dean22029/WTO_Docs huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 11 June 2010
Document codes: WT/DS350/18/Add.6
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 10 June 2010, from the delegation of the United States
to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the
DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute

(WT/DS350)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU").

 On 19 February 2009, the Dispute Settleme nt Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations
and rulings in
(DS350). At the following DSB meeting, on 20 Ma rch 2009, the United States informed the DSB of
its intention to implement the recommendations an d rulings of the DSB in connection with this
matter. The United States and the European Commun ities agreed that the reasonable period of time
for the United States to implement the recommend ations and rulings of the DSB would end on
19 December 2009.

 The United States Trade Representative made a written request to the Secretary of Commerce
to issue a determination under Section 129(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that would
render the following determinations not inconsistent with the re commendations and rulings of the
DSB: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Sweden; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fa ir Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from the Netherlands ; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland ; and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain . On 17 December 2009, the US Department of Commerce
issued the preliminary results under Section 129(b) wi th respect to the four determinations. Interested
parties had an opportunity to comment on the prelim inary results prior to th e issuance of the final
determinations under Section 129(b) . On 12 March 2010, the Departme nt issued the final results
under section 129(b) with respect to the four determin ations in the original investigations. The United
States is now consulting internally on next steps under section 129(b).

 The United States will continue to consult with interested parties in order to address the other
recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 9 July 2010
Document codes: WT/DS350/18/Add.7
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 8 July 2010, from the delegation of the United States to
the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the

DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute

(WT/DS350)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU").

 On 19 February 2009, the Dispute Settleme nt Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations
and rulings in
(DS350). At the following DSB meeting, on 20 Ma rch 2009, the United States informed the DSB of
its intention to implement the recommendations an d rulings of the DSB in connection with this
matter. The United States and the European Commun ities agreed that the reasonable period of time
for the United States to implement the recommend ations and rulings of the DSB would end on
19 December 2009.

 The United States Trade Representative made a written request to the Secretary of Commerce
to issue a determination under Section 129(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that would
render the following determinations not inconsistent with the re commendations and rulings of the
DSB: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Sweden; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fa ir Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from the Netherlands ; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland ; and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain . On 17 December 2009, the US Department of Commerce
issued the preliminary results under Section 129(b) wi th respect to the four determinations. Interested
parties had an opportunity to comment on the prelim inary results prior to th e issuance of the final
determinations under Section 129(b) . On 12 March 2010, the Departme nt issued the final results
under Section 129(b) with respect to the four dete rminations in the original investigations. The
United States is now consulting internally on next steps under Section 129(b).

 The United States will continue to consult with interested parties in order to address the other
recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 20 August 2010
Document codes: WT/DS350/18/Add.8
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 19 August 2010, from the delegation of the UnitedStates
to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the

DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute

(WT/DS350)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU").

 On 19 February 2009, the Dispute Settleme nt Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations
and rulings in
(DS350). At the following DSB meeting, on 20 Ma rch 2009, the United States informed the DSB of
its intention to implement the recommendations an d rulings of the DSB in connection with this
matter. The United States and the European Commun ities agreed that the reasonable period of time
for the United States to implement the recommend ations and rulings of the DSB would end on
19 December 2009.

 The United States Trade Representative made a written request to the Secretary of Commerce
to issue a determination under Section 129(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that would
render the following determinations not inconsistent with the re commendations and rulings of the
DSB: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Sweden; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fa ir Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from the Netherlands ; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland ; and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain . On 17 December 2009, the US Department of Commerce
issued the preliminary results under Section 129(b) wi th respect to the four determinations. Interested
parties had an opportunity to comment on the prelim inary results prior to th e issuance of the final
determinations under Section 129(b) . On 12 March 2010, the Departme nt issued the final results
under Section 129(b) with respect to the four dete rminations in the original investigations. The
United States is now consulting internally on next steps under Section 129(b).

 The United States will continue to consult with interested parties in order to address the other
recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 8 September 2010
Document codes: WT/DS350/18/Add.9
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 7 September 2010, from the delegation of the
UnitedStates to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of
the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the

DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute

(WT/DS350)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU").

 On 19 February 2009, the Dispute Settleme nt Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations
and rulings in
(DS350). At the following DSB meeting, on 20 Ma rch 2009, the United States informed the DSB of
its intention to implement the recommendations an d rulings of the DSB in connection with this
matter. The United States and the European Commun ities agreed that the reasonable period of time
for the United States to implement the recommend ations and rulings of the DSB would end on
19 December 2009.

 The United States Trade Representative made a written request to the Secretary of Commerce
to issue a determination under Section 129(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that would
render the following determinations not inconsistent with the re commendations and rulings of the
DSB: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Sweden; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fa ir Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from the Netherlands ; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland ; and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain . On 17 December 2009, the US Department of Commerce
issued the preliminary results under Section 129(b) wi th respect to the four determinations. Interested
parties had an opportunity to comment on the prelim inary results prior to th e issuance of the final
determinations under Section 129(b) . On 12 March 2010, the Departme nt issued the final results
under Section 129(b) with respect to the four dete rminations in the original investigations. The
United States is now consulting internally on next steps under Section 129(b).

 The United States will continue to consult with interested parties in order to address the other
recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 15 October 2010
Document codes: WT/DS350/18/Add.10
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 14 Oc tober 2010, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settleme nt Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6
of the DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the

DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute

(WT/DS350)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU").

 On 19 February 2009, the Dispute Settleme nt Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations
and rulings in
(DS350). At the following DSB meeting, on 20 Ma rch 2009, the United States informed the DSB of
its intention to implement the recommendations an d rulings of the DSB in connection with this
matter. The United States and the European Commun ities agreed that the reasonable period of time
for the United States to implement the recommend ations and rulings of the DSB would end on
19 December 2009.

 The United States Trade Representative made a written request to the Secretary of Commerce
to issue a determination under Section 129(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that would
render the following determinations not inconsistent with the re commendations and rulings of the
DSB: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Sweden; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fa ir Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from the Netherlands ; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland ; and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain . On 17 December 2009, the US Department of Commerce
issued the preliminary results under Section 129(b) wi th respect to the four determinations. Interested
parties had an opportunity to comment on the prelim inary results prior to th e issuance of the final
determinations under Section 129(b) . On 12 March 2010, the Departme nt issued the final results
under Section 129(b) with respect to the four dete rminations in the original investigations. The
United States is now consulting internally on next steps under Section 129(b).

 The United States will continue to consult with interested parties in order to address the other
recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 12 November 2010
Document codes: WT/DS350/18/Add.11
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 11 November 2010, from the delegation of the United
States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Bo dy, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the
DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the

DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute

(WT/DS350)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU").

 On 19 February 2009, the Dispute Settleme nt Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations
and rulings in
(DS350). At the following DSB meeting, on 20 Ma rch 2009, the United States informed the DSB of
its intention to implement the recommendations an d rulings of the DSB in connection with this
matter. The United States and the European Commun ities agreed that the reasonable period of time
for the United States to implement the recommend ations and rulings of the DSB would end on
19 December 2009.

 The United States Trade Representative made a written request to the Secretary of Commerce
to issue a determination under Section 129(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that would
render the following determinations not inconsistent with the re commendations and rulings of the
DSB: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Sweden; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fa ir Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from the Netherlands ; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland ; and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain . On 17 December 2009, the US Department of Commerce
issued the preliminary results under Section 129(b) wi th respect to the four determinations. Interested
parties had an opportunity to comment on the prelim inary results prior to th e issuance of the final
determinations under Section 129(b) . On 12 March 2010, the Departme nt issued the final results
under Section 129(b) with respect to the four dete rminations in the original investigations. The
United States is now consulting internally on next steps under Section 129(b).

 The United States will continue to consult with interested parties in order to address the other
recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Status Report by the United States Addendum
Date: 7 December 2010
Document codes: WT/DS350/18/Add.12
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Status Report by the United States

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 6 Decemb er 2010, from the delegation of the United
States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Bo dy, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the
DSU.

Status Report Regarding Implementation of the

DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute

(WT/DS350)

 The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on
Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU").

 On 19 February 2009, the Dispute Settleme nt Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations
and rulings in
(DS350). At the following DSB meeting, on 20 Ma rch 2009, the United States informed the DSB of
its intention to implement the recommendations an d rulings of the DSB in connection with this
matter. The United States and the European Commun ities agreed that the reasonable period of time
for the United States to implement the recommend ations and rulings of the DSB would end on
19 December 2009.

 The United States Trade Representative made a written request to the Secretary of Commerce
to issue a determination under Section 129(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that would
render the following determinations not inconsistent with the re commendations and rulings of the
DSB: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Sweden; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fa ir Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from the Netherlands ; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland ; and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain . On 17 December 2009, the US Department of Commerce
issued the preliminary results under Section 129(b) wi th respect to the four determinations. Interested
parties had an opportunity to comment on the prelim inary results prior to th e issuance of the final
determinations under Section 129(b) . On 12 March 2010, the Departme nt issued the final results
under Section 129(b) with respect to the four dete rminations in the original investigations. The
United States is now consulting internally on next steps under Section 129(b).

 The United States will continue to consult with interested parties in order to address the other
recommendations and rulings of the DSB.
UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Request for Further Consultations by the European Communities Addendum
Date: 11 October 2006
Document codes: WT/DS350/1/Add.1; G/L/786/Add.1; G/ADP/D70/1/Add.1
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Request for Further Consultations by the European Communities

Addendum

 The following communication, dated 9 October 2006, from the delegation of the European
Communities to the delegation of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement
Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU.

 On 2 October 2006, the European Communiti es requested consultations with the United
States of America (the "United States") under Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes (the "DSU "); Article XXII:1 of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade 1994 (the "GATT 1994"); an d Articles 17.2 and 17.3 of the Agreement on
implementation of Article VI of the Gene ral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (the
"AD Agreement") with regard to the practice and methodologies for calculating dumping margins
involving the use of zeroing, and the applica tion of zeroing in certain specified anti-dumping
measures (,,).

 The European Communities has identified additi onal administrative reviews in which the US
DOC applied the "zeroing" methodology in calculati ng the margin of dumping, and hereby requests
that those cases are added to the list of cases attached to the above mentioned request for
consultations. The cases concerned are listed in the Annex attached hereto. For the sake of
convenience, the cases follow the numbering of the Annex of the original request for consultations
and therefore starts at number 39.

I. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
Product MS USDOC
No Final Results Amended Final
Results Company Dumping
margin Period covered by the review
39. Stainless steel
sheet and strip in
coils
I A-475-824 70 FR 7472,
February 14, 2005
70 FR 13009,
March 17, 2005
Thyssen Krupp Acciai
Speciali Terni SpA
3,73% 1 July 2002 – 30 June 2003
40. Stainless steel
sheet and strip in
coils
G A-428-825 71 FR 45024, August 8,
2006 (preliminary
results, final results to
be issued by early
December 2006)
 Thyssen Krupp Nirosta
Gmbh
2,51% 1 July 2004 – 30 June 2005
UNITED STATES - CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY
Document: Appellate Body Report and Panel Report Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
Date: 25 February 2009
Document codes: WT/DS350/15; WT/DS350/AB/R; WT/DS350/R
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Norway, Taiwan, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 5.8, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, 11, 1, 11.1, 11.3, 11.2, 2  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994Art. 18.4  Anti-dumpingArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES - CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND APPLICATION
OF ZEROING METHODOLOGY

Appellate Body Report and Panel Report

Action by the Dispute Settlement Body

 At its meeting on 19 February 2009, the Dis pute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body
report on
() and the Panel report (), as modified by the Appellate Body report.
The Panel report should be read in conjunction with the Appellate Body report.

ÉTATS-UNIS - MAINTIEN EN EXISTENCE ET EN APPLICATION
DE LA MÉTHODE DE RÉDUCTION À ZÉRO

Rapport de l'Organe d'appel et rapport du Groupe spécial

 À sa réunion du 19 février 2009, l'Organe de rè glement des différends a adopté le rapport de
l'Organe d'appel sur l'affaire États-Unis - Maintien en existence et en application de la méthode de
rapport de l'Organe d'appel. Le rapport du Groupe spécial devrait être lu conjointement avec celui de
l'Organe d'appel.

ESTADOS UNIDOS - CONTINUACIÓN DE LA EXISTENCIA Y
APLICACIÓN DE LA METODOLOGÍA DE REDUCCIÓN A CERO

Actuación del Órgano de Solución de Diferencias

 En su reunión de 19 de febrero de 2009, el Órgano de Solución de Diferencias adoptó el
CHILE – PROVISIONAL SAFEGUARD MEASURE ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS/ CHILE – DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS
Document: Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Argentina Note by the Secretariat
Date: 21 June 2007
Document codes: WT/DS351/3; WT/DS356/3; WT/DS351/2-WT/DS356/2; WT/DS351/2-WT/DS356/2
Complainant: Argentina
Respondent: Chile
Third parties: U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. I, XIX  GATT 1994Art. 2, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 7.1, 12.2  SafeguardsArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

CHILE – PROVISIONAL SAFEGUARD MEASURE
ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS/
CHILE – DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE
ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS

Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Argentina

Note by the Secretariat

1. At its meeting on 24 April 2007, the Disput e Settlement Body (DSB) established a Panel
pursuant to the request of Argentina in docum ent , in accordance with
Article 6 of the DSU.
2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:
"To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited
by Argentina in document , the matter referred to the DSB
by Argentina in that document, and to ma ke such findings as will assist the DSB in
making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those
agreements."
3. On 15 June 2007, the parties agreed to the following composition of the Panel:
Chairperson: Mr. Felipe Jaramillo
Members: Mr. Wieslaw Karsz
 Ms Penelope Jane Ridings
4. The United States reserved its third-party rights.
CHILE – PROVISIONAL SAFEGUARD MEASURE ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS/ CHILE – DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 6 August 2007
Document codes: WT/DS351/4; WT/DS356/4
Complainant: Argentina
Respondent: Chile
Third parties: U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. I, XIX  GATT 1994Art. 2, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 7.1, 12.2  SafeguardsArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

CHILE – PROVISIONAL SAFEGUARD MEASURE
ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS/
CHILE – DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE
ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

The following communication, dated 3 August 20 07, and addressed to the Dispute Settlement
Body, is circulated in accordan ce with Article 12.12 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding
("DSU").

 In a letter dated 31 July 2007, addressed to Mr . Felipe Jaramillo, Chairman of the Panel, the
Government of Argentina has requested the Pa nel to suspend its work, in accordance with
Article 12.12 of the DSU. The Panel has agreed to this request and will suspend its work until further
notice.
CHILE - PROVISIONAL SAFEGUARD MEASURE ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS/ CHILE - DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS
Document: Lapse of Authority for the Establishment of the Panel Note by the Secretariat At the request of Argentina, the Panel su spended its work on 31 July 2007 (WT/DS351/4 and WT/DS356/4).  Since the Panel has not been request ed to resume its work, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU, the authority for the establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 1 August 2008. CHILI – MESURES DE SAUVEGARDE PROVISOIRE CONCERNANT CERTAINS PRODUITS LAITIERS/ CHILI – MESURES DE SAUVEGARDE DÉFINITIVE CONCERNANT CERTAINS PRODUITS LAITIERS
Date: 1 August 2008
Document codes: WT/DS351/5; WT/DS356/5; WT/DS351/4; WT/DS356/4
Complainant: Argentina
Respondent: Chile
Third parties: U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. I, XIX  GATT 1994Art. 2, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 7.1, 12.2  SafeguardsArt. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

CHILE - PROVISIONAL SAFEGUARD MEASURE
ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS/
CHILE - DEFINITIVE SAFEGUARD MEASURE
ON CERTAIN MILK PRODUCTS

Lapse of Authority for the Establishment of the Panel

Note by the Secretariat

 At the request of Argentina, the Panel su spended its work on 31 July 2007 ( and
). Since the Panel has not been request ed to resume its work, pursuant to Article 12.12
of the DSU, the authority for the establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 1 August 2008.

CHILI – MESURES DE SAUVEGARDE PROVISOIRE CONCERNANT
CERTAINS PRODUITS LAITIERS/
CHILI – MESURES DE SAUVEGARDE DÉFINITIVE CONCERNANT
CERTAINS PRODUITS LAITIERS

Note du Secrétariat

(WT/DS/351/4 et ). Étant donné qu'il n'a pas été demandé au Groupe spécial de
1
er août 2008.

CHILE - MEDIDA DE SALVAGUARDIA PROVISIONAL SOBRE
DETERMINADOS PRODUCTOS LÁCTEOS/
CHILE - MEDIDA DE SALVAGUARDIA DEFINITIVA SOBRE
DETERMINADOS PRODUCTOS LÁCTEOS

Nota de la Secretaría

( y ). Al no haberse pedido al Grupo Especial que reanude sus trabajos, en
INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Document: Request to Join Consultations Communication from the United States
Date: 5 December 2006
Document codes: WT/DS352/2
Complainant: EU
Respondent: India
Third parties: Australia, Chile, Japan, U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. II:1, II:2  GATT 1994

INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE
OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Request to Join Consultations

Communication from the United States

 The following communication, dated 1 December 2006, from the delegation of the
United States to the delegation of India, the de legation of the European Communities and to the
Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

 This concerns the request for consu ltations by the European Communities on ,
circulated on 23 November 2006 (). My authorities have instructed me to notify the
consulting Members and the Dispute Settlement Body of the desire of the United States to be joined in
these consultations, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

The United States has a substantial tr ade interest in these consultations. The United States is
a leading producer and exporter of wine and sp irits worldwide. Over the period 2000-2005,
US exports of wine (HS headi ngs 2204, 2205, and 2206) and spirits (HS heading 2208) worldwide
averaged approximately $630 million and $633 million, respectively, making the United States the
world's 6
th largest exporter of wine and 3 rd largest exporter of spirits. From 2000 to 2005, even with
India's measures in place, US exports of wine a nd spirits to India grew by over 350 per cent and
200 per cent, respectively.
INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Document: Request to Join Consultations Communication from Australia
Date: 6 December 2006
Document codes: WT/DS352/3
Complainant: EU
Respondent: India
Third parties: Australia, Chile, Japan, U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. II:1, II:2  GATT 1994

INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE
OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Request to Join Consultations

Communication from Australia

 The following communication, dated 4 December 2006, from the delegation of Australia to
the delegation of India, the delegation of the Eu ropean Communities and to the Chairman of the
Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

 Pursuant to paragraph 11 of Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), Australia notifies the Government of India that, in light
of the substantial trade interest of Australia, it desi res to be joined in the consultations requested by
the European Communities in the communication entitled and circulated to WTO Members on
23 November 2006 ().

 Australia has substantial trade interests in th is matter. The volume of exports of wine from
Australia to India has been increasing significantly in recent years. In volume terms, Australia's wine
exports have increased from around 62,000 litres in 2000 to around 255,000 litres in 2005; and in
value terms Australia's wine exports have incr eased significantly, from around $A 205,000 in 2000 to
around $A 1.796 million in 2005. Australia's market sh are of India's wine imports is also growing
and has increased from 1.6% in 2000 to 11.9% in 2005. The Australian wine industry is heavily
export-oriented, with 60.1% of wine production (b y volume) exported in 2005 and around 50% of
Australian wineries involved in export trade.

 Australia looks forward to receiving your reply.
INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Document: Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of the European Communities Note by the Secretariat
Date: 21 June 2007
Document codes: WT/DS352/5; WT/DS352/4; WT/DS352/4
Complainant: EU
Respondent: India
Third parties: Australia, Chile, Japan, U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. II:1, II:2  GATT 1994

INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE
OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of the European Communities

Note by the Secretariat

1. At its meeting on 24 April 2007, the Dis pute Settlement Body (DSB) established a Panel
pursuant to the request of the European Communities in document , in accordance with
Article 6 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU).

2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:

"To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited
by the European Communities in document , the matter referred to the
DSB by the European Communiti es in that document, and to make such findings as
will assist the DSB in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided
for in those agreements."
3. On 11 June 2007, the European Communities re quested the Director-General to determine the
composition of the Panel, pursuant to paragraph 7 of Article 8 of the DSU. This paragraph provides:

"If there is no agreement on the panelists within 20 days after the date of the
establishment of a panel, at the request of either party, the Director-General, in
consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the Chairman of the relevant Council
or Committee, shall determine the com position of the panel by appointing the
panelists whom the Director-General consid ers most appropriate in accordance with
any relevant special or additional rules or procedures of the covered agreement or
covered agreements which are at issue in th e dispute, after consulting with the parties
to the dispute. The Chairman of th e DSB shall inform the Members of the
composition of the panel thus formed no later than 10 days after the date the
Chairman receives such a request."
4. On 21 June 2007, the Director-General accordingly composed the Panel as follows:

 Chairman: Mr Luzius Wasescha

 Members: Mr Mateo Diego-Fernández
 Mr Bruce McRae

5. Australia, Chile, Japan and the United States ha ve reserved their rights to participate in the
Panel proceedings as third parties.
INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 17 July 2007
Document codes: WT/DS352/6
Complainant: EU
Respondent: India
Third parties: Australia, Chile, Japan, U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. II:1, II:2  GATT 1994

INDIA – MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE
OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 16 July 2 007, addressed to the Chairman of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 12.12 of the DSU.

 This is to inform you that in a letter to the Panel dated 13 July 2007, the European
Communities has requested the Panel to suspend its work pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU. The
European Communities has reserved its right to request the Panel to resume its work at any time. The
Panel has agreed to this request and suspended its work from 16 July 2007.
INDIA - MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Document: Lapse of Authority for Establishment of the Panel Note by the Secretariat At the request of the European Communities, the Panel suspended its work from 16 July 2007 (WT/DS352/6).  Since the Panel has not been requested  to resume its work, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU, the authority for establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 17 July 2008. INDE - MESURES AFFECTANT L'IMPORTATION ET LA VENTE DE VINS ET DE SPIRITUEUX EN PROVENANCE DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES
Date: 17 July 2008
Document codes: WT/DS352/7; WT/DS352/6
Complainant: EU
Respondent: India
Third parties: Australia, Chile, Japan, U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. II:1, II:2  GATT 1994

INDIA - MEASURES AFFECTING THE IMPORTATION AND SALE
OF WINES AND SPIRITS FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Lapse of Authority for Establishment of the Panel

Note by the Secretariat

 At the request of the European Communities, the Panel suspended its work from 16 July 2007
(). Since the Panel has not been requested to resume its work, pursuant to Article 12.12
of the DSU, the authority for establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 17 July 2008.

INDE - MESURES AFFECTANT L'IMPORTATION ET LA VENTE
DE VINS ET DE SPIRITUEUX EN PROVENANCE
DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES

Note du Secrétariat

compter du 16 juillet 2007 (). Étant donné qu'il n'a pas été demandé au Groupe spécial de
17 juillet 2008.

DE VINOS Y BEBIDAS ESPIRITUOSAS PROCEDENTES
DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS

Nota de la Secretaría

decisión de establecerlo, en virtud de lo dispuesto en el párrafo 12 del artículo 12 del ESD, ha
UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT (SECOND COMPLAINT)
Document: Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of the European Communities Note by the Secretariat
Date: 4 December 2006
Document codes: WT/DS353/3; WT/DS353/2; WT/DS353/2
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 3.1, 3.2, 5, 6.3, 1.1, 2  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. III:4  GATT 1994

UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE
IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT
(SECOND COMPLAINT)

Constitution of the Panel Established at the

Request of the European Communities

Note by the Secretariat

1. At its meeting on 17 February 2006, the Di spute Settlement Body (D SB) established a Panel
pursuant to the request of the European Communities in document
1, in accordance with
Article 6 of the DSU.

2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:

"To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited
by the European Communities in document
1, the matter referred to the
DSB by the European Communiti es in that document, and to make such findings as
will assist the DSB in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided
for in those agreements."
3. On 17 November 2006, the European Comm unities requested the Director-General to
determine the composition of the Panel, pursuant to paragraph 7 of Article 8 of the DSU. This
paragraph provides:

"If there is no agreement on the panelists within 20 days after the date of the
establishment of a panel, at the request of either party, the Director-General, in
consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the Chairman of the relevant Council
or Committee, shall determine the com position of the panel by appointing the
panelists whom the Director-General consid ers most appropriate in accordance with
any relevant special or additional rules or procedures of the covered agreement or
covered agreements which are at issue in the dispute, after consultating with the
parties to the dispute. The Chairman of the DSB shall inform the Members of the
composition of the panel thus formed no later than 10 days after the date the
Chairman receives such a request."
4. On 22 November 2006, Deputy Director-Gener al Alejandro Jara, acting in place of the
Director-General, composed the Panel as follows:

 Chairperson: Mr. Crawford Falconer

 Members: Mr. Francisco Orrego Vicuña
 Mr. Virachai Plasai

1 This document is also numbered WT/DS317/5.

5. Australia, Brazil, China, Japan and Korea have reserved their rights to participate in the Panel
proceedings as third parties.
UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT (SECOND COMPLAINT) RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRATOR NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Document: NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT Addendum On 20 May 2019, the European Union requested the Director -General to compose the Arbitrator due to the unavailability of the original appointees to serve as members of the Arbitrator. On 3  June 2019, the Director- General composed the Arbitrator as follows: Chairperson: Ms Andrea Marie DAWES (née BROWN) Members:  Ms Tracey EPPS Mr Eduardo MUÑOZ ÉTATS-UNIS – MESURES AFFECTANT LE COMMERCE DES AÉRONEFS CIVILS GROS PORTEURS (DEUXIÈME PLAINTE) RECOURS DES ÉTATS-UNIS À L'ARTICLE 22:6 DU MÉMORANDUM D'ACCORD CONSTITUTION DE L'ARBITRE
Date: 4 June 2019
Document codes: WT/DS353/3/Add.1
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 3.1, 3.2, 5, 6.3, 1.1, 2  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. III:4  GATT 1994

UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT
(SECOND COMPLAINT)
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRATOR
NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Addendum
On 20 May 2019, the European Union requested the Director -General to compose the Arbitrator due to the
unavailability of the original appointees to serve as members of the Arbitrator. On 3 June 2019, the Director-
General composed the Arbitrator as follows:

Chairperson: Ms Andrea Marie DAWES (née BROWN)

Members: Ms Tracey EPPS
 Mr Eduardo MUÑOZ

CIVILS GROS PORTEURS (DEUXIÈME PLAINTE)
RECOURS DES ÉTATS-UNIS À L'ARTICLE 22:6 DU MÉMORANDUM D'ACCORD
CONSTITUTION DE L'ARBITRE
NOTE DU SECRÉTARIAT
Addendum
Le 20 mai 2019, l'Union européenne a demandé au Directeur général d'arrêter la composition de l'Arbitre en
raison de l'indisponibilité des personnes initialement désignées pour siéger comme membres de l'Arbitre. Le
3 juin 2019, le Directeur général a donné à l'Arbitre la composition suivante:

Président: Mme Andrea Marie DAWES (née BROWN)

Membres: Mme Tracey EPPS
 M. Eduardo MUÑOZ

ESTADOS UNIDOS - MEDIDAS QUE AFECTAN AL COMERCIO DE
GRANDES AERONAVES CIVILES (SEGUNDA RECLAMACIÓN)
CONSTITUCIÓN DEL ÁRBITRO
NOTA DE LA SECRETARÍA
Addendum

Presidenta: Sra. Andrea Marie DAWES (de soltera BROWN)

Miembros: Sra. Tracey EPPS
 Sr. Eduardo MUÑOZ
UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT (SECOND COMPLAINT)
Document: Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of the European Communities Note by the Secretariat Corrigendum Paragraph 5 of document WT/DS353/3 should read as follows: "5. Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan and Korea have reserved their rights to participate in the Panel proceedings as third parties."
Date: 8 December 2006
Document codes: WT/DS353/3/Corr.1; WT/DS353/3
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 3.1, 3.2, 5, 6.3, 1.1, 2  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. III:4  GATT 1994

UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE
IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT
(SECOND COMPLAINT)

Constitution of the Panel Established at the
Request of the European Communities

Note by the Secretariat

Corrigendum

 Paragraph 5 of document should read as follows:

 "5. Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan and Korea have reserved their rights to participate in
the Panel proceedings as third parties."

AÉRONEFS CIVILS GROS PORTEURS
(DEUXIÈME PLAINTE)

des Communautés européennes

Note du Secrétariat

Corrigendum

ESTADOS UNIDOS - MEDIDAS QUE AFECTAN AL COMERCIO
DE GRANDES AERONAVES CIVILES
(SEGUNDA RECLAMACIÓN)

Constitución del Grupo Especial establecido a petición
de las Comunidades Europeas

Nota de la Secretaría

Corrigendum
UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT (SECOND COMPLAINT)
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 18 May 2007
Document codes: WT/DS353/4
Complainant: EU
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Implementation & Compliance
Agreements cited: Art. 3.1, 3.2, 5, 6.3, 1.1, 2  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. III:4  GATT 1994

UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE
IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT
(SECOND COMPLAINT)

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 18 May 2007 , addressed to the Chairman of the Dispute
Settlement Body (DSB), is circulated in accordan ce with Article 12.9 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU).

 Article 12.8 of DSU provides that the period in which a panel shall conduct its examination,
from the date that the composition and terms of reference of the panel have been agreed upon until the
date the final report is issued to the parties to the dispute, shall, as a general rule, not exceed six
months.

 Article 12.9 of the DSU provides that, when a panel considers that it cannot issue its report
within six months, it shall inform the DSB in writi ng of the reasons for the delay, together with an
estimate of the period within which it will issue its report.

 The Panel on (WT/DS353) was established by the DSB on 17 February 2006 and composed on
22 November 2006.

 It will not be possible for the Panel to complete its work within six months of the date of
composition in light of the substantive and procedural complexities of this dispute.

 The Panel expects to complete its work in July 2008.