AUSTRALIA – QUARANTINE REGIME FOR IMPORTS
Document: Request for Consultations by the European Communities
Date: 9 April 2003
Document codes: WT/DS287/1; G/L/618; G/SPS/GEN/384
Complainant: EU
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, Chile, China, India, Philippines, Thailand, U.S.
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 4.1, 5.1, 5.6, 5.7  Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)

AUSTRALIA – QUARANTINE REGIME FOR IMPORTS
Request for Consultations by the European Communities
The following communication, dated 3 April 2003, from the Permanent Delegation of the
European Commission to the Permanent Mission of Australia and to the Chairman of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU.
On behalf of the European Communities, I hereby request consultations with Australia
pursuant to Article XXII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994),
Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU)
and Article 11 of the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) on the
Australian quarantine regime, both as such and as applied to certain specific cases.
The Australian quarantine regime for imports appears to be governed both by legislation 1 as
well as by the exercise of discretion granted to a Director of Quarantine 2 and by administrative
guidance issued on the exercise of that discretion 3. The effect of this regime appears to be that the
import of products is a priori prohibited, although there is no risk assessment 4. Risk assessments
appear to be commenced, if at all, only once the import of a product has been specifically requested.
In some cases, no risk assessment has been commenced despite such request 5 . In other cases it has
been commenced but not completed6.

1 The Quarantine Act 1908, the Quarantine Proclamation 1998, the Quarantine Regulations 2000, the
Imported Food Control Act 1992, and the Food Standards Code.
2 In particular but not limited to section 70 of the Quarantine Proclamation 1998.
3 Including but not limited to the AFFA (draft) Administrative Process for Import Risk Analysis
Handbook and the information contained in the internet service described as ICON - the Australian Quarantine
and Inspection Service’s import conditions database.
4 This appears to be the case in particular for example for a number of fresh fruits and vegetables from
the EC. For example for EC apples, pears, raspberries, blackberries, bananas, potatoes the ICON database states
that “this commodity is prohibited entry into Australia because insufficient information is available on its risk
status”. For the following EC products the ICON database provides for no import conditions which appears to
mean that their import into Australia is prohibited: plum s, apricots, nectarines, peaches, cherries, strawberries,
blackcurrants, redcurrants, lettuce, carrots, cucumbers, gherkins, aubergines, courgettes, marrows, tomatoes
(other than from the Netherlands) and squash.
5 Examples are calf-milk replacer from the Netherlands, seed potatoes from Scotland, organic fertiliser
based on chicken manure from the Netherlands and live pigs for breeding from the Netherlands.
6 This is the case for the following products from the EC: truss tomatoes from the Netherlands
(assessment started 1997); fresh citrus fruit from Italy (import application made 1998); pig semen (risk
assessment started 1998); edible eggs and egg products (risk assessment started 1998); fresh pigmeat (access
request made 1980, risk assessment underway since 1998); uncooked poultry meat (risk assessment started
December 1998).

Australia permits the import of deboned pigmeat from Denmark for processing in Australia.
However Australia has refused the import of deboned pigmeat for Denmark which has been processed
in the required manner in Denmark. Further, the processing requirements imposed in Australia may
be more trade-restrictive than necessary in the circumstances to protect Australia from PRRS (Porcine
Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome). It also appears that requests have been made for access to
Australia for processed pigmeat or deboned pigmeat for processing from other EU Member States
which have been refused.
Australia permits the import of poultry meat which has been cooked to high temperature and
for long periods to prevent the entry of IBD (infectious bursal disease). However it appears that IBD
may already be present in the Australian poultry flock and that no efforts are being made to eradicate
it. Further, the processing requirements imposed in Australia may be more trade-restrictive than
necessary in the circumstances to protect Australia from IBD.
The EC considers that the measures referred to above may be contrary to the SPS Agreement,
and in particular, although not limited to, its Articles 2.2, 2.3, 3.3, 4.1, 5.1, 5.6 and, if applicable, 5.7,
8 and Annex C.
The EC would welcome the opportunity for consultations with Australia for an explanation of
the operation of its quarantine system and of the specific quarantine measures imposed for the
particular products referred to above. The EC looks forward to receiving the reaction of the
Government of Australia to the present request and to setting a mutually convenient date and place to
begin consultations.