SK

Brusel, 9.1.2007

KOM(2006) 872 v konečnom znení

VÝROČNÁ SPRÁVA KOMISIE

RADE A EURÓPSKEMU PARLAMENTU

o úsilí členských štátov, ktoré v roku 2005 vynaložili na dosiahnutie trvalo udržateľnej rovnováhy medzi kapacitou rybolovu a možnosťami rybolovu

{SEK(2006) 1799}

OBSAH

1. Úvod (...)4

2. Riadenie flotily v rámci zreformovanej spoločnej politiky v oblasti rybného hospodárstva (...)4

3. Súhrn výročných správ členských štátov (...)4

a) Opis flotíl vzhľadom na stav rybného hospodárstva (...)5

b) Vplyv schém zníženia výlovu na kapacitu (...)5

c) Silné a slabé stránky (...)10

d) Súlad so systémom vstupu/výstupu a s referenčnými úrovňami (...)10

4. ZÁVERY KOMISIE (...)11

Technical Annex 1 – Summary Tables and Graphs (...)13

Fleet Management in the reformed Common Fisheries Policy (...)13

a) Entry/Exit regime (...)13

b) Reference Levels (mainland fleet) (...)13

c) Management of fleet reference levels in the outermost regions (...)14

d) Measurement of tonnage (...)14

e) Community Fishing Fleet Register (...)14

Technical Annex 2 – Results by Member State (excluding outermost regions) (...)22

Belgium (...)26

Denmark (...)29

Germany (...)32

Estonia (...)35

Greece (...)37

Spain (...)40

France (...)43

Ireland (...)46

Italy (...)49

Cyprus (...)52

Latvia (...)54

Lithuania (...)56

Malta (...)58

The Netherlands (...)60

Poland (...)63

Portugal (...)65

Slovenia (...)68

Finland (...)70

Sweden (...)73

United Kingdom (...)76

Technical Annex 3 - Results of the outermost regions fleets managment (...)79

1. Úvod

V článku 14 nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 2371/2002 [1] a článku 12 nariadenia Komisie (ES) č. 1438/2003 [2] sa vyžaduje, aby členské štáty do 1. mája každého roku predložili Komisii správu o svojom úsilí, ktoré počas predchádzajúceho roka vynaložili na dosiahnutie trvalo udržateľnej rovnováhy medzi kapacitou flotily a dostupnými možnosťami rybolovu. Správy členských štátov sú prístupné na internetovej stránke „Europa“ [3]. Na základe týchto správ a údajov z registra rybárskej flotily Spoločenstva [4] Komisia pripravila súhrn za rok 2005, ktorý predložila „Vedeckému, technickému a hospodárskemu výboru pre rybné hospodárstvo“ (VTHVRH) a „Výboru pre rybné hospodárstvo a akvakultúru“. V tejto správe teraz Komisia predstavuje Rade Európskemu parlamentu príslušný súhrn, ktorý sprevádzajú stanoviská uvedených výborov.

Táto správa pozostáva z dvoch častí:

– prvá časť opisuje pravidlá, ktoré musia členské štáty dodržiavať pri riadení svojich flotíl a sumarizuje informácie predložené v súlade s článkom 13 nariadenia Komisie (ES) č. 1438/2003, ktoré stanovuje vykonávacie pravidlá pre politiku flotily,

– druhá časť poukazuje na vývoj kapacity flotíl členských štátov v roku 2005 formou číselných tabuliek a grafov, ktoré obsahujú relevantné informácie o riadení vstupov a výstupov plavidiel v rámci každej národnej flotily.

2. Riadenie flotily v rámci zreformovanej spoločnej politiky v oblasti rybného hospodárstva

Po reforme spoločnej politiky rybného hospodárstva (SPR) prijatej v decembri 2002 sa rybárske flotily riadia všeobecným pravidlom, podľa ktorého nová kapacita, vyjadrená tonážou a výkonom, vstupujúca do flotily, nesmie byť väčšia ako kapacita, ktorá bola z flotily vyradená (pozri technickú prílohu 1).

3. Súhrn výročných správ členských štátov

Tento rok predložilo svoje výročné správy ku konečnému termínu 30. apríla 2006 opäť len desať členských štátov, ostatné správy sa oneskorili (napríklad Taliansko alebo Francúzsko predložili svoje správy niekoľko mesiacov po termíne). Spojené kráľovstvo nepredložilo výročnú správu. Okrem toho informácie v správach členských štátov nie sú jednotné a niekedy nie je dodržaný formát a obsah výročných správ. Niekoľko členských štátov navyše prekročilo maximálnu dĺžku 10 strán na správu a priložilo početné prílohy a vysvetľujúce tabuľky.

V dôsledku vyššie uvedených rozporuplností spoločné posudzovanie správ členských štátov bolo problematické a Komisia musela riešiť vážne problémy, aby predložila súhrnnú správu VTHVRH a Výboru pre rybné hospodárstvo a akvakultúru v termíne (31. júla 2006).

a) Opis flotíl vzhľadom na stav rybného hospodárstva

Výročné správy členských štátov poskytli všeobecný opis rybárskych flotíl, čo sa týka počtu plavidiel, kapacity, cieľových druhov a oblastí rybolovu. Členské štáty okrem toho použili rôzne systémy segmentácie, niektoré členské štáty dodržiavali starú segmentáciu MAGP IV, iné uplatnili svoje vlastné národné systémy segmentácie. Vo všeobecnosti sa dá povedať, že segmentácia národných rybárskych flotíl sa riadi nasledujúcim spôsobom:

– segmentáciu MAGP IV používa Nemecko, Francúzsko, Portugalsko, Fínsko a Írsko (s určitými úpravami),

– podľa typu plavidla/nástrojov na rybolov/celkovej dĺžky v Dánsku a na Cypre,

– podľa celkovej dĺžky a nástrojov na rybolov v Grécku a Slovinsku,

– podľa nástrojov na rybolov v Belgicku,

– podľa loviska rýb a typu rybárskeho plavidla v Španielsku, Lotyšsku, Litve a Poľsku,

– podľa celkovej dĺžky, loviska rýb, typu použitých nástrojov na rybolov a druhov rýb ulovených v Estónsku a Švédsku (s výnimkou použitia loviska rýb ako indikátora),

– je rozdelená na dve časti: akvakultúra a segment kontinentálnej flotily (najmä šalupy) v Holandsku.

Niekoľko členských štátov zdôraznilo, že maloobjemová pobrežná rybárska flotila (čo predstavuje viac ako 80 % celkovej rybárskej flotily Spoločenstva) má veľmi dôležitý socio-ekonomický vplyv na pobrežné spoločenstvá. Lepšie riadenie a vývoj tohto odvetvia sú vytýčené ako prioritné úlohy, napríklad vo Švédsku a Grécku.

Väčšina členských štátov sa vo svojich správach pokúsila hodnotiť rovnováhu medzi ich kapacitou rybárskej flotily a dostupnými možnosťami rybolovu. Členské štáty použili rôzne postupy, aby určili vzájomné vzťahy medzi dostupnými zásobami rýb a ich flotilami. Niekoľko členských štátov urobilo analýzy dostupných zásob rýb v spojení s kapacitnými zmenami v segmentoch flotily. Niektoré členské štáty použili socio-ekonomickejší prístup na hodnotenie vývoja ich kapacity rybárskej flotily.

V roku 2005 členské štáty prijali rôzne opatrenia, aby dosiahli lepšiu rovnováhu medzi dostupnými zásobami a rybárskymi flotilami: zníženia kapacity flotily, obmedzenia rybolovných dní, obmedzené prístupy k zdrojom na vnútroštátnej úrovni, obmedzené počty rybárskych licencií, pridelenie rybárskych kvót atď. V roku 2005 všetky členské štáty informovali o postupnom znižovaní kapacity flotily v BRT aj v kW, ktoré dosiahli najmä prostredníctvom vyraďovacích schém.

b) Vplyv schém zníženia výlovu na kapacitu

Ako sa uvádza vyššie, členské štáty v roku 2005 uplatnili rôzne opatrenia na obnovu zásob a schémy zníženia výlovu. Všetky členské štáty, ktoré lovia v Kattegate, Severnom mori a Skagerraku, v západnom Škótsku, na východe Lamanšského prielivu, v Írskom mori, Biskajskom zálive, Kantabrijskom mori a na západe Pyrenejského poloostrova a v Baltickom mori, boli ovplyvnené schémami zníženia výlovu (niektoré z nich sú ustanovené v nariadení Rady (ES) č. 27/2005 [5]). Vo všeobecnosti implementácia týchto opatrení zahŕňala obmedzenie počtu dní, ktoré plavidlá strávili na mori a používaného rybárskeho náradia.

Väčšina príslušných členských štátov oznámila plynulé celkové zníženie svojho výlovu. Okrem toho príslušné členské štáty oznámili, že zníženie ich výlovu bolo dosiahnuté najmä uplatnením rôznych obmedzení výlovu a vyraďovacích schém na úrovni Spoločenstva aj na národnej úrovni. Niektoré členské štáty poznamenali, že zvýšenie cien pohonných látok v roku 2005 tiež hralo dôležitú úlohu v znížení výlovu. Nasledujú niektoré poznámky členských štátov ohľadom schém výlovu v roku 2005:

Belgicko: v roku 2005 činnosti flotily pokryli Severné more, západné vody a Biskajský záliv s obmedzeniami uloženými v súlade s nariadením 27/2005. V každej z týchto oblastí sa flotila riadila plánom obnovy alebo riadiacim plánom (okrem flotily na lov kreviet). Belgický systém obsahuje navyše obmedzenia na celkový počet dovolených plavebných dní na plavidlo za rok vo všetkých oblastiach.

Prípustné dni na mori v oblasti na obnovu zásob tresky boli vnímané ako oprávnené obmedzenie konkrétnymi plavidlami vo flotile s trámovými vlečnými sieťami. Celkový počet dní na mori celej flotily nebol prekročený, pretože niektoré plavidlá neboli využité naplno. Obmedzenie plavebných dní nespôsobilo nevylovenie dostupnej kvóty.

Dánsko: vplyv plánu na obnovu zásob tresky v Severnom mori – 71 642 dní na mori bolo využitých oproti 81 330 dňom na mori v roku 2004, čo predstavuje pokles o 12 %. Vzájomné pôsobenie medzi zdrojom a riadením flotily podľa TAC/obmedzení kvót a výlovu/kapacity bolo skúmané vo výskumnom projekte. Záver tohto projektu z ekonomického uhla pohľadu je, že ak by bol ekonomický výkon flotily vo využívaní zásob rýb vysoko hodnotený, veľkosť flotily by sa musela znížiť. V analýzach 4 krátkodobých scenárov sa počet plavidiel podstatne znižuje vo všetkých prípadoch, okrem prípadu, keď je činnosť plavidiel (na mori) obmedzená. Z dlhodobého hľadiska by očakávaný zisk mohol byť značný vzhľadom na obnovené zásoby. Avšak rovnaký zisk by sa mohol dosiahnuť prostredníctvom riadneho riadenia flotily, ktoré by bolo porovnateľné s riadením zásob rýb. Práca na vytvorení skutočnej rovnováhy medzi veľkosťou flotily a možnosťami lovu pokračuje.

Nemecko: vzhľadom na malú veľkosť rybárskej flotily schémy zníženia výlovu mali len obmedzený vplyv na kapacitu lovu, obzvlášť čo sa týka lovu v Baltickom mori. V rámci systému riadenia flotily, aby sa vytvorila udržateľná rovnováha medzi kapacitou lovu a dostupnými zdrojmi, nemecká rybárska flotila si musí udržať celkovú kapacitu, aby bola schopná využiť kvóty pridelené Nemecku. Vývoj nemeckej rybárskej flotily ukazuje, že sa prispôsobila ekonomickým podmienkam vytvoreným novou SPR ako aj obmedzenej dostupnosti zdrojov. Toto je dôvod, prečo nemecké orgány nemuseli prijať žiadne opatrenia týkajúce sa rozvoja flotily.

Estónsko: nasleduje zníženie TAC tresky v Baltickom mori a plán obnovy v Organizácii pre rybné hospodárstvo v severozápadnom Atlantiku v súlade s nariadením Rady (ES) č. 27/2005.

Grécko: neboli uplatnené žiadne viacročné riadiace plány ani plány obnovy zásob z dôvodu absencie takýchto plánov v rybnom hospodárstve Stredozemného mora, kým uplatnenie opätovnej regulácie opatrení pre kapacitu flotily a možnosťami rybolovu podľa nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 2792/1999 a 2369/2002 pokračovalo v rámci operačného programu pre rybné hospodárstvo.

Španielsko: si udržalo prístup obnovy flotily a modernizáciu, ktorý začal v roku 2003 v súlade s ustanoveniami nariadenia 2371/2002. Týmto spôsobom riadenie vstupov a výstupov umožnilo udržať mierne zníženie kapacity flotily a následne svojho celkového výlovu.

V roku 2005 boli implementované dva národné plány v lovisku rýb Kadizského zálivu. Tieto sú spojené s obnovou zásob a udržateľným riadením rybolovu vykonávaného vlečnými sieťami a rybolovu vykonávaného navíjacími vlečnými sieťami v danom poradí a v podstate obsahujú opatrenia na zníženie výlovu. Obmedzením počtu dní bolo možné znížiť výlov približne o 32 % v porovnaní s predchádzajúcimi rokmi.

Francúzsko: kapacity francúzskej kontinentálnej flotily sa v roku 2005 nezmenili a nebola udelená žiadna podpora verejných zdrojov na vyradenie. V roku 2006 sa očakáva nová vyraďovacia schéma, ktorá sa zameria na flotilu v preťaženom rybnom hospodárstve. Obmedzenia výlovu prijaté v rámci plánov obnovy alebo podľa ustanovení uvedených v prílohe IV k TAC a regulácii kvót sa týkajú asi 850 plavidiel, ale v roku 2005 neboli zredukované žiadne kapacity v dôsledku týchto opatrení.

Írsko: írske rybné hospodárstvo má rámec plánov obnovy zásob, ktoré sú pomerne rôznorodého charakteru a preto je ťažké hodnotiť vplyv schém zníženia výlovu na kapacitu. Írsko, aby sa zosúladilo s nariadením Rady (ES) č. 27/2005, zaviedlo systém, v ktorom rybárske plavidlá loviace v určitých oblastiach, a ktoré používajú určité nástroje na rybolov, musia podpísať „deklaráciu o dňoch na mori“(Formulár pre hlásenie dni na mori). Popri opatreniach týkajúcich sa výlovu spojených s viacročným plánom obnovy zásob tresky v Írskom mori a západne od Škótska sa taktiež uplatňuje všeobecný kontrolný mechanizmus kontroly pre bentické druhy všeobecne (ako aj kraby a lastúry) vo všetkých vodách okolo Írska. Írsko sledovalo úrovne výlovu v týchto rybných hospodárstvach a zaviedlo riadiace opatrenia, aby udržalo flotilu v rámci prideleného výlovu.

V roku 2005 írsky námorný minister spustil novú schému, aby odstránil až do 25 % starších, väčších a aktívnejších plavidiel v bentických oblastiach (polyvalentné a trámové vlečné) flotily, a tiež aby odstránil nadmernú kapacitu flotily loviacej lastúry. V roku 2005 opustilo flotilu v rámci tejto schémy 22 plavidiel (celkom 2 464 BRT a 7 742 kW).

Taliansko: klesajúci trend vo vykládkach zaznamenaný v roku 2005 možno pripísať zníženiu počtu plavidiel ako aj úrovni aktivít. V tomto spojení by sa malo spomenúť, že ceny pohonných látok mali veľký vplyv na celkový počet dní lovu, kvôli čomu veľa prevádzkovateľov muselo zmeniť stratégiu lovu, t.j. obmedziť ich výlov, aby si udržali prevádzkové náklady. V roku 2005 plán zníženia kapacity lovu pomocou verejných zdrojov mal, ako v predchádzajúcich rokoch, dobré výsledky. Aj keď neovplyvnil hodnotenie súladu schémy vstupu/výstupu, výlov v talianskych vodách sa značne znížil.

Cyprus: dva traulery s vlečnými sieťami na lov pri dne boli vyradené a dve plavidlá boli pridelené miestnym múzeám. Celkove 2 864 BRT 5 423 kW bolo permanentne stiahnutých z flotily.

Lotyšsko: počas roku 2005 bolo vyradených 31 plavidiel prostredníctvom verejných zdrojov a všetky tieto plavidlá boli stiahnuté z flotily v Baltickom mori. Hlavný dôvod, prečo majitelia týchto plavidiel požiadali o vyradenie, je veľmi nízky stav zásob rýb v Baltickom mori. Predovšetkým zásoby tresky sú veľmi nízke, preto väčšina vyradených plavidiel boli plavidlá určené na lov tresky. Ďalší dôležitý dôvod na vyradenie bol vek a zlý technický výkon plavidiel ako aj značné zvýšenie nákladov na pohonné látky a ďalších prevádzkových nákladov na lov.

Celkový vplyv schém zníženia výlovu na kapacitu ako aj redukciu lotyšskej rybárskej flotily prostredníctvom vyvezených alebo vyradených plavidiel bez verejných zdrojov spôsobil zníženie kapacity plavidiel na lov tresky o 11%. Od 1. mája 2004 toto zníženie kapacity pozitívne ovplyvňue zásoby tresky ako aj reprodukciu týchto najdôležitejších zásob v Baltickom mori.

Litva: v roku 2005 sa kapacita rybárskych plavidiel pôsobiacich v Baltickom mori a pozdĺž pobrežia v porovnaní s rokom 2004 znížila o 1 576 BRT a 3 104 kW – toto sa dosiahlo vyradením plavidiel pomocou verejných zdrojov. Zníženie kapacity rybolovu rybárskych plavidiel v Baltickom mori o 22 % viedlo k zvýšeniu rybárskych kvót pre zostávajúce rybárske plavidlá.

Malta: vo všeobecnosti sezónnosť a spôsoby lovu počas roku 2005 ostali také isté ako v predchádzajúcich rokoch, bez žiadnych náznakov zvýšenia výlovu v žiadnom rybnom hospodárstve. Neboli implementované žiadne redukčné schémy výlovu a nemôže byť hlásený žiaden vplyv na kapacitu rybolovu. Riadenie maltských rybných hospodárstiev bolo vykonané v súlade s nariadením Rady 813/2004, ktoré nariadilo kontrolné opatrenia súvisiace s ochranou a zachovaním vôd okolo Malty. Stav zdrojov využívaný maltskou rybárskou flotilou je na takej úrovni, že zníženie kapacity rybolovu nie je potrebné.

Holandsko: už niekoľko rokov bola v holandskom odvetví šalúp znepokojujúca situácia, so zníženými kvótami a značne zvýšenými nákladmi. Možnosti chytania plates počas uplynulých niekoľkých rokov obzvlášť klesli. Orgány štátnej správy a rybársky priemysel preto vyvinuli niekoľko iniciatív, aby znížili tlak na zásoby platesy. Jednou z nich je vyraďovacia časť flotily a tak permanentne znižuje kapacitu úlovku. Toto priblížilo kapacitu k rovnováhe s možnosťami úlovku a pomáha zásobám platesy, aby sa obnovili. Ďalším dôsledkom sú lepšie finančné vyhliadky pre ostávajúcich rybárov, pokiaľ vezmeme do úvahy viac možností úlovku na plavidlo.

V septembri 2005 vstúpilo do platnosti nariadenie o znížení kapacity lovu na mori – čoho dôsledkom bolo vyradenie 29 plavidiel, celkom 36 092 kW a 8 982 GT. Čiastočným dôsledkom tohto nariadenia bolo zníženie flotily šalúp, čo pomohlo dosiahnuť zdravšiu rovnováhu medzi flotilou a existujúcimi možnosťami lovu. V roku 2005 kW dni holandskej flotily šalúp v pláne obnovy oblasti Severného mora boli v porovnaní s rokom 2004 nižšie o 15%. Čo sa týka zvyšku flotily, jej veľkosť môže byť oprávnená v zmysle súčasnej veľkosti a situácie v zásobách rýb. Uskutočnené zníženie kapacity a zníženie kapacity využitej v roku 2005 vytvorili zdravšiu rovnováhu medzi veľkosťou zásob a veľkosťou flotily.

Poľsko: zaviedlo schému zníženia výlovu hlavne kvôli vážnej nadmernej kapacite v rybných hospodárstvach rybolovu tresky v Baltickom mori ako aj z dôvodu nízkej ziskovosti. Počas roku 2005 sa vyradilo alebo zmenilo činnosť 270 plavidiel s permanentným vyradením kapacity rybolovu vo výške 15 564 BRT a 42 237 kW.

Portugalsko: flotila bola ovplyvnená obmedzeniami výlovu: lov s navíjacími vlečnými sieťami (sardinky), plán na obnovu zásob Merluccius australis (nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 27/2005), plán onovy halibuta grónskeho v NAFO a nariadení týkajúcich sa hlbinných druhov. Pre hlbinné druhy Portugalsko použilo systém licencií, aby obmedzilo prístup plavidiel k hlbinnému lovu. V roku 2005 bolo schválených 34 návrhov na zníženie, 25 plavidiel bolo vyradených v segmente kontinentálnej flotily už počas roka, čo predstavuje zníženie o 5 011 BRT a 10 123 kW.

Slovinsko: nemôže informovať o žiadnych dosahoch na kapacitu lovu vyplývajúcich z redukčných schém výlovu, nakoľko riadiace alebo plány obnovy ešte neboli zavedené v rybných hospodárstvach v oblasti Stredozemného mora. Tiež tu neexistujú vyraďovacie schémy pre rybárske plavidlá.

Fínsko: bola vypracovaná špeciálna schéma zníženia kapacity lovu z dôvodu zistenej nadmernej kapacity v rybných hospodárstvach pre slede a šproty ako aj zákaz unášaných sietí v Baltickom mori. Fínsko pristúpilo k schémam zníženia výlovu na kapacitu v segmentoch traulerov, ktoré sa zameriavajú na pelagické druhy, a plavidiel s pasívnym rybárskym zariadením. 1 378 BRT and 6 025 kW bolo vyradených prostredníctvom verejných zdrojov.

Výlov flotily zameranej na pelagické druhy sa značne znížil – približne o 15 % počas rokov 2003 až 2005. Lov bentických druhov (najmä tresky) vlečným rybárskym zariadením a statickým rybárskym zariadením sa podstatne znížil v roku 2005, o 79 %, avšak to sa týka len drobných úlovkov a niekoľkých plavidiel. Výlov v rybných hospodárstvach so zameraním na lososa, pstruha a sladkovodné druhy sa najviac znížil počas nedávnych rokov: asi o 88 %.

Švédsko: podľa viacročných riadiacich a plánov obnovy, ktoré boli zavedené v Severnom mori, Skagerraku a Kattegate, kapacita rybolovu sa postupne znižovala ako dôsledok menších TAC a nižšieho počtu dní na mori. Národné pravidlá, ktoré sa týkajú úprav vlečných obmedzení, zavedenia povinných vlečných sietí s nastaviteľnou veľkosťou a obmedzenia pobrežného lovu s vlečnými sieťami a navíjacími vlečnými sieťami, ešte viac znížili kapacitu. Rybárske licencie na lov baltickej tresky obmedzili kapacitu pre tento druh rybného hospodárstva.

So zreteľom na vážnu situáciu zásob druhov rýb žijúcich pri morskom dne v Kattegate a Skagerraku a berúc do úvahy pobrežný lov so statickým rybárskym zariadením, možnosti rybolovu boli obmedzené v rámci „obmedzenia vlečných sietí“ v pobrežných oblastiach. Tieto obmedzenia znamenali, že lov s navíjacími vlečnými sieťami bol zakázaný v ďalších dvoch fjordových systémoch. Časové obmedzenia boli uložené na lov s navíjacími vlečnými sieťami pri svetle. Možnosti rybolovu pre lov sleďa obyčajného boli taktiež obmedzené a najväčšie plavidlá na lov pelagických druhov už nesmú mať licenciu na pobrežný lov. Lov pelagických druhov vlečnými sieťami v dôležitých oblastiach bol zakázaný náhodným rybárom.

V skratke, väčšina členských štátov potvrdila, že existujúce redukčné schémy výlovu všeobecne viedli k dobrým výsledkom a pomohli dosiahnuť lepšiu rovnováhu medzi kapacitou rybolovu a možnosťami rybolovu. Okrem toho niektoré členské štáty naznačili, že kapacita a redukčné schémy výlovu by sa mohli v budúcnosti vylepšiť.

Napríklad, Belgicko potvrdilo, že belgickí rybári už dlho vedeli, že zásoby rýb nie sú na tej istej úrovni ako pred desiatimi rokmi. Súhlasia, že opatrenia sú potrebné, aby zásoby rýb boli menej zraniteľné, a že flotila musí byť znížená, aby tí, čo ostali, mohli udržiavať rybolov udržateľný ekonomicky schodným spôsobom. Napriek tomu, obmedzenia vyplývajúce z plánov obnovyalebo riadiacich plánov potrebujú preukázateľne priniesť ovocie v krátkom až strednodobom horizonte, aby zostali vierohodné a prijateľné pre rybárov. Belgická štúdia naznačila, že 10 000 kW (15 % súčasnej kapacity flotily) by malo byť odstránených z belgickej flotily, aby jej pomohli preraziť v krátkej dobe na základe súčasnej štruktúry nákladov a možností úlovku.

Tým istým spôsobom Švédsko navrhlo, že ďalšie zníženie kapacity je potrebné pre účely dosiahnutia rovnováhy medzi kapacitou a možnosťami. Toto je taktiež nevyhnutný predpoklad pre vytvorenie dlhodobej životaschopnosti v rybárskej flotile. Zásoby rýb ostanú pravdepodobne na tej istej úrovni ešte niekoľko rokov, takže sa dá očakávať pokračujúce zníženie veľkosti flotily. Tiež je dôležité kombinovať riadenie flotily s ďalšími opatreniami, aby sa vytvorila rovnováha medzi kapacitou rybolovu a zdrojmi, ako napríklad opatrenia zamerané na rozdelenie kvót a možností rybolovu a výlovu rýb a obmedzení týkajúcich sa nástrojov.

c) Silné a slabé stránky

Systém vstupu/výstupu dodržali všetky členské štáty. Vo väčšine prípadov údaje národných registrov flotily boli úspešne podané Komisii v súlade s nariadením 26/2004. Hoci pretrvávali nejaké organizačné ťažkosti a ťažkosti so spracovaním údajov, je to najmä kvôli obmedzenej administratívnej kapacite v niektorých členských štátoch. Napriek týmto ťažkostiam, kvalita údajov poslaných Komisii členskými štátmi sa počas roku 2005 výrazne zlepšila. Jednou z dôležitých úloh bol pokračujúci proces krížovej kontroly a overovanie „varovných“ údajov v registri flotily.

Skoro všetky členské štáty mali v roku 2005 funkčné integrované informačné systémy rybných hospodárstiev, ktoré často obsahovali rôzne softvérové aplikácie (register flotily, riadenie kapacity, licencie, vykládky, dostupné kvóty, správy o úlovkoch atď.). V roku 2005 boli spustené nové verzie integrovaných IT systémov rybných hospodárstiev v Írsku a Švédsku. Slovinsko tiež pracovalo na zavedení integrovaného informačného systému rybných hospodárstiev. Tieto systémy vo väčšine prípadov spájajú aj niekoľko orgánov štátnej správy ako aj prepojenie ústredných orgánov štátnej správy s miestnymi orgánmi, a tým podstatne posilňujú národné správy rybárskych flotíl. Okrem toho členské štáty prehlásili, že ich národné registre sú presné, kompletné a aktuálne.

d) Súlad so systémom vstupu/výstupu a s referenčnými úrovňami

Všetky členské štáty vo svojich správach vyhlásili, že plne spĺňajú pravidlá vstupu/výstupu. Súlad so systémom vstupu/výstupu a s referenčnými úrovňami (ak je to aktuálne) na konci roka 2005 sa v technických prílohách 1 a 2 určuje vzorcami ustanovenými v nariadení Komisie (ES) č. 1438/2003. Tieto technické prílohy poskytujú úplné informácie o dodržiavaní zásad a tiež o každom členskom štáte zvlášť.

4. ZÁVERY KOMISIE

Kvalita správ, ktoré členské štáty predložili, sa v porovnaní s rokom 2004 zlepšila. Niektoré členské štáty predložili veľmi podrobné správy a ich obsah niekedy prekročil požadované množstvo informácií, ktoré mali za povinnosť poskytnúť. Predsa však niekoľko členských štátov nerešpektovalo termín predloženia alebo požiadavky na formát a obsah výročnej správy stanovené v článku 13 nariadenia Komisie (ES) č. 1438/2003, v čase prípravy tejto správy Spojené kráľovstvo nepredložilo svoju výročnú správu.

Členské štáty vo svojich správach kládli väčší dôraz na zavádzanie systému riadenia národnej flotily, ale hodnotenie rovnováhy medzi kapacitou rybárskej flotily a dostupnými možnosťami rybolovu je kompletnejšie ako v predchádzajúcich správach.

Výsledky týkajúce sa kontinentálnej flotily (flotila Spoločenstva s výnimkou plavidiel registrovaných v najvzdialenejších regiónoch):

Podľa registra flotily Spoločenstva sa celková kapacita flotily Spoločenstva členských štátov EÚ-15 počas trojročného obdobia rokov 2003 až 2005 znížila o 117 000 BRT a 499 000 kW, čo predstavuje čisté zníženie celkovej tonáže o 6,27 % a výkonu o 7,28 % v rámci flotily EÚ-15. Čisté zníženie v roku 2005 predstavovalo približne 50 000 BRT, zatiaľ čo v roku 2004 to bolo 23 000 BRT a v roku 2003 to bolo 44 000 BRT. Tieto zníženia sa zdajú pomerne malé, ak vezmeme do úvahy vysoké úrovne tlaku lovu vo väčšine rybárskych hospodárstiev Spoločenstva, predovšetkým bentických druhov.

Od 1. mája 2004 sa kapacita flotily v nových členských štátoch znížila o 41 000 BRT a 101 000 kW, čo v rámci ich flotíl predstavuje zníženie tonáže o 18 % a výkonu o 18 % v porovnaní s kapacitou rybolovu v deň vstupu.

Počas rokov 2003, 2004 a 2005 bolo vyradených približne približne 132 000 BRT a 427 000 kW z flotily EÚ prostredníctvom verejných zdrojov, čo znamená, že táto kapacita sa nedá nahradiť.

V rámci tejto kapacity vyradenej prostredníctvom verejných zdrojov prevažná väčšina (112 000 BRT a 373 000 kW) pochádza z členských štátov EÚ-15. Kapacita vyradená prostredníctvom verejných zdrojov v nových členských štátoch od 1. mája 2004 bola 20 000 BRT a 54 000 kW.

Tabuľky 1 a 2 v technickej prílohe 1 sumarizujú dodržanie systému vstupu/výstupu a referenčné úrovne k 31. decembru 2005. Väčšina členských štátov postupovala v súlade s týmito pravidlami. Avšak Grécko nedodržalo systém vstupu/výstupu z hľadiska tonáže, napriek tomu je stupeň nesúladu veľmi malý, pretože maximálna výška bola prekročená len o 0,29 %. Grécke orgány napadli vyhodnotenie Komisie, podľa nich, Grécko postupovalo v súlade so systémom vstupu/výstupu.

Tabuľky 3 a 4 v technickej prílohe 1 poskytujú súhrn odlišností v kapacite flotily od 1. januára 2003 (u nových členských štátov od 1. mája 2004) do 31. decembra 2005. Tieto tabuľky obsahujú aj počet plavidiel. Tabuľka 3 sa vzťahuje na všetky členské štáty. Podrobné vyhodnotenie v rámci každého členského štátu je obsiahnuté v technickej prílohe 2.

Výsledky týkajúce sa flotíl registrovaných v najvzdialenejších regiónoch:

Kapacita flotíl registrovaných v najvzdialenejších regiónoch a jej variácie medzi 1. januárom 2003 a 31. decembrom 2005 sú uvedené v tabuľke 4. Výsledky poukazujú na fakt, že flotila registrovaná v najvzdialenejších regiónoch Španielska a Portugalska, bola významne znížená z hľadiska tonáže a výkonu. Čo sa týka francúzskych zahraničných oddelení, celkový počet plavidiel a ich tonáž sa znížili a výkon sa zvýšil.

Tabuľky v technickej prílohe 3 zobrazujú podrobnosti uplatňovania špeciálneho režimu pre tieto flotily. Zo 17 segmentov najvzdialenejších regiónov, jeden prekročil svoju referenčnú úroveň vzhľadom na výkon na konci roku 2005 („4FJ – plavidlá kratšie ako 12 m z francúzskeho departementu Martinik“) a ďalší segment prekročil svoju referenčnú úroveň vzhľadom na tonáž(segment „CA3“ – plavidlá dlhšie ako 12 m registrované na Kanárskych ostrovoch v medzinárodných vodách a vodách tretích krajín). Špeciálny režim sa na tieto segmenty prestane uplatňovať od chvíle, keď dosiahnu svoju maximálnu referenčnú úroveň a odvolávku na nariadenie [6].

Všeobecné pripomienky

Ako bolo vysvetlené vyššie, táto súhrnná správa je založená na výročných správach členských štátov a na údajoch získaných z CFR. Zostáva niekoľko rozporov medzi údajmi predloženými členskými štátmi v ich správach a údajmi, ktoré vyplývajú z ich vyhlásení pre CFR. Vďaka členským štátom a úsiliu Komisie zosynchronizovať ich údaje, tieto rozpory nie sú dôležité z hľadiska riadenia flotily. Hoci práca na odstránení týchto rozdielov by mala pokračovať. Rozhodne údaje predložené členskými štátmi v ich národných správach nezmenili závery správy.

Podľa článku 16 nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 2371/2002 členské štáty, ktoré nekonajú v súlade s článkami 11, 13 a 15 tohto nariadenia, sú povinné znížiť svoj výlov na úroveň, ktorá by pri dodržiavaní uvedených článkov existovala. Okrem toho sa týmto štátom môže primerane pozastaviť finančná pomoc Spoločenstva v súlade s finančným nástrojom na usmerňovanie rybného hospodárstva (FNURH).

Na účel ďalšieho zlepšenia výročných správ by Komisia spolu s Výborom pre rybné hospodárstvo a akvakultúru mala stanoviť podrobnejšie smernice týkajúce sa ich obsahu a zaviesť spoločný vyvážený metodologický prístup s väčším dôrazom na analýzu vývoja kapacity rybolovu vzhľadom na dostupné zdroje rýb. O týchto záležitostiach sa bude diskutovať na blížiacich sa stretnutiach Výboru pre rybné hospodárstvo a akvakultúru.

V nasledujúcich výročných správach by sa mala venovať väčšia pozornosť tomu, ako nový režim prijatý v roku 2002 prispel k riadeniu flotily Spoločenstva smerom k lepšej rovnováhe medzi flotilami a zásobami rýb. Vplyv národných vyraďovacích schém, najmä schém na zníženie výlovu v oblasti rybného hospodárstva na základe riadiacich alebo plánov obnovy, by sa mal lepšie určovať a hodnotiť.

Technical Annex 1 – Summary Tables and Graphs

Fleet Management in the reformed Common Fisheries Policy

a) Entry/Exit regime

From 1 January 2003 Member States have had to respect a strict entry-exit regime applying to the capacity of their fleets, measured in terms of both tonnage and power. Any entry of capacity into the fleet of a Member State has to be compensated by the previous exit of at least the same amount of capacity (ratio 1:1, “at any time”), unless the entry corresponds to works to improve safety, hygiene or living and working conditions on board (Article 11(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002). For entries of new vessels between 100 and 400 GT built with public aid (the administrative decisions granting aid were possible only until 31 December 2004) the Member State has to withdraw 35% more capacity than it introduces (ratio 1:1.35).

Another important rule is that capacity leaving the fleet with public aid cannot be replaced. Such capacity is subtracted directly from the fleet and also from the reference level established in accordance with Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, and it therefore counts against the entry/exit regime in the ratio 0:1. Capacity reductions supported with public aid are therefore definitive.

All of this means that, as a general rule, the capacity of the national fleets cannot increase with respect to its levels on:

– 1 January 2003 for EU-15 Member States in accordance with Article 6 and 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003;

– 1 May 2004 for new Member States in accordance with Article 1(2) and 1(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 916/2004.

In practice this is likely to be the case. However, the implementing rules for the fleet policy allow for the introduction of vessels outside the framework of the entry/exit regime in the case where administrative decisions have been made by the national authorities:

– between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2002 for those vessels to enter the fleet after 1 January 2003 in EU-15 Member States and,

– between 1 May 2001 and 30 April 2004 for vessels which enter the fleet after 1 May 2004 in new Member States.

These entries have to take place at the most 3 years after the date of the administrative decision (i.e. for EU-15 Member States at the latest by the end of 2005 and for new Member States until 30 April 2007) and must comply with the rules that existed at that time, in particular Article 9 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector.

b) Reference Levels (mainland fleet)

The reference levels for the fleets of Member States are the sum of the global final objectives of Multiannual Guidance Programme (MAGP IV) as established by Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. The general rule is that Member States may not exceed their reference levels at any time.

When a Member State undertakes decommissioning with public aid, these reference levels are automatically reduced by the amount of capacity scrapped. In addition, Member States which gave aid to construction of vessels until the end of 2004 will see their initial 2003 reference level reduced at least by 3% by the end of 2004.

Since the reference levels are a legacy of MAGP IV [7] (period 1997 – 2002), the Council decided that they would not apply to the new Member States (Council Regulation (EC) No 1242/2004 [8]).

c) Management of fleet reference levels in the outermost regions

The fishing fleets registered in the Community outermost regions, namely the French Overseas Departments, the Spanish Canary Islands and the Portuguese Azores and Madera have to comply with specific reference levels for these regions in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2004 [9] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2104/2004 [10].

d) Measurement of tonnage

The measurement of the Community fleet is based on Council Regulation (EC) No 3259/94 [11] and Commission Decision No 95/84/EC [12]. These legislative acts establish that the tonnage of vessels of 15 m in length or more has to be measured in accordance with the London Convention, i.e. as a function of the vessel’s total enclosed volume, while for vessels of less than 15 m in length, the regulation defines a system of tonnage calculation based on an estimate of the hull’s volume.

The fleet should have been entirely measured in accordance with Community law by 31 December 2003. Nevertheless, at the end of 2005, for some Member States there remained number of vessels that were not measured in GT.

In cases where the measurement of the fleet has not been completed, the tonnage figures used in this report are a mixture of GT and GRT. That is, for vessels whose GT tonnage is not available the GRT value is used.

e) Community Fishing Fleet Register

In 2004, the new Community Fleet Register was set up in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 26/2004. It became operational on 1st September 2004. This change was necessary in order to follow up the new rules for managing the fishing capacity of the EU fleet which entered into force on 1st January 2003. This system, following the 2002 CFP reform, gives more responsibility to the Member States in achieving a better balance between the fishing capacity of their fleets and the available resources.

The main tool for monitoring the fishing fleet is the Community Fleet Register (CFR). According Commission Regulation (EC) No 26/2004, Member States are obliged on a quarterly basis ("snapshots" shall be sent on the first working day of March, June, September and December) to transmit electronically all relevant information on the characteristics of approximately 88,500 marine fishing vessels, together with information on entries to and exits from the fleet. Furthermore, the CFR is managed via web based application, called the Community Fleet Register On the Net (FRONT). The FRONT is also available for the general public on the following web page: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/fisheries/fleet/index.cfm

It is important to note that all information contained in the Technical Annexes 1, 2 and 3 has been taken from the CFR, with the exception of:

– data on entries corresponding to administrative decisions taken by national authorities before 1 January 2003 (or 1 May 2004 for the new Member States) and for which the special transitional provisions established in the regulation apply;

– data on exits with public aid in some cases where this was not available.

Only in these two cases has the information been taken directly from the Member States.

0. Table 1: Compliance with Entry/Exit ceilings at 31 December 2005 (except outermost regions)

Member State | GT | kW |

| Fleet capacityA | Entry/Exit ceilingB | A/B | Fleet capacityC | Entry/Exit ceilingD | C/D |

| at 31 December 2005 | at 31 December 2005 |

Belgium | 22.686 | 23.372 | 97,06% | 65.643 | 66.537 | 98,66% |

Denmark | 91.469 | 97.801 | 93,53% | 324.825 | 340.648 | 95,36% |

Germany | 63.858 | 71.101 | 89,81% | 158.545 | 167.133 | 94,86% |

Estonia | 24.253 | 26.606 | 91,16% | 62.048 | 65.007 | 95,45% |

Greece | 93.267 | 92.998 | 100,29% | 537.552 | 544.288 | 98,76% |

Spain | 451.377 | 451.447 | 99,98% | 1.050.702 | 1.163.185 | 90,33% |

France | 199.225 | 200.904 | 99,16% | 849.783 | 870.669 | 97,60% |

Ireland | 84.360 | 84.689 | 99,61% | 208.809 | 222.883 | 93,69% |

Italy | 213.095 | 214.165 | 99,50% | 1.223.933 | 1.254.667 | 97,55% |

Cyprus | 9.056 | 11.579 | 78,21% | 46.843 | 51.254 | 91,39% |

Latvia | 38.580 | 43.033 | 89,65% | 66.209 | 72.609 | 91,19% |

Lithuania | 64.386 | 74.911 | 85,95% | 70.655 | 77.462 | 91,21% |

Malta | 15.274 | 16.450 | 92,85% | 99.145 | 126.350 | 78,47% |

Netherlands | 155.423 | 175.858 | 88,38% | 348.454 | 385.468 | 90,40% |

Poland | 30.254 | 31.144 | 97,14% | 105.452 | 107.599 | 98,01% |

Portugal | 94.128 | 98.952 | 95,12% | 321.436 | 332.512 | 96,67% |

Slovenia | 1.069 | 1.076 | 99,34% | 11.459 | 11.473 | 99,88% |

Finland | 17.001 | 18.532 | 91,74% | 171.511 | 184.499 | 92,96% |

Sweden | 44.259 | 45.907 | 96,41% | 218.745 | 224.092 | 97,61% |

United Kingdom | 218.449 | 236.227 | 92,47% | 881.224 | 933.231 | 94,43% |

Data extracted from the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Bold Italic indicates that the ceiling has been exceeded.

Figure 1: Overall evolution of the Community fleet capacity ceiling

(except outermost regions) [13]

Tonnage of the Community fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

Engine power (kW) of the Community fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Table 2: Compliance with Reference level at 31 December 2005 (MS concerned and except outermost regions)

Member State | GT | kW |

| Fleet capacityA | Reference levelB | A/B | Fleet capacityC | Reference levelD | C/D |

| at 31 December 2005 | at 31 December 2005 |

Belgium | 22.686 | 23.372 | 97,06% | 65.643 | 66.537 | 98,66% |

Denmark | 91.469 | 127.189 | 71,92% | 324.825 | 433.436 | 74,94% |

Germany | 63.858 | 84.246 | 75,80% | 158.545 | 175.883 | 90,14% |

Greece | 93.267 | 109.732 | 85,00% | 537.552 | 601.443 | 89,38% |

Spain | 451.377 | 691.508 | 65,27% | 1.050.702 | 1.579.073 | 66,54% |

France | 199.225 | 218.446 | 91,20% | 849.783 | 879.517 | 96,62% |

Ireland | 84.360 | 84.689 | 99,61% | 208.809 | 222.883 | 93,69% |

Italy | 213.095 | 222.966 | 95,57% | 1.223.933 | 1.298.121 | 94,29% |

Netherlands | 155.423 | 204.186 | 76,12% | 348.454 | 491.308 | 70,92% |

Portugal | 94.128 | 162.069 | 58,08% | 321.436 | 389.277 | 82,57% |

Finland | 17.001 | 21.923 | 77,55% | 171.511 | 210.558 | 81,46% |

Sweden | 44.259 | 50.509 | 87,63% | 218.745 | 253.197 | 86,39% |

United Kingdom | 218.449 | 269.421 | 81,08% | 881.224 | 1.084.189 | 81,28% |

Data extracted from the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Figure 2: Overall evolution of the Community fleet reference level (EU 15 and except their outermost regions)

Tonnage of the Community fleet compared to its reference level.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

Engine power (kW) of the Community fleet compared to its reference level.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Table 3: Summary of Member States fleets evolution from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005 (except outermost regions)

| 1 January 2003 | 31 December 2005 | Fleet capacity variations |

EU-15 Member States | Number of vessels | GT | kW | Number of vessels | GT | kW | Number of vessels | Δ GT | Δ GT in % | Δ kW | Δ kW in % |

BE | 131 | 24.281 | 68.083 | 121 | 22.686 | 65.643 | -10 | -1.595 | -6,57% | -2.440 | -3,58% |

DK | 3.815 | 103.318 | 366.738 | 3.270 | 91.469 | 324.825 | -545 | -11.849 | -11,47% | -41.913 | -11,43% |

DE | 2.244 | 66.844 | 161.045 | 2.120 | 63.858 | 158.545 | -124 | -2.986 | -4,47% | -2.500 | -1,55% |

EL | 19.292 | 101.707 | 594.948 | 18.276 | 93.267 | 537.552 | -1.016 | -8.439 | -8,30% | -57.396 | -9,65% |

ES | 13.613 | 465.657 | 1.145.004 | 12.523 | 451.377 | 1.050.702 | -1.090 | -14.280 | -3,07% | -94.302 | -8,24% |

FR | 5.711 | 211.824 | 910.062 | 5.359 | 199.225 | 849.783 | -352 | -12.598 | -5,95% | -60.279 | -6,62% |

IE | 1.592 | 86.048 | 227.679 | 1.402 | 84.360 | 208.809 | -190 | -1.688 | -1,96% | -18.870 | -8,29% |

IT | 15.767 | 215.595 | 1.278.427 | 14.419 | 213.095 | 1.223.933 | -1.348 | -2.501 | -1,16% | -54.494 | -4,26% |

NL | 779 | 183.678 | 418.505 | 727 | 155.423 | 348.454 | -52 | -28.255 | -15,38% | -70.051 | -16,74% |

PT | 8.214 | 99.757 | 332.417 | 7.884 | 94.128 | 321.436 | -330 | -5.628 | -5,64% | -10.982 | -3,30% |

FI | 3.572 | 19.812 | 190.136 | 3.266 | 17.001 | 171.511 | -306 | -2.812 | -14,19% | -18.624 | -9,80% |

SE | 1.811 | 45.895 | 224.662 | 1.603 | 44.259 | 218.745 | -208 | -1.636 | -3,56% | -5.916 | -2,63% |

UK | 7.424 | 241.078 | 942.607 | 6.767 | 218.449 | 881.224 | -657 | -22.629 | -9,39% | -61.382 | -6,51% |

Total | 83.965 | 1.865.494 | 6.860.313 | 77.737 | 1.748.597 | 6.361.163 | -6.228 | -116.897 | -6,27% | -499.150 | -7,28% |

| | | | | | | | | | | |

| 1 May 2004 | 31 December 2005 | Fleet capacity variations |

New Member States | Number of vessels | GT | kW | Number of vessels | GT | kW | Number of vessels | Δ GT | Δ GT in % | Δ kW | Δ kW in % |

EE | 1054 | 26.606 | 65.007 | 1046 | 24.253 | 62.048 | -8 | -2.353 | -8,84% | -2.960 | -4,55% |

CY | 899 | 11.935 | 52.555 | 883 | 9.056 | 46.843 | -16 | -2.879 | -24,12% | -5.712 | -10,87% |

LV | 898 | 44.452 | 75.817 | 928 | 38.580 | 66.209 | 30 | -5.872 | -13,21% | -9.608 | -12,67% |

LT | 307 | 76.487 | 80.566 | 271 | 64.386 | 70.655 | -36 | -12.101 | -15,82% | -9.911 | -12,30% |

MT | 2251 | 16.450 | 126.350 | 1420 | 15.274 | 99.145 | -831 | -1.176 | -7,15% | -27.205 | -21,53% |

PL | 1280 | 47.316 | 151.124 | 974 | 30.254 | 105.452 | -306 | -17.062 | -36,06% | -45.671 | -30,22% |

SI | 178 | 1.076 | 11.473 | 173 | 1.069 | 11.459 | -5 | -7 | -0,66% | -14 | -0,12% |

Total | 6.867 | 224.322 | 562.891 | 5.695 | 182.872 | 461.811 | -1172 | -41.450 | -18,48% | -101.080 | -17,96% |

Total EU fishing fleet at 31 December 2005 | 83.432 | 1.931.469 | 6.822.974 | |

Data extracted from the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Table 4: Summary of Member States fleets capacity evolution in outermost regions from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005

| 01/01/2003 | 31/12/2005 | Fleet capacity variations |

Member State | Segment code* | Number of vessels | GT | kW | Number of vessels | GT | kW | Number of vessels | Δ GT | Δ GT in % | Δ kW | Δ kW in % |

ES | CA1 | 1.082 | 2.114 | 16.541 | 999 | 1.973 | 15.658 | -83 | -141 | -6,68% | -882 | -5,33% |

| CA2 | 100 | 4.019 | 14.749 | 85 | 3.122 | 11.861 | -15 | -897 | -22,32% | -2.888 | -19,58% |

| CA3 | 133 | 46.202 | 84.118 | 77 | 30.914 | 46.235 | -56 | -15.288 | -33,09% | -37.883 | -45,04% |

| Total | 1.315 | 52.335 | 115.408 | 1.161 | 36.008 | 73.755 | -154 | -16.327 | -31,20% | -41.654 | -36,09% |

FR | 4FC | 248 | 343 | 10.943 | 241 | 385 | 12.390 | -7 | 42 | 12,13% | 1.447 | 13,22% |

| 4FD | 46 | 4.174 | 13.553 | 40 | 3.867 | 12.779 | -6 | -307 | -7,36% | -774 | -5,71% |

| 4FF | 71 | 284 | 3.840 | 92 | 356 | 4.628 | 21 | 72 | 25,17% | 788 | 20,52% |

| 4FG | 53 | 5.994 | 17.173 | 50 | 5.499 | 16.092 | -3 | -496 | -8,27% | -1.081 | -6,29% |

| 4FH | 5 | 288 | 1.010 | 5 | 267 | 798 | 0 | -20 | -7,07% | -212 | -20,99% |

| 4FJ | 1.097 | 2.065 | 59.005 | 1.194 | 2.272 | 68.480 | 97 | 207 | 10,01% | 9.475 | 16,06% |

| 4FK | 8 | 848 | 2.598 | 6 | 552 | 1.966 | -2 | -295 | -34,84% | -632 | -24,33% |

| 4FL | 915 | 2.465 | 96.814 | 870 | 2.421 | 102.605 | -45 | -44 | -1,78% | 5.791 | 5,98% |

| 4FM | 1 | 12 | 220 | 1 | 12 | 220 | 0 | 0 | 0,00% | 0 | 0,00% |

| Total | 2.444 | 16.472 | 205.156 | 2.499 | 15.630 | 219.958 | 55 | -843 | -5,12% | 14.802 | 7,21% |

PT | 4K6 | 423 | 403 | 2.800 | 418 | 407 | 3.011 | -5 | 5 | 1,13% | 211 | 7,55% |

| 4K7 | 49 | 3.585 | 12.522 | 42 | 2.765 | 9.701 | -7 | -820 | -22,87% | -2.822 | -22,53% |

| 4K8 | 5 | 193 | 1.006 | 5 | 193 | 1.006 | 0 | 0 | 0,00% | 0 | 0,00% |

| 4K9 | 1482 | 2.277 | 19.860 | 709 | 1.643 | 19.005 | -773 | -634 | -27,85% | -856 | -4,31% |

| 4KA | 113 | 9.989 | 29.310 | 103 | 8.514 | 25.033 | -10 | -1.475 | -14,76% | -4.277 | -14,59% |

| Total | 2.072 | 16.447 | 65.498 | 1.277 | 13.522 | 57.756 | -795 | -2.924 | -17,78% | -7.743 | -11,82% |

Total EU outermost regions | 5.831 | 85.254 | 386.063 | 4.937 | 65.160 | 351.468 | -894 | -20.093 | -23,57% | -34.594 | -8,96% |

Data extracted from the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

* Description of the outermost regions fleets segmentation codes are given in the Technical Annex 3.

Technical Annex 2 – Results by Member State (excluding outermost regions)

The following tables summarise the development of the Member States’ fleets in relation to their compliance with two levels:

– The entry/exit level;

– The levels of reference (not applicable to the new Member States).

A comparison between above mentioned levels and the situation of the fleet on 31 December 2005 has been made based on data collected from the Community Fleet Register on 26th June 2006 and on data from Member States’ national reports. For each Member State’s fleet the following tables are shown:

Table a) Calculation of baselines:

– (GT03 and kW03) at 1 January 2003 for the EU-15 Member States

– (GT04 and kW04) at 1 May 2004 for the new Member States

The baselines (GT03 and kW03) against which entries and exits over 2003, 2004 and 2005 must be assessed for EU-15 Member States are:

– the capacity identified in the Community Fishing Fleet Register at 1 January 2003 for the EU-15 Member States (GTFR and kWFR),

– plus the capacity entered into the fleet in 2003, 2004 and 2005 based on administrative decisions taken by the national authorities between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2002, for which an associated capacity had been withdrawn before 1 January 2003 (GT1 and kW1 for entries with aid, GT3 and kW3 for entries without aid),

– minus 35% of the capacity entered into the fleet in 2003, 2004 and 2005 with public aid based on an administrative decision taken by the national authorities between 1 January 2002 and 30 June 2002 concerning an MAGP IV segment that did not comply with its objectives, for which an associated capacity withdrawal took place (GT2 or kW2),

– minus 30% of the capacity entered into the fleet in 2003, 2004 and 2005 with public aid based on an administrative decision taken between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2001 concerning an MAGP IV segment that did not comply with its objectives, for which an associated capacity withdrawal took place (GT4 or kW4).

According to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003, the corresponding equations are:

GT03 = GTFR + GT1 – 0,35 GT2 + GT3 – 0,30 GT4

kW03 = kWFR + kW1 – 0,35 kW2 + kW3 – 0,30 kW4

The baselines (GT04 and kW04) against which entries and exits over 2003, 2004 and 2005 must be assessed for new Member States are:

– the capacity identified in the Community Fishing Fleet Register at 1 May 2004 for the New Member States (GTFR and kWFR);

– plus the capacity entered into the fleet after the 1 May 2004 based on administrative decisions taken between 1 May 2001 and 30 April 2004 (GT1 and kW1).

According to Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 916/2004, the corresponding equations are:

GT04 = GTFR + GT1

kW04 = kWFR + kW1

Table b) Management of entries and exits during 2005

Table b) shows Member States’ compliance with the entries and exits regime at 31 December 2005. Calculations have been made in accordance with the following formulas:

For the EU-15 Member States (Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003):

GTt ≤ GT03 - GTa – 0,35 GT100 + GTS + Δ(GT-GRT)

kWt ≤ kW03 - kWa – 0,35 kW100

where:

- GTt or kWt = the size in tonnage and power of the Member State’s fleet at 31 December 2005,

- GT03 or kW03 : see table a) above;

- GTa or kWa = capacities leaving the fleet with public aid after 31 December 2002;

- GT100 or kW100 = capacities of vessels more than 100 GT entering the fleet with public aid;

- GTS = safety tonnage granted under provisions of Article 11(5) of Regulation 2371/2002;

- Δ(GT-GRT) = balance as a result of the re-measurement of the fleet. This term is included in the value of the terms GTt and GT03. This has been done in this way because of the difficulties found in order to calculate it, arising form the incorrect declaration of vessel re-measuring to the Community Fleet Register.

For the new Member States (Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 916/2004):

GTt ≤ GT04 - GTa – 0,35 GT100 + GTS + Δ(GT-GRT)

kWt ≤ kW04 - kWa – 0,35 kW100

where:

- GTt or kWt = the size in tonnage and power of the Member State’s fleet at 31 December 2005,

- GT04 or kW04 :(see table a) above;

- GTa or kWa = capacities leaving the fleet with public aid after 30 April 2004;

- GT100 or kW100 = capacities of vessels more than 100 GT entering the fleet with public aid granted after 30 April 2004;

- GTS = safety tonnage granted under provisions of Article 11(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002;

- Δ(GT-GRT) = balance as a result of the re-measurement of the fleet.

Table c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

– The baselines are the sum of the MAGP IV objectives for the mainland fleets in GT and kW. The reference levels at 1 January 2003, (R (GT03 and R(kW03), are fixed in annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003. Specific reference levels have been fixed for outermost regions in an appropriate legal framework.

– Table c) shows Member States’ compliance, during 2005, with the following formulae (Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003):

R(GTt) = R(GT03) - GTa – 0,35 GT100 + GTS + ΔR(GT-GRT)

R(kWt) = R(kW03) - kWa – 0,35 kW100

where:

R(GTt) or R(kWt) = The reference level in tonnage and power for the Member State’s fleet at 31 December 2005;

The term ΔR(GT-GRT) has not been included. This will only be done once the reference levels are updated to take into account the effect of the re-measurement of the fleet.

Note: Reference levels are not applicable to the new Member States in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1242/2004.

Section d) Graphs

The continuous evolution of the capacity of the fleet in tonnage and power is compared graphically with the capacity ceilings calculated in accordance with Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No1438/2003 as explained above.

The capacity ceiling is fixed on the 1 January 2003 based on the capacity of the fleet on that date plus the capacity of the entries into the fleet decided before and that had not taken place on that date (baseline calculation in table a). After 1 January 2003, the fleet ceiling cannot increase (except for the so called safety tonnage GTs) and is reduced each time capacity is withdrawn from the fleet with public aid.

The capacity of the fleet follows generally a downward trend. Exceptionally, an increase may be seen and this may be due to,

a) Entries of capacity decided before the reform (transitional measures).

b) Exits without public aid whose replacement comes in some time later.

However, apparent decreases followed by an increase in capacity may also be due to declarations to the Community Fleet Register using incorrect codes.

Belgium

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

24.281 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.281 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

68.083 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68.083 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Belgium | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 24.281 | kWFR | 68.083 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 24.281 | kW03 | 68.083 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 490 | | 2.915 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 490 | | 2.915 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 711 | kWa | 1.546 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 1.374 | | 3.809 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 2.085 | | 5.355 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 22.686 | kWt | 65.643 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 23.372 | | 66.537 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Belgium | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 23.372 | R(kW)03 | 67.857 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 711 | kWa | 1.546 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 22.686 | kWt | 65.643 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 23.372 | R(kW)t | 66.537 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Belgian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Belgian fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Denmark

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

103.318 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 103.318 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

366.738 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 366.738 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Denmark | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 103.318 | kWFR | 366.738 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 103.318 | kW03 | 366.738 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 7.812 | | 29.775 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 7.812 | | 29.775 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 5.517 | kWa | 26.090 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 14.144 | | 45.598 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 19.661 | | 71.688 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 91.469 | kWt | 324.825 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 97.801 | | 340.648 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Denmark | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 132.706 | R(kW)03 | 459.526 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 5.517 | kWa | 26.090 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 91.469 | kWt | 324.825 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 127.189 | R(kW)t | 433.436 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Danish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Danish fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Germany

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

66.844 | 47 | 0 | 4.226 | 0 | 71.117 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

161.045 | 221 | 0 | 5.911 | 0 | 167.177 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Germany | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 66.844 | kWFR | 161.045 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 71.117 | kW03 | 167.177 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 10.730 | | 24.654 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 10.730 | | 24.654 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16 | kWa | 44 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 13.700 | | 27.110 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 13.716 | | 27.154 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 63.858 | kWt | 158.545 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 71.101 | | 167.133 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Germany | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 84.262 | R(kW)03 | 175.927 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16 | kWa | 44 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 63.858 | kWt | 158.545 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 84.246 | R(kW)t | 175.883 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the German fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the German fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Estonia

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT04 and kW04) on 1 May 2004

GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 |

26.606 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.606 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 |

65.007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.007 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Estonia | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 26.606 | kWFR | 65.007 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 26.606 | kW04 | 65.007 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 1.014 | | 2.738 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 1.014 | | 2.738 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 0 | kWa | 0 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 3.367 | | 5.698 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 3.367 | | 5.698 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 24.253 | kWt | 62.048 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 26.606 | | 65.007 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Estonian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Estonian fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Greece

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

101.707 | 0 | 0 | 1.469 | 0 | 103.176 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

594.948 | 0 | 0 | 1.394 | 0 | 596.342 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Greece | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 101.707 | kWFR | 594.948 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 103.176 | kW03 | 596.342 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 10.141 | | 37.906 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 10.141 | | 37.906 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 10.178 | kWa | 52.054 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 8.402 | | 43.248 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 18.580 | | 95.302 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 93.267 | kWt | 537.552 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 92.998 | | 544.288 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

Bold Italic indicates that the ceiling has been exceeded.

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Greece | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 119.910 | R(kW)03 | 653.497 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 10.178 | kWa | 52.054 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 93.267 | kWt | 537.552 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 109.732 | R(kW)t | 601.443 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Greek fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Greek fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Spain

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

465.657 | 22.625 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 488.282 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

1.145.004 | 110.847 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.255.851 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Spain | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 465.657 | kWFR | 1.145.004 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 488.282 | kW03 | 1.255.851 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 1.922 | kW100 | 4.022 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 77.529 | | 157.121 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 893 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 80.344 | | 161.143 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 37.056 | kWa | 91.258 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 57.568 | | 164.187 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 94.624 | | 255.445 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 451.377 | kWt | 1.050.702 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 451.447 | | 1.163.185 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Spain | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 728.344 | R(kW)03 | 1.671.739 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 1.922 | kW100 | 4.022 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 893 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 37.056 | kWa | 91.258 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 451.377 | kWt | 1.050.702 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 691.508 | R(kW)t | 1.579.073 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Spanish* fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005.

(...PICT...)

*Excluding the Canary Islands.

Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Power of the Spanish* fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005.

(...PICT...)

*Excluding the Canary Islands.

Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

France

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

211.824 | 891 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 212.715 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

910.062 | 2.059 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 912.121 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| France | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 211.824 | kWFR | 910.062 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 212.715 | kW03 | 912.121 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 21.667 | | 68.034 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 253 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 21.920 | | 68.034 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 12.064 | kWa | 41.452 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 22.455 | | 86.861 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 34.518 | | 128.313 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 199.225 | kWt | 849.783 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 200.904 | | 870.669 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| France (excluding the Overseas Departments) | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 230.257 | R(kW)03 | 920.969 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 253 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 12.064 | kWa | 41.452 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 199.225 | kWt | 849.783 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 218.446 | R(kW)t | 879.517 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the French* fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005.

(...PICT...)

*Excluding the French Overseas Departments.

Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Power of the French* fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005.

(...PICT...)

*Excluding the French Overseas Departments.

Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Ireland

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

86.048 | 0 | 0 | 4.363 | 0 | 86.981 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

227.679 | 0 | 0 | 3.103 | 0 | 230.226 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Ireland | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 86.048 | kWFR | 227.679 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 86.981 | kW03 | 230.226 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 25.845 | | 58.171 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 25.845 | | 58.171 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 2.292 | kWa | 7.343 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 25.242 | | 69.699 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 27.534 | | 77.042 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 84.360 | kWt | 208.809 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 84.689 | | 222.883 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Ireland | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 86.981 | R(kW)03 | 230.226 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 2.292 | kWa | 7.343 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 84.360 | kWt | 208.809 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 84.689 | R(kW)t | 222.883 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Irish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Irish fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Italy

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

216.050 | 689 | 563 | 4.402 | 0 | 220.944 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

1.278.427 | 2.405 | 1.745 | 15.296 | 0 | 1.295.517 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Italy | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 216.050 | kWFR | 1.278.427 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 220.944 | kW03 | 1.295.517 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 289 | kW100 | 1.007 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 14.479 | | 58.396 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 14.768 | | 59.403 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 6.678 | kWa | 40.498 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 11.046 | | 73.399 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 17.724 | | 113.897 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 213.095 | kWt | 1.223.933 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 214.165 | | 1.254.667 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level.

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Italy | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 229.862 | R(kW)03 | 1.338.971 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 289 | kW100 | 1.007 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 6.678 | kWa | 40.498 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 213.095 | kWt | 1.223.933 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 222.966 | R(kW)t | 1.298.121 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Italian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Italian fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Cyprus

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT04 and kW04) on 1 May 2004

GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 |

11.935 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.935 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 |

52.555 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.555 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Cyprus | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 11.935 | kWFR | 52.555 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 11.935 | kW04 | 52.555 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | -1 | | -60 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | -1 | | -60 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 356 | kWa | 1.302 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 2.521 | | 4.351 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 2.877 | | 5.653 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 9.056 | kWt | 46.843 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 11.579 | | 51.254 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Cypriot fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Cypriot fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Latvia

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT04 and kW04) on 1 May 2004

GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 |

44.452 | 510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44.962 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 |

75.817 | 1.451 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77.268 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Latvia | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 44.452 | kWFR | 75.817 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 44.962 | kW04 | 77.268 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 692 | | 2.026 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 692 | | 2.026 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.929 | kWa | 4.660 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 4.636 | | 6.974 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 6.565 | | 11.634 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 38.580 | kWt | 66.209 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 43.033 | | 72.609 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Latvian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Latvian fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Lithuania

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT04 and kW04) on 1 May 2004

GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 |

76.487 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.487 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 |

80.566 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80.566 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Lithuania | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 76.487 | kWFR | 80.566 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 76.487 | kW04 | 80.566 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 11.243 | | 12.870 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 11.243 | | 12.870 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.576 | kWa | 3.104 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 21.768 | | 19.677 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 23.344 | | 22.781 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 64.386 | kWt | 70.655 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 74.911 | | 77.462 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Lithuanian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Lithuanian fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Malta

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT04 and kW04) on 1 May 2004

GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 |

16.450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.450 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 |

126.350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 126.350 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Malta | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 16.450 | kWFR | 126.350 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 16.450 | kW04 | 126.350 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 53 | | -1.566 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 53 | | -1.566 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 0 | kWa | 0 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 1.229 | | 25.639 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 1.229 | | 25.639 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 15.274 | kWt | 99.145 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 16.461 | | 126.323 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Maltese fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Maltese fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

The Netherlands

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

183.678 | 0 | 0 | 1.133 | 0 | 184.811 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

418.505 | 0 | 0 | 2.722 | 0 | 421.227 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| The Netherlands | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 183.678 | kWFR | 418.505 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 184.811 | kW03 | 421.227 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 4.309 | | 19.332 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 27 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 4.336 | | 19.332 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 8.980 | kWa | 35.759 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 23.611 | | 53.624 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 32.591 | | 89.383 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 155.423 | kWt | 348.454 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 175.858 | | 385.468 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| The Netherlands | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 213.139 | R(kW)03 | 527.067 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 27 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 8.980 | kWa | 35.759 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 155.423 | kWt | 348.454 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 204.186 | R(kW)t | 491.308 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Dutch fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Dutch fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Poland

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT04 and kW04) on 1 May 2004

GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 |

47.324 | 191 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47.515 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 |

151.124 | 1.858 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 152.981 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Poland | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 47.324 | kWFR | 151.124 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 47.515 | kW04 | 152.981 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 3.183 | | 8.104 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 3.183 | | 8.104 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16.371 | kWa | 45.383 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 3.882 | | 8.392 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 20.253 | | 53.775 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 30.254 | kWt | 105.452 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 31.144 | | 107.599 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Polish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Polish fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Portugal

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

99.757 | 8.629 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108.386 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

332.417 | 22.147 | 0 | 696 | 0 | 355.260 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Portugal | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 99.757 | kWFR | 332.417 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 108.386 | kW03 | 355.260 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 494 | kW100 | 1.273 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 10.867 | | 42.253 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 11.361 | | 43.527 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 9.260 | kWa | 22.303 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 7.729 | | 32.206 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 16.990 | | 54.508 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 94.128 | kWt | 321.436 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 98.952 | | 332.512 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Portugal (excluding the Azores and Madeira) | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 171.502 | R(kW)03 | 412.025 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 494 | kW100 | 1.273 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 9.260 | kWa | 22.303 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 94.128 | kWt | 321.436 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 162.069 | R(kW)t | 389.277 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Portuguese* fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005.

(...PICT...)

*Excluding the Azores and Madeira.

Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Power of the Portuguese* fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005.

(...PICT...)

*Excluding the Azores and Madeira.

Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006.

Slovenia

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT04 and kW04) on 1 May 2004

GTFR (1-5-2004) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT04 |

1.076 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.076 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-5-2004) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW04 |

11.473 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.473 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Slovenia | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 May 2004 | GTFR | 1.076 | kWFR | 11.473 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT04 | 1.076 | kW04 | 11.473 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 0 | | 9 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 0 | | 9 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 0 | kWa | 0 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 7 | | 23 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 7 | | 23 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 1.069 | kWt | 11.459 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7 ) | | 1.076 | | 11.473 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Slovenian fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Slovenian fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Finland

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

19.812 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.812 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

190.136 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 190.136 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Finland | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 19.812 | kWFR | 190.136 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 19.812 | kW03 | 190.136 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 3.233 | | 20.570 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 3.233 | | 20.570 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.280 | kWa | 5.637 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 4.765 | | 33.557 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 6.045 | | 39.194 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 17.001 | kWt | 171.511 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 18.532 | | 184.499 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Finland | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 23.203 | R(kW)03 | 216.195 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 1.280 | kWa | 5.637 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 17.001 | kWt | 171.511 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 21.923 | R(kW)t | 210.558 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Finish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Finish fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Sweden

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

45.895 | 0 | 0 | 871 | 0 | 46.766 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

224.662 | 0 | 0 | 2.589 | 0 | 227.251 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| Sweden | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 45.895 | kWFR | 224.662 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 46.766 | kW03 | 227.251 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 2.499 | | 22.175 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 76 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 2.575 | | 22.175 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 935 | kWa | 3.159 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 3.276 | | 24.932 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 4.211 | | 28.091 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 44.259 | kWt | 218.745 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 45.907 | | 224.092 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| Sweden | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 51.993 | R(kW)03 | 261.028 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 76 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 935 | kWa | 3.159 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 44.259 | kWt | 218.745 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 50.509 | R(kW)t | 253.197 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the Swedish fleet compared to its tonnage ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Power of the Swedish fleet compared to its power ceiling.

Evolution between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005*

(...PICT...)

*Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

United Kingdom

a) Calculation of the baselines (GT03 and kW03) on 1 January 2003

GTFR (1-1-2003) | GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT03 |

241.052 | 0 | 0 | 11.848 | 0 | 252.900 |

| | | | | |

kWFR (1-1-2003) | kW1 | kW2 | kW3 | kW4 | kW03 |

942.607 | 0 | 0 | 35.629 | 0 | 978.236 |

b) Management of the entry exit regime until the end of 2005

| United Kingdom | GT | kW |

1 | Capacity of the fleet on 1 January 2003 | GTFR | 241.052 | kWFR | 942.607 |

2 | Capacity level for the application of the entry-exit regime | GT03 | 252.900 | kW03 | 978.236 |

3 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

4 | Other entries or capacity increases (not included in 3 & 5) | | 40.218 | | 142.518 |

5 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | | - |

6 | Total entries ( 3 + 4 + 5 ) | | 40.218 | | 142.518 |

7 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16.699 | kWa | 45.005 |

8 | Other exits (not included in 7) | | 46.123 | | 158.926 |

9 | Total exits ( 7 + 8 ) | | 62.822 | | 203.930 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (1 + 6 - 9) | GTt | 218.447 | kWt | 881.194 |

11 | Fleet ceiling on 31 December 2005 ( 2 - 35% 3 + 5 – 7 ) | | 236.201 | | 933.231 |

Lines 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 present figures as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

Line 4 is calculated as: 4 = (1 - 10) + 9 - (3 + 5)

Line 11: If the result of the fleet ceiling (2 - 35% 3 + 5 - 7) is higher than a Member State's reference level, the fleet ceiling is the reference level

c) Reference levels at the end of 2005

| United Kingdom | GT | kW |

1 | Reference level on 1-1-2003 | R(GT)03 | 286.120 | R(kW)03 | 1.129.194 |

2 | Entries of vessels of more than 100 GT financed with public aid | GT100 | 0 | kW100 | 0 |

3 | Increases in tonnage GT for reasons of safety | GTS | 0 | - | - |

4 | Exits financed with public aid | GTa | 16.699 | kWa | 45.005 |

10 | Capacity of the fleet on 31 December 2005 (a) | GTt | 218.447 | kWt | 881.194 |

5 | Reference level on 31 December 2005 (1 - 35% 2 + 3 - 4) | R(GT)t | 269.421 | R(kW)t | 1.084.189 |

(a) Situation as registered in the Community Fleet Register on 4 October 2006

d) Evolution of fleet capacity compared to the capacity ceilings.

Tonnage of the British fleet compare