title: Children’s knowledge and experience of compost/ing

authors: Tsang, Sophia WR

abstract: The Soilsafe Kids education and research programme conducted focus groups about compost/ing in eight primary school classes in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand in 2022 to understand what students learning at New Zealand Curriculum Level 2 (generally students aged 5-11 years old) know about compost/ing. Here, we present a qualitative content analysis of focus groups focusing on children’s knowledge about the process of composting and the resulting material. In general, children (n = 117) demonstrated a broad understanding of the typical process of composting and the materials that make up compost. Our findings contrast previous studies which have indicated children’s comprehension of composting was poor. Despite participating in composting activities in schools, respondents more commonly associated compost/ing activities with their home systems where they compost with their families. Although these results demonstrate a considerable baseline knowledge of compost/ing understood by children, they also had many questions about compost/ing, mainly focused on the timing necessary to biodegrade, the underlying processes, and why we compost. These encouraging findings mean educators have a strong base on which to build lessons, but educators should also be mindful of bridging gaps in retention for greatest pedagogical impact, given our findings suggest that students recall off-campus composting experiences more strongly than on-campus ones. This should be further explored to ensure children have equitable access to composting experiences and knowledge.

text: Children’s knowledge and experience of compost/ing The Soilsafe Kids education and research programme conducted focus groups about compost/ing in eight primary school classes in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand in 2022 to understand what students learning at New Zealand Curriculum Level 2 (generally students aged 5-11 years old) know about compost/ing. Here, we present a qualitative content analysis of focus groups focusing on children’s knowledge about the process of composting and the resulting material. In general, children (n = 117) demonstrated a broad understanding of the typical process of composting and the materials that make up compost. Our findings contrast previous studies which have indicated children’s comprehension of composting was poor. Despite participating in composting activities in schools, respondents more commonly associated compost/ing activities with their home systems where they compost with their families. Although these results demonstrate a considerable baseline knowledge of compost/ing understood by children, they also had many questions about compost/ing, mainly focused on the timing necessary to biodegrade, the underlying processes, and why we compost. These encouraging findings mean educators have a strong base on which to build lessons, but educators should also be mindful of bridging gaps in retention for greatest pedagogical impact, given our findings suggest that students recall off-campus composting experiences more strongly than on-campus ones. This should be further explored to ensure children have equitable access to composting experiences and knowledge.

year: 2025

title: The Barracuda: An investigation of a novel cane pruning technology for avoiding wires in structured vineyard environments

authors: Harvey, Scott

subjects: Robotic

abstract: The viticulture industry, among many others, is trying to improve their product quality whilst facing labour supply challenges and increasing labour costs. The Maaratech research group has been developing human assist technology and an autonomous, prototype grape vine pruning machine to alleviate these issues. The machine is an arched “straddle” platform, containing a camera array, PC, UR5 manipulator, and end-effector. The canes of the grapevine are wrapped around guide wires, making it very difficult for cuts to be made – whether by human or robot. This thesis presents the process of developing and testing a novel technology called the Barracuda, to enable cuts to be made where the wire interferes with a cut. The wire also puts high accuracy requirements on the vision system and manipulator movements if a secondary mechanism was used to separate the wire and cane. The Barracuda was developed as an end effector to alleviate these issues by allowing passive wire separation from the cane. It works by exploiting the diameter difference between the smaller wire, and larger canes. The wire falls into slots, evading the blade, while the cane is cut.

Two Barracuda configurations were tested by making cuts on canes wrapped around the guide wire. Config 1 was a single row of teeth, with larger recesses, flat teeth and a blade-guiding chamfer. Config 2 used two rows of teeth either side of smaller recesses and included rounded teeth tips. The components are CNC machined or laser cut. Results showed for both configurations, the 0° position was most effective. The 0° position is where the wire was below the cane, relative to the handpiece. In this position, Config 1 was effective 40.7% of the time, and config 2, 94.5% of the time. Damage to the wire was caused 8.9% of the time for config 1, and config 2 just 2.6% of the time. Both blades received the same rate of blade damage, however the damage was visibly more significant on config 1. From these results, config 2 was the preferred design, but integrating a chamfer from config 1 should reduce blade damage further.

It also benefits human assist goals. By allowing cuts on the wire, pruners are able to make cuts quickly and easily with Barracuda-modified secateurs or loppers, removing the need to separate the cane from the wire. The design works around the environment, increases the number of points available for decision making, and allows some inaccuracy in the rest of the robotic system by offering passive wire avoidance with the teeth. The performance of the Barracuda in cut situations involving a wire proved it valuable for integration with current manual pruning methods, and as a cornerstone for robotic pruning development, providing further opportunities for the greater system.

text: The Barracuda: An investigation of a novel cane pruning technology for avoiding wires in structured vineyard environments The viticulture industry, among many others, is trying to improve their product quality whilst facing labour supply challenges and increasing labour costs. The Maaratech research group has been developing human assist technology and an autonomous, prototype grape vine pruning machine to alleviate these issues. The machine is an arched “straddle” platform, containing a camera array, PC, UR5 manipulator, and end-effector. The canes of the grapevine are wrapped around guide wires, making it very difficult for cuts to be made – whether by human or robot. This thesis presents the process of developing and testing a novel technology called the Barracuda, to enable cuts to be made where the wire interferes with a cut. The wire also puts high accuracy requirements on the vision system and manipulator movements if a secondary mechanism was used to separate the wire and cane. The Barracuda was developed as an end effector to alleviate these issues by allowing passive wire separation from the cane. It works by exploiting the diameter difference between the smaller wire, and larger canes. The wire falls into slots, evading the blade, while the cane is cut.

Two Barracuda configurations were tested by making cuts on canes wrapped around the guide wire. Config 1 was a single row of teeth, with larger recesses, flat teeth and a blade-guiding chamfer. Config 2 used two rows of teeth either side of smaller recesses and included rounded teeth tips. The components are CNC machined or laser cut. Results showed for both configurations, the 0° position was most effective. The 0° position is where the wire was below the cane, relative to the handpiece. In this position, Config 1 was effective 40.7% of the time, and config 2, 94.5% of the time. Damage to the wire was caused 8.9% of the time for config 1, and config 2 just 2.6% of the time. Both blades received the same rate of blade damage, however the damage was visibly more significant on config 1. From these results, config 2 was the preferred design, but integrating a chamfer from config 1 should reduce blade damage further.

It also benefits human assist goals. By allowing cuts on the wire, pruners are able to make cuts quickly and easily with Barracuda-modified secateurs or loppers, removing the need to separate the cane from the wire. The design works around the environment, increases the number of points available for decision making, and allows some inaccuracy in the rest of the robotic system by offering passive wire avoidance with the teeth. The performance of the Barracuda in cut situations involving a wire proved it valuable for integration with current manual pruning methods, and as a cornerstone for robotic pruning development, providing further opportunities for the greater system.

year: 2022

title: Improving prediction of potential for treatment completion at Tai Aroha

authors: Astridge Clarke,  Abigail Darcy

subjects: Treatment

abstract: Participant non-completion can be a major problem for treatment programmes. Staff may try to minimise non-completion by deciding who to select for treatment using professional intuition and referral information. It can be difficult for treatment staff to make these decisions regarding the potential for programme completion due to a lack of clear guidelines about what information to consider. This lack of clear guidelines can increase susceptibility to biases, and lead to unreliable and potentially inaccurate decisions. Research has identified ‘simple rules’ that are tools to aid decision-making quickly, effectively, and consistently. Therefore, using past treatment data, we1 aimed to identify predictors of programme completion vs. non-completion at Tai Aroha—a residential treatment programme based in Hamilton—to explore whether a “simple rule” can be developed from information readily available at the time of referral, to support staff decision-making when selecting offenders to attend treatment, with the potential to increase programme completion. We were successful in the development of a simple rule to aid Tai Aroha staff selection decisions. The implications, and limitations of our rule and our study are discussed, and future research relating to simple rules are identified.

text: Improving prediction of potential for treatment completion at Tai Aroha Participant non-completion can be a major problem for treatment programmes. Staff may try to minimise non-completion by deciding who to select for treatment using professional intuition and referral information. It can be difficult for treatment staff to make these decisions regarding the potential for programme completion due to a lack of clear guidelines about what information to consider. This lack of clear guidelines can increase susceptibility to biases, and lead to unreliable and potentially inaccurate decisions. Research has identified ‘simple rules’ that are tools to aid decision-making quickly, effectively, and consistently. Therefore, using past treatment data, we1 aimed to identify predictors of programme completion vs. non-completion at Tai Aroha—a residential treatment programme based in Hamilton—to explore whether a “simple rule” can be developed from information readily available at the time of referral, to support staff decision-making when selecting offenders to attend treatment, with the potential to increase programme completion. We were successful in the development of a simple rule to aid Tai Aroha staff selection decisions. The implications, and limitations of our rule and our study are discussed, and future research relating to simple rules are identified.

year: 2023