Represent the dialog for retrieving similar scenarios Speaker1: you might find this interesting <file_other> The title sounds like a clickbait but there's a lot of interesting thoughts with no brainwash attempts. You'll like it
Speaker2: Give me a sec.
Speaker1: Sure
Speaker2: An interesting article indeed. I still think the whole idea of that conflict is a bit blown out of proportion to control the masses. Us vs them. In reality, both China and the US are capably of being fully independent.
Speaker1: I agree to a certain extent.
Speaker2: Elaborate please
Speaker1: The "we have to create  a state of permanent threat for people to need us" approach but as a historian I know everything works in cycles of war.
Speaker2: There are plenty of wars out there. And they are both so huge that their internal doings should be fully sustainable. Plus the US makes enormous profit on arms industry. 
Speaker1: If you want profit from arms industry, you need wars. More wars = more profit
Speaker2: I just think the conflict wouldn't make sense from an economic standpoint. And as much of a crackpot Trump is, he realizes that.
Speaker1: We're talking about the same Trump who refused meeting with Putin at the g20 summit after Russia attacked the Ukraine?
Speaker2: I honestly believe they discuss their issues behind closed doors. Known each other for years.
Speaker1: Yes, but had the meet happened, he would've had to condemn Putin on an international arena. So he remedied the situation by avoiding it completely.
Speaker2: That doesn't matter. It's just PR stunts anyway. Mostly. And the US doesn't really care about Europe
Speaker1: They never have. But they have quite a large influence on Us policies
Speaker2: That doesn't really matter either. It's not the government who will decide but corporate lobbyists. 
Speaker1: Yes but if they feel like they want to retain control they will just need an excuse to start something
Speaker2: Not without business support. It's all about making money anyway, what does "power" even mean anymore?
Speaker1: Power always needs conflict
Represent the dialog scenario for retrieval Speaker1 and Speaker2 discuss world politics after Speaker1 sends Speaker2 an article. Speaker2 doesn't think that the US will go to war as it's not profitable. Speaker1 believes that certain groups might push for an armed conflict to profit more. Speaker1 believes history works in cycles of war.
Represent the dialog scenario for retrieval Speaker1 doesn't like Speaker2 texting her boyfriend, Jim Andrews. Jim is Speaker2's co-worker so Speaker2 needs to communicate with him.