dean22029/WTO_Docs huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU by the United States Communication from the Arbitrator
Date: 7 April 2005
Document codes: WT/DS277/14
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA

Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU by the United States

Communication from the Arbitrator

 The following communication, dated 11 Marc h 2005, has been received from the delegation
of the United States and the delegation of Canada, and addressed to Mr Hardeep Puri, Chairman of the
Arbitrator.

 The United States and Canada wish to thank you and the other arbitrators for accepting to
serve in the above-referenced proceeding.

 On 14 February 2005, Canada requested that the WTO Dispute Settlement Body establish a
panel under Article 21.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of
Disputes ("DSU") and simultaneously requested authorization under Article 22.2 of the DSU to
suspend concessions or other obligations with resp ect to the United States. The United States
objected to the Canadian Article 22.2 request on 23 February 2005. The matte r has been referred to
arbitration pursuant to Article 22.6 of the DSU. The United States and Canada understand that you
and the other arbitrators have also accepted to serve as panelists in the Article 21.5 compliance
proceeding. In accordance with paragraph 5 of the "Agreed Procedures under Articles 21 and 22 of
the Dispute Settlement Understanding Applicable to the WTO Dispute: United States – Investigation
of the International Trade Commission in Soft wood Lumber from Canada (WT/DS277)," dated
23 February 2005 (), the United States and Canada request that the Article 22.6
arbitration proceedings be suspended until either party requests their resumption following adoption
by the DSB of the recommendations and rulings in the Article 21.5 compliance proceedings.

 In accordance with the joint request by the parties, the Arbitrator has suspended the
arbitration proceeding.
UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 25 May 2005
Document codes: WT/DS277/15
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA

Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 25 May 2005 , addressed to the Chairman of the Dispute
Settlement Body (DSB), is circulated pursuan t to Article 12.9 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU).

 Article 21.5 of the DSU stipulates that a panel considering the existence or consistency with a
covered agreement of measures taken to comply with the recommendations and rulings of the DSB
shall circulate its report within 90 days after the date of referral of the matter to it.

 Article 21.5 of the DSU further states that wh en a panel considers that it cannot provide its
report within this time frame, it shall inform the DS B in writing of the reasons for the delay together
with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report.

 The matter – Recourse to Ar ticle 21.5 of the DSU by Canada was referred to the original
Panel by the DSB on 25 February 2005, with the fo rmalities in composing the Panel being completed
on 2 March 2005.

 It will not be possible for the Panel to comple te its work in 90 days in light of scheduling
conflicts.

 The Panel expects to complete its work in September 2005.
UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Communication from the Appellate Body
Date: 10 March 2006
Document codes: WT/DS277/17
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA

Communication from the Appellate Body

 The following communication, dated 10 March 2006, from the Chairman of the Appellate
Body addressed to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with
Article 17.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 I am writing to you pursuant to Article 17.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes, which stipulates that, as a general rule, the Appellate Body will
circulate its Report no later than 60 days afte r the appellant has formally notified the Dispute
Settlement Body of its decision to appeal. Ar ticle 17.5 states, furthermore, that when the
Appellate Body considers that it cannot provide its Report within 60 days, it shall inform the DSB in
writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit
its Report.

 Canada notified the Dispute Settlement Body on 13 January 2006 of its decision to appeal
certain issues of law covered in the Panel Report a nd legal interpretations de veloped by the Panel in
this case, with the result that the 60-day period expires on Tuesday, 14 March 2006. Due to the time
required for completion and translation of the Report, the Appellate Body will not be able to circulate
its Report by Tuesday, 14 March 2006. We estimate that the Appellate Body Report in this appeal
will be circulated to WTO Members no later than Thursday, 13 April 2006.
UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada Communication from the Appellate Body
Date: 13 April 2006
Document codes: WT/DS277/18
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA

Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada

Communication from the Appellate Body

 The following communication, dated 13 April 2006, from the Chairman of the Appellate
Body addressed to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with
Article 17.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 It is my honour to transmit to you the Report of the Appellate Body in , Recourse to
Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada , It will be circulated to Members of the
 at 4 p.m. today, in acco rdance with paragraph 5 of Article 17 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes . It is a confidential
document until its circulation. The three Members of the Appellate Body who served on this appeal
were: Mr. Luiz Olavo Bapista, as Presiding Member; Mr. Georges Abi-Saab, and myself, as
Members.
UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Panel Report Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
Date: 28 April 2004
Document codes: WT/DS277/5; WT/DS277/R
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA

Panel Report

Action by the Dispute Settlement Body

 At its meeting on 26 April 2004, the Disput e Settlement Body adopted the Panel report on
United States – Investigation of the Interna tional Trade Commission in Softwood Lumber from
Canada ().

DANS L'AFFAIRE CONCERNANT CERTAINS BOIS D'ŒUVRE RÉSINEUX
EN PROVENANCE DU CANADA

Rapport du Groupe spécial

concernant certains bois d'œuvre rési neux en provenance du Canada ().

ESTADOS UNIDOS - INVESTIGACIÓN DE LA COMISIÓN
DE COMERCIO INTERNACIONAL RESPECTO DE LA

Informe del Grupo Especial

Actuación del Órgano de Solución de Diferencias

 En su reunión de 26 de abril de 2004, el Órga no de Solución de Diferencias adoptó el informe
UNITED STATES - INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Appellate Body Report and Panel Report pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
Date: 15 May 2006
Document codes: WT/DS277/19; WT/DS277/AB/RW; WT/DS277/RW
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES - INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Appellate Body Report and Panel Report pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU

Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
 At its meeting on 9 May 2006, the Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body
report on : Recourse to Artic le 21.5 of the DSU by Canada () and the Panel
report (), as reversed by the Appellate Body report. The Panel report should be read
in conjunction with the Appellate Body report.

D'ŒUVRE RÉSINEUX EN PROVENANCE DU CANADA
Rapport de l'Organe d'appel et rapport du Groupe spécial au titre de
des différends
 À sa réunion du 9 mai 2006, l'Organe de règl ement des différends a adopté le rapport de
rapport du Groupe spécial (), tel qu'il a ét é infirmé par le rapport de l'Organe d'appel.
Le rapport du Groupe spécial est à rapprocher de celui de l'Organe d'appel.

ESTADOS UNIDOS - INVESTIGACIÓN DE LA COMISIÓN DE COMERCIO
INTERNACIONAL RESPECTO DE LA MADERA BLANDA
PROCEDENTE DEL CANADÁ
Informe del Órgano de Apelación e informe del Grupo Especial de
Actuación del Órgano de Solución de Diferencias
 En su reunión de 9 de mayo de 2006, el Órga no de Solución de Diferencias adoptó el informe
UNITED STATES - INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada Appellate Body Report Corrigendum On page 40, paragraph 102, second sentence, insert the word "the" in between the words "was" and "subject". ÉTATS-UNIS - ENQUÊTE DE LA COMMISSION DU COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL DANS L'AFFAIRE CONCERNANT LES BOIS
Date: 20 August 2007
Document codes: WT/DS277/AB/RW/Corr.1
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES - INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA

Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada

Appellate Body Report

Corrigendum

 On page 40, paragraph 102, second sentence, insert the word "the" in between the words
"was" and "subject".

D'ŒUVRE RÉSINEUX EN PROVENANCE DU CANADA

Rapport de l'Organe d'appel

Corrigendum

"l'objet de".

ESTADOS UNIDOS - INVESTIGACIÓN DE LA COMISIÓN DE COMERCIO
INTERNACIONAL RESPECTO DE LA MADERA BLANDA
PROCEDENTE DEL CANADÁ

Corrigendum

"objeto".
UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA
Document: Request by the United States for Arbitration under Article 22.6 of the DSU
Date: 24 February 2005
Document codes: WT/DS277/10
Complainant: Canada
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: China, EU, Japan, South Korea
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. VI:6  GATT 1994Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 12, 18.1  Anti-dumpingArt. 10, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.7, 15.8, 22, 32.1  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
TRADE COMMISSION IN SOFTWOOD LUMBER FROM CANADA

Request by the United States for Arbitration under Article 22.6 of the DSU

 The following communication, dated 23 Febr uary 2005, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settleme nt Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 22.6
of the DSU.

 Regarding the dispute (WT/DS277), my authorities have instructed me to inform you that,
pursuant to Article 22.6 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of
Disputes ("DSU"), the United States objects to the level of suspension of concessions or other
obligations proposed by Canada in document

 Accordingly, as required by Article 22.6 of the DSU, "the matter shall be referred to
arbitration."
INDIA – IMPORT RESTRICTIONS MAINTAINED UNDER THE EXPORT AND IMPORT POLICY 2002-2007
Document: Request to Join Consultations Communication from the United States
Date: 22 January 2003
Document codes: WT/DS279/2; WT/DS279/1
Complainant: EU
Respondent: India
Dispute stage: Consultation
Agreements cited: Art. 4.2  AgricultureArt. III, X, XI  GATT 1994Art. 1, 2, 3  Import LicensingArt. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8  Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2  Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)

INDIA – IMPORT RESTRICTIONS MAINTAINED UNDER
THE EXPORT AND IMPORT POLICY 2002-2007
Request to Join Consultations
Communication from the United States
The following communication, dated 17 January 2003, from the Permanent Mission of the
United States to the Permanent Mission of India, the Permanent Delegation of the European
Commission and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with
Article 4.11 of the DSU.
I am writing concerning the request for consultations by the European Communities (EC) on
, circulated on
9 January 2003 (). My authorities have instructed me to notify the consulting Members
and the Dispute Settlement Body of the desire of the United States to be joined in these consultations
pursuant to Article 4.11 of the Understanding on Rules and Proce dures Governing the Settlement of
Disputes. As India's third largest supplier, the United States has a substantial trade interest in these
consultations. A significant percentage of Indian imports of products covered by the EC's
consultation request are from the United States. For example, there are 18 lines in the EC's list where
the import values of Indian imports from the United States for each product are greater than
$1 million USD and the US market share is greater than 10 per cent. The HS Chapters represented in
these 18 lines are: chemicals (29 and 34), electrical machinery (85) and aerospace/airplanes (88),
respectively. Further, India's imports of movie film from the United States were about $1 million,
representing more than half of India's imports of these products from the world. The US further has
exports to India of agricultural products included in the consultation request of over $1 million USD.
INDIA - IMPORT RESTRICTIONS MAINTAINED UNDER THE EXPORT AND IMPORT POLICY 2002-2007
Document: Acceptance by India of the Request to Join Consultations The United States notified the Dispute Settlement  Body (DSB) of their desire to be joined in the consultations requested by the European Communities, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU. The Permanent Mission of India informed the DSB that it had accepted the request of the United States to join the consultations. INDE - RESTRICTIONS À L'IMPORTATION MAINTENUES DANS LE CADRE DE LA POLITIQUE D'EXPORTATION ET D'IMPORTATION 2002-2007 Acceptation par l'Inde de la demande de participation aux consultations Les États-Unis ont notifié à l'Organe de règlement des différends (ORD) leur désir d'être admis à participer aux consultations demandées par les Communautés européennes, conformément à l'article 4:11 du Mémorandum d'accord sur le règlement des différends La Mission permanente de l'Inde a informé l'ORD qu'elle avait accepté la demande de participation aux consultations présentée par les États-Unis. INDIA - RESTRICCIONES A LA IMPORTACIÓN MANTENIDAS EN VIRTUD DE LA POLÍTICA DE EXPORTACIÓN E IMPORTACIÓN 2002-2007
Date: 6 February 2003
Document codes: WT/DS279/3
Complainant: EU
Respondent: India
Dispute stage: Consultation
Agreements cited: Art. 4.2  AgricultureArt. III, X, XI  GATT 1994Art. 1, 2, 3  Import LicensingArt. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8  Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2  Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)

INDIA - IMPORT RESTRICTIONS MAINTAINED UNDER
THE EXPORT AND IMPORT POLICY 2002-2007
Acceptance by India of the Request to Join Consultations
The United States notified the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of their desire to be joined in
the consultations requested by the European Communities, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU.
The Permanent Mission of India informed the DSB that it had accepted the request of the
United States to join the consultations.
DE LA POLITIQUE D'EXPORTATION ET D'IMPORTATION 2002-2007
La Mission permanente de l'Inde a informé l'ORD qu'elle avait accepté la demande de
INDIA - RESTRICCIONES A LA IMPORTACIÓN MANTENIDAS EN VIRTUD
DE LA POLÍTICA DE EXPORTACIÓN E IMPORTACIÓN 2002-2007
Los Estados Unidos notificaron al Órgano de Solución de Diferencias (OSD) su deseo de que
Estados Unidos de asociación a las consultas.
UNITED STATES – COUNTERVAILING DUTIES ON STEEL PLATE FROM MEXICO
Document: Request for Consultations by Mexico
Date: 27 January 2003
Document codes: WT/DS280/1; G/L/603; G/SCM/D52/1
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Canada, China, Taiwan, EU
Dispute stage: Panel
Agreements cited: Art. 10, 14, 19, 21  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)

UNITED STATES – COUNTERVAILING DUTIES
ON STEEL PLATE FROM MEXICO
Request for Consultations by Mexico
The following communication, dated 21 January 2003, from the Permanent Mission of
Mexico to the Permanent Mission of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement
Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU.
On instructions from the corresponding authorities of the Government of Mexico, I hereby
request consultations with the Government of the United States pursuant to Article 4 of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Article XXII of the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, and Article 30 of the Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement).
The measure for which Mexico is requesting consultations is the "Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review"
1 of 1998 (C-201-810) as well as the actions that
preceded it and led to the imposition of countervailing duties on imports of carbon steel plate in sheets
from Mexico.
Mexico considers the administrative review by the Department of Commerce (DOC) that
gave rise to the imposition of the countervailing duty of 11.68 per cent ad valorem on Altos Hornos
de México, S.A. de C.V. (AHMSA) following the so called " change-in-ownership" methodology
(more specifically, proof of " same person") to be inconsistent with Articles 10, 14, 19 and 21 of the
SCM Agreement. In particular, Mexico considers that the DOC failed to conduct a determination of
the existence of a benefit as required under paragraph 1(b) of Article 1 of the SCM Agreement.
Accordingly, the Government of Mexico requests the Government of the United States to
have the DOC refrain from further application of that methodology and instead, as a prerequisite to
the imposition or maintenance of countervailing duties on imports of carbon steel plate in sheets from
Mexico, determine whether a benefit has been conferred, ensuring that such determination is made in
conformity with the SCM Agreement.
Mexico reserves the right to raise additional factual and legal claims during the course of the
consultations. We look forward to receiving a reply to this request in order to agree on a mutually
convenient date for the consultations.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO
Document: Notification of Mutually Agreed Solution
Date: 21 May 2007
Document codes: WT/DS281/8; G/L/604/Add.1; G/ADP/D46/2
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO

Notification of Mutually Agreed Solution

 The following communication, dated 16 May 2007, from the delegation of the United States
and the delegation of Mexico to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant
to Article 3.6 of the DSU.

 The Governments of the United States of America and Mexico wish to notify the Dispute
Settlement Body that, in accordance with Article 3.6 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes, we have reached a mutually agreed solution to the matter raised
by Mexico in the above-referenced dispute (WT/DS281).

 This solution has taken the form of an ag reement between the United States and Mexico,
dated 6 March 2006 (the "Trade in Cement Agre ement"). The Trade in Cement Agreement makes
possible increased imports of Mexican cement, enc ourages US cement exports to Mexico, and settles
outstanding litigation relating to the US anti-dumping order on Mexican cement. The Agreement also
provides for the anti-dumping order to be revoked as of 1 February 2009.

 We ask you to circulate this notification to the relevant Councils and Committees, as well as
to the Dispute Settlement Body.

 (signed) (signed)
 David P. Shark Fernando de Mateo
 Chargé d'affaires, a.i. Ambassador and Permanent Representative
 Permanent Mission of the United States of of Mexico to the
 America to the
UNITED STATES - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO
Document: Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Mexico Note by the Secretariat
Date: 8 September 2004
Document codes: WT/DS281/3; WT/DS281/2
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO

Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Mexico

Note by the Secretariat

1. At its meeting on 29 August 2003, the Disput e Settlement Body established a Panel pursuant
to the request by Mexico in document WT/DS281/ 2, in accordance with Article 6 of the Dispute
Settlement Understanding (DSU).
2. At that meeting, the parties to the dispute al so agreed that the Panel should have standard
terms of reference. The terms of reference are, therefore, the following:
"To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited
by Mexico in document , the ma tter referred to the DSB by Mexico in
that document, and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements."
3. On 24 August 2004, Mexico requested the Direct or-General to determine the composition of
the Panel, pursuant to paragraph 7 of Article 8 of the DSU. This paragraph provides:
"If there is no agreement on the panelists within 20 days after the date of the
establishment of a panel, at the request of either party, the Director-General, in
consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the Chairman of the relevant Council
or Committee, shall determine the com position of the panel by appointing the
panelists whom the Director-General consid ers most appropriate in accordance with
any relevant special or additional rules or procedures of the covered agreement or
covered agreements which are at issue in th e dispute after consulting with the parties
to the dispute. The Chairman of the DSB shall inform the Members of the
composition of the panel thus formed no later than 10 days after the date the
Chairman receives such a request."
4. On 3 September 2004, the Director-General accordingly composed the Panel as follows:
Chairman: Mr. Peter Palecka
Members: Mr. Martin Garcia
 Mr. David Unterhalter
5. Canada, China, the European Communities, Jap an and Chinese Taipei reserved their third-
party rights.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 3 March 2005
Document codes: WT/DS281/4
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 1 March 2005, addressed to the Chairman of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 12.9 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU).

 Article 12.8 of the DSU stipulates that the period in which a panel shall conduct its
examination, from the date that the composition and te rms of reference of the panel have been agreed
upon until the date that the final report is issued to the parties, shall, as a general rule, not exceed six
months.

 Article 12.9 of the DSU states that, when a panel considers that it cannot issue its report
within six months, it shall inform the Dispute Settle ment Body (DSB) in writing of the reasons for the
delay, together with an estimate of the period within which it will issue its report.

 The Panel on (WT/DS281)
was established by the DSB on 29 August 2003, and the Director-General composed the Panel on
3 September 2004, with the formalities in composing the Panel being completed on
8 September 2004.

 It will not be possible for the Panel to complete its work within six months of the date of
composition, inter alia due to the large number of claims invol ved, the complexity of the issues and
certain postponements in the Panel's timetable.

 The Panel hopes to complete its work by the end of October 2005.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 5 October 2005
Document codes: WT/DS281/5
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 3 Oct ober 2005, addressed to the Chairman of the
Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accord ance with Article 12.9 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU).

 Article 12.8 of the DSU stipulates that the period in which a panel shall conduct its
examination, from the date that the composition and te rms of reference of the panel have been agreed
upon until the date that the final report is issued to the parties, shall, as a general rule, not exceed six
months.

 Article 12.9 of the DSU states that, when a panel considers that it cannot issue its report
within six months, it shall inform the DSB in writi ng of the reasons for the delay, together with an
estimate of the period within which it will issue its report.

 The Panel on (WT/DS281)
was established by the DSB on 29 August 2003, and the Director-General composed the Panel on
3 September 2004, with the formalities in composing the Panel being completed on
8 September 2004.

 On 1 March 2005, the Panel communicated that it would not be possible for it to complete its
work within the six month period envisaged under the DSU, and that it expected to finalise its work in
October 2005.
1 However, due to its continued consideration of the issues in this dispute, it will not be
possible for the Panel to complete its work by the end of October.

 The Panel now expects to complete its work in January 2006.

 1
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 17 January 2006
Document codes: WT/DS281/6
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 16 January 2006, addressed to the Dispute Settlement
Body (DSB), is circulated in accordance with Article 12.12 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU).

 In the context of negotiations to find a mutua lly acceptable solution to this dispute, Mexico,
the complaining party, requested the Panel on Frid ay, 13 January 2006, to suspend its proceedings, in
accordance with Article 12.12 of the DSU, until further notice. The Panel has agreed to this request.
UNITED STATES - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO
Document: Lapse of Authority for the Establishment of the Panel Note by the Secretariat At the request of Mexico, the Panel suspended its work on 13 January 2006 (WT/DS281/6). Since the Panel has not been requested to resume its  work, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU, the authority for the establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 14 January 2007. ÉTATS UNIS - MESURES ANTIDUMPING APPLICABLES AU CIMENT EN PROVENANCE DU MEXIQUE
Date: 23 March 2007
Document codes: WT/DS281/7; WT/DS281/6
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan
Dispute stage: Mutually Agreed Solution
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, Annex II  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES - ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CEMENT FROM MEXICO

Lapse of Authority for the Establishment of the Panel

Note by the Secretariat

 At the request of Mexico, the Panel suspended its work on 13 January 2006 ().
Since the Panel has not been requested to resume its work, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU, the
authority for the establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 14 January 2007.

ÉTATS UNIS - MESURES ANTIDUMPING APPLICABLES AU CIMENT
EN PROVENANCE DU MEXIQUE

Note du Secrétariat

(). Étant donné qu'il n'a pas été demandé au Groupe spécial de reprendre ses travaux,

ESTADOS UNIDOS - MEDIDAS ANTIDUMPING RELATIVAS
AL CEMENTO PROCEDENTE DE MÉXICO

Nota de la Secretaría

14 de enero de 2007.
UNITED STATES –ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Mexico Note by the Secretariat
Date: 13 February 2004
Document codes: WT/DS282/3; WT/DS282/2
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES –ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY
TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Mexico

Note by the Secretariat

1. At its meeting on 29 August 2003, the Disput e Settlement Body established a Panel pursuant
to the request by Mexico in document WT/DS282/ 2, in accordance with Article 6 of the Dispute
Settlement Understanding (DSU).
2. At that meeting, the parties to the dispute al so agreed that the Panel should have standard
terms of reference. The terms of reference are, therefore, the following:
"To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited
by Mexico in document , the ma tter referred to the DSB by Mexico in
that document, and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements."
3. On 11 February 2004, the parties agreed to the following composition of the Panel:
Chairman: Mr. Christer Manhusen
Members: Mr. Alistair James Stewart
4. Argentina, Canada, China, the European Comm unities, Japan, Chinese Taipei and Venezuela
reserved their third-party rights.
UNITED STATES –ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 18 August 2004
Document codes: WT/DS282/4
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES –ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON
OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 16 Augus t 2004, addressed to the Dispute Settlement
Body (DSB), is circulated pursuant to Article 12.9 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU).

 Article 12.8 of the DSU stipulates that the period in which a panel shall conduct its
examination, from the date that the composition and te rms of reference of the panel have been agreed
upon until the date that the final report is issued to the parties, shall, as a general rule, not exceed six
months.

 Article 12.9 of the DSU states that when a pane l considers that it cannot issue its report within
six months, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay, together with an estimate
of the period within which it will issue its report.

 The Panel on United States- Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG)
from Mexico (DS282) was established by the DSB on 29 August 2003 and composed on
11 February 2004.

 It will not, however, be possible for the Panel to complete its work in six months in light of
the schedule which was agreed after consultations with the parties.

 The Panel expects to complete its work in March 2005.
UNITED STATES –ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 7 February 2005
Document codes: WT/DS282/5
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES –ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON
OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 4 February 2005, addressed to the Dispute Settlement
Body (DSB), is circulated pursuant to Article 12.9 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU).

 Article 12.8 of the DSU stipulates that the period in which a panel shall conduct its
examination, from the date that the composition and te rms of reference of the panel have been agreed
upon until the date that the final report is issued to the parties, shall, as a general rule, not exceed
six months.

 Article 12.9 of the DSU states that when a pane l considers that it cannot issue its report within
six months, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay, together with an estimate
of the period within which it will issue its report.

 The Panel on United States- Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG)
from Mexico (DS282) was established by the DSB on 29 August 2003 and composed on
11 February 2004.

 In August 2004, the Panel informed the DSB that it would not be possible for it to complete
its work in six months in light of the schedule whic h was agreed after consultations with the parties,
and indicated that it expected to complete its work in March 2005 (document , dated
18 August 2004).

 It will not, however, be possible for the Panel to complete its work by March 2005 in light of
subsequent delays in the proceedings due to the complexity of certain issues.

 The Panel expects to complete its work in May 2005.
US – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Communication from the Appellate Body
Date: 10 October 2005
Document codes: WT/DS282/8
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

US – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON
OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Communication from the Appellate Body

 The following communication, dated 26 Septem ber 2005, from the Chairman of the Appellate
Body addressed to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with
Article 17.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.

 I am writing to you pursuant to Article 17.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes, which stipulates that, as a general rule, the Appellate Body will
circulate its Report no later than 60 days afte r the appellant has formally notified the Dispute
Settlement Body of its decision to appeal. Ar ticle 17.5 states, furthermore, that when the
Appellate Body considers that it cannot provide its Report within 60 days, it shall inform the DSB in
writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit
its Report.

 Mexico notified the Dispute Settlement Body on Thursday, 4 August 2005, of its decision to
appeal certain issues of law covered in the Pane l Report and legal interpre tations developed by the
Panel in this case, with the result that the 60-da y period expires on Monday, 3 October 2005. Due to
the time required for completion and translation of th e Report, the Appellate Body will not be able to
circulate its Report by Monday, 3 October 2005. We estimate that the Appellate Body Report in this
appeal will be circulated to WTO Members no later than Wednesday, 2 November 2005.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Communication from the Appellate Body
Date: 3 November 2005
Document codes: WT/DS282/9; WT/DS282/AB/R.
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON
OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Communication from the Appellate Body

 The following communication, dated 2 N ovember 2005, from Mr. Yasuhei Taniguchi,
Chairman of the Appellate Body, addressed to th e Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is
circulated in accordance with Article 17.5 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing
the Settlement of Disputes.

 It is my honour to transmit to you the Report of the Appellate Body in United States – Anti-
Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubu lar Goods (OCTG) from Mexico , It will
be circulated to Members of the at 4 p.m. today, in accordance with
paragraph 5 of Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of
Disputes. It is a confidential document until its circulation. The three Members of the
Appellate Body who served on this appeal were: Mr. A.V. Ganesan, as Presiding Member; Mr. John
Lockhart and myself, as Members.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Agreement under Article 21.3(b) of the DSU
Date: 17 February 2006
Document codes: WT/DS282/11
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON
OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Agreement under Article 21.3(b) of the DSU

 The following communication, dated 15 February 2006, from the delegation of Mexico and
the delegation of the United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in
accordance with Article 21.3(b) of the DSU.

 The United States and Mexico wish to inform you that, pursuant to Article 21.3(b) of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes , we have mutually
agreed that the reasonable period of time for the United States to implement the recommendations and
rulings of the Dispute Settlement Body in the dispute United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Mexico (WT/DS282) shall be six months, expiring on 28 May 2006.

 We request that you circulate this notifica tion to the Members of the Dispute Settlement
Body.

 For Mexico For the United States

 (signed) (signed)
 Fernando de Mateo y Venturini Peter F. Allgeier
 Ambassador Ambassador
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico Constitution of the Panel Note by the Secretariat
Date: 10 May 2007
Document codes: WT/DS282/15; WT/DS282/14.; WT/DS282/14
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY
TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico

Constitution of the Panel

Note by the Secretariat

1. At its meeting on 24 April 2007, the Dispute Settle ment Body (DSB) referred this dispute, if
possible, to the original Panel in accordance with Article 21.5 of the Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU) to examine the matter re ferred to the DSB by Mexico in document

2. The Panel's terms of reference are the following:
"To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited
by Mexico in document , the matter referred to the DSB by Mexico in
that document, and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the
recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements."
3. On 8 May 2007, the Panel was composed as follows:
Chairman: Mr. Christer Manhusen
Members: Mr. Alistair James Stewart
 Ms Stephanie Sin Far Lee (Man)
4. Argentina, China, the European Communities, Japan, and Thailand reserved their third-party
rights.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
Date: 11 July 2007
Document codes: WT/DS282/16
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY
TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico

Communication from the Chairman of the Panel

 The following communication, dated 5 July 2007, and addressed to th e Dispute Settlement
Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 12.12 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding ("DSU").

 In a letter dated 5 July 2007, addressed to Mr. Christer Manhusen, Chairman of the Panel, the
Government of Mexico has requested the Panel to suspend its work, in accordance with Article 12.12
read in conjunction with Article 21.5 of the DSU, until further notice. Mexico has reserved its right to
request the Panel to resume its work at any time. The Panel has agreed to this request and will
suspend its work until further notice.
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO
Document: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico Lapse of Authority for the Establishment of the Panel Note by the Secretariat At the request of Mexico, the Panel suspended its work on 5 July 2007 (WT/DS282/16). Since the Panel has not been requested to resume its  work, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU, the authority for the establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 6 July 2008. ÉTATS-UNIS – MESURES ANTIDUMPING VISANT LES PRODUITS TUBULAIRES POUR CHAMPS PÉTROLIFÈRES
Date: 7 July 2008
Document codes: WT/DS282/17; WT/DS282/16
Complainant: Mexico
Respondent: U.S.
Third parties: Argentina, Canada, China, Taiwan, EU, Japan, Venezuela, Thailand
Dispute stage: Appellate Body
Agreements cited: Art. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 18  Anti-dumpingArt. VI, X  GATT 1994Art. XVI:4  Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON OIL COUNTRY
TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM MEXICO

Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico

Lapse of Authority for the Establishment of the Panel

Note by the Secretariat

 At the request of Mexico, the Panel suspended its work on 5 July 2007 ().
Since the Panel has not been requested to resume its work, pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU, the
authority for the establishment of the Panel lapsed as of 6 July 2008.

ÉTATS-UNIS – MESURES ANTIDUMPING VISANT LES PRODUITS
TUBULAIRES POUR CHAMPS PÉTROLIFÈRES
EN PROVENANCE DU MEXIQUE

Note du Secrétariat

(). Étant donné qu'il n'a pas été demandé au Groupe spécial de reprendre ses travaux,

ESTADOS UNIDOS - MEDIDAS ANTIDUMPING RELATIVAS
PROCEDENTES DE MÉXICO
Nota de la Secretaría
(). Al no haberse pedido al Grupo Especi al que reanude sus trabajos, en virtud de lo
el 6 de julio de 2008.