derek-thomas/squad-v1.1-t5-question-generation huggingface dataset:
Likewise, Émile Durkheim was one of the earliest to suggest that gods represent an extension of human social life to include supernatural beings. In line with this reasoning, psychologist Matt Rossano contends that when humans began living in larger groups, they may have created gods as a means of enforcing morality. In small groups, morality can be enforced by social forces such as gossip or reputation. However, it is much harder to enforce morality using social forces in much larger groups. Rossano indicates that by including ever-watchful gods and spirits, humans discovered an effective strategy for restraining selfishness and building more cooperative groups.

Question: What did Émile Durkheim suggest about the existence of God? Question: Who suggested that by including the presence of an omniscient God, selfishness can be controlled and cooperation can be gained? Question: Who posited that humans created gods to create morality in social groups? Question: Why would humans have begun to create gods? Question: What are ways that small social groups can force morality? Question: Omnipresent gods are a way to watch large groups and enforce what? Question: Omniprestent gods helped build what?
St. Anselm's approach was to define God as, "that than which nothing greater can be conceived". Famed pantheist philosopher Baruch Spinoza would later carry this idea to its extreme: "By God I understand a being absolutely infinite, i.e., a substance consisting of infinite attributes, of which each one expresses an eternal and infinite essence." For Spinoza, the whole of the natural universe is made of one substance, God, or its equivalent, Nature. His proof for the existence of God was a variation of the Ontological argument.

Question: Who defined god as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived"? Question: How did St. Anselm define the existence of God? Question: Who said that God is "a substance consisting of infinite attributes"? Question: Name a famous pantheist? Question: What was Spinoza's concept of God? Question: What did Spinoza believe the world was made of? Question: Spinoza believed that the universe was made up of one substance which is? Question: What did Baruch Spinoza use as proof for the existence of God?
Some findings in the fields of cosmology, evolutionary biology and neuroscience are interpreted by atheists (including Lawrence M. Krauss and Sam Harris) as evidence that God is an imaginary entity only, with no basis in reality. A single, omniscient God who is imagined to have created the universe and is particularly attentive to the lives of humans has been imagined, embellished and promulgated in a trans-generational manner. Richard Dawkins interprets various findings not only as a lack of evidence for the material existence of such a God but extensive evidence to the contrary.

Question: Who believes God isn't real? Question: What do atheists believe of God? Question: How long has the thought of the existence of God been carried on? Question: How does Dawkins interpret evidence for or against the existence of God? Question: How does Dawkins interpret his findings on the existence, or not, of God.
According to the Omnipotence paradox or 'Paradox of the Stone', can God create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it? Either he can or he can’t. If he can’t, the argument goes, then there is something that he cannot do, namely create the stone, and therefore he is not omnipotent. If he can, it continues, then there is also something that he cannot do, namely lift the stone, and therefore he is not omnipotent. Either way, then, God is not omnipotent. A being that is not omnipotent, though, is not God, according to many theological models. Such a God, therefore, does not exist. Several answers to this paradox have been proposed.

Question: What is another term for the Omnipotence paradox? Question: What paradox states that if a god can't create a stone so heavy he can't lift it? Question: What is the Omnipotence paradox? Question: What shows God is not omnipotent if he creates a stone that he cannot lift? Question: What does the Paradox of the Stone posit? Question: What must God be, in order to be a Supreme Being? Question: Does either outcome of the Paradox of the Stone prove the existence of God? Question: What does it mean if a God is not omnipotent? Question: Are there any answers to the Pradox of the Stone?
Different religious traditions assign differing (though often similar) attributes and characteristics to God, including expansive powers and abilities, psychological characteristics, gender characteristics, and preferred nomenclature. The assignment of these attributes often differs according to the conceptions of God in the culture from which they arise. For example, attributes of God in Christianity, attributes of God in Islam, and the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy in Judaism share certain similarities arising from their common roots.

Question: What are some religious traditions that are found within differing religions? Question: What attributes do religions all roughly share? Question: What three religions share similar parts? Question: What three religions share similar beginnings? Question: Who does Christianity share roots with? Question: How many Attributes of Mercy are in Judaism? Question: What do religions share across their belief structures?
The gender of God may be viewed as either a literal or an allegorical aspect of a deity who, in classical western philosophy, transcends bodily form. Polytheistic religions commonly attribute to each of the gods a gender, allowing each to interact with any of the others, and perhaps with humans, sexually. In most monotheistic religions, God has no counterpart with which to relate sexually. Thus, in classical western philosophy the gender of this one-and-only deity is most likely to be an analogical statement of how humans and God address, and relate to, each other. Namely, God is seen as begetter of the world and revelation which corresponds to the active (as opposed to the receptive) role in sexual intercourse.

Question: What do polytheistic religions assign to their gods? Question: In what ways can the gender of God be viewed? Question: How do polytheistic religions view sex by God or gods? Question: In which type of religion does God have no sexual partner? Question: How is sex by God handled in a monotheistic religion? Question: What is God's role in the creation of the world? Question: What role does got serve in a sexual intercourse?
Prayer plays a significant role among many believers. Muslims believe that the purpose of existence is to worship God. He is viewed as a personal God and there are no intermediaries, such as clergy, to contact God. Prayer often also includes supplication and asking forgiveness. God is often believed to be forgiving. For example, a hadith states God would replace a sinless people with one who sinned but still asked repentance. Christian theologian Alister McGrath writes that there are good reasons to suggest that a "personal god" is integral to the Christian outlook, but that one has to understand it is an analogy. "To say that God is like a person is to affirm the divine ability and willingness to relate to others. This does not imply that God is human, or located at a specific point in the universe."

Question: What is a muslims life purpose? Question: What type of God is the Muslim God? Question: What does prayer usually include in Islam? Question: What type of God is the Muslim God? Question: What aspect does Alister McGrath argue is important in Christianity?
Adherents of different religions generally disagree as to how to best worship God and what is God's plan for mankind, if there is one. There are different approaches to reconciling the contradictory claims of monotheistic religions. One view is taken by exclusivists, who believe they are the chosen people or have exclusive access to absolute truth, generally through revelation or encounter with the Divine, which adherents of other religions do not. Another view is religious pluralism. A pluralist typically believes that his religion is the right one, but does not deny the partial truth of other religions. An example of a pluralist view in Christianity is supersessionism, i.e., the belief that one's religion is the fulfillment of previous religions. A third approach is relativistic inclusivism, where everybody is seen as equally right; an example being universalism: the doctrine that salvation is eventually available for everyone. A fourth approach is syncretism, mixing different elements from different religions. An example of syncretism is the New Age movement.

Question: Who believe they are the one and only chosen few? Question: Who believe that they are the only people that know the truth? Question: What is one called that believes he has the one religion, but that the others aren't necessarily wrong? Question: What is it called when someone belives that their own religion is an advancement of older religions? Question: What is a religion that believes that all religions are correct?
Many medieval philosophers developed arguments for the existence of God, while attempting to comprehend the precise implications of God's attributes. Reconciling some of those attributes generated important philosophical problems and debates. For example, God's omniscience may seem to imply that God knows how free agents will choose to act. If God does know this, their ostensible free will might be illusory, or foreknowledge does not imply predestination, and if God does not know it, God may not be omniscient.

Question: Who posited the existence of God? Question: What philosophical debates arose in the middle ages? Question: What does it mean if God can't predict the future?
The last centuries of philosophy have seen vigorous questions regarding the arguments for God's existence raised by such philosophers as Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Antony Flew, although Kant held that the argument from morality was valid. The theist response has been either to contend, as does Alvin Plantinga, that faith is "properly basic", or to take, as does Richard Swinburne, the evidentialist position. Some theists agree that none of the arguments for God's existence are compelling, but argue that faith is not a product of reason, but requires risk. There would be no risk, they say, if the arguments for God's existence were as solid as the laws of logic, a position summed up by Pascal as "the heart has reasons of which reason does not know." A recent theory using concepts from physics and neurophysiology proposes that God can be conceptualized within the theory of integrative level.

Question: Name three philosophers of the last 100 years arguing for the existence of God? Question: How does Alvin Plantinga describe faith? Question: Which philosopher takes the evidentialist position? Question: Who stated "the heart has reasons of which reason does not know"?
On 16 September 2001, at Camp David, President George W. Bush used the phrase war on terrorism in an unscripted and controversial comment when he said, "This crusade – this war on terrorism – is going to take a while, ... " Bush later apologized for this remark due to the negative connotations the term crusade has to people, e.g. of Muslim faith. The word crusade was not used again. On 20 September 2001, during a televised address to a joint session of congress, Bush stated that, "(o)ur 'war on terror' begins with al-Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated."

Question: When did George W. Bush first say 'war on terrorism'? Question: Which word did George W. Bush apologize for using when talking about the war? Question: When did George W. Bush first say 'war on terror'? Question: Where did Bush say the 'war on terror' begins? Question: When did Bush say the 'war on terror' ends?
U.S. President Barack Obama has rarely used the term, but in his inaugural address on 20 January 2009, he stated "Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred." In March 2009 the Defense Department officially changed the name of operations from "Global War on Terror" to "Overseas Contingency Operation" (OCO). In March 2009, the Obama administration requested that Pentagon staff members avoid use of the term, instead using "Overseas Contingency Operation". Basic objectives of the Bush administration "war on terror", such as targeting al Qaeda and building international counterterrorism alliances, remain in place. In December 2012, Jeh Johnson, the General Counsel of the Department of Defense, stated that the military fight will be replaced by a law enforcement operation when speaking at Oxford University, predicting that al Qaeda will be so weakened to be ineffective, and has been "effectively destroyed", and thus the conflict will not be an armed conflict under international law. In May 2013, Obama stated that the goal is "to dismantle specific networks of violent extremists that threaten America"; which coincided with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget having changed the wording from "Overseas Contingency Operations" to "Countering Violent Extremism" in 2010.

Question: What did Obama say the US is at war with, in 2009? Question: What was the "Global War on Terror" officially renamed to in March 2009? Question: What term did Obama want the government to stop using? Question: Who said in 2012 that the fight would change from military to law enforcement? Question: What was the  "Overseas Contingency Operations" renamed to in 2010?
Because the actions involved in the "war on terrorism" are diffuse, and the criteria for inclusion are unclear, political theorist Richard Jackson has argued that "the 'war on terrorism' therefore, is simultaneously a set of actual practices—wars, covert operations, agencies, and institutions—and an accompanying series of assumptions, beliefs, justifications, and narratives—it is an entire language or discourse." Jackson cites among many examples a statement by John Ashcroft that "the attacks of September 11 drew a bright line of demarcation between the civil and the savage". Administration officials also described "terrorists" as hateful, treacherous, barbarous, mad, twisted, perverted, without faith, parasitical, inhuman, and, most commonly, evil. Americans, in contrast, were described as brave, loving, generous, strong, resourceful, heroic, and respectful of human rights.

Question: Who said the 'war on terrorism' is 'an entire language of discourse'? Question: Who said that 9/11 drew a line between 'the civil and the savage'? Question: What did the Bush administration describe as parasitical? Question: What did the Bush administration describe as heroic?
The origins of al-Qaeda can be traced to the Soviet war in Afghanistan (December 1979 – February 1989). The United States, United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the People's Republic of China supported the Islamist Afghan mujahadeen guerillas against the military forces of the Soviet Union and the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. A small number of "Afghan Arab" volunteers joined the fight against the Soviets, including Osama bin Laden, but there is no evidence they received any external assistance. In May 1996 the group World Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders (WIFJAJC), sponsored by bin Laden (and later re-formed as al-Qaeda), started forming a large base of operations in Afghanistan, where the Islamist extremist regime of the Taliban had seized power earlier in the year. In February 1998, Osama bin Laden signed a fatwā, as head of al-Qaeda, declaring war on the West and Israel, later in May of that same year al-Qaeda released a video declaring war on the U.S. and the West.

Question: Which war gave birth to al-Qaeda? Question: When did the Soviets leave Afghanistan? Question: Which countries supported Afghan islamists against the Soviets? Question: Who did Osama bin Laden volunteer to help fight in the 80s? Question: Which group later became al-Qaeda?
On 7 August 1998, al-Qaeda struck the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224 people, including 12 Americans. In retaliation, U.S. President Bill Clinton launched Operation Infinite Reach, a bombing campaign in Sudan and Afghanistan against targets the U.S. asserted were associated with WIFJAJC, although others have questioned whether a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan was used as a chemical warfare plant. The plant produced much of the region's antimalarial drugs and around 50% of Sudan's pharmaceutical needs. The strikes failed to kill any leaders of WIFJAJC or the Taliban.

Question: When did al-Qaeda attack the US embassy in Kenya? Question: How many people were killed when al-Qaeda attacked US embassies in 1998? Question: How many Americans were killed when al-Qaeda attacked US embassies in 1998? Question: What operation did Bill Clinton start to retaliate for the 1998 embassy attacks? Question: How much of Sudan's medicines were produced by a pharmaceutical plant Clinton's operation bombed?
On the morning of 11 September 2001, 19 men affiliated with al-Qaeda hijacked four airliners all bound for California. Once the hijackers assumed control of the airliners, they told the passengers that they had the bomb on board and would spare the lives of passengers and crew once their demands were met – no passenger and crew actually suspected that they would use the airliners as suicide weapons since it had never happened before in history. The hijackers – members of al-Qaeda's Hamburg cell – intentionally crashed two airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. Both buildings collapsed within two hours from fire damage related to the crashes, destroying nearby buildings and damaging others. The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia, just outside Washington D.C. The fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after some of its passengers and flight crew attempted to retake control of the plane, which the hijackers had redirected toward Washington D.C., to target the White House, or the U.S. Capitol. No flights had survivors. A total of 2,977 victims and the 19 hijackers perished in the attacks.

Question: How many al-Qaeda operatives hijacked planes on 9/11? Question: How many planes were hijacked on 9/11? Question: Where were the 9/11 planes originally going? Question: Which al-Qaeda cell were the 9/11 hijackers members of? Question: How soon after planes crashed into them did the WTC towers collapse?
The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists or "AUMF" was made law on 14 September 2001, to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on 11 September 2001. It authorized the President to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on 11 September 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. Congress declares this is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

Question: What law was signed on Sep 14, 2001? Question: Who did the AUMF authorize the US military attacking? Question: What law did Congress refer to as a basic for the AUMF? Question: When was the War Powers Resolution passed?
Subsequently, in October 2001, U.S. forces (with UK and coalition allies) invaded Afghanistan to oust the Taliban regime. On 7 October 2001, the official invasion began with British and U.S. forces conducting airstrike campaigns over enemy targets. Kabul, the capital city of Afghanistan, fell by mid-November. The remaining al-Qaeda and Taliban remnants fell back to the rugged mountains of eastern Afghanistan, mainly Tora Bora. In December, Coalition forces (the U.S. and its allies) fought within that region. It is believed that Osama bin Laden escaped into Pakistan during the battle.

Question: When did the US invade Afghanistan? Question: Who helped the US invade Afghanistan? Question: What was the goal of the US invading Afghanistan? Question: When did the US begin airstrikes on Afghanistan? Question: Where did bin Laden escape to in Dec 2001?
The Taliban regrouped in western Pakistan and began to unleash an insurgent-style offensive against Coalition forces in late 2002. Throughout southern and eastern Afghanistan, firefights broke out between the surging Taliban and Coalition forces. Coalition forces responded with a series of military offensives and an increase in the amount of troops in Afghanistan. In February 2010, Coalition forces launched Operation Moshtarak in southern Afghanistan along with other military offensives in the hopes that they would destroy the Taliban insurgency once and for all. Peace talks are also underway between Taliban affiliated fighters and Coalition forces. In September 2014, Afghanistan and the United States signed a security agreement, which permits United States and NATO forces to remain in Afghanistan until at least 2024. The United States and other NATO and non-NATO forces are planning to withdraw; with the Taliban claiming it has defeated the United States and NATO, and the Obama Administration viewing it as a victory. In December 2014, ISAF encasing its colors, and Resolute Support began as the NATO operation in Afghanistan. Continued United States operations within Afghanistan will continue under the name "Operation Freedom's Sentinel".

Question: Where did the Taliban regroup in 2002? Question: In what parts of Afghanistan did the Taliban attack Coalition forces in 2002? Question: What operation began in Feb 2010? Question: Where did Operation Moshtarak take place? Question: When did Afghanistan sign a security agreement with the US?
In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force – Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a 14-year mission. After JSOTF-P disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team".

Question: Where did the USSOC Pacific deploy to in Jan 2002? Question: What was the goal of the 2002 Philippines deployment? Question: What was the main Filipino Islamist group being attacked? Question: What humanitarian effort followed the 2002 military operation in the Philippines? Question: What did Operation Smiles do for the Philippines?
On 14 September 2009, U.S. Special Forces killed two men and wounded and captured two others near the Somali village of Baarawe. Witnesses claim that helicopters used for the operation launched from French-flagged warships, but that could not be confirmed. A Somali-based al-Qaida affiliated group, the Al-Shabaab, has confirmed the death of "sheik commander" Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan along with an unspecified number of militants. Nabhan, a Kenyan, was wanted in connection with the 2002 Mombasa attacks.

Question: How many people were killed by US Special Forces on Sep 14, 2009? Question: Where was the Sep 14, 2009 action? Question: What country's ships did some witnesses say were involved in the Baarawe attack? Question: What Somali group is affiliated with al-Qaeda? Question: What nationality was Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan?