ARGENTINA – DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE ON IMPORTS OF PRESERVED PEACHES
Document: Request for Consultations by Chile
Date: 24 September 2001
Document codes: WT/DS238/1; G/L/479; G/SG/D19/1
Complainant: Chile
Respondent: Argentina
Third parties: EU, Paraguay, U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. XIX:1  GATT 1994Art. 2, 3, 4, 5, 12  Safeguards

ARGENTINA – DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE
ON IMPORTS OF PRESERVED PEACHES
Request for Consultations by Chile
The following communication, dated 14 September 2001, from the Permanent Mission of
Chile to the Permanent Mission of Argentina and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is
circulated in accordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU.
I have been instructed by my Government to contact you in order to request consultations
with Argentina pursuant to Article XXIII:1 of the GATT 1994, Article 4 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), and Article 14 of the Agreement
on Safeguards. This request is related to the definitive safeguard measure applied by the Government
of Argentina on imports of peaches preserved in water containing added sweetening matter, including
syrup, preserved in any other form or in water (MERCOSUR tariff headings 2008.70.10 and
2008.70.90).
On 15 January 2001, Argentina notified the WTO of the initiation of an investigation
concerning the imposition of a safeguard measure and gave prior notice, under Article 12.4 of the
Agreement on Safeguards, of the adoption of a provisional safeguard measure on the above products
( and RG/2). On 30 January 2001, Chile requested consultations, also
pursuant to Article 12.4, which took place in Geneva on 2 March.
On 17 July 2001, Argentina notified the WTO of its finding of serious injury and decision to
apply a definitive safeguard measure (G /S, and G/ S and
). Pursuant to Article 12.3 of the Agreement on Safeguards, Chile requested
consultations, which took place in Buenos Aires on 16 August 2001.
Chile considers this definitive safeguard measure to be inconsistent with the WTO rules. It is
having serious adverse effects on the competitiveness of Chilean products of the above description in
the Argentine market.
Chile does not consider that the condition of "unforeseen developments", provided for in
Article XIX:1 of the GATT 1994, has been fulfilled. Nor is it clear that the products have been
imported in increased quantities, absolute or relative to domestic production, as required by that
Article and by the Agreement on Safeguards. Nor has any evidence been given of injury or threat of
injury to the domestic industry, since the investigation's conclusions concerning an alleged causal link
were merely declaratory.

In the Minutes (No. 781) of the investigating authority, the existence is clearly established of
objective and quantifiable factors, other than the alleged increase in imports, which might be
responsible for the loss in market share claimed to be experienced by the domestic industry. Failing
to analyse the injury caused by those factors, the investigating authority attributed all the injury to
alleged increased imports.
The level, determination and scope of the definitive safeguard measure are greater than the
extent necessary to prevent or remedy serious injury and to facilitate adjustment. A specific duty of
US$0.50 per kg. has been arbitrarily imposed, which in ad valorem terms and in relation to Chilean
production, represents nearly an extra 70 per cent on the customs duties applicable to Chile (19.6 per
cent). Chile considers that the extent of the measure is unreasonable, prohibitive, and equivalent to an
import prohibition. Since the safeguard measure has been in force, Argentina has in fact failed to
register any imports of canned peaches from Chile or from any other trading partner.
In the light of the above considerations, Chile considers the definitive safeguard measure
imposed on imports of canned peaches to be inconsistent with various WTO provisions, inter alia,
Articles 2, 4, 5 and 12 of the Agreement on Safegu ards and paragraph 1 of Article XIX:1 of the
GATT 1994.
I await your reply to this request for consultations in order to establish a mutually convenient
date for holding them.