title: Chaos and irregularity in karst percolation

authors: Mariethoz, Gregoire

subjects: Australia

abstract: This paper focuses on analyzing chaos in cave percolation water drip rates, which has implications for flow routing in fractured media and on the use of speleothems for paleoclimate reconstructions. It has been shown that the physics of dripping faucets involve a set of non-linear equations leading to chaotic drip rate, meaning that, for a given drip rate, the interval between individual drops can vary greatly. It can be expected that drip waters supplying stalagmites show similar properties, and consequently the dependency between water flux and stalagmite growth rate or geochemistry could be more complicated than usually assumed. We used high-frequency monitoring of two contrasting drips in a cave in Australia, and identified chaos in cave drip rate. Our findings also indicate that the occurrence of chaos can give insights into flow routing in fractured media.

text: Chaos and irregularity in karst percolation This paper focuses on analyzing chaos in cave percolation water drip rates, which has implications for flow routing in fractured media and on the use of speleothems for paleoclimate reconstructions. It has been shown that the physics of dripping faucets involve a set of non-linear equations leading to chaotic drip rate, meaning that, for a given drip rate, the interval between individual drops can vary greatly. It can be expected that drip waters supplying stalagmites show similar properties, and consequently the dependency between water flux and stalagmite growth rate or geochemistry could be more complicated than usually assumed. We used high-frequency monitoring of two contrasting drips in a cave in Australia, and identified chaos in cave drip rate. Our findings also indicate that the occurrence of chaos can give insights into flow routing in fractured media.

year: 2012

title: An investigation into the persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative (DRA) behaviour

authors: Layton, Karen Lorraine

subjects: differential reinforcement of alternative (DRA) behaviour

abstract: Ten experiments used hens to investigate the effects of different disruptive events and ways of introducing differential reinforcement of alternative behaviour (DRA), on the persistence of responding. Of interest was the persistencestrengthening effects of DRA on the target, or problem, behaviour, and whether this could be reduced by training an alternative behaviour in a separate context to that of the target behaviour. A DRA was compared to the effects of a procedure where the alternative and target behaviours were trained in the same context (traditional DRA). The different behaviours were pecking at different coloured keys, and responding was maintained by food reinforcement.
Baseline training involved a three-component multiple schedule; one component with two yellow keys available (DRA analogue using VI 37.5 s and 150 s) and the other two with one key available in each (analogous to target (blue and VI 150 s) and alternative (green and VI 37.5 s) behaviours trained separately). A disruptor test followed, also using three-component multiple schedules. This disruptor test included a component with the two yellow keys (Concurrent/DRA Component) and one which combined the, previously single, green and blue keys (Combined Component). In each experiment, the sequence of baseline followed by a disruptor test was repeated with different components in each test. Persistence was measured as the responses in the test as a proportion of baseline responses for that behaviour.
In Experiment 1 the disruptor was extinction and this showed that separate training reduced persistence of the target behaviour and extinction burst, as in previous research. Experiments 2 and 3 used the same procedures but the hens were exposed to a centre key alone (associated with one of VI 150 s (red centre key), 75 s (white centre key) or 37.5 s (pink centre key) schedule) prior to each baseline and this centre key then acted as the disruptor. Reinforcement was available on all keys in the tests. These found that the red key worked as a disruptor, and there were similar effects on persistence as in Experiment 1, regardless of the red key schedule. Experiment 4, using the same procedures but with no formal disruptor, also found the separate training gave reduced persistence of the target but not the alternative behaviour in the tests. Experiment 5 to 7 examined different disruptors (flashing light, sound, and a separate chamber), all with reinforcement continuing in tests. Target response persistence was reduced as a result of the separate training. Experiment 8 compared the effects on target persistence of separate training with the training schedule thinned prior combining and after combining. This found there was reduced target behaviour persistence when the schedules were thinned prior to being combined. Experiment 9 added a baseline with the target behaviour alone, prior to the previous procedure, and showed the same reduced target persistence even when both the target keys were initially presented alone. Experiment 10 showed the results were robust when each component was associated with a physically separate context. All experiments showed that training a target behaviour in a separate context to the alternative behaviour was successful at reducing the persistence-strengthening effects of DRA.

text: An investigation into the persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative (DRA) behaviour Ten experiments used hens to investigate the effects of different disruptive events and ways of introducing differential reinforcement of alternative behaviour (DRA), on the persistence of responding. Of interest was the persistencestrengthening effects of DRA on the target, or problem, behaviour, and whether this could be reduced by training an alternative behaviour in a separate context to that of the target behaviour. A DRA was compared to the effects of a procedure where the alternative and target behaviours were trained in the same context (traditional DRA). The different behaviours were pecking at different coloured keys, and responding was maintained by food reinforcement.
Baseline training involved a three-component multiple schedule; one component with two yellow keys available (DRA analogue using VI 37.5 s and 150 s) and the other two with one key available in each (analogous to target (blue and VI 150 s) and alternative (green and VI 37.5 s) behaviours trained separately). A disruptor test followed, also using three-component multiple schedules. This disruptor test included a component with the two yellow keys (Concurrent/DRA Component) and one which combined the, previously single, green and blue keys (Combined Component). In each experiment, the sequence of baseline followed by a disruptor test was repeated with different components in each test. Persistence was measured as the responses in the test as a proportion of baseline responses for that behaviour.
In Experiment 1 the disruptor was extinction and this showed that separate training reduced persistence of the target behaviour and extinction burst, as in previous research. Experiments 2 and 3 used the same procedures but the hens were exposed to a centre key alone (associated with one of VI 150 s (red centre key), 75 s (white centre key) or 37.5 s (pink centre key) schedule) prior to each baseline and this centre key then acted as the disruptor. Reinforcement was available on all keys in the tests. These found that the red key worked as a disruptor, and there were similar effects on persistence as in Experiment 1, regardless of the red key schedule. Experiment 4, using the same procedures but with no formal disruptor, also found the separate training gave reduced persistence of the target but not the alternative behaviour in the tests. Experiment 5 to 7 examined different disruptors (flashing light, sound, and a separate chamber), all with reinforcement continuing in tests. Target response persistence was reduced as a result of the separate training. Experiment 8 compared the effects on target persistence of separate training with the training schedule thinned prior combining and after combining. This found there was reduced target behaviour persistence when the schedules were thinned prior to being combined. Experiment 9 added a baseline with the target behaviour alone, prior to the previous procedure, and showed the same reduced target persistence even when both the target keys were initially presented alone. Experiment 10 showed the results were robust when each component was associated with a physically separate context. All experiments showed that training a target behaviour in a separate context to the alternative behaviour was successful at reducing the persistence-strengthening effects of DRA.

year: 2018

title: Positioning historical trauma theory within Aotearoa New Zealand

authors: Pihama, Leonie

abstract: This article explores the relevance of historical trauma theory for Mäori research. In exploring the impact of historical trauma upon Mäori it has become clear that the terminology associated with historical trauma theory is considered controversial in Aotearoa New Zealand. As such, this article provides an overview of key defi nitions relevant to historical trauma and explores these in relation to recent reporting related to the use of the terms “holocaust” and “genocide” in the context of colonization in Aotearoa New Zealand. It is argued that in order to engage fully with the impacts of colonization on Mäori wellbeing we must articulate fully the impact of historical trauma events and the contribution of those events to the negative health disparities experienced by many of our whänau (extended family), hapü (sub- tribes) and iwi (tribes).

text: Positioning historical trauma theory within Aotearoa New Zealand This article explores the relevance of historical trauma theory for Mäori research. In exploring the impact of historical trauma upon Mäori it has become clear that the terminology associated with historical trauma theory is considered controversial in Aotearoa New Zealand. As such, this article provides an overview of key defi nitions relevant to historical trauma and explores these in relation to recent reporting related to the use of the terms “holocaust” and “genocide” in the context of colonization in Aotearoa New Zealand. It is argued that in order to engage fully with the impacts of colonization on Mäori wellbeing we must articulate fully the impact of historical trauma events and the contribution of those events to the negative health disparities experienced by many of our whänau (extended family), hapü (sub- tribes) and iwi (tribes).

year: 2014