dean22029/WTO_Docs huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 17 September 2004
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.8; WT/DS234/24/Add.8
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 16 Se ptember 2004, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 On 19 June 2003, legislation that would bri ng the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies
Agreement and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US Senate (S. 1299).

 On 10 March 2004, legislation that would rep eal the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 The US Administration is continuing to work with Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 8 October 2004
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.9; WT/DS234/24/Add.9
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 7 October 2004, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 On 19 June 2003, legislation that would bri ng the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies
Agreement and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US Senate (S. 1299).

 On 10 March 2004, legislation that would rep eal the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 The US Administration is continuing to work with Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 11 November 2004
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.10; WT/DS234/24/Add.10
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 10 November 2004, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 On 19 June 2003, legislation that would bri ng the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies
Agreement and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US Senate (S. 1299).

 On 10 March 2004, legislation that would rep eal the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 The US Administration is continuing to work with Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 7 December 2004
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.11; WT/DS234/24/Add.11
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 6 December 2004, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the Unite d States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 On 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies
Agreement and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US Senate (S. 1299).

 On 10 March 2004, legislation that would re peal the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset
Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 The US Administration is continuing to work with Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 14 January 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.12; WT/DS234/24/Add.12
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 13 January 2005, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Antidumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 The US Administration will work with the current Congress, which convened this month, to
enact legislation, and will continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to
reach a mutually satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 7 February 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.13; WT/DS234/24/Add.13
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 4 Fe bruary 2005, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 The US Administration will work with the current Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 11 March 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.14; WT/DS234/24/Add.14
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 10 March 2005, from the delegation of the United States
to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121).
That bill has been referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 The US Administration will work with the current Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 8 April 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.15; WT/DS234/24/Add.15
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 7 April 2005, from the delegation of the United States to
the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121).
That bill has been referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 The US Administration will work with the current Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 9 May 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.16; WT/DS234/24/Add.16
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 4 May 2005, from the delegation of the United States to
the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121).
That bill has been referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 The US Administration will work with the current Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 10 June 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.17; WT/DS234/24/Add.17
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 9 June 2005, from the delegation of the United States to
the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121).
That bill has been referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 The US Administration will work with the current Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 8 July 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.18; WT/DS234/24/Add.18
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 7 July 2005, from the delegation of the United States to
the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121).
That bill has been referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 The US Administration will work with the current Congress to enact legislation, and will
continue to confer with the complaining parties in these disputes, in order to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 19 August 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.19; WT/DS234/24/Add.19
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 18 August 2005, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settleme nt Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121).
That bill has been referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 The US Administration will work with the Congress to enact legislation, and will continue to
confer with the complaining parties in these dis putes, in order to reach a mutually satisfactory
resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 16 September 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.20; WT/DS234/24/Add.20
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 15 Se ptember 2005, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settleme nt Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Dispute
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislati on that would repeal the Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act was introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121).
That bill has been referred to the Committee on Wa ys and Means. On 25 July 2005, the Committee
requested public comment by 2 September 2005, on whether to include H.R. 1121 in broader trade
legislation regarding technical corrections and miscellaneous duty suspension. The Committee is now
reviewing those comments.

 On 9 September 2005, an amendment (N° 1680) to appropriations legislation (H.R. 2862) was
filed in the US Senate. The amendment would prohibit the distribution of CDSOA funds unless
distribution of such funds would not be inconsistent with US WTO obligations.

 The US Administration will work with the Congress to enact legislation, and will continue to
confer with the complaining parties in these dis putes, in order to reach a mutually satisfactory
resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 7 October 2005
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.21; WT/DS234/24/Add.21
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 6 October 2005, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settleme nt Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 In the previous US Congress, on 19 June 2003, legislation that would bring the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 ("CDSOA") into conformity with US obligations under the
Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Subsidies Agreemen t and the GATT 1994 was introduced in the US
Senate (S. 1299). On 10 March 2004, legislation th at would repeal the CDSOA was introduced in the
US House of Representatives (H.R. 3933).

 On 7 February 2005, the US Administration proposed repeal of the CDSOA in its budget
proposal for fiscal year 2006. On 3 March 2005, legislation that would repeal the CDSOA was
introduced in the US House of Representatives (H.R. 1121). That bill has been referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means.

 On 9 September 2005, an amendment (No. 1680) to appropriations legislation (H.R. 2862, the
"Science, State, Justice, Commerce, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006") was filed in the
US Senate. The amendment would prohibit the di stribution of CDSOA funds unless distribution of
such funds would not be inconsistent with US WTO obligations.

 The US Administration will work with the Congress to enact legislation, and will continue to
confer with the complaining parties in these dis putes, in order to reach a mutually satisfactory
resolution of this matter.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 7 February 2006
Document codes: WT/DS217/16/Add.24; WT/DS234/24/Add.24
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 6 Fe bruary 2006, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settleme nt Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings

in the Disputes
(WT/DS217 and WT/DS234)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Bo dy ("DSB") adopted its recommendations and
rulings in (WT/DS217 and
WT/DS234). At the same DSB meeting, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to
implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in connection with this matter.

 The United States is pleased to report that, on 1 February 2006, the US Congress approved
the Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act, which includes a provision that repeals the
CDSOA. Once the President signs this Act into law, the United States will have taken the actions
necessary to implement the rulings and recommendations in these disputes.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Appellate Body Report and Panel Report Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
Date: 3 February 2003
Document codes: WT/DS217/11; WT/DS234/19; WT/DS217/AB/R; WT/DS234/AB/R; WT/DS217/R; WT/DS234/R
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING
AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Appellate Body Report and Panel Report
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body
Report on " " (,
) and the Panel Report (, ), as modified by the Appellate
Body Report. The Panel Report should be read in conjunction with the Appellate Body Report.
Rapport de l'Organe d'appel et rapport du Groupe spécial
À sa réunion du 27 janvier 2003, l'Organe de règlement des différends a adopté le rapport de
spécial est à rapprocher de celui de l'Organe d'appel.
ESTADOS UNIDOS – LEY DE COMPENSACIÓN POR CONTINUACIÓN
SUBVENCIONES DE 2000
Actuación del Órgano de Solución de Diferencias
En su reunión de 27 de enero de 2003, el Ór gano de Solución de Diferencias adoptó el
informe del Órgano de Apelación titulado " Estados Unidos – Ley de compensación por continuación
de Apelación.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Document: Request by Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the European Communities, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Thailand for Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU
Date: 19 March 2003
Document codes: WT/DS217/12; WT/DS234/20
Complainant: Canada, Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, EU, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Thailand
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 5.4  Anti-dumpingArt. 5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI  GATT 1994Art. 8, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. 11.4, 18, 32  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI  Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 10  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. X  GATT 1994Art. 1  Anti-dumping

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING
AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Request by Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the European Communities,
India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Thailand
for Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU
The following communication, dated 14 March 2003, from the Permanent Missions of
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, India, Indone sia, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Thailand, and the
Permanent Delegation of the European Commission, to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body,
is circulated at the request of those delegations.
On 27 January 2003, the Dispute Settlement Body (the "DSB") adopted the Appellate Body
Report and the Panel Report in United States – Continued Dumpi ng and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000
(WT/DS217, WT/DS234). In the absence of an agreement with the United States under
Article 21.3(b) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(the "DSU") on a reasonable period of time to co mply with the recommendations and rulings of the
DSB, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the European Communities, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea,
Mexico and Thailand (hereafter the complaining parties) hereby request that such period be
determined through binding arbitration pursuant to Article 21.3(c) of the DSU.
The complaining parties will enter into consulta tions with the United States with a view to
reaching agreement on the arbitrator within the time period provided for in footnote 12 of the DSU.
UNITED STATES – COUNTERVAILING DUTIES ON CERTAIN CARBON STEEL PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL
Document: Request to Join Consultations Communication from the European Communities
Date: 22 January 2001
Document codes: WT/DS218/2; WT/DS218/1
Complainant: Brazil
Respondent: U.S.
Dispute stage: Consultation
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 10, 11, 14, 19, 21  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – COUNTERVAILING DUTIES ON
CERTAIN CARBON STEEL PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL
Request to Join Consultations
Communication from the European Communities
The following communication, dated 18 January 2001, from the Permanent Delegation of the
European Commission to the Permanent Mission of the United States, the Permanent Mission of
Brazil and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with
Article 4.11 of the DSU.
With reference to Brazil's request for consultations concerning "" (, circulated on
9 January 2001), and in light of the European Communities' substantial trade and systemic interest, I
hereby wish to convey the request of the European Communities, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU,
to join in those consultations.
In particular, the European Communities have substantial trade interests in several US
countervailing orders which relate to the same US provisions addressed by the Brazilian request in
question. These provisions relate to the application by the Department of Commerce of a
methodology which allows for the imposition of countervailing duties based on a finding that the
benefits from past subsidies provided to companies prior to their privatizations are passed through to
the companies following a change in ownership. These provisions affect a number of European
Communities exporters, and therefore, the European Communities have also a systemic interest in the
correct application of the SCM Agreement by the US.
The European Communities look forward to bein g informed of the date and venue of the
consultations.
EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES ON MALLEABLE CAST IRON TUBE OR PIPE FITTINGS FROM BRAZIL
Document: Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Brazil Note by the Secretariat
Date: 11 September 2001
Document codes: WT/DS219/3; WT/DS219/2; WT/DS219/2
Complainant: Brazil
Respondent: EU
Third parties: Chile, Japan, Mexico, U.S.
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15  Anti-dumpingArt. I, VI  GATT 1994

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES ON
MALLEABLE CAST IRON TUBE OR PIPE FITTINGS FROM BRAZIL
Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Brazil
Note by the Secretariat
1. At its meeting on 24 July 2001 the Dispute Settl ement Body (DSB) established a panel pursuant
to a request made by Brazil (), in accordance with Article 6 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU).
2. At that meeting, the parties to the dispute ag reed that the Panel should have standard terms of
reference. The terms of reference are the following:
"To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited
by Brazil in document , the matter referred to the DSB by Brazil in that
document and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements".
3. On 5 September 2001, the parties agreed to the following composition of the Panel:
Chairman: Mr. Maamoun Abdel-Fattah
Members: Ms. Deborah Milstein
Mr. G. Bruce Cullen
4. Chile, Japan, Mexico and the United States have reserved their rights to participate in the panel
proceedings as third parties.
EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES ON MALLEABLE CAST IRON TUBE OR PIPE FITTINGS FROM BRAZIL
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 18 January 2002
Document codes: WT/DS219/4
Complainant: Brazil
Respondent: EU
Third parties: Chile, Japan, Mexico, U.S.
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15  Anti-dumpingArt. I, VI  GATT 1994

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES ON
MALLEABLE CAST IRON TUBE OR PIPE FITTINGS FROM BRAZIL
Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
The following communication, dated 16 January 2002 and addressed to the Dispute Settlement
Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 12.12 of the DSU.
In light of ongoing consultations between Brazil and the European Communities and with a
view to reaching a mutually agreed solution to the present dispute, both parties requested, on
15 January 2002, that the Panel suspend its work until 1 March 2002, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the
DSU. The Panel has agreed to this request and will suspend its work from 15 January until
1 March 2002.
EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES ON MALLEABLE CAST IRON TUBE OR PIPE FITTINGS FROM BRAZIL
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 5 March 2002
Document codes: WT/DS219/5
Complainant: Brazil
Respondent: EU
Third parties: Chile, Japan, Mexico, U.S.
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15  Anti-dumpingArt. I, VI  GATT 1994

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES ON
MALLEABLE CAST IRON TUBE OR PIPE FITTINGS FROM BRAZIL
Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
The following communication, dated 28 February 2002 and addressed to the Dispute Settlement
Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 12.12 of the DSU.
In the light of the additional time needed for the ongoing consultations between Brazil and the
European Communities aiming at a mutually agreed solution to the present dispute, both parties
requested, on 28 February 2002, that the suspension of the Panel procedures be extended until
5 April 2002, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU. The Panel has agreed to this request and will
suspend its work until 5 April 2002.