title: Intramolecular dehydrofluorinative coupling of η⁶-arene and fluoroarylphosphine ligands in ruthenium complexes

authors: McGibbon, Angela

subjects: ruthenium

abstract: NMR studies of reactions between a series of arene ruthenium(II) fluoroarylphosphine complexes and Proton Sponge have revealed the necessary conditions for intramolecular dehydrofluorinative ligand coupling. The complex must be cationic, and the phosphine need have only one fluoroaryl substituent. The reaction is rapid and clean for [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl(dfppe)]BF₄, [(η⁶-mesitylene)RuCl{(C₆F₅)₂PC₆H₄SMe}]BF₄ and the diastereomer of [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl{Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh(C₅F₄N-4)}]BF₄ in which the tetrafluoropyridyl substituent is close to the η6-arene. [(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl(dfppe)]BF₄ reacts in the presence of Proton Sponge to give a mixture of unidentified compounds. The neutral complex [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl₂{Ph₂P(C₆F₅)}] and the diastereomer of [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl{Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh(C₅F₄N-4)}]BF₄ in which the tetrafluoropyridyl substituent is distant to the η⁶-arene do not undergo reaction.

text: Intramolecular dehydrofluorinative coupling of η⁶-arene and fluoroarylphosphine ligands in ruthenium complexes NMR studies of reactions between a series of arene ruthenium(II) fluoroarylphosphine complexes and Proton Sponge have revealed the necessary conditions for intramolecular dehydrofluorinative ligand coupling. The complex must be cationic, and the phosphine need have only one fluoroaryl substituent. The reaction is rapid and clean for [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl(dfppe)]BF₄, [(η⁶-mesitylene)RuCl{(C₆F₅)₂PC₆H₄SMe}]BF₄ and the diastereomer of [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl{Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh(C₅F₄N-4)}]BF₄ in which the tetrafluoropyridyl substituent is close to the η6-arene. [(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl(dfppe)]BF₄ reacts in the presence of Proton Sponge to give a mixture of unidentified compounds. The neutral complex [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl₂{Ph₂P(C₆F₅)}] and the diastereomer of [(η⁶-toluene)RuCl{Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh(C₅F₄N-4)}]BF₄ in which the tetrafluoropyridyl substituent is distant to the η⁶-arene do not undergo reaction.

year: 2011

title: Ultra-Brief Clinical Outcome Evaluations in New Zealand: A New Zealand Perspective on the Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale

authors: Pay, Rebecca Ngaire

subjects: Outcome Evaluations

abstract: Outcome evaluations are becoming a routine aspect of psychotherapy, yet many measures are deemed inappropriate for everyday clinical use. Outcome evaluations help to inform clinical decision making and enhance treatment effects, whilst guiding therapy and tracking the client’s progress. Many current outcome evaluations are overly complex, lengthy and are not providing information in the most effective format possible. Given that mental health services nationally are increasingly being accessed, it is essential that the most effective and feasible outcome evaluations are being administered to maintain the meaningfulness of therapy. 

The present study explored an ultra-brief treatment session outcome measure called the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), and compared it to the current New Zealand mandated outcome evaluation Health of Our Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOSCA) (N = 98). A quantitative, non-experimental correlational approach was taken, as studied in a clinical sample. Data was obtained through Lakes District Health Board, Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.

The findings suggest that the ORS measures change and that it is comparable to HoNOSCA on 4 of the 13 HoNOSCA items. Interestingly, these 4 HoNOSCA items all significantly correlate with ORS’s ‘Overall’ measure. Higher ORS scores positively correlate with higher SRS scores, highlighting the importance of therapeutic alliance. Maori intake scores are slightly lower than European intake scores, but even out following therapy. Implications for future clinical directions and future research are discussed.

text: Ultra-Brief Clinical Outcome Evaluations in New Zealand: A New Zealand Perspective on the Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale Outcome evaluations are becoming a routine aspect of psychotherapy, yet many measures are deemed inappropriate for everyday clinical use. Outcome evaluations help to inform clinical decision making and enhance treatment effects, whilst guiding therapy and tracking the client’s progress. Many current outcome evaluations are overly complex, lengthy and are not providing information in the most effective format possible. Given that mental health services nationally are increasingly being accessed, it is essential that the most effective and feasible outcome evaluations are being administered to maintain the meaningfulness of therapy. 

The present study explored an ultra-brief treatment session outcome measure called the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), and compared it to the current New Zealand mandated outcome evaluation Health of Our Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOSCA) (N = 98). A quantitative, non-experimental correlational approach was taken, as studied in a clinical sample. Data was obtained through Lakes District Health Board, Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.

The findings suggest that the ORS measures change and that it is comparable to HoNOSCA on 4 of the 13 HoNOSCA items. Interestingly, these 4 HoNOSCA items all significantly correlate with ORS’s ‘Overall’ measure. Higher ORS scores positively correlate with higher SRS scores, highlighting the importance of therapeutic alliance. Maori intake scores are slightly lower than European intake scores, but even out following therapy. Implications for future clinical directions and future research are discussed.

year: 2017

title: Iwi interests and the RMA: An evaluation of the quality of first generation council plans

authors: Jefferies, Richard

subjects: New Zealand

abstract: This working paper analyses the processes adopted by councils for involving hapū
/iwi in plan implementation, including the resource consents process. Three topic issues were investigated to assess plan implementation — urban amenity,
storm water, and issues of importance to iwi. Questions were asked about the capacity of hapū/iwi to engage in the resource consent
process, which resource issues were of concern to them, their relationship with
council and consent applicants, and their perception of the consent process. Most resources listed in the questionnaire were of concern to hapū/iwi, with water
quality, wāhi tapu and heritage the most commonly cited. In conclusion, we found a general dissatisfaction on the part of hapū/iwi with
councils’ performance with respect to both Treaty relationships and consent
processing under the RMA. A further contributing factor to the poor relationships
found between hapū/iwi and councils, was the lack of clarity over the role of hapū and
iwi in resource management. In several districts, diverging responses from hapū/iwi
and councils to questions about level of understanding and commitment suggests there
is a need for more effective communication. These problems are compounded by the
generally low capacity of hapū/iwi to participate in resource consent processes. These findings suggest that there is much to be done to improve relationships and
behaviour of these key stakeholder groups in the plan implementation process if key
provisions in the RMA related to hapū/iwi interests are to be fulfilled. The differences
shown in reciprocal perceptions have serious implications for establishing a sound
working partnership between councils and hapū/iwi in their areas. Making clear these
discrepancies is a first step towards taking the measures needed for building a better
partnership. Further, the capacity of hapū/iwi to participate could be better utilised if
there was greater integration between regional and district councils on issues of
significance and processes for iwi involvement.

text: Iwi interests and the RMA: An evaluation of the quality of first generation council plans This working paper analyses the processes adopted by councils for involving hapū
/iwi in plan implementation, including the resource consents process. Three topic issues were investigated to assess plan implementation — urban amenity,
storm water, and issues of importance to iwi. Questions were asked about the capacity of hapū/iwi to engage in the resource consent
process, which resource issues were of concern to them, their relationship with
council and consent applicants, and their perception of the consent process. Most resources listed in the questionnaire were of concern to hapū/iwi, with water
quality, wāhi tapu and heritage the most commonly cited. In conclusion, we found a general dissatisfaction on the part of hapū/iwi with
councils’ performance with respect to both Treaty relationships and consent
processing under the RMA. A further contributing factor to the poor relationships
found between hapū/iwi and councils, was the lack of clarity over the role of hapū and
iwi in resource management. In several districts, diverging responses from hapū/iwi
and councils to questions about level of understanding and commitment suggests there
is a need for more effective communication. These problems are compounded by the
generally low capacity of hapū/iwi to participate in resource consent processes. These findings suggest that there is much to be done to improve relationships and
behaviour of these key stakeholder groups in the plan implementation process if key
provisions in the RMA related to hapū/iwi interests are to be fulfilled. The differences
shown in reciprocal perceptions have serious implications for establishing a sound
working partnership between councils and hapū/iwi in their areas. Making clear these
discrepancies is a first step towards taking the measures needed for building a better
partnership. Further, the capacity of hapū/iwi to participate could be better utilised if
there was greater integration between regional and district councils on issues of
significance and processes for iwi involvement.

year: 2002-10-31