title: Final thoughts

authors: Barnard, Roger

abstract: In our introduction to this volume, we pointed out that many academic journals do not have enough space to enable the authors of empirical studies to discuss important methodological details of their projects.

text: Final thoughts In our introduction to this volume, we pointed out that many academic journals do not have enough space to enable the authors of empirical studies to discuss important methodological details of their projects.

year: 2012

title: FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC

authors: Chevalier-Watts, Juliet

abstract: The question for the United Kingdom Supreme Court was whether a bribe or secret commission received by an agent could be held by the agent on trust for his principle, or whether the principle merely had a claim in equitable compensation for a sum equal in value to the bribe or the commission. This was a very important decision, not least because it has given rise to a great deal of academic commentary and judicial inconsistency over the last 200 years. The decision is also important in practical terms. If the bribe/commission is held on trust for the principle, then the principle has a proprietary claim to it, whereas if the claim results merely in equitable compensation, then there is no proprietary claim. This difference is important because if the agent becomes insolvent, then the proprietary claim would give the principle priority over the agent’s unsecured creditors. Whereas if the claim were for equitable compensation, then the principle would rank equally with other unsecured creditors, or pari passu. Further, if there is a proprietary claim, then the principle may trace in equity, whereas an equitable compensatory claim will have no right to trace in equity.

text: FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC The question for the United Kingdom Supreme Court was whether a bribe or secret commission received by an agent could be held by the agent on trust for his principle, or whether the principle merely had a claim in equitable compensation for a sum equal in value to the bribe or the commission. This was a very important decision, not least because it has given rise to a great deal of academic commentary and judicial inconsistency over the last 200 years. The decision is also important in practical terms. If the bribe/commission is held on trust for the principle, then the principle has a proprietary claim to it, whereas if the claim results merely in equitable compensation, then there is no proprietary claim. This difference is important because if the agent becomes insolvent, then the proprietary claim would give the principle priority over the agent’s unsecured creditors. Whereas if the claim were for equitable compensation, then the principle would rank equally with other unsecured creditors, or pari passu. Further, if there is a proprietary claim, then the principle may trace in equity, whereas an equitable compensatory claim will have no right to trace in equity.

year: 2014

title: What does 'Ethical Research'' look like? An indigenous perspective on big data & precision medicine

authors: Hudson, Maui

abstract: Southeast Native American Health Data (SENAHD) in partnership with Native BioData Consortium will host an online symposium about the ethical use of Indigenous genetic, environmental, biological, and cultural data. SENAHD is based at UNC Chapel Hill. Our partner, Native BioData Consortium is located on the Cheyanne River Sioux Reservation in South Dakota. NativeBio is one of the most important voices advocating for Indigenous health equity, data sovereignty, and ethical research practices. NativeBio is coming to the Southeast to recognize and include our region in important conversations taking place across Indian Country

text: What does 'Ethical Research'' look like? An indigenous perspective on big data & precision medicine Southeast Native American Health Data (SENAHD) in partnership with Native BioData Consortium will host an online symposium about the ethical use of Indigenous genetic, environmental, biological, and cultural data. SENAHD is based at UNC Chapel Hill. Our partner, Native BioData Consortium is located on the Cheyanne River Sioux Reservation in South Dakota. NativeBio is one of the most important voices advocating for Indigenous health equity, data sovereignty, and ethical research practices. NativeBio is coming to the Southeast to recognize and include our region in important conversations taking place across Indian Country

year: 2022