title: Investigating the contextual requirements of the Juster Scale

authors: Parackal, Mathew

subjects: Juster Scale

abstract: Researchers have employed the Juster Scale to collect purchase probability data with notable success. Reviewing the Juster Scale studies, however, has revealed that there is considerable variation in its per¬formance. Some of these variations appeared to be caused by the context in which the Juster Scale has been presented to respondents. This paper discusses three factors that influence the context of the Juster Scale and reports the results of a study that attempted to standardise its contextual requirements.
The results substantiate further the Juster Scale's satisfactory performance in collecting purchase probability data.

text: Investigating the contextual requirements of the Juster Scale Researchers have employed the Juster Scale to collect purchase probability data with notable success. Reviewing the Juster Scale studies, however, has revealed that there is considerable variation in its per¬formance. Some of these variations appeared to be caused by the context in which the Juster Scale has been presented to respondents. This paper discusses three factors that influence the context of the Juster Scale and reports the results of a study that attempted to standardise its contextual requirements.
The results substantiate further the Juster Scale's satisfactory performance in collecting purchase probability data.

year: 2006

title: Factors influencing ponderosa pine regeneration in the southwestern USA

authors: Puhlick, Joshua J.

subjects: climate

abstract: Improving predictions of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum) regeneration is critical as landscape-scale restoration efforts are being implemented across the western United States. The establishment of new ponderosa pine cohorts following restoration treatments will have long-term impacts on the future development of forest stands. At a regional scale, we used data associated with 364 Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plots within the ponderosa pine forest type on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico. At a local scale, we sampled 28 stands on basalt and sedimentary parent materials on the Coconino National Forest in northern Arizona. Structural equation models were developed to determine the relative importance of direct and indirect factors affecting ponderosa pine seedling densities at both regional and local scales. The regional model only explained 13% of the variation in pine seedling density. The model indicated that ponderosa pine seedling density was highest where (1) mean annual precipitation was highest, (2) average May minimum temperature was highest, (3) overstory stand basal area was lowest and (4) Muhlenbergia spp. were dominant herbaceous plants. The local model explained 76% of the variation in pine seedling density. Densities were highest where (1) mean annual precipitation was highest, (2) soil clay content was lowest, (3) soil pH was lowest, (4) Muhlenbergia virescens frequency was highest and (5) seed tree frequency was highest. If additional factors such as soil texture, soil pH, screwleaf muhly frequency and seed tree frequency were measured on FIA plots, then perhaps more variation in pine seedling density could be explained at the regional scale.

text: Factors influencing ponderosa pine regeneration in the southwestern USA Improving predictions of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum) regeneration is critical as landscape-scale restoration efforts are being implemented across the western United States. The establishment of new ponderosa pine cohorts following restoration treatments will have long-term impacts on the future development of forest stands. At a regional scale, we used data associated with 364 Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plots within the ponderosa pine forest type on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico. At a local scale, we sampled 28 stands on basalt and sedimentary parent materials on the Coconino National Forest in northern Arizona. Structural equation models were developed to determine the relative importance of direct and indirect factors affecting ponderosa pine seedling densities at both regional and local scales. The regional model only explained 13% of the variation in pine seedling density. The model indicated that ponderosa pine seedling density was highest where (1) mean annual precipitation was highest, (2) average May minimum temperature was highest, (3) overstory stand basal area was lowest and (4) Muhlenbergia spp. were dominant herbaceous plants. The local model explained 76% of the variation in pine seedling density. Densities were highest where (1) mean annual precipitation was highest, (2) soil clay content was lowest, (3) soil pH was lowest, (4) Muhlenbergia virescens frequency was highest and (5) seed tree frequency was highest. If additional factors such as soil texture, soil pH, screwleaf muhly frequency and seed tree frequency were measured on FIA plots, then perhaps more variation in pine seedling density could be explained at the regional scale.

year: 2012-01

title: Cultural justice, ethics and teaching

authors: Nairn, Ray

subjects: Maori

abstract: Te Tiriti o Waitangi provides both a basis for cultural justice in this society and an explication of the term; each of the articles identifying a significant aspect of cultural justice. First, there is the guarantee to the Maori signatories that the Crown would protect their independence - tino rangatiratanga, (also read as authority, autonomy or self-determination) [Article II]. In Article III Maori are promised that they will also have the “Rights and Privileges of British subjects”. Finally, in Article I, Maori cede to the Crown the right to govern, to make laws to protect all peoples from the evil consequences of lawlessness. The 1835 Declaration of Independence located legislative authority in the Wakaminenga (the gathered rangatira meeting in Congress); and in 1840, in the context of the Crown promises, Maori authorised the Crown to exercise that authority. For Maori Te Tiriti specifies cultural justice for interactions between Maori and settlers in the new society. Maori are guaranteed the right to self-determination (and the economic and social resources to make that practical) in their relations with New Zealand society. They are also entitled to the same opportunities as other citizens. The latter rights, embodied in local legislation and international covenants to which we are signatory, are not alternatives to the prior right of Maori people to their (cultural) autonomy. The exercise of legislative and organisational authority must be exercised in a manner consistent with the promises which clearly requires consultation and negotiation with Maori.

text: Cultural justice, ethics and teaching Te Tiriti o Waitangi provides both a basis for cultural justice in this society and an explication of the term; each of the articles identifying a significant aspect of cultural justice. First, there is the guarantee to the Maori signatories that the Crown would protect their independence - tino rangatiratanga, (also read as authority, autonomy or self-determination) [Article II]. In Article III Maori are promised that they will also have the “Rights and Privileges of British subjects”. Finally, in Article I, Maori cede to the Crown the right to govern, to make laws to protect all peoples from the evil consequences of lawlessness. The 1835 Declaration of Independence located legislative authority in the Wakaminenga (the gathered rangatira meeting in Congress); and in 1840, in the context of the Crown promises, Maori authorised the Crown to exercise that authority. For Maori Te Tiriti specifies cultural justice for interactions between Maori and settlers in the new society. Maori are guaranteed the right to self-determination (and the economic and social resources to make that practical) in their relations with New Zealand society. They are also entitled to the same opportunities as other citizens. The latter rights, embodied in local legislation and international covenants to which we are signatory, are not alternatives to the prior right of Maori people to their (cultural) autonomy. The exercise of legislative and organisational authority must be exercised in a manner consistent with the promises which clearly requires consultation and negotiation with Maori.

year: 1993