jurisdiction: US

text:
This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant in a suit for libel brought by the appellant, a merchant of Baltimore City, against the appellee, an attorney at law of that city. The alleged libel was in the following letter, signed and sent by the defendant to a merchant of the City of New York, a creditor of the plaintiff:
 "November 21, 1922.
 "Mr. Leon I. Wachtel, "530 Broadway, "New York City, N Y
 "In Re: Mrs. Mollie Deckelman, trading as New York Waist Store, 2227 E. Monument Street, Baltimore, Md.
 "Dear Sir:
 "I am advised that you are a creditor of Mrs. Deckelman, and therefore wish to bring to your attention the existing conditions as reported to me by some of the largest local creditors of Mrs. Deckelman.
 "A number of suits have been instituted against her recently and are now pending, and it is my belief that as soon as judgment is taken in these cases immediate execution will be ordered.
 "In view of the fact that Mrs. Deckelman is absolutely insolvent, this will mean that these creditors will obtain a preference for their claims, and if it becomes necessary for the sheriff to seize her assets, which I am advised amount to approximately $1,500, all of the other creditors will be shut out. *Page 535
 "I estimate the amount of her liabilities to be approximately $3,000.
 "I do not feel that one creditor should anticipate more than another and this can only be obviated by filing a petition in bankruptcy. In this way, I believe that the creditors would all get a fair return on their claims.
 "Will you advise me by return mail the amount of your claim and whether you will authorize me to use it in bankruptcy as a petitioning creditor?
 "It will be necessary for me to take immediate action in this matter if you wish to head off the sheriff in his execution.
 "The compensation for my services is being taken care of, therefore, you will not be called on in this respect to advance any money, or pay any compensation to me.
 "Very truly yours, "(Signed) Lewis W. Lake.
 "LWL:D."
 To the declaration, in which the letter was sent out in full, the defendant filed a general issue plea and a plea of justification.
 In the trial of the case three exceptions were taken to the rulings of the court, two upon the evidence and one on the prayers.
 At the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence the court, at the request of the defendant, directed a verdict for him on the ground that the plaintiff had offered no evidence legally sufficient to entitle her to recover.
 The court below, as we gather from a statement made by him, found in the record, held that the letter was a qualified privileged communication, with the burden upon the plaintiff to show malice on the part of the defendant, and finding there was no evidence of malice legally sufficient to go to the jury, the case was withdrawn from its consideration.
 The privilege in this case is certainly not more than a qualified privilege, as held by the court below, nor do we *Page 536
 understand that anything more is claimed for it by the appellee.
 It is said in 17 R.C.L. 341, that "a communication made in good faith on any subject matter in which the person communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has a duty, is privileged if made to a person having a corresponding interest or duty, even though it contains matters which, without this privilege, would be actionable. * * * A publication loses its character as privileged, and is actionable, on proof of actual malice, or, at least such gross disregard of the rights of the person injured as is equivalent to malice in fact. In the case of a qualified privileged communication the occasion on which it was made rebuts the inference prima facie arising from a statement prejudicial to the * * * plaintiff, and puts the burden on him to prove that there was malice in fact." Mauricev. Worden, 54 Md. 233; Beeler v. Jackson, 64 Md. 593; Freshv. Cutter, 73 Md. 87; Brinsfield v. Howeth, 107 Md. 278; Jumpv. Barnes, 139 Md. 101.
 Malice, as here used, "in its legal sense means a wrongful act, done intentionally, or with evil intent, without just cause or excuse, or as a result of ill will. Malice does not necessarily imply spite against any individual, but rather, in many instances, merely a wanton disposition grossly negligent of the rights of others." 17 R.C.L. 321.
 The appellant, who had been in business in Leonardtown, Maryland, for a number of years, moved to Baltimore, where she, in 1922 was engaged in the "ladies ready-to-wear cloaks, suits and dress business" at 2227 E. Monument Street. At times she purchased goods from the Juliet Cloak Company of New York. In one of its shipments to her she was not satisfied with the goods and would not receive them, but after being told by the company that they would be sold at auction if not received by her, she sought counsel and was advised by him to adjust the matter if she could, which she did through her attorney, co-operating with the appellant, the company's attorney, whereby a small reduction was made from the amount originally charged for the goods, and it was *Page 537
 arranged that the amount so agreed upon should be paid in monthly installments, which is shown to have been paid as follows: One hundred dollars on August 29th, 1922, seventy-five dollars on September 29th, 1922, seventy-five dollars on October 30th, 1922; and the balance, seventy dollars and thirty cents, which was due on November 29th, on the 9th of December, 1922. It seems, however, that suit had been brought upon this claim, about the time of the adjustment, by the company, through the appellee as its attorney, and such suit was pending during the period covered by said payments. The appellant, desiring to discontinue business in Baltimore City and to return with her husband, an invalid, to Leonardtown, where she intended again to resume business, on the 20th day of September, 1922, entered into an agreement with Rebecca Keisner and S. Harry Keisner, who were represented by S.S. Levin and Israel Gomborov, their attorneys, to sell unto them her "entire business including all fixtures and the balance of her lease on the store and garage," for the sum of twenty-nine hundred dollars, of which amount she was paid five hundred dollars in cash, and the balance was to be paid "on the date of settlement, Tuesday, September 26th, 1922," at which time and upon payment of the balance of the purchase money the transfer of the property was to be made "in accordance with the sales in bulk act." As the sale of the stock of goods and merchandise came within the provisions of said act, the purchasers were furnished a list "containing the names and addresses of all the creditors of said vendor, together with the amount of indebtedness due or owing by said vendor to each of such creditors." The aggregate indebtedness to the creditors, as shown by the list, amounted to thirteen hundred eighty-nine dollars and fifty-eight cents, not including a claim of the United Cloak and Suit Company of one hundred ten dollars and seventy-five cents, the correctness of which was disputed by the plaintiff, and upon which suit was then pending in the Superior Court of Baltimore City. For some reason, not shown by the record, the balance of said purchase money was never paid and the property was never transferred to the purchaser. *Page 538
 The appellee, when called upon by the appellant to explain why he had written the letter to Wachtel, said "I sent the letter, but Gomborov and Levin are in back of this." The appellant's husband, who heard the conversation between his wife and the appellee, in giving his version of it, said that the appellee, in reply to his wife's question as to why he wrote the letter, stated, "I will be honest with you," and "he picked up a piece of paper off of his desk and he says, `You recognize this'?" It was the list of the creditors of the appellant already mentioned, and the appellee then said "Well, I have got it here. Here is where I got that information. I have been tricked in by Mr. Samuel Levin and Gomborov."
 Mr. Louis Schapiro testified that Mrs. Deckelman, the appellant, showed him a letter written to one of her New York creditors (Wachtel) by the appellee, and that he spoke to the latter regarding it, and asked him on what information the letter was written, and he replied, "Mr. Levin came to him stating that he represented a certain party on a case against Mrs. Deckelman (the appellant) and on certain information that Mr. Levin gave to him he wrote that letter. Now, what that information was I do not know." And, when asked if that was the only reason given he said, "That is the only reason that I can recall."
 It was on the 21st day of November, 1922, after three of the installments had been paid on the claim of the Juliet Cloak Company, the only claim against the appellant, so far as the record discloses, in which the appellee was in anywise interested, and only eight days before the last installment of seventy dollars and thirty cents would become due, that the appellee wrote the letter complained of, having before him at such time the statement containing the names of her creditors and showing the aggregate amount owing to them at the time it was furnished, only a short while before, to be fifteen hundred dollars and thirty-three cents, including the disputed claim of one hundred ten dollars and seventy-five cents, and likewise showing the amount agreed to be paid by Mrs. Keisner and her husband for the stock of *Page 539
 goods, etc., to be twenty-nine hundred dollars. In this letter the appellee said that the appellant was "absolutely insolvent" and that it was necessary to institute the bankruptcy proceedings, suggested by him, "to head off the sheriff in his execution" upon the judgments yet to be recovered in the suits then pending against the appellant.
 While it is a question for the court whether a communication, if made in good faith, without malice and in the belief that it was true, is privileged, if there be evidence tending to show the lack of good faith and actual malice, the plaintiff has the right to have the jury pass on the facts. Jump v. Barnes, supra.
 The evidence offered by the plaintiff, including that above stated, reflects, we think, upon the question of the good faith of the appellee in the use of the language prejudicial to the appellant found in the letter, and was, in our opinion, sufficient to take the case to the jury upon the question of malice. Especially is this true when considered in connection with the plea of justification interposed by the defendant, in which he, in effect, says, "I wrote the letter and the alleged libelous words found therein are true." The position of the defendant in this case is not unlike that of the defendant inJump v. Barnes, supra. In that case the language complained of was likewise found in a letter written by the defendant. In it he said, "Another party in town told me he saw the corn and it was rotten when loaded in it, or a good portion of it was; he says it was about as bad a lot of corn as he ever saw loaded to be sent to the market for sale." Judge Boyd, speaking for the Court, said, "If he (the defendant) wanted to be fair and justify his own conduct, he ought at least to have explained who it was, and produce him as a witness, if he could, instead of asking to have the case taken from the jury at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence." So in this case, the appellee, we think, after the introduction of the plaintiff's evidence, should have explained his conduct in respect to the charges made against the appellant, instead of asking to have the *Page 540
 case taken from the jury at the conclusion of the evidence of the plaintiff.
 We now come to the exceptions taken to the evidence. The first is to the admission of the written contract or agreement of sale between the appellant and the Keisners, for the sale of her stock of goods, etc. The appellant, the plaintiff below, had offered evidence as to such sale and its terms and conditions, when upon cross-examination of the plaintiff it was ascertained by defendant's counsel that the agreement of sale was in writing. Upon being asked for the contract, if she had it, the witness gave it to defendant's counsel. It was then offered by him and admitted in evidence against the objection of the plaintiff. If the fact of the sale and the terms thereof were proper to be introduced in evidence then the written agreement was the best evidence of those facts, but in any event, as such facts had already been given in evidence, there was certainly no injury done the plaintiff in its admission.
 It is hard to determine to what the second exception applies. The plaintiff was being interrogated as to the five hundred dollars paid to her in cash under said contract, when she was asked, "Your position was then that you wanted to turn over the property to them and get the twenty-four hundred dollars and they wanted to get back the five; is that the situation." Answer, "They did not ask for the five." The counsel for the plaintiff then said, "I object to going into the demerits and merits of that suit. It don't make any difference whether she won it or lost it." Then followed a discussion between the court and the respective counsel, which resulted in the court over-ruling the objection, and the exception was taken to its ruling thereon. If the objection was to the answer, we can discover no possible injury that was done the plaintiff by the answer.
 Because of the errors committed by the court below in its rulings upon the prayers, the judgment will be reversed.
 Judgment reversed and a new trial awarded, the appellee to paythe costs. *Page 541


type: contracts

jurisdiction: EU

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21999D0171
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 171/1999 av den 26 november 1999 om ändring av bilaga XIII (Transport) till EES-avtalet
 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 061 , 01/03/2001 s. 0030 - 0030
 Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslutnr 171/1999av den 26 november 1999om ändring av bilaga XIII (Transport) till EES-avtaletGEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITTÉN HAR FATTAT DETTA BESLUTmed beaktande av Avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, ändrat genom protokollet med justeringar av Avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsområdet, nedan kallat avtalet, särskilt artikel 98 i detta, ochav följande skäl:(1) Bilaga XIII till avtalet ändrades genom Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 25/97 av den 30 april 1997(1).(2) Kommissionens beslut 1999/569/EG av den 28 juli 1999 om grundparametrarna för delsystem tågstyrning för det transeuropeiska järnvägssystemet för höghastighetståg(2) bör införlivas med avtalet.HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.Artikel 1Följande nya punkt skall införas efter punkt 37a (rådets direktiv 96/48/EG) i bilaga XIII till avtalet:"37b. 399 D 0569: Kommissionens beslut 1999/569/EG av den 28 juli 1999 om grundparametrarna för delsystem tågstyrning för det transeuropeiska järnvägssystemet för höghastighetståg (EGT L 216, 14.8.1999, s. 23), rättat genom EGT L 236, 7.9.1999, s. 38."Artikel 2Texterna till beslut 1999/569/EG på isländska och norska, som bifogas respektive språkversion av detta beslut, är giltiga.Artikel 3Detta beslut träder i kraft den 27 november 1999 under förutsättning att alla anmälningar enligt artikel 103.1 i avtalet har gjorts till Gemensamma EES-kommittén.Artikel 4Detta beslut skall offentliggöras i EES-delen av och EES-supplementet till Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning.Utfärdat i Bryssel den 26 november 1999.På Gemensamma EES-kommitténs vägnarN. v. LiechtensteinOrdförande(1) EGT L 242, 4.9.1997, s. 74.(2) EGT L 216, 14.8.1999, s. 23, rättat genom EGT L 236, 7.9.1999, s. 38.


type: legislation

text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 E1995C0068
 ENTSCHEIDUNG DER EFTA-ÜBERWACHUNGSBEHÖRDE Nr. 68/95/COL vom 19. Juni 1995 zur Genehmigung des von Norwegen vorgelegten Programms zur Überwachung und Bekämpfung von Geflügelsalmonellosen
 Amtsblatt Nr. L 189 vom 10/08/1995 S. 0033 - 0033
 ENTSCHEIDUNG DER EFTA-ÜBERWACHUNGSBEHÖRDE Nr. 68/95/COL vom 19. Juni 1995 zur Genehmigung des von Norwegen vorgelegten Programms zur Überwachung und Bekämpfung von Gefluegelsalmonellosen DIE EFTA-ÜBERWACHUNGSBEHÖRDE -gestützt auf das Abkommen über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum in der Fassung des Anpassungsprotokolls zu diesem Abkommen, insbesondere auf Artikel 17 sowie Protokoll 1 Nummer 4 Buchstabe d),gestützt auf die Rechtsakte, auf die in Anhang I Kapitel I Nummer 34c des Abkommens über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum Bezug genommen wird, namentlich die Richtlinie 92/117/EWG des Rates über Maßnahmen zum Schutz gegen bestimmte Zoonosen bzw. ihre Erreger bei Tieren und Erzeugnissen tierischen Ursprungs zur Verhütung lebensmittelbedingter Infektionen und Vergiftungen, im folgenden "Zoonosen-Richtlinie" genannt, insbesondere auf Artikel 8 Absatz 3,gestützt auf das Abkommen zwischen den EFTA-Staaten zur Errichtung einer Überwachungsbehörde und eines Gerichtshofs in der Fassung des Anpassungsprotokolls zu diesem Abkommen, insbesondere auf Artikel 5 Absatz 2 Buchstabe d) sowie Protokoll 1 Artikel 1 Buchstabe e),in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:Norwegen hat mit Schreiben vom 24. April 1995 gemäß Artikel 8 Absatz 2 der Zoonosen-Richtlinie ein Programm zur Überwachung und Bekämpfung von Gefluegelsalmonellosen übermittelt.Dieses Programm erfuellt alle in Artikel 8 Absatz 2 der Zoonosen-Richtlinie genannten Anforderungen.Die in dieser Entscheidung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des in Unterstützung der EFTA-Überwachungsbehörde fungierenden EFTA-Veterinärkomitees.Entsprechend sollte das Programm genehmigt werden -HAT FOLGENDE ENTSCHEIDUNG ERLASSEN:1. Das von Norwegen vorgelegte Programm zur Überwachung und Bekämpfung von Gefluegelsalmonellosen wird hiermit genehmigt.2. Norwegen erläßt bis zum 1. September 1995 die erforderlichen Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften, um das Programm gemäß Nummer 1 durchzuführen.3. Diese Entscheidung tritt am 1. September 1995 in Kraft.4. Diese Entscheidung ist an Norwegen gerichtet.5. Nur der englische Text dieser Entscheidung ist verbindlich.Brüssel, den 19. Juni 1995Für die EFTA-ÜberwachungsbehördeBjörn FRIÐFINNSSONMitglied des Kollegiums


text:
 Avis juridique important
 |
 21987A0616(01)
 Acordo entre a Comunidade Económica Europeia e a República da Argentina sobre o comércio de produtos têxteis - Protocolo A - Protocolo B - Protocolo C - Protocolo D - Acta aprovada - Troca de notas Tradução não oficial
 Jornal Oficial no L 156 de 16/06/1987 p. 0002 - 0038 L040 13/02/1991 P.0002
 AGREEMENT Between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Argentina on trade in textile products Done at Brussels on 30 September 1986THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,of the one part, andTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINAof the other part,DESIRING to promote, with a view to permanent cooperation and in conditions providing every security for trade, the orderly and equitable development of trade in textile products between the European Economic Community (hereinafter referred to as 'the Community') and the Republic of Argentina ('hereinafter Argentina').RESOLVED to take the fullest possible account of the serious economic and social problems at present affecting the textile industry in both importing and exporting countries, and in particular, to eliminate real risks of market disruption on the market of the Community and real risks of disruption to the textile trade of Argentina.HAVING REGARD to the Arrangement regarding International Trade in Textiles (hereinafter referred to as 'the Geneva Arrangement'), and in particular Article 4 thereof; and to the conditions set out in the Protocol extending the Arrangement.HAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their Plenipotentiaries:THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES:THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA:WHO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:SECTION ITrade arrangementsArticle 11. The Parties recognize and confirm that, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and without prejudice to their rights and obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the conduct of their mutual trade in textile products shall be governed by the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement.2. In respect of the products covered by this Agreement, the Community undertakes not to introduce quantitative restrictions under Article XIX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or Article 3 of the Geneva Arrangement.3. Measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on the importation into the Community of the products covered by this Agreement shall be prohibited.Article 21. This Agreement shall apply to trade in textile products of cotton, wool and man-made fibres originating in Argentina which are listed in Annex I.2. The classification of the products covered by this Agreement is based on the Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff and on the Nomenclature of Goods for the External Trade Statistics of the Community and the Statistics of Trade between Member States (NIMEXE).From the entry into force of the International Convention on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) this classification will be based on the Harmonized System and on the Community nomenclatures derived from that system.3. The origin of the products covered by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the rules in force in the Community.Any amendment to these rules of origin shall be communicated to Argentina and shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for control of the origin of the products referred to above are laid down in Protocol A.Article 3Argentina agrees for each Agreement year to restrain its exports to the Community of the products described in Annex II to the limits set out therein.Exports of textile products set out in Annex II shall be subject to a double-checking system specified in Protocol A.Article 4Argentina and the Community recognize the special and differential character of re-imports of textile products into the Community after processing in Argentina.Such re-imports may be agreed outside the quantitative limits established under this Agreement provided that they are effected in accordance with the regulations on economic outward processing in force in the Community.Article 5Exports of cottage industry fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, garments or other articles obtained manually from such fabrics and traditional folklore handicraft products shall not be subject to quantitative limits, provided that these products meet the conditions laid down in Protocol B.Article 61. Imports into the Community of textile products covered by this Agreement shall not be subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II, provided that they are declared to be for re-export outside the Community in the same state or after processing, within the framework of the administrative system of control which exists within the Community.However, the release for home use of products imported under the conditions referred to above shall be subject to the production of an export licence issued by the Argentine authorities, and to proof of origin in accordance with the provisions of Protocol A.2. Where the Community authorities have evidence that imports of textile products have been set off against a quantitative limit established under this Agreement, but that the products have subsequently been re-exported outside the Community, the authorities concerned shall inform the Argentine authorities within four weeks of the quantities involved and authorize imports of identical quantities of the same products, which shall not be set off against the quantitative limit established under this Agreement for the current or the following year.Article 71. In any Agreement year advance use of a portion of the quantitative limit established for the following Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 5 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.Amounts delivered in advance shall be deducted from the corresponding quantitative limits established for the following Agreement year.2. Carryover to the corresponding quantitative limit for the following Agreement year of the amounts not used during any Agreement year is authorized for each category of products up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the current Agreement year.3. Transfers in respect of categories in Group I shall not be made from any category except as follows:- transfers between categories 2 and 3 and from category 1 to categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 7 % and transfers into category 1 from categories 2 and 3 may be made up to 4 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made,- transfers between categories 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be made up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.Transfers into any category in Groups II and III may be made from any category or categories in Groups I, II and III up to 7 % of the quantitative limit for the category to which the transfer is made.4. The table of equivalence applicable to the transfers referred to above is given in Annex I to this Agreement.5. The increase in any category of products resulting from the cumulative application of the provisions in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above during an Agreement year shall not exceed 17 %.6. Prior notification shall be given by the authorities of Argentina in the event of recourse to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above.Article 81. Exports of textile products not listed in Annex II to this Agreement may be made subject to quantitative limits by Argentina on the conditions laid down in the following paragraphs.2. Where the Community finds, under the system of administrative control set up, that the level of imports of products in a given category not listed in Annex II originating in Argentina exceeds, in relation to the preceding year's total imports into the Community from all sources of products in that category, the following rates:- 1 % for categories of products in Group I,- 5 % for categories of products in Group II,- 10 % for categories of products in Group III.It may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedure described in Article 16 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an appropriate restraint level for the products in such category.The Community shall authorize the importation of products of the said category shipped from Argentina before the date on which the request for consultations was submitted.3. Pending a mutually satisfactory solution, Argentina undertakes to limit exports of the products in the category concerned to the Community or to the regions of the Community market specified by the Community for a provisional period of three months from the date on which the request for consultations is made. Such provisional limit shall be established at 25 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, and gave rise to the request for consultation or 25 % of the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, whichever is the higher.4. Should the Parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16 of the Agreement, the Community shall have the right to introduce a definitive quantitative limit at an annual level not lower than the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2, or 106 % of the level of imports reached during the calendar year preceding that in which imports exceeded the level resulting from the application of the formula set out in paragraph 2 and gave rise to the request for consultations whichever is the higher.The annual level so fixed shall be revised upwards after consultations in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 16, with a view to fulfilling the conditions set out in paragraph 2, should the trend of total imports into the Community of the product in question make this necessary.5. The limits introduced under paragraph 2 or paragraph 4 may in no case be lower than the level of imports of products in that category originating in Argentina in 1985.6. Quantitative limits may also be established by the Community on a regional basis in accordance with the provisions of Protocol C.7. The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under this Article shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Protocol D.8. The provisions of this Article shall not apply where the percentages specified in paragraph 2 have been reached as a result of fall in total imports into the Community, and not as a result of an increase in exports or products originating in Argentina.9. In the event of the provisions of paragraph 2, 3 or 4 being applied, Argentina undertakes to issue export licencesfor products covered by contracts concluded before the introduction of the quantitative limit, up to the volume of the quantitative limit fixed.10. Up to the date of communication of the statistics referred to in Article 9 (7), the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply on the basis of the annual statistics previously communicated by the Community.11. The provisions of this Agreement which concern exports of products subject to the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall also apply to products for which quantitative limits are introduced under this Article.Article 91. Argentina shall supply the Community with precise statistical information on all export certificates issued by the Argentine authorities for all categories of textile products subject to the quantitative limits established under this Agreement as well as on all certificates issued by the Argentine authorities for all products referred to in Article 5 and subject to the provisions of Protocol B.The Community shall likewise transmit to the Argentine authorities precise statistical information on import authorizations or documents issued by the Community authorities in respect of export licences and certificates issued by Argentina.2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall, for all categories of products, be forwarded before the end of the second month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.3. Argentina also undertakes to supply the Community wherever possible with available statistical information on all textile exports by country of destination.4. The Community shall forward to the Argentine authorities import statistics for all products covered by the system of administrative control referred to in Article 8 (2) and for products covered by Article 6 (1).5. The information referred to in paragraph 3 shall, for all categories of products, be transmitted before the end of the third month following the quarter to which the statistics relate.6. Should it be found on analysis of the information exchanged that there are significant discrepancies between the returns for exports and those for imports, consultations may be initiated in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16.7. For the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 7, the Community undertakes to provide the Argentine authorities before 15 April of each year with the preceding year's statistics on imports of all textile products covered by this Agreement, broken down by supplying country and Community Member State.Article 101. Should there be divergent opinions between Argentina and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community on the classification of products covered by the present Agreement, classification shall provisionally be based on indications provided by the Community, pending consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching agreement on definitive classification of the product concerned.2. If the above provisional classification results in provisional debit against a quantitative limit for a category of products other than the category indicated on the export documents issued by the competent Argentine authorities, the Community shall inform Argentina of such provisional debit within 30 days.3. The authorities of Argentina shall be informed of any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision, made in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community, relating to the classification of products covered by this Agreement.Any amendment to the tariff and statistical nomenclatures in force in the Community or any decision which results in a modification of the classification of products covered by this Agreement shall not have the effect of reducing any quantitative limit established in Annex II.The procedures for the application of this paragraph are set out in Protocol A.Article 111. Argentina and the Community agree to cooperate fully in preventing the circumvention of the present Agreement by transhipment, rerouting or whatever other means.2. Where information available to the Community as a result of the investigations carried out in accordance with the procedures set out in Protocol A constitutes evidence that products of Argentine origin subject to quantitatives limits established under this Agreement have been transhipped, rerouted or otherwise imported into the Community in circumvention of this Agreement, the Community may request the opening of consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 of this Agreement, with a view to reaching agreement on an equivalent adjustment of the corresponding quantitative limits established under the Agreement.3. Pending the result of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, Argentina shall as a precautionary measure, if so requested by the Community make the necessary arrangements to ensure that adjustments of quantitative limits liable to be agreed following the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, may be carried out for the quota year in which the request to open consultations in accordance with paragraph 2 was made, or for the following year if the quota for the current year is exhausted, where clear evidence of circumvention is provided.4. Should the parties be unable in the course of consultations to reach a satisfactory solution within the period specified in Article 16 of the Agreement, the Community shall have the right, where clear evidence of circumvention has been provided, to deduct from the quantitative limits established under this Agreement amounts equivalent to the products of Argentine origin.Article 121. Argentina shall endeavour to ensure that exports of textile products subject to quantitative limits are spaced out as evenly as possible over an Agreement year, due account being taken, in particular, of seasonal factors.2. Should there be an excessive concentration of imports on any product within a category subject to quantitative limits under this Agreement, the Community may request consultations in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 of this Agreement with a view to remedying this situation. Article 13Should recourse be had to the denunciation provisions of Article 18 (4), the quantitative limits established in Annex II shall be adapted on a pro rata basis. Article 141. For the purpose of the administration of this Agreement, the limits referred to in Article 3 are broken down by the Community into shares for each of its Member States.2. Portions of the quantitative limits established in Annex II not used in one Member State of the Community may be reallocated to another Member State in accordance with the procedures in force in the Community.The Community undertakes to examine with care and reply within four weeks to any request made for reallocation by Argentina. In the event of agreement on such reallocation, the flexibility provisions set out in Article 6 shall continue to be applicable to the levels of the original allocation.If, in the course of the application of this Agreement, Argentina finds that the break-down of a limit established in Annex II causes particular difficulties, it may request the opening of consultations in accordance with Article 16 with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution.3. After the first of June of each year of application of the Agreement, Argentina may transfer, subject to prior notification to the Community, the unused quantities of the regional quota-shares of a Community quantitative limit, set out in Annex II, to the quota-shares of the same limit of other regions of the Community provided that the regional quota-share from which the transfer is made is utilized by less than 80 %, and up to the amount of the followingpercentages of the quota-share to which the transfer is made:- 2 %in the first year of the application of the Agreement,- 4 % in the second year of the application of the Agreement,- 8 % in the third year of the application of the Agreement,- 12 % in the fourth year of the application of the Agreement.The percentage in the fifth year of the application of the Agreement shall be determined following consultation between the Parties.4. Should it appear in any given region of the Community that additional supplies are required, the Community may, where measures taken pursuant to paragraph 1 are inadequate to cover those requirements, authorize the importation of amounts greater than those stipulated in Annex II.Article 151. Argentina and the Community undertake to refrain from discrimination in the allocation of export licences and import authorizations or documents referred to in Protocol A.2. In implementing this Agreement, the Contracting Parties shall take care to maintain the traditional commercial practices and trade flows between the Community and Argentina.3. Should either Party find that the application of this Agreement is disturbing existing commercial relations between importers in the Community and suppliers in Argentina consultations shall be started promptly, in accordance with the procedure specified in Article 16 with a view to remedying this situation.Article 161. The special consultation procedures referred to in this Agreement shall be governed by the following rules:- any request for consultations shall be notified in writing to the other Party,- the request for consultations shall be followed within a reasonable period (and in any case not later than 15 days following the notification) by a statement setting out the reasons and circumstances which, in the opinion of the requesting Party, justify the submission of such a request,- the parties shall enter into consultations within one month at the latest of notification of the request, with a view to reaching agreement or a mutually acceptable conclusion within one further month at the latest.2. The Community may request consultations in accordance with paragraph 1 when it ascertains that during a particular year of application of the Agreement difficulties arise in the Community or one of its regions from a sharp and substantial increase, by comparison to the preceding year, in imports of a given category of Group I subject to the quantitative limits set out in Annex II.3. If necessary, at the request of either of the Parties and in conformity with the provisions of the Geneva Arrangement, consultations shall be held on any problems arising from the application of this Agreement. Any consultations held under this Article shall be approached by both Parties in a spirit of cooperation and with a desire to reconcile the difference between them.Article 17This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories within which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of Argentina.Article 181. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for this purpose. It shall be applicable until 31 December 1991.2. This Agreement shall apply with effect from 1 January 1987.3. Either party may at any time propose modifications to the Agreement.4. Either Party may at any time denounce this Agreement provided that at least 60 days notice is given. In that event, the Agreement shall come to an end on the expiry of the period of notice.5. The Annexes, Protocols and Agreed Minutes to this Agreement shall form an integral part thereof.Article 19This Agreement shall be drawn up in two copies in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.ANNEX I LIST OF PRODUCTS 1. When the constitutive material of the products of categories 1 to 114 is not specifically mentioned these products are to be taken to be made exclusively of wool or of fine animal hair, of cotton or of man-made fibres.2. Garments which are not recognizable as being garments for men or boys or as garments for women or girls are classified with the latter.3. Where the expression 'babies' garments' is used, this is meant also to cover girls' garments up to and including commercial size 86.>POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>>POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>>POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>>POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>>POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>>POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>ANNEX II For practical reasons the product descriptions used Annex I are given in the present Annex in abbreviated form >POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>PROTOCOL A TITLE ICLASSIFICATIONArticle 11. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Argentina of any changes in the tariff and statistical nomenclatures before the date of their entry into effect in the Community.2. The competent authorities of the Community undertake to inform Argentina of any decisions relating to the classification of products subject to the Agreement within one month of their adoption at the latest. Such communication shall include:(a) a description of the products concerned;(b) the relevant category and the related tariff and statistical references;(c) the reasons which have led to the decision.3. Where a decision on classification results in a change of classification practice or a change of category of any product subject to the Agreement, the competent authorities of the Community shall provide 30 day's notice, from the date of the Community's communication, before the decision is put into effect. Products shipped before the date of application of the decision shall remain subject to the earlier classification practice, provided that the goods in question are presented for importation into the Community within 60 days of that date.4. Where a Community decision on classification resulting in a change of classification practice or a change of categorization of any product subject to the Agreement affects a category subject to restraint, the two Parties agree to enter into consultations in accordance with the procedures described in Article 16 (1) of the Agreement with a view to honouring the obligation under the second subparagraph of Article 10 (3) of the Agreement.TITLE IIORIGINArticle 21. Products originating in Argentina for export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement shall be accompanied by a certificate of Argentina origin conforming to the model annexed to this Protocol.2. The certificate of origin shall be issued by the competent governmental authorities of Argentina if the products in question can be considered products originatingin that country within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.3. However, the products in Group III may be imported into the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement on production of a declaration by the exporter on the invoice or other commercial document relating to the products to the effect that the products in question originate in Argentina within the meaning of the relevant rules in force in the Community.4. The certificate of origin referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required for import of goods covered by a certificate of origin Form A or Form APR completed in accordance with the relevant Community rules in order to qualify for generalized tariff preferences.Article 3The certificate of origin shall be issued only on application having been made in writing by the exporter or, under the exporter's responsibility, by his authorized representative. The competent governmental authorties of Argentina shall ensure that the certificate of origin is properly completed and for this purpose they shall call for any necessary documentary evidence or carry out any check which they consider appropriate.Article 4Where different criteria for determining origin are laid down for products falling within the same category, certificates or declarations of origin shall contain a sufficiently detailed description of the goods to enable the criterion to be determined on the basis of which the certificate was issued or the declaration drawn up.Article 5The discovery of slight discrepancies between the statements made in the certificate of origin and those made in the documents produced to the customs office for the purpose of carrying out the formalities for importing the product shall not ipso facto cast doubt upon the statements in the certificate.TITLE IIIDOUBLE CHECKING SYSTEM FOR CATEGORIES OF PRODUCTS WITH QUANTITATIVE LIMITSSection IExportationArticle 6The competent authorities of Argentina shall issue an export licence in respect of all consignments from Argentina oftextile products referred to in Annex II, up to the relevant quantitative limits as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement and of textile products subject to any definitive or provisional quantitative limits established as a result of the application of Article 8 of the Agreement.Article 71. The export licence shall conform to the model annexed to this Protocol. It must certify inter alia that the quantity of the product in question has been set off against the quantitative limit prescribed for the category of the product in question.2. Each export licence shall only cover one of the categories of products listed in Annex II of this Agreement. It may be used for one or more consignments of the products in question.Article 8The competent Community authorities must be notified forthwith of the withdrawal or alteration of any export licence already issued.Article 91. Exports shall be set off against the quantitative limits established for the year in which shipment of the goods has been effected, even if the export certificate is issued after such shipment.2. For the purpose of applying paragraph 1, shipment of the goods is considered to have taken place on the date of their loading on to the exporting aircraft, vehicle or vessel.Article 10The presentation of an export licence, in application of Article 11, shall be effected not later than 31 March of the year following that in which the goods covered by the licence have been shipped.Section IIImportationArticle 11Importation into the Community of textile products subject to quantitative limits shall be subject to the presentation of an import authorization or document.Article 121. The competent Community authorities shall issue such import authorization or document automatically within fiveworking days of the presentation by the importer of the original of the corresponding export licence.The import authorization or document shall be valid for six months.2. The competent Community authorities shall cancel the already issued import authorization or document if the corresponding export licence has been withdrawn.However, if the competent Community authorities have not been notified about the withdrawal or cancellation of the export licence until after the products have been imported into the Community, the quantities involved shall be set off against the quantitative limit for the category and the quota year in question.Article 131. If the competent Community authorities find that the total quantities covered by export certificates issued by Argentina for a particular category in any Agreement year exceed the quantitative limit established in Annex II for that category, as may be modified by Articles 7, 13 and 14 of the Agreement, or any definitive or provisional limit established under Article 8 of the Agreement, the said authorities may suspend the further issue of import authorizations or documents. In this event, the competent Community authorities shall immediately inform the authorities of Argentina and the special consultation procedure set out in Article 16 of the Agreement shall be initiated forthwith.2. Exports of Argentine origin not covered by Argentine export licences issued in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol may be refused the issue of import authorizations or documents by the competent Community authorities.However, if the import of such products is allowed into the Community by the competent Community authorities, the quantities involved shall not be set off against the appropriate quantitative limits set out in Annex II or established as a result of the application of Article 7 of the Agreement, without the express agreement of Argentina save as provided for in Article 11 of the Agreement.TITLE IVFORM AND PRODUCTION OF EXPORT CERTIFICATES AND CERTIFICATES OF ORIGIN, AND COMMON PROVISIONSArticle 141. The export licence and the certificate of origin may comprise additional copies duly indicated as such. They shall be made out in English or French. If they are completed by hand, entries must be in ink and in block capitals.These documents shall measure 210 × 297 mm. The paper used must be white writing paper, sized, not containing mechanical pulp and weighing not less than 25 g/m$. Eachpart shall have a printed guilloche-pattern background making any falsification by mechanical or chemical means apparent to the eye.If the documents have several copies only the top copy which is the original shall be printed with the guilloche-pattern background. This copy shall be clearly marked as 'original' and the other copies as 'copy'. Only the original shall be accepted by the competent authorities in the Community as being valid for the purposes of export to the Community in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement.2. Each document shall bear a standardized serial number, whether or not printed, by which it can be identified.This number shall be composed of the following elements:- two letters identifying Argentina as follows: AR,- two letters identifying the country of destination as follows:BL = BeneluxDE = GermanyDK = DenmarkFR = FranceGB = United KingdomGR = GreeceIE = IrelandIT = ItalyES = SpainPT = Portugal- a one-digit number identifying quota year, corresponding to the last figure in year, e.g. 7 for 1987,- a two-digit number running consecutively from 01 to 99 identifying issuing office.- a five-digit number running consecutively from 00001 to 99999 allocated to the country of destination.Article 15The export licence and certificate of origin may be issued after the shipment of the products to which they relate. In such cases they shall bear either the endorsement 'délivré a posteriori' or the endorsement 'Issued retrospectively'.Article 161. In the event of theft, loss or destruction of an export licence or a certificate of origin, the exporter may apply to the competent governmental authority which issued the document for a duplicate to be made out on the basis of the export documents in his possession. The duplicate of any such certificate or licence so issued shall bear the endorsement 'duplicata'.2. The duplicate must bear the date of the original export licence or certificate of origin.TITLE VADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATIONArticle 17The Community and Argentina shall cooperate closely to implement the provisions of this Agreement. To this end, contacts and exchanges of views (including on technical matters) shall be facilitated by both Parties.Article 18In order to ensure the proper application of this Agreement, the Community and Argentina shall assist each other in checking the authenticity and accuracy of export licences and certificates of origin issued or declarations made under this Protocol.Article 19Argentina shall send the Commission of the European Communities the names and addresses of the governmental authorities competent for the issue and verification of export licences and certificates of origin together with specimens of the stamps used by these authorities. Argentina shall also notify the Commission of any change in this information.Article 201. Subsequent verification of certificates of origin or export licences shall be carried out at random, or whenever the competent Community authorities have reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the certificate or licence or as to accuracy of the information regarding the products in question.2. In such cases the competent authorities in the Community shall return the certificate of origin or export licence or a copy thereof to the competent governmental authority in Argentina giving, where appropriate, the reasons of form or substance for an enquiry. If the invoice has been submitted, such invoice or a copy thereof shall be attached to the certificate or licence or its copy. The authorities shall also forward any information that has been obtained suggesting that the particulars given on the said certificate or licence are inaccurate.3. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall be applicable to subsequent verifications of the declarations of origin referred to in Article 2 of this Protocol.4. The results of the subsequent verifications carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Community within three months at the latest. The information communicated shall indicate whether the disputed certificate or licence applied to the goods actually exported and whether these goods are eligible for export in accordance with the arrangements established by this Agreement. The information shall also include, at the requestof the Community, copies of all documentation necessary to determine the facts fully and in particular the true origin of the goods.Should such verifications reveal systematic irregularities in the use of declarations of origin, the Community may subject imports of the products in question to the provisions of Article 2 (1) of this Protocol.5. For the purpose of subsequent verification of certificates of origin, copies of the certificates as well as any export documents referring to them shall be kept for a period of at least three years by the competent governmental authority in Argentina.6. Recourse to the random verification procedure specified in this Article must not constitute an obstacle to the release for home use of the products in question.Article 211. Where the verification procedure referred to in Article 20 or where information available to the Community or to Argentina indicates or appears to indicate that the provisions of this Agreement are being contravened, both Parties shall cooperate closely and with appropriate urgency to prevent such contravention.2. To this end Argentina shall on its own initiative or at the request of the Community, carry out appropriateenquiries or arrange for such enquiries to be carried out concerning operations which are, or appear to the Community to be in contravention of this Agreement. Argentina shall communicate the results of these enquiries to the Community together with any other pertinent information enabling the true origin of the goods to be determined.3. By agreement between the competent Community authorities and the competent Argentine authorities, officials designated by the Community may be present at the enquiries referred to above.4. Pursuant to the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, Argentina and the Community shall exchange any information considered by either party to be of use in preventing the contravention of the provisions of this Agreement. These exchanges may include information on textile production in Argentina and on trade in textile products of a kind covered by this Agreement between Argentina and other countries, particularly where the Community has reasonable grounds to consider that the products in question may be in transit across the territory of Argentina and prior to their importation into the Community. This information shall include at the request of the Community copies of all relevant documentation.5. Where it is established that the provisions of this Agreement have been contravened, Argentina and the Community may agree to take such measures as are necessary to prevent a recurrence of such contravention.Annex to Protocol A, Article 2(1) >POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>Annex to Protocol A, Article 7(1) >POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>PROTOCOL B 1. The exemption provided for in Article 5 of the Agreement in respect of cottage industry products shall apply only to the following products:(a) fabrics woven on hand- or foot-operated looms, being fabrics of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Argentina;(b) garments or other textile articles of a kind traditionally made in the cottage industry of Argentina obtained manually from the fabrics referred to above and sewn exclusively by hand without the aid of any machine;(c) traditional folklore textile products of Argentina made by hand in the cottage industry of Argentina as defined in a list to be agreed between both Parties and annexed to this Protocol.Exemption shall be granted only for products accompanied by a certificate issued by the competent Argentine authorities in accordance with the specimen annexed to this Protocol. Such certificates shall state the ground on which exemption is based and shall be accepted by the competent Community authorities provided that they are satisfied that the products concerned conform to the conditions set out in this Protocol. Certificates covering the products referred to in subparagraph (c) above shall bear a conspicuous stamp: 'FOLKLORE'. In case of divergent opinion between Argentina and the competent Community authorities at the point of entry into the Community as to the nature of such products, consultations shall be held within one month with a view to resolving such divergences. Should imports of any of the above products reach such proportions as to cause difficulties to the Community, the two Parties shall open consultations forthwith in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16 of the Agreement with a view to finding a quantitative solution to the problem.2. The provisions of Title IV and V of Protocol A shall apply mutatis mutandi to the products referred to in paragraph 1 of this Protocol.Annex to Protocol B >POSIÇÃO NUMA TABELA>PROTOCOL C Under Article 8 (6) of the Agreement, a quantitative limit may be fixed on a regional basis where imports of a given product into any region of the Community in relation to the amounts determined in accordance with paragraph 2 of the said Article 8 exceed the following regional percentage:Germany 25,5 %Benelux 9,5 %France 16,5 %Italy 13,5 %Denmark 2,7 %Ireland 0,8 %United Kingdom 21,0 %Greece 1,5 %Spain 7,5 %Portugal 1,5 %PROTOCOL D The annual growth rate for the quantitative limits introduced under Article 8 of the Agreement shall be determined as follows:For products in categories falling within Group I, II, III, the growth rate shall be fixed by agreement between the Parties in accordance with the consultation procedure established in Article 16 of the Agreement. Such growth rate may in no case be lower than the highest rate applied to corresponding products under bilateral agreements concluded under the Geneva Arrangement between the Community and other third countries having a level of trade equal to or comparable with that of Argentina.Agreed Minute With reference to Article 14 (3) of the Agreement on trade in textiles between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Argentina, initialled on 30 September 1986, it is agreed that the percentage of the fifth year of the application of the Agreement will be at least equal to the percentage applicable in the fourth year.Head of Delegation of theRepublic of ArgentinaHead of Delegation of theEuropean Economic CommunityExchange of Notes The Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities presents its compliments to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Agreement on trade in textile products between the Republic of Argentina and the Community initialled on 30 September 1986.The Mission wishes to inform the Directorate-General that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Government of the Republic of Argentina is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply provisionally from 1 January 1987 if the Community is disposed to do likewise.The Mission would be grateful if the Community would confirm its agreement to the foregoing.The Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Directorate-General for External Relations of the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Exchange of Notes The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities presents its compliments to the Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities and has the honour to refer to the Note regarding the Agreement on trade in textile products between the Republic of Argentina and the Community initalled on 30 September 1986.The Directorate-General wishes to confirm that whilst awaiting the completion of the necessary procedures for the conclusion and the coming into force of the Agreement, the Community is prepared to allow the provisions of the Agreement to apply provisionally from 1 January 1987.The Directorate-General for External Relations of the Commission of the European Communities avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Mission of the Republic of Argentina to the European Communities the assurance of its highest consideration.Informação relativa ao Acordo entre a Comunidade e a Argentina sobre o comércio de produtos têxteis Nos termos do artigo 2g. da decisão do Conselho de 11 de Dezembro de 1986 relativa à aplicação provisória do Acordo com a Argentina sobre o comércio de produtos têxteis, a Comissão comunicou ao Conselho o acordo formulado a este respeito por aquele país parceiro, em 10 de Dezembro de 1986.


type: wikipedia

text:
Raktažoliniai (Primulaceae) – augalų šeima. Jai priklauso vienamečiai arba daugiamečiai žoliniai augalai. Lapai ištisiniai, skroteliniai arba menturiniai. Stiebai nešakoti arba šakoti, kartais vietoj jo yra belapis žiedynkotis. Žiedai dvilyčiai. Vaisius – daugiasėklė dėžutė.
 Pasaulyje auga 29 gentys, apie 800 rūšių. Lietuvoje žinoma 11 rūšių iš 9 genčių:
 Poraistė (Naumburgia)
 Vyrskydė (Androsace)
 Raktažolė (Primula)
 Griovenė (Hottonia)
 Šimtūnė (Centunculus)
 Pastruoju metu kai kurios raktažolinių gentys priskiriamos kitai šeimai – mirsininių (Myrsinaceae):
 Progailis (Anagallis)
 Pienažolė (Glaux)
 Šilingė (Lysimachia)
 Septynikė (Trientalis). Pav.
 Gentys
 Dvylikadeivė (Dodecatheon)


text:
 Svarbus teisinis pranešimas
 |
 52005PC0062(01)
 Pasiūlymas Tarybos sprendimas dėl Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų pasirašymo ir laikino taikymo /* KOM/2005/0062 galutinis */
 Briuselis, 25.2.2005KOM(2005) 62 galutinis2005/0012 (CNS)PasiūlymasTARYBOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų pasirašymo ir laikino taikymoPasiūlymasTARYBOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų sudarymo(pateiktos Komisijos)AIŠKINAMASIS MEMORANDUMASTarptautinės aviacijos ryšiai tarp valstybių narių ir trečiųjų šalių tradiciškai būdavo nustatomi dvišaliais valstybių narių ir trečiųjų šalių oro susisiekimo paslaugų susitarimais, jų priedais, taip pat kitomis susijusiomis dvišalėmis ir daugiašalėmis priemonėmis.Pagal Europos Bendrijų Teisingumo Teismo sprendimus bylose C-466/98, C-467/98, C-468/98, C-471/98, C-472/98, C-475/98 ir C-476/98 Bendrija turi išimtinę kompetenciją dėl įvairių išorės aviacijos aspektų. Teisingumo Teismas taip pat išaiškino Bendrijos oro vežėjų teisę naudotis įsisteigimo Bendrijos teritorijoje teise, įskaitant ir teisę į nediskriminacinį patekimą į rinką.Tradiciniai valstybių narių dvišalių oro susisiekimo paslaugų susitarimų paskyrimų straipsniai pažeidžia Bendrijos teisę. Jie leidžia trečiajai šaliai atmesti, panaikinti arba sustabdyti leidimą arba įgaliojimą oro vežėjui, kurį paskyrė valstybė narė, tačiau kurio pagrindinis akcijų paketas nepriklauso tai valstybei narei ar jos nacionaliniam subjektui ir kuris nėra veiksmingai jų kontroliuojamas. Tai buvo įvertinta kaip oro vežėjų, kurie yra įsisteigę vienoje valstybėje narėje, bet priklauso ir yra kontroliuojami kitos valstybės narės, diskriminavimas. Tai prieštarauja 43 Sutarties straipsniui, kuriuo kitų valstybių narių subjektams užtikrinamos tokios pat įsisteigimo sąlygos, kaip ir tos valstybės narės, kurioje steigiamasi, subjektams.Pagal Teisingumo Teismo sprendimus Taryba 2003 m. birželio mėn. leido Komisijai pradėti derybas su trečiosiomis šalimis dėl tam tikrų galiojančių dvišalių susitarimų nuostatų pakeitimo Bendrijos susitarimo nuostatomis[1].Pagal Tarybos sprendimo priede pateiktus mechanizmus ir direktyvines nuostatas, leidžiančias Komisijai pradėti derybas su trečiosiomis šalimis dėl tam tikrų galiojančių dvišalių susitarimų nuostatų pakeitimo Bendrijos susitarimo nuostatomis, Komisija vedė derybas su Libano Respublika dėl susitarimo, kuriuo būtų pakeistos tam tikros galiojančių valstybių narių ir Libano Respublikos dvišalių susitarimų dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų nuostatos. Susitarimo 2 straipsnis keičia tradicinius paskyrimų straipsnius Bendrijos paskyrimų straipsniu, leidžiančiu visiems Bendrijos oro vežėjams naudotis įsisteigimo teise. Susitarimo 4 ir 5 straipsniuose apibrėžiamos dviejų tipų nuostatos, susijusios su Bendrijos kompetencija. 4 straipsnyje yra apibrėžiamas aviacinių degalų apmokestinimas, kuris buvo suderintas Tarybos direktyva 2003/96/EB, pakeičiančia Bendrijos energetikos produktų ir elektros energijos mokesčių struktūrą, ypač jos 14 straipsnio 2 dalimi. 5 straipsniu (kainodara) išsprendžiamos teisinės kolizijos tarp galiojančių dvišalių susitarimų dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų ir Tarybos reglamento Nr. 2409/92 dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų kainų ir tarifų, kuriuo draudžiama trečiosios šalies oro vežėjams būti vežimo kainų lyderiais teikiant oro susisiekimo paslaugas visoje Bendrijos teritorijoje.Tarybos yra prašoma patvirtinti sprendimą dėl Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų pasirašymo ir laikino taikymo ir paskirti asmenis, kuriems suteikiami įgaliojimai pasirašyti susitarimą Bendrijos vardu.PasiūlymasTARYBOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų pasirašymo ir laikino taikymoEUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,Atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 80 straipsnio 2 dalį, siejamą su 300 straipsnio 2 dalies pirmosios pastraipos pirmuoju sakiniu,atsižvelgdama į Komisijos pasiūlymą[2]kadangi:2003 m. birželio 5 d. Taryba leido Komisijai pradėti derybas su trečiosiomis šalimis dėl kai kurių galiojančių dvišalių susitarimų nuostatų pakeitimo susitarimu su Bendrija;Komisija Bendrijos vardu vedė derybas su Libano Respublika dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų pagal Tarybos sprendimo priede pateiktus mechanizmus ir direktyvines nuostatas, leidžiančias Komisijai pradėti derybas su trečiosiomis šalimis dėl tam tikrų galiojančių dvišalių susitarimų nuostatų pakeitimo susitarimu su Bendrija;Susitarimą, dėl kurio Komisija veda derybas, sudarius vėliau, jis turės būti pasirašytas ir laikinai taikomas.NUSPRENDĖ:Vienintelis straipsnis1. Tarybos pirmininkas įgaliojamas paskirti asmenį (-is), kuriam (-iems) suteikiami įgaliojimai Bendrijos vardu pasirašyti Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimą dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų, kai jis bus vėliau sudarytas.2. Kol įsigalios, susitarimas laikinai taikomas nuo pirmos pirmojo mėnesio, einančio po šalių pranešimo datos viena kitai apie šiam tikslui skirtų procedūrų baigimo, dienos. Pranešti įgaliojamas Tarybos pirmininkas, kaip numatyta Susitarimo 8 straipsnio 2 dalyje.3. Susitarimo tekstas pridedamas prie šio sprendimo.Priimta Briuselyje,Tarybos varduPirmininkas2005/0012 (CNS)PasiūlymasTARYBOS SPRENDIMASdėl Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų sudarymoEUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,Atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 80 straipsnio 2 dalį, siejamą su 300 straipsnio 2 dalies pirmosios pastraipos pirmuoju sakiniu ir 300 straipsnio 3 dalies pirma pastraipa,atsižvelgdama į Komisijos pasiūlymą[3]atsižvelgdama į Europos Parlamento nuomonę[4]kadangi:(1) 2003 m. birželio 5 d. Taryba leido Komisijai pradėti derybas su trečiosiomis šalimis dėl kai kurių galiojančių dvišalių susitarimų nuostatų pakeitimo susitarimu su Bendrija;(2) Komisija Bendrijos vardu vedė derybas su Libano Respublika dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų pagal Tarybos sprendimo priede pateiktus mechanizmus ir direktyvines nuostatas, leidžiančias Komisijai pradėti derybas su trečiosiomis šalimis dėl tam tikrų galiojančių dvišalių susitarimų nuostatų pakeitimo susitarimu su Bendrija;(3) Šis susitarimas Bendrijos vardu buvo pasirašytas [data], numatant jo vėlesnį sudarymą pagal Tarybos sprendimą .../.../EB [data][5](4) Šis susitarimas turi būti patvirtintas.NUSPRENDĖ:1 straipsnis1. Bendrijos vardu tvirtinamas Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimas dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektų.2. Susitarimo tekstas pridedamas prie šio sprendimo.2 straipsnisTarybos pirmininkas paskiria už pranešimą atsakingą asmenį, kaip numatyta Susitarimo 8 straipsnio 1 dalyje.Priimta Briuselyje,Tarybos varduPirmininkasPriedasSUSITARIMASTarpEuropos Bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos dėl tam tikrų oro susisiekimo paslaugų aspektųEUROPOS BENDRIJAirLIBANO RESPUBLIKA(toliau – šalys)PAŽYMĖDAMOS, kad dvišaliuose oro susisiekimo paslaugų susitarimuose, sudarytuose tarp Europos Bendrijos valstybių narių ir Libano Respublikos, yra nuostatų, prieštaraujančių Europos bendrijos teisei,PAŽYMĖDAMOS, kad Europos bendrija turi išskirtinę kompetenciją kelių aspektų, kurie gali būti įtraukti į dvišalius susitarimus dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų tarp Europos bendrijos valstybių narių ir trečiųjų šalių, atžvilgiu,PAŽYMĖDAMOS, kad pagal Europos bendrijos teisę, Bendrijos oro vežėjai, įsisteigę valstybėje narėje, turi teisę be diskriminacijos patekti į oro susisiekimo maršrutus tarp Europos bendrijos valstybių narių ir trečiųjų šalių,ATSIŽVELGDAMOS į susitarimus tarp Europos bendrijos ir kai kurių trečiųjų šalių, numatančių galimybę tokių trečiųjų šalių piliečiams įsigyti Europos bendrijos valstybių narių oro vežėjų, turinčių licencijas oro susisiekimui vykdyti, bendrovių nuosavybės dalį;PRIPAŽINDAMOS, kad Europos bendrijos valstybių narių ir Libano Respublikos dvišalių susitarimų dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų nuostatos, prieštaraujančios Bendrijos teisei, turi būti visiškai suderintos su Bendrijos teise, kad būtų sukurtas tvirtas teisinis pagrindas oro susisiekimo paslaugoms tarp Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos, ir užtikrintas tokių oro susisiekimo paslaugų tęstinumas,PAŽYMĖDAMOS, kad Europos bendrija, dalyvaudama šiose derybose, nesiekia didinti oro eismo tarp Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos masto, daryti poveikį pusiausvyrai tarp Bendrijos oro vežėjų ir Libano Respublikos oro vežėjų, arba derėtis dėl esamų susitarimų oro susisiekimo paslaugų nuostatų, susijusių su skrydžių teisėmis.SUSITARĖ:1 straipsnis Bendrosios nuostatos1. Šiame susitarime „valstybės narės“ yra Europos bendrijos valstybės narės.2. Kiekviename iš 1 priede išvardytų susitarimų daroma nuoroda į valstybės narės, kuri yra to susitarimo šalis, piliečius, yra suprantama kaip nuoroda į Europos bendrijos valstybių narių piliečius.3. Kiekviename iš 1 priede išvardytų susitarimų daroma nuoroda į valstybės narės, kuri yra to susitarimo šalis, oro vežėjus ar oro linijų bendroves, yra suprantama, kaip nuoroda į tos valstybės narės paskirtus oro vežėjus ar oro linijų bendroves.2 straipsnis Valstybės narės paskyrimas1. Šio straipsnio 2 ir 3 dalys pakeičia atitinkamų 2 priedo (a) ir (b) punktuose išvardytų straipsnių nuostatas dėl atitinkamos valstybės narės oro vežėjo paskyrimo, Libano Respublikos jam suteiktų licencijų oro susisiekimui vykdyti ar leidimų bei atsisakymo išduoti licencijas oro susisiekimui vykdyti ar leidimus tokiam oro vežėjui, jo licencijų oro susisiekimui vykdyti ar leidimų atšaukimo, laikino galiojimo sustabdymo ar apribojimo.2. Gavusi valstybės narės paskyrimą, Libano Respublika kiek įmanoma greitai suteikia atitinkamas licencijas ir leidimus, jeigu:i. oro vežėjas yra įsisteigęs paskiriančiosios valstybės narės teritorijoje pagal Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį ir turi galiojančią licenciją oro susisiekimui vykdyti pagal Europos Bendrijos teisę;ii. už oro vežėjo pažymėjimo išdavimą atsakinga valstybė narė užtikrina veiksmingą oro vežėjo veiklos kontrolę, ir paskyrime yra aiškiai nurodyta atitinkama aviacijos kontrolės institucija; iriii. oro vežėją tiesiogiai valdo arba jo kontrolinį akcijų paketą valdo valstybės narės ir (arba) valstybių narių piliečiai arba kitos 3 priede išvardytos valstybės ir (arba) tokių valstybių piliečiai, ir jį nuolat veiksmingai kontroliuoja tokios valstybės narės ir (arba) jų piliečiai.3. Libano Respublika gali atsisakyti išduoti, atšaukti, laikinai sustabdyti ar apriboti valstybės narės paskirtojo oro vežėjo licencijas oro susisiekimui vykdyti ar leidimus, jeigu:i. oro vežėjas nėra įsisteigęs paskiriančiosios valstybės narės teritorijoje pagal Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį arba neturi galiojančios licencijos oro susisiekimui vykdyti pagal Bendrijos teisę;ii. už oro vežėjo pažymėjimo išdavimą atsakingoji valstybė narė neužtikrina veiksmingos oro vežėjo veiklos kontrolės, ir paskyrime nėra nurodyta atitinkama aviacijos kontrolės institucija; arbaiii. oro vežėjas nėra tiesiogiai ar per savo kontrolinį akcijų paketą valdomas valstybių narių ir (arba) valstybių narių piliečių arba 3 priede išvardytų kitų valstybių ir (arba) tų valstybių piliečių;Naudodamasi šioje dalyje nustatyta savo teise, Libano Respublika nediskriminuoja Bendrijos oro vežėjų dėl jų nacionalinės priklausomybės.3 straipsnis Su kontrole susijusios teisės1. šio straipsnio 2 dalies nuostatos papildo 2 priedo c punkte išvardytus straipsnius.2. Jeigu valstybė narė paskiria oro vežėją, kurį valdo ir kontroliuoja kita valstybė narė, Libano Respublikos teisės, pagal saugumą reglamentuojančias oro vežėją paskyrusios valstybės narės ir Libano respublikos susitarimo nuostatas, jos taikomos, kai kita valstybė narė priima ar įgyvendina saugos standartus ir išduoda oro vežėjui licenciją oro susisiekimui vykdyti.4 straipsnis Aviacinių degalų apmokestinimas1. Šio straipsnio 2 dalies nuostatos papildo atitinkamas 2 priedo d punkte apibrėžtas nuostatas.2. Nepaisant jokių kitų priešingų nuostatų, jokia 2 priedo d dalyje išvardytų susitarimų nuostata nedraudžia valstybėms narėms nustatyti mokesčius, rinkliavas, muitus ar mokesčius už kurą, tiekiamą į Libano respublikos paskirtojo oro vežėjo orlaivį, kai toks oro vežėjas vykdo skrydžius iš vieno valstybės narės teritorijos punkto į kitą tos pačios arba kitos valstybės narės teritorijos punktą.5 straipsnis Vežimo Europos bendrijoje tarifai1. Šio straipsnio 2 dalies nuostatos papildo 2 priedo e punkte išvardytus straipsnius.2. Pagal 1 priede nurodytą susitarimą, kuriame yra 2 priedo e punkte išvardytos nuostatos dėl vežimo tiktai Bendrijos teritorijoje, Libano Respublikos paskirtasis(-ieji) oro vežėjas(-ai) taiko tarifus pagal Bendrijos teisę, laikantis nediskriminavimo principo.6 straipsnis Susitarimo priedaiŠio susitarimo priedai yra neatskiriama susitarimo dalis.7 straipsnis Peržiūra ir dalinis pakeitimasŠalys bet kuriuo metu abipusiu susitarimu gali iš naujo apsvarstyti ir iš dalies pakeisti šį susitarimą.8 straipsnis Įsigaliojimas ir laikinas taikymas1. Šis susitarimas įsigalioja, kai šalys praneša viena kitai raštu, jog visos jų vidaus procedūros, reikalingos šiam susitarimui įsigalioti, yra užbaigtos.2. Nepaisydamos 1 dalies, šalys susitaria taikyti šį susitarimą nuo pirmosios mėnesio, einančio po mėnesio, per kurį šalys praneša viena kitai apie visų procedūrų, reikalingų šio susitarimo įsigaliojimui, užbaigimą, dienos.3. Susitarimai ir kitokios sutartys tarp valstybių narių ir Libano Respublikos, kurie šio susitarimo pasirašymo dieną dar neįsigaliojo ir nėra taikomi laikinai, yra išvardyti 1 priedo b punkte. Šis susitarimas taikomas visiems tokiems susitarimams ir kitoms sutartims, kurie įsigalios ar bus pradėti taikyti laikinai.9 straipsnis Nutraukimas1. Jeigu 1 priede nurodytas susitarimas yra nutraukiamas, visos šio susitarimo nuostatos, susijusios su 1 priede nurodytu susitarimu, netenka galios tuo pat metu.2. Jeigu yra nutraukiami visi 1 priede išvardyti susitarimai, šis susitarimas taip pat netenka galios.TAI PATVIRTINDAMI, toliau nurodyti tinkamai įgalioti asmenys pasirašė šį susitarimą.Šis Susitarimas sudarytas [....] dviem egzemplioriais [...] anglų, čekų, danų, estų, graikų, italų, ispanų, latvių, lenkų, lietuvių, maltiečių, olandų, portugalų, prancūzų, slovakų, slovėnų, suomių, švedų, vengrų, vokiečių ir arabų kalbomis. Esant bet kokiems neatitikimams, galioja tekstas anglų kalba.EUROPOS BENDRIJOS VARDU LIBANO RESPUBLIKOS VARDU1 priedasŠio susitarimo 1 straipsnyje minimų susitarimų sąrašas(a) Susitarimai dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų tarp Libano Respublikos ir Europos bendrijos valstybių narių, kurie šio susitarimo pasirašymo dieną yra sudaryti, pasirašyti ir (arba) taikomi laikinai- Austrijos Federalinės Vyriausybės ir Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų jų teritorijoje ir už jų ribų, pasirašytas Beirute 1969 m. balandžio 2 d. su paskutiniais pakeitimais (toliau – Libano – Austrijos susitarimas)- Belgijos Vyriausybės ir Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų jų teritorijoje ir už jų ribų, pasirašytas Beirute 1953 m. gruodžio 24 d. su paskutiniais pakeitimais (toliau – Libano – Belgijos susitarimas)- Kipro Respublikos Vyriausybės ir Libano Vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo, parafuotas 1996 m. gegužės 23 d. (toliau – Libano – Kipro susitarimas);- Čekijos Respublikos Vyriausybės ir Libano Vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo, sudarytas Beirute 2003 m. rugsėjo 22 d. (toliau – Libano – Čekijos Respublikos susitarimas);- Danijos ir Libano susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo, sudarytas Beirute 1955 m. spalio 21 d. (toliau – Libano – Danijos susitarimas)- Prancūzijos Respublikos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo , parafuotas Prancūzijos Respublikai ir Libano Respublikai atstovaujančių delegacijų konsultavimosi protokolu, pasirašytu Paryžiuje 1998 birželio 24 d., projektas (toliau Libano – Prancūzijos susitarimo projektas)- Vokietijos Federalinės Respublikos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimas dėl oro transporto , pasirašytas Beirute 1961 m. kovo 15 d. su paskutiniais pakeitimais (toliau – Libano – Vokietijos susitarimas)- Federalinės Vokietijos Vyriausybė ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl oro susisiekimo projektas , parafuotas ir pridėtas prie Protokolo, pasirašyto Bonoje 2002 sausio 16 d. (toliau – Peržiūrėtas Libano – Vokietijos susitarimo projektas);- Graikijos Karalystės Vyriausybės ir Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo nustatymo tarp šalių, sudarytas Beirute 1948m. rugsėjo 6 d. (toliau Libano – Graikijos susitarimas);- Vengrijos Liaudies Respublikos ir Libano Respublikos susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo , sudarytas Beirute 1966 m. sausio 15 d. (toliau – Libano – Vengrijos susitarimas);- Italijos Vyriausybės ir Libano Respublikos susitarimas dėl oro transporto , sudarytas Beirute 1949 m. sausio 24 d. su paskutiniais pakeitimais (toliau – Libano – Italijos susitarimas);- Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės ir didžiosios Liuksemburgo Hercogystės vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro transporto , parafuotas ir pridėtas prie Konfidencialaus Susitarimo Memorandumo, pasirašyto Beirute 1998 m. spalio 23 d., kaip B priedas(toliau – Libano – Liuksemburgo susitarimo projektas);- Maltos Vyriausybė ir Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės susitarimo dėl oro susisiekimo projektas , parafuotas ir pridėtas prie Protokolo, pasirašyto Beirute 1999 balandžio 30 d., kaip B priedas (toliau – Libano – Maltos susitarimo projektas);- Nyderlandų Karalystės ir Libano Respublikos susitarimas dėl oro transporto , sudarytas Beirute 1949 m. rugsėjo 20 d. (toliau – Libano – Nyderlandų susitarimas);- Lenkijos Liaudies Respublikos Vyriausybės ir Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo , sudarytas Beirute 1966 m. balandžio 25 d. (toliau – Libano – Lenkijos susitarimas);- Švedijos ir Libano susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo , sudarytas Beirute 1953 m. kovo 23 d. (toliau – Libano – Švedijos susitarimas)- Jungtinės Didžiosios Britanijos ir Šiaurės Airijos Karalystės vyriausybės ir Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės susitarimas dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų jų teritorijoje ir už jų ribų , pasirašytas Beirute 1951 m. rugpjūčio 15 d. su paskutiniais pakeitimais( toliau – Libano – Jungtinės Karalystės susitarimas)(b) Parafuoti ar pasirašyti Libano Respublikos Vyriausybės ir Europos bendrijos valstybių narių susitarimai ir kitos sutartys dėl oro susisiekimo paslaugų, kurie šio susitarimo pasirašymo dieną dar neįsigaliojo arba laikinai nėra taikomi- Ispanijos Karalystės ir Libano Respublikos susitarimo dėl oro susisiekimo projektas , parafuotas Madride 1997 m. balandžio 21 d. (toliau – Libano – Ispanijos susitarimo projektas)2 priedasŠio susitarimo 1 priede išvardytų ir 2–5 straipsniuose minimų susitarimų straipsniaia) Valstybės narės paskyrimas:- Libano ir Austrijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Belgijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Kipro susitarimo projekto 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Čekijos Respublikos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Prancūzijos susitarimo projekto 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vokietijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vengrijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Liuksemburgo susitarimo projekto 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Maltos susitarimo projekto 6 straipsnis;- Libano ir Lenkijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Ispanijos susitarimo projekto 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Jungtinės Karalystės susitarimo 4 straipsnis;b) Atsisakymas išduoti licencijas oro susisiekimui vykdyti ar leidimus, jų atšaukimas, laikinas galiojimo sustabdymas arba apribojimas:- Libano ir Austrijos susitarimo 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Belgijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Kipro susitarimo projekto 5 straipsnis;- Libano ir Čekijos Respublikos susitarimo 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Danijos susitarimo 5 straipsnis;- Libano ir Prancūzijos susitarimo projekto 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vokietijos susitarimo 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Graikijos susitarimo 6 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vengrijos susitarimo 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Italijos susitarimo 6 straipsnis;- Libano ir Liuksemburgo susitarimo projekto 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Maltos susitarimo projekto 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Nyderlandų susitarimo 6 straipsnis;- Libano ir Lenkijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Ispanijos susitarimo projekto 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Švedijos susitarimo 5 straipsnis;- Libano ir Jungtinės Karalystės susitarimo 4 straipsnis;(c) Reguliavimo kontrolė:- Libano ir Austrijos susitarimo 7a straipsnis;- Libano ir Čekijos Respublikos susitarimo 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Prancūzijos susitarimo projekto 8 straipsnis;- Libano ir Liuksemburgo susitarimo projekto 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vokietijos peržiūrėto susitarimo projekto 6 straipsnis;(d) Aviacinio kuro apmokestinimas:- Libano ir Austrijos susitarimo 5 straipsnis;- Libano ir Belgijos susitarimo 4 straipsnis;- Libano ir Kipro susitarimo projekto 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Čekijos Respublikos susitarimo 8 straipsnis;- Libano ir Danijos susitarimo 9 straipsnis;- Libano ir Prancūzijos susitarimo projekto 10 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vokietijos susitarimo 6 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vokietijos peržiūrėto susitarimo projekto 10 straipsnis;- Libano ir Graikijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vengrijos susitarimo 14 straipsnis;- Libano ir Italijos susitarimo 3 straipsnis;- Libano ir Liuksemburgo susitarimo projekto 8 straipsnis;- Libano ir Maltos susitarimo projekto 9 straipsnis;- Libano ir Lenkijos susitarimo 6 straipsnis;- Libano ir Ispanijos susitarimo projekto 5 straipsnis;- Libano ir Švedijos susitarimo 9 straipsnis;- Libano ir Jungtinės Karalystės susitarimo 5 straipsnis;(e) Vežimo Europos bendrijoje tarifai:- Libano ir Austrijos susitarimo 9 straipsnis;- Libano ir Belgijos susitarimo 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Kipro susitarimo projekto 16 straipsnis;- Libano ir Čekijos Respublikos susitarimo 12 straipsnis;- Libano ir Danijos susitarimo 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Prancūzijos susitarimo projekto 14 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vokietijos susitarimo 9 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vokietijos peržiūrėto susitarimo projekto 14 straipsnis;- Libano ir Vengrijos susitarimo 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Liuksemburgo susitarimo projekto 13 straipsnis;- Libano ir Maltos susitarimo projekto 14 straipsnis;- Libano ir Lenkijos susitarimo 10 straipsnis;- Libano ir Ispanijos susitarimo projekto 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Švedijos susitarimo 7 straipsnis;- Libano ir Jungtinės Karalystės susitarimo 7 straipsnis;3 priedasKitų šio susitarimo 2 straipsnyje minimų valstybių sąrašasa) Islandijos Respublika (pagal Europos ekonominės erdvės sutartį);b) Lichtenšteino Kunigaikštystė (pagal Europos ekonominės erdvės sutartį);c) Norvegijos Karalystė (pagal Europos ekonominės erdvės sutartį);d) Šveicarijos Konfederacija (pagal susitarimą tarp Europos bendrijos ir Šveicarijos oro transporto konfederacijos).[1] 2003 m. bir ̨elio 5 d. Tarybos sprendimas 11323/03 (ribotam naudojimui)[2] OL C[...], [...], p. [...].[3] OL C[...], [...], p. [...].[4] OL C[...], [...], p. [...].[5] OL C[...], [...], p. [...].