Sentence:  &#91;[https://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2965&conhastings_law_journal#page=413 pages 413–434]&#93; The modern <WSD>Nuremberg Defenses</WSD> are the antithesis of the original defense: criminal defendants today build a defense based on the reasoning and principles used by the Allied nations to convict Germans at Nuremberg. There are essentially two modern <WSD>Nuremberg Defenses</WSD>: the Citizen's Duty and the Citizen's Privilege. [...] Under the Citizen's Duty defense, defendants assert that they could be held liable for complicity with international crimes if they fail to take action to prevent such crimes. [...] &#91;[https://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2965&conhastings_law_journal page 416]&#93; Under the Citizen's Privilege formulation of the Defense, the Nuremberg Principles are joined with the statutory and common law privileges allowing citizens to prevent crime. This then creates a "citizen's privilege" to break domestic law. 
Meaning of the word marked with <WSD> tags:  An explanation offered as a defense to criminal or wrongful behavior, claiming that one is justified in not obeying a governmental order or a domestic law because the order or law is itself unlawful.