ARGENTINA – DEFINITIVE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON IMPORTS OF CERAMIC FLOOR TILES FROM ITALY
Document: Request for the Establishment of a Panel by the European Communities
Date: 7 November 2000
Document codes: WT/DS189/3
Complainant: EU
Respondent: Argentina
Third parties: Japan, Turkey, U.S.
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 2.4, 6.5, 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, Annex II  Anti-dumping

ARGENTINA – DEFINITIVE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON IMPORTS OF
CERAMIC FLOOR TILES FROM ITALY
Request for the Establishment of a Panel by the European Communities
The following communication, dated 6 November 2000, from the Permanent Delegation of
the European Commission to the Chairman of the Di spute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to
Article 6.2 of the DSU.
The European Communities (the "EC") request the establishment of a panel pursuant to
Article 6 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU)
and Article 17 of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade 1994 (Anti-Dumping Agreement) regarding the definitive anti-dumping measures
on imports of ceramic floor tiles ("porcellanato") from Italy imposed by Argentina on
12 November 1999.
On 26 January 2000, the EC requested consultations with Argentina with a view to reach a
mutually satisfactory solution of the matter. The request was circulated in document
dated 1 February 2000. Such consultations, which were held on 1 March 2000 in Geneva, have
allowed a better understanding of the respective positions, but have not led to a satisfactory resolution
of the matter.
The EC considers that the above mentioned measures are inconsistent with Articles 2.4, 6.8 in
conjunction with Annex II, 6.9 and 6.10 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement and, as a result, nullify and
impair the benefits accruing to the EC under that agreement.
Specifically, the claims submitted by the EC may be summarized as follows:
(1) The Argentinean investigative authority (the "Dirección de Competencia Desleal"
(DCD)) disregarded all the information on normal value and on export prices provided by the
exporters included in the sample, and used instead the normal value data alleged by the petitioner and
official import statistics. The DCD has not explained why the information provided by the exporters
was disregarded. By disregarding that information without any valid justification, the DCD acted
inconsistently with Article 6.8 and Annex II, which only allow investigating authorities to resort to
"facts available" in those cases where the exporters do not provide timely necessary information or
significantly impede the investigation.
(2) The DCD failed to calculate an individual dumping margin for each of the exporters
included in the sample, contrary to Article 6.10.
(3) the DCD failed to make due allowance for the differences in physical characteristics
between the models exported to Argentina and those sold in Italy, thereby violating Article 2.4.

(4) The DCD failed to inform the Italian exporters of the essential facts concerning the
existence of dumping which formed the basis for the decision whether to apply definitive measures,
thereby preventing the Italian exporters from defending adequately their interests, contrary to the
requirement set out in Article 6.9.
The EC request that the panel be established with the standard terms of reference as provided
for in Article 7 of the DSU.
The EC asks that this request be placed on the agenda for the next meeting of the Dispute
Settlement Body.