Título: Crazy Horse
Seção: Photograph controversy
Background: Sources differ on the precise year of Crazy Horse's birth, but most agree he was born between 1840 and 1845. According to a close friend, he and Crazy Horse "were both born in the same year at the same season of the year," which census records and other interviews place in 1842. Encouraging Bear, an Oglala medicine man and spiritual adviser to the Oglala war leader, reported that Crazy Horse was born "in the year in which the band to which he belonged, the Oglala, stole One Hundred Horses, and in the fall of the year," a reference to the annual Lakota calendar or winter count. Among the Oglala winter counts, the stealing of 100 horses is noted by Cloud Shield, and possibly by American Horse and Red Horse owner, as equivalent to the year 1840-41.

Conteúdo: Most sources question whether Crazy Horse was ever photographed. Dr. McGillycuddy doubted any photograph of the war leader had been taken. In 1908, Walter Camp wrote to the agent for the Pine Ridge Reservation inquiring about a portrait. "I have never seen a photo of Crazy Horse," Agent Brennan replied, "nor am I able to find any one among our Sioux here who remembers having seen a picture of him. Crazy Horse had left the hostiles but a short time before he was killed and it's more than likely he never had a picture taken of himself."  In 1956, a small tintype portrait purportedly of Crazy Horse was published by J. W. Vaughn in his book With Crook at the Rosebud. The photograph had belonged to the family of the scout Baptiste "Little Bat" Garnier. Two decades later, the portrait was published with further details about how the photograph was produced at Fort Robinson, though the editor of the book "remained unconvinced of the authenticity of the photograph."  In the late 1990s the original tintype was on exhibit at the Custer Battlefield Museum in Garryowen, Montana. The museum says that it is the only authentic portrait of Crazy Horse. Historians continue to dispute the identification.  Experts argue that the tintype was taken a decade or two after 1877. The evidence includes the individual's attire, the length of the hair pipe breastplate and the ascot tie), which closely resembles the attire of Buffalo Bill's Wild West Indian performers active from 1883 to the early 1900s.

user: Why is the photograph controversial?

assistant: Most sources question whether Crazy Horse was ever photographed.

user: Can you tell me more about the photograph controversy?

assistant: Dr. McGillycuddy doubted any photograph of the war leader had been taken.

user: Did anyone agree or disagree with Dr. McGillycuddy?

assistant: " Agent Brennan replied, "nor am I able to find any one among our Sioux here who remembers having seen a picture of him.

user: Can you tell me more about people agreeing or disagreeing with Dr. McGillycuddy and Agent Brennan?

assistant: In 1908, Walter Camp wrote to the agent for the Pine Ridge Reservation inquiring about a portrait. "I have never seen a photo of Crazy Horse,"

user: Amazing, who else agreed or disagreed with Dr. McGillycuddy?

assistant: CANNOTANSWER

user: Are there any other interesting aspects to the photograph controversy?

assistant: In 1956, a small tintype portrait purportedly of Crazy Horse was published by J. W. Vaughn in his book With Crook at the Rosebud.

user: Are there any other purported photographs?

assistant: The museum says that it is the only authentic portrait of Crazy Horse. Historians continue to dispute the identification.

user: Are there any aspects of controversy with regards to the photograph?

assistant: Experts argue that the tintype was taken a decade or two after 1877.