title: Crystal structure of (η⁵ pentamethylcyclopentadienyl){bis(pentafluorophenyl)×thiomethylphenyl phosphine-κ₂ S,P)chloro-iridium(III) tetrafluoroborate

authors: Bellabarba, R. M.

subjects: conglomerate

abstract: The salt (η⁵-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl){bis(pentafluorophenyl)thiomethylphenylphosphine-κ₂ S,P)chloroiridium(III) tetrafluoroborate, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)IrCl{κ₂ S,P-(C₆F₅)₂PC₆H₄SMe-2}]BF₄, crystallizes as a conglomerate in the orthorhombic crystal system in space group P2₁2₁2₁ with unit cell parameters a = 9.9621(9) Å, b = 16.7793(15) Å, c = 18.5040(16) Å, V = 3093.1(5) Å³, Z = 4, d calc = 2.014 g•cm⁻³. The structure of the S Ir, S S stereoisomer reveals three-legged piano stool geometry about Ir, with Cp*-Ir, Ir-P, Ir-S and Ir-Cl distances of 1.847(5) Å, 2.2791(14) Å, 2.3451(13) Å, and 2.3840(12) Å respectively.

text: Crystal structure of (η⁵ pentamethylcyclopentadienyl){bis(pentafluorophenyl)×thiomethylphenyl phosphine-κ₂ S,P)chloro-iridium(III) tetrafluoroborate The salt (η⁵-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl){bis(pentafluorophenyl)thiomethylphenylphosphine-κ₂ S,P)chloroiridium(III) tetrafluoroborate, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)IrCl{κ₂ S,P-(C₆F₅)₂PC₆H₄SMe-2}]BF₄, crystallizes as a conglomerate in the orthorhombic crystal system in space group P2₁2₁2₁ with unit cell parameters a = 9.9621(9) Å, b = 16.7793(15) Å, c = 18.5040(16) Å, V = 3093.1(5) Å³, Z = 4, d calc = 2.014 g•cm⁻³. The structure of the S Ir, S S stereoisomer reveals three-legged piano stool geometry about Ir, with Cp*-Ir, Ir-P, Ir-S and Ir-Cl distances of 1.847(5) Å, 2.2791(14) Å, 2.3451(13) Å, and 2.3840(12) Å respectively.

year: 2013

title: Embracing uncertainty: Informing decisions on flood risk and land use planning in a changing climate

authors: Hanna, Christina Jane

abstract: To increase resilience, decisionmakers must embrace uncertainty by shifting from static planning to adaptive strategies incorporate scenarios, national equitable multiple that future support consistent policy, access and ensure to and understanding of evolving flood risk information.

text: Embracing uncertainty: Informing decisions on flood risk and land use planning in a changing climate To increase resilience, decisionmakers must embrace uncertainty by shifting from static planning to adaptive strategies incorporate scenarios, national equitable multiple that future support consistent policy, access and ensure to and understanding of evolving flood risk information.

year: 2025

title: The art of dialogue with indigenous communities in the new biotechnology world

authors: Hudson, Maui

subjects: biotechnology

abstract: Te Hau Mihi Ata is a research project that aims to negotiate spaces for and develop processes of dialogue that allow for a deeper level of interaction between mtauranga Māori (Māori indigenous knowledge) and science. Over a two-year period a series of facilitated exchanges or wnanga were held focusing on areas of new technology (assisted reproductive technologies, life technologies, and future food technologies) that involved Māori scientists and people with expertise in mtauranga Māori. These dialogue events were designed to explore, through the challenge of considering new biotechnologies, the similarities and differences that emerge from approaching these issues from different knowledge paradigms. This paper will outline the key project findings from this series of exchanges including the barriers and facilitators to the dialogue process and knowledge exchange as well as discuss how participants created connections between scientific discourse and indigenous knowledge frameworks.

text: The art of dialogue with indigenous communities in the new biotechnology world Te Hau Mihi Ata is a research project that aims to negotiate spaces for and develop processes of dialogue that allow for a deeper level of interaction between mtauranga Māori (Māori indigenous knowledge) and science. Over a two-year period a series of facilitated exchanges or wnanga were held focusing on areas of new technology (assisted reproductive technologies, life technologies, and future food technologies) that involved Māori scientists and people with expertise in mtauranga Māori. These dialogue events were designed to explore, through the challenge of considering new biotechnologies, the similarities and differences that emerge from approaching these issues from different knowledge paradigms. This paper will outline the key project findings from this series of exchanges including the barriers and facilitators to the dialogue process and knowledge exchange as well as discuss how participants created connections between scientific discourse and indigenous knowledge frameworks.

year: 2012