title: Influences of catchment and corridor imperviousness on urban stream macroinvertebrate communities at multiple spatial scales

authors: Collier, Kevin J.

subjects: stormwater

abstract: Resolving land cover hierarchy relationships in urban settings is important for defining the scale and type of management required to enhance stream health. We investigated associations between macroinvertebrate assemblages in urban streams of Hamilton, New Zealand, and environmental variables measured at multiple spatial scales comprising (i) local-scale physicochemical conditions, (ii) impervious area in multiple stream corridor widths (30, 50 and 100 m) along segments (sections of stream between tributary nodes) and for entire upstream networks, and (iii) total impervious area in stream segment sub-catchments and upstream catchments. Imperviousness was higher for stream segment subcatchments than for entire catchments because of the agricultural headwaters of some urban streams. Imperviousness declined as corridor width declined at both segment and catchment scales reflecting the vegetated cover along most urban stream gullies. Upstream catchment imperviousness was strongly and inversely correlated with dissolved organic carbon concentration, whereas segment and upstream corridor scales were correlated with water temperature and pH. Corridor imperviousness appeared to be a stronger predictor than catchment imperviousness of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera taxa richness and the Quantitative Urban Community Index specifically developed to assess impacts of urbanisation. In contrast, imperviousness at all measured scales added only marginal improvement in assemblage-based models over that provided by the local-scale physicochemical variables of reach width, habitat quality, macrophyte cover, pH and dissolved oxygen concentration. These findings infer variable scales of influence affecting macroinvertebrate communities in urban streams and suggest that it may be important to consider local and corridor factors when determining mechanisms of urbanisation impacts and potential management options.

text: Influences of catchment and corridor imperviousness on urban stream macroinvertebrate communities at multiple spatial scales Resolving land cover hierarchy relationships in urban settings is important for defining the scale and type of management required to enhance stream health. We investigated associations between macroinvertebrate assemblages in urban streams of Hamilton, New Zealand, and environmental variables measured at multiple spatial scales comprising (i) local-scale physicochemical conditions, (ii) impervious area in multiple stream corridor widths (30, 50 and 100 m) along segments (sections of stream between tributary nodes) and for entire upstream networks, and (iii) total impervious area in stream segment sub-catchments and upstream catchments. Imperviousness was higher for stream segment subcatchments than for entire catchments because of the agricultural headwaters of some urban streams. Imperviousness declined as corridor width declined at both segment and catchment scales reflecting the vegetated cover along most urban stream gullies. Upstream catchment imperviousness was strongly and inversely correlated with dissolved organic carbon concentration, whereas segment and upstream corridor scales were correlated with water temperature and pH. Corridor imperviousness appeared to be a stronger predictor than catchment imperviousness of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera taxa richness and the Quantitative Urban Community Index specifically developed to assess impacts of urbanisation. In contrast, imperviousness at all measured scales added only marginal improvement in assemblage-based models over that provided by the local-scale physicochemical variables of reach width, habitat quality, macrophyte cover, pH and dissolved oxygen concentration. These findings infer variable scales of influence affecting macroinvertebrate communities in urban streams and suggest that it may be important to consider local and corridor factors when determining mechanisms of urbanisation impacts and potential management options.

year: 2010

title: Assessment in senior secondary physical education. Questions of judgement

authors: Penney, Dawn

subjects: physical education

abstract: The ways in which various aspects of senior physical education courses should be assessed and whether some can, or indeed should be incorporated in external examinations, are matters of longstanding professional debate across Australia and internationally. Differences in current practice across Australasia reflect an ongoing lack of consensus about how assessment requirements and arrangements and particularly, examinations in senior physical education, can best address concerns to ensure validity, reliability, equity and feasibility. An issue never far from such debates is that of ‘professional judgement’ and more specifically, whether and how professional judgement does and/or should ‘come into play’ in assessment. This paper reports on research that has explored new approaches to examination assessment and marking in senior physical education, using digital technologies. It focuses specifically on the ways in which ‘professional judgement’ can be deemed to be inherent to two contrasting methods of assessment used in the project: ‘analytical standardsbased’ assessment and ‘comparative pairs’ assessment. Details of each method of assessment are presented. Data arising directly from assessors’ comments and from analysis which explored intermarker reliability for each method of assessment and compared results generated by internal teacher assessment, standards-based and comparative pairs assessment, is reported. Discussion explores whether the data arising can be seen as lending weight to arguments for (i) more faith to be placed in professional judgement and (ii) for the comparative pairs methods to be more widely employed in examination assessment in senior physical education.

text: Assessment in senior secondary physical education. Questions of judgement The ways in which various aspects of senior physical education courses should be assessed and whether some can, or indeed should be incorporated in external examinations, are matters of longstanding professional debate across Australia and internationally. Differences in current practice across Australasia reflect an ongoing lack of consensus about how assessment requirements and arrangements and particularly, examinations in senior physical education, can best address concerns to ensure validity, reliability, equity and feasibility. An issue never far from such debates is that of ‘professional judgement’ and more specifically, whether and how professional judgement does and/or should ‘come into play’ in assessment. This paper reports on research that has explored new approaches to examination assessment and marking in senior physical education, using digital technologies. It focuses specifically on the ways in which ‘professional judgement’ can be deemed to be inherent to two contrasting methods of assessment used in the project: ‘analytical standardsbased’ assessment and ‘comparative pairs’ assessment. Details of each method of assessment are presented. Data arising directly from assessors’ comments and from analysis which explored intermarker reliability for each method of assessment and compared results generated by internal teacher assessment, standards-based and comparative pairs assessment, is reported. Discussion explores whether the data arising can be seen as lending weight to arguments for (i) more faith to be placed in professional judgement and (ii) for the comparative pairs methods to be more widely employed in examination assessment in senior physical education.

year: 2011

title: New Zealand’s Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) model undermines Maori research

authors: Roa, Tom

subjects: Performance Based Research Funding

abstract: The Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) model was instigated in 2002 to increase “the quality of research through peer assessment and performance indicators” in New Zealand (Ministry of Education 2002: 17). It is used to allocate funding between universities, departments and researchers according to the putative quality and quantity of their research outputs over the preceding 6 years. PBRF is expected to incentivise improved research excellence and efficiency, and allow government to invest research funds where greatest returns will result. This is potentially a huge gain for Māori. However, “by changing the conditions of knowledge production, research assessment exercises may also alter the shape and direction of disciplines by diverting and channelling researchers’ intellectual attention and political engagement, influencing what they study, how they do it, and how they report and write” (Middleton 2009: 194). Indeed, universities repeatedly encourage researchers to focus on activities that will improve their PBRF rankings. We believe that an unintended consequence of PBRF is the creation of significant barriers to increasing the volume, scope and quality of environmental research for Māori.

text: New Zealand’s Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) model undermines Maori research The Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) model was instigated in 2002 to increase “the quality of research through peer assessment and performance indicators” in New Zealand (Ministry of Education 2002: 17). It is used to allocate funding between universities, departments and researchers according to the putative quality and quantity of their research outputs over the preceding 6 years. PBRF is expected to incentivise improved research excellence and efficiency, and allow government to invest research funds where greatest returns will result. This is potentially a huge gain for Māori. However, “by changing the conditions of knowledge production, research assessment exercises may also alter the shape and direction of disciplines by diverting and channelling researchers’ intellectual attention and political engagement, influencing what they study, how they do it, and how they report and write” (Middleton 2009: 194). Indeed, universities repeatedly encourage researchers to focus on activities that will improve their PBRF rankings. We believe that an unintended consequence of PBRF is the creation of significant barriers to increasing the volume, scope and quality of environmental research for Māori.

year: 2009