CHINA – MEASURES RELATED TO THE EXPORTATION OF RARE EARTHS, TUNGSTEN, AND MOLYBDENUM COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
Document: COMMUNICATION FROM
Date: 19 June 2014
Document codes: WT/DS431/11
Complainant: U.S.
Respondent: China
Third parties: Brazil, Canada, Colombia, EU, India, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Vietnam, Argentina, Australia, Indonesia, Turkey, Peru, Russia
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. XI:1, X:3(a)  GATT 1994Part I, para. 1.2, Part I, para. 11.3, Part I, para. 5.1,   Protocol of Accession

CHINA – MEASURES RELATED TO THE EXPORTATION OF
RARE EARTHS, TUNGSTEN, AND MOLYBDENUM
COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
The following notification, dated 17 June 2014, from the Chair of the Appellate Body addressed to
the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circul ated to Members in accordance with Article 17.5
of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

I am writing to you pursuant to Article 17.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), wh ich stipulates that, as a general rule, the
Appellate Body will circulate its report no later than 60 days after the appellant has formally
notified the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of its decision to appeal. Article 17.5 states,
furthermore, that when the Appellate Body considers that it cannot provide its report within
60 days, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of
the period within which it will submit its report.

The United States notified the DSB on 8 April 2014 of its decision to appeal certain issues of law
covered in the Panel Report , and legal interpretations developed by the Panel in this
dispute. The Appellate Body was not able to circulate its Report within 60 days of the initiation of
the appeal. Moreover, the Appellate Body expects that it will not be able to circulate its Report
within the 90-day timeframe provided for in the last sentence of Article 17.5 of the DSU. As
explained below, this is due to several reasons, including the unfilled vacancy on the Appellate
Body, the Appellate Body's significant workload, the volume and complexity of the issues raised by
the participants, the large number of participants and third participants, and the consolidation of
this appeal with the appellate proceedings in DS432 and DS433.

On 25 April 2014, China filed a Notice of Appeal with respect to the Panel Reports in China –
Measures related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten, and Molybdenum , WT/DS432/R
(complaint by the European Union) and WT/DS433/R (complaint by Japan). Before the Panel, the
proceedings in DS431, DS432, and DS433 were consolidated and followed the same timetable. In
a Procedural Ruling dated 1 May 2014, the Division hearing these appeals, having heard the views
of the participants and third participants, decided to consolidate the three appellate proceedings.
These consolidated proceedings thus encompass appeals by the United States and China (as other
appellant) in DS431, as well as appeals by China in DS432 and DS433. In conjunction with this
consolidation, the Division further decided to modify and extend certain time periods for the filing
of submissions in these appeals, and to hold a single oral hearing for all three appeals.

Moreover, as you are aware, for the last six months the Appellate Body has been composed of only
six, rather than the full complement of seven, Appellate Body Members. The Appellate Body has
faced a substantial workload during the first half of 2014, and there has been significant overlap in
the composition of the Divisions that have been composed to hear different appeals during this
period. Due to the scheduling issues arising from this situation, the consolidation of the three
appeals and the subsequent extended Working Schedule, as well as the time required for
translation of the Report so that it can be circulated in all three official languages, it will not be
possible for the Appellate Body to circulate its Report in this appeal within the 90-day timeframe
provided for in Article 17.5 of the DSU.

Having consolidated the appellate proceedings in this dispute with those in DS432, and DS433, the
Appellate Body intends to communicate the expect ed date of circulation for the Appellate Body
Reports in all three disputes upon expiry of the 60-day period specified in Article 17.5 of the DSU
for DS432 and DS433. Such 60-day period will expire on 24 June 2014.