title: Human factors affecting the control and perception of motor vehicle dynamics

authors: Spackman, Kerry

abstract: Vehicle Dynamics Engineers (VDEs) responsible for developing passenger vehicles and Elite Race Drivers were analysed over a 5 year period using telemetry data. Investigations were undertaken in an attempt to identify the most important rate limiting factors for each profession and to develop effective training methods for them. 

In a preliminary investigation it was found that the VDEs were unable to reliably detect certain changes to a vehicle’s dynamic behaviour despite their high confidence that they were doing so. This result led to the main VDE study where the VDEs were assessed using a Rotary vestibular platform, the RAF Basic Attributes tests and telemetry analysis of their performance while they evaluated changes to a vehicle’s dynamic behaviour. It was found that there was no significant relation between either the Attributes scores or vestibular performance and the VDEs’ ability to discriminate changes to the dynamic behaviour of a vehicle, termed their Evaluation performance. 

After the VDE’s baseline Evaluation performance was established, they received individual training to improve both their performance at sensing dynamic motion (Perceptual performance) and their consistency and accuracy of controlling vehicle motion (Control performance). The VDEs were then retested to determine the effect of this training on their Evaluation performance. Whereas before training most VDEs scored in the worst Evaluation performance category, after training most scored in the highest Evaluation performance category. A new mathematical technique for analysing telemetry data was developed which allowed us to separately determine the effects of Perceptual performance and Control performance on Evaluation performance. It was found that improving the VDE’s Perceptual performance accounted for all improvements in their Evaluation performance whereas Control performance was unrelated to their Evaluation performance. This finding led to the development of a new Human Factors training program which will be instituted for all Ford’s professional VDEs from 1996 onward. 

In the Elite race driver study, a mathematical model was developed which allowed us to simulate the effect of altering a driver’s curvature control strategy, which is a key component of a driver’s style, on lap times. It was found that all drivers tested, with the notable exception of 3 times World Formula 1 Champion Jackie Stewart, had inadequate and / or faulty cognitive models for optimising curvature control when compared to our computer simulations. Training the subjects to improve their curvature control model produced substantial objective improvements in performance whereas additional unaided practice produced no improvement. For example a 19 year old N.Z. race driver was trained in one afternoon to lap faster than the current World Touring Car champion using the same vehicle.

text: Human factors affecting the control and perception of motor vehicle dynamics Vehicle Dynamics Engineers (VDEs) responsible for developing passenger vehicles and Elite Race Drivers were analysed over a 5 year period using telemetry data. Investigations were undertaken in an attempt to identify the most important rate limiting factors for each profession and to develop effective training methods for them. 

In a preliminary investigation it was found that the VDEs were unable to reliably detect certain changes to a vehicle’s dynamic behaviour despite their high confidence that they were doing so. This result led to the main VDE study where the VDEs were assessed using a Rotary vestibular platform, the RAF Basic Attributes tests and telemetry analysis of their performance while they evaluated changes to a vehicle’s dynamic behaviour. It was found that there was no significant relation between either the Attributes scores or vestibular performance and the VDEs’ ability to discriminate changes to the dynamic behaviour of a vehicle, termed their Evaluation performance. 

After the VDE’s baseline Evaluation performance was established, they received individual training to improve both their performance at sensing dynamic motion (Perceptual performance) and their consistency and accuracy of controlling vehicle motion (Control performance). The VDEs were then retested to determine the effect of this training on their Evaluation performance. Whereas before training most VDEs scored in the worst Evaluation performance category, after training most scored in the highest Evaluation performance category. A new mathematical technique for analysing telemetry data was developed which allowed us to separately determine the effects of Perceptual performance and Control performance on Evaluation performance. It was found that improving the VDE’s Perceptual performance accounted for all improvements in their Evaluation performance whereas Control performance was unrelated to their Evaluation performance. This finding led to the development of a new Human Factors training program which will be instituted for all Ford’s professional VDEs from 1996 onward. 

In the Elite race driver study, a mathematical model was developed which allowed us to simulate the effect of altering a driver’s curvature control strategy, which is a key component of a driver’s style, on lap times. It was found that all drivers tested, with the notable exception of 3 times World Formula 1 Champion Jackie Stewart, had inadequate and / or faulty cognitive models for optimising curvature control when compared to our computer simulations. Training the subjects to improve their curvature control model produced substantial objective improvements in performance whereas additional unaided practice produced no improvement. For example a 19 year old N.Z. race driver was trained in one afternoon to lap faster than the current World Touring Car champion using the same vehicle.

year: 1996

title: Revised calendar date for the Taupo eruption derived by ¹⁴C wiggle-matching using a New Zealand kauri ¹⁴C calibration data set

authors: Hogg, Alan G.

subjects: ¹⁴C  wiggle-match dating

abstract: Taupo volcano in central North Island, New Zealand, is the most frequently active and productive rhyolite volcano on Earth. Its latest explosive activity about 1800 years ago generated the spectacular Taupo eruption, the most violent eruption known in the world in the last 5000 years. We present here a new accurate and precise eruption date of AD 232 ± 5 (1718 ± 5 cal. BP) for the Taupo event. This date was derived by wiggle-matching 25 high-precision ¹⁴C  dates from decadal samples of Phyllocladus trichomanoides from the Pureora buried forest near Lake Taupo against the high-precision, first-millennium AD subfossil Agathis australis (kauri) calibration data set constructed by the Waikato Radiocarbon Laboratory. It shows that postulated dates for the eruption estimated previously from Greenland ice-core records (AD 181 ± 2) and putative historical records of unusual atmospheric phenomena in ancient Rome and China (c. AD 186) are both untenable. However, although their conclusion of a zero north–south ¹⁴C  offset is erroneous, and their data exhibit a laboratory bias of about 38 years (too young), Sparks et al. (Sparks RJ, Melhuish WH, McKee JWA, Ogden J, Palmer JG and Molloy BPJ (1995) ¹⁴C  calibration in the Southern Hemisphere and the date of the last Taupo eruption: Evidence from tree-ring sequences. Radiocarbon 37: 155–163) correctly utilized the Northern Hemisphere calibration curve of Stuiver and Becker (Stuiver M and Becker B (1993) High-precision decadal calibration of the radiocarbon timescale, AD 1950–6000 BC. Radiocarbon 35: 35–65) to obtain an accurate wiggle-match date for the eruption identical to ours but less precise (AD 232 ± 15). Our results demonstrate that high-agreement levels, indicated by either agreement indices or χ² data, obtained from a ¹⁴C  wiggle-match do not necessarily mean that age models are accurate. We also show that laboratory bias, if suspected, can be mitigated by applying the reservoir offset function with an appropriate error value (e.g. 0 ± 40 years). Ages for eruptives such as Taupo tephra that are based upon individual ¹⁴C  dates should be considered as approximate only, and confined ideally to short-lived material (e.g. seeds, leaves, small branches or the outer rings of larger trees).

text: Revised calendar date for the Taupo eruption derived by ¹⁴C wiggle-matching using a New Zealand kauri ¹⁴C calibration data set Taupo volcano in central North Island, New Zealand, is the most frequently active and productive rhyolite volcano on Earth. Its latest explosive activity about 1800 years ago generated the spectacular Taupo eruption, the most violent eruption known in the world in the last 5000 years. We present here a new accurate and precise eruption date of AD 232 ± 5 (1718 ± 5 cal. BP) for the Taupo event. This date was derived by wiggle-matching 25 high-precision ¹⁴C  dates from decadal samples of Phyllocladus trichomanoides from the Pureora buried forest near Lake Taupo against the high-precision, first-millennium AD subfossil Agathis australis (kauri) calibration data set constructed by the Waikato Radiocarbon Laboratory. It shows that postulated dates for the eruption estimated previously from Greenland ice-core records (AD 181 ± 2) and putative historical records of unusual atmospheric phenomena in ancient Rome and China (c. AD 186) are both untenable. However, although their conclusion of a zero north–south ¹⁴C  offset is erroneous, and their data exhibit a laboratory bias of about 38 years (too young), Sparks et al. (Sparks RJ, Melhuish WH, McKee JWA, Ogden J, Palmer JG and Molloy BPJ (1995) ¹⁴C  calibration in the Southern Hemisphere and the date of the last Taupo eruption: Evidence from tree-ring sequences. Radiocarbon 37: 155–163) correctly utilized the Northern Hemisphere calibration curve of Stuiver and Becker (Stuiver M and Becker B (1993) High-precision decadal calibration of the radiocarbon timescale, AD 1950–6000 BC. Radiocarbon 35: 35–65) to obtain an accurate wiggle-match date for the eruption identical to ours but less precise (AD 232 ± 15). Our results demonstrate that high-agreement levels, indicated by either agreement indices or χ² data, obtained from a ¹⁴C  wiggle-match do not necessarily mean that age models are accurate. We also show that laboratory bias, if suspected, can be mitigated by applying the reservoir offset function with an appropriate error value (e.g. 0 ± 40 years). Ages for eruptives such as Taupo tephra that are based upon individual ¹⁴C  dates should be considered as approximate only, and confined ideally to short-lived material (e.g. seeds, leaves, small branches or the outer rings of larger trees).

year: 2011

title: Ko wai tēnei e tū ake nei? Activating collectivity and accountability through grounded positioning

authors: Rata, Arama

abstract: Building on conference conversations about positionality—about who we are and how our identities shape our views of the world, about the connections and disconnections experienced between us, and about our proximities to place, power, and privilege—this piece brings together four conference participants to continue to reflect on what positionality means, on why it is important, and on how to practice it in non-performative, well-developed, and mutually nourishing ways. Their dialogue reflects active and critical positioning in process and practice, creating opportunities for acknowledging our relationships and activating both collectivity and accountability in the various spaces where we live, work, create, and hope.

text: Ko wai tēnei e tū ake nei? Activating collectivity and accountability through grounded positioning Building on conference conversations about positionality—about who we are and how our identities shape our views of the world, about the connections and disconnections experienced between us, and about our proximities to place, power, and privilege—this piece brings together four conference participants to continue to reflect on what positionality means, on why it is important, and on how to practice it in non-performative, well-developed, and mutually nourishing ways. Their dialogue reflects active and critical positioning in process and practice, creating opportunities for acknowledging our relationships and activating both collectivity and accountability in the various spaces where we live, work, create, and hope.

year: 2021-12