title: Traditional kava use and body sway: A pilot investigation

authors: Aporosa, S. 'Apo'

abstract: Introduction The (traditionally influenced) consumption of kava (Piper methysticum) has been associated with increased body sway, raising concerns about fall risk. However, studies typically utilise pill-styled kava extracts with a lack of understanding regarding experienced naturalistic kava drinkers. This pilot study investigated the effects of naturalistic kava consumption over a six-hour period on postural control. Methods Six experienced male kava drinkers consumed 100ml of kava every 10 minutes over six hours in a culturally responsive setting. Postural control was examined at three time points (Pre, Mid, and Post) using a 30-seconds eyes-closed feet-together postural balance test conducted on a 3D force plate. Centre of pressure path length, average velocity, and area of the 95th percentile ellipse data were extracted and compared between time points using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Findings There were no significant differences in the centre of pressure parameters. Based on the Pre and Post differences for path length and average velocity logged values, this study would require 19 participants to achieve an 80% power and 5% significance level. Discussion Irrespective of limited sample size, our preliminary results do not support that kava consumption negatively affects postural control, findings that appear to be corroborated by a recent neuroscience study. The perceived risks of naturalistic kava consumption with regards to falls may be overstated. Further study on the physiological implications of kava consumption in naturalistic settings is needed to quantify the actual risks. Highlights• Kava is a culturally significant drink for Pacific people• Anecdotal reports describe impaired balance following high traditional use volumes• Postural control was tested during and following kava use in a pilot study• Contrary to hypothesis, results do not show that kava negatively affects postural control.

text: Traditional kava use and body sway: A pilot investigation Introduction The (traditionally influenced) consumption of kava (Piper methysticum) has been associated with increased body sway, raising concerns about fall risk. However, studies typically utilise pill-styled kava extracts with a lack of understanding regarding experienced naturalistic kava drinkers. This pilot study investigated the effects of naturalistic kava consumption over a six-hour period on postural control. Methods Six experienced male kava drinkers consumed 100ml of kava every 10 minutes over six hours in a culturally responsive setting. Postural control was examined at three time points (Pre, Mid, and Post) using a 30-seconds eyes-closed feet-together postural balance test conducted on a 3D force plate. Centre of pressure path length, average velocity, and area of the 95th percentile ellipse data were extracted and compared between time points using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Findings There were no significant differences in the centre of pressure parameters. Based on the Pre and Post differences for path length and average velocity logged values, this study would require 19 participants to achieve an 80% power and 5% significance level. Discussion Irrespective of limited sample size, our preliminary results do not support that kava consumption negatively affects postural control, findings that appear to be corroborated by a recent neuroscience study. The perceived risks of naturalistic kava consumption with regards to falls may be overstated. Further study on the physiological implications of kava consumption in naturalistic settings is needed to quantify the actual risks. Highlights• Kava is a culturally significant drink for Pacific people• Anecdotal reports describe impaired balance following high traditional use volumes• Postural control was tested during and following kava use in a pilot study• Contrary to hypothesis, results do not show that kava negatively affects postural control.

year: 2022

title: Exploring interindividual running economy responses to advanced footwear technology shoes across a range of variables: A quantitative study

authors: Cumming, Christiaan

abstract: Abstract
In the past decade, the running landscape has changed due to advanced footwear technology (AFT) being imbedded in running shoes. While AFT shoes have been shown to improve running economy (RE) on average, little is known about the factors that explain the large interindividual variability in RE response. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the interindividual variability in RE response to AFT and identify potential predictors of this variability using quantitative methods. This thesis considered participant characteristics, anthropometric measures, neuromuscular measures, and subjective perceptions as potential factors underpinning interindividual variability.
This thesis is separated into three chapters. Chapter One is a brief review on AFT, their components, and their influence on RE and performance, as well as the observed interindividual variability in AFT shoe responses and the factors proposed to mediate this variability. AFT shoes have been designed to improve RE and include thick lightweight resilient and compliant foams, stiff elements embedded in the foam, and curved shoe geometry. Research has explored how these components may contribute to RE improvements and has proposed various factors that may explain the interindividual variability, such as running speed, training level, sex, leg length, body mass, shoe size, and plantarflexion muscle-tendon unit properties. Comparing the characteristics of responders to non-responders and exploring relationships between these characteristics and RE responses can assist in identifying runners more likely to benefit from running in AFT.
Chapter Two presents an experimental study using a cross-sectional, repeated-measures design.  A heterogenous sample of sixty-four participants (32 males, 32 females) of varying running levels, experience, age, and anthropometric characteristics completed two laboratory sessions between two and seven days apart. The first included baseline information and participant characteristics for anthropometric, neuromuscular measures, and maximal oxygen uptake. The second session served as the experimental phase, during which RE variables were evaluated in the two different shoe conditions: Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 (AFT) and Salomon Aero Glide 2 (CONTROL). RE was measured over four 6-minute trials in an AFT and a CONTROL shoe, allocated in a randomised, crossover order. Descriptive statistics (means ± SD), inferential comparisons (paired samples t-tests, Chi square, and Fishers exact), and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to compare between responders and non-responders to AFT shoes and explain AFT shoe response. The mean improvement in RE (expressed in terms of oxygen consumption) was 4.13 ± 1.6% when wearing AFT compared to CONTROL shoes, with individual responses ranging from -2.62% to 11.01%. From all the variables collected, only gastrocnemius medialis (GM) stiffness normalised to leg length was significantly different (p = 0.046) between groups, with responders exhibiting greater GM stiffness (329.8 ± 36.6 N/m²) compared to non-responders (296.4 ± 47.3 N/m²). No other between-group differences were statistically significant. Two variables were significantly and moderately correlated to RE response, where greater navicular drop (r = 0.31, p = 0.012) and greater GM stiffness (normalised to leg length) (r = 0.35, p = 0.005) were linked to greater RE benefits from running in AFT shoes. Additionally greater gear ratio (r = 0.26, p = 0.040) and lower standing plantarflexion isometric strength (normalised to body weight) (r = -0.26, p = 0.041) displayed significant and small correlations with improvements in RE when running in AFT shoes. A multiple linear regression including standing plantarflexion isometric strength, navicular drop, gear ratio, and GM stiffness (normalised to leg length) explained 27% of the variance in our AFT RE responses (R² = 0.2731, adjusted R² = 0.223), with GM stiffness being the most important factor (B = 0.014, p = 0.015). 
Lastly, Chapter Three summarises the findings, strengths, limitations, and recommendations for future research. This research provides further insight into interindividual variability in RE responses to AFT, showing not all runners benefit equally from AFT shoes. Therefore, runners should be aware that they may not improve their RE via AFT, however, individuals with greater GM stiffness, navicular drop, and static ankle gear ratio, and with lower standing plantarflexion isometric strength may benefit to a greater extent from AFT shoe wear. These factors may help guide more personalised footwear selection and prescription. Future research should investigate whether training interventions that modify these characteristics can enhance responses to AFT footwear and examine how other biomechanical variables, such as foot strike patterns or flight times, may interact with RE responses.

text: Exploring interindividual running economy responses to advanced footwear technology shoes across a range of variables: A quantitative study Abstract
In the past decade, the running landscape has changed due to advanced footwear technology (AFT) being imbedded in running shoes. While AFT shoes have been shown to improve running economy (RE) on average, little is known about the factors that explain the large interindividual variability in RE response. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the interindividual variability in RE response to AFT and identify potential predictors of this variability using quantitative methods. This thesis considered participant characteristics, anthropometric measures, neuromuscular measures, and subjective perceptions as potential factors underpinning interindividual variability.
This thesis is separated into three chapters. Chapter One is a brief review on AFT, their components, and their influence on RE and performance, as well as the observed interindividual variability in AFT shoe responses and the factors proposed to mediate this variability. AFT shoes have been designed to improve RE and include thick lightweight resilient and compliant foams, stiff elements embedded in the foam, and curved shoe geometry. Research has explored how these components may contribute to RE improvements and has proposed various factors that may explain the interindividual variability, such as running speed, training level, sex, leg length, body mass, shoe size, and plantarflexion muscle-tendon unit properties. Comparing the characteristics of responders to non-responders and exploring relationships between these characteristics and RE responses can assist in identifying runners more likely to benefit from running in AFT.
Chapter Two presents an experimental study using a cross-sectional, repeated-measures design.  A heterogenous sample of sixty-four participants (32 males, 32 females) of varying running levels, experience, age, and anthropometric characteristics completed two laboratory sessions between two and seven days apart. The first included baseline information and participant characteristics for anthropometric, neuromuscular measures, and maximal oxygen uptake. The second session served as the experimental phase, during which RE variables were evaluated in the two different shoe conditions: Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 (AFT) and Salomon Aero Glide 2 (CONTROL). RE was measured over four 6-minute trials in an AFT and a CONTROL shoe, allocated in a randomised, crossover order. Descriptive statistics (means ± SD), inferential comparisons (paired samples t-tests, Chi square, and Fishers exact), and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to compare between responders and non-responders to AFT shoes and explain AFT shoe response. The mean improvement in RE (expressed in terms of oxygen consumption) was 4.13 ± 1.6% when wearing AFT compared to CONTROL shoes, with individual responses ranging from -2.62% to 11.01%. From all the variables collected, only gastrocnemius medialis (GM) stiffness normalised to leg length was significantly different (p = 0.046) between groups, with responders exhibiting greater GM stiffness (329.8 ± 36.6 N/m²) compared to non-responders (296.4 ± 47.3 N/m²). No other between-group differences were statistically significant. Two variables were significantly and moderately correlated to RE response, where greater navicular drop (r = 0.31, p = 0.012) and greater GM stiffness (normalised to leg length) (r = 0.35, p = 0.005) were linked to greater RE benefits from running in AFT shoes. Additionally greater gear ratio (r = 0.26, p = 0.040) and lower standing plantarflexion isometric strength (normalised to body weight) (r = -0.26, p = 0.041) displayed significant and small correlations with improvements in RE when running in AFT shoes. A multiple linear regression including standing plantarflexion isometric strength, navicular drop, gear ratio, and GM stiffness (normalised to leg length) explained 27% of the variance in our AFT RE responses (R² = 0.2731, adjusted R² = 0.223), with GM stiffness being the most important factor (B = 0.014, p = 0.015). 
Lastly, Chapter Three summarises the findings, strengths, limitations, and recommendations for future research. This research provides further insight into interindividual variability in RE responses to AFT, showing not all runners benefit equally from AFT shoes. Therefore, runners should be aware that they may not improve their RE via AFT, however, individuals with greater GM stiffness, navicular drop, and static ankle gear ratio, and with lower standing plantarflexion isometric strength may benefit to a greater extent from AFT shoe wear. These factors may help guide more personalised footwear selection and prescription. Future research should investigate whether training interventions that modify these characteristics can enhance responses to AFT footwear and examine how other biomechanical variables, such as foot strike patterns or flight times, may interact with RE responses.

year: 2025

title: Indigenous languages shaping multi-lingual interfaces

authors: Keegan, Te Taka Adrian Gregory

subjects: computer science

abstract: This paper reports on an investigation into the indigenous language usage of two bilingual/multilingual digital libraries. Results show that the indigenous language was significantly used by clients and indicate why clients chose to use the indigenous language. Feedback from clients has suggested how the interface should be improved to assist both indigenous and non-indigenous language usage. These results serve as an example of how indigenous languages are shaping multilingual interfaces.

text: Indigenous languages shaping multi-lingual interfaces This paper reports on an investigation into the indigenous language usage of two bilingual/multilingual digital libraries. Results show that the indigenous language was significantly used by clients and indicate why clients chose to use the indigenous language. Feedback from clients has suggested how the interface should be improved to assist both indigenous and non-indigenous language usage. These results serve as an example of how indigenous languages are shaping multilingual interfaces.

year: 2008