title: Assessing machine learning models for near-infrared regression by measuring stability towards diffeomorphisms

authors: Wohlers, Mark W.

subjects: computer science

abstract: Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is widely used as a tool for non-destructive assessment of fruit quality by applying measured spectra to predict quality parameters such as dry matter and soluble solids content using a suitable regression method. With continued advancements in deep learning, there is potential for improved predictive performance when neural network models are applied instead of partial least-squares regression, but choosing a model remains challenging as performance is sensitive to the model's architecture. Taking inspiration from work done in image classification, we propose model selection by assessing relative stability to diffeomorphic transformations, providing a complementary approach to standard validation methods. This is particularly useful when labelled validation data is limited. Our empirical results on several NIR regression problems indicate that the proposed approach is comparable to the use of independent validation sets. In addition to the choice of deep learning architecture, we also consider the selection of the number of components in partial least-squares regression to demonstrate the method's generality.

text: Assessing machine learning models for near-infrared regression by measuring stability towards diffeomorphisms Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is widely used as a tool for non-destructive assessment of fruit quality by applying measured spectra to predict quality parameters such as dry matter and soluble solids content using a suitable regression method. With continued advancements in deep learning, there is potential for improved predictive performance when neural network models are applied instead of partial least-squares regression, but choosing a model remains challenging as performance is sensitive to the model's architecture. Taking inspiration from work done in image classification, we propose model selection by assessing relative stability to diffeomorphic transformations, providing a complementary approach to standard validation methods. This is particularly useful when labelled validation data is limited. Our empirical results on several NIR regression problems indicate that the proposed approach is comparable to the use of independent validation sets. In addition to the choice of deep learning architecture, we also consider the selection of the number of components in partial least-squares regression to demonstrate the method's generality.

year: 2025

title: Stratigraphic columns and correlations for the Late Eocene - Oligocene Te Kuiti Group, central-western North Island, New Zealand

authors: Kamp, Peter J.J.

subjects: lithostratigraphy

abstract: This report presents a compilation of stratigraphic columns for geological sections and outcrops of Late Eocene – Oligocene Te Kuiti Group units in central-western parts of North Island, New Zealand, between Port Waikato and Awakino. The columns have been prepared as part of a basin analysis investigation undertaken by the Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology Research Group in the Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences at the University of Waikato, and have been compiled into a common format from recent MSc and PhD theses to make the information more readily available, principally to assist hydrocarbon exploration activities in the region. The columns represent a level of detail underpinning a rationalized lithostratigraphy of the Te Kuiti Group presented in a companion report (Tripathi et al. 2008). This report contains two enclosures, one show in the location of columns in relation to the distribution of the two subgroups (Okoko Subgroup, Castle Craig Subgroup) of the Te Kuiti Group, and the other shows a series of north-south and west-east column correlation panels.

text: Stratigraphic columns and correlations for the Late Eocene - Oligocene Te Kuiti Group, central-western North Island, New Zealand This report presents a compilation of stratigraphic columns for geological sections and outcrops of Late Eocene – Oligocene Te Kuiti Group units in central-western parts of North Island, New Zealand, between Port Waikato and Awakino. The columns have been prepared as part of a basin analysis investigation undertaken by the Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology Research Group in the Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences at the University of Waikato, and have been compiled into a common format from recent MSc and PhD theses to make the information more readily available, principally to assist hydrocarbon exploration activities in the region. The columns represent a level of detail underpinning a rationalized lithostratigraphy of the Te Kuiti Group presented in a companion report (Tripathi et al. 2008). This report contains two enclosures, one show in the location of columns in relation to the distribution of the two subgroups (Okoko Subgroup, Castle Craig Subgroup) of the Te Kuiti Group, and the other shows a series of north-south and west-east column correlation panels.

year: 2008

title: Indigenous challenges to enhance freshwater governance and management in Aotearoa New Zealand - the Waikato river settlement

authors: Te Aho, Linda

subjects: New Zealand

abstract: Co-management of environmental resources is an idea that has been developing for some time in Aotearoa New Zealand as a strategy that recognises Indigenous interests in the environment, and the different ways that people view the world. The contest for control of New Zealand's rivers has generally arisen from successive governments purporting to secure rights based upon English common law. Precepts of that law were completely foreign to the Indigenous Maori who had their own conceptions of rivers. Through the eyes of the Maori, rivers have their own life force, their own spiritual energy and their own powerful identities. Rivers are inextricably linked to tribal identities. Over time a raft of policies was employed and legislation passed by parliament in the name of development and the national interest which did not take into account Maori understandings of the river and its ecosystems, nor their rights, interests, or authority. Excluded from decision-making processes, Maori have long brought matters to the attention of courts by using any basis to assert our rights and interests, and to have our concerns about the deteriorating health and wellbeing of our rivers taken seriously. The search for redress has been relentless. The Resource Management Act 1991 formalised a range of legal rights, but such rights can be meaningless if presented as just one of many other considerations that decision-makers have to take into account. This article explores the notion of collaborative management and the development of co-management models as a background to the emergent Waikato River settlement ± a legal solution embedded in the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 that generates a more robust opportunity to bring to an end a paradigm of exclusion and usher in a new era that promises enhanced governance and management of a significant waterway.

text: Indigenous challenges to enhance freshwater governance and management in Aotearoa New Zealand - the Waikato river settlement Co-management of environmental resources is an idea that has been developing for some time in Aotearoa New Zealand as a strategy that recognises Indigenous interests in the environment, and the different ways that people view the world. The contest for control of New Zealand's rivers has generally arisen from successive governments purporting to secure rights based upon English common law. Precepts of that law were completely foreign to the Indigenous Maori who had their own conceptions of rivers. Through the eyes of the Maori, rivers have their own life force, their own spiritual energy and their own powerful identities. Rivers are inextricably linked to tribal identities. Over time a raft of policies was employed and legislation passed by parliament in the name of development and the national interest which did not take into account Maori understandings of the river and its ecosystems, nor their rights, interests, or authority. Excluded from decision-making processes, Maori have long brought matters to the attention of courts by using any basis to assert our rights and interests, and to have our concerns about the deteriorating health and wellbeing of our rivers taken seriously. The search for redress has been relentless. The Resource Management Act 1991 formalised a range of legal rights, but such rights can be meaningless if presented as just one of many other considerations that decision-makers have to take into account. This article explores the notion of collaborative management and the development of co-management models as a background to the emergent Waikato River settlement ± a legal solution embedded in the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 that generates a more robust opportunity to bring to an end a paradigm of exclusion and usher in a new era that promises enhanced governance and management of a significant waterway.

year: 2010