title: Echoed silencing in Te Whare/Tangata

authors: Lewis, Cassandra Louise Terauhina

subjects: Mana Wāhine

abstract: Wāhine Māori voices are suppressed due to multiple intersecting factors in Aotearoa which negatively impact our lived realities. The aim of this thesis is to foreground wāhine voice and identity within a settler colonial housing system. The current ‘housing crisis’ has been an issue of interest in academia focusing on housing insecurity, homelessness and neoliberalism. Additionally, the criminalisation of Māori has been explored by scholars to a similar extent, especially the pipelining of Māori into incarceration and precarity through policing and surveillance strategies. However, how the criminal justice system and the housing systems interact is scarcely investigated in Aotearoa, and moreover, has not been examined through a Mana wāhine theoretical framework. Mana Wāhine scholars have long critiqued colonisation and the accompanying practices, ideologies and discourses of difference that misrepresent wāhine as the ‘savage other’. How wāhine Māori are constructed through political discourse and factors leading to the silencing of wāhine are at the forefront of this inquiry and moreover, wāhine resistance, survival and aspirations while navigating a discriminatory housing system is examined.

Political and Western discourse contributes to the criminalisation and deficit framing of wāhine as the ‘undeserving poor’ and ‘criminal other’ which subsequently silences wāhine and encourages discriminatory practices. This thesis contends that the channelling of wāhine Māori into a precarious population, the criminalisation of wāhine Māori, and the colonial discourses surrounding wāhine interact together and create barriers to wāhine Māori access to housing. An analysis of housing discourse, alongside wāhine perspectives provides a counter-narrative of the lived reality and voice from wāhine who reside in a predominantly precarious and Māori populated area. The findings show cases of surveillance, discrimination, social policing and steering wāhine Māori into unhealthy living conditions, however, wāhine were also creative in their practices of resistance and survivance.

text: Echoed silencing in Te Whare/Tangata Wāhine Māori voices are suppressed due to multiple intersecting factors in Aotearoa which negatively impact our lived realities. The aim of this thesis is to foreground wāhine voice and identity within a settler colonial housing system. The current ‘housing crisis’ has been an issue of interest in academia focusing on housing insecurity, homelessness and neoliberalism. Additionally, the criminalisation of Māori has been explored by scholars to a similar extent, especially the pipelining of Māori into incarceration and precarity through policing and surveillance strategies. However, how the criminal justice system and the housing systems interact is scarcely investigated in Aotearoa, and moreover, has not been examined through a Mana wāhine theoretical framework. Mana Wāhine scholars have long critiqued colonisation and the accompanying practices, ideologies and discourses of difference that misrepresent wāhine as the ‘savage other’. How wāhine Māori are constructed through political discourse and factors leading to the silencing of wāhine are at the forefront of this inquiry and moreover, wāhine resistance, survival and aspirations while navigating a discriminatory housing system is examined.

Political and Western discourse contributes to the criminalisation and deficit framing of wāhine as the ‘undeserving poor’ and ‘criminal other’ which subsequently silences wāhine and encourages discriminatory practices. This thesis contends that the channelling of wāhine Māori into a precarious population, the criminalisation of wāhine Māori, and the colonial discourses surrounding wāhine interact together and create barriers to wāhine Māori access to housing. An analysis of housing discourse, alongside wāhine perspectives provides a counter-narrative of the lived reality and voice from wāhine who reside in a predominantly precarious and Māori populated area. The findings show cases of surveillance, discrimination, social policing and steering wāhine Māori into unhealthy living conditions, however, wāhine were also creative in their practices of resistance and survivance.

year: 2021

title: Ngā maihi o Te Whare Hukahuka, ngā maihi o Te Whare o Ruamano: Te whare kōrero o ngā maihi o Tuteao

authors: Hona, Hakahaka Charlie Barlow

subjects: Tuteao

abstract: Ko Pūtauaki te maunga
Ko Rangitāiki te awa
Ko Hekerangi te papa whenua
Ko Tuteao te marae
Ko Ngā Maihi te hapū
Ko Ngāti Awa te iwi
Ko Mataatua te waka
Tihe mauri-ora
Ko tōku kāwai rangatira tēnei. E mōhio ai te tangata ko wai ahau; nō hea ahau, nā wai hoki ahau. Ā, nā whai anō taku urupounamu, ko wai a Ngā Maihi o Tuteao? E mea ana ngā pākeke, he iwi tawhito a Ngā Maihi i heke mai i ngā tātai whakapapa o Tangaroa, o Pōtiki, o Mahutapoanui, o Toroa, o Tuteao. Hēoi, kua kore e rangona ōna kōrero i runga marae ātea. Kua kore e wānangahia i roto i te poho o te whare o Tuteao. Kua ngū ngā poupou o te whare kōrero. Ka mutu, i roto i ngā tau tata nei kua riro tītapu ngā puna o te kī, ngā whītiki o te kupu, o te hapū; kua kore e rangona ngā kōrero o Ngā Maihi i runga marae ātea. Ko te haumate o te reo i runga o Tuteao tētahi take i pēnei ai. Nō reira, kai te imu te ruhi, kai te imu te ngēngē. E noho pōhara ana a Ngā Maihi ki ngā tāonga o tōna whare kōrero. Hei te tau 2027, ka whakanuia te rautau o te whare tīpuna a Tuteao, ā i tēnei tau tonu 2022, e whai whakaaro ana te hapū ki taua kaupapa otirā ki te hanga whare tīpuna hou; he whare kaitā e uru ai te tokomaha. Nō reira, e whakaaro ana hoki ki ngā kōrero ka whakairohia ki ngā pakitara o te whare. I tēnei tau hoki kua mana te whakaako i ngā kōrero hītori o te Māori i roto i ngā kura, nō reira he aha rā ngā kōrero e wātea ana ki ngā tamariki o ngā kura e pā ana ki a Ngā Maihi? He maramara, he kongakonga, he putunga kōrero e noho marara ana i ngā wāhi tūmatanui. He uaua te kitea o ētahi atu, kei ngā wāhi tūmataiti, pēnei i te Kōti Whenua Māori, i ngā tuhinga ā-whānau, kei ngā pukapuka wānanga o te marae. Nō reira, he uaua te kite atu i tōna whānuitanga, i tōna hohonutanga. Tīmata ake i ngā kohinga kōrero o te hapū tonu o Ngā Maihi, i ōna kaumātua, i ōna wānanga, i ōna whānau. I tua atu i wā te whare pukapuka, kei ngā wāhi tūmataiti ētahi putunga kōrero hei ō mo te whare kōrero o Ngā Maihi o Tuteao. Ka mutu, kei ngā waiata, ngā haka, ngā mōteatea. Kai ngā kōrero hoki o iwi kē, e pā ana ki wō mātou tīpuna. I reira i tōtō mai i te kōrero.

text: Ngā maihi o Te Whare Hukahuka, ngā maihi o Te Whare o Ruamano: Te whare kōrero o ngā maihi o Tuteao Ko Pūtauaki te maunga
Ko Rangitāiki te awa
Ko Hekerangi te papa whenua
Ko Tuteao te marae
Ko Ngā Maihi te hapū
Ko Ngāti Awa te iwi
Ko Mataatua te waka
Tihe mauri-ora
Ko tōku kāwai rangatira tēnei. E mōhio ai te tangata ko wai ahau; nō hea ahau, nā wai hoki ahau. Ā, nā whai anō taku urupounamu, ko wai a Ngā Maihi o Tuteao? E mea ana ngā pākeke, he iwi tawhito a Ngā Maihi i heke mai i ngā tātai whakapapa o Tangaroa, o Pōtiki, o Mahutapoanui, o Toroa, o Tuteao. Hēoi, kua kore e rangona ōna kōrero i runga marae ātea. Kua kore e wānangahia i roto i te poho o te whare o Tuteao. Kua ngū ngā poupou o te whare kōrero. Ka mutu, i roto i ngā tau tata nei kua riro tītapu ngā puna o te kī, ngā whītiki o te kupu, o te hapū; kua kore e rangona ngā kōrero o Ngā Maihi i runga marae ātea. Ko te haumate o te reo i runga o Tuteao tētahi take i pēnei ai. Nō reira, kai te imu te ruhi, kai te imu te ngēngē. E noho pōhara ana a Ngā Maihi ki ngā tāonga o tōna whare kōrero. Hei te tau 2027, ka whakanuia te rautau o te whare tīpuna a Tuteao, ā i tēnei tau tonu 2022, e whai whakaaro ana te hapū ki taua kaupapa otirā ki te hanga whare tīpuna hou; he whare kaitā e uru ai te tokomaha. Nō reira, e whakaaro ana hoki ki ngā kōrero ka whakairohia ki ngā pakitara o te whare. I tēnei tau hoki kua mana te whakaako i ngā kōrero hītori o te Māori i roto i ngā kura, nō reira he aha rā ngā kōrero e wātea ana ki ngā tamariki o ngā kura e pā ana ki a Ngā Maihi? He maramara, he kongakonga, he putunga kōrero e noho marara ana i ngā wāhi tūmatanui. He uaua te kitea o ētahi atu, kei ngā wāhi tūmataiti, pēnei i te Kōti Whenua Māori, i ngā tuhinga ā-whānau, kei ngā pukapuka wānanga o te marae. Nō reira, he uaua te kite atu i tōna whānuitanga, i tōna hohonutanga. Tīmata ake i ngā kohinga kōrero o te hapū tonu o Ngā Maihi, i ōna kaumātua, i ōna wānanga, i ōna whānau. I tua atu i wā te whare pukapuka, kei ngā wāhi tūmataiti ētahi putunga kōrero hei ō mo te whare kōrero o Ngā Maihi o Tuteao. Ka mutu, kei ngā waiata, ngā haka, ngā mōteatea. Kai ngā kōrero hoki o iwi kē, e pā ana ki wō mātou tīpuna. I reira i tōtō mai i te kōrero.

year: 2022

title: The development of an international model for technology adoption: the case of Hong Kong

authors: Au, Alan Kai Ming

abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the causal relationships between the internal beliefs formation of a decision-maker on technology adoption and the extent of the development of a technology adoptive behaviour. In particular, this study aims to develop an International Model For Technology Adoption (IMTA), which builds upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour (Ajzen 1992) and improves on the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis 1986). 

The development of such a model requires an understanding of the environmental factors which shape the cognitive processes of the decision maker. Hence, this is a behavioural model which investigates the constructs influencing the adoption behaviour and how the interaction between these constructs and the external variables can impact on the decision making process at the level of the firm. 

Previous research on technology transfer and innovation diffusion has classified factors affecting the diffusion process into two dimensions: 1) external-influence and 2) internal-influence. Hence, in this research, the International Model For Technology Adoption looks at how the endogenous and exogenous factors enter into the cognitive process of a technology adoption decision through which attitudes and behavioural intentions are shaped. 

Under the IMTA, the behavioural intention to adopt is a function of two exogenous variables, 1) Strategic Choice, and 2) Environmental Control. The Environmental Control factor is further categorised by two exogenous factors, namely, 1) Government Influence, and 2) Competitive Influence. In addition, the Competitive Influence factor is, in turn, classified into five forces: namely, 1) Industry Structure, 2) Price Intensity, 3) Demand Uncertainty, 4) Information Exposure, 5) Domestic Availability. 

Regarding the cognitive process which forms the attitude to adopt, it is hypothesised to be affected by six other endogenous beliefs: 1) Compatibility; 2) Enhanced Value; 3) Perceived Benefits; 4)Adaptative Experiences, 5) Perceived Difficulty; and 6) Suppliers’ Commitment. 

A survey research method was utilised in this study and the research instrument was developed after a comprehensive review of the relevant literature and an expert interview. A total of 298 completed questionnaires were returned; giving a response rate of 13.56%. Of the 298 questionnaires, 39 of the responses were unusable with missing date. This gives a total of 259 usable questionnaires and an effective response rate of 11.78%. 

The results of the analysis suggested that the fitness of the International Model For Technology Adoption was good and the data of this study supported the overall structure of the IMTA. When compared with the null model, which was used by the EQS as a baseline model to judge to overall fitness for the IMTA, the IMTA yielded a value of 0.914 in the Comparative Fit index; hence, indication of a good fit model. 

In addition, the results of the principal component analysis also illustrated that the 16-factor International Model For Technology Adoption was an adequate model to capture the information collected during the survey. The results shown that this 16-factor structure represented nearly 77% of the total variance of all items. A further analysis into the factor structure, again, revealed that there existed a perfect match between the conceptual dimensionality of the International Model For Technology Adoption and the empirical data collected in the survey. 

However, the results of the hypotheses testing on the individual constructs were mixed. While not all the magnitude of these ten hypotheses was statistically significant, almost all pointed to the direction conceptualised by the IMTA. 

From these results, it can be interpreted that while the results of the structural equation modelling analysis provided overall support to the International Model For Technology Adoption, the results of individual constructs of the Model revealed that some constructs were forming a larger impact than others in the decision making process to adopt foreign technology. In particular, the intention to adopt was greatly affected by the attitude of the prospective adopters, the influence of the government and the degree of industry rivalry. However, the impact of the overall competitive influence factor on the intention to adopt was not supported by the results. Again, the existence of investment alternative was also not a serious concern for the prospective adopters.

text: The development of an international model for technology adoption: the case of Hong Kong The purpose of this study is to examine the causal relationships between the internal beliefs formation of a decision-maker on technology adoption and the extent of the development of a technology adoptive behaviour. In particular, this study aims to develop an International Model For Technology Adoption (IMTA), which builds upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour (Ajzen 1992) and improves on the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis 1986). 

The development of such a model requires an understanding of the environmental factors which shape the cognitive processes of the decision maker. Hence, this is a behavioural model which investigates the constructs influencing the adoption behaviour and how the interaction between these constructs and the external variables can impact on the decision making process at the level of the firm. 

Previous research on technology transfer and innovation diffusion has classified factors affecting the diffusion process into two dimensions: 1) external-influence and 2) internal-influence. Hence, in this research, the International Model For Technology Adoption looks at how the endogenous and exogenous factors enter into the cognitive process of a technology adoption decision through which attitudes and behavioural intentions are shaped. 

Under the IMTA, the behavioural intention to adopt is a function of two exogenous variables, 1) Strategic Choice, and 2) Environmental Control. The Environmental Control factor is further categorised by two exogenous factors, namely, 1) Government Influence, and 2) Competitive Influence. In addition, the Competitive Influence factor is, in turn, classified into five forces: namely, 1) Industry Structure, 2) Price Intensity, 3) Demand Uncertainty, 4) Information Exposure, 5) Domestic Availability. 

Regarding the cognitive process which forms the attitude to adopt, it is hypothesised to be affected by six other endogenous beliefs: 1) Compatibility; 2) Enhanced Value; 3) Perceived Benefits; 4)Adaptative Experiences, 5) Perceived Difficulty; and 6) Suppliers’ Commitment. 

A survey research method was utilised in this study and the research instrument was developed after a comprehensive review of the relevant literature and an expert interview. A total of 298 completed questionnaires were returned; giving a response rate of 13.56%. Of the 298 questionnaires, 39 of the responses were unusable with missing date. This gives a total of 259 usable questionnaires and an effective response rate of 11.78%. 

The results of the analysis suggested that the fitness of the International Model For Technology Adoption was good and the data of this study supported the overall structure of the IMTA. When compared with the null model, which was used by the EQS as a baseline model to judge to overall fitness for the IMTA, the IMTA yielded a value of 0.914 in the Comparative Fit index; hence, indication of a good fit model. 

In addition, the results of the principal component analysis also illustrated that the 16-factor International Model For Technology Adoption was an adequate model to capture the information collected during the survey. The results shown that this 16-factor structure represented nearly 77% of the total variance of all items. A further analysis into the factor structure, again, revealed that there existed a perfect match between the conceptual dimensionality of the International Model For Technology Adoption and the empirical data collected in the survey. 

However, the results of the hypotheses testing on the individual constructs were mixed. While not all the magnitude of these ten hypotheses was statistically significant, almost all pointed to the direction conceptualised by the IMTA. 

From these results, it can be interpreted that while the results of the structural equation modelling analysis provided overall support to the International Model For Technology Adoption, the results of individual constructs of the Model revealed that some constructs were forming a larger impact than others in the decision making process to adopt foreign technology. In particular, the intention to adopt was greatly affected by the attitude of the prospective adopters, the influence of the government and the degree of industry rivalry. However, the impact of the overall competitive influence factor on the intention to adopt was not supported by the results. Again, the existence of investment alternative was also not a serious concern for the prospective adopters.

year: 1997