title: Physical and chemical attributes affecting survival and collection of freshwater mahinga kai species

authors: Collier, Kevin J.

abstract: Mahinga kai is one of a number of significant Māori values identified within the National Objectives Framework (NOF) for freshwater management. The Ngā Tohu o Te Taiao (NToTT) project aimed to develop knowledge, tools and processes for setting freshwater limits for mahinga kai within the NOF. Māori have raised issues and concerns about mahinga kai species due to: (i) declines in abundance, size and quality; and (ii) potential contamination from anthropogenic activities. This review provides information about the contaminants and environmental stressors likely to be affecting some important freshwater mahinga kai, with a focus on tuna (eel), īnanga (whitebait), kākahi (freshwater mussel), kōura (freshwater crayfish) and wātakirihi (watercress). In this report, we provide guidance on how to relate existing guidelines and regulations to freshwater invertebrate and fish species traditionally used for food gathering. The guidance covered includes: (i) the ANZECC (2000) water quality guidelines for physical and chemical attributes of aquatic life, which are in the process of being updated; (ii) selected international water quality guidelines (e.g., USEPA, Environment Canada, OECD) which can be used to support and supplement ANZECC water quality guidelines; (iii) human health information for collection and consumption of aquatic foods; and (iv) the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) and the NOF (which is also under further development). It is envisaged this report will support discussion on food abundance and safety of mahinga kai, and promote steps to ensure appropriate standards are set for clean waterways and customary resources under the NPS-FM and ANZECC (2000). We highlight the complexity of issues affecting abundance and suitability of five commonly-used mahinga kai species: tuna, īnanga, kōura, kākahi and wātakirihi. Information from this report should also be of use in future freshwater habitat and species restoration projects, especially where mahinga kai species are at risk and the goal is to maintain or enhance customary resource use, and species state and condition.

text: Physical and chemical attributes affecting survival and collection of freshwater mahinga kai species Mahinga kai is one of a number of significant Māori values identified within the National Objectives Framework (NOF) for freshwater management. The Ngā Tohu o Te Taiao (NToTT) project aimed to develop knowledge, tools and processes for setting freshwater limits for mahinga kai within the NOF. Māori have raised issues and concerns about mahinga kai species due to: (i) declines in abundance, size and quality; and (ii) potential contamination from anthropogenic activities. This review provides information about the contaminants and environmental stressors likely to be affecting some important freshwater mahinga kai, with a focus on tuna (eel), īnanga (whitebait), kākahi (freshwater mussel), kōura (freshwater crayfish) and wātakirihi (watercress). In this report, we provide guidance on how to relate existing guidelines and regulations to freshwater invertebrate and fish species traditionally used for food gathering. The guidance covered includes: (i) the ANZECC (2000) water quality guidelines for physical and chemical attributes of aquatic life, which are in the process of being updated; (ii) selected international water quality guidelines (e.g., USEPA, Environment Canada, OECD) which can be used to support and supplement ANZECC water quality guidelines; (iii) human health information for collection and consumption of aquatic foods; and (iv) the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) and the NOF (which is also under further development). It is envisaged this report will support discussion on food abundance and safety of mahinga kai, and promote steps to ensure appropriate standards are set for clean waterways and customary resources under the NPS-FM and ANZECC (2000). We highlight the complexity of issues affecting abundance and suitability of five commonly-used mahinga kai species: tuna, īnanga, kōura, kākahi and wātakirihi. Information from this report should also be of use in future freshwater habitat and species restoration projects, especially where mahinga kai species are at risk and the goal is to maintain or enhance customary resource use, and species state and condition.

year: 2017

title: Fishing activity in the Waikato and Waipa rivers

authors: Hicks, Brendan J.

subjects: fishing

abstract: The purpose of this research project is to collate information regarding the recent use of fisheries resources in the Waikato River and Waipa River catchment areas. In particular, the project sought to summarise the commercial, customary, and recreational fishing activity in the catchments of the Waikato and Waipa rivers in the spatial context of recently introduced co-governance areas. These fisheries include, but are not exclusive to, the broad range of aquatic life managed under the Fisheries Act 1996. Such information is required to support management which includes a co-management framework. The research describes the commercial, customary and recreational fisheries including species and quantities taken, fishing methods, and seasonal influences.

text: Fishing activity in the Waikato and Waipa rivers The purpose of this research project is to collate information regarding the recent use of fisheries resources in the Waikato River and Waipa River catchment areas. In particular, the project sought to summarise the commercial, customary, and recreational fishing activity in the catchments of the Waikato and Waipa rivers in the spatial context of recently introduced co-governance areas. These fisheries include, but are not exclusive to, the broad range of aquatic life managed under the Fisheries Act 1996. Such information is required to support management which includes a co-management framework. The research describes the commercial, customary and recreational fisheries including species and quantities taken, fishing methods, and seasonal influences.

year: 2013

title: Teaching well-being/quality of life from a philosophical perspective

authors: Weijers, Dan M.

abstract: Before academic disciplines were invented, philosophers were teaching their students about the good life. These days, academics from a broad range of disciplines, including philosophy, teach their students about various aspects of well-being or quality of life. This chapter discusses the methods, topics, and perspectives that characterise a philosophical approach to teaching well-being or quality of life, focussing especially on how to create and critique a theory of well-being. While discussing these features of the philosophical approach, key differences with other mainly social scientific approaches to teaching well-being and quality of life will be highlighted. Then the chapter discusses some ideas about how to teach well-being and quality of life in a methodologically informed way, one that enables students to critique the methods used by a range of well-being and quality of life researchers, especially those used by philosophers. The chapter concludes with some suggestions on how to harness the subject matter in a way that creates an engaging undergraduate-level course on well-being and quality of life.

text: Teaching well-being/quality of life from a philosophical perspective Before academic disciplines were invented, philosophers were teaching their students about the good life. These days, academics from a broad range of disciplines, including philosophy, teach their students about various aspects of well-being or quality of life. This chapter discusses the methods, topics, and perspectives that characterise a philosophical approach to teaching well-being or quality of life, focussing especially on how to create and critique a theory of well-being. While discussing these features of the philosophical approach, key differences with other mainly social scientific approaches to teaching well-being and quality of life will be highlighted. Then the chapter discusses some ideas about how to teach well-being and quality of life in a methodologically informed way, one that enables students to critique the methods used by a range of well-being and quality of life researchers, especially those used by philosophers. The chapter concludes with some suggestions on how to harness the subject matter in a way that creates an engaging undergraduate-level course on well-being and quality of life.

year: 2020