TLDR FOR PEOPLE DOING PREFS QUICKLY
Good for most arguments, mainly debated the K, but have had my fair share of framework and debated some nine-off rounds, so don't worry about it too much.
Intro
Stockdale '22MSU '26
Went to TOC in LD but mainly did Policy
email: scully.glen.e@gmail.complease put me on the chain
pronouns - he/him/his

Notes - Policy
I don't have much knowledge on this topic (NATO) other than general knowledge about the world and countries within NATO
Speaks: I'll try to stick between 28.5-29.5 for the most part
I'll refer to you as they/them if your pronoun is not on tabroom, so please let me know before the rounds!
You can call me judge or Glen, I didn't like calling people by their names when I debated in high school, but if you don't want to call me judge then feel free to call me Glen.

I debated the K for my last two years of high school, focusing on high-theory arguments. My coach was Jared Burke/most of CSUF and I went to RKS for two years, all of that influences how I view debate. If you say something sexist/racist/ableist, I will drop you and give you as low speaker points as possible.
Go slightly slower on analytics, try to differentiate between tags and cards, if you just blaze through everything monotone chances are I will miss something.
I'm fine with condo, but will vote on condo bad if the affirmative can convince me.Policy Affs - ran these for two years and am now at MSU, so these are totally fine. Explain how the plan solves clearly in the 2AC though.
K Affs - ran these for the other two years, feel free to run them in front of me, make sure to not get clowned in cx though. I'll vote on pretty much any of these, but if your aff has zero link to the topic, you'll need to win a lot to justify it. Needs a role for the negative
K's - most familiar with these, I'm very familiar with Cap, Baudrillard, and Security, and Afropessimism, everything else I still know about, but am less quickly to understand. Make sure to clearly explain your links in the 2NC. You don't need an alt, but you should have something to generate some uniqueness or else it'll be pretty difficult for me to find a reason to vote for it
DA's/CP's - alright for these, I'm not a huge fan of 9-11 off strats and vastly prefer 5 off with a K, but I would vote on them, if you're reading 6-7 conditional worlds and they read condo 1NR should be like two minutes of condo. If you read this just to outspread novices then you probably won't get a 29.9 even if you destroy them unless the block/2NR has great analysis.
Topicality/FW - I don't really find going for fairness alone as an impact convincing, trying to use it to win the internal link to education is much more convincing. TVAs + SSD are your friends, please read it/one. All K AFFs are not cheating though, so before determining that the round will be one off framework think if there is one other strat you could do. Big fan of tactics fw + K or cap.

Notes - LD
Mostly same thing as policy, good for prog/trad, anything but tricks. I will not vote on a 2 second theory blurb that you put at the bottom of a sheet randomly. Don't take that as I won't vote on theory at all, but if you want me to, it should be a very clear/worthy interp + violation + a few standards that are relatively impacted out.
I'll try to protect the NR, but time-skew means I need to allow some elaboration.