Título: Benjamin Lee Whorf
Seção: Degree of influence of language on thought
Background: Benjamin Lee Whorf (; April 24, 1897 - July 26, 1941) was an American linguist and fire prevention engineer. Whorf is widely known as an advocate for the idea that differences between the structures of different languages shape how their speakers perceive and conceptualize the world. This principle has frequently been called the "Sapir-Whorf hypothesis", after him and his mentor Edward Sapir, but Whorf called it the principle of linguistic relativity, because he saw the idea as having implications similar to Einstein's principle of physical relativity. Throughout his life Whorf was a chemical engineer by profession, but as a young man he took up an interest in linguistics.

Conteúdo: If read superficially, some of Whorf's statements lend themselves to the interpretation that he supported linguistic determinism. For example, in an often-quoted passage Whorf writes:  We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native language. The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscope flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds--and this means largely by the linguistic systems of our minds. We cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significances as we do, largely because we are parties to an agreement to organize it in this way--an agreement that holds throughout our speech community and is codified in the patterns of our language. The agreement is of course, an implicit and unstated one, but its terms are absolutely obligatory; we cannot talk at all except by subscribing to the organization and classification of data that the agreement decrees. We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar, or can in some way be calibrated.  The statements about the obligatory nature of the terms of language have been taken to suggest that Whorf meant that language completely determined the scope of possible conceptualizations. However neo-W

user: To what degree was his influence on language of thought

assistant: the world is presented in a kaleidoscope flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds

user: What was his influence

assistant: If read superficially, some of Whorf's statements lend themselves to the interpretation that he supported linguistic determinism.

user: Tell me more about his ideas

assistant: the world is presented in a kaleidoscope flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds--and this means largely by the linguistic systems of our minds.

user: Are there any other interesting aspects about this article?

assistant: Whorf is writing about the terms in which we speak of the world, not the terms in which we think of it.

user: What does he say about how we speak of the world

assistant: Whorf noted that to communicate thoughts and experiences with members of a speech community speakers must use the linguistic categories of their shared language,

user: What were the categories

assistant: categories of their shared language, which requires moulding experiences into the shape of language to speak them

user: tell me more about his theory

assistant: ". This interpretation is supported by Whorf's subsequent statement that "No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality,