text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21987A0616(01)
 Accord entre la Communauté économique européenne et la République d'Argentine sur le commerce des produits textiles - Protocole A - Protocole B - Protocole C - Protocole D - Procès-verbal agréé - Echange de notes Traduction non officielle
 Journal officiel n° L 156 du 16/06/1987 p. 0002 - 0038 L040 13/02/1991 P.0002
 AGREEMENT Between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Argentina on trade in textile products Done at Brussels on 30 September 1986THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINAof the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing every security for trade, the orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Economic Community (hereinafter referred to as 'the Community') and the Republic of Argentina ('hereinafter Argentina').RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, and in particular, to eliminate real risks of market disruption on the market of the Community and real risks of disruption to the textile trade of Argentina.HAVING REGARD to the Arrangement regarding International Trade in Textiles (hereinafter referred to as 'the Geneva Arrangement'), and in particular Article 4 thereof; and to the conditions set out in the Protocol extending the Arrangement.HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their Plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES:THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA:WHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:SECTION ITrade arrangementsArticle 11. The Parties recognize and confirm that, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and without prejudice to their rights and obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the conduct of their mutual trade in textile products shall be governed by the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement.2. In respect of the products covered by this Agreement, the Community undertakes not to introduce quantitative restrictions under Article XIX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or Article 3 of the Geneva Arrangement.3. Measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on the importation into the Community of the products covered by this Agreement shall be prohibited.Article 21. This Agreement shall apply to trade in textile products of cotton, wool and man-made fibres originating in Argentina which are listed in Annex I.2. The classification of the products covered by this Agreement is based on the Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff and on the Nomenclature of Goods for the External Trade Statistics of the Community and the Statistics of Trade between Member States (NIMEXE).From the entry into force of the International Convention on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) this classification will be based on the Harmonized System and on the Community nomenclatures derived from that system.3. The origin of the products covered by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the rules in force in the Community.Any amendment to these rules of origin shall be communicated to Argentina and shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for control of the origin of the products referred to above are laid down in Protocol A.Article 3Argentina agrees for each Agreement year to restrain its exports to the Community of the products described in Annex II to the limits set out therein.Exports of textile products set out in Annex II shall be subject to a double-checking system specified in Protocol A.Article 4Argentina and the Community recognize the special and differential character of re-imports of textile products into the Community after processing in Argentina.Such re-imports may be agreed outside the quantitative limits established under this Agreement provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing in force in the Community.Article 5Exports of cottage industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other articles obtained manually from such fabrics and traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to quantitative limits, provided that these products meet the conditions laid down in Protocol B.Article 61. Imports into the Community of textile products covered by this Agreement shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II, provided that they are declared to be for re-export outside the Community in the same state or after processing, within the framework of the administrative system of control which exists within the Community.However, the release for home use of products imported under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export licence issued by the Argentine authorities, and to proof of origin in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A.2. Where the Community authorities have evidence that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Agreement, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported outside the Community, the authorities concerned shall inform the Argentine authorities within four weeks of the quantities involved and authorize imports of identical quantities of the same products, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Agreement for the current or the following year.Article 71. In any Agreement year advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established for the following Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 5 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limits established for the following Agreement year.2. Carryover to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following Agreement year of the amounts not used during any Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.3. Transfers in respect of categories in Group I shall not be made from any category except as follows:- transfers between categories 2 and 3 and from category 1 to categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 7 % and transfers into category 1 from categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 4 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made,- transfers between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be made up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Transfers into any category in Groups II and III may be made from any category or categories in Groups I, II and III up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to above is given in Annex I to this Agreement.5. The increase in any category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above during an Agreement year shall not exceed 17 %.6. Prior notification shall be given by the authorities of Argentina in the event of recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above.Article 81. Exports of textile products not listed in Annex II to this Agreement may be made subject to quantitative limits by Argentina on the conditions laid down in the following paragraphs.2. Where the Community finds, under the system of administrative control set up, that the level of imports of products in a given category not listed in Annex II originating in Argentina exceeds, in relation to the preceding year's total imports into the Community from all sources of products in that category, the following rates:- 1 % for categories of products in Group I,- 5 % for categories of products in Group II,- 10 % for categories of products in Group III.It may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedure described in Article 16 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate restraint level for the products in such category.The Community shall authorize the importation of products of the said category shipped from Argentina before the date on which the request for consultations was submitted.3. Pending a mutually satisfactory solution, Argentina undertakes to limit exports of the products in the category concerned to the Community or to the regions of the Community market specified by the Community for a provisional period of three months from the date on which the request for consultations is made. Such provisional limit shall be established at 25 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, and gave rise to the request for consultation or 25 % of the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, whichever is the higher.4. Should the Parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16 of the Agreement, the Community shall have the right to introduce a definitive quantitative limit at an annual level not lower than the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, or 106 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2 and gave rise to the request for consultations whichever is the higher.The annual level so fixed shall be revised upwards after consultations in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 16, with a view to fulfilling the conditions set out in paragraph 2, should the trend of total imports into the Community of the product in question make this necessary.5. The limits introduced under paragraph 2 or paragraph 4 may in no case be lower than the level of imports of products in that category originating in Argentina in 1985.6. Quantitative limits may also be established by the Community on a regional basis in accordance with the provisions of Protocol C.7. The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under this Article shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Protocol D.8. The provisions of this Article shall not apply where the percentages specified in paragraph 2 have been reached as a result of fall in total imports into the Community, and not as a result of an increase in exports or products originating in Argentina.9. In the event of the provisions of paragraph 2, 3 or 4 being applied, Argentina undertakes to issue export licencesfor products covered by contracts concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.10. Up to the date of communication of the statistics referred to in Article 9 (7), the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply on the basis of the annual statistics previously communicated by the Community.11. The provisions of this Agreement which concern exports of products subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall also apply to products for which quantitative limits are introduced under this Article.Article 91. Argentina shall supply the Community with precise statistical information on all export certificates issued by the Argentine authorities for all categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits established under this Agreement as well as on all certificates issued by the Argentine authorities for all products referred to in Article 5 and subject to the provisions of Protocol B.The Community shall likewise transmit to the Argentine authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations or documents issued by the Community authorities in respect of export licences and certificates issued by Argentina.2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall, for all categories of products, be forwarded before the end of the second month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.3. Argentina also undertakes to supply the Community wherever possible with available statistical information on all textile exports by country of destination.4. The Community shall forward to the Argentine authorities import statistics for all products covered by the system of administrative control referred to in Article 8 (2) and for products covered by Article 6 (1).5. The information referred to in paragraph 3 shall, for all categories of products, be transmitted before the end of the third month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.6. Should it be found on analysis of the information exchanged that there are significant discrepancies between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be initiated in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16.7. For the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 7, the Community undertakes to provide the Argentine authorities before 15 April of each year with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Agreement, broken down by supplying country and Community Member State.Article 101. Should there be divergent opinions between Argentina and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by the present Agreement, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the Community, pending consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching agreement on definitive classification of the product concerned.2. If the above provisional classification results in provisional debit against a quantitative limit for a category of products other than the category indicated on the export documents issued by the competent Argentine authorities, the Community shall inform Argentina of such provisional debit within 30 days.3. The authorities of Argentina shall be informed of any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision, made in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community, relating to the classification of products covered by this Agreement.Any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision which results in a modification of the classification of products covered by this Agreement shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for the application of this paragraph are set out in Protocol A.Article 111. Argentina and the Community agree to cooperate fully in preventing the circumvention of the present Agreement by transhipment, rerouting or whatever other means.2. Where information available to the Community as a result of the investigations carried out in accordance with the procedures set out in Protocol A constitutes evidence that products of Argentine origin subject to quantitatives limits established under this Agreement have been transhipped, rerouted or otherwise imported into the Community in circumvention of this Agreement, the Community may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an equivalent adjustment of the corresponding quantitative limits established under the Agreement.3. Pending the result of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, Argentina shall as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the Community make the necessary arrangements to ensure that adjustments of quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted, where clear evidence of circumvention is provided.4. Should the parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16 of the Agreement, the Community shall have the right, where clear evidence of circumvention has been provided, to deduct from the quantitative limits established under this Agreement amounts equivalent to the products of Argentine origin.Article 121. Argentina shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits are spaced out as evenly as possible over an Agreement year, due account being taken, in particular, of seasonal factors.2. Should there be an excessive concentration of imports on any product within a category subject to quantitative limits under this Agreement, the Community may request consultations in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 of this Agreement with a view to remedying this situation. Article 13Should recourse be had to the denunciation provisions of Article 18 (4), the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall be adapted on a pro rata basis. Article 141. For the purpose of the administration of this Agreement, the limits referred to in Article 3 are broken down by the Community into shares for each of its Member States.2. Portions of the quantitative limits established in Annex II not used in one Member State of the Community may be reallocated to another Member State in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community.The Community undertakes to examine with care and reply within four weeks to any request made for reallocation by Argentina. In the event of agreement on such reallocation, the flexibility provisions set out in Article 6 shall continue to be applicable to the levels of the original allocation.If, in the course of the application of this Agreement, Argentina finds that the break-down of a limit established in Annex II causes particular difficulties, it may request the opening of consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution.3. After the first of June of each year of application of the Agreement, Argentina may transfer, subject to prior notification to the Community, the unused quantities of the regional quota-shares of a Community quantitative limit, set out in Annex II, to the quota-shares of the same limit of other regions of the Community provided that the regional quota-share from which the transfer is made is utilized by less than 80 %, and up to the amount of the followingpercentages of the quota-share to which the transfer is made:- 2 %in the first year of the application of the Agreement,- 4 % in the second year of the application of the Agreement,- 8 % in the third year of the application of the Agreement,- 12 % in the fourth year of the application of the Agreement.The percentage in the fifth year of the application of the Agreement shall be determined following consultation between the Parties.4. Should it appear in any given region of the Community that additional supplies are required, the Community may, where measures taken pursuant to paragraph 1 are inadequate to cover those requirements, authorize the importation of amounts greater than those stipulated in Annex II.Article 151. Argentina and the Community undertake to refrain from discrimination in the allocation of export licences and import authorizations or documents referred to in Protocol A.2. In implementing this Agreement, the Contracting Parties shall take care to maintain the traditional commercial practices and trade flows between the Community and Argentina.3. Should either Party find that the application of this Agreement is disturbing existing commercial relations between importers in the Community and suppliers in Argentina consultations shall be started promptly, in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 with a view to remedying this situation.Article 161. The special consultation procedures referred to in this Agreement shall be governed by the following rules:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Party,- the request for consultations shall be followed within a reasonable period (and in any case not later than 15 days following the notification) by a statement setting out the reasons and circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the parties shall enter into consultations within one month at the latest of notification of the request, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest.2. The Community may request consultations in accordance with paragraph 1 when it ascertains that during a particular year of application of the Agreement difficulties arise in the Community or one of its regions from a sharp and substantial increase, by comparison to the preceding year, in imports of a given category of Group I subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II.3. If necessary, at the request of either of the Parties and in conformity with the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Agreement. Any consultations held under this Article shall be approached by both Parties in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the difference between them.Article 17This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories within which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of Argentina.Article 181. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for this purpose. It shall be applicable until 31 December 1991.2. This Agreement shall apply with effect from 1 January 1987.3. Either party may at any time propose modifications to the Agreement.4. Either Party may at any time denounce this Agreement provided that at least 60 days notice is given. In that event, the Agreement shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice.5. The Annexes, Protocols and Agreed Minutes to this Agreement shall form an integral part thereof.Article 19This Agreement shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.ANNEX I LIST OF PRODUCTS 1. When the constitutive material of the products of categories 1 to 114 is not specifically mentioned these products are to be taken to be made exclusively of wool or of fine animal hair, of cotton or of man-made fibres.2. Garments which are not recognizable as being garments for men or boys or as garments for women or girls are classified with the latter.3. Where the expression 'babies' garments' is used, this is meant also to cover girls' garments up to and including commercial size 86.>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>>TABLE>ANNEX II For practical reasons the product descriptions used Annex I are given in the present Annex in abbreviated form >TABLE>PROTOCOL A TITLE ICLASSIFICATIONArticle 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Argentina of any changes in the tariff and statistical nomenclatures before the date of their entry into effect in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Argentina of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the Agreement within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category and the related tariff and statistical references;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to the Agreement, the competent authorities of the Community shall provide 30 day's notice, from the date of the Community's communication, before the decision is put into effect. Products shipped before the date of application of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in question are presented for importation into the Community within 60 days of that date.4. Where a Community decision on classification resulting in a change of classification practice or a change of categorization of any product subject to the Agreement affects a category subject to restraint, the two Parties agree to enter into consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 (1) of the Agreement with a view to honouring the obligation under the second subparagraph of Article 10 (3) of the Agreement.TITLE IIORIGINArticle 21. Products originating in Argentina for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement shall be accompanied by a certificate of Argentina origin conforming to the model annexed to this Protocol.2. The certificate of origin shall be issued by the competent governmental authorities of Argentina if the products in question can be considered products originatingin that country within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.3. However, the products in Group III may be imported into the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement on production of a declaration by the exporter on the invoice or other commercial document relating to the products to the effect that the products in question originate in Argentina within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.4. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required for import of goods covered by a certificate of origin Form A or Form APR completed in accordance with the relevant Community rules in order to qualify for generalized tariff preferences.Article 3The certificate of origin shall be issued only on application having been made in writing by the exporter or, under the exporter's responsibility, by his authorized representative. The competent governmental authorties of Argentina shall ensure that the certificate of origin is properly completed and for this purpose they shall call for any necessary documentary evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, certificates or declarations of origin shall contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods to enable the criterion to be determined on the basis of which the certificate was issued or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between the statements made in the certificate of origin and those made in the documents produced to the customs office for the purpose of carrying out the formalities for importing the product shall not ipso facto cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE IIIDOUBLE CHECKING SYSTEM FOR CATEGORIES OF PRODUCTS WITH QUANTITATIVE LIMITSSection IExportationArticle 6The competent authorities of Argentina shall issue an export licence in respect of all consignments from Argentina oftextile products referred to in Annex II, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement and of textile products subject to any definitive or provisional quantitative limits established as a result of the application of Article 8 of the Agreement.Article 71. The export licence shall conform to the model annexed to this Protocol. It must certify inter alia that the quantity of the product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit prescribed for the category of the product in question.2. Each export licence shall only cover one of the categories of products listed in Annex II of this Agreement. It may be used for one or more consignments of the products in question.Article 8The competent Community authorities must be notified forthwith of the withdrawal or alteration of any export licence already issued.Article 91. Exports shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which shipment of the goods has been effected, even if the export certificate is issued after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading on to the exporting aircraft, vehicle or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 11, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence have been shipped.Section IIImportationArticle 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization or document.Article 121. The competent Community authorities shall issue such import authorization or document automatically within fiveworking days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.The import authorization or document shall be valid for six months.2. The competent Community authorities shall cancel the already issued import authorization or document if the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent Community authorities have not been notified about the withdrawal or cancellation of the export licence until after the products have been imported into the Community, the quantities involved shall be set off against the quantitative limit for the category and the quota year in question.Article 131. If the competent Community authorities find that the total quantities covered by export certificates issued by Argentina for a particular category in any Agreement year exceed the quantitative limit established in Annex II for that category, as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement, or any definitive or provisional limit established under Article 8 of the Agreement, the said authorities may suspend the further issue of import authorizations or documents. In this event, the competent Community authorities shall immediately inform the authorities of Argentina and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 16 of the Agreement shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of Argentine origin not covered by Argentine export licences issued in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol may be refused the issue of import authorizations or documents by the competent Community authorities.However, if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent Community authorities, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits set out in Annex II or established as a result of the application of Article 7 of the Agreement, without the express agreement of Argentina save as provided for in Article 11 of the Agreement.TITLE IVFORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT CERTIFICATES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONSArticle 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in block capitals.These documents shall measure 210 × 297 mm. The paper used must be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp and weighing not less than 25 g/m$. Eachpart shall have a printed guilloche-pattern background making any falsification by mechanical or chemical means apparent to the eye.If the documents have several copies only the top copy which is the original shall be printed with the guilloche-pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original' and the other copies as 'copy'. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities in the Community as being valid for the purposes of export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying Argentina as follows: AR,- two letters identifying the country of destination as follows:BL = BeneluxDE = GermanyDK = DenmarkFR = FranceGB = United KingdomGR = GreeceIE = IrelandIT = ItalyES = SpainPT = Portugal- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in year, e.g. 7 for 1987,- a two-digit number running consecutively from 01 to 99 identifying issuing office.- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the country of destination.Article 15The export licence and certificate of origin may be issued after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they shall bear either the endorsement 'délivré a posteriori' or the endorsement 'Issued retrospectively'.Article 161. In the event of theft, loss or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent governmental authority which issued the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so issued shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata'.2. The duplicate must bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE VADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATIONArticle 17The Community and Argentina shall cooperate closely to implement the provisions of this Agreement. To this end, contacts and exchanges of views (including on technical matters) shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 18In order to ensure the proper application of this Agreement, the Community and Argentina shall assist each other in checking the authenticity and accuracy of export licences and certificates of origin issued or declarations made under this Protocol.Article 19Argentina shall send the Commission of the European Communities the names and addresses of the governmental authorities competent for the issue and verification of export licences and certificates of origin together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities. Argentina shall also notify the Commission of any change in this information.Article 201. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to accuracy of the information regarding the products in question.2. In such cases the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate of origin or export licence or a copy thereof to the competent governmental authority in Argentina giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance for an enquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or licence or its copy. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall be applicable to subsequent verifications of the declarations of origin referred to in Article 2 of this Protocol.4. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest. The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate or licence applied to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement. The information shall also include, at the requestof the Community, copies of all documentation necessary to determine the facts fully and in particular the true origin of the goods.Should such verifications reveal systematic irregularities in the use of declarations of origin, the Community may subject imports of the products in question to the provisions of Article 2 (1) of this Protocol.5. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for a period of at least three years by the competent governmental authority in Argentina.6. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 211. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 20 or where information available to the Community or to Argentina indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Agreement are being contravened, both Parties shall cooperate closely and with appropriate urgency to prevent such contravention.2. To this end Argentina shall on its own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriateenquiries or arrange for such enquiries to be carried out concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be in contravention of this Agreement. Argentina shall communicate the results of these enquiries to the Community together with any other pertinent information enabling the true origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the competent Community authorities and the competent Argentine authorities, officials designated by the Community may be present at the enquiries referred to above.4. Pursuant to the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, Argentina and the Community shall exchange any information considered by either party to be of use in preventing the contravention of the provisions of this Agreement. These exchanges may include information on textile production in Argentina and on trade in textile products of a kind covered by this Agreement between Argentina and other countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit across the territory of Argentina and prior to their importation into the Community. This information shall include at the request of the Community copies of all relevant documentation.5. Where it is established that the provisions of this Agreement have been contravened, Argentina and the Community may agree to take such measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such contravention.Annex to Protocol A, Article 2(1)>TABLE>Annex to Protocol A, Article 7(1)>TABLE>PROTOCOL B 1. The exemption provided for in Article 5 of the Agreement in respect of cottage industry products shall apply only to the following products:(a) fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, being fabrics of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Argentina;(b) garments or other textile articles of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Argentina obtained manually from the fabrics referred to above and sewn exclusively by hand without the aid of any machine;(c) traditional folklore textile products of Argentina made by hand in the cottage industry of Argentina as defined in a list to be agreed between both Parties and annexed to this Protocol.Exemption shall be granted only for products accompanied by a certificate issued by the competent Argentine authorities in accordance with the specimen annexed to this Protocol. Such certificates shall state the ground on which exemption is based and shall be accepted by the competent Community authorities provided that they are satisfied that the products concerned conform to the conditions set out in this Protocol. Certificates covering the products referred to in subparagraph (c) above shall bear a conspicuous stamp: 'FOLKLORE'. In case of divergent opinion between Argentina and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community as to the nature of such products, consultations shall be held within one month with a view to resolving such divergences. Should imports of any of the above products reach such proportions as to cause difficulties to the Community, the two Parties shall open consultations forthwith in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16 of the Agreement with a view to finding a quantitative solution to the problem.2. The provisions of Title IV and V of Protocol A shall apply mutatis mutandi to the products referred to in paragraph 1 of this Protocol.Annex to Protocol B>TABLE>PROTOCOL C Under Article 8 (6) of the Agreement, a quantitative limit may be fixed on a regional basis where imports of a given product into any region of the Community in relation to the amounts determined in accordance with paragraph 2 of the said Article 8 exceed the following regional percentage:Germany 25,5 %Benelux 9,5 %France 16,5 %Italy 13,5 %Denmark 2,7 %Ireland 0,8 %United Kingdom 21,0 %Greece 1,5 %Spain 7,5 %Portuga l1,5 %PROTOCOL D The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under Article 8 of the Agreement shall be determined as follows:For products in categories falling within Group I, II, III, the growth rate shall be fixed by agreement between the Parties in accordance with the consultation procedure established in Article 16 of the Agreement. Such growth rate may in no case be lower than the highest rate applied to corresponding products under bilateral agreements concluded under the Geneva Arrangement between the Community and other third countries having a level of trade equal to or comparable with that of Argentina.Agreed Minute With reference to Article 14 (3) of the Agreement on trade in textiles between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Argentina, initialled on 30 September 1986, it is agreed that the percentage of the fifth year of the application of the Agreement will be at least equal to the percentage applicable in the fourth year.Head of Delegation of theRepublic of ArgentinaHead of Delegation of theEuropean Economic CommunityExchange of Notes The Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on trade in textile products between the Republic of Argentina and the Community initialled on 30 September 1986.The Mission wishes to inform the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Government of the Republic of Argentina is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply provisionally from 1 January 1987 if the Community is disposed to do likewise.The Mission would be grateful if the Community would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Exchange of Notes The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Note regarding the Agreement on trade in textile products between the Republic of Argentina and the Community initalled on 30 September 1986.The Directorate-General wishes to confirm that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply provisionally from 1 January 1987.The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.


type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
C 180/4 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 27.7.2002
 DOMSTOLENS DOM DOMSTOLENS DOM
 (femte avdelningen) (femte avdelningen)
 av den 6 juni 2002
 av den 13 juni 2002
 i mål C-159/00 (begäran om förhandsavgörande från Cour
 i mål C-158/00: Storhertigdömet Luxemburg mot Euro- de cassation): Sapod Audic mot Eco-Emballages SA (1)
 peiska gemenskapernas kommission (1)
 (Direktiv 83/189/EEG – Informationsförfarande beträffan-
 de tekniska standarder och föreskrifter – Skyldighet att
 (Avslut av räkenskaper – EUGFJ – Räkenskapsåren anmäla förslag till tekniska föreskrifter – Direktiven 75/
 1996–1998 – Jordbruksgrödor – Förfarande som kommissio- 442/EEG och 91/156/EEG – Avfall – Skyldighet att informe-
 nen skall följa) ra om avsedda åtgärder – Nationell lagstiftning om bortskaf-
 fande av förpackningsavfall – Skyldighet för tillverkare
 (2002/C 180/06) och importörer att identifiera de förpackningar som ett
 auktoriserat företag skall omhänderta – Skyldighet för det
 auktoriserade företaget att säkerställa att de förpackningar
 (Rättegångsspråk: franska) som omhändertas uppfyller tekniska krav)
 (Preliminär översättning; den slutgiltiga översättningen kommer att (2002/C 180/07)
 publiceras i ”Rättsfallssamling från Europeiska gemenskapernas
 domstol och förstainstansrätt”) (Rättegångsspråk: franska)
 (Preliminär översättning; den slutgiltiga översättningen kommer att
 publiceras i ”Rättsfallssamling från Europeiska gemenskapernas
 I mål C-158/00, Storhertigdömet Luxemburg (ombud: M. F. domstol och förstainstansrätt”)
 Hoffstetter, biträdd av advokaten R. Nothar) mot Europeiska
 gemenskapernas kommission (ombud: P. Oliver och G. Ber-
 scheid), angående en talan om delvis ogiltigförklaring av I mål C-159/00, angående en begäran enligt artikel 234 EG,
 kommissionens beslut 2000/216/EG av den 1 mars 2000 om från Cour de cassation (Frankrike), att domstolen skall meddela
 undantagande från gemenskapsfinansiering av vissa utgifter ett förhandsavgörande i det vid den nationella domstolen
 som verkställts av medlemsstaterna inom ramen för garantisek- anhängiga målet mellan Sapod Audic och Eco-Emballages SA,
 tionen vid Europeiska utvecklings- och garantifonden för angående tolkningen av artiklarna 1 och 10 i rådets direktiv 83/
 jordbruket (EUGFJ) (EGT L 67, s. 37), i den del detta innebär 189/EEG av den 28 mars 1983 om ett informationsförfarande
 att gemenskapsfinansiering inte skall ske avseende utgifter beträffande tekniska standarder och föreskrifter (EGT L 109,
 på 56 106 800 LUF, som verkställts av Storhertigdömet s. 8; svensk specialutgåva, område 13, volym 12, s. 154), i
 Luxemburg inom sektorn för jordbruksgrödor avseende räken- ändrad lydelse enligt rådets direktiv 88/182/EEG av den
 skapsåren 1996–1998, har domstolen (femte avdelningen), 22 mars 1988 (EGT L 81, s. 75; svensk specialutgåva,
 sammansatt av avdelningsordföranden P. Jann samt domarna område 13, volym 17, s. 36), av artikel 3.2 i rådets direktiv
 S. von Bahr (referent), D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola och 75/442/EEG av den 15 juli 1975 om avfall (EGT L 194, s. 39;
 M. Wathelet, generaladvokat: A. Tizzano, justitiesekreterare: svensk specialutgåva, område 15, volym 1, s. 238), i ändrad
 R. Grass, den 13 juni 2002 avkunnat en dom där domslutet lydelse enligt rådets direktiv 91/156/EEG av den 18 mars 1991
 har följande lydelse: (EGT L 78, s. 32; svensk specialutgåva, område 15, volym 1,
 s. 238) samt av artikel 30 i EG-fördraget (nu artikel 28 EG i
 1) Kommissionens beslut 2000/216/EG av den 1 mars 2000 ändrad lydelse), har domstolen (femte avdelningen), samman-
 om undantagande från gemenskapsfinansiering av vissa utgifter satt av avdelningsordföranden P. Jann samt domarna S. von
 som har verkställts av medlemsstaterna inom ramen för Bahr och C.W.A. Timmermans (referent), generaladvokat:
 garantisektionen vid Europeiska utvecklings– och garantifonden F.G. Jacobs, justitiesekreterare: biträdande justitiesekreteraren
 för jordbruket (EUGFJ) ogiltigförklaras i den del detta innebär H. von Holstein, den 6 juni 2002 avkunnat en dom där
 att gemenskapsfinansiering inte skall ske avseende de utgifter domslutet har följande lydelse:
 som har verkställts av Storhertigdömet Luxemburg inom sektorn
 för jordbruksgrödor före den 26 maj 1996. 1) En nationell bestämmelse som artikel 4 andra stycket i dekret
 nr 92-377 av den 1 april 1992 om genomförande, vad gäller
 2) Talan ogillas i övrigt. förpackningsavfall, av lag nr 75-633 av den 15 juli 1975 om
 bortskaffande av avfall och återvinning av material, i ändrad
 lydelse, endast kan utgöra en teknisk föreskrift i den mening
 3) Vardera parten skall bära sin rättegångskostnad.
 som avses i rådets direktiv 83/189/EEG av den 28 mars 1983
 om ett informationsförfarande beträffande tekniska standarder
 (1) EGT C 176, 24.6.2000.
 och föreskrifter, i ändrad lydelse enligt rådets direktiv 88/182/
 EEG av den 22 mars 1988, om den nationella domstolen
 beslutar att den skall tolkas som innehållande en märknings-
 eller etiketteringsskyldighet.
 ---pagebreak--- 27.7.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 180/5
 2) Artikel 10 i direktiv 83/189, i ändrad lydelse enligt direk- DOMSTOLENS DOM
 tiv 88/182, skall tolkas så, att om en nationell bestämmelse
 som artikel 4 andra stycket i dekret nr 92-377 måste tolkas som
 att den innehåller en märknings- eller etiketteringsskyldighet, är (femte avdelningen)
 denna bestämmelse inte undantagen från den anmälningsskyl-
 dighet som föreskrivs i artikel 8 i direktiv 83/189.
 av den 25 april 2002
 3) Εn enskild kan åberopa en underlåten anmälan enligt artikel 8
 i nämnda direktiv av en nationell bestämmelse såsom artikel 4 i mål C-183/00 (begäran om förhandsavgörande från
 andra stycket i dekret nr 92-377 för det fall den senare Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción no 5 de
 bestämmelsen skall tolkas som innehållande en märknings- Oviedo): Marı́a Victoria González Sánchez mot Medicina
 eller etiketteringsskyldighet. Det ankommer då på den nationella Asturiana SA (1)
 domstolen att inte tillämpa denna bestämmelse. Vidare skall
 det preciseras att frågan om vilka slutsatser som skall dras av
 det förhållandet att den nationella bestämmelsen inte är (Tillnärmning av lagstiftning – Direktiv 85/374/EEG –
 tillämplig såvitt avser omfattningen av den sanktionsåtgärd Skadeståndsansvar för produkter med säkerhetsbrister –
 som föreskrivs i tillämplig nationell rätt, såsom till exempel att Ställning i förhållande till andra ansvarssystem)
 avtalet är ogiltigt eller inte kan göras gällande, regleras av
 nationell rätt. Denna slutsats är emellertid underställd villkoret
 att tillämpliga nationella rättsregler inte får vara mindre (2002/C 180/08)
 förmånliga än dem som avser en liknande talan som grundas
 på nationell rätt eller i praktiken gör det omöjligt att utöva
 rättigheter som följer av gemenskapsrätten. (Rättegångsspråk: spanska)
 4) För det fall direktiv 83/189 inte är tillämpligt på bestämmel- (Preliminär översättning; den slutgiltiga översättningen kommer att
 serna i dekret nr 92-377 var den berörda medlemsstaten med publiceras i ”Rättsfallssamling från Europeiska gemenskapernas
 stöd av artikel 3.2 i rådets direktiv 75/442/EEG av den 15 juli domstol och förstainstansrätt”)
 1975 om avfall i ändrad lydelse enligt rådets direktiv 91/156/
 EEG av den 18 mars 1991 skyldig att informera kommissionen
 om förslag till sådana nationella bestämmelser.
 I mål C-183/00, angående en begäran enligt artikel 234 EG,
 5) Artikel 3.2 i direktiv 75/442 skall tolkas så, att den inte ger från Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción nr 5 de Oviedo
 enskilda någon rättighet som kan göras gällande inför nationell (Spanien), att domstolen skall meddela ett förhandsavgörande
 domstol i syfte att en nationell lagstiftning som omfattas av i det vid den nationella domstolen anhängiga målet mellan
 denna bestämmelses tillämpningsområde skall ogiltigförklaras Marı́a Victoria González Sánchez och Medicina Asturiana SA,
 eller inte tillämpas med motiveringen att denna lagstiftning angående tolkningen av artikel 13 i rådets direktiv 85/374/
 antagits utan att kommissionen först har meddelats. EEG av den 25 juli 1985 om tillnärmning av medlemsstaternas
 lagar och andra författningar om skadeståndsansvar för pro-
 dukter med säkerhetsbrister (EGT L 210, s. 29; svensk special-
 6) En nationell bestämmelse som artikel 4 andra stycket i dekret utgåva, område 15, volym 6, s. 239), har domstolen (femte
 nr 92-377 kan, för det fall att den nationella domstolen inte avdelningen), sammansatt av avdelningsordföranden P. Jann
 tolkar den som innehållande en märknings- eller etiketterings- (referent) samt domarna S. von Bahr och C.W.A. Timmermans,
 skyldighet utan en allmän skyldighet att identifiera de förpack- generaladvokat: L.A. Geelhoed, justitiesekreterare: biträdande
 ningar som omhändertas för bortskaffande av ett auktoriserat justitiesekreteraren H. von Holstein, den 25 april 2002 avkun-
 företag, kvalificeras som ett försäljningsvillkor. Det ankommer nat en dom där domslutet har följande lydelse:
 på den nationella domstolen att pröva huruvida de villkor som
 fastställts härför i domstolens rättspraxis är uppfyllda för att
 utesluta att en sådan skyldighet omfattas av artikel 30 i EG- Artikel 13 i rådets direktiv 85/374/EEG av den 25 juli 1985 om
 fördraget (nu artikel 28 EG i ändrad lydelse), det vill säga att tillnärmning av medlemsstaternas lagar och andra författningar om
 bestämmelsen i fråga är tillämplig på samtliga berörda skadeståndsansvar för produkter med säkerhetsbrister skall tolkas så
 näringsidkare som bedriver verksamhet inom det nationella att de rättigheter som personer som har vållats skada av en produkt
 territoriet och att den såväl rättsligt som faktiskt påverkar med säkerhetsbrister tillförsäkras i den nationella lagstiftningen
 avsättningen av inhemska varor och varor från andra medlems- genom ett allmänt ansvarssystem med samma grund som det som
 stater på samma sätt. inrättats genom direktivet kan begränsas eller inskränkas till följd av
 införlivandet av direktivet med den aktuella medlemsstatens nationella
 rättsordning.
 (1) EGT C 176, 24.6.2000.
 (1) EGT C 192, 8.7.2000.


type: wikipedia

text:
Milan Katičić (Vrbanja, 1863. – Zagreb, 1944.), hrvatski pravnik, dr. iur.
 Rodočelnik čuvene hrvatske obitelji koja je dala dva akademika, Natka (sin) i Radoslava (unuk).
 Višu realnu gimnaziju završio je u Vinkovcima. Studirao i diplomirao pravne znanosti na Pravoslovnoj akademiji u Zagrebu.
 Kao student upao je u oči Khuenovim vlastima jer je izrazito bio hrvatski rodoljub, pa su ga uvrstili u neku crnu listu. Kad je shvatio da će mu u Hrvatskoj i Slavoniji biti onemogućena advokatura, otišao je u Bosnu.
 Znao je reći: "Uskočio sam od kralja k caru". Kad se javio advokatskoj komori u Sarajevu, rekli su mu u kojim gradovima može otvoriti kancelariju. Među njima je bio i Bihać. A on se sjetio da se u srednjovjekovnim ispravama Bihać opisuje kao "caput regni Croatiae".I odmah je odlučio poći onamo. U komori su se čudili jer je Bihać za njih bio najzabitnija provincija. Sav radni vijek proveo je u Bišću.
 Sudjelovao je i u javnom životu, te je bio i zastupnik u Bosanskom saboru. Bio aktivan u HKD Napretku, kojeg je zapravo i osnovao.
 U Hrvatskoj narodnoj zajednici čiji je Predsjednik dr. Nikola Mandić, tajnik Nikola Precca, a predsjednici okružnih odbora: dr. Jozo Sunarić (Banjaluka), dr. Milan Katičić (Bihać), fra Ambroz Miletić (Mostar), Petar Zelenika (Sarajevo), fra Marijan Duić (Travnik) i dr. Ivo Pilar (Donja Tuzla).
 (Prema tekstu Antuna Gustava Matoša IZ SARAJEVA Ex oriente lux!).
 Tek negdje 1940. preselio se u Zagreb da pod starost bude blizu sinu Natku. Umro je 1944. u visokoj dobi i pokopan je na Mirogoju u obiteljskom grobu uz suprugu Isabellu rođenu Stenzel (1867-1945).
 Katičić, Milan


text:
 26.9.2009
 SV
 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
 C 233/12
 Överklagande ingett den 12 augusti 2009 av NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB av den dom som förstainstansrätten (första avdelningen) meddelade den 9 juni 2009 i mål T-152/06, NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB mot Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission
 (Mål C-322/09 P)
 2009/C 233/21
 Rättegångsspråk: engelska
 Parter
 Klagande: NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB (ombud: M. Merola and L. Armati, avvocati)
 Övrig part i målet: Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission
 Klagandens yrkanden
 Klaganden yrkar att domstolen ska
 —
 upphäva den överklagade domen i dess helhet,
 —
 slå fast att Destination Stockholms talan i mål T-152/06 kunde prövas i sak och skulle bifallas, och därför bifalla klagandens yrkanden i första instans, och
 —
 förpliktiga kommissionen att ersätta rättegångskostnaderna.
 Klaganden yrkar alternativt att domstolen ska
 —
 upphäva den överklagade domen i dess helhet och slå fast att Destination Stockholms talan i mål T-152/06 kunde prövas i sak,
 —
 återförvisa målet till förstainstansrätten för en ny prövning, och
 —
 uppskjuta beslutet om rättegångskostnaderna i förstainstansrätten och domstolen till ett senare tillfälle.
 Grunder och huvudargument
 Klaganden anför att förstainstansrätten i den överklagade domen
 —
 har gjort en felaktig tillämpning av artikel 230 EG genom att uppenbarligen förvränga innehållet i de omtvistade skrivelserna, upphovsmannens avsikt och den bevisning som åberopats vid förstainstansrätten,
 —
 felaktigt har betecknat kommissionens ståndpunkt beträffande de omtvistade åtgärdernas förenlighet med den gemensamma marknaden som preliminär och har fört ett motsägelsefullt resonemang i detta avseende,
 —
 otillbörligen har hänvisat till artikel 88.1 EG genom att bedöma att kommissionen avslog en begäran om att den skulle lämna förslag till lämpliga åtgärder, och
 —
 felaktigt har tillämpat artiklarna 4, 10, 13 och 20.2 i förordning nr 659/1999 (1), särskilt genom att slå fast att kommissionens beteckning av de omtvistade åtgärderna som befintligt stöd gör det omöjligt att invända mot underkännandet av ett klagomål.
 (1) Rådets förordning (EG) nr 659/1999 av den 22 mars 1999 om tillämpningsföreskrifter för artikel 93 i EG-fördraget (EGT L 83, s. 1).


type: contracts

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21992A0220(01)
 Aftale i form af brevveksling mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Kongeriget Norge om tilpasning af aftalen om samhandelen med ost
 EF-Tidende nr. L 044 af 20/02/1992 s. 0039 - 0039
 AFTALE i form af brevveksling mellem Det Europaeiske OEkonomiske Faellesskab og Kongeriget Norge om tilpasning af aftalen om samhandelen med ost A. Brev fra Faellesskabet Hr. . . .Jeg skal hermed henvise til de konsultationer, der har vaeret afholdt mellem Det Europaeiske OEkonomiske Faellesskab og Kongeriget Norge i overensstemmelse med punkt 7 i aftalen om samhandelen med ost, undertegnet den 22. marts 1989.Jeg bekraefter, at konsultationerne er blevet afsluttet med foelgende resultater:1) De i aftalen fastsatte ostemaengder og importafgifter viderefoeres uaendret i 1992.2) I loebet af andet halvaar af 1992 vil der om noedvendigt blive afholdt konsultationer for at bestemme, hvilke maengder og importafgifter der skal gaelde i de foelgende aar.Jeg vil vaere Dem taknemmelig for at bekraefte Deres regerings godkendelse af dette brevs indhold.Modtag, hr. . . ., forsikringen om min mest udmaerkede hoejagtelse.Paa vegne af Raadet for De Europaeiske Faellesskaber B. Brev fra Norge Hr. . . .Jeg har den aere hermed at anerkende modtagelsen af Deres skrivelse af dags dato med foelgende ordlyd:»Jeg skal hermed henvise til de konsultationer, der har vaeret afholdt mellem Det Europaeiske OEkonomiske Faellesskab og Kongeriget Norge i overensstemmelse med punkt 7 i aftalen om samhandelen med ost, undertegnet den 22. marts 1989.Jeg bekraefter, at konsultationerne er blevet afsluttet med foelgende resultater:1) De i aftalen fastsatte ostemaengder og importafgifter viderefoeres uaendret i 1992.2) I loebet af andet halvaar af 1992 vil der om noedvendigt blive afholdt konsultationer for at bestemme, hvilke maengder og importafgifter der skal gaelde i de foelgende aar.Jeg vil vaere Dem taknemmelig for at bekraefte Deres regerings godkendelse af dette brevs indhold.« Jeg skal hermed bekraefte, at min regering kan godkende dette brevs indhold.Modtag, hr. . . ., forsikringen om min mest udmaerkede hoejagtelse.For regeringen for Kongeriget Norge


type: legislation

text:
 21.12.2020
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 431/30
 ROZPORZĄDZENIE WYKONAWCZE KOMISJI (UE) 2020/2157
 z dnia 14 grudnia 2020 r.
 zatwierdzające zmiany na poziomie Unii w specyfikacji produktu oznaczonego chronioną nazwą pochodzenia lub chronionym oznaczeniem geograficznym („Montello – Colli Asolani” (ChNP))
 KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA,
 uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,
 uwzględniając rozporządzenie delegowane Komisji (UE) 2019/33 z dnia 17 października 2018 r. uzupełniające rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 1308/2013 w odniesieniu do wniosków o objęcie ochroną nazw pochodzenia, oznaczeń geograficznych i określeń tradycyjnych w sektorze wina, procedury zgłaszania sprzeciwu, ograniczeń stosowania, zmian w specyfikacji produktu, unieważnienia ochrony oraz etykietowania i prezentacji (1), w szczególności jego art. 15 ust. 2,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 Komisja rozpatrzyła wniosek o zatwierdzenie zmian na poziomie Unii w specyfikacji produktu objętego chronioną nazwą pochodzenia „Montello – Colli Asolani”, przekazany przez Włochy zgodnie z art. 105 rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 1308/2013 (2) w związku z art. 15 rozporządzenia delegowanego (UE) 2019/33. Zmiany dotyczą zmiany nazwy z „Montello – Colli Asolani” na „Asolo Montello”/„Montello Asolo”.
 (2)
 Komisja opublikowała wniosek o zatwierdzenie zmian na poziomie Unii w specyfikacji w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej (3) zgodnie z art. 97 ust. 3 rozporządzenia (UE) nr 1308/2013.
 (3)
 Komisja nie otrzymała żadnego oświadczenia o sprzeciwie na podstawie art. 98 rozporządzenia (UE) nr 1308/2013.
 (4)
 Należy zatem zatwierdzić zmiany na poziomie Unii w specyfikacji produktu zgodnie z art. 99 rozporządzenia (UE) nr 1308/2013 w związku z art. 15 ust. 2 rozporządzenia delegowanego (UE) 2019/33,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZE ROZPORZĄDZENIE:
 Artykuł 1
 Niniejszym zatwierdza się zmiany specyfikacji produktu opublikowane w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej dotyczące nazwy „Montello – Colli Asolani” (ChNP).
 Artykuł 2
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wchodzi w życie dwudziestego dnia po jego opublikowaniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.
 Niniejsze rozporządzenie wiąże w całości i jest bezpośrednio stosowane we wszystkich państwach członkowskich.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 14 grudnia 2020 r.
 W imieniu Komisji,
 za Przewodniczącą,
 Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
 Członek Komisji
 (1) Dz.U. L 9 z 11.1.2019, s. 2.
 (2) Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 1308/2013 z dnia 17 grudnia 2013 r. ustanawiające wspólną organizację rynków produktów rolnych oraz uchylające rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 922/72, (EWG) nr 234/79, (WE) nr 1037/2001 i (WE) nr 1234/2007 (Dz.U. L 347 z 20.12.2013, s. 671).
 (3) Dz.U. C 325 z 2.10.2020, s. 28.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 52003PC0791
 Πρόταση κανονισμός του Συμβουλίου για την τροποποίηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001 που επιτρέπει την προσφορά και την παράδοση στην άμεση ανθρώπινη κατανάλωση ορισμένων εισαγόμενων οίνων στους οποίους μπορεί να έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί οινολογικές πρακτικές που δεν προβλέπονται από τον (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1493/1999 /* COM/2003/0791 τελικό */
 Πρόταση ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ για την τροποποίηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001 που επιτρέπει την προσφορά και την παράδοση στην άμεση ανθρώπινη κατανάλωση ορισμένων εισαγόμενων οίνων στους οποίους μπορεί να έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί οινολογικές πρακτικές που δεν προβλέπονται από τον (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1493/1999(υποβληθείσα από την Επιτροπή)ΑΙΤΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΕΚΘΕΣΗΟι οίνοι που κατάγονται από τρίτες χώρες, στους οποίους έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί οινολογικές πρακτικές που δεν γίνονται αποδεκτές από την κοινοτική νομοθεσία, δεν δύνανται να προσφερθούν για την άμεση ανθρώπινη κατανάλωση στην Κοινότητα, εκτός από ρητή παρέκκλιση που θα αποφασιστεί από το Συμβούλιο. Η διαδικασία παρεκκλίσεως προβλέπεται στο άρθρο 45, παράγραφος 2, του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1493/1999 περί κοινής οργανώσεως της αμπελοοινικής αγοράς.Κατά παρέκκλιση από το άρθρο 45, παράγραφος 1, του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1493/1999, δύναται να προσφερθούν ή να παραδοθούν για την άμεση ανθρώπινη κατανάλωση εντός της Κοινότητας τα προϊόντα που υπάγονται στους κωδικούς ΣΟ 2204 10, 2204 21, 2204 29 και 2204 30 10, που προέρχονται από σταφύλια που έχουν συγκομιστεί και οινοποιηθεί στην επικράτεια των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών της Αμερικής, για τα οποία χρησιμοποιήθηκαν, κατά τις εργασίες επεξεργασίας και αποθεματοποίησης, σύμφωνα με τις διατάξεις των ΗΠΑ, μια ή περισσότερες οινολογικές πρακτικές που αναφέρονται στην παράγραφο 1, σημείο α) και β) του παραρτήματος του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001.Όσον αφορά τη χρησιμοποίηση των οινολογικών πρακτικών που αναφέρονται στην παράγραφο 1 σημείο β) του παραρτήματος, η άδεια αυτή θα ίσχυε μέχρις ενάρξεως ισχύος της συμφωνίας που θα προκύψει από τις διαπραγματεύσεις με τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής, σχετικά με το εμπόριο οίνων, που θα αφορά ιδίως τις οινολογικές πρακτικές καθώς και την προστασία των γεωγραφικών ενδείξεων και το αργότερο έως τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2003.Η Επιτροπή προτείνει να διατηρηθεί η άδεια αυτή έως την περάτωση των διαπραγματεύσεων που διεξάγονται μεταξύ της Κοινότητας και των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών της Αμερικής προκειμένου να καταλήξουν σε συμφωνία σχετικά με το εμπόριο οίνου και το αργότερο έως τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2004.Η πρόταση αυτή δεν έχει καμία δημοσιονομική επίπτωση για τον κοινοτικό προϋπολογισμό.Πρόταση ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ για την τροποποίηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001 που επιτρέπει την προσφορά και την παράδοση στην άμεση ανθρώπινη κατανάλωση ορισμένων εισαγόμενων οίνων στους οποίους μπορεί να έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί οινολογικές πρακτικές που δεν προβλέπονται από τον (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1493/1999ΤΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ,Έχοντας υπόψη:τη συνθήκη για την ίδρυση της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας,τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1493/1999 του Συμβουλίου, της 17ης Μαΐου 1999, για την κοινή οργάνωση της αμπελοοινικής αγοράς [1], και ιδίως το άρθρο 45, παράγραφος 2,[1] ΕΕ L 179 της 14.7.1999, σ. 1. Κανονισμός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1795/2003 της Επιτροπής (ΕΕ L 262 της 14.10.2003, σ. 13).την πρόταση της Επιτροπής,Εκτιμώντας τα εξής:(1) Κατά παρέκκλιση από άρθρο 45, παράγραφος 1, του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1493/1999, ο κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001 του Συμβουλίου [2] επιτρέπει την εισαγωγή στην Κοινότητα αμερικανικών οίνων στους οποίους έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί οινολογικές πρακτικές που δεν προβλέπονται από τις κοινοτικές διατάξεις. Για τις οινολογικές πρακτικές που αναφέρονται στην παράγραφο 1, σημείο β), του παραρτήματος του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001, η άδεια αυτή λήγει στις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2003.[2] ΕΕ L 145 της 31.5.2001, σ. 12.(2) Λαμβάνοντας υπόψη ότι οι διεξαγόμενες διμερείς διαπραγματεύσεις με τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής δεν θα περατωθούν πριν από το τέλος του έτους και προκειμένου να αποφευχθεί οποιαδήποτε εμπορική διαταραχή, πρέπει να προβλεφθεί να συνεχιστούν να επιτρέπονται οι αμερικανικές οινολογικές πρακτικές που αναφέρονται στην παράγραφο 1, σημείο β), του παραρτήματος του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001, έως την έναρξη ισχύος της συμφωνίας που θα προκύψει από τις εν λόγω διαπραγματεύσεις, και το αργότερο έως τις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2004.(3) Πρέπει συνεπώς να τροποποιηθεί ανάλογα ο κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001.ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ:Άρθρο 1Στο άρθρο 1, παράγραφος 1, δεύτερο εδάφιο του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1037/2001, η ημερομηνία "31 Δεκεμβρίου 2003" αντικαθίσταται από την ημερομηνία "31 Δεκεμβρίου 2004".Άρθρο 2Ο παρών κανονισμός αρχίζει να ισχύει την τρίτη ημέρα από τη δημοσίευσή του στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.Ο παρών κανονισμός είναι δεσμευτικός ως προς όλα τα μέρη του και ισχύει άμεσα σε κάθε κράτος μέλος.Βρυξέλλες,Για το ΣυμβούλιοΟ Πρόεδρος>ΘΕΣΗ ΠIΝΑΚΑ>


text:
Bhí Emiliano Zapata Salazar, a rugadh ar an 8 Lúnasa 1879 in Anenecuilco (stát Morelos) agus a maraíodh ar an 10 Aibreán 1919 i Chinameca sa stát chéanna, ar na ceannairí ba tábhachtaí i Réabhlóid Mheicsiceo in aghaidh an deachtóra Porfirio Díaz sa bhliain 1910.
 Saol
 Rugadh faoin tuath é, ach ní raibh sé chomh bocht leis an gcuid is dearóile de mhuintir na tuaithe, agus bhí ról ceannasach aige ina phobal féin sula ndeachaigh sé leis an réabhlóid. Cé go raibh sé féin réasúnta sócúlach, luigh a chroí le cosmhuintir Anenecuilco, agus theastaigh uaidh buille a bhualadh ar a son siúd. Eisean a d'earcaigh Arm Fuascailte an Deiscirt, fórsa tábhachtach réabhlóideach, agus bhí sé féin ina ghinearál ar an bhfórsa seo, freisin. Dá réir sin, thugtaí El Caudillo del Sur, "Taoiseach an Deiscirt", air.
 Thaobhaigh Zapata le Francisco Madero, a bhí ag iarraidh Díaz a chloí, ach nuair a d'éirigh le Madero an deachtóir a ruaigeadh, ní raibh sé féin sásta an cineál leasuithe radacacha a chur i gcrích a bhí ag teastáil ó Zapata. Chuaigh Zapata chun cogaidh le tailte a bhaint amach do na bochtáin, agus bhain Madero mealladh as, ó nach raibh athroinnt chuimsitheach na dtailte ar a chlár oibre féin. I ndeireadh na bliana 1911, d'éalaigh Zapata go dtí na sléibhte le gluaiseacht réabhlóideach nua a thosú.
 Sa bhliain 1913, dúnmharaíodh Francisco Madero, agus tháinig Victoriano Huerta i gcomharbas air. Rinne Huerta iarrachtaí le síocháin a shocrú le Zapata, ach ní raibh Zapata sásta comhoibriú "leo siúd a mharaigh Madero", mar a dúirt sé - cé gur chaith sé féin tréimhse ag cur cogaidh ar Madero. Nuair a tháinig Venustiano Carranza i gcomharbas ar Huerta mar Uachtarán, níor thug Zapata aitheantas dó ach an oiread: thaobhaigh sé le Francisco "Pancho" Villa, taoiseach míleata an Tuaiscirt, agus thacaigh an bheirt le hEulalio Gutiérrez mar Uachtarán sealadach.
 D'éirigh le Carranza, áfach, sluaite Villa a chur ag cúlú, agus sa bhliain 1916, bhris a chuid trúpaí an cath ar Zapata ina lán áiteanna. Nuair a maraíodh Zapata i luíochán ar an 10 Aibreán 1919, ní raibh ann ach taoiseach treallchogaíochta a raibh na trúpaí ag rith gann air.
 Oidhreacht
 Mar sin féin, i ndiaidh a bháis, d'iompaigh sé ina naomh i súile na mbochtán, agus scríobh duine acu na focail seo ar chros a uaighe: Níl ach marbhán éigin ina luí anseo. Ní anseo atá Zapata. Mhair Arm Fuascailte an Deiscirt ag troid tréimhse mhaith i ndiaidh bhás Zapata, agus sa bhliain 1994, tháinig gluaiseacht fhuascailte nua ar an bhfód i measc na mbocht i ndeisceart na tíre a luann Zapata mar réalta eolais: na Zapatistas, nó Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional ("Arm Zapatista na Fuascailte Náisiúnta").
 Chuir finscéal Zapata - an treallchogaí dochloíte - an oiread draíochta ar na daoine taobh amuigh de Mheicsiceo féin go ndearna an stiúrthóir Elia Kazan scannán faoina shaol, Viva Zapata!, sa bhliain 1952. Ba é Marlon Brando a chonacthas i ról Zapata féin. Bhí an scannán bunaithe ar an tuiscint gur réabhlóidí simplí a bhí i Zapata nach raibh ach ag iarraidh cothrom na féinne a bhaint amach do na bochtáin, agus nach raibh na ceannairí réabhlóideacha eile ach ag glacadh buntáiste ar Zapata lena sainleas féin a chur chun cinn. Is é an cur síos a thug an scannán ar Zapata ná gur scológ a bhí ann nach raibh ceá ná ciú aige - le fírinne, áfach, bhí cúlra meánaicme aige, agus léamh agus scríobh aige dá réir.
 Tagairtí
 Féach freisin
 Réabhlóid Mheicsiceo
 Stair Mheicsiceo
 Daoine a rugadh i 1879
 Básanna i 1919


text:
Carolyn Carlson (nacida en 1943) es una coreógrafa norteamericana (de ascendencia finlandesa) de danza contemporánea artista y poeta.
 Carolyn es la vicedirectora del Centro Coreográfico Nacional en Roubaix y del Atelier de París en La Cartoucherie de Vincennes en París. Se le concedió el título de Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres de la República Francesa.
 Carrera
 Carolyn estudió danza en la Escuela de Ballet de San Francisco y en la Universidad de Utah. En 1965 se incorporó a la compañía de danza Alwin Nikolais en Nueva York convirtiéndose en una bailarina excepcional de la compañía.
 En 1968 ganó el Festival Internacional de Danza de París como mejor bailarina ( Danseur Meilleur ). En 1971 se incorporó a la compañía de danza Anne Béranger y en 1972 presentó Ritual pour un rêve mort en el Festival de Aviñón . Sucesivamente fue invitada a unirse a la London School of Contemporary Dance como profesora , intérprete y coreógrafa.
 En 1974 conoció a Rolf Liebermann y fue invitada a unirse a la Ópera de París como coreógrafa. En 1975 dirigió el Groupe de Recherches Théâtrales ( GRTOP ). Creaciones de este período incluyen Densidad 21,5 , Los Arquitectos , Esto, aquello y lo otro , Lenta, pesada y azul . A partir de 1974 enseñó improvisación y técnicas de composición en clases magistrales realizadas en la Rotonde de la Ópera .
 En 1980 se encontraba en el "Teatro la Fenice" en Venecia. Las obras de este período incluyen Undici Onde ; Underwood , Lady Blue .
 En 1985 regresó a París, donde actuó en el "Théâtre de la Ville " presenta Oscuro , Still Waters y otras obras. En 1991-1992 estuvo en Finlandia ( Elokuu ; syyskuu ; Maa ) . Ella también dirigió al Cullberg Ballet de Estocolmo durante dos años (Sub Rosa) .
 Presentó varias coreografías en solitario como Lady Blue ( 1984 ), Vu d’ici ( 1995 ). Otros trabajos incluyen coreografías para bailarines como Nina Hyvärinen , Talia Paz, Marie -Claude Pietragalla , Tero Saarinen. En 1998, ganó el Premios Benois de la Danza como coreógrafa.
 Fue directora del sector de la danza de la Bienal de Venecia (Bienal de Danza - Venecia , Italia) desde 1999 a 2002. Trabajos allí incluyen Parábola (1999), Portadores de luz (2000), J. Beuys canción (2001), Escritos sobre el agua (2002) . En Venecia abrió la academia de danza contemporánea Accademia Isola Danza y creó un festival.
 Ha actuado en improvisaciones con artistas como Larrio Ekson, Jorma Uotinen, Malou Airaudo, y con músicos como Michel Portal, John Surman, René Aubry, Joachim Kuhn, Trilok Gurtu.
 Carolyn crea piezas de repertorio para la Ópera de París ( Signes ), Ópera de Bordeaux (hidrógeno Jukebox) .
 Cronología
 1965-1971 - Figura principal de la empresa Alwin Nikolais
 1974-1980 - Etoile- chorégraphe en el Ballet de la Ópera de París (GRTOP)
 1980-1984 - Director Artístico del Teatro La Fenice , de Venecia
 1985-1991 - Artista residente en el Théâtre de la Ville , Paris
 1991-1992 - Artista residente en el Teatro de la ciudad de Helsinki y el Ballet Nacional de Finlandia
 1994-1995 - Director artístico del Cullberg Ballet , Estocolmo
 1999-2002 - Director Artístico de la sección de danza de la Bienal de Venecia
 A partir de 1999 - Dirección artística del Atelier de París - Carolyn Carlson , centro de Clases Magistrales
 Desde 2004 - Director Artístico del Centro Coreográfico Nacional de Roubaix Nord- Pas de Calais.
 Referencias
 Enlaces externos
 Carolyn Carlson bibliography at UNESCO Office Venice
 Carolyn Carlson at the Atelier de Paris
 Carolyn Carlson at Biennale de la Dance 2008
 Carolyn Carlson at Federal Agency of Culture and Cinematography
 Carolyn Carlson at CCN Roubaix
 Carolyn Carlson at the Biennale Danza (en Italiano)
 Coreógrafos de Estados Unidos
 Nacidos en Oakland (California)