text:
Πότε ξεκινάει το νέο πρόγραμμα επιδότησης του ΟΑΕΔ | e-theseis.gr "}).appendTo(followBox.find(".follow-by-email-inner"));followBox.find("td:last").removeAttr("width");var followHeight="-"+followBox.outerHeight()+"px";followBox.hide().css({bottom:"-500px"});setTimeout(function(){followBox.show().animate({bottom:followHeight})},500);w2b(".w2bfollowButton").click(function(e){if(followBox.hasClass("followOpened")){w2b(this).removeClass("followActive");followBox.removeClass("followOpened").animate({bottom:followHeight},{duration:200,easing:"easeOutCubic"})}else{w2b(this).addClass("followActive");followBox.addClass("followOpened").animate({bottom:"0"},{duration:400,easing:"easeOutCubic"})}e.preventDefault()})})})(jQuery); /*]]>*/
 Πότε ξεκινάει το νέο πρόγραμμα επιδότησης του ΟΑΕΔ
 Πότε ξεκινάει το νέο πρόγραμμα επιδότησης του ΟΑΕΔ – Για 10.000 η 12μηνη κοινωφελής στα νοσοκομεία
 Έως το τέλος του έτους αναμένεται να προκύψουν πάνω από 60.000 ωφελούμενοι, μέσω των προγραμμάτων απασχόλησης που εκπονεί ο ΟΑΕΔ.
 Σύμφωνα με την διοικήτρια του Οργανισμού, κ. Μαρία Καραμεσίνη ήδη από χθες ξεκίνησε το Πρόγραμμα Εργασιακής Εμπειρίας που αφορά σε 3.000 νέους, ηλικίας 25-29 ετών. Σε συνέντευξη που παραχώρησε στο Αθηναϊκό Πρακτορείο Ειδήσεων (ΑΠΕ), η κ. Καραμεσίνη τόνισε ότι στο συγκεκριμένο πρόγραμμα «έχει ήδη δοθεί εντολή στους εργασιακούς συμβούλους των ΚΠΑ να επικοινωνήσουν με τους ανέργους, που βρίσκονται στους πίνακες κατάταξης, για να προσέλθουν στα ΚΠΑ και να λάβουν το συστατικό τους. Μετά την ολοκλήρωση της πρακτικής άσκησης θα ακολουθήσει ένα Πρόγραμμα, το οποίο θα επιχορηγήσει νέες θέσεις εργασίας για τους ίδιους νέους, στις ίδιες ή άλλες επιχειρήσεις από αυτές που έκαναν την πρακτική τους άσκηση».
 Σχετιικά με τα νέα προγράμματα που θα ξεκινήσουν από τον Οργανισμό, η κ. Καραμεσίνη αναφέρθηκε διεξοδικά στο Πρόγραμμα Επιχορήγησης Επιχειρήσεων για την απασχόληση ανέργων 30-49 ετών, το οποίο θα πάρει σάρκα και οστά μέσα στο Νοέμβριο.
 «Το Πρόγραμμα αφορά άνεργους ηλικίας 30-49 ετών, με έμφαση στους μακροχρόνια άνεργους, και επιχορηγεί νέες θέσεις εργασίας σε επιχειρήσεις του ιδιωτικού τομέα και ΚΟΙΝΣΕΠ. Οι επιχειρήσεις θα επιχορηγούνται για την πρόσληψη των ανέργων και την απασχόλησή τους για 12 μήνες. Ο αριθμός των ωφελούμενων ανέργων ανέρχεται στις 10.000. Η αναζήτηση των ανέργων για πρόσληψη θα γίνεται υποχρεωτικά από το μητρώο του Οργανισμού και οι επιχειρήσεις θα έχουν τη δυνατότητα να δηλώσουν μέχρι 10 επιλογές υποψηφίων. Ο ΟΑΕΔ θα αναρτήσει σύντομα στην ιστοσελίδα του τη σχετική πρόσκληση προς τις επιχειρήσεις σύντομα, καθώς αναμένεται η ΚΥΑ με βάση την οποία θα βγει η πρόσκληση».
 Ο Οργανισμός πρόκειται στο εξής να δίνει έμφαση στην απασχόληση και όχι στην Κατάρτιση με Προγράμματα μεγαλύτερης διάρκειας. «Γι’ αυτό και στο Πρόγραμμα Πρακτικής Άσκησης, έχουμε 4 μήνες πρακτική άσκηση και 8 μήνες απασχόληση, και προσπαθούμε να υπάρχει αντιστοίχιση των σπουδών των συμμετέχόντων με το αντικείμενο της θέσης εργασίας. Και με αυτόν τον τρόπο, η μεν κατάρτιση να είναι πραγματικά μια εμπειρία πάνω στις σπουδές τους, η δε απασχόληση να είναι το πρώτο βήμα της εργασιακής τους ένταξης», επισήμανε η κ. Καραμεσίνη.
 Τα υπόλοιπα προγράμματα που πρόκειται να «τρέξουν» εντός του έτους είναι:
 α) Επιταγή επανένταξης που σχετίζεται με τη μετατροπή του επιδόματος ανεργίας, σε επίδομα εργασίας για 10.000 επιδοτούμενους ανέργους. Αναμένεται Νομοθετική Ρύθμιση και εκτιμάται ότι θα ξεκινήσει μέσα στο Νοέμβριο.
 γ )Στη συνέχεια έπονται δύο Προγράμματα ένα για ΚΟΙΝΣΕΠ και ένα για ΚΟΙΣΠΕ. Στην πρώτη περίπτωση θα υπάρχει επιχορήγηση για τα ιδρυτικά μέλη των ΚΟΙΝΣΕΠ προκειμένου να καλύψουν τις ασφαλιστικές τους εισφορές και στη δεύτερη περίπτωση για να μπορούν να προσλάβουν ΑμΕΑ
 Ξεχωριστή σημασία έχει για την διοικήτρια του ΟΑΕΔ το Πρόγραμμα Νεανικής Επιχειρηματικότητας, που αναμένεται να ξεκινήσει στο τέλος του έτους ή στις αρχές του 2017 και αφορά 2.000-2.500 άνεργους ηλικίας 18-29 ετών. «Πρόκειται για ένα πρόγραμμα νεανικής επιχειρηματικότητας, το οποίο αυτή τη στιγμή ετοιμάζουμε σε συνεργασία με τους Κοινωνικούς Εταίρους. Θα υπάρξει μια Κοινοπραξία, μια Προγραμματική Συμφωνία πολύ σύντομα. Θα προσπαθήσουμε αυτό να γίνει μέσα στο 2016, διαφορετικά στις αρχές του νέου χρόνου. Στόχος μας είναι η διαρκής συνεργασία, που ήδη υφίσταται, με τους επιχειρηματικούς φορείς», σημείωσε η κ. Καραμεσίνη.
 Αναφορικά με την πορεία της ανεργίας τον περασμένο Αύγουστο, μήνα κατά τον οποία κινήθηκε ανοδικά, η κ. Καραμεσίνη παραδέχτηκε ότι πράγματι «υπάρχει μια ανοδική πορεία στην εγγεγραμμένη ανεργία στον ΟΑΕΔ, η οποία καταγράφεται εδώ και αρκετό καιρό. Αυτό οφείλεται σε μια μεγάλη προσπάθεια που κάνει ο ΟΑΕΔ να προσελκύσει ανέργους, οι οποίοι δεν γράφονται στον Οργανισμό μας. Αυτό τους δίνει τη δυνατότητα να συμμετέχουν στα Προγράμματα Απασχόλησης, γιατί θέλουμε να δώσουμε ίσες ευκαιρίες σε όλους τους πολίτες που βρίσκονται σε αυτήν την κατάσταση- δηλαδή στους ανέργους στους οποίους στοχεύουν τα Προγράμματα- να συμμετέχουν σε αυτά. Έτσι, αυξάνεται ο αριθμός των εγγεγραμμένων. Από τον προηγούμενο Μάρτιο που βγήκε το πρώτο Πρόγραμμα για τους μακροχρόνια άνεργους άνω των 50 ετών, κάνουμε συστηματικά ειδοποιήσεις στους ανέργους που εντάσσονται στις διάφορες κατηγορίες στους οποίους απευθύνονται τα Προγράμματα, να έρθουν να γραφτούν, διότι επίκειται η έναρξη του Προγράμματος.
 Το ίδιο κάναμε και για τα δύο Προγράμματα Εργασιακής Εμπειρίας 18-24 και 25-29 ετών. Βεβαίως, εκτός από αυτό υπάρχουν και τα Προγράμματα Κοινωφελούς Εργασίας, τα οποία στοχεύουν στους μακροχρόνια ανέργους. Για να μπορέσει κάποιος να συμμετέχει σε αυτά τα Προγράμματα, πρέπει να ξεκινήσει την εγγραφή του ώστε να μετράει η διάρκεια της μακροχρόνιας ανεργίας. ‘Αρα, υπάρχουν διπλά κίνητρα για τους ανέργους και αυτοί που δεν συμμετέχουν από μόνοι τους ειδοποιούνται από εμάς να γραφτούν».
 Την ίδια στιγμή έχει ξεκινήσει από το 2014 το σχέδιο αναδιοργάνωσης του Οργανισμού. Πρώτος στόχος είναι κατά την κ. Καραμεσίνη «η άμεση εξυπηρέτηση του πολίτη με το νέο portal, με το τηλεφωνικό κέντρο, με τις υπηρεσίες υποδοχής σε κάθε ΚΠΑ και γενικά με τις ηλεκτρονικές υπηρεσίες ώστε να μην χρειάζεται κάποιος να έρθει στον ΟΑΕΔ για να κάνει τη δουλειά του. Οι περισσότερες υπηρεσίες, πλέον, γίνονται ηλεκτρονικά εκτός απο ορισμένες που γίνονται σε ΚΕΠ, όπως π.χ παροχή εγγράφων και πιστοποιητικών».
 «Το δεύτερο σκέλος της αναδιοργάνωσης», σύμφωνα με την κ. Καραμεσίνη, «έχει να κάνει με την παροχή περισσότερων και πιο στοχευμένων υπηρεσιών στους ανέργους. Εκτός δηλαδή από το να δίνουμε επιδόματα ανεργίας και να κάνουμε προγράμματα απασχόλησης, αναπτύσσουμε δραστηριότητά μας στον τομέα της συμβουλευτικής υποστήριξης. Φιλοδοξούμε μέσα από αυτό, οι άνεργοι να έχουν πρόσβαση στις ηλεκτρονικές μας υπηρεσίες, που θα περιλαμβάνουν σε σύντομο χρονικό διάστημα και νέες θέσεις εργασίας από τη μεριά των εργοδοτών. Οι σύμβουλοι θα καλύψουν και το κομμάτι της επαφής με τους εργοδότες και της τοποθέτησης των ανέργων.Το τρίτο σκέλος της αναδιοργάνωσης αφορά στη βελτίωση των σχέσεων με τους εργοδότες. Αυτό θα γίνεται καθώς οι ίδιοι εργοδότες θα μπορούν να μπαίνουν στο portal του ΟΑΕΔ στο σύνολο των μητρώων των ανέργων, στο οποίο θα έχουν πρόσβαση. Αυτό θα αφορά μεγάλες αλλά και μικρομεσαίες επιχειρήσεις».
 Επίσης, κ. Καραμεσίνη γνωστοποίησε ότι μέχρι το τέλος Οκτωβρίου ή το αργότερο αρχές Νοεμβρίου, πρόκειται να προκηρυχθεί το νέο Πρόγραμμα για τον Κοινωνικό Τουρισμό.
 Αναρτήθηκε από e-theseis,gr στις 5:55 π.μ.


type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 1.9.2016
 DA
 Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
 L 235/8
 KOMMISSIONENS GENNEMFØRELSESFORORDNING (EU) 2016/1444
 af 31. august 2016
 om ændring af forordning (EU) nr. 37/2010 for så vidt angår stoffet hydrocortisonaceponat
 (EØS-relevant tekst)
 EUROPA-KOMMISSIONEN HAR —
 under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,
 under henvisning til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 470/2009 af 6. maj 2009 om fællesskabsprocedurer for fastsættelse af grænseværdier for restkoncentrationer af farmakologisk virksomme stoffer i animalske fødevarer, om ophævelse af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2377/90 og om ændring af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2001/82/EF og Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 726/2004 (1), særlig artikel 14 sammenholdt med artikel 17,
 under henvisning til udtalelse fra Det Europæiske Lægemiddelagentur udarbejdet af Udvalget for Veterinærlægemidler, og
 ud fra følgende betragtninger:
 (1)
 I henhold til artikel 17 i forordning (EF) nr. 470/2009 skal der ved en forordning fastsættes en maksimalgrænseværdi for restkoncentrationer (MRL) af farmakologisk virksomme stoffer, som i Unionen er bestemt til anvendelse i veterinærlægemidler til dyr bestemt til fødevareproduktion eller i biocidholdige produkter, der anvendes i husdyrbrug.
 (2)
 Tabel 1 i bilaget til Kommissionens forordning (EU) nr. 37/2010 (2) indeholder en liste over farmakologisk virksomme stoffer og disses klassifikation med hensyn til maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer i animalske fødevarer.
 (3)
 Hydrocortisonaceponat er endnu ikke opført i denne tabel.
 (4)
 Der er indgivet en ansøgning om fastsættelse af MRL'er for hydrocortisonaceponat i kvæg til Det Europæiske Lægemiddelagentur (EMA).
 (5)
 EMA har på grundlag af udtalelsen fra Udvalget for Veterinærlægemidler anbefalet, at der fastsættes en MRL for hydrocortisonaceponat i væv og mælk fra kvæg, og begrænsede dets anvendelse til udelukkende intramammær anvendelse.
 (6)
 I henhold til artikel 5 i forordning (EF) nr. 470/2009 skal EMA overveje at anvende MRL'er, som er fastsat for et farmakologisk virksomt stof i en bestemt fødevare, i forbindelse med en anden fødevare hidrørende fra samme art, eller MRL'er, som er fastsat for et farmakologisk virksomt stof i en eller flere arter, i forbindelse med andre arter.
 (7)
 EMA har vurderet, at MRL for hydrocortisonaceponat bør ekstrapoleres fra mælk fra kvæg til mælk fra alle drøvtyggere og dyr af hestefamilien, mens det ikke er nødvendigt at fastsætte en MRL for hydrocortisonaceponat i alle andre væv fra alle drøvtyggere og dyr af hestefamilien af hensyn til beskyttelsen af menneskers sundhed.
 (8)
 Forordning (EU) nr. 37/2010 bør ændres i overensstemmelse hermed.
 (9)
 Der bør indrømmes de berørte parter en rimelig frist til at træffe de foranstaltninger, der måtte være nødvendige for at overholde den nye MRL.
 (10)
 Foranstaltningerne i denne forordning er i overensstemmelse med udtalelse fra Det Stående Udvalg for Veterinærlægemidler —
 VEDTAGET DENNE FORORDNING:
 Artikel 1
 Bilaget til forordning (EU) nr. 37/2010 ændres som angivet i bilaget til nærværende forordning.
 Artikel 2
 Denne forordning træder i kraft på tyvendedagen efter offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.
 Den anvendes fra den 31. oktober 2016.
 Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver medlemsstat.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 31. august 2016.
 På Kommissionens vegne
 Jean-Claude JUNCKER
 Formand
 (1) EUT L 152 af 16.6.2009, s. 11.
 (2) Kommissionens forordning (EU) nr. 37/2010 af 22. december 2009 om farmakologisk virksomme stoffer og disses klassifikation med hensyn til maksimalgrænseværdier for restkoncentrationer i animalske fødevarer (EUT L 15 af 20.1.2010, s. 1).
 BILAG
 Nedenstående stof indsættes i alfabetisk rækkefølge i tabel 1 i bilaget til forordning (EU) nr. 37/2010:
 Farmakologisk virksomt stof
 Restmarkør
 Dyreart
 MRL
 Målvæv
 Andre bestemmelser (jf. artikel 14, stk. 7, i forordning (EF) nr. 470/2009)
 Terapeutisk klassifikation
 »Hydrocortisonaceponat
 Summen af hydrocortison og estere deraf efter alkalisk hydrolyse udtrykt som hydrocortison
 Alle drøvtyggere, dyr af hestefamilien
 10 μg/kg
 Mælk
 Kun til intramammær anvendelse
 Corticosteroider«
 Ikke relevant
 Alle drøvtyggere, dyr af hestefamilien
 MRL kun påkrævet for mælk
 Ikke relevant


type: other

text:
Is-sistema tal-qrati fl-Irlanda għandha l-oriġini tagħha fil-Kostituzzjoni tal-1922, li pprovdiet għall-istabbiliment ta’ qrati ġodda biex jieħdu post dawk li kienu evolvew taħt l-amministrazzjoni Brittanika. Fl-1924 ġew stabbiliti qrati ġodda taħt l-Att dwar il-Qrati tal-Ġustizzja, 1924, li stabbilixxa l-bażi ġuridika għal sistema tal-qrati.
 Il-qrati preżenti ġew stabbiliti bl-Att dwar il-Qrati (Stabbiliment u Kostituzzjoni) tal-1961, skont l-Artikolu 34 tal-Kostituzzjoni adottata mill-poplu Irlandiż fl-1937. Il-Qorti tal-Appell ġiet stabbilita fid-29 ta’ Ottubru, 2014, wara referendum fl-2013.
 L-Artikoli 34 sa 37 tal-Kostituzzjoni jittrattaw l-amministrazzjoni tal-ġustizzja b’mod ġenerali. L-Artikolu 34.1 jistipula li, “Il-ġustizzja għandha tiġi amministrata fi Qrati stabbiliti bil-liġi”. Il-Kostituzzjoni tiddeskrivi l-istruttura tas-sistema tal-qrati li tikkonsisti minn qorti tal-appell finali, il-Qorti Suprema, il-Qorti tal-Appell li għandha ġurisdizzjoni fi kwistjonijiet kemm kriminali kif ukoll ċivili, u l-qrati tal-prim’istanza li jinkludu High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) li għandha ġurisdizzjoni sħiħa fil-kwistjonijiet kriminali u ċivili kollha u l-qrati ta’ ġurisdizzjoni limitata, Circuit Court u Qorti Distrettwali organizzati fuq bażi reġjonali.
 Saru tibdiliet sinifikanti fil-ġurisdizzjoni tal-appell tal- Qorti Suprema bid-dħul fis-seħħ fit-28 ta’ Ottubru 2014, tat-Tlieta u tletin Emenda tal-Kostituzzjoni li stabbiliet il-Qorti tal-Appell. B’effett mill-jum tal-istabbiliment, il-Qorti Suprema għandha ġurisdizzjoni biex tisma’ appelli –
 (a) minn deċiżjoni tal-Qorti tal-Appell jekk il-Qorti Suprema tkun sodisfatta li d-deċiżjoni tinvolvi kwistjoni ta’ importanza pubblika ġenerali, jew fl-interessi tal-ġustizzja jkun neċessarju li jsir appell quddiem il-Qorti Suprema, u;
 (b) minn deċiżjoni tal-High Court jekk il-Qorti Suprema tkun sodisfatta li hemm ċirkustanzi eċċezzjonali li jiġġustifikaw appell quddiemha – prekundizzjoni biex il-Qorti Suprema tkun sodisfatta hija l-preżenza ta’ wieħed miż-żewġ fatturi li ġejjin jew tat-tnejn li huma – id-deċiżjoni tinvolvi kwistjoni ta’ importanza pubblika ġenerali; l-interessi tal-ġustizzja.
 L-appelli fi proċedimenti ċivili mill-High Court li qabel it-Tlieta u tletin Emenda kienu jinstemgħu mill-Qorti Suprema issa huma f’idejn il-Qorti tal-Appell, ħlief f'dawk il-każijiet li fihom il-Qorti Suprema ppermettiet appell quddiemha wara li kienet sodisfatta li l-appell jissodisfa l-limitu stabbilit fl-Artikolu 34.5.4° tal-Kostituzzjoni. Barra minn hekk, kwistjonijiet tal-liġi li qabel setgħu jiġu rinvijati mis-Circuit Court lill-Qorti Suprema biex jiġu deċiżi (“każ iddikjarat”) issa jiġu deċiżi mill-Qorti tal-Appell.
 It-Tlieta u tletin Emenda ma affettwatx il-ġurisdizzjoni oriġinali tal-Qorti Suprema li fil-fatt tikkonsisti mill-funzjoni skont l-Artikolu 26 tal-Kostituzzjoni. L-Artikolu 26 jistipula li l-Qorti Suprema għandha s-setgħa li tiddeċiedi jekk Abbozz ta' liġi (jew kwalunkwe dispożizzjoni jew dispożizzjonijiet tiegħu), li jkun għadda miż-żewġt Ikmamar tal-Oireachtas u ġie ppreżentat lill-President tal-Irlanda għall-firma tiegħu qabel jiġi promulgat f’liġi, imurx kontra l-Kostituzzjoni, fir-rigward tal-kwistjoni rinvijata lill-qorti mill-President. Jekk tqum kwistjoni dwar l-inkapaċità permanenti tal-President, tali kwistjoni għandha tiġi deċiża mill-Qorti Suprema.
 Il-Qorti ġeneralment tiltaqa’ b’kompożizzjoni ta’ tlieta jew ħames imħallfin u, b’mod eċċezzjonali, seba’ mħallfin. Meta jkunu qegħdin jinstemgħu kawżi dwar il-validità kostituzzjonali ta' Att tal-Oireachtas (Parlament), il-Kostituzzjoni tirrikjedi li l-qorti tkun magħmula minn tal-anqas ħames imħallfin. Dan ir-rekwiżit japplika wkoll meta l-Qorti tintalab tagħti opinjoni dwar il-validità kostituzzjonali ta’ Abbozz ta’ liġi adottat mill-Oireachtas meta jiġi rinvijat lilha mill-President tal-Irlanda skont l-Artikolu 26 tal-Kostituzzjoni. Huwa meħtieġ ukoll minimu ta’ ħames imħallfin jekk il-Qorti jkollha tistabbilixxi, skont l-Artikolu 12 tal-Kostituzzjoni, jekk il-President ikunx sar inkapaċitat b’mod permanenti. Il-Prim Imħallef jew imħallef tal-Qorti Suprema jista’ jisma’ waħdu ċerti rikorsi interlokutorji u proċedurali.
 Il-Qorti tal-Appell ġiet stabbilita fid-29 ta’ Ottubru 2014, wara referendum fl-2013. Bħal Qrati Superjuri oħra, parti mill-ġurisdizzjoni tal-Qorti tal-Appell hija mogħtija mill-Kostituzzjoni u parti hija mogħtija mil-leġiżlazzjoni. Hija tokkupa livell ġurisdizzjonali ta' appell bejn il-High Court u l-Qorti Suprema.
 Il-Qorti għandha ġurisdizzjoni biex tisma’ appelli fi proċedimenti ċivili mill-High Court li, qabel it-Tlieta u tletin Emenda tal-Kostituzzjoni kienu jinstemgħu mill-Qorti Suprema. L-eċċezzjonijiet huma dawk il-każijiet li fihom il-Qorti Suprema ppermettiet appell quddiemha wara li kienet sodisfatta li l-appell jissodisfa l-limitu stabbilit fl-Artikolu 34.5.4 tal-Kostituzzjoni. Il-Qorti tista’ tisma’ appelli minn kawżi mismugħa fil-High Court dwar jekk liġi hijiex kostituzzjonali jew le. Il-Kostituzzjoni tistipula li ma tista’ tiġi mgħoddija l-ebda liġi li tillimita l-ġurisdizzjoni tal-Qorti tal-Appell biex tagħmel dan.
 Il-Qorti tal-Appell hija komposta minn President u disa’ mħallfin ordinarji. Il-Prim Imħallef u l-President tal-High Court huma mħallfin ex officio tal-Qorti tal-Appell. Il-Qorti tista’ tiltaqa’ f’diviżjonijiet ta’ tliet imħallfin. Xi rikorsi interlokutorji u proċedurali jistgħu jinstemgħu mill-President waħdu jew minn imħallef ieħor nominat mill-President.
 Skont il-Kostituzzjoni, il-High Court għandha ġurisdizzjoni u setgħa oriġinali sħiħa biex tiddeċiedi l-kawżi u l-kwistjonijiet kollha, kemm ta’ fatt jew ta’ dritt, ċivili jew kriminali. Il-High Court għandha ġurisdizzjoni esklużiva fi kwistjonijiet li għandhom x’jaqsmu mal-adozzjoni tat-tfal u fir-rigward tar-rikorsi għall-estradizzjoni. Il-ġurisdizzjoni tal-High Court testendi għall-kwistjoni tal-validità ta’ kwalunkwe liġi, skont id-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Kostituzzjoni (ħlief liġi li diġà tkun ġiet rinvijata lill-Qorti Suprema mill-President tal-Irlanda). Il-biċċa l-kbira tal-kawżi quddiem il-High Court jiġu deċiżi minn imħallef wieħed, għalkemm hemm dispożizzjoni fil-liġi għal ċerti kwistjonijiet bħalma huma l-kawżi għal libell, offiża fuq il-persuna jew arrest illegali li jiġu ġġudikati minn imħallef bil-ġurija. Kawżi ta’ importanza eċċezzjonali jistgħu jinstemgħu minn żewġ imħallfin jew aktar li jiltaqgħu bħala Qorti Diviżjonali.
 Il-High Court taġixxi bħala qorti tal-appell mis-Circuit Court fi kwistjonijiet ċivili. Minbarra l-ġurisdizzjoni tagħha li tisma’ l-appelli ċivili mis-Circuit Court, il-High Court għandha wkoll is-setgħa li tirrieżamina d-deċiżjonijiet tat-tribunali inferjuri kollha permezz tal-ħruġ ta’ ordnijiet prerogattivi ta' Mandamus, Projbizzjoni u Certiorari. Dawn l-ordnijiet ma jirrigwardawx il-merti tad-deċiżjoni tat-tribunali inferjuri iżda l-kwistjoni dwar jekk tkunx inqabżet il-ġurisdizzjoni.
 Il-High Court tista’ tiddeċiedi dwar kwistjoni tal-liġi mressqa mill-Qorti Distrettwali. Hija tisma' wkoll ir-rikorsi għal pleġġ meta l-imputat ikun ġie akkużat b’reat ta’ omiċidju jew fejn l-imputat ikun jixtieq varjazzjoni tat-termini u tal-kundizzjonijiet imposti mill-Qorti Distrettwali.
 Normalment il-High Court tiltaqa’ f’Dublin biex tisma’ l-kawżi oriġinali. Hija tippresjedi wkoll f’għadd ta’ postijiet provinċjali biex tisma’ kawżi oriġinali għad-danni minħabba Offiżi Personali u Fatali. Il-High Court on Circuit tisma’ appelli mis-Circuit Court f’postijiet provinċjali.
 Il-ġurisdizzjoni ċivili tas- Circuit Court hija waħda limitata sakemm il-partijiet kollha f’kawża ma jagħtux il-kunsens tagħhom, f’liema każ il-ġurisdizzjoni tkun illimitata. Il-limitu tal-ġurisdizzjoni tal-qorti jirrigwarda prinċipalment kawżi fejn it-talba ma taqbiżx EUR 75 000 (EUR 60 000 f’kawżi dwar danni personali).
 Is-Circuit Court għandha ġurisdizzjoni fi kwistjonijiet relatati mal-probation, u fi kwistjonijiet li jikkonċernaw it-titolu jew il-kirjiet ta’ proprjetà immobbli fejn il-valwazzjoni stmata tal-proprjetà ma taqbiżx EUR 253,95. Is-Circuit court għandha ġurisdizzjoni wkoll fi proċeduri tal-liġi tal-familja inklużi s-separazzjoni ġudizzjarja, id-divorzju, l-annullament u l-appelli mill-Qorti Distrettwali.
 Il-kawżi ċivili fis-Circuit Court jiġu ġġudikati minn imħallef mingħajr ġurija. Din il-qorti taġixxi bħala qorti tal-appell mill-Qorti Distrettwali fi kwistjonijiet kemm ċivili kif ukoll kriminali. L-appell jieħu l-forma ta’ smigħ mill-ġdid u d-deċiżjoni tas-Circuit Court hija finali u ma tistax tiġi appellata aktar.
 Is-Circuit Court għandha ġurisdizzjoni wkoll fil-każijiet kollha ta’ rikors għal liċenzji ġodda għall-bejgħ tal-alkoħol għall-konsum fuq il-post, u għandha ġurisdizzjoni biex tisma’ appelli mid-deċiżjonijiet ta’ tribunali bħad-Direttur tal-Investigazzjonijiet dwar l-Ugwaljanza.
 Il- Qorti Distrettwali għandha ġurisdizzjoni lokali u limitata. Fi kwistjonijiet tal-Liġi tal-Familja hija għandha s-setgħa li tagħti ordnijiet ta’ manteniment, barring, kustodja, aċċess u affiljazzjoni.
 Il-Qorti Distrettwali għandha ġurisdizzjoni biex tisma’ kawżi ċivili msejsa fuq kuntratt, ftehim ta’ lokazzjoni b’opzjoni ta' xiri jew ta’ bejgħ bi kreditu, obbligi, nuqqas ta’ ħlas tal-kera jew iż-żamma illegali ta’ oġġetti, fejn il-valur tat-talba ma jaqbiżx EUR 15 000. Hija għandha wkoll ġurisdizzjoni fir-rigward tal-infurzar ġenerali tas-sentenzi ta’ kwalunkwe qorti dwar id-dejn, ġurisdizzjoni fir-rigward ta’ għadd kbir ta’ dispożizzjonijiet dwar liċenzji, pereżempju relatati mal-bejgħ ta’ xorb alkoħoliku, u ġurisdizzjoni fir-rigward ta’ talbiet għad-danni malizzjużi meta l-ammont mitlub ma jaqbiżx EUR 15 000.
 Il-Qorti Distrettwali tiltaqa’ f’postijiet madwar il-pajjiż f’24 Distrett li jinkludu d-Distrett Metropolitan ta’ Dublin u 23 Distrett ieħor. Ġeneralment, il-post fejn tinstema’ l-kawża jiddependi minn fejn ikun sar il-kuntratt, jew fejn ikun joqgħod il-konvenut jew iwettaq in-negozju tiegħu, jew f’kawżi dwar liċenzji, mill-post fejn ikun jinstab il-bini liċenzjat.
 Il-Qorti Suprema tisma’ appelli mill-Qorti tal-Appell f’kawżi fejn jitqajjem punt tal-liġi ta’ importanza pubblika eċċezzjonali.
 Skont l-Att dwar il-Qorti tal-Appell tal-2014, il-Qorti tal-Appell ingħatat il-ġurisdizzjoni tal-appell li qabel kienet eżerċitata mill-Qorti tal-Appell Kriminali.
 L-appelli minn persuni misjuba ħatja mis-Circuit Court jew mill-Qorti Kriminali Ċentrali, li jiksbu ċertifikat mill-imħallef tal-proċess kriminali li l-każ jista' jiġi appellat, issa jsiru fil-Qorti tal-Appell. F’każ ta’ ċaħda minn dan iċ-ċertifikat, il-Qorti tal-Appell innifisha, wara appell minn din iċ-ċaħda, tista’ tagħti permess għall-appell.
 Barra minn hekk, id-Direttur tal-Prosekuzzjonijiet Pubbliċi jista’ jappella lill-Qorti tal-Appell għal raġunijiet ta’ klemenza eċċessiva tas-sentenza skont l-Artikolu 2 tal-Att tal-1993 dwar il-Ġustizzja Kriminali. F’każ ta’ allegata amministrazzjoni ħażina tal-ġustizzja, jista’ jiġi ppreżentat appell skont l-Artikolu 2 tal-Att dwar il-Proċedura Kriminali tal-1993.
 Il-Qorti tal-Appell ingħatat ukoll ġurisdizzjoni biex tisma’ appelli mid-Direttur tal-Prosekuzzjonijiet Pubbliċi fuq kwistjoni tal-liġi li toħroġ minn proċessi kriminali li rriżultaw f’ħelsien mill-ħtija. Id-deċiżjoni tal-Qorti tal-Appell ma taffettwax il-verdett ta’ ħelsien mill-ħtija f’każijiet bħal dawn.
 L-appelli mid-Direttur tal-Prosekuzzjonijiet Pubbliċi kontra ħelsien mill-ħtija jew kontra deċiżjoni biex ma jiġix ordnat proċess ġdid isiru wkoll lill-Qorti tal-Appell. Skont l-Att dwar il-Qorti tal-Appell tal-2014, il-Qorti tal-Appell ingħatat il-ġurisdizzjoni tal-appell li qabel kienet eżerċitata mill-Qorti tal-Appell Marzjali. Dan ifisser li l-appelli minn persuni li nstabu ħatja minn qorti marzjali issa jsiru fil-Qorti tal-Appell.
 Qorti tal-Appell Kriminali
 Skont l-Att dwar il-Qorti tal-Appell tal-2014, il-ġurisdizzjoni ta’ appell tal- Qorti tal-Appell Kriminali ġiet trasferita lill-Qorti tal-Appell.
 Qorti Kriminali Speċjali
 Il- Qorti Kriminali Speċjali ġiet stabbilita għall-proċess ta’ reati fejn kien stabbilit li l-qrati ordinarji mhumiex adegwati biex jiżguraw l-amministrazzjoni effettiva tal-ġustizzja u ż-żamma tal-paċi u l-ordni pubbliċi. Il-qorti tippresjedi bi tliet imħallfin mingħajr ġurija.
 Qorti Kriminali Ċentrali
 Il- Qorti Kriminali Ċentrali hija t-taqsima kriminali tal-High Court. Hija tipproċessa reati serji, inklużi reati ta’ omiċidju, reati ta’ stupru, tradiment u piraterija u proċessi kriminali skont l-Att dwar il-Kompetizzjoni, 2002. Il-qorti tippresjedi b’imħallef u ġurija.
 Qorti Kriminali tas-Circuit
 Il-Qorti Kriminali tas-Circuit tipproċessa reati għajr dawk li jistgħu jiġu pproċessati fil-Qorti Kriminali Ċentrali. Il-qorti tippresjedi b'imħallef u ġurija. Hija tisma’ appelli mill-Qorti Distrettwali.
 Il-Qorti Distrettwali tittratta reati sommarji (il-biċċa l-kbira ta’ natura statutorja) u xi reati li jistgħu jwasslu għal akkuża. Il-qorti tiġi preseduta minn imħallef biss.


type: wikipedia

text:
Týdenník bol osvetový týždenník, ktorý vydával v bibličtine Juraj Palkovič v rokoch 18121818 v Bratislave.
 Až po dlhých bojoch sa Palkovičovi cisárskym dekrétom z roku 1811 podarilo získať privilégium na vydávanie „česko-slovenských novín“, (einer böhmisch-slawischen Zeitschrift) za podmienky, že v nich sa nebudú uverejňovať politické správy a články. Svoje noviny Týdenník začal vydávať až nasledujúceho roku s podtitulom Národní noviny, no po zásahu vrchnosti bol ho Palkovič od 22. čísla VI. ročníku prinútený zmeniť na „Prešpurské slovenské noviny“.
 Charakteristika
 Svoje noviny redigoval tak, aby boli čo najprístupnejšie vidieckemu obyvateľstvu, ale aj drobným remeselníkom a kramárom v mestečkách. Pamätal pritom aj na najzaostalejšie negramotné vrstvy a prinášal pre ne také články, ktoré im mohli čítať dedinskí inteligenti v tzv. nedeľných školách. Týždenník bol skutočne obľúbený medzi slovenským ľudom. Chválil ho tiež napr. Ján Kollár i Jozef Miloslav Hurban, ktorý sa neskoršie názorovo rozišiel s Palkovičom v otázke spisovného jazyka. Hurban tvrdil, že Týdenník mal „čistý sloh, rozmanitý obsah poučný i zábavný, čo mu získalo velikuo obecenstvo“ po celom Slovensku. Iný recenzent Týdenníka vo viedenských Wiener Allgemeine Litteratur Zeitung, chválil tieto noviny pre ich „rozširovanie užitočných vedomostí“, pre dobrý štýl a vynikajúci jazyk. Vyplývalo to z Palkovičových dlhoročných skúseností z redigovania a vydávania ľudovýchovnej spisby, ako aj z jeho intímneho poznania sociálnych a kultúrnych potrieb dedinského človeka, i z jeho znalostí niekoľkých cudzích jazykov.
 Týdenník po každej stránke predstihol Prešpurské noviny, hlavne po stránke novinárskeho majstrovstva a publicistického štýlu. Týdenník sa stal čoskoro reprezentantom vznikajúceho bratislavského slovenského kultúrneho strediska. Dobrá jazyková úroveň Týdenníka, jeho jednoduchá no vhodná grafická úprava, zavedenie stálych rubrík, uplatňovanie rozličných novinových žánrových foriem - to boli hlavné prednosti novín v porovnaní so slovenskou osvieteneckou publicistikou.
 So svojou koncepciou novinárskej práce zoznámil verejnosť bližšie v predhovore prvého čísla Týdenníka, v ktorej tvrdil, že roľníci len vtedy si podstatne zlepšia svoj biedny životný údel, keď si nadobudnú vzdelanie. Pritom však nespomenul, že práve nespravodlivé spoločenské zriadenie zamedzovalo chudobných prístup do škôl a odsudzovalo ich na negramotnosť a biedu. Očakával, že ako vydavateľ Týdenníka bude mať finančné straty. Aby sa noviny čo najviac rozšírili, volil ich vydávať len v malom oktávovom formáte za nízke predplatné. Napriek tomu hospodárske výsledky prvého ročníka Týdenníka boli dosť zlé a ani v nasledujúcich rokoch sa to veľmi nezlepšovalo. Palkovič mal okrem toho málo dopisovateľov a rozširovateľov svojich novín. Preto aj napísal: „Každý počátek je těžký a slovenských novín nejtěžší. By to je moji milí a ctění krajané tak vědeli a cítili jako já.“
 Podľa programu sa Týdenník orientoval na národnú, hospodársku a zdravotnícku výchovu ľudových vrstiev. Palkovič chcel vo svojich novinách publikovať správy o poľnohospodárstve, štátnom zriadení, popularizovať hlavne prírodné vedy, propagovať nové druhy plodín a vynálezy slúžiace hlavne poľnohospodárstvu a remeslám, pravidelne informovať o novinkách krásnej a odbornej literatúry a prinášať aj články ľudovýchovné, z nevyhnutnosti pritom vylúčiac príspevky politického zamerania. (Všeobecní památní příběhové, Hospodářske věci, Umění moudreho a pravého vychovávaní dítek, Učení o zřízeních a pořádcích obecních ve vsech a městečkách, Literární zprávy, Všelijaké publikácie, prohlášení, návěstí, oznámení, Pěkné básne, neb verše...).
 Nakoniec k programu dodal: „Způsob psaní bude...slovenčina čistá, jadrná a ozdobná, taková, jako jest v Biblí.“ Považoval za potrebné zdôrazniť, že aj v týchto novinách sa bude pridržiavať bibličtiny a nie modernej jungmanovskej češtiny. Domnieval sa, že jeho Týdenník si získa čitateľov aj v Čechách a na Morave. Preto aj oznámil, že si ich môžu čitatelia objednať aj v Prahe u kníhkupca P. Kalveho, v Brne u Juraja Jastla a vo Viedni u P. R. Mosla a Antona Dolla.
 Palkovič mienil vo svojich novinách publikovať správy o poľnohospodárstve, štátnom zriadení, popularizovať hlavne prírodné vedy, propagovať nové objavy a vynálezy, pravidelne informovať čitateľov o novinkách krásnej a odbornej literatúry a prinášať aj ľudovýchovné články, vylúčiac pritom z nevyhnutnosti príspevky politického zamerania.
 Tento plán bol v súlade s jeho celkovým názorom na ľudovýchovu. Týdenník chcel redigovať, tak, aby mohli z neho čítať dedinskí inteligenti zhromaždeným, hlavne negramotným sedliakom. Preto aj v súlade s postupnou výchovou ľudu prechádzal od vydávania kalendárov k pravidelne vychádzajúcim novinám, ktoré by nielen prinášali nové poznatky pre málo vzdelaných čitateľov, ale aj formovali ich národné povedomie. Pravda, v dobe vychádzania Týdenníka bolo slovenské národné hnutie ešte nerozvinuté a veľmi slabé. Týdenník sa stal aj odrazom politickej nevyhranenosti svojho tvorcu, ktorý sa nevedel vymaniť z ideológie osvieteneckého racionalizmu, ani dôsledne si privlastniť názory stúpencov revolučného romantizmu.
 Príznačnou črtou Palkoviča ako novinára, je jeho zmysel pre praktické potreby života. Preto si ani nevytváral veľkorysé koncepcie novinárskej práce, ale v súlade so slabosťou nášho národného hnutia, postavil si ciele skromnejšie, no tým viacej reálnejšie. Mienil upevňovať jednotu spoločnej spisovnej reči Čechov, Moravanov a Slovákov, podchytiť záujem ľudových vrstiev o hospodársky a technický pokrok a prebúdzať slovenské národné povedomie aj medzi menej vzdelanými a chudobnejšími vrstvami spoločnosti. Pravda, jeho slovenské i slovanské cítenie nemalo výbojných revolučných čŕt. Horlil síce za nejeden osvietenecký ideál, ale bol pritom lojálny k vrchnosti. Vyhlasoval sa za stúpenca jozefinizmu i racionalizmu, no nevládal sa vymaniť z rámca cirkevných tradícií. Aj keď horlil za literárny klasicizmus, mal pochopenie i pre mladú štúrovskú generáciu, propagujúcu revolučný romantizmus.
 Prílohy
 Pozoruhodnou aktualitou, v slovenskom novinárstve do tých čias veľmi zriedkavou, boli nepravidelné prílohy k Týdenníku, ktoré písali o formách zlepšovania poľnohospodárskej výroby, o boji proti poverčivosti, preventívnej ochrane pred chorobami a pod. Takýto boli napr. Rozmluvaní Včeláka, Mlynáře a Vináře dobrých sousedů, Zpráva o sázení a obdělávaní stromoví sepsané od Slováka. Plánoval tiež rozšírenie rubriky Cirkevní a učené věci na osobitnú prílohu, čo však neurobil pre nedostatok spolupracovníkov i pre nízky počet predplatiteľov novín.
 Palkovič tieto prílohy vytváral podľa príkladu veľkého českého novinára a ľudovýchovného pracovníka Václava Mateja Kraméria, ktorého dielo nielenže dobre poznal, ale ho aj vysoko oceňoval. Sám tiež roku 1817 v Bratislave vydal jeho životopis od Rudolfa Kvěcha. Vydavateľ Týdenníka sa takto vyslovil o „otcovi českého osvieteneckého novinárstva“: „Kramérius si zasloužil, aby mu vděčná vlast památku vystavila... Žádny za našeho věku tolik a tak dobře psaných spisu rozličného obsahu na svůj náklad vydaných národu Slovanskému nepozůstavil, jako on.“
 Financie
 Doteraz sa nám nepodarilo zistiť, v akom náklade Palkovič Týdenník vydával, no možno ho odhadovať na 150250 výtlačkov. Boli aj roky v ktorých na vydávanie novín značne doplácal, no nikdy tak naliehavo, zúfalo a neustále neprosil svojich čitateľov o predplatné, ako to robil Daniel Tállayi v Prešpurských novinách. Palkovič, ako uvedomelý vlastenec, považoval vydávanie novín za svoju vlasteneckú povinnosť, za prirodzené zavŕšenie svojej osvetovej a ľudovýchovnej činnosti. Len krátke zmienky svedčia o tom, že napr. v druhej polovici roku 1817 mu peniaze z predplatného sotva stačili na papier a na tlač Týdenníka. Inokedy bol prinútený, pre vysoké finančné straty, vydávať noviny len v polovičnom rozsahu.
 Jazyk novín
 Napriek tomu, že ho volali „posledným strážcom veleslavínskej češtiny na Dunaji“, vyšiel v ústrety aj snahám bernolákovcov o spisovný jazyk i samostatnú slovenskú literatúru. Ba v Týdenníku uverejnil aj monológ o Antonovi Bernolákovi, v ktorom vysoko hodnotil jeho celoživotné vedecké dielo. Mohlo sa tak stať len preto, že bol vnímavým pre liberalistické a demokratické tendencie slovenskej inteligencie a iných maloburžoáznych vrstiev.
 Palkovičovo napodobňovanie prežitej klasicistickej poézie, propagovanie zastaranej formy českej spisovnej reči, jeho boj proti modernej češtine Jozefa Jungmana a jeho stúpencov (hoci napr. v Týdenníku kladne hodnotil Jungmanov preklad Miltonovho Strateného raja a uznanlivo hovoril aj o jeho ostatných jazykovedných prácach), prílišná orientácia na editorskú, spisovateľskú i novinársku činnosť na úkor pedagogickej práce na lýceu, to všetko mu vyslúžilo povesť staromilca a konzervatívneho človeka, nad ktorého hlavou vyrastala nová, odlišná literárna škola. Aj keď v týchto slovách bolo veľa pravdy, predsa len nejeden kritik bol k nemu nespravodlivým. Veď Palkovič napr. svojou novinárskou činnosťou urobil veľa záslužného nielen pre pokrokový vývoj slovenskej publicistiky, ale aj pre naše národné hnutie.
 Redakcia a dopisovatelia
 Redakcia Týdenníka, alebo ako hovoril Palkovič, slovenská novinárňa, bola umiestnená v Bratislave v tzv. Regenovskom dome č. 338. Palkovič svoje noviny redigoval sám, aj keď sa pritom občas opieral o pomoc spolupracovníkov. Medzi nich patrili hlavne starší poslucháči ev. lýcea v tomto meste. Jedným z nich bol aj František Palacký mimoriadne nadaný, no chudobný študent, ktorý pre Týdenník vyberal a prekladal z cudzojazyčných novín rôzne úradné zprávy, ako aj informácie o priebehu napoleonských vojen, ktorých ohlas bol na Slovensku veľký. Veď po viedenskom kongrese roku 1815 ruský cár Alexander Wellington, Talleyrand, Metternich a iní vysokí hodnostári navštívili Bratislavu nielen preto, aby si ju prezreli, ale aj aby tu mohli vidieť uväzneného saského kráľa Fridricha Augusta. Palacký sa v redakcii Týdenníka dobre zaučil do novinárskej práce a dosiahol aj na tomto poli dobré výsledky. Preto mu i roku 1817 zverili redigovanie bratislavských latinských novín Ephemerides politico-statisticae/Politicko-štatistické listy/. Domnievame sa, že Palkovič mal sporadicky aj iných spolupracovníkov pri vedení Týdenníka, hlavne takých, ktorí sa vyznali v poľnohospodárskej problematike. Ich mená však nepoznáme.
 Týdenník mal svojich dopisovateľov nielen v slovenských krajoch, ale aj v Čechách a na Morave, v Báčke, Banáte, Srieme a inde. Patrili medzi nich dedinskí inteligenti (napr. Peter Ambrózy - ev. farár z Veličnej na Orave), ale aj príslušníci ľudových vrstiev (Ján Sabö - richtár z Horných Petian). Pravidelných dopisovateľov mal Týdenník v Skalici, Modre, Pezinku, ale aj v Prahe a v Budíne. Pravda, ich príspevky tvorili len pomerne malú časť novín a Palkovič sa aj tu musel spoliehať predovšetkým na vlastné sily.
 Pre domáce i zahraničné spravodajstvo Týdenníka Palkovič preberal materiál nielen z rakúskych, ale aj zo zahraničných novín. Boli to napr.: Pražské noviny, Brnenské noviny, Pressburger Zeitung, Pester Zeitung, Magyar Kurir, Wiener allgemeine Literatur Zeitung, Morgenblatt, Ephemerides Wiennae, Der deutsche Beobachter, Augsburger allgemeine Zeitung, Frankfurter Merkur, noviny berlínske, mníchovské... Podľa všetkého si väčšinu týchto novín Palkovič sám neobjednával, ale ich chodil čítať do mestského kasína, pretože ich predplatné bolo veľmi vysoké. (Roku 1817 bolo napr. ročné predplatné Týdenníka 14 zl., Pražských novín 74 zl., londýnskych The Times v Uhorsku 1016 zl. a úradného francúzskeho Moniteur-u 436 zl.)
 Obsah a témy novín
 Vydavateľ a redaktor Týdenníka si uvedomoval, že tieto noviny majú osobitné postavenie v slovenskom verejnom živote. Aj keď nemal privilégium na vydávanie politických novín, snažil sa do Týdenníka prepašovať politické články, alebo komentáre, prostredníctvom ktorých chcel vychovávať hlavne čitateľov z ľudu a z maloburžoáznych vrstiev. Darilo sa mu to len veľmi ťažko, lebo cenzor nemilosrdne vyhadzoval z týchto novín všetko, čo len zaváňalo pokrokovými myšlienkami. Cenzora k takémuto postupu oprávňovali aj reakčné predpisy z roku 1810.
 Palkovič považoval za nutné uverejňovanie politických článkov, hlavne v rokoch napoleonských vojen preto, lebo sa tieto dramatické udalosti bezprostredne dotýkali aj slovenských krajov. Palkovičove „vojnové spravodajstvo“ bolo jedným z dokladov jeho veľkého vlasteneckého zanietenia a slovenského cítenia. Z jeho článkov preniká obdiv a úcta k ruskému národu a hlavne k ruskej armáde, ktorá sa ako víťaz nad Napoleonom preslávila v celej Európe svojou chrabrosťou a vojenským umením.
 V Týdenníku môžeme sledovať rusko-francúzsku vojnu už od jeho začiatku roku 1812, kedy si Palkovič zaumienil pravidelne informovať slovenskú verejnosť „o stave a položení nynějších europských mocností a národu.“ Informácie o priebehu bojov potom doplňoval podrobným výkladom o mestách a dedinách Poľska i Ruska zasiahnutých vojnovým požiarom. Nájdeme tu nielen podrobný geografický popis týchto oblastí, ale aj zmienky o ich pokrokových historických tradíciách, súčasných spoločenských a politických pomeroch s osobitným zreteľom na upevňovanie slovanskej spolupatričnosti.
 Porážka francúzskej armády v Rusku, jej ústup cez Poľsko a Nemecko boli vtedy v strede pozornosti slovenských čitateľov. Koncom roku 1814 prišiel do Bratislavy ruský cár Alexander oslavovaný ako víťaz nad Napoleonom. Ruského cára, ktorého sprevádzal pruský kráľ s princom Viliamom i uhorský palatín Jozef, vítala slávnostne vysvietená Bratislava vyzdobená aj triumfálnymi oblúkmi. Palkovič vtedy podrobne popisoval priebeh veľkých ľudových zhromaždení v meste, ktorých účastníci búrlivo pozdravovali ruského cára. Pravda, v Týdenníku sú aj články o menej slávnostných chvíľach, napr. o pochode zajatých francúzskych vojakov cez Bratislavu, ktorí boli vo veľmi biednom telesnom stave, ale aj o ťažkých bojových zrážkach, ktoré si vyžiadali veľa ranených a mŕtvych. Palkovič aj naďalej sledoval priebeh vojnových a politických udalostí v Európe, medzi ktoré patril bratislavský mier, odvezenie Napoleona na ostrov Elbu, jeho útek do Francúzska, ktorý mu umožnil stodňovú vládu a pod. Vydavateľ Týdenníka mienil vydať aj svoju „Historii přítomné Ruské války od počátku jejího až do konce“ ako brožúru, ktorú mal dostať zadarmo každý odberateľ jeho novín. Či sa tak stalo, nevieme.
 Palkovič, napriek prísnej cenzúre, dokázal prepašovať do svojich novín aj kritické state. Napr. na začiatku správy o úteku Napoleona z Elby napísal: „Jakožto historické aktá klademe zde následujíci prohlášení, ktoré Bonapart při svém zrádnem a bezbožném vtržení do země Francouzské, vydati se opovážil.“ Za tým nasledovalo úplné znenie Napoleonovej proklamácie k francúzskemu národu a k armáde, v ktorej boli ostré výpady proti panovníkom a ich prisluhovačom, podporujúcim zhanobený feudalizmus a zotročujúcim celé národy.
 Zahranično-politické spravodajstvo Týdenníka bolo dosť bohaté. Vydavateľ v ňom tiež uverejňoval napr. informácie o konštitučnom zriadení vo Francúzsku po reštaurácii Bourbonovcov, o anglickom parlamentarizme a pod. Tak nevdojak nútil čitateľov porovnávať reakčný metternichovský absolutizmus v rakúskej monarchii s politickým vývojom v západnej Európe poznačenom revolučnými výdobytkami mladej buržoázie proti feudálnej šľachte. O svojej orientácii na slovenský ľud napísal: „Tam ovšem směrujeme, aby tyto naše slovenské národní noviny také jaké jako hlásatelem a letopisy šlechetných činu v národu našem byly a již proto samé hodné jsou toho, aby nám trvaly a kvetly.“
 Palkovič do Týdenníka zaraďoval spravodajstvo podľa vopred stanoveného programu. V rubrikách Památní příběhové a Všeobecní památné věci bývali napred správy z Bratislavy a z jej najbližšieho okolia, z ostatných krajov Slovenska a až potom z iných oblastí rakúskej monarchie a zo zahraničia. Tu nájdeme zmienky o stoličných zhromaždeniach, úradných menovaniach, snemových rokovaniach, vojenských prehliadkach, ale aj informácie o počasí, úrode, živelných pohromách, o nových hospodárskych strojoch, plodinách, manufaktúrach, o modernizácii remesiel a pod. Zdrojom domáceho spravodajstva boli hlavne listy dopisovateľov, ktoré redaktor podľa potreby upravoval a skracoval, alebo údaje z nich využíval vo vlastných článkoch. Takýmto redigovaním dosiahol, že Týdenník netrpel na rozvláčnosť a na ťarbavý štýl, ktorý bol typický pre slovenské noviny v dobe jozefinizmu. Chybou bolo, že Palkovič zásadne v Týdenníku neuvádzal mená dopisovateľov a ich príspevky až príliš upravoval a menil, takže stieral individuálny štýl autorov. Ich príspevky v Týdenníku takto uvádzal: „Jistý v Uhřích putujíci...takto píše; Z Abaujvarské stolice; Novější pak...od Kyskéresu a pod.“
 Po ukončení napoleonských vojen sa cenzúra ešte sprísnila, takže Palkovič nemohol v Týdenníku prinášať nijaké politické články a komentáre. Tým publicita novín trpela. Redaktor sa potom sústreďoval hlavne na ľudovýchovnú, osvetovú a národno-buditeľskú činnosť. Vo svojich príspevkoch s hospodárskou tematikou sa vždy snažil vychádzať z domácich pomerov. Jeho hlavným cieľom bola zmena extenzívnej poľnohospodárskej výroby u nás aj pomocou dodržiavania agrotechnických lehôt, dobrým hnojením, striedaním plodín, správnym kŕmením dobytka, zavádzaním poľnohospodárskej techniky i zlepšením remeselníckej výroby.
 „Slovenský novinář“ Palkovič ako jeden z prvých ľudí v našich krajoch propagoval trávopoľný systém, zriaďovanie vetrolamov vysádzaním stromových pásov, odstránenie trojpoľného systému, a zvyšovanie výnosov poľnohospodárskych produktov. To malo v tejto dobe konjunktúry poľnohospodárskej výroby v Uhorsku veľký význam a to tým viacej, že medzi čitateľmi Týdenníka bolo veľa roľníkov.
 Ešte roku 1800 stála napr. v Bratislave merica pšenice 45 grošov, roku 1808 už 150 grošov a roku 1812 už 500 grošov. To značne podnietilo rozvoj obrábania pôdy a pomáhalo odstraňovať feudálny trojpoľný systém hospodárenia. Druhou príčinou rozšírenia ornej i obhospodarovanej pôdy bol prudký rast obyvateľstva. Uhorsko za čias Jozefa II. roku 1780 malo asi 8.500.000 obyvateľov, roku 1825 už skoro 13.000.000. Za štyridsaťpäť rokov to bol vzrast o 51%. Poľnohospodárstvo muselo tento prírastok uživiť.
 Palkovič nielen sám uverejňoval hospodárske rady a pokyny, ale vyzýval všetkých „vlastencov“, aby písali podobné články a upozorňovali ho aj na všetky spisy, z ktorých by sa dali čerpať poznatky o modernizácii poľnohospodárskej a remeselníckej výroby. V Týdenníku nájdeme aj ojedinelé návrhy na zakladanie manufaktúr v slovenských stoliciach. Odporúčal slovenským mládencom, aby študovali vo Francúzsku a Nemecku, kde by sa mohli podrobne zoznámiť s výrobou v manufaktúrach. Volal po vydávaní odbornej literatúry i po založení slovenských hospodárskych novín.
 V Týdenníku sústavne bojoval proti nevzdelanosti a poverčivosti ľudu. V rubrike Učené věci, Fizyka a Umění přírozených věcí publikoval popularizačno-vedecké články, ktoré mali vytláčať z vedomia čitateľov najzaostalejšie náboženské predsudky a sprístupňoval im pravdivé poznanie zákonitostí prírody. Preto píše o spôsobe ochrany pred bleskom, o výskyte komét a o Vesmíre, o vulkanickej činnosti a pod. Významná bola aj jeho dlhoročná propagácia preventívnej ochrany pred chorobami, štepenia detí a všestrannej lekárskej liečby. V Palkovičovom Týdenníku nájdeme na ten čas u nás ojedinelú kampaň proti pijanstvu, nebezpečne rozšírenému v našich krajoch. Proti tejto kampani sa však ostro stavali majitelia a nájomníci oravských páleníc, ktorí lieh vyhlasovali za najlepšiu medicínu. Protipáleničná akcia v Týdenníku zakrátko prestala pre malú podporu slovenskej verejnosti.
 Zarážajúce je však to, že vydavateľ jediných slovenských novín sa vyhýbal prinášaniu správ o sociálnych pomeroch našich ľudových vrstiev. Nepísal o vzrastajúcich triednych protikladoch na dedinách, o stupňujúcom sa feudálnom vykorisťovaní ľudu zemanmi, ani o biednych životných pomeroch sproletarizovanej dedinskej inteligencie závislej na milosti miestnej šľachty a vysokej cirkevnej hierarchie. Aj keď mu v tom musela čiastočne zabraňovať prísna cenzúra, predsa len to bol tiež dôsledok Palkovičovho kompromisníckeho „mierneho osvietenectva.“
 Sám síce radil ako možno zlepšovať poľnohospodársku i remeselnícku výrobu, no nespomenul odkiaľ by na to mali zobrať peniaze zbedačení roľníci a drobní remeselníci. Nezmieňoval sa o vinníkoch biedy poddaných roľníkov a iných vrstiev našej spoločnosti, a preto ani Týdenník nemohol mať taký ohlas medzi čitateľmi, aký očakával jeho vydavateľ. Už však tým, že upozorňoval na možnosti zlepšenia spoločenskej výroby a postupnej likvidácie feudálnych prežitkov, ako aj na ľudovýchovu, ktorú považoval za nedeliteľnú súčasť politiky národného hnutia, ukazoval cestu, ktorá sa stala východiskom pre slovenskú periodickú tlač v neskorších rokoch.
 V Týdenníku bývali z času na čas publikované aj správy o slovenskom kultúrnom a literárnom živote. Napriek tomu nemožno ešte v týchto novinách hovoriť o pravidelnej kultúrnej rubrike, hoci práve oblasť kultúry bola vydavateľovi novín najbližšie. Bývali tu informácie o nových knihách, ktoré si bolo možno objednať nielen v jeho „bratislavskej slovenskej novinárni“, ale aj u pražských, peštianskych a viedenských kníhkupcoch. Teda propagoval slovenskú, českú, ale aj nemeckú a maďarskú literatúru. Palkovič propagoval, alebo recenzoval napr. Jungmanove preklady, Šafárikovu Tatranskú múzu s lýrou slovenskou, Tablicove Poézye, Novú kroniku českú od Martina Pelcla i hospodárske brožúry Alexandra Tolnaya. Prinášal informácie o vedeckej a literárnej činnosti V. M. Kraméria, J. Dobrovského, Hněvkovského i Puchmayera. Propagoval tu Rožnayove preklady z antických básnikov, ktorých ukážky v Týdenníku aj uverejňoval. V Palkovičových novinách nájdeme aj prvé zmienky o literárnej tvorbe Jána Hollého, ktorému však vytýkal užívanie bernolákovskej slovenčiny.
 Palkovič vždy horlil za „čistú vzdelanostnú slovenčinu“, ktorou rozumel veleslavínsku češtinu a nesúhlasil ani s jungmanovskou modernou češtinou, s bernolákovskou, ani so štúrovskou spisovnou rečou, pretože ich pokladal len za slabo kultivované nárečia. Ani on, ani nikto druhý, nemohol však zastaviť postupný proces prenikania slovakizmov do češtiny užívanej ako spisovnej reči v slovenských krajoch. Nemohol, pochopiteľne, zamedziť ani vzniku spisovnej slovenčiny. Sám si to aj nevdojak uvedomoval, pretože odporúčal spisovateľom „rozumné užívanie čistých slovenských slov“, hlavne v dielach a v spisoch určených čitateľom z ľudu.
 V Týdenníku sa nachádzajú aj zmienky o dejinách slovenského novinárstva - o Prešpurských novinách, ktorých prvý redaktor Štefan Leška ešte vtedy žil v Kiss-Kéresi pri Pešti a prispieval aj do Palkovičových novín. Aj tieto údaje o minulosti slovenských osvieteneckých novín sú však, rovnako, ako aj iné kultúrne správy, informácie, literárne kritiky a recenzie až nápadne stručné, tézovité a nesústavné. Zapríčiňoval to malý rozsah a celkové zameranie Palkovičovho orgánu. Sám považoval skromný rozsah svojich novín len za prechodné riešenie. Chystal sa ich vydávať vo zväčšenom formáte a rozsahu strán, zaviesť do nich nové rubriky a obohatiť ich viacerými prílohami tak, aby tieto „národní noviny nejkrásnější zkvětly.“ Tento plán však nemohol uskutočniť pre nedostatok predplatiteľov, peňazí, ale aj pre nepriazeň vrchnosti, hlavne bratislavskej mestskej rady.
 Zánik
 V posledných rokoch existencie mal Týdenník stále menej predplatiteľov. Vyplývalo to aj z toho, že vzdelanejší Slováci dávali prednosť cudzojazyčným politickým novinám pre ich aktuálne spravodajstvo. O takúto aktuálnosť sa snažil aj Palkovič. Preto už roku 1815, po viedenskom kongrese, ktorý mal veľký význam pre vývoj politických pomerov v Európe, si podal žiadosť na Kráľovskú miestodržiteľskú radu do Budína, aby mu aspoň na pol hárku Týdenníka dovolila uverejňovať politické a vojenské správy prevzaté z viedenských novín Beobachter a Wiener Zeitung. Žiadosť nadriadené úrady však zamietli už aj preto, lebo bratislavský mestský magistrát a nájomníci mestských novín Pressburger Zeitung ju neodporúčali na priaznivé vybavenie. Urobili tak z konkurenčných dôvodov, lebo sa obávali, že stratia veľkú časť slovenských čitateľov Pressburger Zeitung. V bratislavských nemeckých novinách sa potom začali objavovať kritické články o Týdenníku, ale aj o Palkovičovej verejnej a vedeckej činnosti vôbec.
 Vydavateľ Týdenníka sa však nevzdáva. Roku 1817 si podal ďalšiu žiadosť. Urobil tak preto, lebo chcel svoje noviny zachrániť pred zánikom. V tejto dobe sa totiž dostali do vážnej hospodárskej krízy, zapríčinenej zvýšením ceny papiera, novinového kolku i tlačiarenských prác. To ho prinútilo k zvýšeniu predplatného, čo malo za následok ďalšiu stratu predplatiteľov. „Přetěžké jest nyní i tyto noviny vydávati, ale vlastenecká horlivost a naděje budoucího lepšího jich napomáhají mne obživuje“ - napísal Palkovič plný obáv v Týdenníku koncom mája 1818. Ešte stále dúfal v priaznivé vybavenie svojej žiadosti.
 16. júna 1818 dostal konečne odpoveď na svoju opakovanú žiadosť - a to úplne negatívnu. Sám zaneprázdnený úmornou prácou nad jazykovedným slovníkom, ktorému venoval dlhé roky života, po toľkých neúspechoch sa rozhodol ustúpiť. 30. júna 1818 sa posledný raz takto obrátil na slovenskú verejnosť: „Když závist a nenávist ze světa zahyne! Přitom s srděčným děkováním pp. předplatitelům, pp. dopisovatelům a přátelům svým za dosavadní napomáhaní těchto novin ujišťují je a jiné milé krajany své, že se všemožně přičiním, aby ožily a docela nám nezahynuly.“
 Boli to však plané nádeje. Týdenník sa mu už nepodarilo obnoviť, aj keď sa o to toku 1822 znovu pokúsil. Až roku 1832 sa rozhodol pokračovať v novinárskej práci vydávaním a redigovaním ďalšieho, tentoraz literárneho časopisu. Keď už sám však nepomohol vydávať a redigovať slovenské politické noviny, s nadšením i s energiou podporoval po roku 1841 snahy svojich žiakov - štúrovcov o založenie prvých slovenských politických novín.
 Zdroj
 Dejiny Slovenska
 Slovenské novinárstvo


text:
Enciklopēdija (no , kas savukārt cēlies no — ‘apmācīšanā pilnā aplī’; — ‘aplis’, — ‘apmācīšana’) ir rakstisks, zinātnisks izdevums, kurā ir sistemātiskas ziņas par daudzu zinātņu jautājumiem. Enciklopēdijas var būt vispārīgas, saturot rakstus par daudzām dažādām nozarēm, vai arī specializēties kādā no tām — piemēram, medicīnas enciklopēdijas.
 Doma par visu pasaules zināšanu apkopošanu vienuviet radās jau senajā pasaulē, kaut gan termins "enciklopēdija" radās 16. gadsimtā. Terminoloģiskās vārdnīcas un zināšanu apkopojumi tika sastādīti jau Senajā Ēģiptē un Senajā Ķīnā 2. gadu tūkstotī p.m.ē. Viens šāds apkopojums ir Aleksandrijas bibliotēka. Daudzi senatnes rakstnieki (piemēram, Aristotelis) centās izsmeļoši aprakstīt zināšanas visās nozarēs. Viens no nozīmīgākajiem enciklopēdistiem bija Plīnijs Vecākais, kas uzrakstīja "Dabas Vēsturi" — 37 sējumu dabas aprakstu, kas bija plaši izplatīts Eiropā līdz pat viduslaikiem.
 Lielākās drukātās enciklopēdijas
 Encyclopædia Britannica
 Brockhaus
 Lielā padomju enciklopēdija
 Interneta enciklopēdijas
 Vikipēdija
 The Dictionary of the History of Ideas. / University of Virginia Library
 Энциклопедия Гатчина
 Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона (nepilnīgs variants)
 Энциклопедический Словарь Ф.А.Брокгауза и И.А.Ефрона
 Большая Советская Энциклопедия
 Электронная еврейская энциклопедия
 Энциклопедия Кругосвет
 Библейский словарь Вихлянцева
 Библейский словарь Брокгауза
 Словарь старорусских и малопонятных слов из Библии
 Биографическая Энциклопедия
 Oekonomische Encyklopädie von J. G. Krünitz
 Skatīt arī
 Latvijas enciklopēdijas
 Ārējās saites
 Enciklopēdija - Vēstures terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca
 Senās un mūsdienu enciklopēdijas. / Roze L. Pasaule vārdnīcu skatījumā. - Zinātne, Rīga, 1982., 7.-26.lpp.


text:
Artigo7 | Dissertação - Serviço Personalizado
 Também denominada de reconstituição do crime, a reprodução simulada dos fatos, como bem coloca guilherme de souza nucci “() pode tornar-se importante fonte. Ola arthur, se ver bem eu não limitei o artigo 19, eu expliquei o que ele não abrange,e isso é importantíssimo pra não haver a confusão. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. La ley es la misma para todos debe tratarnos a todos justamente este es el derecho humano número 7 de los 30 derechos humanos que tenemos. United nations commission on international trade law uncitral model law on international commercial arbitration 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006. Created date: 20081024155611z.
 O artigo 7 estabelece como determinar o valor aduaneiro nos casos em que este não puder ser determinado de acordo com o disposto em algum dos artigos anteriores os membros. Abstract analysis of spatial-temporal orientation in competitive motor performance in rhythmic gymnastics, infantile and pre-infantile the objective of this study was. Civa charter high school is a premier college preparatory school built around the visual and performing arts located in colorado springs, co district 11. Idoso, família e domicílio: uma revisão narrativa sobre a decisão de morar so. Ibiz 2008 ted brown martin methodist college, usa ethics in elearning synopsis we tend to think of net business in terms of commercial companies — the production.
 2,579 followers, 5,918 following, 1,154 posts - see instagram photos and videos from arthur p (@artigo7. Art 1o a república federativa do brasil, formada pela união indissolúvel dos estados e municípios e do distrito federal, constitui-se em estado democrático de. Este dispositivo descreve situações em que a lei brasileira se aplica a fatos que não foram praticados dentro do território nacional, mas que ainda assim o brasil se reserva o direito de. Explore rachel robbins's board art ed 7-8: martin luther king, jr on pinterest | see more ideas about king jr, nu'est jr and martin luther.
 Artigo 6o acréscimo vitalício de pensão o acréscimo vitalício de pensão, previsto no artigo 7o da lei no 9/2002, de 11 de fevereiro, é uma. Angelica artigo is on facebook join facebook to connect with angelica artigo and others you may know facebook gives people the power to share and makes. Artigo 7o - objectivos e limites da tributação artigo 8o - princípios da legalidade tributária artigo 9o - acesso à justiça tributária.
 A melodia, a harmonia e o timbre (a cor tímbrica de uma nota em particular) também interagem no caso do timbre é por demais sabido que certas tonalidades tímbricas.
 Artigos definidos e artigos indefinidos definite article and indefinite article. Veja grátis o arquivo malária - artigo enviado para a disciplina de parasitologia categoria: outros - 7 - 17985554. Considerando que a constituição federal de 1988 estabelece em seu artigo 5o, inciso i o teor constante acima, alego que deveremos rever o que se reza nele, pois se. Resumo do artigo consideraÇÕes sobre a formaÇÃo continuada dos docentes em nÍvel federal e estadual paulista.


text:
Nambaryn Enchbajar, mongolsky: Намбарын Энхбаяр, (* 1. června 1958 v Ulánbátaru) je mongolský politik, v letech 2000–2004 předseda vlády a v letech 2005–2009 prezident Mongolské republiky.
 Život
 Vystudoval literaturu na univerzitách v Moskvě a v Leedsu. V letech 1980–1990 pracoval jako překladatel a byl též funkcionářem Mongolského svazu spisovatelů. Od roku 1985 je členem Mongolské lidové revoluční strany (MLRS). Roku 1992 byl zvolen poslancem Velkého státního churalu a v letech 1992 až 1996 zastával funkci ministra kultury. Poté, co v roce 1997 převzal vedení MLRS, podařilo se mu ji zmodernizovat a dovést k vítězství v následujících volbách roku 2000, po němž se stal předsedou vlády. V tomto úřadě setrval až do voleb 2004, kdy jeho strana ztratila část křesel. Od srpna 2004 do května 2005 posléze zastával funkci předsedy parlamentu.
 V prezidentských volbách, konaných dne 22. května 2005, byl Nambaryn Enchbajar již v prvním kole lidového hlasování ziskem 53,4 procenta hlasů zvolen prezidentem Mongolské republiky, zatímco jeho hlavní soupeř, Mendsajchan Enchsajchan z Mongolské demokratické strany, obdržel 20 procent.
 V prezidentských volbách v roce 2009 jej porazil Cachjagín Elbegdordž.
 Externí odkazy
 Prezidenti Mongolska
 Narození 1958
 Žijící lidé
 Muži
 Narození 1. června
 Narození v Ulánbátaru
 Nositelé Puškinovy medaile


type: caselaw

text:
 19.2.2011
 FI
 Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti
 C 55/37
 Kanne 8.10.2010 — AM v. parlamentti
 (Asia F-100/10)
 2011/C 55/68
 Oikeudenkäyntikieli: ranska
 Asianosaiset
 Kantaja: AM (Málaga, Espanja) (edustajat: asianajaja L. Lévi ja asianajaja C. Bernard-Glanz)
 Vastaaja: Euroopan parlamentti
 Oikeusriidan kohde ja kuvaus
 Sen päätöksen kumoaminen, jossa kieltäydyttiin pitämästä kantajan kärsimää aivohalvausta henkilöstösääntöjen 73 artiklassa ja yhteisen sairausvakuutusjärjestelmän 2 kohdassa tarkoitettuna tapaturmana.
 Vaatimukset
 —
 on kumottava nimittävän viranomaisen 12.11.2009 tekemä päätös, jossa kieltäydyttiin pitämästä kantajan kärsimää aivohalvausta henkilöstösääntöjen 73 artiklassa ja vakuutusmääräysten 2 artiklassa tarkoitettuna tapaturmana, ja tarvittaessa kumottava nimittävän viranomaisen tekemä päätös, jolla hylättiin valitus
 —
 on määrättävä, että uusi lääketieteellinen komitea tutkii uudelleen kantajan henkilöstösääntöjen 73 artiklan nojalla tekemän hakemuksen
 —
 vastaaja on velvoitettava suorittamaan vahingonkorvauksena kohtuulliseksi katsottava 50 000 euroa kantajalle riidanalaisista päätöksistä aiheutuneesta henkisestä kärsimyksestä
 —
 vastaaja on velvoitettava suorittamaan vahingonkorvausta, jonka suuruus arvioidaan tilapäisesti 25 000 euroksi, hänelle riidanalaisista päätöksistä aiheutuneesta henkisestä kärsimyksestä
 —
 vastaaja on velvoitettava suorittamaan henkilöstösääntöjen 73 artiklan nojalla maksettavalla pääomalle 12 prosentin suuruista viivästyskorkoa viimeistään 15.3.2007 lukien siihen saakka, kunnes pääoma on kokonaan maksettu
 —
 Euroopan parlamentti on velvoitettava korvaamaan oikeudenkäyntikulut.


text:
7. 10 . 89 De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende Nr. L 289/45
 KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EØF) Nr. 3027/89
 af 6. oktober 1989
 om fastsættelse af det beløb, som skal trækkes fra afgiften på ris indført fra Den
 Arabiske Republik Egypten
 KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE i henhold til Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr.
 FÆLLESSKABER HAR — 2942/73 af 30. oktober 1973 om gennemførelsesbestem
 under henvisning til Traktaten om Oprettelse af Det melserne til forordning (EØF) nr. 2412/73 (4), ændret ved
 Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab, forordning (EØF) nr. 3817/85 (*), skal referenceperioden
 være det kvartal, der går forud for den måned, hvor
 under henvisning til akten vedrørende Spaniens og Portu beløbet fastsættes ;
 gals tiltrædelse,
 de afgifter, der anvendes i løbet af juli, august og
 under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1418/76 september 1989, lægges til grund —
 af 21 . juni 1976 om den fælles markedsordning for ris ('),
 senest ændret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 1806/89 (2), særlig
 artikel 11 ,
 UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING :
 under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1250/77
 af 17. maj 1977 om indførsel af ris fra Den Arabiske Artikel 1
 Republik Egypten (3), særlig artikel 1 , og
 Det i artikel 1 i forordning (EØF) nr. 1250/77 nævnte
 ud fra følgende betragtninger : beløb, som skal trækkes fra importafgiften på ris med
 Ved forordning (EØF) nr. 1250/77 er det fastsat, at der fra oprindelse i og indført fra Den Arabiske Republik Egyp
 den i overensstemmelse med artikel 11 i forordning ten, fastsættes som anført i bilaget.
 (EØF) nr. 1418/76 beregnede afgift trækkes et beløb, som
 hvert kvartal fastsættes af Kommissionen ; dette beløb Artikel 2
 skal være lig med 25 % af gennemsnittet af de afgifter,
 der er anvendt i løbet af en referenceperiode ; Denne forordning træder i kraft den 1 . november 1989.
 Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver
 medlemsstat.
 Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 6. oktober 1989.
 På Kommissionens vegne
 Ray MAC SHARRY
 Medlem af Kommissionen
 (>) EFT nr. L 166 af 25. 6. 1976, s. 1 .
 (2) EFT nr. L 177 af 24. 6. 1989, s. 1 . C) EFT nr. L 302 af 31 . 10. 1973, s. 1 .
 (3) EFT nr. L 146 af 14. 6. 1977, s. 9. I5) EFT nr. L 368 af 31 . 12. 1985, s. 16.
 ---pagebreak--- Nr. L 289/46 De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 7. 10 . 89
 BILAG
 til Kommissionens forordning af 6. oktober 1989 om fastsættelse af det beløb, som skal
 trækkes fra afgiften på ris indført fra Den Arabiske Republik Egypten
 (ECU/ton)
 KN-kode Beløb der skal fratrækkes
 1006 10 21 73,85
 1006 10 23 63,25
 1006 10 25 63,25
 1006 10 27 63,25
 1006 10 92 73,85
 100610 94 63,25
 1006 10 96 63,25
 100610 98 63,25
 1006 20 11 92,31
 1006 20 13 79,06
 100620 15 79,06
 1006 20 17 79,06
 1006 20 92 92,31
 1006 20 94 79,06
 1006 20 96 79,06
 1006 20 98 79,06
 1006 30 21 123,19
 1006 30 23 129,44
 1006 30 25 129,44
 1006 30 27 129,44
 1006 30 42 123,19
 1006 30 44 129,44
 1006 30 46 129,44
 1006 30 48 129,44
 1006 30 61 131,20
 1006 30 63 138,77
 1006 30 65 138,77
 1006 30 67 138,77
 1006 30 92 131,20
 1006 30 94 138,77
 1006 30 96 138,77
 1006 30 98 138,77
 1006 40 00 22,85


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 52004PC0057
 Pasiūlymas Tarybos reglamentas iš dalies keičiantis Reglamentą (EEB) Nr. 1365/75 dėl Europos gyvenimo ir darbo sąlygų gerinimo fondo įsteigimo /* KOM/2004/0057 galutinis - CNS 2004/0026 */
 Briuselis, 23.4.2004KOM(2004) 57 galutinis2004/0026 (CNS).PasiūlymasTARYBOS REGLAMENTASiš dalies keičiantis Reglamentą (EEB) Nr. 1365/75 dėl Europos gyvenimo ir darbo sąlygų gerinimo fondo įsteigimo(pateikta Komisijos)EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1. IntroductionThe European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, hereinafter referred to as the Foundation, is one of the first-generation Agencies of the European Union, created in 1975 through Council Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75[1]. It is situated in Dublin, Ireland.The tasks of the Foundation are to develop and to pursue ideas on the improvement of living and working conditions in the medium and long term in the light of practical experience and to identify factors leading to change. The Foundation has a tripartite Administrative Board made up of national representatives of governments, employers' organisations and employees' organisations. In addition, the Commission is represented in the Board. The employers' organisations at European level and the employees' organisations at European level each have an observer in the Board. The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) participates in the Board meetings as an observer, as does a representative for the EFTA countries.The national and tripartite composition of the Administrative Board of the Foundation is a feature shared with two other decentralised Agencies, the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) in Thessaloniki, Greece, and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) in Bilbao, Spain. The composition of the Boards is clearly stated in the basic acts of the Agencies. While the Board of the Foundation was created in a Community of nine Member States, three new Board members have been added for each new Member State, and the Board is now composed of 48 members, and as many alternates. With ten new Member States next year, the number of Board members will reach 78.The contribution of the national social partners and government representatives in the Board is fundamental for the functioning of the Foundation, given the diversity that characterises social issues in the European Union. On the other hand, taking into account enlargement, it is important to ensure that the Board has the capacity to provide a strategic contribution.The Board normally meets twice a year to take decisions related to the work programme and the budget of the Foundation. In addition, a Bureau has been established in the Rules of Procedure with the aim of managing urgent matters between the Board meetings. However, the Board is still in charge of a number of cumbersome and time-consuming administrative issues, which does not leave enough room for more important strategic deliberations on the functioning and role of the Foundation.This legislative proposal aims at reinforcing the strategic role of the Administrative Board while conferring more administrative tasks on the already existing Bureau, and at formally recognising the role of the Bureau in the basic act.In addition, it aims at providing for a more modern and flexible model for the contribution of independent experts to the activities of the Foundation.Finally, certain provisions have been included in order to transfer the staff of the Foundation into the Community staff rules. The Foundation is the only Community Agency that has its own Staff Regulations. Within the framework of the Staff Reform for the staff of the European Communities, it is appropriate to include the Foundation in the Community rules as from the entry into force of this Regulation.2. Context2.1. The external evaluationThe external evaluation of the Foundation carried out in 2001 recognises the Foundation's important contribution to the knowledge of living and working conditions in the European Union, but it also identifies a number of areas for improvement. While most of these issues are included in a Foundation action plan adopted by its Board following the external evaluation and covering strategic and operational aspects to be addressed in order to remedy the identified weaknesses, two points raised by the evaluators should be treated by means of adaptations to the legislative framework: the role and tasks of the Administrative Board, and the functioning of the Committee of Experts of the Foundation.2.1.1. The Administrative BoardThe evaluators found that the administrative tasks of the Board prevented it from devoting sufficient time to strategic considerations. This weakens the decision-making capacity of the Board. In addition, the added value of the tripartite construction of the Board is partially lost.The Bureau, already laid down in the rules of Procedure, could play a more important role in carrying out certain administrative tasks of the Board. In addition, this role should be given formal recognition in the Regulation, and the relationship between the Board and the Bureau should be clearly stated.2.1.2. The Committee of ExpertsThe Committee of Experts is set up by Articles 10-11 of the basic Regulation of the Foundation. Its role is to provide the best possible technical and scientific advice within the main areas of research of the Foundation, i.e. living and working conditions. It is composed of one member for each Member State. It shall deliver its opinion on the draft work programme prepared by the Director of the Foundation and may also deliver opinions in all fields falling within the competence of the Foundation, either at the request of the Director or at its own initiative.The Committee thus has a rather weak position in the structures of the Foundation and has not played an important role in its activities. It has been difficult to ensure a relevant and complementary experience of its members and a firm commitment to the work of the Committee. In relation to the tasks of the Committee, the national representation does not seem to be a relevant criterion. On the other hand, certain members of the Committee of Experts have given an excellent contribution to the work of the Foundation within their specific areas of expertise. Therefore, it is considered important to maintain the possibility in the Regulation to provide for the continued contribution of external experts in specific areas of research, in accordance with the specific competence of the experts concerned and the needs of the Foundation. In addition, the experts should not be selected on a national basis but rather according to their capacity to contribute usefully to the work of the Foundation. It is therefore proposed not to keep the formal Committee of Experts in its current form, but to include provisions that will make it possible for the Foundation to ensure a well targeted and timely input from independent experts to its activities. The precise arrangements will be decided by the Board on a proposal of the Director of the Foundation.2.2. The Joint Opinion of the tripartite Boards of the Foundation, Cedefop, and EU-OSHA[2]The three Community agencies having Boards with a tripartite composition, i.e. the Foundation, Cedefop and EU-OSHA, function in a very similar way. The tripartite structure is of fundamental importance to these agencies and should be maintained. However, as reflected in the external evaluations of the three agencies, they share certain shortcomings in relation to the functioning of their Boards. The solutions proposed in the evaluations are to strengthen the strategic role of the Boards and the executive role of the Bureaux, while leaving the director accountable and responsible for every-day management.In line with the findings of the external evaluations, in January 2003 the agencies transmitted a Joint Opinion of their Boards on the functioning and governance of their management structures to the Commission. In this opinion, the Boards stress that their future rules of governance should be based on the following principles: the fundamental value of tripartite governance; the role of the social partners (workers and employers) in these bodies that creates a specificity requiring them to function according to common rules and differently from the other Community agencies; and finally that the maintenance of the national tripartite representation from each country is essential for the involvement of all actors, taking account of the diversity of interests and approaches which characterise social issues.In order to respect these principles, the Joint Opinion suggests that the Boards should remain the decision-making structures, with responsibility for the major orientations of the agency (strategy, budget, work programme). In addition, they suggest that the Bureaux become executive structures, with well-defined tasks. Their size ought to remain limited to ensure efficient operations but should be sufficient to reflect the different views of the tripartite Boards.The Boards also consider that the co-ordination of each group (governments, employees, employers) has proven to be an important factor to increase efficiency. They propose therefore to formalise the already existing function of co-ordinator.2.3. The opinion of the European ParliamentThe Commission notes that the European Parliament in the recent discharge procedure underlines for both the Foundation and Cedefop the need for rationalisation of agency boards and invites the Commission to put forward proposals to this end[3]. The Commission has carefully considered the invitation of the European Parliament to rationalise the functioning of these Bodies.The full representation of all Member States and the involvement of social partners being essential for the development of Community social policy, the Commission considers that any reduction of the number of members of the Boards would be detrimental to the tripartite representation of all Member States and would not be advisable. On the other hand, the different nature of the responsibilities entrusted to the Agency, as compared to other Community agencies, precludes the Commission to consider the European Parliament suggestion for joint administrative Boards for bodies with similar responsibilities. Therefore, while maintaining the national and tripartite character of the Boards, which is a key feature of the agencies, the Commission proposes to rationalise the Boards' working methods by reinforcing the strategic role of the Boards and reducing the frequency of meetings to once a year. This should ensure that enlargement will not have a negative financial impact.3. JUSTIFICATION OF THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSALSIn the light of the findings of the external evaluators, of practice in recent years and of the above-mentioned Joint Opinion delivered by the three relevant Boards, the Commission proposes changes to the basic Regulation of the Foundation, with a view to increasing effectiveness and cost efficiency. Similar changes are proposed for Cedefop and EU-OSHA.The proposed changes concern mainly the governance and functioning of the Board. The national tripartite representation in the Board is acknowledged as a key element of success and maintained. The existing three groups, namely government, employers' and employees' representatives are formalised, as is the designation of a co-ordinator within each group.The Commission proposes that the Board meets in principle once every year and takes all strategic decisions in relation to the annual work programme and the budget. This shift from administrative to strategic tasks is reflected in the modification of the denomination of the Board from Administrative Board to Governing Board.In addition, the Commission's proposal gives formal recognition to the existing Bureau and formalises the relationship between the Bureau and the Board. The Bureau would be composed of eight members, namely the Chairperson, the three Vice-chairpersons of the Board, the three co-ordinators, and one more representative of the Commission. Upon delegation of the Board, the Bureau will have the mandate to take certain measures on its behalf. The proposed size and composition of the Bureau will ensure efficiency and reflect the different groups represented in the Board. The Bureau would not vote but have a consensus-based decision-making.As for the Committee of Experts, the proposed provisions would ensure a structured and targeted contribution of external and independent experts to the work of the Foundation, in accordance with the specific needs of the different research areas.The proposed staff provisions aim at the inclusion of the staff of the Foundation, recruited after the entry into force of this Regulation, into the Staff Regulation and Conditions of Employment of Other Servants[4].4. Subsidiarity and proportionalityThe tasks of the Foundation are to develop and to pursue ideas on the improvement of living and working conditions in the medium and long term in the light of practical experience and to identify factors leading to change. It provides data and analysis for informing and supporting the formulation of EU policy on working and living conditions. In this way, the Agency conforms to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.5. Legal basisArticle 235 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Article 308) provided the legal base for the basic Regulation; therefore the Commission considers Article 308 to be the legal base for the amendments proposed to this Regulation.6. Commentary on the amendments proposedArticle 1 of the proposed Regulation:Article 3(2):A specific reference is added to the need for appropriate co-operation with EU-OSHA. This is in line with current practice and with a similar provision in the Regulation for EU-OSHA. Both bodies operate in the social policy area, although they each have distinctive tasks.Strengthening the existing co-operation between the two bodies is already under way. In 2001, the two agencies signed a Memorandum of Understanding, which sets out guidelines to ensure efficient co-operation following the recommendations of the external evaluation. More recently, in June 2003, they signed a co-operation agreement which identified concrete actions and activities. The Commission, taking account of the comments of the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on this issue, considers that it is important to have an explicit reference to this co-operation in the Regulation and proposes the same reference in the proposal amending the Regulation of the EU-OSHA.Article 5:The Bureau is formally recognised. In addition, the reference to the Committee of Experts is deleted, since this Committee will no longer exist in its current form.Article 6(1):The amendments to this Article, relevant to the composition and functioning of the Board, are in line with the external evaluation and the Joint Opinion submitted to the Commission by the management or administrative Boards of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.The proposed modification does not change the national and tripartite composition of the Board; however the wording allows for maintaining the principle of national and tripartite representation for each Member State without the need for amendments to the article in case of change of number of Member States.Article 6(2):A gender dimension is introduced in the composition of the Board through a provision based on Article 3 of the Treaty on balanced representation in the Board of the Foundation. In addition, a subparagraph has been added on the need to publish the list of Board members in the Official Journal of the European Union for information purposes. The latter provision reflects the current practice of the Foundation and is in line with the European Union's policy of transparency and access to information for citizens.Article 6(4):It is clearly expressed that the Chairperson and Vice-Chairpersons shall represent each of the Groups of the Board as well as the Commission. This clarifies the fact that one of the Chairpersons represents the Commission, as expressed in the provisions of the Rules of Procedure of the Foundation. In addition, the period of mandate of the Chairpersons is set at one year renewable, which is justified in particular by the need for continuity since the Board will meet only once a year.Article 6(5):The frequency of meetings is reduced to once a year instead of twice. This is justified by the new, more strategic role of the Board, and its large number of members. If necessary, additional meetings may be convened at the request of at least one third of the Board members.Article 6(7) – 6(10):The Groups and the co-ordinators of the social partners' organisations at European level, which already play an important role for the preparation of decisions, are formally recognised through point 7.The aim is to formalise the existence of the three groups represented in the Board and the way they operate. In practice there are three separate groups: representatives of national governments, employees' organisations and employers’ organisations. Before Board meetings, the three groups hold separate internal discussions, the results of which are reported in the Board meeting, without prejudice to each Board member’s individual entitlement to be given the floor.In this context it is important to note that representatives of the social partners’ organisations at Community level who also attend the Board meetings without being entitled to vote, play an active role in the work of the Board, in particular by co-ordinating views within the respective groups. As requested in the Joint Opinion of the three Community bodies concerning the future governance of their Boards, it is proposed that the government group also designate a co-ordinator, for reasons of balance among the groups and of better efficiency of the Board's work.The Commission believes that, as this organisational structure has proven its usefulness and is supported by stakeholders, it seems appropriate to formalise it in principle, leaving any operational details to a new set of rules of procedure.The responsibilities, composition and operational rules of the Bureau are stated in the Rules of procedure, without any reference in the Regulation. In point 8, it is proposed to formalise the role of the Bureau, since it will have more responsibilities delegated to it by the Board. The wording reflects current practice of the Foundation. The number of members (the chairman and the three vice-chairmen of the Governing Board, the three co-ordinators of the groups and one more representative of the Commission) is sufficient to ensure that the different opinions of the Board are taken into account, while not exceeding a number that would have a negative impact on the efficiency of the proceedings.Point 9 states that the Board will decide on the annual schedule of meetings of the Bureau, while additional meetings may be convened at the request of the Bureau members.Point 10 states that the Bureau shall deal with measures delegated to it by the Board and that decisions be taken by consensus. If no consensus can be reached, the Bureau can refer the matter to the Governing Board for decision. This will ensure the necessary transparency between the Board and the Bureau, and the compliance of the proceedings of the Bureau with the strategic guidelines of the Board.Article 7(1):The reference to the consultation of the Committee of Experts in the preparation of the work programme of the Foundation is deleted, since the Committee will be replaced by a model for ad hoc contribution of external experts on specific issues in relation to the work programme.Article 7(4):A new point is added to determine the mandate of the Bureau: It shall not overlap with the prerogatives of the Director, nor the exclusive competencies of the Board in relation to the work programme and the budget of the Foundation.Article 9:Amendments have been added to ensure that the tasks of the Director in relation to the Board also include the Bureau, where appropriate.Article 10:The article is amended to reflect the new role and tasks of external experts. The Board may take the necessary measures to ensure the contribution of independent experts, on a proposal of the Director.Article 11:Since the Committee of Experts will be replaced by a more flexible model for expert contributions, Article 11 on the role and functioning of this Committee should be deleted.Article 12(1):The reference to the Committee of Experts in relation to the preparation of the work programme of the Foundation is made superfluous by the fact that this Committee will no longer exist in its current form.Article 17:The current specific provisions of the Foundation are replaced by the standard provisions for Agency staff in relation to the regulations and rules applicable to the officials and other servants of the European Communities. The Community rules will apply to Foundation staff recruited after the entry into force of this Regulation. As laid down in Article 2, (see below), the current rules will continue to apply to staff recruited under these rules.In addition, it is proposed that all references to "the Administrative Board" in this Regulation shall be replaced by "the Governing Board" in order to reflect more accurately the strategic role of the Board.Article 2 of the proposed Regulation:This article states that the current staff provisions, Council Regulation (ESC, EEC, EURATOM) No 1860/76, will continue to apply to the staff of the Foundation recruited under this Regulation.7. Budget characteristics:The proposed changes will have no impact on the overall budget of the Foundation, in the sense that no new activities are launched. As a consequence, the proposal is presented without a financial statement.2004/0026 (CNS)PasiūlymasTARYBOS REGLAMENTASiš dalies keičiantis Reglamentą (EEB) Nr. 1365/75 dėl Europos gyvenimo ir darbo sąlygų gerinimo fondo įsteigimoEUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 308 straipsnį,atsižvelgdama į Komisijos pasiūlymą[5],atsižvelgdama į Europos Parlamento nuomonę[6],atsižvelgdama į Europos ekonomikos ir socialinių reikalų komiteto nuomonę[7],atsižvelgdama į Regionų komiteto nuomonę[8] ,kadangi:(1) Tarybos reglamente (EEB) Nr. 1365/75 dėl Europos gyvenimo ir darbo sąlygų gerinimo fondo įsteigimo[9] yra numatytos nuostatos dėl Fondo, ir ypač jo administracinės valdybos organizacijos. Šios nuostatos buvo kelis kartus iš dalies keičiamos po kiekvienos naujos valstybės narės įstojimo, naujiems nariams prisijungiant prie administracinės valdybos.(2) 2001 metais atliktame išoriniame Europos gyvenimo ir darbo sąlygų gerinimo fondo (toliau – Fondo) įvertinime pabrėžiama, kad Reglamento (EEB) Nr. 1365/75 nuostatas būtina pritaikyti tam, kad būtų išlaikyti Fondo ir jo valdymo struktūrų našumas ir efektyvumas, be to, turėtų būti patikslintos nuostatos dėl ekspertų komiteto.(3) Europos Parlamentas paragino Komisiją persvarstyti agentūrų valdybų sudėtį ir darbo metodus bei pateikti atitinkamų pasiūlymų[10].(4) Atitinkamos valdančiosios ar administracinės valdybos Komisijai pateikė bendrą nuomonę dėl tolesnio Fondo, Europos darbuotojų saugos ir sveikatos agentūros ir Europos profesinio mokymo plėtros centro valdybų valdymo ir jų veikimo.(5) Trišalis vyriausybių, darbdavių ir darbuotojų organizacijų atstovų vadovavimas Fondui, Europos profesinio mokymo plėtros centrui Europos darbuotojų saugos ir sveikatos agentūrai yra šių organų sėkmės pagrindas.(6) Socialinių partnerių dalyvavimas šių trijų Bendrijos organų valdyme suteikia specifiškumo, dėl kurio jie turi veikti pagal bendras taisykles.(7) Paaiškėjo, kad trijų grupių, sudarytų iš vyriausybės, darbdavių ir darbuotojų, buvimas trišalėje valdyboje bei darbdavių ir darbuotojų grupių koordinatoriaus paskyrimas yra ypač svarbūs. Todėl šį susitarimą reikėtų įforminti ir jis taip pat turėtų būti taikomas vyriausybinei grupei.(8) Trišalio atstovavimo kiekvienai valstybei narei išlaikymas užtikrina, kad bus įtraukti visi svarbiausi dalyviai ir bus atsižvelgta į su socialiniais klausimais susijusių interesų bei požiūrių įvairovę.(9) Būtina iš anksto numatyti praktines pasekmes, kurias patirs Fondas dėl būsimos Sąjungos plėtros. Valdybos sudėtis ir veikimas turėtų būti patikslinti, kad būtų atsižvelgta į naujųjų valstybių narių įstojimą.(10) Valdybos darbo tvarkos taisyklėse numatytas biuras turi būti sustiprintas, kad būtų užtikrintas Fondo veiklos tęstinumas ir jos sprendimų priėmimo veiksmingumas. Biuro sudėtis turėtų ir toliau atspindėti valdybos trišalę struktūrą.(11) Pagal Sutarties 3 straipsnį visose veiklos srityse Bendrija siekia pašalinti moterų ir vyrų nelygybės apraiškas ir diegti jų lygybę. Todėl reikėtų numatyti, kad būtų skatinamas subalansuotas atstovavimas moterims ir vyrams vadybos sudėtyje.(12) Valdybai turėtų būti palikta galimybė užtikrinti oficialų nepriklausomų ekspertų bendradarbiavimą per apibrėžtą laikotarpį specifinių darbo programos tikslų įgyvendinimui.(13) Fondas yra vienintelė Bendrijos agentūra, kuri vadovaujasi savo Tarnybos nuostatais. Kadangi 2004 metais turėtų įsigalioti Europos Bendrijų pareigūnų tarnybos nuostatų reforma, būtų tikslinga ištaisyti šį neatitikimą ir patikslinti nuostatas, taikomas Fondo darbuotojams. Tarybos reglamentas (EAPB, EEB, Euratomas) Nr. 1860/76, nustatantis Europos gyvenimo ir darbo sąlygų gerinimo fondo personalo įdarbinimo sąlygas[11] turėtų ir toliau būti taikomas Fondo darbuotojų, įdarbintų pagal šio Reglamento taisykles, atžvilgiu.(14) Todėl Reglamentas (EEB) Nr. 1365/75 turėtų būti atitinkamai iš dalies keičiamas.(15) Šiam reglamentui priimti Sutartis nenumato jokių įgaliojimų, išskyrus tuos, kurie nurodyti 308 straipsnyje,PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ REGLAMENTĄ:1 straipsnisReglamentas (EEB) Nr. 1365/75 iš dalies keičiamas taip:(1) 3 straipsnio 2 dalis pakeičiama taip:„2. Fondas kaip įmanoma glaudžiau bendradarbiauja su valstybių narių specializuotais institutais, fondais ir institucijomis ir tarptautiniu lygiu. Visų pirma, Fondas užtikrina tinkamą bendradarbiavimą su Europos darbuotojų saugos ir sveikatos agentūra, jei tai neprieštarauja jo tikslams.“(2) 5 straipsnis pakeičiamas taip:„5 straipsnisFondą sudaro:a) valdyba;b) biuras;c) direktorius ir direktoriaus pavaduotojas.“(3) 6 straipsnis pakeičiamas taip:„6 straipsnis1. Valdybą sudaro:a) vienas narys, atstovaujantis kiekvienos valstybės narės vyriausybėms;b) vienas narys, atstovaujantis kiekvienos valstybės narės darbdavių organizacijoms;c) vienas narys, atstovaujantis kiekvienos valstybės narės darbuotojų organizacijoms;d) trys nariai, atstovaujantys Komisijai.2. Pirmojoje dalyje a, b ir c punktuose išvardytus narius skiria Taryba, remdamasi principu, pagal kurį vienas narys atstovauja kiekvienai valstybei narei ir kiekvienai pirmiau išvardytai kategorijai. Tuo pačiu metu Taryba, laikydamasi nariams taikomų sąlygų, paskiria pakaitinį narį dalyvauti valdybos posėdžiuose tais atvejais, jei narys į juos neatvyksta.Komisija skiria jai atstovaujančius narius ir pakaitinius narius.Pateikdamos kandidatų sąrašus, valstybės narės, darbdavių ir darbuotojų organizacijos stengiasi, kad valdyboje būtų užtikrintas subalansuotas atstovavimas moterims ir vyrams.Valdybos narių sąrašą Taryba skelbia Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje .3. Valdybos narių kadencija yra trys metai. Kadencija gali būti atnaujinama.Pasibaigus narių kadencijai arba nariams atsistatydinus, jie toliau eina pareigas tol, kol atnaujinama jų kadencija arba į jų vietą paskiriami kiti nariai.4. Valdyba išsirenka pirmininką ir tris pirmininko pavaduotojus iš trijų 7 dalyje nurodytų grupių ir Komisijos vienerių metų kadencijai, kuri gali būti atnaujinama.5. Pirmininkas sušaukia valdybos posėdžius kartą per metus. Pirmininkas sušaukia papildomus posėdžius ne mažiau kaip vieno trečdalio valdybos narių prašymu.6. Sprendimus valdyba priima absoliučia savo narių balsų dauguma.7. Vyriausybių, darbuotojų ir darbdavių organizacijų atstovai valdyboje sudaro atskiras grupes. Kiekviena grupė paskiria koordinatorių. Darbuotojų ir darbdavių grupių koordinatoriai yra atitinkamų organizacijų Europos lygmens atstovai ir dalyvauja posėdžiuose be balso teisės.8. Valdyba įsteigia biurą. Biurą sudaro valdybos pirmininkas ir trys pirmininko pavaduotojai, po vieną kiekvienos 7 dalyje nurodytų grupių koordinatorių ir dar vienas Komisijos atstovas.9. Valdyba sprendžia dėl biuro posėdžių metinio tvarkaraščio. Pirmininkas sušaukia papildomus biuro posėdžius jo narių prašymu.10. Biuro sprendimai priimami bendru susitarimu. Jei susitarimo pasiekti negalima, biuras perduoda klausimą spręsti valdybai.“(4) 7 straipsnis iš dalies keičiamas taip:a) 1 dalis pakeičiama taip:„1. Valdyba valdo Fondą, apibrėždama jo veiklos kryptis. Remdamasi direktoriaus pateiktu projektu, valdyba, neprieštaraujant Komisijai, patvirtina darbo programą.“b) straipsnis papildomas šia 4 dalimi:„4. Nepažeisdamas direktoriaus įsipareigojimų, išdėstytų 8 ir 9 straipsniuose, valdybos nurodymu biuras imasi visų reikiamų priemonių tinkamam Fondo valdymui tarp valdybos posėdžių, išskyrus priemones, nurodytas 12 ir 15 straipsniuose.“(5) 9 ir 10 straipsniai pakeičiami taip:„9 straipsnis1. Direktorius atsako už Fondo valdymą ir įgyvendina valdybos ir biuro sprendimus. Jis yra teisinis Fondo atstovas.2. Nepažeisdamas 8 straipsnio 1 dalies, direktorius naudojasi įgaliojimais, apibrėžtais 17 straipsnio 1 dalyje.3. Direktorius parengia valdybos ir biuro veiklos kryptis. Direktorius arba direktoriaus pavaduotojas, arba abu dalyvauja valdybos ir biuro susirinkimuose.4. Direktorius yra atsakingas valdybai už vadovavimą Fondui.10 straipsnisDirektoriui pasiūlius, valdyba turi turėti galimybę kreiptis į nepriklausomus ekspertus dėl konkrečių klausimų, susijusių su metine darbų programa.“(6) 11 straipsnis išbraukiamas.(7) 12 straipsnio 1 dalies antra pastraipa pakeičiama taip:Rengdamas šią programą, direktorius atsižvelgia į Bendrijos institucijų ir Europos ekonomikos ir socialinių reikalų komiteto nuomones.“(8) 17 straipsnis pakeičiamas taip:„17 straipsnis1. Fondo darbuotojams, įdarbintiems po [ šio reglamento įsigaliojimo datos ], taikomi Europos Bendrijų pareigūnų tarnybos nuostatai arba, prireikus, kitų Europos Bendrijų tarnautojų įdarbinimo sąlygos. Fondas darbuotojų atžvilgiu vykdo įgaliojimus, suteiktus paskiriančiajai arba atitinkamai užsakančiajai institucijai .2. Valdyba, neprieštaraujant Komisijai, priima tinkamas įgyvendinimo taisykles.“(9) Visuose straipsniuose sąvokos „administracinė vadyba“ arba „valdančioji valdyba“ keičiamos į „valdyba“.2 straipsnisReglamentas (EAPB, EEB, Euratomas) Nr. 1860/76 yra taikomas Europos gyvenimo ir darbo sąlygų gerinimo fondo darbuotojams, įdarbintiems pagal šio Reglamento nuostatas.3 straipsnisŠis reglamentas įsigalioja dvidešimtą dieną nuo jo paskelbimo Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje .Šis reglamentas yra privalomas visas ir tiesiogiai taikomas visose valstybėse narėse.Priimta Briuselyje, [...]Tarybos varduPirmininkas [1] OJ L 139. 30.5.1975, p. 1.[2] The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.[3] EP A5-0079/2003 § 28 [The European Parliament] “considers it out of the question, on grounds of efficiency and cost, further to expand the administrative boards of the Community bodies during the forthcoming enlargement; takes the view that enlargement offers a good opportunity thoroughly to reconsider the composition and working methods of these administrative Boards, which are already very ponderous as a rule; calls on the Commission to put forward appropriate proposals by 31 July 2003 to amend the founding regulations accordingly".[4] The Staff Regulations of officials and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities applicable from 5 March 1968, as laid down by Articles 2 and 3 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of 29 February 1968 (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968) and later Regulations amending that Regulation.[5] OL C [...], [...], p. [...].[6] OL C [...], [...], p. [...].[7] OL C [...], [...], p. [...].[8] OL C [...], [...], p. [...].[9] OL L 139. 1975 5 30, p. 1. Reglamentas su paskutiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 1649/2003 (OL L 245, 2003 9 29, p. 25).[10] EP A5-0079/2003§28[11] OL L 214. 1976 8 6, p. 24.