title: Marine natural products

authors: Blunt, John W.

subjects: Science & Technology

abstract: This review covers the literature published in 2014 for marine natural products (MNPs), with 1116 citations (753 for the period January to December 2014) referring to compounds isolated from marine microorganisms and phytoplankton, green, brown and red algae, sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans, molluscs, tunicates, echinoderms, mangroves and other intertidal plants and microorganisms. The emphasis is on new compounds (1378 in 456 papers for 2014), together with the relevant biological activities, source organisms and country of origin. Reviews, biosynthetic studies, first syntheses, and syntheses that lead to the revision of structures or stereochemistries, have been included.

text: Marine natural products This review covers the literature published in 2014 for marine natural products (MNPs), with 1116 citations (753 for the period January to December 2014) referring to compounds isolated from marine microorganisms and phytoplankton, green, brown and red algae, sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans, molluscs, tunicates, echinoderms, mangroves and other intertidal plants and microorganisms. The emphasis is on new compounds (1378 in 456 papers for 2014), together with the relevant biological activities, source organisms and country of origin. Reviews, biosynthetic studies, first syntheses, and syntheses that lead to the revision of structures or stereochemistries, have been included.

year: 2016

title: Structured articulation of knowledge: The influence of question response structure on recipient attitude

authors: Bircham-Connolly, Heather Jayne

subjects: knowledge sharing

abstract: Business today is faced with discontinuity and unpredictable change, which makes
many of the structured processes of yesteryear redundant or obsolete. Process-based
transactions are being replaced with technology and increasingly organisations are
recognising the importance of proactively managing their knowledge transactions, to
remain competitive. While research on knowledge sharing is gaining the attention of
researchers, almost invariably their focus has been on the factors influencing
knowledge transfer at the macro-level in large multi-national organisations. Few
have attempted to unravel the complexities of individual-to-individual micro-level
knowledge sharing and those that have, for the most part have directed their
investigations towards exploring factors that enhance or impede the source individual
sharing their knowledge, rather than the recipient's receiving of knowledge. While
questioning is implicit in knowledge sharing there are assumptions that underpin the
structure of a question and these assumptions affect both the source and the
recipient.
This study investigates how the structure of a question posed to a source individual
when eliciting knowledge, influences the attitude of a recipient individual towards the
knowledge they receive from the question response. Drawing upon theoretical
assumptions that underpin question structure, three hypotheses are posed to
compare binary, open-ended and directed question responses. To test the
hypotheses a progression of three independent studies were performed using
laboratory and field experiments. The first study conducted in a laboratory, used a
contrived scenario case as the knowledge context and the second study replicated
this experiment in the field. The last study conducted in a single organisation, used
real organisational knowledge as the knowledge context.
Recipients of shared knowledge were found to be more favourably disposed towards
question responses that were structured in a complex manner; open-ended and
directed question responses were more favoured than binary question responses.
ii
There was no difference in recipient attitude between open-ended and directed
question responses and recipient attitude towards the shared knowledge was found
to be positively related to their intention to use the knowledge in the future.
These findings are of significance as they illustrate the importance of structuring
questions in a manner that is consistent with recipients of the shared knowledge
being more favourably disposed towards the knowledge they have received. In an
environment of ambiguity, complexity and uncertainty where decisions are nonprogrammed,
strategic and imperative to the competitiveness of the organisation, no
longer is the binary 'Yes' or 'No' compliance or audit style question, with its implicit
assumptions, sufficient to elicit knowledge. It is important to recognise that often we
do not know what we need to know until it is shared by someone. Further, when
shared knowledge is cognitively processed with our current knowledge base, the new
knowledge is likely to facilitate more informed decision-making. The more
favourably disposed the recipient is towards the knowledge the more likely it is that
they will use it in the future; knowledge is transferred.

text: Structured articulation of knowledge: The influence of question response structure on recipient attitude Business today is faced with discontinuity and unpredictable change, which makes
many of the structured processes of yesteryear redundant or obsolete. Process-based
transactions are being replaced with technology and increasingly organisations are
recognising the importance of proactively managing their knowledge transactions, to
remain competitive. While research on knowledge sharing is gaining the attention of
researchers, almost invariably their focus has been on the factors influencing
knowledge transfer at the macro-level in large multi-national organisations. Few
have attempted to unravel the complexities of individual-to-individual micro-level
knowledge sharing and those that have, for the most part have directed their
investigations towards exploring factors that enhance or impede the source individual
sharing their knowledge, rather than the recipient's receiving of knowledge. While
questioning is implicit in knowledge sharing there are assumptions that underpin the
structure of a question and these assumptions affect both the source and the
recipient.
This study investigates how the structure of a question posed to a source individual
when eliciting knowledge, influences the attitude of a recipient individual towards the
knowledge they receive from the question response. Drawing upon theoretical
assumptions that underpin question structure, three hypotheses are posed to
compare binary, open-ended and directed question responses. To test the
hypotheses a progression of three independent studies were performed using
laboratory and field experiments. The first study conducted in a laboratory, used a
contrived scenario case as the knowledge context and the second study replicated
this experiment in the field. The last study conducted in a single organisation, used
real organisational knowledge as the knowledge context.
Recipients of shared knowledge were found to be more favourably disposed towards
question responses that were structured in a complex manner; open-ended and
directed question responses were more favoured than binary question responses.
ii
There was no difference in recipient attitude between open-ended and directed
question responses and recipient attitude towards the shared knowledge was found
to be positively related to their intention to use the knowledge in the future.
These findings are of significance as they illustrate the importance of structuring
questions in a manner that is consistent with recipients of the shared knowledge
being more favourably disposed towards the knowledge they have received. In an
environment of ambiguity, complexity and uncertainty where decisions are nonprogrammed,
strategic and imperative to the competitiveness of the organisation, no
longer is the binary 'Yes' or 'No' compliance or audit style question, with its implicit
assumptions, sufficient to elicit knowledge. It is important to recognise that often we
do not know what we need to know until it is shared by someone. Further, when
shared knowledge is cognitively processed with our current knowledge base, the new
knowledge is likely to facilitate more informed decision-making. The more
favourably disposed the recipient is towards the knowledge the more likely it is that
they will use it in the future; knowledge is transferred.

year: 2007

title: The Truth About Stories: A Native Narrative By Thomas King

authors: Douglas, Zanna

abstract: The truth about stories is that that’s all we are.” Koinei ngā kupu e tika ana hei whakamana i te āhua o te pukapuka nei nā Thomas King i tuhi. Ko te pakiwaitara tētehi āhuatanga e pupuri nei e te iwi taketake, he huarahi e mārama ai tātou ki te huringa o te ao. He taonga hoki ēnei kua take mai nō mua rā anō, kia kore e warewaretia wā tātou hītori, kia pupuri tonu hoki ki ngā kōrero ō mua, ngā kōrero e puawai ai te tuakiri o te tangata. Mō King, ka hanga te pakiwaitara i te tangata, nā koianei te pūtakenga mai o tāna aronga i roto i te pukapuka nei. Ko tāna he whakatakoto mai i ngā pakiwaitara kua rangona e ia i roto i ōna tau, me kī ko ngā hītori nō tōna iwi. Ko tētehi o ngā āhuatanga matua ka tū mai i roto i te tuhituhinga nei ko tāna kōrero mō ngā āhuatanga kua pā ki a ia i roto i tōna oranga. He huarahi pai tēnei hei whakamahana atu i te kaituhi ki te kaipānui, mā reira e āhei ana te kaipānui ki te whakawhanaunga atu ki te ngako o ngā kōrero o roto i te pukapuka.

text: The Truth About Stories: A Native Narrative By Thomas King The truth about stories is that that’s all we are.” Koinei ngā kupu e tika ana hei whakamana i te āhua o te pukapuka nei nā Thomas King i tuhi. Ko te pakiwaitara tētehi āhuatanga e pupuri nei e te iwi taketake, he huarahi e mārama ai tātou ki te huringa o te ao. He taonga hoki ēnei kua take mai nō mua rā anō, kia kore e warewaretia wā tātou hītori, kia pupuri tonu hoki ki ngā kōrero ō mua, ngā kōrero e puawai ai te tuakiri o te tangata. Mō King, ka hanga te pakiwaitara i te tangata, nā koianei te pūtakenga mai o tāna aronga i roto i te pukapuka nei. Ko tāna he whakatakoto mai i ngā pakiwaitara kua rangona e ia i roto i ōna tau, me kī ko ngā hītori nō tōna iwi. Ko tētehi o ngā āhuatanga matua ka tū mai i roto i te tuhituhinga nei ko tāna kōrero mō ngā āhuatanga kua pā ki a ia i roto i tōna oranga. He huarahi pai tēnei hei whakamahana atu i te kaituhi ki te kaipānui, mā reira e āhei ana te kaipānui ki te whakawhanaunga atu ki te ngako o ngā kōrero o roto i te pukapuka.

year: 2011-04