title: The Behavioural Dyscontrol Scale-Validation of a computerised version in a non-clinical New Zealand population

authors: Kendall, Virginia Ruth

subjects: computerised neuropsychological testing

abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of a new computerised version of the Behavioural Dyscontrol Scale (BDS) in comparison to the original manual version which research has shown to be a sensitive, reliable and valid measure of executive function (EF), and in particular of control over voluntary behaviour. A.J Luria deconstructed the complex construct of EF into Three Functional Units of working memory (Fluid Intelligence Factor), motor programming (Motor Programming Factor), and inappropriate response inhibition (Environmental Independence Factor) which he regarded to be predictive of a person’s capacity to function independently and autonomously in their environment. This theoretical framework and demonstrated ecological utility is what differentiates the BDS from other traditional clinical measures of EF. The subjective scoring system has restricted the use of the BDS; the development of a valid and reliable computerised version would address this limitation generating a much greater depth and range of finite objective data. Participants were 38 tertiary students who completed a demographic questionnaire, the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression self-report Scale (HADS), the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVACPT), Trail Making Test A and B, the manual and computerised versions of the Behavioural Dyscontrol Scale. Findings showed good levels of internal reliability and construct validity for the CBDS which yielded high sensitivity and specificity across all Three Functional Units, together with a high level of correspondence to scores generated by the manual version and by the Trails and IVACPT measures. Potential clinical applications, limitations and future directions are discussed.

text: The Behavioural Dyscontrol Scale-Validation of a computerised version in a non-clinical New Zealand population The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of a new computerised version of the Behavioural Dyscontrol Scale (BDS) in comparison to the original manual version which research has shown to be a sensitive, reliable and valid measure of executive function (EF), and in particular of control over voluntary behaviour. A.J Luria deconstructed the complex construct of EF into Three Functional Units of working memory (Fluid Intelligence Factor), motor programming (Motor Programming Factor), and inappropriate response inhibition (Environmental Independence Factor) which he regarded to be predictive of a person’s capacity to function independently and autonomously in their environment. This theoretical framework and demonstrated ecological utility is what differentiates the BDS from other traditional clinical measures of EF. The subjective scoring system has restricted the use of the BDS; the development of a valid and reliable computerised version would address this limitation generating a much greater depth and range of finite objective data. Participants were 38 tertiary students who completed a demographic questionnaire, the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression self-report Scale (HADS), the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVACPT), Trail Making Test A and B, the manual and computerised versions of the Behavioural Dyscontrol Scale. Findings showed good levels of internal reliability and construct validity for the CBDS which yielded high sensitivity and specificity across all Three Functional Units, together with a high level of correspondence to scores generated by the manual version and by the Trails and IVACPT measures. Potential clinical applications, limitations and future directions are discussed.

year: 2013

title: Liability for pollution damage from offshore oil spills: The CLC and fund conventions, the EU's Environmental Liability Directive and their implications for New Zealand law

authors: Farnworth, Steven Edward

subjects: Offshore

abstract: This thesis will apply conventional methods of legal analysis to ask how New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime came to be created from a pair of international shipping liability and fund conventions, and explaining how the EU and Member States developed and implemented the Environmental Liability and Offshore Safety Directives. New Zealand’s government has actively encouraged growth in its offshore petroleum sector in the belief that seabed drilling can be carried out safely and profitably at any depth, and that the owners of offshore petroleum installations will pay administrative penalties and damages to compensate for all oil pollution claims. The recent Deepwater Horizon disaster has had global repercussions for operators and regulators, but has sparked little discussion of legal liability issues in the New Zealand context.  
New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime used two international shipping conventions which had created a system of strict and limited liability for oil pollution damage, channelled to the shipowner, and backed up by mandatory insurance and an industry-fed compensation fund. The shipping conventions became the standard model for many regional and international environmental damage liability regimes, because there is no international offshore liability convention, but New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime has diverged from this ideal. New Zealand sought to capture a broad range of owners and operators of offshore installations in a net of strict and unlimited liability, but without providing adequate mandatory insurance regulations or a compensation fund. Meanwhile, the European Union created its own environmental damage liability regime and only later applied it to offshore oil and gas operators, but also without providing harmonized mandatory insurance regulations or an EU-wide compensation fund. Much like New Zealand, EU Member States have struggled to implement consistent and predictable environmental liability laws, or to develop appropriate financial security guarantees.  
Analysing New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime in this context accomplishes two overall objectives. First, a detailed examination of the international shipping conventions will provide guidance about how New Zealand should interpret, quantify and allocate liability for the key elements of pollution damage liability. Second, the comparison of New Zealand and the EU Member States’ experiences demonstrates the difficulties that nations face in adopting disparate over-arching international or supranational legal frameworks to create domestic statutory liability systems. The discussion has profound implications, not just for the specifics of any one country’s liability laws, but also for future attempts to create a practical and durable regional or international offshore petroleum liability and fund convention.

text: Liability for pollution damage from offshore oil spills: The CLC and fund conventions, the EU's Environmental Liability Directive and their implications for New Zealand law This thesis will apply conventional methods of legal analysis to ask how New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime came to be created from a pair of international shipping liability and fund conventions, and explaining how the EU and Member States developed and implemented the Environmental Liability and Offshore Safety Directives. New Zealand’s government has actively encouraged growth in its offshore petroleum sector in the belief that seabed drilling can be carried out safely and profitably at any depth, and that the owners of offshore petroleum installations will pay administrative penalties and damages to compensate for all oil pollution claims. The recent Deepwater Horizon disaster has had global repercussions for operators and regulators, but has sparked little discussion of legal liability issues in the New Zealand context.  
New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime used two international shipping conventions which had created a system of strict and limited liability for oil pollution damage, channelled to the shipowner, and backed up by mandatory insurance and an industry-fed compensation fund. The shipping conventions became the standard model for many regional and international environmental damage liability regimes, because there is no international offshore liability convention, but New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime has diverged from this ideal. New Zealand sought to capture a broad range of owners and operators of offshore installations in a net of strict and unlimited liability, but without providing adequate mandatory insurance regulations or a compensation fund. Meanwhile, the European Union created its own environmental damage liability regime and only later applied it to offshore oil and gas operators, but also without providing harmonized mandatory insurance regulations or an EU-wide compensation fund. Much like New Zealand, EU Member States have struggled to implement consistent and predictable environmental liability laws, or to develop appropriate financial security guarantees.  
Analysing New Zealand’s offshore petroleum liability regime in this context accomplishes two overall objectives. First, a detailed examination of the international shipping conventions will provide guidance about how New Zealand should interpret, quantify and allocate liability for the key elements of pollution damage liability. Second, the comparison of New Zealand and the EU Member States’ experiences demonstrates the difficulties that nations face in adopting disparate over-arching international or supranational legal frameworks to create domestic statutory liability systems. The discussion has profound implications, not just for the specifics of any one country’s liability laws, but also for future attempts to create a practical and durable regional or international offshore petroleum liability and fund convention.

year: 2018

title: Te Ahurei a Rangatahi sexual health programme: An evaluation

authors: Nikora, Linda Waimarie

subjects: youth

abstract: The Maori and Psychology Research Unit was engaged in August 2001 to evaluate a
sexual health programme delivered by Te Ahurei a Rangatahi. Established in 1997,
Te Ahurei a Rangatahi is a community based charitable trust that delivers a variety of
programmes to Rangatahi.

text: Te Ahurei a Rangatahi sexual health programme: An evaluation The Maori and Psychology Research Unit was engaged in August 2001 to evaluate a
sexual health programme delivered by Te Ahurei a Rangatahi. Established in 1997,
Te Ahurei a Rangatahi is a community based charitable trust that delivers a variety of
programmes to Rangatahi.

year: 2001-12-01