title: Urban affairs in New Zealand

authors: Kenward, J.K.

abstract: This thesis is an analysis of the decision-making processes from which emerge the pattern and form of New Zealand’s “growth and development”. Involving three distinct but interrelated sections the analysis examines the nature of the relations which exist between “government” and “private” interests and the effect of decisions taken in both spheres for areas of concern such as regional development, local and regional planning, and the provision of housing. Decisions are seen to reflect processes whereby competing centres of influence negotiate with one another while, at the same time, attempting to manoeuvre into positions of competitive advantage.

The first section involves an examination of the monetary policies of successive National administrations during the nineteen sixties and early seventies. This provides a framework within which to understand not only the effects of central government financial policies on private institutional investment decisions but also the repercussions of these decisions for New Zealand’s “growth and development”. The section also compares the respective economic and financial philosophies of the Labour and National Parties and their differing views on the extent to which central government should intervene in “private” decisions.

Subsequent sections examine Labour’s attempts to implement its “social” policies between 1972 and 1975. This involves a detailed account of the measures adopted by Labour to implement its housing policies. This empirical material is examined by a case study of a Hamilton City boundary extension proposal. It provides insight into the “strategy” adopted by one local authority to strengthen its negotiating position in  relation to both central government and “private” interests. By using its statutory powers and position in the Hamilton Regional Planning Authority the Council attempted to pressure the Labour Government to commit itself to local and regional planning policies and to provide additional financial assistance to the City for the provision of services.

text: Urban affairs in New Zealand This thesis is an analysis of the decision-making processes from which emerge the pattern and form of New Zealand’s “growth and development”. Involving three distinct but interrelated sections the analysis examines the nature of the relations which exist between “government” and “private” interests and the effect of decisions taken in both spheres for areas of concern such as regional development, local and regional planning, and the provision of housing. Decisions are seen to reflect processes whereby competing centres of influence negotiate with one another while, at the same time, attempting to manoeuvre into positions of competitive advantage.

The first section involves an examination of the monetary policies of successive National administrations during the nineteen sixties and early seventies. This provides a framework within which to understand not only the effects of central government financial policies on private institutional investment decisions but also the repercussions of these decisions for New Zealand’s “growth and development”. The section also compares the respective economic and financial philosophies of the Labour and National Parties and their differing views on the extent to which central government should intervene in “private” decisions.

Subsequent sections examine Labour’s attempts to implement its “social” policies between 1972 and 1975. This involves a detailed account of the measures adopted by Labour to implement its housing policies. This empirical material is examined by a case study of a Hamilton City boundary extension proposal. It provides insight into the “strategy” adopted by one local authority to strengthen its negotiating position in  relation to both central government and “private” interests. By using its statutory powers and position in the Hamilton Regional Planning Authority the Council attempted to pressure the Labour Government to commit itself to local and regional planning policies and to provide additional financial assistance to the City for the provision of services.

year: 1977

title: Love me long time: safety and risk in heterocoupledom at adolescence.

authors: Parker, Lisa Maree

abstract: This thesis argues that heterocoupledom at adolescence discursively constitutes Girlfriends and Boyfriends as gendered subjects of safety and risk. The gendering of safety and risk operates to position Girlfriends as risk navigators who make pre-emptive and response-able moves. Safety and risk are regarded as disciplinary techniques that regulate Girlfriends’ performances in relation to defending or maintaining safety and managing risk. It is argued that this positioning as risk navigators only makes ‘sense’ when the subject of Girlfriend is figured as already unsafe and yet responsible for risk. Boyfriends are argued to be positioned as already safe and capable risk takers within heterocoupledom and this configuration means that young men’s engagements with safety and risk remain normalised and unproblematic.

Interviews with young women and focus groups with young women and men were conducted in the mid 1990's. i then read these texts from a feminist discursive position. This discursive approach to feminist psychology is described as it shifted politically and across disciplinary boundaries. Drawing from feminist readings of Foucauldian understandings of power and heterosexuality, i have examined the ways in which hegemonic discourses of heterocoupledom constitute Girlfriends as subjects who are expected to take responsibility for managing and navigating safety and risk. Throughout i ‘make strange’ the way risk warnings convey a taken for granted sensibility that young women should take precautions against harm, abuse and violence, and defend against their safety. The constitution of Girlfriend as already unsafe and Boyfriend as already safe is problematised.

The thesis is structured around a reading of the constitution of gendered heterocoupledom, romance, risk and adolescence, and problematises how heterocoupledom is entered into, the labours of love, and the young women’s responses to harm, abuse, and violence from Boyfriends. Among the many discourses discussed, a discourse of feminine sexuality as threatened and threatening is argued to position young women as already unsafe. A girl-power femininity is argued to have been recuperated to incite young women to become subject to the labours of navigating for safety. i also pay attention to the many subversions of the discourses of gender that young people make in their everyday heterocoupledom and how masculinity and femininity are remixed in a post-modern, globalised capitalist Western context where both recuperation and resistance are at work. The overall focus remains on the disciplinary workings and implications for Girlfriends of navigating a double danger where safety (as managing risk) depends on the re-invention and reification of the already unsafe subject - Girlfriend.

text: Love me long time: safety and risk in heterocoupledom at adolescence. This thesis argues that heterocoupledom at adolescence discursively constitutes Girlfriends and Boyfriends as gendered subjects of safety and risk. The gendering of safety and risk operates to position Girlfriends as risk navigators who make pre-emptive and response-able moves. Safety and risk are regarded as disciplinary techniques that regulate Girlfriends’ performances in relation to defending or maintaining safety and managing risk. It is argued that this positioning as risk navigators only makes ‘sense’ when the subject of Girlfriend is figured as already unsafe and yet responsible for risk. Boyfriends are argued to be positioned as already safe and capable risk takers within heterocoupledom and this configuration means that young men’s engagements with safety and risk remain normalised and unproblematic.

Interviews with young women and focus groups with young women and men were conducted in the mid 1990's. i then read these texts from a feminist discursive position. This discursive approach to feminist psychology is described as it shifted politically and across disciplinary boundaries. Drawing from feminist readings of Foucauldian understandings of power and heterosexuality, i have examined the ways in which hegemonic discourses of heterocoupledom constitute Girlfriends as subjects who are expected to take responsibility for managing and navigating safety and risk. Throughout i ‘make strange’ the way risk warnings convey a taken for granted sensibility that young women should take precautions against harm, abuse and violence, and defend against their safety. The constitution of Girlfriend as already unsafe and Boyfriend as already safe is problematised.

The thesis is structured around a reading of the constitution of gendered heterocoupledom, romance, risk and adolescence, and problematises how heterocoupledom is entered into, the labours of love, and the young women’s responses to harm, abuse, and violence from Boyfriends. Among the many discourses discussed, a discourse of feminine sexuality as threatened and threatening is argued to position young women as already unsafe. A girl-power femininity is argued to have been recuperated to incite young women to become subject to the labours of navigating for safety. i also pay attention to the many subversions of the discourses of gender that young people make in their everyday heterocoupledom and how masculinity and femininity are remixed in a post-modern, globalised capitalist Western context where both recuperation and resistance are at work. The overall focus remains on the disciplinary workings and implications for Girlfriends of navigating a double danger where safety (as managing risk) depends on the re-invention and reification of the already unsafe subject - Girlfriend.

year: 2002

title: Pātangaroa: Co-developing management strategies for a starfish outbreak in Ōhiwa Harbour

authors: Ranapia, Megan

subjects: marine management

abstract: The management of marine environments often prioritises scientific information to address complex marine social-ecological issues. However, there is a wealth of learning to be gained from Indigenous people who have generated place-based intergenerational understandings and cultural ethics and practices. Consequently, Indigenous knowledge alongside science can offer better insights, holistic understanding, sustainable management strategies and greater sources of evidence. This research is located in Aotearoa New Zealand and engages in mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) alongside marine ecology as an appropriate method for contemporary marine research and management. The thesis study focused on Ōhiwa Harbour, aiming to co-develop a starfish management action plan (SMAP) with local iwi (tribe) Ngāti Awa and other affiliated iwi, district councils and regional council to address the overabundant starfish (species: Coscinasterias muricata and Patiriella regularis). By engaging in transdisciplinary research and collaborative decision-making, this study sought to bridge the gap between Indigenous knowledge and mainstream science, offering lessons for inclusive marine management practices.

To achieve this, I developed and prescribed a co-developed framework actively promoting a mixed-methods approach, inclusive of kaupapa Māori research methodologies, tikanga, participatory design, applied mātauranga ā iwi, quantitative marine scientific field methods and experimental study design. Through the collaborative process, I identified areas of appropriate research aims and methods. This included co-developing a novel starfish trapping methodology sensitive to local ecology and cultural values and an experimental starfish removal study to assist decision-makers in implementing an efficient and effective starfish removal regime as an approach to management.

Results from the field studies showed the efficacy of starfish traps is dependent on environmental conditions, physical characteristics and soaking time (the length of time the trap is left in the water). A soaking time of 48 h maintained the highest starfish catch per unit effort (CPUE) while minimising time to re-bait and reset traps. Observations also indicated an open trap design had less bycatch than a semi-enclosed box trap and could withstand the tidal currents for a longer period. The findings found that bait type did not impact on CPUE. In the starfish removal study, the combined effort of diver removals and trapping produced higher daily catch rates than the single treatments (i.e., diver removals only or trapping only), therefore was themost efficient removal method. The empirical information gathered from the field studies was then used to inform the SMAP and was accepted unanimously at the highest local/regional co-management level. Furthermore, through the findings I identified future research opportunities that would further close gaps in our knowledge around the best management approaches for a starfish outbreak. These included investigation into the predation impacts of P. regularis on mussel recruitment, identification of alternative restoration sites less susceptible to starfish predation pressures and investigation of potential drivers of the starfish outbreak.

Overall, the acceptance of the SMAP by local iwi/hapū and government authorities underscores the success of the collaborative approach. The collaborative process not only addresses the immediate concerns of starfish infestation but contributed to the broader goal of supporting kaitiakitanga (active guardianship) responsibilities and promoting Indigenous perspectives in marine management. This thesis demonstrates and recommends a new approach to starfish management in coastal marine areas using both marine science and mātauranga Māori understandings, practices and ethics, furthermore, it demonstrates the commitment to the inclusion of multiple knowledge systems and involvement of communities.

text: Pātangaroa: Co-developing management strategies for a starfish outbreak in Ōhiwa Harbour The management of marine environments often prioritises scientific information to address complex marine social-ecological issues. However, there is a wealth of learning to be gained from Indigenous people who have generated place-based intergenerational understandings and cultural ethics and practices. Consequently, Indigenous knowledge alongside science can offer better insights, holistic understanding, sustainable management strategies and greater sources of evidence. This research is located in Aotearoa New Zealand and engages in mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) alongside marine ecology as an appropriate method for contemporary marine research and management. The thesis study focused on Ōhiwa Harbour, aiming to co-develop a starfish management action plan (SMAP) with local iwi (tribe) Ngāti Awa and other affiliated iwi, district councils and regional council to address the overabundant starfish (species: Coscinasterias muricata and Patiriella regularis). By engaging in transdisciplinary research and collaborative decision-making, this study sought to bridge the gap between Indigenous knowledge and mainstream science, offering lessons for inclusive marine management practices.

To achieve this, I developed and prescribed a co-developed framework actively promoting a mixed-methods approach, inclusive of kaupapa Māori research methodologies, tikanga, participatory design, applied mātauranga ā iwi, quantitative marine scientific field methods and experimental study design. Through the collaborative process, I identified areas of appropriate research aims and methods. This included co-developing a novel starfish trapping methodology sensitive to local ecology and cultural values and an experimental starfish removal study to assist decision-makers in implementing an efficient and effective starfish removal regime as an approach to management.

Results from the field studies showed the efficacy of starfish traps is dependent on environmental conditions, physical characteristics and soaking time (the length of time the trap is left in the water). A soaking time of 48 h maintained the highest starfish catch per unit effort (CPUE) while minimising time to re-bait and reset traps. Observations also indicated an open trap design had less bycatch than a semi-enclosed box trap and could withstand the tidal currents for a longer period. The findings found that bait type did not impact on CPUE. In the starfish removal study, the combined effort of diver removals and trapping produced higher daily catch rates than the single treatments (i.e., diver removals only or trapping only), therefore was themost efficient removal method. The empirical information gathered from the field studies was then used to inform the SMAP and was accepted unanimously at the highest local/regional co-management level. Furthermore, through the findings I identified future research opportunities that would further close gaps in our knowledge around the best management approaches for a starfish outbreak. These included investigation into the predation impacts of P. regularis on mussel recruitment, identification of alternative restoration sites less susceptible to starfish predation pressures and investigation of potential drivers of the starfish outbreak.

Overall, the acceptance of the SMAP by local iwi/hapū and government authorities underscores the success of the collaborative approach. The collaborative process not only addresses the immediate concerns of starfish infestation but contributed to the broader goal of supporting kaitiakitanga (active guardianship) responsibilities and promoting Indigenous perspectives in marine management. This thesis demonstrates and recommends a new approach to starfish management in coastal marine areas using both marine science and mātauranga Māori understandings, practices and ethics, furthermore, it demonstrates the commitment to the inclusion of multiple knowledge systems and involvement of communities.

year: 2025-05