dean22029/WTO_Docs huggingface dataset:
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES – MEASURES RELATING TO TRADE IN GOODS AND SERVICES, AND TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Document: COMMUNICATION FROM
Date: 20 January 2022
Document codes: WT/DS526/8
Complainant: Qatar
Respondent: UAE
Third parties: Afghanistan, Australia, Bahrain, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, EU, Guatemala, Honduras, Japan, Kazakhstan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Philippines, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, U.S., Yemen
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. I:1, V:2, X:1, X:2, XI:1, XIII:1, XXIII:1(b)  GATT 1994Art. II:1, III:1, III:2, III:3, XVI  Services (GATS)Art. 3.1, 4, 41.1, 42, 61  Intellectual Property (TRIPS)

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES – MEASURES RELATING TO TRADE IN GOODS AND SERVICES,
AND TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
The following communication, dated 18 January 2022 , was received from the delegation of the
United Arab Emirates with the request that it be circulated to the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB).

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) writes to confirm the end of the proceedings in the dispute United
Arab Emirates – Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services and Trade -Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights (DS526) pursuant to the terms of the Al Ula Declaration signed on
5 January 2021.

The UAE welcomes that the State of Qatar considers the proceedings and the dispute at an end. On
its part, the UAE has decided not to seek the resumption of the proceedings, in order to give effect
to the Al Ula Declaration, which requires termination of all legal cases pending between the Parties.

The UAE wishes to thank the Panel and Secretariat for their important and valuable work on the
DS526 dispute.

The UAE requests that the above communication be circulated to the Dispute Settlement Body
(DSB).
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from China
Date: 18 September 2017
Document codes: WT/DS529/2
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from China
The following communication, dated 15 September 2017 , from the delegation of China to the
delegation of Australia, the delegation of Indonesia and to the Chairperson of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

Pursuant to Article 4.11 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement
of Disputes (DSU), the People's Republic of China hereby notifies the Government of Australia, the
Government of Indonesia, and the Dispute Settlement Body that, in the light of the substantial
trade interest of the People 's Republic of China, it desires to be joined in the consultat ions
requested by Indonesia in a communication circulated to WTO Members on 5 September 2017
(, , ) entitled Australia — Anti-Dumping Measures On A4 Copy
Paper.

As a result of the anti -dumping investigation subject to these consultations, Australia has also
imposed anti-dumping measures on imports of A4 Copy Paper from China in the range of 3.1 and
34.4%. The People 's Republic of China has therefore a substantial trade interest in the present
dispute and in the correct applic ation of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994.

The People 's Republic of China looks forward to being informed of the date and venue of the
consultations.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from the United States
Date: 18 September 2017
Document codes: WT/DS529/3; WT/DS529/1
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from the United States
The following communication, dated 15 September 2017, from the delegation of the United States
to the delegation of Australia, the delegation of Indonesia and to the Chairperson of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

This concerns the request for consultations by Indonesia on Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on
A4 Copy Paper (), circulated on 5 September 2017. My authorities have instructed
me to notify the consulting Members and the Dispute Settlement Body of the desire of the United
States to be joined in these consultations, pursuant to Article 4 .11 of the Understanding on Rules
and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

The United States is the primary export market for Australian uncoated paper, and the second -
largest export market for Indonesian uncoated paper. Pricing practices of Indonesian exporters
and market effects in Australia are therefore of significant interest to the United States.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from the European Union
Date: 27 September 2017
Document codes: WT/DS529/4; WT/DS529/1; G/L/1184; G/ADP/D118/1
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from the European Union
The following communication, dated 25 September 2017, from the delegation of the European
Union to the delegation of Australia, the delegation of Indonesia and to the Chairperson of the
Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

Following the request for consultations of Indonesia that was circulated to the WTO Members on
5 September 2017 (, , ), and pursuant to Article 4.11 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures G overning the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), the
European Union hereby notifies the Government of Australia, the Government of Indonesia and the
Dispute Settlement Body of its desire to be joined in the aforementioned consultations.

The European Union is a major producer and exporter of uncoated paper and an important export
market for both Indonesia and Australia. Therefore, the European Union has a significant interest
in these consultations.

The European Union looks forward to being informed of the date and venue of the consultations.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER ACCEPTANCE BY AUSTRALIA OF THE REQUESTS TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: ACCEPTANCE BY AUSTRALIA OF THE REQUESTS TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Date: 6 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS529/5
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
ACCEPTANCE BY AUSTRALIA OF THE REQUESTS TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
China, the European Union and the United States notified the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of
their desire to be joined in the consultations requested by Indonesia, pursuant to Article 4.11 of
the DSU.

The delegation of Australia informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of China, the
European Union and the United States to join the consultations.

DE PARTICIPATION AUX CONSULTATIONS
(ORD) qu'ils désiraient être admis à participer aux consultations demandées par l'Indonésie,

La délégation de l'Australie a informé l'ORD qu'elle avait ac cepté les demandes de participation

DE FORMATO A4 PARA COPIADORA
China, los Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea notifica ron al Órgano de Solución de Diferencias
consultas solicitadas por Indonesia.

La delegación de Australia ha informado al OSD de que ha aceptado las solicitudes de asociación a
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF INDONESIA NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Document: NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Date: 13 July 2018
Document codes: WT/DS529/7; WT/DS529/6; WT/DS529/6
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF INDONESIA
NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
1. At its meeting on 27 April 2018, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) established a panel
pursuant to the request of Indonesia in document , in accordance with Article 6 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU).

2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:

To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited by
the parties to the dispute, the matter referred to the DSB by Indonesia in document
 and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements.
3. Following the agreement of the parties, the panel was composed on 12 July 2018 as follows:

 Chairperson: Mr Hugo Perezcano Díaz

 Members: Mr Marco Tulio Molina Tejeda
 Ms Tomoko Ota

4. Canada, China, the European Union, India, Israel, Japan, the Republic of Korea,
the Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, the United States, and Viet Nam have
reserved their rights to participate in the Panel proceedings as third parties.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF INDONESIA NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Document: NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Date: 15 March 2021
Document codes: WT/DS529/7/Rev.1; WT/DS529/6; WT/DS529/6
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF INDONESIA
NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Revision
1. At its meeting on 27 April 2018, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) established a panel
pursuant to the request of Indonesia in document , in accordance with Article 6 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU).

2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:

To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited by
the parties to the dispute, the matter referred to the DSB by Indonesia in document
 and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements.
3. Following the agreement of the parties, the panel was composed on 12 July 2018 as follows:

 Chairperson: Mr Hugo Perezcano Díaz

 Members: Mr Marco Tulio Molina Tejeda
 Ms Tomoko Ota

4. Canada, China, Egypt, the European Union, India, Israel, Japan, the Republic of Korea,
the Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, the United States, and Viet Nam have
reserved their rights to participate in the Panel proceedings as third parties.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
Document: COMMUNICATION FROM
Date: 16 October 2018
Document codes: WT/DS529/8
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
The following communication, dated 1 2 October 2018, was received from the Chairperson of the
Panel with the request that it be circulated to the Dispute Settlement Body.

Paragraph 1(3) of the Working Procedures for the Panel proceedings in the dispute
Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper provides:

These Working Procedures and the timetable will be made available to all WTO Members during
the course of the dispute by being added to the DS document series for the dispute. The Panel
will circulate preliminary rulings as appropriate.
Accordingly, please find enclosed the partial timetable adopted by the Panel on 5 October 2018.

I would be grateful if you would circulate this document to the DSB.

TIMETABLE FOR THE PANEL PROCEEDINGS1

Adopted on 5 October 2018

Panel established on 27 April 2018
Panel composed on 12 July 2018

Description Dates Time
Organizational meeting 21 September 2018 3:00 pm
a. First written submissions
i. Indonesia 10 October 2018 5 pm
ii. Australia 7 November 2018 5 pm
b. Third parties' written
submissions (Canada, China,
Egypt, European Union, India,
Israel, Japan, Republic of
Korea, Russian Federation,
Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine,
United States, Viet Nam)

5 pm
c. First substantive meeting with
the parties
18-19 December 2018 10 am to 6
pm
 Third-party session 19 December 2018 10 am
d. Responses from the parties and
third parties to written questions
25 January 2019 5 pm
e. Integrated executive
summaries of third parties'
arguments
1 February 2019 5 pm
f. First integrated executive
summaries of the parties
1 February 2019 5 pm
g. Second written submissions of
the parties
15 February 2019 5 pm
h. Second substantive meeting
with the parties
9-10 April 2019 10 am to 6
pm
i. Responses to written
questions
3 May 2019 5 pm
j. Comments on responses to
questions
17 May 2019 5 pm
k. Second i ntegrated executive
summaries of the parties
24 May 2019 5 pm

1 The above timetable may be changed in the light of subsequent developments.

Description Dates Time
l. Issuance of descriptive part of
the report to the parties

m. Comments by the parties on
the descriptive part of the
report

n. Issuance of the interim
report, including findings and
conclusions to the parties

o. Deadline for parties to request
review of part(s) of the report
and to request an interim
review meeting

p. Interim review meeting or, if
no meeting is requested,
deadline for comments on
requests for review

q. Issuance of the final report to
the parties

r. Circulation of the final report
to Members
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
Document: Addendum
Date: 28 February 2019
Document codes: WT/DS529/8/Add.1
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
Addendum
The following communication, dated 26 February 2019 , was received from the Chairperson of the
Panel with the request that it be circulated to the Dispute Settlement Body.

Paragraph 1(3) of the Working Procedures for the Panel proceedings in the dispute Australia – Anti-
Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper provides:

These Working Procedures and the timetable will be made available to all WTO Members
during the course of the dispute by being added to the DS document series for the
dispute. The Panel will circulate preliminary rulings as appropriate.
The original partial timetable was adopted by the Panel on 5 October 2018 and was circulated to the
DSB on 16 October 2018 ().

After having consulted with the p arties, the Panel rescheduled the dates of the second substantive
meeting and made subsequent changes to the timetable. The revised dates are:

Second written submissions of the parties 1 March 2019
Second substantive meeting with the parties 14-15 May 2019
Responses to written questions 7 June 2019
Comments on responses to questions 21 June 2019
Second integrated executive summaries of the parties 28 June 2019

The Panel still expects to issue its final report to the parties in the second half of 2019, as
communicated to the DSB on 16 October 2018 ().

I would be grateful if you would circulate this document to the DSB.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
Document: COMMUNICATION FROM
Date: 16 October 2018
Document codes: WT/DS529/11
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
The following communication, dated 12 October 2018, addressed to the Chairperson of the Dispute
Settlement Body (DSB), is circulated in accordance with Article 12.9 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU).

Article 12.8 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(DSU) provides that the period in which a panel shall conduct its examination, from the date that
the composition and terms of reference of the panel have been agreed upon until the date the final
report is issued to the parties to the dispute, shall, as a general rule, not exceed six months.

Article 12.9 of the DSU provides that, when a panel considers t hat it cannot issue its report within
six months, it shall inform the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) in writing accordingly and indicate
the reasons, together with an estimate of the period within which it will issue its report.

The Panel in Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper (DS529) was established by the
DSB on 27 April 2018 and composed on 12 July 2018.

The beginning of the Panel's work has been delayed due to a lack of personnel in the Secretariat
available to staff disputes. The work of the Panel will proceed in accordance with the partial timetable
adopted by the Panel on 5 October 2018 and separately circulated to the DSB in accordance with
the Working Procedures adopted by the Panel. The Panel expects to issue its final report to the
parties in the second half of 2019.

I would be grateful if you would circulate this letter to the DSB.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER PANEL REPORT
Document: Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
Date: 30 January 2020
Document codes: WT/DS529/14; WT/DS529/R; WT/DS529/R/Add.1; WT/DS529/R; WT/DS529/R/Add.1
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
PANEL REPORT
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 27 January 2020, the Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Panel report on
Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper ( and ).

RAPPORT DU GROUPE SPÉCIAL

DE FORMATO A4 PARA COPIADORA
INFORME DEL GRUPO ESPECIAL
Actuación del Órgano de Solución de Diferencias
En su reunión de 27 de enero de 2020, el Órgano de Solución de Diferenci as adoptó el informe del
copiadora ( y ).
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER COMMUNICATION FROM AUSTRALIA
Document: COMMUNICATION FROM
Date: 27 February 2020
Document codes: WT/DS529/15
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
COMMUNICATION FROM AUSTRALIA
The following communication, dated 26 February 2020 , from the delegation of Australia to the
Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated at the request of that delegation.

At its 27 January 2020 meeting, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted recommendations
and rulings in the dispute Australia – Anti dumping measures on A4 copy paper from Indonesia
(WT/DS529). This communication advises the DSB of the intentions of Australia with respect to
implementation of the recommendations and rulings of the DSB, as is Australia's responsibility under
Article 21.3 o f the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes
("DSU"). Indonesia has agreed that Australia would inform the DSB of its intentions by written
notification rather than a special meeting of the DSB.

Australia intends to imp lement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in this dispute in a
manner that meets its WTO obligations. At the request of the Australian Minister for Industry,
Science and Technology, the Commissioner of the Australian Anti-Dumping Commission will initiate
a review of the anti-dumping measures (review of measures) at issue in this dispute. The review of
measures will take into account the recommendations and rulings of the DSB. The review of
measures will be conducted within the framework of Australia's anti-dumping system.

Australia will need a reasonable period of time in which to conduct this review and implement the
rulings and recommendations of the DSB and is in discussions with Indonesia on this matter, in
accordance with Article 21.3(b) of the DSU.

Australia requests that you circulate this communication to the Members of the DSB.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER AGREEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 21.3(B) OF THE DSU
Document: AGREEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 21.3
Date: 16 March 2020
Document codes: WT/DS529/16
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
AGREEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 21.3(B) OF THE DSU
The following communication, dated 12 March 2020 , from the delegation of Australia and the
delegation of Indonesia to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in
accordance with Article 21.3(b) of the DSU.

Australia and Indonesia wish to inform the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) that, pursuant to
Article 21.3(b) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(DSU), Australia and Indonesia have agreed that the reasonable period of time (RPT) for Australia
to implement the DSB recommendations and rulings in Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on A4
copy paper (WT/DS529) shall be 8 months from 27 January 2020 (date of adoption of the DSB
recommendations and rulings), with an extension of 1 month in the event of unavoidable delays.
Accordingly, the RPT expires on 27 September 2020, with any extension to be notified in writing to
the DSB.

Australia and Indonesia request that you circulate this communication to the Members of the DSB.
AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER STATUS REPORT REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DSB RECOMMENDATIONS AND RULINGS BY AUSTRALIA
Document: Panel report
Date: 18 September 2020
Document codes: WT/DS529/17
Complainant: Indonesia
Respondent: Australia
Third parties: Canada, China, EU, Egypt, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, U.S., Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.2, 2.2.1.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1  GATT 1994Art. 9.3  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:2  GATT 1994

AUSTRALIA – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON A4 COPY PAPER
STATUS REPORT REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
DSB RECOMMENDATIONS AND RULINGS
BY AUSTRALIA
The following communication, dated 17 September 2020 , from the delegation of Australia to the
Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU.

Australia submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on Rules and
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.
At its meeting on 27 January 2020, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) adopted the Panel report in
Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper from Indonesia (WT/DS529). On 26 February
2020, Australia notified the DSB of its intention to implement the recommendations and rulings of
the DSB through a review of the anti -dumping measures (review of measures) at issue in this
dispute, within the framework of Aust ralia's anti -dumping system. Australia also notified that it
would require a reasonable period of time to conduct the review of measures. On 12 March 2020,
Australia and Indonesia informed the DSB they had agreed on a reasonable period of time for
implementation, expiring on 27 September 2020, with an extension of 1 month in the event of
unavoidable delays.
As outlined below, Australia has fully implemented the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in
this dispute.
On 12 March 2020, the Australian Anti -Dumping Commission (ADC) initiated a review of measures
under Division V of Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth) for the purpose of implementing the
rulings and recommendations of the DSB in this dispute (Review 547).
On 11 September 2020, the Minister for Industry, Science and Technology signed a notice
(Anti-Dumping Notice No. 2020/90, published on 14 September 2020), adopting the
recommendations and reasons for the recommendations in the ADC's Final Report for Review 547,
and declaring that the dumping duty notice be revoked in its application to A4 copy paper exported
from Indonesia to Australia by Indah Kiat and Pindo Deli with effect from 12 March 2020, the date
of initiation of Review 547.
KAZAKHSTAN – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON STEEL PIPES REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from the Russian Federation
Date: 10 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS530/2
Complainant: Ukraine
Respondent: Kazakhstan
Dispute stage: Consultation
Agreements cited: Art. 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, 6.2, 6.8, 8.3, 11.1, 11.3, 12.2, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI  GATT 1994

KAZAKHSTAN – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON STEEL PIPES
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from the Russian Federation
The following communication, dated 6 October 2017, from the delegation of the Russian
Federation to the delegation of Kazakhstan, the delegation of Ukraine and to the Chairperson of
the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

I wish to refer to the consultations requested by Ukraine pursuant to Articles 1 and 4 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), Article XXII
of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and Articles 17.2 and 17.3 of the Agreement
on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and T rade 1994 in the
communication circulated to WTO Members on 21 September 2017 (, ,
) titled "Kazakhstan — Anti-dumping Measu res on Steel Pipes (DS530)".
My authorities have instructed me to notify the consulting Members and th e Dispute Settlement
Body of the desire of the Russian Federation to be joined in these consult ations, pursuant to the
Article 4.11 of the DSU.

Ukraine challenges a measure reflected in the Decision of the Collegium of the Eurasian Economic
Commission No. 48 of 2 June 2016 "On prolongation of anti-dumping measures on certain types of
steel pipes originating in Ukraine and imported into the customs territory of the Eurasian Economic
Union" and the findings of the Eurasian Economic Commission in the Repor t ( Notice
No. 2016/55/AD1R2 of 3 June 2016) "On the results of the sunset review of anti -dumping duties
on certain types of steel pipes originating in Ukraine. The Russian Federation is a member of the
Eurasian Economic Union. Since the measure is aimed to pr otect against dumped imports the
entire territory of the Eurasian Economic Union, including the territory of Russia, the Russian
Federation has a substantial trade interest in this dispute and requests to be joined in the
consultations as a third party.
KAZAKHSTAN - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON STEEL PIPES ACCEPTANCE BY KAZAKHSTAN OF THE REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: ACCEPTANCE BY KAZAKHSTAN OF THE REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Date: 18 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS530/3
Complainant: Ukraine
Respondent: Kazakhstan
Dispute stage: Consultation
Agreements cited: Art. 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, 6.2, 6.8, 8.3, 11.1, 11.3, 12.2, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI  GATT 1994

KAZAKHSTAN - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON STEEL PIPES
ACCEPTANCE BY KAZAKHSTAN OF THE REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
The Russian Federation notified the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of its desire to be joined in the
consultations requested by Ukraine, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU.

The delegation of Kazakhstan informed the DSB that it had accepted the request of the Russian
Federation to join the consultations.

KAZAKHSTAN - MESURES ANTIDUMPING VISANT LES TUYAUX EN ACIER
DE PARTICIPATION AUX CONSULTATIONS
La Fédération de Russie a informé l'Organe de règlement des différends (ORD) de son désir d'être

La Federación de Rusia notificó al Órgano de Solución de Diferencias (OSD) su deseo de ser
del ESD.

La delegación de Kazajstán ha informado al OSD de que ha aceptado la solicitud de asociación a
KAZAKHSTAN - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON STEEL PIPES COMMUNICATION FROM UKRAINE
Document: COMMUNICATION FROM
Date: 23 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS530/4
Complainant: Ukraine
Respondent: Kazakhstan
Dispute stage: Consultation
Agreements cited: Art. 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, 6.2, 6.8, 8.3, 11.1, 11.3, 12.2, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI  GATT 1994

KAZAKHSTAN - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON STEEL PIPES
COMMUNICATION FROM UKRAINE
The following communication, dated 19 October 2017, was received from the delegation of Ukraine
with the request that it be circulated to the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB).

I would like to refer to the Russian Federation 's request dated 6 October 2017 to be joined in the
consultations requested by Ukraine with the Government of Kazakhstan pursuant to Articles 1 and
4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedu res Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU"),
Article XXII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and Articles 17.2 and 17.3 of the
Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994
with respect to anti-dumping measures on steel pipes ( DS 530 Kazakhstan – Anti-Dumping
Measures on Steel Pipes).
My authorities have instructed me to inform you about serious concerns regarding the Russian
Federation's noncompliance with procedural requirements of the DSU , in particular Article 4.11
thereof.
According to Article 4.11 of the DSU, a Member that has a substantial trade interest in
consultations may notify the consulting Members and the DSB, within 10 days after the date of the
circulation of the request for consultations of its desire to be joined in the consultations.
Ukraine's request for consultations with respect to anti -dumping measures on steel pipes was
circulated on 21 September 2017 (; ; ). Thus, deadline for
countries to join the consultations according to the Article 4.11 of the DSU lapsed on
1 October 2017. By filing request to be joined in the consultations on 6 October 2017 the Russian
Federation failed to meet the deadline set out in the DSU, thus deprived itself of a right to be
joined in the consultations.
Moreover, in Ukraine 's view, accepting the mentioned request to be joined in the consultations
after expired deadline breaches the provisions of Article 4.6 of the DSU which establishes
requirement of confidentiality. Therefore, Ukraine considers the request of the Russian Federation
as not eligible and cannot accept its participation in the consultations.
I would like to emphasize that complying with the provisions of the WTO covered agreements,
including those relating to the procedural matters, is of the utmost importance for Ukraine. Acting
in line with the DSU provisions ensure smooth functioning of the WTO dispute settlement
mechanism, whilst ignoring the set deadlines hinder the effectiveness of the system.
CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT) REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from Australia
Date: 13 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS531/2
Complainant: U.S.
Respondent: Canada
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, EU, India, Israel, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. III:4  GATT 1994

CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY
STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT)
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from Australia
The following communication, dated 11 October 2017 , from the delegation of Australia to the
delegation of Canada, the delegation of the United States and to the Chairperson of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

Pursuant to Article 4.11 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement
of Disputes (DSU), Australia notifies the Government of Canada that, in light of the substantial
trade interest of Australia, it desires to be joined in Canada 's consultations with the United States
pursuant to the communication entitled Canada-Measures Governing the Sale of Wine in Grocery
Stores (Second Complaint) circulated to WTO Members on 2 October 2017 ().
Australia has substantial trade and commercial interests in this matter as a significant exporter of
wine to Canada. Austral ia exported $193 million in wine to Canada in the 2016 calendar year,
making Canada Australia's fourth largest export market for wine.
Mindful of the rights and obligations of WTO Members under Article 4.11 of the DSU, Australia
looks forward to receiving your reply, and advice of the date and venue of the consultations.
CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT) REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from New Zealand
Date: 13 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS531/3; WT/DS531/1
Complainant: U.S.
Respondent: Canada
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, EU, India, Israel, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. III:4  GATT 1994

CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY
STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT)
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from New Zealand
The following communication, dated 11 October 2017, from the delegation of New Zealand to the
delegation of Canada, the delegation of the United States and to the Chairperson of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

This concerns the request for consultations by the United States in Canada – Measures
Governing the Sale of Wine in Grocery Stores (Second Complaint) , circulated to Members on
2 October 2017 () . My authorities have instructed me to notify the consulting
Members and the Dispute Settlement Body of New Zealand's desire to be jo ined in these
consultations pursuant to Article 4.11 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the
Settlement of Disputes.

 New Zealand has a substantial trade interest in these consultations as New Zealand is an
exporter of wine to Canada. C anada is our fourth largest export market for wine and our exports
are also subject to the laws and regulations cited by the United States in its consultations request.

New Zealand looks forward to confirmation of receipt and acceptance of this request to join
the consultations and advice regarding the timing and venue for the consultations.
CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT) REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from Argentina
Date: 16 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS531/4
Complainant: U.S.
Respondent: Canada
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, EU, India, Israel, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. III:4  GATT 1994

CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE
IN GROCERY STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT)
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from Argentina
The following communication, dated 11 October 2017, from the delegation of Argentina to the
delegation of Canada, the delegation of the United States and the Chairperson of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

Pursuant to Art icle 4.11 of the Understanding on Rul es and Procedures Governing the Settlement
of Disputes (DSU), the Government of the Argentine Republic hereby notifies the Government of
Canada, the Government of the United States and the Dispute Settlement Body that, in light of its
substantial trade interest, it wishes to join the consultations with Canada that were requested by
the United States in its communication of 2 October 2017 in Canada – Measures Governing the
Sale of Wine in Grocery Stores (Second Complaint) ().

In this respect, Argentina wishes to recall that on 2 February 2017 it requested to join the
consultations concerning the first compla int, in DS520 Canada – Measures Governing the Sale of
Wine in Grocery Stores , and that it participated in these consultations through the presence of
officials from its capital. The reasons for the present request are the same as those on the first
occasion and are reiterated below.

As an exporting Member of wines and related products, Argentina has a substan tial trade interest
in this dispute. Canada was the second and third largest export market for Argentine wines
(in terms of both f.o.b. value and hectolitres) in 2014 and 2015 respectively . The Canadian
measures that are to be the subject of consultations are directly related to the marketing of wine
of foreign origin, including Argentine wine. Argentina is also concerned about the possible systemic
implications of such measures for international trade in agricultural products.

In view of the above, and mindful of the rights and obligations of WTO Members under Article 4.11
of the DSU, A rgentina looks forward to receiving your reply, together with details regarding the
date of the consultations and the way in which they will be conducted.
CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT) REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: Communication from the European Union
Date: 16 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS531/5
Complainant: U.S.
Respondent: Canada
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, EU, India, Israel, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. III:4  GATT 1994

CANADA – MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY
STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT)
REQUEST TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Communication from the European Union
The following communication, dated 12 October 2017, from the delegation of the European Union
to the delegation of Canada, the delegation of the United States and to the Chairperson of the
Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.

Pursuant to Article 4.11 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement
of Disputes (DSU), the European Union (the EU) hereby notifies the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada, and the Dispute Settlement Body that, in the light of its
substantial trade interest, it desi res to be joined in the consultations requested by the United
States in a communication circulated to WTO Members on 2 October 2017 (;
), entitled "Canada – Measures governing the sale of wine in grocery stores (second
complaint)".
The EU notes that the request for consultations relates to measures maintained by the Canadian
province of British Columbia governing the sale of wine in grocery stores. The EU is the first wine
exporter to Canada. In the recent years, more than fifty per cent o f wine imported into Canada
came from the EU. The measures maintained by the Canadian province of British Columbia
regarding the sale of wine in grocery stores may have a substantial impact on the sale and
consequently on the importation of EU wine into Br itish Columbia. The EU has, therefore, a
substantial trade interest in these consultations.
Earlier this year, when the United States and Canada held consultations over nearly identical
matters, the EU also requested to be joined in those consultations, an d Canada accepted that
request.
CANADA - MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT) ACCEPTANCE BY CANADA OF THE REQUESTS TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Document: ACCEPTANCE BY CANADA OF THE REQUESTS TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Date: 25 October 2017
Document codes: WT/DS531/6
Complainant: U.S.
Respondent: Canada
Third parties: Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, EU, India, Israel, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. III:4  GATT 1994

CANADA - MEASURES GOVERNING THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY
STORES (SECOND COMPLAINT)
ACCEPTANCE BY CANADA OF THE REQUESTS TO JOIN CONSULTATIONS
Argentina, Australia, the European Union and New Zealand, notified the Dispute Settlement Body
(DSB) of their desire to be joined in the consultations requested by the United States, pursuant to
Article 4.11 of the DSU.
The delegation of Canada informed th e DSB t hat it had accepted the requests of Argentina,
Australia, the European Union and New Zealand to join the consultations.

CANADA - MESURES RÉGISSANT LA VENTE DE VIN
(DEUXIÈME PLAINTE)
PARTICIPATION AUX CONSULTATIONS
L'Argentine, l'Australie, la Nouvelle -Zélande et l'Union européenne ont fait savoir à l'Organe de
règlement des différends (ORD) qu' elles désiraient être admis es à participer aux consultations
règlement des différends.
consultations présentées par l'Argentine, l'Australie, la Nouvelle-Zélande et l'Union européenne.

TIENDAS DE COMESTIBLES (SEGUNDA RECLAMACIÓN)
La Argentina, Australia, Nueva Zelandia y la Unión Europea notificaron al Órgano de Solución de
UNITED STATES – COUNTERVAILING MEASURES ON SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF CANADA NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Document: NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
Date: 9 July 2018
Document codes: WT/DS533/3; WT/DS533/2; WT/DS533/2
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, EU, Japan, Kazakhstan, South Korea, Russia, Turkey, Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 1.1(b), 14(d), 19.3, 19.4  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. VI:3  GATT 1994Art. 11.2, 11.3, 1.1(a)(1)(iii), 1.1(a)(1), 10, 19.1, 1.1(a)(1)(i), 2.1(a), 2.1(b), 10, 21.1, 21.2, 32.1, 32.5  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – COUNTERVAILING MEASURES ON SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF CANADA
NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT
1. At its meeting on 9 April 2018 , the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB ) established a panel
pursuant to the request of Canada in document , in accordance with Article 6 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU).1

2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:

To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited by
the parties to the dispute, the matter referred t o the DSB by Canada in document
 and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements.
3. On 27 June 2018, Canada requested the Director -General to de termine the composition of
the Panel, pursuant to Article 8.7 of the DSU. This paragraph provides:

If there is no agreement on the pa nelists within 20 days after the date of the
establishment of a panel, at the request of either party, the Director -General, in
consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the Chairman of the relevant Council
or Committee, shall determine the composition of the panel by appointing the
panelists whom the Director -General considers most appropriate in accordance with
any relevant special or additional rules or procedures of the covered agreement or
covered agreements which are at issue in the dispute, after consulting with the parties
to the dispute. The Chairman of the DSB shall inform the Members of the composition
of the panel thus formed no later than 10 days after the date the Chairman recei ves
such a request.
4. On Friday 6 July, the Director-General accordingly composed the Panel as follows:

 Chairperson: Ms Enie Neri de Ross

 Members: Mr Gustav Brink
 Mr Alberto Trejos

5. Brazil, China, the European Union, Japan, Kazakhstan, the Republic of Korea, the
Russian Federation, Turkey, and Viet N am have reserved their rights to participate in the Panel
proceedings as third parties.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES APPLYING DIFFERENTIAL PRICING METHODOLOGY TO SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF CANADA
Document: Note by the Secretariat
Date: 23 May 2018
Document codes: WT/DS534/3; WT/DS534/2; WT/DS534/2
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Brazil, China, EU, Japan, Kazakhstan, South Korea, Russia, Vietnam
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.4.2, 2.4, 1, 2.1  Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2  GATT 1994

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES APPLYING DIFFERENTIAL PRICING
METHODOLOGY TO SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL ESTABLISHED AT THE REQUEST OF CANADA
Note by the Secretariat
1. At its meeting on 9 April 2018 , the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB ) established a panel
pursuant to the request of Canada in document , in accordance with Article 6 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU).

2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:

To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited by
the parties to the dispute, the matter referred t o the DSB by Canada in document
 and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements.
3. On 9 May 2018, Canada requested the Director-General to determine the composition of the
Panel, pursuant to Article 8.7 of the DSU. This paragraph provides:

If there is no agreement on the panelists within 20 days after the date of the
establishment of a panel, at the request of either party, the Director -General, in
consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the C hairman of the relevant Council
or Committee, shall determine the composition of the panel by appointing the
panelists whom the Director -General considers most appropriate in accordance with
any relevant special or additional rules or procedures of the cov ered agreement or
covered agreements which are at issue in the dispute, after consulting with the parties
to the dispute. The Chairman of the DSB shall inform the Members of the composition
of the panel thus formed no later than 10 days after the date the Chairman receives
such a request.
4. On 22 May 2018, the Director-General accordingly composed the Panel as follows:

 Chairperson: Mr Thinus Jacobsz

 Members: Ms María Valeria Raiteri
 Mr Guillermo Valles

5. Brazil, China, the European Union, Japan, Kazakhstan, the Republic of Korea,
the Russian Federation, and Viet Nam have reserved their rights to participate in the Pane l
proceedings as third parties.