SL

Bruselj, 7.5.2009

COM(2009) 213 konč.

SPOROČILO KOMISIJE SVETU IN EVROPSKEMU PARLAMENTU

O IZDATKIH DRŽAV ČLANIC PRI IZVAJANJU SISTEMOV SPREMLJANJA IN NADZORA, KI SE UPORABLJAJO V SKUPNI RIBIŠKI POLITIKI, V OBDOBJU 2001–2006, KI JIH JE SOFINANCIRALA SKUPNOST

SPOROČILO KOMISIJE SVETU IN EVROPSKEMU PARLAMENTU

O IZDATKIH DRŽAV ČLANIC PRI IZVAJANJU SISTEMOV SPREMLJANJA IN NADZORA, KI SE UPORABLJAJO V SKUPNI RIBIŠKI POLITIKI, V OBDOBJU 2001–2006, KI JIH JE SOFINANCIRALA SKUPNOST

1. RAZLOGI ZA SOFINANCIRANJE SKUPNOSTI NA PODROČJU NADZORA RIBIŠTVA

Predpisi Skupnosti o ohranjanju staležev rib, ki so del skupne ribiške politike (SRP), lahko postanejo učinkoviti le, če imajo države članice, ki so odgovorne za pravilno izvajanje navedenih predpisov, na voljo ustrezne človeške vire in tehnična sredstva. Zaradi tega Skupnost od leta 1990 uporablja shemo finančne pomoči, s katero podpira prizadevanja držav članic pri izvajanju predpisov Skupnosti o nadzoru ribištva. Shema je bila večkrat spremenjena, da bi se lahko odzvala na ocene glede učinkovitosti podprtih ukrepov kot tudi na nove izzive za nadzor ribištva. Med te spremembe spadata odločbi Sveta 2001/431/ES [1] in 2004/465/ES [2], tj. pravna akta, ki določata obliko sheme pomoči za obdobje 2001–2003 oziroma 2004–2006.

2. ODLOČBI SVETA 2001/431/ES IN 2004/465/ES

2.1. Vrste izdatkov, ki jih sofinancira Skupnost

Vrste izdatkov, upravičenih do podpore Skupnosti, kakor so določene v členu 2 Odločbe Sveta 2001/431/ES, so bile povzete in razširjene v ustreznem členu 4 Odločbe Sveta 2004/465/ES, vendar z nekoliko spremenjenim besedilom.

Tako obe odločbi določata podporo za vzpostavitev omrežij IT, ki bi omogočala izmenjavo podatkov v zvezi z nadzorom med organi različnih držav članic ter med organi držav članic in Komisijo.

Inovativne pristope je treba spodbujati s sofinanciranjem izdatkov, povezanih z uvedbo novih tehnologij pri nadzoru ribištva. Medtem ko so v Odločbi 2001/431/ES izdatki za VMS in elektronske naprave za zapisovanje združeni pod točko „nove tehnologije“, so v Odločbi 2004/465/ES navedeni kot dve samostojni postavki izdatkov.

Da bi izboljšali spretnosti in znanja zaposlenih v nadzornih oddelkih ter spodbudili nadaljnje usklajevanje z organi drugih držav članic, je treba na seznam upravičenih projektov vključiti ustrezne programe za usposabljanje in izmenjavo.

Ker Skupnost sodeluje v regionalnih ribiških organizacijah in jo zanima njihova učinkovitost, spadajo stroški, ki jih imajo države članice v zvezi z izvajanjem novih programov o pregledu in opazovanju v okviru regionalnih ribiških organizacij, med upravičene izdatke v okviru sheme za obdobje 2001–2003. Za obdobje 2004–2006 se je področje uporabe določbe razširilo, tako da so postali upravičeni pilotni programi o nadzoru in opazovanju na splošno in ne le tisti, ki so povezani z regionalnimi ribiškimi organizacijami.

Poleg tega Skupnost sofinancira tudi odkup in posodabljanje opreme za nadzor in spremljanje. Ta vrsta izdatkov zajema tako manjše popravke kot tudi izgradnjo novih patruljnih plovil in zrakoplovov.

Tudi stroški v zvezi s sistemom za oceno izdatkov, ki so nastali pri nadzoru nad SKP, se štejejo za upravičene.

Glede na različna stališča držav članic do pregona resnih kršitev predpisov o SRP so se v shemi za obdobje 2004–2006 v kategorijo upravičenih izdatkov dodali seminarji in medijski pripomočki, namenjeni ozaveščanju o potrebi po boju proti nezakonitemu ribolovu. Poleg tega so stroški držav članic v zvezi s študijami na področju nadzora ribištva, ki so se opravile na pobudo Komisije, postali upravičeni s spremembo konec leta 2005 [3].

2.2. Stopnje prispevkov

V členih 5–10 Odločbe Sveta 2001/431/ES in v členu 6(2) Odločbe Sveta 2004/465/ES so določene najvišje stopnje prispevka za posamezno vrsto upravičenih izdatkov za obdobje 2001–2003 oziroma 2004–2006. Kot je razvidno iz levega razdelka tabele v Prilogi I, je shema za obdobje 2004–2006 prinesla zelo malo sprememb v primerjavi s prejšnjo shemo.

3. LETNE ODLOČBE KOMISIJE O FINANCIRANJU

3.1. Stopnje prispevkov

Kot je razvidno iz desnega razdelka tabele v Prilogi I, so se v letnih odločbah o financiranju, ki jih je sprejela Komisija za izvajanje določb odločb Sveta 2001/431/ES in 2004/465/ES, na splošno uporabljale stopnje prispevkov, ki ustrezajo največjim dovoljenim stopnjam iz navedenih odločb.

Edina izjema je stopnja prispevka za izdatke v zvezi z IT na podlagi odločb o financiranju za leti 2002 in 2003, kjer se je uporabila 50-odstotna stopnja namesto dovoljene 65-odstotne stopnje.

Določbe v zvezi z VMS so se v obdobjih 2001–2003 in 2004–2006 podobno uporabljale. V obeh obdobjih sta bila določena najvišji upravičeni izdatek za sofinanciranje za satelitsko sledilno napravo in rok, po katerem se stopnja prispevka zmanjša s 100 % na 50 %.

3.2. Skupne obveznosti

Tako Odločba Sveta 2001/431/ES kot tudi spremenjena Odločba Sveta 2004/465/ES v členu 4(2) oziroma 5(1) določata najvišji prispevek Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva v višini 105 milijonov EUR, porazdeljen čez tri leta. Navedene odločbe so se izvedle z letnimi odločbami Komisije o financiranju. Pri tem so bili za vsako državo članico določeni upravičeni izdatki za vsako kategorijo izdatkov ter tudi stopnje finančnega prispevka, pri čemer je nastal največji skupni prispevek v višini 100 890 377 EUR za obdobje 2001–2003 in 98 319 418 EUR za obdobje 2004–2006 [4].

3.3. Največji prispevki za posamezno kategorijo upravičenih izdatkov

Primerjava sorazmernih deležev različnih postavk izdatkov največjega skupnega prispevka za obdobji 2001–2003 in 2004–2006 (glej sliko I) kaže na velike podobnosti. Izgradnji/modernizaciji plovil in zrakoplovov pripada daleč največji delež (56 % in 62,2 %), sledi mu sofinanciranje v zvezi z novimi tehnologijami (20,6 % in 16,6 %), ki je bilo zaradi lažje predstavitve

(...PICT...)

2001-03

(...PICT...)

2004-06

Slika I – Največji prispevki za posamezno vrsto upravičenih izdatkov

združeno s prispevki Skupnosti v zvezi z VMS in drugimi elektronskimi napravami za poročanje. Na tretjem mestu je finančna pomoč za vzpostavitev omrežij IT (16,7 % in 15,3 %), ki je večja od finančne podpore za tečaje usposabljanja nadzornih inšpektorjev (6,1 % in 3,9 %).

V obeh obdobjih 2001–2003 in 2004–2006 predstavljajo prispevki za vzpostavitev sistema za oceno izdatkov najmanjšo postavko izdatkov (0,5 % in 0,1 %), manjšo od pomoči v zvezi s seminarji za ozaveščanje (1,7 % v obdobju 2004–2006) in izvajanjem novih razporedov inšpekcij (0,3 % v obdobju 2004–2006).

3.3.1. Relativna pomembnost prispevkov Skupnosti za opremo za nadzor

Kot je razvidno iz slike I predstavljata tako v obdobju 2001–2003 kot tudi v obdobju 2004–2006 nakup in posodobitev plovil in zrakoplovov več kot 50 % obveznosti Skupnosti, pri čemer se je delež povečal s 56 % na 62 %. Razlog za tako velik delež so seveda povprečni stroški za naprave v tej kategoriji izdatkov. Izgradnja morskih plovil lahko vključuje stroške v višini več milijonov eurov, medtem ko se druge kategorije nikoli ne bodo približale tem ravnem. Da bi se vseeno zmanjšali prispevki Skupnosti za to kategorijo stroškov, je Komisija v obrazložitvenem memorandumu k predlogu za shemo finančne pomoči za obdobje 2001–2003 [5] napovedala premik od politike „zagotavljanja izhodiščne opreme“ na selektivnejšo politiko, ki se osredotoča le na „obnavljanje in dopolnjevanje“. Temu premiku je sledila čedalje bolj restriktivna praksa pri dodeljevanju finančne pomoči za to kategorijo izdatkov. V obdobju 2001–2003 je znašalo razmerje med obveznostmi v zvezi z opremo za nadzor in izdatki za opremo za nadzor v nacionalnih programih nadzora le 74 %, v obdobju 2004–2006 pa se je še nadalje zmanjšalo na 48 %. Na ta prizadevanja Komisije pa so negativno vplivale zahteve držav članic po vse večjih zneskih. Medtem ko so načrtovani izdatki za opremo za nadzor v letu 2001 znašali približno 40 milijonov EUR, so se ti v programih nadzora za leto 2006 povečali na več kot 190 milijonov EUR. Tega trenda ni obrnilo niti zmanjšanje največje stopnje prispevka za izdatke, povezane z opremo, ki se je uporabljalo v odločbah o financiranju od leta 2004 dalje (25-odstotno sofinanciranje namesto 35-odstotnega).

3.3.2. Kategorije izdatkov, ki se redko ali nikoli ne uporabljajo

Kot je razvidno iz slike I se nekatere kategorije izdatkov niso oziroma so se komaj prenesle v upravičene stroške. V obdobju 2001–2003 velja to za stroške držav članic v zvezi z izvajanjem novih programov o pregledu in opazovanju v okviru regionalnih ribiških organizacij. Glede na dejstvo, da sta le dve državi članici uspešno zaprosili za ustrezne prispevke, se zdi, da se je pri vzpostavitvi sistema za oceno izdatkov pojavil podoben problem.

Tudi v obdobju 2004–2006 sta le dva programa nadzora držav članic omogočila prevzem obveznosti za navedeni dve vrsti izdatkov. Glede kategorij izdatkov, ki so bile na novo uvedene v obdobju 2004–2006, so države članice zaprosile le za sofinanciranje seminarjev o nezakonitem ribolovu, kar je omogočilo prevzem ustreznih obveznosti [6].

4. PREGLED FINANCIRANIH POSTAVK

Z odločbami o financiranju za obdobje 2001–2006 so se do zdaj povrnili izdatki za 472 od 900 projektov, ki so bili upravičeni do sofinanciranja Skupnosti. Številke v nadaljevanju zadevajo izbiro postavk izdatkov, ki so razmeroma standardizirani in se tako lahko združijo na evropski ravni. Tako si je mogoče bolje predstavljati, kaj se je do zdaj doseglo s pomočjo Skupnosti.

Sofinanciralo se je 161 projektov v zvezi z usposabljanjem zaposlenih na področju nadzora ribištva, od katerih so številni vključevali izmenjavo osebja med državami članicami. Poleg tega je bilo pet projektov izključno namenjenih izmenjavi osebja za nadzor, namenjeni spodbujanju sodelovanja in usklajevanja med državami članicami. V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da so štiri od sedmih držav članic, ki so pristopile leta 2004 in so obalne države, prejele sofinanciranje za projekte, ki so delno ali v celoti namenjeni izmenjavi inšpektorjev. Tri od navedenih sedmih držav članic pa niso izvedle sofinanciranih izmenjav, pri čemer dvema med njimi ni uspelo izvesti niti sofinanciranega tečaja usposabljanja. Glede na možne prednosti, zlasti za nove države članice, se zdi, da se možnosti programov za izmenjavo še niso v celoti izkoristile.

Skupno 5 066 modrih skrinjic, ki so se sofinancirale na podlagi odločb o financiranju v obdobju 2001–2006, se na prvi pogled zdi ogromno. Podrobnejša proučitev pa kaže, da je to število daleč od zadovoljivega. Odločba Komisije o financiranju 2004/690/ES [7] je na primer v celoti namenjena VMS in je nastala na podlagi konkretnih zahtev držav članic. Vendar se je sofinanciralo samo 1 050 modrih skrinjic, čeprav jih je za upravičene veljalo 4 653. Če so zahtevki držav članic temeljili na realistični oceni števila plovil, ki morajo na krovu imeti modro skrinjico, se priporoča, da se v prihodnjih odločbah o financiranju izdatki, povezani z VMS, obravnavajo prednostno.

Zaradi velikega obsega pri financiranju plovil je primerno, da se ti izdatki uvrstijo med splošne stroške izgradnje. To poteka vzporedno z različnimi razredi zadevnih plovil. V najmanjši razred spadajo plovila v vrednosti do 50 000 EUR [8], med katera spadajo napihljivi čolni s trdim dnom, ki se običajno uporabljajo za kratke razdalje in lahko plujejo tudi v obalnih vodah. Skupnost je prispevala k nakupu približno 27 plovil iz tega razreda.

Cenovni razpon 50 000–1 000 000 EUR zajema večino patruljnih plovil, od katerih jih je bilo približno 33 zgrajenih s prispevkom Skupnosti. Plovila, ki stanejo precej več kot 1 000 000 EUR, spadajo v razred patruljnih plovil, ki izvajajo nadzor na odprtem morju, včasih daleč od evropskih voda. S prispevkom Skupnosti je bilo zgrajenih 13 takšnih plovil.

5. IZVRŠEVANJE LETNIH PROGRAMOV NADZORA

Po opisu strukture obveznosti Skupnosti in navedbi konkretnih številk v zvezi z do zdaj financiranimi postavkami, je treba zagotoviti tudi celovitejši pregled nad tem, do kakšne stopnje so se dejansko izvršili nacionalni programi nadzora.

Izračun razmerja skupnih sproščenih obveznosti do prvotnih obveznosti kaže na skupno stopnjo neizvršitve v višini 25 % za obdobje 2001–2003 in 14 % za obdobje 2004–2006. Glede na to, da te številke spremlja razmerje neporavnanih obveznosti do prvotnih obveznosti, ki znaša 33 % oziroma 53 %, se le stopnja neizvršitve za obdobje 2001–2003 zdi dovolj primerna za nadaljnjo analizo.

Pri stopnji neizvršitve v višini 25 % in stopnji neporavnanih obveznosti v višini 33 % pomeni, da se je preostanek (42 % prvotnih obveznosti) izvršil, razmerje med sproščenimi obveznostmi in plačanimi prispevki znaša torej približno 1 proti 2 [9]. To nakazuje, da se bo do zaključka vseh programov za obdobje 2001–2003 stopnja neizvršitve zaradi novih sproščenih obveznosti verjetno dvignila na vsaj 33 %; če predvidevamo, da se bo verjetnost sprostitve neporavnanih obveznosti s časom povečevala, se celo zdi, da je 33 % precej konzervativna ocena. Jasno je, da sta tako sporočena stopnja neizvršitve kot tudi, in celo še bolj, ocenjena končna stopnja neizvršitve enako nezadovoljivi.

5.1. Razmerje med stopnjami neizvršitve in največjimi prispevki

V tabeli v Prilogi II so prikazane temeljne strukture in razvrstitev držav članic, ki so bile zajete v shemi za obdobje 2001–2003, glede na njihovo stopnjo neizvršitve. Države članice, ki so označene z (*), se ne smejo upoštevati, saj so njihove neporavnane obveznosti precej višje od dejanske skupne stopnje (in imajo zato zavajajoče nizke stopnje neizvršitve). Ostale države članice pa se lahko brez tveganja uporabijo za analizo.

Kot je razvidno iz tabele, znašajo stopnje neizvršitve za države članice pod številkami 1–10 od četrtine največjih prispevkov do skoraj sto odstotkov. Primerjava teh številk z razvrstitvijo v sredini tabele (največji prispevki, odobreni državam članicam) jasno kaže, da ni dokazov o sistematični pozitivni soodvisnosti med stopnjami neizvršitve in višino največjih prispevkov. Tako ima na primer Belgija, čeprav ji je bil odobren drugi najnižji največji prispevek, še vedno drugo največjo stopnjo neizvršitve. Nasprotno je Španija sicer povezana z drugim največjim prispevkom Skupnosti, vendar je njena stopnja neizvršitve precej manjša od povprečne stopnje v višini 51 %. Kot kažeta primera Finske in Grčije, tudi o obratni soodvisnosti ni prepričljivega dokaza. Zdi se torej, da višina največjega prispevka, odobrenega državi članici, ne vpliva na izvedbo programa s strani države članice.

5.2. Razmerje med največjimi prispevki in sproščenimi obveznostmi

Ugotovitve so drugačne, če pozornost posvetimo absolutni višini sproščenih obveznosti (v desnem razdelku tabele) namesto relativni. Pri primerjavi te razvrstitve z razvrstitvijo na podlagi največjega prispevka za posamezno državo članico je mogoče ugotoviti močno soodvisnost. Pet držav z najvišjimi največjimi prispevki (razen držav članic, označenih z zvezdico) je hkrati tudi pet držav z najvišjimi zneski sproščenih obveznosti. Čeprav izhaja ta vzorec iz strukture dodelitve obveznosti (sedem največjih držav prejemnic predstavlja 87 % največjega skupnega prispevka), bi se ta soodvisnost lahko še vedno zmanjšala, če bi si države, ki imajo od sheme največje koristi, bolj prizadevale za zmanjšanje svojih stopenj neizvršitve. V prihodnosti bi bilo zaželeno, da vse države članice, ki prejemajo nadpovprečne največje prispevke, poskrbijo za podpovprečno stopnjo neizvršitve.

5.3. Razlogi za suboptimalno izvrševanje programov nadzora

Razlogi za neizvršitev velikega števila letnih programov nadzora so različni in ker države članice pogosto ne sporočajo razlogov, je nemogoče sestaviti reprezentativen seznam. Na splošno sta za opustitev projekta določilna dva razloga.

5.3.1. Precenitev proračunskih zmogljivosti s strani držav članic

Kot prvo pogostost odpovedi projektov s strani držav članic, pri katerih je Komisija velik delež izdatkov, načrtovanih v okviru programov nadzora, že označila za neupravičen, kaže na to, da je morda obseg programov nadzora že v osnovi enostavno prevelik. S tega vidika bi bili zaželeni hkrati zmernejši kot tudi bolj realistični letni programi nadzora.

5.3.2. Neupravičenost izdatkov

Drugi razlog vključuje neupravičenost izdatkov. Značilni primeri so projekti, ki so bili vključeni v določen program nadzora, vendar so se začeli izvajati pred letom, na katero se nanaša program nadzora, zaradi česar Komisija zahtevke za povračilo za te programe običajno zavrača.

Ti problemi ne bi bili tako pogosti, če bi države članice natančneje upoštevale pravila, ki se uporabljajo za financiranje Skupnosti na področju nadzora ribištva. Podobno bi bilo treba države članice spodbujati, da se v primeru dvomov glede razlage določenih predpisov obrnejo na pristojno osebje Komisije ter se tako izognejo delovanju na podlagi domnev, ki se na koncu lahko izkažejo za napačne in povzročijo zavrnitev prispevka Skupnosti.

V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da je začetno neupoštevanje pravil v zvezi z dokazili, ki jih je treba priložiti vsakemu zahtevku za povračilo [10], pogosto vzrok za zamude pri povračilu. Če bi države članice v celoti upoštevale pravila, bi bili postopki izplačevanja hitrejši.

6. UČINEK PROGRAMOV NADZORA V OBDOBJU 2001–2006

Člen 16(b) Odločbe Sveta 2004/465/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo Sveta 2006/2/ES, med drugim zahteva celovito oceno učinka prispevka Skupnosti na programe nadzora ribištva v celotnem obdobju od leta 2001 do leta 2006. Vendar to obveznost zadovoljivo izpolnjujejo le poročila nekaterih držav članic [11].

Zaradi neuravnoteženega poročanja je težko v celoti oceniti učinek. Vendar se določeni trendi pojavljajo v ocenjevalnih poročilih več kot ene države članice, zato je mogoče sklepati, da odražajo splošne težnje.

6.1. Spodbujevalni učinek proti varčevalnemu

Zdi se predvsem, da je imela pomoč Skupnosti velik učinek na porabniško vedenje držav članic. Namesto da bi samo zmanjšali izdatke, ki bi se tako ali tako pojavili, dve državi članici izrecno navajata, da ju je sofinanciranje Skupnosti spodbudilo, da sta izvedli projekte, ki jih sicer ne bi [12]. Kjer financiranje EU ni povzročilo uresničitve projektov, ki si jih sicer ne bi mogli privoščiti, je vsaj v nekaterih primerih vplivalo na izbiro rešitev višje kakovosti [13] in/ali zgodnejše izvajanje projektov [14].

6.2. Povezovanje in usklajevanje med državami članicami

Druga skupna značilnost številnih poročil je poudarek pomembnosti povezovanja in usklajevanja, ki naj bi se izboljšalo med državami članicami [15]. Programi za izmenjavo ribiških inšpektorjev ter nova programska oprema za centre za spremljanje ribištva, ki omogočajo enostavno izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami, predstavljajo le dva primera.

6.3. Kvantitativni učinki

Poleg kvalitativnih učinkov številne države članice poudarjajo tudi kvantitativni učinek pomoči Skupnosti. To velja zlasti za naložbe v opremo za nadzor (npr. plovila in zrakoplove) in tečaje usposabljanja, ki so pomagali pripraviti veliko število novega osebja za delo na področju nadzora ribištva.

6.4. Učinek programov nadzora v številkah

Medtem ko večina držav članic v svojih poročilih o učinku pomoči Skupnosti ne navaja konkretnih številk, so štiri med njimi uporabile numerične kazalce, kot je določeno v členu 16(b)(iii) Odločbe Sveta 2004/465/ES.

Španija navaja število letnih inšpekcij. Število pregledov, ki so jih opravila plovila, se je povečalo s 320 v letu 2001 na 2 612 v letu 2006, zaradi tega se je tudi število ugotovljenih kršitev povečalo s 129 v letu 2001 na 959 v letu 2006.

Italijanski organi za isto obdobje poročajo o povečanju skupnega števila pregledov (ne samo na morju) za 71 %. Tudi v tem primeru je mogoče opaziti ugodne posledice, saj se je število ugotovljenih resnih upravnih kršitev povečalo za 58 % oziroma 26 %.

Portugalsko poročilo primerja število opazovanih in pregledanih plovil v letu 2006 z ustreznim številom v letu 2001. Pri tem je bilo ugotovljeno izrazito povečanje s 1 432 na 33 975 oziroma s 1 929 na 6 750.

Estonija je zagotovila kazalec razvoja kršitev pri sporočanju in registraciji podatkov v obdobju od 2004 do 2007. Vendar iz na splošno majhnega števila ugotovljenih kršitev ni mogoče statistično utemeljeno sklepati.

Ekstrapolacija številk, sporočenih v tej točki, da bi ocenili učinek naložb na druge države članice, ni mogoča zaradi različnih razlogov. Vendar številke vsaj nekoliko podpirajo domnevo, da je imelo financiranje Skupnosti pomemben učinek na zmogljivosti držav članic za nadzor ter je neposredno vplivalo na učinkovitost nadzornih organov.

7. SKLEPNA PRIPOROČILA

Čeprav je bil ugotovljen pozitiven učinek pomoči Skupnosti na nadzor ribištva, je v poročilu ugotovljeno, da je nekatere stvari mogoče še izboljšati, na podlagi česar so nastali naslednji praktični ukrepi:

Komisija bi morala:

· še naprej kritično pregledovati vse večje število projektov na področju izgradnje in posodobitve plovil ter zrakoplovov glede njihove nujnosti;

· v prihodnje dati prednost finančnim odločbam o sofinanciranju avtomatizacije in upravljanja podatkov, e-ladijskih dnevnikov in VMS kot tudi tečajev usposabljanja in programov za izmenjavo, zlasti na področju nezakonitega ribolova;

· skleniti memorandume o soglasju z državami članicami, ki tega do zdaj še niso storile [16]. Ti dogovori bodo namenjeni opredelitvi potreb po izboljšanju nacionalnih sistemov nadzora v okviru finančne pomoči Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva. Vzpostavili bodo okvir za strateško analizo tveganja in določili merila uspešnosti za te izboljšave. Ta merila uspešnosti bodo zajemala vsa vprašanja v zvezi z inšpekcijami od nacionalnih pravnih okvirov do sredstev in postopkov inšpekcij ali uporabe VMS in drugih podatkov. Pokazala bodo tudi na izboljšave, ki so potrebne na področju upravnega nadzora, nacionalne organizacijske strukture in spremljanja kršitev.

Države članice bi morale:

· omejiti obseg letnih programov nadzora, da bi bilo mogoče izvesti vse projekte;

· (EU-10) brez oklevanja vlagati v tečaje usposabljanja in programe za izmenjavo nadzornega osebja;

· povečati ozaveščenost v upravi glede možnosti za sofinanciranje kategorij izdatkov, ki se do zdaj v programih držav članic za nadzor niso veliko uporabljale. Zlasti bi si bilo smiselno prizadevati za vzpostavitev sistema za oceno izdatkov, saj bi tak sistem državam članicam lahko pomagal doseči navedeni cilj selektivnejših letnih programov nadzora;

· poskrbeti za nadaljnje zmanjšanje svojih stopenj neizvršitve. V zvezi s tem imajo države članice, ki prejemajo nadpovprečne najvišje prispevke, posebno odgovornost in bi morale poskrbeti za podpovprečno stopnjo neizvršitve;

· zagotoviti, da osebje, ki je pristojno za izvajanje programov, v celoti pozna pravila o upravičenosti izdatkov in tako zmanjšati tveganje, da bi Komisija izdatke, za katere se zahteva povračilo, štela za neupravičene;

· zagotoviti izvajanje memorandumov o soglasju, sklenjenih v dogovoru s Komisijo;

· natančno upoštevati predpisano obliko in roke v zvezi z letnimi ocenjevalnimi poročili.

Annex I – Maximum contribution rates per Council Decision & actual contribution rates per Commission Financing Decision

TYPES OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURE & MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION RATES (in %) | ACTUAL CONTRIBUTION RATES (in %) |

Council Decision 2001/431/EC | Council Decision 2004/465/EC | Financing Decisions: |

| | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |

IT: | 65% | 50% |

65% | 50% | | |

NEW TECHNOLOGIES: | 50%; 50%/100% for VMS, electr. logbook | 50% |

50%;>50% for VMS/logbook | >50% | | |

| VMS/REPORT. DEVICES: | | for VMS: 50%/100% |

| lump sum | | |

TRAINING: | 50% |

50% | 50% | |

NEW INSPECTION SCHEDULES: | n/a | 50% | n/a |

50% | 50% | | | |

EQUIPMENT: | 35% | 25%;50% for new MS |

35% | 25%; 50% for new MS | | |

EXPENDITURE ASSESSMENT: | 50% | n/a | 50% |

50% | 50% | | | |

| SEMINARS: | | 75% |

| >50% | | |

| STUDIES: | | n/a |

| 100% | | |

Annex II – Ranking of the Member States regarding non-execution rate, maximum contribution & de-commitment (for the period 2001-03)

Place | | Member State | Non-execution Rate | | Member State | Maximum Contribution (in EUR) | | Member State | De-commitment (in EUR) |

1 | | Austria | 95% | | Portugal* | 22.029.251 | | United Kingdom | 6.617.895 |

2 | | Belgium | 75% | | Spain | 16.717.903 | | Greece | 4.796.214 |

3 | | Denmark | 58% | | United Kingdom | 16.453.097 | | Spain | 4.773.458 |

4 | | Greece | 57% | | Italy | 10.568.802 | | Italy | 2.583.399 |

5 | | France | 57% | | Ireland* | 9.369.700 | | France | 2.387.880 |

6 | | Germany | 41% | | Greece | 8.455.000 | | Denmark | 1.917.704 |

7 | | United Kingdom | 40% | | France | 4.209.308 | | Germany | 473.615 |

8 | | Finland | 36% | | Sweden* | 3.891.863 | | Finland | 469.799 |

9 | | Spain | 29% | | Denmark | 3.304.734 | | Netherlands* | 343.294 |

10 | | Italy | 24% | | Netherlands* | 3.021.667 | | Belgium | 299.770 |

11 | | Netherlands* | 11% | | Finland | 1.300.320 | | Portugal* | 269.711 |

12 | | Portugal* | 1% | | Germany | 1.141.615 | | Austria | 27.336 |

13 | | Ireland* | 0% | | Belgium | 398.228 | | Ireland* | 0 |

14 | | Sweden* | 0% | | Austria | 28.889 | | Sweden* | 0 |

| | | | | | | | | |

| | Average: | 37%51%** | | Overall: | 100.890.377 | | Overall | 24.960.075 |

* Member States with an outstanding commitments rate significantly higher than the overall outstanding commitments rate** average after the exclusion of the Member States indicated with an asterisk |

Annex III [17] – Overview of the Execution of Community Funds per Member State for the Periods 2001-03 and 2004-06 respectively

AUSTRIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 19.259 | 50% | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 19.259 | 50% | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 19.259 | 50% | 9.630 | 1.553 | 8.077 | 84 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 19.259 | | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 19.259 | | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 19.259 | | 9.630 | 1.553 | 8.077 | 84 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

AUSTRIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

BELGIUM | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 12.395 | 65% | 8.057 | 0 | 8.057 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 24.790 | 50% | 12.395 | 0 | 12.395 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 24.790 | 50% | 12.395 | 0 | 12.395 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 24.790 | 50% | 12.395 | 0 | 12.395 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 94.200 | 50% | 47.100 | 21.338 | 25.762 | 55 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 107.800 | 50%/100% | 91.650 | 41.175 | 50.475 | 55 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 9.914 | 50% | 4.957 | 0 | 4.957 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 9.914 | 50% | 4.957 | 0 | 4.957 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 9.914 | 50% | 4.957 | 0 | 4.957 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 223.105 | 35% | 78.087 | 0 | 78.087 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 463.020 | 35% | 121.279 | 35.945 | 85.334 | 70 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 47.099 | | 25.409 | 0 | 25.409 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 352.009 | | 142.539 | 21.338 | 121.201 | 85 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 605.524 | | 230.281 | 77.120 | 153.161 | 67 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

BELGIUM | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 5.000 | 50% | 2.500 | 0 | 2.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 15.000 | 50% | 7.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.500 | 100 |

2006*** | 10.000 | 50% | 5.000 | 0 | 5.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 5.000 | 75% | 3.750 | 0 | 3.750 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 11.550.000 | 25% | 2.887.500 | 0 | 2.887.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 5.000 | | 2.500 | 0 | 2.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 11.565.000 | | 2.895.000 | 0 | 2.887.500 | 100 | 7.500 | 0 |

2006*** | 15.000 | | 8.750 | 0 | 8.750 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

CYPRUS | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 83.000 | 50% | 41.500 | 0 | 0 | | 41.500 | |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 107.800 | 50%/100% | 90.650 | 0 | 90.650 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 20.000 | 50% | 10.000 | 2.367 | 7633 | 76 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 15.000 | 50% | 7.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.500 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools: |

2004* | 30.000 | 75% | 22.500 | 998 | 21.502 | 96 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 1.400.000 | 50% | 700.000 | 0 | 700.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 2.300.000 | 50% | 1.150.000 | 575.000 | 0 | 0 | 575.000 | 50 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 1.557.800 | | 823.150 | 3.365 | 819.785 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 2.398.000 | | 1.199.000 | 575.000 | 0 | 0 | 624.000 | 52 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

DENMARK | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 30.000 | 65% | 19.500 | 19.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.580.000 | 50% | 790.000 | 476.582 | 313.418 | 40 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 640.000 | 50% | 320.000 | 82.499 | 237.501 | 74 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 380.000 | 50%/100% | 195.000 | 107.506 | 87.494 | 45 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.780.000 | 50% | 890.000 | 1.569 | 888.431 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 1.159.968 | 50%/100% | 920.234 | 556.751 | 363.483 | 39 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 80.000 | 50% | 40.000 | 39.198 | 802 | 2 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 160.000 | 50% | 80.000 | 67.391 | 12.609 | 16 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 100.000 | 50% | 50.000 | 36.035 | 13.965 | 28 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 490.000 | | 254.500 | 166.204 | 88.296 | 35 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 3.520.000 | | 1.760.000 | 545.542 | 1.214.458 | 69 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 1.899.968 | | 1.290.234 | 675.285 | 614.949 | 48 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

DENMARK | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 271.000 | 50% | 135.500 | 80.288 | 55.212 | 41 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 525.000 | 50% | 262.500 | 158.695 | 0 | 0 | 103.805 | 40 |

2006*** | 1.333.334 | 50% | 666.667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 666.667 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 482.142 | 50%/100% | 401.571 | 333.075 | 68.496 | 17 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 750.000 | 50% | 375.000 | 375.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 275.000 | 50% | 137.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 137.500 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 56.500 | 50% | 28.250 | 16.927 | 11323 | 40 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 150.000 | 50% | 75.000 | 64.148 | 0 | 0 | 10.852 | 14 |

2006*** | 523.199 | 50% | 261.600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 261.600 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 93.333 | 50% | 46.667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46.667 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 40.000 | 75% | 30.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.000 | 100 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 809.642 | | 565.321 | 430.291 | 135.030 | 24 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 1.465.000 | | 742.500 | 597.843 | 0 | 0 | 144.657 | 19 |

2006*** | 2.224.866 | | 1.112.434 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.112.434 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

ESTONIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 229.217 | 50% | 114.609 | 65.875 | 48.734 | 43 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 115.050 | 50%/100% | 101.775 | 0 | 101.775 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 9.590 | 50% | 4.795 | 0 | 4795 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 13.195 | 50% | 6.598 | 641 | 5.956 | 90 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 300.704 | 50% | 150.352 | 106.551 | 43.801 | 29 | 0 | 0 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 124.640 | | 106.570 | 0 | 106.570 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 543.116 | | 271.558 | 173.067 | 98.491 | 36 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

FINLAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 176.597 | 65% | 114.788 | 97.232 | 17.556 | 15 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 264.896 | 50% | 132.448 | 76.212 | 56.236 | 42 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 900.000 | 50% | 450.000 | 450.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 248.918 | 50%/100% | 194.824 | 33.610 | 161.214 | 83 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 160.788 | 50%/100% | 153.688 | 102.330 | 51.358 | 33 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 310.000 | 50%/100% | 163.000 | 30.832 | 132.168 | 81 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 26.910 | 50% | 13.455 | 5.119 | 8.336 | 62 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 30.274 | 50% | 15.137 | 7.181 | 7.956 | 53 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 20.000 | 50% | 10.000 | 5.140 | 4.860 | 49 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 33.638 | 35% | 11.773 | 0 | 11.773 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 117.732 | 35% | 41.206 | 22.864 | 18.342 | 45 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 486.063 | | 334.840 | 135.961 | 198.879 | 59 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 573.690 | | 342.479 | 208.587 | 133.892 | 39 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 1.230.000 | | 623.000 | 485.972 | 137.028 | 22 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

FINLAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 545.000 | 50% | 272.500 | 17.943 | 254.557 | 93 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 600.000 | 50% | 300.000 | 25.760 | 274.240 | 91 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 402.000 | 50% | 201.000 | 87.628 | 0 | 0 | 113.372 | 56 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 190.800 | 50%/100% | 108.000 | 78.000 | 30.000 | 28 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 33.000 | 50%/100% | 22.820 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.820 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 30.000 | 50% | 15.000 | 3.147 | 11853 | 79 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 30.000 | 50% | 15.000 | 4.092 | 10.908 | 73 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 24.200 | 50% | 12.100 | 2.405 | 0 | 0 | 9.695 | 80 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 105.000 | 25% | 26.250 | 23.929 | 2.321 | 9 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 870.800 | | 421.750 | 123.018 | 298.732 | 71 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 630.000 | | 315.000 | 29.852 | 285.148 | 91 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 459.200 | | 235.920 | 90.033 | 0 | 0 | 145.887 | 62 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

FRANCE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 153.000 | 65% | 99.450 | 0 | 99.450 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.000.000 | 50% | 500.000 | 0 | 500.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 153.000 | 50% | 76.500 | 33.975 | 0 | 0 | 42.525 | 56 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 2.100.000 | 50%/100% | 1.500.000 | 160.165 | 750.000 | 50 | 589.835 | 39 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 305.000 | 50% | 152.500 | 6.070 | 146.430 | | | |

2003*** | 70.000 | 50% | 35.000 | 15.000 | 10.000 | 29 | 10.000 | 29 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 2.520.000 | 35% | 882.000 | 0 | 882.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 2.520.000 | 35% | 882.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 882.000 | 100 |

2003*** | 233.881 | 35% | 81.858 | 81.858 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 2.673.000 | | 981.450 | 0 | 981.450 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 3.825.000 | | 1.534.500 | 6.070 | 646.430 | 42 | 882.000 | 57 |

2003*** | 2.556.881 | | 1.693.358 | 290.998 | 760.000 | 45 | 642.360 | 38 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

FRANCE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 1.800.000 | 50%/40% | 750.000 | 743.830 | 0 | 0 | 6.170 | 1 |

2005** | 150.000 | 50% | 75.000 | 75.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 935.000 | 50% | 467.500 | 177.327 | 0 | 0 | 290.173 | 62 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 2.047.500 | 50%/100% | 1.365.000 | 363.626 | 0 | 0 | 1.001.374 | 73 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 130.000 | 50% | 65.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.000 | 100 |

2005** | 34.050 | 50% | 17.025 | 4.622 | 12.403 | 73 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 58.350 | 50% | 29.175 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.175 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 286.000 | 25% | 71.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71.500 | 100 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 3.977.500 | | 2.180.000 | 1.107.456 | 0 | 0 | 1.072.544 | 49 |

2005** | 470.050 | | 163.525 | 79.622 | 12.403 | 8 | 71.500 | 44 |

2006*** | 993.350 | | 496.675 | 177.327 | 0 | 0 | 319.348 | 64 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

GERMANY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 127.823 | 50% | 63.912 | 63.912 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 360.000 | 50% | 180.000 | 54.913 | 125.087 | 69 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 127.823 | 50% | 63.912 | 46.293 | 17.618 | 28 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 595.824 | 50% | 297.912 | 149.675 | 129.069 | 43 | 19.168 | 6 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 34.257 | 50% | 17.129 | 4.151 | 12.978 | 76 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 47.113 | 50% | 23.557 | 8.954 | 14.602 | 62 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 20.713 | 50% | 10.357 | 6.312 | 4.045 | 39 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 100.842 | 35% | 35.295 | 30.619 | 4.676 | 13 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 934.408 | 35% | 327.043 | 278.963 | 48.079 | 15 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 350.000 | 35% | 122.500 | 5.039 | 117.461 | 96 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 262.922 | | 116.335 | 81.063 | 35.272 | 30 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.109.344 | | 414.512 | 351.829 | 62.681 | 15 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 1.326.537 | | 610.769 | 215.939 | 375.661 | 62 | 19.168 | 3 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

GERMANY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 235.000 | 50% | 117.500 | 11.056 | 0 | 0 | 106.444 | 91 |

2005** | 50.000 | 50% | 25.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.000 | 100 |

2006*** | 210.000 | 50% | 105.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 105.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 780.000 | 50%/100% | 585.000 | 341.250 | 0 | 0 | 243.750 | 42 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 52.500 | 50% | 26.250 | 1.012 | 0 | 0 | 25.238 | 96 |

2005** | 52.100 | 50% | 26.050 | 3.002 | 0 | 0 | 23.048 | 88 |

2006*** | 64.000 | 50% | 32.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 77.798 | 25% | 19.449 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.449 | 100 |

2005** | 51.331.250 | 25% | 12.832.813 | 17.231 | 0 | 0 | 12.815.581 | 100 |

2006*** | 900.000 | 25% | 225.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225.000 | 100 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 1.145.298 | | 748.199 | 353.318 | 0 | 0 | 394.881 | 53 |

2005** | 51.433.350 | | 12.883.863 | 20.233 | 0 | 0 | 12.863.629 | 100 |

2006*** | 1.174.000 | | 362.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 362.000 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

GREECE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 1.000.000 | 65% | 650.000 | 0 | 650.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 205.960 | 0 | 0 | 544.040 | 73 |

2003*** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 750.000 | 100 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 1.400.000 | 50% | 700.000 | 19.030 | 680.970 | 97 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 0 | 325.000 | 43 | 425.000 | 57 |

2003*** | 2.926.000 | 50%/100% | 1.335.000 | 618.101 | 266.974 | 20 | 449.925 | 34 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 141.088 | 608912 | 81 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 26.391 | 723.609 | 96 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 6.086 | 664.947 | 89 | 78.967 | 11 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 1.100.000 | 35% | 385.000 | 0 | 179.200 | 47 | 205.800 | 53 |

2003*** | 1.100.000 | 35% | 385.000 | 0 | 385.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 300.000 | 50% | 150.000 | 90.254 | 59746 | 40 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 300.000 | 50% | 150.000 | 0 | 150.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 400.000 | 50% | 200.000 | 0 | 101.856 | 51 | 98.144 | 49 |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 4.200.000 | | 2.250.000 | 250.372 | 1.999.628 | 89 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 5.900.000 | | 2.785.000 | 232.351 | 1.377.809 | 49 | 1.174.840 | 42 |

2003*** | 7.426.000 | | 3.420.000 | 624.187 | 1.418.777 | 41 | 1.377.036 | 40 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

GREECE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 310.000 | 50% | 155.000 | 0 | 155.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 2.250.000 | 50% | 1.125.000 | 0 | 1.125.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 2.569.600 | 50%/100% | 876000 | 423.000 | 0 | 0 | 453.000 | 52 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 200.000 | 50% | 100.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.000 | 100 |

2005** | 370.000 | 50% | 185.000 | 0 | 185.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 40.000 | 50% | 20.000 | 0 | 20.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 200.000 | 75% | 150.000 | 0 | 150.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 75.000 | 75% | 56.250 | 0 | 56.250 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 660.860 | 75% | 495.645 | 0 | 495.645 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 1.050.000 | 25% | 262.500 | 0 | 262.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 2.301.312 | 25% | 575.328 | 0 | 575.328 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 4.019.600 | | 1.388.500 | 423.000 | 412.500 | 30 | 553.000 | 40 |

2005** | 795.000 | | 416.250 | 0 | 416.250 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 5.212.172 | | 2.195.973 | 0 | 2.195.973 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

IRELAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 902.921 | 65% | 586.899 | 586.899 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 3.813.702 | 50% | 1.906.851 | 1.906.851 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 615.552 | 50% | 307.776 | 282.381 | 0 | 0 | 25.395 | 8 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 690.000 | 50%/100% | 450.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 450.000 | 100 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 133.323 | 50% | 66.662 | 28.081 | 0 | 0 | 38.581 | 58 |

2002** | 166.970 | 50% | 83.485 | 47.049 | 0 | 0 | 36.436 | 44 |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 1.539.057 | 35% | 538.670 | 101.934 | 0 | 0 | 436.736 | 81 |

2002** | 5.892.034 | 35% | 2.062.212 | 1.923.687 | 0 | 0 | 138.525 | 7 |

2003*** | 10.181.919 | 35% | 3.367.146 | 350.573 | 0 | 0 | 3.016.572 | 90 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 2.575.301 | | 1.192.231 | 716.914 | 0 | 0 | 475.316 | 40 |

2002** | 9.872.706 | | 4.052.548 | 3.877.587 | 0 | 0 | 174.961 | 4 |

2003*** | 11.487.471 | | 4.124.922 | 632.954 | 0 | 0 | 3.491.967 | 85 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

IRELAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 2.000.000 | 50% | 1.000.000 | 723.061 | 0 | 0 | 276.939 | 28 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 250.000 | 50% | 125.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 125.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 552.000 | 50%/100% | 360.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 360.000 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 200.000 | 50% | 100.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 1.000.000 | 25% | 250.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250.000 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 3.552.000 | | 1.610.000 | 723.061 | 0 | 0 | 886.939 | 55 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 450.000 | | 225.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225.000 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

ITALY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 2.223.026 | 65% | 1.444.967 | 939.228 | 0 | 0 | 505.739 | 35 |

2002** | 1.755.953 | 50% | 877.977 | 0 | 877.977 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 1.755.953 | 50% | 877.977 | 438.989 | 438.989 | 50 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 13.620.747 | 50%/100% | 4.415.200 | 3.826.100 | 112.500 | 3 | 476.600 | 11 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 1.188.367 | 50% | 594.184 | 560.549 | 33.634 | 6 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.373.775 | 50% | 686.887 | 28.182 | 142.248 | 21 | 516.457 | 75 |

2003*** | 1.142.116 | 50% | 571.058 | 285.529 | 0 | 0 | 285.529 | 50 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 1.394.434 | 35% | 488.052 | 0 | 488.052 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.400.000 | 35% | 490.000 | 0 | 490.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 350.000 | 35% | 122.500 | 122.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 4.805.827 | | 2.527.203 | 1.499.778 | 521.686 | 21 | 505.739 | 20 |

2002** | 4.529.728 | | 2.054.864 | 28.182 | 1.510.225 | 73 | 516.457 | 25 |

2003*** | 16.868.816 | | 5.986.735 | 4.673.118 | 551.489 | 9 | 762.129 | 13 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

ITALY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 1.755.953 | 50% | 877.977 | 0 | 877.977 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 1.783.200 | 50% | 891.600 | 445.800 | 0 | 0 | 445.800 | 50 |

2006*** | 4.000.000 | 50% | 2.000.000 | 1.000.000 | 0 | 0 | 1.000.000 | 50 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 9.984.000 | 50%/100% | 3.744.000 | 1.872.000 | 0 | 0 | 1.872.000 | 50 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 265.000 | 50% | 132.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 132.500 | 100 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 1.270.816 | 50% | 635.408 | 486.699 | 75763 | 12 | 72.946 | 11 |

2005** | 1.191.075 | 50% | 595.538 | 51.451 | 0 | 0 | 544.086 | 91 |

2006*** | 1.000.000 | 50% | 500.000 | 39.769 | 0 | 0 | 460.231 | 92 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 13.010.769 | | 5.257.385 | 2.358.699 | 953.740 | 18 | 1.944.946 | 37 |

2005** | 3.239.275 | | 1.619.638 | 497.251 | 0 | 0 | 1.122.386 | 69 |

2006*** | 5.000.000 | | 2.500.000 | 1.039.769 | 0 | 0 | 1.460.231 | 58 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

LATVIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 23.300 | 50% | 11.650 | 0 | 11.650 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 23.300 | | 11.650 | 0 | 11.650 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

LITHUANIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 110.000 | 50% | 55.000 | 48.846 | 0 | 0 | 6.154 | 11 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 30.000 | 50% | 15.000 | 11.618 | 0 | 0 | 3.382 | 23 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 30.000 | 50%/100% | 22.500 | 0 | 22.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 20.000 | 50% | 10.000 | 3.524 | 0 | 0 | 6.476 | 65 |

2005** | 12.000 | 50% | 6.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.000 | 100 |

2006*** | 11.000 | 50% | 5.500 | 1.459 | 0 | 0 | 4.041 | 73 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 10.000 | 75% | 7.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.500 | 100 |

2005** | 8.000 | 75% | 6.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.000 | 100 |

2006*** | 9.000 | 75% | 6.750 | 693 | 0 | 0 | 6.057 | 90 |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 210.000 | 50% | 105.000 | 0 | 105.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 500.000 | 50% | 250.000 | 250.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 170.000 | | 95.000 | 52.370 | 22.500 | 24 | 20.130 | 21 |

2005** | 230.000 | | 117.000 | 0 | 105.000 | 90 | 12.000 | 10 |

2006*** | 550.000 | | 277.250 | 263.771 | 0 | 0 | 13.479 | 5 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

MALTA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 96.763 | 50% | 48.381 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48.381 | 100 |

2005** | 577.446 | 50% | 288.723 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 288.723 | 100 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 321.943 | 50%/100% | 159.000 | 146.999 | 0 | 0 | 12.001 | 8 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 190.944 | 50%/100% | 132.972 | 132.538 | 0 | 0 | 434 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 600.901 | 50% | 300.451 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300.451 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 8.196 | 50% | 4.098 | 4.098 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 600.000 | 50% | 300.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300.000 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 1.619.607 | | 807.832 | 146.999 | 0 | 0 | 660.833 | 82 |

2005** | 577.446 | | 288.723 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 288.723 | 100 |

2006*** | 199.140 | | 137.070 | 136.636 | 0 | 0 | 434 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

NETHER- LANDS | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 794.115 | 65% | 516.175 | 358.570 | 157.605 | 31 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.025.543 | 50% | 512.772 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 512.772 | 100 |

2003*** | 443.732 | 50% | 221.866 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 221.866 | 100 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 324.453 | 50% | 162.227 | 0 | 162.227 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 176.974 | 50% | 88.487 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88.487 | 100 |

2003*** | 1.074.406 | 100% | 761.953 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 761.953 | 100 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 127.421 | 50% | 63.711 | 40.248 | 23.463 | 37 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 208.512 | 50% | 104.256 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104.256 | 100 |

2003*** | 68.680 | 50% | 34.340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.340 | 100 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 1.588.231 | 35% | 555.881 | 555.881 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 2.834.220 | | 1.297.994 | 954.699 | 343.294 | 26 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.411.029 | | 705.515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 705.515 | 100 |

2003*** | 1.586.818 | | 1.018.159 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.018.159 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

NETHER- LANDS | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 310.325 | 50% | 155.163 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 155.163 | 100 |

2005** | 417.325 | 50% | 208.663 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 208.663 | 100 |

2006*** | 470.505 | 50% | 235.253 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 235.253 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 722.500 | 50%/100% | 488.750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 488.750 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 139.674 | 50% | 69.837 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69.837 | 100 |

2005** | 178.620 | 50% | 89.310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89.310 | 100 |

2006*** | 144.093 | 50% | 72.047 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72.047 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 565.000 | 25% | 141.250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141.250 | 100 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 1.172.499 | | 713.750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 713.750 | 100 |

2005** | 595.945 | | 297.973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 297.973 | 100 |

2006*** | 1.179.598 | | 448.550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 448.549 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

PORTUGAL | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 2.663.406 | 65% | 1.731.214 | 1.244.154 | 0 | 0 | 487.060 | 28 |

2002** | 42.000 | 50% | 21.000 | 8.506 | 0 | 0 | 12.494 | 59 |

2003*** | 74.820 | 50% | 37.410 | 0 | 37.410 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 240.666 | 50%/100% | 145.828 | 24.939 | 26.051 | 18 | 94.838 | 65 |

2002** | 5.258.250 | 50% | 2.629.125 | 1.207.750 | 206.250 | 8 | 1.215.125 | 46 |

2003*** | 1.939.868 | 50%/100% | 1.218.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.218.000 | 100 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 764.705 | 50% | 382.353 | 3.100 | 0 | 0 | 379.253 | 99 |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 6.610.230 | 35% | 2.313.581 | 835.351 | 0 | 0 | 1.478.230 | 64 |

2002** | 38.602.391 | 35% | 13.510.837 | 773.205 | 0 | 0 | 12.737.632 | 94 |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 79.808 | 50% | 39.904 | 39.882 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 10.358.815 | | 4.612.880 | 2.147.426 | 26.051 | 1 | 2.439.403 | 53 |

2002** | 43.902.641 | | 16.160.962 | 1.989.462 | 206.250 | 1 | 13.965.250 | 86 |

2003*** | 2.014.688 | | 1.255.410 | 0 | 37.410 | 3 | 1.218.000 | 97 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

PORTUGAL | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 2.291.616 | 50% | 1.145.808 | 0 | 118.500 | 10 | 1.027.308 | 90 |

2005** | 2.568.260 | 50% | 1.284.130 | 0 | 1.284.130 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 667.790 | 50% | 333.895 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 333.895 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 586.000 | 50% | 293.000 | 0 | 293.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 249.700 | 50% | 124.850 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 124.850 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 102.967 | 50% | 51.484 | 0 | 51484 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 95.588 | 50% | 47.794 | 0 | 47.794 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 25.600 | 50% | 12.800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.800 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 94.910 | 50% | 47.455 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47.455 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 50.000 | 50% | 25.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.000 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 75.000 | 75% | 56.250 | 0 | 56.250 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 68.750 | 75% | 51.563 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51.563 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 4.630.000 | 25% | 1.157.500 | 0 | 1.157.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 720.000 | 25% | 180.000 | 0 | 180.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 16.442.150 | 25% | 4.110.537 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.110.537 | 100 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 7.755.493 | | 2.720.247 | 0 | 1.620.484 | 60 | 1.099.763 | 40 |

2005** | 3.458.848 | | 1.568.174 | 0 | 1.568.174 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2006*** | 17.453.990 | | 4.633.645 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.633.645 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

POLAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 60.000 | 50% | 30.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.000 | 100 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 585.000 | 50%/100% | 468.000 | 342.999 | 125.001 | 27 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 150.000 | 50% | 75.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 200.000 | 75% | 150.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 3.600.000 | 50% | 1.800.000 | 33.081 | 0 | 0 | 1.766.919 | 98 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 585.000 | | 468.000 | 342.999 | 125.001 | 27 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 3.660.000 | | 1.830.000 | 33.081 | 0 | 0 | 1.796.919 | 98 |

2006*** | 350.000 | | 225.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225.000 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

SLOVENIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 250.354 | 50% | 125.177 | 72.248 | 52.929 | 42 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 48.000 | 50% | 24.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.000 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 25.760 | 50%/100% | 18.880 | 11.958 | 6.922 | 37 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 35.808 | 50% | 17.904 | 446 | 17.458 | 98 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 6.008 | 75% | 4.506 | 428 | 4.078 | 91 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 50.792 | 50% | 25.396 | 1.982 | 23.414 | 92 | 0 | 0 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 48.000 | | 24.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.000 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 368.722 | | 191.863 | 87.062 | 104.801 | 55 | 0 | 0 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

SPAIN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 521.752 | 65% | 339.138 | 16.100 | 323.039 | 95 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 1.762.821 | 50% | 881.410 | 18.030 | 863.380 | 98 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 923.812 | 50% | 461.906 | 156.149 | 18.631 | 4 | 287.126 | 62 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 40.000 | 50%/100% | 29.000 | 18.850 | 10.150 | 35 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 321.654 | 50% | 160.827 | 55.650 | 105.177 | 65 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 3.905.470 | 50%/100% | 2.477.735 | 1.964.840 | 512.896 | 21 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 76.857 | 50% | 38.429 | 3.874 | 34.554 | 90 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 221.172 | 50% | 110.586 | 9.725 | 100.861 | 91 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 239.793 | 50% | 119.897 | 8.791 | 111.106 | 93 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 11.827.663 | 35% | 4.139.682 | 3.461.836 | 677.846 | 16 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 14.648.841 | 35% | 5.127.094 | 3.629.765 | 1.497.329 | 29 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 15.118.519 | 35% | 2.832.199 | 2.313.710 | 518.489 | 18 | 0 | 0 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 12.466.272 | | 4.546.249 | 3.500.660 | 1.045.589 | 23 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 16.954.488 | | 6.279.917 | 3.713.170 | 2.566.747 | 41 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 20.187.594 | | 5.891.737 | 4.443.489 | 1.161.122 | 20 | 287.126 | 5 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

SPAIN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 719.828 | 50% | 359.914 | 322.440 | 0 | 0 | 37.474 | 10 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 2.866.500 | 50%/100% | 1.911.000 | 1.057.500 | 853.500 | 45 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 183.703 | 50% | 91.852 | 12.342 | 79510 | 87 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 230.236 | 50% | 115.118 | 20.019 | 0 | 0 | 95.099 | 83 |

2006*** | 86.640 | 50% | 43.320 | 15.703 | 0 | 0 | 27.617 | 64 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 6.000 | 75% | 4.500 | 0 | 4.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 6.000 | 75% | 4.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.500 | 100 |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 22.238.597 | 25% | 5.559.649 | 5.436.071 | 123.578 | 2 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 4.350.804 | 25% | 1.087.701 | 589.870 | 0 | 0 | 497.831 | 46 |

2006*** | 24.683.674 | 25% | 6.170.918 | 4.393.144 | 0 | 0 | 1.777.775 | 29 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 25.294.799 | | 7.567.001 | 6.505.913 | 1.061.087 | 14 | 0 | 0 |

2005** | 5.306.868 | | 1.567.233 | 932.329 | 0 | 0 | 634.904 | 41 |

2006*** | 24.770.314 | | 6.214.238 | 4.408.847 | 0 | 0 | 1.805.392 | 29 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

SWEDEN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 316.905 | 65% | 205.988 | 202.498 | 0 | 0 | 3.491 | 2 |

2002** | 316.905 | 50% | 158.453 | 21.856 | 0 | 0 | 136.597 | 86 |

2003*** | 766.904 | 50% | 383.452 | 9.916 | 0 | 0 | 373.536 | 97 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 327.833 | 50%/100% | 305.285 | 113.748 | 0 | 0 | 191.537 | 63 |

2002** | 273.195 | 50%/100% | 191.237 | 54.639 | 0 | 0 | 136.598 | 71 |

2003*** | 611.415 | 50%/100% | 469.945 | 2.829 | 0 | 0 | 467.116 | 99 |

Art. 2(c): training of staff: |

2001* | 16.392 | 50% | 8.888 | 8.888 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 49.174 | 50% | 24.587 | 2.867 | 0 | 0 | 21.720 | 88 |

2003*** | 27.319 | 50% | 13.660 | 832 | 0 | 0 | 12.828 | 94 |

Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: |

2001* | 1.016.282 | 35% | 355.699 | 267.812 | 0 | 0 | 87.886 | 25 |

2002** | 611.955 | 35% | 214.184 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 214.184 | 100 |

2003*** | 4.458.529 | 35% | 1.560.485 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.560.485 | 100 |

Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: |

2001* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2002** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

TOTAL: |

2001* | 1.677.412 | | 875.860 | 592.947 | 0 | 0 | 282.914 | 32 |

2002** | 1.251.229 | | 588.461 | 79.362 | 0 | 0 | 509.098 | 87 |

2003*** | 5.864.167 | | 2.427.542 | 13.578 | 0 | 0 | 2.413.964 | 99 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. |

SWEDEN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: |

2004* | 87.430 | 50% | 43.715 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.715 | 100 |

2005** | 111.200 | 50% | 55.600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55.600 | 100 |

2006*** | 120.000 | 50% | 60.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: |

2004* | 262.320 | 50%/100% | 176.160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 176.160 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 166.070 | 50% | 83.035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.035 | 100 |

2006*** | 130.000 | 50% | 65.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(d): training: |

2004* | 132.790 | 50% | 66.395 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66.395 | 100 |

2005** | 40.000 | 50% | 20.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.000 | 100 |

2006*** | 22.000 | 50% | 11.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.000 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: |

2004* | 474.400 | 50% | 237.200 | 20.704 | 0 | 0 | 216.496 | 91 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: |

2004* | 0 | | | | | | | |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | |

Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools |

2004* | 230.000 | 75% | 172.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 172.500 | 100 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 210.000 | 75% | 157.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 157.500 | 100 |

Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: |

2004* | 5.700.000 | 25% | 1.425.000 | 76.008 | 0 | 0 | 1.348.992 | 95 |

2005** | 0 | | | | | | | |

2006*** | 18.000.000 | 25% | 4.500.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.500.000 | 100 |

TOTAL: |

2004* | 6.886.940 | | 2.120.970 | 96.712 | 0 | 0 | 2.024.258 | 95 |

2005** | 317.270 | | 158.635 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 158.635 | 100 |

2006*** | 18.482.000 | | 4.793.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.793.500 | 100 |

*The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. |

UNITED KINGDOM | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution |

| | | | | | | | |

Art. 2(a): IT equipment: |

2001* | 232.404 | 65% | 151.063 | 86.342 | 64721 | 43 | 0 | 0 |

2002** | 132.802 | 50% | 66.401 | 66.401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2003*** | 527.662 | 50% | 263.831 | 150.367 | 0 | 0 | 113.464 | 43 |

Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: |

2001* | 0 | | | | |