPOSAL/PRE-BID CONFERENCE [XX/XX]
 (c) Offerors, individuals, or interested parties who plan to attend the pre-proposal/pre-bid conference must provide the Contracting Officer in writing, at a minimum, full name of the attendee(s), identification of nationality (U.S. or specify other nation citizenship), Lawful Permanent Resident Numbers in the case of foreign nationals, affiliation and full office address/phone number. Center-specific security requirements for this pre-proposal/pre-bid conference will be given to a company representative prior to the conference or will be identified in this solicitation as follows: (fill-in). Examples of specific identification information which may be required include state driver's license and social security number. Except for foreign nationals, the identification information must be provided at least (fill-in) working days in advance of the conference. This information shall be provided at least (fill-in) working days in advance of the conference for foreign nationals due to the longer badging and clearance processing time required. However, the Center reserves the right to determine foreign nationals may not be allowed on the Government site. The Government is not responsible for offerors' inability to obtain clearance within sufficient time to attend the conference. Due to space limitations, representation of any potential Offeror may not exceed (fill-in) company representatives/persons per Offeror. Any “lobbying firm or lobbyist” as defined in 2 U.S.C. 1602(9) and (10), or any Offeror represented by a lobbyist under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 shall be specifically identified.
 (d) Visitors on NASA Centers are allowed to possess and use photographic equipment (including camera cell phones) and related materials EXCEPT IN CONTROLLED AREAS. Anyone desiring to use camera equipment during the conference should contact the Contracting Officer to determine if the site(s) to be visited is a controlled area.
 (e) The Government will respond to questions regarding this procurement provided such questions have been received at least five (5) working days prior to the conference. Other questions will be answered at the conference or in writing at a later time. All questions, together with the Government's response, will be transmitted to all solicitation recipients via the government-wide point of entry (GPE). In addition, conference materials distributed at the preproposal/pre-bid conference will be made available to all potential offerors via the GPE using the NAIS Electronic Posting System.
 (End of provision)
 19 Section 1852.215-81 is amended by:
 a. Paragraph (a) is amended by removing the chart and replacing it to read;
 b. Paragraph (b) is amended by adding a sentence at the end of the paragraph.
 c. Paragraph (c) is revised.
 The revisions read as follows:
 1852.215-81
 Proposal Page Limitations.
 (a) * * *
 Proposal section
 (List each
 volume or
 section)
 Page limit(Specify limit)
 [Proposal subsection
 (List each
 subsection
 (e.g. Offeror's Subcontracting Plan should not exceed 20 pages)
 (b) * * * Other limitations/instructions identified as follows: (fill-in, if there are other limitations/instructions).
 (c) Identify any exclusions to the page limits that are excluded from the page counts specified in paragraph (a) of this provision (e.g. title pages, table of contents) as follows: (fill-in). In addition, the Cost section of your proposal is not page limited. However, this section is to be strictly limited to cost and price information. Information that can be construed as belonging in one of the other sections of the proposal will be so construed and counted against that section's page limitation.
 (End of provision)
 20. Section 1852.234-1 is amended as follows:
 a. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding the phrase “(current version at time of solicitation).” After the word “Systems” at the end of the paragraph.
 b. Paragraph (b)(1)(iii) and paragraph (b)(1)(vii).
 The revisions read as follows:
 1852.234-1
 Notice of Earned Value Management System.
 (b) * * *
 (1) * * *
 (iii) Provide a matrix that correlates each guideline in ANSI/EIA 748 (current version at time of solicitation) to the corresponding process in the offeror's written management procedures;
 (vii) If the value of the offeror's proposal, including options, is $50 million or more, provide a schedule of events leading up to formal validation and Government acceptance of the Contractor's EVMS. Guidance can be found in the Department of Defense Earned Value Management Implementation Guide (https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=19557) as well as in the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Earned Value Management Systems Acceptance Guide (http://www.ndia.org/divisions/divisions/procurement/pages/programsystemcommittee.aspx).
 21. Section 1852.234-2 is amended as follows:
 a. By revising paragraph (a)(2) ;
 b. The first sentence in paragraph (b) is amended by removing the phrase “cost/schedule control system” and adding “EVMS” in its place;
 c. Paragraph (c) is amended by adding the sentence “See the NASA IBR Handbook (http://evm.nasa.gov/handbooks.html) for guidance.” at the end of the paragraph:
 The revisions read as follows:
 1852.234-2
 Earned Value Management System.
 (a) * * *
 (2) Earned Value Management (EVM) procedures that provide for generation of timely, accurate, reliable, and traceable information for the Contract Performance Report (CPR) and the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) required by the data requirements descriptions in the contract.
 1852.241-70
 [Removed and Reserved]
 22. Remove and reserve section t 1852.241-70.
 23. In § 1852.246-72, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
 1852.246-72
 Material Inspection and Receiving Report.
 (a) At the time of each delivery to the Government under this contract, the Contractor shall prepare and furnish a Material Inspection and Receiving Report (DD Form 250 series). The form(s) shall be prepared and distributed as follows:
 (Insert number of copies and distribution instructions.)
 [FR Doc. 2013-06441 Filed 4-17-13; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7510-01-P


type: legislation

text:
 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 50 CFR Part 679
 RIN 0648-BD23
 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area; Amendment 105
 AGENCY:
 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
 ACTION:
 Notification of availability of fishery management plan amendment; request for comments.
 SUMMARY:
 The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) submitted Amendment 105 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI FMP) to the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) for review. If approved, Amendment 105 would establish a process for Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) groups and cooperatives established under the Amendment 80 Program (Amendment 80 cooperatives) to exchange harvest quota from one of three flatfish species (flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole) for an equal amount of another of these three flatfish species, while maintaining total catch below acceptable biological catch (ABC) limits for each species and below the sum of the total allowable catches (TACs) for all three species. This action would modify the annual harvest specification process to allow the Council to establish the maximum amount of flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole that may be exchanged based on social, economic, or biological considerations. This action is necessary to mitigate the operational variability, environmental conditions, and economic factors that may constrain the CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives from achieving, on a continuing basis, the optimum yield (OY) in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI) groundfish fisheries. This action is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, BSAI FMP, and other applicable laws.
 DATES:
 Comments on the amendment must be received on or before August 12, 2014.
 ADDRESSES:
 You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2013-0074, by any of the following methods:
 • Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0074, click the “Comment Now!” icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments
 • Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668.
 Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, address) confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter “N/A” in the required fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
 Electronic copies of Amendment 105 to the BSAI FMP, the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), and the Categorical Exclusion prepared for this action (collectively the “Analysis”), the supplemental information report prepared for the final 2014 and 2015 harvest specifications (Harvest Specifications Supplemental Information Report (SIR)), and the Alaska Groundfish Harvest Specifications Final Environmental Impact Statement (Harvest Specifications EIS) may be obtained from http://www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Seanbob Kelly, 907-586-7228.
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
 The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) in section 304(a) requires that each regional fishery management council submit an amendment to a fishery management plan to NMFS for review and approval, disapproval, or partial approval by the Secretary. The Magnuson-Stevens Act in section 304(a) also requires that the Secretary, upon receiving an amendment to a fishery management plan, immediately publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing that the amendment is available for public review and comment. The Council has submitted Amendment 105 to the FMP to the Secretary for review. This document announces that proposed Amendment 105 to the BSAI FMP is available for public review and comment.
 The groundfish fisheries in the exclusive economic zone of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI) are managed under the BSAI FMP. The BSAI FMP was prepared by the Council under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The RIR prepared for this action contains a complete description of the alternatives and a comparative analysis of the potential impacts of the alternatives (see ADDRESSES).
 Amendment 105 is intended to provide additional harvest opportunities to CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives participating in the BSAI flatfish fisheries. As proposed, Amendment 105 would maximize catch, retention, and utilization of flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole while maintaining catch at, or below, the ABC. Amendment 105 is intended to result in higher retention and utilization of groundfish without increasing overall bycatch of groundfish or non-groundfish species beyond existing limitations. Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to incorporate changes in the annual harvest specifications process used by the Council and NMFS to set annual catch limits described in greater detail in the following paragraphs.
 Annually at the December Council meeting, the Council adopts the overfishing levels (OFLs) and ABC limits for BSAI flatfish as part of the harvest specifications process. The Council also recommends TACs at this meeting. The TAC is the annual catch target for a species or species group, derived from the ABC by considering social and economic factors and management uncertainty. The BSAI FMP requires that the TAC must be set lower than or equal to the ABC. The BSAI FMP requires the sum of the TACs in all BSAI groundfish fisheries to be set within a range from 1.4 to 2 million metric tons (mt). Pursuant to the BSAI FMP, the Council may recommend TACs that are lower than the ABCs if setting TACs equal to ABCs would cause TACs to exceed 2 million mt. In addition, a statutory provision requires that “[t]he optimum yield for groundfish in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area shall not exceed 2 million metric tons” (See section 803(c) of Pub. L. No. 108-199). NMFS complies with this law by limiting the sum of the TACs for all BSAI groundfish to 2 million mt.
 Flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole are valuable flatfish species that are not fully harvested due to a variety of statutory and regulatory constraints on the setting of TAC limits and operational, economic, and environmental limitations described in more detail in the Analysis prepared for this action (See ADDRESSES). Typically, flatfish TACs are set below the ABC to ensure that the sum of the TACs do not exceed the statutory 2 million mt OY for the BSAI groundfish fisheries and to provide harvest opportunity for other valuable groundfish fisheries.
 NMFS assigns CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives exclusive harvest privileges for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole on an annual basis. The CDQ groups are assigned CDQ allocations, and the Amendment 80 cooperatives are assigned cooperative quota (CQ). CDQ groups are assigned CDQ allocations for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole based on provisions in section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Amendment 80 cooperatives are assigned CQ for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole in proportion to the total amount of Amendment 80 QS assigned to that Amendment 80 cooperative for that species. Regulations prohibit CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives from exceeding a CDQ or CQ allocation.
 In this mixed species fishery, operators target certain species of flatfish but also take a variety of species incidentally. The composition of groundfish species taken in the BSAI flatfish fisheries varies by season and by fishing year. Both Amendment 80 cooperatives and vessels fishing CDQ allocations are affected by the same uncertain operational conditions (e.g., difficult to predict harvest rates of flatfish in target and non-target fisheries), unpredictable environmental conditions, and uncertain market conditions that can limit harvest.
 Although a broad range of non-regulatory arrangements and regulatory measures have been implemented to aid in the more complete harvesting of flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole CDQ and CQ, these measures have limited utility to address the range of conditions that can constrain harvest. The fact that harvests of flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole are substantially below the available CDQ or CQ allocations indicates that existing management measures may not provide the flexibility needed to allow more complete harvest.
 The objective of proposed Amendment 105 is to provide CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives with additional opportunities to fully harvest flathead sole, rock sole, or yellowfin sole allocations, while ensuring that biological limits are not exceeded. As proposed, Amendment 105 would allow CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives to apply to NMFS to exchange a portion of their unused annual allocations of one or two flatfish species for an equal amount of another flatfish species (i.e. a Flatfish Exchange).
 As proposed, Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to define an ABC surplus for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole as the difference between each species' annual ABC and TAC. The ABC surplus would represent the maximum additional amount of flathead sole, rock sole or yellowfin sole that could be harvested above the TAC. Amendment 105 would also amend the BSAI FMP to define an ABC reserve for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole as the ABC surplus that may be reduced for social, economic, or ecological considerations during the determination of the annual harvest specifications. Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to clarify that the Council would specify the ABC surplus, and determine the ABC reserve for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole each year in the annual specifications process. Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to specify that the ABC reserve would be apportioned to CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives. Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to specify that the CDQ groups would receive 10.7 percent of the ABC reserve for each species of flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole, and that each species would be allocated among the six CDQ groups based on current allocation schedules established in sections 305(i)(1)(B) and (C) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to specify that each Amendment 80 cooperative would be allocated an amount of the ABC reserve for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole remaining after allocation to the CDQ groups, and that each species would be allocated in proportion to each Amendment 80 cooperative's share of flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole Amendment 80 QS.
 Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to require a CDQ group or an Amendment 80 cooperative to submit an application for NMFS' approval in order to exchange unused CDQ or CQ for a portion of its CDQ ABC reserve or Amendment 80 ABC reserve. Amendment 105 would amend the BSAI FMP to limit each CDQ groups or Amendment 80 cooperative to no more than three exchanges of CDQ or CQ for a portion of its CDQ ABC reserve or Amendment 80 ABC reserve.
 Amendment 105 is not intended to completely resolve the complex issues that have constrained the CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives from fully harvesting their flatfish allocations. As proposed, Amendment 105 is intended to provide the flexible management necessary to mitigate a diverse range of conditions that may limit harvest of flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole. Amendment 105 would provide participants with additional tools to address the regulatory, economic, and environmental challenges to fully harvest the exclusive harvest allocations in these multi-species fisheries.
 The proposed modifications to the BSAI FMP under Amendment 105 are appropriate given the fact that CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives are participating in catch share fisheries that are capable of limiting their overall harvests within specific catch limits. CDQ groups and Amendment 80 cooperatives are subject to strict management controls that would maintain total catch below ABC limits for flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole and below the sum of the TACs for all three species.
 Public comments are being solicited on proposed Amendment 105 to the BSAI FMP through the end of the comment period (see DATES). NMFS intends to publish this action in the Federal Register and seek public comment on a proposed rule that would implement Amendment 105, following NMFS' evaluation of the proposed rule under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Public comments on the proposed rule must be received by the end of the comment period for Amendment 105 to be considered in the approval/disapproval decision on Amendment 105. All comments received by the end of the comment period on Amendment 105, whether specifically directed to the BSAI FMP amendment or the proposed rule will be considered in the FMP approval/disapproval decision. Comments received after that date will not be considered in the approval/disapproval decision on the amendment. To be considered, comments must be received, not just postmarked or otherwise transmitted, by the close of business on the last day of the comment period.
 Authority:
 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., 1801 et seq., 3631 et seq.; and Pub. L. 108-447.
 Dated: June 10, 2014.
 Emily H. Menashes,
 Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
 [FR Doc. 2014-13855 Filed 6-12-14; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 28.8.2014
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 256/31
 DECISIONE DEL COMITATO MISTO SEE
 N. 53/2014
 dell’8 aprile 2014
 che modifica l’allegato XIII (Trasporti) dell’accordo SEE
 IL COMITATO MISTO SEE,
 visto l’accordo sullo Spazio economico europeo («accordo SEE»), in particolare l’articolo 98,
 considerando quanto segue:
 (1)
 Occorre integrare nell’accordo SEE il regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 1264/2013 della Commissione, del 3 dicembre 2013, recante modifica del regolamento (CE) n. 474/2006 che istituisce un elenco comunitario dei vettori aerei soggetti a un divieto operativo all’interno della Comunità (1).
 (2)
 Occorre pertanto modificare opportunamente l’allegato XIII dell’accordo SEE,
 HA ADOTTATO LA PRESENTE DECISIONE:
 Articolo 1
 Al punto 66zab [Regolamento (CE) n. 474/2006 della Commissione] dell’allegato XIII dell’accordo SEE è aggiunto il seguente trattino:
 «—
 32013 R 1264: Regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 1264/2013 della Commissione, del 3 dicembre 2013 (GU L 326 del 6.11.2013, pag. 7).»
 Articolo 2
 I testi del regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 1264/2013 nelle lingue islandese e norvegese, da pubblicare nel supplemento SEE della Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea, fanno fede.
 Articolo 3
 La presente decisione entra in vigore il 9 aprile 2014, a condizione che siano pervenute tutte le notifiche previste dall’articolo 103, paragrafo 1, dell’accordo SEE (2).
 Articolo 4
 La presente decisione è pubblicata nella sezione SEE e nel supplemento SEE della Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, l’8 aprile 2014
 Per il Comitato misto SEE
 Il presidente
 Gianluca GRIPPA
 (1) GU L 326 del 6.12.2013, pag. 7.
 (2) Non è stata comunicata l’esistenza di obblighi costituzionali.


type: caselaw

text:
 2.12.2006
 ES
 Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea
 C 294/43
 Sentencia del Tribunal de Primera Instancia de 27 de septiembre de 2006 — Werkgroep Commerciële Jachthavens Zuidelijke Randmeren y otros/Comisión
 (Asunto T-117/04) (1)
 («Ayudas de Estado - Ayudas concedidas por las autoridades neerlandesas a puertos deportivos sin ánimo de lucro - Recurso de anulación - Admisibilidad»)
 (2006/C 294/91)
 Lengua de procedimiento: neerlandés
 Partes
 Demandantes: Werkgroep Commerciële Jachthavens Zuidelijke Randmeren (Zeewolde, Países Bajos); Jachthaven Zijl Zeewolde BV (Zeewolde); Maatschappij tot exploitatie van onroerende goederen Wolderwijd II BV (Zeewolde); Jachthaven Strand-Horst BV (Ermelo, Países Bajos); Recreatiegebied Erkemederstrand vof (Zeewolde); Jachthaven- en Campingbedrijf Nieuwboer BV (Bunschoten-Spakenburg, Países Bajos; y Jachthaven Naarden BV (Naarden, Países Bajos) (representantes: T. Ottervanger, A. Bijleveld y A. van den Oord, abogados)
 Demandada: Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas (representantes: H. van Vliet, A. Bouquet y A. Nijenhuis, agentes)
 Parte coadyuvante en apoyo de la demandada: Reino de los Países Bajos (representantes: H. Sevenster y M. de Grave, agentes)
 Objeto
 Anulación de la Decisión 2004/114/CE de la Comisión, de 29 de octubre de 2003, relativa a las medidas ejecutadas por los Países Bajos en favor de los puertos deportivos sin ánimo de lucro en los Países Bajos (DO 2004, L 34, p. 63)
 Fallo
 1)
 Declarar la inadmisibilidad del recurso.
 2)
 Condenar a los demandantes a pagar sus propias costas y las de la Comisión. El Reino de los Países Bajos soportará sus propias costas.
 (1) DO C 118, de 30.4.2004.


type: other

text:
U hebt als makelaar de meetinstructie NVM niet gevolgd, waardoor er bij een woning op Funda een verkeerde woonoppervlakte stond vermeld. U wordt voor het foutief vermelde woonoppervlak door de koper van de woning aansprakelijk gesteld. Hoe vindt de schadeberekening plaats? Ik schets enkele voorbeelden en geef een eindconclusie.
 NEN-2580-meetinstructie
 In 2010 is de ‘Meetinstructie Gebruiksoppervlakte Woningen’ opgesteld door onder andere makelaarsverenigingen NVM, VBO Makelaar en VastgoedPRO. Makelaars die zijn aangesloten bij die verenigingen dienen de oppervlakte van een woning te meten volgens de NEN-2580-meetinstructie.
 Uitspraak Rechtbank Den Haag 11 september 2013
 Op 11 september 2013 heeft de Rechtbank Den Haag voor het eerst geoordeeld dat een bij NVM aangesloten verkopend makelaar, ten opzichte van de koper van een woning, aansprakelijk is. De verkopend makelaar heeft de door NVM voorgeschreven meetinstructie met betrekking tot de woonoppervlakte niet gevolgd.
 Na koop en levering van de woning, bleek dat de woning (60 m2 – 51,9 m2 =) 8,1 m2 kleiner was dan op de website Funda stond vermeld. De aankoopprijs bedroeg € 110.000,00. De koper stelde de verkopend makelaar met succes aansprakelijk. Dit was destijds opmerkelijk omdat de verkopend makelaar natuurlijk géén contractuele relatie had tot de koper. Ook had de koper geen directe relatie tot NVM en haar gedragsregels. De juridische grondslag voor de vordering tot schadevergoeding van de koper was dan ook een onrechtmatige daad.
 De Rechtbank Den Haag achtte het redelijk om de door de koper geleden schade vast te stellen, voornamelijk aan de hand van de gemiddelde vierkante meterprijs, vermenigvuldigd met het verschil tussen de opgegeven en de daadwerkelijke vierkante meters woonoppervlakte. Dit leidde in die zaak tot een schadebedrag van € 14.850,-, dat wegens andere factoren naar beneden werd bijgesteld tot € 12.000,-.
 Vooral vanuit de makelaarskant is er kritiek gekomen op deze berekening van de door de koper geleden schade. Dit heeft behoorlijk wat gerechtelijke uitspraken teweeg gebracht. Enkele daarvan treft u hieronder aan.
 Uitspraak Hoge Raad 22 februari 2019
 Nadat het Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden op 28 november 2017, in een andere maar gelijksoortige zaak, op dezelfde wijze de door koper geleden schade vaststelde, oordeelde de Hoge Raad op 22 februari 2019 anders.
 De omvang van de schade die kopers hebben geleden, dient anders te worden bepaald. Namelijk door de situatie waarin de koper verkeert te vergelijken met de situatie waarin hij zou hebben verkeerd, wanneer de makelaar zich aan de meetinstructie NVM zou hebben gehouden. In dat geval zou de juiste woonoppervlakte, namelijk 124 m2, in de verkoopinformatie vermeld hebben gestaan, in plaats van de foutieve 150m2. Ook in die denkbeeldige situatie zou de woning immers niet een woonoppervlakte van 150 m2 hebben gehad.
 Het oordeel van het Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden:
 “Dat de schade dient te worden bepaald door het waardeverminderende aspect als gevolg van het feit dat de woning slechts een woonoppervlakte heeft van 124 m2 in plaats van de in de verkoopbrochure vermelde woonoppervlakte van 150 m2 is volgens de Hoge Raad onjuist.” De uitspraak van het Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden werd vernietigd en de zaak werd ter verdere behandeling en beslissing verwezen naar een ander gerechtshof.
 Uitspraak Gerechtshof ’s-Hertogenbosch 20 augustus 2019
 In weer een andere zaak had een makelaar uit Veldhoven in de verkoopbrochure vermeld dat de woonoppervlakte van een in oktober 2013 aangekochte woning 105 m2 zou bedragen, maar dat bleek later slechts 88 m2 te zijn. Op 20 augustus 2019 oordeelde het Gerechtshof ’s-Hertogenbosch in haar tussenarrest weinig verrassend in overeenstemming met eerdergenoemde uitspraak van de Hoge Raad. De zaak bij het Gerechtshof ’s-Hertogenbosch loopt nu nog steeds omdat een deskundige (een makelaar) moet worden benoemd om de door de koper geleden schade vast te stellen. Het hof acht voorshands de volgende aannames gerechtvaardigd bij het onderzoek:
 Koper zou zich bij een juiste voorstelling van zaken niet als gegadigde voor deze woning hebben gemeld.
 Koper zou bij een juiste voorstelling van zaken een woning hebben gekocht, in een soortgelijke wijk in Veldhoven, die vergelijkbare eigenschappen en voorzieningen heeft, maar afmetingen heeft van 100 m2 (of iets meer).
 Wilt u een representatief aantal woningen (referentiepanden) van 100 m2 (of iets meer) beschrijven, die vergelijkbaar zijn (wat betreft relevante eigenschappen en voorzieningen, zoals locatie en staat van onderhoud), in een soortgelijke wijk in Veldhoven?
 Wilt u de marktwaarde van deze woningen bepalen per oktober 2013 en per de datum van uw rapport?
 Wilt u de marktwaarde van de woning van koper bepalen per de datum van uw rapport?
 Hoewel er in de laatst besproken gerechtelijke procedure nog geen einduitspraak is – en misschien komt die er ook wel niet vanwege een schikking tussen de partijen – lijkt het er vooralsnog op dat de veranderende schadeberekening in de rechtspraak gunstig is voor makelaars en ongunstig voor kopers.
 In de praktijk is het namelijk heel goed mogelijk dat een iets kleinere, maar gelijksoortige woning in eenzelfde wijk (ongeveer) dezelfde marktwaarde heeft als een iets grotere woning. Bij de aan- en verkoop van woning komt het ook vaak aan op het gevoel dat kopers bij een bepaalde woning hebben. Dit is ook het argument/verweer wat makelaars in gerechtelijke procedures steeds opvoerden; de koper had de woning toch wel gekocht, ook als hij/zij op de hoogte was geweest van het juiste aantal vierkante meters woonoppervlakte. Kortom, dat de woonoppervlakte van ondergeschikt belang is en dat het niet rechtvaardig is om de niet daadwerkelijk aangekochte vierkante meters van de koopprijs af te trekken.
 Lagere schadeberekeningen in de toekomst
 Het ligt zodoende in de lijn der verwachting dat de schadeberekeningen in de toekomst relatief lager zullen uitvallen dan in het verleden. Heeft u nog vragen? Neem dan contact op met de advocaten van de sectie bouw- en vastgoed van TRC Advocaten.


text:
 6.8.2011
 PT
 Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
 C 232/24
 Acórdão do Tribunal Geral de 28 de Junho de 2011 — ATB Norte/IHMI — Bricocenter Italia (BRICO CENTER)
 (Processo T-475/09) (1)
 (Marca comunitária - Processo de oposição - Pedido de marca figurativa comunitária BRICO CENTER - Marcas figurativas comunitárias anteriores ATB CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE Brico Centro e CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BricoCentro - Motivo relativo de recusa - Risco de confusão - Artigo 8.o, n.o 1, alínea b), do Regulamento (CE) n.o 207/2009)
 2011/C 232/42
 Língua do processo: italiano
 Partes
 Recorrente: ATB Norte, SL (Burgos, Espanha) (representantes: inicialmente P. López Ronda, G. Macias Bonilla, H. Curtis-Oliver e G. Marín Raigal, depois F. Brandolini Kujman, advogados)
 Recorrido: Instituto de Harmonização do Mercado Interno (marcas, desenhos e modelos) (representantes: O. Montalto e G. Mannucci, agentes)
 Outra parte no processo na Câmara de Recurso, interveniente no Tribunal Geral: Bricocenter Italia Srl (Rozzano, Itália) (representantes: G. Ghidini, M. Mergati e C. Signorini, advogados)
 Objecto
 Recurso da decisão da Quarta Câmara de Recurso do IHMI, de 24 de Setembro de 2009 (processo R 500/2008-4), relativa a um processo de oposição entre a ATB Norte, SL e a Bricocenter Italia Srl.
 Dispositivo
 1)
 A decisão da Quarta Câmara de Recurso do Instituto de Harmonização do Mercado Interno (marcas, desenhos e modelos) (IHMI), de 24 de Setembro de 2009 (processo R 500/2008-4,) é anulada na medida em que deu provimento ao recuso interposto pela Bricocenter Italia Srl na Câmara de Recurso no que diz respeito aos serviços de «publicidade», de «gestão dos negócios comerciais» e de «administração comercial», visados pelo pedido de marca comunitária.
 2)
 É negado provimento ao recurso quanto ao restante.
 3)
 A ATB Norte, Sl, a Bricocenter Italia Srl e o IHMI suportarão cada um as suas próprias despesas efectuadas durante o processo no Tribunal Geral.
 (1) JO C 24 de 30.1.2010.


text:
 Svarīgs juridisks paziņojums
 |
 52006PC0716(01)
 Priekšlikums padomes Lemumam par Eiropas Kopienas un Kanādas nolīguma slēgšanu /* COM/2006/0716 galīgā redakcija - ACC 2006/0243 */
 [pic] | EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA |Briselē, 23.11.2006COM(2006) 716 galīgā redakcija2006/0243 (ACC)2006/0244 (ACC)PriekšlikumsPADOMES LĒMUMAMpar Eiropas Kopienas un Kanādas nolīguma slēgšanuPriekšlikumsPADOMES REGULAar ko īsteno nolīgumu, ko pēc sarunām saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu ir noslēgusi EK, un groza un papildina I pielikumu Regulai (EEK) Nr. 2658/87 par tarifu un statistikas nomenklatūru un kopējo muitas tarifu(iesniegusi Komisija)PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTS1. Saistībā ar muitas savienības paplašināšanos VVTT XXIV panta 6. punkta noteikumi EK uzliek par pienākumu sākt sarunas ar trešām valstīm, kurām ir sarunu tiesības kādā no pievienošanās dalībvalstīm, lai vienotos par kompensācijas korekcijām, ja, pieņemot EK ārējā muitas tarifa režīmu, pievienošanās dalībvalsts tarifi paaugstinās, pārsniedzot līmeni, ko tā uzņēmusies PTO, turklāt „pienācīgi ņemot vērā attiecīgajai tarifa pozīcijai atbilstošus nodokļu samazinājumus, ko, izveidojot muitas savienību, noteikuši citi dalībnieki”.2. Padome 2004. gada 22. martā pilnvaroja Komisiju sākt sarunas saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu (COM priekšlikums 6792/04 PTO 34).3. Komisija vadīja sarunas, apspriežoties ar komiteju, kas izveidota ar Līguma 133. pantu, un pamatojoties uz Padomes izdotajām sarunu direktīvām.4. Komisija vadīja sarunas ar PTO dalībvalstīm, kam ir sarunu tiesības par īpašu koncesiju atcelšanu, attiecībā uz Čehijas Republikas, Igaunijas Republikas, Kipras Republikas, Latvijas Republikas, Lietuvas Republikas, Ungārijas Republikas, Maltas Republikas, Polijas Republikas, Slovēnijas Republikas un Slovākijas Republikas sarakstu atcelšanu, tām pievienojoties Eiropas Kopienai.5. Šo sarunu iznākums ir nolīgums ar Kanādu.6. Ar šo priekšlikumu Padomei lūdz apstiprināt minēto nolīgumu.2006/0243 (ACC)PriekšlikumsPADOMES LĒMUMAMpar Eiropas Kopienas un Kanādas nolīguma slēgšanuEIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu un jo īpaši tā 133. pantu saistībā ar 300. panta 2. punkta pirmās daļas pirmo teikumu,ņemot vērā Komisijas priekšlikumu,tā kā:1. Padome 2004. gada 22. martā pilnvaroja Komisiju saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu sākt sarunas ar dažām citām PTO dalībvalstīm saistībā ar Čehijas Republikas, Igaunijas Republikas, Kipras Republikas, Latvijas Republikas, Lietuvas Republikas, Ungārijas Republikas, Maltas Republikas, Polijas Republikas, Slovēnijas Republikas un Slovākijas Republikas pievienošanos Eiropas Kopienai.2. Komisija vadīja sarunas, apspriežoties ar komiteju, kas izveidota ar Līguma 133. pantu, un pamatojoties uz Padomes izdotajām sarunu direktīvām.3. Komisija ir beigusi sarunas par Eiropas Kopienas un Kanādas nolīgumu. Šis nolīgums ir jāapstiprina,IR NOLEMUSI ŠADI.1. pantsAr šo Kopienas vārdā apstiprina Eiropas Kopienas un Kanādas nolīgumu par īpašu koncesiju atcelšanu attiecībā uz Čehijas Republikas, Igaunijas Republikas, Kipras Republikas, Latvijas Republikas, Lietuvas Republikas, Ungārijas Republikas, Maltas Republikas, Polijas Republikas, Slovēnijas Republikas un Slovākijas Republikas sarakstu atcelšanu, tām pievienojoties Eiropas Kopienai.Nolīguma teksts pievienots šim lēmumam.2. pantsAr šo Padomes priekšsēdētāju pilnvaro izraudzīt personu(-as), kura(-as) ir tiesīga(-as) parakstīt 1. pantā minēto nolīgumu, lai tas kļūtu saistošs Kopienai.BriselēPadomes vārdāpriekšsēdētājsEiropas Kopienas un Kanādas valdības nolīgums, nobeidzot sarunas par VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktuPēc Eiropas Kopienu (EK) un Kanādas valdības sarunām saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu un XXVIII pantu par koncesiju korekcijām Čehijas Republikas, Igaunijas Republikas, Kipras Republikas, Latvijas Republikas, Lietuvas Republikas, Ungārijas Republikas, Maltas Republikas, Polijas Republikas, Slovēnijas Republikas un Slovākijas Republikas saistību sarakstos, šīm valstīm pievienojoties Eiropas Kopienai; sarunas sāka pēc EK 2004. gada 19. janvāra paziņojuma PTO saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu,Eiropas Kopiena (EK) un Kanādas valdība, turpmāk „puses”,Ir vienojušās par šādiem noteikumiem.1. EK sarakstos, kas ir spēkā 25 dalībvalstu Eiropas Kopienas muitas teritorijā, iekļauj iepriekšējā Eiropas Kopienu 15 dalībvalstu CLX sarakstā noteiktās koncesijas.2. Turklāt EK sarakstos, kas ir spēkā 25 dalībvalstu EK muitas teritorijā, iekļauj šī nolīguma pielikumā minētās koncesijas.3. EK ne vēlāk kā līdz 2007. gada 1. martam saskaņā ar pielikumu samazina tarifus un pielāgo tarifa likmes kvotas.4. Šis nolīgums stājas spēkā dienā, kad Kanāda ir paziņojusi par attiecīgo iekšzemes procedūru pabeigšanu, pēc tam, kad puses ir parakstījušas nolīgumu.TO APLIECINOT , attiecīgi pilnvarotas personas ir parakstījušas šo nolīgumu.PARAKSTĪTS xxx, 200_. gada xxx. xxx divos eksemplāros angļu un franču valodā, visi teksti ir vienlīdz autentiski.EIROPAS KOPIENAS VāRDā— | KANāDAS VALDīBAS VāRDā— |Pielikums- valstij (Kanāda) piešķir tarifa likmes kvotu 4624 tonnas cūkgaļai (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0203 1211, 0203 1219, 0203 1911, 0203 1913, 0203 1915, ex 0203 1955, 0203 1959, 0203 2211, 0203 2219, 0203 2911, 0203 2913, 0203 2915, ex 0203 2955 un 0203 2959), kvotas likme 233-434 EUR/t,- pievieno 35 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai „mājas cūku izcirtņi” (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0203 1211, 0203 1219, 0203 1911, 0203 1913, 0203 1915, ex 0203 1955, 0203 1959, 0203 2211, 0203 2219, 0203 2911, 0203 2913, 0203 2915, ex 0203 2955 un 0203 2959), kvotas likme 233-434 EUR/t,- pievieno 1265 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai „saldēti bezkaula šķinķi un garie muguras gabali” (tarifa pozīcijas numurs ex 0203 1955, ex 0203 2955), kvotas likme 250 EUR/t,- pievieno 49 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai „svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti cāļu liemeņi” (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0207 11 10, 0207 11 30, 0207 11 90, 0207 12 10, 0207 12 90), kvotas likme 131-162 EUR/t,- pievieno 4070 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai „svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti cāļu izcirtņi“ (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0207 13 10, 0207 13 20, 0207 13 30, 0207 13 40, 0207 13 50, 0207 13 60, 0207 13 70, 0207 14 20, 0207 14 30, 0207 14 40, 0207 14 60), kvotas likme 93-512 EUR/t,- pievieno 1605 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai „vistu izcirtņi” (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0207 14 10), kvotas likme 795 EUR/t,- pievieno 201 tonnu ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai „svaiga, atdzesēta vai saldēta tītara gaļa” (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0207 24 10, 0207 24 90, 0207 25 10, 0207 25 90, 0207 26 10, 0207 26 20, 0207 26 30, 0207 26 40, 0207 26 50, 0207 26 60, 0207 26 70, 0207 26 80, 0207 27 30, 0207 27 40, 0207 27 50, 0207 27 60, 0207 27 70), kvotas likme 93-425 EUR/t,- pievieno 2485 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai „saldēti tītara izcirtņi” (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0207 27 10, 0207 27 20, 0207 27 80), kvotas likme 0%,- pievieno 537 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai sausajam vājpienam (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 0402 10 19), kvotas likme 475 EUR/t,- atver tarifa likmes kvotu 20000 hl ( erga omnes ) vīnam (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 2204 2965, 2204 2975), kvotas likme 8,0 EUR/hl,- atver tarifa likmes kvotu 40000 hl ( erga omnes ) vīnam (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 2204 2179, 2204 2180), kvotas likme 10,0 EUR/hl,- atver tarifa likmes kvotu 13810 hl ( erga omnes ) vīnam (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 2205 9010), kvotas likme 7,0 EUR/hl,- atver tarifa likmes kvotu 2838 tonnas ( erga omnes ) konservētiem ananasiem, citrusaugiem, bumbieriem, aprikozēm, ķiršiem, persikiem un zemenēm (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 2008 2011, 2008 2019, 2008 2031, 2008 2039, 2008 2071, 2008 3011, 2008 3019, 2008 3031, 2008 3039, 2008 3079, 2008 4011, 2008 4019, 2008 4021, 2008 4029, 2008 4031, 2008 4039, 2008 5011, 2008 5019, 2008 5031, 2008 5039, 2008 5051, 2008 5059, 2008 5071, 2008 6011, 2008 6019, 2008 6031, 2008 6039, 2008 6060, 2008 7011, 2008 7019, 2008 7031, 2008 7039, 2008 7051, 2008 7059, 2008 8011, 2008 8019, 2008 8031, 2008 8039, 20088070), kvotas likme 20 %,- pievieno 6215 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai miežiem (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 1003 00), kvotas likme 16 EUR/t,- par 853 tonnām palielina Kanādai spēkā esošo piešķīrumu EK tarifa likmes kvotai parastajiem kviešiem (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 1001 9099), kvotas likme 12 EUR/t,- atver tarifa likmes kvotu 242074 tonnas ( erga omnes ) kukurūzai (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 1005 9000, 1005 1090), kvotas likme 0 %,- atver tarifa likmes kvotu 2058 tonnas ( erga omnes ) suņu un kaķu barībai (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 2309 1013, 2309 1015, 2309 1019, 2309 1033, 2309 1039, 2309 1051, 2309 1053, 2309 1059, 2309 1070), kvotas likme 7 %,- pievieno 2700 tonnas ( erga omnes ) EK tarifa likmes kvotai izstrādājumiem, kas izmantojami dzīvnieku barībā (tarifa pozīcijas numurs 2309 9031, 2309 9041, 2309 9051, 2309 9095, 2309 9099), kvotas likme 7%.FINANŠU PĀRSKATS |DATUMS: 11.07.2006. |1. | BUDŽETA POZĪCIJA: 10. nodaļa. – Lauksaimniecības maksājumi | APROPRIĀCIJAS: 2,302 miljoni euro |2. | SADAĻA: Priekšlikums Padomes Lēmumam par Eiropas Kopienas un Kanādas nolīguma slēgšanu attiecībā uz kompensācijas korekcijām, kas paredzētas 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktā |3. | JURIDISKAIS PAMATS: Līguma 133. pants |4. | MĒRĶI: Ievērot 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punkta prasības saistībā ar muitas savienības paplašināšanos 2004. gada 1. maijā |5. | FINANSIĀLĀS SEKAS | 12 MĒNEŠU PERIODS (miljonos EUR) | KĀRTĒJAIS FINANŠU GADS [n] (miljonos EUR) | NĀKAMAIS FINANŠU GADS [n+1] (miljonos EUR) |5.0. | IZDEVUMI, KO SEDZ - NO EK BUDŽETA (KOMPENSĀCIJAS/INTERVENCES PASĀKUMI) - VALSTS IESTĀDES - CITI NOTEIKUMI |5.1. | IEŅĒMUMI - EK PAŠU RESURSI (MAKSĀJUMI/MUITAS NODOKĻI) - VALSTS | - 2,302 miljoni euro (1) |[n+2] | [n+3] | [n+4] | [n+5] |5.0.1. | APRĒĶINĀTIE IZDEVUMI |5.1.1. | APRĒĶINĀTIE IEŅĒMUMI |5.2. | APRĒĶINU METODE: |6.0. | VAI PROJEKTU VAR FINANSĒT NO KĀRTĒJĀ BUDŽETA ATTIECĪGAJĀ NODAĻĀ IEKĻAUTAJĀM APROPRIĀCIJĀM? | Nepiemēro |6.1. | VAI PROJEKTU VAR FINANSĒT NO KĀRTĒJĀ BUDŽETA STARONODAĻU PĀRVEDUMIEM? | Nepiemēro |6.2. | VAI BŪS NEPIECIEŠAMS PAPILDU BUDŽETS? | NĒ |6.3. | VAI NĀKAMAJOS BUDŽETOS BŪS JĀIEKĻAUJ APROPRIĀCIJAS? | NĒ |NOVĒROJUMI: |PASKAIDROJUMA RAKSTS4. Izdarīta atsauce uz Padomes Lēmumu XXXX attiecībā uz nolīguma slēgšanu ar Kanādu pēc sarunām saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu.5. Ar šo Padomes regulas priekšlikumu īsteno Kopienas noslēgto nolīgumu.2006/0244 (ACC)PriekšlikumsPADOMES REGULAar ko īsteno nolīgumu, ko pēc sarunām saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu ir noslēgusi EK, un groza un papildina I pielikumu Regulai (EEK) Nr. 2658/87 par tarifu un statistikas nomenklatūru un kopējo muitas tarifuEIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu un jo īpaši tā 133. pantu,ņemot vērā Komisijas priekšlikumu[1],tā kā:(1) Ar Padomes Regulu (EEK) Nr. 2658/87(1) izveidoja preču nomenklatūru, turpmāk tekstā „Kombinētā nomenklatūra”, un noteica kopējā muitas tarifa līgtās nodokļu likmes.(2) Ar Lēmumu Nr. XX/XXX/EK par Eiropas Kopienas un Kanādas nolīguma slēgšanu Padome Kopienas vārdā apstiprināja iepriekš minēto nolīgumu, lai nobeigtu sarunas, ko uzsāka saskaņā ar 1994. gada VVTT XXIV panta 6. punktu,IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO REGULU.1. pantsRegulas (EEK) Nr. 2658/87 7. pielikuma III sadaļas trešo daļu (PTO tarifu kvotas, ko piešķir Kopienas kompetentās iestādes) groza, pievienojot tarifa kvotas un papildinot ar apjomiem, kas minēti regulas pielikumā.2. pantsŠī regula stājas spēkā nākamajā dienā pēc tās publicēšanas Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī .Šī regula uzliek saistības kopumā un ir tieši piemērojama visās dalībvalstīs.BriselēPadomes vārdā—priekšsēdētājsPIELIKUMSNeskarot noteikumus par Kombinētās nomenklatūras interpretāciju, preču apraksts ir jāuzskata tikai par informatīvu, jo šā pielikuma kontekstā koncesijas ir noteiktas, izmantojot Kombinētās nomenklatūras (KN) kodus, kas bija spēkā šīs regulas pieņemšanas laikā. Ja ir norādīti KN ex kodi, koncesijas nosaka, piemērojot gan KN kodu, gan attiecīgo aprakstu.TREŠĀ DAĻA Tarifa pielikumi |KN kods | Apraksts | Maksājuma likme |0203 1211 0203 1219 0203 1911 0203 1913 0203 1915 ex02031955 0203 1959 0203 2211 0203 2219 0203 2911 0203 2913 0203 2915 ex02032955 0203 2959 | Mājas cūku izcirtņi, svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti, ar kauliem vai bezkaula, izņemot atdalītu fileju, kas minēta atsevišķi. | Valstij (Kanāda) piešķir tarifa likmes kvotu 4264 tonnas, kvotas likme 233-434 EUR/t. |0203 1211 0203 1219 0203 1911 0203 1913 0203 1915 ex02031955 0203 1959 0203 2211 0203 2219 0203 2911 0203 2913 0203 2915 ex02032955 0203 2959 | Mājas cūku izcirtņi, svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti, ar kauliem vai bezkaula, izņemot atdalītu fileju, kas minēta atsevišķi. | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |ex02031955 ex02032955 | Mājas cūku bezkaula garie muguras gabali un šķiņķi, svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |0207 1110 0207 1130 0207 1190 0207 1210 0207 1290 | Cāļu liemeņi, svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |0207 1310 0207 1320 0207 1330 0207 1340 0207 1350 0207 1360 0207 1370 0207 1420 0207 1430 0207 1440 0207 1460 | Cāļu izcirtņi, svaigi, atdzesēti vai saldēti | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |0207 1410 | Saldēti Gallus domesticus sugas putnu gaļas bezkaula gabali | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |0207 2410 0207 2490 0207 2510 0207 2590 0207 2610 0207 2620 0207 2630 0207 2640 0207 2650 0207 2660 0207 2670 0207 2680 0207 2730 0207 2740 0207 2750 0207 2760 0207 2770 | Tītara gaļa, svaiga, atdzesēta vai saldēta | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |0207 2710 0207 2720 0207 2780 | Tītara izcirtņi, saldēti Bezkaula Puses vai ceturtdaļas Citi | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |0402 1019 | Sausais vājpiens | Pievieno 537 tonnas (erga omnes) EK tarifa likmes kvotai, kvotas likme 475 EUR/t. |2204 2965 2204 2975 | Svaigu vīnogu vīns (izņemot dzirkstošo vīnu un īpašos reģionos ražotu kvalitatīvu vīnu), kura faktiskā spirta tilpumkoncentrācija nepārsniedz 13%, tvertnēs, kuru tilpums ir lielāks par 2 litriem. | Atver tarifa likmes kvotu 20 000 hl (erga omnes), kvotas likme 8,0 EUR/hl. |2204 2179 2204 2180 | Svaigu vīnogu vīns (izņemot dzirkstošo vīnu un īpašos reģionos ražotu kvalitatīvu vīnu), kura faktiskā spirta tilpumkoncentrācija ir mazāka par 13%, tvertnēs, kuru tilpums ir 2 litri vai mazāks nekā 2 litri. | Atver tarifa likmes kvotu 40 000 hl (erga omnes), kvotas likme 10,0 EUR/hl. |2205 9010 | Vermuts un citi svaigo vīnogu vīni, kas aromatizēti ar augiem vai aromātiskām vielām un kuru faktiskā spirta tilpumkoncentrācija ir 18% vai mazāka nekā 18%, tvertnēs, kuru tilpums ir lielāks par 2 litriem. | Atver tarifa likmes kvotu 13 810 hl, kvotas likme 7,0 EUR/hl. |2008 2011 2008 2019 2008 2031 2008 2039 2008 2071 2008 3011 2008 3019 2008 3031 2008 3039 2008 3079 2008 4011 2008 4019 2008 4021 2008 4029 2008 4031 2008 4039 2008 5011 2008 5019 2008 5031 2008 5039 2008 5051 2008 5059 2008 5071 2008 6011 2008 6019 2008 6031 2008 6039 2008 6060 2008 7011 2008 7019 2008 7031 2008 7039 2008 7051 2008 7059 2008 8011 2008 8019 2008 8031 2008 8039 2008 8070 | Konservēti ananasi, bumbieri, aprikozes, ķirši, persiki un zemenes | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |1003 00 | Mieži | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |1001 9099 | Parastie kvieši | Par 853 tonnām palielina Kanādai spēkā esošo piešķīrumu EK tarifa likmes kvotai, kvotas likme 12 EUR/t. |1005 9000 1005 1090 | Kukurūza | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |2309 1013 2309 1015 2309 1019 2309 1033 2309 1039 2309 1051 2309 1053 2309 1059 2309 1070 | Suņu un kaķu barība | Īsteno ar Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 711/2006 (OV L 124, 11.5.2006., 1. lpp.). |2309 9031 2309 9041 2309 9051 2309 9095 2309 9099 | Izstrādājumi, kas izmantojami dzīvnieku barībā | Atver tarifa likmes kvotu 2700 tonnas (erga omnes) EK tarifa likmes kvotai, kvotas likme 7%. |Visām iepriekšminētajām tarifa pozīcijām un kvotām piemēro precīzu 15 valstu EK tarifa aprakstu.[1] OV C [...], [...], [...]. lpp.


text:
 24.3.2021
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 102/8
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2021/507
 z dne 23. marca 2021
 o podaljšanju dovoljenja za piridoksin hidroklorid (vitamin B6) kot krmni dodatek za vse živalske vrste in razveljavitvi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 515/2011
 (Besedilo velja za EGP)
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1831/2003 z dne 22. septembra 2003 o dodatkih za uporabo v prehrani živali (1) in zlasti člena 9(2) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 (1)
 Uredba (ES) št. 1831/2003 določa dovoljevanje dodatkov za uporabo v prehrani živali ter razloge in postopke za izdajo in podaljšanje takih dovoljenj.
 (2)
 Piridoksin hidroklorid (vitamin B6) je bil z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 515/2011 (2) dovoljen za 10 let kot krmni dodatek za vse živalske vrste.
 (3)
 V skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 je bil vložen zahtevek za podaljšanje dovoljenja za piridoksin hidroklorid kot krmni dodatek za vse živalske vrste in njegovo uvrstitev v kategorijo dodatkov „nutritivni dodatki“. Navedenemu zahtevku so bili priloženi zahtevani podatki in dokumenti iz člena 14(2) navedene uredbe.
 (4)
 Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) je v mnenju z dne 30. septembra 2020 (3) ugotovila, da je vložnik predložil podatke, ki dokazujejo, da dodatek izpolnjuje obstoječe pogoje za dovoljenje. Agencija je ugotovila, da piridoksin hidroklorid pod sedanjimi dovoljenimi pogoji uporabe nima škodljivega učinka na zdravje živali, varnost potrošnikov ali na okolje. Ugotovila je tudi, da dodatek ne draži kože in oči ter ne povzroča preobčutljivosti kože, vendar lahko povzroči preobčutljivost na svetlobo, prav tako pa ni bilo mogoče v celoti izključiti škodljivih učinkov na dihala, ker ni študij strupenosti pri vdihavanju. Zato Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba sprejeti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe, da se preprečijo škodljivi učinki na zdravje ljudi, zlasti kar zadeva uporabnike dodatka. Agencija je tudi ugotovila, da v okviru podaljšanja dovoljenja ni potrebe po ocenjevanju učinkovitosti dodatka.
 (5)
 Ocena piridoksin hidroklorida je pokazala, da so pogoji za dovoljenje iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 izpolnjeni. Zato bi bilo treba podaljšati dovoljenje za navedeni dodatek.
 (6)
 Zaradi podaljšanja dovoljenja za piridoksin hidroklorid kot krmni dodatek bi bilo treba Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 515/2011 razveljaviti.
 (7)
 Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Dovoljenje za dodatek iz Priloge, ki spada v kategorijo dodatkov „nutritivni dodatki“ in funkcionalno skupino „vitamini, provitamini in kemijsko natančno definirane snovi s podobnim učinkom“ za vse živalske vrste, se podaljša v skladu s pogoji iz navedene priloge.
 Člen 2
 Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 515/2011 se razveljavi.
 Člen 3
 Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 23. marca 2021
 Za Komisijo
 Predsednica
 Ursula VON DER LEYEN
 (1) UL L 268, 18.10.2003, str. 29.
 (2) Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 515/2011 z dne 25. maja 2011 o izdaji dovoljenja za vitamin B6 kot krmni dodatek za vse živalske vrste (UL L 138, 26.5.2011, str. 40).
 (3) EFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6289.
 PRILOGA
 Identifikacijska številka dodatka
 Dodatek
 Sestava, kemijska formula, opis, analizna metoda
 Vrsta ali kategorija živali
 Najvišja starost
 Najnižja vsebnost
 Najvišja vsebnost
 Druge določbe
 Datum izteka veljavnosti dovoljenja
 mg dodatka/kg popolne krmne mešanice z 12-odstotno vsebnostjo vlage
 Kategorija nutritivnih dodatkov
 Funkcionalna skupina: vitamini, provitamini in kemijsko natančno definirane snovi s podobnimi učinki
 3a831
 „piridoksin hidroklorid“ ali „vitamin B6“
 Sestava dodatka
 Piridoksin hidroklorid
 C8H11NO3·HCl.
 Merila čistosti: ne manj kot 98,5 %.
 Lastnosti aktivne snovi
 Piridoksin hidroklorid.
 vse živalske vrste
 –
 –
 –
 1.
 V navodilih za uporabo dodatka in premiksov se navedejo pogoji skladiščenja ter obstojnost pri toplotni obdelavi in v vodi.
 2.
 Piridoksin hidroklorid ali vitamin B6 se lahko uporablja tudi v vodi za pitje.
 3.
 Nosilci dejavnosti poslovanja s krmo zaradi morebitnih tveganj za uporabnike dodatka in premiksov pri ravnanju z njimi določijo postopke varnega ravnanja in organizacijske ukrepe. Kadar navedenih tveganj s takimi postopki in ukrepi ni mogoče odpraviti ali čim bolj zmanjšati, se dodatek in premiksi uporabljajo z osebno zaščitno opremo, vključno z zaščito za dihala.
 13. april 2031
 Analizna metoda
 (1)
 Za določanje piridoksin hidroklorida (vitamin B6) v krmnem dodatku:
 —
 titracija s perklorovo kislino (10. izdaja Evropske farmakopeje, monografija 0245).
 Za določanje piridoksin hidroklorida (vitamin B6) v premiksih:
 —
 tekočinska kromatografija visoke ločljivosti z reverzno fazo v povezavi z UV detektorjem (RP-HPLC-UV) – VDLUFA Bd.III, metoda 13.9.1.
 Za določanje piridoksin hidroklorida (vitamin B6) v krmi in vodi:
 —
 tekočinska kromatografija visoke ločljivosti z reverzno fazo v povezavi s fluorescenčno detekcijo (RP-HPLC-FLD) – metoda, ki temelji na EN14164:2008.
 (1) Podrobnosti o analiznih metodah so na voljo na naslednjem naslovu referenčnega laboratorija: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports.