title: “This is not us”: But actually, it is. Talking about when to raise the issue of colonisation.

authors: Waitoki, Waikaremoana

abstract: This paper is a commentary on some of the responses to the public narrative of the events after the March 15th Christchurch attack. Several colleagues had publicly and privately, offered their views on the Government’s and media outlets use of terms such as ‘unprecedented’, ‘our loss of innocence’ and ‘our darkest day’. A fiery and empassioned exchange of words emerged on social media about the statement: ‘This is not us’. By exposing the counternarrative to these emotion laden terms, a shady past, and invisible present was revealed. However, the timing of the talk about colonisation also seemed out of step with the need for sensitivity. This paper also explores the role of White supremacy and causal racism in New Zealand. A personal I/we/us narrative style is used throughout the paper to describe how Muslim and Maori lives intersected prior to, and after the attack. The timeline of events is primarily 1 week, and up to 6 weeks post the attack.

text: “This is not us”: But actually, it is. Talking about when to raise the issue of colonisation. This paper is a commentary on some of the responses to the public narrative of the events after the March 15th Christchurch attack. Several colleagues had publicly and privately, offered their views on the Government’s and media outlets use of terms such as ‘unprecedented’, ‘our loss of innocence’ and ‘our darkest day’. A fiery and empassioned exchange of words emerged on social media about the statement: ‘This is not us’. By exposing the counternarrative to these emotion laden terms, a shady past, and invisible present was revealed. However, the timing of the talk about colonisation also seemed out of step with the need for sensitivity. This paper also explores the role of White supremacy and causal racism in New Zealand. A personal I/we/us narrative style is used throughout the paper to describe how Muslim and Maori lives intersected prior to, and after the attack. The timeline of events is primarily 1 week, and up to 6 weeks post the attack.

year: 2019

title: Ora Kainga Rua: Experiences of Kura Kaupapa Māori Graduates

authors: Waller, Arianna Leigh Mana

subjects: indigenous auto ethnography

abstract: There is a wealth of indigenous scholarship examining the impacts of imperialist policies and ideologies on the learning identities of indigenous students. However, within the New Zealand context, there is a lack of literature which focuses solely on the experiences and aspirations of total immersion students to tertiary education settings. 
Using Kaupapa Māori and auto ethnography this thesis privileges the student voice by investigating the transitional experiences of four female kura Kaupapa Māori graduates into mainstream settings particularly their transition to the University of Waikato. 
The thesis argues that there are two main spaces of synergy between an indigenous research paradigm and auto ethnography. The first is the criticality of the “self” in the work, without a sharp separation between the researcher and the subject (dual meaning intended). The second is the shared modality and intentional use of storytelling as a method. By combining insights from in-depth interviews with the researcher’s life story, the thesis identified the coping mechanisms the participants employed and the services The University of Waikato provides that were utilised to help them transition into a new educational setting. 
The participants’ experiences demonstrate that the unique cultural educational experiences of kura Kaupapa Māori differ significantly from the educational and environmental experiences offered at University. The participants’ narratives demonstrated that the clear sense of identity gained from the kura Kaupapa Māori context gave them the inner strength to cope with these differences. In addition to their strong sense of Māori identity, the main coping mechanisms that the students drew on, was the wealth of institutional knowledge that family members and role models provided of the university context as past students and current staff members. The benefits that these students experienced can be strengthened by building stronger relationships between Māori total immersion schools, the wider Māori community and universities ensuring that Māori total immersion students are able to access the academic and institutional knowledge they need to succeed. 
Furthermore, the thesis argues that the kura Kaupapa Māori movement can deliver more for their students if they do not shut out the Pākehā world but rather teach their students to walk between and within the two worlds. In order to better understand this balancing act, the lived experiences of immersion students requires more research, particularly as more and more kura graduates transition into Aotearoa New Zealand tertiary settings.

text: Ora Kainga Rua: Experiences of Kura Kaupapa Māori Graduates There is a wealth of indigenous scholarship examining the impacts of imperialist policies and ideologies on the learning identities of indigenous students. However, within the New Zealand context, there is a lack of literature which focuses solely on the experiences and aspirations of total immersion students to tertiary education settings. 
Using Kaupapa Māori and auto ethnography this thesis privileges the student voice by investigating the transitional experiences of four female kura Kaupapa Māori graduates into mainstream settings particularly their transition to the University of Waikato. 
The thesis argues that there are two main spaces of synergy between an indigenous research paradigm and auto ethnography. The first is the criticality of the “self” in the work, without a sharp separation between the researcher and the subject (dual meaning intended). The second is the shared modality and intentional use of storytelling as a method. By combining insights from in-depth interviews with the researcher’s life story, the thesis identified the coping mechanisms the participants employed and the services The University of Waikato provides that were utilised to help them transition into a new educational setting. 
The participants’ experiences demonstrate that the unique cultural educational experiences of kura Kaupapa Māori differ significantly from the educational and environmental experiences offered at University. The participants’ narratives demonstrated that the clear sense of identity gained from the kura Kaupapa Māori context gave them the inner strength to cope with these differences. In addition to their strong sense of Māori identity, the main coping mechanisms that the students drew on, was the wealth of institutional knowledge that family members and role models provided of the university context as past students and current staff members. The benefits that these students experienced can be strengthened by building stronger relationships between Māori total immersion schools, the wider Māori community and universities ensuring that Māori total immersion students are able to access the academic and institutional knowledge they need to succeed. 
Furthermore, the thesis argues that the kura Kaupapa Māori movement can deliver more for their students if they do not shut out the Pākehā world but rather teach their students to walk between and within the two worlds. In order to better understand this balancing act, the lived experiences of immersion students requires more research, particularly as more and more kura graduates transition into Aotearoa New Zealand tertiary settings.

year: 2016

title: Generating group agreement in cooperative computer-mediated groups: Towards an integrative model of group interaction

authors: Whitworth, Brian

abstract: This study addresses the problem of generating agreement in computer-mediated groups.
The key entities of group interaction are proposed to be the task, the other individuals, and the group. Extending this three way categorisation across the input-process-output framework suggests an integrative model with three processes (task resolution, interpersonal relating, and group representation), three levels of social influence (informational influence, personal influence, and normative influence), and three types of output (task results, relationships, and agreement).
The background upon which these processes operate is the communication setting. A proposed taxonomy of communication settings suggests the natural setting for generating electronic group agreement is asynchronous, many-to-many interaction.
Describing non-task group activities as "process losses" denies group combining behaviour, and raises the "group effectiveness paradox", where groups expend more effort to produce less. The integrative model accounts for group activities without paradox.
The generation of agreement in cooperative groups is attributed to the "identification" of individuals with the group. Members who identify with a group, tend to accept the group's decisions as their own. This process may use relatively simple position information embedded within multi-threaded communications, rather than complex "social" information. If so, computer-mediated groups can enact agreement across plain text networks.
Software was written to simulate asynchronous, many-to-many exchange of position information. Anonymous computer-mediated groups sat multi-choice tests under blind, group aware and confidence aware conditions. The exchange of position information alone produced a significant change in agreement, although neither medium nor exchanged information were "rich", no reasons were given, and there was no personal "presence" or discussion.
It was concluded that computer-mediated groups can enact agreement. The method adopted, of isolating one process within a single communication setting, is recommended for research. However for practical implementation, a balance of all three processes is suggested, as all have a role in group interaction.

text: Generating group agreement in cooperative computer-mediated groups: Towards an integrative model of group interaction This study addresses the problem of generating agreement in computer-mediated groups.
The key entities of group interaction are proposed to be the task, the other individuals, and the group. Extending this three way categorisation across the input-process-output framework suggests an integrative model with three processes (task resolution, interpersonal relating, and group representation), three levels of social influence (informational influence, personal influence, and normative influence), and three types of output (task results, relationships, and agreement).
The background upon which these processes operate is the communication setting. A proposed taxonomy of communication settings suggests the natural setting for generating electronic group agreement is asynchronous, many-to-many interaction.
Describing non-task group activities as "process losses" denies group combining behaviour, and raises the "group effectiveness paradox", where groups expend more effort to produce less. The integrative model accounts for group activities without paradox.
The generation of agreement in cooperative groups is attributed to the "identification" of individuals with the group. Members who identify with a group, tend to accept the group's decisions as their own. This process may use relatively simple position information embedded within multi-threaded communications, rather than complex "social" information. If so, computer-mediated groups can enact agreement across plain text networks.
Software was written to simulate asynchronous, many-to-many exchange of position information. Anonymous computer-mediated groups sat multi-choice tests under blind, group aware and confidence aware conditions. The exchange of position information alone produced a significant change in agreement, although neither medium nor exchanged information were "rich", no reasons were given, and there was no personal "presence" or discussion.
It was concluded that computer-mediated groups can enact agreement. The method adopted, of isolating one process within a single communication setting, is recommended for research. However for practical implementation, a balance of all three processes is suggested, as all have a role in group interaction.

year: 1997