Subfield: Optics

- Proton mass, $m_{p}=1.67 \cdot 10^{-27} \mathrm{~kg}$
- Neutron mass, $m_{n}=1.67 \cdot 10^{-27} \mathrm{~kg}$
- Electron mass, $m_{e}=9.11 \cdot 10^{-31} \mathrm{~kg}$
- Avogadro's constant, $N_{0}=6.02 \cdot 10^{23} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1}$
- Universal gas constant, $R=8.31 \mathrm{~J} /(\mathrm{mol} \cdot \mathrm{K})$
- Boltzmann's constant, $k_{B}=1.38 \cdot 10^{-23} \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{K}$
- Electron charge magnitude, $e=1.60 \cdot 10^{-19} \mathrm{C}$
- 1 electron volt, $1 \mathrm{eV}=1.60 \cdot 10^{-19} \mathrm{~J}$
- Speed of light, $c=3.00 \cdot 10^{8} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$
- Universal Gravitational constant,

$$
G=6.67 \cdot 10^{-11}\left(\mathrm{~N} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}\right) / \mathrm{kg}^{2}
$$

- Solar Mass

$$
M_{\odot}=1.988 \cdot 10^{30} \mathrm{~kg}
$$

- Acceleration due to gravity, $g=9.8 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}^{2}$
- 1 unified atomic mass unit,

$$
1 \mathrm{u}=1.66 \cdot 10^{-27} \mathrm{~kg}=931 \mathrm{MeV} / \mathrm{c}^{2}
$$

- Planck's constant,

$$
h=6.63 \cdot 10^{-34} \mathrm{~J} \cdot \mathrm{s}=4.41 \cdot 10^{-15} \mathrm{eV} \cdot \mathrm{s}
$$

- Permittivity of free space,

$$
\epsilon_{0}=8.85 \cdot 10^{-12} \mathrm{C}^{2} /\left(\mathrm{N} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)
$$

- Coulomb's law constant,

$$
k=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}}=8.99 \cdot 10^{9}\left(\mathrm{~N} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}\right) / \mathrm{C}^{2}
$$

- Permeability of free space,

$$
\mu_{0}=4 \pi \cdot 10^{-7} \mathrm{~T} \cdot \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{A}
$$

- Magnetic constant,

$$
\frac{\mu_{0}}{4 \pi}=1 \cdot 10^{-7}(\mathrm{~T} \cdot \mathrm{m}) / \mathrm{A}
$$

- 1 atmospheric pressure,

$$
1 \mathrm{~atm}=1.01 \cdot 10^{5} \mathrm{~N} / \mathrm{m}^{2}=1.01 \cdot 10^{5} \mathrm{~Pa}
$$

- Wien's displacement constant, $b=2.9$. $10^{-3} \mathrm{~m} \cdot \mathrm{K}$
- Stefan-Boltzmann constant,

$$
\sigma=5.67 \cdot 10^{-8} \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} / \mathrm{K}^{4}
$$

Question: These days, there are so many stylish rectangular home-designs (see figure A). It is possible from the outline of those houses in their picture to estimate with good precision where the camera was. Consider an outline in one photograph of a rectangular house which has height $H=3$ meters (see figure B for square-grid coordinates). Assume that the camera size is negligible, how high above the ground (in meters) was the camera at the moment this picture was taken?<img_4269>

Solution:
The formation of the house's image seen in the picture is due to pinhole principle, and note that the fish-eye effect here is weak (straight-lines stays straight). Define points $A, B, C, A^{\prime}, B^{\prime}, C^{\prime}$ as in the attached Fig., since $A A^{\prime}, B B^{\prime}, C C^{\prime}$ stays parallel we know that the camera looked horizontally



at the time this picture is taken.

<img_4322>

To determine the height of the camera at the very same moment, we need to know the where is the horizontal plane passing through the camera in the picture which is collapsed into a line. That can be found by finding the intersection $M$ of $A B \cap A^{\prime} B^{\prime}$ and the intersection $N$ of $B C \cap B^{\prime} C^{\prime}$, then $M N$ is the line of interests. $M N$ intersects $B B^{\prime}$ at $P$, the position of $P$ can be calculated too be $(22,0.9)$, therefore the height of the camera is the length-ratio $P B^{\prime} / B B^{\prime}$ times $3 \mathrm{~m}$, which equals to $0.9 \mathrm{~m}$.

Final answer: $0.9$ m