title: 'Kōrero Tuku Iho': Reconfiguring Oral History and Oral Tradition

authors: Mahuika, Nepia

subjects: History

abstract: The studies of oral history and oral tradition each have their own distinctive bodies of literature and preferred methodologies, yet share significant overlaps that make them difficult to differentiate. For many indigenous peoples, oral histories and traditions are key to their their past, present, and future lives, and are rarely considered separate. This thesis examines the differences and similarities between the studies of oral history and oral tradition. It explores how these areas of research converge and diverge in form, politics, practice, and theory, and the extent to which they resonate within a specific ‘indigenous’ context and community.
The thesis draws on the life narrative interviews of four generations of Ngāti Porou descendents, the second largest tribal group in New Zealand, whose home boundaries extend from Potikirua in the north to Te Toka-a-Taiau in the south on the East Coast of the North Island. Drawing on these voices, this study offers a commentary on the form and nature of oral traditions and histories from an indigenous perspective, and explores the ways they converge and depart from ‘international’ understandings. An exploration of these intersections offers insights to the ways oral history and oral traditions might be reconsidered as distinctive fields of study. Reconfigured through an indigenous frame of reference, this thesis challenges scholars of both oral history and oral tradition to expand their conceptions. Likewise, it urges indigenous scholars to consider more deeply the work of oral historians and oral traditionalists to further enhance their scholarship. Moreover, this thesis revisits the intellectual and conceptual territory that names and claims oral history and oral tradition, and invites all those who work in these areas to develop a more extensive comprehension of the interconnections that exist between each area of study.

text: 'Kōrero Tuku Iho': Reconfiguring Oral History and Oral Tradition The studies of oral history and oral tradition each have their own distinctive bodies of literature and preferred methodologies, yet share significant overlaps that make them difficult to differentiate. For many indigenous peoples, oral histories and traditions are key to their their past, present, and future lives, and are rarely considered separate. This thesis examines the differences and similarities between the studies of oral history and oral tradition. It explores how these areas of research converge and diverge in form, politics, practice, and theory, and the extent to which they resonate within a specific ‘indigenous’ context and community.
The thesis draws on the life narrative interviews of four generations of Ngāti Porou descendents, the second largest tribal group in New Zealand, whose home boundaries extend from Potikirua in the north to Te Toka-a-Taiau in the south on the East Coast of the North Island. Drawing on these voices, this study offers a commentary on the form and nature of oral traditions and histories from an indigenous perspective, and explores the ways they converge and depart from ‘international’ understandings. An exploration of these intersections offers insights to the ways oral history and oral traditions might be reconsidered as distinctive fields of study. Reconfigured through an indigenous frame of reference, this thesis challenges scholars of both oral history and oral tradition to expand their conceptions. Likewise, it urges indigenous scholars to consider more deeply the work of oral historians and oral traditionalists to further enhance their scholarship. Moreover, this thesis revisits the intellectual and conceptual territory that names and claims oral history and oral tradition, and invites all those who work in these areas to develop a more extensive comprehension of the interconnections that exist between each area of study.

year: 2012

title: Bilingual/immersion education in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Setting the context.

authors: May, Stephen

subjects: bilingual education

abstract: Introduction to a special issue of IJBEB, focusing on recent developments in bilingual/
immersion education in Aotearoa/New Zealand, particularly, but not solely,
Maori-medium education.

text: Bilingual/immersion education in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Setting the context. Introduction to a special issue of IJBEB, focusing on recent developments in bilingual/
immersion education in Aotearoa/New Zealand, particularly, but not solely,
Maori-medium education.

year: 2005-01-01

title: Determinants of risky decision-making: What is peer influence?

authors: Andrews, Tegan Emily Anne-Marie

subjects: Peer influence

abstract: Impulsive and risky decision-making have been linked to dangerous driving, substance use, gambling, overspending, and general delinquency. The aim of the series of studies presented in this thesis was to gain an understanding into contextual factors that influence decision-making, focusing on the effects of peers, age, and gender. Article 1 (Chapter 2) reports on a single study where participants completed a delay-discounting task either alone, or in the presence of a same-aged peer of the same gender. Those in the peer condition exhibited significantly greater rates of discounting compared to those alone when comparing the area under the curve; however, there was no significant difference between the discount rates (k) between those in the peer condition and those in the alone condition. Due to difficulty with recruitment, we had a small sample, therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Article 2 (Chapter 3) presents two studies which examine the difference between peer presence, and peer influence (when peers provide an opinion) on risk-taking. In both studies, we used three hypothetical probabilistic-discounting scenarios to examine risk-taking. The first study investigated risk-taking under three conditions: peer absence, peer presence, and negative peer influence (risk-promoting peer). The second study added a fourth condition, positive peer influence (risk-averse peer), to examine whether positive peer influence was more like peer absence, or peer presence. Both studies showed that participants exhibited the greatest amount of risk-taking in the negative peer-influence condition, compared to both the peer-present and peer-absent conditions. Risk-taking was also greater in the peer-present condition compared to in the peer-absent condition. Therefore, both the presence and negative influence of peers increased risk-taking. The results of the second study in Article 2 extended our findings, showing that positive peer influence resulted in the lowest rates of risk-taking behaviour, lower than when decision-making occurred in the absence of peers.
Article 3 (Chapter 4) outlines two studies which examined whether peer influence extends to other social relationships. The first study in Article 3 investigated whether risk-taking differs under the influence of parents, partners, and friends. We found that risk-taking was higher for parents and partners, compared to friends. We hypothesised that people were more influenced by their partners and parents as they had a closer relationship with them, compared to friends. Thus, the second study in Article 3 examined whether risk-taking differed based on the closeness of the relationship. Using a combination of probability and social discounting methods, we asked participants how likely they would be to risk receiving a fine for five social contacts of varied degrees of closeness. We found that risk-taking systematically differed based on the closeness of the relationship. Participants exhibited greater risk-taking for a closer social contact, compared to a more distant social contact. We also examined the effects of age and gender on decision-making across the five studies presented in this thesis. Our findings provided little evidence that risk-taking was related to age, however, there was some evidence that risk-taking of younger participants may be more influenced by peers than risk-taking of older participants. Risk-taking between men and women was similar and susceptibility to the presence and influence of peers was also similar between men and women. Collectively, these studies illustrate that both the presence and influence of peers affect decision-making, however, providing a direct influence has a greater effect. The greatest risk-taking occurs when peers provided a risk-promoting opinion, and the least when peers provided a risk-averse opinion. The influence of peers is not just limited to friends, but peer influence extended to others, such as romantic partners and parents. People were most influenced by those with whom they had a closer relationship. Thus, the social context wherein decision-making occurs is fundamental to the likelihood of risky choices.

text: Determinants of risky decision-making: What is peer influence? Impulsive and risky decision-making have been linked to dangerous driving, substance use, gambling, overspending, and general delinquency. The aim of the series of studies presented in this thesis was to gain an understanding into contextual factors that influence decision-making, focusing on the effects of peers, age, and gender. Article 1 (Chapter 2) reports on a single study where participants completed a delay-discounting task either alone, or in the presence of a same-aged peer of the same gender. Those in the peer condition exhibited significantly greater rates of discounting compared to those alone when comparing the area under the curve; however, there was no significant difference between the discount rates (k) between those in the peer condition and those in the alone condition. Due to difficulty with recruitment, we had a small sample, therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Article 2 (Chapter 3) presents two studies which examine the difference between peer presence, and peer influence (when peers provide an opinion) on risk-taking. In both studies, we used three hypothetical probabilistic-discounting scenarios to examine risk-taking. The first study investigated risk-taking under three conditions: peer absence, peer presence, and negative peer influence (risk-promoting peer). The second study added a fourth condition, positive peer influence (risk-averse peer), to examine whether positive peer influence was more like peer absence, or peer presence. Both studies showed that participants exhibited the greatest amount of risk-taking in the negative peer-influence condition, compared to both the peer-present and peer-absent conditions. Risk-taking was also greater in the peer-present condition compared to in the peer-absent condition. Therefore, both the presence and negative influence of peers increased risk-taking. The results of the second study in Article 2 extended our findings, showing that positive peer influence resulted in the lowest rates of risk-taking behaviour, lower than when decision-making occurred in the absence of peers.
Article 3 (Chapter 4) outlines two studies which examined whether peer influence extends to other social relationships. The first study in Article 3 investigated whether risk-taking differs under the influence of parents, partners, and friends. We found that risk-taking was higher for parents and partners, compared to friends. We hypothesised that people were more influenced by their partners and parents as they had a closer relationship with them, compared to friends. Thus, the second study in Article 3 examined whether risk-taking differed based on the closeness of the relationship. Using a combination of probability and social discounting methods, we asked participants how likely they would be to risk receiving a fine for five social contacts of varied degrees of closeness. We found that risk-taking systematically differed based on the closeness of the relationship. Participants exhibited greater risk-taking for a closer social contact, compared to a more distant social contact. We also examined the effects of age and gender on decision-making across the five studies presented in this thesis. Our findings provided little evidence that risk-taking was related to age, however, there was some evidence that risk-taking of younger participants may be more influenced by peers than risk-taking of older participants. Risk-taking between men and women was similar and susceptibility to the presence and influence of peers was also similar between men and women. Collectively, these studies illustrate that both the presence and influence of peers affect decision-making, however, providing a direct influence has a greater effect. The greatest risk-taking occurs when peers provided a risk-promoting opinion, and the least when peers provided a risk-averse opinion. The influence of peers is not just limited to friends, but peer influence extended to others, such as romantic partners and parents. People were most influenced by those with whom they had a closer relationship. Thus, the social context wherein decision-making occurs is fundamental to the likelihood of risky choices.

year: 2022