type: caselaw

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 9.7.2005
 SK
 Úradný vestník Európskej únie
 C 171/14
 ROZSUDOK SÚDU PRVÉHO STUPŇA
 z 11. mája 2005
 vo veci T-25/03: Marco de Stefano proti Komisii Európskych spoločenstiev (1)
 (Úradníci - Všeobecné konkurzy - Nepripustenie ku skúškam - Vyžadované potvrdenia o vzdelaní)
 (2005/C 171/24)
 Jazyk konania: francúzština
 Vo veci T-25/03, Marco de Stefano, úradník Komisie Európskych spoločenstiev, bydliskom v Bruseli (Belgicko), v zastúpení: G. Vandersanden a G. Verbrugge, advokáti, proti Komisii Európskych spoločenstiev (splnomocnené zástupkyne: H. Tserepa-Lacombe a L. Lozano Palacios, ktoré si zvolili adresu na doručovanie v Luxemburgu), ktorej predmetom je návrh na zrušenie rozhodnutia konkurznej komisie EUR/A/166/01 z 8. apríla 2002 pre vytvorenie rezervy pre nábor referentov (A 7/A6) v oblasti auditu, ktorým sa zamietla prihláška žalobcu, ako aj subsidiárne návrh na náhradu škody, Súd prvého stupňa (štvrtá komora), v zložení: predseda komory H. Legal, sudcovia P. Mengozzi a I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, tajomník: H. Jung, vyhlásil 11. mája 2005 rozsudok, ktorého výrok znie:
 1.
 Žaloba sa zamieta.
 2.
 Každý z účastníkov konania znáša svoje vlastné trovy.
 (1) Ú. v. EÚ C 83, 5.4.2003.


type: contracts

text:
 Important legal notice
 |
 12008E/PRO/01
 Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 1) on the role of National Parliaments in the European Union
 Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0203 - 0205
 PROTOCOL (No 1)ON THE ROLE OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNIONTHE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,RECALLING that the way in which national Parliaments scrutinise their governments in relation to the activities of the Union is a matter for the particular constitutional organisation and practice of each Member State,DESIRING to encourage greater involvement of national Parliaments in the activities of the European Union and to enhance their ability to express their views on draft legislative acts of the Union as well as on other matters which may be of particular interest to them,HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community:TITLE IINFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARLIAMENTSArticle 1Commission consultation documents (green and white papers and communications) shall be forwarded directly by the Commission to national Parliaments upon publication. The Commission shall also forward the annual legislative programme as well as any other instrument of legislative planning or policy to national Parliaments, at the same time as to the European Parliament and the Council.Article 2Draft legislative acts sent to the European Parliament and to the Council shall be forwarded to national Parliaments.For the purposes of this Protocol, "draft legislative acts" shall mean proposals from the Commission, initiatives from a group of Member States, initiatives from the European Parliament, requests from the Court of Justice, recommendations from the European Central Bank and requests from the European Investment Bank for the adoption of a legislative act.Draft legislative acts originating from the Commission shall be forwarded to national Parliaments directly by the Commission, at the same time as to the European Parliament and the Council.Draft legislative acts originating from the European Parliament shall be forwarded to national Parliaments directly by the European Parliament.Draft legislative acts originating from a group of Member States, the Court of Justice, the European Central Bank or the European Investment Bank shall be forwarded to national Parliaments by the Council.Article 3National Parliaments may send to the Presidents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a reasoned opinion on whether a draft legislative act complies with the principle of subsidiarity, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.If the draft legislative act originates from a group of Member States, the President of the Council shall forward the reasoned opinion or opinions to the governments of those Member States.If the draft legislative act originates from the Court of Justice, the European Central Bank or the European Investment Bank, the President of the Council shall forward the reasoned opinion or opinions to the institution or body concerned.Article 4An eight-week period shall elapse between a draft legislative act being made available to national Parliaments in the official languages of the Union and the date when it is placed on a provisional agenda for the Council for its adoption or for adoption of a position under a legislative procedure. Exceptions shall be possible in cases of urgency, the reasons for which shall be stated in the act or position of the Council. Save in urgent cases for which due reasons have been given, no agreement may be reached on a draft legislative act during those eight weeks. Save in urgent cases for which due reasons have been given, a ten-day period shall elapse between the placing of a draft legislative act on the provisional agenda for the Council and the adoption of a position.Article 5The agendas for and the outcome of meetings of the Council, including the minutes of meetings where the Council is deliberating on draft legislative acts, shall be forwarded directly to national Parliaments, at the same time as to Member States' governments.Article 6When the European Council intends to make use of the first or second subparagraphs of Article 48(7) of the Treaty on European Union, national Parliaments shall be informed of the initiative of the European Council at least six months before any decision is adopted.Article 7The Court of Auditors shall forward its annual report to national Parliaments, for information, at the same time as to the European Parliament and to the Council.Article 8Where the national Parliamentary system is not unicameral, Articles 1 to 7 shall apply to the component chambers.TITLE IIINTERPARLIAMENTARY COOPERATIONArticle 9The European Parliament and national Parliaments shall together determine the organisation and promotion of effective and regular interparliamentary cooperation within the Union.Article 10A conference of Parliamentary Committees for Union Affairs may submit any contribution it deems appropriate for the attention of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. That conference shall in addition promote the exchange of information and best practice between national Parliaments and the European Parliament, including their special committees. It may also organise interparliamentary conferences on specific topics, in particular to debate matters of common foreign and security policy, including common security and defence policy. Contributions from the conference shall not bind national Parliaments and shall not prejudge their positions.--------------------------------------------------


text:
 8.8.2016
 HU
 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja
 C 287/10
 A Bíróság (hatodik tanács) 2016. június 2-i ítélete (a Symvoulio tis Epikrateias [Görögország] előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelme) – Kapnoviomichania Karelia AE kontra Ypourgos Oikonomikon
 (C-81/15. sz. ügy) (1)
 ((Előzetes döntéshozatal - Adózás - A jövedéki adóra vonatkozó általános rendelkezések - 92/12/EGK irányelv - Jövedékiadó-felfüggesztéssel szállított dohánygyártmányok - Az adóraktári engedélyes felelőssége - A tagállamok azon lehetősége, hogy a csempészet elkövetőivel szemben kiszabott pénzbüntetéseknek megfelelő összegek megfizetése tekintetében megállapítsák az adóraktári engedélyes egyetemleges felelősségét - Az arányosság és a jogbiztonság elve))
 (2016/C 287/12)
 Az eljárás nyelve: görög
 A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság
 Symvoulio tis Epikrateias
 Az alapeljárás felei
 Felperes: Kapnoviomichania Karelia AE
 Alperes: Ypourgos Oikonomikon
 Rendelkező rész
 Az európai uniós jog általános elveinek, különösen a jogbiztonság és az arányosság elvének fényében az 1992. december 14-i 92/108/EGK tanácsi irányelvvel módosított, a jövedékiadó-köteles termékekre vonatkozó általános rendelkezésekről és e termékek tartásáról, szállításáról és ellenőrzéséről szóló, 1992. február 25-i 92/12/EGK tanácsi irányelvet úgy kell értelmezni, hogy azzal ellentétes az olyan nemzeti szabályozás – mint amely a jelen ügyben szerepel, és amely lehetővé teszi többek között az ezen termékek tulajdonosainak az adófelfüggesztés hatálya alatt álló termékek szállítása során elkövetett jogsértés esetén kiszabott pénzbírságoknak megfelelő összegek megfizetéséért való egyetemleges felelősségének megállapítását, amennyiben e tulajdonosokat olyan szerződéses kapcsolat fűzi a jogsértés elkövetőihez, amely azokat a megbízottjainak minősíti –, amely alapján az adóraktári engedélyes egyetemlegesen felelősnek minősül az említett összegek megfizetéséért, anélkül hogy e felelősség alól mentesülhetne, amennyiben bizonyítja, hogy semmi köze a jogsértés elkövetőinek cselekményeihez, abban az esetben is, ha a nemzeti jog szerint ez az engedélyes nem volt tulajdonosa az említett termékeknek a jogsértés elkövetésekor, és nem fűzte ez utóbbi elkövetőihez olyan szerződéses kapcsolat, amely azokat a megbízottjainak minősíti.
 (1) HL C 138., 2015.4.27.


text:
 28.9.2013
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 284/4
 Prasība, kas celta 2013. gada 2. augustā — KO-Invest/ITSB — Kraft Foods Schweiz (“Milkoshake For Active People”)
 (Lieta T-399/13)
 2013/C 284/05
 Valoda, kādā sagatavots prasības pieteikums — poļu
 Lietas dalībnieki
 Prasītāja: KO-Invest Sp. z o.o. (Łódź, Polija) (pārstāvis — R. Rumpel, advokāts)
 Atbildētājs: Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas birojs (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi)
 Otra procesa ITSB Apelāciju padomē dalībniece: Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding GmbH (Zug, Šveice)
 Prasītājas prasījumi:
 —
 atcelt Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas biroja (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi) Apelāciju ceturtās padomes 2013. gada 27. maija lēmumu lietā R 720/2012-4, ciktāl ar to tiek atteikta Kopienas preču zīmes “Milkoshake For Active People” attiecībā uz precēm, kas ietilpst 5., 29., 30. un 32. klasē, reģistrācija;
 —
 apstrīdēto lēmumu grozīt tādējādi, ka preču zīme ir jāreģistrē attiecībā uz visām reģistrācijas pieteikumā norādītajām precēm;
 —
 piespriest ITSB atlīdzināt tiesāšanās izdevumus.
 Pamati un galvenie argumenti
 Kopienas preču zīmes reģistrācijas pieteikuma iesniedzēja: prasītāja
 Attiecīgā Kopienas preču zīme: grafiska preču zīme ar vārdisku elementu “Milkoshake For Active People” attiecībā uz precēm, kas ietilpst 5., 29., 30. un 32. klasē
 Iebildumu procesā pretstatītās preču zīmes vai apzīmējuma īpašniece: otra procesa ITSB Apelāciju padomē dalībniece
 Pretstatītā preču zīme vai apzīmējums: Kopienas preču zīmes Nr. 31 369 un Nr. 31 344, starptautiska reģistrācija (IR) Nr. 163 135 un plaši pazīstama preču zīme “MILKA” attiecībā uz precēm, kas ietilpst 5., 29., 30. un 32. klasē
 Iebildumu nodaļas lēmums: iebildumus apmierināt
 Apelāciju padomes lēmums: apelācijas sūdzību noraidīt
 Izvirzītie pamati: Regulas Nr. 207/2009 (1) 8. panta 1. punkta b) apakšpunkta pārkāpums
 (1) Padomes 2009. gada 26. februāra Regula (EK) Nr. 207/2009 par Kopienas preču zīmi (OV L 78, 1. lpp.).


type: wikipedia

text:
Friday () é um filme estadunidense de 1995. O filme gira em torno de 16 horas nas vidas de Craig Jones (Ice Cube) e Smokey (Chris Tucker), que precisam pagar 200 dólares para um traficante antes das 22 horas de sexta-feira. Michael Clarke Duncan faz sua estreia nesse filme, mas é increditado.
 Roteiro
 O filme mostra uma sexta-feira na vida de dois amigos, Craig Jones e Smokey, em South Los Angeles. Craig foi recentemente despedido de seu emprego depois de ter sido pego tirando dinheiro das caixas registradoras, apesar dele alegar ser inocente. Após a demissão, seu pai, Sr. Jones (John Witherspoon), ameaça expulsar Craig de casa se ele não arrumar um novo emprego. Enquanto isso, Craig tem mantido o olho na sua bonita vizinha Debbie (Nia Long), mas sua invejosa e extravagante namorada Joi (Paula Jai Parker) está sendo um obstáculo. Para piorar a situação, seu amigo Smokey o influencia a fumar maconha para tentar reanimá-lo. Mas a droga que os dois fumaram juntos, foi dada a Smokey pelo traficante Big Worm(Faizon Love) para que Smokey vendesse. Agora, os dois tem que pagar 200 dólares antes das 22:00, ou serão mortos.
 Elenco
 Ice Cube - Craig Jones
 Chris Tucker - Smokey
 Nia Long - Debbie
 Tom Lister Jr. - Deebo
 John Witherspoon - Sr. Jones
 Anna Maria Horsford - Sr.a Jones
 Regina King - Dana Jones
 Paula Jai Parker - Joi
 Faizon Love - Big Worm
 D.J. Pooh - Red
 Angela Means - Felisha
 Vickilyn Reynolds - Joann
 Ronn Riser - Stanley
 Kathleen Bradley - Sr.a Parker
 Tony Cox - Sr. Parker
 Anthony Johnson - Ezal
 Demetrius Navarro - Hector
 Jason Bose Smith - Lil Chris
 Bernie Mac - Pastor Clever
 Justin Revoner - Criança #1
 Meagan Good - Criança #2
 Lawanda Page - Senhora
 Terri J. Vaughn - China
 F. Gary Gray - Homem da Loja
 Yvette Wilson - Rita
 William L. Calhoun, Jr. - Atirador
 Reynaldo Rey - Pai do Red
 Michael Clarke Duncan - Jogador
 Ronye Beck - James
 Lançamento
 Friday foi lançado em 26 de Abril de 1995 nos Estados Unidos, 30 de Junho de 1995 no Reino Unido e 5 de Outubro de 1995 na Austrália.
 Foi lançado no formato de DVD em 2 de Março de 1999 e em Blu-ray em 8 de Setembro de 2009 com novos cortes do diretor. O DVD contém um trailer teatral, uma metragem sobre o filme e entrevistas com o elenco e com a equipe.
 Recepção
 O filme recebeu no geral comentários positivos dos críticos, ganhando 77% de críticas favoráveis de acordo com Rotten Tomatoes, e no Metacritic recebeu uma nota média de 54, baseada em 10 comentários.
 Sucesso de bilheteria
 Friday arrecadou 65 893 41 de dólares em seu primeiro fim de semana estreando na posição 2 da bilheteria em 865 cinemas, com média de 7 617 de dólares por cinema. O filme arrecadou 27 467 564 de dólares na América do Norte e 748 354 de dólares na bilheteria estrangeira com um total de 28 215 918 de dólares mundialmente.
 Trilha sonora
 Sua trilha sonora vendeu mais de 2 milhões de cópias só nos Estados Unidos e possui os sucessos Friday de Ice Cube e Keep Their Heads Ringin de Dr. Dre.
 Sequências
 Em 2000, foi lançado Mais Uma Sexta Feira em Apuros, com Mike Epps substituindo Chris Tucker, como Day-Day. Em 2002, foi lançado A Mais Louca Sexta Feira Em Apuros. Em 2010, Ice Cube falou de um possível quarto filme chamado A Última Sexta Feira em Apuros, com todo o elenco original de volta, incluindo Chris Tucker como Smokey. Com o passar de 2011, ele disse estar conversando com os atores para o filme. Até agora, apenas John Witherspoon, e Tom Lister Jr., que interpretam o Sr. Jones, e Deebo, respectivamente, se pronunciaram, dizendo que aceitariam fazer uma sequência.
 Filmes dos Estados Unidos de 1995
 Filmes de comédia dos Estados Unidos
 Filmes em língua inglesa
 Filmes dirigidos por F. Gary Gray
 Filmes ambientados em Los Angeles
 Filmes sobre afro-americanos
 Filmes que se passam num dia
 Filmes sobre Cannabis


text:
 30.1.2020
 PL
 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej
 L 26/39
 DECYZJA WSPÓLNEGO KOMITETU EOG
 NR 56/2018
 z dnia 23 marca 2018 r.
 zmieniająca załącznik II (Przepisy techniczne, normy, badania i certyfikacja) do Porozumienia EOG [2020/73]
 WSPÓLNY KOMITET EOG,
 uwzględniając Porozumienie o Europejskim Obszarze Gospodarczym („Porozumienie EOG”), w szczególności jego art. 98,
 a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:
 (1)
 W Porozumieniu EOG należy uwzględnić rozporządzenie Komisji (UE) 2017/2228 z dnia 4 grudnia 2017 r. zmieniające załącznik III do rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (WE) nr 1223/2009 dotyczącego produktów kosmetycznych (1), sprostowane w Dz.U. L 326 z 9.12.2017, s. 55.
 (2)
 Należy zatem odpowiednio zmienić załącznik II do Porozumienia EOG,
 PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ:
 Artykuł 1
 W pkt 1a (rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (WE) nr 1223/2009) w rozdziale XVI załącznika II do Porozumienia EOG dodaje się tiret w brzmieniu:
 „—
 32017 R 2228: rozporządzeniem Komisji (UE) 2017/2228 z dnia 4 grudnia 2017 r. (Dz.U. L 319 z 5.12.2017, s. 2), sprostowanym w Dz.U. L 326 z 9.12.2017, s. 55.”.
 Artykuł 2
 Teksty rozporządzenia (UE) 2017/2228, sprostowanego w Dz.U. L 326 z 9.12.2017, s. 55, w języku islandzkim i norweskim, które zostaną opublikowane w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej, są autentyczne.
 Artykuł 3
 Niniejsza decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem 24 marca 2018 r., pod warunkiem dokonania wszystkich notyfikacji przewidzianych w art. 103 ust. 1 Porozumienia EOG (*1).
 Artykuł 4
 Niniejsza decyzja zostaje opublikowana w sekcji EOG i w Suplemencie EOG do Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej.
 Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 23 marca 2018 r.
 W imieniu Wspólnego Komitetu EOG
 Claude MAERTEN
 Przewodniczący
 (1) Dz.U. L 319 z 5.12.2017, s. 2.
 (*1) Nie wskazano wymogów konstytucyjnych.


type: other

text:
Γράφτηκε από pey1 // Τετάρτη, 30 Ιανουαρίου 2013 22:07 // ΔΑΚΕ// 10911
 ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΕΞΑΡΤΗΤΗ Αθήνα 29 Ιανουαρίου 2013
 ΚΙΝΗΣΗ ΕΡΓΑΖΟΜΕΝΩΝ Ο.Α.Ε.Δ.
 Οι απαιτήσεις των σημερινών δύσκολων καιρών, δεν επιτρέπουν σε κανέναν να βάζει τις διεκδικήσεις των συναδέλφων του ΟΑΕΔ κάτω από παραταξιακές και προσωπικές επιδιώξεις! Η παράταξή μας η ΔΑΚΕ υποστήριξε τη διαμόρφωση ενός κοινού ψηφοδελτίου από το σύνολο των συνδικαλιστικών παρατάξεων του ΟΑΕΔ, μακριά από κομματικές δεσμεύσεις και εξαρτήσεις. Ο σκοπός όμως αυτός, δεν κατέστη εφικτό να γίνει πραγματικότητα, τουλάχιστον στην παρούσα φάση, επειδή κάποιοι επιδίωξαν τη διαμόρφωση ενός “δήθεν” ανεξάρτητου ψηφοδελτίου, με ένα και μόνο στόχο: να αποποιηθούν χρόνιες εξαρτήσεις και δεσμεύσεις με συγκεκριμένα κόμματα!! Το αποτέλεσμα αυτής της προσπάθειας μιλάει από μόνο του. Ποτέ άλλοτε και ύστερα από τέτοια διαβούλευση για την ενότητα του συνδικαλιστικού κινήματος, δεν οδηγηθήκαμε σε τέτοια πολυδιάσπαση!!!! Και όλα αυτά αρκούν για να αναφωνήσει και ο τελευταίος καλόπιστος συνάδελφος: « ́Αλλαξε ο Μανωλιός και έβαλε τα ρούχα του αλλιώς»!
 Θεωρούμε ότι η μακροχρόνια σχέση εμπιστοσύνης που μας συνδέει, δεν μας επιτρέπει να χρησιμοποιήσουμε το αίτημα της μεγάλης πλειοψηφίας των συναδέλφων μας για κοινό ψηφοδέλτιο, σαν «Δούρειο ίππο» !!
 Οφείλουμε ειδικά σε αυτή την πολύ δύσκολη περίοδο για τη χώρα, να αναδείξουμε την καλύτερη δυνατή εκπροσώπηση των 1.300 συναδέλφων μας στα συλλογικά όργανα (Π.Ε.Υ. και Ομοσπονδία). Και όπως πράξαμε κατά το προηγούμενο χρονικό διάστημα γυρνώντας τις πλάτες απέναντι σε κομματικές προσταγές, έτσι και στη συνέχεια η παράταξη μας δεσμεύεται να συνεχίσει την άσκηση του ρόλου της, ελεύθερα και δυναμικά!
 Η ΔΑΚΕ, αντίθετα με κάποιους «συνδικαλιστές» που επεδίωκαν να είναι αρεστοί στις εκάστοτε πολιτικές ηγεσίες, διεκδίκησε για τους συναδέλφους:
 1) Το συμψηφισμό των δανείων που δόθηκαν από τον Οργανισμό, με τα εφάπαξ και συγχρόνως, το πάγωμα των δανείων για τουλάχιστον ένα χρόνο. Θεωρήσαμε ότι αυτό μπορεί να αποτελέσει μια προσωρινή λύση ουσίας για όλους, σε αυτή τη δύσκολη συγκυρία που μας έχουν κόψει το 40% του μισθού μας.
 2) Πρωτοστατήσαμε στη διεκδίκηση του επιδόματος που έπαιρναν οι Φορείς Κοινωνικής Ασφάλισης (το οικονομικό κίνητρο). Ο ΟΑΕΔ από το Φεβρουάριο του 2012 χαρακτηρίζεται Φορέας Κοινωνικής Ασφάλισης και αυτό ισχυροποιεί τη θέση μας!!
 Θα παλέψουμε για να πληρωθούν με πρωτόδικες αποφάσεις, οι υποθέσεις όσων συναδέλφων αορίστου χρόνου έχουν εκδικαστεί και είναι θετικές, ενώ επίκειται και η εκδίκαση των τακτικών υπαλλήλων.
 3) Τα έξοδα κίνησης αποτελούν πραγματικές δαπάνες κίνησης και κακώς δεν καταβάλλονται, με το σκεπτικό πως αποτελούν επίδομα που υπάγεται στις διατάξεις του Ν.4024/11. Το ζήτημα αυτό απασχολεί όλους μας και δεσμευόμαστε πως θα συνεχίσουμε να ασκούμε πιέσεις προς κάθε κατεύθυνση, μέχρις ότου διευθετηθεί το θέμα!
 4) Συνεχίζουμε τις πιέσεις για την άμεση ενημέρωσή μας σχετικά με την «τύχη» του Οργανογράμματος του Οργανισμού μας, αφού όσες φορές ζητήθηκε από τη Διοίκηση, η απάντηση ήταν πως δεν υφίσταται! Κατά τον προηγούμενο χρόνο έγινε πρόταση περικοπής προς το Υπουργείο του 35% των δομών του Οργανισμού. ́Αμεσα βγάλαμε ανακοίνωση και απαιτήσαμε σύγκλιση Δ.Σ. και έκτακτο συνέδριο Ομοσπονδίας, προκειμένου να ενημερωθούν πανελλαδικά όλοι οι συνάδελφοι και οι συνδικαλιστές, ώστε διαμορφώσουμε όλοι μαζί άποψη για τον Οργανισμό και τις δράσεις του και να υπάρξει μια κοινή δράση. Δεν γίνεται να καταργούνται υπηρεσίες και δομές στη Διοίκηση και στην περιφέρεια, χωρίς οι συνάδελφοι και εμείς οι ίδιοι να γνωρίζουμε το παραμικρό!!!
 Εγκαινιάζοντας ένα διάλογο με τους συναδέλφους για περαιτέρω ενέργειες, μπορούμε ενδεικτικά να συμπεριλάβουμε στις προσεχείς προτάσεις μας για το διεκδικητικό πλαίσιο τα εξής:
 Τη χρήση των βρεφονηπιακών σταθμών (πρώην ΟΕΕ) για τα παιδιά των υπαλλήλων του ΟΑΕΔ
 Τη χρήση δελτίων κοινωνικού τουρισμού
 Την έκδοση καινούργιας υπουργικής απόφασης, για τη παράταση του παγώματος των δανείων του ΟΑΕΔ, από ένα έως 2 χρόνια, λόγω της συνεχιζόμενης οικονομικής κρίσης.
 Μένοντας πιστοί στην κεντρική θέση της ΔΑΚΕ, πως η συνδικαλιστική ανάδειξη δεν συνδυάζεται με τοποθέτηση σε θέσεις ευθύνης, δίνουμε την απάντηση σε όσους συλλήβδην κατηγορούν όλες τις παρατάξεις για κυβερνητικό συνδικαλισμό!
 Επιδίωξή μας είναι να δράσουμε άμεσα και να προχωρήσουμε στη σύνταξη όλων των δυνάμεων μας, αφού για την αντιμετώπιση των μεγάλων, καθημερινών προβλημάτων δεν υπάρχει περιθώριο να χαθεί ούτε μια μέρα!
 Τους επόμενους μήνες οι προκλήσεις τις οποίες θα αντιμετωπίσουμε θα είναι ακόμη μεγαλύτερες. Μπροστά μας έχουμε δύσκολο έργο εφόσον δεν γνωρίζουμε μέσα στο 2013 τι θα γίνει: πρώτον με όλους μας αφού προσωρινά εξαιρέθηκε ο ΟΑΕΔ από τις διαθεσιμότητες για την κατηγορία Δ.Ε. Ι.Δ.Α.Χ και δεύτερον με την εφαρμογή του μέτρου της αξιολόγησης από το Υπουργείο Εσωτερικών, σε συνδυασμό με τις προτεινόμενες περικοπές των δομών του Οργανισμού κατά 35%.
 Ο Οργανισμός μας βρίσκεται στο μάτι του κυκλώνα, με την ανεργία να αυξάνεται όλο και περισσότερο, τα κοινωνικά και εργασιακά μας δικαιώματα να κατεδαφίζονται, ενώ η μείωση των εισοδημάτων μας και η συνεχής αύξηση των άμεσων φόρων, να ανατρέπει τον οικογενειακό μας προγραμματισμό!
 Το μέλλον όλων μας απειλείται!!
 Πρέπει να μείνουμε ενωμένοι και να αγωνιστούμε δυναμικά, όλοι - για όλους!!
 Πρέπει να δώσουμε αγώνα για τον ενιαίο και Δημόσιο χαρακτήρα του Οργανισμού μας!!
 Δεν πρέπει να χαθεί ούτε μια θέση εργασίας από τον ΟΑΕΔ!
 Και αυτό αποτελεί ύψιστη συνδικαλιστική προτεραιότητα για όλους μας!!
 Σας θέλουμε όλους δίπλα μας, αφού τώρα ξεκινάνε τα δύσκολα!!!
 Για τους λόγους αυτούς, δώστε μας δύναμη στο ψηφοδέλτιο της ΔΑΚΕ!
 1. ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ του ΗΛΙΑ
 2. ΓΚΛΑΒΑΣ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ του ΕΥΑΓΓΕΛΟΥ
 3. ΓΚΟΥΝΗΣ ΣΤΑΣΙΝΟΣ του ΠΑΝΑΓΙΩΤΟΥ
 4. ΘΕΟΔΩΡΑΚΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΣΠΥΡΟΣ του ΔΗΜΗΤΡΙΟΥ
 5. ΘΕΟΛΟΓΟΥ ΦΩΤΕΙΝΗ του ΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΙΝΟΥ
 6. ΚΑΛΛΑΤΖΗ ΚΑΛΛΙΟΠΗ του ΧΑΡΑΛΑΜΠΟΥΣ
 7. ΚΑΝΕΛΛΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ ΠΟΛΥΞΕΝΗ (ΠΕΓΚΥ) του ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ
 8. ΚΑΡΑΣΤΑΜΑΤΗ ΧΡΥΣΑΝΘΗ του ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ
 9. ΚΟΥΡΟΥΓΛΟΣ ΑΓΓΕΛΟΣ του ΠΕΡΙΚΛΗ
 10. ΝΤΑΛΙΑΝΗΣ ΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΙΝΟΣ του ΑΘΑΝΑΣΙΟΥ
 11. ΠΑΝΑΓΙΩΤΟΥ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑ (ΤΖΙΝΑ) του ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ
 12. ΠΑΠΑΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΥ ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ του ΑΝΤΩΝΙΟΥ
 13. ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΠΑ ΑΝΝΑ του ΑΘΑΝΑΣΙΟΥ
 14. ΡΕΠΠΑΣ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ του ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ
 15. ΧΑΛΟΥΛΑΚΟΣ ΗΛΙΑΣ του ΤΖΑΝΕΤΟΥ
 1. ΓΚΟΤΣΗ ΑΙΚΑΤΕΡΙΝΗ του ΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΙΝΟΥ
 ΥΠΟΨΗΦΙΟΙ ΑΝΤΙΠΡΟΣΩΠΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΟΜΟΣΠΟΝΔΙΑ ΟΑΕΔ
 7. ΚΑΛΟΦΩΛΙΑ ΠΑΝΑΓΙΩΤΑ (ΤΖΙΝΑ) του ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ
 8. ΚΑΝΕΛΛΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ ΠΟΛΥΞΕΝΗ (ΠΕΓΚΥ) του ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ
 9. ΚΑΡΑΣΤΑΜΑΤΗ ΧΡΥΣΑΝΘΗ του ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ
 10. ΚΟΥΡΟΥΓΛΟΣ ΑΓΓΕΛΟΣ του ΠΕΡΙΚΛΗ
 11. ΝΤΑΛΙΑΝΗΣ ΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΙΝΟΣ του ΑΘΑΝΑΣΙΟΥ
 12. ΠΑΝΑΓΙΩΤΟΥ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑ (ΤΖΙΝΑ) του ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΥ
 13. ΠΑΠΑΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΥ ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ του ΑΝΤΩΝΙΟΥ
 14. ΠΑΠΑΡΟΥΠΑ ΑΝΝΑ του ΑΘΑΝΑΣΙΟΥ
 15. ΡΕΠΠΑΣ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ του ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ
 16. ΧΑΛΟΥΛΑΚΟΣ ΗΛΙΑΣ του ΤΖΑΝΕΤΟΥ
 Περισσότερα σε αυτή την κατηγορία: « ΑΝΑΚΟΙΝΩΣΗ ΔΑΚΕ - 24/2/2012 ΔΑΚΕ - ΚΙΝΔΥΝΟΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΤΑΜΕΙΑΚΑ ΔΙΑΘΕΣΙΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΟΑΕΔ »


text:
 2.2.2015
 LV
 Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis
 C 34/37
 Vispārējās tiesas 2014. gada 11. decembra spriedums – Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp/ITSB – Vincci Hoteles (“NAMMU”)
 (Lieta T-498/13) (1)
 (Kopienas preču zīme - Spēkā neesamības atzīšanas process - Kopienas vārdiska preču zīme “NAMMU” - Relatīvi spēkā neesamības pamati - Agrākas preču zīmes faktiskas izmantošanas pierādījums - Regulas (EK) Nr. 207/2009 57. panta 2. un 3. punkts un Regulas (EK) Nr. 2868/95 22. noteikuma 2.—4. punkts)
 (2015/C 034/43)
 Tiesvedības valoda – angļu
 Lietas dalībnieki
 Prasītāja: Nanu–Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Brême, Vācija) (pārstāvji – A. Nordemann, T. Boddien un M. Maier, advokāti)
 Atbildētājs: Iekšējā tirgus saskaņošanas birojs (preču zīmes, paraugi un modeļi) (pārstāvis – J. Crespo Carrillo)
 Otra procesa ITSB Apelāciju padomē dalībniece: Vincci Hoteles, SA (Alcobendas, Spānija)
 Priekšmets
 Prasība par ITSB Apelāciju pirmās padomes 2013. gada 27. jūnija lēmumu lietā R 611/2012–1 attiecībā uz iebildumu procesu starp Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG un Vincci Hoteles SA
 Rezolutīvā daļa:
 1)
 prasību noraidīt;
 2)
 Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG atlīdzina tiesāšanās izdevumus.
 (1) OV C 344, 23.11.2013.


type: legislation

text:
 21.10.2016
 BG
 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
 L 286/32
 РЕГЛАМЕНТ ЗА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕ (ЕС) 2016/1867 НА КОМИСИЯТА
 от 20 октомври 2016 година
 за изменение на приложението към Регламент (ЕО) No 3199/93 относно взаимното признаване на процедурите за пълно денатуриране на алкохол за целите на освобождаването от акциз
 ЕВРОПЕЙСКАТА КОМИСИЯ,
 като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,
 като взе предвид Директива 92/83/ЕИО на Съвета от 19 октомври 1992 г. за хармонизиране на структурата на акцизите върху алкохола и алкохолните напитки (1), и по-специално член 27, параграф 4 от нея,
 като има предвид, че:
 (1)
 Съгласно член 27, параграф 1, буква а) от Директива 92/83/ЕИО от държавите членки се изисква да освобождават от акциз алкохола, който е напълно денатуриран в съответствие с изискванията на всяка от държавите членки, при условие че тези изисквания са надлежно съобщени и приети в съответствие с условията по параграфи 3 и 4 от посочения член.
 (2)
 Денатуриращите вещества, които се използват във всяка държава членка за целите на пълното денатуриране на алкохол в съответствие с член 27, параграф 1, буква а) от Директива 92/83/ЕИО, са описани в приложението към Регламент (ЕО) No 3199/93 на Комисията (2).
 (3)
 С Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 162/2013 на Комисията (3) е въведена обща процедура за пълното денатуриране на алкохол. При тази обща процедура се използват три литра изопропилов алкохол (IPA), три литра метилетилкетон (MEK) и един грам денатониум бензоат на хектолитър абсолютен етанол. Тази обща процедура е предназначена да замени различните национални процедури за денатуриране, с цел да се предотвратят избягването на данъчното облагане, укриването на данъци и данъчните измами.
 (4)
 Въпреки че общата процедура за денатуриране се смята за сигурен, ефикасен и ефективен процес в борбата срещу измамите и същевременно предотвратява неволното или умишлено потребление, тя не е била използвана в повечето видове промишлена употреба, главно поради по-високите разходи за тази процедура в сравнение с някои национални процедури за денатуриране. Големият брой национални процедури за денатуриране затруднява ефективния надзор и поражда възможности за измама.
 (5)
 Чрез обсъждане с компетентните органи и предвид становищата на сектора беше постигнат консенсус по една общ процедура за денатуриране. Тази процедура води до по-ниски разходи, тъй като намалява необходимото количество изопропилов алкохол (IPA), метилетилкетон (MEK) и денатониум бензоат на хектолитър абсолютен етанол, като в същото време гарантира достатъчно равнище на превенция.
 (6)
 Поради това всички национални процедури за денатуриране следва да бъдат заличени от приложението към Регламент (ЕО) No 3199/93. За държавите членки, които продължават да използват национални процедури за денатуриране, се прилагат условията по член 27, параграф 1, буква б) от Директива 92/83/ЕИО, който предвижда освобождаване от облагане с хармонизирания акциз на денатуриран алкохол, използван за производството на какъвто и да е продукт, който не е предназначен за потребление от хора.
 (7)
 Комисията е предала на останалите държави членки всички съобщения, посочени в член 27, параграф 3 от Директива 92/83/ЕИО.
 (8)
 Срещу съобщените изисквания не е направено възражение съгласно член 27, параграф 4 от Директива 92/83/ЕИО.
 (9)
 Целесъобразно е да се предвиди разумен период от време, в който промишленият сектор може да се адаптира към новата обща процедура за денатуриране и да изпълни съществуващите договорни задължения.
 (10)
 Следователно Регламент (ЕО) No 3199/93 следва да бъде съответно изменен.
 (11)
 Мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент, са в съответствие със становището на Комитета по акцизите,
 ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ:
 Член 1
 Приложението към Регламент (ЕО) No 3199/93 се заменя с текста в приложението към настоящия регламент.
 Член 2
 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на двадесетия ден след деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
 Той се прилага от 1 август 2017 г.
 Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави членки.
 Съставено в Брюксел на 20 октомври 2016 година.
 За Комисията
 Председател
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 (1) ОВ L 316, 31.10.1992 г., стр. 21.
 (2) Регламент (ЕО) No 3199/93 на Комисията от 22 ноември 1993 г. относно взаимното признаване на процедурите за пълно денатуриране на алкохол за целите на освобождаването от акциз (ОВ L 288, 23.11.1993 г., стр. 12).
 (3) Регламент за изпълнение (ЕС) No 162/2013 на Комисията от 21 февруари 2013 г. за изменение на приложението към Регламент (ЕО) No 3199/93 относно взаимното признаване на процедурите за пълно денатуриране на алкохол за целите на освобождаването от акциз (ОВ L 49, 22.2.2013 г., стр. 55).
 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 „ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ
 1.
 Списък на продуктите с техния регистрационен номер, издаден от Службата, предоставяща обобщена информация за химичните вещества (CAS), които са разрешени за пълното денатуриране на алкохол:
 Денатониев бензоат
 CAS номер: 3734-33-6
 Изопропилов алкохол (IPA)
 CAS номер: 67-63-0
 Метилетилкетон (бутанон) (MEK)
 CAS номер: 78-93-3
 2.
 В базата данни на Европейския митнически опис на химичните вещества се съдържат синоними на разрешените продукти на различни официални езици на Съюза.
 3.
 В настоящото приложение се използва терминът „абсолютен етанол“ в съответствие с терминологията, използвана от Международния съюз за чиста и приложна химия (IUPAC).
 4.
 Обща процедура за денатуриране, използвана във всички държави членки за получаването на напълно денатуриран алкохол:
 на хектолитър абсолютен етанол се добавят следните вещества:
 —
 1,0 литър изопропилов алкохол (IPA),
 —
 1,0 литър метилетилкетон (MEK),
 —
 1,0 грам денатониум бензоат.
 5.
 Към денатурирания алкохол може да се добави оцветител, с цел той да придобие характерен цвят, по който да може да бъде разпознат незабавно.“


text:
 30.11.2011
 SL
 Uradni list Evropske unije
 L 317/26
 IZVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) št. 1237/2011
 z dne 29. novembra 2011
 o določitvi standardnih uvoznih vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
 ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
 ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (Uredba o enotni SUT) (1),
 ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 543/2011 z dne 7. junija 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 za sektorja sadja in zelenjave ter predelanega sadja in zelenjave (2) ter zlasti člena 136(1) Uredbe,
 ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
 Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 543/2011 na podlagi izida večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj urugvajskega kroga določa merila, po katerih Komisija določi standardne vrednosti za uvoz iz tretjih držav za proizvode in obdobja iz dela A Priloge XVI k tej uredbi –
 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
 Člen 1
 Standardne uvozne vrednosti iz člena 136 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
 Člen 2
 Ta uredba začne veljati 30. novembra 2011.
 Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
 V Bruslju, 29. novembra 2011
 Za Komisijo V imenu predsednika
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 Generalni direktor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
 (1) UL L 299, 16.11.2007, str. 1.
 (2) UL L 157, 15.6.2011, str. 1.
 PRILOGA
 Pavšalne uvozne vrednosti za določitev vhodne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Oznaka KN
 Oznaka tretjih držav (1)
 Pavšalna uvozna vrednost
 0702 00 00
 AL
 59,8
 IL
 98,1
 MA
 41,4
 TN
 143,0
 TR
 89,3
 ZZ
 86,3
 0707 00 05
 EG
 193,3
 TR
 110,9
 ZZ
 152,1
 0709 90 70
 MA
 34,4
 TR
 146,7
 ZZ
 90,6
 0805 20 10
 MA
 80,7
 ZZ
 80,7
 0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70, 0805 20 90
 HR
 50,4
 IL
 80,7
 TR
 77,0
 UY
 71,0
 ZZ
 69,8
 0805 50 10
 TR
 57,1
 ZA
 49,5
 ZZ
 53,3
 0808 10 80
 CA
 105,1
 CL
 90,0
 CN
 74,9
 MK
 36,4
 NZ
 41,5
 US
 130,8
 ZA
 116,2
 ZZ
 85,0
 0808 20 50
 CN
 64,1
 TR
 137,2
 ZZ
 100,7
 (1) Nomenklatura držav, določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1833/2006 (UL L 354, 14.12.2006, str. 19). Oznaka „ZZ“ predstavlja „druga porekla“.


text:
Ard-Rí Éirinn go bhfreasúra ab ea Toirdhealbhach Ua Briain (1009–14 Iúil 1086). Garmhac Bhriain Bóramha agus neacht Dhonnchaidh mac Briain, Ard-ríthe eile, a bhí ann.
 Bhí éileamh aige ar ríocht na tíre ón mbliain 1055, nuair a thosaigh sé ag cur i gcoinne a uncail Donnchadh, go dtí a bhás sa bhliain 1086. Bhí teagmháil aige leis an bPápa Gréagóir VII agus le hArd-Easpaig rathúil Canterbury, Lanfranc. Shocraigh sé cathair Luimnigh mar phríomhchathair a ríochta. Thóg sé ríocht chathair Ghallach Átha Cliath ó mhuintir na cathrach sin sa bhliain 1072, agus bhronn sé í ar a mhac Muircheartach mar phrintíseacht ríochta. Tá fianaise go raibh lámh aige i bpolaitíocht Mhanann agus na Breataine Bige. Bhásaigh sé sa bhliain 1086 i gCeann Coradh tar éis tréimhse fhada fhulaingthe agus aithreachais, de réir na n-annála.
 Féach freisin
 Stair na hÉireann
 Liosta Ard-Ríthe na hÉireann
 Tagairtí
 Ard-Ríthe na hÉireann
 Daoine as Contae an Chláir
 Daoine a rugadh i 1009
 Básanna i 1086


text:
 13.4.2013
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 108/24
 Üldkohtu 20. veebruari 2013. aasta määrus — Albergo Quattro Fontane jt versus komisjon
 (Liidetud kohtuasjad T-278/00–T-280/00, T-282/00–T-286/00 ja T-288/00–T-295/00) (1)
 (Tühistamishagi - Riigiabi - Veneetsia ja Chioggia territooriumil asutatud ettevõtjatele suunatud sotsiaalmaksuvähendused - Otsus, millega tunnistatakse abikava ühisturuga kokkusobimatuks ja nähakse ette makstud abi tagasinõudmine - Ilmselgelt ilma igasuguse õigusliku aluseta hagi)
 2013/C 108/64
 Kohtumenetluse keel: itaalia
 Pooled
 Hagejad: Albergo Quattro Fontane Snc (Venezia Lido, Itaalia) (kohtuasi T-278/00); Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere” (Marghera, Itaalia) (kohtuasjad T-278/00–T-280/00, T-282/00–T-286/00 ja T-289/00–T-295/00); Hotel Gabrielli Sandwirth SpA (Veneetsia, Itaalia) (kohtuasi T-279/00); Astrocoop — Universale — Pulizie, manutenzioni e trasporti Soc. coop. rl (Marghera) (kohtuasi T-280/00); GE.AL.VE. Srl (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-282/00); Metropolitan Srl (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-283/00); Hotel Concordia Snc (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-284/00); Manutencoop Soc. coop. rl (Bologna, Itaalia) (kohtuasi T-285/00); Società per l’industria alberghiera (SPLIA) (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-286/00); Principessa Srl (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-288/00); Albergo ristorante „All’Angelo” Snc (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-289/00); Albergo Saturnia Internazionale SpA (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-290/00); Savoia e Jolanda Srl (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-291/00); Hotels Biasutti Snc (Venezia Lido) (kohtuasi T-292/00); Ge.A.P. Srl (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-293/00); Rialto Inn Srl (Veneetsia) (kohtuasi T-294/00); ja Bonvecchiati Srl (Veneetsia) (esindaja: A. Bianchini) (kohtuasi T-295/00)
 Kostja: Euroopa Komisjon (esindajad: V. Di Bucci, keda abistas advokaat A. Dal Ferro)
 Ese
 Nõue tühistada komisjoni 25. novembri 1999. aasta otsus 2000/394/EÜ, mis puudutab abimeetmeid, mis on Venezia ja Chioggia territooriumil tegutsevate ettevõtjate kasuks ette nähtud seadustega nr 30/1997 ja nr 206/1995, millega kehtestatakse sotsiaalmaksuvähendused (EÜT 2000, L 150, lk 50).
 Resolutsioon
 1.
 Liita kohtuasjad T-278/00-T-280/00, T-282/00-T-286/00 ja T-288/00- T-295/00 käesoleva määruse tegemiseks.
 2.
 Liita komisjoni esitatud vastuvõetamatuse väide põhikohtuasjaga.
 3.
 Jätta hagid rahuldamata, kuna need on ilmselgelt õiguslikult põhjendamata.
 4.
 Jätta Albergo Quattro Fontane Snc, Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere», Hotel Gabrielli Sandwirth SpA, Astrocoop — Universale — Pulizie, manutenzioni e trasporti Soc. coop. rl, GE.AL.VE. Srl, Metropolitan Srl, Hotel Concordia Snc, Manutencoop Soc. coop. rl, Società per l’industria alberghiera (SPLIA), Principessa Srl, Albergo ristorante «All’Angelo» Snc, Albergo Saturnia Internazionale SpA, Savoia e Jolanda Srl, Hotels Biasutti Snc, Ge.A.P. Srl, Rialto Inn Srl ja Bonvecchiati Srl kohtukulud nende endi kanda ja mõista neilt välja komisjoni kohtukulud.
 (1) ELT C 372, 23.12.2000.


text:
 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/140
 BESCHLUSS DER KOMMISSION
 vom 28. April 2004
 über den Abschluss des Abkommens in Form eines Briefwechsels zwischen der
 Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten zur Änderung
 von Anhang I des Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den
 Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten über die gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz
 der Bezeichnungen im Spirituosensektor in Hinblick auf die Erweiterung
 (Bekannt gegeben unter Aktenzeichen K(2004) 1566)
 (2004/483/EG)
 DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN —
 gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft,
 gestützt auf den Beschluss des Rates 97/361/EG vom 27. Mai 1997 über den Abschluss des
 Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen
 Staaten über die gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im
 Spirituosensektor1, insbesondere auf Artikel 4,
 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:
 (1) Im Hinblick auf die kommende Erweiterung muss der Anhang I des Abkommens
 zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten
 über die gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im
 Spirituosensektor geändert werden, um ab 1. Mai 2004 die Bezeichnungen für
 Spirituosen der neuen Mitgliedsstaaten zu schützen.
 (2) Dazu haben die Europäische Gemeinschaft und die Vereinigten Mexikanischen
 Staaten ein Abkommen in Form eines Briefwechsels nach Artikel 18 des oben
 genannten Abkommens zur Änderung von dessen Anhang I ausgehandelt. Dieser
 Briefwechsel sollte genehmigt werden.
 (3) Die in diesem Beschluss vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme
 des Ausschusses für die Durchführung der Bestimmungen über Spirituosen —
 1
 ABl. L 152 vom 11.6.1997, S.15.
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/141
 BESCHLIESST:
 Artikel 1
 Das Abkommen in Form eines Briefwechsels zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und
 den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten zur Änderung von Anhang I des Abkommens
 zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten über
 die gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im Spirituosensektor wird
 im Namen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft genehmigt.
 Der Wortlaut des Abkommens ist diesem Beschluss als Anlage beigefügt.
 Artikel 2
 Das für Landwirtschaft zuständige Mitglied der Kommission wird ermächtigt, das Abkommen
 im Namen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zu unterzeichnen.
 Brüssel, den 28. April 2004
 Für die Kommission
 Franz FISCHLER
 Mitglied der Kommission
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/142
 ANLAGE
 ABKOMMEN IN FORM EINES BRIEFWECHSELS
 zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten
 zur Änderung von Anhang I des Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft
 und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten über die gegenseitige Anerkennung
 und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im Spirituosensektor
 Schreiben Nr. 1
 Schreiben der Europäischen Gemeinschaft
 Brüssel, den 28. April 2004
 Sehr geehrter Herr,
 Ich beehre mich, auf die Beratungen über technische Anpassungen nach Artikel 18 des
 Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen
 Staaten über die gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im
 Spirituosensektor vom 27. Mai 1997 Bezug zu nehmen, wonach die Vertragsparteien das
 Abkommen in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen ändern können.
 Die Erweiterung der Europäischen Union wird am 1. Mai 2004 stattfinden. In diesem
 Zusammenhang sind technische Anpassungen in Anhang I des oben genannten Abkommens
 erforderlich, um die Bezeichnungen für Spirituosen der neuen Mitgliedsstaaten aufzunehmen
 und deren Anerkennung und Schutz durch die Vertragsparteien ab 1. Mai 2004 zu
 gewährleisten.
 Daher beehre ich mich vorzuschlagen, den Anhang I des Abkommens zwischen der
 Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten über die
 gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im Spirituosensektor mit
 Wirkung vom 1. Mai 2004 durch den beigefügten Anhang zu ersetzen, vorbehaltlich des
 Inkrafttretens des Vertrags über den Beitritt der Tschechischen Republik, Estlands, Zyperns,
 Lettlands, Litauens, Ungarns, Maltas, Polens, Sloweniens und der Slowakei zur Europäischen
 Union zu demselben Datum.
 Ich wäre Ihnen verbunden, wenn Sie die Zustimmung Ihrer Regierung zum Inhalt dieses
 Schreibens bestätigen wollten.
 Genehmigen Sie, sehr geehrter Herr, den Ausdruck meiner ausgezeichnetsten Hochachtung.
 Im Namen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft
 Franz Fischler
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/143
 Schreiben Nr. 2
 Schreiben der Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten
 Brüssel, den 28. April 2004
 Sehr geehrter Herr,
 ich beehre mich, den Eingang Ihres Schreibens vom 28. April 2004 mit folgendem Wortlaut
 zu bestätigen:
 "Ich beehre mich, auf die Beratungen über technische Anpassungen nach Artikel 18 des
 Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen
 Staaten über die gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im
 Spirituosensektor vom 27. Mai 1997 Bezug zu nehmen, wonach die Vertragsparteien das
 Abkommen in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen ändern können.
 Die Erweiterung der Europäischen Union wird am 1. Mai 2004 stattfinden. In diesem
 Zusammenhang sind technische Anpassungen in Anhang I des oben genannten Abkommens
 erforderlich, um die Bezeichnungen für Spirituosen der neuen Mitgliedsstaaten aufzunehmen
 und deren Anerkennung und Schutz durch die Vertragsparteien ab 1. Mai 2004 zu
 gewährleisten.
 Daher beehre ich mich vorzuschlagen, Anhang I des Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen
 Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten über die gegenseitige
 Anerkennung und den Schutz der Bezeichnungen im Spirituosensektor mit Wirkung vom
 1. Mai 2004 durch den beigefügten Anhang zu ersetzen, vorbehaltlich des Inkrafttretens des
 Vertrags über den Beitritt der Tschechischen Republik, Estlands, Zyperns, Lettlands,
 Litauens, Ungarns, Maltas, Polens, Sloweniens und der Slowakei zur Europäischen Union zu
 demselben Datum.
 Ich wäre Ihnen verbunden, wenn Sie die Zustimmung Ihrer Regierung zum Inhalt dieses
 Schreibens bestätigen wollten."
 Ich beehre mich Ihnen mitzuteilen, dass die Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten dem Inhalt
 Ihres Schreibens zustimmen.
 Genehmigen Sie, sehr geehrter Herr, den Ausdruck meiner ausgezeichnetsten Hochachtung.
 Im Namen der Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staaten
 Porfirio Alejandro Muñoz Ledo y Lazo de la Vega
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/144
 "ANHANG I
 zum Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und den Vereinigten
 Mexikanischen Staaten über die gegenseitige Anerkennung und den Schutz
 der Bezeichnungen im Spirituosensektor
 1. Rum
 Rhum de la Martinique / Rhum de la Martinique traditionnel
 Rhum de la Guadeloupe / Rhum de la Guadeloupe traditionnel
 Rhum de la Réunion / Rhum de la Réunion traditionnel
 Rhum de la Guyane / Rhum de la Guyane traditionnel
 Ron de Málaga
 Ron de Granada
 Rum da Madeira
 2. a) Whisky
 Scotch Whisky
 Irish Whisky
 Whisky español
 (Diese Bezeichnungen können durch die Angaben "Malt" oder "Grain" ergänzt werden.)
 2. b) Whiskey
 Irish Whiskey
 Uisce Beatha Eireannach / Irish Whiskey
 (Diese Bezeichnungen können durch die Angabe "Pot Still" ergänzt werden.)
 3. Getreidespirituose
 Eau-de-vie de seigle de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Korn
 Kornbrand
 4. Branntwein
 Eau-de-vie de Cognac
 Eau-de-vie des Charentes
 Cognac
 (Die Bezeichnung "Cognac" kann durch eine der folgenden Angaben ergänzt werden:
 – Fine
 – Grande Fine Champagne
 – Grande Champagne
 – Petite Champagne
 – Petite Fine Champagne
 – Fine Champagne
 – Borderies
 – Fins Bois
 – Bons Bois)
 Fine Bordeaux
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/145
 Armagnac
 Bas-Armagnac
 Haut-Armagnac
 Ténarèse
 Eau-de-vie de vin de la Marne
 Eau-de-vie de vin originaire d'Aquitaine
 Eau-de-vie de vin de Bourgogne
 Eau-de-vie de vin originaire du Centre-Est
 Eau-de-vie de vin originaire de Franche-Comté
 Eau-de-vie de vin originaire du Bugey
 Eau-de-vie de vin de Savoie
 Eau-de-vie de vin originaire des Coteaux de la Loire
 Eau-de-vie de vin des Côtes-du-Rhône
 Eau-de-vie de vin originaire de Provence
 Eau-de-vie de Faugères / Faugères
 Eau-de-vie de vin originaire du Languedoc
 Aguardente do Minho
 Aguardente do Douro
 Aguardente da Beira Interior
 Aguardente da Bairrada
 Aguardente do Oeste
 Aguardente do Ribatejo
 Aguardente do Alentejo
 Aguardente do Algarve
 5. Brandy
 Brandy de Jerez
 Brandy del Penedés
 Brandy italiano
 Brandy Αττικής /Brandy of Attica
 Brandy Πελλοπονήσου / Brandy of the Peloponnese
 Brandy Κεντρικής Ελλάδας / Brandy of Central Greece
 Deutscher Weinbrand
 Wachauer Weinbrand
 Weinbrand Dürnstein
 Karpatské brandy špeciál
 6. Tresterbrand
 Eau-de-vie de marc de Champagne / Marc de Champagne
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire d'Aquitaine
 Eau-de-vie de marc de Bourgogne
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire du Centre-Est
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire de Franche-Comté
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire de Bugey
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire de Savoie
 Marc de Bourgogne
 Marc de Savoie
 Marc d'Auvergne
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire des Coteaux de la Loire
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/146
 Eau-de-vie de marc des Côtes du Rhône
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire de Provence
 Eau-de-vie de marc originaire du Languedoc
 Marc d'Alsace Gewürztraminer
 Marc de Lorraine
 Bagaceira do Minho
 Bagaceira do Douro
 Bagaceira da Beira Interior
 Bagaceira da Bairrada
 Bagaceira do Oeste
 Bagaceira do Ribatejo
 Bagaceiro do Alentejo
 Bagaceira do Algarve
 Orujo gallego
 Grappa
 Grappa di Barolo
 Grappa piemontese / Grappa del Piemonte
 Grappa lombarda / Grappa di Lombardia
 Grappa trentina / Grappa del Trentino
 Grappa friulana / Grappa del Friuli
 Grappa veneta / Grappa del Veneto
 Südtiroler Grappa / Grappa dell'Alto Adige
 Τσικουδιά Κρήτης / Tsikoudia of Crete
 Τσίπουρο Μακεδονίας / Tsipouro of Macedonia
 Τσίπουρο Θεσσαλίας / Tsipouro of Thessaly
 Τσίπουρο Τυρνάβου / Tsipouro of Tyrnavos
 Τσιπουρο Τυρναβου / Tsipouro of Tyrnavos
 Eau-de-vie de marc de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Zivania
 Pálinka
 7. Obstbrand
 Schwarzwälder Kirschwasser
 Schwarzwälder Himbeergeist
 Schwarzwälder Mirabellenwasser
 Schwarzwälder Williamsbirne
 Schwarzwälder Zwetschgenwasser
 Fränkisches Zwetschgenwasser
 Fränkisches Kirschwasser
 Fränkischer Obstler
 Mirabelle de Lorraine
 Kirsch d'Alsace
 Quetsch d'Alsace
 Framboise d'Alsace
 Mirabelle d'Alsace
 Kirsch de Fougerolles
 Südtiroler Williams / Williams dell'Alto Adige
 Südtiroler Aprikot / Südtiroler Marille / Aprikot dell'Alto Adige / Marille dell'Alto Adige
 Südtiroler Kirsch / Kirsch dell'Alto Adige
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/147
 Südtiroler Zwetschgeler / Zwetschgeler dell'Alto Adige
 Südtiroler Obstler / Obstler dell'Alto Adige
 Südtiroler Gravensteiner / Gravensteiner dell'Alto Adige
 Südtiroler Golden Delicious / Golden Delicious dell'Alto Adige
 Williams friulano / Williams del Friuli
 Sliwovitz del Veneto
 Sliwovitz del Friuli-Venezia Giulia
 Sliwovitz del Trentino-Alto Adige
 Distillato di mele trentino / Distillato di mele del Trentino
 Williams trentino / Williams del Trentino
 Sliwovitz trentino / Sliwovitz del Trentino
 Aprikot trentino / Aprikot del Trentino
 Medronheira do Algarve
 Medronheira do Buçaco
 Kirsch Friulano / Kirschwasser Friulano
 Kirsch Trentino / Kirschwasser Trentino
 Kirsch Veneto / Kirschwasser Veneto
 Aguardente de pêra da Lousã
 Eau-de-vie de pommes de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Eau-de-vie de poires de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Eau-de-vie de kirsch de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Eau-de-vie de quetsch de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Eau-de-vie de mirabelle de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Eau-de-vie de prunelles de marque nationale luxembourgeoise
 Wachauer Marillenbrand
 Bošácka Slivovica
 Szatmári Szilvapálinka
 Kecskeméti Barackpálinka
 Békési Szilvapálinka
 Szabolcsi Almapálinka
 Slivovice
 Pálinka
 8. Brand aus Apfel- oder Birnenwein
 Calvados
 Calvados du Pays d'Auge
 Eau-de-vie de cidre de Bretagne
 Eau-de-vie de poiré de Bretagne
 Eau-de-vie de cidre de Normandie
 Eau-de-vie de poiré de Normandie
 Eau-de-vie de cidre du Maine
 Aguardiente de sidra de Asturias
 Eau-de-vie de poiré du Maine
 9. Enzian
 Bayerischer Gebirgsenzian
 Südtiroler Enzian / Genzians dell'Alto Adige
 Genziana trentina / Genziana del Trentino
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/148
 10. Obstspirituosen
 Pacharán
 Pacharán navarro
 11. Spirituosen mit Wachholder
 Ostfriesischer Korngenever
 Genièvre Flandres Artois
 Hasseltse jenever
 Balegemse jenever
 Péket de Wallonie
 Steinhäger
 Plymouth Gin
 Gin de Mahón
 Vilniaus Džinas
 Spišská Borovička
 Slovenská Borovička Juniperus
 Slovenská Borovička
 Inovecká Borovička
 Liptovská Borovička
 12. Spirituosen mit Kümmel
 Dansk Akvavit / Dansk Aquavit
 Svensk Aquavit / Svensk Akvavit / Swedish Aquavit
 13. Spirituosen mit Anis
 Anis español
 Évoca anisada
 Cazalla
 Chinchón
 Ojén
 Rute
 Oύζο / Ouzo
 14. Likör
 Berliner Kümmel
 Hamburger Kümmel
 Münchener Kümmel
 Chiemseer Klosterlikör
 Bayerischer Kräuterlikör
 Cassis de Dijon
 Cassis de Beaufort
 Irish Cream
 Palo de Mallorca
 Ginjinha portuguesa
 Licor de Singeverga
 Benediktbeurer Klosterlikör
 Ettaler Klosterlikör
 ---pagebreak--- 30.4.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160/149
 Ratafia de Champagne
 Ratafia catalana
 Anis português
 Finnish berry / Finnish fruit liqueur
 Grossglockner Alpenbitter
 Mariazeller Magenlikör
 Mariazeller Jagasaftl
 Puchheimer Bitter
 Puchheimer Schlossgeist
 Steinfelder Magenbitter
 Wachauer Marillenlikör
 Jägertee / Jagertee / Jagatee
 Allažu Kimelis
 Čepkeliu
 Demänovka Bylinný Likér
 Polish Cherry
 Karlovarská Hořká
 15. Gemischte Spirituosen
 Pommeau de Bretagne
 Pommeau du Maine
 Pommeau de Normandie
 Svensk Punsch / Swedish Punch
 Slivovice
 16. Wodka
 Svensk Vodka / Swedish Vodka
 Suomalainen Vodka / Finsk Vodka / Vodka of Finland
 Polska Wódka/ Polish Vodka
 Laugarício Vodka
 Originali Lietuviška degtiné
 Wódka zioowa z Niziny Pónocnopodlaskiej aromatyzowana ekstraktem z trawy żubrowej /
 Herbal Vodka from the North Podlasie Lowland aromatised with an extract of bison grass
 Latvijas Dzidrais
 Rīgas Degvīns
 LB Degvīns
 LB Vodka
 17. Spirituosen mit bitterem Geschmack
 Rīgas melnais Balzāms / Riga Black Balsam
 Demänovka bylinná horká"


text:
„Mozilla Firefox“ ( = „ugninė lapė“) – atvirojo kodo interneto naršyklė. „Firefox“ naršyklę kuria pasaulinė atvirųjų programų organizacija „Mozilla“ – tūkstančiai savanorių. Pagrindinis projekto tikslas yra pasirinkimo laisvės ir naujų technologijų vystymosi palaikymas interneto terpėje. Dirba įvairiose operacinėse sistemose, palaiko XHTML, JavaScript, CSS. Turi įvairių priedų, temų, įdiegiamų į naršyklę. Yra oficialus programos vertimas į lietuvių kalbą.
 Dave Hyatt, Joe Hewitt, Blake Ross pradėjo „Firefox“ projektą kaip eksperimentinę „Mozilla“ projekto atšaką. Jie manė, kad komerciniai reikalavimai „Netscape“ paramai gauti ir perdėtas funkcionalumas „Mozilla“ naršyklę pastatė į pavojų. Anksčiau naršyti internetą buvo galima naudojantis „Mozilla Suite“ programinės įrangos paketu, skirtame programuotojams. Nuo 2003 m. „Mozilla“ pradėjo teikti „Firefox“ interneto naršyklei ir „Thunderbird“ elektroninio pašto programų vystymui pirmenybę.
 Pirmoji versija 1.0 pasirodė 2004 m. lapkričio 9 d. „Mozilla“ duomenimis, 2014 m. gruodžio mėn. „Firefox“ naršykle naudojosi pusė milijardo vartotojų iš viso pasaulio. 2021 m. vasario mėn. „StatCounter“ pateikiamais duomenimis, „Firefox“ sudaro apie 3,76 % kompiuterių ir išmaniųjų įrenginių rinkos visame pasaulyje, atsilieka nuo „Google“ bendrovės „Chrome“ (63,59 %), „Apple“ bendrovės „Safari“ (19,14 %) naršyklių tarptautinėse rinkose.
 Atmainos
 Leidžia įprastą „Quantum“, „Beta“, programuotojams skirtą „Developer Edition“ (anksčiau „Aurora“), „Nightly“ naršyklės atmainas. „Nightly“ atnaujinama kasdien ir yra pati nestabiliausia iš visų naršyklės atmainų.
 Savybės
 Galimybė keisti išvaizdą.
 Praplėtimai leidžia lengvai vienu paspaudimu įdiegti papildomas funkcijas („uBlock Origin“ ir kt.).
 Blokuoja virusus, šnipinėjančias programas ir erzinančias iššokančias reklamas
 Privatus naršymas, leidžiantis išsisukti nuo nukreipiamosios reklamos, automatinis slapukų pašalinimas.
 Prisijungus sinchronizuoja naršymą kompiuteryje bei išmaniuose įrenginiuose.
 Naršymas kortelėmis – galima atidaryti kelis Interneto puslapius viename naršyklės lange, bet skirtingose kortelėse.
 Integruota paieška – galimybė ieškoti tiesiai iš Firefox naršyklės, neatidarant paieškos sistemos puslapio.
 Automatinis atnaujinimas.
 Aktyvūs skirtukai (RSS naujienos).
 Rašybos tikrinimas.
 Adresynas.
 Atsisiuntimų valdymas
 Priemonės saityno kūrėjams.
 Išnašos
 Nuorodos
 Mozilla Firefox svetainė
 Beta, Nightly, Developer Edition
 Laisvoji programinė įranga
 Mozilla
 Naršyklės


text:
12.10.2017
 LT
 Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys
 L 263/30
 EEE JUNGTINIO KOMITETO SPRENDIMAS
 Nr. 312/2015
 2015 m. gruodžio 11 d.
 kuriuo iš dalies keičiami EEE susitarimo II priedas (Techniniai reglamentai, standartai, tyrimai ir sertifikavimas) ir IV priedas (Energija) [2017/1823]
 EEE JUNGTINIS KOMITETAS,
 atsižvelgdamas į Europos ekonominės erdvės susitarimą (toliau – EEE susitarimas), ypač į jo 98 straipsnį,
 kadangi:
 (1)
 į EEE susitarimą turi būti įtrauktas 2014 m. liepos 7 d. Komisijos reglamentas (ES) Nr. 1253/2014, kuriuo įgyvendinant Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvą 2009/125/EB nustatomi vėdinimo įrenginių ekologinio projektavimo reikalavimai (1);
 (2)
 todėl EEE susitarimo II ir IV priedai turėtų būti atitinkamai iš dalies pakeisti,
 PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ SPRENDIMĄ:
 1 straipsnis
 EEE susitarimo II priedo IV skyriuje po 6k punkto (Komisijos reglamentas (ES) Nr. 66/2014) įterpiamas šis punktas:
 „6l.
 32014 R 1253: 2014 m. liepos 7 d. Komisijos reglamentas (ES) Nr. 1253/2014, kuriuo įgyvendinant Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvą 2009/125/EB nustatomi vėdinimo įrenginių ekologinio projektavimo reikalavimai (OL L 337, 2014 11 25, p. 8).“
 2 straipsnis
 EEE susitarimo IV priede po 26l punkto (Komisijos reglamentas (ES) Nr. 66/2014) įterpiamas šis punktas:
 „26m.
 32014 R 1253: 2014 m. liepos 7 d. Komisijos reglamentas (ES) Nr. 1253/2014, kuriuo įgyvendinant Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvą 2009/125/EB nustatomi vėdinimo įrenginių ekologinio projektavimo reikalavimai (OL L 337, 2014 11 25, p. 8).“
 3 straipsnis
 Europos Sąjungos oficialiojo leidinio EEE priede skelbtinas Reglamento (ES) Nr. 1253/2014 tekstas islandų ir norvegų kalbomis yra autentiškas.
 4 straipsnis
 Šis sprendimas įsigalioja 2015 m. gruodžio 12 d., jei pateikti visi pranešimai pagal EEE susitarimo 103 straipsnio 1 dalį (*1).
 5 straipsnis
 Šis sprendimas skelbiamas Europos Sąjungos oficialiojo leidinio EEE skyriuje ir EEE priede.
 Priimta Briuselyje 2015 m. gruodžio 11 d..
 EEE jungtinio komiteto vardu
 Pirmininkė
 Oda SLETNES
 (1) OL L 337, 2014 11 25, p. 8.
 (*1) Konstitucinių reikalavimų nenurodyta.


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 22000A0719(02)
 Protocol defining, for the period 3 December 1999 to 2 December 2002, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Mauritius on fishing in the waters of Mauritius
 Official Journal L 180 , 19/07/2000 P. 0030 - 0031
 Protocoldefining, for the period 3 December 1999 to 2 December 2002, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Mauritius on fishing in the waters of MauritiusArticle 1Pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement, and for a period of three years from 3 December 1999, the following fishing possibilities shall be accorded:>TABLE>Article 21. The financial compensation referred to in Article 6 of the Agreement for the abovementioned period is fixed at EUR 206250 per year.2. This compensation shall cover a catch weight in waters of Mauritius of 5500 tonnes of catches per year. If the annual amount of catches by Community vessels in the waters of Mauritius exceeds this quantity, the abovementioned compensation shall be increased by EUR 50 for each additional tonne caught.3. The use to which this compensation is put shall be the sole competence of Mauritius.4. The financial compensation shall be paid into an account indicated by the Government of Mauritius, in the name of the public Treasury.Article 3During the period covered by the Protocol, the Community shall contribute an additional EUR 618750 to financing the measures described below, allocated as follows:1. EUR 543750 for scientific and technical programmes to promote better understanding and management of fisheries and living resources in Mauritius fishing zone, and the implementation of an appropriate monitoring and control surveillance scheme, including an electronic fisheries management information system based on the vessel monitoring system;2. EUR 75000 for study grants and practical training courses in the various scientific, technical and economic fields linked to fishing. Of this amount, up to EUR 25000 may be used, at the request of the Mauritian authority responsible for fisheries, to cover the costs of attending international meetings relating to fisheries.The Mauritian Ministry responsible for fisheries shall transmit an annual report on the implementation of these measures and the results achieved to the Delegation of the European Commission in Mauritius, three months after the anniversary date of the Protocol. The Commission reserves the right to request additional information on these results from the Mauritian authority responsible for fisheries and to review the payments concerned in the light of the actual implementation of the measures.All the amounts indicated shall be paid into an account indicated by the Government of Mauritius, in the name of the public Treasury.Article 4Should the Community fail to make any of the payments specified in Articles 2 and 3, the Agreement on fishing may be suspended.Article 5The Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Mauritius on fishing in the waters of Mauritius is hereby repealed and replaced by the Annex to this Protocol.Article 6This Protocol with its Annex shall enter into force on the date of its signature.It shall apply from 3 December 1999.Done at ...For the Government of MauritiusFor the Council of the European UnionANNEXCONDITIONS FOR THE PURSUIT OF FISHING ACTIVITIES BY COMMUNITY VESSELS IN THE WATERS OF MAURITIUS1. LICENCE APPLICATION AND ISSUING FORMALITIESThe application procedure for, and issue of, the licences enabling Community vessels to fish in the waters of Mauritius shall be as follows:(a) the Commission of the European Communities shall present to the Mauritian authority via the representative of the Commission of the European Communities in Mauritius an application, made by the shipowner, for each vessel that wishes to fish under this Agreement, at least 20 days before the date of commencement of the period of validity requested. The application shall be made on the forms provided for that purpose by Mauritius, a specimen of which is attached as Appendix 1;(b) every licence shall be issued to the shipowner for one designated vessel. At the request of the Commission of the European Communities the licence for a vessel may and, in cases of force majeure, shall be replaced by a licence for another Community vessel;(c) the licences shall be delivered by the authorities of Mauritius to the representative of the Commission of the European Communities in Mauritius;(d) the licence document must be held on board at all times. However, on receipt of the notification of the advance payment sent by the Commission of the European Communities to the Mauritian authority, the vessel will be included on a list, to be notified to the Mauritian fisheries control authorities. While awaiting receipt of the licence document, a fax copy of this licence document may be obtained and shall be kept on board, which will authorise the vessel to fish, pending delivery on board of the licence document;(e) the Mauritian authority shall communicate before the date of entry into force of the Protocol the arrangements for payments of the licence fees, and in particular the details of the bank account and the currency to be used.2. VALIDITY OF LICENCES AND PAYMENT OF FEES1. Advance paymentsFor tuna seiners and surface longliners, licences shall be valid for a period of one year. They are renewable.The fee shall be set at EUR 25 per tonne caught in the waters of Mauritius.For tuna seiners, licences shall be issued on advance payment of an annual sum of EUR 1750 per tuna seiner, equivalent to the fees for 70 tonnes of annual catches within the waters of Mauritius.For surface longliners, licences shall be issued on advance payment to Mauritius of an annual sum of EUR 1375 for a surface longliner of more than 150 grt and EUR 1000 for surface longliners of 150 grt or less. These amounts correspond respectively to the fees due for 55 tonnes and for 40 tonnes of annual catches in Mauritian waters.For vessels fishing by line, licences shall be valid for three, six or 12 months. The fee shall be fixed in relation to the grt as follows: EUR 80 per year per grt pro rata temporis.2. Final statementFor tuna seiners and surface longliners, a final statement of the fees due for the fishing year shall be drawn up by the Commission of the European Communities at the end of each calendar year on the basis of the catch statements made by the shipowners and confirmed by the scientific institutes competent for verifying catch statistics such as Orstom (Office of Overseas Scientific and Technical Research), IEO (Spanish Oceanographic Institute), Ipimar (Instituto Nacional das Pescas e do Mar) and any international fishing organisations in the Indian Ocean, as may be designated by the Mauritian authority. The statement shall simultaneously be notified to the Mauritian authority and the shipowners. The shipowners shall meet their financial obligations within 30 days of the receipt of the statement. If the amount of the sum due for actual fishing operations is less than the advance payment, the corresponding outstanding sum shall not be recoverable by the shipowner.3. DECLARATIONS OF CATCHESVessels authorised to fish in the waters of Mauritius under the Agreement shall notify their catch statistics to the Mauritian authority, with a copy for the delegation of the European Communities in Mauritius, in accordance with the following procedure.Tuna seiners shall complete a fishing form corresponding to the specimen in Appendix 2. Surface longliners shall complete a fishing form corresponding to the specimen in Appendix 3. Vessels fishing by line shall complete a fishing form corresponding to the specimen in Appendix 4.Forms must be completed legibly and be signed by the master of the vessel. In addition, they must be completed by all vessels which have obtained a licence, even if they have not fished.The forms shall be forwarded to the Mauritian authority not later than 45 days after each fishing campaign.4. OBSERVERSAll vessels above 50 grt shall, at the request of the authorities of Mauritius, take on board an observer designated by these authorities in order to check catches made in the waters of Mauritius. Observers shall have all facilities necessary for the performance of this duty including access to places and documents. An observer must not be present for longer than the time required to fulfil his duties. They shall be provided with suitable food and accomodation while on board. Should a vessel with a Mauritian observer on board leave the waters of Mauritius, every step will be taken to ensure that the observer returns to Mauritius as soon as possible, at the shipowner's expense.5. RADIO COMMUNICATIONVessels above 50 grt shall communicate, when entering and leaving Mauritian waters, and, every three days, while fishing in Mauritian waters, to a radio station (the name, call sign and frequency of which shall be specified in the licence) or by fax (No 23 02 08 19 29) or by e-mail (fish@intnet.mu), their position and the volume of catches on board.6. FISHING ZONESTuna seiners and surface longliners may fish in the waters of Mauritius except within a distance of 12 nautical miles measured from the baseline.Vessels fishing by line are only authorised to fish in their traditional grounds, namely Soudan Bank and East Soudan Bank.7. SUPPLY TO THE TUNA CANNING INDUSTRYCommunity tuna vessels shall endeavour to sell part of their catch to the Mauritian tuna canning industry at a price to be fixed in common agreement between Community shipowners and the owners of the Mauritian tuna canning industry.8. BOARDING1. Transmission of informationThe Mauritian authority responsible for fisheries shall inform the Delegation and the flag State, within 48 hours, of the boarding of any fishing vessel flying the flag of a Member State of the Community fishing under the Fisheries Agreemnent in Mauritius' fishing zone and shall transmit a brief report of the circumstances and reasons leading to such boarding. The Delegation and the flag State shall be kept informed of any proceedings initiated and penalties imposed.2. Settlement of boardingIn accordance with the law on fisheries and the relevant regulations, infringements may be settled:(a) either by composition, in which case the amount of the fine shall be determined in accordance with the Mauritian legislation laying down minimum and maximum figures;(b) or by legal proceedings, if no composition is possible, in accordance with Mauritian law.3. The vessel shall be released and its crew authorised to leave the port:(a) either as soon as the obligations imposed by the composition procedure have been completed on presentation of the receipt for the settlement, or(b) on presentation of proof that a bank security has been ledged, pending completion of the legal proceedings.Appendix 1APPLICATION FOR A FOREIGN FISHING VESSEL LICENCE>PIC FILE= "L_2000180EN.003402.EPS">Appendix 2TUNA VESSELS FISHING LOGBOOK>PIC FILE= "L_2000180EN.003502.EPS">Appendix 3STATEMENT OF CATCH FOR SURFACE LONGLINERS>PIC FILE= "L_2000180EN.003602.EPS">>PIC FILE= "L_2000180EN.003701.EPS">Appendix 4FISHERY BY LINE>PIC FILE= "L_2000180EN.003802.EPS">


jurisdiction: US

text:
 116 HRES 171 IH: Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women’s History Month.
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2019-03-05
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 IV116th CONGRESS1st SessionH. RES. 171IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMarch 5, 2019Mr. Thompson of California (for himself, Ms. Adams, Ms. Barragán, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Beyer, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Brown of Maryland, Ms. Brownley of California, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Case, Mr. Casten of Illinois, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Cisneros, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Costa, Mr. Cox of California, Mrs. Craig, Mrs. Davis of California, Ms. Dean, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. DelBene, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Engel, Ms. Escobar, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Foster, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Miss González-Colón of Puerto Rico, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Haaland, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Heck, Ms. Hill of California, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Hurd of Texas, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Johnson of Texas, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mrs. Lawrence, Ms. Lee of California, Mrs. Lee of Nevada, Mr. Lipinski, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Lynch, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mrs. McBath, Ms. McCollum, Mr. McGovern, Mr. McNerney, Ms. Moore, Mr. Morelle, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Neguse, Ms. Norton, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Peters, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Porter, Ms. Pressley, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Richmond, Mr. Rose of New York, Mr. Rouda, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Rush, Mr. San Nicolas, Ms. Sánchez, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Soto, Ms. Speier, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Takano, Ms. Titus, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Tonko, Mrs. Trahan, Mr. Trone, Mr. Vela, Ms. Velázquez, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Ms. Wexton, Mr. Yarmuth, Mr. Courtney, and Mrs. Luria) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and ReformRESOLUTIONSupporting the goals and ideals of National Women’s History Month.
 Whereas the purpose of National Women’s History Month is to increase awareness and knowledge of women’s involvement in history;
 Whereas, as recently as the 1970s, women’s history was rarely included in the kindergarten through grade 12 curriculum and was not part of public awareness;
 Whereas the Education Task Force of the Sonoma County (California) Commission on the Status of Women initiated a Women’s History Week celebration in 1978 centered around International Women’s History Day, which is celebrated on March 8;
 Whereas in 1980, the National Women’s History Project was founded in Sonoma County, California, by Molly Murphy MacGregor, Mary Ruthsdotter, Maria Cuevas, Paula Hammett, and Bette Morgan to broadcast women’s historical achievements;
 Whereas National Women’s History Project co-founder Mary Ruthsdotter, who passed away in January 2010, was a leader in the effort to ensure the inclusion of women’s accomplishments in the Nation’s history;
 Whereas in 1981, responding to the growing popularity of women’s history celebrations, Congress passed a resolution making Women’s History Week a national observance;
 Whereas during this time, using information provided by the National Women’s History Project, founded in Sonoma County, California, thousands of schools and communities joined in the commemoration of National Women’s History Week, with support and encouragement from governors, city councils, school boards, and Congress;
 Whereas in 1987, the National Women’s History Project petitioned Congress to expand the national celebration to include the entire month of March;
 Whereas educators, workplace program planners, parents, and community organizations in thousands of communities in the United States under the guidance of the National Women’s History Project, have turned National Women’s History Month into a major local learning experience and celebration;
 Whereas the popularity of women’s history celebrations has sparked a new interest in uncovering women’s forgotten heritage;
 Whereas the President’s Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History was established to consider how best to acknowledge and celebrate the roles and accomplishments of women in United States history;
 Whereas the National Women’s History Museum was founded in 1996 as an institution dedicated to preserving, interpreting, and celebrating the diverse historic contributions of women, and integrating this rich heritage fully into the Nation’s teachings and history books;
 Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes March 2019 as National Women’s History Month; and Whereas the theme of National Women’s History Month 2019 is Visionary Women: Champions of Peace and Nonviolence: Now, therefore, be it
 That the House of Representatives— (1)supports the goals and ideals of National Women’s History Month; and
 (2)recognizes and honors the women and organizations in the United States that have fought for and continue to promote the teaching of women’s history.


text:
Archívy Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov - Advokátska kancelária UHAĽ s.r.o.
 Vyporiadanie bezpodielového spoluvlastníctva manželov (BSM) dohodou uzavretou po troch rokoch od jeho zániku
 Dátum 03/01/2017
 Vyporiadanie BSM je možné vykonať súdnou cestou na návrh niektorého z manželov (bývalých manželov), alebo dohodou.
 Zákon však ustanovuje aj lehotu (v trvaní 3 rokov), v ktorej je potrebné vykonať vyporiadanie, respektíve podať návrh na vyporiadanie BSM na súd, pretože ak sa tak nestane, dochádza k zákonnému vyporiadaniu BSM. Čítať ďalej
 Podľa § 149 ods. 1 OZ, „Ak zanikne bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo, vykoná sa vyporiadanie podľa zásad uvedených v § 150.“
 Podľa § 149 ods. 2 OZ, „Ak dôjde k vyporiadaniu dohodou, sú manželia povinní vydať si na požiadanie písomné potvrdenie o tom, ako sa vyporiadali.“
 Podľa § 149 ods. 3 OZ, „Ak sa vyporiadanie nevykoná dohodou, vykoná ho na návrh niektorého z manželov súd.“
 Podľa § 149 ods. 5 OZ, „Ak sa po vyporiadaní bezpodielového spoluvlastníctva manželov rozhodnutím súdu alebo dohodou objaví majetok, ktorý nebol zahrnutý v rámci vyporiadania, platí preň domnienka uvedená v odseku 4.“
 Zmyslom vyporiadania bezpodielového spoluvlastníctva manželov je ukončenie spoluvlastníckeho vzťahu manželov (bývalých manželov), čím sa zároveň predchádza vzniku možných sporov ohľadom spoločných majetkových vecí manželov v budúcnosti. Za tým účelom by sa teda súd rozhodujúci v konaní o vyporiadanie BSM mal snažiť rozhodovať spory tak, aby každému z manželov bola prikázaná do vlastníctva celá vec v BSM, s tým, že pri vzniku disparity (nerovnosti) podielov, zaviaže toho z manželov, ktorý obdržal veci či práva vo vyššej hodnote, na výplatu druhého z manželov v peniazoch.
 V určitých prípadoch môže nastať situácia, keď vzhľadom na výnimočné okolnosti, nie je vhodné určitú vec v BSM (pôjde najmä o nehnuteľnosť) prikázať len jednému z manželov, ale súd ju prikáže do podielového spoluvlastníctva, čím ich spoluvlastnícky vzťah neukončí, ale pretransformuje na podielové spoluvlastníctvo. Čítať ďalej


text:
 9.4.2011
 IT
 Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea
 L 96/19
 REGOLAMENTO DI ESECUZIONE (UE) N. 346/2011 DELLA COMMISSIONE
 dell’8 aprile 2011
 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all’importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di taluni ortofrutticoli
 LA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA,
 visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell’Unione europea,
 visto il regolamento (CE) n. 1234/2007 del Consiglio, del 22 ottobre 2007, recante organizzazione comune dei mercati agricoli e disposizioni specifiche per taluni prodotti agricoli (regolamento unico OCM) (1),
 visto il regolamento (CE) n. 1580/2007 della Commissione, del 21 dicembre 2007, recante modalità di applicazione dei regolamenti (CE) n. 2200/96, (CE) n. 2201/96 e (CE) n. 1182/2007 nel settore degli ortofrutticoli (2), in particolare l’articolo 138, paragrafo 1,
 considerando quanto segue:
 Il regolamento (CE) n. 1580/2007 prevede, in applicazione dei risultati dei negoziati commerciali multilaterali dell’Uruguay round, i criteri per la fissazione da parte della Commissione dei valori forfettari all’importazione dai paesi terzi, per i prodotti e i periodi indicati nell’allegato XV, parte A, del medesimo regolamento,
 HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:
 Articolo 1
 I valori forfettari all’importazione di cui all’articolo 138 del regolamento (CE) n. 1580/2007 sono quelli fissati nell’allegato del presente regolamento.
 Articolo 2
 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 9 aprile 2011.
 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.
 Fatto a Bruxelles, l’8 aprile 2011.
 Per la Commissione, a nome del presidente,
 José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
 Direttore generale dell'Agricoltura e dello sviluppo rurale
 (1) GU L 299 del 16.11.2007, pag. 1.
 (2) GU L 350 del 31.12.2007, pag. 1.
 ALLEGATO
 Valori forfettari all’importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di taluni ortofrutticoli
 (EUR/100 kg)
 Codice NC
 Codice paesi terzi (1)
 Valore forfettario all'importazione
 0702 00 00
 JO
 68,6
 MA
 44,5
 TN
 104,8
 TR
 86,7
 ZZ
 76,2
 0707 00 05
 EG
 152,2
 TR
 144,8
 ZZ
 148,5
 0709 90 70
 MA
 50,5
 TR
 102,8
 ZA
 15,5
 ZZ
 56,3
 0805 10 20
 EG
 55,7
 IL
 71,6
 MA
 51,2
 TN
 55,4
 TR
 73,3
 ZZ
 61,4
 0805 50 10
 TR
 48,2
 ZZ
 48,2
 0808 10 80
 AR
 75,8
 BR
 82,5
 CA
 107,4
 CL
 87,8
 CN
 94,0
 MK
 50,2
 NZ
 122,9
 US
 174,9
 UY
 74,1
 ZA
 80,4
 ZZ
 95,0
 0808 20 50
 AR
 98,3
 CL
 100,9
 CN
 76,3
 US
 72,1
 ZA
 94,1
 ZZ
 88,3
 (1) Nomenclatura dei paesi stabilita dal regolamento (CE) n. 1833/2006 della Commissione (GU L 354 del 14.12.2006, pag. 19). Il codice «ZZ» rappresenta le «altre origini».


text:
 14.12.2015
 ET
 Euroopa Liidu Teataja
 C 414/27
 Üldkohtu 23. oktoobri 2015. aasta otsus – TrekStor versus Siseturu Ühtlustamise Amet (SmartTV Station)
 (Kohtuasi T-649/13) (1)
 ((Ühenduse kaubamärk - Ühenduse sõnamärgi SmartTV Station taotlus - Absoluutsed keeldumispõhjused - Eristusvõime puudumine - Kirjeldavus - Määruse (EÜ) nr 207/2009 artikli 7 lõike1 punktid b ja c - Määruse nr 207/2009 artikli 7 lõige 3))
 (2015/C 414/34)
 Kohtumenetluse keel: saksa
 Pooled
 Hageja: TrekStor Ltd (Hong-Kong, Hiina) (esindajad: advokaadid O. Spieker ja M. Alber)
 Kostja: Siseturu Ühtlustamise Amet (kaubamärgid ja tööstusdisainilahendused) (esindajad: M. Fischer, hiljem G. Schneider ja A. Schifko)
 Ese
 Hagi Siseturu Ühtlustamise Ameti neljanda apellatsioonikoja 1. oktoobri 2013. aasta otsuse (asi R 128/2013-4) peale, mis käsitleb sõnalise tähise SmartTV Station registreerimist ühenduse kaubamärgina.
 Resolutsioon
 1.
 Jätta hagi rahuldamata.
 2.
 Jätta TrekStor Ltd kohtukulud tema enda kanda ja mõista temalt välja Siseturu Ühtlustamise Ameti (kaubamärgid ja tööstusdisainilahendused) kohtukulud.
 (1) ELT C 39, 8.2.2014.


text:
Madre Terra è un singolo dei Tazenda in collaborazione con Francesco Renga, pubblicato il 20 maggio 2008 come primo estratto dall'omonimo album della band.
 Video musicale
 Il video ufficiale del brano, diretto da Laura Chissone e prodotto da Radiorama, vede alternarsi scene dove i Tazenda e Renga cantano il brano in vari spazi aperti ad altre dove vengono mostrate immagini tratte da ogni angolo dalla Terra.
 Classifiche
 Note
 Collegamenti esterni
 Brani dei Tazenda
 Brani musicali dei Tazenda


text:
William E. Coles Jr. (1932–2005) was an American novelist and professor.
 Born in Summit, New Jersey, Coles earned degrees from Lehigh University, the University of Connecticut, the University of Minnesota. From 1974 to 1998 he served as a professor and director of composition at the University of Pittsburgh.
 Coles died on March 21, 2005. He was survived by his wife, Janet Kafka.
 Books
 The Plural I, novel (1978).
 Funnybone, novel (New York: Atheneum Books, 1992).
 Another Kind of Monday, novel (New York: Atheneum Books, 1996).
 Compass in the Blood, novel (New York: Atheneum Books, 2001).
 References
 Sources
 Contemporary Authors Online. The Gale Group, 2006.
 Matthew Lavelle (2007). Pennsylvania Center for the Book: Profile of William E. Coles, Jr.. Retrieved November 29, 2008.
 Storlie, Erik F. Go Deep & Take Plenty of Root: A Prairie-Norwegian Father, Rebellion in Minneapolis, Basement Zen, Growing Up, Growing Tender. Recollections of W.E. Coles, Chapters 6-7. Createspace 2013.
 1932 births
 2005 deaths
 Writers from Pittsburgh
 University of Connecticut alumni
 Lehigh University alumni
 University of Minnesota alumni
 University of Pittsburgh faculty
 American male novelists
 20th-century American novelists
 20th-century American male writers
 Novelists from Pennsylvania
 People from Summit, New Jersey


text:
7.6.2003 FR Journal officiel de l’Union européenne C 135/7
 de cette directive, la Cour (première chambre), composée de M. C. W. A. Timmermans, président de chambre,
 M. M. Wathelet (rapporteur), président de chambre, MM. D. A.) O. Edward et S. von Bahr (rapporteur), juges,
 MM. P. Jann et A. Rosas, juges, avocat général: M. J. Mischo, avocat général: M. P. Léger, greffier: M. R. Grass, a rendu le
 greffier: M. R. Grass, a rendu le 10 avril 2003 un arrêt dont le 6 février 2003 une ordonnance dont le dispositif est le suivant:
 dispositif est le suivant:
 1) Le pourvoi est rejeté.
 1) En ne prenant pas, dans le délai prescrit, toutes les dispositions
 législatives, réglementaires et administratives nécessaires pour 2) Dieckmann & Hansen GmbH est condamnée aux dépens.
 se conformer à la directive 98/8/CE du Parlement européen et
 du Conseil, du 16 février 1998, concernant la mise sur le
 marché des produits biocides, la République française a manqué (1 ) JO C 44 du 16.2.2002.
 aux obligations qui lui incombent en vertu de cette directive.
 2) La République française est condamnée aux dépens.
 ( 1) JO C 131 du 1.6.2002.
 Recours introduit le 27 février 2003 par le royaume
 d’Espagne contre le Conseil de l’Union européenne
 (Affaire C-87/03)
 ORDONNANCE DE LA COUR (2003/C 135/11)
 (quatrième chambre)
 La Cour de justice des Communautés européennes a été saisie
 du 6 février 2003 le 27 février 2003 d’un recours dirigé contre le Conseil de
 l’Union européenne et formé par le royaume d’Espagne,
 dans l’affaire C-492/01 P: Dieckmann & Hansen GmbH représenté par Mme Nuria Díaz Abad, abogado del Estado, qui
 contre Commission des Communautés européennes (1) élit domicile à Luxembourg.
 («Décision 1999/244/CE modifiant la décision 97/296/CE La partie requérante conclut à ce qu’il plaise à la Cour:
 établissant la liste des pays tiers en provenance desquels
 l’importation des produits de la pêche est autorisée pour — annuler le règlement (CE) no 2341/2002 ( 1) du Conseil,
 l’alimentation humaine — Interdiction de l’importation de du 20 décembre 2002, établissant, pour 2003, les
 caviar en provenance du Kazakhstan — Responsabilité possibilités de pêche et les conditions associées pour
 extracontractuelle de la Communauté — Pourvoi en partie certains stocks halieutiques et groupes de stock halieuti-
 manifestement irrecevable et en partie manifestement non ques, applicables dans les eaux communautaires et, pour
 fondé») les navires communautaires, dans les eaux soumises à des
 limitations de capture, dans la mesure où il n’attribue pas
 (2003/C 135/10) certains quotas à la flotte espagnole dans les eaux
 communautaires de la Mer du Nord et de la Baltique, et
 (Langue de procédure: l’allemand) — condamner l’institution défenderesse aux dépens.
 (Traduction provisoire; la traduction définitive sera publiée au «Recueil
 de la Jurisprudence de la Cour»)
 Moyens et principaux arguments
 — Violation du principe de non-discrimination: à compter
 Dans l’affaire C-492/01 P, Dieckmann & Hansen GmbH, de l’expiration de la période transitoire le 31 décembre
 établie à Hambourg (Allemagne), (avocat: Me H.-J. Rabe), ayant 2002, les pêcheurs espagnols sont dans la même situation
 pour objet un pourvoi formé contre l’arrêt du Tribunal de que les pêcheurs des autres États membres et ils doivent
 première instance des Communautés européennes (cinquième bénéficier de l’égalité d’accès aux eaux et aux ressources.
 chambre) du 23 octobre 2001, Dieckmann & Hansen/Com- Toutefois, par le biais de la norme attaquée, les pêcheurs
 mission (T-155/99, Rec. p. II-3143), et tendant à l’annulation espagnols sont traités différemment, car il ne leur est pas
 de cet arrêt, l’autre partie à la procédure étant: Commission permis de pêcher dans les eaux de la Mer du Nord et de
 des Communautés européennes (agents: MM. G. Berscheid et la Mer baltique la quasi-totalité des espèces soumises à
 M. Niejhar), la Cour (quatrième chambre), composée de quota.


text:
Die Ruine Simmenegg, auch Simieta genannt, ist die Ruine einer mittelalterlichen Höhenburg aus dem 13. Jahrhundert in der Gemeinde Boltigen im Kanton Bern.
 Lage und Beschreibung
 Die Burgruine liegt auf etwa 1,6 km von der Gemeinde Boltigen entfernt. Sie wurde auf einer felsigen Anhöhe links der Simme gebaut. Die Burg bestand aus einem Bergfried, dem an der Nordostseite ein Palas angebaut war. Diese beiden Gebäudeteile, waren an drei Seiten von einer Ringmauer umgeben. Der Zugang erfolgte an der von der Simme abgewandten Seite über eine Zugbrücke.
 Geschichte
 Die Burg Simmenegg wurde 1276 zum ersten Mal unter dem Namen Simieta als Lehen des Kaisers erwähnt. Zu Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts werden die Freiherren von Weissenburg, damals die mächtigsten Herren im Niedersimmental, als Lehnsträger genannt. Um 1300 zog Peter von Weißenburg seinen Schwiegersohn Thüring von Brandis als weiteren Lehnsträger bei. 1337 wurde Thüring von Brandis Bürger der Stadt Bern und mit ihm auch sein Lehen, die Simmenegg. Als 1368 die Freiherren von Weissenburg im Mannesstamm ausstarben, wurden die Freiherren von Brandis alleinige Lehnträger der Burg. Von seinem Onkel, Thüring der 2. von Brandis, erbte Rudolf von Aarburg 1374 die Burg. Sein Erbe wurde ihm aber von Mangold von Brandis streitig gemacht. Als dieser sich in der Simmenegg festsetzen wollte, erhoben sich im Jahre 1378 die Talleute des Simmentals gegen ihn. Die Stadt Bern griff in den Streit ein und sprach die Herrschaft Simmenegg Rudolf von Aarburg zu. Dieser verkaufte sie dann im Jahr 1391 an die Stadt Bern. Die Herrschaft Simmenegg wurde der Kastlanei Obersimmental angegliedert und die Burg dem Zerfall überlassen. Heute sind lediglich noch einige Mauerreste vorhanden.
 Weblinks
 Unteres Simmental – Schloss Wimmis auf der Website burgenweg.ch
 Simmenegg, Boltigen auf der Website hauswege.ch
 Simmenegg
 Simmenegg
 Boltigen
 Simme