title: Merea Wikiriwhi and George Thomas Wilkinson

authors: Hart, Philip

abstract: Merea Wikiriwhi was one of the few women to invest in Te Aroha mining. Her life has been traced in as much detail as can be found because so little has survived about the lives of Maori women. As George Thomas Wilkinson’s surviving diaries reveal his importance in her life, his story was included as well, concentrating on his personal life rather than his official career. 
Merea was a member of several Ohinemuri hapu, with links through whakapapa to some of their more senior rangatira. Mostly living at or near Waitoki, between Paeroa and Te Aroha, she lived a frugal life, not wasting the income she received from land sales. These sales first required her to insist on her rights both in the land court and in a convoluted legal battle over a will signed in her favour by a distant relative. Over time, she would sell most of her land, but never became entirely landless. She invested in only one mining claim, but in the 1930s joined others to claim that the government was not paying them goldfields revenue for land they had sold.
George Thomas Wilkinson entered her life in 1880, when he was the ‘native agent’ in Hauraki. Despite having fought against Maori and nearly being killed, his surviving diaries reveal that he lived in the manner of a Pakeha Maori with three Maori women (simultaneously for a time), having children both by Merea and the woman he would eventually marry. Wilkinson had close friendships with many Maori and Pakeha Maori, and his genuine regard for them is reflected not only in his attempting, in his official capacity, to be fair to their interests – even as he assisted the government to separate them from their land – but in particular by his affection for a young girl, Wairingiringi, who shared his house in Thames. Although he and Merea would part, he tried to ensure that her children, like all his children, would do well in a Pakeha world.

text: Merea Wikiriwhi and George Thomas Wilkinson Merea Wikiriwhi was one of the few women to invest in Te Aroha mining. Her life has been traced in as much detail as can be found because so little has survived about the lives of Maori women. As George Thomas Wilkinson’s surviving diaries reveal his importance in her life, his story was included as well, concentrating on his personal life rather than his official career. 
Merea was a member of several Ohinemuri hapu, with links through whakapapa to some of their more senior rangatira. Mostly living at or near Waitoki, between Paeroa and Te Aroha, she lived a frugal life, not wasting the income she received from land sales. These sales first required her to insist on her rights both in the land court and in a convoluted legal battle over a will signed in her favour by a distant relative. Over time, she would sell most of her land, but never became entirely landless. She invested in only one mining claim, but in the 1930s joined others to claim that the government was not paying them goldfields revenue for land they had sold.
George Thomas Wilkinson entered her life in 1880, when he was the ‘native agent’ in Hauraki. Despite having fought against Maori and nearly being killed, his surviving diaries reveal that he lived in the manner of a Pakeha Maori with three Maori women (simultaneously for a time), having children both by Merea and the woman he would eventually marry. Wilkinson had close friendships with many Maori and Pakeha Maori, and his genuine regard for them is reflected not only in his attempting, in his official capacity, to be fair to their interests – even as he assisted the government to separate them from their land – but in particular by his affection for a young girl, Wairingiringi, who shared his house in Thames. Although he and Merea would part, he tried to ensure that her children, like all his children, would do well in a Pakeha world.

year: 2016

title: Taupiri rau kotahi - Taupiri rau manomano

authors: Sam-Turner, Hiko Akuhata Te Ngoungou Raniera

subjects: Taupiri marae

abstract: Kua roa nei te paepae o Taupiri marae e noho mokemoke ana, i te nuinga o te waa kaaore he tangata hei kawe i ngaa tikanga, aa, kua waiho maa te tokoiti e moohio ana me peewhea te whakahaere tika i ngaa tikanga o te marae. I te nuinga o te waa e waimarie ana maatou mehemea ka tae atu ngaa taangata e rua ki te manaaki i te mauri o te paepae moo te roanga ake o te kaupapa, ahakoa tangihanga mai, huritau mai, aha atu raanei.
I ngaa tau kua kaha kitea ahau te toimaha o teeraa o ngaa haepapa ka taka ki runga i te tokoiti. Naa teenaa, ka hua ake te uho o teenei o ngaa kaupapa rangahau, he waihanga i teetehi rautaki whaikoorero e piki ake ai ngaa nama o te hunga kawe i teenei aahuatanga. Ko taa te tuhingaroa nei he waiho i eetehi moohiotanga hei aawhina, hei whakapakari, hei whakamaamaa i ngaa aahuatanga ka tau ki runga i ngaa taangata whaikoorero. Kua waihotia e au eetehi kura hei aarahi, hei aawhina i ngaa whaanau o te marae, heoti, te hunga e piikoko ana ki te kawe i ngaa taonga o too taatou ahurea.
Ko te tino take kua ahu peenei taku rangahau kia moohio pai ngaa whakatupuranga ki eenei maatauranga, heoti, kia moohio pai ngaa whakatupuranga me peewhea te whakahaere i eenei aahuatanga. I runga anoo i te tuupono ka tae mai ki te waa me manaaki te reanga rangatahi i te paepae, ka taka raanei te haepapa whakahaere paepae ki a maatou te hunga rangatahi, ko te wawata ia ka aawhina teenei tuhingaroa i a taatou. Kaaore e kore hei ngaa tau e heke mai nei ka kii pohapoha te paepae o Taupiri marae i te hunga e moohio ana ki te whakatakoto i aana kupu, ki te whaikoorero. Koia te take i hua mai te ingoa o teenei o ngaa tuhingaroa, maa te whaangai i te rau kotahi ko te whaainga ia aa toona waa ka hora katoa eeraa maatauranga ki ngaa rau manomano.
“Hei aha te pae nekeneke, waiho mai raa ki ahau he pae kounga, he pae motuhake”

text: Taupiri rau kotahi - Taupiri rau manomano Kua roa nei te paepae o Taupiri marae e noho mokemoke ana, i te nuinga o te waa kaaore he tangata hei kawe i ngaa tikanga, aa, kua waiho maa te tokoiti e moohio ana me peewhea te whakahaere tika i ngaa tikanga o te marae. I te nuinga o te waa e waimarie ana maatou mehemea ka tae atu ngaa taangata e rua ki te manaaki i te mauri o te paepae moo te roanga ake o te kaupapa, ahakoa tangihanga mai, huritau mai, aha atu raanei.
I ngaa tau kua kaha kitea ahau te toimaha o teeraa o ngaa haepapa ka taka ki runga i te tokoiti. Naa teenaa, ka hua ake te uho o teenei o ngaa kaupapa rangahau, he waihanga i teetehi rautaki whaikoorero e piki ake ai ngaa nama o te hunga kawe i teenei aahuatanga. Ko taa te tuhingaroa nei he waiho i eetehi moohiotanga hei aawhina, hei whakapakari, hei whakamaamaa i ngaa aahuatanga ka tau ki runga i ngaa taangata whaikoorero. Kua waihotia e au eetehi kura hei aarahi, hei aawhina i ngaa whaanau o te marae, heoti, te hunga e piikoko ana ki te kawe i ngaa taonga o too taatou ahurea.
Ko te tino take kua ahu peenei taku rangahau kia moohio pai ngaa whakatupuranga ki eenei maatauranga, heoti, kia moohio pai ngaa whakatupuranga me peewhea te whakahaere i eenei aahuatanga. I runga anoo i te tuupono ka tae mai ki te waa me manaaki te reanga rangatahi i te paepae, ka taka raanei te haepapa whakahaere paepae ki a maatou te hunga rangatahi, ko te wawata ia ka aawhina teenei tuhingaroa i a taatou. Kaaore e kore hei ngaa tau e heke mai nei ka kii pohapoha te paepae o Taupiri marae i te hunga e moohio ana ki te whakatakoto i aana kupu, ki te whaikoorero. Koia te take i hua mai te ingoa o teenei o ngaa tuhingaroa, maa te whaangai i te rau kotahi ko te whaainga ia aa toona waa ka hora katoa eeraa maatauranga ki ngaa rau manomano.
“Hei aha te pae nekeneke, waiho mai raa ki ahau he pae kounga, he pae motuhake”

year: 2022

title: Does ‘acoustic anchoring’ reduce post-translocation dispersal of North Island robins?

authors: Bradley, David William

subjects: acoustic anchoring

abstract: Context: Animal translocations are an important conservation tool; however, post-release dispersal can hinder successful population establishment. Playback of conspecific song attracts dispersing individuals in some species, although its application following animal translocation has yet to be rigorously investigated.

Aims: To determine whether conspecific song can be used as an ‘acoustic anchor’, we adopted an experimental approach during the translocation of 60 North Island robins (Petroica longipes).
Methods: At one of two release locations, we broadcast song at natural rates from four speakers (4 h per morning), for 9 days following release; we set the second release location as a control where identical conditions were established but no playback occurred. To assess the impact of playback, we monitored speaker and control locations, surveyed tracks around the release areas, and radio-tracked robins over nine playback days and an additional 9 days.
Key results: Most robins left both immediate release areas; however, our results showed that (1) more robins (6 birds on 14 of the 18 days), in particular females (3 birds), approached the playback location than the ‘flagged’ control location (3 male birds on 5 of the 18 days), (2) individual robins returned to the playback location repeatedly, unlike those at the control site, and (3) robins also visited the playback location longer after playback than they did silent control locations. In contrast, radio-telemetry data from five robins suggested that general dispersal was not influenced by playback. Two radio-tracked females moved over long distances (some to >3 km from their release location), whereas two radio-tracked males remained relatively close to the release sites.
Conclusions: We demonstrated a short-term attraction effect of playback over a period of several weeks for some birds, particularly females. In contrast, we detected fewer birds over a shorter period at the silent control release site, where no females were detected. However, long-term monitoring at both sites suggested that the effect of playback on reducing post-release dispersal was transitory.
Implications: The lack of a clear and lasting effect of acoustic anchoring on dispersal in the present study has provided information on the limited utility of song playback as a conservation management tool for this species. Consideration of the species’ ecology and suitability for ‘acoustic anchoring’ must be made before playback is employed as a conservation measure to reduce excess post-translocation dispersal.

text: Does ‘acoustic anchoring’ reduce post-translocation dispersal of North Island robins? Context: Animal translocations are an important conservation tool; however, post-release dispersal can hinder successful population establishment. Playback of conspecific song attracts dispersing individuals in some species, although its application following animal translocation has yet to be rigorously investigated.

Aims: To determine whether conspecific song can be used as an ‘acoustic anchor’, we adopted an experimental approach during the translocation of 60 North Island robins (Petroica longipes).
Methods: At one of two release locations, we broadcast song at natural rates from four speakers (4 h per morning), for 9 days following release; we set the second release location as a control where identical conditions were established but no playback occurred. To assess the impact of playback, we monitored speaker and control locations, surveyed tracks around the release areas, and radio-tracked robins over nine playback days and an additional 9 days.
Key results: Most robins left both immediate release areas; however, our results showed that (1) more robins (6 birds on 14 of the 18 days), in particular females (3 birds), approached the playback location than the ‘flagged’ control location (3 male birds on 5 of the 18 days), (2) individual robins returned to the playback location repeatedly, unlike those at the control site, and (3) robins also visited the playback location longer after playback than they did silent control locations. In contrast, radio-telemetry data from five robins suggested that general dispersal was not influenced by playback. Two radio-tracked females moved over long distances (some to >3 km from their release location), whereas two radio-tracked males remained relatively close to the release sites.
Conclusions: We demonstrated a short-term attraction effect of playback over a period of several weeks for some birds, particularly females. In contrast, we detected fewer birds over a shorter period at the silent control release site, where no females were detected. However, long-term monitoring at both sites suggested that the effect of playback on reducing post-release dispersal was transitory.
Implications: The lack of a clear and lasting effect of acoustic anchoring on dispersal in the present study has provided information on the limited utility of song playback as a conservation management tool for this species. Consideration of the species’ ecology and suitability for ‘acoustic anchoring’ must be made before playback is employed as a conservation measure to reduce excess post-translocation dispersal.

year: 2011