Letno poročilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o prizadevanjih držav članic v letu 2005, da bi dosegle trajnostno ravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi {SEC(2006) 1799} /* KOM/2006/0872 končno */





[pic] | KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI | Bruselj, 9.1.2007 COM(2006) 872 konč. LETNO POROČILO KOMISIJE SVETU IN EVROPSKEMU PARLAMENTU o prizadevanjih držav članic v letu 2005, da bi dosegle trajnostno ravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi {SEC(2006) 1799} VSEBINA 1. Uvod… 4 2. Upravljanje flote po reformi skupne ribiške politike 4 3. Povzetek letnih poročil držav članic 4 a) Opis flot v razmerju do stanja v ribištvu 5 b) Vpliv shem zmanjševanja napora na zmogljivost 5 c) Prednosti in slabosti 10 d) Skladnost z režimom vstopa/izstopa in referenčnimi ravnmi 10 4. Zaključki Komisije 11 Tehnična priloga 1 – Pregledne tabele in grafi 13 a) Režim vstopa/izstopa 13 b) Referenčne ravni (matična flota) 13 c) Upravljanje referenčnih ravni flote v najbolj oddaljenih regijah 14 d) Merjenje tonaže 14 e) Register ribolovne flote Skupnosti 14 Tehnična priloga 2 – Rezultati po državah članicah (brez najbolj oddaljenih regij) 22 Belgija 26 Danska 29 Nemčija 32 Estonija 35 Grčija 37 Španija 40 Francija 43 Irska 46 Italija 49 Ciper 52 Latvija 54 Litva 56 Malta 58 Nizozemska 60 Poljska 63 Portugalska 65 Slovenija 68 Finska 70 Švedska 73 Združeno kraljestvo 77 Tehnična priloga 3 – Rezultati upravljanja flot najbolj oddaljenih regij 79 1. UVOD Člen 14 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002[1] in člen 12 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1438/2003[2] zahtevata, da države članice Komisiji vsako leto do 1. maja predložijo poročilo o svojih prizadevanjih v predhodnem letu, da bi dosegle trajnostno ravnovesje med zmogljivostjo flote in razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi možnostmi. Poročila držav članic so na voljo na spletni strani „Europa“[3]. Komisija je na podlagi teh poročil in podatkov iz Registra ribolovne flote Skupnosti[4] sestavila zbirno poročilo za leto 2005, ki ga je predložila ‘Znanstvenemu, tehničnemu in gospodarskemu odboru za ribištvo’ (STEFC) in ‘Odboru za ribištvo in ribogojstvo’. Komisija v tem poročilu Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu predstavlja navedeno zbirno poročilo, ki so mu priložena mnenja zgoraj navedenih odborov. To poročilo je razdeljeno na dva dela: - v prvem delu so opisana pravila, ki jih morajo države članice upoštevati pri upravljanju svojih flot, in povzete informacije, predložene v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1438/2003 o pravilih za izvajanje politike flote Skupnosti; - iz drugega dela je razviden razvoj zmogljivosti flot držav članic v letu 2005 v obliki številčnih tabel in grafov, ki vsebujejo ustrezne informacije o upravljanju vstopov in izstopov plovil za vsako posamezno nacionalno floto. 2. UPRAVLJANJE FLOTE PO REFORMI SKUPNE RIBIšKE POLITIKE V skladu s skupno ribiško politiko (SRP), sprejeto decembra 2002, poteka upravljanje ribolovne flote po splošnem pravilu, da nova zmogljivost, vpeljana v floto, izražena v tonaži in moči, ne sme biti večja od zmogljivosti, ki je bila umaknjena iz flote (glej Tehnično prilogo 1). 4. POVZETEK LETNIH POROčIL DRžAV čLANIC Letos je svoja letna poročila v predvidenem roku do 30. aprila 2006 ponovno oddalo samo deset držav članic; ostala poročila so prispela z zamudo (Italija ali Francija sta, na primer, svoja poročila oddali več mesecev po danem roku). Združeno kraljestvo letnega poročila ni oddalo. Poleg tega informacije iz poročil držav članic niso homogene, hkrati pa tudi ni bila vedno upoštevana oblika/vsebina letnih poročil. Države članice so ponovno tudi presegle dolžino poročila, ki naj bi obsegala največ 10 strani, priložile pa so tudi številne priloge in pojasnjevalne tabele. Zgoraj navedena neskladja so bila problematična za skupno oceno poročil držav članic, Komisija pa je imela resne težave pri upoštevanju svojega roka (31. julij 2006) za predložitev zbirnega poročila STEFC in Odboru za ribištvo in ribogojstvo. a) Opis flot v razmerju do stanja v ribištvu Letna poročila držav članic so zagotovila splošen opis ribolovnih flot po številu plovil, zmogljivosti, ciljnih vrstah in ribolovnih območjih. Poleg tega so države članice uporabile različne segmentacijske sisteme; nekatere so obdržale staro MAGP IV segmentacijo, druge so uporabile svoje lastne segmentacijske sisteme. Na splošno se segmentacija nacionalne flote izvaja na naslednji način: - MAGP IV segmentacijo uporabljajo Nemčija, Francija, Portugalska, Finska in Irska (z nekaj dodatki); - segmentacija po vrsti plovil/ribolovni opremi/celotni dolžini se uporablja na Danskem in Cipru; - segmentacija po celotni dolžini in ribolovni opremi se uporablja v Grčiji in Sloveniji; - segmentacija po ribolovni opremi se uporablja v Belgiji; - segmentacija po geografskih ribolovnih območjih in vrsti ribiških plovil se uporablja v Španiji, Latviji, Litvi in na Poljskem; - segmentacija po celotni dolžini, ribolovnih območjih, uporabljeni ribolovni opremi in ulovljenih ribah se uporablja v Estoniji in na Švedskem (razen kadar se ribolovna oprema uporablja kot kažipot); - na Nizozemskem je segmentacija razdeljena na dva dela: na segment ribolovne in matične flote (v glavnem kuterji). Več držav članic je poudarilo, da ima flota za mali priobalni ribolov (ki predstavlja več kot 80 % celotne ribolovne flote Skupnosti) zelo pomemben socialno ekonomski vpliv na priobalne skupnosti. Boljše upravljanje in razvoj tega sektorja je, na primer, prednostna naloga na Švedskem in v Grčiji. Večina držav članic je v svojih poročilih poskusila oceniti ravnovesje med zmogljivostjo njihove ribolovne flote in razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi možnostmi. Za določitev korelacij med razpoložljivimi staleži rib in flotami držav članic so bili uporabljeni različni pristopi. Nekaj držav članic je opravilo analizo razpoložljivih staležev rib, povezanih s spremembami zmogljivosti v vsakem izmed segmentov njihove flote. Nekatere države članice s uporabile bolj socialno ekonomski pristop za ocenitev razvijanja zmogljivosti svoje ribolovne flote. Leta 2005 so države članice izvedle različne ukrepe, da bi dosegle boljše ravnovesje med razpoložljivimi viri in ribolovnimi flotami: zmanjšanje zmogljivosti flot, omejitve ribolovnih dni, omejitev dostopa do virov na nacionalni ravni, omejeno število ribolovnih dovoljenj, dodeljevanje ribolovnih kvot itd. Vse države članice s poročale o postopnem zmanjšanju zmogljivosti flot v letu 2005, tako v BT in kW, ki je bilo doseženo v glavnem s pomočjo shem za razgradnjo. b) Vpliv shem zmanjševanja napora na zmogljivost Kot je bilo že omenjeno zgoraj, so v letu 2005 v državah članicah veljali različni obnovitveni ukrepi in sheme zmanjševanja napora. Na vse države članice, ki lovijo v Kattegatu, Severnem morju in Skagerraku, zahodni Škotski, v vzhodnem delu Rokavskega preliva, Irskem morju, Biskajskem zalivu, Kantabrijskem morju in Zahodni Iberiji ter Baltskem morju, so vplivali ukrepi za zmanjšanje ribolovnega napora (nekateri izmed njih so določeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 27/2005[5]). Na splošno je izvajanje teh ukrepov vključevalo omejitev števila dni, ki jih plovila lahko preživijo na morju, in uporabljene ribolovne opreme. Večina zadevnih držav članic je poročala o enakomernem skupnem zmanjšanju njihovega ribolovnega napora. Poleg tega so zadevne države članice poročale, da so zmanjšanje svojega ribolovnega napora dosegle v glavnem z uporabo različnih shem za omejitev ribolovnega napora in razgradnjo, tako na ravni Skupnosti kot na nacionalni ravni. Nekatere države članice so navedle, da je pomembno vlogo pri zmanjševanju njihovega ribolovnega napora igralo tudi zvišanje cen goriva v teku leta 2005. V nadaljevanju je nekaj pripomb s strani držav članic v zvezi s shemami zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora v letu 2005: Belgija: leta 2005 so dejavnosti flote pokrivale Severno morje, zahodne vode in Biskajski zaliv, z omejitvami, naloženimi v skladu z Uredbo 27/2005. V vsakem izmed teh območij je flota izvajala načrt obnovitve ali upravljanja (razen flote za ribolov kozic). Poleg tega belgijski sistem predvideva omejitve za skupno število dovoljenih potovalnih dni na plovilo na letni ravni, ki pokriva vsa območja. Razpoložljivost dni na morju na območju obnovitve staleža trske so kot resnično omejitev doživela nekatera plovila v floti z vlečnimi mrežami z gredjo. Skupno število dni na morju za celotno floto ni bilo preseženo, ker nekatera plovila svojih dni niso porabila v celoti. Zaradi omejitve potovalnih dni se ni zgodilo, da razpoložljiva kvota ne bi bila ulovljena. Danska: Vpliv načrta obnovitve staleža trske za Severno morje – v primerjavi z 81330 dnevi na morju v letu 2004 je bilo porabljenih 71642 dni, kar je 12 % zmanjšanje. Medsebojno vplivanje virov in upravljanja flote v smislu omejitev celotnega dovoljenega ulova/kvot in napora/zmogljivosti je bilo obravnavano v raziskovalnem projektu. Zaključek z ekonomskega vidika, v katerem se ekonomski dosežek flote pri izrabi staležev rib visoko ceni, je ta, da bi se morala velikost flote zmanjšati. V analizi 4 kratkoročnih scenarijev se število plovil bistveno zmanjša v vseh primerih, razen kadar je dejavnost plovil (dni na morju) omejena. Dolgoročno bi se lahko večji pričakovani dobiček ustvaril z obnovljenim staležem. Enakovreden dobiček bi lahko ustvarilo tudi ustrezno upravljanje flote, ki je primerljivo upravljanju staležev rib. Delo, katerega cilj je določiti dejansko ravnovesje med velikostjo flote in ribolovnimi možnostmi, se nadaljuje. Nemčija: Zaradi majhne velikosti ribolovne flote so sheme zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora imele zgolj omejen učinek na ribolovno zmogljivost, in sicer skoraj izključno na ribolov v Baltskem morju. V kontekstu sistema upravljanja flote, katerega namen je ustvariti trajnostno ravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in razpoložljivimi viri, mora nemška ribolovna flota obdržati zadostno skupno zmogljivost, da bi lahko uporabila kvote, ki so dodeljene Nemčiji. Razvoj nemških ribolovnih flot kaže, da se je le-ta prilagodila tako ekonomskim razmeram, ki jih je ustvarila nova SRP, kakor tudi omejeni razpoložljivosti virov. Zaradi tega nemškim oblastem ni bilo treba ukrepati pri razvoju flote. Estonija: sledi zmanjšanju celotnega dovoljenega ulova za trske v Baltskem morju in obnovitvenem načrtu Organizacije za ribištvo severozahodnega Atlantika v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 27/2005. Grčija: uporabljeni niso bili nikakršni načrti upravljanja ali obnovitve staležev, in sicer zaradi odsotnosti teh načrtov za sredozemsko ribištvo, se pa v okviru Operativnega programa za ribištvo nadaljuje izvajanje ukrepov prilagajanja za zmogljivost flote in ribolovne možnosti v skladu z uredbama Sveta (ES) št. 2792/1999 in 2369/2002. Španija: je obdržala pristop obnovitve in posodobitve flote, s katerim je pričela leta 2003, v skladu z določbami Uredbe 2371/2002. Na ta način je bilo z upravljanjem vstopov in izstopov mogoče ohraniti rahlo zmanjšanje zmogljivosti flote in posledično tudi skupnega ribolovnega napora. V teku leta 2005 sta bila izvedena dva nacionalna načrta na ribolovnem območju zaliva Cadiz. Ta načrta zadevata obnovitev in trajnostno upravljanje ribolova z vlečno mrežo oziroma zaporno plavarico, v svoji osnovi pa vsebujeta ukrepe za zmanjševanje napora. Z omejitvijo števila dni je bilo mogoče ribolovni napor glede na pretekla leta zmanjšati za približno 32 %. Francija: Zmogljivost francoske celinske flote je vse leto 2005 ostala stabilna; za razgradnjo v letu 2005 ni bilo dodeljene nikakršne državne pomoči. Za leto 2006 je predvidena nova shema za razgradnjo, ki je osredotočena na floto, usmerjeno v prekomerno izkoriščene staleže. Omejitve ribolovnega napora, sprejete v okviru načrtov obnovitve ali določb Priloge IV k uredbi o celotnem dovoljenem ulovu in kvotah, zadevajo približno 850 plovil; ti ukrepi v letu 2005 niso povzročili nikakršnega zmanjšanja zmogljivosti. Irska: irsko ribištvo, ki spada v okvir načrtov obnovitve staležev, je zelo mešane narave. Zaradi tega je težko oceniti vpliv shem zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora na ribolovno zmogljivost. Da bi upoštevali Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 27/2005, je Irska uvedla sistem, s katerim so ribiška plovila, ki lovijo na posebej določenih območjih z uporabo posebej določene ribolovne opreme, dolžna izpolniti „Uradno izjavo o številu dni na morju“. Poleg ukrepov, ki so usmerjeni v napor in povezani z večletnim načrtom obnovitve staleža trske v Irskem morju in zahodni Škotski, obstaja tudi splošni nadzorni mehanizem napora, ki se uporablja za pridnene vrste na splošno (kakor tudi za rakovice in pokrovače) v vseh vodah okrog Irske. Irska je spremljala ravni napora pri tem ribištvu in uvedla ukrepe upravljanja, da bi floto ohranila znotraj razporeditev ribolovnega napora. Leta 2005 je irski minister za pomorstvo predstavil novo shemo za odstranitev do 25 % starejših, večjih in dejavnejših plovil (večnamenskih in z vlečno mrežo) v pridnenih sektorjih flote in hkrati za odpravo presežne zmogljivosti v floti za ribolov pokrovač. Leta 2005 se je v skladu s to shemo iz flote umaknilo 22 plovil (skupaj 2464 BT in 7742 kW). Italija: padajoči trend pri izkrcavanju, zabeležen v letu 2005, je mogoče pripisati zmanjšanju tako števila plovil kot obsegu dejavnosti. V tej zvezi je treba opomniti, da so cene goriva najbolj vplivale na skupno število ribolovnih dni, pri čemer so mnogi izvajalci dejavnosti morali spremeniti svojo ribolovno strategijo, t.j. omejiti svoj ribolovni napor, da bi zajezili operativne stroške. Leta 2005 je načrt zmanjševanja ribolovne zmogljivosti s pomočjo državne pomoči, tako kot v preteklih letih, dal dobre rezultate. Čeprav ni vplival na oceno v zvezi s skladnostjo z režimom vstopa/izstopa, je prišlo do absolutnega zmanjšanja ribolovnega napora v italijanskih vodah. Ciper: dve plovili za lov s pridneno vlečno mrežo sta bili razrezani, dve pa dodeljeni lokalnim muzejem. Skupaj je bilo iz flote trajno umaknjenih 2864 BT in 5423 kW. Latvija: v teku leta 2005 je bilo z državno pomočjo razrezanih 31 plovil; vsa ta plovila so bila umaknjena iz flote Baltskega morja. Glavni razlog, zaradi katerega so lastniki teh plovil zaprosili za razgradnjo, je bilo slabo stanje ribjih staležev v Baltskem morju. Ker še posebej slabo kaže staležem trske, so večino razgrajenih plovil predstavljala plovila za ribolov trsk. Drug pomemben razlog za razrez je bila starost in slaba tehnična zmogljivost plovil, kakor tudi velik porast cen goriva in drugih stroškov ribolovnih dejavnosti. Skupni vpliv sheme zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora, kakor tudi zmanjšanja latvijske ribolovne flote z izvozom ali razrezom plovil brez državne pomoči, je 11 % zmanjšanje zmogljivosti plovil za ribolov trsk. Od 1. maja 2004 to zmanjšanje zmogljivosti pozitivno vpliva na staleže trsk, kakor tudi na razmnoževanje tega najbolj pomembnega staleža v Baltskem morju. Litva : leta 2005 se je zmogljivost ribiških plovil, ki delujejo na Baltskem morju in ob njegovi obali, v primerjavi z letom 2004 zmanjšala za 1576 BT in 3104 kW – to je bilo doseženo z razrezom plovil z državno pomočjo. 22 % zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti plovil, ki lovijo v Baltskem morju, je povzročilo povečanje ribolovnih kvot za preostala ribiška plovila. Malta: na splošno so sezonska narava in ribolovni vzorci v teku leta 2005 ostali enaki kot v preteklih letih, ne da bi kar koli kazalo na povečanje ribolovnega napora v katerem koli ribištvu. Izvedene niso bile nikakršne sheme zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora in zato ni mogoče poročati o nikakršnem vplivu na ribolovno zmogljivost. Upravljanje malteškega ribištva je bilo opravljeno v skladu z Uredbo Sveta 813/2004, ki je določilo ukrepe za nadzor ribolovnega napora v vodah okrog Malte. Položaj virov, ki jih izkorišča malteška ribolovna flota, je takšen, da zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti ni potrebno. Nizozemska: nizozemski sektor kuterjev je že več let v zaskrbljujočem položaju zaradi zmanjšanih kvot in močno povečanih stroškov. V preteklih letih so močno upadle zlasti možnosti za ulov morskih plošč. Zaradi tega so oblasti in ribiška industrija oblikovali številne pobude za zmanjšanje pritiska na staleže morskih plošč. Ena izmed teh je razgradnja dela flote in s tem trajno zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti. Zmogljivost se je tako bolj uravnovesila z možnostmi ulova, s čimer se pomaga obnoviti staleže morskih plošč. Druga posledica so boljša finančna pričakovanja za preostale ribiče, pod pogojem da ima vsako plovilo več možnosti ulova. Septembra 2005 je začela veljati uredba o zmanjševanju zmogljivosti morskega ribolova – rezultat tega je bila razgradnja 29 plovil, kar skupaj pomeni 36092 kW in 8982 BT. Deloma je bil rezultat te uredbe tudi zmanjšanje flote kuterjev, kar je pomagalo ustvariti primernejše ravnovesje med floto in obstoječimi ribolovnimi možnostmi. Leta 2005 so bile kW dni nizozemske flote kuterjev v načrtu obnovitve za Severno morje zmanjšane za 15 % v primerjavi z letom 2004. Kar se tiče preostalega dela flote, je mogoče njegovo velikost upravičiti v smislu trenutne velikosti in stanja ribjih staležev. Ustvarjeno zmanjšanje zmogljivosti in zmanjšanje zmogljivosti, uporabljeno leta 2005, je ustvarilo primernejše ravnovesje med velikostjo staležev in velikostjo flote. Poljska: je predstavila shemo zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora v glavnem zaradi močno prekomerne zmogljivosti v ribolovu trske v Baltskem morju, kakor tudi zaradi nizke donosnosti. V teku leta 2005 je bilo razrezanih ali je svojo dejavnost zamenjalo 270 plovil, dosežen pa je bila tudi trajen umik ribolovne zmogljivosti v višini 15564 BT in 42237 kW. Portugalska: na floto so vplivale naslednje omejitve napora: za lov s potegalkami (sardine), načrt obnovitve za južnega osliča (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 27/2005), lov na grenlandsko morsko ploščo v območju NAFO ter predpisi o globokomorskih vrstah. V zvezi s slednjim je Portugalska uporabila sistem za izdajo dovoljenj, da bi plovilom omejila dostop do globokomorskega ribolova. Leta 2005 je bilo odobrenih 34 predlogov za zmanjšanje, pri čemer je bilo 25 plovil iz segmenta matične flote razrezanih že v teku leta, kar je povzročilo zmanjšanje v višini 5011 BT in 10123 kW. Slovenija: ne more poročati o nikakršnih vplivih na ribolovno zmogljivost, ki bi izhajale iz shem zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora, ker za ribištvo v Sredozemlju ni bilo sprejetih nikakršnih načrtov upravljanja ali obnovitve. Hkrati za ribiška plovila ni nikakršnih shem za razgradnjo ali umik. Finska: izdelana je bila posebna shema zmanjševanja ribolovne zmogljivosti. Razlog za to je ugotovljena prevelika zmogljivost v ribolovu sledi in papalin, kakor tudi prepoved uporabe viseče mreže v Baltskem morju. Finska je to shemo zmanjševanja zmogljivosti uvedla za segment plovil s pelagičnimi vlečnimi mrežami in mirujočo opremo. Z državno pomočjo je bilo umaknjenih 1378 BT in 6025 kW. Napor flote za pelagični ribolov se je občutno zmanjšal – za približno 15 % v letih 2003–2005. Leta 2005 se je močno zmanjšal tudi ribolov z vlečno in mirujočo opremo za lov pridnenih vrst – za približno 79 % - vendar pa to zadeva le manjši ulov in zgolj nekaj plovil. V največji meri pa se je v preteklih letih zmanjšal ribolovni napor pri lovu na lososa, postrv in sladkovodne vrste: za približno 88 %. Švedska: v okviru večletnih načrtov upravljanja in obnovitve v Severnem morju, Skagerraku in Kattegatu se je ribolovna zmogljivost postopoma zmanjševala, in sicer zaradi manjšega skupnega dovoljenega ulova in manjšega števila dni na morju. Dodatno so zmogljivost zmanjšala nacionalna pravila, ki vključujejo prilagoditve omejitve ribolova z vlečno mrežo, uvedbo obveznih vlečnih mrež, ki se izbirajo po velikosti, in omejitev obalnega ribolova z vlečnimi mrežami in potegalkami. Posebna dovoljenja za ribolov trske v Baltskem morju so omejila zmogljivost za to vrsto ribištva. Zaradi resnega položaja staležev pridnenih vrst v Kattegatu in Skagerraku in ob upoštevanju obalnega ribolova z mirujočo opremo, so ribolovne možnosti v priobalnih območjih omejene znotraj „omejitev za ribolov z vlečnimi mrežami“. Te omejitve so pomenile prepoved ribolova z zapornimi plavaricami v dveh dodatnih fjordskih sistemih. Za ribolov z zapornimi plavaricami pod lučmi so bile uvedene časovne omejitve. Omejene so bile tudi ribolovne možnosti za pelagični ribolov sledi, največja plovila za pelagični ribolov pa ne smejo več imeti dovoljenja za obalni ribolov. Pelagični ribolov z vlečnimi mrežami je bil prepovedan na območjih, ki so zlasti pomembna za ribiče, ki lovijo z vršami. Če povzamemo, je večina držav članic potrdila, da so veljavne sheme zmanjševanja ribolovnega napora obrodile dobre rezultate in pomagale pri doseganju boljšega ravnovesja med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in ribolovnimi možnostmi. Poleg tega so nekatere države članice navedle, da je treba ukrepe za zmanjševanje zmogljivosti in ribolovnega napora v prihodnosti okrepiti. Belgija je, na primer, ugotovila, da njihovi ribiči že dolgo časa vedo, da staleži rib niso na isti ravni kot pred desetimi leti. Zaradi tega se strinjajo, da je treba ukrepati v smeri manjše ranljivosti staležev rib ter zmanjšati floto, da bi tisti, ki bi preživeli, lahko na ekonomsko uspešen način ohranili trajnostno naravo ribištva. Vendar pa morajo omejitve, ki so rezultat načrtov obnovitve in upravljanja, obroditi vidne sadove že v kratkem ali srednje dolgem času, če naj ostanejo verodostojne in sprejemljive za ribiče. Študija, izvedena v Belgiji, je pokazala, da je treba iz belgijske flote umakniti 10000 kW (15 % trenutne zmogljivosti flote), da bi se na podlagi veljavne stroškovne strukture in možnosti ulova stroški povrnili v kratkem roku. Na enak način je tudi Švedska opozorila, da je zmanjšanje zmogljivosti zaželeno zaradi doseganja ravnovesja med zmogljivostjo in možnostmi. To je tudi predpogoj za ustvarjanje dolgoročne sposobnosti preživetja ribolovne flote. Staleži rib bodo verjetno ostali na isti ravni tudi v naslednjih nekaj letih, zato je mogoče pričakovati neprekinjeno zmanjševanje velikosti flote. Da bi se ustvarilo ravnovesje med ribolovno zmogljivostjo in viri, je treba upravljanje flote povezati z drugimi ukrepi, kot so ukrepi, usmerjeni v razdelitev kvot in ribolovne možnosti ter napor in omejitve pri opremi. c) Prednosti in slabosti Vse države članice so upoštevale režim vstopa/izstopa. V večini primerov so bili podatki iz registrov nacionalnih flot uspešno posredovani Komisiji v skladu z Uredbo 26/2004. Vendar pa je ostalo nekaj organizacijskih težav in težav na področju obdelave podatkov, kar je v glavnem posledica omejene upravne zmogljivosti v nekaterih državah članicah. Kljub tem težavam se je kakovost podatkov, ki so jih Komisiji poslale države članice, v teku leta 2005 bistveno izboljšala. Ena izmed pomembnih nalog je bil stalni postopek navzkrižnega preverjanja podatkov iz Registra flote in preverjanja „opozoril“. Skoraj vse države članice so v letu 2005 imele funkcionalne celostne informacijske sisteme na področju ribištva, ki so pogosto vsebovali različne programske aplikacije (register flote, upravljanje zmogljivosti, dovoljenja, izkrcanja, razpoložljive kvote, poročanje o ulovu itd.). Leta 2005 so bile na Irskem in Švedskem predstavljene nove verzije celostnih sistemov IT na področju ribištva. Na uvedbi celostnega informacijskega sistema na področju ribištva je delala tudi Slovenija. Ti sistemi v večini primerov povezujejo nekaj upravnih organov med seboj, kakor tudi osrednji upravni organ z lokalnimi, s čimer se znatno okrepi uprava nacionalne ribolovne flote. Poleg tega so države članice zatrdile, da so njihovi nacionalni registri točni, popolni in posodobljeni. d) Skladnost z režimom vstopa/izstopa in referenčnimi ravnmi Vse države članice so v svojih poročilih navedle, da v celoti delujejo v skladu s pravili vstopa/izstopa. Skladnost z režimom vstopa/izstopa in referenčnimi ravnmi (če je primerno) ob koncu leta 2005 je določena v Tehničnih prilogah 1 in 2 z uporabo formule, določene v Uredbi komisije (ES) št. 1438/2003. Navedeni tehnični prilogi, ki temeljita na podatkih iz Registra flote Skupnosti, nudita celostne informacije o usklajenosti za Skupnost in tudi po državah članicah. 4. ZAKLJUČKI KOMISIJE Kakovost poročil, ki so jih predložile države članice, se je v primerjavi z letom 2004 izboljšala. Nekatere države članice so predložile zelo podrobna poročila, ki so včasih vsebovala več informacij, kot so jih bile dolžne posredovati. Vendar pa druge države članice niso upoštevale roka za oddajo ali zahteve glede oblike in vsebine, določene v členu 13 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1438/2003; v času sestave osnutka tega poročila svojega letnega poročila še vedno ni oddalo Združeno kraljestvo. Države članice so v svojih poročilih poudarile izvajanje sistema upravljanja nacionalne flote, ocena ravnovesja med zmogljivostjo ribolovnih flot in razpoložljivostjo ribolovnih možnosti pa je bolj popolna kot v prejšnjih poročilih. Rezultati za matično floto (flota Skupnosti razen plovil, registriranih v najbolj oddaljenih regijah): Glede na Register flote Skupnosti se je v triletnem obdobju od leta 2003 do 2005 skupna zmogljivost flote Skupnosti držav članic EU-15 zmanjšala za 117000 BT in 499000 kW, kar predstavlja 6,27 % neto zmanjšanje tonaže in 7,28 % zmanjšanje moči flote EU-15. Neto zmanjšanje v teku leta 2005 je znašalo približno 50000 BT, medtem ko je leta 2004 znašalo 23000 BT, leta 2003 pa 44000 BT. Ta zmanjšanja se zdijo relativno majhna, če upoštevamo visoke ravni ribolovnega pritiska na večini področij ribištva Skupnosti, zlasti pa pri ribolovu pridnenih vrst. V novih državah članicah, ki so to postale 1. maja 2004, je bila zmogljivost flote zmanjšana za 41000 BT in 101000 kW, kar predstavlja 18 % zmanjšanje tonaže in 18 % zmanjšanje moči njihovih flot v primerjavi z njihovo ribolovno zmogljivostjo na dan pristopa. V letih 2003, 2004 in 2005 je bilo iz flote EU z državno pomočjo umaknjenih približno 132000 BT in 427000 kW, kar pomeni, da te zmogljivosti ni mogoče nadomestiti. Precejšnja večina (112000 BT in 373000 kW) te zmogljivosti, ki je bila umaknjena z državno pomočjo, je izhajala iz držav članic EU-15. Zmogljivost, ki so jo nove države članice umaknile z državno pomočjo po 1. maju 2004 je bila 20000 BT in 54000 kW. Tabeli 1 in 2 v Tehnični prilogi 1 povzemata skladnost z režimom vstopa/izstopa in referenčnimi ravnmi 31. decembra 2005. Večina držav članic je upoštevala ta pravila. Grčija ni delovala v skladu z režimom vstopa/izstopa v smislu tonaže, čeprav je njena stopnja neskladnosti zelo majhna, ker je bila zgornja meja tonaže presežena le za 0,29 %. Grške oblasti oceno Komisije izpodbijajo; po njihovem mnenju je Grčija ravnala v skladu z režimom vstopa/izstopa. Tabeli 3 in 4 v Tehnični prilogi 1 zagotavljata povzetek sprememb zmogljivosti flot od 1. januarja 2003 (od 1. maja 2004 pri novih državah članicah) do 31. decembra 2005. Tabeli vključujeta tudi število plovil. Tabela 3 zajema vse države članice. Podrobna ocena za vsako posamezno državo članico je vključena v Tehnično prilogo 2. Rezultati za flote, registrirane v najbolj oddaljenih regijah : Zmogljivost flot, registriranih v najbolj oddaljenih regijah, in njihovih sprememb med 1. januarjem 2003 in 31. decembrom 2005, so prikazane na tabeli 4. Rezultati kažejo, da je bila flota, registrirana v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Španije in Portugalske, bistveno zmanjšana tako po tonaži kot po moči. V francoskih čezmorskih departmajih je prišlo do rahlega zmanjšanja skupnega števila plovil in njihove tonaže ter do povečanja moči. Tabele iz Tehnične priloge 3 prikazujejo podrobnosti uporabe posebnega sistema za te flote. Eden od 17 segmentov najbolj oddaljenih regij je konec leta 2005 presegel referenčno raven v smislu moči (segment ‘4FJ – plovila krajša od 12 m francoskega departmaja Martinique), drug segment pa je presegel svojo referenčno raven po tonaži (segment 'CA3' – plovila dolžine več kot 12 m, registrirana na Kanarskih otokih, ki lovijo v mednarodnih vodah in vodah tretjih držav). Posebni sistem se preneha uporabljati za ta segmenta v trenutku, ko dosežejo svojo najvišjo referenčno raven, uporablja pa se sklic na uredbo[6]. Splošne pripombe Kakor je navedeno zgoraj, to zbirno poročilo temelji na letnih poročilih držav članic in podatkih iz Registra flote Skupnosti. Še vedno obstajajo nekatera neskladja med številkami, ki so jih v svojih poročilih navedle države članice, in številkami, ki izhajajo iz njihovih izjav v Registru flote Skupnosti. Zahvaljujoč državam članicam in prizadevanjem Komisije, da sinhronizira njihove podatke, ta odstopanja s stališča upravljanja flote niso pomembna. Vendar pa je treba še naprej delati na odpravljanju razlik. V vsakem primeru podatki, ki so jih države članice predstavile v svojih nacionalnih poročilih, ne spreminjajo zaključkov tega poročila. V skladu s členom 16 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 morajo tiste države članice, ki ne ravnajo v skladu s členi 11, 13 in 15 te uredbe, zmanjšati svoj ribolovni napor na raven, ki bi obstajala, če bi ravnale v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi členi. Poleg tega lahko za njih velja sorazmerna ukinitev finančne pomoči Skupnosti po FIUR. Da bi se izboljšala kakovost letnih poročil, namerava Komisija skupaj z Odborom za ribištvo in ribogojstvo določiti podrobnejše smernice glede njihove vsebine in vpeljati skupen usklajen metodološki pristop z večjim poudarkom na analizi razvoja ribolovnih zmogljivosti v povezavi z razpoložljivimi staleži rib. Ta vprašanja se bodo obravnavala na naslednjih sejah Odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo. V prihodnjih letnih poročilih je treba več pozornosti nameniti prispevku novega režima, sprejetega leta 2002, za upravljanje flote Skupnosti, da bi dosegli boljše ravnovesje med flotami in staleži rib. Bolje mora biti opredeljen in ocenjen vpliv nacionalnih shem za razgradnjo, zlasti na zmanjševanje ribolovnega napora v ribištvu. TECHNICAL ANNEX 1 – SUMMARY TABLES AND GRAPHS Fleet Management in the reformed Common Fisheries Policy a) Entry/Exit regime From 1 January 2003 Member States have had to respect a strict entry-exit regime applying to the capacity of their fleets, measured in terms of both tonnage and power. Any entry of capacity into the fleet of a Member State has to be compensated by the previous exit of at least the same amount of capacity (ratio 1:1, “at any time”), unless the entry corresponds to works to improve safety, hygiene or living and working conditions on board (Article 11(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002). For entries of new vessels between 100 and 400 GT built with public aid (the administrative decisions granting aid were possible only until 31 December 2004) the Member State has to withdraw 35% more capacity than it introduces (ratio 1:1.35). Another important rule is that capacity leaving the fleet with public aid cannot be replaced. Such capacity is subtracted directly from the fleet and also from the reference level established in accordance with Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, and it therefore counts against the entry/exit regime in the ratio 0:1. Capacity reductions supported with public aid are therefore definitive. All of this means that, as a general rule, the capacity of the national fleets cannot increase with respect to its levels on: - 1 January 2003 for EU-15 Member States in accordance with Article 6 and 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003; - 1 May 2004 for new Member States in accordance with Article 1(2) and 1(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 916/2004. In practice this is likely to be the case. However, the implementing rules for the fleet policy allow for the introduction of vessels outside the framework of the entry/exit regime in the case where administrative decisions have been made by the national authorities: - between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2002 for those vessels to enter the fleet after 1 January 2003 in EU-15 Member States and, - between 1 May 2001 and 30 April 2004 for vessels which enter the fleet after 1 May 2004 in new Member States. These entries have to take place at the most 3 years after the date of the administrative decision (i.e. for EU-15 Member States at the latest by the end of 2005 and for new Member States until 30 April 2007) and must comply with the rules that existed at that time, in particular Article 9 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector. b) Reference Levels (mainland fleet) The reference levels for the fleets of Member States are the sum of the global final objectives of Multiannual Guidance Programme (MAGP IV) as established by Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. The general rule is that Member States may not exceed their reference levels at any time. When a Member State undertakes decommissioning with public aid, these reference levels are automatically reduced by the amount of capacity scrapped. In addition, Member States which gave aid to construction of vessels until the end of 2004 will see their initial 2003 reference level reduced at least by 3% by the end of 2004. Since the reference levels are a legacy of MAGP IV[7] (period 1997 – 2002), the Council decided that they would not apply to the new Member States (Council Regulation (EC) No 1242/2004[8]). c) Management of fleet reference levels in the outermost regions The fishing fleets registered in the Community outermost regions, namely the French Overseas Departments, the Spanish Canary Islands and the Portuguese Azores and Madera have to comply with specific reference levels for these regions in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2004[9] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2104/2004[10]. d) Measurement of tonnage The measurement of the Community fleet is based on Council Regulation (EC) No 3259/94[11] and Commission Decision No 95/84/EC[12]. These legislative acts establish that the tonnage of vessels of 15 m in length or more has to be measured in accordance with the London Convention, i.e. as a function of the vessel’s total enclosed volume, while for vessels of less than 15 m in length, the regulation defines a system of tonnage calculation based on an estimate of the hull’s volume. The fleet should have been entirely measured in accordance with Community law by 31 December 2003. Nevertheless, at the end of 2005, for some Member States there remained number of vessels that were not measured in GT. In cases where the measurement of the fleet has not been completed, the tonnage figures used in this report are a mixture of GT and GRT. That is, for vessels whose GT tonnage is not available the GRT value is used. e) Community Fishing Fleet Register In 2004, the new Community Fleet Register was set up in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 26/2004. It became operational on 1st September 2004. This change was necessary in order to follow up the new rules for managing the fishing capacity of the EU fleet which entered into force on 1st January 2003. This system, following the 2002 CFP reform , gives more responsibility to the Member States in achieving a better balance between the fishing capacity of their fleets and the available resources. The main tool for monitoring the fishing fleet is the Community Fleet Register (CFR). According Commission Regulation (EC) No 26/2004, Member States are obliged on a quarterly basis ("snapshots" shall be sent on the first working day of March, June, September and December) to transmit electronically all relevant information on the characteristics of approximately 88,500 marine fishing vessels, together with information on entries to and exits from the fleet. Furthermore, the CFR is managed via web based application, called the Community Fleet Register On the Net (FRONT). The FRONT is also available for the general public on the following web page: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/fisheries/fleet/index.cfm It is important to note that all information contained in the Technical Annexes 1, 2 and 3 has been taken from the CFR, with the exception of: - data on entries corresponding to administrative decisions taken by national authorities before 1 January 2003 (or 1 May 2004 for the new Member States) and for which the special transitional provisions established in the regulation apply; - data on exits with public aid in some cases where this was not available. Only in these two cases has the information been taken directly from the Member States. Table 1: Compliance with Entry/Exit ceilings at 31 December 2005 (except outermost regions) Member State | GT | kW | Fleet capacity A | Entry/Exit ceiling B | A/B | Fleet capacity C | Entry/Exit ceiling D | C/D | at 31 December 2005 | at 31 December 2005 | Belgium | 22.686 | 23.372 | 97,06% | 65.643 | 66.537 | 98,66% | Denmark | 91.469 | 97.801 | 93,53% | 324.825 | 340.648 | 95,36% | Germany | 63.858 | 71.101 | 89,81% | 158.545 | 167.133 | 94,86% | Estonia | 24.253 | 26.606 | 91,16% | 62.048 | 65.007 | 95,45% | Greece | 93.267 | 92.998 | 100,29% | 537.552 | 544.288 | 98,76% | Spain | 451.377 | 451.447 | 99,98% | 1.050.702 | 1.163.185 | 90,33% | France | 199.225 | 200.904 | 99,16% | 849.783 | 870.669 | 97,60% | Ireland | 84.360 | 84.689 | 99,61% | 208.809 | 222.883 | 93,69% | Italy | 213.095 | 214.165 | 99,50% | 1.223.933 | 1.254.667 | 97,55% | Cyprus | 9.056 | 11.579 | 78,21% | 46.843 | 51.254 | 91,39% | Latvia | 38.580 | 43.033 | 89,65% | 66.209 | 72.609 | 91,19% | Lithuania | 64.386 | 74.911 | 85,95% | 70.655 | 77.462 | 91,21% | Malta | 15.274 | 16.450 | 92,85% | 99.145 | 126.350 | 78,47% | Netherlands | 155.423 | 175.858 | 88,38% | 348.454 | 385.468 | 90,40% | Poland | 30.254 | 31.144 | 97,14% | 105.452 | 107.599 | 98,01% | Portugal | 94.128 | 98.952 | 95,12% | 321.436 | 332.512 | 96,67% | Slovenia | 1.069 | 1.076 | 99,34% | 11.459 | 11.473 | 99,88% | Finland | 17.001 | 18.532 | 91,74% | 171.511 | 184.499 | 92,96% | Sweden | 44.259 | 45.907 | 96,41% | 218.745 | 224.092 | 97,61% | United Kingdom | 218.449 | 236.227 | 92,47% | 881.224 | 933.231 | 94,43% | Data extracted from the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. Bold Italic indicates that the ceiling has been exceeded. Figure 1: Overall evolution of the Community fleet capacity ceiling (except outermost regions)[13] Tonnage of the Community fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] Engine power (kW) of the Community fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Table 2: Compliance with Reference level at 31 December 2005 (MS concerned and except outermost regions) Member State | GT | kW | Fleet capacity A | Reference level B | A/B | Fleet capacity C | Reference level D | C/D | at 31 December 2005 | at 31 December 2005 | Belgium | 22.686 | 23.372 | 97,06% | 65.643 | 66.537 | 98,66% | Denmark | 91.469 | 127.189 | 71,92% | 324.825 | 433.436 | 74,94% | Germany | 63.858 | 84.246 | 75,80% | 158.545 | 175.883 | 90,14% | Greece | 93.267 | 109.732 | 85,00% | 537.552 | 601.443 | 89,38% | Spain | 451.377 | 691.508 | 65,27% | 1.050.702 | 1.579.073 | 66,54% | France | 199.225 | 218.446 | 91,20% | 849.783 | 879.517 | 96,62% | Ireland | 84.360 | 84.689 | 99,61% | 208.809 | 222.883 | 93,69% | Italy | 213.095 | 222.966 | 95,57% | 1.223.933 | 1.298.121 | 94,29% | Netherlands | 155.423 | 204.186 | 76,12% | 348.454 | 491.308 | 70,92% | Portugal | 94.128 | 162.069 | 58,08% | 321.436 | 389.277 | 82,57% | Finland | 17.001 | 21.923 | 77,55% | 171.511 | 210.558 | 81,46% | Sweden | 44.259 | 50.509 | 87,63% | 218.745 | 253.197 | 86,39% | United Kingdom | 218.449 | 269.421 | 81,08% | 881.224 | 1.084.189 | 81,28% | Data extracted from the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. Figure 2: Overall evolution of the Community fleet reference level (EU 15 and except their outermost regions) Tonnage of the Community fleet compared to its reference level. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] Engine power (kW) of the Community fleet compared to its reference level. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Table 3: Summary of Member States fleets evolution from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005 (except outermost regions) 1 January 2003 | 31 December 2005 | Fleet capacity variations | Data extracted from the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. Table 4: Summary of Member States fleets capacity evolution in outermost regions from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005 01/01/2003 | 31/12/2005 | Fleet capacity variations | 24.281 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.281 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 68.083 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68.083 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Belgium | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 24.281 | kWFR | 68.083 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 24.281 | kW03 | 68.083 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 490 | 2.915 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 490 | 2.915 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 711 | kWa | 1.546 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 1.374 | 3.809 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 2.085 | 5.355 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 22.686 | kWt | 65.643 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 23.372 | 66.537 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Belgium | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 23.372 | R(kW)03 | 67.857 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 711 | kWa | 1.546 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 22.686 | kWt | 65.643 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 23.372 | R(kW)t | 66.537 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Belgian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Belgian fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 DENMARK a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 103.318 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 103.318 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 366.738 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 366.738 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Denmark | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 103.318 | kWFR | 366.738 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 103.318 | kW03 | 366.738 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 7.812 | 29.775 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 7.812 | 29.775 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 5.517 | kWa | 26.090 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 14.144 | 45.598 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 19.661 | 71.688 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 91.469 | kWt | 324.825 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 97.801 | 340.648 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Denmark | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 132.706 | R(kW)03 | 459.526 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 5.517 | kWa | 26.090 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 91.469 | kWt | 324.825 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 127.189 | R(kW)t | 433.436 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Danish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Danish fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 GERMANY a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 66.844 | 47 | 0 | 4.226 | 0 | 71.117 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 161.045 | 221 | 0 | 5.911 | 0 | 167.177 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Germany | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 66.844 | kWFR | 161.045 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 71.117 | kW03 | 167.177 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 10.730 | 24.654 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 10.730 | 24.654 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16 | kWa | 44 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 13.700 | 27.110 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 13.716 | 27.154 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 63.858 | kWt | 158.545 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 71.101 | 167.133 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Germany | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 84.262 | R(kW)03 | 175.927 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16 | kWa | 44 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 63.858 | kWt | 158.545 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 84.246 | R(kW)t | 175.883 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the German fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the German fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 ESTONIA a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 04 and kW 04 ) on 1 May 2004 GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 | 26.606 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.606 | kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 | 65.007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.007 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Estonia | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 26.606 | kWFR | 65.007 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 26.606 | kW04 | 65.007 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 1.014 | 2.738 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 1.014 | 2.738 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 0 | kWa | 0 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 3.367 | 5.698 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 3.367 | 5.698 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 24.253 | kWt | 62.048 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 26.606 | 65.007 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Estonian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Estonian fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 GREECE a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 101.707 | 0 | 0 | 1.469 | 0 | 103.176 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 594.948 | 0 | 0 | 1.394 | 0 | 596.342 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Greece | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 101.707 | kWFR | 594.948 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 103.176 | kW03 | 596.342 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 10.141 | 37.906 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 10.141 | 37.906 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 10.178 | kWa | 52.054 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 8.402 | 43.248 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 18.580 | 95.302 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 93.267 | kWt | 537.552 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 92.998 | 544.288 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level Bold Italic indicates that the ceiling has been exceeded. c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Greece | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 119.910 | R(kW)03 | 653.497 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 10.178 | kWa | 52.054 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 93.267 | kWt | 537.552 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 109.732 | R(kW)t | 601.443 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Greek fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Greek fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 SPAIN a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 465.657 | 22.625 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 488.282 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 1.145.004 | 110.847 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.255.851 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Spain | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 465.657 | kWFR | 1.145.004 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 488.282 | kW03 | 1.255.851 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 1.922 | kW100 | 4.022 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 77.529 | 157.121 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 893 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 80.344 | 161.143 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 37.056 | kWa | 91.258 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 57.568 | 164.187 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 94.624 | 255.445 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 451.377 | kWt | 1.050.702 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 451.447 | 1.163.185 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Spain | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 728.344 | R(kW)03 | 1.671.739 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 1.922 | kW100 | 4.022 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 893 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 37.056 | kWa | 91.258 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 451.377 | kWt | 1.050.702 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 691.508 | R(kW)t | 1.579.073 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Spanish* fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005. [pic] *Excluding the Canary Islands. Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. Power of the Spanish* fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005. [pic] *Excluding the Canary Islands. Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. FRANCE a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 211.824 | 891 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 212.715 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 910.062 | 2.059 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 912.121 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 France | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 211.824 | kWFR | 910.062 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 212.715 | kW03 | 912.121 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 21.667 | 68.034 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 253 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 21.920 | 68.034 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 12.064 | kWa | 41.452 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 22.455 | 86.861 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 34.518 | 128.313 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 199.225 | kWt | 849.783 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 200.904 | 870.669 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 France (excluding the Overseas Departments) | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 230.257 | R(kW)03 | 920.969 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 253 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 12.064 | kWa | 41.452 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 199.225 | kWt | 849.783 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 218.446 | R(kW)t | 879.517 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the French* fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005. [pic] *Excluding the French Overseas Departments. Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. Power of the French* fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005. [pic] *Excluding the French Overseas Departments. Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. IRELAND a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 86.048 | 0 | 0 | 4.363 | 0 | 86.981 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 227.679 | 0 | 0 | 3.103 | 0 | 230.226 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Ireland | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 86.048 | kWFR | 227.679 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 86.981 | kW03 | 230.226 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 25.845 | 58.171 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 25.845 | 58.171 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 2.292 | kWa | 7.343 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 25.242 | 69.699 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 27.534 | 77.042 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 84.360 | kWt | 208.809 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 84.689 | 222.883 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Ireland | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 86.981 | R(kW)03 | 230.226 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 2.292 | kWa | 7.343 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 84.360 | kWt | 208.809 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 84.689 | R(kW)t | 222.883 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Irish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Irish fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 ITALY a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 216.050 | 689 | 563 | 4.402 | 0 | 220.944 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 1.278.427 | 2.405 | 1.745 | 15.296 | 0 | 1.295.517 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Italy | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 216.050 | kWFR | 1.278.427 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 220.944 | kW03 | 1.295.517 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 289 | kW100 | 1.007 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 14.479 | 58.396 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 14.768 | 59.403 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 6.678 | kWa | 40.498 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 11.046 | 73.399 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 17.724 | 113.897 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 213.095 | kWt | 1.223.933 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 214.165 | 1.254.667 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level. c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Italy | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 229.862 | R(kW)03 | 1.338.971 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 289 | kW100 | 1.007 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 6.678 | kWa | 40.498 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 213.095 | kWt | 1.223.933 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 222.966 | R(kW)t | 1.298.121 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Italian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Italian fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 CYPRUS a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 04 and kW 04 ) on 1 May 2004 GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 | 11.935 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.935 | kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 | 52.555 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.555 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Cyprus | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 11.935 | kWFR | 52.555 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 11.935 | kW04 | 52.555 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | -1 | -60 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | -1 | -60 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 356 | kWa | 1.302 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 2.521 | 4.351 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 2.877 | 5.653 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 9.056 | kWt | 46.843 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 11.579 | 51.254 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Cypriot fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Cypriot fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 LATVIA a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 04 and kW 04 ) on 1 May 2004 GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 | 44.452 | 510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44.962 | kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 | 75.817 | 1.451 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77.268 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Latvia | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 44.452 | kWFR | 75.817 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 44.962 | kW04 | 77.268 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 692 | 2.026 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 692 | 2.026 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.929 | kWa | 4.660 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 4.636 | 6.974 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 6.565 | 11.634 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 38.580 | kWt | 66.209 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 43.033 | 72.609 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Latvian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Latvian fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 LITHUANIA a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 04 and kW 04 ) on 1 May 2004 GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 | 76.487 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.487 | kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 | 80.566 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80.566 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Lithuania | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 76.487 | kWFR | 80.566 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 76.487 | kW04 | 80.566 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 11.243 | 12.870 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 11.243 | 12.870 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.576 | kWa | 3.104 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 21.768 | 19.677 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 23.344 | 22.781 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 64.386 | kWt | 70.655 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 74.911 | 77.462 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Lithuanian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Lithuanian fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 MALTA a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 04 and kW 04 ) on 1 May 2004 GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 | 16.450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.450 | kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 | 126.350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 126.350 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Malta | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 16.450 | kWFR | 126.350 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 16.450 | kW04 | 126.350 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 53 | -1.566 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 53 | -1.566 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 0 | kWa | 0 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 1.229 | 25.639 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 1.229 | 25.639 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 15.274 | kWt | 99.145 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 16.461 | 126.323 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Maltese fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Maltese fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 THE NETHERLANDS a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 183.678 | 0 | 0 | 1.133 | 0 | 184.811 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 418.505 | 0 | 0 | 2.722 | 0 | 421.227 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 The Netherlands | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 183.678 | kWFR | 418.505 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 184.811 | kW03 | 421.227 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 4.309 | 19.332 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 27 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 4.336 | 19.332 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 8.980 | kWa | 35.759 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 23.611 | 53.624 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 32.591 | 89.383 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 155.423 | kWt | 348.454 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 175.858 | 385.468 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 The Netherlands | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 213.139 | R(kW)03 | 527.067 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 27 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 8.980 | kWa | 35.759 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 155.423 | kWt | 348.454 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 204.186 | R(kW)t | 491.308 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Dutch fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Dutch fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 POLAND a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 04 and kW 04 ) on 1 May 2004 GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 | 47.324 | 191 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47.515 | kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 | 151.124 | 1.858 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 152.981 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Poland | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 47.324 | kWFR | 151.124 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 47.515 | kW04 | 152.981 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 3.183 | 8.104 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 3.183 | 8.104 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16.371 | kWa | 45.383 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 3.882 | 8.392 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 20.253 | 53.775 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 30.254 | kWt | 105.452 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 31.144 | 107.599 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Polish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Polish fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 PORTUGAL a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 99.757 | 8.629 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108.386 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 332.417 | 22.147 | 0 | 696 | 0 | 355.260 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Portugal | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 99.757 | kWFR | 332.417 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 108.386 | kW03 | 355.260 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 494 | kW100 | 1.273 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 10.867 | 42.253 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 11.361 | 43.527 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 9.260 | kWa | 22.303 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 7.729 | 32.206 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 16.990 | 54.508 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 94.128 | kWt | 321.436 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 98.952 | 332.512 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Portugal (excluding the Azores and Madeira) | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 171.502 | R(kW)03 | 412.025 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 494 | kW100 | 1.273 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 9.260 | kWa | 22.303 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 94.128 | kWt | 321.436 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 162.069 | R(kW)t | 389.277 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Portuguese* fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005. [pic] *Excluding the Azores and Madeira. Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. Power of the Portuguese* fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005. [pic] *Excluding the Azores and Madeira. Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. SLOVENIA a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 04 and kW 04 ) on 1 May 2004 GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 | 1.076 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.076 | kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 | 11.473 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.473 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Slovenia | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 1.076 | kWFR | 11.473 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 1.076 | kW04 | 11.473 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 0 | 9 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 0 | 9 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 0 | kWa | 0 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 7 | 23 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 7 | 23 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 1.069 | kWt | 11.459 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | 1.076 | 11.473 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Slovenian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Slovenian fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 FINLAND a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 19.812 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.812 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 190.136 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 190.136 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Finland | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 19.812 | kWFR | 190.136 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 19.812 | kW03 | 190.136 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 3.233 | 20.570 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 3.233 | 20.570 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.280 | kWa | 5.637 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 4.765 | 33.557 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 6.045 | 39.194 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 17.001 | kWt | 171.511 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 18.532 | 184.499 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Finland | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 23.203 | R(kW)03 | 216.195 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.280 | kWa | 5.637 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 17.001 | kWt | 171.511 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 21.923 | R(kW)t | 210.558 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Finish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Finish fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 SWEDEN a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 45.895 | 0 | 0 | 871 | 0 | 46.766 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 224.662 | 0 | 0 | 2.589 | 0 | 227.251 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 Sweden | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 45.895 | kWFR | 224.662 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 46.766 | kW03 | 227.251 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 2.499 | 22.175 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 76 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 2.575 | 22.175 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 935 | kWa | 3.159 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 3.276 | 24.932 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 4.211 | 28.091 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 44.259 | kWt | 218.745 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 45.907 | 224.092 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 Sweden | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 51.993 | R(kW)03 | 261.028 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 76 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 935 | kWa | 3.159 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 44.259 | kWt | 218.745 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 50.509 | R(kW)t | 253.197 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the Swedish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the Swedish fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 UNITED KINGDOM a) Calculation of the baselines (GT 03 and kW 03 ) on 1 January 2003 GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 | 241.052 | 0 | 0 | 11.848 | 0 | 252.900 | kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 | 942.607 | 0 | 0 | 35.629 | 0 | 978.236 | b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005 United Kingdom | GT | kW | 1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 241.052 | kWFR | 942.607 | 2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 252.900 | kW03 | 978.236 | 3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | 40.218 | 142.518 | 5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | 6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | 40.218 | 142.518 | 7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16.699 | kWa | 45.005 | 8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | 46.123 | 158.926 | 9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | 62.822 | 203.930 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 218.447 | kWt | 881.194 | 11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | 236.201 | 933.231 | Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5) Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level c) Reference levels at the end of 2005 United Kingdom | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 286.120 | R(kW)03 | 1.129.194 | 2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 | 3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - | 4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16.699 | kWa | 45.005 | 10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 218.447 | kWt | 881.194 | 5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 269.421 | R(kW)t | 1.084.189 | (a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings. Tonnage of the British fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Power of the British fleet compared to its power ceiling. Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005* [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 TECHNICAL ANNEX 3 - RESULTS OF THE OUTERMOST REGIONS FLEETS MANAGMENT This annex shows Member States compliance at 31 December 2005, with the capacity levels for outermost regions in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2004 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2104/2004. The reference levels for the outermost regions were fixed for each segment of the fleet on the 1 January 2003. At any later date, the reference level for each segment is calculated by deducting from the initial reference levels the capacity withdrawn with public aid for that particular segment. It is in this way that the graphs presented below have been calculated. Each of the tables summarises the situation on 31 December 2005. d) Management of capacity levels for outermost regions during 2005 Canary Islands (Spain) | CA1 Length < 12 m EU waters | CA2 Length > 12 m EU waters | CA3 Length > 12 m International and third country waters | GT | kW | GT | kW | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | 2.878 | 23.202 | 4.779 | 16.055 | 51.167 | 90.680 | 2 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | 2.114 | 16.541 | 4.019 | 14.749 | 46.202 | 84.118 | 3 | Exits financed with public aid | 147 | 1.188 | 1.334 | 4.189 | 20.906 | 42.177 | 4 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 3 ) | 2.731 | 22.014 | 3.445 | 11.866 | 30.261 | 48.503 | 5 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 | 1.973 | 15.658 | 3.122 | 11.861 | 30.914 | 46.235 | Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006. Bold Italic indicates that the reference level has been exceeded. [pic] [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Management of capacity levels for outermost regions during 2005 Reunion (French Overseas Department) | 4FC Demersal and pelagic species. Length < 12 m | 4FD Pelagic species. Length > 12 m | GT | kW | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | 1.050 | 14.000 | 9.705 | 24.610 | 2 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | 343 | 10.943 | 4.174 | 13.553 | 3 | Exits financed with public aid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 3 ) | 1.050 | 14.000 | 9.705 | 24.610 | 5 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 | 385 | 12.390 | 3.867 | 12.779 | Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Management of capacity levels for outermost regions during 2005 French Guiana | 4FF Demersal and pelagic species. L < 12 m | 4FG Shrimp vessels | 4FH Pelagic species. Offshore vessels | GT | kW | GT | kW | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | 400 | 5.250 | 6.526 | 19.726 | 3.500 | 5.000 | 2 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | 284 | 3.840 | 5.994 | 17.173 | 288 | 1.010 | 3 | Exits financed with public aid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 3 ) | 400 | 5.250 | 6.526 | 19.726 | 3.500 | 5.000 | 5 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 | 356 | 4.628 | 5.499 | 16.092 | 267 | 798 | Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Management of capacity levels for outermost regions during 2005 Martinique (French Overseas Department) | 4FJ Demersal and pelagic species. Length < 12 m | 4FK Pelagic species. Length > 12 m | GT | kW | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | 2.800 | 65.500 | 1.000 | 3.000 | 2 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | 2.065 | 59.005 | 848 | 2.598 | 3 | Exits financed with public aid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 3 ) | 2.800 | 65.500 | 1.000 | 3.000 | 5 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 | 2.272 | 68.480 | 552 | 1.966 | Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 Bold Italic indicates that the reference level has been exceeded. [pic] [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Management of capacity levels for outermost regions during 2005 Guadeloupe (French Overseas Department) | 4FL Demersal and pelagic species. Length < 12 m | 4FM Pelagic species. Length > 12 m | GT | kW | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | 4.100 | 105.000 | 500 | 1.750 | 2 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | 2.465 | 96.814 | 12 | 220 | 3 | Exits financed with public aid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 3 ) | 4.100 | 105.000 | 500 | 1.750 | 5 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 | 2.421 | 102.605 | 12 | 220 | Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Management of capacity levels for outermost regions during 2005 Madeira (Portugal) | 4K6 Demersal species. Length < 12 m | 4K7 Demersal and pelagic species. Length > 12 m | 4K8 Pelagic species. Seine. Length > 12 m | GT | kW | GT | kW | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | 680 | 4.574 | 5.354 | 17.414 | 253 | 1.170 | 2 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | 403 | 2.800 | 3.585 | 12.522 | 193 | 1.006 | 3 | Exits financed with public aid | 30 | 247 | 870 | 2.924 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 3 ) | 650 | 4.327 | 4.484 | 14.490 | 253 | 1.170 | 5 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 | 407 | 3.011 | 2.765 | 9.701 | 193 | 1.006 | Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 d) Management of capacity levels for outermost regions during 2005 Azores (Portugal) | 4K9 Demersal species. Length < 12 m | 4KA Demersal and pelagic species. Length > 12 m | GT | kW | GT | kW | 1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | 2.721 | 20.815 | 14.246 | 36.846 | 2 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | 2.277 | 19.860 | 9.989 | 29.310 | 3 | Exits financed with public aid | 90 | 980 | 952 | 3.128 | 4 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 3 ) | 2.631 | 19.835 | 13.294 | 33.718 | 5 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 | 1.643 | 19.005 | 8.514 | 25.033 | Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [pic] [pic] *Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006 [1] Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 (UL L 358, 31.12.2002, str. 59-80) [2] Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1438/2003 (UL L 204, 12.8.2003, str. 21-28) [3] http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/fleet/index.cfm?method=FM_Reporting.menu [4] Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 26/2004 (UL L 5, 9.1.2004, str. 25-35) [5] Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 27/2005 (UL L 12, 14.1.2005, str. 1 – 151) [6] Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 639/2004 (UL L 102, 7.4.2004, str. 9–11) [7] 4th Multiannual Guidance Programs [8] Council Regulation (EC) No 1242/2004 (OJ L 236 of 7 July 2004, p. 1 – 2) [9] Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2004 (OJ L 102 of 7 April 2004, p. 9 – 11) [10] Commission Regulation (EC) No 2104/2004 (OJ L 365 of 10 December 2004, p. 19 – 21) [11] Council Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 (OJ L 339, 29 December 1994, p. 11 – 13) [12] Commission Decision No 95/84/EC (OJ L 67, 25 March 1995, p. 33 – 36) [13] Increase of the overall fleet capacity on 1 May 2004 is due to the accession of the New Member States.